WEBVTT

NOTE Authors Forum: "Anarchy and Law"

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.200
I'm very excited to be here. I'm very excited to introduce this new volume,

2
00:00:05.200 --> 00:00:09.880
Anarchy and the Law, the Political Economy of Choice.

3
00:00:09.880 --> 00:00:14.480
I'll read the first quote on the back of it. It's by P.J. Arorick.

4
00:00:14.480 --> 00:00:23.320
He says, finally, a fit rejoinder to people who begin sentences with there ought to be a law.

5
00:00:23.320 --> 00:00:27.160
Rod Long had a very complimentary description of the book.

6
00:00:27.160 --> 00:00:36.960
This nearly 700-page book is quite simply the definitive collection on free market anarchism.

7
00:00:36.960 --> 00:00:45.720
This, here and now, is it.

8
00:00:45.720 --> 00:00:51.880
This book is an edited volume containing 40 of the most important ideas discussing the

9
00:00:51.880 --> 00:01:16.880
Many people have this very skeptical view of government, skeptical view of politics, but when it comes to law, when it comes to police and courts, many people somehow assume that government is going to be automatically working in the interest of the public.

10
00:01:16.880 --> 00:01:30.880
Private property anarchism, on the other hand, and that's what this book is about, says that, look, just as markets provide bread, so too should markets provide law.

11
00:01:30.880 --> 00:01:41.880
If someone were to argue to you, food is so important, so therefore the government needs to provide food, most people would respond, that would be a total disaster.

12
00:01:41.880 --> 00:01:49.480
And what private property anarchism does is it applies this logic to police and courts as well.

13
00:01:49.480 --> 00:01:53.480
It says because the protection of property rights is so important,

14
00:01:53.480 --> 00:01:55.680
it's the last thing we should leave the government.

15
00:01:55.680 --> 00:01:58.580
We should leave it to private enterprise.

16
00:01:58.580 --> 00:02:03.580
So when many people hear the word anarchy, they say, oh, there's no law.

17
00:02:03.580 --> 00:02:05.280
There's not going to be any private property rights.

18
00:02:05.280 --> 00:02:05.880
No.

19
00:02:05.880 --> 00:02:09.180
Under private property anarchism, there would be law.

20
00:02:09.180 --> 00:02:11.080
There'd be private property rights.

21
00:02:11.080 --> 00:02:14.760
There'd be market forces, there would just be no state.

22
00:02:14.760 --> 00:02:19.760
So police would be provided as it is privately,

23
00:02:19.760 --> 00:02:24.680
as it is in colleges, in casinos, hotels, shopping malls.

24
00:02:24.680 --> 00:02:27.200
Courts would be provided privately

25
00:02:27.200 --> 00:02:31.120
as they are with arbitration and mediation today.

26
00:02:31.120 --> 00:02:33.160
So this current volume brings together

27
00:02:33.160 --> 00:02:38.080
a sampling of the major essays explaining, debating,

28
00:02:38.080 --> 00:02:41.800
and Stateless Orders.

29
00:02:41.800 --> 00:02:43.600
It's 700 pages.

30
00:02:43.600 --> 00:02:45.440
You can see it's kind of big.

31
00:02:45.440 --> 00:02:48.840
Some people ask me, why did it need to be so long?

32
00:02:48.840 --> 00:02:52.880
Actually, it was hard to actually limit it

33
00:02:52.880 --> 00:02:54.520
to only 40 articles, because there's

34
00:02:54.520 --> 00:02:57.520
a lot more that could have been included.

35
00:02:57.520 --> 00:03:01.640
But the main reason I wanted the book to be so big

36
00:03:01.640 --> 00:03:04.160
was I wanted it big enough so people could

37
00:03:04.160 --> 00:03:05.920
use it to help smash the state.

38
00:03:08.080 --> 00:03:24.080
Before I put this book together, there was a lot of great work out there on anarchism, but it was difficult to track down a lot of it.

39
00:03:24.080 --> 00:03:33.080
I found a lot of people were aware of some of the writings but unaware of whole areas of other research.

40
00:03:33.080 --> 00:03:37.080
So what I wanted to do is get this all together in one place.

