WEBVTT

NOTE Science and the Free Market: How Government Distorts Scientific Research Through Public Funding

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.500
Well, by way of introduction, as he said, my name is Norman Horne from the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin.

2
00:00:06.500 --> 00:00:15.000
I'll do a little shameless self-promotion. One of my projects is that I edit the website libertarianchristians.com, so if you'd like to check that out, feel free.

3
00:00:15.000 --> 00:00:24.000
Again, my topic is science and the free market. We're going to talk a little bit about government distortion of scientific research through public funding.

4
00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:30.000
Well, generally speaking, you write these presentations, you find out you're going to go way too long.

5
00:00:30.000 --> 00:00:35.000
So what I'm going to do is I'm going to front load and tell you, I think, the main message that I want to get across first.

6
00:00:35.000 --> 00:00:40.000
Basically, you know, everybody knows that science makes our lives better.

7
00:00:40.000 --> 00:00:46.000
Through research and industry, we improve our well-being.

8
00:00:46.000 --> 00:00:52.000
And so this, to me, tells me something very important.

9
00:00:52.000 --> 00:00:57.000
Science is basically the good guy's way to get back at the government.

10
00:00:57.000 --> 00:01:05.000
Science shows again and again that the government is basically unnecessary for either our survival or our productivity.

11
00:01:05.000 --> 00:01:13.000
And I think that's why the government endeavors so much to control science so badly.

12
00:01:13.000 --> 00:01:20.000
Good science is their enemy, and so they have to dupe citizens into thinking that they need to support science

13
00:01:20.000 --> 00:01:23.800
so that we can be productive and prosperous.

14
00:01:23.800 --> 00:01:26.400
Okay, so if you don't get anything else out of this,

15
00:01:26.400 --> 00:01:27.840
remember that.

16
00:01:27.840 --> 00:01:30.320
Okay, so first off, we're gonna talk a little bit about

17
00:01:30.320 --> 00:01:31.360
why does the government say

18
00:01:31.360 --> 00:01:32.700
that they need to be involved in science?

19
00:01:32.700 --> 00:01:35.640
Well, we kinda just said they have to dupe us

20
00:01:35.640 --> 00:01:37.240
into thinking that they're necessary

21
00:01:37.240 --> 00:01:38.560
in order to make us productive.

22
00:01:38.560 --> 00:01:41.360
In other words, they wanna tell us

23
00:01:41.360 --> 00:01:43.080
that there's insufficient incentives

24
00:01:43.080 --> 00:01:44.960
to do scientific research from the market

25
00:01:44.960 --> 00:01:48.000
because they want profits, not progress.

26
00:01:48.000 --> 00:01:49.560
And so the basic research,

27
00:01:49.560 --> 00:01:53.400
The most basic stuff in chemistry and physics and biology is just, oh, well the market's

28
00:01:53.400 --> 00:01:58.520
not going to provide for that, so that constitutes to them a market failure to provide for the

29
00:01:58.520 --> 00:02:02.280
public and thus the economy is going to be operating at a sub-optimal level, so they

30
00:02:02.280 --> 00:02:06.240
got to get in there, they got to do the funding and get it done.

31
00:02:06.240 --> 00:02:08.000
Well what's so wrong with this?

32
00:02:08.000 --> 00:02:13.560
Well, the nature of the state-sponsored science that we see all throughout the economy itself

33
00:02:13.560 --> 00:02:18.480
is problematic at best, and I think it's outright deceptive at worst, and we'll talk a little

34
00:02:18.480 --> 00:02:22.800
about how that happens and there's basically the problem of socialism and then there's

35
00:02:22.800 --> 00:02:26.720
other problems that kind of enter into the equation. After that what I'm going to do

36
00:02:26.720 --> 00:02:31.080
is I'm going to talk about a free market model for scientific research and kind of explain

37
00:02:31.080 --> 00:02:34.720
why their argument that there are no incentives and that the market's not going to do it

38
00:02:34.720 --> 00:02:40.000
is just flat wrong. And so we'll talk a little bit about how science actually advances and

39
00:02:40.000 --> 00:02:45.420
then give you a little bit of a model for how scientific research progresses. Now everybody

40
00:02:45.420 --> 00:02:50.380
Hayek here is pretty familiar with Mises and Rothbard and Hayek, and so you know what I'm

41
00:02:50.380 --> 00:02:54.500
going to say about socialism, that there are no rational means of economic calculation.

