WEBVTT

NOTE One Size Does Not Fit All: The Case Against Global Accounting Standards

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:07.120
Well, I'm back again, a second year to talk about accounting. Isn't this amazing?

2
00:00:07.120 --> 00:00:16.400
Accounting, a hot topic. You know, most of my colleagues became accountants because they

3
00:00:16.400 --> 00:00:25.960
couldn't stand the raw excitement of actuarial work. And I promise you that if CPAs had been

4
00:00:25.960 --> 00:00:35.800
running the country 234 years ago we'd still be working for the king. There's libertarian,

5
00:00:35.800 --> 00:00:45.800
there's conservative and then there's head in the mud. Two nights ago I was in Montgomery,

6
00:00:45.800 --> 00:00:55.240
it rains there too, and have you seen this ad? I saw it on Fox, it's a BDO, BDO Seedman,

7
00:00:55.240 --> 00:01:01.960
8th or 9th biggest accounting firm in the country, talking about GAAP and IFRS, I was

8
00:01:01.960 --> 00:01:07.580
probably the only viewer who understood what they were talking about, but it was interesting

9
00:01:07.580 --> 00:01:15.840
to me that it was such a topic that they felt compelled to put it on TV.

10
00:01:15.840 --> 00:01:26.560
In the age of Obama, it's probably not surprising that we should have a push towards more central

11
00:01:26.560 --> 00:01:31.600
planning, something bigger, etc.

12
00:01:31.600 --> 00:01:42.480
Unfortunately, the Obama administration is picking up where the Bush administration left

13
00:01:42.480 --> 00:01:44.980
off.

14
00:01:44.980 --> 00:01:50.740
The global public accounting firms, the big four, I call them the four, you can think

15
00:01:50.740 --> 00:01:58.900
of another word that rhymes with four, have been pushing for a shift to international

16
00:01:58.900 --> 00:02:02.940
financial reporting standards for about a decade now.

17
00:02:02.940 --> 00:02:12.540
And they mask their advocacy and comparability across countries of financial reporting.

18
00:02:12.540 --> 00:02:20.820
And like the UN, it sounds like a really wonderful idea, unlike the UN, this is not just about

19
00:02:20.820 --> 00:02:21.820
talk.

20
00:02:21.820 --> 00:02:30.740
It's arguably more important than that and has, I think, some implications for the standards

21
00:02:30.740 --> 00:02:36.820
of living here in the United States that should concern all of us.

22
00:02:36.820 --> 00:02:46.020
First, why not international reporting standards? Wouldn't it increase market efficiency and

23
00:02:46.020 --> 00:02:51.420
presumably consumer surplus? Wouldn't the cost of capital go down? Wouldn't our standard

24
00:02:51.420 --> 00:03:04.580
of living go up? You know? Answers. 20. No, no, and no. Spontaneous order and accounting

25
00:03:04.580 --> 00:03:18.380
The Financial Accounting Standards Board is the arbiter of generally accepted accounting

26
00:03:18.380 --> 00:03:19.980
principles in the United States.

27
00:03:19.980 --> 00:03:21.500
It's a non-government agency.

28
00:03:21.500 --> 00:03:26.340
It's funded by the privately funded Financial Accounting Foundation.

29
00:03:26.340 --> 00:03:55.340
Frasbie in mid-2009 decided to take their 168 statements and codify them, put them all in one big document, and just an example of, here are just two of 168, there's 279 pages, 245.

30
00:03:55.340 --> 00:04:03.060
If you ever have trouble sleeping, if my writing doesn't do it, try this.

31
00:04:03.060 --> 00:04:06.980
What did I do, Peter, where did it go?

32
00:04:06.980 --> 00:04:09.980
There's a button on the bottom that says try that one.

33
00:04:09.980 --> 00:04:10.980
Ah, thank you.

34
00:04:10.980 --> 00:04:12.980
Mechanical devices baffling.

35
00:04:12.980 --> 00:04:22.060
Anyway, in addition to the 168 statements there, 46 FASB staff interpretations, 81 FASB

36
00:04:22.060 --> 00:04:28.460
have position memoranda, technical bulletins, topic pronouncements, and something called

37
00:04:28.460 --> 00:04:34.660
the EITF, the Emerging Issues Task Force which is composed of really, really smart people

38
00:04:34.660 --> 00:04:37.860
with way too much time on their hands.

