WEBVTT

NOTE Extensions of Rothbardian Anarchist Analytics

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:10.340
So the question I'm interested in is, studying to what extent economists agree that markets are a good thing,

2
00:00:10.340 --> 00:00:16.260
but, there's always a but, often it's a really big but,

3
00:00:16.260 --> 00:00:21.660
most economists believe that markets require some degree of state intervention,

4
00:00:21.660 --> 00:00:29.660
Specifically, almost all economists believe that the state is necessary for the enforcement of contracts.

5
00:00:29.660 --> 00:00:32.660
And I'll just give you this typical position.

6
00:00:32.660 --> 00:00:36.660
Richard Epstein of Chicago, under its classical liberal formulation,

7
00:00:36.660 --> 00:00:46.660
the great social contract sacrifices liberty, but only to the extent that it is necessary to gain security against force and fraud.

8
00:00:46.660 --> 00:00:52.660
Perhaps we might go farther, but surely we go this far.

9
00:00:52.660 --> 00:01:00.660
Law, he says, becomes critical to offer a secure framework for these voluntary transactions to take place.

10
00:01:00.660 --> 00:01:12.660
He says, one would be a naive visionary to believe that markets could operate of their own volition without any kind of support from the state.

11
00:01:12.660 --> 00:01:24.660
Okay, so this is the classical liberal consensus. All of these people, Hayek, Mises, Rand, Stigler, Friedman, believe that law enforcement must be provided by the state.

12
00:01:24.660 --> 00:01:32.660
So that's even the biggest advocates of liberty are also advocates of the state.

13
00:01:32.660 --> 00:01:50.660
Now, since then, mainly in the last 40 years or so, there is an alternative which is becoming more popular and I'll call this the private property anarchism of Rothbard and many subsequent writers.

14
00:01:50.660 --> 00:01:56.660
Rothbard basically questioned the idea that markets depend on the state.

15
00:01:56.660 --> 00:02:11.660
He questioned the idea that private law enforcement cannot exist and he also questioned the idea that government is created to fix problems with the market.

16
00:02:11.660 --> 00:02:22.660
In Rothbard's writings, he gave some theoretical arguments about how markets could work privately without government law enforcement.

17
00:02:22.660 --> 00:02:35.660
Law Enforcement, so he described his vision, and he also pointed to some examples of markets that functioned without relying on public law enforcement.

18
00:02:35.660 --> 00:02:50.660
So private law enforcement, and there's really some great work on this, if you act now, you too can own a copy of Anarchy in the Law by Edward Stringham.

19
00:02:50.660 --> 00:02:59.660
And at no additional charge, you get this wonderful free picture of me.

20
00:02:59.660 --> 00:03:10.660
Okay, so there's some historical examples of private law enforcement.

21
00:03:10.660 --> 00:03:17.660
But many people, even if you tell them that, they say, well, these are just peculiar episodes from the past.

22
00:03:17.660 --> 00:03:22.660
It couldn't work today. Maybe it could work in Iceland 700 years ago.

23
00:03:22.660 --> 00:03:28.660
But you can't have a complicated market today without government law.

24
00:03:28.660 --> 00:03:38.660
So they can look at any one of these studies, many of which are included in this great book.

25
00:03:38.660 --> 00:03:45.660
And they might say, well, okay, yeah, there's some studies of trade without external enforcement,

26
00:03:45.660 --> 00:03:49.980
Enforcement, but a lot of them are from primitive societies, from the past,

27
00:03:49.980 --> 00:03:56.180
ethically homogenous societies. I don't know if it would work. They say, yeah,

28
00:03:56.180 --> 00:04:03.100
there's some theories of how markets can have self-enforcing contracts, but the

29
00:04:03.100 --> 00:04:08.980
conventional view is that sophisticated markets, such as stock markets, financial

30
00:04:08.980 --> 00:04:14.220
markets, all the things we have today cannot emerge unless there is government

31
00:04:14.220 --> 00:04:20.020
Supervision. I just want to give you a couple quick quotes to give you the

32
00:04:20.020 --> 00:04:26.340
standard view on this. Manker-Olson, most of the gains from transactions like

33
00:04:26.340 --> 00:04:31.940
those in capital market require impartial third-party enforcement.

34
00:04:31.940 --> 00:04:37.220
Gordon Tullock, my former professor, transactions in which large payments

35
00:04:37.220 --> 00:04:41.820
will be made in the future would be impossible if we depended solely on the

36
00:04:41.820 --> 00:04:47.820
The Discipline of Continuous Dealings, and Janet Landa, The Discipline of Continuous Dealings

37
00:04:47.820 --> 00:04:54.820
cannot be relied upon if credit transactions are important.

38
00:04:54.820 --> 00:05:03.820
So what I want to talk about today is, are the classical liberals correct that sophisticated markets require government?

39
00:05:03.820 --> 00:05:05.820
Or was Rothbard on to something?

40
00:05:05.820 --> 00:05:12.820
Maybe even advanced markets, including stock markets, do not require government.

41
00:05:12.820 --> 00:05:18.820
And whenever there's a debate, I view it as an opportunity as a scholar to say,

42
00:05:18.820 --> 00:05:20.820
well, let's start writing about this.

43
00:05:20.820 --> 00:05:25.820
If someone makes a strong claim, markets can never do something.

44
00:05:25.820 --> 00:05:32.820
This is a potential research opportunity that can help either disprove that position

45
00:05:32.820 --> 00:05:34.820
or corroborate it in the other position.

46
00:05:34.820 --> 00:05:44.820
So when people are going around saying, all swans are black, if we find some white swans, we can help disprove this claim.

47
00:05:44.820 --> 00:05:53.820
So our examples of stateless orders, only examples from small, simple, close-knit markets.

48
00:05:53.820 --> 00:06:00.820
There's many potential case studies that one could do, and I've done a few,

49
00:06:00.820 --> 00:06:11.820
There are a few, but I want to share with you just one that I've conducted just to indicate an example of some of the things I'm doing.

50
00:06:11.820 --> 00:06:21.820
Okay, so what I am going to talk about today is a case study of the world's first stock market, and does anyone know where this is?

51
00:06:21.820 --> 00:06:25.500
All right, okay, 17th century Amsterdam.

