WEBVTT

NOTE The Founding Fathers of Constitutional Subversion

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:30.000
These four presentations are going to be brief summaries of papers that were delivered at a conference that Don Livingston organized last year under the Abbeville Institute, which is his organization, and they've been turned into a book, and that's the cover of the book that's going to be published in the fall, right, Don, in this fall, Rethinking the American Union. And so you want to put that on your list of books to buy, I guess. And so what I'm going to talk about, founding fathers of constitutional

2
00:00:30.000 --> 00:00:36.320
Conversion is how from the very beginning of the American Republic, there was a very powerful

3
00:00:36.320 --> 00:00:43.120
group of men who wanted to simply subvert the Constitution and create a system of unlimited

4
00:00:43.120 --> 00:00:44.120
government.

5
00:00:44.120 --> 00:00:49.240
And they were led by Alexander Hamilton, one of the co-authors of the Federalist Papers.

6
00:00:49.240 --> 00:00:54.200
And so I guess one of the main points I make in this paper is that it was doomed from the

7
00:00:54.200 --> 00:00:55.200
beginning.

8
00:00:55.200 --> 00:01:03.120
of Limited Constitutional Government was whittled away at as soon as the ink was dry, literally,

9
00:01:03.120 --> 00:01:08.560
on the original constitution. And John C. Calhoun had this figured out. In his great

10
00:01:08.560 --> 00:01:15.200
book, A Disquisition on Government, here's what he said. This was published in 1850.

11
00:01:15.200 --> 00:01:20.520
He said, it is a great mistake to suppose that the mere insertion of provisions to restrict

12
00:01:20.520 --> 00:01:25.720
and Limit the Powers of Government without investing those for whose protection they

13
00:01:25.720 --> 00:01:31.400
are inserted with the means of enforcing their observance will be sufficient to prevent the

14
00:01:31.400 --> 00:01:35.600
major and dominant party from abusing its powers.

15
00:01:35.600 --> 00:01:40.200
The party in possession of government will always be opposed to any and all restrictions

16
00:01:40.200 --> 00:01:41.560
on its powers.

17
00:01:41.560 --> 00:01:46.080
They will have no need of these restrictions and would come in time to regard these limitations

18
00:01:46.080 --> 00:01:53.080
as Unnecessary and Improper Restraints and Endeavor to Elude Them.

19
00:01:53.080 --> 00:01:58.720
It is sheer folly to suppose that the party in possession of the ballot box and the physical

20
00:01:58.720 --> 00:02:04.640
force of the country, the military force, could be successfully resisted by an appeal

21
00:02:04.640 --> 00:02:11.520
to reason, truth, justice, or the obligations imposed by the Constitution.

22
00:02:11.520 --> 00:02:16.240
He predicted that the restrictions of government and power would ultimately be annulled and

23
00:02:16.240 --> 00:02:19.960
the government be converted into one of unlimited powers.

24
00:02:19.960 --> 00:02:22.320
And of course he was exactly right.

25
00:02:22.320 --> 00:02:24.720
And now where did Calhoun get these ideas?

26
00:02:24.720 --> 00:02:31.040
This was 1850, he was warning about this and he was writing about the need for some sort

27
00:02:31.040 --> 00:02:38.560
of system of the people of the states to interpret the constitution and to have a say in constitutionality

28
00:02:38.560 --> 00:02:41.840
rather than leaving it up to the central government itself.

29
00:02:41.840 --> 00:02:48.160
Well, he got these ideas because he had been involved in politics since 1811 and he had

30
00:02:48.160 --> 00:02:54.240
been observing his colleagues in the Congress, the United States Senate, he was vice president,

31
00:02:54.240 --> 00:02:58.120
he was secretary of war, you know, for a while.

32
00:02:58.120 --> 00:03:04.760
And so he spent his whole adult life in politics and Murray Rothbard considered Calhoun to

33
00:03:04.760 --> 00:03:11.000
to be one of the greatest American political philosophers, if not the best American political

34
00:03:11.000 --> 00:03:14.240
philosopher of all time.

35
00:03:14.240 --> 00:03:16.160
And so what did Calhoun know?

