WEBVTT

NOTE The Summers Heresy at Large

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.200
I work as a heretic within my field, public administration, because I have criticized affirmative

2
00:00:05.200 --> 00:00:10.200
action while the Code of Ethics of the American Society for Public Administration commits members

3
00:00:10.200 --> 00:00:13.480
to quote, promote affirmative action.

4
00:00:13.480 --> 00:00:18.440
Larry Summers too criticized affirmative action, yet it was a greater heresy along with a pocketful

5
00:00:18.440 --> 00:00:23.660
of peccadillos that got him, after a year of confessing his error, fired from the presidency

6
00:00:23.660 --> 00:00:25.960
of Harvard University.

7
00:00:25.960 --> 00:00:32.200
He suggested the possibility of a biological basis for the under-representation of women

8
00:00:32.200 --> 00:00:34.280
in high-end scientific professions.

9
00:00:34.280 --> 00:00:38.080
Let's be clear from the start about what he did not say.

10
00:00:38.080 --> 00:00:43.240
He did not say that in general women are less intelligent than men, though that is what

11
00:00:43.240 --> 00:00:48.000
even my brightest undergraduates give as the answer on the first day of class.

12
00:00:48.000 --> 00:00:53.640
Neither did he say, as a large body of psychological research suggests, that women are less talented

13
00:00:53.640 --> 00:00:58.440
in the kinds of cognitive skills that are especially relevant to science and engineering,

14
00:00:58.440 --> 00:01:03.920
abstract reasoning, spatial visualization and other non-computational forms of mathematics.

15
00:01:03.920 --> 00:01:09.000
What he did say, and I'll simply quote it so that you've got it here, it does appear

16
00:01:09.000 --> 00:01:14.240
that on many, many different human attributes, height, weight, propensity for criminality,

17
00:01:14.240 --> 00:01:19.560
overall IQ, mathematical ability, scientific ability, there is relatively clear evidence

18
00:01:19.560 --> 00:01:30.760
There is a difference in the standard deviation and variability of a male and a female population.

19
00:01:30.760 --> 00:01:36.160
If one is talking about physicists at a top 25 research university, one is talking about

20
00:01:36.160 --> 00:01:42.840
people who are three and a half, four standard deviations above the mean in the one out of

21
00:01:42.840 --> 00:01:50.120
1 out of 5,000 or 1 out of 10,000 class. That's the picture we have here. That is the normal

22
00:01:50.120 --> 00:01:55.880
distribution of 73 different cognitive abilities tests that ETS put together. The national

23
00:01:55.880 --> 00:02:02.280
random sample of all 12th graders, boys and girls have the same mean, median and mode,

24
00:02:02.280 --> 00:02:07.000
but the girls are clustered at the middle and the boys are running off to either end.

25
00:02:07.000 --> 00:02:11.320
Males run to extremes is the general proposition.

26
00:02:11.320 --> 00:02:15.600
The hypothesis of greater male variability carries a long pedigree beginning with Darwin

27
00:02:15.600 --> 00:02:21.760
and encapsulated by Dr. Helena Cronin of the Darwin Center at the London School of Economics

28
00:02:21.760 --> 00:02:31.040
with the comment that the male population produces, quote, more dumbbells and more nobels.

29
00:02:31.040 --> 00:02:34.720
Darwin's statement of a hypothesis in the descent of man and selection in relation to

30
00:02:34.720 --> 00:02:36.940
sex was played upon by Galton.

31
00:02:36.940 --> 00:02:41.860
It stimulated a debate between Havelock Ellis, the sexologist, and Carl Pearson, the statistician,

32
00:02:41.860 --> 00:02:45.900
and rattled around for about half a century among psychologists in the US until systematic

33
00:02:45.900 --> 00:02:51.540
testing of national random samples appeared to establish it within the canon of contemporary

34
00:02:51.540 --> 00:02:55.620
psychology, only for it to be tossed again by controversy in the wake of the summer's

35
00:02:55.620 --> 00:02:57.860
heresy.

36
00:02:57.860 --> 00:03:04.900
So here's the picture in which we see that males and females have the same average, and

37
00:03:04.900 --> 00:03:11.000
There's a surplus. Females are black, males are white, the gray area is where you put it together.

38
00:03:11.000 --> 00:03:14.400
Surplus females in the middle, surplus males at either end.

