WEBVTT

NOTE Summary of IP Law

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.000
Against Intellectual Property by Stefan Kinsella

2
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:10.000
A summary of intellectual property law

3
00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:13.000
Types of IP

4
00:00:13.000 --> 00:00:26.000
Intellectual property is a broad concept that covers several types of legally recognized rights arising from some type of intellectual creativity or that are otherwise related to ideas.

5
00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:37.000
IP rights are rights to intangible things, to ideas as expressed, copyrights, or as embodied in a practical implementation, patents.

6
00:00:37.000 --> 00:00:49.000
Tom Palmer puts it this way, intellectual property rights are rights in ideal objects, which are distinguished from the material substrata in which they are instantiated.

7
00:00:49.000 --> 00:00:59.000
In today's legal systems, IP typically includes at least copyrights, trademarks, patents and trade secrets.

8
00:00:59.000 --> 00:01:02.000
Copyright

9
00:01:02.000 --> 00:01:11.000
Copyright is a right given to authors of original works, such as books, articles, movies and computer programs.

10
00:01:11.000 --> 00:01:20.000
Copyright gives the exclusive right to reproduce the work, prepare derivative works or to perform and present the work publicly.

11
00:01:20.000 --> 00:01:28.000
Copyrights protect only the form or expression of ideas, not the underlying ideas themselves.

12
00:01:28.000 --> 00:01:36.000
While a copyright may be registered to obtain legal advantages, a copyright need not be registered to exist.

13
00:01:36.000 --> 00:01:55.000
Rather, a copyright comes into existence automatically the moment the work is fixed, in a tangible medium of expression, and lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years, or for a total of 95 years in cases in which the employer owns the copyright.

14
00:01:55.000 --> 00:01:56.000
Patent

15
00:01:56.000 --> 00:02:03.160
A patent is a property right in inventions, that is, in devices or processes that perform

16
00:02:03.160 --> 00:02:05.360
a useful function.

17
00:02:05.360 --> 00:02:10.960
A new or improved mousetrap is an example of a type of device which may be patented.

18
00:02:10.960 --> 00:02:15.720
A patent effectively grants the inventor a limited monopoly on the manufacture, use or

19
00:02:15.720 --> 00:02:17.520
sale of the invention.

20
00:02:17.520 --> 00:02:23.860
However, a patent actually only grants to the patentee the right to exclude, i.e. to

21
00:02:23.860 --> 00:02:27.860
to prevent others from practicing the patented invention.

22
00:02:27.860 --> 00:02:34.620
It does not actually grant to the patentee the right to use the patented invention.

23
00:02:34.620 --> 00:02:40.580
In a footnote, the author expands, Suppose A invents and patents a better mousetrap,

24
00:02:40.580 --> 00:02:46.380
which has a nitinol memory metal spring for better snapping ability.

25
00:02:46.380 --> 00:02:52.340
Now suppose B invents and patents a mousetrap with a nitinol spring covered with non-stick

26
00:02:52.340 --> 00:02:57.520
Nonstick Coating to improve the ability to remove mouse remains while still providing

27
00:02:57.520 --> 00:03:03.880
the nitinol driven snapping action. B has to have a mousetrap with a nitinol spring

28
00:03:03.880 --> 00:03:11.000
in order to use his invention, but this would infringe upon A's patent. Similarly, A cannot

29
00:03:11.000 --> 00:03:18.000
add the non-stick coating to his own invention without infringing upon B's improvement patent.

30
00:03:18.000 --> 00:03:24.240
In such situations the two patentees may cross license so that A can practice B's improvement

31
00:03:24.240 --> 00:03:30.760
on the mousetrap and so B can use his own invention.

32
00:03:30.760 --> 00:03:36.560
Not every innovation or discovery is patentable. The U.S. Supreme Court has, for example, identified

33
00:03:36.560 --> 00:03:42.400
three categories of subject matter that are unpatentable, namely laws of nature, natural

34
00:03:42.400 --> 00:03:49.000
Practical Phenomena and Abstract Ideas Reducing abstract ideas to some type of practical

35
00:03:49.000 --> 00:03:57.320
application, i.e. a useful concrete and tangible result, is patentable, however. U.S. patents

36
00:03:57.320 --> 00:04:03.360
since June 8, 1995, last from the date of issuance until 20 years from the original

37
00:04:03.360 --> 00:04:10.360
Trade Secret

38
00:04:16.000 --> 00:04:21.720
A trade secret consists of any confidential formula, device or piece of information which

39
00:04:21.720 --> 00:04:27.680
gives its holder a competitive advantage, so long as it remains secret.

