WEBVTT

NOTE Tools and Charts: Intellectuals and Financial Crises as Revealed through the “Lost” Plans to End the Great Depression

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.640
My talk is going to be about the characteristics of intellectuals in a financial crisis and

2
00:00:04.640 --> 00:00:09.360
more specifically a much shorter title would have been Popular Economist of the Great Depression

3
00:00:09.360 --> 00:00:13.880
as Hayekian Intellectuals and I'll start with this.

4
00:00:13.880 --> 00:00:19.280
See Finnegem is my firm, I'm a trader, I've been a trader for about a decade and a half

5
00:00:19.280 --> 00:00:24.940
and over time I've become sort of a buff of economic history and more specifically financial

6
00:00:24.940 --> 00:00:29.980
market history and so I found that everything I read about the Great Depression, there was

7
00:00:29.980 --> 00:00:38.060
There was some reference to popular economists. For example, Townsend, Francis Townsend,

8
00:00:38.060 --> 00:00:44.660
Huey Long, all those fellows, Father Coughlin. And the thing was that even in Rothbard's

9
00:00:44.660 --> 00:00:49.960
America's Great Depression or in Ray Moley's After Seven Years and Many Others, they allude

10
00:00:49.960 --> 00:00:53.120
to those few, but they say that there were many more. They say that there were, in some

11
00:00:53.120 --> 00:01:23.120
in some cases they say there were dozens. So, what I did was I essentially set out to try and find as many of those as I could. I wanted to first kind of catalog them and summarize them and then what I wanted to do was I wanted to look for the high level trends and recurring themes and then finally using some analytical framework which I hadn't yet determined, look for even deeper significance kind of analysis. And I did so and it took over

12
00:01:23.120 --> 00:01:43.120
The criteria I set from the beginning was that I wanted books, pamphlets, transcripts of speeches, all that sort of thing, magazine articles that were published between 1930 and the end of 1939, that were American, and more specifically that had two distinct elements.

13
00:01:43.120 --> 00:01:49.120
They had to both posit a cause for the Great Depression and then offer a specific solution, whatever it was.

14
00:01:49.120 --> 00:01:58.200
It took me about two years and I came up with 171 specific plans.

15
00:01:58.200 --> 00:02:01.640
So then I had to determine essentially what framework I was going to look at these folks

16
00:02:01.640 --> 00:02:02.640
from.

17
00:02:02.640 --> 00:02:06.800
And I determined right away that I needed something to kind of analyze intellectuals.

18
00:02:06.800 --> 00:02:10.120
So there are three, now there's four, but at the time, two years ago, there were three

19
00:02:10.120 --> 00:02:16.840
competing, I consider three competing approaches for analysis.

20
00:02:16.840 --> 00:02:21.040
One was Julian Benda, who some of you are familiar with, The Treason of the Learned,

21
00:02:21.040 --> 00:02:23.240
which was written in 1928.

22
00:02:23.240 --> 00:02:27.980
The second, of course, is Hayek, his article in 1949 about the intellectuals and socialism.

23
00:02:27.980 --> 00:02:32.400
And the last was a book published in 1969 by a guy named John Gross.

24
00:02:32.400 --> 00:02:36.080
The only picture I could find of him was him drinking wine, so I might have to choose that

25
00:02:36.080 --> 00:02:37.080
guy.

26
00:02:37.080 --> 00:02:42.080
His book was called The Rise and Fall of the Man of Letters, and all three look at intellectuals,

27
00:02:42.080 --> 00:03:00.480
Hayek and his article mentions, if you read it, you can figure out about nine or ten characteristics

28
00:03:00.480 --> 00:03:05.880
of intellectuals. I've looked at all of them and I've chosen four. The four are the most

29
00:03:05.880 --> 00:03:09.760
interesting to talk about this afternoon.

30
00:03:09.760 --> 00:03:13.660
So here's the first one. The first one is that Hayek's first point is that intellectuals

31
00:03:13.660 --> 00:03:19.000
tend to be people who understand nothing in particular really well. Their knowledge intends

32
00:03:19.000 --> 00:03:24.620
in fact to be rather superficial. They're not in possession of any special wisdom. And

33
00:03:24.620 --> 00:03:28.800
that is much to their credit for no other reason than because what their job really

34
00:03:28.800 --> 00:03:35.480
is is to take disparate information out. They take a concept from a textbook, a personal

35
00:03:35.480 --> 00:04:05.480
and Financial Anecdote Articles and what they do is they craft that into a narrative which they then put out through articles and all that sort of thing and this was certainly the case in the Great Depression and their lack of expertise was much to their credit and it made their message that much more I guess attractive because economists had been so wrong so people started to say well what do these guys have to say and so I have a few examples well first first this slide here shows the breakdown of that 171 individuals dominated by

36
00:04:05.480 --> 00:04:10.680
by writers and activists, academics, business people, all the way down to a couple of actors,

37
00:04:10.680 --> 00:04:15.680
a soldier and a poet. And a few that I couldn't even tell. Some people wrote on their pseudonyms

38
00:04:15.680 --> 00:04:19.880
and stuff, so that was hard to figure out. And by the way, I have an asterisk by academics.

