WEBVTT

NOTE Practicing Law in Light of Rothbard

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.560
It's also a great honor to be on this panel with Professor Hoppe.

2
00:00:03.560 --> 00:00:10.640
In line with the topic for this panel, I'll just briefly discuss how I ended up becoming a lawyer,

3
00:00:10.640 --> 00:00:15.480
because I guess it all goes back to Rothbard as well.

4
00:00:15.480 --> 00:00:23.280
We all had the privilege of studying under Rothbard, and I'd actually left Brooklyn Polytech to follow Rothbard out to Las Vegas.

5
00:00:23.280 --> 00:00:27.760
And I took his history of economic thought, I think, maybe about a half a dozen times.

6
00:00:27.760 --> 00:00:34.560
and I can tell you that each and every time it was different each semester anyway he he was very

7
00:00:34.560 --> 00:00:40.640
accessible and he always encouraged you to find your niche and to exploit that niche as best you

8
00:00:40.640 --> 00:00:47.360
could and he always encouraged people to think outside the box if you had the talent and inclination

9
00:00:47.360 --> 00:00:51.840
by all means go into a graduate program in economics and Rothbard was the first one to tell

10
00:00:51.840 --> 00:00:56.400
you that you know you better get used to you know ramen soup and you know canned tuna because that's

11
00:00:56.400 --> 00:01:00.400
That's what you've eaten for a long time, even after you get your PhD.

12
00:01:00.400 --> 00:01:03.400
But if you had other interests, he encouraged that as well.

13
00:01:03.400 --> 00:01:09.400
And so I was sitting in his office one day, and he was always very tolerant of my incredibly stupid questions.

14
00:01:09.400 --> 00:01:12.400
And I was asking him, what should I do for my senior thesis?

15
00:01:12.400 --> 00:01:14.400
I wanted to do a senior thesis.

16
00:01:14.400 --> 00:01:17.400
And we go back and forth and back and forth, and then finally he's like,

17
00:01:17.400 --> 00:01:19.400
you know, you have a second major, don't you?

18
00:01:19.400 --> 00:01:21.400
I said, yeah, I'm accounting, you know, economics, accounting.

19
00:01:21.400 --> 00:01:23.400
And he said, well, do something on accounting.

20
00:01:23.400 --> 00:01:30.980
So I ended up doing a senior thesis on activity-based costing and Austrian economics, but what

21
00:01:30.980 --> 00:01:36.560
remained with me from that is that you don't have to do the Ph.D. And trust me when I say

22
00:01:36.560 --> 00:01:41.880
that all of us in Las Vegas, when Professor Rothbard passed away, we were all confronted

23
00:01:41.880 --> 00:01:46.360
with, okay, we have to stop being groupies now, we have to go out and do something, right?

24
00:01:46.360 --> 00:01:51.960
And some of us went into Ph.D. programs like my good friend James Yoey, and others of us

25
00:01:51.960 --> 00:01:55.400
did not have that kind of courage, so we had to do something else.

26
00:01:55.400 --> 00:02:00.480
Now, so of course, one day I'm sitting at Arthur Anderson, grinding away on taxes, and

27
00:02:00.480 --> 00:02:03.560
it occurred to me like, what the heck am I doing here?

28
00:02:03.560 --> 00:02:04.800
What would Murray say about this?

29
00:02:04.800 --> 00:02:08.080
I mean, am I ever going to achieve glory filling in blanks?

30
00:02:08.080 --> 00:02:12.720
And so I decided, no, no, no, with the encouragement of Jeff Barr and other people, including Professor

31
00:02:12.720 --> 00:02:15.000
Hoppe, I decided to go to law school.

32
00:02:15.000 --> 00:02:18.640
All right, so this is how I ended up going to law school.

33
00:02:18.640 --> 00:02:23.840
Now, flash forward, first year of law school, by the way, if anybody does law school, I

34
00:02:23.840 --> 00:02:27.340
assure you that the first year is probably the best, because there they challenge you

35
00:02:27.340 --> 00:02:30.840
the most, they introduce you to a new way of thinking, and as Hans would say, it's essentially

36
00:02:30.840 --> 00:02:35.920
applied philosophy and logic, so that was probably one of the best years of my life,

37
00:02:35.920 --> 00:02:39.900
because I was what they call a gunner in law school, so basically I would be constantly

38
00:02:39.900 --> 00:02:43.960
engaging the professor, much to the relief of fellow students who then didn't have to

39
00:02:43.960 --> 00:02:45.400
to get called on for the cases.

40
00:02:45.400 --> 00:02:50.360
If I ever missed a class, people would go running in the hallways looking for me, like,

41
00:02:50.360 --> 00:02:51.360
where's Lee?

42
00:02:51.360 --> 00:02:52.360
Where's Lee?

43
00:02:52.360 --> 00:02:57.320
Anyway, so I graduate law school and I was fortunate enough to get a position as a law

44
00:02:57.320 --> 00:03:02.280
clerk to a newly created department in Clark County, which is the largest county in Las

45
00:03:02.280 --> 00:03:04.760
Vegas in its business court.