40
00:04:27.680 --> 00:04:31.960
An example would be the formula for Coca-Cola.

41
00:04:31.960 --> 00:04:36.360
Trade secrets can include information that is not novel enough to be subject to patent

42
00:04:36.360 --> 00:04:43.360
protection or not original enough to be protected by copyright, for example, a database of seismic

43
00:04:43.360 --> 00:04:46.640
data or customer lists.

44
00:04:46.640 --> 00:04:53.600
Trade secret laws are used to prevent misappropriations of the trade secret or to award damages for

45
00:04:53.600 --> 00:04:56.920
such misappropriations.

46
00:04:56.920 --> 00:05:01.880
Trade secrets are protected under State law, although recent Federal law has been enacted

47
00:05:01.880 --> 00:05:06.380
to prevent theft of trade secrets.

48
00:05:06.380 --> 00:05:11.920
Trade secret protection is obtained by declaring that the details of a subject are secret.

49
00:05:11.920 --> 00:05:17.720
The trade secret theoretically may last indefinitely, although disclosure, reverse engineering or

50
00:05:17.720 --> 00:05:21.360
independent invention may destroy it.

51
00:05:21.360 --> 00:05:26.400
Trade secrets can protect secret information and processes, for example, compilations of

52
00:05:26.400 --> 00:05:33.400
One disadvantage of relying on trade secret protection is that a competitor who independently invents the subject of another's trade secret can obtain a patent on the device or process and actually prevent the original inventor, the trade secret holder, from using the invention.

53
00:05:56.400 --> 00:06:00.400
Trademark

54
00:06:00.400 --> 00:06:11.400
A trademark is a word, phrase, symbol or design used to identify the source of goods or services sold and to distinguish them from the goods or services of others.

55
00:06:11.400 --> 00:06:24.400
For example, the Coca-Cola mark and the design that appears on their soft drinks cans identifies them as products of that company, distinguishing them from competitors such as Pepsi.

56
00:06:24.400 --> 00:06:36.400
Trademark law primarily prevents competitors from infringing upon the trademark, i.e. using confusingly similar marks to identify their own goods and services.

57
00:06:36.400 --> 00:06:44.400
Unlike copyrights and patents, trademark rights can last indefinitely if the owner continues to use the mark.

58
00:06:44.400 --> 00:06:53.400
The term of a Federal trademark registration lasts 10 years, with 10-year renewal terms being available.

59
00:06:53.400 --> 00:07:03.400
Other rights related to trademark protection include rights against trademark dilution, certain forms of cyber squatting and various unfair competition claims.

60
00:07:03.400 --> 00:07:14.400
IP also includes recent legal innovations such as the mask work protection available for semiconductor integrated circuit IC designs,

61
00:07:14.400 --> 00:07:20.800
Designs, the sui generis protection, similar to copyright for boat hull designs, and the

62
00:07:20.800 --> 00:07:28.080
proposed sui generis right in databases or collections of information.

63
00:07:28.080 --> 00:07:33.800
In the United States, Federal law almost exclusively governs copyrights and patents, since the

64
00:07:33.800 --> 00:07:39.360
Constitution grants Congress the power to promote the progress of science and useful

65
00:07:39.360 --> 00:07:46.640
Despite the Federal source of patents and copyrights, various related aspects, such

66
00:07:46.640 --> 00:07:51.860
as ownership of patents, are based on state law, which nevertheless tend to be fairly

67
00:07:51.860 --> 00:08:00.120
uniform from state to state. Federal trademarks, by contrast, not being explicitly authorized

68
00:08:00.120 --> 00:08:06.000
in the Constitution, are based on the Interstate Commerce Clause, and thus only covers marks

69
00:08:06.000 --> 00:08:12.880
for Goods and Services in Interstate Commerce. State trademarks still exist, since they have

70
00:08:12.880 --> 00:08:18.760
not been completely pre-empted by Federal law, but Federal marks tend to be more commercially

71
00:08:18.760 --> 00:08:25.140
important and powerful. Trade secrets are generally protected under State, not Federal

72
00:08:25.140 --> 00:08:32.400
law. Many laymen, including libertarians, have a poor understanding of intellectual

73
00:08:32.400 --> 00:08:39.400
It is widely and incorrectly believed that in the U.S. system, the inventor who files first at the patent office has priority over those who file later. However, the U.S. system is actually a first-to-invent system, unlike most other countries which do have a first-to-file system for priority.

