WEBVTT

NOTE The Progressive Era Triple Alliance: Government as Cartellizer

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.000
But now I'll get to progressivism, which I entitled Progressivism and the Triple Alliance, Government as Cartelizer.

2
00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:25.000
And just as I believe, of course, as I mentioned last night, that I don't believe that big business monopoly, in quotes, grew up out of the free market, government had to combat it.

3
00:00:25.000 --> 00:00:35.000
Quite the contrary, business was doing very well on its own, with monopoly collapsing, and big business being very progressive, in the correct sense.

4
00:00:35.000 --> 00:00:44.000
And now we have a new system being imposed upon it, the progressive era, with the government functioning as a giant cartelizer.

5
00:00:44.000 --> 00:00:49.000
And the reason I consider the progressive period very important is I think really the progressive period is us.

6
00:00:49.000 --> 00:01:02.000
We are the enemy, we met the enemy and we are us, the famous joke, we are living in a progressive period really, we're living in a more systematic, more developed form of it,

7
00:01:02.000 --> 00:01:10.000
but really the embryo of all the stuff that we're living in, all the regulatory agencies and social warfare and all the rest of it, including war mobilization,

8
00:01:10.000 --> 00:01:17.000
really starts in a progressive period and continues on, grows and strengthens and develops into sort of a cancerous growth.

9
00:01:17.000 --> 00:01:46.000
The Middle Way, State Monopoly Capitalism, State Capitalism, Corporate State, Progressivism, Mixed Economy, Welfare, Warfare State,

10
00:01:46.000 --> 00:01:53.240
State, New Nationalism, New Freedom, New Deal, Fair Deal, Race Society. I like the word corporate

11
00:01:53.240 --> 00:01:59.960
state, I have a certain ring to it. It also fits in very nicely with, of course, the Stato

12
00:01:59.960 --> 00:02:10.520
Corporate Divo in Italy in the 20s, 30s. And also, some other phrases, the military educational

13
00:02:10.520 --> 00:02:18.520
and Industrial Complex, Garrison State, so forth and so on, neo-mercandilism is all sorts of ways you can look at it.

14
00:02:18.520 --> 00:02:34.520
What you do then, essentially, not only cartelize, but you replace these disorderly functions of the market of voluntary action by a strong central government, big government,

15
00:02:34.520 --> 00:02:42.520
Headed usually by a strong leader, known as President of the United States, Duce, an Italian Fuhrer in Germany.

16
00:02:42.520 --> 00:02:47.520
All of these are terms for leaders, purely verify analysis.

17
00:02:47.520 --> 00:02:51.520
And you have a strong government staff, by all sorts of great experts and technicians,

18
00:02:51.520 --> 00:02:57.520
recruiter from the new intellectuals and professional intellectuals who have been proliferating, as we mentioned before,

19
00:02:57.520 --> 00:03:03.520
to plan the economy, to subsidize it, regulate it, push people around, tell them what to do,

20
00:03:03.520 --> 00:03:12.480
In conjunction with who? Which is the Triple Alliance?

21
00:03:12.480 --> 00:03:16.480
Triple Alliance in my view is various segments of big business interests, those who couldn't

22
00:03:16.480 --> 00:03:23.600
make the monopoly on the market, progressive intellectuals who couldn't, who were looking

23
00:03:23.600 --> 00:03:30.400
for the status, privileges, and the new law that goes with the state apparatus, and the

24
00:03:30.400 --> 00:03:43.400
New Labor Unionism or so-called Responsible Labor Unionism, symbolized by the AFL-CIO, certainly by the AFL, they might have some arguments about the CIO.

25
00:03:43.400 --> 00:03:55.400
At any rate, to impose then this system under the guise, as I mentioned before, of anti-monopoly, under the guise of welfare, of humanism, etc. etc.

26
00:03:55.400 --> 00:03:59.400
for the Common Good of Public Interest, General Welfare, and so forth.

27
00:03:59.400 --> 00:04:03.400
Incidentally, about mercantilism, it's always been amusing me about mercantilism.

28
00:04:03.400 --> 00:04:10.400
I really believe this is a recrudescence of mercantilism in the industrial era.

29
00:04:10.400 --> 00:04:14.400
It's amusing me about mercantilism that people, many economists looking at mercantilism say,

30
00:04:14.400 --> 00:04:16.400
well, yeah, it's irrational.

31
00:04:16.400 --> 00:04:19.400
You look at them and say, here are these guys, they're subsidizing exports,

32
00:04:19.400 --> 00:04:21.400
and they're also subsidizing imports.

33
00:04:51.400 --> 00:05:03.400
So you have a joint alliance, so to speak, of the export interests and the domestic interests, both of whom are being subsidized by the system at the expense of the lowly consumer and taxpayer.

34
00:05:03.400 --> 00:05:13.400
You know, it's the same thing with the New Deal Farm Program, which, I'm leaping ahead, but this is a beautiful example of so-called irrationality in action.

35
00:05:13.400 --> 00:05:23.400
You have a farm program which starts with Herbert Hoover in January and March 1929 and continues on through Roosevelt, of course, and from then on.

36
00:05:23.400 --> 00:05:27.400
If you look at the farm program from the point of view of rationality, it seems like total lunacy.

37
00:05:27.400 --> 00:05:33.400
Here you have a situation where, for example, the government is paying farmers not to produce wheat or cotton.

38
00:05:33.400 --> 00:05:38.400
Paying them to produce less or produce nothing and have a soil bank and lay a line of fallow and so forth.

39
00:05:38.400 --> 00:05:54.400
Paying under a strict production. At the very same time, another division of the Department of Agriculture down the hall is paying the money to irrigate, to subsidize, to have new agricultural machinery, new irrigation, new fertilizer techniques, paying them to produce more.

40
00:05:54.400 --> 00:06:06.400
Now, this looks like economic insanity. On one hand, you have the Department of Agriculture, one division, paying farmers to produce less wheat. On the other hand, you have another division, paying them to produce more wheat. Sounds crazy, right? It's not crazy.

41
00:06:06.400 --> 00:06:12.400
It's not crazy from two points of view. It's not crazy from the point of view of the Department of Agriculture, which now has two huge bureaucratic divisions,

42
00:06:12.400 --> 00:06:16.400
happily, you know, either pay money for this, the contradictory thing,

43
00:06:16.400 --> 00:06:22.400
and for the farmers who get paid both ways, of course. They get paid not to produce less, and they get paid to produce more.

44
00:06:22.400 --> 00:06:30.400
I mean, they're raking it in. It's fantastic. I wish I could be paid to produce more and to teach less.

45
00:06:30.400 --> 00:06:36.400
So, for the farmers, usually of course the big farmers, they're getting, that's a real bonanza.

46
00:06:36.400 --> 00:06:40.400
But the taxpayer and the consumer of course, it is irrational, of course.

47
00:06:40.400 --> 00:06:55.400
Does anybody know who is the biggest recipient of soul banking subsidies down to go down to the United States and the United States?

48
00:06:55.400 --> 00:07:09.400
What are they being paid not to produce? Wheat or cotton?

49
00:07:09.400 --> 00:07:38.400
Well, as I try to point out, they had to replace, well, the old mercantilist, by the way, so I recommend the Edgar Frenes book on mercantilism.

50
00:07:38.400 --> 00:07:48.400
The old mercantilists were very frank. One of the things about the old mercantilism, they didn't have to worry about elections, about the votes, about PR and that sort of stuff, Madison Avenue techniques, they laid it on the line.

51
00:07:48.400 --> 00:08:06.400
And their view of the masses, the English working masses for example, was very frank. For example, William Pettit, a distinguished mercantilist, wrote of labor as, quote, a capital material, raw and undigested, committed into the hands of supreme authority,

52
00:08:06.400 --> 00:08:12.400
In whose prudence and disposition it is to improve, manage, and fashion it to more or less advantage.

53
00:08:12.400 --> 00:08:15.400
That's the more or less advantage of the ruling groups.

54
00:08:15.400 --> 00:08:22.400
So there's no problem about common good, general welfare, and that sort of stuff. None of that nonsense in the mercantilist period.

55
00:08:22.400 --> 00:08:26.400
Now we have a situation. We have democracy or voting.

56
00:08:26.400 --> 00:08:35.400
We have classical liberalism, which one of the great pitches of classical liberalism was that it would bring prosperity and increase the standard of living, etc., of everybody.

57
00:08:35.400 --> 00:08:39.900
So, now you have to appeal to the masses for this new rhetoric.

58
00:08:39.900 --> 00:08:46.400
You have to appeal to them as really more humanitarian, more general welfare-y, if that's a word, than laissez-faire.

59
00:08:46.400 --> 00:08:55.400
But you need, as I say, you need two things. You need liberal intellectuals, or court intellectuals, to propound the virtues of the system,

60
00:08:55.400 --> 00:09:03.400
to weave apologetics for it, and you need responsible labor unions to keep the workers in line, in case they get a little feisty.

61
00:09:03.400 --> 00:09:15.400
Fortunately, they had a model. Both groups really had a model, and I think we've touched on this before, which is essentially Bismarck's Germany, pressure on Germany in the late 19th century.

62
00:09:15.400 --> 00:09:26.400
First of all, Bismarck pioneered the state cartelization, the idea of the state forcing industries into cartels, and restricting production and raising prices.

63
00:09:26.400 --> 00:09:30.400
The NFL and the others have been doing a really good job of raising prices.

64
00:09:30.400 --> 00:09:34.400
When they did that and buying the masses off of social welfare programs with social insurance

65
00:09:34.400 --> 00:09:38.400
and all sorts, unemployment insurance, health insurance, and the rest of it.

66
00:09:38.400 --> 00:09:42.400
Not only buying them off but also cartilagin because when you raise the cost

67
00:09:42.400 --> 00:09:46.400
of all firms in the industry, you cartilagin.

68
00:09:46.400 --> 00:09:50.400
You enable them to raise prices on top of it. Please.

69
00:09:50.400 --> 00:10:20.400
And then, to protect this, to ensure that Germany, of course, is not going to be outcompeted if you're raising the price of restricting production in the German industrial machine, to protect them against foreign competition, you have to have very high tariffs to insulate the German industry from the foreign competition, which you had under the Bismarck system,

70
00:10:20.400 --> 00:10:28.400
And so the protective tariff becomes extremely important to the German cartel system. It's all linked together.

71
00:10:28.400 --> 00:10:37.400
As I say, you have the original welfare state program, which by, again, by increasing business costs,

72
00:10:37.400 --> 00:10:41.400
necessitated the cartelization. It helped a lot with the cartelization.

73
00:10:41.400 --> 00:10:46.400
Also along with this came the pro-union policy, building up responsibility with unions in Germany,

74
00:10:46.400 --> 00:10:49.880
Germany, also raising costs for everybody and allowing this kind of part of the

75
00:10:49.880 --> 00:10:53.440
relationship to take place. All of the expensive parts of the German consumer was

76
00:10:53.440 --> 00:10:59.280
unorganized. And as I pointed out, the second method of doing this, the way the

77
00:10:59.280 --> 00:11:02.360
liberal movement, which is very laissez-faire liberal movement, which was

78
00:11:02.360 --> 00:11:05.920
quite strong in Germany at the time, the way that was smashed was by the patriotic

79
00:11:05.920 --> 00:11:09.920
Patriotic Military National Front

80
00:11:35.920 --> 00:11:44.920
Schmoller, the great German historian and economist of the University of Berlin, declared the task of professor of the university to be, quote, the intellectual bodyguard of the House of Holland, and so on.