46
00:03:04.760 --> 00:03:09.400
And you can imagine as an Austrian, being a law clerk to the first business court judge

47
00:03:09.400 --> 00:03:13.600
in Las Vegas, it was absolutely the best possible job you could have.

48
00:03:13.600 --> 00:03:18.320
Because I got to see the law in action every single day, and we were also at the time probably

49
00:03:18.320 --> 00:03:21.080
one of the busiest courts in the country.

50
00:03:21.080 --> 00:03:25.320
So the sheer volume of stuff that came across my desk was absolutely amazing.

51
00:03:25.320 --> 00:03:29.400
And it was gratifying because, I mean, my small way, you know, by doing research and

52
00:03:29.400 --> 00:03:33.840
doing the bench memos and whatnot, you know, I was able to contribute to liberty in one

53
00:03:33.840 --> 00:03:34.840
way or the other.

54
00:03:34.840 --> 00:03:39.640
And my judge, thankfully, was a really smart guy, but more importantly, he had that, like

55
00:03:39.640 --> 00:03:42.880
Ronak would say, he had that quality where you could kind of look past everything and

56
00:03:42.880 --> 00:03:45.840
and say, all right, this is the good guy, this is the bad guy, let's figure out something

57
00:03:45.840 --> 00:03:46.840
that's gonna work.

58
00:03:46.840 --> 00:03:50.780
Let's flash forward a little bit more.

59
00:03:50.780 --> 00:03:59.000
So this judge decides to retire about two years later, and I asked him, and I don't

60
00:03:59.000 --> 00:04:02.040
think he would object to me saying this publicly, I supposed to say, you know, why would you

61
00:04:02.040 --> 00:04:03.040
leave the bench?

62
00:04:03.040 --> 00:04:05.320
You were doing such a great job, and you were very, you were extremely popular.

63
00:04:05.320 --> 00:04:09.600
And the answer was, well, yeah, you know, when I'm wearing the robe, I'm just making

64
00:04:09.600 --> 00:04:12.320
people do, you know, what I'm telling them to do.

65
00:04:12.320 --> 00:04:16.720
But when I'm wearing my suit as a private mediator or arbitrator, which is what he does now,

66
00:04:16.720 --> 00:04:20.480
you know, they're coming to me voluntarily.

67
00:04:20.480 --> 00:04:26.360
They are submitting in effect to me on a voluntary basis, based on my reputation and whatnot.

68
00:04:26.360 --> 00:04:32.520
And the significance difference between the robe and the suit kind of plugs into what

69
00:04:32.520 --> 00:04:39.200
Jeff Barr was talking about, and here I'll pick up on the intent stream that he'd started.

70
00:04:39.200 --> 00:04:47.200
You know, when you read, whether it be Rynock or Hoppe or Gödelhusman or even Kinsella or Block or anyone,

71
00:04:47.200 --> 00:04:54.200
there's a lot of talk about what would be the appropriate libertarian jurisprudence and system and whatnot.

72
00:04:54.200 --> 00:05:00.200
And, you know, the one question that doesn't get asked very often, and Jeff and I, we've been going back for a century too.

73
00:05:00.200 --> 00:05:06.800
Anyway, we've been going back and forth for probably about as long as we've known each other about all these topics,

74
00:05:06.800 --> 00:05:36.800
but this intense stuff has just been driving us nuts for years now and you know we've confronted Hoppe with that too on numerous occasions you know the central question is okay there's no doubt that as a libertarian you believe in negative rights right the right to exclude the right to preserve right this is me this is my body this is my property leave it alone no touchy that's fine and we all know that on the other side they tend to be more positive rights oh I want you know I want that stuff and you know I want your body or whatever the story is in slavery

75
00:05:36.800 --> 00:05:40.600
So, what do you draw from that in terms of libertarian jurisprudence?

76
00:05:40.600 --> 00:05:44.600
Well, the assertion of a negative right can never be wrong, okay?

77
00:05:44.600 --> 00:05:48.600
In other words, if you take my stuff and I take it back,

78
00:05:48.600 --> 00:05:51.400
I cannot possibly do wrong, per se,

79
00:05:51.400 --> 00:05:53.800
as long as I'm trying to get back what was taken from me.

80
00:05:53.800 --> 00:05:56.400
So, conceptually, that's not a problem.

81
00:05:56.400 --> 00:05:58.600
Where it gets difficult, like Jeff was saying,

82
00:05:58.600 --> 00:06:00.200
is, you know, what about punishment?

83
00:06:00.200 --> 00:06:01.800
And I can assure you, sitting on the bench,

84
00:06:01.800 --> 00:06:05.000
not sitting on the bench, I mean, I sat next to the guy, I didn't sit on the bench, but, you know,

85
00:06:05.000 --> 00:06:10.600
You know, I've sat through tons of trials, I've done a lot of trials myself, I've done a boatload of jury trials and whatnot,

86
00:06:10.600 --> 00:06:16.800
and you get to brief the juror, you know, debrief the jurors afterwards, and in the case of being a law clerk, talk to the judge afterwards,

87
00:06:16.800 --> 00:06:23.600
and you know, they'll tell you, you know, here I am, I'm sitting in this jury box, and I'm supposed to decide, you know, how do I punish this guy?

