WEBVTT

NOTE Ending the Monetary Fiasco and Returning to Sound Money

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:08.000
Ladies and gentlemen, dear Professor Salerno, dear Mr. Tucker and dear Mr. Rockwell,

2
00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:17.000
it is the greatest pleasure and honor for me to be here and to have the opportunity to give the Mises Lecture 2009.

3
00:00:17.000 --> 00:00:21.000
I may say that I was really overwhelmed by your invitation.

4
00:00:21.000 --> 00:00:28.000
Giving the Mises Lecture, making a tribute to a gigantic thinker, is a great challenge,

5
00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:33.000
which I accepted, well knowing what Mark Trane said.

6
00:00:33.000 --> 00:00:43.000
It is better to keep your mouth closed and keep people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.

7
00:00:43.000 --> 00:00:50.000
Ludwig von Mises is, and I suppose virtually all of you would agree, the Dean of the Austrian School of Economics.

8
00:00:50.000 --> 00:01:00.000
And I do not hesitate to add he is also the most important economist of the 20th century and one of the greatest social philosophers.

9
00:01:05.000 --> 00:01:16.000
Mises' personal courage and rigorous intellectual reasoning are and will always be an inspiration and encouragement to all students of social sciences.

10
00:01:16.000 --> 00:01:35.000
His outstanding expertise in the fields of economics, politics, history and psychology combined with his unwavering ability to integrate these diverse elements into a coherent theoretical system is what sets him apart from other economists.

11
00:01:35.000 --> 00:01:48.000
Mises not only reconstructed the theory of economics along the line of a humanistic social theory, praxeology, the science of the logic of human action.

12
00:01:48.000 --> 00:01:59.000
He also made a scientifically founded ethical case for capitalism, showing that the free market, the organization along the lines of private property,

13
00:01:59.000 --> 00:02:09.000
essentially means productive, peaceful and sustainable association and cooperation among three individuals.

14
00:02:09.000 --> 00:02:16.000
Mises knew that capitalism for a number of reasons has politically powerful enemies.

15
00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:26.000
The most powerful, most destructive and most vicious and subversive of these would be a false monetary theory

16
00:02:26.000 --> 00:02:37.000
and a result of that a misguided monetary system. In The Theory of Money and Credit published in 1912, Mises noted,

17
00:02:37.000 --> 00:02:47.000
It would be a mistake to assume that the modern organization of exchange is bound to continue to exist.

18
00:02:47.000 --> 00:02:52.000
It carries within itself the germ of its own destruction.

19
00:02:52.000 --> 00:02:59.000
The development of the fiduciary medium must necessarily lead to its breakdown.

20
00:02:59.000 --> 00:03:04.000
With fiduciary medium, Mises meant fraudulent money.

21
00:03:04.000 --> 00:03:11.000
Money that is systematically or is systematically violating the principle of private property.

22
00:03:11.000 --> 00:03:15.000
Money that isn't backed by freely chosen money proper.

23
00:03:15.000 --> 00:03:22.000
Government controlled money is and will always be by construction, fraudulent money.

24
00:03:22.000 --> 00:03:31.000
We already find ourselves facing the destructive consequences of the worldwide fiat money regime,

25
00:03:31.000 --> 00:03:38.000
impoverishment caused by malinvestment and rising despair among the people,

26
00:03:38.000 --> 00:03:44.000
which it must be feared will set into motion disintegrating forces for capitalism.

27
00:03:44.000 --> 00:03:54.000
We are witnessing yet another sign of the failure of the fiat money regime, this time perhaps its eventual collapse on a worldwide scale.

28
00:03:54.000 --> 00:04:03.000
It has been predicted, logically deduced from praxeology by Ludwig von Mises and his followers.

29
00:04:03.000 --> 00:04:09.000
However, this assessment is not shared by public majority opinion.

30
00:04:09.000 --> 00:04:29.000
On the contrary, free markets are being blamed for having caused the disaster and even more government interventionism, restrictions, controls, special privileges, subsidies or Keynesian spending programs is seen as the way out of the catastrophe.

31
00:04:29.000 --> 00:04:43.000
Interventionism is, Mises wrote in 1940, not an economic system. It is not a method which enables people to achieve their aims.

32
00:04:43.000 --> 00:04:49.000
It is merely a system of procedures which disturb and eventually destroy the market economy.

33
00:04:49.000 --> 00:04:57.000
It hampers production and impairs satisfaction of needs. It does not make people richer, it makes people poorer.

34
00:04:57.000 --> 00:05:09.000
From the viewpoint of the Austrian School of Economics, only a return to sound money, that is free market money, can prevent further impoverishment and the destruction of a free societal order.

35
00:05:09.000 --> 00:05:18.000
In his magnificent magnum opus, Human Action, Mises identified the cause and the way out of the disaster.

36
00:05:18.000 --> 00:05:30.000
There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by circulation credit expansion.

37
00:05:30.000 --> 00:05:39.000
The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as a result of a voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion

38
00:05:39.000 --> 00:05:45.000
or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved.

39
00:05:45.000 --> 00:05:55.000
In 1923, when nations were still suffering from the devastation caused by World War I, Mises wrote,

40
00:05:55.000 --> 00:06:01.000
The claimer to eliminate the deficiencies in the field of money has become universal.

41
00:06:01.000 --> 00:06:09.000
People have become convinced that the restoration of domestic peace within nations

42
00:06:09.000 --> 00:06:17.000
and the revival of international economic relations are impossible with a sound monetary system.

43
00:06:17.000 --> 00:06:30.000
Today, with the standard of living relatively high in major economies and international relations between the economic and militarily powerful nations being by and large peaceful by historical standards,

44
00:06:30.000 --> 00:06:38.000
one would think that the chances for monetary reform are much more promising than back in the 1920s.

45
00:06:38.000 --> 00:06:49.000
In an era of big government, however, with its corrupting effects in the society increasingly weakening the voices of freedom,

46
00:06:49.000 --> 00:06:57.000
the chances for returning to what Mises called sound money have undoubtedly declined.

47
00:06:57.000 --> 00:07:00.000
But change hasn't become impossible.

48
00:07:00.000 --> 00:07:09.000
Powerful tools remain in place, intellectual debate, education and conversion of a large number of people to the cause.

49
00:07:09.000 --> 00:07:23.000
The most powerful and rigorous arguments making an uncompromising case for sound money as an indispensable prerequisite of freedom can be found in the works of Ludwig von Mises.

50
00:07:23.000 --> 00:07:29.000
And having said that, please let me briefly outline the structure of the rest of my talk.

51
00:07:29.000 --> 00:07:34.000
In the second part, I will briefly review the work of Ludwig von Mises.

52
00:07:34.000 --> 00:07:40.000
In the third part, I will turn our attention to the current state of world monetary affairs.

53
00:07:40.000 --> 00:07:44.000
I will show you some charts which you may like.

54
00:07:44.000 --> 00:07:51.000
In the fourth part, I will take the courage along the lines of Mises and Rothbard and outline a strategy

55
00:07:51.000 --> 00:07:56.000
for ending the monetary fiasco and returning to some money.

