WEBVTT

NOTE Government Ag Policies: Harvesting Absurdities

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.000
Our next speaker, he is our clean-up man today, so that means we've saved the best for last.

2
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:11.000
He's an adjunct scholar with the Mises Institute, kind of grew up at the Mises Institute in

3
00:00:11.000 --> 00:00:12.000
many ways.

4
00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:19.080
He went to, he got his Bachelor of Arts at Hillsdale College, which many of you may be

5
00:00:19.080 --> 00:00:27.840
familiar with, but went to the big city, NYU, for his PhD.

6
00:00:27.840 --> 00:00:36.160
for Laffer Associates, he has a portfolio analyst, he has a blog called Free Advice,

7
00:00:36.160 --> 00:00:39.920
he's written a number of books, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Capitalism, it is over

8
00:00:39.920 --> 00:00:47.540
there on sale, Study Guide to Man, Economy and State, Study Guide to Human Action, Politically

9
00:00:47.540 --> 00:00:52.040
Incorrect Guide to the Great Depression and New Deal, I think all those titles are over

10
00:00:52.040 --> 00:00:59.280
over there, but he does a lot of great work. You've seen him possibly on Judge Napolitano's

11
00:00:59.280 --> 00:01:07.440
show. He's going to talk to you about government ag policy, harvesting absurdities. Robert

12
00:01:07.440 --> 00:01:10.440
Murphy.

13
00:01:10.440 --> 00:01:23.480
Well thank you everybody for sticking around. I was remarking to Doug that I

14
00:01:23.480 --> 00:01:26.520
seem to have cleared out the table where we were sitting. Everyone there decided

15
00:01:26.520 --> 00:01:30.360
to leave. I told a few off-color jokes during lunch but I didn't think I was

16
00:01:30.360 --> 00:01:36.320
gonna have that effect. In all honesty it is good to be here and it's

17
00:01:36.320 --> 00:01:40.320
particularly true to say that because yesterday Doug and I were sort of running

18
00:01:40.320 --> 00:01:41.320
and The Golden Gauntlet, if you will.

19
00:01:41.320 --> 00:01:47.060
Maybe you know we had to present to a group of about 51 high school students.

20
00:01:47.060 --> 00:01:49.040
And that's actually the hardest crowd.

21
00:01:49.040 --> 00:01:53.000
I've done presentations to various crowds.

22
00:01:53.000 --> 00:01:55.960
The biggest one was at Fifth Third Arena last year, last HACS day.

23
00:01:55.960 --> 00:01:57.580
There was a tea party event.

24
00:01:57.580 --> 00:01:58.760
And I was the number two guy.

25
00:01:58.760 --> 00:02:00.120
The headliner was Jonah Goldberg.

26
00:02:00.120 --> 00:02:02.900
So that was sort of a surreal experience for me.

27
00:02:02.900 --> 00:02:04.760
And so there was a huge crowd and everything.

28
00:02:04.760 --> 00:02:07.600
And that was actually very easy because I tell people, no, it's not intimidating because

29
00:02:07.600 --> 00:02:08.760
you get out there.

30
00:02:08.760 --> 00:02:12.160
And if you say something that you think should be an applause line, you just wait.

31
00:02:12.160 --> 00:02:15.000
And if there's 3,000 people in there, someone's going to say, oh, we're supposed to start

32
00:02:15.000 --> 00:02:16.520
clapping and then everyone starts clapping.

33
00:02:16.520 --> 00:02:20.780
So it's very, in contrast, yesterday, Doug and I, you know, we had a couple of jokes

34
00:02:20.780 --> 00:02:24.560
that just didn't quite work because Doug and I have this sort of deadpan delivery and that's

35
00:02:24.560 --> 00:02:29.840
not often suitable for a high school crowd because they just don't know when you're

36
00:02:29.840 --> 00:02:30.840
kidding or not.

37
00:02:30.840 --> 00:02:31.840
They just assume everything.

38
00:02:31.840 --> 00:02:36.760
I made a reference to the fact that I was a consultant and I said, so I work for myself

39
00:02:36.760 --> 00:02:42.600
And I said, so my boss is a jerk. And I was waiting for the line. And the kids are just

40
00:02:42.600 --> 00:02:49.320
looking at me like, oh, why? What does he do? Does he swear at you? And then I, and

41
00:02:49.320 --> 00:02:53.480
then later, and so I thought, okay, I'm going to keep things real. So I'm a man of many

42
00:02:53.480 --> 00:03:00.080
talents. And somehow I worked in this anecdote, which is true, that there was a guy at another

43
00:03:00.080 --> 00:03:04.880
Mises event in Greenville. I was out after they've been walking around, and this man

44
00:03:04.880 --> 00:03:07.960
of the Street, if you will, comes up to me and he's like, hey, hey, how you doing?

45
00:03:07.960 --> 00:03:12.080
And I know he's going to hit me up for money and he just say, hey, you ever, you ever see

46
00:03:12.080 --> 00:03:13.080
that show Seinfeld?

