WEBVTT

NOTE The War on Drugs Is a War on Freedom

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.600
My new book is titled, The War on Drugs is a War on Freedom.

2
00:00:04.600 --> 00:00:09.240
Let me say two things about it at the outset.

3
00:00:09.240 --> 00:00:14.280
Number one, the book has its beginnings in the Mises Institute.

4
00:00:14.280 --> 00:00:19.680
And two, this is a book that I never expected to write.

5
00:00:19.680 --> 00:00:24.320
It was almost 20 years ago now that through the Mises Institute,

6
00:00:24.320 --> 00:00:32.600
I discovered Murray Rothbard and quickly became a hardcore libertarian. Absolute drug freedom

7
00:00:32.600 --> 00:00:38.920
is the only consistent libertarian position, and I had no trouble seeing the importance

8
00:00:38.920 --> 00:00:45.640
of maintaining that position. Perhaps the first book I read on the subject was The Economics

9
00:00:45.640 --> 00:00:51.740
of Prohibition by Mark Thornton. Although I had contributed articles to the free market

10
00:00:51.740 --> 00:01:02.400
as far back as 1996 and first wrote for Mises Daily in 2003, it was not until 2009 that

11
00:01:02.400 --> 00:01:08.280
I wrote anything exclusively about the subject of drug freedom.

12
00:01:08.280 --> 00:01:13.300
After reading an article by the philosopher John Gray titled, The Case for Legalizing

13
00:01:13.300 --> 00:01:19.900
All Drugs is Unanswerable, I could see right away that the problem with his unanswerable

14
00:01:19.900 --> 00:01:26.980
argument was that it was strictly utilitarian. It was not an argument based on the freedom

15
00:01:26.980 --> 00:01:33.840
to use drugs for freedom's sake. I immediately wrote a reply that was featured as a Mises

16
00:01:33.840 --> 00:01:43.140
Daily article in October of 2009, and that is the first article that's in this book.

17
00:01:43.140 --> 00:01:48.240
But that's not the only connection this book has with the Mises Institute. At the Austrian

18
00:01:48.240 --> 00:01:54.500
In the 2010 Scholar's Conference, I gave a lecture with the provocative title of The

19
00:01:54.500 --> 00:02:03.360
Moral Case for Drugs. There I argued two things. One, that it is neither the job of government

20
00:02:03.360 --> 00:02:11.760
nor the business of any individual to prohibit, regulate, restrict or otherwise control what

21
00:02:11.760 --> 00:02:21.640
What a man desires to eat, drink, smoke, inject, absorb, snort, sniff, inhale, swallow or otherwise

22
00:02:21.640 --> 00:02:25.320
ingest into his body.

23
00:02:25.320 --> 00:02:32.320
And two, that there is no ethical precept in any religion or moral code that should

24
00:02:32.320 --> 00:02:40.200
lead anyone to believe that it is the job of government to prohibit, regulate, restrict

25
00:02:40.200 --> 00:02:44.640
or otherwise control what a man desires to eat, drink, smoke,

26
00:02:44.640 --> 00:02:48.320
inject, absorb, snort, sniff, inhale, swallow,

27
00:02:48.320 --> 00:02:51.720
or otherwise ingest into his body.

28
00:02:51.720 --> 00:02:55.960
A revised version of my lecture was published later that year

29
00:02:55.960 --> 00:03:00.840
in the magazine Freedom Daily with a better title,

30
00:03:00.840 --> 00:03:04.280
The Moral Case for Drug Freedom.

31
00:03:04.280 --> 00:03:08.440
So why did I never expect to write this book?

32
00:03:08.440 --> 00:03:15.960
Because I am a conservative Christian Libertarian, I don't smoke crack, I don't snort cocaine,

33
00:03:15.960 --> 00:03:22.320
I don't shoot up heroin, I don't pop ecstasy pills or smoke marijuana. However, because

34
00:03:22.320 --> 00:03:27.220
I am a conservative Christian Libertarian, I don't think it's any of my business if

35
00:03:27.220 --> 00:03:36.540
you do any or all of those things. The problem with most Christians, conservative or otherwise,

36
00:03:36.540 --> 00:03:44.340
is that they're not libertarians.

37
00:03:44.340 --> 00:03:52.540
I guess they never heard my Mises Institute lecture is libertarianism compatible with religion.

38
00:03:52.540 --> 00:03:57.820
But anyway, even worse is that many Christians are die-hard prohibitionists.

39
00:03:57.820 --> 00:04:03.340
That is, they want to use the power of the state to enforce morality and stamp out vice.

40
00:04:03.340 --> 00:04:07.340
Naturally, this includes drugs from marijuana on up.

41
00:04:07.340 --> 00:04:13.340
Although I can remember questioning the whole idea of drug prohibition and victimless crimes

42
00:04:13.340 --> 00:04:18.340
when I was just, for lack of a better term, a libertarian-leaning conservative,

43
00:04:18.340 --> 00:04:23.340
my hesitation in writing anything negative about drug prohibition

44
00:04:23.340 --> 00:04:28.340
was due to the pathetically predictable negative reaction

45
00:04:28.340 --> 00:04:41.340
I knew I would receive outside of libertarian circles, and especially due to the hysterical reaction I knew I would receive from some of my conservative Christian brethren.