56
00:07:56.000 --> 00:08:06.000
Mises' book The Theory of Money and Credit, I mentioned already, it was published in 1912, was a groundbreaking work.

57
00:08:06.000 --> 00:08:18.000
In it, he succeeded in solving what had been seen so far as an insurmountable task, integrating the value of money into the marginal utility theory.

58
00:08:18.000 --> 00:08:29.000
In doing so, Mises not only provided a macroeconomic foundation for determining the value of money, but also solved the so-called Austrian Circle.

59
00:08:29.000 --> 00:08:39.000
You may know in Principles of Economics, Carl Menger in 1871 had developed a logical historical theory of the origin of money.

60
00:08:39.000 --> 00:08:44.000
Money, he maintained, could only have originated out of barter.

61
00:08:44.000 --> 00:08:49.000
Such an explanation, however, led to the problem of the Austrian Circle.

62
00:08:49.000 --> 00:08:56.000
At any given time, the purchasing power of money is determined by the supply of and demand for money,

63
00:08:56.000 --> 00:09:01.000
which, in turn, depend on the pre-existing purchasing power of money.

64
00:09:01.000 --> 00:09:06.000
This led to the so-called infinite logical regress.

65
00:09:06.000 --> 00:09:15.000
But Mises showed that the hitherto assumed infinite logical regress would not be infinite.

66
00:09:15.000 --> 00:09:22.000
The regress ends at precisely the point in time when money is a useful non-monetary commodity.

67
00:09:22.000 --> 00:09:29.000
Mises regression theorem demonstrates that the value of money has a historical dimension,

68
00:09:29.000 --> 00:09:36.000
as was stated by Menger, and it also provides a logical explanation for Menger's theory.

69
00:09:36.000 --> 00:09:43.000
And what is more, the regression theory shows that money must be established by free market forces,

70
00:09:43.000 --> 00:09:47.000
that it cannot be established by government interventionism.

71
00:09:47.000 --> 00:09:55.000
The only possibility for the government obtaining control of the money supply is through coercive action.

72
00:09:55.000 --> 00:10:04.000
In The Theory of Money and Credit, Mises also outlined the foundation of what later became the Austrian monetary theory of the trade cycle.

73
00:10:04.000 --> 00:10:11.000
Mises built his business cycle theory on basically three existing elements.

74
00:10:11.000 --> 00:10:20.000
The boom and bust model of the currency school, the differentiation between the natural interest rate and the market interest rate,

75
00:10:20.000 --> 00:10:26.160
Market Interest Rate, as outlined by Swedish economist Knut Wichsel, and the Capital and

76
00:10:26.160 --> 00:10:31.600
Interest Rate Theory as developed by Eugen von Boehm-Bawerk.

77
00:10:31.600 --> 00:10:36.200
By integrating these previously separated theories, Mises showed that any artificial

78
00:10:36.200 --> 00:10:41.920
government manipulation of the interest rate by expanding what he called circulation credit

79
00:10:41.920 --> 00:10:47.840
sets into motion an economic boom which must inevitably end in bust.

80
00:10:47.840 --> 00:10:56.360
In his monograph Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth, Mises in 1920 irrefutably

81
00:10:56.360 --> 00:11:02.400
demonstrated that socialism was doomed to fail, outstanding achievement in a time when

82
00:11:02.400 --> 00:11:08.320
everybody basically believed socialism is the new societal order.

83
00:11:08.320 --> 00:11:14.000
This argument was then developed further in his remarkable book Socialism.

84
00:11:14.000 --> 00:11:25.000
Early on, Mises was of the opinion that government-market interference would almost invariably prove to be counterproductive.

85
00:11:25.000 --> 00:11:30.000
And his works on money and the business cycle confirmed and reinforced this view.

86
00:11:30.000 --> 00:11:37.000
In interventionism in 1940, Mises exposed the fallacies of the middle-of-the-road policy,

87
00:11:37.000 --> 00:11:46.000
showing that interventionism would be inherently unstable, unsustainable form of societal organization.

88
00:11:46.000 --> 00:11:50.000
He identified the general law of government failure basically.

89
00:11:50.000 --> 00:11:58.000
Whenever the state intervenes, it invariably ends in not solving the problem it tries to solve,

90
00:11:58.000 --> 00:12:02.000
but in creating one or many other new problems,

91
00:12:02.000 --> 00:12:07.000
Provoking even further government interference in private property.

92
00:12:07.000 --> 00:12:13.000
Socialism is impossible. It does not allow for the survival of the human race.

93
00:12:13.000 --> 00:12:17.000
And interventionism leads to full-scale socialism.

94
00:12:17.000 --> 00:12:24.000
So the logical conclusion is that the only viable form of societal organization is capitalism.

95
00:12:24.000 --> 00:12:30.000
In that sense, Mises provided the hitherto vaguely formulated and moral-based case

96
00:12:30.000 --> 00:12:37.000
and the free market with a logical, consistent and thought-through theory in favor of capitalism.

97
00:12:37.000 --> 00:12:44.000
After he fled Europe in 1940, Mises continued his prolific work in the United States of America.

98
00:12:44.000 --> 00:12:50.000
He published Omnipotent Government and Bureaucracy both in 1944.

99
00:12:50.000 --> 00:12:59.000
In 1949, Mises published his Human Action, a completely rewritten and expanded version of national economy.

100
00:12:59.000 --> 00:13:15.000
Planning for Freedom, The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality, Followed in 1952, Theory and History in 1957, and The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science in 1962.

101
00:13:15.000 --> 00:13:22.000
All these works made important contribution to economic theory and the pro-capitalism case.

102
00:13:22.000 --> 00:13:29.000
And all of them were in stark opposition to the prevailing mainstream viewpoint of the profession,

103
00:13:29.000 --> 00:13:37.000
which had been characterized by logical positivism, empiricism and societal relativism.

104
00:13:37.000 --> 00:13:44.000
In fact, these tenets have remained the very guiding principles of today's mainstream economics.

105
00:13:44.000 --> 00:13:51.200
Perhaps most characteristically in Human Action, Mises gave economic theory a solid epistemological

106
00:13:51.200 --> 00:13:58.620
fundamental, reshaping economic theory as the implication of the formal fact of human

107
00:13:58.620 --> 00:14:05.640
action. He cast economics as a subdivision of praxeology, the science of the logic of

108
00:14:05.640 --> 00:14:13.160
human action. Economics follows the discipline of applied logic based on the axiom of action,

109
00:14:13.160 --> 00:14:21.160
and a priori true proposition, basically in the best tradition of the great philosopher Immanuel Kant.

110
00:14:21.160 --> 00:14:31.160
It goes without saying that praxeology, building on axiomatic, deductive arguments for providing irrefutable truth,

111
00:14:31.160 --> 00:14:39.160
brought Mises in an age of socialism, interventionism, democratic, egalitarianism and ethical relativism

112
00:14:39.160 --> 00:14:43.160
in severe conflict with the mainstream economic profession.

