WEBVTT

NOTE Progressive Academic Scholarship and Liberal Protestant Theology: 1902-1940

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.000
Because these have to be done very rapidly, 17 minutes,

2
00:00:05.000 --> 00:00:10.000
I don't expect you to frantically write down everything, so I'm passing out a handout.

3
00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:15.000
If there's something that I say that looks interesting, you can follow it up,

4
00:00:15.000 --> 00:00:20.000
and otherwise you don't have to worry one way or the other.

5
00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:26.000
In the writing of history, there are just a few rules that we have to follow.

6
00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:33.240
And you can be fairly effective in covering the basic historical materials.

7
00:00:33.240 --> 00:00:37.080
Some of them are very, very simple rules.

8
00:00:37.080 --> 00:00:43.800
I always like the one, if you find a skeleton in a closet, find out who owns the house.

9
00:00:43.800 --> 00:00:46.320
Kind of an obvious starting point.

10
00:00:46.320 --> 00:00:53.840
The two that I do my best to follow in my writing.

11
00:00:53.840 --> 00:00:59.160
The first principle is follow the money.

12
00:00:59.160 --> 00:01:05.160
And the second principle is follow the confession of faith.

13
00:01:05.160 --> 00:01:13.400
And if you want a summary of a phrase that we have come to associate with both positions,

14
00:01:13.400 --> 00:01:22.360
follow the money is the question of money talks, or as Marx put it, the cash nexus.

15
00:01:22.360 --> 00:01:29.920
And with respect to follow the confession of faith, that's the principle that ideas have consequences.

16
00:01:29.920 --> 00:01:38.200
And most historians prefer one or the other, but they very rarely combine the two.

17
00:01:38.200 --> 00:01:41.980
And one of the few exceptions was Murray Rothbard.

18
00:01:41.980 --> 00:01:48.160
And Rothbard's work on the progressive movement is an almost flawless example of how somebody

19
00:01:48.160 --> 00:01:53.360
have followed the money and followed the confession of faith.

20
00:01:53.360 --> 00:01:57.600
And I don't pretend to be able to do as good a job as Rothbard did,

21
00:01:57.600 --> 00:02:04.120
but at least that becomes my model.

22
00:02:04.120 --> 00:02:07.800
Let's go to a study very briefly

23
00:02:07.800 --> 00:02:11.920
of what I see as the battle for the American mind

24
00:02:11.920 --> 00:02:13.560
and really the American soul

25
00:02:13.560 --> 00:02:16.640
that began in the 1870s

26
00:02:16.640 --> 00:02:26.280
is still going on, but certainly was in full force through the first half of the 20th century.

27
00:02:26.280 --> 00:02:34.760
And that is the battle in politics between progressivism and what we might call a kind

28
00:02:34.760 --> 00:02:40.260
of traditional American politics, kind of constitutional politics.

29
00:02:40.260 --> 00:02:46.040
And on the other hand, the battle between modernism and Christianity.

30
00:02:46.040 --> 00:02:54.640
And both of those battles took place at the same time, and both of them were interrelated.

31
00:02:54.640 --> 00:03:01.680
In following the confession of faith, as I have put in the handout, I start with what

32
00:03:01.680 --> 00:03:05.780
I call the biblical covenant model.

33
00:03:05.780 --> 00:03:14.800
And I recommend this to anybody who is studying any aspect of social theory or social organization.

34
00:03:14.800 --> 00:03:33.300
And these are the issues as follows. Sovereignty, authority, law, sanctions, and time. Once again, sovereignty, authority, law, sanctions, and time.

35
00:03:33.300 --> 00:03:43.300
Now let's put it in simple language when you're looking at any organization. Sovereignty question is, who's in charge here?

36
00:03:43.300 --> 00:03:47.380
The authority question is, to whom do I report?

37
00:03:47.380 --> 00:03:50.820
The law question is, what are the rules?

38
00:03:50.820 --> 00:03:54.700
The sanctions question is, what do I get if I obey,

39
00:03:54.700 --> 00:03:57.140
and what happens to me if I disobey?

40
00:03:57.140 --> 00:04:01.540
And the future question is, does this outfit have a future?

41
00:04:01.540 --> 00:04:06.300
And if you ask those five questions of any organization,

42
00:04:06.300 --> 00:04:08.500
you're going to have a pretty good handle

43
00:04:08.500 --> 00:04:12.420
on how the particular organization functions.

44
00:04:12.420 --> 00:04:17.100
And so I like to use those questions when I'm looking at the history of social thought,

45
00:04:17.100 --> 00:04:22.140
and I like to ask those questions when I'm looking at the history of any kind of an organization.

