WEBVTT

NOTE The Agricultural-University Complex: Destroying Agriculture for 80 Years

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:07.640
Our first speaker today is a gentleman who has appeared on Judge Napolitano's Freedom

2
00:00:07.640 --> 00:00:11.420
Watch, if any of you are familiar with that program.

3
00:00:11.420 --> 00:00:20.900
He recently testified on Capitol Hill in Ron Paul's subcommittee meeting and had a fairly

4
00:00:20.900 --> 00:00:28.240
spirited sparring match with the brightest of minds in Washington.

5
00:00:28.240 --> 00:00:31.800
He is a senior faculty member for the Ludwig von Mises Institute.

6
00:00:31.800 --> 00:00:35.920
He's been doing work for us for two to three decades.

7
00:00:35.920 --> 00:00:37.840
He's been around for a long time.

8
00:00:37.840 --> 00:00:41.680
Holds a PhD from Virginia Tech.

9
00:00:41.680 --> 00:00:45.040
He's written a number of books.

10
00:00:45.040 --> 00:00:47.120
If you don't know the real story behind Lincoln,

11
00:00:47.120 --> 00:00:51.760
he tells it in The Real Lincoln, Lincoln Unmasked.

12
00:00:51.760 --> 00:00:56.760
He has a book, I think, on Hamilton,

13
00:00:56.760 --> 00:01:07.200
that great guy Hamilton and so he pretty much rips the facade off these old, all these old

14
00:01:07.200 --> 00:01:15.280
guys that sent America the wrong way. So he's a wonderful, wonderful speaker, wonderful

15
00:01:15.280 --> 00:01:20.760
friend of the Institute, author of two essays in Reassessing the Presidency. He's going

16
00:01:20.760 --> 00:01:28.680
Let me talk about the Agricultural University Complex, Destroying Agriculture for 80 years,

17
00:01:28.680 --> 00:01:29.680
Tom DiLorenzo.

18
00:01:29.680 --> 00:01:45.000
Thank you all for coming, and thanks to the Weber family for supporting us in this event.

19
00:01:45.000 --> 00:01:47.960
I'm glad to see the 14 or so students here.

20
00:01:47.960 --> 00:01:53.760
And when I was asked to participate in this, I haven't written that much about agriculture,

21
00:01:53.760 --> 00:01:55.300
as far as that goes.

22
00:01:55.300 --> 00:02:00.120
But the first thing that came into my mind was the work of someone who was probably the

23
00:02:00.120 --> 00:02:05.440
best free market economist who was writing, who has written over the past several decades

24
00:02:05.440 --> 00:02:08.200
on agriculture and agricultural economics.

25
00:02:08.200 --> 00:02:13.800
His name is E. C. Passour, those were his initials, E. C. If you look him up on the

26
00:02:13.800 --> 00:02:17.520
web, P-A-S-O-U-R is how he spells his name.

27
00:02:17.520 --> 00:02:23.360
I've never met E.C. I've read a lot of his writings. Some people call him Eddie, some

28
00:02:23.360 --> 00:02:27.880
people call him Zeke. I don't know how they get Zeke out of E and a C, but that's sort

29
00:02:27.880 --> 00:02:33.440
of a nickname. And so I thought, since I'd read a lot of his writings, I thought the

30
00:02:33.440 --> 00:02:39.920
topic I would give would be the relationship between sort of the academic support system

31
00:02:39.920 --> 00:02:45.680
for the government's farm programs and the effect of that academic support system for

32
00:02:45.680 --> 00:02:47.600
for the Government's Farm Programs.

33
00:02:47.600 --> 00:02:51.640
But the first thing I want to do though is give you a little historical perspective from

34
00:02:51.640 --> 00:02:53.400
my perspective.

35
00:02:53.400 --> 00:02:59.800
Does anyone here happen to know who, which president, which American president started

36
00:02:59.800 --> 00:03:01.800
the U.S. Department of Agriculture?

37
00:03:01.800 --> 00:03:06.160
I know a few people I talked to last night knew.

38
00:03:06.160 --> 00:03:08.640
But I guess FDR.

39
00:03:08.640 --> 00:03:09.640
FDR, no.

40
00:03:09.640 --> 00:03:12.720
No, but it was A-blanket.

41
00:03:12.720 --> 00:03:17.240
If you look up the USDA on the internet, you'll find out that during the Lincoln administration,

42
00:03:17.240 --> 00:03:20.120
the Department of Agriculture was created.

43
00:03:20.120 --> 00:03:26.160
As were the land-grant universities, it was a politician from Vermont named Morrill who

44
00:03:26.160 --> 00:03:32.880
was also the author of the Morrill Tariff, M-O-R-R-I-L-L, tariff, around the same time

45
00:03:32.880 --> 00:03:39.480
who started the business of the government giving hundreds of acres of land to the states

46
00:03:39.480 --> 00:03:45.440
for state universities, like one of my alma mater is Virginia Tech, to be an agricultural

47
00:03:45.440 --> 00:03:46.440
college.

48
00:03:46.440 --> 00:03:53.760
And so that was the beginning of it, and from the very beginning, this was sort of, my interpretation

49
00:03:53.760 --> 00:04:01.120
of this was sort of an interventionist scam, because look at Mr. Morrill, Justin Morrill.

50
00:04:01.120 --> 00:04:05.380
He was responsible, he's a sponsor of the Morrill Tariff Act, which more than doubled

51
00:04:05.380 --> 00:04:08.520
tariff rates in the United States.

52
00:04:08.520 --> 00:04:14.280
And high tariffs have always been disproportionately harmful to farmers, especially because American

53
00:04:14.280 --> 00:04:17.400
farmers have always exported a lot.

