WEBVTT

NOTE Hayek's Theory of Mind and Individualism

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.000
My speech is about Hayek and the French sociologist Raymond Boudon.

2
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:12.000
Boudon is one of today's most important champions of methodological individualism.

3
00:00:13.000 --> 00:00:19.000
I would like to compare Hayek's theory of action with Boudon's one.

4
00:00:21.000 --> 00:00:23.000
Boudon criticized Hayek.

5
00:00:23.000 --> 00:00:32.660
Hayek. Like other authors, it's stated that Hayek's methodological individualism deals with

6
00:00:32.660 --> 00:00:42.720
assumptions that are partially wrong. Boudon correctly maintains that methodological individualism

7
00:00:42.720 --> 00:01:06.720
Action is based on two ideas. The first idea is the indeterminist nature of action. This means that action is not determined by social or economic context, as Hollis supposes.

8
00:01:06.720 --> 00:01:20.720
Its cause has not to be thought in the context, but inside the individual, in his motivations, in his intentional choice.

9
00:01:20.720 --> 00:01:31.720
The second idea, the second pillar of methodological individualism is the analysis of the unintended effects of human action.

10
00:01:31.720 --> 00:01:42.720
Boudin thinks that Hayek is wrong because he only concentrated on this second pillar.

11
00:01:42.720 --> 00:01:58.720
He believes that Hayek neglected or denied the crucial importance of the indeterminism of action, as well as that of the intentionality of choice.

12
00:01:58.720 --> 00:02:15.720
In particular, Boudon states that Hayek did not understand the importance of explaining human ideas in terms of methodological individualism.

13
00:02:15.720 --> 00:02:27.720
One of the most interesting contributions of Boudon is his sociological analysis of human beliefs.

14
00:02:27.720 --> 00:02:39.320
is analysis of the actions that lead to the endorsement or rejection of a belief.

15
00:02:39.320 --> 00:02:52.160
Boudin did not study purely personal beliefs, like I believe that red wine is better than white wine.

16
00:02:52.160 --> 00:03:08.160
The first kind, this is purely subjective, Boudin considers collective beliefs, the beliefs that are largely shared inside a certain society.

17
00:03:09.160 --> 00:03:15.160
According to Boudin there are two kinds of collective beliefs.

18
00:03:16.160 --> 00:03:21.160
The first kind is represented by positive beliefs.

19
00:03:22.160 --> 00:03:42.160
Beliefs that something is true or false. For instance, the idea that earth is spheric or that earth is flat, as our ancestors believed.

20
00:03:42.160 --> 00:03:53.160
The second kind is represented by normative beliefs, beliefs which concern ethical points of view,

21
00:03:54.160 --> 00:04:03.160
the ideas about what is fair or unfair, about what is right or not,

22
00:04:03.160 --> 00:04:13.720
which, as you know, change in the different societies. In a cannibal tribe, it is ethically

23
00:04:13.720 --> 00:04:25.400
acceptable to eat human meat. It is not the same in our society. Boudin stresses that both these two

24
00:04:25.400 --> 00:04:34.100
Several kinds of beliefs are very often explained by using a holistic approach.

25
00:04:34.100 --> 00:04:39.320
Let's consider first positive beliefs.

26
00:04:39.320 --> 00:04:47.700
Let's consider namely positive beliefs that are very strange and obviously false and that

27
00:04:47.700 --> 00:04:54.700
that individuals keep using in spite of empirical refutations of their validity.

28
00:04:56.700 --> 00:05:14.700
According to a holist anthropologist, the fact that a member of a primitive tribe believes, for instance, that rain dance is a useful instrument to force rain to come,

29
00:05:14.700 --> 00:05:24.700
is determined by the culture he has absorbed.

30
00:05:25.700 --> 00:05:36.700
The cause of this false belief and of this action has to be sought outside the individual, in the cultural context.

31
00:05:37.700 --> 00:05:43.700
The meaning the action carries out for the individual is not important.

32
00:05:44.700 --> 00:05:52.700
The individual is not aware of the fact that he is actually directed by cultural factors.