113
00:14:43.160 --> 00:14:46.160
But he held course.

114
00:14:46.160 --> 00:14:50.160
As a great teacher and mentor, the list of Mises devoted students

115
00:14:50.160 --> 00:14:55.160
among which rank highly eminent names is truly staggering.

116
00:14:55.160 --> 00:14:58.160
Murray Rothbard is certainly the most influential scholar

117
00:14:58.160 --> 00:15:03.160
among the rationalist mainstream of the Austrian School of Economics.

118
00:15:03.160 --> 00:15:08.160
Inspired by Mises, Rothbard, going beyond utilitarianism,

119
00:15:08.160 --> 00:15:14.160
developed a system of rational ethics based on private property.

120
00:15:14.160 --> 00:15:20.160
In the ethics of liberty, Rothbard deduced Austrian-based libertarianism,

121
00:15:20.160 --> 00:15:28.160
a system that integrated value-free Austrian economics and the libertarian political philosophy.

122
00:15:28.160 --> 00:15:34.160
I would now like to move our attention to Mises' achievements in monetary theory,

123
00:15:34.160 --> 00:15:41.160
which is, as will be seen shortly, inseparably linked to the scientific case for capitalism.

124
00:15:41.160 --> 00:15:50.160
Let me say that capitalism rests on individuals' property rights, private ownership of the means of production.

125
00:15:50.160 --> 00:15:55.160
All claims capitalism makes result from this fundamental insight.

126
00:15:55.160 --> 00:16:03.160
Motivated by self-interest, property encourages individuals to increasingly take advantage of the division of labour.

127
00:16:03.160 --> 00:16:13.160
and free trade, as the latter allow for higher productivity and higher incomes when compared with the system of economically self-sufficient individuals.

128
00:16:13.160 --> 00:16:25.160
Money emerges from individuals pursuing their self-interest. Using money no longer restricts exchange to a double coincidence of wants of the parties involved,

129
00:16:25.160 --> 00:16:42.160
Mises realized that money is not an abstract concept that can be treated separately from the sphere of commodities, but he knows that money is a commodity, in a free market, money is the kind of commodity which is considered most exchangeable or marketable.

130
00:16:42.160 --> 00:16:52.160
of Commodities. But he knows that money is a commodity. In a free market, money is the kind of commodity which is considered most exchangeable or marketable.

131
00:16:52.160 --> 00:17:05.160
With prices of all vendable items expressed in terms of a single commodity, transaction costs are greatly diminished, requiring less resources for making exchange possible,

132
00:17:05.160 --> 00:17:10.160
They are also contributing to higher productivity and higher standards of living.

133
00:17:10.160 --> 00:17:18.160
The use of money as an accounting tool provides for an accurate expression of an individual's opportunity costs.

134
00:17:18.160 --> 00:17:24.160
This in turn supports efficient decision making on the part of producers and consumers.

135
00:17:24.160 --> 00:17:29.160
Money allows for higher incomes and higher incomes lower people's time preference,

136
00:17:29.160 --> 00:17:34.160
that is individual's preference for present goods over future goods.

137
00:17:34.160 --> 00:17:43.160
And the lower people's time preference is the earlier the onset of the process of capital formation.

138
00:17:43.160 --> 00:17:51.160
A decline in people's time preference means that a greater portion of current income will be saved and invested.

139
00:17:51.160 --> 00:17:59.160
As the stock of capital rises and as production becomes more roundabout, the marginal productivity of labor increases.

140
00:17:59.160 --> 00:18:04.160
and this leads to higher employment and higher wages and higher standards of living.

141
00:18:04.160 --> 00:18:11.160
The expansion of the division of labour and free trade accompanied by a rising saving and investment activity

142
00:18:11.160 --> 00:18:16.160
brings about ever closer economic ties between individuals.

143
00:18:16.160 --> 00:18:23.160
Growing economic integration makes people less present oriented and more future oriented

144
00:18:23.160 --> 00:18:28.160
and this too gives another boost to higher degree of interpersonal cooperation.

145
00:18:28.160 --> 00:18:39.160
In other words, civilization. So we can basically conclude that money plays a key role in facilitating the process of civilization.

146
00:18:39.160 --> 00:18:54.160
However, this holds true only for free market money, while with government controlled fiat money, the opposing tendency comes into operation, namely the process of de-civilization.

147
00:18:54.160 --> 00:19:03.160
As noted already, Mises showed that money is an integral and forming element of the free market system.

148
00:19:03.160 --> 00:19:09.160
In that sense, free market money can be characterized as sound money.

149
00:19:09.160 --> 00:19:19.160
In the theory of money and credit, and I apologize, the quote was already mentioned by a speaker in the previous session,

150
00:19:19.160 --> 00:19:28.840
Mises, the sound money principle has two aspects. It is affirmative in approving the market's

151
00:19:28.840 --> 00:19:35.200
choice of a commonly used medium of exchange. It is negative in obstructing the government's

152
00:19:35.200 --> 00:19:43.700
propensity to meddle with the currency system. And further, it is impossible to grasp the

153
00:19:43.700 --> 00:19:57.700
The meaning of the idea of sound money, if one does not realize that it was devised as an instrument for the protection of the civil liberties against despotic inroads on the part of governments.

154
00:19:57.700 --> 00:20:05.700
Ideologically, it belongs in the same class with political constitutions and bills of rights.

155
00:20:05.700 --> 00:20:14.700
So, Mises' sound money principle is basically a protection against destructive government interference in the free market.

156
00:20:14.700 --> 00:20:19.700
In that sense, sound money can be interpreted as a means to an end.

157
00:20:19.700 --> 00:20:27.700
Sound money safeguards the free market order, leading to prosperity and supporting the process of civilization.

158
00:20:27.700 --> 00:20:43.700
It is against this backdrop that today's monetary regimes, which in the last decades have evolved in a diametrical opposition to Mises Sound Money principle, must be seen as a source of destruction to the free society.

159
00:20:43.700 --> 00:20:50.700
Today's money is supplied by government controlled central banks, which hold the money supply monopoly.

160
00:20:50.700 --> 00:20:59.700
Today's money is fiat money. It is no longer linked to any commodities such as gold, silver or other precious metals.

161
00:20:59.700 --> 00:21:04.700
Central banks can and do issue new money out of thin air.

162
00:21:04.700 --> 00:21:12.700
The stock of money is increased without invoking any wealth producing activities which are required in the free market.

163
00:21:12.700 --> 00:21:16.700
Fiat money creation, which is typically done via the credit markets,

164
00:21:16.700 --> 00:21:24.700
Free markets can therefore, from the viewpoint of the best legal tradition, be called counter-fighting money.

165
00:21:24.700 --> 00:21:30.700
In a free market wealth can only be created through homesteading, producing and contracting.

166
00:21:30.700 --> 00:21:40.700
Exchanging goods and services against fiat money, be that in the market for present goods or in the market for exchanging present goods against future goods,

167
00:21:40.700 --> 00:21:51.200
The time market as Rothbard called it, it is a violation of the free market principle as it is no longer mutually beneficial for all parties involved.