54
00:04:17.400 --> 00:04:21.480
And at this particular time, the southern farmers were exporting about three-fourths

55
00:04:21.480 --> 00:04:26.080
of everything they grew, to Europe mostly, and Midwestern farmers were exporting a lot

56
00:04:26.080 --> 00:04:27.080
too.

57
00:04:27.080 --> 00:04:31.360
So there's always been a discriminatory effect on farmers.

58
00:04:31.360 --> 00:04:37.120
And let me try to explain the economics of it to you, of how high tariffs discriminate

59
00:04:37.120 --> 00:04:42.800
Against Farmers by quoting the late Milton Friedman, a lot of you probably know who Milton

60
00:04:42.800 --> 00:04:47.160
Friedman was, you've heard of Milton Friedman, he wrote this famous book with his wife called

61
00:04:47.160 --> 00:04:53.840
Free to Choose in 1980, and the students in the class, I would recommend that you read

62
00:04:53.840 --> 00:05:00.920
this book sometime, the students in the room, and so here's a short passage on how people

63
00:05:00.920 --> 00:05:07.080
who export things are disproportionately harmed by tariffs, which are taxes on imports, and

64
00:05:07.080 --> 00:05:19.960
If tariffs are imposed on textiles, that will add to output and employment in the textile

65
00:05:19.960 --> 00:05:25.960
industry. However, foreign producers who can no longer sell their textiles in the United

66
00:05:25.960 --> 00:05:32.120
States earn fewer dollars. They will have less to spend in the United States. Exports

67
00:05:32.120 --> 00:05:39.400
will go down to balance the decreased imports, and so, you know, one of the laws of economics

68
00:05:39.400 --> 00:05:44.280
is that a tax on imports ends up being a tax on exports as well.

69
00:05:44.280 --> 00:05:48.640
So if you're in the exporting business, a tariff on the stuff coming into the country

70
00:05:48.640 --> 00:05:56.360
will eventually hurt you, will hurt your business, and farmers understood this in the 19th century.

71
00:05:56.360 --> 00:05:59.600
Another book that I would highly recommend, I don't think we have it here today because

72
00:05:59.600 --> 00:06:09.600
The Income Tax, Root of All Evil by Frank Trotterov

73
00:06:29.600 --> 00:06:59.600
was made worse by the protective terrorist policy of the government. The best they could get for their products was the competitive world price, while manufacturers they bought from the East were loaded down with duties. The populists clamored therefore for lower tariffs, so the Midwestern farmers understood that they were being ripped off by this high-tariff policy. And so when the USDA was founded during the Lincoln administration, at the same time, terrorists were

74
00:06:59.600 --> 00:07:09.600
I look at it as Uncle Sam walking up to a farmer and handing him a penny and saying here, this is from your government, aren't you lucky? Here's a penny.

75
00:07:09.600 --> 00:07:16.600
And while he's handing him the penny, he's reaching around into his back pocket and pulling out his wallet with $10,000 in it.

76
00:07:16.600 --> 00:07:20.600
And then the farmer walks away saying thank you, Uncle Sam, for the penny.

77
00:07:20.600 --> 00:07:26.440
And that's how I view the creation of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the land

78
00:07:26.440 --> 00:07:33.000
grant system during the 1860s, because the harm done to farmers by the high tariff policy

79
00:07:33.000 --> 00:07:41.440
was lasted until 1913, until the income tax came in, I think far exceeded any conceivable

80
00:07:41.440 --> 00:07:48.360
benefit from government bureaucrats talking to farmers about which kind of seeds to plant,

81
00:07:48.360 --> 00:07:53.840
which is pretty much what the USDA did for a long time, as though they needed that.

82
00:07:53.840 --> 00:08:00.120
And so that was the beginning of interventionism, and the farmers seemed to understand economics

83
00:08:00.120 --> 00:08:04.920
pretty well back then, they were businessmen after all.

84
00:08:04.920 --> 00:08:09.640
But there was sort of a change in the type of interventionism, as far as I can tell,

85
00:08:09.640 --> 00:08:14.520
beginning with Herbert Hoover, and it wasn't just sort of technical assistance, subsidizing

86
00:08:14.520 --> 00:08:20.920
Banking, University Research, and so forth. There was pretty dramatic interventionism

87
00:08:20.920 --> 00:08:28.120
in agriculture. And it was Herbert Hoover who started the Federal Farm Boards that established

88
00:08:28.120 --> 00:08:34.320
what were called stabilization corporations that were supposed to control farm surpluses

89
00:08:34.320 --> 00:08:41.560
and to prop up farm prices, to make farm prices go higher. In other words, it was a legal

90
00:08:41.560 --> 00:08:51.560
The first federal antitrust law was passed in 1890, which outlawed what the government called conspiracies and restraint of trade.

91
00:08:51.560 --> 00:09:00.560
But by the time you get to the late 1920s, here's the president organizing a legal cartel to help farmers.

92
00:09:00.560 --> 00:09:08.560
Look at who was on the Federal Farm Board. The whole purpose was to push up prices of food.

93
00:09:08.560 --> 00:09:14.000
Here are some of the people who are on this board who controlled food production and prices.

94
00:09:14.000 --> 00:09:20.520
Let's see, there's James Stone of the Tobacco Growers Association, Carl Williams of the

95
00:09:20.520 --> 00:09:26.480
Cotton Farmers Cooperative Association, C.B. Denman of the National Livestock Producers

96
00:09:26.480 --> 00:09:32.520
Association, C.C. Teague of the Fruit Growers Exchange, William F. Schilling of the National

97
00:09:32.520 --> 00:09:38.080
Dairy Association, and Samuel McKelvey, a lobbyist for grain farmers.

98
00:09:38.080 --> 00:09:43.520
And so, this is similar to what happened with the railroad industry in the late 1800s, when

99
00:09:43.520 --> 00:09:48.840
the Interstate Commerce Commission was created, the first supposedly to protect consumers

100
00:09:48.840 --> 00:09:53.920
from railroad monopolies, the first head of that was a railroad industry president.