41
00:03:37.080 --> 00:03:48.580
The book is organized into four sections. The first section presents the major theoretical works that argue in favor of private property anarchism.

42
00:03:48.580 --> 00:04:02.080
The second section contains the writings that debate the viability of private property anarchism, and it contains criticisms by political liberals, and then it contains responses by anarchists.

43
00:04:02.080 --> 00:04:11.080
Section 3 contains some of the early works in individualist anarchism, the precursors to modern libertarian anarchism.

44
00:04:11.080 --> 00:04:18.080
And then it contains a couple of modern articles outlining the history of anarchist thought.

45
00:04:18.080 --> 00:04:29.080
And then finally, the fourth section contains some case studies and historical examples of societies that functioned without government law.

46
00:04:29.080 --> 00:04:35.080
So let me just go through and I'll give you just a quick preview of some of the articles in here.

47
00:04:35.080 --> 00:04:39.080
I won't be able to summarize all of them or all of the arguments in there,

48
00:04:39.080 --> 00:04:42.080
but I want to just give you an idea of some of the major ones.

49
00:04:42.080 --> 00:04:50.080
In the first section it starts out with Murray Rothbard's statement about how police and courts can be privatized

50
00:04:50.080 --> 00:04:58.080
and how he argues how it could function and how this system would be much more in line with natural rights.

51
00:04:58.080 --> 00:05:04.080
The next chapter is by David Friedman who also argues that private law enforcement could work.

52
00:05:04.080 --> 00:05:09.080
He talks about how competing groups could function within the same jurisdiction.

53
00:05:09.080 --> 00:05:17.080
And he gives a more economic efficiency based argument in favor of private law enforcement.

54
00:05:17.080 --> 00:05:24.080
Also in this section is work by the Tannehills who published in the 1970s

55
00:05:24.080 --> 00:05:41.080
1970s, very speculative account of how the market might look. It's not as worked out as some of the later writings, but this is some of the earliest work on this subject in the 1970s that before now was kind of hard to find.

56
00:05:41.080 --> 00:05:57.080
Also in this section are articles by Randy Barnett. He argues that criminal law is largely unnecessary. Let's just rely on restitution, where the victims get compensated rather than focusing on punishing criminals.

57
00:05:57.080 --> 00:06:08.080
The next chapter is by Hans-Hermann Hoppe. The next chapter is by Jeffrey Rogers Hummel and Don LeVoy. All of these people address the question, how can you protect your property rights?

58
00:06:08.080 --> 00:06:19.080
Roderick Long has a chapter on defending a free nation where he talks about various ways you can have a national defense without a state.

59
00:06:19.080 --> 00:06:25.080
And finally in this section there's a great article by John Hasnas called The Myth of the Rule of Law.

60
00:06:25.080 --> 00:06:30.080
Many people, when they first read it, they like it as much as I did.

61
00:06:30.080 --> 00:06:41.080
The idea that we can somehow tell the government to enforce an objective set of libertarian laws is not going to be very likely,

62
00:06:41.080 --> 00:06:47.080
because government courts are ultimately always going to have to interpret and enforce the laws.

63
00:06:47.080 --> 00:06:55.080
And when the government courts are doing it, they're more likely to be interpreting it in their own favor rather than in the favor of liberty.

64
00:06:55.080 --> 00:06:56.080
of Liberty.

65
00:06:56.080 --> 00:07:01.160
So, there's some great articles in this section.

66
00:07:01.160 --> 00:07:05.440
In the debate section, it starts out with Robert Nozick.

67
00:07:05.440 --> 00:07:10.540
He has a famous book, Anarchy, State, and Public Choice, where he posits an invisible

68
00:07:10.540 --> 00:07:16.200
hand theory of the state, where he says out of a state of anarchy, government would just

69
00:07:16.200 --> 00:07:21.360
naturally form, a monopoly would form, and then a government would form, and if it follows

70
00:07:21.360 --> 00:07:38.360
For people who don't like the fact that this government is forming, as long as the government compensates people, they will be no worse off than without the government, so everybody will be okay.

71
00:07:38.360 --> 00:07:45.360
Next chapter in the book is by Roy Charles, and he basically gets to a really important criticism.

