WEBVTT

NOTE Marketing Subscription-Based Patrol and Restitution

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.120
I'm pushing the limits of the types of papers that are possible to present at the Austrian

2
00:00:05.120 --> 00:00:11.240
Scholars Conference by discussing a marketing study.

3
00:00:11.240 --> 00:00:18.960
So I want to give a little bit of a context to what I'm doing and talk to you a little

4
00:00:18.960 --> 00:00:22.880
bit about the business model that I've been researching and then I'll go into the marketing

5
00:00:22.880 --> 00:00:26.920
research that we've done.

6
00:00:26.920 --> 00:00:32.620
What I'm doing I might call open source entrepreneurship. I've been studying a business model for several

7
00:00:32.620 --> 00:00:38.520
years and as I've been nailing down various elements of it, I've been writing papers and

8
00:00:38.520 --> 00:00:45.360
presenting them, several of them here. So these are some of the past papers that we

9
00:00:45.360 --> 00:00:53.000
presented. That last one was just recently published. None of those others are published

10
00:00:53.000 --> 00:00:55.540
unless you count being on the web as published.

11
00:00:55.540 --> 00:01:00.320
The last one is published in libertarian papers.

12
00:01:00.320 --> 00:01:08.140
So the business model that we have in mind is we call it subscription, patrol and restitution

13
00:01:08.140 --> 00:01:18.880
and is inspired by the writings of Molinari, Rothbard, the Tannahills and so forth.

14
00:01:18.880 --> 00:01:28.080
The idea is to create a full business model for internal security.

15
00:01:28.080 --> 00:01:35.380
In the current offering, it's a residential service, subscription-based, about a price

16
00:01:35.380 --> 00:01:43.680
point of $35 a month, patrol, monthly newsletter on area crime, first responder, various concierge

17
00:01:43.680 --> 00:01:50.280
Care Services while you're out watching, taking care of the pets, so forth, and then covering

18
00:01:50.280 --> 00:01:54.920
the crime cycle as I show on the right hand side, which would be if a crime occurs to

19
00:01:54.920 --> 00:02:01.240
investigate it, to find the perpetrator, to engage in the mediation or binding arbitration

20
00:02:01.240 --> 00:02:08.760
or failing that to make restitution directly to the subscriber.

21
00:02:08.760 --> 00:02:16.000
So right now, one of the things we want to know of course is would people buy this, right?

22
00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:25.560
So in 2006, we did a marketing study, a pilot, and some of the things that we learned was

23
00:02:25.560 --> 00:02:29.640
that people do indeed want more patrol.

24
00:02:29.640 --> 00:02:36.040
This was, this particular marketing research, what we did was we targeted homes that had

25
00:02:36.040 --> 00:02:38.460
home monitoring signs in the yard.

26
00:02:38.460 --> 00:02:46.660
So we went specifically to people who we already knew were buying additional amounts of security

27
00:02:46.660 --> 00:02:48.040
services.

28
00:02:48.040 --> 00:02:53.900
In the U.S. about 20% of homeowners subscribe to a home monitoring service.

29
00:02:53.900 --> 00:03:01.220
And of course if you go to higher valuation of home, about $300,000 homes and up, 40%

30
00:03:01.220 --> 00:03:08.060
of Americans subscribe to home monitoring services.

31
00:03:08.060 --> 00:03:16.340
And we in great detail laid out in this questionnaire pilot what the business model would be and

32
00:03:16.340 --> 00:03:20.540
we asked them what do you see in the value of this and they thought the patrol was the

33
00:03:20.540 --> 00:03:25.840
main value and that the restitution they also were very interested in.

34
00:03:25.840 --> 00:03:32.700
And one of the things that we found was that this business model was perceived by home

35
00:03:32.700 --> 00:03:39.620
Home Monitoring Subscribers as being a complement to and not a replacement for their home monitoring

36
00:03:39.620 --> 00:03:41.980
services.

37
00:03:41.980 --> 00:03:49.240
Another element is we were trying to probe the question of free riding.

38
00:03:49.240 --> 00:03:53.980
In this business model, you know, anyone down the street could subscribe to this model,

39
00:03:53.980 --> 00:04:00.620
could subscribe to this business and then if there were two people or three people or

40
00:04:00.620 --> 00:04:05.180
for People on a Street. The patrol, of course, would still come down the street in patrol.