101
00:09:53.920 --> 00:09:59.440
And so, of course, the thing benefited the railroad corporations, not the consumer, and

102
00:09:59.440 --> 00:10:05.280
the same sort of model was used by Herbert Hoover to form a legal government-run cartel

103
00:10:05.280 --> 00:10:07.380
for the benefit of farmers.

104
00:10:07.380 --> 00:10:13.180
And so this is the business where farmers were paid for not growing crops and for not

105
00:10:13.180 --> 00:10:14.180
raising livestock.

106
00:10:14.180 --> 00:10:20.500
My old friend Walter Williams, a syndicated columnist who sometimes guest hosts the Russ

107
00:10:20.500 --> 00:10:21.500
Limbaugh shows.

108
00:10:21.500 --> 00:10:27.740
I've been reading his columns for 30 years and one of my all-time favorites was when

109
00:10:27.740 --> 00:10:35.740
Walter read in a newspaper that Sam Donaldson, the former ABC newsman, used to cover the

110
00:10:35.740 --> 00:10:38.420
of the White House during the Reagan administration.

111
00:10:38.420 --> 00:10:45.640
He owns a sheep ranch in New Mexico, and he received a check for $200,000 for not raising

112
00:10:45.640 --> 00:10:47.820
sheep on his sheep ranch.

113
00:10:47.820 --> 00:10:54.060
And Walter, in his column, wrote the column in the form of a Dear IRS letter, and it said,

114
00:10:54.060 --> 00:10:58.380
Dear IRS, I also do not raise sheep on my property.

115
00:10:58.380 --> 00:10:59.380
Where's my $200,000?

116
00:10:59.380 --> 00:11:13.500
And so here's Herbert Hoover condemning wheat farmers for profiteering, how awful, profiteering,

117
00:11:13.500 --> 00:11:16.980
and harshly criticized the evils of overproduction.

118
00:11:16.980 --> 00:11:22.100
This was sort of something that was going on in the academic world in these days.

119
00:11:22.100 --> 00:11:26.900
There were a lot of economists and others who were condemning what they called excessive

120
00:11:26.900 --> 00:11:30.900
Excessive Duplication, which is just another word for competition.

121
00:11:30.900 --> 00:11:36.860
And so they use these euphemisms for competition like overproduction and excessive duplication.

122
00:11:36.860 --> 00:11:42.740
I suppose you could say, you know, since we have Toyota and Volvo and Dodge and Chevrolet

123
00:11:42.740 --> 00:11:47.460
and all this, there's excessive duplication of cars.

124
00:11:47.460 --> 00:11:51.560
But who would think that that's a bad thing, that we have competition in the car industry?

125
00:11:51.560 --> 00:11:54.100
But they were saying this about agriculture.

126
00:11:54.100 --> 00:12:01.560
Culture. Here's something that Murray Rothbard concluded in one of his books where he wrote

127
00:12:01.560 --> 00:12:07.860
about Herbert Hoover. This is his book, America's Great Depression, summarizing Herbert Hoover's

128
00:12:07.860 --> 00:12:17.100
efforts. He said, the grandiose stabilization effort of the Federal Farm Board failed ignominously.

129
00:12:17.100 --> 00:12:23.760
Its loans encourage greater production, greater production, adding to its farm surpluses.

130
00:12:23.760 --> 00:12:28.960
So it created farm surpluses, which overhung the market, driving prices down, even though

131
00:12:28.960 --> 00:12:31.600
its policy was to drive prices up.

132
00:12:31.600 --> 00:12:36.960
The FFB thus aggravated the very farm depression that it was supposed to solve.

133
00:12:36.960 --> 00:12:42.800
With the FFB a generally acknowledged failure, President Hoover began to pursue the inexorable

134
00:12:42.800 --> 00:12:48.440
logic of government intervention to the next step, where that is recommending that productive

135
00:12:48.440 --> 00:12:54.680
of Land be withdrawn from cultivation, that crops be plowed under, and that immature farm

136
00:12:54.680 --> 00:13:00.120
animals be slaughtered, all to reduce the very surpluses that the government itself

137
00:13:00.120 --> 00:13:02.160
had brought into being.

138
00:13:02.160 --> 00:13:06.160
And so from the very beginning, government intervention in agriculture had been one big

139
00:13:06.160 --> 00:13:12.640
Rube Goldberg machine, not too dissimilar from the Soviet-style central planning in

140
00:13:12.640 --> 00:13:16.760
agriculture, which Yuri Maltsev is going to talk to us about.

141
00:13:16.760 --> 00:13:23.920
In fact, when you get to Roosevelt, his top economic advisor for the duration of his administration

142
00:13:23.920 --> 00:13:31.360
was a man named Rexford Tugwell from Columbia University, and he wrote a book in 1930 on

143
00:13:31.360 --> 00:13:37.240
the American economy in which he praised Soviet central planners to the treetops, and he thought

144
00:13:37.240 --> 00:13:42.240
it was the wave of the future, and he boasted that we Americans will show these slobs how

145
00:13:42.240 --> 00:13:43.240
to do it.

146
00:13:43.240 --> 00:13:44.960
We'll show them how central planning works.

147
00:13:44.960 --> 00:13:50.520
But I have to think that his advice had something to do with what FDR eventually did.

148
00:13:50.520 --> 00:13:58.500
And so speaking of FDR, if you look up on the web, there's all sorts of information

149
00:13:58.500 --> 00:14:00.720
on FDR on the web.

150
00:14:00.720 --> 00:14:05.960
And if you were to search around and find his role in agriculture, he pretty much continued

151
00:14:05.960 --> 00:14:07.680
when Hoover started.