33
00:05:52.700 --> 00:05:56.700
Following the methodological individualist approach,

34
00:05:56.700 --> 00:06:06.700
Boudon offers a different explanation of the belief in the efficiency of the rain dance.

35
00:06:06.700 --> 00:06:12.700
He assumes that the cause of action is always inside the individual,

36
00:06:12.700 --> 00:06:21.700
in his intentions. The cause of reindence depends on the meaning the primitive person gives to his action.

37
00:06:21.700 --> 00:06:38.700
It depends on an evaluation this person holds. His evaluation is perfectly rational, even if it looks completely irrational from the outside.

38
00:06:38.700 --> 00:06:55.700
The action of such a person is not a mysterious and irrational phenomenon which can be explained only by saying that there is a cultural determinism.

39
00:06:55.700 --> 00:07:10.700
For Boudon, the primitive individual's action is rational and perfectly understandable in the light of his background knowledge.

40
00:07:10.700 --> 00:07:22.700
This background knowledge is very different from ours. That's why primitive actions seem so strange to us.

41
00:07:22.700 --> 00:07:33.700
The primitive person does not master the principles of biology, physics or meteorology.

42
00:07:33.700 --> 00:07:42.700
The best instrument this person has to explain nature is a set of religious theories.

43
00:07:42.700 --> 00:07:50.700
So his rationality is situated, is linked to those theories.

44
00:07:50.700 --> 00:08:03.700
Moreover, this individual has good reasons to continue to believe in the utility of the rain dance, in spite of empirical refutations.

45
00:08:03.700 --> 00:08:18.700
It's necessary to consider, for instance, that the rain dance is usually practiced in the time of the year when rain is useful for cultivation.

46
00:08:18.700 --> 00:08:30.700
This is the period when rain usually falls, so it seems to the primitive that rain dance actually works.

47
00:08:30.700 --> 00:08:48.700
Boudin states that positive beliefs have to be explained thus trying to reconstruct what he calls the good reasons individuals have to endorse them.

48
00:08:48.700 --> 00:09:00.700
Those good reasons are based on a bounded or subjective rationality, which is linked to a limited and fallible knowledge.

49
00:09:00.700 --> 00:09:09.700
So, for Boudon, even the actions which are based on wrong beliefs are irrational.

50
00:09:09.700 --> 00:09:19.700
Like Mises, Boudon denies the necessity to make a distinction between rational action and irrational action.

51
00:09:20.700 --> 00:09:25.700
Let's consider now the second kind of collective beliefs.

52
00:09:26.700 --> 00:09:37.700
For Boudon, not only the choice of means, but even the choice of aims can often be studied as the product of good reasons.

53
00:09:37.700 --> 00:09:45.700
In other words, we can also explain the ethical beliefs in terms of good reasons.

54
00:09:45.700 --> 00:09:53.700
When Boudon says ethical beliefs, it does not mean every kind of value or aim.

55
00:09:53.700 --> 00:10:05.700
As I said, Boudon considers only the moral views which are largely shared inside a specific human group.

56
00:10:05.700 --> 00:10:14.700
Those collective beliefs on what is right and what is not right can be explained by methodological individualism.

57
00:10:14.700 --> 00:10:25.700
This is an original point because usually methodological individualists don't care much to analyze ethical views.

58
00:10:25.700 --> 00:10:39.700
According to Boudon, this has been a mistake which encouraged the development of holistic approaches in sociology and anthropology.

59
00:10:39.700 --> 00:10:53.700
Indeed, some holistic scholars admit that methodological individualism is useful to explain the choice of means, the positive beliefs,

60
00:10:53.700 --> 00:11:00.700
But it's useless to explain the choice of aims, the normative beliefs.

61
00:11:00.700 --> 00:11:12.700
Those holists suppose that we can explain the individual aims only by using a social or cultural determinism.

62
00:11:12.700 --> 00:11:21.700
In order to illustrate the necessity of enlarging the field of application of methodological individualism,

63
00:11:21.700 --> 00:11:36.700
Boudin considers a very interesting historical case, the part played by religion in political and social life in the United States and France.

64
00:11:36.700 --> 00:11:45.700
While Americans usually have a positive attitude towards religion, the French don't.