36
00:03:16.160 --> 00:03:22.160
Well, he knew all about the machinations of Hamilton and his fellow nationalists.

37
00:03:22.160 --> 00:03:28.440
Hamilton, when Hamilton got to the Constitutional Convention, he laid out his plan.

38
00:03:28.440 --> 00:03:32.600
His plan was the plan of the nationalists who were headquartered mostly in Philadelphia,

39
00:03:32.600 --> 00:03:36.440
in New York and New England, and they wanted a permanent president who would appoint all

40
00:03:36.440 --> 00:03:40.680
the governors who would have veto power over all state legislation.

41
00:03:40.680 --> 00:03:45.160
So there would be no state government at all, really, it'd be all power would have been

42
00:03:45.160 --> 00:03:47.600
centralized at the center.

43
00:03:47.600 --> 00:03:53.200
And they wanted that in order to adopt British-style mercantilism as an economic system.

44
00:03:53.200 --> 00:03:57.400
They knew that they couldn't have a system where New York could have 50 percent tariffs

45
00:03:57.400 --> 00:04:02.220
on imports, but South Carolina could have 10 percent tariffs on imports.

46
00:04:02.220 --> 00:04:06.820
The Trade of the World would go into Charleston and not New York, so they needed a centralized

47
00:04:06.820 --> 00:04:11.420
governmental power and they needed a bank modeled after the Bank of England, they said,

48
00:04:11.420 --> 00:04:15.820
Hamilton said, and of course he got that when he got the Bank of the United States, and

49
00:04:15.820 --> 00:04:21.620
they wanted a big public debt and they wanted corporate welfare, what we today call corporate

50
00:04:21.620 --> 00:04:22.620
welfare.

51
00:04:22.620 --> 00:04:24.900
They called it an internal improvement subsidies.

52
00:04:24.900 --> 00:04:30.140
It was Hamilton who coined the phrase the American system to describe this economic system.

53
00:04:30.140 --> 00:04:36.400
And so these two things, centralized governmental power and the British-style mercantilism

54
00:04:36.400 --> 00:04:42.180
were at the heart of what the nationalists so-called wanted, the Federalist Party basically.

55
00:04:42.180 --> 00:04:48.440
And so as soon as the ink was dry on the Constitution, Hamilton denounced it as a frail and worthless

56
00:04:48.440 --> 00:04:50.680
fabric because he didn't get his way.

57
00:04:50.680 --> 00:04:56.140
We didn't get a king, a permanent president who would appoint all the governors as his

58
00:04:56.140 --> 00:04:57.140
puppets.

59
00:04:57.140 --> 00:05:02.820
and so he went to work destroying the Constitution. In his great debate with Jefferson over the

60
00:05:02.820 --> 00:05:07.700
constitutionality of the Bank of the United States, the original central bank, he invented

61
00:05:07.700 --> 00:05:13.140
the notion of implied powers of the Constitution. Jefferson said there's no, the delegated powers

62
00:05:13.140 --> 00:05:19.940
do not include a central bank. The Constitutional Convention debated this and rejected the idea of

63
00:05:19.940 --> 00:05:24.660
a national bank and Hamilton said well you have to read between the lines and there are implied

64
00:05:24.660 --> 00:05:26.660
Applied Powers.

65
00:05:26.660 --> 00:05:31.960
And that argument, they even call it a doctrine now, a doctrine of implied powers.

66
00:05:31.960 --> 00:05:38.660
Hamilton was the first to bastardize the general welfare clause of the Constitution,

67
00:05:38.660 --> 00:05:43.940
to expand it to mean not just things that would benefit everyone, but special interest

68
00:05:43.940 --> 00:05:45.380
programs.

69
00:05:45.380 --> 00:05:47.020
He perverted the commerce clause.

70
00:05:47.020 --> 00:05:52.660
He was probably the very first lawyer to expand the commerce clause, which was originally

71
00:06:22.660 --> 00:06:34.660
To make the claim that the states did not ratify the Constitution, the Constitution and the Federal Government somehow created the states, which is exactly backwards of actual history and is illogical as well.

72
00:06:34.660 --> 00:06:46.660
You know, the union of two things cannot be older than the things themselves. That would be like saying a husband and a marriage could be older than either a husband or wife, and so that's just illogical and ahistorical.