152
00:14:07.680 --> 00:14:12.080
And here's one description of what FDR did that I think is pretty accurate.

153
00:14:12.080 --> 00:14:17.360
It says, when FDR was elected as president, he appointed Henry Wallace as his secretary

154
00:14:17.360 --> 00:14:18.680
of agriculture.

155
00:14:18.680 --> 00:14:24.880
In 1933, Wallace drafted the Agricultural Adjustment Act, the AAA.

156
00:14:24.880 --> 00:14:29.760
The AAA paid farmers not to grow crops and not to produce dairy produce such as milk

157
00:14:29.760 --> 00:14:30.760
and butter.

158
00:14:30.760 --> 00:14:34.160
It also paid them not to raise pigs and lambs.

159
00:14:34.160 --> 00:14:40.080
The money to pay the farmers for cutting back production above about 30% was raised by a

160
00:14:40.080 --> 00:14:46.040
tax on companies that bought the farm products and processed them into food and clothing.

161
00:14:46.040 --> 00:14:52.040
So the consumers were hit twice, once with higher prices caused by the 30% supply reduction,

162
00:14:52.040 --> 00:14:57.680
and then a second time when a lot of these taxes were passed on to the customers of the

163
00:14:57.680 --> 00:14:59.920
companies that distributed the food.

164
00:14:59.920 --> 00:15:04.840
And so that was FDR's start in this whole business.

165
00:15:04.840 --> 00:15:09.320
And so what was going on here is similar to what was going on in the late 19th, early

166
00:15:09.320 --> 00:15:39.320
In the early 20th century, in a lot of industries in America, the Americans were basically adopting a European style fascism as their economy. The Europeans, the Germans and the Italians especially, had intentionally created cartels of various sorts and run them under the sharp control of government bureaucrats when the businesses were ostensibly private, would fail, they would be bailed out.

167
00:15:39.320 --> 00:15:48.860
and we were essentially doing something very similar here in the United States with agriculture

168
00:15:48.860 --> 00:15:53.940
and manufacturing, especially during Roosevelt's era, the National Recovery Act was pretty

169
00:15:53.940 --> 00:15:58.320
much the same thing, a government organized cartel system.

170
00:15:58.320 --> 00:16:02.880
And there are two good books that talk about this.

171
00:16:02.880 --> 00:16:07.160
One of them is called In Restraint of Trade by Butler Schaefer and the other is The Triumph

172
00:16:07.160 --> 00:16:14.440
of Conservatism by Gabriel Kolko, K-O-L-K-O, to talk about how big business in particular

173
00:16:14.440 --> 00:16:21.200
was very active in seeking government intervention, because the bigger businesses understood that

174
00:16:21.200 --> 00:16:26.060
they could work the system, that this interventionism would probably be very harmful to their smaller

175
00:16:26.060 --> 00:16:28.720
competitors, but good for them.

176
00:16:28.720 --> 00:16:32.500
And what was going on in farming seemed to be similar to this.

177
00:16:32.500 --> 00:16:39.460
And so the main effects of all this in the name of stabilizing farm incomes I think has

178
00:16:39.460 --> 00:16:45.540
not been so much to stabilize incomes but to create greater inequality because the government

179
00:16:45.540 --> 00:16:52.020
farm programs benefit primarily the larger agricultural corporations because of the way

180
00:16:52.020 --> 00:16:57.740
these programs are set up and so it pretty much guarantees that the larger corporations

181
00:16:57.740 --> 00:17:22.740
The price support rip-off. The government for a long time had price supports on a lot of farm products, but this is politically risky because every once in a while the public would get wind of the fact that the reason why certain food items have gone up is that the government has forced them up.

182
00:17:22.740 --> 00:17:30.740
And so if you're a politician and you get caught having voted to raise the price of food, that's not a good thing for you.

183
00:17:30.740 --> 00:17:37.740
And so they've tried all sorts of subterfuges to try to hide essentially the same kind of thing.

184
00:17:37.740 --> 00:17:48.740
In fact, one of the reasons for price supports in the first place is that it's even worse to a politician if you're getting caught just literally giving cash to farmers or to anybody.

185
00:17:48.740 --> 00:17:49.740
."

186
00:17:49.740 --> 00:17:54.220
You know, taxpayers are going to say, why are you giving my money to this multi-billion

187
00:17:54.220 --> 00:17:58.060
dollar corporation that's a food distributor or something like that?

188
00:17:58.060 --> 00:18:01.900
But if you can manipulate the system in terms of making the price higher of the thing that

189
00:18:01.900 --> 00:18:06.100
they sell, the average consumer is not going to really know about that.

190
00:18:06.100 --> 00:18:09.700
But sometimes the consumers do even catch on with that.

191
00:18:09.700 --> 00:18:16.820
And one example is an article I wrote several years ago on Mises.org called Farm Drobbery.

192
00:18:16.820 --> 00:18:46.820
and there's an article in USA Today that caught my eye as a good example of this, it was about the cotton business and there's a picture of a cotton farmer from Texas on the front page of USA Today and he had a big smile on his face just like Jimmy Carter, the older people in the room know Jimmy Carter, he had this big horse teeth and big smile, big politician smile, so this guy, he looked just awfully happy and it sort of caught my eye, I looked at his USA Today

193
00:19:16.820 --> 00:19:24.980
was a banner year for cotton farming and so the huge supply drove down the price to $0.35.

194
00:19:24.980 --> 00:19:29.580
So the world price of cotton was $0.35 and the U.S. government had a program that says

195
00:19:29.580 --> 00:19:35.700
we, the government, that is the tax payers, will pay you the difference between $0.35

196
00:19:35.700 --> 00:19:45.060
and $0.52 if the price goes below $0.52, which it did and so this guy's name was Bednards.