81
00:11:44.920 --> 00:11:50.920
I repeat that, and I think it's a beautiful, short summation.

82
00:11:50.920 --> 00:11:57.920
And we have a PhDmanship in all the rest.

83
00:11:57.920 --> 00:12:24.920
And another thing about the intellectuals at the time that I also touched on, they rejected laissez-faire, these new progressive intellectuals, rejected laissez-faire for reasons we talked about yesterday, and rejected Marxism as being too messy, too revolutionary, too proletarian.

84
00:12:24.920 --> 00:12:28.920
After all, if you're really strictly pro-Italian, you haven't got much room for bourgeois intellectuals.

85
00:12:28.920 --> 00:12:31.920
I mean, you have to really shuffle the cards a lot.

86
00:12:31.920 --> 00:12:35.920
You have to adopt the Carl Mannheim thesis that, well, it's okay for it to be an intellectual,

87
00:12:35.920 --> 00:12:38.920
even though you're not a worker, because intellectuals are free-floating.

88
00:12:38.920 --> 00:12:39.920
They're above class determination.

89
00:12:39.920 --> 00:12:45.920
They somehow rise above, they float above, they levitate above the class struggle.

90
00:12:45.920 --> 00:12:50.920
But that's really kind of, you know, it's kind of chancy.

91
00:12:50.920 --> 00:12:53.920
So if you're a bourgeois intellectual, your Marxism looks pretty messy.

92
00:12:53.920 --> 00:13:08.920
And so here we find this third way, this way of the national state, upper house, etc.

93
00:13:08.920 --> 00:13:14.920
And we find this fortuitous coincidence, so to speak, of these new intellectuals coming up, influenced by German

94
00:13:14.920 --> 00:13:22.920
Partializing ideas, welfare state ideas, and we find businessmen also aiming in this direction, we have this happy fusion of these two groups.

95
00:13:22.920 --> 00:13:32.920
Happy fusion of intellectuals seeking a state and businessmen seeking intellectuals, and this marvelous coming together of these two groups.

96
00:13:32.920 --> 00:13:43.920
Also in addition to that, to have a state apparatus, you have to have technicians, you have to have people actually planning, you have to have intellectuals staffing the bureaus, planning the economy and giving money to the poor and all that stuff.

97
00:13:43.920 --> 00:13:48.920
You need a lot of intellectuals to do this, and so you need experts or technicians.

98
00:13:48.920 --> 00:13:52.920
You begin to have the idea, which of course permeates the progressive period and later on.

99
00:13:52.920 --> 00:13:56.920
You don't hear it so much anymore. Maybe in just the last few years it happily is dying out a bit.

100
00:13:56.920 --> 00:14:00.920
But the idea is you need experts, and the key thing you have is politics is messy.

101
00:14:00.920 --> 00:14:08.920
As we'll see a little later, it permeates the urban progressive and the municipal progressive as well.

102
00:14:08.920 --> 00:14:17.920
Politics is very messy. It's corrupt and it's people buying votes and it's chancing and so on.

103
00:14:17.920 --> 00:14:25.920
But we need to replace all this messy political conflict with experts, experts who levitate above the political struggle, who take things out of politics.

104
00:14:25.920 --> 00:14:30.920
This, of course, we hear this all the time. If there's a problem in the New York subway system or something, take it out of politics.

105
00:14:30.920 --> 00:14:33.920
Remove it from the post office. Take it out of politics.

106
00:14:33.920 --> 00:14:43.920
What it actually means, of course, is it's still on the government hands, except now you can't vote about it. You can't even vote to do anything about it. You can't get rid of it if they are the permanent carbuncle on the system.

107
00:14:43.920 --> 00:14:52.920
Isolate it, insulate it for any kind of political action. I'm not a fan of politics, but the thing is, the one good thing about politics is at least the voter can have some kind of influence getting rid of it.

108
00:14:52.920 --> 00:15:01.920
But now this is eliminated. You say, take it out of politics, put it into the hands of the experts, who turn out to be these progressive types, technicians and so forth and so forth.

109
00:15:01.920 --> 00:15:26.920
And so this, the new intellectual, the progressive intellectual, they're pushing this very hard, the idea of taking things out of politics, taking foreign policy out of politics, bipartisanship, take the streets out of politics, take a postal office out of politics, and pretty soon, of course, there's nothing to vote about except which gang of clowns is going to do this, going to do this. So all the issues are taken out of the public hands.

110
00:15:26.920 --> 00:15:37.920
So, this becomes, I say, a continuing theme among all these new intellectuals.

111
00:15:37.920 --> 00:15:45.920
But incidentally, one of Coco's triumphal conservatism, which I think is an excellent book,

112
00:15:45.920 --> 00:15:52.920
the one criticism that my old friend Marty Sklar, who's a distinguished, rather erratic left historian,

113
00:15:52.920 --> 00:15:55.920
Marty Slaw's one criticism of the Cocoa Buck was the title.

114
00:15:55.920 --> 00:15:58.920
He said instead of being the triumph of conservatism, it should have been the triumph of liberalism.

115
00:15:58.920 --> 00:16:06.920
And it sort of highlights the fact that there's not really too much difference between conservatism and liberalism, if you get right down to it.

116
00:16:06.920 --> 00:16:08.920
And certainly I think he's right.

117
00:16:08.920 --> 00:16:12.920
I think the term corporate liberal is a beautiful, it's actually a Williams term,

118
00:16:12.920 --> 00:16:19.920
it's a beautiful term for the intellectuals and the businessmen who are pushing major theoreticians,

119
00:16:19.920 --> 00:16:34.920
I mentioned the Needham quote about mid-folks. I won't repeat that, but the glory of the ancient China, making poets and scholars into officials.

120
00:16:34.920 --> 00:16:45.920
Here's the quote. Needham says, quote, the successive Chinese emperors were served in all ages by a great company of profoundly humane and disinterested scholars.

121
00:16:45.920 --> 00:16:52.320
The Civilization which Professor Wittfogel was so bitterly attacking was one which could

122
00:16:52.320 --> 00:16:56.080
make poets or scholars into officials.

123
00:16:56.080 --> 00:16:59.280
The intellectual, the planner, etc.

124
00:16:59.280 --> 00:17:03.240
The expert, the technician, becomes another great term, beautiful term, which probably

125
00:17:03.240 --> 00:17:07.480
comes in this period, maybe later, the social engineer, a really beautiful term also.

126
00:17:07.480 --> 00:17:13.200
He's a technician, he's an engineer planning people, shuffling around, like the regular

127
00:17:13.200 --> 00:17:18.160
Social engineer, the non-social engineer is shuffling stones around or shuffling leavers

128
00:17:18.160 --> 00:17:29.160
or electricity. Social engineer shuffles around people. And this sort of brings me, I'm really

129
00:17:29.160 --> 00:17:36.480
leaping ahead a lot, but it brings me to one of my, let's use the term that Professor

130
00:17:36.480 --> 00:17:41.360
Rico likes to use, and my second, just about my second favorite person, my first favorite

131
00:17:41.360 --> 00:18:00.360
Richard Speck, Charles Manson, Richard Speck, the second favorite person of the 20th century is the Rexford guy Pugwell.

132
00:18:00.360 --> 00:18:04.360
He embodies an enormous amount of this stuff.

133
00:18:04.360 --> 00:18:13.360
When I was the enter of the right wing, so to speak, they were always quoting a great poem by Tugwell. I wish I had brought it up with me. I'm sure you've all seen it.

134
00:18:13.360 --> 00:18:27.360
It goes something like, I shall, he Tugwell, speaking of course for his class, I shall roll up my sleeves, I shall gather my charts and my compasses, I shall roll up my sleeves, I shall make America over.

135
00:18:27.360 --> 00:18:30.360
That really grabs you in the gut.

136
00:18:30.360 --> 00:18:36.360
And so it's, so Tuglon has followed social engineers, has followed technocrats, as they're also called,

137
00:18:36.360 --> 00:18:42.360
rolling up their sleeves and making everybody over, which is really, of course, what it amounts to.

138
00:18:42.360 --> 00:18:47.360
So this, of course, is a heady wine for the new intellectuals. I mean, here, my goodness, before this, what could they do?

139
00:18:47.360 --> 00:18:54.360
They could be ministers teaching humane or moral philosophy in some small college somewhere.

140
00:18:54.360 --> 00:19:24.360
James Gilbert has written a very interesting book, just come out about six months ago, called Designing the Industrial State, which I will also mention in my biography, where he deals largely with these progressive intellectuals and their so-called collectivism, and he shows that collectivism ranges from what we call left to what we call right, from industrial people to socialists and so forth.

141
00:19:24.360 --> 00:19:36.800
When he talks about the collectivist intellectuals, Gilbert says that what they were engaged in

142
00:19:36.800 --> 00:19:40.240
was, quote, the effort to make room for themselves and to mark off a function which would be

143
00:19:40.240 --> 00:19:42.240
their own specialty and justification.

144
00:19:42.240 --> 00:19:49.120
Well, this is, you know, economic determinism of the intellectuals, so to speak.

145
00:19:49.120 --> 00:19:58.760
And many of these people found that the structure of the corporation was their model, except

146
00:19:58.760 --> 00:20:00.920
they wanted to make it compulsory and universal.

147
00:20:00.920 --> 00:20:04.480
Charles Steinmetz, the famous engineer working for General Electric, felt that the whole

148
00:20:04.480 --> 00:20:08.160
world should be one vast General Electric, constituting the government, sort of the government

149
00:20:08.160 --> 00:20:11.480
as General Electric or vice versa.

150
00:20:11.480 --> 00:20:18.640
And many other people had very similar views in this period.

151
00:20:18.640 --> 00:20:22.720
So we have these experts. We have, I think, I have a note here that a certain Tolman,

152
00:20:22.720 --> 00:20:28.720
1909, first used the phrase social engineers. It might have been earlier. We have the economists

153
00:20:28.720 --> 00:20:33.120
changing. We have the new science of sociology, in quotes, popping up with very similar views

154
00:20:33.120 --> 00:20:39.440
and so forth and so on. So to the collectivist intellectuals, it would be the intellectuals,

155
00:20:39.440 --> 00:20:43.240
they, these intellectuals, who form these social engineers, they form these experts,

156
00:20:43.240 --> 00:20:49.240
The State is a class of technicians, technocrats, destined to harmonize all classes.

157
00:20:49.240 --> 00:20:58.240
They're above the classes. You have the idea also that the State is being the umpire of everything, but they after all can see clearly and deeply, being big shot intellectuals.

158
00:20:58.240 --> 00:21:09.240
They can roll up their sleeves and make us all over, and they can harmonize big business and big labor and all other groups in this one great harmonic, hierarchical kind of structure.

159
00:21:09.240 --> 00:21:21.240
And as social scientists, there's another thing. The idea of social science as determining, as giving you the right and the license and the privilege to mold everybody also, of course, comes in as part of this whole picture.

160
00:21:21.240 --> 00:21:29.240
Because you have scientific social engineering. It's not just your values. It's not just the tug wall that's trying to tell us what to do because he's an SOV. It's because he's a scientist.