46
00:04:22.140 --> 00:04:29.940
Very simple questions, though very difficult, accurately, to assess and evaluate effectively.

47
00:04:29.940 --> 00:04:34.700
It's not easy work, but they're fairly straightforward questions.

48
00:04:34.700 --> 00:04:40.820
Now with respect to the battle on Christianity versus modernism, let's start with very briefly

49
00:04:40.820 --> 00:04:49.820
What was the fundamental, covenantal view of American Protestant Christianity, say, in 1874 or 1875?

50
00:04:49.820 --> 00:04:59.820
God is sovereign. The Bible is the Word of God. God's law is authoritative.

51
00:04:59.820 --> 00:05:09.820
There is going to be a final judgment, and the Kingdom of God in history has a consequence. Those five issues.

52
00:05:09.820 --> 00:05:15.100
We can date, actually, we really can date in a rare situation, we can date almost exactly

53
00:05:15.100 --> 00:05:21.300
when the battle began, between 1875 and 1876, and that was the time that higher criticism

54
00:05:21.300 --> 00:05:26.560
of the Bible first began to take root in the United States, and for that matter really

55
00:05:26.560 --> 00:05:28.660
in Great Britain.

56
00:05:28.660 --> 00:05:34.960
And the modernist position took essentially the same five points and they rewrote them.

57
00:05:34.960 --> 00:05:44.920
And the modernist position is sovereignty is some form of evolution, including social evolution.

58
00:05:44.920 --> 00:05:50.960
There is higher criticism of the Bible, so the Bible is not the authoritative Word of God.

59
00:05:50.960 --> 00:05:55.720
Law is some form of situation ethics.

60
00:05:55.720 --> 00:06:00.060
Sanctions, there is no hell.

61
00:06:00.060 --> 00:06:07.060
Now if there's any doctrine of modernism that was the central doctrine, today, as in 1875,

62
00:06:07.060 --> 00:06:11.260
that is the central doctrine, there is no hell.

63
00:06:11.260 --> 00:06:16.780
And the fifth point was the Kingdom of God is extended through ecumenism in terms of

64
00:06:16.780 --> 00:06:24.260
a great joining of all religions into one large religious confessional association.

65
00:06:24.260 --> 00:06:31.700
Now the modernist position is almost kind of a rubber-stamp parallel of the modern, the

66
00:06:31.700 --> 00:06:33.940
progressive position is a rubber-stamp of the modernist.

67
00:06:33.940 --> 00:06:38.980
That is, it also begins with the principle that man is sovereign, at least at this point

68
00:06:38.980 --> 00:06:40.760
of evolutionary history.

69
00:06:40.760 --> 00:06:43.280
Man is sovereign right now.

70
00:06:43.280 --> 00:06:48.960
The second point in terms of their whole concept of authority in the progressive movement was

71
00:06:48.960 --> 00:06:52.860
the state is finally authoritative.

72
00:06:52.860 --> 00:07:03.740
The third position on law was legislation slash regulation is the basis of social ordering.

73
00:07:03.740 --> 00:07:10.740
Fourth position was, in terms of sanctions, it's a combination of politics and money.

74
00:07:10.740 --> 00:07:15.020
And the fifth position was the American Century.

75
00:07:15.020 --> 00:07:20.380
That in some way we were going to find that the 20th century was the American Century

76
00:07:20.380 --> 00:07:44.380
This is the basis, then, of what I would call the war between Christian Protestant America that you can date around 1875 and that extends still going on, but certainly escalated visibly in the first half of the 20th century.

77
00:07:44.380 --> 00:07:55.740
I believe that the battle began in the religious sphere first. I think the war on modernism

78
00:07:55.740 --> 00:08:02.460
versus Christianity really got into action from about, again, as I say, from about 1875

79
00:08:02.460 --> 00:08:12.780
to say 1885, maybe 1890, that period, where you had the real confrontation between the

80
00:08:12.780 --> 00:08:24.540
liberal, theological, innovators, revolutionaries, if you call it, and the old traditional Protestantism.

81
00:08:24.540 --> 00:08:29.080
Then in the mid-1880s and certainly in the 1890s, you saw the rise of the progressive

82
00:08:29.080 --> 00:08:36.380
movement. Murray was very, very good on this issue. He went to a book, a very important

83
00:08:36.380 --> 00:08:41.980
book, Crondon on Ministers of Reform, which is a history of the progressive leaders, and

84
00:08:41.980 --> 00:08:49.980
He said, Cronin said, and Murray believed, that these people were mostly sons of old Calvinists

85
00:08:49.980 --> 00:08:53.980
who had a post-millennial vision that the Kingdom of God was going to extend across the face of the earth.