52
00:06:25.500 --> 00:06:28.340
What I'm gonna do is I'm gonna talk about the legal

53
00:06:28.340 --> 00:06:31.340
and regulatory climate,

54
00:06:31.340 --> 00:06:34.180
and then I'm gonna look at a primary source

55
00:06:34.180 --> 00:06:38.300
to see the de facto practices of the stock market.

56
00:06:39.140 --> 00:06:41.220
Maybe economists can learn something

57
00:06:41.220 --> 00:06:46.080
by studying the evolution of the world's stock markets.

58
00:06:46.080 --> 00:06:50.580
Was it the case that government created this legal system

59
00:06:50.580 --> 00:06:59.420
And only later did that enable the markets to emerge, or did things go in a different order.

60
00:06:59.420 --> 00:07:08.580
Okay, and before I talk about the specifics of Amsterdam, I just wanted to talk about some preliminary evidence by some people who've addressed this.

61
00:07:08.580 --> 00:07:15.620
The first one is by Adam Smith, actually did discuss this in lectures on jurisprudence.

62
00:07:15.620 --> 00:07:25.860
I know that Adam Smith is sometimes a statist, but he does say some good things from time to time, many times actually.

63
00:07:25.860 --> 00:07:32.900
He talked about how in England buying stocks by time is against the law.

64
00:07:32.900 --> 00:07:38.580
He says the law gives no redress for a sum above five pounds.

65
00:07:38.580 --> 00:07:48.180
But he goes on to discuss how people do engage in these forward contracts and he says that the law is not effective.

66
00:07:48.180 --> 00:07:53.660
He says, in the same manner, all laws against gaming never hinder it.

67
00:07:53.660 --> 00:07:56.500
People actually go on and make these trades.

68
00:07:56.500 --> 00:08:05.100
But even though they're not enforceable in courts of law, he says, yet all the great sums that are lost are punctually paid.

69
00:08:05.100 --> 00:08:12.260
So there are these contracts taking place even though they're not enforceable in courts of law.

70
00:08:12.260 --> 00:08:17.220
He says, what's the explanation? He says, persons who game must keep their credit,

71
00:08:17.220 --> 00:08:21.980
else nobody will deal with them. It is quite the same for stock-jobbing.

72
00:08:21.980 --> 00:08:29.900
They who do not keep their credit will be turned out and in the language of change alley be called a lame duck.

73
00:08:29.900 --> 00:08:40.900
So this is a picture from 18th century England of the, kind of hard to see, but it does say Change Alley and there's a duck there waddling out.

74
00:08:40.900 --> 00:08:50.900
If you don't follow through with your contracts, people say, get out of here, we're not going to deal with you, because you don't want to be cheated.

75
00:08:50.900 --> 00:08:57.900
He says, of all the nations in Europe, the Dutch, the most commercial, are the most faithful to their word.

76
00:08:57.900 --> 00:09:10.900
It is reducible to self-interest, that general principle which regulates the actions of every man and which leads men to act in a certain manner from the views of advantage.

77
00:09:10.900 --> 00:09:17.900
A dealer is afraid of losing his character and is scrupulous in observing every engagement.

78
00:09:17.900 --> 00:09:31.900
When a person makes 20 contracts in a day, he cannot so much gain so much by endeavoring to impose on his neighbors as the very appearance of a cheat would make him lose, okay?

79
00:09:31.900 --> 00:09:42.900
So when you're in business and you're looking to get customers, you're not going to be able to get a lot of customers and stay in business very long if everybody knows you're a cheat, okay?

80
00:09:42.900 --> 00:09:52.900
So if you want to attract lots of business, you've got to establish a reputation, whether or not the law is telling you to do something.

81
00:09:52.900 --> 00:10:01.900
And the next bit of preliminary evidence I want to discuss before I talk about Amsterdam is this statement here by Janet Landa.

82
00:10:01.900 --> 00:10:06.900
There's actually a linguistically problematic part of the statement.

83
00:10:06.900 --> 00:10:10.900
Does anybody see what's linguistically wrong with the statement?

84
00:10:10.900 --> 00:10:15.300
Does anyone know the origin of the word credit?

85
00:10:15.300 --> 00:10:18.500
Where does the word credit come from, from Latin?

86
00:10:18.500 --> 00:10:20.000
What does it mean?

87
00:10:20.000 --> 00:10:22.000
Okay, good, alright.

88
00:10:22.000 --> 00:10:27.100
Belief, trust or reputation, okay?

89
00:10:27.100 --> 00:10:30.300
So rather than credit transactions being called

90
00:10:30.300 --> 00:10:35.700
transactions that require external government enforcement for them to work,

91
00:10:35.700 --> 00:10:37.700
okay, that's not how they were named.

92
00:10:37.700 --> 00:10:44.020
And there were transactions that require reputation and trust.

93
00:10:44.020 --> 00:10:47.620
And this is different from the governmental view.

94
00:10:47.620 --> 00:10:48.620
Okay.

95
00:10:48.620 --> 00:10:49.620
All right.

96
00:10:49.620 --> 00:10:55.860
So let me just give you some background of Amsterdam and then I can talk about the market.

97
00:10:55.860 --> 00:11:01.020
Amsterdam in the 1600s, this was a long time ago, right?

98
00:11:01.020 --> 00:11:05.980
Pretty undeveloped compared to what we have today.

99
00:11:05.980 --> 00:11:08.620
It was right after the Protestant Reformation.

100
00:11:08.620 --> 00:11:09.980
Here's a picture.

101
00:11:09.980 --> 00:11:11.860
It's called Fishing for Souls.

102
00:11:11.860 --> 00:11:14.460
The Catholics are on the right.

103
00:11:14.460 --> 00:11:16.460
The Protestants are on the left.

104
00:11:16.460 --> 00:11:21.400
In Amsterdam, they seceded from the government of Spain.

105
00:11:21.400 --> 00:11:24.300
And so it was kind of this new country.

106
00:11:24.300 --> 00:11:26.860
And one of the things they decided to have

107
00:11:26.860 --> 00:11:32.540
was more tolerance than in Spain before them.

108
00:11:32.540 --> 00:11:35.180
Other things we think about during this time period

109
00:11:35.180 --> 00:11:40.860
is things like windmills or flowers, including tulips.