65
00:11:45.700 --> 00:11:54.700
Atheism and anti-religious tendencies are very common in France, but not in America.

66
00:11:54.700 --> 00:11:59.700
Why is there such a difference between these two countries?

67
00:11:59.700 --> 00:12:13.700
Holistic sociologists would explain that stating this fact depends on the fact that Americans are Americans, while French are French.

68
00:12:13.700 --> 00:12:27.700
Americans have a certain culture and this culture, which they interiorize, determines their actions and their values.

69
00:12:28.700 --> 00:12:34.700
French have a different culture and they are determined by their different culture.

70
00:12:35.700 --> 00:12:42.700
As Boudon says, this kind of explanation is completely unsatisfactory.

71
00:12:43.700 --> 00:12:46.700
actually is not an explanation at all.

72
00:12:46.700 --> 00:12:52.700
In order to really explain this difference between Americans and French,

73
00:12:52.700 --> 00:12:59.700
it's necessary to reconstruct their different reasons, their different motivations.

74
00:12:59.700 --> 00:13:04.700
I don't have time to give you all of Boudin's arguments.

75
00:13:04.700 --> 00:13:08.700
Just an example of his individualistic approach.

76
00:13:08.700 --> 00:13:18.700
Boudin states that Americans, unlike the French, do not have reasons to limit the part played by religion to the spiritual sphere.

77
00:13:18.700 --> 00:13:25.700
This behavior relies on different historical occurrences.

78
00:13:25.700 --> 00:13:33.700
For instance, in Europe religion has historically been in competition with politics.

79
00:13:33.700 --> 00:13:37.700
The church has tried to play a part in politics.

80
00:13:37.700 --> 00:13:51.700
On the contrary, American churches, being so numerous and in competition with each other, have not given in to the temptations of politics.

81
00:13:51.700 --> 00:14:02.700
They immerse themselves in the social context, focusing on public health, social assistance, public education and so on.

82
00:14:02.700 --> 00:14:15.700
Neither public authorities nor intellectuals nor private citizens have reason to challenge these activities.

83
00:14:15.700 --> 00:14:26.700
American churches are part of everyday social life. Citizens do not have any reason to reject them.

84
00:14:26.700 --> 00:14:45.700
So for Boudon, even the cultural differences among nations have to be explained through the meaning they acquire in the minds of individuals by trying to understand the individual motivations.

85
00:14:45.700 --> 00:15:00.700
As I told you, Boudon criticizes Hayek's methodological individualism, stating that it is only concentrated on the part played by unintended consequences.

86
00:15:00.700 --> 00:15:12.700
According to Boudon, Hayek denied the importance of the indeterminism of human action and the importance of the demotivation of individuals.

87
00:15:12.700 --> 00:15:35.700
I think Boudon's criticism of Hayek is unfair. It's obviously true that Hayek gave more importance to the analysis of unintended consequences, but it's false that he denied the indeterminism of human action.

88
00:15:35.700 --> 00:15:43.700
To argue that this is false, it's necessary to consider Hayek's psychology.

89
00:15:43.700 --> 00:15:55.700
As other critics of Hayek's theory of action, Boudon did not care to carefully analyze the content of Hayek's book, The Sensory Order.

90
00:15:55.700 --> 00:16:02.700
I think that this book contains Hayek's most important contribution to the theory of action.

91
00:16:02.700 --> 00:16:20.700
It has been unfairly neglected. Although it is not a treatise of sociology, it deals with issues which are very important for every theory which aims at explaining collective beliefs.

92
00:16:20.700 --> 00:16:31.700
The sensory order is a claim for the indeterminism of human action and for the necessity of explaining beliefs in the terms of good reasons.

93
00:16:31.700 --> 00:16:40.700
It's a very complex book on psychology. I can't analyze its content in detail. I will only sketch its main point.

94
00:16:40.700 --> 00:16:55.700
According to Hayek, the mind doesn't have only logical and conscious skills. It's not endowed only with abilities of conscious reasoning and deduction.

95
00:16:55.700 --> 00:17:11.700
For Hayek, consciousness is the type of an iceberg, the mind's conscious skills, the skills of logical deduction, are based on tacit or meta-conscious abilities.