39
00:04:37.860 --> 00:04:44.060
And ASB itself is, they have 67 employees there including the five members of the board

40
00:04:44.060 --> 00:04:49.300
itself and they're a really, really bright bunch of people.

41
00:04:49.300 --> 00:04:58.020
The Securities and Exchange Commission in this country has statutory authority under

42
00:04:58.020 --> 00:05:04.220
the 34th SEC Act to set accounting standards.

43
00:05:04.220 --> 00:05:09.140
From the beginning, the SEC has deferred to the private sector.

44
00:05:09.140 --> 00:05:13.820
The FASB's predecessor was the Accounting Principles Board.

45
00:05:13.820 --> 00:05:14.820
It went out in 1973.

46
00:05:14.820 --> 00:05:18.220
FASB has been there ever since.

47
00:05:18.220 --> 00:05:26.020
For some reason, among his many shortcomings, Chris Cox really got to be in his bonnet for

48
00:05:26.020 --> 00:05:27.580
IFRS.

49
00:05:27.580 --> 00:05:33.540
Cynics might speculate, well, maybe it had something to do with post-administration employment.

50
00:05:33.540 --> 00:05:37.580
Heaven forbid anybody would ever think of doing something like that.

51
00:05:37.580 --> 00:05:45.220
But anyway, in August of 2008, barely just under five months before he left office, his

52
00:05:45.220 --> 00:05:51.320
These people put out something called the Eifers Roadmap, and they did that of course

53
00:05:51.320 --> 00:06:00.620
while they slept soundly through the Madoff heist, having been warned by Harry Markopolos

54
00:06:00.620 --> 00:06:06.580
up in Boston since 1999, repeated written warnings from him about the fraud that Madoff

55
00:06:06.580 --> 00:06:10.500
was perpetrating.

56
00:06:10.500 --> 00:06:20.340
Mary Shapiro, arguably a better choice than Cox, despite the person who chose her, faced

57
00:06:20.340 --> 00:06:26.740
a dilemma to appoint the position of chief accountant at the SEC.

58
00:06:26.740 --> 00:06:31.900
This is the most powerful accounting position in the world and it's probably the most powerful

59
00:06:31.900 --> 00:06:35.900
position you've never heard of.

60
00:06:35.900 --> 00:06:43.820
But her choices essentially boiled down to, there were two finalists, Jim Croker, a former

61
00:06:43.820 --> 00:06:51.980
big four guy, and Jack Cezelski of Baltimore, who for 30 years has published the Accounting

62
00:06:51.980 --> 00:07:00.320
Analyst Observer, a high dollar newsletter for corporate clients about the intricacies

63
00:07:00.320 --> 00:07:09.800
of Gap. And the Big Four, of course, were singularly lined up behind Croker because

64
00:07:09.800 --> 00:07:16.160
they knew he would be their Cody and their water carrier. The civilized world was lined

65
00:07:16.160 --> 00:07:30.160
up behind Cezelski, including yours truly. And to paraphrase Lloyd Benson in 1988, you

66
00:07:30.160 --> 00:07:45.160
I know Jax Zazelsky. I've worked with Jax Zazelsky. Jax Zazelsky is a friend of mine, and Jim Croker is no Jax Zazelsky.

67
00:07:45.160 --> 00:07:54.160
Unfortunately, Shapiro chose Croker, which I guess proves Everett Dirksen's old admonition,

68
00:07:54.160 --> 00:08:20.320
She dithered for six months before she chose Croker.

69
00:08:20.320 --> 00:08:22.720
What do Obamacare and IFRS have in common?

70
00:08:22.720 --> 00:08:33.000
They're both what Hayek called made order, top-down order as opposed to grown order.

71
00:08:33.000 --> 00:08:38.520
In the road to serfdom, any international economic authority not subject to a superior

72
00:08:38.520 --> 00:08:43.560
political power, even if strictly confined to a particular field, was he thinking about

73
00:08:43.560 --> 00:08:54.760
could easily exercise the most tyrannical and irresponsible power imaginable, etc.

74
00:08:54.760 --> 00:08:57.280
We all know that centralization is bad stuff.

75
00:08:57.280 --> 00:09:03.080
History shows that centralization doesn't work, yet powers that be persist.

76
00:09:03.080 --> 00:09:10.760
We have examples all over the place, both historically and even currently.