161
00:21:29.240 --> 00:21:33.240
You see it deeply and more clearly in the rest of the book, and therefore he pushes it around.

162
00:21:33.240 --> 00:21:47.240
And they were above politics. We shouldn't even consider them tarred with a political brush and subject to voting at the election. They should be a permanent part of the American structure.

163
00:21:47.240 --> 00:21:59.240
So, as Gilbert puts it, I think it wasn't very neatly, quote, occupying a position above the dialectic of social struggle, they felt able to judge the aspirations of the other classes.

164
00:21:59.240 --> 00:22:22.600
The idea of the scientific expert, the efficiency expert, etc., fitting in as planner and organizer

165
00:22:22.600 --> 00:22:27.320
and theoretician, Forrest mentioned John Cummings, John R. Cummings is one of the key people in

166
00:22:27.320 --> 00:22:34.320
The New Welfare State System

167
00:22:57.320 --> 00:23:10.320
Socialism from then on, Wisconsin Idea formulating all sorts of stuff, unemployment insurance, social insurance, social security, the whole stuff, all these things start in Wisconsin and then permeate outward, often becoming doing it themselves.

168
00:23:10.320 --> 00:23:26.320
Extremely influential with the AFR valve, because this whole theory of labor unions is essentially the AFR valve theory, you know, erected in science, the idea that you have labor unions carving out monopoly systems,

169
00:23:26.320 --> 00:23:36.320
The system's areas, usually craft unions, which of course is the AFL's thing, keeping out lower types.

170
00:23:36.320 --> 00:23:44.320
The thing that gives craft unions union power, power to raise wage raise, you're keeping out low types.

171
00:23:44.320 --> 00:23:48.320
Low types being the unskilled, minority races and so forth and so on.

172
00:23:48.320 --> 00:23:53.080
So we have, this thing will enter as the AFFL thesis.

173
00:23:53.080 --> 00:23:56.680
Cummins is being written by one of the great ideologists, not an ideologist, but an activist,

174
00:23:56.680 --> 00:24:02.880
writing, working out legislation of all sorts in Wisconsin and the federal government and so forth.

175
00:24:02.880 --> 00:24:07.720
Cummins got himself an distinguished corporatist.

176
00:24:07.720 --> 00:24:12.200
In 1899, Cummins delivers a paper for the American Economic Association

177
00:24:12.200 --> 00:24:16.000
and sets forth his thesis in some detail.

178
00:24:16.000 --> 00:24:24.000
The Congress, we shouldn't have this political Congress. Note the intimations trailing clouds of glory of fascism later on.

179
00:24:24.000 --> 00:24:31.000
Congress should not be messy and have voters from geographical districts. Congress should consist of representatives of organized economic classes.

180
00:24:31.000 --> 00:24:41.000
Labor unions should elect their representatives, and bankers like JP Morgan, whom you mentioned specifically, by the way, me being a Morgan diabolist I think is very interesting,

181
00:24:41.000 --> 00:24:53.000
should elect their representatives, and the trusts should elect their representatives, and the railroad should elect their representatives, and the farm blocks should elect their representatives, and then we all band together with economists electing their representatives.

182
00:24:53.000 --> 00:24:57.000
That's a really cute one. I'll find out a special personal grabber.

183
00:24:57.000 --> 00:25:03.000
Economists elect their representatives. Mitchel Ely, of course, is one of the people who should be the first guy to be elected by economists.

184
00:25:03.000 --> 00:25:06.000
Obviously, the implicit thing is that he would be the second.

185
00:25:06.000 --> 00:25:21.000
And with economists running this whole show, running Congress, this new Congress of American Occupations, we then have broad-minded patriotic compromises between all these groups, engineered by the economists.

186
00:25:21.000 --> 00:25:29.000
I'm sure the economist in the room would be particularly happy with this.

187
00:25:29.000 --> 00:25:35.040
and again he keeps on with this in 1908 he talks about three major groups in

188
00:25:35.040 --> 00:25:39.400
society workers capitalism and the quote public and then again he's one of the

189
00:25:39.400 --> 00:25:43.280
founders of this whole theory of the tripartite commission tripartite

190
00:25:43.280 --> 00:25:46.400
organization running everything running specific things and everything and

191
00:25:46.400 --> 00:25:49.480
representative unions you have the representative of the capitalists and you

192
00:25:49.480 --> 00:25:52.080
have the representative of the so-called public always turns out to be somebody

193
00:25:52.080 --> 00:26:10.080
The so-called public representative represents the nation, society, and science, all wrapped up in one big great ball of wax.

194
00:26:10.080 --> 00:26:16.080
The workers and the capitalists are narrow in self-interest. It's okay, it wasn't against self-interest, but they were narrow.

195
00:26:16.080 --> 00:26:20.080
They like their representatives, and along with them, harmonizing and running the whole show,

196
00:26:20.080 --> 00:26:25.080
as well as the scientific sociologists and economists.

197
00:26:25.080 --> 00:26:33.080
So the public in these contrived part-time bureaus and commissions and regulatory agencies

198
00:26:33.080 --> 00:26:36.080
are supposed to be embodied in progressive intellectuals,

199
00:26:36.080 --> 00:26:40.080
manning the state and its allied institutions as experts, officials, scientists, academics,

200
00:26:40.080 --> 00:26:46.080
and academics, reformers, government agents, mediation boards, lawyers, etc. etc.

201
00:26:46.080 --> 00:26:51.080
This whole group, proliferation of new professionals coming in.

202
00:26:51.080 --> 00:27:05.080
As I said, these intellectuals were the public in quotes because they floated high above the narrow selfish economic interests of these narrower economic classes.

203
00:27:05.080 --> 00:27:15.080
As Gilbert says, quote, in the frozen dialectics of such a state, the intelligentsia of being them and the technical experts seem to be the national rulers.

204
00:27:20.080 --> 00:27:29.080
So, then you have this whole idea of society as an organism. All this comes up around this being used to proliferate, society as an organ, society as a giant machine.

205
00:27:29.080 --> 00:27:42.080
Society is a colossal machine of which we are all parts, and men in the most exact sense are members one of another.

206
00:27:42.080 --> 00:28:12.080
and the other. Of course, there's somebody heading the machine, that guy is the Rex Tugwell type, the social engineer, the social mechanic, and every one of the social organism kind of metaphor has always a brain, or a head of the social organism, every newly developed organism has a brain, and the head of the brain, of course, is the state apparatus, the government, and these guys staffing it. Steinmetz, whom I mentioned, is a great inventor, of course.

207
00:28:12.080 --> 00:28:18.080
A Powerful, Centralized Government of Deeply Competent Men Remaining Continuously in Office

208
00:28:42.080 --> 00:29:10.080
The Alliance, being a conspiracy theorist and a Morgan diabolist, I can't resist this.

209
00:29:10.080 --> 00:29:31.080
Herbert Crowley, who is one of the great theoreticians of the Teddy Roosevelt New Nationalism, and very much in the spirit, a progressive and a collectivist intellectual, was set up, earned his mission life, received his mission life, as editor of a great new weekly journal, which we all love and revere, The New Republic.

210
00:29:31.080 --> 00:29:47.080
and he lucrebrates and infuses men on. In the late 20s, as we'll see later, he becomes a great laudator, a theoretician of Muslim fascism, and for good reason, because it all fits into this kind of setup.

211
00:29:47.080 --> 00:29:53.080
The thing I want to point out is that the magazine New Republic was owned and established by Willard Strait, Morgan partner.

212
00:29:53.080 --> 00:30:02.080
His son, Michael Strayer, grandson, however, was continued on until very recently as a publisher, owner of the New Republic.

213
00:30:02.080 --> 00:30:07.080
I don't see coincidences in all of this.

214
00:30:07.080 --> 00:30:17.080
Okay, we come now to a couple of the organizations of the corporatists.

215
00:30:17.080 --> 00:30:26.360
One of the major organizations my old friend James Weinstein has developed and examined

216
00:30:26.360 --> 00:30:30.920
in his book, Corporate Ideal in a Liberal State, he knows he calls it a liberal state

217
00:30:30.920 --> 00:30:35.440
rather than a conservative state, following along with the Sklar analysis, the National

218
00:30:35.440 --> 00:30:36.440
Civic Federation.

219
00:30:36.440 --> 00:30:40.240
The National Civic Federation is extremely important, it dies out in the 20s largely

220
00:30:40.240 --> 00:30:45.560
because the brilliant organizer of this thing, a certain Ralph Easley, becomes a real hopped

221
00:30:45.560 --> 00:30:51.560
Red Bader by the 1920s, it becomes so extreme that they all sort of leave him, and the organization dies out.

222
00:30:51.560 --> 00:31:00.560
But before the war, before World War I, it's founded in 1900, before the war and during the war, it's the major organization of what you can call corporate liberalism.

223
00:31:00.560 --> 00:31:14.560
It pushes, inaugurates all the great welfare programs, unemployment insurance, various social welfare, monopolistic, the Federal Trade Commission, etc., etc.

224
00:31:14.560 --> 00:31:28.560
National Civic Federation consists of many, all sorts of big shots, the roster reads like a litany of big shots at the time, all sorts of big businessmen, all sorts of trade union, responsible trade union leaders,

225
00:31:28.560 --> 00:31:43.560
Gompers, of course, being very high on the list, head of the American Federation of Labor, and public representatives, including corporate lawyers, university presidents, newspapers, publishers, etc.

226
00:31:43.560 --> 00:31:50.560
The National Civic Federation had state councils, state federations that handled problems of district level, and so forth.

227
00:31:50.560 --> 00:32:00.560
The first president of the National Civic Federation was Marcus Hanna, the famous boss of the Republican Party for many years with the higher Republican machine.

228
00:32:00.560 --> 00:32:07.560
He leaves fairly quickly and is replaced by August Belmont, an international banker extraordinaire from New York.

229
00:32:07.560 --> 00:32:15.560
And the rest of the roster of the group, the organization, as I say, includes an enormous number of big shots, several Morgan partners, of course,

230
00:32:15.560 --> 00:32:29.560
including George W. Perkins, who will pop up again and again in these lectures, and Judge Gary, and Henry W. Davison is a Morgan partner, and Isaac Seligman is a banker, and Andrew Carnegie,

231
00:32:29.560 --> 00:32:41.560
Charles Francis Adams, the National City Bank Cyrus McCormick, and on and on, Jacob Reese, John R. Commons, of course, these guys of course are very strong in this whole.

232
00:32:41.560 --> 00:32:54.560
There's also other big shots, William Howard Taft, Grover Cleveland in his late 20 years, Ella Huerute, who's everywhere ubiquitous in corporate and political structure, Morgan-oriented,

233
00:32:54.560 --> 00:33:05.560
Nicholas Murray Butler, my revered, for whom I am named, revered president of Columbia University, Charles Elliott, Harvard Elliott, and so forth.

234
00:33:05.560 --> 00:33:13.560
George W. Perkins, by the way, in addition to being a Morgan partner, was also the director of the United States Steel and the International Harvester.

235
00:33:13.560 --> 00:33:17.560
Some strange coincidence, as the Morgans put them all together.

236
00:33:17.560 --> 00:33:21.560
He was also wound up as the operating head of the Progressive Party of America,

237
00:33:21.560 --> 00:33:26.560
which is devoted to bringing freedom and prosperity and public interest to all of us.