73
00:06:46.660 --> 00:06:47.660
and so on.

74
00:06:47.660 --> 00:06:52.860
But he made that argument and that argument was repeated for decades thereafter that the

75
00:06:52.860 --> 00:06:57.740
central government had all sovereignty and the people of the states did not.

76
00:06:57.740 --> 00:07:03.820
And so there's a historian named Clinton Rossiter who taught at Cornell for many years.

77
00:07:03.820 --> 00:07:08.660
And Clinton Rossiter said this, he said that Hamilton would have affixed certain certificate

78
00:07:08.660 --> 00:07:12.020
of constitutionality to every last tax.

79
00:07:12.020 --> 00:07:16.020
Hamilton took a large view of the power of Congress to tax because he took a large view

80
00:07:16.020 --> 00:07:46.020
And then he says, having failed to persuade his colleagues at Philadelphia of the beauties of a truly national plan of government, and having thereafter recognized the futility of persuading the legislature of three-fourths of the states to surrender even a jot of their privileges, Hamilton set out to remold the Constitution into an instrument of national supremacy, to remold the Constitution with lawyerly subterfuge, not through constitutional amendments.

81
00:07:46.020 --> 00:07:48.980
," but through reinterpretation of the Constitution.

82
00:07:48.980 --> 00:07:51.820
His view was the opposite of Jefferson's.

83
00:07:51.820 --> 00:07:57.860
Jefferson was a strict constructionist, whereas Hamilton thought that the Constitution could

84
00:07:57.860 --> 00:08:02.940
potentially be used as a rubber stamp of approval of anything the government ever wanted to

85
00:08:02.940 --> 00:08:03.940
do.

86
00:08:03.940 --> 00:08:07.540
That, of course, is what it is now.

87
00:08:07.540 --> 00:08:09.220
That's what it's become now.

88
00:08:09.220 --> 00:08:14.660
As Judge Napolitano pointed out in one of his books, that the Supreme Court did not

89
00:08:14.660 --> 00:08:24.900
and how to rule a single federal law unconstitutional from 1937 to 1995, rubber stamp of everything.

90
00:08:24.900 --> 00:08:27.100
And here's Clinton Rossiter who's celebrating this.

91
00:08:27.100 --> 00:08:34.040
He says, with the aid of the doctrine of implied powers, Hamilton converted the powers enumerated

92
00:08:34.040 --> 00:08:40.220
in Article 1, Section 8 into a firm foundation for whatever prodigious feats of legislation

93
00:08:40.220 --> 00:08:43.340
any future Congress might contemplate.

94
00:08:43.340 --> 00:08:47.640
So Article 1, Section 8 was supposed to be a restriction of the powers of government.

95
00:08:47.640 --> 00:08:53.480
Hamilton's rhetoric turned it into unlimited government, properly interpreted by slick lawyers

96
00:08:53.480 --> 00:08:56.040
like himself.

97
00:08:56.040 --> 00:08:58.440
So this subterfuge continued.

98
00:08:58.440 --> 00:09:02.300
The next most important person that I write about in this paper, and I don't have time

99
00:09:02.300 --> 00:09:06.700
to really get into it in a lot of detail, is John Marshall, the Chief Justice, who was

100
00:09:06.700 --> 00:09:11.200
appointed by John Adams at the very last day of the Adams administration, and he was the

101
00:09:11.200 --> 00:09:16.960
the Chief Justice for over 30 years, and one of the things he did was to invent out of

102
00:09:16.960 --> 00:09:22.280
thin air the notion of judicial review. Those words do not exist in the Constitution, and

103
00:09:22.280 --> 00:09:28.580
this essentially meant review of federal legislation by John Marshall. John Marshall will tell

104
00:09:28.580 --> 00:09:35.120
us all what's constitutional and what's not. He was the Chief Justice after all. And also

105
00:09:35.120 --> 00:09:41.360
In a case called Martin vs. Hunter's Lisey, Marshall also invented out of thin air the

106
00:09:41.360 --> 00:09:45.720
notion that the federal government had a right to veto state court decisions.