72
00:07:45.360 --> 00:07:54.640
What is Nozick willing to offer us as compensation? He is generous to a fault. He will give us

73
00:07:54.640 --> 00:08:00.920
nothing less than the state. So what Nozick proposes is, for those of you who don't like

74
00:08:00.920 --> 00:08:07.320
the fact that we're creating police as compensation, we're going to give you more government police.

75
00:08:07.320 --> 00:08:16.080
Thank you. So that's a great article by Childs. Next one by Rand, sorry, Rothbard is excellent

76
00:08:16.080 --> 00:08:22.520
criticizing Nozick. And then the next section in the book is on Ayn Rand, where she also

77
00:08:22.520 --> 00:08:30.040
criticized the idea of anarchy. She said, if you have multiple agencies in one area,

78
00:08:30.040 --> 00:08:35.920
there's going to be conflict and war. And as a response to that, Roy Childs wrote an

79
00:08:35.920 --> 00:08:48.920
An open letter to Ayn Rand and said, really, if you believe in your principles of individual rights and markets, you should be an anarchist rather than a limited government classical liberal.

80
00:08:48.920 --> 00:08:56.920
And this kind of set off this interesting debate. Apparently, he had his subscription to the Objectivist magazine cancelled.

81
00:08:56.920 --> 00:09:18.920
And unfortunately this still is happening. I wanted to include the Rand chapter in this book because I thought it was important and so I had to get the copyright permission request and I sent it to them and they said, the state of Ayn Rand said,

82
00:09:18.920 --> 00:09:26.920
The request for permission to include the nature of government by Ayn Rand in your book Anarchy and the Law is denied.

83
00:09:26.920 --> 00:09:35.920
The estate of Ayn Rand refuses to associate with any book or project supporting anarchist or libertarian agenda.

84
00:09:35.920 --> 00:09:42.920
Touche!

85
00:09:42.920 --> 00:09:48.920
So we get to include the criticisms of her, and she can't speak for herself, so I'm sorry, Ms. Rand.

86
00:09:51.920 --> 00:09:56.920
Also in this section is a great article by Alfred Couson.

87
00:09:56.920 --> 00:09:59.920
Do we really ever get out of anarchy? He says,

88
00:09:59.920 --> 00:10:05.920
the idea that we're all going to be underneath one overarching authority is never the case.

89
00:10:05.920 --> 00:10:10.920
We're always going to be in some type of anarchy, and the question is, what type of anarchy?

90
00:10:10.920 --> 00:10:18.400
He argues that private property anarchy is superior to any other forms.

91
00:10:18.400 --> 00:10:24.120
Later critics of anarchism included in this section are Tyler Cowen.

92
00:10:24.120 --> 00:10:28.320
He says law is a public good, the economics of anarchy.

93
00:10:28.320 --> 00:10:34.760
He doesn't really say that government is necessarily a good thing, but he says that the way law

94
00:10:34.760 --> 00:10:38.280
enforcement works, if you're going to have multiple agencies, they're going to have to

95
00:10:38.280 --> 00:10:44.280
to somehow cooperate, and the ability for them to cooperate is going to enable them to collude.

96
00:10:44.280 --> 00:10:52.280
So he argues that market forces are going to lead towards monopolization and the eventual formation of government.

97
00:10:52.280 --> 00:11:05.280
In response to that, David Friedman has an article critiquing that, and then there's an excellent one critiquing that by Kaplan and Stringham.

98
00:11:05.280 --> 00:11:14.280
And then we also have Cowan and Sutter responding to Kaplan and Stringham.

99
00:11:14.280 --> 00:11:19.280
Another couple of articles we've got are Anthony DeJaze.

100
00:11:19.280 --> 00:11:26.280
He basically accepts a lot of the Hobbesian arguments, but he says anarchism is still superior.

101
00:11:26.280 --> 00:11:34.280
Andrew Rutten basically says no, even though government isn't created for good reasons,

102
00:11:34.280 --> 00:11:54.280
Government is unnecessary, but inevitable. Government is not moral, nor is government created to create public goods.

103
00:11:54.280 --> 00:12:02.280
But, he says, whether we like it or not, we're going to be stuck with it, so we might as well stick with arguing for limited government.

