WEBVTT

NOTE The Master Race: Racialist Legacies of Progressivism

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:09.000
I'm looking at the progressive era and the whole racial atmosphere that they created.

2
00:00:09.000 --> 00:00:14.000
By the way, I have a co-author, David Kiriatsis, who's our department chair at Frostberg State.

3
00:00:14.000 --> 00:00:19.000
He's from Detroit, and as you can see, if you want to talk about affirmative action, you can see Detroit.

4
00:00:19.000 --> 00:00:26.000
And I think you will understand that things can get very, very interesting.

5
00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:29.000
A lot of historians have looked at the progressives.

6
00:00:29.000 --> 00:00:34.800
If you read the progressives, if you know the things that they said, you know that these guys were just out and out, hardcore racists.

7
00:00:34.800 --> 00:00:44.800
I mean, they said things, it was very polite to say things back then that you would lose your job for today, or worse, and how historians treated them.

8
00:00:46.040 --> 00:00:57.840
Historians have admitted these people are racist, but it was a blind spot, because after all, they were giving us great economic reforms.

9
00:00:57.840 --> 00:01:03.840
They were for the consumer, they were for the worker, they were for goodness and everything else.

10
00:01:03.840 --> 00:01:10.840
And so the racism that accompanied the progressive era and the whole progressive movement

11
00:01:10.840 --> 00:01:22.840
was seen as just kind of a blind spot, something that grew up as a natural extension from the post-Civil War South.

12
00:01:22.840 --> 00:01:42.840
All right. In other words, that you had these feelings already, and it just sort of like grew like a slow movement, and finally by the 1890s, it just got worse and worse, and in around 1900, late 1800s, 1900 around there, now we start going into what we call Jim Crow.

13
00:01:42.840 --> 00:01:51.240
Well, here's an interesting editorial that, and I don't have time, it was, the news

14
00:01:51.240 --> 00:01:58.940
and courier in 1898 argued against the passage of a law in South Carolina to segregate rail

15
00:01:58.940 --> 00:02:04.160
cars. And their reasoning was this, you know, if we could do this, yeah, why don't we just,

16
00:02:04.160 --> 00:02:08.200
hey, why don't we have Jim Crow Bibles? Yeah, that's it. And they start, why don't we have

17
00:02:08.200 --> 00:02:27.200
Jim Crow Waiting Rooms, and bathrooms, and Jim Crow Water Place, and they went on, it was a reducio ad absurdum argument, and at the end of the decade, you had all those things, including the Jim Crow Bibles to kiss, for witnesses testifying in court.

18
00:02:27.200 --> 00:02:34.200
As they said, we've got along fairly well for a third of a century, including a long period of construction, we'll probably get on as well hereafter.

19
00:02:34.200 --> 00:02:40.200
and certainly not so extreme a measure should not be adopted in force without added and urgent cause.

20
00:02:40.200 --> 00:02:45.200
And at the time, it wasn't seen as any kind of added or urgent cause.

21
00:02:45.200 --> 00:02:52.200
Now, here's an interesting thing. I found a quote, you know, that turned out that Nathan Bedford Forrest,

22
00:02:52.200 --> 00:02:59.200
who of course is always vilified as the apostle of the worst kind of racism because he was the original,

23
00:02:59.200 --> 00:03:04.400
or one of the original founders of the Ku Klux Klan in 1868.

24
00:03:04.400 --> 00:03:08.560
If you read that, and I don't feel like I need to read the whole thing and take up all this time,

25
00:03:08.560 --> 00:03:18.400
but nonetheless, that you can see from there, this is not exactly a speech that is there to incite racial hatreds.

26
00:03:18.400 --> 00:03:19.400
What is he saying?

27
00:03:19.400 --> 00:03:28.760
You know, that, you know, do whatever you want, vote, you know, we're having, you know,

28
00:03:28.760 --> 00:03:37.480
enfranchisement. He wasn't talking about not letting them vote. He says that, I came to meet you as

29
00:03:37.480 --> 00:03:43.560
friends and welcome you to the white people. I want you to come near to us. And we made different

30
00:03:43.560 --> 00:03:50.480
in color but not in sentiment, and on and on, and so, and when you are oppressed, I'll

31
00:03:50.480 --> 00:03:51.480
come to your relief.

32
00:03:51.480 --> 00:03:58.520
Now, again, this, if you read the usual stuff, of course, in the New York Times about Nathan

33
00:03:58.520 --> 00:04:01.240
Bedford Forrest, that never quite makes it.

34
00:04:01.240 --> 00:04:05.640
It doesn't fit the Times paradigm, and as you know, the New York Times will go to great

35
00:04:05.640 --> 00:04:10.080
lengths to push their own paradigm even if the facts don't jive.

