WEBVTT

NOTE Austrian Economics and Investing

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.500
So our next speaker is Joe Colandro.

2
00:00:05.500 --> 00:00:12.200
He's an enterprise risk manager of a global financial services firm.

3
00:00:12.200 --> 00:00:16.100
And he's a faculty member at the University of Connecticut,

4
00:00:16.100 --> 00:00:22.700
where he designs and teaches MBA courses in value investing and risk management.

5
00:00:22.700 --> 00:00:27.600
He has a new book coming out called Applied Value Investing.

6
00:00:27.600 --> 00:00:29.600
And I'm holding it up right here.

7
00:00:29.600 --> 00:00:39.360
Applied Value Investing, so we're going to fill this in later with the magic of media.

8
00:00:39.360 --> 00:00:44.600
Joe, please join us. We're running about 10 minutes late, but we'll be sure and get you all.

9
00:00:44.600 --> 00:00:59.560
Thank you all. Before I start, I would like to thank the Mises Institute as well as the sponsors of this great event for inviting me to speak today.

10
00:00:59.560 --> 00:01:04.880
When I got here this morning, I was speaking with a friend of mine, Robert Blumen, who's

11
00:01:04.880 --> 00:01:11.440
a pioneer in Austrian financial economics, and he asked me, you know, when are you speaking?

12
00:01:11.440 --> 00:01:15.120
So I told him what my slot was, and I was somewhat complaining a little bit because

13
00:01:15.120 --> 00:01:16.800
the speaker after me is Lew Rockwell.

14
00:01:16.800 --> 00:01:21.320
It's like, I don't want comparisons with Lew Rockwell.

15
00:01:21.320 --> 00:01:26.160
And Robert said to me in the insightful way that only he could say it, he goes, Joe, it

16
00:01:26.160 --> 00:01:27.160
could be worse.

17
00:01:27.160 --> 00:01:28.160
It could be a lot worse.

18
00:01:28.160 --> 00:01:40.360
So by way of background, I traded currencies and commodities in the 1990s, and I did exceptionally

19
00:01:40.360 --> 00:01:42.200
well for about four years.

20
00:01:42.200 --> 00:01:49.600
At year five, I was caught in the Asian contagion, and my fortunes were reversed, if you will.

21
00:01:49.600 --> 00:01:54.740
So examining the mistakes I made, and I made quite a few, led me to the study of Austrian

22
00:01:54.740 --> 00:01:59.020
and Economics and Value Investing, which was fortunate in a sense, timing-wise.

23
00:01:59.020 --> 00:02:03.620
Now I say it was fortunate because there were parallels with what I was seeing in the 1990s

24
00:02:03.620 --> 00:02:09.060
in the new economy and what I was reading about from the new era in the 1920s.

25
00:02:09.060 --> 00:02:13.900
And significantly, from an investment point of view, Austrian business cycle theory predicted

26
00:02:13.900 --> 00:02:18.740
both the boom and bust waves of both business cycles, which is important from an investment

27
00:02:18.740 --> 00:02:19.740
perspective.

28
00:02:19.740 --> 00:02:23.100
So I started out writing memos for select friends of mine.

29
00:02:23.100 --> 00:02:27.180
Those memos turned into working papers, some of which I actually presented at earlier Austrian

30
00:02:27.180 --> 00:02:29.140
Scholars Conferences.

31
00:02:29.140 --> 00:02:33.440
Working papers turned into journal articles, including in the Quarterly Journal of Austrian

32
00:02:33.440 --> 00:02:38.540
Economics and some of those ended up in my book which was recently published.

33
00:02:38.540 --> 00:02:45.220
Now the thesis of my talk today is that good economics facilitates good investing.

34
00:02:45.220 --> 00:02:48.980
And I'd like to begin with something that Warren Buffett said about investment.

35
00:02:48.980 --> 00:02:53.500
He indicated that investment students need only two well-taught courses.

36
00:02:53.500 --> 00:02:57.940
The first is how to value a business and the second is how to think about market prices.

37
00:02:57.940 --> 00:03:01.900
Now if I was coming up with courses, I would add two more of those, one of which is how

38
00:03:01.900 --> 00:03:05.240
to think about money, but that's for another time.