74
00:09:02.400 --> 00:09:06.040
In a footnote, the author expands,

75
00:09:06.040 --> 00:09:14.240
Ayn Rand mistakenly assumes that the first to file has property, and then she is at pains to defend such a system.

76
00:09:14.240 --> 00:09:25.640
See Ayn Rand, Patents and Copyrights, in Capitalism, the Unknown Ideal, New York, New American Library, 1967, page 133.

77
00:09:25.640 --> 00:09:31.540
She also confusingly attacks the strict antitrust scrutiny given to patent holders.

78
00:09:31.540 --> 00:09:37.940
However, since patents are government-granted monopolies, it is not unjust to use an anti-monopoly

79
00:09:37.940 --> 00:09:42.820
law to limit the ability of a patent owner to extend this monopoly beyond the bounds

80
00:09:42.820 --> 00:09:48.660
intended by the patent statute. The problem with anti-trust laws is in their application

81
00:09:48.660 --> 00:09:55.880
to normal, peaceful business dealings, not to limit real, i.e. government-granted, monopolies.

82
00:09:55.880 --> 00:10:00.620
A similar point might be made with regard to Bill Gates, whose fortune has largely been

83
00:10:00.620 --> 00:10:07.620
IP Rights and Relation to Tangible Property As noted above, IP rights at least for patents

84
00:10:30.620 --> 00:10:35.340
Copyrights and copyrights may be considered rights in ideal objects.

85
00:10:35.340 --> 00:10:41.180
It is important to point out that ownership of an idea or ideal object effectively gives

86
00:10:41.180 --> 00:10:47.820
the IP owners a property right in every physical embodiment of that work or invention.

87
00:10:47.820 --> 00:10:50.940
Consider a copyrighted book.

88
00:10:50.940 --> 00:10:55.900
Copyright holder A has a right to the underlying ideal object, of which the book is but one

89
00:10:55.900 --> 00:10:58.100
example.

90
00:10:58.100 --> 00:11:04.820
The copyright system gives A the right in the very pattern of words in the book. Therefore,

91
00:11:04.820 --> 00:11:11.820
by implication, A has a right to every tangible instantiation or embodiment of the book, i.e.

92
00:11:11.820 --> 00:11:17.900
a right in every physical version of the book, or at least to every book within the jurisdiction

93
00:11:17.900 --> 00:11:25.200
of the legal system that recognizes the copyright. Thus, if A writes a novel, he has a copyright

94
00:11:25.200 --> 00:11:26.960
in this work.

95
00:11:26.960 --> 00:11:30.760
If he sells a physical copy of the novel to B in book form,

96
00:11:30.760 --> 00:11:32.820
then B only owns

97
00:11:32.820 --> 00:11:35.960
that one physical copy of the novel.

98
00:11:35.960 --> 00:11:40.000
B does not own the novel itself and is not entitled to make a copy of the

99
00:11:40.000 --> 00:11:40.720
novel,

100
00:11:40.720 --> 00:11:44.560
even using his own paper and ink.

101
00:11:44.560 --> 00:11:48.600
Thus, even if B owns the material property of paper and printing press,

102
00:11:48.600 --> 00:11:53.040
he cannot use his property to create another copy of A's book.

103
00:11:53.040 --> 00:11:58.840
Only A has the right to copy the book, hence copyright.

104
00:11:58.840 --> 00:12:04.240
Likewise, A's ownership of a patent gives him the right to prevent a third party from

105
00:12:04.240 --> 00:12:10.040
using or practicing the patented invention, even if the third party only uses his own

106
00:12:10.040 --> 00:12:11.700
property.

107
00:12:11.700 --> 00:12:18.080
In this way, A's ownership of ideal rights gives him some degree of control, ownership,

108
00:12:18.080 --> 00:12:22.920
over the tangible property of innumerable others.

109
00:12:22.920 --> 00:12:29.920
Finance and Copyright invariably transfer partial ownership of tangible property from its natural owner to innovators, inventors and artists.
