WEBVTT

NOTE Practicing Law in Light of Rothbard

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.240
Thank you, Professor. I'm very honored to be a member, an honorary member of the Las Vegas Hoppe gang.

2
00:00:06.240 --> 00:00:13.440
We're here to disprove the old adage that, you know, you can't swear with the eagles if you hoot with the owls,

3
00:00:13.440 --> 00:00:18.040
and we're all here living proof that that is not true.

4
00:00:18.040 --> 00:00:23.040
So I'm going to talk to you just a little bit today about what private lawyers can do

5
00:00:23.040 --> 00:00:27.340
in furtherance of the Austria-libertarian model.

6
00:00:27.340 --> 00:00:37.340
I started out my career as a union lawyer long ago in Philadelphia, but it didn't take me too long to figure out that I was on the wrong side.

7
00:00:37.340 --> 00:00:47.340
So I've now spent the last 15 years just as a hard knuckle management lawyer working to protect the rights of private employers.

8
00:00:47.340 --> 00:00:53.340
I guess the best way to explain that transformation is to quote somebody I'm not fond of quoting,

9
00:00:53.340 --> 00:01:23.340
So I'll just paraphrase or modify Winston Churchill's famous saying when he said something to the effect if you're not a Democrat when you're young you don't have a heart but if you're not a Libertarian when you get older you probably don't have a brain so that's the way I explain my transformation anyway I've spent the last decade and a half just protecting property rights private property rights and enforcing contracts after all as Michael Oakeshott famously said

10
00:01:23.340 --> 00:01:31.340
The right to contract is really what separates the free man from the slave, that together with the right of association.

11
00:01:31.340 --> 00:01:40.340
One of the things that I spend my time doing is fighting and educating people about what I call fascist legislation.

12
00:01:40.340 --> 00:01:52.340
One such legislative act that's been circulating around our legislature in the United States for the last few years is the so-called Employee Free Choice Act.

13
00:01:52.340 --> 00:02:07.340
I say so-called because any time a union names something, you can be sure that they named it euphemistically and it really should be called the Employee No-Choice Act, but Employee Free Choice Act, or the acronym is IFCA.

14
00:02:07.340 --> 00:02:20.340
So if the National Labor Relations Act weren't already stifling enough on private enterprise, they've now proposed, or the unions through Andy Stern and the other union leaders in the country,

15
00:02:20.340 --> 00:02:25.040
have now proposed legislation that would amend the National Labor Relations Act, which if

16
00:02:25.040 --> 00:02:33.340
passed will have the most drastic overhauling effect on relations in the private sector

17
00:02:33.340 --> 00:02:38.580
between employers and their employees since the National Labor Relations Act passed in

18
00:02:38.580 --> 00:02:40.700
1935.

19
00:02:40.700 --> 00:02:46.780
So if it passes, IFCA will just drastically change the way unions organize in this country

20
00:02:46.780 --> 00:02:49.260
in three dramatic ways.

21
00:02:49.260 --> 00:02:53.940
So before I tell you about that, I just quickly give you an overview of how unions currently

22
00:02:53.940 --> 00:02:54.940
organize.

23
00:02:54.940 --> 00:03:01.700
The traditional bottom-up method of organizing is unions go around and they advocate their

24
00:03:01.700 --> 00:03:07.620
wares to unsuspecting employees, they get authorization cards signed and when they have

25
00:03:07.620 --> 00:03:12.060
a majority of these cards, they take them to the prospective employer and say, look,

26
00:03:12.060 --> 00:03:17.240
I have the majority of your employees want me to be their bargaining agent, so you can

27
00:03:17.240 --> 00:03:20.680
You can either recognize me voluntarily or we can have an election.

28
00:03:20.680 --> 00:03:27.240
So most employers generally petition the labor board for a secret ballot election.