197
00:19:45.060 --> 00:19:49.540
He was a cotton farmer in Texas, so the reason he was smiling is that he had just cashed

198
00:19:49.540 --> 00:19:57.980
a check for $340,000 because he had produced so much cotton, the volume of cotton that

199
00:19:57.980 --> 00:20:05.020
his farm produced multiplied by the difference between 52 cents and 35 cents ended up being

200
00:20:05.020 --> 00:20:06.020
$340,000.

201
00:20:06.020 --> 00:20:13.820
And so he got $340,000 and in return the consumers got absolutely nothing at all, just the same

202
00:20:13.820 --> 00:20:25.180
And so that's another type of program that we have, and it turns out this type of program

203
00:20:25.180 --> 00:20:31.020
was recommended years and years ago, it's just a plain old rip-off, it's legal plunder

204
00:20:31.020 --> 00:20:38.220
is what Friedrich Bastiat called it, it's sort of like I'm a college professor, we college

205
00:20:38.220 --> 00:20:42.860
professors make a lot of money, at least a million a year, and so it's as though we had

206
00:20:42.860 --> 00:20:47.340
Law saying that I can never make less than $2 million a year if my salary ever did.

207
00:20:47.340 --> 00:20:53.620
Say we have open borders immigration policy, and 500,000 economists from India come here

208
00:20:53.620 --> 00:20:57.060
and drive the price of economists down to a very low level.

209
00:20:57.060 --> 00:21:02.300
I'm guaranteed the difference between $2 million a year and whatever low level the price is.

210
00:21:02.300 --> 00:21:06.680
That would be a pretty good scam, but that's what they have in cotton farming.

211
00:21:06.680 --> 00:21:07.680
But this was recommended.

212
00:21:07.680 --> 00:21:18.680
There's a well-known agricultural economist named D. Gale Johnson, who recommended this way back, right after World War II.

213
00:21:18.680 --> 00:21:24.680
He was the president of the American Farm Economic Association and the American Economic Association.

214
00:21:24.680 --> 00:21:29.680
He was a pretty well-known economist of the last generation, and he recommended this.

215
00:21:29.680 --> 00:21:33.680
He recommended, quote, forward prices for agriculture.

216
00:21:33.680 --> 00:21:35.680
Now what is this? Here's a description of it.

217
00:21:35.680 --> 00:21:43.680
The government would determine and announce the right price for each commodity for the upcoming crop year.

218
00:21:43.680 --> 00:21:49.680
No markets would determine the price. The government would declare the correct price for the next year,

219
00:21:49.680 --> 00:21:55.680
setting the price at the level that the government thinks would clear anticipated supply and demand.

220
00:21:55.680 --> 00:22:01.680
Good luck with that. If market prices fell sufficiently far below the forward price level,

221
00:22:01.680 --> 00:22:02.680
of the World.

222
00:22:02.680 --> 00:22:30.680
And so, you know, the first 15 minutes of my talk here, I've briefly described some

223
00:22:30.680 --> 00:22:38.680
and other forms of interventionism that the government has always been involved in and has always created instability.

224
00:22:38.680 --> 00:22:44.680
It creates agricultural surpluses and then it tries to do things to get rid of the surpluses.

225
00:22:44.680 --> 00:22:54.680
FDR was famous for carrying forward Hoover's policy of slaughtering farm animals and destroying crops to try to drive up the price.

226
00:22:54.680 --> 00:23:06.680
But it was a public relations disaster for FDR because the Great Depression was on, and there were long food lines, people nearly starving to death, and here's the government destroying food.

227
00:23:06.680 --> 00:23:19.680
And so he wised up and did more to pay farmers to not raise crops or grow livestock in the first place, rather than allowing them to raise the crops and so forth, or grow the crops and then destroying them.

228
00:23:19.680 --> 00:23:22.680
That's foolish, shouldn't do that.

229
00:23:22.680 --> 00:23:25.440
and so they had the other program.

230
00:23:25.440 --> 00:23:37.000
Now, the role of the agricultural university complex, beginning roughly the New Deal era,

231
00:23:37.000 --> 00:23:43.280
there was a big surge in a number of economists, especially, who became agricultural economists.

232
00:23:43.280 --> 00:23:48.400
And here's what E.S. Passour says in one of his articles, the New Deal farm programs

233
00:23:48.400 --> 00:23:52.240
markedly increased the demand for agricultural economists.

234
00:23:52.240 --> 00:24:03.240
In 1929 and 1939, the total number of agricultural economists increased about four times in the United States and by about two-thirds in land-grant universities.

235
00:24:03.240 --> 00:24:18.240
A prominent agricultural economist at the time concluded that after 1933, almost every agricultural economist was engaged directly or indirectly in the development, administration, or appraisal of government farm programs.

236
00:24:18.240 --> 00:24:23.680
So you're paid, at least in part by the government, and your job is to appraise the government's

237
00:24:23.680 --> 00:24:25.920
foreign programs.

238
00:24:25.920 --> 00:24:31.520
That's like being employed by Coca-Cola, and they're asking you, tell us what you think

239
00:24:31.520 --> 00:24:37.480
of Coca-Cola compared to Pepsi, you know, you're an outside observer, you're at a university,

240
00:24:37.480 --> 00:24:41.200
which do you think is a better product?

241
00:24:41.200 --> 00:24:47.000
And so the government set up a system of paying all these academics to assess the government's

242
00:24:47.000 --> 00:24:53.400
programs, and of course their pay and the continuation of their pay is always contingent

243
00:24:53.400 --> 00:24:57.360
on giving the right answers to these programs.

244
00:24:57.360 --> 00:25:01.680
If you start telling the government you're creating a disaster for the farm economy,

245
00:25:01.680 --> 00:25:08.000
you're not going to have a long career in agricultural economics.