47
00:03:13.080 --> 00:03:14.080
And I'm like, yeah, I know.

48
00:03:14.080 --> 00:03:16.320
He goes, do you know you look, I don't mean to offend you.

49
00:03:16.320 --> 00:03:19.480
And so I knew where he was going for the George Costanza.

50
00:03:19.480 --> 00:03:21.240
So I just, you know, I said, I made it a guy's day.

51
00:03:21.240 --> 00:03:24.080
I just went, George is very angry, like that.

52
00:03:24.080 --> 00:03:27.640
And so, you know, it got, it got a little bit of laughter and I was like, okay, I've

53
00:03:27.640 --> 00:03:28.640
worked out.

54
00:03:28.640 --> 00:03:31.120
So I'm thinking here that I'm, you know, putting on a show, hamming it up for the high school

55
00:03:31.120 --> 00:03:34.800
kids and this father comes up to me afterward and says, Dr. Murphy, really?

56
00:04:04.800 --> 00:04:16.800
This is really, so the last thing, I'm sort of mad that the weavers had to leave because I did have a lot of recommendations about popcorn.

57
00:04:16.800 --> 00:04:23.800
You know, I don't know if you guys have noticed that when you, the microwaving issue, that if you go a little bit too long, you know, there's burning.

58
00:04:23.800 --> 00:04:25.800
If you don't go long enough, then there's extra unpopped kernels.

59
00:04:25.800 --> 00:04:31.800
And I really thought we were going to make some headway on that issue, but apparently I'm going to have to just write a letter.

60
00:04:31.800 --> 00:04:34.800
Alright, so what am I talking to you guys about today?

61
00:04:34.800 --> 00:04:39.480
It is harvesting absurdities with agricultural policy.

62
00:04:39.480 --> 00:04:45.320
I'm going to be repeating some of what the other speakers have said here.

63
00:04:45.320 --> 00:04:50.160
I guess the sort of theme of my talk is going to be the fact that when it comes to government

64
00:04:50.160 --> 00:04:55.720
intervention in general but also in this particular area specifically, the theory is wrong.

65
00:04:55.720 --> 00:04:59.840
So the official justifications they're giving you for why we're going to do what we're

66
00:04:59.840 --> 00:05:04.840
They don't make any sense. It's bad economics. Even on a theoretical level, it doesn't make any sense.

67
00:05:04.840 --> 00:05:09.840
But then what's worse is that's not really why they're doing it. They're doing it for corrupt reasons.

68
00:05:09.840 --> 00:05:16.840
They're doing a bad policy that doesn't make sense on the face of it, and they're doing it for ignoble reasons.

69
00:05:16.840 --> 00:05:21.840
Many of you may have heard of this team that makes these documentaries,

70
00:05:21.840 --> 00:05:28.840
and they're against the official environmentalist movement. They sort of debunk global warming and things like that.

71
00:05:28.840 --> 00:05:58.840
and so their latest documentary is called Not Evil, Just Wrong, so what they're trying to say is we're not saying there's a big conspiracy, we're just saying these scientists warning about global warming and blah blah, they happen to be wrong, we're not saying they're evil or anything, that slogan doesn't really ring true for me, I would say it's not stupid, just liars, in terms of when it comes to politicians in general that these guys, they're not, I'm not here talking just about the environmental stuff, I'm talking about just in general government intervention

72
00:05:58.840 --> 00:06:28.840
especially the politicians, they're not dumb and I know that that's it's kind of fun and I do it too you know we make jokes about Ben Bernanke being an idiot and stuff but they're only idiots if you actually thought they were telling you the truth and if they believed the stuff they were saying then yes they would have to be stupid that'd be the only explanation but if you entertain just for one minute well gee maybe these politicians are lying through their teeth all the time well then you know you said well it doesn't need to be the case that they're dumb and of course how could some of the most powerful people in the world just be bumbling fools

73
00:06:28.840 --> 00:06:41.460
One example of that, just to show you the contrast, is I remember when I was younger

74
00:06:41.460 --> 00:06:46.600
that I thought, a great example of how the government is just stupid is to say, oh, on

75
00:06:46.600 --> 00:06:51.840
the one hand, the government subsidizes tobacco farmers, and on the other hand, they spend

76
00:06:51.840 --> 00:06:54.840
all this money on public service announcements for people to quit smoking.