39
00:04:19.880 --> 00:04:26.400
Those were mostly economics and sociological professors with a couple of psychologists

40
00:04:26.400 --> 00:04:27.400
as well.

41
00:04:27.400 --> 00:04:38.240
Here's one. This was Alfred Jones' book. It's called His Fascism, The Answer. This is interesting

42
00:04:38.240 --> 00:04:42.760
because throughout the book, Jones says very clearly, he's impressed with the value, this

43
00:04:42.760 --> 00:04:48.240
is like 1932 or so, he says, I'm impressed with the value of fascism. Space doesn't permit

44
00:04:48.240 --> 00:04:52.760
a detail of their marvelous progress under Mussolini. He praises the fact that they've

45
00:04:52.760 --> 00:04:57.360
imposed a shorter working day, which he believes is responsible for the lower levels of unemployment

46
00:04:57.360 --> 00:04:58.920
and Employment at that time.

47
00:04:58.920 --> 00:05:04.360
It's a system of marvelous simplicity of economy, and he insists throughout the book that Mussolini's

48
00:05:04.360 --> 00:05:08.000
planned economy provides the essentials to economic recovery.

49
00:05:08.000 --> 00:05:11.000
But in the last couple pages of the book, he says, well, you know, I have no real training

50
00:05:11.000 --> 00:05:15.440
in finance or economics, and I presume to cover no such topics.

51
00:05:15.440 --> 00:05:19.040
So you get that at the end.

52
00:05:19.040 --> 00:05:24.040
This is a picture, and then, of course, one of the caveats that Hayek adds is it'd be

53
00:05:24.040 --> 00:05:26.920
a fatal mistake to underestimate their power for this reason.

54
00:05:26.920 --> 00:05:40.920
Goldie Ladon wrote a book called Distributism in the early 1930s and she offers not only

55
00:05:40.920 --> 00:05:45.200
a cause and solution for the depression but also a key to permanent prosperity and that

56
00:05:45.200 --> 00:05:49.080
key is of course to take women out of the workplace.

57
00:05:49.080 --> 00:05:54.200
So what she says is that all women should be forced to stay at home or they should be

58
00:05:54.200 --> 00:06:24.200
to be pensioned out of work. And her logic is, first of all, that women are taking men's jobs and also that women not being at home, and this is the 1930s, I mean, how many women were there in the workplace as a percentage, I don't even know, but the one thing that she says is that it's also women being in the workplace has taken away that sort of home economic instinct of women, so budgets are all screwed up and that's one reason why we're in the depression. And she, by the way, is the poet, so I should mention that. She was called the female poet laureate of America.

59
00:06:24.200 --> 00:06:27.800
The thing that's interesting about this is that this picture added here is of a group

60
00:06:27.800 --> 00:06:31.720
that was called the Farmers National Holiday Association.

61
00:06:31.720 --> 00:06:36.280
And they were kind of a militant, left-leaning group, which actually, for the simplicity

62
00:06:36.280 --> 00:06:42.640
of her view and for the fact that she's a poet, they adopted her as one of their pet

63
00:06:42.640 --> 00:06:43.640
economists.

64
00:06:43.640 --> 00:06:47.240
And they were fully on board with her, and this was several thousand people, tens of

65
00:06:47.240 --> 00:06:51.160
thousands I imagine, who adopted her as one of their pet economists.

66
00:06:51.160 --> 00:06:55.700
And they were responsible for a number of violent attacks, including one death across

67
00:06:55.700 --> 00:07:02.760
the Midwest in the early 1930s, and in one case pulled a judge out of a car who had upheld

68
00:07:02.760 --> 00:07:08.080
creditors' rights and threatened to lynch him.

69
00:07:08.080 --> 00:07:11.360
Not being credible doesn't necessarily mean being dismissable.

70
00:07:11.360 --> 00:07:15.080
Here's a few others.

71
00:07:15.080 --> 00:07:16.360
Top left is the Ham and Eggs Plan.

72
00:07:16.360 --> 00:07:18.520
I don't know if any of you have heard of that.

73
00:07:18.520 --> 00:07:24.760
That was proposed as a plan in California, but the backers of the plan had every inclination

74
00:07:24.760 --> 00:07:26.880
to make it a national plan eventually.

75
00:07:26.880 --> 00:07:30.880
And it was run by a guy whose name was Roy Owens, and Roy Owens billed himself as an

76
00:07:30.880 --> 00:07:34.840
engineer economist, which is an interesting title because it recurs constantly throughout

77
00:07:34.840 --> 00:07:36.120
this period.

78
00:07:36.120 --> 00:07:41.040
And Roy Owens, it turned out, there's a sociological law, I don't know what it is, maybe I can

79
00:07:41.040 --> 00:07:44.520
posit it here, and that is that when organizations reach a certain size, they get investigated.

80
00:07:44.520 --> 00:07:48.120
I don't know what the size is, but there are people who do exposés and things.