107
00:09:45.720 --> 00:09:49.880
That's not in the Constitution either, but so you had the federal government taking over

108
00:09:49.880 --> 00:09:53.320
the state courts at the same time.

109
00:09:53.320 --> 00:09:59.600
Marshall also repeated Hamilton's bogus theory that somehow the nation created the states,

110
00:09:59.600 --> 00:10:01.560
the whole people created the states somehow.

111
00:10:01.560 --> 00:10:06.920
Now, it wasn't the states that ratified the Constitution creating the central government.

112
00:10:06.920 --> 00:10:12.400
And here's what he says, in the name of the people, the federal government claimed the

113
00:10:12.400 --> 00:10:19.680
right quote, to legitimately control all individuals or governments within the American territory.

114
00:10:19.680 --> 00:10:23.340
All individuals or governments. And that was not the American system. The American system

115
00:10:23.340 --> 00:10:29.320
was the states in Article 7 of the Constitution. They ratified the Constitution, not the other

116
00:10:29.320 --> 00:10:38.040
and the Other Way Around, and so Marshall went a long way in adopting Hamilton's implied

117
00:10:38.040 --> 00:10:44.240
powers idea and of course his famous decision of McCulloch versus Maryland where he ruled

118
00:10:44.240 --> 00:10:48.880
that the central bank, the bank of the United States was constitutional, that's where he

119
00:10:48.880 --> 00:10:55.800
almost used verbatim Hamilton's opinion on the constitutionality of the bank that he

120
00:11:25.800 --> 00:11:43.800
This is what our liberties would be. In fact, the Jeffersonians thought that this was the most absurd idea in the world, that you would fight a revolution and then hand over everyone's liberty into five government lawyers with lifetime tenure, put it all in their hands.

121
00:11:43.800 --> 00:11:54.800
What kind of sense would that make? How stupid could they have been to have done such a thing? Why would that be better than a king, as far as that goes?

122
00:11:54.800 --> 00:12:01.520
The next co-conspirator was Joseph Story, the Supreme Court Justice, and he wrote a

123
00:12:01.520 --> 00:12:07.640
famous book called Commentaries on the Constitution, which Clinton Rossiter said should have been

124
00:12:07.640 --> 00:12:16.320
called Commentaries on Alexander Hamilton's Commentaries on the Constitution.

125
00:12:16.320 --> 00:12:21.360
And this was a book that went a long way to spread this idea that the central government

126
00:12:21.360 --> 00:12:26.740
and his supreme Hamiltonian idea that we should have sort of a king-like president who would

127
00:12:26.740 --> 00:12:31.560
appoint all the governors and that the states should be eviscerated of their powers and

128
00:12:31.560 --> 00:12:34.720
we should have a centralized monopolistic state.

129
00:12:34.720 --> 00:12:38.440
And just among some of the things he said in this, you know, it's a big long book and

130
00:12:38.440 --> 00:12:43.800
I've critiqued it, but he said, secession of a single state would mean dissolution of

131
00:12:43.800 --> 00:12:44.800
the government.

132
00:12:44.800 --> 00:12:48.840
Well, how would that happen if Alabama seceded?

133
00:12:48.840 --> 00:12:53.160
When Washington, D.C. disappeared, how many people think that would happen?

134
00:12:53.160 --> 00:12:58.840
When the 11 southern states seceded during the war to prevent southern independence,

135
00:12:58.840 --> 00:13:03.240
the federal government proceeded to fill the largest army in the history of the world up

136
00:13:03.240 --> 00:13:05.040
to that point for four years.

137
00:13:05.040 --> 00:13:06.040
It didn't disappear.

138
00:13:06.040 --> 00:13:07.040
It grew.

139
00:13:07.040 --> 00:13:10.200
And so, you know, that was kind of nonsense.

140
00:13:10.200 --> 00:13:15.720
Another thing Story said, to give you an example of what's in this book, is that the original

141
00:13:15.720 --> 00:13:21.720
The general compact of society in no instance has ever been formally expressed at the first

142
00:13:21.720 --> 00:13:23.980
institution of a state.

143
00:13:23.980 --> 00:13:28.600
That is, there was never any agreement by the citizens of any state to always and forever

144
00:13:28.600 --> 00:13:30.880
be obedient to that state.