77
00:06:54.840 --> 00:06:57.920
And so people say, oh, this is stupid, the government doesn't know what the right hand

78
00:06:57.920 --> 00:07:03.760
left-hands doing that kind of thing. But no, that only is crazy and idiotic and counterproductive

79
00:07:03.760 --> 00:07:08.140
if you actually thought there's this single thing called the U.S. government that has

80
00:07:08.140 --> 00:07:14.420
objectives and that it really wants people to not smoke, right? That's the only, it really

81
00:07:14.420 --> 00:07:17.080
cares about public health. If you thought that, then yeah, what the government does

82
00:07:17.080 --> 00:07:22.400
is crazy and yeah, Washington's just a bunch of idiots. But that's of course not really

83
00:07:22.400 --> 00:07:26.200
what's going on. And so Bob Higgs alluded to this with his analysis and a lot of stuff

84
00:07:26.200 --> 00:07:31.920
that Tom DiLorenzo was saying too that what's called the public choice approach to government

85
00:07:31.920 --> 00:07:37.760
says well no, if you look at the actual policies and the incentives facing the individual people

86
00:07:37.760 --> 00:07:42.920
involved and stop analyzing in terms of what does the government want to do here and you

87
00:07:42.920 --> 00:07:46.360
look at it more realistically and say what does this particular senator get out of it

88
00:07:46.360 --> 00:07:52.040
and so forth, then it all makes perfect sense so that the senators and congress people from

89
00:07:52.040 --> 00:07:55.280
states that have a lot of tobacco farmers, obviously they're going to vote for those

90
00:07:55.280 --> 00:08:00.040
of the Subsidies, and their colleagues will go along with those votes if in turn they

91
00:08:00.040 --> 00:08:04.320
reciprocate and vote for the stuff that their colleagues want on some future vote, so that

92
00:08:04.320 --> 00:08:06.640
makes total sense why they would do that.

93
00:08:06.640 --> 00:08:11.880
And then in terms of the smoking campaigns, there's various people who benefit from that,

94
00:08:11.880 --> 00:08:14.400
and so that's why they vote for those things.

95
00:08:14.400 --> 00:08:16.120
So again, it's not...

96
00:08:16.120 --> 00:08:19.880
So what I'm saying is even though it's kind of fun to make fun of those idiot politicians

97
00:08:19.880 --> 00:08:21.680
or whatever, that it's...

98
00:08:21.680 --> 00:08:26.240
I think that's actually naive and you won't really understand government policy and especially

99
00:08:26.240 --> 00:08:30.480
won't be able to predict future policies that haven't yet been determined if you actually

100
00:08:30.480 --> 00:08:34.440
think you know they're a bunch of bumbling idiots sort of like you know the Chevy Chase's

101
00:08:34.440 --> 00:08:39.120
portrayal of Gerald Ford that's you know it's funny to do that and to think that but it

102
00:08:39.120 --> 00:08:44.400
really is not accurate that there's reasons for why the government does certain things

103
00:08:44.400 --> 00:08:46.820
that on the face of it seem crazy.

104
00:08:46.820 --> 00:08:50.680
Another example that's relevant for today is I don't know how many of you know this

105
00:08:50.680 --> 00:08:57.480
but President Obama recently went to Brazil and there was a big, a lot of people in the

106
00:08:57.480 --> 00:09:02.440
energy who are interested in energy issues were really upset because as you may know,

107
00:09:02.440 --> 00:09:07.720
especially since the spill in the Gulf that there's been a lot of stuff with Washington,

108
00:09:07.720 --> 00:09:11.080
you know, there was like a moratorium on offshore drilling and then they lifted it officially

109
00:09:11.080 --> 00:09:14.460
but it's hard for people to get permits. So there's a lot of companies in the United

110
00:09:14.460 --> 00:09:21.980
The United States who want to develop offshore oil and natural gas, and they're having difficulty

111
00:09:21.980 --> 00:09:26.220
getting permits and so forth to do, they're getting official permission, and yet President

112
00:09:26.220 --> 00:09:30.700
Obama went to Brazil and he's given a talk about how we're going to work, the US government

113
00:09:30.700 --> 00:09:35.220
is going to help you to develop your offshore oil resources, and we know that that's the

114
00:09:35.220 --> 00:09:39.540
way to bring more supplies in the future and bring down oil prices, so people were upset

115
00:09:39.540 --> 00:09:45.140
that Obama was, you know, while they were fighting the U.S. government to develop American

116
00:09:45.140 --> 00:09:50.500
offshore oil resources that he's promising taxpayer aid for Brazil so that they can develop

117
00:09:50.500 --> 00:09:52.140
their offshore resources.

118
00:09:52.140 --> 00:09:56.940
But another part of that speech that made no sense is he, so obviously he had to be

119
00:09:56.940 --> 00:10:00.700
careful with what he was doing there because he left himself open to objection from the

120
00:10:00.700 --> 00:10:03.980
environmentalists left because they hate oil and why would you want to develop offshore

121
00:10:03.980 --> 00:10:06.620
oil resources here or in Brazil?

122
00:10:06.620 --> 00:10:09.920
And so he said, but at the same time, that's just a temporary thing, at the same time we

123
00:10:09.920 --> 00:10:13.520
have to work with the Brazilian government and you have to develop your biofuel industry

124
00:10:13.520 --> 00:10:17.100
and da-da-da-da-da, lots of nice rhetoric about that.

125
00:10:17.100 --> 00:10:22.520
But the biofuel farmers in Brazil would of course, if they knew the situation, could

126
00:10:22.520 --> 00:10:27.620
be understandably upset and know that he's lying there because the U.S. government has

127
00:10:27.620 --> 00:10:32.700
a tariff on ethanol that's produced in Brazil.