81
00:07:48.120 --> 00:07:52.280
Anyway, when Ham and Eggs got big enough, an investigation showed that not only was

82
00:07:52.280 --> 00:07:56.960
Roy Owens not an engineer and not an economist, he didn't even graduate high school and he

83
00:07:56.960 --> 00:08:01.480
was an ex-felon.

84
00:08:01.480 --> 00:08:06.680
Even knowing this, a few years later this organization had 330,000 members and it was

85
00:08:06.680 --> 00:08:11.800
on a proposition in 1928 to become either a new branch of government or to occupy some

86
00:08:11.800 --> 00:08:18.000
government positions and they only lost 1.14 million to 1.39 million.

87
00:08:18.000 --> 00:08:23.000
So, once again, having a lack of credibility and no official credentials doesn't in any

88
00:08:23.000 --> 00:08:26.040
way dampen the message of a lot of these groups.

89
00:08:26.040 --> 00:08:28.280
In the middle, the utopians are coming.

90
00:08:28.280 --> 00:08:32.040
That was a group of, it was kind of like a technocratic group, if you're familiar with

91
00:08:32.040 --> 00:08:36.320
the technical alliance and all those guys, but it also had some mystical elements about

92
00:08:36.320 --> 00:08:38.880
business cycles and all that sort of thing.

93
00:08:38.880 --> 00:08:43.600
And despite the fact that the guys who met it were actors who professed from the very

94
00:08:43.600 --> 00:08:46.520
beginning no economic experience or financial knowledge.

95
00:08:46.520 --> 00:08:54.520
On June 23, 1935, over 30,000 people came to the Hollywood Bowl to listen to their speeches.

96
00:08:54.520 --> 00:08:57.400
And then the last I mentioned here, of course, is Townsend.

97
00:08:57.400 --> 00:09:02.840
It was only when Francis Townsend got in front of Congress and was confronted by a few congressmen

98
00:09:02.840 --> 00:09:08.880
that it turned out that his plan, which involved what he built as a very small tax to kind

99
00:09:08.880 --> 00:09:14.740
of pension people at that age, I guess it was over 60, would have cost half of the national

100
00:09:14.740 --> 00:09:15.740
and Financial Income.

101
00:09:15.740 --> 00:09:21.780
So it would have in some cases multiplied final retail prices by a certain amount.

102
00:09:21.780 --> 00:09:27.340
And another personal aside is that I love the response that they had when they were

103
00:09:27.340 --> 00:09:29.460
trounced in front of Congress.

104
00:09:29.460 --> 00:09:32.060
They went back to the drawing board and they came out with a new motto and the motto was

105
00:09:32.060 --> 00:09:34.540
honor thy father and mother.

106
00:09:34.540 --> 00:09:40.060
So they tried to appeal to your, if we can't do math we can at least respect the elderly.

107
00:09:40.060 --> 00:09:46.740
So, the second point of Hayek is that intellectuals generally judge all particular issues exclusively

108
00:09:46.740 --> 00:09:52.620
in the light of certain very general ideas. And this point I thought was interesting because

109
00:09:52.620 --> 00:09:59.500
it kind of ties, and it ties a little bit to some things that Rothbard said in his World

110
00:09:59.500 --> 00:10:04.500
War I intellectuals in power, World War I as fulfillment, because this was really the

111
00:10:04.500 --> 00:10:09.020
generation behind, this is really the generation after those. Those folks like Richard T. Eli

112
00:10:09.020 --> 00:10:17.740
The average age here of these folks was roughly, the average age of this 171 person was roughly,

113
00:10:17.740 --> 00:10:22.060
they were in their late 40s. They tended to be born about 1882, which if you look at the

114
00:10:22.060 --> 00:10:26.660
events in their life, it's sort of telling. They were in their early teens during the

115
00:10:26.660 --> 00:10:33.100
panic of 1893. They were going to college and school during the entire progressive era.

116
00:10:33.100 --> 00:10:37.740
Their students tended to be, their teachers tended to be those people like Eli and Woodrow

117
00:10:37.740 --> 00:10:45.180
Wilson and a lot of the progressivists, Dewey and all those guys.

118
00:10:45.180 --> 00:10:49.020
Once again, I'm not going to go through all these, but they're dominant themes. Some of

119
00:10:49.020 --> 00:10:53.220
the dominant themes are, of course, Darwinism and scientism, which they just called science,

120
00:10:53.220 --> 00:11:01.740
but it's truly scientism. That fellow in the middle you see up here, that's Taylor, the

121
00:11:01.740 --> 00:11:07.620
scientific management idea. Of course, Edward Bellamy's Looking Backward, that's the Warren

122
00:11:07.620 --> 00:11:12.620
The War Industries Board, roughly 20% that I could count, at least of those who mentioned it,

123
00:11:12.620 --> 00:11:18.620
roughly 20% of these 171 individuals served in some capacity with the War Industries Board.

124
00:11:18.620 --> 00:11:23.620
The personification of Wall Street as the embodiment of all evil.