39
00:03:05.240 --> 00:03:10.700
Now with respect to the linkage between business valuation and market prices, I note that Mises

40
00:03:10.700 --> 00:03:16.120
stated in his seminal 1920 article that quote, where there is no free market, there is no

41
00:03:16.120 --> 00:03:22.240
No Pricing Mechanism, and Without a Pricing Mechanism, There is No Economic Calculation."

42
00:03:22.240 --> 00:03:27.400
So there's a direct correlation between valuing a business and market pricing. So in other

43
00:03:27.400 --> 00:03:32.480
words, good economics facilitates good investing. And by economics, for purposes of this talk,

44
00:03:32.480 --> 00:03:37.240
I mean the science which studies human behavior as a relationship between ends and scarce

45
00:03:37.240 --> 00:03:43.920
means which have alternative uses. And that of course is Lionel Robbins' famous definition.

46
00:03:43.920 --> 00:03:48.360
Now what do I mean by investment? What's the definition for investment? And as Rothbard

47
00:03:48.360 --> 00:03:54.240
indicated, quote, the capitalist entrepreneur buys factors or factor services in the present,

48
00:03:54.240 --> 00:03:58.520
his product must be sold in the future. He's always on the lookout then for discrepancies

49
00:03:58.520 --> 00:04:03.200
for areas where he can earn more than the market rate of interest, close quotes. So

50
00:04:03.200 --> 00:04:08.500
price discrepancies. Well, how do investors do that? And according to Mises, open quotes,

51
00:04:08.500 --> 00:04:13.360
the books in the balance sheets are the conscience of business. They are also the businessman's

52
00:04:13.360 --> 00:04:19.240
Compass, close quotes. The books and the balance sheets, not just the books. And the

53
00:04:19.240 --> 00:04:24.660
method that I found that facilitates the analysis of both the books and the balance sheets the

54
00:04:24.660 --> 00:04:30.960
best is the modern gram and dot approach. And it proceeds over a unique value continuum

55
00:04:30.960 --> 00:04:35.360
analytically. It begins with the balance sheet and net asset value, proceeds to the books

56
00:04:35.360 --> 00:04:41.280
and earnings power value, and then potentially proceeds to franchise value competitive advantage

57
00:04:41.280 --> 00:04:45.680
Research Analysis and then potentially Growth Value, which is the final and least tangible

58
00:04:45.680 --> 00:04:48.080
aspect on the continuum.

59
00:04:48.080 --> 00:04:52.720
Now value investing was founded by Benjamin Graham, the late great Benjamin Graham, in

60
00:04:52.720 --> 00:04:55.060
the 1920s and 1930s.

61
00:04:55.060 --> 00:05:00.120
He was heavily influenced by the New Era boom of the 1920s and the subsequent Buster or

62
00:05:00.120 --> 00:05:01.120
Great Depression.

63
00:05:01.120 --> 00:05:06.640
Now significantly, especially for purposes of this talk, he founded a price discrepancy

64
00:05:06.640 --> 00:05:07.640
Based Strategy.

65
00:05:07.640 --> 00:05:13.040
In its original formulation, it involved buying assets less than the liquidation value, which

66
00:05:13.040 --> 00:05:17.860
resulted in a significant price discrepancy or what we call the margin of safety.

67
00:05:17.860 --> 00:05:22.120
Now this concept of a margin of safety is the cornerstone of the approach and remains

68
00:05:22.120 --> 00:05:27.280
so to this day, and it is what differentiates an investment from a speculation to Graham

69
00:05:27.280 --> 00:05:28.560
and his students.

70
00:05:28.560 --> 00:05:32.680
Now Graham's most famous student obviously is Warren Buffett, but there have been others

71
00:05:32.680 --> 00:05:39.680
The difference between bottom-up analysis and top-down analysis is somewhat analogous to the difference between mindset analysis and top-down analysis.

72
00:06:02.680 --> 00:06:05.680
Microeconomics and Macroeconomics

73
00:06:05.680 --> 00:06:09.680
Microeconomics pertains to individual action, supply, demand, pricing

74
00:06:09.680 --> 00:06:12.680
things we can all get our arms around

75
00:06:12.680 --> 00:06:15.680
whereas macroeconomics involves aggregate analysis

76
00:06:15.680 --> 00:06:18.680
gets very murky, there's definitional problems and the like

77
00:06:18.680 --> 00:06:21.680
Similarly, the difference between fundamental analysis

78
00:06:21.680 --> 00:06:24.680
and portfolio analysis is somewhat similar

79
00:06:24.680 --> 00:06:27.680
meaning fundamental analysis is concentrated on price discrepancies