77
00:09:10.760 --> 00:09:14.400
Yours is administered by the International Accounting Standards Board, which is based

78
00:09:14.400 --> 00:09:15.400
in London.

79
00:09:15.400 --> 00:09:22.920
IASB is to financial reporting, as the UN is to diplomacy, draw your own conclusions

80
00:09:22.920 --> 00:09:23.920
from that one.

81
00:09:23.920 --> 00:09:30.600
The IASB has a parent, the International Accounting Standards Committee Foundation, which is funded

82
00:09:30.600 --> 00:09:34.640
by listed and unlisted companies from around the world.

83
00:09:34.640 --> 00:09:40.080
The aim is to have it funded in rough proportion to each country's relative share of world

84
00:09:40.080 --> 00:09:50.400
GDP, which in 2009 is estimated to be $57.5 trillion, the five biggest contributors, holding

85
00:09:50.400 --> 00:09:57.360
about 52% U.S., Japan, China, Germany, and France in that order.

86
00:09:57.360 --> 00:10:06.800
The U.S. is at about 25% with over $14 trillion, even in a down GDP year as 2009 was.

87
00:10:06.800 --> 00:10:13.360
IASB has 15 board members, six from the UK, four from the United States, three from Asia,

88
00:10:13.360 --> 00:10:19.620
one each from Africa and South America, currently Brazil.

89
00:10:19.620 --> 00:10:25.160
These 15 board members, in turn, are appointed by a 22 member, and I'm doing this, not trying

90
00:10:25.160 --> 00:10:31.840
to get too far in the weeds, but just to show you just how opaque this process is.

91
00:10:31.840 --> 00:10:41.440
22-member IASCF board, which in turn is overseen, I'm not making this up, by a monitoring board

92
00:10:41.440 --> 00:10:47.360
comprised of one member each from the European Commission, which is the Society of Securities

93
00:10:47.360 --> 00:10:57.120
Regulators over in Europe, the Japan Financial Services Agency, the US SEC, and then committees

94
00:10:57.120 --> 00:11:09.720
from IOSCO, which is, I've even forgotten what that stands for, the international, I

95
00:11:09.720 --> 00:11:19.440
mean it is so, there it is, the International Organization of Securities Commissions. So

96
00:11:19.440 --> 00:11:29.240
So we have this kind of a bureaucratic hierarchy, and having been tyrannized by a government

97
00:11:29.240 --> 00:11:34.600
agency, the Roanoke City Airport, two days ago, and I'm still grinding my teeth over

98
00:11:34.600 --> 00:11:43.040
that one, I can only imagine what this layering could do if it had authority here in the United

99
00:11:43.040 --> 00:11:44.040
States.

100
00:11:44.040 --> 00:11:54.040
As you can see, we have one vote on this monitoring board, one designated vote, one designated vote.

101
00:11:54.040 --> 00:12:02.040
As it happens, the member from the technical committee of IOSCO now is also from the United States.

102
00:12:02.040 --> 00:12:13.040
IASB Resources, it's a small, small agency, has a long tradition on any complex accounting question of, let's go ask FASB.

103
00:12:13.040 --> 00:12:22.880
IASB is trying to ramp up but it's going to take years, literally years, for IASB to have

104
00:12:22.880 --> 00:12:32.280
the reliable processes and routines in place that FASB has and I'm not especially a great

105
00:12:32.280 --> 00:12:41.680
admirer of FASB but it's kind of like favoring negligent homicide over murder one but it's

106
00:12:41.680 --> 00:12:47.280
is certainly better than something remote and totally unaccountable.

107
00:12:47.280 --> 00:12:55.600
PricewaterhouseCoopers publishes every year a kind of a dictionary of gap and eifers differences.

108
00:12:55.600 --> 00:12:59.680
That publication runs 220 pages right now.

109
00:12:59.680 --> 00:13:01.480
There are significant differences.

110
00:13:01.480 --> 00:13:07.480
They include stock options, which can be and was for the late 90s, early 2000s, a very

111
00:13:07.480 --> 00:13:09.440
hot topic.

112
00:13:09.440 --> 00:13:14.480
Evaluation of long-lived assets, you know, they get to mark these things to market up

113
00:13:14.480 --> 00:13:18.520
and down, more volatility, more risk in markets.

114
00:13:18.520 --> 00:13:24.160
But most important where the United States is concerned is inventory valuation.