125
00:11:23.620 --> 00:11:27.620
There's a lot of revisionist history, what taxes have done for America, everything.

126
00:11:27.620 --> 00:11:32.620
The railroads, things like that. Those are some of the recurring themes.

127
00:11:32.620 --> 00:11:46.620
Thorstein Veblen's Engineers in the Price System, Herbert Crowley's The Promise of American Life, Teddy Roosevelt, Karl Marx.

128
00:11:46.620 --> 00:11:52.620
There's probably like 15 themes which occur over and over in these writings.

129
00:11:52.620 --> 00:11:54.620
And that's somewhat reflected in their attribution.

130
00:11:54.620 --> 00:11:58.620
This is the overall attribution among these individuals for the causes of the Great Depression.

131
00:11:58.620 --> 00:12:07.620
Fully one in three attributed to planlessness. In other words, there's no more coordination between production and consumption,

132
00:12:07.620 --> 00:12:13.620
between the various stages of production, and we need the government to sort of oversee that. This is the implication.

133
00:12:13.620 --> 00:12:21.620
Overproduction, largely because a few years before the Great Depression, two fellows, I guess it was Waddle and Catchings, wrote a book

134
00:12:21.620 --> 00:12:27.820
where they posited the possibility of over-production and under-consumption and causing economic

135
00:12:27.820 --> 00:12:34.180
disconnects, a lack of purchase power, those guys down on Wall Street, et cetera, et cetera.

136
00:12:34.180 --> 00:12:38.900
Interestingly, five attributed the cause of Great Depression to government, and two of

137
00:12:38.900 --> 00:12:41.140
those said the government wasn't vigilant enough.

138
00:12:41.140 --> 00:12:45.460
We need much more government, otherwise this will keep happening.

139
00:12:45.460 --> 00:12:48.260
Let's go on here.

140
00:12:48.260 --> 00:12:53.700
A third point that Hayek made was that the power of their ideas grows in proportion to

141
00:12:53.700 --> 00:12:59.220
their generality, abstractness and vagueness. There are huge dividends to be paid by not

142
00:12:59.220 --> 00:13:06.980
being specific. Even if you are familiar with your subject, it is in their interest to be

143
00:13:06.980 --> 00:13:12.140
as vague as possible. Second, that the climate of opinion of any period determines the importance

144
00:13:12.140 --> 00:13:17.500
of new facts and opinions. In other words, if your message is going to be derailed by

145
00:13:17.500 --> 00:13:22.700
by New Information, you need to integrate it. If it's not, just pretend it's not there.

146
00:13:22.700 --> 00:13:31.580
Or more specifically, as Huey Long said, never explain details by the mother of sectarianism.

147
00:13:31.580 --> 00:13:34.460
So this fellow here, I'm sure some of you have heard of him, this guy's called, he was

148
00:13:34.460 --> 00:13:42.620
named Stuart Chase. And Chase was an intellectual. In many ways, he is kind of the quintessential

149
00:13:42.620 --> 00:13:48.900
Popular Economist, in that he was an engineer, trained at MIT, became an accountant, served

150
00:13:48.900 --> 00:13:53.700
in the war industries board, made a trip to Russia in the late 20s to kind of see how

151
00:13:53.700 --> 00:13:58.860
their experiment was going, wrote some articles, and throughout the 1920s he was a pretty

152
00:13:58.860 --> 00:14:03.660
prominent member of a technocratic group. He studied with Thorson Veblen and all those

153
00:14:03.660 --> 00:14:08.580
fellows. And so he was in a prominent position and he was highly visible during the Great

154
00:14:08.580 --> 00:14:09.580
Depression.

155
00:14:09.580 --> 00:14:13.660
And what he first said in 1930 when the crash occurred and when the depression started was

156
00:14:13.660 --> 00:14:19.020
he predicted, he said he attributed the cause to psychology, just negative psychology, it'll

157
00:14:19.020 --> 00:14:23.540
be over in about a year, everything will be fine, and he made some light references to

158
00:14:23.540 --> 00:14:29.820
a need maybe for more regulation, he was kind of non-committal about all that.

159
00:14:29.820 --> 00:14:36.420
And in 1931, as unemployment grew and as businesses started floundering, he changed his attribution

160
00:14:36.420 --> 00:14:41.540
of the Crash to Overproduction. He cited a need for more coordination, whether voluntary

161
00:14:41.540 --> 00:14:51.420
or coerced among business and the government. And in 1932, as we move on, he took a pretty

162
00:14:51.420 --> 00:14:56.740
sharp turn to the left, called Marks for Profit, endorsed the nationalization of industry and

163
00:14:56.740 --> 00:15:06.000
an inflationary campaign to spur spending. Further still, in 1933 he wrote an article

164
00:15:06.000 --> 00:15:10.540
for Harper is called If I Were a Dictator. And in that article, he not only advocated

165
00:15:10.540 --> 00:15:15.240
complete control of industry and finance, but also nationally enforced birth control

166
00:15:15.240 --> 00:15:22.120
policies and sunbathing resorts all across the country. You could see how that would

167
00:15:22.120 --> 00:15:26.320
help the economic environment as well.