104
00:12:02.280 --> 00:12:09.280
And then, in response to that, there's a brilliant response by Leeson and Stringham, which is awesome.

105
00:12:09.280 --> 00:12:21.280
The next section is the History of Anarchist Thought, and in that it starts out with a great piece by David Hart,

106
00:12:21.280 --> 00:12:28.280
who basically outlines the history of individualist anarchism, how did it come about,

107
00:12:28.280 --> 00:12:35.280
and he talks about how there was this classical liberal tradition that emphasized individual liberty

108
00:12:35.280 --> 00:12:40.280
and eventually people started pushing it to its extreme that said,

109
00:12:40.280 --> 00:12:44.280
if we believe in individual rights we should push markets all the way

110
00:12:44.280 --> 00:12:50.280
and he talks about that such as the early authors like Gustav de Molinari.

111
00:12:50.280 --> 00:13:04.280
Also, one of the earliest works included in this book is by Edmund Burke, who's often considered a conservative, but he's got this excellent piece called The Vindication of Natural Society.

112
00:13:04.280 --> 00:13:19.280
Rothbard said this is a great piece. Many people say that it's a satire. It was written anonymously by Burke, and when it came out that he wrote it,

113
00:13:19.280 --> 00:13:39.280
Careful reading reveals hardly a trace of irony or satire. In fact, it is a very sober and earnest treatise written in his characteristic style.

114
00:13:39.280 --> 00:14:06.280
You legislators, you civilizers of mankind, with respect to you, it be spoken, your regulations have done more mischief in cold blood than all the rage of the fiercest animals in their greatest terrors or furies have ever done or could ever do.

115
00:14:09.280 --> 00:14:24.280
Next we've got Gustav de Molinari, who many of you know was one of the first people to propose how a system of competing law enforcement agencies might function.

116
00:14:24.280 --> 00:14:34.280
From there we've got a bunch of American authors talking about anarchism in the United States.

117
00:14:34.280 --> 00:14:43.280
The United States, Lysander Spooner, Benjamin Tucker, Volterine DeClair have some great pieces in here.

118
00:14:43.280 --> 00:14:51.280
Also included is 19th century preacher David Lipscomb, who basically makes a moral case against government.

119
00:14:51.280 --> 00:14:58.280
He says government is force and if we believe in Christianity, we should oppose force.

120
00:14:58.280 --> 00:15:10.280
And he says that Christians should not participate in politics, they should not vote, they should not work in government administration, or participate in juries or in war.

121
00:15:10.280 --> 00:15:15.280
So it's a really fascinating piece as well.

122
00:15:15.280 --> 00:15:27.280
And then finally concluding that section is an excellent article by David Osterfeld, where he basically, he's a modern writer, where he gives an overview of all the different types of anarchism.

123
00:15:27.280 --> 00:15:57.280
libertarian anarchism, how does that compare to syndicalist anarchism and he says that there are certain aspects that are compatible as long as they're not willing to use force against business and he contrasts that to the communist anarchists who are willing to use force against business and so this is just a great overview comparing the different anarchists to the different types of non-anarchists, classical liberals, etc. And then final section in the book, to me this is one of the most interesting sections

124
00:15:57.280 --> 00:16:04.000
is on case studies of non-state legal systems. Bruce Benson has an excellent

125
00:16:04.000 --> 00:16:09.440
article, Our Public Goods, Really Common Pools. In this one he talks about how in

126
00:16:09.440 --> 00:16:13.800
England a thousand years ago there was a very worked out system, well developed

127
00:16:13.800 --> 00:16:19.880
system of private dispute resolution. People would be members of these groups

128
00:16:19.880 --> 00:16:23.720
called hundreds where they would pledge, if you're part of this group you're

129
00:16:23.720 --> 00:16:27.720
The King of England started observing this, and they said,

130
00:16:27.720 --> 00:16:31.720
Oh, there's lots of restitution being paid to victims.

131
00:16:31.720 --> 00:16:35.720
Maybe, in addition to paying restitution to the victims,

132
00:16:35.720 --> 00:16:39.720
maybe you can pay some of the restitution to the king as well.