128
00:10:32.700 --> 00:10:40.100
So there's a 45-cent tax credit that the U.S. government gives to domestic refiners who

129
00:10:40.100 --> 00:10:47.580
blend ethanol into their gasoline products, which Bob was talking about, and then at the

130
00:10:47.580 --> 00:10:53.300
same time there's a 54-cent tariff on Brazilian ethanol because what happens is in Brazil

131
00:10:53.300 --> 00:10:58.800
they use sugar cane, it's actually they are more efficient at making ethanol than American

132
00:10:58.800 --> 00:11:00.220
corn farmers would be.

133
00:11:00.220 --> 00:11:07.420
So if you had an open market in ethanol, then, yeah, the government could buy with the tax

134
00:11:07.420 --> 00:11:13.820
credit and with the mandates and so forth, could convince or cajole US refiners to mix

135
00:11:13.820 --> 00:11:17.700
ethanol into gasoline that then, you know, consumers get motorists get when they go to

136
00:11:17.700 --> 00:11:18.700
the pump.

137
00:11:18.700 --> 00:11:23.140
But the point is that wouldn't be helping US corn farmers, it would be helping Brazilian

138
00:11:23.140 --> 00:11:25.220
farmers who grow sugar cane.

139
00:11:25.220 --> 00:11:29.540
And so to avoid that, what they do is they slap on the 54 cent tariff.

140
00:11:29.540 --> 00:11:34.040
And what's funny is that's not just speculation like back when those issues were being debated

141
00:11:34.040 --> 00:11:39.840
some I forget who it was I didn't I should have saved it but a US politician literally

142
00:11:39.840 --> 00:11:43.620
just came out and said that words to the effect I don't remember the exact quote but said

143
00:11:43.620 --> 00:11:46.840
well no we have to keep the Brazilian tariff in place because otherwise the domestic tax

144
00:11:46.840 --> 00:11:51.100
credit would go to Brazilian sugarcane farmers and it wouldn't go to American corn farmers

145
00:11:51.100 --> 00:11:55.700
so why would we do that you know in his mind he thought I'm showing I'm keeping the jobs

146
00:12:25.700 --> 00:12:32.700
I think you're saying that you want to promote more ethanol use and yet you're putting up a tariff against Brazilian ethanol when that would be a cheaper way.

147
00:12:32.700 --> 00:12:38.700
In other words, U.S. motorists could use more ethanol if you allowed in the cheaper Brazilian product, but they don't do that.

148
00:12:38.700 --> 00:12:41.700
So that's just another example of that.

149
00:12:41.700 --> 00:12:47.700
Now, I want to come back a little bit to something that Tom DiLorenzo brought up about tariffs,

150
00:12:47.700 --> 00:12:56.040
in Paris, because there is this relationship between the U.S. government supporting farmers

151
00:12:56.040 --> 00:12:59.620
on the one hand, and saying that we're helping the farmers, but then on the other hand, by

152
00:12:59.620 --> 00:13:06.660
having tariffs in place on manufactured goods from other countries, that implicitly hurts

153
00:13:06.660 --> 00:13:10.860
American farmers, right? So Tom mentioned this, but it's sort of a subtle point, so

154
00:13:10.860 --> 00:13:15.940
I think it's okay to repeat it. So the one way to think about it, just in the grand scheme

155
00:13:15.940 --> 00:13:21.680
In the long run, a country pays for its imports with its exports.

156
00:13:21.680 --> 00:13:28.540
In terms of an individual household, you could get by for a while if you spent more than

157
00:13:28.540 --> 00:13:29.540
your income.

158
00:13:29.540 --> 00:13:32.020
If your expenditures were higher, you could get by for a little while because you could

159
00:13:32.020 --> 00:13:33.680
run up debts and so forth.

160
00:13:33.680 --> 00:13:35.860
If you had assets, you could sell them off.

161
00:13:35.860 --> 00:13:41.420
But the point is ultimately the way you pay for your purchases is you work and you earn

162
00:13:41.420 --> 00:13:44.300
an income in terms of the individual household level.

163
00:13:44.300 --> 00:13:47.420
And the same thing analogously holds for a country as a whole, the way they do the trade

164
00:13:47.420 --> 00:13:54.220
statistics is that in one sense, broadly speaking, the way a country pays for its imports is

165
00:13:54.220 --> 00:13:58.460
by exporting stuff that countries around the world aren't going to just keep sending us

166
00:13:58.460 --> 00:14:02.940
cars and TVs and so forth if we never send them anything in return that we produce in

167
00:14:02.940 --> 00:14:03.940
the United States.

168
00:14:03.940 --> 00:14:08.420
Okay, so again, there's caveats to all that, but for our purposes, that's a good benchmark

169
00:14:08.420 --> 00:14:10.340
to think about, way to think about it.