86
00:08:53.980 --> 00:09:01.980
They secularized it. And in secularizing it, they became progressives. They became, as Cronin calls them, ministers of reform.

87
00:09:01.980 --> 00:09:10.980
To use the state as an agency of reform to transform civilization in an ethical way, but not in a biblical way.

88
00:09:10.980 --> 00:09:24.980
And so, in terms of theology, the battle became the social gospel, which was essentially the theological foundation of the progressive movement.

89
00:09:24.980 --> 00:09:36.980
They gave that their ethical foundation was in the social gospel, and that gospel was in a head-on collision against traditional conservative Protestantism in this country.

90
00:09:36.980 --> 00:10:05.980
Now, with respect to the issue of follow the money, I suppose it starts getting clear in 1891, you begin to see the first source of the funding, and that is when John D. Rockefeller Sr. is convinced by a Baptist minister, by the name of Frederick Gates, that what is necessary is a Baptist university.

91
00:10:05.980 --> 00:10:13.660
And Rockefeller puts up the money and the university is the University of Chicago.

92
00:10:13.660 --> 00:10:22.140
And that becomes a spearhead organization for both the progressive movement and for modernism.

93
00:10:22.140 --> 00:10:30.380
Now, Chicago has been defined as or described as the university in which agnostic students

94
00:10:30.380 --> 00:10:41.880
Study at a Baptist University, reading Thomas Aquinas, to be taught by atheist Jews.

95
00:10:41.880 --> 00:10:49.180
And that institution became the spearhead institution, and Gates became, I believe,

96
00:10:49.180 --> 00:10:55.380
if I were going to do a book of the ten invisible Americans who changed America,

97
00:10:55.380 --> 00:10:57.380
Gates would certainly have a chapter.

98
00:10:57.380 --> 00:11:04.580
because Gates became, he was a genius investor and a systematic theologian of the modernist movement

99
00:11:04.580 --> 00:11:12.180
and he got Rockefeller's ear on both issues and he became the guy who wrote the checks for Rockefeller

100
00:11:12.180 --> 00:11:17.680
basically from 1900 until 1923, 1924.

101
00:11:17.680 --> 00:11:20.880
He was the key check writer.

102
00:11:20.880 --> 00:11:27.280
I like to think of him as the bag man and he absolutely transformed the country.

103
00:11:27.280 --> 00:11:35.040
in terms of all of the Rockefeller institutions, multiple foundations, Rockefeller medical efforts,

104
00:11:35.040 --> 00:11:41.200
the General Education Board which was started in 1902, got rolling in 1903 and whose goal

105
00:11:41.200 --> 00:11:49.880
was to bring public education to the American South and to systematically take religion

106
00:11:49.880 --> 00:11:55.640
out of the colleges which at that point were totally decentralized and Rockefeller wrote

107
00:11:55.640 --> 00:12:08.640
The Quid Pro Quo was, you had to hire PhDs. And all PhD education from 1875 onward was totally secular because of the seminar system.

108
00:12:08.640 --> 00:12:19.640
There were no ministers teaching in graduate schools in the United States. They taught in the lower division, but they did not teach in the graduate schools, and the model was Johns Hopkins.

109
00:12:19.640 --> 00:12:29.640
And out of Johns Hopkins, on the East Coast certainly, that became a spearhead organization for both the modernist movement and the progressive movement.

110
00:12:29.640 --> 00:12:38.640
And you had, for example, in 1885, you had in one group, you had J. Franklin Jameson in history, studying under Herbert Adams.

111
00:12:38.640 --> 00:12:48.640
You had Eli, who became the American Economic Association founder.

112
00:12:48.640 --> 00:12:56.640
and you had the ultimate progressivist, the absolute incarnation of both modernism and politics, Woodrow Wilson.

113
00:12:56.640 --> 00:13:00.640
And that was how Wilson got his start.

114
00:13:00.640 --> 00:13:06.640
In a, what was called then, believe it or not, not a seminar, an historical seminary.

115
00:13:06.640 --> 00:13:14.640
They even had the old language, they only dropped the Y towards the end of the 19th century.

116
00:13:14.640 --> 00:13:21.760
In terms of the funding, I have a phrase, all roads lead to Picatico Hills.

117
00:13:21.760 --> 00:13:25.080
All go back to the Rockefeller family interests.

118
00:13:25.080 --> 00:13:30.120
He puts up the money for the General Education Board. That, again, was Gates's idea.