39
00:03:14.400 --> 00:03:21.900
And know what happens as you move across from the top 10%, when you take the top 5%, you take the top 1%.

40
00:03:21.900 --> 00:03:27.600
The farther you go out, the greater the disproportion, the greater the male surplus.

41
00:03:27.600 --> 00:03:33.500
That's what Larry Summers got fired for saying.

42
00:03:33.500 --> 00:03:49.500
His mistake was to apologize for a whole year, that wiped him out as a scientist, but then that left him free so he can go and fix our economy, which he's doing in Washington now.

43
00:03:49.500 --> 00:03:58.500
The context for the contemporary concern with the summer's heresy has been the surge of women into the labor force, particularly the rise in their participation rate in a variety of professions.

44
00:03:58.500 --> 00:04:02.820
Access to elite positions in American society is currently filtered through an array of

45
00:04:02.820 --> 00:04:05.260
gatekeeping examinations.

46
00:04:05.260 --> 00:04:10.700
The early entrants through these gates were pioneers of exceptional tastes and talents.

47
00:04:10.700 --> 00:04:17.420
While the later cohorts bore a more plebeian character, the pioneers had to be exceptional

48
00:04:17.420 --> 00:04:21.140
in order to overcome the headwinds of convention.

49
00:04:21.140 --> 00:04:25.700
One such pioneer, Justice Shirley Abrahamson, a woman who graduated first in her class at

50
00:04:25.700 --> 00:04:30.020
at the Indiana University Law School, and went on to be the first woman on the Wisconsin

51
00:04:30.020 --> 00:04:35.480
Supreme Court put with understandable hyperbole that, quote, in this male world, a woman has

52
00:04:35.480 --> 00:04:40.540
to be twice as good and work twice as hard to get the same place a man does.

53
00:04:40.540 --> 00:04:41.540
And that was true.

54
00:04:41.540 --> 00:04:46.140
Maybe not twice, but that was true when women were less than five percent.

55
00:04:46.140 --> 00:04:52.220
Such exceptions in a few women obscured the underlying reality of greater male variability.

56
00:04:52.220 --> 00:04:57.120
This reality, however, came to the fore when a more representative supply of talent approached

57
00:04:57.120 --> 00:05:02.140
the gatekeeper examinations under the more equal opportunity that became available with

58
00:05:02.140 --> 00:05:06.780
the movement from what I call the pioneer stage to the plebeian stage.

59
00:05:06.780 --> 00:05:09.740
And for that, I hand out, oh, I can turn it over here.

60
00:05:09.740 --> 00:05:18.780
If you look at the other side, there's this focus, it's in focus, okay.

61
00:05:18.780 --> 00:05:27.120
So what we see here is, these are the king of the cream. These are women in law school

62
00:05:27.120 --> 00:05:33.960
who win the Order of the Coif. They graduate in the top tenth of their class. And here

63
00:05:33.960 --> 00:05:39.320
at the bottom we have just the percent of women who are graduating in law. So we see

64
00:05:39.320 --> 00:05:45.820
this movement from the pioneer period when these pioneers observed that they were, well

65
00:05:45.820 --> 00:05:53.420
In 1951-55, only about 3.7% of law students at elite schools were women, but there were

66
00:05:53.420 --> 00:05:57.380
4.7% of those who graduated in the top of their class, and there's some evidence that

67
00:05:57.380 --> 00:05:59.340
they had higher LSAT scores.

68
00:05:59.340 --> 00:06:04.740
There's a shift, however, in the middle from the pioneer phase to what I call the plebeian

69
00:06:04.740 --> 00:06:05.740
stage.

70
00:06:05.740 --> 00:06:14.220
So, now that we see women are 48% or about 50% of law students, there are also 48% of

71
00:06:14.220 --> 00:06:21.020
of Law Students in the elite law schools, but there are only 44% or 45% of those who

72
00:06:21.020 --> 00:06:26.780
graduate in the top 10. So this is the shift that I'm talking about, which underlines here

73
00:06:26.780 --> 00:06:32.260
the summer's heresy was obscured, but here when women are more participant, it comes to

74
00:06:32.260 --> 00:06:39.620
the fore, and that's what raises the problem. So then I talk about, Tim's here, isn't he?