170
00:14:10.340 --> 00:14:16.900
So what happens then if the US government puts in place tariff barriers on stuff produced

171
00:14:16.900 --> 00:14:21.340
abroad like let's say Japanese cars, makes it more expensive for Japanese cars to come

172
00:14:21.340 --> 00:14:27.980
into the United States, then obviously that hurts American consumers, people who were

173
00:14:27.980 --> 00:14:32.300
going to buy automobiles, now the price is higher, but at the same time, which a lot

174
00:14:32.300 --> 00:14:36.060
of people don't see the implications because it's sort of an indirect effect, is it hurts

175
00:14:36.060 --> 00:14:43.260
and of course U.S. based exporters who traditionally have been farmers, right, because we export

176
00:14:43.260 --> 00:14:46.580
stuff around the world in terms of agriculture.

177
00:14:46.580 --> 00:14:53.780
So and David Friedman actually was one who came up with a pretty clever way of illustrating

178
00:14:53.780 --> 00:14:54.780
that.

179
00:14:54.780 --> 00:14:58.200
So David Friedman, the son of Milton Friedman, so it's kind of ironic that Tom read quotes

180
00:14:58.200 --> 00:15:01.400
from Milton Friedman and I had in mind this anecdote from his son David Friedman to make

181
00:15:01.400 --> 00:15:03.100
the same basic point.

182
00:15:03.100 --> 00:15:07.100
I guess the Freedmen sat around talking about exports and imports all day at the dinner table.

183
00:15:07.100 --> 00:15:15.100
So he said, look, one way to think about this, again the point being when the U.S. government puts up a tariff

184
00:15:15.100 --> 00:15:24.100
keeping out manufactured goods from abroad that actually hurts U.S.-based exporters, including farmers,

185
00:15:24.100 --> 00:15:31.100
is he said one way to think about it is just imagine that international trade is just like a type of technology.

186
00:15:31.100 --> 00:15:35.540
And he said, so we actually have two ways in the United States of producing cars.

187
00:15:35.540 --> 00:15:39.840
One way is we ship steel and rubber and so forth to factories in Detroit and then people

188
00:15:39.840 --> 00:15:43.440
go into the factories and assemble it and the cars come out the other end of the factory.

189
00:15:43.440 --> 00:15:46.000
That's one technological recipe we have.

190
00:15:46.000 --> 00:15:50.900
But another way we've discovered of turning resources into finished cars is we take a

191
00:15:50.900 --> 00:15:57.180
bunch of wheat from American farms, we put it on a ship, we ship it across the ocean

192
00:15:57.180 --> 00:16:00.860
And then a couple of months later, the ship comes back and the wheat's turned into cars.

193
00:16:00.860 --> 00:16:05.260
And so what he means, of course, is that we sell the wheat to Japan and then they ship

194
00:16:05.260 --> 00:16:07.060
us cars in exchange.

195
00:16:07.060 --> 00:16:12.580
And he said, so it's not an issue of help of creating jobs on net if you put up a tariff

196
00:16:12.580 --> 00:16:16.700
barrier and say, no, we don't want cars coming in from Japan anymore.

197
00:16:16.700 --> 00:16:24.700
He said, all that does is it puts the car producing farmers out of business, or it hurts

198
00:16:24.700 --> 00:16:25.700
their business.

199
00:16:25.700 --> 00:16:36.700
All you're doing is clamping down on that particular way of making cars and instead you're saying we want to favor the way of assembling them in Detroit rather than putting the wheat on a ship that magically turns into cars.

200
00:16:36.700 --> 00:16:46.700
That's one way maybe of getting it to click if you get lost in the currency exchanges and things is to see that you're not promoting jobs per se with tariff barriers.

201
00:16:46.700 --> 00:17:15.700
The tie-in historically there is Herbert Hoover, again this myth that Herbert Hoover was a do-nothing reactionary who just sat back and twiddled his thumbs while the country fell into the Great Depression.

202
00:17:15.700 --> 00:17:23.660
Robert Hoover was the most interventionist person in terms of peacetime interventions

203
00:17:23.660 --> 00:17:28.440
to help the economy up to that point, so one of his big things was even before he got elected

204
00:17:28.440 --> 00:17:34.020
he was campaigning to be a friend to the U.S. farmer and he did put in place various subsidies

205
00:17:34.020 --> 00:17:39.440
and so forth, but another big thing he did of course famously or infamously was signing

206
00:17:39.440 --> 00:17:42.340
in the Smoot-Hawley Tariff.

207
00:17:42.340 --> 00:17:46.020
It didn't cause the Great Depression, but it certainly kicked the economy when it was

208
00:17:46.020 --> 00:17:50.360
down. It was an awful piece of legislation that drastically raised tariff rates across

209
00:17:50.360 --> 00:17:54.560
the board, and a lot of people would argue foreign countries then reciprocated because

210
00:17:54.560 --> 00:18:02.020
of that and had an international trade war. So that, ironically, certainly undid whatever

211
00:18:02.020 --> 00:18:05.620
alleged benefits he was giving to the farmers directly was by putting up this huge tariff

212
00:18:05.620 --> 00:18:09.900
barrier. So that's just one example of when the government says, we're here to help you,

213
00:18:09.900 --> 00:18:14.900
And we're going to help farmers that, you know, you should be afraid of that.