42
00:02:54.500 --> 00:02:55.940
That's the calculation problem.

43
00:02:55.940 --> 00:02:59.620
And Hayek had talked about how knowledge is distributed in a society.

44
00:02:59.620 --> 00:03:03.040
It's not centralized into the state apparatus.

45
00:03:03.040 --> 00:03:05.780
And so you could expect that they're not going to be able to make very good decisions about

46
00:03:05.780 --> 00:03:06.780
such things.

47
00:03:06.780 --> 00:03:11.140
Now, mind you, I'm not saying that what's going to happen is that all science that comes

48
00:03:11.140 --> 00:03:19.940
is flawed and wrong in terms of correctness. There will be correct science that will come,

49
00:03:19.940 --> 00:03:27.340
but there will be distortions. When we apply these critiques of socialism to science itself,

50
00:03:27.340 --> 00:03:32.140
we can come up with a few conclusions. First, there are no rational means that the government

51
00:03:32.140 --> 00:03:37.260
has to actually figure out what research needs to be done. They just don't have the capacity

52
00:03:37.260 --> 00:03:41.460
to make that decision. Now they can make guesses, but they're probably, they might be right

53
00:03:41.460 --> 00:03:45.220
a few times, but they're not going to be able to be efficient about it. And there's also

54
00:03:45.220 --> 00:03:51.340
no rational means to figure out how much resources they need to commit to any research program.

55
00:03:51.340 --> 00:03:55.140
So at best, we have to say that the central planners are going to be taking market signals,

56
00:03:55.140 --> 00:03:59.900
which begs the question, why are they necessary? Or at worst, they're just stabbing in the

57
00:03:59.900 --> 00:04:05.700
air. Okay, so the fundamental problem that leads from this is that the government is

58
00:04:05.700 --> 00:04:13.780
is effectively the controller of what is researched. So, this is a big abridgment of academic freedom,

59
00:04:13.780 --> 00:04:18.540
which if you're familiar with the concept of academic freedom, it just says that we

60
00:04:18.540 --> 00:04:24.940
in academia need to basically be free from outside influence in order to pursue knowledge

61
00:04:24.940 --> 00:04:28.380
to the best of our ability. Now, that's not entirely accurate. They're never going to

62
00:04:28.380 --> 00:04:33.860
be free from influence. We'll talk about that later. But basically, the power of the purse

63
00:04:33.860 --> 00:04:39.860
The course that the government holds over scientists has a great influence on how things are going to work.

64
00:04:39.860 --> 00:04:44.860
And it's naive to just assume that the government is going to be a neutral third party to the situation.

65
00:04:44.860 --> 00:04:47.860
I mean, it isn't like they're neutral in anything else, right?

66
00:04:47.860 --> 00:04:53.860
Well, another thing that's going to happen is that in government-sponsored science, you're just going to get poorly conducted research.

67
00:04:53.860 --> 00:04:58.860
This is just a natural consequence of the type of decision-making that they do.

68
00:04:58.860 --> 00:05:04.860
It takes money away from the people who can make right decisions and put it into the hands of people who make poor decisions.

69
00:05:04.860 --> 00:05:07.860
So, for a big example, this is NASA.

70
00:05:07.860 --> 00:05:15.860
We all know that, yes, there are some benefits that we've received from that, but they're a massive, colossal waste, and have been since the beginning.

71
00:05:15.860 --> 00:05:23.860
Well, and this also constitutes an artificial increase in demand for scientific research, and this is going to drive up the prices for it.

72
00:05:23.860 --> 00:05:27.860
And this is why there's a ton of money in what they're doing.

73
00:05:27.860 --> 00:05:38.860
I think also that you end up with some practical property rights issues here, and they get exacerbated a whole lot when you just start throwing government money or actually public money into it.

74
00:05:38.860 --> 00:05:50.860
You know, so who owns it? It's kind of strange. I mean, I don't really want to get into intellectual property issues per se, although, like I say here, the intellectual property laws exacerbate all these problems.

75
00:05:50.860 --> 00:05:57.860
But really, who profits from the research? Who gets to? The public? The federal government? Society? The world? Who knows?

76
00:05:57.860 --> 00:06:02.860
We just don't really know because there's no private property involved.

77
00:06:02.860 --> 00:06:11.860
Okay, and I think most of all, and this goes back to who controls the research, you also get a lot of agenda-based research.