238
00:33:29.560 --> 00:33:34.560
George W. Perkins noted, for example, that businessmen should be in R,

239
00:33:34.560 --> 00:33:39.560
fortunately for him, you know, both a value statement and an existential statement,

240
00:33:39.560 --> 00:33:44.560
businessmen should be in R, merging, quote, into the public official, public officials.

241
00:33:44.560 --> 00:34:01.560
The National Civil Federation was stronger apparently on the bankers than they were on the industrialists, if you want to weight these things.

242
00:34:01.560 --> 00:34:07.560
Henry Ford certainly was very much opposed to this group and the various others.

243
00:34:07.560 --> 00:34:12.560
Ralph Easley put it beautifully, it's one of the great statements, one of the great sentences in the Weinstein book,

244
00:34:12.560 --> 00:34:17.640
Our enemies, that means the enemies of the National Federation consensus, this great centrist consensus,

245
00:34:17.640 --> 00:34:20.240
state monopoly capitalist consensus which is developing,

246
00:34:20.240 --> 00:34:24.380
our enemies are the socialists among the labor people, that means the left wing,

247
00:34:24.380 --> 00:34:26.280
Marxist left, Marxist socialist,

248
00:34:26.280 --> 00:34:31.240
among the labor people, and the anarchists among the capitalists, unquote.

249
00:34:31.240 --> 00:34:35.460
By the anarchists among the capitalists, he meant essentially the National Association of Manufacturers,

250
00:34:35.460 --> 00:34:38.400
which in those days represented largely small business,

251
00:34:38.400 --> 00:34:41.400
and were anti-union and generally laissez-faire, roughly,

252
00:34:41.400 --> 00:34:44.720
laissez-faire, I'm not going to push that, but roughly.

253
00:34:44.720 --> 00:34:47.000
They were, of course, called anarchists by these,

254
00:34:47.000 --> 00:34:49.960
by the new corporate state theoreticians.

255
00:34:56.360 --> 00:34:58.560
One of the things they were pushing quite early

256
00:34:58.560 --> 00:35:01.200
was the welfare state kind of set up,

257
00:35:01.200 --> 00:35:02.560
early welfare state set up.

258
00:35:05.440 --> 00:35:06.920
And also they were pushing unionism.

259
00:35:06.920 --> 00:35:36.920
The idea of raising up unions as an important and responsible part of this triple partnership, a junior partnership in this triple alliance, this is something for us that many businessmen could not swallow, having born and bred anti-unionism is very difficult for many of them to accept the idea of suddenly welcoming the end of the end of the picture, but the National Civic Federation definitely did,

260
00:35:36.920 --> 00:35:45.920
The idea that various issues also should be taken out of politics, handled by experts non-politically.

261
00:35:45.920 --> 00:35:55.920
And one of the things they were pushing, that all problems are really technical, resolved by extra political means,

262
00:35:55.920 --> 00:35:58.920
was the collaboration of business unions and government.

263
00:35:58.920 --> 00:36:08.920
One of the things they were pushing were uniform state laws on workman's compensation before they got to the national scene, which they got to fairly quickly.

264
00:36:08.920 --> 00:36:18.920
In the early 1900s or so, they were pushing the idea of minimum wage laws, workman's compensation laws, and public utility regulation, and outlawing of child labor.

265
00:36:18.920 --> 00:36:34.920
Why do these big businessmen like minimum wage laws?

266
00:36:34.920 --> 00:36:37.920
Well, for one thing, as I said, this is part of a categorizing process.

267
00:36:37.920 --> 00:36:42.920
You're imposing higher costs on everybody, including many of your nasty, rascally competitors,

268
00:36:42.920 --> 00:36:45.920
like small southern firms, for example, pay lower wage rates.

269
00:36:45.920 --> 00:36:52.920
If you force their wage rates up, you're imposing higher costs on them, much more severely than you're imposing higher costs on yourself.

270
00:36:52.920 --> 00:36:59.920
As a matter of fact, the national minimum wage law, just to sort of skip to the current period for a bit, for a minute,

271
00:36:59.920 --> 00:37:04.920
one of the main, who are the guys who are lobbying for constantly higher minimum wage rates? Obviously unions are,

272
00:37:04.920 --> 00:37:08.920
for very good economic reasons, because they're getting, they're increasing their pay,

273
00:37:08.920 --> 00:37:14.920
even though the expense of increasing the unemployment of marginal, unskilled workers, who we don't really care much about,

274
00:37:14.920 --> 00:37:21.920
The other guys are a lot, they're theoreticians, liberal theoreticians of all sorts, and another group,

275
00:37:21.920 --> 00:37:24.920
an interesting group that are lobbying constantly for higher minimum, federal minimum wage rates,

276
00:37:24.920 --> 00:37:31.920
northern textile manufacturers from New York and New England, and printers too,

277
00:37:31.920 --> 00:37:36.920
who, being inefficient, high cost, worrying about the competition of southern low-cost plants,

278
00:37:36.920 --> 00:37:41.920
want to impose, since they know, of course, prevailing wages are usually lower in the South than they are here,

279
00:37:41.920 --> 00:37:48.920
One reason, you know, the cost of living is lower in the South, they want to impose higher wage rates on their southern competitors. This is the way they do it.

280
00:37:48.920 --> 00:37:57.920
They like to have a protective tariff. They love to have a high tariff wall at the Potomac and keep out southern products. It's still unconstitutional to do that.

281
00:37:57.920 --> 00:38:02.920
So this is the indirect route by which they do it, imposing higher costs on their southern competitors.

282
00:38:02.920 --> 00:38:10.920
So the minimum wage is not necessarily an anti-business proposal. It all depends on which businesses, I think Forrest mentioned, depends on which businesses are doing it.

283
00:38:10.920 --> 00:38:13.920
and what their interests happen to be.

284
00:38:13.920 --> 00:38:21.920
And so the National Civic Federation, you know, creates, I guess, the model legislation written by people like Commons and others, and then they push it, lobby for it, and so forth, and so on.

285
00:38:26.920 --> 00:38:29.920
Woodman's Compensation Law is another thing they were pushing.

286
00:38:29.920 --> 00:38:44.320
A common law has stated that an employee, if he suffers an accident, cannot receive compensation

287
00:38:44.320 --> 00:38:50.520
from an employer unless, if there are, if he's assumed a knowledgeable risk, this is

288
00:38:50.520 --> 00:38:54.280
part of a knowledgeable assumption of risk of the job, if he contributes to the negligence,

289
00:38:54.280 --> 00:38:58.280
if he provides a contributor to the negligence, he helped cause the accident, or if a fellow

290
00:38:58.280 --> 00:39:03.280
The Federal Employee was really responsible for serving the doctrine.

291
00:39:03.280 --> 00:39:19.280
What the labor unions wanted at the time was to have a new kind of employer liability laws which would weaken these defenses in the common law courts so they could collect, employees could collect for damages.

292
00:39:19.280 --> 00:39:22.480
So labor unions in those days were opposed to work months compensation laws because they

293
00:39:22.480 --> 00:39:25.880
felt this would be a way out, this would be a work months compensation law that for all

294
00:39:25.880 --> 00:39:30.400
being paid for off to a larger extent by the workers themselves, by paycheck, but they

295
00:39:30.400 --> 00:39:34.680
wanted us to have a free field and collect through the courts.

296
00:39:34.680 --> 00:39:39.380
The National Civic Federation has an end run around this and a cunning end run around this

297
00:39:39.380 --> 00:39:44.880
by promoting work months compensation legislation.

298
00:39:44.880 --> 00:39:51.920
And some of the people who were pushing this fairly early, by 1911, for example, were

299
00:39:51.920 --> 00:39:58.400
August Belmont and other industrialists, George W. Perkins, Andrew Carnegie, Otis Elevator

300
00:39:58.400 --> 00:40:00.880
Company and so forth, etc.

301
00:40:00.880 --> 00:40:10.660
The Perkins said about this and many other things, one other quote from Perkins, cooperation

302
00:40:10.660 --> 00:40:16.820
In business, meaning cartels and all these other things and government intervention, government

303
00:40:16.820 --> 00:40:23.420
cartelization, is taking and should take the place of ruthless competition.

304
00:40:23.420 --> 00:40:29.060
We had many private business compensation plans being developed.

305
00:40:29.060 --> 00:40:32.700
The smaller businesses didn't have the resources for voluntary plans, and the smaller businesses

306
00:40:32.700 --> 00:40:36.700
were sucked in or induced, I should say, to go along with the idea of working with compensation

307
00:40:36.700 --> 00:40:37.700
laws.

308
00:40:37.700 --> 00:40:53.100
So even the NAM then came out in support of it, and organized business, and only a few quote, narrow-minded, unquote businessmen continued to oppose it, and so by 1911 we had a state-workman's conversation that was going to sweep all the states.

309
00:40:53.100 --> 00:41:02.100
The National Civic Federation took up the drive in earnest by 1908 or 1909, including especially August Belmont, who was pushing it very heavily.

310
00:41:02.100 --> 00:41:12.100
In 1909, they persuaded the AFL to remove their previous opposition, and then on, it was an easy street.

311
00:41:12.100 --> 00:41:20.100
We also had another interesting group, which starts around this period, it starts in 1904, around 1900 or so.

312
00:41:20.100 --> 00:41:28.100
The American Association of Labor Legislation, it's one of my sort of little pet outfits, it consists of all these intellectuals,

313
00:41:28.100 --> 00:41:36.100
All these economists, corporatist economists, sociologists, social workers, etc., and all these big businessmen and a couple of union leaders.

314
00:41:36.100 --> 00:41:48.100
They were pushing, they began to push permanently, they were devoted permanently, all during the teens and twenties, social welfare legislation, minimum wage laws, compulsory unionization of all sorts, etc.

315
00:41:48.100 --> 00:42:10.100
In 1911, as sort of a slight hitch developed, the New York State Workman's Compensation Law was declared unconstitutional by the pesky courts.

316
00:42:10.100 --> 00:42:16.100
The courts were one of the last vestiges of true laissez-faire, not corporatism.

317
00:42:16.100 --> 00:42:44.100
The Survey Magazine, one of the leading magazines of progressive intellectuals, said, talking about this decision, it would have been different if it had been made by big businessmen.

318
00:42:44.100 --> 00:42:48.100
The problem is, in other words, big businessmen would have approved Workman's Compensation Law as their only problem.

319
00:42:48.100 --> 00:42:52.100
The problem is these reactionary, old-fashioned judges.

320
00:42:52.100 --> 00:42:58.100
But they said if we really had broad-gauge businessmen with responsibility for vast property interests on their shoulders,

321
00:42:58.100 --> 00:43:09.100
such as J.P. Morgan, Jacob Schiff, E.H. Gary, Andrew Carnegie, and John J. Hill, it would have been much better. They would have approved it.

322
00:43:09.100 --> 00:43:17.100
And the major critic of this IVE decision, which is what it was, was a case of IVE versus South Buffalo Railway Company.

323
00:43:17.100 --> 00:43:29.100
The major critic of this was Francis Lynn Stutson, who was a more-time Morgan lawyer, who criticized the IVE's decision bitterly and tried to get a federal compensation law into Congress.