110
00:11:40.860 --> 00:11:45.580
The most important thing was in the 17th century Netherlands,

111
00:11:45.580 --> 00:11:49.580
they invented Dutch gin, which is really important.

112
00:11:49.580 --> 00:11:54.620
If those of you haven't read it, I was in some national media

113
00:11:54.620 --> 00:11:57.700
recently for an article I had documenting

114
00:11:57.700 --> 00:12:02.580
how drinkers earn more money than non-drinkers.

115
00:12:02.580 --> 00:12:08.980
So, what the Dutch did is they started drinking, and they said, well, let's start making more money.

116
00:12:08.980 --> 00:12:14.380
I like that.

117
00:12:14.380 --> 00:12:19.480
They started looking to trade as a way of making more money,

118
00:12:19.480 --> 00:12:29.280
and they started to look to places that were traditionally monopolized by the Spanish and Portuguese as a way of making money.

119
00:12:29.280 --> 00:12:35.280
And this is a clavichord lid painting here that indicates Amsterdam.

120
00:12:35.280 --> 00:12:36.840
This is from 1606.

121
00:12:36.840 --> 00:12:46.520
They were already considering themselves the center for world trade, a society that relied heavily on commerce.

122
00:12:46.520 --> 00:12:50.200
So they started sending ships out around the globe.

123
00:12:50.200 --> 00:12:58.600
And one area was to the East Indies, which they viewed as a potentially lucrative trading area.

124
00:12:58.600 --> 00:13:02.360
One thing about this is it was very risky, okay?

125
00:13:02.360 --> 00:13:04.440
And the statistics from the late 1600s,

126
00:13:04.440 --> 00:13:06.560
but even in the late 1600s,

127
00:13:06.560 --> 00:13:10.360
5% of ships would not come home, okay?

128
00:13:10.360 --> 00:13:12.140
So if you're just one person

129
00:13:12.140 --> 00:13:14.340
and you put all your eggs in one basket

130
00:13:14.340 --> 00:13:17.640
and your ship sinks, you're in a lot of trouble.

131
00:13:17.640 --> 00:13:19.980
So what the Dutch people realized is,

132
00:13:19.980 --> 00:13:22.680
well, what if we pool our money, okay?

133
00:13:22.680 --> 00:13:25.400
Send out 100 ships, not all of them come back

134
00:13:25.400 --> 00:13:49.400
So they created, right around 1600, the Dutch East India Company, which raised money from 3,000 investors from all over Holland, different types of people, and they issued shares, okay?

135
00:13:49.400 --> 00:13:56.900
So you would own a fraction of this company rather than owning the entire thing.

136
00:13:56.900 --> 00:14:04.900
The interesting thing about this was it wasn't initially created to be a long-term venture.

137
00:14:04.900 --> 00:14:11.900
They were going to send out a bunch of ships, they were going to come back, cash in the profits, liquidate the assets and that was it.

138
00:14:11.900 --> 00:14:15.900
But when the ships started coming back and they were making so much profits,

139
00:14:15.900 --> 00:14:21.900
They said, well, let's start reinvesting the profits and make this an ongoing venture.

140
00:14:21.900 --> 00:14:23.900
So this is something that kind of just evolved.

141
00:14:23.900 --> 00:14:26.900
The government didn't really think of this or anything.

142
00:14:26.900 --> 00:14:28.900
It's just something that happened.

143
00:14:28.900 --> 00:14:31.900
And for the first 10 years, they paid no dividends.

144
00:14:31.900 --> 00:14:38.900
And on the 11th year, they paid dividends of roughly 100% of your initial investment.

145
00:14:38.900 --> 00:14:41.900
So it was a pretty good thing.

146
00:14:41.900 --> 00:14:44.900
The other thing, they didn't plan ahead of time.

147
00:14:44.900 --> 00:14:48.900
I didn't plan that there was going to be a secondary market in shares.

148
00:14:48.900 --> 00:14:56.900
So initially, when you wanted to trade your share, you'd have to go in with the other person who you want to trade the share in,

149
00:14:56.900 --> 00:15:04.900
go to the offices of the East India Company, meet with some fine-looking gentlemen like this,

150
00:15:04.900 --> 00:15:12.900
and they would open their books and have the shares traded, which worked, but it involved high transaction costs.

151
00:15:12.900 --> 00:15:33.900
People after a while said, well, there's lots of people who want to trade and so people started specializing in being stock brokers that said, alright, I've got a bunch of people who want to buy, a bunch of people who want to sell, I'll just keep records of this and then I'll go to the offices every so often to minimize those transaction costs.

152
00:15:33.900 --> 00:15:55.900
So the brokers started trading on the Amsterdam bourse, which is here, there's a commodities exchange, they traded things like grains, whale oil, herring, tulips, all a bunch of things, and the stockbrokers occupied a corner of the exchange.

153
00:15:55.900 --> 00:16:09.900
This building no longer exists. It was built by this guy, but I was in Amsterdam last summer walking around and I saw this building built in the 1600s and it says built by Hendrik de Keeser.

154
00:16:09.900 --> 00:16:17.900
So some of these buildings are still around. It's kind of amazing. You get to see some just amazing sights in Amsterdam.

155
00:16:17.900 --> 00:16:37.900
And the company and the stock market grew with popularity along with the good fortunes of the East India Company.

156
00:16:37.900 --> 00:16:42.900
So over this century, this is the stock price appreciation.

157
00:16:42.900 --> 00:16:53.900
It's pretty steady, and over this entire century they paid an average of dividends of 22.5% per year for an entire 100 years.

158
00:16:53.900 --> 00:16:58.900
So it was a significant amount of money.

159
00:16:58.900 --> 00:17:05.900
At the end of the century they had factories in East India.

160
00:17:05.900 --> 00:17:08.340
Here's a whale oil factory.

161
00:17:08.340 --> 00:17:13.380
Here's one of their plants in Indonesia.

162
00:17:13.380 --> 00:17:16.460
And it created a lot of wealth and made certain people

163
00:17:16.460 --> 00:17:19.940
like this gentleman very wealthy.

164
00:17:19.940 --> 00:17:22.580
At the end of the century, they had 300 ships

165
00:17:22.580 --> 00:17:24.080
traveling back and forth.