145
00:13:30.880 --> 00:13:34.840
And so he recognized that, that there was never any agreement to be obedient to whatever

146
00:13:34.840 --> 00:13:40.600
the state does, even if it's done in the name of the majority or whatever.

147
00:13:40.600 --> 00:13:47.040
And then he goes on to say, however, every part should pay obedience to the will of the

148
00:13:47.040 --> 00:13:48.040
whole.

149
00:13:48.040 --> 00:13:50.840
And then he says, who is to define the will of the whole?

150
00:13:50.840 --> 00:13:51.960
The government.

151
00:13:51.960 --> 00:13:55.960
He doesn't say that there should be any plebiscite or any vote or anything like that.

152
00:13:55.960 --> 00:14:00.000
The government will tell us what the will of the whole says, and then we must be obedient

153
00:14:00.000 --> 00:14:01.000
to that.

154
00:14:01.000 --> 00:14:02.540
That's Joseph's story.

155
00:14:02.540 --> 00:14:06.560
And then he goes on to say, the majority, and he's not talking about the majority of

156
00:14:06.560 --> 00:14:11.440
of the People. He's talking about the politicians' interpretation of what they think the majority

157
00:14:11.440 --> 00:14:17.080
will is. He says, the majority must have a right to accomplish that object by the means

158
00:14:17.080 --> 00:14:22.580
which they deem adequate for the end. The will of the majority of the people is absolute

159
00:14:22.580 --> 00:14:28.160
and sovereign, and here's the creepy part, limited only by its means and power to make

160
00:14:28.160 --> 00:14:35.100
its will effectual. So the only limits are the limits of violence, you know, the limits

161
00:14:35.100 --> 00:14:42.100
of Money and Credit, The Theory of Money and Credit, The Theory of Money and Credit, The

162
00:15:05.100 --> 00:15:07.100
and the French Revolution.

163
00:15:07.100 --> 00:15:17.300
He also expressed the view that if government becomes tyrannical, the only legitimate resort

164
00:15:17.300 --> 00:15:22.780
should be, quote, the proper tribunals constituted by the government, which would appeal to the

165
00:15:22.780 --> 00:15:26.320
good sense and integrity and justice of the majority of the people.

166
00:15:26.320 --> 00:15:27.320
So rely on elections.

167
00:15:27.320 --> 00:15:31.420
Okay, well, we'll just rely on elections, and don't let the people have anything to

168
00:15:31.420 --> 00:15:32.420
do with it.

169
00:15:32.420 --> 00:15:33.420
Okay.

170
00:15:33.420 --> 00:15:40.260
I will repeat John Marshall's fable that the so-called Supremacy Clause of the Constitution

171
00:15:40.260 --> 00:15:46.820
made the Federal Government supreme over all matters, but all the so-called Supremacy Clause

172
00:15:46.820 --> 00:15:52.100
did is that there were delegated powers in Article 1, Section 8. There are 17 things

173
00:15:52.100 --> 00:15:57.160
there. The Federal Government is supreme in those, the foreign policy, for example,

174
00:15:57.160 --> 00:16:02.820
but that's it. The 10th Amendment says all else is reserved to the people and the states,

175
00:16:02.820 --> 00:16:07.860
And this has been perverted year after year after year by people who think that because

176
00:16:07.860 --> 00:16:12.260
it's called the Supremacy Clause, the federal government is supreme in everything.

177
00:16:12.260 --> 00:16:16.860
But no, it only has precedent in those things that are, those powers that are delegated

178
00:16:16.860 --> 00:16:19.580
to it in Article 1, Section 8.

179
00:16:19.580 --> 00:16:25.260
Okay, but that lie was spread by a story also.

180
00:16:25.260 --> 00:16:38.620
I'll go on. Daniel Webster was another one. Daniel Webster had a famous debate with Robert

181
00:16:38.620 --> 00:16:43.540
Hayne, a senator from South Carolina, on the Constitution. And this is online. You can read

182
00:16:43.540 --> 00:16:48.740
stories. The book is online. The commentary is on the Constitution. And the Webster-Hayne

183
00:16:48.740 --> 00:16:54.860
debate is also online, if you want to read it. And he was a very prominent person, of

184
00:16:54.860 --> 00:17:13.860
The Constitution of the United States confers on the government itself the power of deciding ultimately and conclusively upon the extent of its own authority.