46
00:04:41.340 --> 00:04:48.340
But once I got started with those first two articles I mentioned, there was no turning back.

47
00:04:48.340 --> 00:04:56.900
The War on Drugs is a War on Freedom is a collection of 19 essays written between October

48
00:04:56.900 --> 00:05:06.300
2009 and July 2012 on the constitutional, moral, philosophical and practical aspects

49
00:05:06.300 --> 00:05:13.340
of the U.S. government's failed war on drugs. After I had written about 15 articles on the

50
00:05:13.340 --> 00:05:19.000
and the general theme of the drug war, I thought it might be good because of my unique perspective

51
00:05:19.000 --> 00:05:25.900
as both a conservative Christian and a hardcore libertarian to collect everything I had written

52
00:05:25.900 --> 00:05:31.820
into a book like I had done for my essays on Christianity and war.

53
00:05:31.820 --> 00:05:34.500
But this is not a religious book.

54
00:05:34.500 --> 00:05:41.060
There is in fact only one essay in the book written from a religious point of view, and

55
00:05:41.060 --> 00:05:48.400
That's called Should Christians Support the War on Drugs, which was an LRC article.

56
00:05:48.400 --> 00:05:54.840
As I mentioned previously, one of the essays was a Mises Daily article, and one was published

57
00:05:54.840 --> 00:05:57.740
in the magazine Freedom Daily.

58
00:05:57.740 --> 00:06:03.740
Of the other 17, one was published in the New American Magazine, and that was a chore

59
00:06:03.740 --> 00:06:07.640
to get that published in that conservative magazine.

60
00:06:07.640 --> 00:06:13.120
One was a column at lewrockwell.com, as I mentioned, and the balance of the essays were

61
00:06:13.120 --> 00:06:19.920
initially written as commentaries for the Future Freedom Foundation. Jacob Hornberger,

62
00:06:19.920 --> 00:06:24.700
the founder and president of the Future and Freedom Foundation, contributed a foreword

63
00:06:24.700 --> 00:06:31.540
to the book. After a summary of each essay in the introduction, I merely present the

64
00:06:31.540 --> 00:06:36.540
I included the essays in chronological order in the form as they were first published.

65
00:06:36.540 --> 00:06:40.540
So all of the essays are actually available online as well.

66
00:06:40.540 --> 00:06:46.540
I conclude in the last essay that the war on drugs should be ended

67
00:06:46.540 --> 00:06:52.540
because it is a war on the free market, a free society and freedom itself.

68
00:06:52.540 --> 00:07:06.540
About the cover. The image on the cover was drawn by political cartoonist Paul Kallstein, who was tragically struck down the 50th year of his life in 2003.

69
00:07:06.540 --> 00:07:16.540
I discovered the image quite by accident and immediately contacted the copyright holder about using it, and he graciously gave me his permission.

70
00:07:16.540 --> 00:07:36.540
I'm not quite sure that he realized exactly what was going to be in the book, but I have the email where he gives me the permission, so I haven't heard from him since, so I don't know if that's good or bad.

71
00:07:36.540 --> 00:07:47.540
The book has been well received. David Gordon did a review, as did the New American Magazine, which kind of surprised me.

72
00:07:47.540 --> 00:07:56.540
I did a few interviews about the book, including with Mike Church and Robert Wenzel and Scott Horton.

73
00:07:56.540 --> 00:08:03.540
No churches have asked me to speak about the book. I'm still waiting for those invitations.

74
00:08:03.540 --> 00:08:07.540
I haven't stopped writing about the evils of the drug war.

75
00:08:07.540 --> 00:08:11.540
Since the book was published, I've written three more essays on the subject,

76
00:08:11.540 --> 00:08:14.540
and I have two more planned for later this year.

77
00:08:14.540 --> 00:08:20.540
This is because it is impossible for anyone to really believe in individual liberty,

78
00:08:20.540 --> 00:08:25.540
the free market, the Constitution, limited government, and a free society,

79
00:08:25.540 --> 00:08:30.540
and at the same time be a proponent or defender of the war on drugs.

80
00:08:30.540 --> 00:08:39.540
Republicans try, but of course they don't really believe in liberty, the Constitution and a free society in the first place.

81
00:08:39.540 --> 00:08:53.540
But if my unique perspective won't entice them to read my essays, then I offer this statement from Ludwig von Mises, certainly no drug user.

82
00:08:53.540 --> 00:08:58.540
I offer this statement for them to consider. Here's Mises.

83
00:08:58.540 --> 00:09:21.540
Opium and morphine are certainly dangerous habit-forming drugs, but once the principle is admitted that it is the duty of government to protect the individual against his own foolishness, no serious objections can be advanced against further encroachments. Thank you.

84
00:09:28.540 --> 00:09:30.540
Thank you very much.