80
00:06:27.680 --> 00:06:30.680
looking for areas where there's a difference between

81
00:06:30.680 --> 00:07:00.680
between Value and What You Can Buy the Assets for Today and Portfolio Analysis which is more concerned with top-down efficient frontiers and asset allocation strategies and significantly for the purposes of this talk portfolio analysis in many ways forms the basis of some of the risk models that did not perform very well in the credit crisis and to understand why I included a quote from Murray Rothbard which indicates quote it is certainly

82
00:07:00.680 --> 00:07:05.560
It is not legitimate and necessary for economics and working out an analysis of reality to

83
00:07:05.560 --> 00:07:10.520
isolate different segments for concentration as the analysis proceeds, but it is not legitimate

84
00:07:10.520 --> 00:07:15.960
to falsify reality in this separation so that the final analysis does not present a correct

85
00:07:15.960 --> 00:07:21.000
picture of the individual parts and their interrelations."

86
00:07:21.000 --> 00:07:26.920
And I would indicate that one of the reasons why some of the quantitative models have collapsed

87
00:07:26.920 --> 00:07:30.640
is because they did not present a correct picture of either the individual parts, meaning

88
00:07:30.640 --> 00:07:37.640
and Individual Securities, or their interrelations, especially under conditions of stress.

89
00:07:37.640 --> 00:07:42.120
Value investing begins with three core principles, and while these principles are associated

90
00:07:42.120 --> 00:07:47.200
with the school, they don't necessarily need to be unique to the school, meaning they could

91
00:07:47.200 --> 00:07:52.000
apply to any form of investment, and the first one is knowledge-based.

92
00:07:52.000 --> 00:07:57.320
To begin my discussion, I'd like to paraphrase something that Frederic Hayek said in his

93
00:07:57.320 --> 00:08:12.320
The recognition of the insupportable limits to his knowledge ought indeed to teach the student of investment a lesson of humility which should guard him against becoming an accomplice in men's failed striving to achieve quick and easy returns.

94
00:08:12.320 --> 00:08:18.320
In other words, human knowledge is inherently limited, and in many cases, it's severely limited.

95
00:08:18.320 --> 00:08:25.320
And as a result, from an investment perspective, you greatly increase the probability of success if you focus on what you know.

96
00:08:25.320 --> 00:08:29.920
Benjamin Graham referred to this as the circle of competence and with respect to

97
00:08:29.920 --> 00:08:33.680
the circle of competence Warren Buffett indicated that the size of that circle

98
00:08:33.680 --> 00:08:39.120
is not important but knowing its boundaries is vital and that's important

99
00:08:39.120 --> 00:08:42.480
because when you're doing a bottom-up evaluation you have to know which

100
00:08:42.480 --> 00:08:46.320
adjustments you have the expertise to make yourself and which require the

101
00:08:46.320 --> 00:08:50.120
services of an expert and I'll give you two examples of what I mean by that

102
00:08:50.120 --> 00:09:00.120
There's a show on cable television called Pawn Stars, and it's a family-run pawn shop in Las Vegas run by a family of entrepreneurs who are very, very savvy.

103
00:09:00.120 --> 00:09:09.120
But every now and then someone will come in the store with an item that's very specialized and they can't either assess its originality, if it's real, or price it, so they call in an expert.

104
00:09:09.120 --> 00:09:13.120
And many value investors do the same type of thing.

105
00:09:43.120 --> 00:09:47.960
I have an insurance background, so I wrote about Warren Buffett's Geico acquisition,

106
00:09:47.960 --> 00:09:50.600
Jennery acquisition, and Pepsi Play for a billion sweepstakes.

107
00:09:50.600 --> 00:09:53.920
So one of my students said, hey, you know, all right, you're real good when it comes

108
00:09:53.920 --> 00:09:56.920
to that type of stuff, but could you do like retail?

109
00:09:56.920 --> 00:09:59.160
Way, way out of my circle of competence.

110
00:09:59.160 --> 00:10:03.240
So I took a crack at it and I followed the framework level by level.

111
00:10:03.240 --> 00:10:04.800
I do not know Mr. Lampert.

112
00:10:04.800 --> 00:10:10.500
I don't know how he values investments, but using this approach and using it conservatively,

113
00:10:10.500 --> 00:10:14.980
I was able to come up with a value relatively close to what he paid for Sears.