133
00:16:39.720 --> 00:16:43.720
So they started passing these laws that said, not only did you violate the victim's rights,

134
00:16:43.720 --> 00:16:47.720
but you can also pay some of the restitution to the king as well.

135
00:16:47.720 --> 00:16:51.720
So they started passing these laws that said,

136
00:17:21.720 --> 00:17:26.960
And then the government says, look, it's a market failure. Markets don't work. So they

137
00:17:26.960 --> 00:17:32.280
stepped in, ex post, and said, we need to provide public law enforcement. But it wasn't

138
00:17:32.280 --> 00:17:38.000
because the market wasn't doing it. It was because the government intervened.

139
00:17:38.000 --> 00:17:44.560
Other chapters in this section, which are excellent in my opinion, is Joseph Peden,

140
00:17:44.560 --> 00:17:51.120
Property Rights in Celtic Irish Law. He talks about how it worked in medieval Ireland. David

141
00:17:51.120 --> 00:17:56.880
Friedman's Private Creation and Enforcement of Law, a historical case where he documents

142
00:17:56.880 --> 00:18:03.920
how it worked in medieval Iceland. Also included in this is Paul Milgram, Doug North and Barry

143
00:18:03.920 --> 00:18:09.720
Weingast, who talk about the law merchant, private judges and champagne fairs, where

144
00:18:09.720 --> 00:18:15.400
you had contracts enforced privately.

145
00:18:15.400 --> 00:18:20.960
And finally, we've got a couple others. We've got one by Bruce Benson, Legal Evolution

146
00:18:20.960 --> 00:18:26.840
in Primitive Societies, where he moves forward in history and says there's lots of societies

147
00:18:26.840 --> 00:18:33.960
in the world today that don't function with law enforcement as we know it, and this is

148
00:18:33.960 --> 00:18:35.640
quite common.

149
00:18:35.640 --> 00:18:45.280
Also in this section is PJ Hill and Terry Anderson, an American experiment in anarcho-capitalism,

150
00:18:45.280 --> 00:18:51.240
The Not-So-Wild Wild West, this is their classic article on this, where they said that governments

151
00:18:51.240 --> 00:18:57.920
in America's frontier had yet to be established in many cases, but nevertheless people created

152
00:18:57.920 --> 00:19:03.020
ways of creating and enforcing property rights through things like cattlemen's associations

153
00:19:03.020 --> 00:19:06.540
and miners camps, different things like that.

154
00:19:06.540 --> 00:19:14.780
And the last chapter in this section is Robert Ellickson's portion of his Order Without Law.

155
00:19:14.780 --> 00:19:19.780
This is just a document that stateless order is all around us.

156
00:19:19.780 --> 00:19:24.780
What Robert Ellickson did is he went to rural Shasta County, California,

157
00:19:24.780 --> 00:19:31.780
and he interviewed farmers and ranchers, and he said, he looked on the books and the law said,

158
00:19:31.780 --> 00:19:35.780
this is what the law says, disputes must be settled in such a way,

159
00:19:35.780 --> 00:19:39.780
and he interviewed people and everyone said, what law?

160
00:19:39.780 --> 00:19:41.780
What are you talking about?

161
00:19:41.780 --> 00:19:43.780
Because they settled things completely differently.

162
00:19:43.780 --> 00:19:50.620
So people find ways of settling disputes independently of the state.

163
00:19:50.620 --> 00:19:59.300
So that one is another just a fascinating article as well.

164
00:19:59.300 --> 00:20:09.220
Okay, so that's basically a summary of some of the chapters in this book.

165
00:20:09.220 --> 00:20:11.620
And I'm excited that they're in one place.

166
00:20:11.620 --> 00:20:21.620
It's 40 chapters, but I view it as really just the tip of the iceberg of work that can be done on the subject, the section on the debate that's ongoing.

167
00:20:21.620 --> 00:20:32.620
There's more and more articles coming out, more and more brilliant authors writing on the subject that I highly recommend that you read.

168
00:20:32.620 --> 00:20:45.620
And the debate is continuing and the section on the historical and modern case studies is only, you know, one quarter of the book, but that really could be expanded to much more.