78
00:06:11.860 --> 00:06:16.860
Science is used initially as a basis for fear and then for control.

79
00:06:16.860 --> 00:06:21.860
The example of this is environmental science. In the 80s we were all worried about global cooling.

80
00:06:21.860 --> 00:06:27.860
Now we're worried about global warming. And under the precincts of science, this has now been changed to climate change.

81
00:06:27.860 --> 00:06:32.860
And nobody really knows what's true and what's not. It's a big mess.

82
00:06:32.860 --> 00:06:36.860
This is not going to be solved until the government gets out of it.

83
00:06:36.860 --> 00:06:43.860
In fact, I just recently published a paper in a peer-reviewed journal on what I presented last year at this conference

84
00:06:43.860 --> 00:06:49.860
on the problem of transportation pollution and how that cannot be solved when the government is doing all its work,

85
00:06:49.860 --> 00:06:55.860
trying to fund all these projects and trying to get everything done like that. It's not going to work.

86
00:06:55.860 --> 00:07:02.860
And furthermore, you have this really interesting phenomena of the government sponsoring research

87
00:07:02.860 --> 00:07:07.860
just to find out how necessary they are to sponsor research. This happens continually,

88
00:07:07.860 --> 00:07:27.860
The reality of scientific advancement. How does science actually proceed along the free market?

89
00:07:27.860 --> 00:07:35.860
If you look through history, what you realize is that science moves forward when individuals are allowed to exercise their minds in freedom.

90
00:07:35.860 --> 00:07:40.700
Perfect examples of this are people like Copernicus and Galileo and Newton.

91
00:07:40.700 --> 00:07:46.420
Can you imagine what the change would have been like if Copernicus and Galileo had been

92
00:07:46.420 --> 00:07:49.580
sponsored by the state church and the state government at the time?

93
00:07:49.580 --> 00:07:54.120
Do you think they would have been able to stand against those people who were basically

94
00:07:54.120 --> 00:07:57.140
oppressing them for their ideas?

95
00:07:57.140 --> 00:07:58.140
I doubt it.

96
00:07:58.140 --> 00:08:01.900
If they were funded by the government, I mean, you know that that is another conflict of

97
00:08:01.900 --> 00:08:09.500
In the Industrial Revolution, how much state-sponsored science was there?

98
00:08:09.500 --> 00:08:13.380
As far as I can tell, and I haven't seen a lot of work on this, but there was very little.

99
00:08:13.380 --> 00:08:16.260
In fact, I would say it's pretty close to zero.

100
00:08:16.260 --> 00:08:21.820
And yet, we're supposed to believe that the only way we're going to have progress is through

101
00:08:21.820 --> 00:08:22.820
government funding.

102
00:08:22.820 --> 00:08:25.660
Okay, that seems a little dubious.

103
00:08:25.660 --> 00:08:30.900
In the 20th century, we have a whole lot of other instances of ways that science has progressed

104
00:08:30.900 --> 00:08:33.260
without any interference from government whatsoever.

105
00:08:33.260 --> 00:08:37.260
Albert Einstein published his four major papers

106
00:08:37.260 --> 00:08:40.180
that literally changed physics itself

107
00:08:40.180 --> 00:08:42.140
while he was working at a patent office.

108
00:08:42.140 --> 00:08:43.780
He did it on the side.

109
00:08:43.780 --> 00:08:45.120
You know, that's how science advances.

110
00:08:45.120 --> 00:08:49.460
It's by people who are interested in a particular subject,

111
00:08:49.460 --> 00:08:50.780
exercising their mind.

112
00:08:52.260 --> 00:08:54.340
And in my field, I work in polymer science

113
00:08:54.340 --> 00:08:56.900
in the Department of Chemical Engineering.

114
00:08:56.900 --> 00:09:00.180
The bulk of the early research and development

115
00:09:00.180 --> 00:09:04.220
in Polymer Science occurred via private industry.

116
00:09:04.220 --> 00:09:06.820
Without people like Wallace Carruthers at DuPont

117
00:09:06.820 --> 00:09:11.820
and Dow Chemical and whatnot, we would not have polymers

118
00:09:12.700 --> 00:09:14.820
and you wouldn't be wearing them,

119
00:09:14.820 --> 00:09:17.980
which everybody uses polymers every day,

120
00:09:17.980 --> 00:09:19.740
and even if they don't know it.