41
00:04:05.180 --> 00:04:11.180
So the question is, well, as long as my neighbor is subscribing, why should I subscribe? What

42
00:04:11.180 --> 00:04:15.600
we tried to do is build into the offering enough internalized benefits so that free

43
00:04:15.600 --> 00:04:26.420
writing is not a concern. And with the offering as we gave it, the consumers were reporting

44
00:04:26.420 --> 00:04:31.140
marketing that, no, it was not a concern, whether or not their neighbor subscribed did

45
00:04:31.140 --> 00:04:37.620
not have a significant impact about whether or not they said that they would subscribe.

46
00:04:37.620 --> 00:04:44.680
This is the perils of marketing research is, you know, you think social science is an art,

47
00:04:44.680 --> 00:04:51.460
you know, wait till you get to marketing research, you know, stated intent purchases is very

48
00:04:51.460 --> 00:04:53.020
iffy.

49
00:04:53.020 --> 00:04:59.060
So this year, to follow up on our marketing research, we went a little deeper.

50
00:04:59.060 --> 00:05:08.580
There are some entrepreneurs that would argue that, in particular, Rob Adams comes to mind.

51
00:05:08.580 --> 00:05:14.980
He wrote a great book called A Good Hard Kick in the Ass, which is a, he's a venture capitalist

52
00:05:14.980 --> 00:05:15.980
out of Austin.

53
00:05:15.980 --> 00:05:22.420
He's also an adjunct professor at the University of Texas, teaches a course at UT Austin on

54
00:05:22.420 --> 00:05:29.140
New Venture Creation, and in his book and in his courses, he always suggests that the

55
00:05:29.140 --> 00:05:36.620
way that an entrepreneur go about his work is to look at a target market and ask them

56
00:05:36.620 --> 00:05:44.820
where is your pain, what is your most penetrating problems, and then to sculpt a business plan

57
00:05:44.820 --> 00:05:47.020
to solve those problems.

58
00:05:47.020 --> 00:05:51.660
In this case, one of the concerns we had was, well we're coming with a hammer and now we're

59
00:05:51.660 --> 00:06:05.660
This was an attempt to probe what we call general pain points, ask open questions to people about security needs.

60
00:06:05.660 --> 00:06:08.660
These are some of the questions we had.

61
00:06:08.660 --> 00:06:16.660
We did this with Google Docs forms, and I had 14 replies on this.

62
00:06:16.660 --> 00:06:25.660
And a couple of the main things we found were that home monitoring dominates what we call the mind-share.

63
00:06:25.660 --> 00:06:30.660
That is, if you talk to somebody and you say, tell me about your problems with home security,

64
00:06:30.660 --> 00:06:35.660
they immediately think to themselves, oh, you mean my home security system that I have.

65
00:06:35.660 --> 00:06:42.660
And so it requires a learning process or further probing to get at,

66
00:06:42.660 --> 00:06:49.980
know we mean all of your security guns dogs lighting locks burglar bars anything

67
00:06:49.980 --> 00:06:56.460
behaviors etc another thing that we learned was that people don't know there

68
00:06:56.460 --> 00:07:06.620
are no clear or compelling pain points a la Adams but I do want to I do want to

69
00:07:06.620 --> 00:07:36.620
I want to mention some other marketing researchers. This is a book by Moskowitz and Goffman, and there are some very interesting marketing research guys. These are the guys that are responsible for chunky tomato sauce, and the reason why is they developed a marketing methodology that bears a little bit of a resemblance to evolution,

70
00:08:06.620 --> 00:08:23.460
in the better product or service. So we said, well, Moskowitz and Goffman give us hope.

71
00:08:23.460 --> 00:08:28.260
So the next thing we did was we said, well, let's break it down. We took the SPR business

72
00:08:28.260 --> 00:08:34.620
model and we broke it into its eight constituent parts that we could think of and then we turned

73
00:08:34.620 --> 00:09:04.620
We put them each into an independent offering, that is, describe a newsletter service, saying okay, here's a service you might get, you get a monthly newsletter on crime, it has a map, here's your house, it shows all of the crimes that occurred in the last month, it lists various things about the crimes, whether someone was caught, what the impact to the victim was, and it will also have articles about security in it and so forth.

74
00:09:04.620 --> 00:09:09.620
Okay, this is the newsletter bundle. This is the vacation integrity check bundle.

75
00:09:09.620 --> 00:09:15.620
We took each one of those and we asked people, how much would you expect to pay for something like that?

76
00:09:15.620 --> 00:09:20.620
And then the next question is, would you pay for something like that?

77
00:09:20.620 --> 00:09:29.620
And some goober went to the mall and rented a table and gave out $2 bills in exchange for completing the survey.