29
00:03:27.240 --> 00:03:31.840
And I say secret ballot because when these elections are held, employees are allowed

30
00:03:31.840 --> 00:03:40.120
to go in a ballot booth and exercise their free choice in the privacy of a ballot booth

31
00:03:40.120 --> 00:03:44.500
without having the coercion of unions there or peer pressure.

32
00:03:44.500 --> 00:03:53.500
and they can actually just choose or more often vote against the union without having threat of reprisal.

33
00:03:53.500 --> 00:04:00.500
So once the secret ballot election is held in the traditional method, either the employer or union wins.

34
00:04:00.500 --> 00:04:05.500
If the union wins, then they sit down with the employer and negotiate a contract.

35
00:04:05.500 --> 00:04:11.500
And that's the key word, they negotiate a contract. They can negotiate until the cows come home.

36
00:04:11.500 --> 00:04:16.500
There's no legal requirement that a contract is ever reached at all.

37
00:04:16.500 --> 00:04:22.500
But they do have a duty to bargain in good faith, but they can bargain forever.

38
00:04:22.500 --> 00:04:27.500
And if any mistakes are made or violations of the law are made along the way,

39
00:04:27.500 --> 00:04:31.500
you know, the biggest penalty that can be imposed on an employer is,

40
00:04:31.500 --> 00:04:38.500
outside of extreme circumstances, is they might have to post a government acknowledgement

41
00:04:38.500 --> 00:04:41.500
and the acknowledgement that they broke the law and promised never to do it again.

42
00:04:41.500 --> 00:04:44.500
But the key is they never have to enter into a contract.

43
00:04:44.500 --> 00:04:47.500
There's no duty on them to do that.

44
00:04:47.500 --> 00:04:52.500
But if IFCA passes, this is going to change the landscape dramatically.

45
00:04:52.500 --> 00:04:56.500
First of all, the secret ballot election will be replaced with card checks.

46
00:04:56.500 --> 00:05:01.500
So the unions will still go out and get cards, but once they have the majority, that's it.

47
00:05:01.500 --> 00:05:05.500
Bargaining rights will be granted to them.

48
00:05:05.500 --> 00:05:11.500
and the employer will be forced to sit down and negotiate with them.

49
00:05:11.500 --> 00:05:13.500
But that's the second big change.

50
00:05:13.500 --> 00:05:20.500
Negotiation will be supplanted by mandatory and binding arbitration.

51
00:05:20.500 --> 00:05:28.500
So once the union wins the election, the employer will be forced to immediately sit down with them

52
00:05:28.500 --> 00:05:31.500
because they'll just have 30 days to reach a contract

53
00:05:31.500 --> 00:05:34.500
and if a contract's not reached within those 30 days,

54
00:05:34.500 --> 00:05:40.340
A federal mediator will be appointed, and when I say that, I'm talking about a government

55
00:05:40.340 --> 00:05:48.500
employee is going to be appointed to be the moderator and mediate the further negotiations.

56
00:05:48.500 --> 00:05:53.660
So there'll be 90 days with the mediator wherein the parties will attempt to reach a contract

57
00:05:53.660 --> 00:05:59.120
and if no contract's reached, another federal arbitrator will be appointed that will have

58
00:05:59.120 --> 00:06:02.460
just omnipotent authority.

59
00:06:02.460 --> 00:06:06.580
They'll have authority to impose a contract on their own terms.

60
00:06:06.580 --> 00:06:12.100
They don't even have to start with the terms that the employer and union started to or

61
00:06:12.100 --> 00:06:13.100
began to reach.

62
00:06:13.100 --> 00:06:16.580
Let's say they had some agreement on some points but not others.

63
00:06:16.580 --> 00:06:19.940
The arbitrator won't have to start where the party's left off.

64
00:06:19.940 --> 00:06:26.180
He can just come in with a boilerplate collective bargaining agreement written by the service

65
00:06:26.180 --> 00:06:31.660
This Employees Union or whichever union it is and tell the employer, you know, I'm imposing

66
00:06:31.660 --> 00:06:32.980
these terms.