168
00:21:51.200 --> 00:21:56.700
And having said that, please let us turn to Mises' business cycle theory.

169
00:21:56.700 --> 00:22:07.200
From praxeology we can deduce that government fiat money is to be held responsible for the recurrence of boom and bust cycles.

170
00:22:07.200 --> 00:22:12.200
as outlined by Mises' monetary theory of the trade cycle.

171
00:22:12.200 --> 00:22:16.200
So let us take a look at the chain of events.

172
00:22:16.200 --> 00:22:24.200
An increase in the fiat money supply through what Mises called the expansion of circulation credit

173
00:22:24.200 --> 00:22:32.200
lowers and necessarily so the market interest rate to below the natural interest rate or people's time preference.

174
00:22:32.200 --> 00:22:44.200
It is this artificial downward manipulation of the market interest rate which sets into motion the economically harmful and politically devastating boom and bust cycles.

175
00:22:44.200 --> 00:22:56.200
The increase in the fiat money supply via circulation credit is inflationary and its consequence is prices for consumer and or assets going up.

176
00:22:56.200 --> 00:23:00.200
What is more, it leads to a false sense of real savings.

177
00:23:00.200 --> 00:23:11.200
The artificially lowered market interest rate induces investment projects which would not have been undertaken under an unchanged credit and money supply.

178
00:23:11.200 --> 00:23:16.200
The artificially lowered market interest rate makes production more roundabout.

179
00:23:16.200 --> 00:23:25.200
That is, economic resources are increasingly diverted from the production of consumption to goods to investment goods.

180
00:23:25.200 --> 00:23:38.200
The lowered market interest rate reduces real savings and increases consumption and investment, making monetary demand overstretch the economy's real resources.

181
00:23:38.200 --> 00:23:50.200
Sooner or later, however, people return to their favored portfolio situation. When this happens, it becomes obvious that the economy has lived beyond its means.

182
00:23:50.200 --> 00:23:58.200
That is, it has embarked upon an unsustainable path and the credit and money-fueled boom turns into bust.

183
00:23:58.200 --> 00:24:06.200
But now comes the hard part, of which Mises was so well aware.

184
00:24:06.200 --> 00:24:17.200
In view of an approaching depression, recession, whatever, people start calling for the continuation of the very policies that have caused the Malays

185
00:24:17.200 --> 00:24:23.200
Even lower interest rates through a further increase in the supply of credit and money.

186
00:24:23.200 --> 00:24:33.200
More credit and more money at the lowest possible interest rate are seen as a remedy rather than a cause of the disaster.

187
00:24:33.200 --> 00:24:41.200
Lower central bank interest rates may prevent depression on some occasions, but this comes at a high price.

188
00:24:41.200 --> 00:24:46.200
A correction of the distortions in the production structure is prevented.

189
00:24:46.200 --> 00:24:54.200
and the artificially lowered interest rate encourages even more distortions in the economy's production structure.

190
00:24:54.200 --> 00:25:04.200
As a result, a monetary policy that tries to fend off depression, the economically painful but necessary process of correcting malinvestment,

191
00:25:04.200 --> 00:25:15.200
merely postpones the inevitable crisis and because it increases the amount of malinvestment, increases the cost of the ultimate bust.

192
00:25:15.200 --> 00:25:25.400
First, one may blame the public's economic illiteracy and its anti-capitalist mentality

193
00:25:25.400 --> 00:25:30.980
for failing to come up with the right diagnosis of the causes of the crisis and to advocate

194
00:25:30.980 --> 00:25:38.640
an appropriate cure. This, however, would run the risk of underrating the disaster-causing

195
00:25:38.640 --> 00:25:44.240
role of government. Governments and their sympathizers and beneficiaries have an existential

196
00:25:44.240 --> 00:26:01.240
There is a considerable interest in preserving and strengthening the fiat money regime, marketing it in public, especially in state funded schools and universities, as being in the best interest of the people, suggesting that there is no viable alternative.

197
00:26:01.240 --> 00:26:07.240
But of course, there is a viable alternative, free market money.

198
00:26:07.240 --> 00:26:18.240
And a monetary regimen change is badly needed, a case unmistakably made by the disintegrating developments of the fiat money systems the world over.

199
00:26:19.240 --> 00:26:30.240
But the majority of the people, as I indicated earlier, does not believe in free markets as epitomized by the popular term credit crisis.

200
00:26:30.240 --> 00:26:39.240
To put it mildly, this is a misleading interpretation of what is really going on.

201
00:26:39.240 --> 00:26:47.240
What is called crisis is actually an inevitable process through which malinvestment is corrected.

202
00:26:47.240 --> 00:26:59.240
However, governments and their central banks take measures, essentially bailouts of the greatest possible dimension for fending off the inevitable correction.

203
00:26:59.240 --> 00:27:05.240
It goes without saying that they won't improve things but will make things worse.

204
00:27:05.240 --> 00:27:12.240
In view of the gigantic debt pyramid which has been hit up over the last decades,

205
00:27:12.240 --> 00:27:20.240
lenders have become increasingly concerned about the ability of the borrower to service their debt.

206
00:27:20.240 --> 00:27:29.240
Creditors are no longer willing to refinance loans falling due, let alone increase their credit exposure.

207
00:27:29.240 --> 00:27:41.240
Borrowers, on the other side, accustomed to carrying high debt loads, cannot repay their maturing debt and shoulder higher refinancing rates.

208
00:27:41.240 --> 00:27:53.240
In an effort of deleveraging and de-risking the balance sheets, commercial banks rein in the credit supply and call upon borrowers to repay their debt.

209
00:27:53.240 --> 00:28:07.240
As a result, the credit and money supply is going to contract. If commercial banks default on their debt, bank liabilities in the form of unsecured and secured debentures

210
00:28:07.240 --> 00:28:11.240
and finally also demand time and saving deposits would be destroyed.

211
00:28:11.240 --> 00:28:19.240
The economic process brought about by the remaining free market forces under a fiat money system

212
00:28:19.240 --> 00:28:25.240
would transform the inflation regime into a deflation regime

213
00:28:25.240 --> 00:28:31.240
and before we talk in some more detail about inflation and deflation and its consequences

214
00:28:31.240 --> 00:28:36.240
please let us take a brief look at some charts which should help illustrate

215
00:28:36.240 --> 00:28:45.240
demonstrate the current state of worldwide monetary affairs and the developments that have led to it.

216
00:28:45.240 --> 00:28:50.240
I would like to kick off with showing some symptoms.

217
00:28:50.240 --> 00:28:57.240
The first chart shows stock prices around the world are falling sharply, in particular bank stocks.

218
00:28:57.240 --> 00:28:59.240
That is the light blue line.

219
00:28:59.240 --> 00:29:13.240
This might reflect growing investor concern about the future profitability of banking, especially so in view of growing banking nationalization efforts on the part of governments.

220
00:29:13.240 --> 00:29:26.240
In fact, let me say Karl Marx would be most delighted to see what mainstream economists, including many who think of themselves as capitalism friendly, are calling for.