166
00:17:24.080 --> 00:17:27.180
And they had over 20,000 employees,

167
00:17:27.180 --> 00:17:29.340
which is really large considering the fact

168
00:17:29.340 --> 00:17:34.420
that Amsterdam's population was only 50 or 100,000 people.

169
00:17:34.420 --> 00:17:37.580
So it was a very large concern.

170
00:17:37.580 --> 00:17:41.620
There was also a publicly traded firm.

171
00:17:41.620 --> 00:17:44.100
The other one was the West India Company.

172
00:17:44.100 --> 00:17:48.180
It started out with the same, roughly, number of investors

173
00:17:48.180 --> 00:17:50.460
and same size.

174
00:17:50.460 --> 00:17:53.460
But this one, they went to the West Indies.

175
00:17:53.460 --> 00:17:56.300
Here's a sugar plantation in Brazil.

176
00:17:56.300 --> 00:17:59.240
This one, in contrast, didn't do so well.

177
00:17:59.240 --> 00:18:02.260
I did some econometric analysis on this,

178
00:18:02.260 --> 00:18:09.060
And I found that this company is tracking exactly my investments in dot-com stocks.

179
00:18:09.060 --> 00:18:18.620
All right, okay, so those are the companies.

180
00:18:18.620 --> 00:18:27.260
Now I want to talk a little bit about the legal and regulatory status climate during this time.

181
00:18:27.260 --> 00:18:42.340
During the first decade of the trading, it started actually catching on and people started applying some relatively sophisticated contracts to it.

182
00:18:42.340 --> 00:18:52.020
They started engaging in short sales and types of forward contracts, but the government viewed the stock market with suspicion.

183
00:18:52.020 --> 00:18:58.020
The government thought it was a form of gambling.

184
00:18:58.020 --> 00:19:01.020
They said that all these people who are trading all the time,

185
00:19:01.020 --> 00:19:05.700
they're just doing this to manipulate and suppress stock prices.

186
00:19:05.700 --> 00:19:14.020
In 1608, the shares fell by 35% and the government blamed short sellers.

187
00:19:14.020 --> 00:19:21.540
So in 1610, the government then outlawed short selling or selling in Blanca.

188
00:19:21.540 --> 00:19:28.100
In 1621, they outlawed other forward contracts, Windhandle, which is trading in wind.

189
00:19:28.100 --> 00:19:31.100
How can you trade something that you don't own?

190
00:19:31.100 --> 00:19:33.040
That's what they said.

191
00:19:33.040 --> 00:19:41.920
Other ordinances in 1623, 24, 30, 36 and 77 outlawed other types of stock market transactions

192
00:19:41.920 --> 00:19:48.580
that we have that are legal and commonplace today, but at the time, they just did not

193
00:19:48.580 --> 00:19:50.500
like them.

194
00:19:50.500 --> 00:19:57.660
I was in Amsterdam Museum last summer and I saw these plates. It's kind of interesting.

195
00:19:57.660 --> 00:20:03.460
And you can see they have these little sayings on them. Does anyone here speak Dutch? They've

196
00:20:03.460 --> 00:20:10.420
got these sayings on them. And if you translate them, it says things like, away with dandy

197
00:20:10.420 --> 00:20:16.260
speculators. So this guy is a speculator. He's got a tennis racket, whatever type of

198
00:20:16.260 --> 00:20:21.260
He's playing with money. He's a very whimsical guy.

199
00:20:21.260 --> 00:20:29.260
These things say, squeeze the speculators tight, down with speculators, away with actions and speculators.

200
00:20:29.260 --> 00:20:42.260
I don't know who buys plates like this.

201
00:20:42.260 --> 00:20:47.660
So the law was motivated by a moralistic attack against speculation,

202
00:20:47.660 --> 00:20:55.460
rather than some sophisticated Joseph Stiglitz argument about economics.

203
00:20:55.460 --> 00:21:00.460
The Dutch authorities did not know as much about stock markets,

204
00:21:00.460 --> 00:21:04.860
the benefits of things like short selling as modern economists.

205
00:21:04.860 --> 00:21:11.860
So the law basically said, unless you transfer the shares to the other party within 14 days,

206
00:21:11.860 --> 00:21:15.860
Then it's going to be against the law. So that's how that worked.

207
00:21:15.860 --> 00:21:19.860
Interestingly, they did not actively punish people.

208
00:21:19.860 --> 00:21:23.860
The only thing they did is they said,

209
00:21:23.860 --> 00:21:27.860
if you engage in these illegal transactions, they're not going to be enforced

210
00:21:27.860 --> 00:21:31.860
in courts of law. So they were

211
00:21:31.860 --> 00:21:35.860
de jure, very strict, but de facto

212
00:21:35.860 --> 00:21:39.860
very hands-off. Not too much involvement.

213
00:21:39.860 --> 00:21:54.860
The government had better things to do, like go to the horse fairs, or here, this is kind of a neat picture, the assembly of the state general, 1651, Holland simply refused to approve a new stat holder.

214
00:21:54.860 --> 00:22:05.860
So it was kind of like this tenuous situation, not as organized as they didn't have a George Bush at the time.

215
00:22:05.860 --> 00:22:13.220
all right okay so the next thing I want to do is look at a primary source to see

216
00:22:13.220 --> 00:22:18.140
actually what was going on in the stock market there's not a lot of data from the

217
00:22:18.140 --> 00:22:24.460
1600s but luckily I found an excellent account and there's this book published

218
00:22:24.460 --> 00:22:31.580
in 1688 Confusión de Confusiones by Joseph Penso de la Vega who was a stock

219
00:22:31.580 --> 00:22:38.580
And he wrote this book in the form of a dialogue between different characters where the different characters would say,

220
00:22:38.580 --> 00:22:44.580
Tell me, how does the stock market work? And the other characters say, Oh, it works like this, this and this.

221
00:22:44.580 --> 00:22:48.580
And the other one would say, And then how does this work? And the other one would explain it.

222
00:22:48.580 --> 00:22:57.580
So it's kind of written as a manual or frequently asked questions type of thing that you might see on the Internet.

223
00:23:01.580 --> 00:23:16.580
Okay, so the first thing he does is he talks about different types of transactions and whether or not they are legal or illegal.