324
00:43:29.100 --> 00:43:33.100
He submitted a brief to Congress to try to overturn this federal action.

325
00:43:33.100 --> 00:43:56.100
The FTC began, the origins of the Federal Trade Commission, they start with a bill such as the Hepburn Bill, which introduced the Congress in 1908, which wasn't passed yet, but it was prefigured the greatness to come.

326
00:43:56.100 --> 00:44:08.100
Some of the leaders in that were Francis Lynn Stetson, a Morgan lawyer, Victor Morowitz, and Bill Beach mentioned as a distinguished Morgan railroad lawyer, a lawyer associated with Morgan-owned railroads.

327
00:44:08.100 --> 00:44:20.100
The Hepburn Bill, which is the predecessor to the Federal Trade Commission, was opposed by the National Association of Manufacturers, the Merchants Association of New York, and the Board of Trade of New York, but they didn't cut the ice that the Morgans cut.

328
00:44:20.100 --> 00:44:39.100
Frank Muncie made a revealing statement, Frank Muncie being a newspaper publisher, and the Morgan Embitt, wrote a letter to Teddy Roosevelt in January 1912, sort of summing up the outlook of him and his colleagues, he said, quote,

329
00:44:39.100 --> 00:44:46.100
It is the work of a state to think for the people and plan for the people, to teach them how to do, what to do, and to sustain them in the doing.

330
00:45:09.100 --> 00:45:22.460
The Progressive Legislation of Progressivism in general was the result not of any impersonal

331
00:45:22.460 --> 00:45:29.220
mechanistic necessity, but of the conscious needs and decisions of specific men and institutions.

332
00:45:29.220 --> 00:45:34.020
He also says that progressivism was a movement for the political rationalization of business

333
00:45:34.020 --> 00:45:38.340
and Intellectual and Industrial Conditions.

334
00:45:38.340 --> 00:45:40.700
The regulation itself, quote, was invariably controlled

335
00:45:40.700 --> 00:45:42.620
by leaders of the regulated industry

336
00:45:42.620 --> 00:45:44.460
and directed toward ends they deemed acceptable

337
00:45:44.460 --> 00:45:45.740
and desirable, unquote.

338
00:45:45.740 --> 00:45:47.500
One of the things about Coco, for example,

339
00:45:47.500 --> 00:45:49.420
one of the things that he brings to this is that

340
00:45:49.420 --> 00:45:50.580
almost everybody admits now,

341
00:45:50.580 --> 00:45:52.420
if you look at the Interstate Commerce Commission,

342
00:45:52.420 --> 00:45:55.300
if you look at the CAB, everybody says,

343
00:45:55.300 --> 00:45:57.460
well, they're controlled by the major firms in the industry.

344
00:45:57.460 --> 00:45:59.780
The CAB is controlled by the big four airlines.

345
00:45:59.780 --> 00:46:09.780
And even the most devoted adherents of these regulations agree to this, but what they say is, well, the problem was it's deteriorated.

346
00:46:09.780 --> 00:46:16.780
Back in the good old days, in the golden age, when these regulations were first founded, such as 1900, 1912 period, then they were great.

347
00:46:16.780 --> 00:46:23.780
Then they were put in by real liberal progressive general welfare types and really anti-big business, but somehow it got corrupted.

348
00:46:53.780 --> 00:47:02.780
Morganas Koko puts it, he calls this political capitalism, which is another good word, I should have added this to the other, I've lived in the year about 20 before.

349
00:47:02.780 --> 00:47:11.780
It consists, quote, of the utilization of political outlets to attain conditions of stability, predictability and security, to attain rationalization in the economy.

350
00:47:11.780 --> 00:47:18.780
I would call that caudalization, another little gutsier word for it, a more precise word for the same thing.

351
00:47:23.780 --> 00:47:53.780
And the fact he says, when he talks about the Morgan and the Warren steel industry and all the rest of it being in favor of all these things, he says the fact that an Alabama grocers might be opposed to some of these things is really not important because the guys with the political influence and power were not the Alabama grocers but the people who have been mentioning. Because he says, quote, the group that supported it consistently were, quote, the men in the top echelons of finance and industry.

352
00:47:53.780 --> 00:47:55.780
In other words, the key power centers.

353
00:47:59.780 --> 00:48:03.780
Well, I think this is a good point to stop. I will continue on tomorrow night with more specifics

354
00:48:03.780 --> 00:48:12.780
and different specific industries, and different specific laws, and hopefully also the municipal progressive. Thank you.

355
00:48:12.780 --> 00:48:31.780
Okay, I'm now going to go into a little wider application of my Morgan theabolism and explain why I differ as far as on the William Howard Taft question.

356
00:48:31.780 --> 00:48:37.780
I recognize, of course, that Taft has a sort of dumb-dumb legalism in his approach. I mean, that's the law and it has to be enforced.

357
00:48:37.780 --> 00:48:46.780
So that's a question of emphasis as to his approach.

358
00:48:46.780 --> 00:48:54.780
It seems to me that one of the key points of political history in this whole period goes something like this.

359
00:48:54.780 --> 00:49:01.780
In that John D. Rockefeller is an Ohio Republican, he's based in Cleveland, his whole operation is in Cleveland,

360
00:49:01.780 --> 00:49:05.780
and the Ohio Republican party is essentially a Rockefeller party.

361
00:49:05.780 --> 00:49:24.780
I don't go quite as far as those muckrakers who say, you know, so-and-so parenthesis Morgan or so-and-so parenthesis Rockefeller, but there was a close symbiosis, let's say, between the Ohio Republican Party and Rockefeller and the Standard Oil Ambit.

362
00:49:24.780 --> 00:49:39.780
And we realized the Ohio Republican Party was extremely important in this whole period, McKinley was an Ohio Republican, Mark Hanna was the political boss of the entire party, as well as Ohio was an Ohio Republican, Warren Harding was an Ohio Republican, and William Howard Taft was an Ohio Republican.

363
00:49:39.780 --> 00:49:49.780
I look at the McKinley, Taft, Harding, et cetera, essentially in the Rockefeller embit.

364
00:49:49.780 --> 00:49:53.780
A little bit more factual information here.

365
00:49:53.780 --> 00:50:03.780
In the McKinley administration, for example, McKinley was highly indebted to Senator Hannah, the great boss of the whole party.

366
00:50:03.780 --> 00:50:28.780
Mark Hanna turned out to have been an old high school classmate and close friend of John D. Rockefeller Sr.

367
00:50:28.780 --> 00:50:34.780
This is sort of a continental kind of, it's the first of many coincidences along this line.

368
00:50:34.780 --> 00:50:44.780
The speaker of a house, an extremely powerful speaker, he was sort of the boss, not like now, the speaker is sort of, you know, first among equals.

369
00:50:44.780 --> 00:50:52.780
An extremely powerful speaker during this period was speaker Thomas Reed, who turns out to have been an old friend of Henry H. Rogers, who was in the Rockefeller Embankment.

370
00:50:52.780 --> 00:50:56.780
One of the Rockefeller families I mentioned before, Flagler's Rockefellers, Prats, etc.

371
00:50:56.780 --> 00:51:13.780
One of those was the Rogerses. Tom Platt, who was the Republican boss of New York State, turned out to have been an old schoolmate of John D. Rockefeller Senior at Owego High School, somewhere around here somewhere, as the other classmate somehow popping up.

372
00:51:13.780 --> 00:51:20.780
Senator Nelson W. Aldrich, whom Forrest mentioned this morning, also turns out to have been the father-in-law of John D. Rockefeller Jr.

373
00:51:20.780 --> 00:51:26.780
It was a kinsman, in other words, of the Rockefeller family.

374
00:51:26.780 --> 00:51:30.780
Oldrich, this is another footnote on Oldrich.

375
00:51:30.780 --> 00:51:34.780
He entered the Senate in 1881 as a moderately well-off wholesale grocer.

376
00:51:34.780 --> 00:51:43.780
He died 30 years later of something like $12 million on his $8,000 salary, as far as mentioned.

377
00:51:43.780 --> 00:51:54.780
The McKinley is also an important Ohio Republican Senator, Senator Joseph Foraker, who was on the payroll of Rockefeller, so direct payroll.

378
00:51:54.780 --> 00:52:03.780
In the McKinley cabinet there was Secretary of State John Sherman, who was an Ohio Republican.

379
00:52:03.780 --> 00:52:10.780
He can't exactly be called a Rockefeller person, he's an old-timer, but still he's an Ohio Republican, which means something.

380
00:52:10.780 --> 00:52:18.780
Secretary of Treasury Lyman J. Gage, who was very close to the National City Bank, which was William Rockefeller, essentially, William Rockefeller, his ambit.

381
00:52:18.780 --> 00:52:28.780
Now, William Rockefeller was the brother of Johnny Rockefeller, and it's true there were some certain splits there, but I, you know, I figure, and for good, for our purposes, we can sort of lump them together a bit.

382
00:52:28.780 --> 00:52:36.780
The ambassador to Great Britain and the McKinley administration was Joe Choate, the attorney for Stanton Oil Company in New Jersey.

383
00:52:36.780 --> 00:52:49.780
And so we have a certain heavy propensity from other groups, too, in the McKinley cabinet, but basically the weight, it seems to me, is on the side of the Rockefeller interests.

384
00:52:49.780 --> 00:53:02.660
The, McKinley has this, McKinley wanted, excuse me, the Rockefellers did not want Teddy Roosevelt

385
00:53:02.660 --> 00:53:07.220
to be vice president in the McKinley administration, it was considered in the Morgan eminent, considered

386
00:53:07.220 --> 00:53:17.580
I think quite properly, and they wanted, but they were forced to accept him, I figured

387
00:53:47.580 --> 00:54:17.580
George W. Perkins, Morgan

388
00:54:17.580 --> 00:54:24.720
in this whole period, who is the Wall Street lawyer of Thomas Fortune Ryan, who you can

389
00:54:24.720 --> 00:54:30.580
consider from New York, who is more or less in the Morgan ambit, at least an ally in the

390
00:54:30.580 --> 00:54:33.900
Morgan ambit, who has become Secretary of War and then Secretary of State, it's very

391
00:54:33.900 --> 00:54:38.360
difficult to keep up with, and extremely important.

392
00:54:38.360 --> 00:54:41.580
I like how Ruth, during this period, worked for Morgan, for example, to reorganize Equitable

393
00:54:41.580 --> 00:54:46.700
Life Insurance Company, so we can consider him, I think, pretty well in the Morgan ambit.

394
00:54:46.700 --> 00:54:52.700
He also was Morgan's agent for Chinese investments during this whole period, during part of this period.

395
00:54:52.700 --> 00:55:02.700
He becomes Secretary of State in 1905, and he appoints as Assistant Secretary of State Robert Bacon, who was a friend of Teddy Roosevelt, who was also a Morgan partner.

396
00:55:02.700 --> 00:55:06.700
Now you see, there are two interpretations at all, it seems to me, as we're going along.