114
00:10:14.980 --> 00:10:19.260
So again, you may not have as an individual investor the means to go out and hire a professional

115
00:10:19.260 --> 00:10:23.300
yourself, but you do know people and you do have resources you could tap as you conduct

116
00:10:23.300 --> 00:10:26.280
your investment analysis.

117
00:10:26.280 --> 00:10:31.100
Even if you're operating within a circle of competence, you could still be wrong.

118
00:10:31.100 --> 00:10:36.140
As Mises indicates, quote, man does not always act correctly from the objective point of

119
00:10:36.140 --> 00:10:37.140
view.

120
00:10:37.140 --> 00:10:48.060
Either from ignorance of causal relations or because of an erroneous judgment of the given situation, in order to realize his ends, he acts differently from the way in which he would act if he had correct information."

121
00:10:48.060 --> 00:10:53.860
In other words, as an investor, you could be wrong for any number of reasons, quantitative, qualitative, or behavioral.

122
00:10:53.860 --> 00:11:00.540
And as a result, you should approach each adjustment very, very conservatively or each valuation very, very conservatively.

123
00:11:00.540 --> 00:11:04.060
However, even if you do so, you could still be wrong.

124
00:11:04.060 --> 00:11:06.620
As Rothbard has indicated, quote,

125
00:11:06.620 --> 00:11:08.660
this world is a world of uncertainty.

126
00:11:08.660 --> 00:11:10.900
We shall never be able to forecast the future course

127
00:11:10.900 --> 00:11:12.900
of the world with precision.

128
00:11:12.900 --> 00:11:14.980
Every action therefore involves risk.

129
00:11:14.980 --> 00:11:17.340
This risk cannot be eliminated.

130
00:11:17.340 --> 00:11:20.020
The man who keeps his cash balances suffers the risk

131
00:11:20.020 --> 00:11:21.980
that his purchasing power may dwindle.

132
00:11:21.980 --> 00:11:23.980
The man who invests suffers the risk of loss

133
00:11:23.980 --> 00:11:25.940
and so forth, close quotes.

134
00:11:25.940 --> 00:11:29.620
So how do successful investors manage or mitigate this risk?

135
00:11:29.620 --> 00:11:32.860
Well, they discover discrepancies between present prices

136
00:11:32.860 --> 00:11:37.740
and the anticipated prices of products lest the market rates of interest and are interested

137
00:11:37.740 --> 00:11:40.660
and are eager to profit from them.

138
00:11:40.660 --> 00:11:45.420
Value investors in general have operationalized this by the margin of safety concept and the

139
00:11:45.420 --> 00:11:50.300
rule of thumb basis holds that the price you pay for an asset should be at least 30% less

140
00:11:50.300 --> 00:11:53.900
than conservatively estimated value.

141
00:11:53.900 --> 00:11:59.780
When you apply those principles in evaluation, absent of firm experiencing performance issues,

142
00:11:59.780 --> 00:12:04.500
What you're going to see most of the time is the net asset value relatively reconciling

143
00:12:04.500 --> 00:12:09.620
with the earnings power value and the reason for that is because most firms earn the rate

144
00:12:09.620 --> 00:12:15.100
required by capital providers and as a result are valued at an amount consistent with the

145
00:12:15.100 --> 00:12:18.920
reproduction value of their assets, no more, no less.

146
00:12:18.920 --> 00:12:23.700
But every now and then you're going to come across a firm with earnings power significantly

147
00:12:23.700 --> 00:12:29.460
greater than the net asset value and that will tip you off of the existence of a potential

148
00:12:29.460 --> 00:12:32.880
Sustainable Competitive Advantage.

149
00:12:32.880 --> 00:12:37.140
Value investors refer to that type of firm as a franchise and a number of my students

150
00:12:37.140 --> 00:12:41.860
ask me, what is it, how do you start one, what are some of the characteristics of one?