214
00:18:14.900 --> 00:18:19.460
Now what, I think Tom also read a little bit about this, so I'm going to cover some of

215
00:18:19.460 --> 00:18:23.140
the same material, but give you different examples of it.

216
00:18:23.140 --> 00:18:28.980
So what was happening is, originally in the Hoover administration, they wanted to, let

217
00:18:28.980 --> 00:18:33.900
me just check on the time here, okay, they wanted to, the Hoover administration wanted

218
00:18:33.900 --> 00:18:35.900
to help farmers, and so what do you do?

219
00:18:35.900 --> 00:18:38.920
Well, raise farm prices, duh, that's the way you help them.

220
00:18:38.920 --> 00:18:42.360
And so originally, they were going to take government money and just start buying stuff.

221
00:18:42.360 --> 00:18:44.360
So they put a floor price under it.

222
00:18:44.360 --> 00:18:48.540
And so the idea was if the price of a certain, whatever it was, wheat or soybeans or whatever

223
00:18:48.540 --> 00:18:53.820
goes below, if the market price would be below the target floor that the government set,

224
00:18:53.820 --> 00:18:58.280
they would use tax dollars to buy the surplus and they'd put it in silos.

225
00:18:58.280 --> 00:19:02.960
And Murray Rothbard goes through and explains all these programs and how they had sort of

226
00:19:02.960 --> 00:19:04.960
of Unanticipated Results

227
00:19:32.960 --> 00:19:36.000
Now, they knew that was coming because they were lobbying for it and that's how he got

228
00:19:36.000 --> 00:19:38.200
elected or one of his things.

229
00:19:38.200 --> 00:19:44.320
So they saw that coming and so they planted more knowing that this was in the offing.

230
00:19:44.320 --> 00:19:50.040
So again, it's not clear that even on its own terms, it was making the price higher

231
00:19:50.040 --> 00:19:54.680
than it otherwise would have been because now you had more land going into the production

232
00:19:54.680 --> 00:19:58.780
of those particular crops that were being subsidized.

233
00:19:58.780 --> 00:20:03.380
And then Rothbard just goes through a lot of statistical evidence to show that he had these

234
00:20:03.380 --> 00:20:08.820
crazy boom-bust cycles in these various crops because the government, what were they going

235
00:20:08.820 --> 00:20:09.820
to do with it?

236
00:20:09.820 --> 00:20:14.340
They bought it, so they put it in silos because they were still of the mentality that food

237
00:20:14.340 --> 00:20:18.680
is a good thing, you don't want to destroy it, right, so they put it in the silos.

238
00:20:18.680 --> 00:20:22.740
But then as it started building up, speculators would see those inventory levels and if they

239
00:20:22.740 --> 00:20:26.660
started getting really high, eventually speculators would start shortening those products because

240
00:20:26.660 --> 00:20:29.540
Because they would know, well, the government's going to dump that stuff in the market, it's

241
00:20:29.540 --> 00:20:30.540
going to kill the price.

242
00:20:30.540 --> 00:20:39.220
And so it actually, it made, because in effect, the government was, you know, doing the opposite

243
00:20:39.220 --> 00:20:41.780
of what a successful speculator would do.

244
00:20:41.780 --> 00:20:43.940
The government was not in the business of trying to make money.

245
00:20:43.940 --> 00:20:45.900
They were almost, in a sense, trying to lose money.

246
00:20:45.900 --> 00:20:50.260
And so it was doing the opposite of what successful speculators would do, and so it was screwing

247
00:20:50.260 --> 00:20:51.260
up the market.

248
00:20:51.260 --> 00:20:56.580
So you had these wild, volatile swings in the prices because of the government getting

249
00:21:26.580 --> 00:21:56.580
I got this from a Heritage Foundation study. I think this was true as of about 1999 or so. I don't know what the numbers would be today, but as of then, he was saying, this analyst had looked into it, and he said of all the agricultural subsidies going out the door from Washington, the majority of them go to certain commercial farmers, as opposed to just the Ma and Pa raising Clark Kent or something.

250
00:21:56.580 --> 00:22:03.680
So these commercial farmers, huge agricultural businesses, and he said, restrict this now,

251
00:22:03.680 --> 00:22:08.560
these commercial farmers who get the majority of the subsidies in terms of the dollar amounts,

252
00:22:08.560 --> 00:22:13.620
their average income is over $200,000 a year and their average net worth is over $2 million.

253
00:22:13.620 --> 00:22:18.080
So again, that just makes sense. If the government is going to start handing out money to people,

254
00:22:18.080 --> 00:22:21.620
they're not going to give it to real poor people who don't have a lot of political clout.