397
00:55:06.700 --> 00:55:11.700
Either that all these guys are picking the best men available, sort of out of a big hat,

398
00:55:11.700 --> 00:55:17.700
by coincidence all these Morgan types are picked in one administration and Rockefeller types are picked in another administration

399
00:55:17.700 --> 00:55:21.700
it seems to me the statistical probabilities of this happening are almost zero

400
00:55:21.700 --> 00:55:26.700
or you can feel some more personal direct connections

401
00:55:26.700 --> 00:55:31.700
that's the hypothesis I'm going on

402
00:55:31.700 --> 00:55:40.700
also, postmaster general in the Teddy Roosevelt administration was a certain George Fon L. Meyer

403
00:55:40.700 --> 00:55:46.380
coming from the hailing from the old colony trust company in Boston, essentially an agent of Morgan

404
00:55:46.380 --> 00:55:51.580
Secretary of the Navy was Paul Morton from Equitable Life, which I've already talked about as being in the Morgan-M

405
00:55:51.580 --> 00:56:04.580
Herbert L. Satterley, Assistant Secretary of the Navy, turned out to be Morgan's son-in-law, even closer to the Morgan orbit

406
00:56:04.740 --> 00:56:08.500
and the handpicked successor, until something went wrong

407
00:56:08.500 --> 00:56:18.500
To Teddy Roosevelt, Teddy Roosevelt's handpicked successor, before he selected Taft was Elihu Root, and Elihu Root was very bitter at not having gotten it. He felt he had deserved it.

408
00:56:18.500 --> 00:56:35.500
The Attorney General under Teddy Roosevelt who launched whatever trust bustings were undertaken was Philander C. Knox, who was coming from Western Pennsylvania as a Carnegie Steel lawyer, and who was essentially Frick Mellon.

409
00:56:35.500 --> 00:56:41.500
and we've heard about Frick being sort of an ally to the Morgans in this period in the U.S. steel situation and so forth.

410
00:56:41.500 --> 00:56:46.500
So, we have these things. Meantime, we have the Roosevelt administration.

411
00:56:46.500 --> 00:56:54.500
Okay. And the Sherman Antitrust Act, as we know, had hardly been used at all during this whole period.

412
00:56:54.500 --> 00:57:02.500
So the dead letter. Incidentally, just before I get to that, sort of like forward to that,

413
00:57:02.500 --> 00:57:09.500
My view of the antitrust act, you say, well, if I'm saying that the appropriate state of the cartilaging device,

414
00:57:09.500 --> 00:57:14.500
how come the antitrust law is even kept in a formal sense? Because that seems to be in opposition to it.

415
00:57:14.500 --> 00:57:22.500
What I'm saying is, and I think Forrest hinted at that this morning also, is that the antitrust act becomes a device, not an anti-business device per se,

416
00:57:22.500 --> 00:57:28.500
but a device by which one businessman or groups of businessmen clobber the other group, competing group.

417
00:57:28.500 --> 00:57:36.500
In other words, it's a device used by one set of businessmen to engage in monopolistic privileges or subsidies and to cripple the competition.

418
00:57:36.500 --> 00:57:44.500
We see now, of course, this is done all the time, even openly, we have these private antitrust suits where, for example, a recent IBM case,

419
00:57:44.500 --> 00:57:49.500
IBM was, a suit was brought against IBM, an antitrust division, as a monopoly.

420
00:57:49.500 --> 00:57:54.500
This case was brought by the Controlled Data Corporation, competing computer outfit,

421
00:57:54.500 --> 00:58:00.500
and other allied computer, and it fits in an obvious attempt to cripple a large and successful competitor.

422
00:58:00.500 --> 00:58:05.500
So, and Lowell Mason's great book, The Language of Dissent, I think it's called,

423
00:58:05.500 --> 00:58:10.500
is talking about his experiences with the Federal Trade Commission as a constant one-man laissez-faire minority.

424
00:58:10.500 --> 00:58:15.500
The Federal Trade Commission in the 50s and 60s, I think it was, keeps talking about all these cases,

425
00:58:15.500 --> 00:58:19.500
and most of these cases are brought by competing businessmen who want to clobber a successful opposition.

426
00:58:19.500 --> 00:58:22.500
They don't like the fact this guy's having rebates, this guy has this, that, and the other thing.

427
00:58:22.500 --> 00:58:24.500
So, outlaw it, stop it.

428
00:58:24.500 --> 00:58:39.500
What I'm saying here is that the TAF, I mean the Teddy Roosevelt launching, the modern anti-trust policy, so to speak, is part of the same pattern, except on a larger scale.

429
00:58:39.500 --> 00:58:50.500
Because, as far as I said, Teddy Roosevelt was not a trust buster, but what he did is, it seems to me, he tried to bust, and did successfully bust, one trust.

430
00:58:50.500 --> 00:58:54.500
That trust happened to be a standard oil company in New Jersey.

431
00:58:54.500 --> 00:59:01.500
So in other words, we break this sort of fairly happy situation, peaceful coexistence in the business world, politically.

432
00:59:01.500 --> 00:59:07.500
It's suddenly ruptured by a savage attack launched on standard oil by Teddy Roosevelt.

433
00:59:10.500 --> 00:59:16.500
Why did he do it? Here I think, I feel on firm ground by saying that this is what he did.

434
00:59:16.500 --> 00:59:29.500
This is essentially a Morgan attack on Rockefeller, opening up a great titanic struggle for quite some time between the Morgan interests and the Rockefeller interests, which I feel goes down for many years thereafter.

435
00:59:29.500 --> 00:59:36.500
Why was this launched? I don't know, I can only hear, I can really be very speculative. I don't think too much has been done on this.

436
00:59:36.500 --> 00:59:44.500
Let me say, it seems to me not purely a coincidence that around this time, around the early 1900s,

437
00:59:44.500 --> 00:59:49.700
we begin to have a titanic struggle on a worldwide scale for international oil markets and international

438
00:59:49.700 --> 00:59:54.500
oil investments and oil concessions between Standard Oil Company New Jersey on one hand,

439
00:59:54.500 --> 00:59:58.020
Rockefeller Interest on one hand, and Royal Dutch Shell on the other.

440
00:59:58.020 --> 01:00:03.780
Royal Dutch Shell is a fusion between the British Shell Transport and Trading Company

441
01:00:03.780 --> 01:00:09.780
and the Royal Dutch Company, which were existing before 1907, then they were merged formally in 1907,

442
01:00:09.780 --> 01:00:21.780
which was essentially a giant organization fueled in the ambit of the famous and extremely powerful Rothschild interest.

443
01:00:21.780 --> 01:00:25.780
So what we have is essentially the Rothschild interest with its Royal Dutch shell on the one hand

444
01:00:25.780 --> 01:00:28.780
and the Standard Oil and Rockefeller interest on the other,

445
01:00:28.780 --> 01:00:32.780
waging a fantastic struggle beginning around this period and continuing on for a long time.

446
01:00:32.780 --> 01:00:54.780
In the late 1920s, several books were written by reputable journalists around 1920 and 1930, actually predicting war between the United States and Britain, physical war, military conflict, because of this great oil struggle, standard oil versus oil that shall struggle.

447
01:00:54.780 --> 01:01:07.780
Now, what I am speculating here is that the Morgan attack, the Morgan Teddy Roosevelt blistering attack on Standard Oil to break it up might have had something to do with the Rothschild.

448
01:01:07.780 --> 01:01:13.780
The Rothschild and the Royal Dutch Shell war with Standard Oil on the international front.

449
01:01:13.780 --> 01:01:19.780
In other words, what I'm postulating is essentially a Morgan Rothschild tie-in, at least to this extent.

450
01:01:19.780 --> 01:01:28.280
At any rate, Teddy Roosevelt launches this blistering attack on the Rockefellers.

451
01:01:28.280 --> 01:01:31.280
The Morgans are very happy with Teddy Roosevelt, of course, throughout.

452
01:01:31.280 --> 01:01:43.280
When Teddy Roosevelt runs for the election, the Morgans and everybody in their ambit boost him and so forth,

453
01:01:43.280 --> 01:01:46.780
give money to his campaign, and they're very happy with the whole situation.

454
01:01:46.780 --> 01:02:01.780
Poor old Rockefeller, of course, was not very happy, and Rockefeller broke his long-standing ties with the Republican Party, at least for one campaign, to support poor old Judge Olden H. Parker, the Democratic candidate for president in 1904.

455
01:02:01.780 --> 01:02:09.780
Judge Parker was hardly a good competitor with Teddy Roosevelt's charismatic style and stuff, and was clobbered.

456
01:02:16.780 --> 01:02:23.980
What we have is the Morgans, I think, much stronger than the Rockefellers in pushing the National

457
01:02:23.980 --> 01:02:28.820
Civic Federation kind of thing, the Perkins and the FDC and all that, as I think I sort

458
01:02:28.820 --> 01:02:32.340
of mentioned in passing, the Rockefeller wasn't very happy with the entry into World War I,

459
01:02:32.340 --> 01:02:39.460
just about the only large business corporate leader who was at least benevolently not neutral,

460
01:02:39.460 --> 01:02:45.140
or malevolently neutral to the idea of intervention.

461
01:02:45.140 --> 01:03:01.140
What then with Taff? Through some kind of fluke, Ella Heweroot, the designated successor of Teddy Roosevelt, not the designated successor of William Howard Taff, takes over.

462
01:03:01.140 --> 01:03:09.140
William Howard Taff, I postulate, is essentially a Rockefeller person being an Ohio Republican, and starts launching a huge antitrust campaign against whom?

463
01:03:09.140 --> 01:03:17.140
The anti-trust campaign has two giant Morgan companies, the biggest anti-trust campaign, the United States Steel Corporation and International Harvester.

464
01:03:17.140 --> 01:03:28.140
So I interpret the Taft anti-trust campaign as not only a sort of legalistic dumb-dumb legalism, but also the great Rockefeller revenge against the Morgan.

465
01:03:28.140 --> 01:03:34.140
using antitrust, say, okay, you did this to me, I'm going to smash you, boy, and, you know,

466
01:03:34.140 --> 01:03:41.260
and lashing out, perfectly reasonable, understandable, it's an approach.

467
01:03:41.260 --> 01:03:49.100
Taft, when Teddy Roosevelt started objecting very vociferously, and there was a split,

468
01:03:49.100 --> 01:03:54.700
split of big business with Taft comes as soon as he starts launching these attacks

469
01:03:54.700 --> 01:04:14.700
Tax and U.S. Steel and International Harvester, and Taft in kind of a dumb-dumb way, I must admit, accuses Teddy Roosevelt of selling out the Morgan and the Steel Trust because Teddy Roosevelt is opposing this antitrust action, presumably he should have known that Teddy Roosevelt sold out a long time ago.

470
01:04:14.700 --> 01:04:30.700
At any rate, Taft, in launching this attack on international harvester, denounces this Teddy Roosevelt Morgan Alliance.

471
01:04:30.700 --> 01:04:36.700
So comes the 1912 campaign. Taft had had one term in office.

472
01:04:36.700 --> 01:04:48.700
and what does it react, first as far as I mentioned this morning, the usual interpretation of the historians is that Taff is a terrible, Teddy Roosevelt is a great liberal progressive and Taff is a horrible big business reactionary.

473
01:04:48.700 --> 01:05:04.700
Who supports Taff re-election? Not big business, that's for sure. It's not only that they don't support Taff re-election, they launch a new party, and this is a big headache, they launch a new party on a nationwide scale, costs a lot of money, costs a lot of energy.

474
01:05:04.700 --> 01:05:08.260
They launched a new party, the Progressive Party, for the express purpose of smashing

475
01:05:08.260 --> 01:05:14.620
William Howard Taft, sending him back to the showers and ensuring the re-election would

476
01:05:14.620 --> 01:05:19.020
roll loose.