151
00:12:41.860 --> 00:12:47.540
And effectively, franchise begins with the entrepreneur and as Mises noted, quote, the

152
00:12:47.540 --> 00:12:52.140
business of the entrepreneur is to select from the multitude of technologically feasible

153
00:12:52.140 --> 00:12:56.620
methods those which are best fit to supply the public in the cheapest way with the things

154
00:12:56.620 --> 00:13:03.340
is there asking for most urgently." Now, for the most part, entrepreneurs can't do that

155
00:13:03.340 --> 00:13:10.820
themselves, so they start a firm or an enterprise. And as Mises also noted, open quotes, a profit-seeking

156
00:13:10.820 --> 00:13:16.260
enterprise is supported by the voluntary patronage of the public. It cannot subsist if customers

157
00:13:16.260 --> 00:13:23.340
do not pour in. Now, this concept of customers pouring in is very important because if a

158
00:13:23.340 --> 00:13:28.460
The firm is able to do that, meaning voluntarily now, produce goods and services people want

159
00:13:28.460 --> 00:13:31.900
to buy to the extent that they pour in to buy them.

160
00:13:31.900 --> 00:13:37.260
They effectively evolve from what I call a base case firm or a firm showing a value profile

161
00:13:37.260 --> 00:13:41.500
with assets equaling earnings to a franchise.

162
00:13:41.500 --> 00:13:47.900
And Murray Rothbard describes how this evolution occurs, quote, the elemental physical nature

163
00:13:47.900 --> 00:13:53.820
The structure of a good may be only one of its properties, in some cases a brand name.

164
00:13:53.820 --> 00:13:57.600
The goodwill of a particular company or a more pleasant atmosphere in the store will

165
00:13:57.600 --> 00:14:02.660
differentiate the product from its rivals in the view of many of its customers."

166
00:14:02.660 --> 00:14:07.180
So let's kind of see what one of those looks like.

167
00:14:07.180 --> 00:14:13.820
On the overhead is my valuation of Warren Buffett's 1995 acquisition of Geico.

168
00:14:13.820 --> 00:14:15.180
Now I don't know Mr. Buffett.

169
00:14:15.180 --> 00:14:19.820
I did work for one of his subsidiaries at one time, but I don't know how he values assets.

170
00:14:19.820 --> 00:14:24.060
I don't know what valuation methodology he used, but I do know he was a student of Benjamin

171
00:14:24.060 --> 00:14:26.860
Graham and he's a long-time proponent of the system.

172
00:14:26.860 --> 00:14:33.540
And when he purchased Geico, he paid approximately $70 a share for it, which was about 26% price

173
00:14:33.540 --> 00:14:38.020
premium over the stock price at the time, and it surprised many people.

174
00:14:38.020 --> 00:14:44.100
So when I valued, when I valued Geico, I came to, my earnings power value came to $69 a

175
00:15:14.100 --> 00:15:18.800
And with the benefit of hindsight, he made many multiples of that given the level of

176
00:15:18.800 --> 00:15:21.900
profitability Geico has generated over the years.

177
00:15:21.900 --> 00:15:23.660
It was a master stroke.

178
00:15:23.660 --> 00:15:28.340
So the question you may ask now is, all right, well, he did it with Geico, what's the next

179
00:15:28.340 --> 00:15:29.340
Geico?

180
00:15:29.340 --> 00:15:32.980
I mean, what's the key driver of franchise value?

181
00:15:32.980 --> 00:15:36.100
And in short, it's management.

182
00:15:36.100 --> 00:15:41.500
And as Mises noted, quote, the profit motive is precisely the factor that forces the businessman

183
00:15:41.500 --> 00:15:47.340
and to provide in the most efficient way those commodities the consumers most want to use."

184
00:15:47.340 --> 00:15:53.100
So again, there's a very customer focus to a franchise, but as I indicated, entrepreneurs

185
00:15:53.100 --> 00:15:57.780
and firms really can't do this themselves, so they have to have other people voluntarily

186
00:15:57.780 --> 00:15:59.060
help them.

187
00:15:59.060 --> 00:16:03.580
And as a result, one of the qualifications required for any higher position is precisely

188
00:16:03.580 --> 00:16:05.980
the ability to judge people correctly.

189
00:16:05.980 --> 00:16:11.100
He who fails in this regard jeopardizes his chances of success, and he's exactly right.

190
00:16:11.100 --> 00:16:15.560
And as a result, the fourth course I would teach to investment students today, in addition

191
00:16:15.560 --> 00:16:19.780
to how to think about market prices, how to value a business and how to think about money,

192
00:16:19.780 --> 00:16:21.620
would be management, how to manage people.

193
00:16:21.620 --> 00:16:26.500
There's been a lot written on this and some of it's better than others, but anecdotally

194
00:16:26.500 --> 00:16:31.220
and in my opinion, successful managers have four core things in common.