119
00:13:30.120 --> 00:13:35.280
A junior puts up the money for the Federal Council of Churches in 1908,

120
00:13:35.280 --> 00:13:41.440
which became the central organization of the ecumenical movement in the United States,

121
00:13:41.440 --> 00:13:47.280
and it was there that you saw the social gospel really put into action,

122
00:13:47.280 --> 00:13:52.960
into some kind of a series of calls for state intervention into the economy,

123
00:13:52.960 --> 00:13:58.240
justifying the progressive movements call for centralization,

124
00:13:58.240 --> 00:14:01.760
only justifying it in a theological way.

125
00:14:01.760 --> 00:14:08.800
And Rockefeller, junior and senior, but especially junior after about 1910,

126
00:14:08.800 --> 00:14:15.920
begins to fund both the progressive movement, but especially theological education, theological

127
00:14:15.920 --> 00:14:19.280
standards in the United States.

128
00:14:19.280 --> 00:14:25.720
And what they really together, the two of them work together, the old man and the son

129
00:14:25.720 --> 00:14:32.960
were in agreement basically, but the son became the real ramrod in the area of American Protestant

130
00:14:32.960 --> 00:14:34.380
religion.

131
00:14:34.380 --> 00:14:44.660
And he wrote, the estimate is at least $100 million of those kinds of dollars to do this

132
00:14:44.660 --> 00:14:48.860
in the period of 50 years when he was writing the checks.

133
00:14:48.860 --> 00:14:54.260
And he came across, under an obscure situation, he came across a man by the name of Raymond

134
00:14:54.260 --> 00:15:02.740
Fosdick, around 1912 or 13, he liked Fosdick, he sort of became Fosdick's metter and financer,

135
00:15:02.740 --> 00:15:11.060
In about 1923, Fosdick, Raymond Fosdick, replaces Gates and for the next 40 years he writes the

136
00:15:11.060 --> 00:15:19.060
checks and Fosdick is the brother of Harry Emerson Fosdick who was the most important

137
00:15:19.060 --> 00:15:24.100
theological figure of theological modernism in the first half of the 20th century.

138
00:15:24.100 --> 00:15:28.900
I had no idea those two were brothers.

139
00:15:28.900 --> 00:15:57.700
The two of them and the religion FASDIC was on the transformation of the Rockefeller Board in 17 when Junior takes over and in 1925 Junior builds the Riverside Church for him and the Federal Council of Churches then moves into 75 Riverside Drive and that becomes the spearhead now for the whole social gospel movement in the United States.

140
00:15:57.700 --> 00:16:04.020
is Rockefeller money from day one, from day one.

141
00:16:04.020 --> 00:16:12.820
He was very subtle, he did not seek publicity, he was a wise man, he was Mr. Anonymous.

142
00:16:12.820 --> 00:16:17.700
And there's only one man that I know of who's comparable on our side, and they were competitors

143
00:16:17.700 --> 00:16:23.300
and they tried to do exactly the same thing, we had one too, J. Howard Pugh of Sun Oil,

144
00:16:23.300 --> 00:16:29.940
which is Calvinist who ever lived and he went lockstep with lockstep in terms of finances

145
00:16:29.940 --> 00:16:36.900
and in terms of oil development with the Rockefeller interest and he put up the money for many many

146
00:16:36.900 --> 00:16:41.700
of the organizations which finally have come down to here at the Mises Institute without

147
00:16:41.700 --> 00:16:45.340
Pugh's money things would have been much more difficult for most of us.

148
00:16:45.340 --> 00:16:51.780
But he never had the clout, he never had the following, Rockefeller was really expressive

149
00:16:51.780 --> 00:16:58.360
of what sometimes is called the ideas of the age.

150
00:16:58.360 --> 00:17:05.520
He was the right man at the right time to do almost all of the wrong things.

151
00:17:05.520 --> 00:17:08.660
So in my bibliography I've got some things listed.

152
00:17:08.660 --> 00:17:16.060
I cover this in my book called Crossed Fingers, where I trace the money and I trace the ideas

153
00:17:16.060 --> 00:17:21.680
with respect to the takeover of the Presbyterian Church, but of course it was all of the seven

154
00:17:51.680 --> 00:18:21.680
The old protestant establishment began to disintegrate when finally the old timers began to retire and die and the congregation members died and they were not replaced by young innovative kids who either went to college and lost their faith or they went back to the older traditional evangelical religions and did not go back into the mainstream mainline denominations in the United States. And all of them have shrunk since about 1960.

155
00:18:21.680 --> 00:18:28.680
I want to thank you for the time. I hope it gave you some help.