477
01:05:19.020 --> 01:05:23.140
Big business and big business in the Morgan M. Bitton particularly was very enthusiastic

478
01:05:23.140 --> 01:05:28.060
about the Teddy Roosevelt campaigns, this great progressive campaign in 1912.

479
01:05:28.060 --> 01:05:32.020
George W. Perkins, of course, was the head of the whole Progressive Party, Morgan partner.

480
01:05:32.020 --> 01:05:38.020
Frank Munzey, a newspaper publisher on the Morgan M bit, was another big shot in the Teddy Roosevelt campaign.

481
01:05:38.020 --> 01:05:47.020
Also lots of McCormick's, a whole bunch of McCormick people in the McCormick family. Judge Gary, naturally.

482
01:05:47.020 --> 01:06:01.020
And we have in the Progressive Party, the leadership of the Progressive Party, an enormous number of large businessmen, corporate lawyers, a few professors and editors.

483
01:06:01.020 --> 01:06:07.020
The big business support on the other hand for William Howard Taft is almost nil.

484
01:06:07.020 --> 01:06:10.020
He has, of course, the Republican Party machine.

485
01:06:10.020 --> 01:06:15.020
He's our president. We re-elected him. It was a normal response.

486
01:06:15.020 --> 01:06:20.020
And just about the only big businessmen who were for Taft were Elihu Root,

487
01:06:20.020 --> 01:06:24.020
who was disgruntled because Roosevelt had not selected him to be his successor,

488
01:06:24.020 --> 01:06:29.020
and Senator Nelson W. Aldrich and Rockefeller Ambit.

489
01:06:29.020 --> 01:06:49.020
Poor old Rockefeller had been boosting Mark Hanna for the presidency as against Teddy Roosevelt, before Hanna was elected, and Mark Hanna died and there was no candidate.

490
01:06:49.020 --> 01:07:00.660
So, we have a campaign where Taff had virtually no support among big business leadership.

491
01:07:00.660 --> 01:07:07.380
Some of the interesting things about the progressive party of 1912, Teddy Roosevelt was backed

492
01:07:07.380 --> 01:07:14.820
by 90% of the Union League of Chicago, I keep returning you that.

493
01:07:14.820 --> 01:07:24.820
George W. Perkins was, as we'll see, was very much ardently in favor of the Federal Trade-Type Commission.

494
01:07:24.820 --> 01:07:36.820
And Frank Munsey, a newspaper publisher, had invested very heavily personally in U.S. Steel International Harvester and other Morgan companies.

495
01:07:36.820 --> 01:07:43.820
Two-thirds of the leadership of the progressive party going to cocoa were big businessmen and corporate lawyers.

496
01:07:43.820 --> 01:07:51.820
and generally is a very high concentration of upper-class urban lost Republicans, white Anglo-Saxon Republicans.

497
01:07:51.820 --> 01:07:56.820
Teddy Roosevelt calls during the campaign for a national industrial commission similar to the ICC.

498
01:07:56.820 --> 01:07:59.820
This theme, of course, pops up continually now.

499
01:07:59.820 --> 01:08:05.820
To do for big business in general what the ICC did for the railroad, not to the railroad, but for them.

500
01:08:05.820 --> 01:08:09.820
To prevent overcapitalization, in other words, restrict competition.

501
01:08:09.820 --> 01:08:17.820
Progressive Party Platform Demands Strong National Regulation of Corporations, a Federal Commission similar to the ICC to attack what? To attack unfair competition.

502
01:08:17.820 --> 01:08:26.820
Whenever businessmen talk about unfair competition, what they mean is effective competition. In other words, you can cross out the unfair and put it into the effective.

503
01:08:26.820 --> 01:08:38.820
Professor Party Platform said, with this new kind of Federal Trade Commission,

504
01:08:38.820 --> 01:08:43.820
the businessman will have certain knowledge of the law, the investor will find security for his capital,

505
01:08:43.820 --> 01:08:48.820
dividends will be rendered more certain. Under such a system of constructive regulation, legitimate business,

506
01:08:48.820 --> 01:08:53.820
freed from confusion, uncertainty and fruitless litigation, will develop normally.

507
01:08:53.820 --> 01:08:59.740
The Progressive Party cited Germany openly as the ideal example, for in Germany, quote,

508
01:08:59.740 --> 01:09:03.940
their policy of cooperation between government and business has in comparatively few years

509
01:09:03.940 --> 01:09:08.740
made them a leading competitor for the commerce of the world, unquote, end quote.

510
01:09:08.740 --> 01:09:12.380
The time has come when the Federal Government should cooperate with manufacturers and producers

511
01:09:12.380 --> 01:09:18.380
in extending our fall in commerce, unquote.

512
01:09:18.380 --> 01:09:22.700
The Republican Party also called for a Federal Trade Commission with considerably less enthusiasm

513
01:09:22.700 --> 01:09:36.820
The Morgans have their revenge for this aberration of William Howard, half a smash, an incredible

514
01:09:36.820 --> 01:09:39.900
clobbering of a major party presidential candidate.

515
01:09:39.900 --> 01:09:47.620
We have the election of the good gray Woodrow Wilkinson, who sort of ranks, in my view, somewhere

516
01:09:47.620 --> 01:10:17.620
Wilson has always been held up as an anti-business, progressive, Jeffersonian type, who were his main sponsors in this, well they weren't as illustrious as the sponsors of Teddy Roosevelt, but they still lay, they cut a pretty good swath, for example, there was this classmate of mine, who was the classmate of the classmate of the classmate of the classmate of the classmate

517
01:10:17.620 --> 01:10:47.620
Cleveland Dodge, very important, Magnate and Copper and various other things, there was Cyrus H. McCormick, an old pal of Woodrow Wilson, there was George W. Harvey, president of Harper Brothers and Harper's Weekly, great publishers, which was essentially controlled by Morgan M. But Thomas Fortune Ryan was heavily involved here, and then we come to his fortuitous thing around this time, we have his new son-in-law, William

518
01:10:47.620 --> 01:10:57.620
James McAdoo, who was very important from now through the 20s, who was a longtime associate of the Ryan interest in New York City utilities, and again, at least the Morgan ally.

519
01:10:57.620 --> 01:11:03.620
McAdoo had a strange career after the war. During the war he was extremely important.

520
01:11:03.620 --> 01:11:14.940
Also in the favor of Wilson in 1912 was Jacob Schiff, Hugh Loeb & Company, Henry Lee Higginson,

521
01:11:14.940 --> 01:11:21.260
the great Boston magnate. Cleveland Dodge, by the way, was associated with the National

522
01:11:21.260 --> 01:11:32.460
City Bank of New York. And Brennan and Baruch, David B. Jones and Thomas Jones, an international

523
01:11:32.460 --> 01:11:44.460
J.P. Morgan was elected, J.P. Morgan writes to somebody and expresses his great friendship

524
01:11:44.460 --> 01:12:03.460
and so forth. Woodrow Wilson is a very sound fellow. So it seems to me here we have a great ploy where the big business magnates, originally and usually Republican, band together to smash this anti-Morgan upstart and pack him away and ensure the election of Wilson.

525
01:12:03.460 --> 01:12:14.460
Wilson, quite early, I think it's interesting that Wilson was the first great professor

526
01:12:14.460 --> 01:12:23.460
to become president, and that should be a warning to all of us. He was, in 1912 in the campaign,

527
01:12:23.460 --> 01:12:27.460
expressed himself in favor of government regulation and competition of reasonable combination,

528
01:12:27.460 --> 01:12:52.460
In his most precise speech, full of speech on the subject of business regulation during the campaign, he came out in favor of the government preventing price-fixing and control of war materials and, what, in our old friends, cutthroat competition. In this case, cutthroat is the same as unfair, i.e. effective.

529
01:12:52.460 --> 01:13:11.460
It gets cut from competition and overcapitalization, which means it's in favor of restricting the government cartelizing the system so as to reduce, restrict production and keep competition moderate, so to speak.

530
01:13:11.460 --> 01:13:20.460
These are very similar views, which he admits are very similar views to what Perkins has been advocating for quite some time.

531
01:13:20.460 --> 01:13:27.460
After the election, Professor Jeremiah W. Jencks of the International Civic Federation,

532
01:13:27.460 --> 01:13:32.460
distinguished economist at this current university, a big money corporatist,

533
01:13:32.460 --> 01:13:39.460
says, well, now that the campaign is over, liberalism is like that we should get on with the constructive work of stabilizing the system.

534
01:13:39.460 --> 01:13:59.460
The COCO has this section of material on the origins of the Federal Trade Commission, which I'll sort of summarize a bit here.

535
01:13:59.460 --> 01:14:09.460
As early as 1908, two people have been pushing the idea of the Federal Trade Commission or Interstate Trade Commission.

536
01:14:09.460 --> 01:14:13.460
Francis Lynn Stetson, who I mentioned before, is J.P. Morgan's personal attorney,

537
01:14:13.460 --> 01:14:21.460
and Victor Marlwitz, Bill Beech's pal, a railroad attorney from Morgan Railroads.

538
01:14:21.460 --> 01:14:25.460
They drafted a bill called the Hepburn Bill. I mentioned the Hepburn Bill.

539
01:14:25.460 --> 01:14:29.460
This is not the Hepburn Act, in which he is a specialist.

540
01:14:29.460 --> 01:14:33.460
This is the Hepburn Bill for the Federal Trade Commission.

541
01:14:33.460 --> 01:14:37.460
The bill will allow corporations to register with the Federal Government to be informed

542
01:14:37.460 --> 01:14:43.460
whether any proposed action or merger is legal or illegal.

543
01:14:47.460 --> 01:14:54.460
Stetson and Moore were aided in their effort by Judge Gary, George W. Perkins, Isaac Seligman, Augustus Belmont,

544
01:15:24.460 --> 01:15:35.460
The bill goes into abeyance for a while, and under Taff, of course, the whole thing, you know, the whole Morgan ambit disappears. We have to go, we have to wait until Wilson becomes president.

545
01:15:38.460 --> 01:15:51.460
Meantime, one of the most interesting people in this whole world was Arthur J. Eddy, Chicago corporation lawyer, who was one of the great theoreticians of trade associations, eliminating unfair competition, competition period,

546
01:15:51.460 --> 01:15:59.460
Creating cartels, allocating markets, allocating quotas for each firm, fixing prices, in other words, raising prices, and so forth.

547
01:15:59.460 --> 01:16:05.460
In 1912 Eddie wrote a very important book called The New Competition, sort of the manifesto of this movement.

548
01:16:05.460 --> 01:16:13.460
Whereas I said before, I think, competition, he says competition is war, because he blazes this all throughout the book in italics.

549
01:16:13.460 --> 01:16:18.460
Competition is war, war is hell, and therefore we should, you know, end competition, more or less.

550
01:16:18.460 --> 01:16:25.460
He wanted to repeal the Sherman Act outright and to pass a federal licensing law for corporations,

551
01:16:25.460 --> 01:16:34.460
enact the Federal Trade Commission to govern trade associations, to enforce price and market agreements by industrial self-government,

552
01:16:34.460 --> 01:16:42.460
enforce cartel agreements to raise prices and restrict production. It's a very detailed outline of a corporate-state kind of setup.