67
00:06:32.980 --> 00:06:37.780
So no negotiation, no right to refuse to enter into a contract.

68
00:06:37.780 --> 00:06:42.820
It will be mandatory within 90 days a contract will be imposed.

69
00:06:42.820 --> 00:06:47.740
And the last significant change is that there'll be make whole remedies available.

70
00:06:47.740 --> 00:06:52.380
Right now, you know, you have to post a sign saying, sorry, you know, I won't do it again.

71
00:06:52.380 --> 00:06:58.940
Now, under the current proposed legislation, there'll be monetary fines up to $20,000 only

72
00:06:58.940 --> 00:07:00.500
against the employer, by the way.

73
00:07:00.500 --> 00:07:05.460
The union is, it's a unilateral make whole provision.

74
00:07:05.460 --> 00:07:10.980
So you can see why I call it a fascist act, because the government allows you to believe

75
00:07:10.980 --> 00:07:16.220
that you own your business and that you control the terms and conditions between you and your

76
00:07:16.220 --> 00:07:17.220
employees.

77
00:07:17.220 --> 00:07:21.580
But they do this all the while they're removing the employer's right to deal directly with

78
00:07:21.580 --> 00:07:26.500
with their employees and decide what they'll be paid and what benefits they'll receive.

79
00:07:26.500 --> 00:07:31.300
And at the same time, they give the union complete carte blanche to their business.

80
00:07:31.300 --> 00:07:37.340
So it will destroy the private enterprise, if you ask me.

81
00:07:37.340 --> 00:07:39.340
So will it pass?

82
00:07:39.340 --> 00:07:40.700
I mean, this is the big question.

83
00:07:40.700 --> 00:07:43.380
We've been really afraid of this.

84
00:07:43.380 --> 00:07:51.540
I've spent untold weeks lecturing around the country, explaining to employees what it means.

85
00:07:51.540 --> 00:07:58.940
to employers, what it means, trying to get support to see that this bill is put where

86
00:07:58.940 --> 00:08:02.420
it belongs, which is in the trash can.

87
00:08:02.420 --> 00:08:05.500
But in the beginning, it looked like it was a shoe in.

88
00:08:05.500 --> 00:08:10.320
In the beginning, considering the fact that President Obama and Vice President Biden were

89
00:08:10.320 --> 00:08:14.140
two of the original sponsors of the legislation.

90
00:08:14.140 --> 00:08:21.520
And then when we watched President Obama being sworn in and on the dais, there's Michelle

91
00:08:21.520 --> 00:08:26.800
the Children, and Andy Stern, the president of the Service Employers Union.

92
00:08:26.800 --> 00:08:33.200
You know, at his inauguration we thought, okay, well it's over, it's a shoe-in, but frankly

93
00:08:33.200 --> 00:08:38.800
the only good thing that's come out of the fact that we were in this downturn economically

94
00:08:38.800 --> 00:08:47.160
is that the economy is too bad, I think even for Obama to support the passage of this legislation.

95
00:08:47.160 --> 00:08:51.440
So, you know, we see the election of Scott Brown in Massachusetts, and I think that this

96
00:08:51.440 --> 00:08:55.160
is really sending a new mandate to Obama.

97
00:08:55.160 --> 00:08:59.840
I think he's a little too afraid to grout on the stump for this right now.

98
00:08:59.840 --> 00:09:07.800
So you know, we think that there's probably enough fear out there in the legislators to

99
00:09:07.800 --> 00:09:12.920
that might prevent them from ringing the death knell, you know, for private enterprise.

100
00:09:12.920 --> 00:09:13.920
But we'll see.

101
00:09:13.920 --> 00:09:26.920
In the meantime, you know, we need to keep up the fight and we need to train good lawyers in the Austrian model so that they can understand right from wrong and go out and help us win the battle, so thank you.