195
00:16:31.220 --> 00:16:35.100
The first is they have to have entrepreneurial insight and discipline.

196
00:16:35.100 --> 00:16:39.780
Now they don't necessarily have to be entrepreneurs themselves, but they do have to have insight

197
00:16:39.780 --> 00:16:56.540
Second, they have to know how to select, incentivize, develop and retain talent, third, they have

198
00:16:56.540 --> 00:17:05.100
to effectively assign decision rights, and fourth, they have to be fanatical about profit

199
00:17:05.100 --> 00:17:06.100
Profit and Loss

200
00:17:06.100 --> 00:17:10.060
Now notice I said fanatical about profit and loss, I did not say fanatical about the stock

201
00:17:10.060 --> 00:17:11.060
price.

202
00:17:11.060 --> 00:17:20.060
If you can find somebody who can do this consistently over time, and they're very, very rare, you

203
00:17:20.060 --> 00:17:22.860
will generate significant abnormal returns over time.

204
00:17:22.860 --> 00:17:27.380
There's another way to generate significant abnormal returns over time and that has to

205
00:17:27.380 --> 00:17:32.380
do not with a firm approach but with more of a kind of a macro approach.

206
00:17:32.380 --> 00:17:36.580
Now I know what I said at the beginning of the talk that value investors in general are

207
00:17:36.580 --> 00:17:42.420
bottom-up, not top-down focused, and that's true, but I note that even Ben Graham himself

208
00:17:42.420 --> 00:17:47.680
once said that, quote, you should buy during periods of pessimism and low prices and sell

209
00:17:47.680 --> 00:17:51.140
during periods of optimism and high prices.

210
00:17:51.140 --> 00:17:56.460
I think it would be easier to do that if you understood the macroeconomic reasons driving

211
00:17:56.460 --> 00:17:59.500
the pessimism and optimism, and I took it a step further.

212
00:17:59.500 --> 00:18:03.900
I think you could use macro-based insights to screen for potential business opportunities

213
00:18:03.900 --> 00:18:08.540
and one way of doing that is through the efficient use of Austrian business cycle theory.

214
00:18:08.540 --> 00:18:12.940
Now there were a number of other speakers today who spoke about this so I'm not going

215
00:18:12.940 --> 00:18:13.940
to define it.

216
00:18:13.940 --> 00:18:16.740
I'm going to move right into my example.

217
00:18:16.740 --> 00:18:23.820
Now the left chart on the overhead was created by George Soros, who's a favorite speculator

218
00:18:23.820 --> 00:18:27.420
and one of my two favorite investors, Warren Buffett being the other.

219
00:18:27.420 --> 00:18:32.940
And as I said, I have a trading background, someone with a trading background. The first

220
00:18:32.940 --> 00:18:38.340
time I saw that chart, it just had the right kind of feel to it. And again, I rode the

221
00:18:38.340 --> 00:18:44.620
Asian Contagion, I rode the good wave and I got clubbed in the bus, right? So from experience

222
00:18:44.620 --> 00:18:51.220
too, it mirrored what I saw. But he didn't provide, you know, definite criteria for each

223
00:18:51.220 --> 00:18:55.860
of the eight stages that are listed on the x-axis. So what I did is I used Austrian business

224
00:18:55.860 --> 00:19:05.860
I used his technical model, as well as behavioral economics and Soros' reflexive theory, and I came up with criteria for each of the eight stages of the business cycle.

225
00:19:05.860 --> 00:19:11.860
And I applied them to the new economy business cycle, and you see my application on the chart on the right.

226
00:19:11.860 --> 00:19:20.860
Now, this isn't completely a retrospective analysis. I actually started this in stage five, and I was making calls.

227
00:19:20.860 --> 00:19:28.860
I wasn't timing this market. That's impossible to do. George Soros can't do it. There's no reason why I would think I could do it.

228
00:19:28.860 --> 00:19:34.860
And we can't do it. So I didn't even try. But you did say, okay, this is where we are now. This is what's going to happen.

229
00:19:34.860 --> 00:19:37.860
Not quite sure when, but here's kind of how you should protect yourself.

230
00:19:37.860 --> 00:19:43.860
And it started off with just verbal consultation with friends, started off to a memo, then a paper, and then another paper.

231
00:19:43.860 --> 00:19:49.860
And I can't, due to time constraints here, go through each of the criteria, but I will go through one.