246
00:25:08.000 --> 00:25:13.560
And so the economic livelihood of these agricultural economists is closely tied to the government's

247
00:25:13.560 --> 00:25:16.440
role in agriculture, the government's policies.

248
00:25:16.440 --> 00:25:22.200
And so this, that's why, you know, these land grants that occurred during the Lincoln administration

249
00:25:22.200 --> 00:25:27.200
was really the camel's nose under the tent, as they say, of political correctness.

250
00:25:27.200 --> 00:25:34.040
You know, it was the first intervention of the federal government into higher education,

251
00:25:34.040 --> 00:25:36.120
the university system in a big way.

252
00:25:36.120 --> 00:25:42.080
And of course, when you take the king's money, you always become the king's man to some extent,

253
00:25:42.080 --> 00:25:44.920
as the old saying goes, to paraphrase that.

254
00:25:44.920 --> 00:25:51.320
And so they began corrupting academics from the 1860s.

255
00:25:51.320 --> 00:25:55.000
Here's one example of this, of the type of corruption.

256
00:25:55.000 --> 00:25:58.320
This is from Eddie Passor's, one of his articles.

257
00:25:58.320 --> 00:26:05.240
In 1943, an agricultural economist at Iowa State College wrote a pamphlet on dairy policy.

258
00:26:05.240 --> 00:26:12.280
The study concluded that margarine compared favorably with butter in nutrition and palatability

259
00:26:12.280 --> 00:26:18.240
and argued for federal changes in federal and state legislation that impeded the consumption

260
00:26:18.240 --> 00:26:20.360
of margarine.

261
00:26:20.360 --> 00:26:25.200
Following a tax on the pamphlet by groups of dairy farmers and a subsequent recommendation

262
00:26:25.200 --> 00:26:31.260
by a review committee that the pamphlet be retracted and revised, the professor and several

263
00:26:31.260 --> 00:26:36.200
other agricultural economists resigned from Iowa State College.

264
00:26:36.200 --> 00:26:40.560
And the professor, the top professor, his name was Theodore Schultz, who later won the

265
00:26:40.560 --> 00:26:47.880
Nobel Prize in Economics and so he dared to actually say the truth about this one program

266
00:26:47.880 --> 00:26:58.760
and he was forced to leave his job, that was 1943 and a few other examples of the role

267
00:26:58.760 --> 00:27:05.920
of agricultural economists, a lot of them in economics, the students in the room if you

268
00:27:05.920 --> 00:27:22.920
In order to go and take an economics course, you'll learn all about market failure, there's theories of market failure, and I categorize all of these theories, and there are hundreds of them, into something that an economist named Harold Demsitz called the Nirvana Fallacy.

269
00:27:22.920 --> 00:27:32.920
They create an unrealistic theory of a competitive economy that the Austrians never bought into. It's called perfect competition.

270
00:27:32.920 --> 00:27:38.200
and it's a contrived theory, and then they compare the real world to that, and of course

271
00:27:38.200 --> 00:27:43.640
the real world is never perfect, nothing on earth is perfect, and they'll say, ah-ha,

272
00:27:43.640 --> 00:27:50.160
the world, the market fails because it's not perfect, well nothing succeeds compared to

273
00:27:50.160 --> 00:27:52.280
perfection or nirvana.

274
00:27:52.280 --> 00:27:58.340
And so there are many economists who have made careers, 40 or 50 year careers writing

275
00:27:58.340 --> 00:28:05.700
paper after paper after paper, just with applications of this silly Nirvana fallacy, comparing actual

276
00:28:05.700 --> 00:28:11.580
markets to some sort of unachievable ideal that could never be achieved in the real world.

277
00:28:11.580 --> 00:28:15.620
And a lot of that is in agricultural economics too.

278
00:28:15.620 --> 00:28:19.720
And it's even worse in agricultural economics because the agricultural markets have been

279
00:28:19.720 --> 00:28:28.840
and so perverted and changed around by government intervention that it's hardly realistic to

280
00:28:28.840 --> 00:28:31.080
call them free markets.

281
00:28:31.080 --> 00:28:37.160
And so when bad things happen, blaming it on the market system is very dubious indeed

282
00:28:37.160 --> 00:28:42.760
because there's so much interventionism in agriculture and has been for such a long time.

283
00:28:42.760 --> 00:28:45.120
But here are some examples of how the game is played.

284
00:28:45.120 --> 00:28:51.680
is an agricultural economist named Daryl Ray, who has the Blazing Game Chair of Excellence

285
00:28:51.680 --> 00:28:56.800
in Agricultural Policy and is Director of the Agricultural Policy Center at the University

286
00:28:56.800 --> 00:28:59.160
of Tennessee.

287
00:28:59.160 --> 00:29:06.280
He says this in one of his articles, there is no recognition that when crop prices capsize,

288
00:29:06.280 --> 00:29:11.140
market demand does not provide a rigging to raise them back up again.

289
00:29:11.140 --> 00:29:16.500
There is also no recognition that market response on the supply side is no help in the search

290
00:29:16.500 --> 00:29:19.060
for a cure for low prices.

291
00:29:19.060 --> 00:29:23.820
While belief in the market self-correction via supply and demand response to depressed

292
00:29:23.820 --> 00:29:30.180
prices may have been a reason to embrace the 1996 legislation, he's talking about the farm

293
00:29:30.180 --> 00:29:34.540
bill, why would we want to take that dog out to hunt again this time around?

294
00:29:34.540 --> 00:29:36.700
So he's saying markets don't work.

295
00:29:36.700 --> 00:29:39.300
He's proclaiming markets don't work.

296
00:29:39.300 --> 00:29:45.600
Another example is Neil Harrell, who's the Charles F. Curtis Professor of Agriculture.

297
00:29:45.600 --> 00:29:48.560
These guys all have huge job titles.