221
00:29:26.240 --> 00:29:33.240
In effect, most mainstream economists agree now with Marx in calling for, quote,

222
00:29:33.240 --> 00:29:41.240
the centralization of credit in the banks of the state by means of a national bank with state capital and exclusive monopoly,

223
00:29:41.240 --> 00:29:51.240
which is actually proposal number five in Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto published in 1848.

224
00:29:51.240 --> 00:30:02.160
You see that the volatility in financial markets has increased dramatically.

225
00:30:02.160 --> 00:30:09.720
Just take a look at the graph on the left hand side from 1920 until March 2009, you

226
00:30:09.720 --> 00:30:17.920
would see the volatility of the weekly changes in the stock prices of the Dow Jones stock

227
00:30:17.920 --> 00:30:28.160
Market Index. At the same time, and despite government guarantees for bank liabilities,

228
00:30:28.160 --> 00:30:36.960
banks refinancing costs have continued to edge up, basically across all rating categories,

229
00:30:36.960 --> 00:30:42.360
not only in the U.S. but also elsewhere. For instance, in the U.S., you can see the graph

230
00:30:42.360 --> 00:30:54.460
On the left hand side, on the right hand side you see the developments in the Euro area.

231
00:30:54.460 --> 00:31:00.620
The credit quality of the corporate sector has not remained unaffected.

232
00:31:00.620 --> 00:31:11.920
As another indicator for investor credit default concerns, the yield spread of corporate bonds

233
00:31:11.920 --> 00:31:20.660
have risen to the highest level since the Great Depression in 1929.

234
00:31:20.660 --> 00:31:24.040
At the same time, unemployment is going up.

235
00:31:24.040 --> 00:31:29.480
On these charts, on this chart basically, you see the unemployment situation in the

236
00:31:29.480 --> 00:31:32.600
major countries of the world.

237
00:31:32.600 --> 00:31:41.140
Unemployment is about to rise further.

238
00:31:41.140 --> 00:31:48.000
This chart shows you the annual expansion rate of the monetary base in the United States

239
00:31:48.000 --> 00:31:58.640
of America since 1918 up to January 2009. It's running at around 100% per year. This

240
00:31:58.640 --> 00:32:05.820
is the result of the US Federal Reserve taking over troubled assets from banks in exchange

241
00:32:05.820 --> 00:32:13.820
Change for Additional Base Money Balances.

242
00:32:13.820 --> 00:32:27.140
Now on this chart you would see the so-called credit default swap spreads on government bonds

243
00:32:27.140 --> 00:32:33.260
for various European government market traded securities.

244
00:32:33.260 --> 00:32:39.760
And as you can see, the price has been rising sharply in particular after the default of

245
00:32:39.760 --> 00:32:46.880
Lehman on the 15th September 2008.

246
00:32:46.880 --> 00:32:56.400
And this expresses investors increasingly concern that governments who have basically underwritten

247
00:32:56.400 --> 00:33:00.080
Bank's balance sheets are getting into deep trouble.

248
00:33:03.640 --> 00:33:09.680
Now, turning to the causes of the crisis, this chart shows the US private saving ratio

249
00:33:10.040 --> 00:33:15.720
from the early 1950s until the end of 2008.

250
00:33:17.120 --> 00:33:23.640
The saving ratio has been declining considerably from around 10% in the 1980s

251
00:33:23.640 --> 00:33:33.640
and it hit basically zero in 2008 and only lately it has increased slightly.

252
00:33:33.640 --> 00:33:51.640
Now the trend decline in the US savings ratio which you have just seen has been accompanied by bank credit exceeding the expansion of nominal GDP as you can see on this chart.

253
00:33:51.640 --> 00:34:05.640
And this strongly suggests that the credit expansion can be characterized as circulation credit expansion.

254
00:34:05.640 --> 00:34:16.640
So the expansion of credit in excess of real savings as Mises identified as the major cause of the business cycle.

255
00:34:16.640 --> 00:34:35.640
Now viewed from a somewhat different angle, the trend decline in the Federal Reserve fund rate, which set in the early 1980s, has been fueled a massive rise in the economy's total debt outstanding in percent of GDP.

256
00:34:35.640 --> 00:34:43.640
It's now around about 360% of GDP.

257
00:34:43.640 --> 00:34:55.640
In this context, it should be of particular interest to take a look at the relation between government debt and the Federal Reserve's interest rate in a longer term perspective.

258
00:34:55.640 --> 00:35:00.640
Declining Fed rates have been accompanied by rising government debt and vice versa.

259
00:35:00.640 --> 00:35:09.640
By the way, such a relation can also be detected, so this negative relation, can also be detected in other countries such as, for instance, Japan.

260
00:35:09.640 --> 00:35:28.640
After the credit boom collapsed in the early 1990s, the Bank of Japan lowered interest rates to zero with the government trying to deficit spend the banking sector back to health and the economy out of recession.

261
00:35:28.640 --> 00:35:41.640
And after running huge Keynesian economic-inspired public deficits, Japan's gross public debt to GDP is now approaching 200%.

262
00:35:41.640 --> 00:35:51.640
The negative relation between central bank rates and the level of government debt deserves some further comment at this juncture.

263
00:35:51.640 --> 00:36:03.640
If the government holds the monopoly of the money supply, inflation is a readily available source of government revenue.

264
00:36:03.640 --> 00:36:12.640
However, once inflation reaches a certain level, it becomes politically extremely difficult to handle.

265
00:36:12.640 --> 00:36:18.640
This is because inflation undermines the principle of mutually beneficial exchange,

266
00:36:18.640 --> 00:36:22.640
thereby damaging the prosperity creating forces of the free market.

267
00:36:22.640 --> 00:36:30.640
It leads to hardship for many and sooner or later it makes people dissatisfied with their government

268
00:36:30.640 --> 00:36:36.640
threatening its very existence through non-violent or violent action.

269
00:36:36.640 --> 00:36:46.640
When compared with inflation, issuing government debt seems to be a politically much more convenient instrument

270
00:36:46.640 --> 00:36:53.640
of Expropriation and Redistribution from the Viewpoint of the Ruling Class and the Class of the Ruled.

271
00:36:53.640 --> 00:36:58.640
On the one hand, government debt allows the government to secure its revenues.

272
00:36:58.640 --> 00:37:09.640
On the other hand, investors in government debt form an alliance with the state aimed at expropriating future generations of taxpayers.

273
00:37:09.640 --> 00:37:14.640
One should have no illusions about the fact that the huge government debt piles,

274
00:37:14.640 --> 00:37:20.500
Profiles, which have been accumulated over the last decades and which will grow even

275
00:37:20.500 --> 00:37:27.900
bigger by governments trying to fend off depression, represent pent-up inflation. Mises, basically

276
00:37:27.900 --> 00:37:36.660
in view of the German experience made in the early 1920s, put it succinctly, quote, inflation

277
00:37:36.660 --> 00:37:43.180
becomes one of the most important psychological aids to an economic policy which tries to

278
00:37:43.180 --> 00:38:00.180
to camouflage its effects. And further, by deceiving public opinion, it permits a system of government to continue, which would have no hope of receiving the approval of the people if conditions were frankly explained to them.