255
00:22:21.620 --> 00:22:25.420
Why would they do that? What's the point of, you might pick up a few votes that's much

256
00:22:25.420 --> 00:22:55.420
So that's one example, illustration of this. So back to Herbert Hoover's time, that's what was happening. It was causing more volatility. And then, of course, coming into FDR's administration, so what happened is, there was a... the planners, they realized, they realized that they had a lot of money. They realized that they had a lot of money. They realized that they had a lot of money. They realized that they had a lot of money. They realized that they had a lot of money.

257
00:22:55.420 --> 00:23:25.420
So they could see what was happening, you know, even in the Hoover administration, they could see, okay, this isn't working, we can't just go out in the market and buy up the product, because then we're just exacerbating the problem, we're just making farmers put more land under cultivation, which is what we don't want to have happen if the problem is there's a glut and it's pushing down the price, we don't want them to plant even more. So that's how they then switched to the tactic of paying farmers not to grow the stuff.

258
00:23:25.420 --> 00:23:35.420
in the weird world of Washington and politics, that actually made more sense than buying up the stuff and letting it rot in the silos or giving it away and then causing the price to crash and so on.

259
00:23:35.420 --> 00:23:40.420
And so that was the objective there, because in their mind that was a tweak, that was an improvement.

260
00:23:40.420 --> 00:23:43.420
We learned from the past, we don't do that silly thing anymore and put it in silos.

261
00:23:43.420 --> 00:23:52.420
We're now paying them to not grow it in the first place, but there was a lag period where the farmers had already planted this stuff.

262
00:23:52.420 --> 00:24:00.420
So let me just read you two things. So this is coming from The Grapes of Wrath, Steinbeck's famous novel.

263
00:24:00.420 --> 00:24:10.420
And so the part of that novel where that phrase comes from is like the most horrifying thing in terms of an indictment of free market capitalism.

264
00:24:10.420 --> 00:24:16.420
So he's talking about all these starving people who are outside looking at these farm operations.

265
00:24:16.420 --> 00:24:46.420
And he said, and they stand still and watch the potatoes float by, listen to the screaming pigs being killed in a ditch and covered with liquid line, watch the mountains of oranges slopped down to a putrefying ooze, and in the eyes of the people there is a failure, and in the eyes of the hungry there is a growing wrath, in the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage. Okay, so that, what Steinbeck thought he was seeing was free market capitalism, that well yeah, if you've got land held privately,

266
00:24:46.420 --> 00:24:50.420
And that's the way you make your money as you sell food in exchange for money.

267
00:24:50.420 --> 00:24:53.420
Well, duh, the way you make more money is you destroy your product.

268
00:24:53.420 --> 00:24:56.420
And even if people are starving on the streets, you don't care,

269
00:24:56.420 --> 00:24:59.420
because that's this crazy laissez-faire world that we're living in.

270
00:24:59.420 --> 00:25:02.420
And so Steinbeck thought this was the operation of free market capitalism.

271
00:25:02.420 --> 00:25:06.420
But of course, no, that's not the way free market capitalism works,

272
00:25:06.420 --> 00:25:10.420
because if you have a bunch of farmers spread around the country, yeah,

273
00:25:10.420 --> 00:25:15.420
and one particular orange farmer douses his crop with gasoline and destroys half of it,

274
00:25:15.420 --> 00:25:28.420
that raises orange prices slightly, but it also means he gets to sell 50% as much product if you destroy half of his yield, so he's bearing the brunt of it, whereas the high prices get enjoyed by all his colleagues.

275
00:25:28.420 --> 00:25:39.420
Okay, so the only way it makes sense to deliberately destroy huge amounts of the product to raise the market price is if you get everybody to do it, or at least all the major players, and for that you need the government.

276
00:25:39.420 --> 00:25:43.420
So that's why you needed the government to come in and do this stuff.

277
00:25:43.420 --> 00:25:47.420
So this was not a market-based outcome. Steinbeck was just wrong in thinking that.

278
00:25:47.420 --> 00:25:50.420
This was because of a government-enforced cartel.

279
00:25:50.420 --> 00:25:55.420
So the producers, in this narrow sense, did benefit from the operations,

280
00:25:55.420 --> 00:25:57.420
but the point was they couldn't have done it unilaterally.

281
00:25:57.420 --> 00:25:59.420
They needed the government to come in and make sure everyone did it,

282
00:25:59.420 --> 00:26:01.420
because otherwise people would cheat.

283
00:26:01.420 --> 00:26:07.420
So historian Jim Powell talks about this, and some of this is going to be overlapping with what Tom said.

284
00:26:07.420 --> 00:26:13.180
So he said by the time the Agricultural Adjustment Act became law and key people were recruited,

285
00:26:13.180 --> 00:26:18.300
corn, cotton, tobacco and wheat were already planted and livestock operations were moving along.

286
00:26:18.300 --> 00:26:22.140
The contemplated output restrictions wouldn't take effect until the following year.