168
00:15:26.320 --> 00:15:33.200
Then like that boomerang, he came right back to the middle in 1934 and endorsed FDR, saying

169
00:15:33.200 --> 00:15:38.600
The road to recovery would be through functionalism, which he never defined, but whatever functionalism

170
00:15:38.600 --> 00:15:41.840
is, this guy had it.

171
00:15:41.840 --> 00:15:50.280
By 1935, Chase decided that Roosevelt's commitment to change was highly questionable and called

172
00:15:50.280 --> 00:15:55.120
him an economic royalist who had made too many concessions to big business and finance.

173
00:15:55.120 --> 00:16:00.040
There's not that many years left, so he's running out of them.

174
00:16:00.040 --> 00:16:04.440
In 1937, he advocated a complete scrapping of the Constitution, a rewrite.

175
00:16:04.440 --> 00:16:08.760
He said, you know, it's time to start from scratch, none of this stuff is working.

176
00:16:08.760 --> 00:16:10.280
And he said, it's time to start over.

177
00:16:10.280 --> 00:16:14.120
Even the amendment mechanisms weren't enough, and it was time to start from scratch.

178
00:16:14.120 --> 00:16:21.160
And in 1939, I'm not sure exactly what happened, but he made a sort of a sheepish admission

179
00:16:21.160 --> 00:16:26.560
that maybe freer competition and prices being set by markets was a better idea.

180
00:16:26.560 --> 00:16:28.760
So he traveled the full circle.

181
00:16:28.760 --> 00:16:33.160
That illustrates Hayek's point that what's important is relevance and not consistency.

182
00:16:33.160 --> 00:16:42.220
In fact, when I was reading on this, I thought, if they say that the first casualty of war

183
00:16:42.220 --> 00:16:48.720
is truth, the first casualty of economic ideas is consistency, something like that.

184
00:16:48.720 --> 00:16:54.780
So another example of this kind of shift is seen in the very far left, the communist and

185
00:16:54.780 --> 00:16:58.360
socialist literature of the era, which was consistent throughout the entire Great Depression.

186
00:16:58.360 --> 00:17:05.520
In the beginning to the end, they were sounding the clarion for revolution, but the change

187
00:17:05.520 --> 00:17:12.680
came in mid-1935. Until then, all the literature was this kind of thing. It was rife with the

188
00:17:12.680 --> 00:17:18.120
language of class warfareism, violent revolution, all that kind of thing. There was a writer

189
00:17:18.120 --> 00:17:23.040
from New York named Akiva Liu who wrote a book where he basically said, to arms, everybody

190
00:17:23.040 --> 00:17:26.360
get your rifles, go down to Wall Street and start killing traders and brokers, and he

191
00:17:26.360 --> 00:17:34.160
be likened the victims of the crash and unemployment to the victims of the Lusitania, the main.

192
00:17:34.160 --> 00:17:37.960
And I did a little background research, and this could be completely off, but I attribute

193
00:17:37.960 --> 00:17:42.640
the change, which I'll give into a 1935, in the 6th Congress, which took place in July

194
00:17:42.640 --> 00:17:47.880
and August of 1928. That's the common turn, kind of a global jamboree for communists where

195
00:17:47.880 --> 00:17:53.360
they talk about the party line and they argue about the inaugural, I guess. They said that

196
00:17:53.360 --> 00:17:57.920
They predicted that the end of capitalism was growing near, and so kind of the word

197
00:17:57.920 --> 00:18:05.560
that went out from the organelles of whoever was saying doctrine for communism was, you've

198
00:18:05.560 --> 00:18:07.040
got to push as hard as you can.

199
00:18:07.040 --> 00:18:11.500
And when the crash came the very next year, it became an all-out, you know, this was their

200
00:18:11.500 --> 00:18:14.720
opportunity to push as hard as they could to get the great revolution going.

201
00:18:14.720 --> 00:18:17.800
This was the end of capitalism.

202
00:18:17.800 --> 00:18:22.480
The seventh congress took place in 1935, about halfway through the Great Depression.

203
00:18:22.480 --> 00:18:25.320
And the tone changed completely.

204
00:18:25.320 --> 00:18:29.000
And the reason why the tone changed, I attribute two reasons for the tone changing.

205
00:18:29.000 --> 00:18:34.100
The first being that a lot of the plans that were put in place, the real plans, not the

206
00:18:34.100 --> 00:18:38.680
proposed ones like the New Deal and such, were starting to show some traction.

207
00:18:38.680 --> 00:18:40.080
They started to see some recovery.

208
00:18:40.080 --> 00:18:44.840
And on top of that, the rise of fascism greatly worried a lot of the communists.

209
00:18:44.840 --> 00:18:51.520
So they specifically went out and tried to soften their message.

210
00:18:51.520 --> 00:18:56.800
And they took a highly conciliatory turn and toned down their rhetoric starting in 1935.