279
00:38:00.180 --> 00:38:18.180
The monetary fiasco which has been coming to the surface in recent months causes concerns of deflation rather than inflation despite unprecedented increases in the base money supply and the drastic increases in government debt the world over.

280
00:38:18.180 --> 00:38:28.180
In mainstream economics, inflation is typically defined as an ongoing rise in the economy's overall prices,

281
00:38:28.180 --> 00:38:33.180
while deflation is understood as an ongoing decline in overall prices.

282
00:38:33.180 --> 00:38:40.180
Mises had a different view. He noted that inflation and deflation are not praxeological concepts,

283
00:38:40.180 --> 00:38:47.180
but were created by economists adhering to the fallacious notion of the stability of money.

284
00:38:47.180 --> 00:38:54.920
In human action, however, there are no constants and there is no such thing as a stable piece of money.

285
00:38:54.920 --> 00:39:02.420
Money is a good like any other and as such it is subject to the law of diminishing marginal utility.

286
00:39:02.420 --> 00:39:07.420
That is the law of determining subjective value.

287
00:39:07.420 --> 00:39:11.420
Now, let us take a closer look at deflation.

288
00:39:11.420 --> 00:39:20.420
Under commodity-based money, such as the gold standard, deflation is a phenomenon inherent in the working of such a regime.

289
00:39:20.420 --> 00:39:32.420
It is either the result of voluntary exchange or a correction of a preceding violation of property rights by banks having issued too much notes relative to their gold stock.

290
00:39:32.420 --> 00:39:36.420
In that sense, there's nothing wrong with deflation as such.

291
00:39:36.420 --> 00:39:55.420
Under a fiat money system, however, especially so after a worldwide decade-long inflation process, it is important to note that deflation would yield consequences which would be different from deflation under free market money.

292
00:39:55.420 --> 00:40:02.420
First and foremost, under fiat money deflation, so I'm talking about the contraction of the money supply.

293
00:40:02.420 --> 00:40:13.420
Under fiat money deflation, it would be an arbitrary act like any other action taken on the part of the government.

294
00:40:13.420 --> 00:40:17.420
And so it cannot be called desirable in any way.

295
00:40:17.420 --> 00:40:22.420
What is more deflation cannot return, and this is most important I think,

296
00:40:22.420 --> 00:40:33.420
It cannot return the fiat money regime to some kind of market equilibrium in terms of the money supply prices, the production structure and employment.

297
00:40:33.420 --> 00:40:44.420
The reason is that the fiat money system does not have any base of money proper towards which it could deflate.

298
00:40:44.420 --> 00:40:51.420
And third, deflation would in all likelihood bring about a collapse of the government

299
00:40:51.420 --> 00:41:06.420
whose very existence rests to a large extent on debt financing and in deflation government tax revenues would drop and the government would no longer be in a position to roll over their debt falling due, let alone increase their debt.

300
00:41:06.420 --> 00:41:21.420
I may add a political consideration here. Public opinion massaged by government preservers will presumably see inflation, the increase in the money stock, as a lesser evil in view of an approaching deflation.

301
00:41:21.420 --> 00:41:26.420
And so the total destruction of the currency would presumably within reach.

302
00:41:26.420 --> 00:41:36.460
In this context, we should remind ourselves of the most prominent German experience in

303
00:41:36.460 --> 00:41:38.660
the early 1920s.

304
00:41:38.660 --> 00:41:45.380
It was a democratically elected government which decided in view of reparation payment

305
00:41:45.380 --> 00:41:54.660
obligations and depleted funds to take recourse to the printing press, which ended in hyperinflation

306
00:41:54.660 --> 00:42:00.660
and brought with it unspeakable hardship for the people and paved the way towards totalitarianism.

307
00:42:00.660 --> 00:42:09.660
Ladies and gentlemen, there is a way of transforming the fiat money regime into a sound money regime.

308
00:42:09.660 --> 00:42:20.660
Praxeology, the science of the logic of human action, allows us to state the very principle along which a sound money system must be built,

309
00:42:20.660 --> 00:42:26.660
namely allowing for complete freedom of the supply of and demand for the currency.

310
00:42:26.660 --> 00:42:35.660
This in turn implies privatizing the money system, establishing free banking based on a 100% reserve banking.

311
00:42:35.660 --> 00:42:43.660
The corollary would be ending any government interference in monetary affairs and abolishing the central bank.

312
00:42:43.660 --> 00:42:48.660
But how can the current fiat money regime be transformed into sound money?

313
00:42:48.660 --> 00:42:55.660
Well, I think Mises gave us some guidance. We can make use of the regression theory.

314
00:42:58.660 --> 00:43:07.660
As was outlined earlier, neither inflation nor deflation will prevent the final collapse of the fiat money regime.

315
00:43:07.660 --> 00:43:14.660
regime. So if we want to return to some money and if by doing so we want to prevent the

316
00:43:14.660 --> 00:43:21.980
total destruction of the existing exchange value of fiat money, the only option available

317
00:43:21.980 --> 00:43:29.140
is a re-anchoring in the first step, a re-anchoring of the stock of fiat money to commodity. Mises,

318
00:43:29.140 --> 00:43:35.620
the first 20th century economist proposing free banking with 100% reserve requirement

319
00:43:35.620 --> 00:43:56.620
on demand deposits had worked out such a reform proposal. Mises demanded that banks must no longer be permitted to expand the money stock and that all future that is newly created deposits would be subject to a 100% reserve of money proper.

320
00:43:56.620 --> 00:44:02.260
Rothbard built on Mises' proposal, supporting it with a strong legal foundation.

321
00:44:02.260 --> 00:44:08.020
Rothbard proposed in his Mystery of Banking a two-way strategy.

322
00:44:08.020 --> 00:44:12.220
In the first step, the outstanding liabilities of the commercial banking sector,

323
00:44:12.220 --> 00:44:18.900
plus notes and coins, would be backed by gold, which is still in the seller of the central banks.

324
00:44:18.900 --> 00:44:25.300
Holders of bank liabilities plus cash money would receive the legal right

325
00:44:25.300 --> 00:44:31.620
to convert at any one time the holdings into a predetermined amount of gold ounces.

326
00:44:31.620 --> 00:44:38.100
By doing so, the currency names such as, for instance, dollars, British pounds, Swiss francs,

327
00:44:38.100 --> 00:44:42.220
would simply become expressions of certain weights of gold.

328
00:44:42.220 --> 00:44:47.180
In the second step, the monetary system would be privatized and the system of free banking

329
00:44:47.180 --> 00:44:48.980
would be established.

330
00:44:48.980 --> 00:45:02.980
Now, the critical question is, how much should a unit of fiat money fetch in terms of central bank gold?

331
00:45:02.980 --> 00:45:14.980
It is this very decision that determines whether and if so by how much the exchange value of the existing fiat money will be affected.