224
00:23:16.580 --> 00:23:21.580
The first one he discusses is short sales and how they're against the law.ology.

225
00:23:21.580 --> 00:23:41.580
Frederick Henry promulgated an ordinance according to which he who sold shares for future delivery without putting them on a time account should be exposed to a danger that the buyer will not take the pieces at the time fixed upon.

226
00:23:41.580 --> 00:23:47.580
So when someone doesn't have the money to cover their position they might quote appeal to Frederick.

227
00:23:47.580 --> 00:23:53.580
So you sell something short, you're hoping it goes down, you can buy low and then give them the shares.

228
00:23:53.580 --> 00:23:56.580
But if it goes up, you've got to buy these shares at a higher price.

229
00:23:56.580 --> 00:24:01.580
Well, if that happened, people might say, oh, did we engage in this transaction?

230
00:24:01.580 --> 00:24:04.580
I'm sorry, that was illegal. I'm not going to pay you.

231
00:24:04.580 --> 00:24:08.580
So people could do that. And here's just some quotes.

232
00:24:08.580 --> 00:24:16.580
He says, if you act with unfair intentions, there is the ordinance of Frederic Henry in case of an unfavorable turn.

233
00:24:16.580 --> 00:24:22.580
So people could appeal to Frederic, but nevertheless, this was not common.

234
00:24:22.580 --> 00:24:26.580
The guy says, what do you do in these situations?

235
00:24:26.580 --> 00:24:28.580
He says, well, this is what you're supposed to do.

236
00:24:28.580 --> 00:24:36.580
He says, when a loss occurs, the losers are expected to pay at least what they have available at the moment.

237
00:24:36.580 --> 00:24:41.580
And it might be expected that when the wound is fresh, there would be no new injury.

238
00:24:41.580 --> 00:24:52.580
Other people gradually fulfill their obligations after having sold their last valuables, and thus meet with punctuality the reverses of misfortune.

239
00:24:52.580 --> 00:24:59.580
So despite people being able to call upon the law to get out of their contract, they actually didn't do that.

240
00:24:59.580 --> 00:25:05.580
People paid even though they didn't have to. So why is this?

241
00:25:05.580 --> 00:25:15.580
The real world is very different from the standard simple game theory prisoner's dilemma, which says people are always going to cheat, okay?

242
00:25:15.580 --> 00:25:21.580
It's always in your incentive to cheat. Well, there's not a lot of one-shot prisoner's dilemmas.

243
00:25:21.580 --> 00:25:28.580
If you're dealing with people every day, you cheat once, how many other times is that person going to deal with you?

244
00:25:28.580 --> 00:25:34.580
So markets have incentives. The discipline of continuous dealing says to people,

245
00:25:34.580 --> 00:25:40.580
you've got to be reliable otherwise you're not going to get any business.

246
00:25:40.580 --> 00:25:46.580
Other contracts he describes are different types of long-forward contracts.

247
00:25:46.580 --> 00:25:54.580
He describes how they have printed forms where they would then fill out the details of the amount of money,

248
00:25:54.580 --> 00:26:04.180
The dates, they would sign them, exchange them, and here, too, these were illegal.

249
00:26:04.180 --> 00:26:07.740
He says, the regulation applies in the case of time bargains,

250
00:26:07.740 --> 00:26:13.580
unless the seller has the shares transferred to the time account of the purchaser within a fortnight.

251
00:26:13.580 --> 00:26:19.100
The seller, as well as the buyer, is allowed to appeal to Frederic.

252
00:26:19.100 --> 00:26:21.620
If I have bought a share under these circumstances,

253
00:26:21.620 --> 00:26:28.120
I need neither declare myself bankrupt in order to free myself, nor disappear in order to shake loose.

254
00:26:28.120 --> 00:26:31.120
I can merely appeal to the edict.

255
00:26:31.120 --> 00:26:43.320
Okay, so this is something that's against the law, but nevertheless these forward contracts were very common throughout the entire century.

256
00:26:43.320 --> 00:26:46.520
All right, the next one, I just have a question.

257
00:26:46.520 --> 00:26:51.220
Does anyone know when options were invented?

258
00:26:51.220 --> 00:27:03.220
I was born in 1975, so if you were to ask me when options were invented, I'd say probably about 1975, right? Sound like a good one?

259
00:27:03.220 --> 00:27:15.220
Actually, do you know? The 1600s, they actually had very sophisticated options, markets, calls, puts, all of that stuff.

260
00:27:15.220 --> 00:27:25.220
He discusses this, how the contracts look, and he says,

261
00:27:25.220 --> 00:27:33.220
As to whether the regulation is applicable to options contracts, the opinions of experts diverge widely.

262
00:27:33.220 --> 00:27:38.220
With regard to the put premium, there are also great differences of opinion.

263
00:27:38.220 --> 00:27:55.220
For while the scholars assume that no legally valid claims can be made because of the regulation, there are contrary decisions by the courts, so that the law and legal opinion, the regulations and the decisions are contradictory.

264
00:27:55.220 --> 00:28:05.220
The theory remains uncertain, and one cannot tell which way adjudication tends.

265
00:28:05.220 --> 00:28:18.220
Okay, so government officials aren't always the most knowledgeable about modern finance theory, so the people could not rely on the courts of law.

266
00:28:18.220 --> 00:28:29.220
The next thing they had is called hypothecation, where you use an equity as collateral for a loan, if you pledge that as the collateral.

267
00:28:29.220 --> 00:28:35.020
However, if the price of the equity starts going down to below the value of the loan,

268
00:28:35.020 --> 00:28:40.980
your ability to pay might... it decreases, so people would have to actually sell the

269
00:28:40.980 --> 00:28:45.780
shares and repay the loan when this happened.

270
00:28:45.780 --> 00:28:52.100
But here too, he describes how you can raise the objection.

271
00:28:52.100 --> 00:28:57.760
The person who borrowed the money says, oh, actually this was illegal and so I don't really

272
00:28:57.760 --> 00:29:08.760
want to pay. However, this is not common. He says the mortgagee is obliged to pay the difference or declare himself insolvent.

273
00:29:08.760 --> 00:29:15.760
Okay, so these very sophisticated arrangements all against the law, right?