169
00:20:45.620 --> 00:20:58.620
So I wanted to put this together for people to be able to A, read it, say, okay, there's a lot of stuff out there, and to encourage people to start realizing this is something we could work more on.

170
00:20:58.620 --> 00:21:08.620
The state has been working for years trying to indoctrinate people saying private law enforcement, that's impossible.

171
00:21:08.620 --> 00:21:14.620
Well, the articles in this book suggest otherwise.

172
00:21:14.620 --> 00:21:23.620
So economists have done a very convincing job to many people saying that markets and private enterprise are desirable in other areas.

173
00:21:23.620 --> 00:21:27.620
And I think now we can start applying this logic to the law.

174
00:21:37.620 --> 00:21:41.620
All right, I guess we've got a few minutes left for questions. Yes.

175
00:21:43.620 --> 00:21:45.620
Yeah, Steve.

176
00:21:45.620 --> 00:21:50.620
Could you summarize a little bit of the, since we have Randall Mulcombe here,

177
00:21:50.620 --> 00:22:08.620
I want to summarize a little bit of the Leithen and Stringham response to Randall Holcomb, because the story of those hundreds in England and how that broke down and the violation of the King's Treaty, that sounds like a Randall Holcomb kind of story, where government was just kind of inevitable.

178
00:22:08.620 --> 00:22:22.620
We agree that currently we have government in most places in the world, but we say just because it exists, it doesn't prove it's inevitable.

179
00:22:22.620 --> 00:22:30.620
So someone could have said 500 years ago, monarchy exists all over the world, someone might come up with an alternative proposal.

180
00:22:30.620 --> 00:22:37.620
We want mass democracy and people say, well, that's a nice idea in theory, but it's just impossible.

181
00:23:07.620 --> 00:23:25.620
Another point on Birk. It speaks on the affiliation of the colonies between the American and the Muslim.

182
00:23:25.620 --> 00:23:35.620
You mentioned that in order to punish the rebels, the British government suspended the local government in the colonies in order to fill them with payout.

183
00:23:35.620 --> 00:23:54.620
Yeah, it's a great quote. Yeah, thank you. Yes.

184
00:23:54.620 --> 00:24:09.620
As we've had discussions and e-mails on this, I am struggling for any system which will offer me has to be in accord with the perennial philosophy.

185
00:24:09.620 --> 00:24:17.620
And the perennial philosophy says that government is a perfect society and other things like that.

186
00:24:17.620 --> 00:24:21.940
By that I'm struggling to reconcile the two things.

187
00:24:21.940 --> 00:24:31.580
The conclusion I'm coming up with is that it's a mistake in vocabulary.

188
00:24:31.580 --> 00:24:36.980
I don't think anarchists are against government.

189
00:24:36.980 --> 00:24:44.180
We are for government, but the kind of government we're for is a de-sexualized government.

190
00:24:44.180 --> 00:24:56.180
Individual, individually chosen government, individually chosen court system, fleet system, defense system.

191
00:24:56.180 --> 00:25:03.180
We are in favor of government. I don't think we should be saying we are against government.

192
00:25:03.180 --> 00:25:07.180
We are for government, but a different kind of government.

193
00:25:07.180 --> 00:25:11.180
And saying that, I'm in perfect accord with the perennial philosophy.

194
00:25:11.180 --> 00:25:14.180
I would like comments from the audience on my...

195
00:25:14.180 --> 00:25:18.180
Okay, great. I'm glad you agree with me on everything, Joe. I appreciate that.

196
00:25:18.180 --> 00:25:25.180
I do agree there's some questions about what the right wording is, and certainly you're right.

197
00:25:25.180 --> 00:25:33.180
We do believe in voluntary governing organizations, whether you want to call those governments is another question.

198
00:25:33.180 --> 00:25:39.180
Most people think of government when they think of the state, as in the coercive state.

199
00:25:39.180 --> 00:26:01.180
But certainly you're right, if you want to call a voluntary, non-coercive governing body, a type of government, maybe a non-coercive government, I won't call it a government, but if you want to use that terminology, then we can discuss that, but I think it doesn't disagree with the main point of this.

200
00:26:04.180 --> 00:26:07.180
All right, yeah, we're exactly at 12. Thank you.