115
00:13:24.160 --> 00:13:28.720
There is something called last in, first out.

116
00:13:28.720 --> 00:13:36.080
And in periods of inflation, when prices are rising, you want the cost of what you sold

117
00:13:36.080 --> 00:13:39.580
to be as high as possible in order to keep your taxes down.

118
00:13:39.580 --> 00:13:43.000
In the United States, that is legitimate.

119
00:13:43.000 --> 00:13:48.260
It is acceptable for generally accepted accounting principles.

120
00:13:48.260 --> 00:13:58.880
And right now, it has kept 59.1 billion in revenue from the federal budget, which we

121
00:13:58.880 --> 00:14:00.720
know they would spend it wisely.

122
00:14:00.720 --> 00:14:05.920
We were never so sure of anything in our entire lives.

123
00:14:05.920 --> 00:14:13.880
President Obama, of course, wants to repeal LIFO to get the $59 billion.

124
00:14:13.880 --> 00:14:19.700
In addition, there has long been a controversy between advocates of one set of financial

125
00:14:19.700 --> 00:14:24.020
standards and advocates of what are called big gap, little gap.

126
00:14:24.020 --> 00:14:30.240
Let's have a little version of financial reporting standards for smaller companies, particularly

127
00:14:30.240 --> 00:14:34.720
non-public companies, they shouldn't have to go through all the other hoops that everybody

128
00:14:34.720 --> 00:14:42.080
has to go through. And on the surface, you know, like IFRS, this sounds good. But ask

129
00:14:42.080 --> 00:14:47.600
a banker. You really want two sets of financial standards. Isn't one of these things tough

130
00:14:47.600 --> 00:14:54.440
enough? You can imagine, again, conversion costs, which mean lots of consulting fees

131
00:14:54.440 --> 00:14:59.680
for the big accounting firms and for not so big accounting firms. You can imagine the

132
00:14:59.680 --> 00:15:08.040
The additional training for accountants, the American Institute of CPAs for years pushed

133
00:15:08.040 --> 00:15:10.440
what's called the 150-hour rule.

134
00:15:10.440 --> 00:15:18.680
So CPAs now have to have 150 semester hours of credit, which equals about five years.

135
00:15:18.680 --> 00:15:23.200
Only a bunch of accountants could have been surprised when the barriers to entry went

136
00:15:23.200 --> 00:15:26.620
up and the number of entrants went down.

137
00:15:26.620 --> 00:15:32.320
and of course the AICPA was horrified when the number of people enrolled in accounting

138
00:15:32.320 --> 00:15:38.820
programs declined. If you do the cost benefit on that extra year of education, it's frankly

139
00:15:38.820 --> 00:15:47.820
not worth it. The opportunity cost is just horrific. But there are accounts. As I said,

140
00:15:47.820 --> 00:15:54.900
oh and where's the line between big and not big? That's another one. Nobody's quite determined

141
00:15:54.900 --> 00:16:01.900
and that one yet. But if accounting fees are high now, the one thing we can be sure of

142
00:16:01.900 --> 00:16:06.940
is that they will go higher if there are two sets. In shameless pandering to the small

143
00:16:06.940 --> 00:16:17.100
business crowd in mid-2009, the IASB issued a little Eifers brand. We have other issues.

144
00:16:17.100 --> 00:16:20.860
Some people say, well, if Eifers had been in place, we would have never had the meltdown

145
00:16:20.860 --> 00:16:26.940
in the United States, hogwash, didn't stop it from hitting Europe. We know what caused

146
00:16:26.940 --> 00:16:32.340
the belt down. It began with pressure over many years to relax mortgage lending standards

147
00:16:32.340 --> 00:16:38.300
as our own Tom Woods has amply documented and Stan Lebowitz did in a paper for the Independent

148
00:16:38.300 --> 00:16:46.340
Institute in 2008. There's the issue of culture and comparability. I have a quote here from

149
00:16:46.340 --> 00:16:51.460
Thomas Sowell, his wonderful book, Migration and Culture.

150
00:16:51.460 --> 00:16:56.980
Cultures differ in their relative significance. They attach to time, noise, safety, cleanliness,

151
00:16:56.980 --> 00:17:04.980
violence, thrift, intellect, sex, and art. These differences make for differences in social choices,

152
00:17:04.980 --> 00:17:08.180
economic efficiency, and political stability.