274
00:29:15.760 --> 00:29:23.760
If you're, you know, you're a banker and you need to have a reliable reputation to engage in business.

275
00:29:23.760 --> 00:29:34.760
The next thing they had was a type of securitization, which is basically creating new securities based on the existence of other securities.

276
00:29:34.760 --> 00:29:41.760
So back then they didn't have stock splits or stock dividends the way we have now.

277
00:29:41.760 --> 00:29:50.760
So the price of the shares had gone up to 15,000 guilders and daily wages for a laborer was roughly one gilder per day.

278
00:29:50.760 --> 00:30:00.760
So it would take a lifetime of earnings to buy one share, and that's obviously going to preclude lots of people from the market.

279
00:30:00.760 --> 00:30:06.760
And what people figured out is, well, let's create these new things called small shares.

280
00:30:06.760 --> 00:30:12.760
And we'll create 100 small shares will be equal to one large share.

281
00:30:12.760 --> 00:30:19.760
And he describes it as if it's like when you break a mirror and you've got a bunch of small mirrors, it's still the same size as the original.

282
00:30:19.760 --> 00:30:25.000
the original mirror and he talks about how popular this had become because it

283
00:30:25.000 --> 00:30:31.000
really allowed a lot more people to get into the market he says this and it was

284
00:30:31.000 --> 00:30:36.000
called it was called trading in Ducaton shares because this would be the rich

285
00:30:36.000 --> 00:30:39.840
people all the other people couldn't afford to buy it so it's called trading

286
00:30:39.840 --> 00:30:45.760
in Ducaton shares which is just a very small coin he says this branch of trade

287
00:30:45.760 --> 00:30:50.560
has been increasing during the last five years to such an extent and mainly with

288
00:30:50.560 --> 00:30:54.640
a certain group which is as boisterous as it is quick-witted that it is engaged

289
00:30:54.640 --> 00:31:01.320
in by both sexes, old men, women and children. He goes on he says, even

290
00:31:01.320 --> 00:31:07.280
children who hardly know the world and at best own a little pocket money agree

291
00:31:07.280 --> 00:31:13.000
that by that each point by which the large shares rise or fall will mean a

292
00:31:13.000 --> 00:31:31.000
In a certain amount of their pocket money for their small shares, if one were to lead a stranger through the streets of Amsterdam and ask him where he is, he would answer, among speculators, for there is no corner in the city where one does not talk shares.

293
00:31:31.000 --> 00:31:37.000
Okay, so this is a really just an amazing innovation, purely private.

294
00:31:37.000 --> 00:31:45.000
By the time government addressed trading in Ducaton shares, they declared it to be a form of gambling and a bet.

295
00:31:45.000 --> 00:31:54.000
So that too was not enforceable in courts of law, but they developed a very sophisticated system.

296
00:31:54.000 --> 00:31:58.000
People would hire a private party. They'd make the agreement with them.

297
00:31:58.000 --> 00:32:28.000
And then at the end of the month, this private party would go to the stock exchange, find out the price and then he would come out and there was this process called raising the stick where he'd raise the stick and say the price for these shares is this and there was like a big ruckus every time and they had to stop raising the stick but it worked really well and got a lot of people into the market and this is a purely private innovation rather than a government plant.

298
00:32:28.000 --> 00:32:32.000
Innovation.

299
00:32:32.000 --> 00:32:36.400
All right, so why did people follow through

300
00:32:36.400 --> 00:32:39.920
with their bargains? It obviously wasn't because of the law.

301
00:32:39.920 --> 00:32:43.520
There's a bunch of other potential hypotheses

302
00:32:43.520 --> 00:32:48.080
that people, critics of private ordered systems might say well

303
00:32:48.080 --> 00:32:51.920
it only worked because it's a small closed old boys network.

304
00:32:51.920 --> 00:32:55.920
This clearly was not the case.

305
00:32:55.920 --> 00:33:00.520
It was open to all different types of people.

306
00:33:00.520 --> 00:33:06.840
He describes how some live opulently, nevertheless, there are numerous people in the business

307
00:33:06.840 --> 00:33:13.040
simply for the reason of providing decently for the families, he says.

308
00:33:13.040 --> 00:33:21.120
Other dialogue, one of the characters says, how can I get involved?

309
00:33:21.120 --> 00:33:22.800
I have limited capital.

310
00:33:22.800 --> 00:33:27.600
I think that will preclude me from trading because there would be, quote, nobody to give

311
00:33:27.600 --> 00:33:35.720
me credit, but he's told to start with options, which is potentially lower risk, until he

312
00:33:35.720 --> 00:33:41.920
can, quote, gain in reputation for generosity as well as foresight, okay?

313
00:33:41.920 --> 00:33:46.840
So people could get into this market if they wanted to.

314
00:33:46.840 --> 00:33:52.320
A couple other hypotheses people have is they say, well, it can only work if everyone's

315
00:33:52.320 --> 00:34:19.320
In the book, my research indicates that traders followed through with their bargains not because of law or any of these other things, but simply because of market incentives.

316
00:34:19.320 --> 00:34:24.120
Okay? We see this in this market. We see this in markets today. Okay?

317
00:34:24.120 --> 00:34:28.760
Go on the internet and you see a website you've never heard of.

318
00:34:28.760 --> 00:34:31.880
Sometimes people will buy from that, but many times they won't.

319
00:34:31.880 --> 00:34:35.400
Say, I want to go to the established one. I'm willing to pay a premium.

320
00:34:35.400 --> 00:34:39.320
Or you go onto eBay and you see the person with the higher

321
00:34:39.320 --> 00:34:43.400
reputation score and you say, oh, this person is a reliable person.

322
00:34:43.400 --> 00:34:46.920
The market has created incentives for people

323
00:34:46.920 --> 00:34:55.880
to follow through with their bargains because, you know, obviously no one wants to get cheated.

324
00:34:55.880 --> 00:35:00.440
When you're dealing with someone a long time, you're not going to want to cheat each other.

325
00:35:00.440 --> 00:35:13.720
And when people are dealing with lots of other people, as long as they can share information about reputation and reliability of the other parties, then this can work.

326
00:35:13.720 --> 00:35:23.720
Alright, so let me just give you some, a couple more quotes to illustrate the importance of reputation in this market.