211
00:18:56.800 --> 00:18:59.680
So what you started to see is things like this.

212
00:18:59.680 --> 00:19:01.800
This plan is called democratic distribution.

213
00:19:01.800 --> 00:19:04.120
The word democracy is all over these things.

214
00:19:04.120 --> 00:19:08.360
And this fellow's name was Lewis Waldman, who had previously been a really hardcore

215
00:19:08.360 --> 00:19:10.160
communist in this country.

216
00:19:10.160 --> 00:19:15.600
And in 1936 or so, what he did was he broke from the hardliners and he actually converted

217
00:19:15.600 --> 00:19:22.640
and several hundred thousand communist voters to FDR.

218
00:19:22.640 --> 00:19:23.640
Just two quick charts.

219
00:19:23.640 --> 00:19:26.520
I know charts are not...

220
00:19:26.520 --> 00:19:29.300
This has to do with the climate of opinion, and what I wanted to demonstrate here was

221
00:19:29.300 --> 00:19:34.960
I charted basically changes in the Dow Jones Industrial Average with the number of plans

222
00:19:34.960 --> 00:19:37.320
that were issued within the following six months.

223
00:19:37.320 --> 00:19:41.400
You can see a very strong relationship here, and this has to do with that climate of opinion.

224
00:19:41.400 --> 00:19:43.240
As the market gets worse, as that sort of...

225
00:19:43.240 --> 00:19:47.680
If you look at the market as I do in some context, as a sort of great voting mechanism,

226
00:19:47.680 --> 00:19:58.040
as the environment gets worse, as the economic outlook gets poorer, there's a rush to judgment

227
00:19:58.040 --> 00:20:05.480
and there's a whole bunch of this rush to introduce alternatives and that sort of thing.

228
00:20:05.480 --> 00:20:07.000
That's all I meant to show here.

229
00:20:07.000 --> 00:20:11.360
And then this isn't going to come out really well, but what I sought to show here were

230
00:20:11.360 --> 00:20:16.160
The colors, the bands, are, with each planet that came out during the Great Depression,

231
00:20:16.160 --> 00:20:19.160
what they attributed the cause of the depression to.

232
00:20:19.160 --> 00:20:20.840
And those were pretty homogenous across.

233
00:20:20.840 --> 00:20:28.720
There's no real consistent trend in that case of intellectual opinion.

234
00:20:28.720 --> 00:20:35.360
On the other hand, the attribution of solutions was traveling in very distinct, discrete sort

235
00:20:35.360 --> 00:20:36.880
of waves of opinion.

236
00:20:36.880 --> 00:20:39.400
Early on it was government-business partnerships.

237
00:20:39.400 --> 00:20:43.120
And there was more of like a coercive element to it, cartelization, forcing the businesses

238
00:20:43.120 --> 00:20:46.520
together and then make programs and all that.

239
00:20:46.520 --> 00:20:50.640
Finally, you know, in the 1930s, there was anything goes, just everything, which I'll

240
00:20:50.640 --> 00:20:53.820
talk about in a few minutes, some of those more interesting ones there.

241
00:20:53.820 --> 00:20:58.280
National planning, and then of course you had FDR come in, and then you've got more,

242
00:20:58.280 --> 00:21:03.800
it went from a business to a more monetary, and then finally to a more fiscal basis.

243
00:21:03.800 --> 00:21:15.800
Fiscal policy, setting wages, taxes, pensioning people out of the workforce, constitutional revisionism, of course, was an area of interest with the court-tacking decisions and such.

244
00:21:15.800 --> 00:21:27.800
And then finally, what I call reconciliationism. All the books there had titles like The New Government, The New Frontier, you know, it was kind of like almost cathartic in the way they treated the changes that had been made in the New Deal.

245
00:21:27.800 --> 00:21:33.320
And there's two very high-level memes that I detected here. In the early part of the

246
00:21:33.320 --> 00:21:38.760
Great Depression, everything was about coordination. It was coordinating production, coordinating

247
00:21:38.760 --> 00:21:46.840
people's interests, coordinating just every element of economic discourse you could imagine.

248
00:21:46.840 --> 00:21:52.400
And later, everything was about democracy. It was almost as if the meme was to sort of

249
00:21:52.400 --> 00:21:59.240
of Comfort, those who questioned where we were and what the changes had been, you know,

250
00:21:59.240 --> 00:22:05.000
sort of the, it was almost, again, it was almost cathartic, it was almost like they

251
00:22:05.000 --> 00:22:09.840
were saying, don't worry, this is, what we have here is real democracy now, which is

252
00:22:09.840 --> 00:22:10.840
arguable.

253
00:22:10.840 --> 00:22:16.720
Okay, and this is the last point I have, and that is that Hayek wrote that speculations

254
00:22:16.720 --> 00:22:22.080
about the possible entire reconstruction of society, rather than practical and short-run

255
00:22:22.080 --> 00:22:25.080
Give public intellectuals a visionary character.

256
00:22:25.080 --> 00:22:29.080
It's really not fun to talk about free markets and all that.