153
00:17:10.420 --> 00:17:16.180
Institutions vary across countries. Truth-telling and transparency are not universally embraced.

154
00:17:16.180 --> 00:17:25.620
Ask Toyota, IASB trumpets that 120 countries have adopted IFRS, but what they don't tell

155
00:17:25.620 --> 00:17:32.180
you is that 112 of them have only adopted IFRS partially.

156
00:17:32.180 --> 00:17:36.100
Scary stuff.

157
00:17:36.100 --> 00:17:41.180
And there's the issue, in my view, and one that has not received any press, of the potential

158
00:17:41.180 --> 00:17:44.460
impact on the United States standard of living.

159
00:17:44.460 --> 00:17:49.420
First requires less detailed financial reporting, lower levels of disclosure, and generally

160
00:17:49.420 --> 00:17:52.940
accepted accounting principles.

161
00:17:52.940 --> 00:17:54.820
Less transparency means less trust.

162
00:17:54.820 --> 00:17:57.980
You can sure make an argument for that.

163
00:17:57.980 --> 00:17:59.540
Does cost of capital rise?

164
00:17:59.540 --> 00:18:00.540
Does growth slow?

165
00:18:00.540 --> 00:18:02.220
Does unemployment go up?

166
00:18:02.220 --> 00:18:03.220
I think so.

167
00:18:03.220 --> 00:18:04.260
I think so.

168
00:18:04.260 --> 00:18:10.660
I think we end up with something that looks like a European economy, which I think President

169
00:18:10.660 --> 00:18:23.500
To summarize, IFRS upends spontaneous order. IASB lacks both the chops and the staff to

170
00:18:23.500 --> 00:18:28.980
make IFRS happen worldwide. Potential LIFO tax bonanza for the U.S. government. No one

171
00:18:28.980 --> 00:18:38.140
else on the face of the planet has LIFO. Little Gap is a siren song for higher costs. No impact

172
00:18:38.140 --> 00:18:44.940
on the 2008-2009 Collapse, Cultural Differences will always, always prevent IFRS from being

173
00:18:44.940 --> 00:18:49.700
fully embraced as a worldwide set of standards.

174
00:18:49.700 --> 00:18:55.860
All in all, this is a big grab for money by the four biggest accounting firms.

175
00:18:55.860 --> 00:18:59.820
They would sell their mothers if it would make them a buck.

176
00:18:59.820 --> 00:19:05.860
And I'm not a conspiracy guy at all, but I know hundreds of these people.

177
00:19:05.860 --> 00:19:07.380
I've been on committees with them.

178
00:19:07.380 --> 00:19:13.380
I have members of organizations with them. That's who and what they are. They are shameless.

179
00:19:13.380 --> 00:19:26.180
They are shameless. Shameless plug, speaking of shameless. You like that segue? May 24th,

180
00:19:26.180 --> 00:19:35.620
coming to a bookstore near you. Feel free to questions, phone calls. You have to call

181
00:19:35.620 --> 00:20:04.620
Dr. Warren, Hayek and Mises said that if we leave the choice of money up to the market, eventually, probably, gold will run out.

182
00:20:04.620 --> 00:20:17.620
If we left accounting choices up to the market, wouldn't the end result be a spontaneous order giving us a uniform, better system?

183
00:20:34.620 --> 00:20:41.100
Standards, and we relied on markets, would we end up with something that emerged bottom

184
00:20:41.100 --> 00:20:48.020
up, bottom up that would arguably work for everyone? Is that a fair restatement? I believe

185
00:20:48.020 --> 00:20:53.660
that, but when I say I believe, I am not saying I know. That's the first thing. The second

186
00:20:53.660 --> 00:20:59.580
thing is that I have long questioned, loudly and publicly, principally by pounding my spoon

187
00:20:59.580 --> 00:21:09.180
This is your local CPA too.

188
00:21:09.180 --> 00:21:14.940
In the main, particularly the smaller firms, are made up of fairly conservative people,

189
00:21:14.940 --> 00:21:21.740
and yet two out of the three functions they offer are government mandated, audits and

190
00:21:21.740 --> 00:21:22.740
tax returns.

191
00:21:22.740 --> 00:21:27.700
These are conservative, give me a break.

192
00:21:27.700 --> 00:21:34.740
I have long wondered why they are entitled to an annual mandated annuity flow of revenue.