327
00:35:25.720 --> 00:35:32.720
He says, he says, the exchange business is comparable to a game.

328
00:35:32.720 --> 00:35:41.720
Some of the players behave like princes and can combine strength with tenderness, amiability with intelligence.

329
00:35:41.720 --> 00:35:45.720
I love reading about myself like that.

330
00:35:49.720 --> 00:36:02.720
But there are some participants who lose their reputation

331
00:36:02.720 --> 00:36:08.720
and others who lack devotion to their business even before the play begins.

332
00:36:08.720 --> 00:36:32.720
And as we would expect, the untrustworthy brokers are not going to get a lot of business compared to the trustworthy brokers.

333
00:36:32.720 --> 00:36:49.720
Since the status, the insignificant capital, the low reputation and the limited trustworthiness of such people are well known, they do not dare attempt to carry on any considerable business.

334
00:36:49.720 --> 00:36:57.720
So you've got to work to get your customers and people can talk, people can say don't deal with that person.

335
00:36:57.720 --> 00:37:27.720
and the people who can provide assurances that they're going to be more reliable are going to get more business and he describes this he says so great is the loyalty of some brokers to their principles whom they usually call their masters and so great is their industry their activity their zeal and their vigilance that the customers get their money's worth and I'll just finish up with one last nice quote he says to be sure there is

336
00:37:27.720 --> 00:37:31.720
with its wide-spread honesty and expedition on the exchange.

337
00:37:31.720 --> 00:37:40.720
For example, the business and stocks and the bustle of the sales which are made when unforeseen news occurs is wonderful to behold.

338
00:37:40.720 --> 00:37:50.720
Nobody changes the decisions which he makes in his momentary passion and his words are held sacred even in the case of a price difference of 50%.

339
00:37:50.720 --> 00:37:58.120
And although tremendous business is done by merchants without the mediation of brokers who could serve as witnesses,

340
00:37:58.120 --> 00:38:02.160
no confusion occurs and no quarrels take place.

341
00:38:02.160 --> 00:38:09.840
Such honesty, cooperation and accuracy are admirable and surprising.

342
00:38:09.840 --> 00:38:13.600
Okay, so some conclusions from this study.

343
00:38:13.600 --> 00:38:23.680
Government was not supportive of the world's first stock market.

344
00:38:23.680 --> 00:38:34.440
Nevertheless, traders developed very sophisticated contracts.

345
00:38:34.440 --> 00:38:39.720
The market, I find this case study interesting because the market was complex.

346
00:38:39.720 --> 00:38:47.720
It wasn't just a simple barter market, the market had lots of people, there were hundreds of brokers.

347
00:38:47.720 --> 00:38:53.720
The market had heterogeneous people, so lots of different people from different groups were interacting.

348
00:38:53.720 --> 00:39:01.720
And it worked even as some shares, you know, the shares were going up and down, some people were gaining, other people were losing.

349
00:39:01.720 --> 00:39:04.720
So it wasn't just the case where everyone was making money hand over fist.

350
00:39:04.720 --> 00:39:10.720
It worked over a hundred years throughout this entire swings in the market.

351
00:39:10.720 --> 00:39:17.720
So the stock market, in my opinion, developed not because of the law but in spite of the law.

352
00:39:17.720 --> 00:39:26.720
And the last thing that I find extremely interesting about this market is it worked basically without any formal enforcement.

353
00:39:26.720 --> 00:39:38.720
So often times private parties hire formal third party enforcement that is private, but here's an example of this working without that.

354
00:39:38.720 --> 00:39:52.720
So the idea that you have to have written contracts with formal arrangements for everything you do I think is overrated in the current world.

355
00:39:52.720 --> 00:40:02.720
So, to conclude, government is not necessary for the enforcement of contracts, even in sophisticated markets.

356
00:40:02.720 --> 00:40:13.720
And in my opinion, the more evidence we can amass of this, I think it's just a gold mine, we can just keep digging up more and more examples of this.

357
00:40:13.720 --> 00:40:29.720
The more evidence that we can amass of this, the less likely people like Mises, that statist Mises, Hayek, that statist Hayek, Wren, that statist Wren.

358
00:40:29.720 --> 00:40:38.720
I'm just kidding. I like these people. I like all of them. They're all my friends.

359
00:40:38.720 --> 00:40:46.720
Stigler and Friedman, the less likely they are to assume that private enforcement of contracts is impossible.

360
00:40:46.720 --> 00:40:49.720
It's just simply not true.

361
00:40:49.720 --> 00:40:58.720
Now, people might respond and they might say, well, okay, we grant that private law enforcement is possible.

362
00:40:58.720 --> 00:41:05.720
But they might say, well, socialized law enforcement is going to be better for these reasons.

363
00:41:05.720 --> 00:41:35.720
private law enforcement is going to be suboptimal and they can make that argument but that's a completely set separate set of arguments and I'd like to have people you know I'd like to have people having that debate compared to the position of 50 years ago where it's like no no no that's that's simply impossible I'd like to shift the debate I've talked about an example of contracts without external enforcement

364
00:41:35.720 --> 00:42:05.720
Management or an example of a private ordering. There's basically a million areas that we might study and I'm just one of the many people contributing to this very excellent field, but there's people like Bruce Benson and other people who are documenting examples of criminal law, alternatives to criminal law I should say, court law, property law, police,

365
00:42:05.720 --> 00:42:33.720
So what I would like to see is people just taking a subject and, okay, let's have 10 articles about each subject and then have 10 more people write 10 more articles and then, you know, at the end of the day, we're going to have this huge body of work that will document, look, the idea that government needs to do all this stuff is not exactly clear.

366
00:42:33.720 --> 00:42:44.720
So the more research we do, the more we can unravel what I consider the feeble case for socialized law enforcement.

367
00:42:44.720 --> 00:42:47.720
Markets work! Thank you.

368
00:42:47.720 --> 00:43:04.720
All right, so we've got some time for questions. Yeah.

369
00:43:04.720 --> 00:43:09.720
Thank you. I agree pretty much entirely with everything.

370
00:43:09.720 --> 00:43:12.720
Great. Excellent question. Okay, next one.

371
00:43:12.720 --> 00:43:39.720
The way you use the word law, you say people enforce their contracts even though there wasn't support from the law, and I think you're using law in the sense that, I don't use it that way anymore, I say government law, because in fact law is, as you prove in your book, law exists before government exists.