553
01:16:42.460 --> 01:16:49.460
And interestingly enough, he uses sort of what we often would consider to be left-wing altruist rhetoric.

554
01:16:49.460 --> 01:16:56.460
He says competition is selfish and we should therefore restrict it in favor of the altruistic world of cooperation.

555
01:16:56.460 --> 01:17:01.460
And cooperation is sort of the other word, the code word for cardinalization.

556
01:17:01.460 --> 01:17:11.460
Competition he refers to as inhuman and piratic and destructive to stable prices, in other words, destructive to high prices.

557
01:17:11.460 --> 01:17:18.460
Quote from Eddie, competition free and unfettered is absolutely destructive to all stability of prices.

558
01:17:18.460 --> 01:17:24.460
Before the interstate commerce law, see for the railroads, regulating railway rates, competition reigned.

559
01:17:24.460 --> 01:17:30.460
To a certain extent the railroads from time to time cooperated to control conditions by pools and associations,

560
01:17:30.460 --> 01:17:36.460
but not until the government stepped in and called a halt to vicious competition where rates regulated in any permanent manner.

561
01:17:36.460 --> 01:17:43.660
which sets forth the so-called COCO thesis of the function of the Interstate Commerce Commission

562
01:17:43.660 --> 01:17:56.780
and then he adds that he wants legislation, he adds in a letter, he says something, he says he wants legislation at least as effective for the general industry as the ICC was for the railroads

563
01:17:56.780 --> 01:18:03.180
He also, in the course of a book, hailed what he called the more philosophical socialists.

564
01:18:04.700 --> 01:18:08.460
By this he meant the right-wing socialists, the Bernstein types,

565
01:18:10.620 --> 01:18:15.660
and in the United States the more conservative socialists who would surface during the Wilson

566
01:18:15.660 --> 01:18:21.500
administration later, who were in favor of the trust as a forerunner of socialism.

567
01:18:21.500 --> 01:18:24.860
They have the trust. The trust is great because all we have to do is have the government take it over

568
01:18:24.860 --> 01:18:31.860
The only class in the country that benefits from free competition are the non-producers who have fixed incomes because they want low prices.

569
01:18:54.860 --> 01:19:05.860
In the 1915 edition of the book, the book came out originally in 1912, in the 1915 edition, Eddie Hale, the new Federal Trade Commission, and Warren Whitehouse is even one of the people who contributed to writing it,

570
01:19:05.860 --> 01:19:12.860
Hales the new Federal Trade Act, especially Section 5, which outlawed, quote, unfair methods of competition, unquote.

571
01:19:12.860 --> 01:19:18.860
and he says this will lead to uniform prices in the reign of cutthroat competition

572
01:19:18.860 --> 01:19:26.860
and will lead to things like fair trade or resale price maintenance, which comes in of course later in force.

573
01:19:33.860 --> 01:19:41.860
When the Federal Trade Commission is finally passed, it turns out that one of the very few people attacking it on individualist grounds

574
01:19:41.860 --> 01:20:01.860
And Wilson's 1914 message to Congress calls for this, calls for something like the Federal Trade Commission, which will ensure no further antagonism between government and business.

575
01:20:01.860 --> 01:20:09.860
And generally, most business groups hailed and watered the Federal Trade Commission,

576
01:20:09.860 --> 01:20:14.860
including the Chicago Association of Commerce and the National U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

577
01:20:14.860 --> 01:20:19.860
One of the people especially enthusiastic about this was Thomas Cray, who was the attorney

578
01:20:19.860 --> 01:20:22.860
for Cudahy Meatpacking Company.

579
01:20:22.860 --> 01:20:28.860
One of the few business groups that strongly opposed the Federal Trade Commission was

580
01:20:28.860 --> 01:20:31.860
The New York State Chamber of Commerce and the Philadelphia Bourse

581
01:20:31.860 --> 01:20:36.860
The NAM was split, uncertain, divided, and we take the strong stand one way or the other

582
01:20:42.860 --> 01:20:46.860
Comes the Federal Trade Commission, as Koko points out

583
01:20:46.860 --> 01:20:52.860
The law was vague enough for outlawing unfair competition

584
01:20:52.860 --> 01:20:55.860
The Clayton Act, which comes along with it, outlawing price discrimination

585
01:21:25.860 --> 01:21:55.860
Joseph Davies, who had been head of the Bureau of Corporations, and Joseph Davies pops up much later in American foreign policy as ambassador of Soviet Russia in the author of the famous book Mission to Moscow, for which he was attacked by the right wing as being a communist, I don't think that his general outlook changed much from one decade to another, these are different conditions, at any rate,

586
01:21:55.860 --> 01:22:02.860
So he was the head of the Federal Trade Commission. Thomas Cray, whom I mentioned before, from Cudahy was a member of it.

587
01:22:02.860 --> 01:22:14.860
Another member was George Ruble, who was a corporation lawyer and one of the major drafters of the bill, and Gilbert Montague of the Merchants Association in New York.

588
01:22:14.860 --> 01:22:21.860
The Federal Trade Commission has said outlawed unfair competition and the Clayton Act, price discrimination.

589
01:22:21.860 --> 01:22:28.860
And also in the Clayton Act it said unions were not illegal. It didn't exactly exempt unions from the Antitrust Act, but it was sort of a step in that direction.

590
01:22:28.860 --> 01:22:37.860
And it was felt that the Clayton Act would make it possible for trade associations to voluntarily stabilize prices and not be harassed for that.

591
01:22:37.860 --> 01:22:44.860
Again, hailing the act in addition to the people I mentioned was Samuel Gompers in the American Federation of Labor, of course this fits right in with their point of view.

592
01:22:44.860 --> 01:23:14.860
point of view, Francis Lynn Stutzen, Morgan Moyer is one of the original theoreticians of all of this, author of J. Eddie mentioned, and comes the Commission, as I say, excuse me, these were not the Federal Trade Commission, these were some of the people favoring pushing it, Montague, Rubley, Cray, etc., Federal Trade Commission comes in and Joe Davies was the Chairman, Vice Chairman was a key figure on the Commission,

593
01:23:14.860 --> 01:23:22.860
by Dan Hurley of Chicago, was a manufacturer in Illinois, president of the Illinois Manufacturers Association and one of the founders of the pneumatic tool industry.

594
01:23:22.860 --> 01:23:35.860
Ridley was on it, was nominated by the Chicago Association of Commerce, also had been a lawyer, leader of the Progressive Party, also big in the United States Chamber of Commerce.

595
01:23:35.860 --> 01:23:44.860
William Perry, a shipbuilder, and William Harris, a Georgia businessman, these were the commissioners.

596
01:23:44.860 --> 01:23:55.860
Also the secretary of commerce during the Wilson administration, a very important figure, William C. Redfield, who had formerly been president of the American Manufacturers Export Association,

597
01:23:55.860 --> 01:24:10.860
as a New York iron and steel manufacturer and a long-time advocate of corporate business-government cooperation kind of system, especially in foreign trade, and also a long-time advocate of encouraging trade associations.

598
01:24:10.860 --> 01:24:20.860
Davies, in working out the guidelines and the specific details for the Federal Trade Commission, is aided and abetted by Arthur J. Eddy, again right in their hip-deep.

599
01:24:20.860 --> 01:24:29.860
Booker D. Hines, railroad executive, becomes important later on, and Victor Marlwitz, our old friend, railroad attorney and C.R. van Huy's of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

600
01:24:29.860 --> 01:24:36.860
Business was generally highly enthused about the whole thing, enthused about the appointments and about the law now.

601
01:24:36.860 --> 01:24:41.860
Wilson said this was helping business, this was a great thing.

602
01:24:41.860 --> 01:24:49.860
Davey says there's a great opportunity for this new agency and government to be a practical aid to the business of this country.

603
01:24:49.860 --> 01:24:53.860
That is indeed one of the purposes for which it was created.

604
01:24:58.860 --> 01:25:05.860
Davies pretty soon shifts to the foreign affairs, after about a year or so, shifts to the great task of preparing for the war with Germany.

605
01:25:05.860 --> 01:25:10.860
And this leaves Hurley as sort of the key figure in the Federal Trade Commission.

606
01:25:10.860 --> 01:25:17.860
Hurley is beloved, and it comes with what Coco describes as a great love affair between the organized business and then Hurley.

607
01:25:19.860 --> 01:25:26.260
Hurley, for example, told the Association of National Advertisers in December 1915,

608
01:25:26.260 --> 01:25:31.060
Through a period of years, the government has been gradually extending its machinery of helpfulness.

609
01:25:31.060 --> 01:25:37.560
Then he mentions the railroads have, the shippers have the ICC, the bankers have the Federal Reserve System,

610
01:25:37.560 --> 01:25:40.860
the farmers have the Department of Agriculture, and now,

611
01:25:40.860 --> 01:25:45.160
to do for general business that which these other agencies do for the groups to which I have referred,

612
01:25:45.160 --> 01:25:49.660
was the thought behind the creation of the Federal Trade Commission.

613
01:25:49.660 --> 01:25:58.540
Willson read this and fully supported this interpretation of the origins and nature of the Federal Freikamish

614
01:25:58.540 --> 01:26:06.300
As a matter of fact, we got one of these things which pops up a lot. It might have popped up earlier in American history, but I just glimmed onto this here.

615
01:26:06.300 --> 01:26:14.300
Hurley, for example, by 1916 is grafting Willson's speech praising Hurley and Hurley's actions of the Federal Freikamish.

616
01:26:14.300 --> 01:26:16.300
Herbert Hoover did a lot of this later on.

617
01:26:16.300 --> 01:26:19.300
He was drafting stuff for Wilson to praise, what a great guy Hoover is.

618
01:26:21.300 --> 01:26:25.300
And Hurley tells the National Industrial Conference Board in July 1916, quote,

619
01:26:25.300 --> 01:26:30.300
I do not know anything about the law, and that applies to the Clayton Act and the Federal Trade Commission Act.

620
01:26:30.300 --> 01:26:33.300
In my position on the Federal Trade Commission, I'm there as a businessman.

621
01:26:33.300 --> 01:26:36.300
When I was offered a place, I told the president that all I knew was business,

622
01:26:36.300 --> 01:26:39.300
that I knew nothing about the new laws or the old ones,

623
01:26:39.300 --> 01:26:42.300
that I would apply the force that I might have in the interest of business.

624
01:26:42.300 --> 01:26:50.300
I think that the businessmen of this country will bear me out when I say that I try to work totally in the interest of business, which of course is a great applause.

625
01:26:56.300 --> 01:27:08.300
The Federal Trade Commission is now pushing also directly for shortly after it gets started, for cartels, for price fixing, especially for export trade associations, for foreign competition.

626
01:27:08.300 --> 01:27:18.300
It was one of the major forces behind the Webb-Pommering Act of April of 1918, which allowed export trade associations, gave essentially the federal government and promoter behind them.

627
01:27:18.300 --> 01:27:27.300
And Wilson put it, in 1916, the Federal Trade Commission has transformed the government of the United States from being an antagonist of business into being a friend of business.

628
01:27:27.300 --> 01:27:34.300
Coco says it's a little bit of an exaggeration because they weren't really an antagonist of business before that anyway, but this is the way Wilson chose to see it.