298
00:29:48.560 --> 00:29:52.620
Also Professor of Economics at Iowa State University, former president of the American

299
00:29:52.620 --> 00:29:56.900
Agricultural Economics Association.

300
00:29:56.900 --> 00:30:02.540
He supports worldwide central planning of agriculture by the United Nations.

301
00:30:02.540 --> 00:30:05.500
How do you think that would work out?

302
00:30:05.500 --> 00:30:10.920
Here's what he says, farm policy debate in the United States in the 1920s was largely

303
00:30:10.920 --> 00:30:16.620
about whether it was appropriate to have a national food and agricultural policy.

304
00:30:16.620 --> 00:30:23.360
To a considerable extent, the decision was in the negative until 1933, Roosevelt.

305
00:30:23.360 --> 00:30:27.700
In many respects, farm policy today poses a similar question.

306
00:30:27.700 --> 00:30:32.420
Should efforts be directed toward a global food and agriculture policy?

307
00:30:32.420 --> 00:30:35.700
The opinion of this commentator, the answer is yes.

308
00:30:35.700 --> 00:30:37.300
So we should have worldwide sense.

309
00:30:37.300 --> 00:30:39.500
This was 2003.

310
00:30:39.500 --> 00:30:41.140
When did communism fail?

311
00:30:41.140 --> 00:30:44.620
About 1990, something like that.

312
00:30:44.620 --> 00:30:49.140
So you see a lot of this in academe, when I can recall, right in the middle of the collapse

313
00:30:49.140 --> 00:30:52.860
of communism, I happened to be at the University of Tennessee at the time, and there was a

314
00:30:52.860 --> 00:30:57.100
Marxist on the economics faculty, his name was John, and I remember running into him

315
00:30:57.100 --> 00:30:58.100
on the parking lot.

316
00:30:58.100 --> 00:31:04.740
The Soviet Union had fallen apart, and all of Eastern and Central Europe had left, and

317
00:31:04.740 --> 00:31:10.300
I said, well, John, now what are you going to do, carpenter, bricklayer, what?

318
00:31:10.300 --> 00:31:15.540
And he said, oh, no, no, we're no longer tainted by all these bad guys like Stalin and all

319
00:31:15.540 --> 00:31:16.540
that.

320
00:31:16.540 --> 00:31:22.900
Now, now, we could really have a socialist paradise, and apparently the agricultural

321
00:31:22.900 --> 00:31:27.540
economists are of the same mind, at least some of them, some of the top ones.

322
00:31:27.540 --> 00:31:31.140
There are some good ones, I'm not saying they're all like this, but these are some big shots

323
00:31:31.140 --> 00:31:33.260
that I'm quoting.

324
00:31:33.260 --> 00:31:41.580
Another one, Robert Taylor, he's the, I'm thinking this might be a typo in this article

325
00:31:41.580 --> 00:31:45.860
I'm reading here, he's the Alpha Eminent Scholar, I thought it might be Alpha, Alpha Eminent

326
00:31:45.860 --> 00:31:50.980
Scholar, but it's the Alpha Eminent Scholar and Professor of Agricultural Economics at

327
00:31:50.980 --> 00:31:51.980
Auburn University.

328
00:31:51.980 --> 00:32:00.240
The permissive attitude behind the approval of recent mergers, acquisitions and joint

329
00:32:00.240 --> 00:32:06.140
ventures among agricultural corporations appears to be based on the single-minded pursuit of

330
00:32:06.140 --> 00:32:08.420
economic efficiency.

331
00:32:08.420 --> 00:32:09.420
Imagine that.

332
00:32:09.420 --> 00:32:11.540
Isn't that horrible?

333
00:32:11.540 --> 00:32:18.460
Legislation including GATT, NAFTA and freedom to farm also reflect pursuit of economic efficiency

334
00:32:18.460 --> 00:32:24.020
as does the teaching of many present-day professional economists, and he's complaining about this.

335
00:32:24.020 --> 00:32:28.060
He's complaining that people want to make the most efficient use of resources in farming

336
00:32:28.060 --> 00:32:32.860
is a bad thing, and we shouldn't allow that.

337
00:32:32.860 --> 00:32:34.540
Labor unions usually say the same thing.

338
00:32:34.540 --> 00:32:41.100
They're always complaining about economic efficiency, which is pretty bizarre in a competitive

339
00:32:41.100 --> 00:32:42.900
world economy.

340
00:32:42.900 --> 00:32:46.980
One more, there's Richard Rogers, professor of resource economics at the University of

341
00:32:46.980 --> 00:32:52.420
of Massachusetts and his co-author Richard Sexton, Professor of Agricultural and Resource

342
00:32:52.420 --> 00:32:59.540
Economics at University of California Davis, they say that markets for raw agricultural

343
00:32:59.540 --> 00:33:09.300
products are likely to be structural oligopsinies and that monopsony slash oligopsiny issues

344
00:33:09.300 --> 00:33:13.340
deserve strong consideration in food policy debates.

345
00:33:13.340 --> 00:33:18.220
These are the models of market failure that I was referring to, and these are people that

346
00:33:18.220 --> 00:33:23.460
once again are making models saying that first of all it's false that there's free markets

347
00:33:23.460 --> 00:33:28.140
in most agricultural products because there's so much intervention, and then second they're

348
00:33:28.140 --> 00:33:33.860
saying we need to model these free markets as somehow being insidious because there's

349
00:33:33.860 --> 00:33:38.460
not enough competition in them.

350
00:33:38.460 --> 00:33:42.220
So I guess you get the message of what I'm saying here is that there's a whole industry

351
00:33:42.220 --> 00:33:48.020
of Economists, that they look at agricultural policy, which started out as one big system

352
00:33:48.020 --> 00:33:57.300
of creating cartels, and it has ended up continuing to try to do that, to transfer income to farmers

353
00:33:57.300 --> 00:34:02.500
from the rest of the population, with massive intervention, with the credit programs and

354
00:34:02.500 --> 00:34:07.300
the regulations and the EPA regulations that affect all farmers and everything else.