257
00:22:29.080 --> 00:22:31.080
I mean, I think it is, but most people don't.

258
00:22:31.080 --> 00:22:35.080
Because it is conservative, not in a political sense,

259
00:22:35.080 --> 00:22:38.080
but it involves adhering to what got us where we are.

260
00:22:38.080 --> 00:22:42.080
It's more fun to talk about radically recreating the world in interesting ways.

261
00:22:42.080 --> 00:22:45.080
And it gives them an opportunity for the play of the imagination.

262
00:22:45.080 --> 00:22:48.080
Those who are unencumbered by much knowledge of facts,

263
00:22:48.080 --> 00:22:56.360
Tax. They tend to be disinterested in technical details or practical difficulties. If you

264
00:22:56.360 --> 00:23:01.600
haven't thought any of this stuff was funny yet, you might now. Here's an example of something

265
00:23:01.600 --> 00:23:07.640
that occurs regularly, a pretty frequent proposal was that somewhere out there there was a mathematical

266
00:23:07.640 --> 00:23:13.320
equation which if we just followed it, everything would be okay. In this case, this is the prosperity

267
00:23:13.320 --> 00:23:14.320
and Formula.

268
00:23:14.320 --> 00:23:20.200
It is actually, this author says, in seventh commandment of God, in economic matters, thou

269
00:23:20.200 --> 00:23:21.200
shall not steal.

270
00:23:21.200 --> 00:23:25.640
I actually agree with that, but anyway, it's an extreme beauty, not only those who are

271
00:23:25.640 --> 00:23:27.280
able to think, but will discover.

272
00:23:27.280 --> 00:23:32.000
So this book is full of equations, which of course, if you follow those, we would never

273
00:23:32.000 --> 00:23:35.840
have gotten into that situation in the first place.

274
00:23:35.840 --> 00:23:36.840
Here's another one.

275
00:23:36.840 --> 00:23:41.240
This guy, what was his name?

276
00:23:41.240 --> 00:23:42.240
I can't remember his name.

277
00:23:42.240 --> 00:23:45.040
The idea is planned obsolescence.

278
00:23:45.040 --> 00:23:46.680
So what happens in this system?

279
00:23:46.680 --> 00:23:53.120
Well, the way to spur consumption, which some authors attribute as the way to get the economy

280
00:23:53.120 --> 00:23:56.680
back on track, was to...

281
00:23:56.680 --> 00:23:59.080
The problem was that people were holding on to things for too long.

282
00:23:59.080 --> 00:24:05.640
So what they recommended is if the shoe manufacturer is having a bad quarter, he tells the government,

283
00:24:05.640 --> 00:24:06.640
my sales are down.

284
00:24:06.640 --> 00:24:10.160
And what the government then does is require you to turn in your shoes.

285
00:24:10.160 --> 00:24:14.040
You turn in your shoes and you get a ticket, and that ticket has a certain amount of money

286
00:24:14.040 --> 00:24:18.120
that you can use to offset the price of buying new shoes.

287
00:24:18.120 --> 00:24:22.200
You can only imagine how this would be abused.

288
00:24:22.200 --> 00:24:25.080
Every time I think about it, I think this is the government that couldn't run the cash

289
00:24:25.080 --> 00:24:27.800
for clunkers, something that every junkyard does anyway.

290
00:24:27.800 --> 00:24:32.320
They're going to do this to the entire economy?

291
00:24:32.320 --> 00:24:33.320
There are two here.

292
00:24:33.320 --> 00:24:35.640
The one on the left is the New Market Cities Plan.

293
00:24:35.640 --> 00:24:37.880
It will create permanent mass consumption.

294
00:24:37.880 --> 00:24:40.080
It's got to be true because it's all capitalized.

295
00:24:40.080 --> 00:24:47.400
And basically, what they proposed was that they take two million people and build more

296
00:24:47.400 --> 00:24:48.400
cities.

297
00:24:48.400 --> 00:24:49.400
Who's going to live in them?

298
00:24:49.400 --> 00:24:50.400
What's going to happen there?

299
00:24:50.400 --> 00:24:51.400
That's all.

300
00:24:51.400 --> 00:24:52.400
Those are later details.

301
00:24:52.400 --> 00:24:53.400
We're just going to build them.

302
00:24:53.400 --> 00:24:54.400
We're going to build cities.

303
00:24:54.400 --> 00:24:58.480
And this guy, Adolf Gang, recommended essentially that all savings be in the hand of the government

304
00:24:58.480 --> 00:25:03.200
because the notion of hoarding, that if you're not spending, you're not consuming, and that's

305
00:25:03.200 --> 00:25:07.080
keeping the economy down so that the government would essentially take control of all savings.

306
00:25:07.080 --> 00:25:09.360
A couple more.

307
00:25:09.360 --> 00:25:15.640
The one on the left is one of the ones here placing one of seven of our present charitable

308
00:25:15.640 --> 00:25:20.280
family cases on farms, just relocating people out to the countryside.