78
00:09:29.620 --> 00:09:32.620
And these are the results.

79
00:09:32.620 --> 00:09:42.100
What's really nice is generally it looks like this is a marketable service, independently

80
00:09:42.100 --> 00:09:50.020
and in combination people are expecting to pay and are willing to pay what I consider

81
00:09:50.020 --> 00:09:55.260
to be vast sums of money on security and it was quite interesting to take some of these

82
00:09:55.260 --> 00:10:01.260
surveys because a man and a woman would be standing there and a married couple and I'd

83
00:10:31.260 --> 00:10:36.180
Marketing Research, because you learn so much more actually talking to the people instead

84
00:10:36.180 --> 00:10:43.860
of handing it off to a service to fill out cold questionnaires for you.

85
00:10:43.860 --> 00:10:47.900
So that's, how much time do I have left now?

86
00:10:47.900 --> 00:10:49.740
About five minutes, okay good.

87
00:10:49.740 --> 00:10:52.460
So that occupies part of the paper.

88
00:10:52.460 --> 00:10:59.060
The paper by the way, I've got a whole bunch of them, very athic, you know this is just

89
00:10:59.060 --> 00:11:05.600
Flavor and Concepts, right? If you want the meat, it's all right here, and there are several

90
00:11:05.600 --> 00:11:11.260
copies out here. You're welcome to take them. So the next question that we have is, when

91
00:11:11.260 --> 00:11:27.300
you're trying to build a business model into the mainstream, you have a challenge, and

92
00:11:27.300 --> 00:11:35.180
Here's a book that's highly regarded in the high-tech industry called Crossing the Chasm

93
00:11:35.180 --> 00:11:37.780
by Jeffrey Moore.

94
00:11:37.780 --> 00:11:42.100
And it's about the fact that there are these different market segments that as you try

95
00:11:42.100 --> 00:11:48.940
to enter the mainstream, to start with the high-tech side, you have people who are just

96
00:11:48.940 --> 00:11:49.940
tech junkies.

97
00:11:49.940 --> 00:11:52.940
They'll buy a VCR when it's $2,000.

98
00:11:52.940 --> 00:11:58.460
They'll buy the newest gadget just because they think it's cool.

99
00:11:58.460 --> 00:12:03.920
And then there are these kind of visionary people, which are the next segment of consumers,

100
00:12:03.920 --> 00:12:06.380
that they kind of get it.

101
00:12:06.380 --> 00:12:13.340
You know, once you have a concept that's pretty well defined and you pitch it to them, they

102
00:12:13.340 --> 00:12:17.220
say, aha, that's something I can use and they purchase it.

103
00:12:17.220 --> 00:12:21.740
But the vast majority of consumers are not like that.

104
00:12:21.740 --> 00:12:28.620
Instead, they need extensive amounts of evidence and they also exhibit imitation behavior where

105
00:12:28.620 --> 00:12:35.100
they rely a lot on what other people have done or have subscribed to.

106
00:12:35.100 --> 00:12:37.940
They ask their friends, hey, have you done this?

107
00:12:37.940 --> 00:12:38.940
Have you tried this product?

108
00:12:38.940 --> 00:12:41.180
Is it good?

109
00:12:41.180 --> 00:12:47.580
And so he shows that there's this chasm, and I've got a little note here, okay, between

110
00:12:47.580 --> 00:12:50.180
the early adopters and the early majority.

111
00:12:50.180 --> 00:12:55.720
And this is where most businesses fail. And there's a whole strategy for targeting a market

112
00:12:55.720 --> 00:13:02.720
niche within the early majority and going after them and going after them with a vengeance.

113
00:13:02.720 --> 00:13:06.780
And then having established that beachhead, and now I'm going to switch analogies, you've

114
00:13:06.780 --> 00:13:10.940
got the head pin done and now you have to hit the next pins and the next pins and that's

115
00:13:10.940 --> 00:13:17.940
how you get into this, get all the pins down. And so what I've done is I've translated

116
00:13:17.940 --> 00:13:43.940
I've translated Jeffrey Moore's concepts into the security environment, and I go into this paper quite a bit, but I explain why I think that the best strategy will be to start with some high-end consumers, to go into a high-crime area next, and then go into a middle-class area, and all of this has to be in one geographic area, which presents some difficulties.

117
00:13:43.940 --> 00:13:52.940
So, I think that's all I'm going to say about the paper, but we can talk about this after the papers are over.

118
00:13:52.940 --> 00:13:54.940
Thank you very much.