88
00:06:23.600 --> 00:06:29.000
And what's the basis for the punishment? And in the end, you know what it boils down to? You know, they pull it out of thin air.

89
00:06:29.000 --> 00:06:33.600
Well, you know, that's hardly the basis for, you know, proper jurisprudence.

90
00:06:33.600 --> 00:06:42.600
Going back to the theoretical question, so here you have no question that a negative right, the assertion of a negative right, is always okay.

91
00:06:42.600 --> 00:06:52.600
Or to put it back to Plato and Socrates and the question of can you do right by doing wrong, and the answer to that of course always has to be no, you cannot do right by doing wrong.

92
00:06:52.600 --> 00:07:02.600
So where from did you derive the right for the guy, the hypothetical guy who stole my wallet, to impose what's called punishment, something above and beyond restitution?

93
00:07:02.600 --> 00:07:09.100
And the answer to that has to be, you can't. There is no justification. I do not think anybody can come up with a justification.

94
00:07:09.100 --> 00:07:12.100
But everybody says, well, what do we do with the bad guys, the criminals?

95
00:07:12.100 --> 00:07:19.100
And, by the way, I'll digress briefly. The first day in court, I mean, the first day as a law clerk, I'm like, you know, it kind of smells bad here.

96
00:07:19.100 --> 00:07:23.100
And the secretary starts laughing. She's like, yeah, yeah, we're doing the criminal arraignments this morning.

97
00:07:23.100 --> 00:07:28.100
And, you know, all these guys, I mean, literally just chain gangs. Everybody's chained together in the hallways.

98
00:07:28.100 --> 00:07:32.100
And then they put them into groups of chains and they shower once a week at the detention center.

99
00:07:32.100 --> 00:07:38.020
but anyway but it was relatively peaceful and the reason was relatively

100
00:07:38.020 --> 00:07:41.620
peaceful is most of these guys once they get caught and they get dropped into the

101
00:07:41.620 --> 00:07:45.420
chains they know they belong there more or less and they voluntarily ascent to

102
00:07:45.420 --> 00:07:49.100
it that you very every once in a while you get a guy who's like I shouldn't be

103
00:07:49.100 --> 00:07:52.820
here I didn't do it you know a little bit of tasering later he's more relaxed

104
00:07:52.820 --> 00:07:59.780
right but so the question is can you mete out punishment and the answer is

105
00:07:59.780 --> 00:08:08.780
Yeah, you can even out-punish me, and I'm a parent, you know, I punish my kids routinely, it's rather fun, but it's the voluntary submission that is key.

106
00:08:08.780 --> 00:08:16.780
And if you do not have voluntary submission, you can't do it. And then I'm just going to close out by saying, you know, people say, well, if you don't have voluntary submission and the guy's a bad guy, what do you do?

107
00:08:16.780 --> 00:08:26.780
Well, the negative rights implies the answer. The answer is exclusion. You don't deal with the guy, and you persuade your neighbors and your friends and everybody else in the community also not to deal with the guy.

108
00:08:26.780 --> 00:08:34.780
And in most parts of the world, outside of our sophisticated first world standard, if you leave, if you exclude a guy, chances are he's going to die eventually.

109
00:08:34.780 --> 00:08:38.780
One way or the other, it's exposure or the wolves or, you know, rhinos or whatever.

110
00:08:38.780 --> 00:08:45.780
And I go back to the ecclesiastical courts, you know, what was the ultimate punishment the church could mete out to you?

111
00:08:45.780 --> 00:08:49.780
Exclusion. You were excommunicated, right?

112
00:08:49.780 --> 00:08:53.780
Jeff and I, hopefully, by next year, will have finally worked out a paper on this topic.

113
00:08:53.780 --> 00:08:54.620
on this topic.

114
00:08:54.620 --> 00:08:56.140
And let me just close out to say that

115
00:08:56.140 --> 00:08:59.420
I did not go to law school with great enthusiasm at first.

116
00:08:59.420 --> 00:09:00.260
I was kind of worried about it.

117
00:09:00.260 --> 00:09:03.740
I thought I might betraying my philosophy,

118
00:09:03.740 --> 00:09:05.660
my libertarianism and whatnot.

119
00:09:05.660 --> 00:09:09.100
And I have to say, advocating on behalf of clients,

120
00:09:09.100 --> 00:09:10.580
having had a chance, the great privilege

121
00:09:10.580 --> 00:09:11.660
to work with a great judge,

122
00:09:11.660 --> 00:09:14.220
to meet out what's quote unquote justice,

123
00:09:14.220 --> 00:09:17.500
I can really say that if you have the mind for it

124
00:09:17.500 --> 00:09:20.420
and the spirit for it and the patience for it,

125
00:09:20.420 --> 00:09:23.180
a career in law is truly an outstanding choice.