372
00:43:39.720 --> 00:43:51.720
I'm moving away from, like Milton Friedman said, we shouldn't have let them steal our word, which is liberal.

373
00:43:51.720 --> 00:44:01.720
We shouldn't have let them steal that other L word, law, because in fact law grows privately, everywhere, wherever people meet and pray.

374
00:44:01.720 --> 00:44:20.720
I totally think you're making an excellent point. The question said law precedes government and I totally agree with that.

375
00:44:20.720 --> 00:44:24.720
So should I change my language when I say when it's against the law?

376
00:44:24.720 --> 00:44:31.720
I could have added, when it's against government laws, but my talk would have been too long.

377
00:44:31.720 --> 00:44:42.720
Have you sent this to Gordon Tulloch, and if so, what did he have to say back to that?

378
00:44:42.720 --> 00:44:49.720
Yeah, I actually presented this in front of Gordon Tulloch, and then afterwards he said,

379
00:44:49.720 --> 00:44:51.560
He said, what's your address?

380
00:44:51.560 --> 00:44:56.760
And I gave it to him, and then he sent me something.

381
00:44:56.760 --> 00:45:00.480
And it was on, it's called, The Non-Prisoners' Dilemma,

382
00:45:00.480 --> 00:45:02.320
where it's really not a big problem.

383
00:45:02.320 --> 00:45:04.520
And the next time I saw him, he said, see,

384
00:45:04.520 --> 00:45:05.860
I'm not really a statist.

385
00:45:05.860 --> 00:45:06.360
Yeah.

386
00:45:11.920 --> 00:45:15.720
I found it fascinating.

387
00:45:15.720 --> 00:45:18.880
I'm not sure it proves the point you're trying to make,

388
00:45:18.880 --> 00:45:34.880
That's the point you're trying to make. The fact that, let's call it a business model, developed spontaneously, in spite of the fact that there wasn't specific legislation on it.

389
00:45:34.880 --> 00:45:44.880
In fact, legislation is usually way behind, trying to regulate and control businesses and activities that are already there.

390
00:45:44.880 --> 00:46:05.880
So, you know, I find it interesting that this develops spontaneously, but it doesn't really say that this could develop in the total absence of authority, which I think would be more an anarchist argument.

391
00:46:05.880 --> 00:46:13.880
The question would be, could it have developed in the absence of authority, not in the absence of legislation?

392
00:46:13.880 --> 00:46:20.880
Given that it does develop in the absence of legislation, but can it develop in the absence of authority?

393
00:46:35.880 --> 00:47:05.880
and Property Rights. Interestingly, actually, the East India Company had their own private militaries with their boats, they protected their boats all over, and there were some problems, but you're certainly right, this is just addressing one aspect, but I think it does get at a bunch of people say, today markets, financial markets, you can't have them without legislation, and I think that's what I'm showing is not necessarily true.

394
00:47:05.880 --> 00:47:09.880
The question about authority, I think that's a good one.

395
00:47:09.880 --> 00:47:12.880
It's just a matter of what kind of authority.

396
00:47:12.880 --> 00:47:23.880
And the history of financial markets were self-governing authorities rather than publicly governed authorities.

397
00:47:23.880 --> 00:47:29.880
I didn't mean that. I just meant that under the umbrella of an authority.

398
00:47:29.880 --> 00:47:36.880
No, it's common law and judgmental law. I mean, this would exist without any legislation.

399
00:47:59.880 --> 00:48:17.880
I've done some other work. The question is, what forces people out of the market is ostracism.

400
00:48:17.880 --> 00:48:23.140
I have other work on the London Stock Exchange, and it's a very similar story. They transformed

401
00:48:23.140 --> 00:48:28.040
coffee houses into private clubs. If you didn't follow the rules, you would get kicked out

402
00:48:28.040 --> 00:48:38.040
Do you know of any case in which you didn't keep an aeroplane because of the fact that both his son and his dad's son are in it?

403
00:48:58.040 --> 00:49:18.040
I'm not wanting to answer and I kept pressing and pressing them and then finally said, number six, David Friedman, so, so, yeah, number seven was, was Ed Stringham, Dan.

404
00:49:28.040 --> 00:49:33.040
and also the complexity of the issues and whatnot.

405
00:49:33.040 --> 00:49:40.040
But I guess I'm kind of skeptical as to whether or not you're living up to the terms or the way they use them.

406
00:49:44.040 --> 00:49:47.040
So, they may say complex and heterogeneous, altruistic and very different things.

407
00:49:47.040 --> 00:49:54.040
You mentioned earlier that young and old men and women, but they were still all Dutch.

408
00:49:58.040 --> 00:50:04.160
Portuguese people who had fled at that time. So there was all

409
00:50:04.160 --> 00:50:08.680
different languages going on during the exchange.

410
00:50:28.040 --> 00:50:41.040
No, I think you're making a good point. There are some more modern, sophisticated arguments about how it can only work in certain cases.

411
00:50:41.040 --> 00:50:50.040
But at least some of the traditional classical liberals wouldn't even grant the possibility of private ordering at all.

412
00:50:50.040 --> 00:50:57.040
So yes, I agree with you that you could come up with a more complex market.

413
00:50:57.040 --> 00:51:22.040
The stock market in London 100 years later was more complex or markets today are more complex, there's more people, so I'm not saying this is the most complex market ever, but I think that it is showing that it's much more sophisticated than a barter market, which is what people like Manker-Olson say, well you can have barter but you can't have anything else, so good question, yeah.

414
00:51:52.040 --> 00:52:19.040
...

415
00:52:19.040 --> 00:52:25.040
Wow. Wow. Thank you for the fascinating story.

416
00:52:27.040 --> 00:52:28.040
Walter.

417
00:52:41.040 --> 00:52:44.040
I want to put a wet blanket on you, Walter.

418
00:53:19.040 --> 00:53:34.040
I totally agree with you, Walter, and I think this is just one piece of evidence to say if you want to be intellectually honest about it, you can't make those claims.

419
00:53:34.040 --> 00:53:37.040
So thank you very much for being such a great professor to me.

420
00:53:49.040 --> 00:53:50.040
is another one.