309
00:25:20.280 --> 00:25:24.460
And the interesting thing here is this was in some sense realized through the Resettlement

310
00:25:24.460 --> 00:25:26.440
Administration, which was run by Rexford Tugwell.

311
00:25:26.440 --> 00:25:27.880
I actually tried some of this.

312
00:25:27.880 --> 00:25:30.720
Also Eleanor Roosevelt's Pet Project, Arthordale.

313
00:25:30.720 --> 00:25:35.640
All of these were notions of resettlement of individuals out to the countryside, thinking,

314
00:25:35.640 --> 00:25:39.640
and I guess that they had to more evenly distribute the populace or something like that.

315
00:25:39.640 --> 00:25:45.640
And on the left is, this book is called Capitalism and Communism and Reconciliation.

316
00:25:45.640 --> 00:25:47.640
This is a great one.

317
00:25:47.640 --> 00:25:51.640
So this guy, this guy's a professor and he said, you know, there's really no way of determining

318
00:25:51.640 --> 00:25:53.640
whether communism or capitalism, which one is better.

319
00:25:53.640 --> 00:25:57.640
So why don't we have a great, a huge contest?

320
00:25:57.640 --> 00:26:04.640
So what he proposed was that there would be metrics proposed such as, you know, longevity and GDP

321
00:26:04.640 --> 00:26:09.620
and that the two governments would agree to not compete with each other, would compete

322
00:26:09.620 --> 00:26:15.200
over a period of 10 years, and then a winner would be declared.

323
00:26:15.200 --> 00:26:19.000
I can't even measure the levels of naivety it takes to think that one government would

324
00:26:19.000 --> 00:26:23.960
say, you're right, we lost, we'll step down.

325
00:26:23.960 --> 00:26:28.440
The loser's state would amicably just step to the side and say, it was a good contest,

326
00:26:28.440 --> 00:26:30.600
but that was his proposal.

327
00:26:30.600 --> 00:26:36.440
And, of course, no financial crisis would be complete without an appearance by the Malthusians

328
00:26:36.440 --> 00:26:44.360
and the Eugenicists, where this book has a chapter called Eugenics and Industry, and

329
00:26:44.360 --> 00:26:48.160
in one sense he agrees with all the other planners and popular economists of the Great

330
00:26:48.160 --> 00:26:53.040
Depression that the problem is overproduction, but he's overproduction of people in his case.

331
00:26:53.040 --> 00:27:01.640
So he certainly, he seeks to dampen that. And is this the two more? Meritism. Here's

332
00:27:01.640 --> 00:27:05.760
another good one. No more money. Let's get rid of money. It's a problem. Instead what

333
00:27:05.760 --> 00:27:11.400
we do is the government decides what you do, or rather what the point value is of what

334
00:27:11.400 --> 00:27:17.040
you do. So if you, you know, if you're a, if you're a doctor, you get a hundred points

335
00:27:47.040 --> 00:27:57.440
And here's the last one. There's a lot of talk and many references are made to war being

336
00:27:57.440 --> 00:28:08.580
a solution for a bad economy. And I was able to find one in this group of, in this universe

337
00:28:08.580 --> 00:28:15.800
of popular economists. This is a kind of mysterious army officer who recommended in 1935 that

338
00:28:15.800 --> 00:28:20.240
The best way to get out of the Great Depression would be to essentially wage war against

339
00:28:20.240 --> 00:28:27.200
Canada, Mexico and take control of the hemisphere from the North Pole to Panama.

340
00:28:27.200 --> 00:28:31.140
In case you think this is a bad idea, first of all, he says, a real American doesn't

341
00:28:31.140 --> 00:28:36.840
shudder and shrink at the notion of blood spilled on the sands of time, especially when

342
00:28:36.840 --> 00:28:39.440
great affairs are in the offing.

343
00:28:39.440 --> 00:28:44.220
But hopefully that comforts you, hopefully that will get you where you're going.

344
00:28:44.220 --> 00:28:48.620
It's also interesting that a huge part of this book is dedicated to fighting communism, but

345
00:28:48.620 --> 00:28:59.020
one of the core beliefs that communists hold about capitalism is the necessity of imperialism.

346
00:28:59.020 --> 00:29:07.020
So he's sort of playing right into their hands with this proposal.

347
00:29:07.020 --> 00:29:12.580
And just in closing, I was just going to say, I mean, today, these are all recent images

348
00:29:12.580 --> 00:29:18.300
and such. These ideas are live and well. The professional thinkers are going to be with

349
00:29:18.300 --> 00:29:24.100
us in every economic environment. And you can see echoes of all these guys. For example,

350
00:29:24.100 --> 00:29:29.780
I don't know if any of you are familiar with Larry Kudlow on CNBC. Well, for years, Larry

351
00:29:29.780 --> 00:29:34.200
has been saying that he's a free marketeer and all that. In September, maybe the week

352
00:29:34.200 --> 00:29:42.540
before Lehman fell down, he threw his weight behind Paulson, saying, you know, echoing

353
00:30:12.540 --> 00:30:16.540
are effectively the battle for ideas. Thank you.