232
00:19:49.860 --> 00:19:59.860
And I want you to focus on the left-hand side chart, stage three, the significant short-term top is what I call it.

233
00:19:59.860 --> 00:20:06.860
And that's a very important technical indicator because it means if you follow that over the life cycle of the boom and bust waves,

234
00:20:06.860 --> 00:20:14.860
once the bust prices blow through that level of support, it effectively creates a speculative bubble.

235
00:20:14.860 --> 00:20:19.540
So, specular bubbles don't pop. It's basically just a price structure that forms over the

236
00:20:19.540 --> 00:20:24.140
boom and bust waves of a business cycle. So, what does that mean? Earlier this morning

237
00:20:24.140 --> 00:20:30.000
Doug French quoted a famous economist from Chicago who said, I don't even know, I don't

238
00:20:30.000 --> 00:20:33.860
know what bubbles are, I don't know what they mean. And I think what he meant by that is,

239
00:20:33.860 --> 00:20:39.560
he's a mathematical economist. Mathematically, this is very difficult to do. I spent a year

240
00:20:39.560 --> 00:20:45.320
You're trying to do it after I traded. Again, I had a lot of bad habits to unlearn. My numbing

241
00:20:45.320 --> 00:20:51.200
math didn't make any sense, was completely wrong, and it was the wrong approach. And it's

242
00:20:51.200 --> 00:20:56.960
the wrong approach because, as the Austrians tell us, economics is not a quantitative science,

243
00:20:56.960 --> 00:21:01.360
it's a qualitative science. And you could make qualitative predictions and they're intellectually

244
00:21:01.360 --> 00:21:05.480
valid but more importantly for those of us in this room, they're actionable. You can

245
00:21:05.480 --> 00:21:17.800
Let me sum up my thoughts. Pricing and valuation, as I hope I've been able to convey, is predominantly

246
00:21:17.800 --> 00:21:23.000
about people voluntarily buying and selling, and the resources allocated to produce goods

247
00:21:23.000 --> 00:21:29.000
and services they want to buy and sell. Therefore, buying a security is like buying anything else.

248
00:21:29.000 --> 00:21:33.920
You likely would not buy a compact disc based on a cross-section of different musical genres

249
00:21:33.920 --> 00:21:44.120
As investors, we must know what we're buying, why, what we expect to get out of it, and

250
00:21:44.120 --> 00:21:46.840
when, on every deal we make.

251
00:21:46.840 --> 00:21:52.720
Value investing is a proven method of doing that over time.

252
00:21:52.720 --> 00:21:57.440
There's also potential, value potential, buying into a privilege early, and I gave you an

253
00:21:57.440 --> 00:22:00.240
example of business cycles, there's potentially a way to do that.

254
00:22:00.240 --> 00:22:02.800
But you can also do it on a firm by firm basis.

255
00:22:02.800 --> 00:22:07.380
I'm doing a paper right now on Warren Buffett's Burlington Northern Deal, and no, railroads

256
00:22:07.380 --> 00:22:11.960
are not in my circle of competence, so I'm being very careful as to how I put this together.

257
00:22:11.960 --> 00:22:18.240
Doug French reviewed an early draft of that paper for me, and you know, railroads have

258
00:22:18.240 --> 00:22:21.680
a long history in the United States of governmental privileges, and one of the things that came

259
00:22:21.680 --> 00:22:26.800
out of the research was they're very well positioned to benefit again under the Obama

260
00:22:26.800 --> 00:22:31.520
administration, and if that does happen, it could greatly increase the value of this acquisition

261
00:22:31.520 --> 00:22:32.520
over time.

262
00:22:32.520 --> 00:22:38.040
Now, one cautionary note, if you're going to do this, I mean, if you're going to try to play a government privilege,

263
00:22:38.040 --> 00:22:43.720
you should be very, very conservative and very, very careful, because it's very much a dual-edged sword,

264
00:22:43.720 --> 00:22:47.480
as one very prominent investment bank is finding out right now.

265
00:22:47.480 --> 00:22:55.800
It's just like a boom bust, if you ride it on the boom wave up, you could really be the beneficiary of significant abnormal returns,

266
00:22:55.800 --> 00:22:59.560
but get out before it tops out and protect yourself, especially during a bust.