287
00:26:22.700 --> 00:26:26.940
So some of the new dealers began to think their only option if they wanted to force up farm prices

288
00:26:26.940 --> 00:26:31.580
soon was to destroy crops already planted. Agricultural Department officials signed up

289
00:26:31.580 --> 00:26:36.060
about a million cotton farmers and they were paid $100 million to plow under some 10 million acres

290
00:26:36.060 --> 00:26:42.300
as a Farmland, hog farmers were paid to slaughter some six million baby pigs, and economic

291
00:26:42.300 --> 00:26:46.220
historian Broadus Mitchell noted that most of this pork, under agreement of the government

292
00:26:46.220 --> 00:26:50.660
with the Packers, became fertilizer, less than a tenth was saved as food and distributed

293
00:26:50.660 --> 00:26:51.660
in relief.

294
00:26:51.660 --> 00:26:52.660
Okay?

295
00:26:52.660 --> 00:26:57.580
And they go on to say a few other things, and so John T. Flynn, who was a critic of

296
00:26:57.580 --> 00:27:02.000
the New Deal, pointed out the hypocrisy of this, and he said, while the agriculture secretary

297
00:27:02.000 --> 00:27:06.120
Murray Wallace was paying out hundreds of millions to kill millions of hogs, burn oats,

298
00:27:06.120 --> 00:27:11.040
plow under cotton. The Department of Agriculture at the same time issued a bulletin telling

299
00:27:11.040 --> 00:27:14.520
the nation the great problem of our time was our failure to produce enough food.

300
00:27:14.520 --> 00:27:18.600
Okay, so again, just showing you the absurdity and the craziness of what the government was

301
00:27:18.600 --> 00:27:23.800
doing there. So again, in light of that, it was an improvement now to get through that

302
00:27:23.800 --> 00:27:29.540
transition period where they had to pay people to destroy pigs and so forth and deliberately

303
00:27:59.540 --> 00:28:07.540
I just want to read you one last thing, because I remembered this idea of the government paying people not to grow food.

304
00:28:07.540 --> 00:28:17.540
It's hilarious in its implications, and I think the funniest take on that I heard was something you may be familiar with, the novel Catch-22 by Joseph Heller.

305
00:28:17.540 --> 00:28:26.540
One of the characters in there, so he's in the military, and his official name is Major, Major, Major, Major, because his first and last name are Major,

306
00:28:26.540 --> 00:28:43.320
Major was a sober, God-fearing man whose idea of a good joke was to lie about his age.

307
00:28:43.320 --> 00:28:47.680
He was a long-limbed farmer, a God-fearing, freedom-loving, law-abiding, rugged individualist

308
00:28:47.680 --> 00:28:51.720
who held that federal aid to anyone but farmers was creeping socialism.

309
00:28:51.720 --> 00:28:59.040
He advocated thrift and hard work and disapproved of loose women who turned him down.

310
00:28:59.040 --> 00:29:03.240
His specialty was alfalfa and he made a good thing out of not growing any.

311
00:29:03.240 --> 00:29:07.960
The government paid him well for every bushel of alfalfa he did not grow.

312
00:29:07.960 --> 00:29:11.820
The more alfalfa he did not grow, the more money the government gave him and he spent

313
00:29:11.820 --> 00:29:16.200
every penny he didn't earn on new land to increase the amount of alfalfa he did not

314
00:29:16.200 --> 00:29:17.880
produce.

315
00:29:17.880 --> 00:29:21.060
Major Major's father worked without rest at not growing alfalfa.

316
00:29:21.060 --> 00:29:25.420
On long winter evenings, he remained indoors and did not mend harness, and he sprang out

317
00:29:25.420 --> 00:29:30.020
of bed at the crack of noon every day just to make certain that the chores would not

318
00:29:30.020 --> 00:29:31.020
be done.

319
00:29:31.020 --> 00:29:34.820
He invested in land wisely and soon was not growing more alfalfa than any other man in

320
00:29:34.820 --> 00:29:36.660
the county.

321
00:29:36.660 --> 00:29:40.180
Neighbors sought him out for advice on all subjects, for he had made much money and was

322
00:29:40.180 --> 00:29:41.180
therefore wise.

323
00:29:41.180 --> 00:29:45.940
As ye sow, so shall ye reap, he counseled one and all, and everyone said amen.

324
00:29:45.940 --> 00:29:49.540
Major Major's father was an outspoken champion of economy and government provided he did

325
00:29:49.540 --> 00:29:53.920
not interfere with the sacred duty of government to pay farmers as much as they could get for

326
00:29:53.920 --> 00:29:58.280
all the alfalfa they produced that no one else wanted or for not producing any alfalfa

327
00:29:58.280 --> 00:30:02.360
at all. He was a proud and independent man who was opposed to unemployment insurance

328
00:30:02.360 --> 00:30:06.280
and never hesitated to whine, whimper, wheedle, and extort for as much as he could get from

329
00:30:06.280 --> 00:30:11.220
whomever he could. He was a devout man whose pulpit was everywhere. The Lord gave us good

330
00:30:11.220 --> 00:30:14.660
farmers two strong hands so that we could take as much as we could grab with both of

331
00:30:14.660 --> 00:30:21.660
So with that, I will turn it over back to Doug.