193
00:21:34.740 --> 00:21:37.380
And I think your point is well taken.

194
00:21:37.380 --> 00:21:43.980
I believe that there should be no requirement to audit publicly held companies.

195
00:21:43.980 --> 00:21:49.540
I guarantee you investors like the people in this room and certainly including me would

196
00:21:49.540 --> 00:21:53.860
make prudent choices if companies did not choose to be audited.

197
00:21:53.860 --> 00:21:55.860
Boy would they get walloped.

198
00:21:55.860 --> 00:21:57.060
Boy would they get walloped.

199
00:21:57.060 --> 00:22:01.060
I think your point is well taken. Your point is well taken. That's a great question. Yes, sir.

200
00:22:01.060 --> 00:22:03.060
Is your paper on your website?

201
00:22:03.060 --> 00:22:13.060
It is not there yet. I have a late beta version with me. And I'd be glad to give you a copy.

202
00:22:13.060 --> 00:22:18.060
I've got about 20 copies with me. And I don't expect to get trampled in a stampede here,

203
00:22:18.060 --> 00:22:24.060
but I'll be glad to provide copies. You're welcome to send me an email.

204
00:22:24.060 --> 00:22:28.060
If you prefer the electronic version, I can send you a PDF.

205
00:22:28.060 --> 00:22:30.060
Anyone else? Yes, sir?

206
00:22:30.060 --> 00:22:42.060
If I want to invest in a country that has overseas investments, what would I want to make for its differences?

207
00:22:42.060 --> 00:22:50.060
Let me start by saying no sensible person wants to invest directly overseas.

208
00:22:50.060 --> 00:22:53.060
Unless that's how you make a living.

209
00:22:53.060 --> 00:23:00.980
Overseas investing, as Jack Templeton and others prove, is for specialists. It's for specialists.

210
00:23:01.940 --> 00:23:09.460
I don't know to the extent to which Brazil has adopted IFRS, but I would certainly be looking at

211
00:23:09.460 --> 00:23:15.060
I would be looking at options. I'd really be looking at the revaluation of long-lived assets

212
00:23:16.820 --> 00:23:22.180
because international financial reporting standards allow them to run those revaluations

213
00:23:22.180 --> 00:23:27.700
through the income statement. So you would want to see what portion of their profit came from this

214
00:23:27.700 --> 00:23:33.700
revaluation, but then you'd also want to try to look at how was this revalued, who did it, what are

215
00:23:33.700 --> 00:23:42.100
their credentials? You know, there are independent people, I'm one of them, but we do get paid by

216
00:23:42.100 --> 00:23:48.180
those companies. There is implied pressure there. It doesn't affect me, which is probably why I'm

217
00:23:48.180 --> 00:23:50.900
I'm still working at this age and have a mortgage.

218
00:23:50.900 --> 00:23:55.580
I value my freedom, integrity and reputation more than I value anything.

219
00:23:55.580 --> 00:23:59.740
Sometimes it terrifies my wife, but that's how things go.

220
00:23:59.740 --> 00:24:02.460
But I would first look at the revaluation issue.

221
00:24:02.460 --> 00:24:03.460
Other questions?

222
00:24:03.460 --> 00:24:05.460
Other questions?

223
00:24:05.460 --> 00:24:07.460
If I could just follow up on Joe's question.

224
00:24:07.460 --> 00:24:17.460
In trying to imagine what kinds of practices, what kinds of disclosure standards would we have in practice in a world without mandated disclosure,

225
00:24:17.460 --> 00:24:23.460
a world without the SEC and so on, what can we learn from an historical record?

226
00:24:23.460 --> 00:24:43.460
In other words, when formalized and legally mandated procedures first emerged, were they codified practices that were fairly common at the time, were they implementing new practices? What were the disclosure standards prior to, in the 19th century?

227
00:24:43.460 --> 00:24:49.780
Prior to the 34 Act, there were none. In all honesty, I'm not an accounting historian.

228
00:24:49.780 --> 00:24:57.700
I really don't know the answer to that question. We know that the 34 Act came during the Depression

229
00:24:57.700 --> 00:25:03.540
when there had been a horrible meltdown in markets. Unemployment eventually reached 25 percent.

230
00:25:04.980 --> 00:25:12.580
But in all honesty, Peter, I don't know. I do know that they've gotten enormously,

231
00:25:12.580 --> 00:25:15.500
enormously more complex over the years.