332
00:45:14.980 --> 00:45:24.980
This simple equation shows you the gold cover ratio, as I call it, and it should help outlining the options available.

333
00:45:24.980 --> 00:45:36.980
It simply shows the sum of C, which is cash, coins and notes, D, T and S, which are demand, time and savings deposits respectively,

334
00:45:36.980 --> 00:45:45.980
and L, which is defined as banks long-term liabilities, divided by the amount of gold ounces in the seller of the central bank.

335
00:45:45.980 --> 00:45:56.980
Now, if only C and D, that is the stock of payments are backed by gold, the price of gold in terms of the existing fiat money stock would be relatively low.

336
00:45:56.980 --> 00:46:04.980
Alternatively, if C, D, T and S and L would be backed by gold, the price of gold would be relatively high.

337
00:46:04.980 --> 00:46:19.980
What is more, we have to take into account that the economy's money stock would be the gold stock as held by the central bank plus any outside gold that is gold which is already circulating.

338
00:46:19.980 --> 00:46:25.980
So the choice of the gold cover ratio has an important impact on the quantity of the money stock.

339
00:46:25.980 --> 00:46:33.980
I would like to outline three options. Option number one would be a gold backing of bank's liabilities and total liabilities.

340
00:46:33.980 --> 00:46:41.980
In this case, deflation would be mitigated in terms of the contraction of the money stock to the greatest possible extent.

341
00:46:41.980 --> 00:46:48.980
Option number two would be a gold backing just for monetary aggregates such as M1, M2, M3.

342
00:46:48.980 --> 00:46:58.980
Bank defaults could then wipe out part of people's savings in the form of non-gold-backed bank deposits.

343
00:46:58.980 --> 00:47:09.980
Option number three is basically similar. It would be using the prevailing gold price for backing fiat money with gold.

344
00:47:09.980 --> 00:47:13.980
Such a choice would lead to result basically similar to option two.

345
00:47:13.980 --> 00:47:25.980
And having said that option one, which implies a 100% backing of banks liabilities, would preserve people's total nominal amount of money holdings,

346
00:47:25.980 --> 00:47:33.980
While options 2 and 3 would allow for a potential reduction in the stock of money caused by bank failures.

347
00:47:33.980 --> 00:47:45.980
In other words, option number 1 would, assuming that the outstanding gold would qualify as a means of payment, exert the biggest loss in the purchasing power of money.

348
00:47:45.980 --> 00:48:03.980
What these considerations make clear is that there is actually no alternative to unmasking the loss of exchange value already incurred by fiat money holders and investors in fiat money denominated paper.

349
00:48:03.980 --> 00:48:14.980
Just consider the alternatives. If the current fiat money system is pushed into deflation, ensuring bank defaults would wipe out the paper claims of the people,

350
00:48:14.980 --> 00:48:22.980
It could, as the regression theorem shows, lead to complete breakdown, a complete breakdown of the exchange value of money.

351
00:48:22.980 --> 00:48:30.980
If the path of inflation is not abandoned sooner or later, the exchange value of money will be destroyed completely.

352
00:48:30.980 --> 00:48:39.980
And it is also no viable strategy if the government issues more debt for keeping afloat the fiat money regime,

353
00:48:39.980 --> 00:48:43.980
as this would merely postpone the inevitable day of reckoning.

354
00:48:43.980 --> 00:49:11.980
So, what about setting the gold cover ratio? Mises provides some very helpful thoughts and I would say, against the backdrop of his writings, it should be reasonable to opt for a gold cover ratio which backs less than 100% of bank liabilities, so backing of M1 or M2 seems reasonable and that is basically a proposal as upheld by Rothbard.

355
00:49:11.980 --> 00:49:26.980
Now, if for instance the money stock M2 in the United States would be backed by gold, the resulting gold price would climb to more than $31,000 per ounce.

356
00:49:26.980 --> 00:49:36.980
In the case of a 100% gold backing of M1, the gold price would exceed $6,000 per ounce.

357
00:49:36.980 --> 00:49:44.980
And just to give you a flavor, if for instance the Euro area would also back its fiat money stock as defined by M3,

358
00:49:44.980 --> 00:49:55.980
the resulting price for gold would be more than 26,000 euro per ounce of gold.

359
00:49:55.980 --> 00:50:01.980
And you can compare that with the current price of slightly above more than 900 dollars per ounce.

360
00:50:01.980 --> 00:50:08.980
and in euro you would pay close to 770 euro per gold ounce.

361
00:50:09.980 --> 00:50:16.980
But whatever the gold cover ratio will be, the really important issue is the re-anchoring

362
00:50:16.980 --> 00:50:24.980
in the first step of money to gold, which would save the currency system from a complete destruction

363
00:50:24.980 --> 00:50:30.980
and pave the way towards free market money, that is sound money under free banking.

364
00:50:31.980 --> 00:50:41.980
Ladies and gentlemen, in conclusion, I have tried to take the opportunity to pay tribute to Ludwig von Mises.

365
00:50:41.980 --> 00:50:47.980
He truly deserves to hold the preeminent place in the intellectual history of social theory.

366
00:50:47.980 --> 00:50:57.980
In the Mises tradition, I have tried to outline the key role of sound money for peaceful and productive cooperation in society.

367
00:50:57.980 --> 00:51:05.980
Mises lay bare, and unmistakably so, the de-civilization process caused by government controlled fiat money.

368
00:51:05.980 --> 00:51:09.980
Fiat money destroys, sooner or later, the free society.

369
00:51:09.980 --> 00:51:16.980
The only way out is a return to sound money, namely free market money under free banking.

370
00:51:16.980 --> 00:51:22.980
Free market money and individual freedom are inseparable, as Mises clearly recognized.

371
00:51:22.980 --> 00:51:31.980
All these conclusions are not, as some hysterical antagonists and mainstream economists may wish to maintain, ideologically distorted.

372
00:51:31.980 --> 00:51:36.980
On the contrary, they can be largely deduced from Mises' praxeology.

373
00:51:36.980 --> 00:51:45.980
The global financial debacle is a testimony to what Mises and his followers have stated on the basis of praxeology,

374
00:51:45.980 --> 00:51:55.980
namely the failure of government controlled fiat money and that it is high time to seek a fundamental monetary reform.

375
00:51:55.980 --> 00:52:06.980
It is my impression that the number of supporters for ending the monetary fiasco and returning to some money is growing by the day.

376
00:52:06.980 --> 00:52:15.980
This development is no doubt to a great extent attributable to the fantastic work of the Ludwig von Mises Institute.

377
00:52:15.980 --> 00:52:25.980
I imagine that if Ludwig von Mises, the defender of freedom, could see his intellectual heritage being cared for by the Mises Institute,

378
00:52:25.980 --> 00:52:36.980
He would not only be highly delighted, but also take hope that eventually sound money will win over fiat money and capitalism over socialism.

379
00:52:37.980 --> 00:52:39.980
Thank you very much for your attention.