121
00:09:19.740 --> 00:09:23.300
And so we find even now that in polymer science,

122
00:09:23.300 --> 00:09:26.300
the bulk of innovation comes from private industry.

123
00:09:27.540 --> 00:09:29.440
If you just take a look at the funding statistics,

124
00:09:29.440 --> 00:09:35.440
This is not my graph. I got it from Boudos and McQuade in one of their articles from 2006.

125
00:09:35.440 --> 00:09:41.440
You see that really what the industry still funds basic research at an alarming rate.

126
00:09:41.440 --> 00:09:45.440
And in fact, it's only been in more recent years when the government has just kind of,

127
00:09:45.440 --> 00:09:50.440
that big black mark on there, shows the government funding.

128
00:09:50.440 --> 00:09:55.440
And you see, wow, it's really nearly doubled in the last few years alone.

129
00:09:55.440 --> 00:09:59.440
and it actually gives you kind of an indication that this might be a bubble.

130
00:09:59.440 --> 00:10:02.440
Oh wow, novel thought there.

131
00:10:02.440 --> 00:10:05.440
And a lot of that goes actually into medical science industry

132
00:10:05.440 --> 00:10:12.440
and you've seen how the government is continually taking control over the medical industry over time.

133
00:10:12.440 --> 00:10:16.440
Okay, so let's talk a little bit about how science proceeds on the free market

134
00:10:16.440 --> 00:10:18.440
and there's two ways this is going to happen.

135
00:10:18.440 --> 00:10:21.440
It's going to happen through industry and it's going to happen in academia

136
00:10:21.440 --> 00:10:24.440
and I'm kind of ignoring just people doing it in the comfort of their own home

137
00:10:24.440 --> 00:10:35.320
Okay, but how does research proceed in industry? Well, scientific research creates more roundabout

138
00:10:35.320 --> 00:10:40.280
production. And so what we could say is that the inevitable outcome of more roundabout

139
00:10:40.280 --> 00:10:45.840
production being demanded is going to be a demand for more basic research. Any production

140
00:10:45.840 --> 00:10:51.260
process that is science-based is based on sound scientific theory. And thus, if we expect

141
00:10:51.260 --> 00:10:55.820
to maintain roundabout production, we have to invest in research, so the free market

142
00:10:55.820 --> 00:10:59.540
will eventually demand research, it's gonna happen.

143
00:10:59.540 --> 00:11:06.340
Now there's also more benefit to this than just meets the eye, there's a so-called first

144
00:11:06.340 --> 00:11:12.360
mover benefit, those who are the first to achieve a certain scientific process will

145
00:11:12.360 --> 00:11:16.980
benefit first from this and then they actually have the capacity then to market this, they

146
00:11:16.980 --> 00:11:21.940
They have the first reinvestable profits. They can then take their research and, provided

147
00:11:21.940 --> 00:11:27.300
that they can show people that it's useful, they can even use their science to make even

148
00:11:27.300 --> 00:11:32.500
more money. So there's research, there are incentives to doing research and marketing

149
00:11:32.500 --> 00:11:37.620
it that the government seems to just ignore in their analysis of why they need to be funding

150
00:11:37.620 --> 00:11:43.160
it. Now, research can be kept internal, we could call that a trade secret, but there

151
00:11:43.160 --> 00:11:48.040
There are advantages to being more open, and as I already mentioned a little bit, let's

152
00:11:48.040 --> 00:11:50.280
talk a little bit about that.

153
00:11:50.280 --> 00:11:52.480
Advantages to openness.

154
00:11:52.480 --> 00:11:56.680
Scientific contributions are an enhancement to a firm's public image.

155
00:11:56.680 --> 00:11:57.680
Three minutes?

156
00:11:57.680 --> 00:11:58.680
Okay, great.

157
00:11:58.680 --> 00:12:01.680
All right, we'll have to jump in a little faster.

158
00:12:01.680 --> 00:12:05.200
So they're just like charitable donations, and it is going to attract the goodwill of

159
00:12:05.200 --> 00:12:10.100
consumers and scientists, and it will attract top talent for their company.

160
00:12:10.100 --> 00:12:13.500
Because if a firm is open and people see that, if students see that, they're going to come

161
00:12:13.500 --> 00:12:15.100
and work for them.

162
00:12:15.100 --> 00:12:21.100
Okay, there also will be new business opportunities because implementation of research is a different

163
00:12:21.100 --> 00:12:23.100
thing than the research itself.