75
00:06:39.620 --> 00:06:45.860
And he read everything I wrote, but I talk about a lot of things that I hope Tim understood

76
00:06:45.860 --> 00:06:47.440
with lots of statistics.

77
00:06:47.440 --> 00:06:53.220
And let me simply come quickly to where we begin to conclude that I find this is true

78
00:06:53.220 --> 00:06:56.660
not only in law, we know more about it with law, with law school, we've done a lot of

79
00:06:56.660 --> 00:07:02.100
research on law students in law school and I find that the LSAT is a good predictor of

80
00:07:02.100 --> 00:07:08.420
who gets to be an appellate court judge rather than a district judge, so that this difference

81
00:07:08.420 --> 00:07:13.900
This is an important difference. I find that there is supporting evidence if we look at

82
00:07:13.900 --> 00:07:22.900
the GMAT. With the GMAT, we find that women are about 40% of the takers of the GMAT, but

83
00:07:23.180 --> 00:07:27.720
if you take the top third of people on the GMAT, women are only about 30%, and if you

84
00:07:27.720 --> 00:07:34.720
take the top 1% of the scores on the GMAT, women are about 20%. So we see this tapering

85
00:07:34.720 --> 00:07:49.720
The more extreme you go, the greater the proportion of ales, at both ends, but at the top end is where it's crucial when we're talking about the recruitment of elites.

86
00:07:49.720 --> 00:08:01.720
To conclude then, Larry Summers utters his heresy at a National Bureau of Economic Research conference on, quote, diversifying the science and engineering workforce.

87
00:08:01.720 --> 00:08:07.620
He suggested that the problem, and presumably his explanation for it, extended beyond science

88
00:08:07.620 --> 00:08:13.660
and engineering into major corporations, large law firms, prominent teaching hospitals, prominent

89
00:08:13.660 --> 00:08:16.720
professional service organizations, as well as higher education.

90
00:08:16.720 --> 00:08:20.560
Let's take a quick look at government today.

91
00:08:20.560 --> 00:08:25.920
30 years ago, at the end of the pioneer period in law school, women were about one-third

92
00:08:25.920 --> 00:08:29.340
of the top graduates in top law schools.

93
00:08:29.340 --> 00:08:37.440
The Obama administration has brought in a set of cabinet and cabinet-level officials that is about one-third female.

94
00:08:37.440 --> 00:08:41.280
This is higher than the level of the immediately previous administration, but not quite up

95
00:08:41.280 --> 00:08:45.900
to the level of the second Clinton administration, which the Center for American Women and Politics

96
00:08:45.900 --> 00:08:50.700
claims reached 47% for cabinet and cabinet-level females.

97
00:08:50.700 --> 00:08:54.940
Now, the Center has assembled – I just got this off the web on the last day of writing

98
00:08:54.940 --> 00:09:06.940
has assembled a file of 15, quote, women named to cabinet, cabinet level and other top positions in the Obama administration and they fit our findings neatly for that period.

99
00:09:06.940 --> 00:09:19.940
Half of them can be identified as lawyers with a median age of 52, which puts their graduation a year about before the transition from pioneer to plebeian status.

100
00:09:19.940 --> 00:09:30.940
and D.R.'s Select Lot. Two graduated from Yale Law School, two from Michigan, which is in the top ten, one from Harvard, one from Virginia, only one from the outside of the fold from Florida.

101
00:09:30.940 --> 00:09:35.940
I hope there's nobody from the University of Florida here. I don't want to be unkind.

102
00:09:35.940 --> 00:09:45.940
There will be lots of room at the very top in the political appointments to the sub-cabinet and to the courts, but change will be slower below in the senior civil service and over in the legislature,

103
00:09:45.940 --> 00:09:51.020
Legislature, where even the incoming members of recent congresses have been less than one-fifth

104
00:09:51.020 --> 00:09:53.460
female.

105
00:09:53.460 --> 00:09:58.580
So when the demand is made for moving closer to parity between the sexes, an interesting

106
00:09:58.580 --> 00:10:04.660
question is, will Larry Summers, who now has what is known in the theater as, quote, a

107
00:10:04.660 --> 00:10:12.900
thinking part on the national stage, think about the supply side restraints implicit

108
00:10:12.900 --> 00:10:15.700
in His Heresy.