96
00:17:11.700 --> 00:17:16.700
Those meta-conscious abilities build the sensorial world.

97
00:17:16.700 --> 00:17:21.700
The sensual world is not the mirror of the external world.

98
00:17:21.700 --> 00:17:25.700
It's our interpretation of the external world.

99
00:17:25.700 --> 00:17:31.700
For instance, the color red is not an objective property of the external world.

100
00:17:31.700 --> 00:17:37.700
It's the way we interpret certain features of the external world.

101
00:17:37.700 --> 00:17:39.700
It's a mental construction.

102
00:17:39.700 --> 00:17:47.200
Hayek considers perceptions as interpretations, which depend partly on biological evolution

103
00:17:47.200 --> 00:17:50.700
and partly on the personal experience of the individual.

104
00:17:52.200 --> 00:17:58.200
Perceptions produce the necessary assumptions for intentional choice.

105
00:17:58.700 --> 00:18:04.700
They define the basic framework of the process of conscious decision.

106
00:18:04.700 --> 00:18:20.700
The metaconscious process which builds perceptions selects a basic set of meanings and possible alternatives for action which is the foundation of rational reasoning.

107
00:18:20.700 --> 00:18:27.700
A very important point is that this metaconscious process is not deterministic.

108
00:18:27.700 --> 00:18:37.700
It depends on a process of self-organization in a complex system of neuronal networks.

109
00:18:37.700 --> 00:18:42.700
It's impossible to forecast the functioning of the mind.

110
00:18:42.700 --> 00:18:48.700
It's impossible to conceive it in deterministic terms.

111
00:18:48.700 --> 00:19:01.700
Today, many studies on the processes of self-organization of mind and on its tacit skills confirm Hayek's insights.

112
00:19:01.700 --> 00:19:08.700
What Hayek points out is very important for the explanation of collective beliefs.

113
00:19:08.700 --> 00:19:30.700
Hayek's theory of the sensory order is a very interesting defense of methodological individualist theory of action, namely of the indeterminism of human action.

114
00:19:30.700 --> 00:19:42.700
Both methodological holists and Hayek maintain that consciousness is not the only important aspect of human nature.

115
00:19:42.700 --> 00:19:55.700
But while holists assume the action as determined at an unconscious level, Hayek states the contrary.

116
00:19:55.700 --> 00:20:02.700
An example of a holist approach is Marx's theory of false consciousness.

117
00:20:02.700 --> 00:20:12.700
This theory is linked to the idea that collective beliefs are unconsciously determined by the economic structure.

118
00:20:12.700 --> 00:20:22.700
For Marx, the individual is not aware of the fact that his actions are determined by the economic context.

119
00:20:22.700 --> 00:20:29.700
According to Hayek's theory of mind, Marx's approach is completely wrong.

120
00:20:29.700 --> 00:20:42.700
For Hayek, the meta-conscious dimension that is the basis of knowledge is characterized by processes of self-organization which are not deterministic.

121
00:20:42.700 --> 00:20:49.700
There indeterminism rules out the possibility to use the holistic methodology.

122
00:20:49.700 --> 00:20:59.700
It legitimates methodological individualism. It legitimates Boudin's explanations of beliefs.

123
00:20:59.700 --> 00:21:10.700
For Hayek, the cause of action has to be found in the individual. It cannot be sought outside him.

124
00:21:10.700 --> 00:21:17.700
Individual ideas cannot be determined by something which is outside the human mind.

125
00:21:17.700 --> 00:21:30.700
In the last pages of the sensory order, Hayek explicitly states that action has to be explained in terms of good reasons, in terms of individual motivations.

126
00:21:30.700 --> 00:21:37.700
So, Boudon's idea that Hayek denies the indeterminate of human action is wrong.

127
00:21:37.700 --> 00:21:47.700
Boudin's individualistic theory of collective beliefs is the natural implication of Hayek's psychology.

128
00:21:47.700 --> 00:21:59.700
Boudin's sociology and Hayek's psychology can be used fully combined in order to argue for an individualistic theory of action.