267
00:22:59.560 --> 00:23:05.000
Now that said, as Murray Rothbard indicates, especially over the last 100 or so years,

268
00:23:05.000 --> 00:23:09.480
there's a very long history of investors and businessmen seeking privileges, quote,

269
00:23:09.480 --> 00:23:14.440
the steel manufacturer seeking a tariff, the bankers seeking taxes to repay their government

270
00:23:14.440 --> 00:23:20.040
bonds, the rulers seeking a strong state from which to obtain subsidies, the bureaucrats wishing to

271
00:23:20.040 --> 00:23:25.160
expand their empire are all professionals in statism. They are constantly at work trying to

272
00:23:25.160 --> 00:23:28.680
to Preserve and Expand their Privileges.

273
00:23:28.680 --> 00:23:32.780
One last word on playing a boom bust or playing a privilege.

274
00:23:32.780 --> 00:23:37.280
Whenever you hear the word new, used to describe market phenomena, especially by a government

275
00:23:37.280 --> 00:23:39.360
official, get ready for a bust.

276
00:23:39.360 --> 00:23:41.760
And I mean directionally, not timing-wise.

277
00:23:41.760 --> 00:23:47.160
We saw that in a new era boom of the 1920s, the new economy, the 1990s, and the recent

278
00:23:47.160 --> 00:23:51.640
new paradigm credit boom that ended in such a disaster.

279
00:23:51.640 --> 00:23:59.400
So, Austrian economics facilitates good investing. However, the converse is not necessarily true.

280
00:23:59.400 --> 00:24:04.280
Good investing does not equate to good economics. An example of this will be after the recent

281
00:24:04.280 --> 00:24:10.080
credit crisis. There were a number of very, very successful investors, many of whom clearly

282
00:24:10.080 --> 00:24:13.960
should have known better, who were clamoring for more state intervention as a result of

283
00:24:13.960 --> 00:24:43.960
and I spoke to a few of them and rather than getting in a shouting match or a debate all I reminded them of was what F.A. Hayek once said that the curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design and usually when I say that many of them said well who's Hayek so I explained who he was and what's Austrian economics and as a former educator that gave me the opening I needed to talk about for the reading.

284
00:24:43.960 --> 00:24:47.880
Mises Institute offers a book called The Mystery of Banking by Murray Rothbard.

285
00:24:47.880 --> 00:24:51.400
I strongly recommend it to every investment professional.

286
00:24:51.400 --> 00:24:58.480
We live in a time right now where you're no longer able not to really understand banking

287
00:24:58.480 --> 00:25:02.440
and what's going on in the banking community, and that book is a great primer on it.

288
00:25:02.440 --> 00:25:07.600
I just bought my second copy because my first copy has notes written all over it.

289
00:25:07.600 --> 00:25:10.040
I also recommend His America's Great Depression.

290
00:25:10.040 --> 00:25:14.680
For those of you interested in value investing, there's two books in particular I want to

291
00:25:14.680 --> 00:25:16.120
call your attention to.

292
00:25:16.120 --> 00:25:19.760
The sixth edition of Security Analysis just came out last year.

293
00:25:19.760 --> 00:25:24.840
Seth Klarman, who's probably the leading value investor today, served as the lead editor.

294
00:25:24.840 --> 00:25:30.800
In my opinion, if you serve as the lead editor of Security Analysis, you lead the school.

295
00:25:30.800 --> 00:25:34.080
But Seth also wrote a book in 1991 called Margin of Safety.

296
00:25:34.080 --> 00:25:38.180
It's very, very difficult to find, especially priced reasonably.

297
00:25:38.180 --> 00:25:43.260
But it set the stage for all modern work in the field and all authors, including me, that

298
00:25:43.260 --> 00:25:45.100
came after him, worked to that book.

299
00:25:45.100 --> 00:25:48.820
I want to say one more thing because I know there are young students in this room and

300
00:25:48.820 --> 00:25:51.500
I know there are young analysts and young investors.

301
00:25:51.500 --> 00:25:57.080
The field of Austrian finance and Austrian financial economics is really in its infancy

302
00:25:57.080 --> 00:26:03.020
and you have a great opportunity to develop the field both intellectually and from a practical

303
00:26:03.020 --> 00:26:04.020
perspective.

304
00:26:04.020 --> 00:26:08.980
And over the coming years, I'm looking forward to celebrating your success, to reading your

305
00:26:08.980 --> 00:26:12.460
papers and to moving or to advancing the school even further.