185
00:17:13.860 --> 00:17:22.860
So he declares that if there are going to be limits on the government authority, it's the government itself that determines what those limits are to be.

186
00:17:22.860 --> 00:17:33.860
That was never the American system. It was always supposed to be the people of the states and political communities organized at the state and local level would confer this power.

187
00:17:33.860 --> 00:17:47.860
And Senator John Taylor of Virginia, he wrote a book on the Constitution based on the notes that were taken by Robert Yates, who was a New York Supreme Court Chief Justice who attended the Constitutional Convention.

188
00:17:47.860 --> 00:17:52.420
and after Yates' death his notes on the convention were published by his wife

189
00:17:52.420 --> 00:17:55.380
and Taylor, John Taylor cited these

190
00:17:55.380 --> 00:17:59.340
and he said one of the things he said was the constitution could never have

191
00:17:59.340 --> 00:18:01.540
designed to destroy liberty

192
00:18:01.540 --> 00:18:04.860
by investing five or six men installed for life

193
00:18:04.860 --> 00:18:08.180
with the power of regulating the constitutional rights of all political

194
00:18:08.180 --> 00:18:09.380
departments

195
00:18:09.380 --> 00:18:12.380
and that's what Webster was saying that we should just leave it up to the

196
00:18:12.380 --> 00:18:13.420
government itself

197
00:18:13.420 --> 00:18:16.580
to determine what the limits of its powers are

198
00:18:16.580 --> 00:18:46.580
He also said, quote, one of two things is true, either the laws of the union are beyond the discretion and beyond the control of the states, or else we have no constitution or general government. So either the people of the states are totally out of it and have no control over the central government, or we have no government. So if you want to have a government, you have to give us monopolistic power. And this is the kind of propaganda. He also, the bottom line was, trust us.

199
00:18:46.580 --> 00:18:53.080
He said this, you know, so what if we have tyranny in the future? What do we do about it?

200
00:18:53.080 --> 00:19:00.580
He says this, quote, trust in the efficacy of frequent elections, trust in the judicial power,

201
00:19:00.580 --> 00:19:05.080
trust us lawyers, trust us politicians. That's what he's saying.

202
00:19:05.080 --> 00:19:14.080
And so you hear old John Calhoun is reading this and he probably didn't know whether to laugh or cry

203
00:19:14.080 --> 00:19:20.640
reading of trust in lawyers and the lawyers who beginning with Hamilton went diligently at work

204
00:19:20.640 --> 00:19:26.960
destroying the constitution trust in them to limit the tyrannical proclivities of government

205
00:19:26.960 --> 00:19:32.240
that's not likely to work that's why people like Calhoun thought nullification and secession

206
00:19:32.240 --> 00:19:37.200
in concurrent majorities and other vehicles like this were necessary so that the people could

207
00:19:37.200 --> 00:19:43.840
interpose for themselves and not just rely on the good graces of the Daniel Websters and the Joseph

208
00:19:43.840 --> 00:19:46.640
of Stories of the World.

209
00:19:46.640 --> 00:19:52.760
And so the point of this paper, really the main point, is to show how from the very beginning

210
00:19:52.760 --> 00:19:59.400
the Constitution was in the minds of some people a dead letter, the Hamiltonian segment

211
00:19:59.400 --> 00:20:04.240
of American polity, and they worked very diligently for many years.

212
00:20:04.240 --> 00:20:13.460
And Stories, Commentaries was really the book that the northerners, northerners understood

213
00:20:13.460 --> 00:20:18.980
to be the theory of the Constitution prior to the American Civil War, as it's called.

214
00:20:18.980 --> 00:20:26.340
Whereas most of the people in the South understood the Jeffersonian vision of states' rights

215
00:20:26.340 --> 00:20:29.740
and federalism as far as that's concerned.

216
00:20:29.740 --> 00:20:33.100
And so my time is about up and that's my story for now.

217
00:20:33.100 --> 00:20:34.100
Thanks.

218
00:20:34.100 --> 00:20:36.100
Thank you very much.