164
00:12:23.100 --> 00:12:27.460
And they may have the ability to implement research that goes beyond that which the research

165
00:12:27.460 --> 00:12:28.460
alone has.

166
00:12:28.460 --> 00:12:29.460
So there are things like that.

167
00:12:29.460 --> 00:12:33.220
There's also a very interesting phenomenon that we've seen in research consortium development,

168
00:12:33.220 --> 00:12:39.380
and a good example of this is the Semitech Corporation in Texas, where we have 14 corporations,

169
00:12:39.380 --> 00:12:47.380
The biggest semiconductor companies in the world are joining together voluntarily and doing research together for their mutual benefit.

170
00:12:47.380 --> 00:12:51.380
Okay, jumping quickly to academia, and we'll summarize after this.

171
00:12:51.380 --> 00:12:55.380
There are a lot of different funding sources that can go into research.

172
00:12:55.380 --> 00:13:01.380
I'm going to talk specifically about the final two that you see on this slide, business donations and contracted projects.

173
00:13:01.380 --> 00:13:05.380
What are the business incentives to donating to science?

174
00:13:05.380 --> 00:13:08.380
Well, first of all, there's, again, charity and public image.

175
00:13:08.380 --> 00:13:11.020
That is almost like direct advertising to them.

176
00:13:11.020 --> 00:13:13.940
There could also be tax breaks for university donations,

177
00:13:13.940 --> 00:13:15.740
and so that could actually be a good thing

178
00:13:15.740 --> 00:13:19.080
that government could do, get rid of taxes

179
00:13:19.080 --> 00:13:20.900
on university donations.

180
00:13:20.900 --> 00:13:24.100
And then also it's gonna attract talented students to them

181
00:13:24.100 --> 00:13:26.980
because that's, and they do this all the time already.

182
00:13:26.980 --> 00:13:30.060
And also I think a bigger idea was the idea

183
00:13:30.060 --> 00:13:32.100
of just contracted projects.

184
00:13:32.100 --> 00:13:34.980
Researchers are then free to negotiate terms

185
00:13:34.980 --> 00:13:36.620
on contracted projects.

186
00:13:36.620 --> 00:13:49.620
So for instance, Richard could come to me and say, hey, I got this problem and I need you to solve it, and so you can pay me to solve that research project, and then you get the benefits of the research, I get the benefits of profits retained.

187
00:13:49.620 --> 00:13:57.620
And so that's an enhancement of the division of labor. And what's really cool about this is that you could say that this rewards success and not publications.

188
00:13:57.620 --> 00:14:05.620
A lot of you may hear the term publisher perish. That's sort of the mantra in academia a lot. And this rewards success, not publications.

189
00:14:05.620 --> 00:14:09.620
I guess I'm going to skip this. Well, I'll just briefly touch on this slide.

190
00:14:09.620 --> 00:14:15.620
Ultimately, what I'm trying to get across here is that when we go with this free market model,

191
00:14:15.620 --> 00:14:22.620
where I'm only receiving donations that are private or that I'm doing research for other companies

192
00:14:22.620 --> 00:14:27.620
in order to produce something of value for them,

193
00:14:27.620 --> 00:14:31.620
and then I retain the profits to do my own personally interested research,

194
00:14:31.620 --> 00:14:35.940
Research, I'm in control of the research program and not the government. Everything

195
00:14:35.940 --> 00:14:42.220
done is voluntary. So that's a big thing for me. And so I would like to just really emphasize

196
00:14:42.220 --> 00:14:47.300
that, that I control the research program, not the government. And so we get out of this

197
00:14:47.300 --> 00:14:50.180
idea that the government is the ultimate in control.

198
00:14:50.180 --> 00:14:54.020
So here's the conclusions. Publicly funded research is socialistic in nature, should

199
00:14:54.020 --> 00:14:59.500
be eliminated, rah rah. The free market is fully capable of supporting research. And

200
00:14:59.500 --> 00:15:05.860
And then I've just proposed to you a model for scientific research in industry and academia.

201
00:15:05.860 --> 00:15:12.000
And so finally I just want you to remember again why government wants to control science.

202
00:15:12.000 --> 00:15:18.420
If they control it, they have a means of controlling everyone, because science is very integral

203
00:15:18.420 --> 00:15:19.420
to our society.

204
00:15:19.420 --> 00:15:23.420
And with that I will leave it up to questions, so thank you.