232
00:25:15.500 --> 00:25:22.860
Part of that, in fairness, reflects the complexities of an advanced industrial economy.

233
00:25:22.860 --> 00:25:28.820
It's estimated that 75% of the net worth in the United States comes from intangible assets.

234
00:25:28.820 --> 00:25:36.060
And yet, if you look on Microsoft's balance sheet, Windows, Office, Internet Explorer,

235
00:25:36.060 --> 00:25:38.420
none of those are there.

236
00:25:38.420 --> 00:25:40.140
None of those are on their balance sheet.

237
00:25:40.140 --> 00:25:46.020
And that shows up in price to book ratios from a valuation standpoint.

238
00:25:46.020 --> 00:25:51.900
So we don't account for internally created intellectual property worth a darn.

239
00:25:51.900 --> 00:25:53.260
Not yet anyway.

240
00:25:53.260 --> 00:25:58.460
The only way you see these intangible assets show up on a balance sheet is when company

241
00:25:58.460 --> 00:26:04.460
A goes out to buy company B and they overpay for the quote tangible assets and then you

242
00:26:04.460 --> 00:26:06.940
start to get recognition of intangibles.

243
00:26:06.940 --> 00:26:11.640
But that's only been the case since July 2001.

244
00:26:11.640 --> 00:26:17.560
I would expect that we would have a greater push towards accounting for internally created

245
00:26:17.560 --> 00:26:23.300
intangible assets that has a lot of bear traps and a lot of opportunities to tempt people

246
00:26:23.300 --> 00:26:28.460
in the wrong way, which I'm sure is one reason that it hasn't happened yet.

247
00:26:28.460 --> 00:26:35.100
But it is a very contentious issue in a society economy like ours where so much of the wealth

248
00:26:35.100 --> 00:26:38.100
is in fact intangible, comes from intangible asset.

249
00:26:38.100 --> 00:26:39.100
Yes, sir?

250
00:26:39.100 --> 00:26:44.100
I have a question about the FDSB's recent action in 2009.

251
00:26:44.100 --> 00:26:46.100
It was basically...

252
00:26:46.100 --> 00:26:47.100
Caved?

253
00:26:47.100 --> 00:26:48.100
Yeah.

254
00:26:48.100 --> 00:26:53.100
Could you explain what the goal is?

255
00:26:53.100 --> 00:27:02.660
A group of pitchfork-wielding interest groups led by the American Banking Association came

256
00:27:02.660 --> 00:27:32.660
The same after the Financial Accounting Standards Board in March of 2009, a House committee had a hearing and Bob Hurst, the Chairman of the FASB, I think it was on March 12, 2009 in fact, I think a year ago today, was there and he was flogged awfully, awfully hard about mark to market for financial instruments and in financial instruments there are three classifications available for sale,

257
00:27:32.660 --> 00:27:54.260
The banking industry was reacting to what happened in May 2008 when Merrill Lynch sold

258
00:27:54.260 --> 00:28:00.100
$31 billion of mortgage-backed securities for $0.22 on the dollar.

259
00:28:00.100 --> 00:28:07.940
So 22 cents on the dollar became the public market benchmark for what mortgage backed

260
00:28:07.940 --> 00:28:13.860
securities were worth and the auditors who didn't want to be sued were leaned on their

261
00:28:13.860 --> 00:28:17.820
clients to say, you got to mark these things down.

262
00:28:17.820 --> 00:28:21.820
You have to mark these things down and of course, ultimately, the auditors have the

263
00:28:21.820 --> 00:28:26.580
power to say, you mark them down or we're not going to sign off on this.

264
00:28:26.580 --> 00:28:31.180
and so they dragged hers up there, flogged him pretty hard, threatened him with something

265
00:28:31.180 --> 00:28:36.320
called, something called, and if this doesn't scare you, nothing will, the Federal Accounting

266
00:28:36.320 --> 00:28:45.140
Standards Board to be appointed by the Senate, the House and the President, God help us all.

267
00:28:45.140 --> 00:28:51.100
Anyway, they did relax some of the standards, they did soften some of them.

268
00:28:51.100 --> 00:28:53.060
You can really get deep in the weeds on that stuff.

269
00:28:53.060 --> 00:29:00.060
Mark the myth or mark the model. Mark the model works too.