380
00:52:55.980 --> 00:53:13.980
What do you think of the proposal to simply abolish legal tender laws and force the Federal Reserve on currency to really compete against them rather than trying to rejigger the dollar as a gold plate?

381
00:53:25.980 --> 00:53:29.980
and the repeat against the fiat money unit.

382
00:53:29.980 --> 00:53:34.980
Well, basically I would agree, the only thing I'm concerned about is,

383
00:53:34.980 --> 00:53:38.980
and as you may have seen in my presentation,

384
00:53:38.980 --> 00:53:46.980
is that such a system would not allow to preserve any wealth stored in fiat money.

385
00:53:46.980 --> 00:53:54.980
I see the only possibility to preserve some of the exchange value of the fiat money stock

386
00:53:54.980 --> 00:53:59.260
by re-anchoring it to some kind of commodity.

387
00:53:59.260 --> 00:54:06.660
Otherwise, your system might result in the complete wiping out of the exchange value of fiat money.

388
00:54:06.660 --> 00:54:21.180
That's my concern and that is why I think Rothbard has made a practical proposal to solve the issue.

389
00:54:21.180 --> 00:54:33.180
Well, you say it would wipe out the value of the fiat money, but also the value of any contract denominated in fiat money. So that would just cause a lot of chaos.

390
00:54:33.180 --> 00:54:47.180
Exactly. What you say is, it's not only, we're not talking about the wiping out of the exchange value of money, but also the wiping out of all contracts denominated in the fiat money stock.

391
00:54:47.180 --> 00:54:54.460
and exactly I share this concern and again what I presented is a politically

392
00:54:54.460 --> 00:55:01.580
motivated concept it's not based on a scientific consideration unfortunately we

393
00:55:01.580 --> 00:55:07.660
have to take an arbitrary decision to get out of it and I think the most

394
00:55:07.660 --> 00:55:13.980
promising way is by re-anchoring the fiat money stock but even then there will

395
00:55:13.980 --> 00:55:21.980
There will be huge losses, huge losses in the exchange value of the existing fiat money stock, even if you get a re-anchoring.

396
00:55:21.980 --> 00:55:26.980
The damage has been done, there's no way of denial.

397
00:55:43.980 --> 00:55:59.980
Well, thank you very much. The gentleman said maybe the government gets an incentive for making its currency more competitive against a new market money.

398
00:55:59.980 --> 00:56:04.980
That may be so, but I'm not sure.

399
00:56:04.980 --> 00:56:15.980
Again, my major concern is really to prevent the complete collapse of the exchange value of the existing money, fiat money stock,

400
00:56:15.980 --> 00:56:29.980
which would, at least to me, appear very likely once people shift from, let's say, fiat money balances into free market money.

401
00:56:29.980 --> 00:56:45.980
What would you think it narrowed in your whole government shifts, in that it only covered the monetary base and then phased into 100% of your requirements?

402
00:56:59.980 --> 00:57:27.980
America is close to $2,000 billion and as far as I'm informed, the stock of M1 is around about $1,600, so basically we are close to get, close, close, you know, we're not really far apart, but I think the problem really is if banks default, people are going to lose their deposits, right?

403
00:57:27.980 --> 00:57:43.980
Because if you choose a coverage ratio, a gold cover ratio, which is just covering demand deposits, but not time deposits, and time deposits become due and banks cannot repay under default.

404
00:57:43.980 --> 00:57:56.980
So the money is gone. It's a deflationary impact. So weighing the pros and cons, and again, I mean it's not scientifically based, it's just a rather arbitrary way of looking at things.

405
00:57:56.980 --> 00:58:03.980
Do you think going to a basket of commodities is a good idea if you could try and lower yourself?

406
00:58:26.980 --> 00:58:42.340
and I think we we all should make our peace with gold and the second part of

407
00:58:42.340 --> 00:58:49.940
your question what's going to happen with China and maybe other fiat money

408
00:58:49.940 --> 00:58:58.140
countries. It's hard to say, I mean you are looking at this situation I guess in

409
00:58:58.140 --> 00:59:04.340
the same way as I do and all I can say is within the next five years we're going

410
00:59:04.340 --> 00:59:11.500
to see dramatic changes and I really could imagine that countries which will

411
00:59:11.500 --> 00:59:18.780
see that they cannot deficit spend themselves out of recession and see

412
00:59:18.780 --> 00:59:28.780
to see their money value getting eroded, to reconsider the idea of re-anchoring to money.

413
00:59:28.780 --> 00:59:32.780
That might be even the United States of America.

414
00:59:48.780 --> 01:00:16.780
Right, the question is, we're talking about free market money and obviously we would say that's the best kind of money. Why didn't it emerge?

415
01:00:16.780 --> 01:00:46.620
I think the case has been made, the fiat money has been established by basically cutting the link between paper money and gold in the early 1970s and I mean at that time people were quite familiar with using US dollars or DMACC at the time

416
01:00:46.620 --> 01:00:57.020
and for most people it didn't make a difference, so they kept on making their contracts in the fiat money.

417
01:00:57.020 --> 01:01:04.060
And see, the situation we're talking about, it's my feeling, maybe it's different in the US,

418
01:01:04.060 --> 01:01:10.780
we are not really there at the point where people become really concerned about the quality of money.

419
01:01:10.780 --> 01:01:18.780
I mean what's happening in the financial markets is people are dumping their stocks, their corporate bonds, in exchange for what?

420
01:01:18.780 --> 01:01:22.780
For government bonds and fiat money.

421
01:01:22.780 --> 01:01:35.780
So what I'm talking about is really something which is increasingly appearing on the horizon and soon or later it will hit.

422
01:01:35.780 --> 01:02:01.780
I have a couple of questions. One, how frequently do you give a formula for re-increasing price exchange ratio between gold and fiat money? How frequently do you see that being recalculated? And what do you think is the impact of this suggestion?

423
01:02:05.780 --> 01:02:34.780
I produce an update. I did that one on Wednesday and I run that every day. It's basically very simple because it's an Excel sheet and I have some feeds in it which give me the actual gold price, the exchange rates and well, the official gold price, the official gold reserves don't change much.

424
01:02:34.780 --> 01:02:53.780
Do you have your suggestion to re-tie the dollar with the Federal Reserve's fee? How would that impact money market problems?

425
01:03:04.780 --> 01:03:24.780
I mean, the banking system is going to change, but I guess that there will still be people who would like to hold time deposits or money market funds, so there wouldn't be much of a change, right?

426
01:03:24.780 --> 01:03:31.780
So money market funds basically would distribute the money stock within the banking industry.

427
01:03:31.780 --> 01:03:38.780
There will be new markets emerging, like for people who are concerned that there might be a new gold rush somewhere.

428
01:03:38.780 --> 01:03:48.780
You know, institutions would provide hedges against expected losses in the purchasing power of money due to a change in the worldwide gold stock.

429
01:03:48.780 --> 01:03:53.780
So a beautiful new world of new markets would emerge, no doubt.

430
01:03:53.780 --> 01:04:00.780
Thank you. We're all on time. I appreciate it.