355
00:34:07.300 --> 00:34:11.260
And they call this, they tend to refer to this as free market, and they condemn the

356
00:34:11.260 --> 00:34:15.300
Free Market. They don't condemn the agricultural programs, and when they do, they sometimes

357
00:34:15.300 --> 00:34:21.980
get fired for condemning the programs. And so, we really need more people like Eddie

358
00:34:21.980 --> 00:34:28.140
Passour on our side of the things. And I recommend to any of you who want to follow up on this

359
00:34:28.140 --> 00:34:33.980
to look him up on the web and read some of his articles on agricultural economics, because

360
00:34:33.980 --> 00:34:39.480
he really is the one free market Austrian-oriented economist that I know of who has spent a

361
00:34:39.480 --> 00:34:44.280
a career writing and researching on agricultural economics and has written a lot of good stuff,

362
00:34:44.280 --> 00:34:47.760
but I can't think of another one, I don't know of another one that's out there other

363
00:34:47.760 --> 00:34:51.800
than, we have Rich Wilkie in the audience, he's sort of the closest, where's Rich at,

364
00:34:51.800 --> 00:34:59.480
he's, is he here, oh there he is, he's probably the closest we can get, but he's not been

365
00:34:59.480 --> 00:35:05.080
as prolific as Eddie Passour, I've been reading his articles for 25 years and he's a publishing

366
00:35:05.080 --> 00:35:07.280
in Dynamo.

367
00:35:07.280 --> 00:35:12.800
And so one final comment I'll make about this is that one of the things I've found out in

368
00:35:12.800 --> 00:35:17.440
digging into some of this literature is that the agricultural economists, like a lot of

369
00:35:17.440 --> 00:35:24.560
economists that aren't in agriculture, that research other areas, they claim to be positive

370
00:35:24.560 --> 00:35:25.560
economists.

371
00:35:25.560 --> 00:35:29.880
That is, they'll write things and they'll explain how a policy works, for example.

372
00:35:29.880 --> 00:35:34.280
And so, even if they do take the big step and explain how one of these cartel policies

373
00:35:34.280 --> 00:35:37.800
works, they'll never make a judgment saying that it's good or bad.

374
00:35:37.800 --> 00:35:41.080
They'll say, it's not my role to say it's good or bad.

375
00:35:41.080 --> 00:35:46.880
And that's one big difference between the Austrians, most Austrians anyway, and the mainstream,

376
00:35:46.880 --> 00:35:51.560
is that if we see a policy that is sort of an immoral rip-off of the consumer, we call

377
00:35:51.560 --> 00:35:56.040
it an immoral rip-off of the consumer, we're not afraid to.

378
00:35:56.040 --> 00:35:58.920
But we're not paid by the USDA.

379
00:35:58.920 --> 00:36:02.360
And so, but if you're paid by the USDA, you can't say that.

380
00:36:02.360 --> 00:36:07.720
And so I don't know how many times in my career I've had letters or emails from people responding

381
00:36:07.720 --> 00:36:14.920
to my articles saying something like, by academics, or comment, or personal comments, saying something

382
00:36:14.920 --> 00:36:19.720
to say, gee, why don't you tell us what you think, DeLorenzo?

383
00:36:19.720 --> 00:36:22.440
What am I supposed to tell them what I don't think?

384
00:36:22.440 --> 00:36:24.600
And that's sort of the attitude.

385
00:36:24.600 --> 00:36:28.480
What do you mean, tell, you know, sarcastically tell us what you think?

386
00:36:28.480 --> 00:36:31.480
If you're an academic and you're a writer and you're a researcher, isn't that what you're

387
00:36:31.480 --> 00:36:32.480
doing?

388
00:36:32.480 --> 00:36:40.400
It should be, but these people are so cowed into not wanting to disturb their financial

389
00:36:40.400 --> 00:36:46.320
benefactors, the government, that they never ever make a statement on good or bad.

390
00:36:46.320 --> 00:36:49.120
They're scared to death they might lose their funding.

391
00:36:49.120 --> 00:36:54.720
Again, it's not everybody who's in this business, but I think that's true of some of the big

392
00:36:54.720 --> 00:37:01.000
shots that I've looked up to prepare this talk, some of the highlights in the agricultural

393
00:37:01.000 --> 00:37:02.000
economics business.

394
00:37:02.000 --> 00:37:06.880
And I went to school with some of these people, I went to Virginia Tech and I can remember

395
00:37:06.880 --> 00:37:13.520
taking a statistics class with one of the smartest and most brilliant statisticians

396
00:37:13.520 --> 00:37:19.000
I could ever imagine is employed in the United States, the guy was great.

397
00:37:19.000 --> 00:37:22.760
But the one thing that impeded my learning in that class was that I was in that class

398
00:37:22.760 --> 00:37:27.880
with all the ag-econ people and they would all come into class every day with chewing

399
00:37:27.880 --> 00:37:33.720
tobacco being spit out into a Coke can and horse manure on their boots and the professors

400
00:37:33.720 --> 00:37:39.040
smoked a cigar and so I would sit there with a cigar smoke and the manure and the tobacco

401
00:37:39.040 --> 00:37:45.760
juice and by 50 minutes my head was pounding and I didn't learn nearly as much statistic.

402
00:37:45.760 --> 00:37:49.080
Maybe that's why I'm so critical today of these people.

403
00:37:49.080 --> 00:37:51.080
I think my time is about up.

404
00:37:51.080 --> 00:37:52.080
Thank you very much.

405
00:37:52.080 --> 00:37:54.080
Thank you very much.