36
00:04:10.080 --> 00:04:16.160
Alright, now, let's look at the progressives, okay, this is Irving Fisher, alright, one

37
00:04:16.160 --> 00:04:27.800
of the most important US economists, alright, and now he was talking about the immigration

38
00:04:27.800 --> 00:04:32.840
but then he goes on, you know, that the core of immigration is one of race and eugenics,

39
00:04:32.840 --> 00:04:39.120
the problem of the Anglo-Saxon racial stock being overwhelmed by racially inferior defectives,

40
00:04:39.120 --> 00:04:46.000
and Delinquents and Dependents, and on and on. In fact, a number of progressives were

41
00:04:46.000 --> 00:04:52.580
very much into eugenics, including Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood. What

42
00:04:52.580 --> 00:04:57.080
she wanted to do was have birth control to, quote, eliminate the entire Negro race. And

43
00:04:57.080 --> 00:05:04.080
she said, we need to get the black pastors to help us do this. And I don't have her in

44
00:05:04.080 --> 00:05:18.560
Edward A. Ross, yet another one of the founders of the American Economics Association

45
00:05:18.560 --> 00:05:22.640
The theory that the races are virtually equal in capacity leads to such monumental follies

46
00:05:22.640 --> 00:05:26.440
as lying in the valleys of the south with the bones of half a million picked whites

47
00:05:26.440 --> 00:05:33.200
in order to improve the condition of four million unpicked blacks.

48
00:05:33.200 --> 00:05:41.080
Frank Fetter, yes. In fact, in the very book that Jeff had talked about yesterday, he also

49
00:05:41.080 --> 00:05:46.920
has that the benefits of social progress are being neutralized by race degeneration owing

50
00:05:46.920 --> 00:05:50.960
to the suspension of the selective process. In other words, we've got to have eugenics.

51
00:05:50.960 --> 00:05:57.080
All right, now why do I bring this in? Because these are prominent people. These are not

52
00:05:57.080 --> 00:06:01.920
rednecks. These are not, you know, good old boy with the University of Alabama cap on

53
00:06:01.920 --> 00:06:22.640
Let's look at perhaps the most glorified of all progressives, and that's President Woodrow

54
00:06:22.640 --> 00:06:23.640
Wilson.

55
00:06:23.640 --> 00:06:30.120
Woodrow Wilson not only hated the Constitution, but in fact, when he came into office, it

56
00:06:30.120 --> 00:06:34.440
was announced Negroes should be expected to be treated as a servile race and then they

57
00:06:34.440 --> 00:06:42.060
had it was Wilson that really, really brought Jim Crow to the federal government in a way

58
00:06:42.060 --> 00:06:45.040
that nobody else had done before.

59
00:06:45.040 --> 00:06:51.920
And furthermore, the Congress, the Congress from 1913 to 1915, the same Congress that

60
00:06:51.920 --> 00:06:56.200
gives us of course all of these other wonderful things including the Federal Reserve that

61
00:06:56.200 --> 00:07:09.200
from 1913 to 1915, that Congress put through more racially discriminatory laws than any other Congress in the history of this country.

62
00:07:09.200 --> 00:07:23.200
And you look at some of the things that were done, these folks, let me tell you that these guys probably would have made Bull Connor look like a liberal.

63
00:07:23.200 --> 00:07:46.200
And of course we know that during that time lynching, it's very interesting because lynching goes from sort of a way to deal with different people, in fact more whites than blacks were lynched in the South long after the Civil War, but then getting to the progressive era, it starts to change.

64
00:07:46.200 --> 00:08:14.200
Now, you've got, of course, the Jim Crow laws that these were taken from later, but you've got that from Durham, North Carolina, a bus station there, the drinking, well, the old drinking place, that would have been at the workplace, but you had all of the, you know, this was an apartheid system, alright?

65
00:08:14.200 --> 00:08:22.360
Now, the theme of my paper though is not simply about what these guys believe because we already

66
00:08:22.360 --> 00:08:23.360
know this.

67
00:08:23.360 --> 00:08:28.200
I mean, I'm not telling people things that they didn't know about already.

68
00:08:28.200 --> 00:08:34.920
The people understand this, but what I want to do and what we do in this paper is we take

69
00:08:34.920 --> 00:08:42.420
on this whole blind spot thing because what we say is that the progressives had method

70
00:08:42.420 --> 00:08:49.860
to their madness, to their blindness, whatever, that the progressives actually did this on

71
00:08:49.860 --> 00:08:57.100
purpose because this was part and parcel to their economic reforms. Keep in mind, when

72
00:08:57.100 --> 00:09:04.520
I say reforms, I use that word very, very lightly. Now, so do we laud the reforms but

73
00:09:04.520 --> 00:09:11.340
condemn the racism? Okay. Now, what we're doing is really coming up with an alternative

74
00:09:11.340 --> 00:09:14.240
Theory.

75
00:09:14.240 --> 00:09:17.260
What is it that's going on progressivism?

76
00:09:17.260 --> 00:09:18.760
We hear all sorts of praise.

77
00:09:18.760 --> 00:09:25.080
Those progressives, they gave us occupational licensing and credentialing.

78
00:09:25.080 --> 00:09:28.620
That was one of the things with the Rockefellers.

79
00:09:28.620 --> 00:09:31.000
They were great believers in credentialing.

80
00:09:31.000 --> 00:09:32.560
We have the rise of John Dewey.

81
00:09:32.560 --> 00:09:37.200
You have the rise of professional classes that you have to go to certain kinds of school

82
00:09:37.200 --> 00:09:39.300
to go there.

83
00:09:39.300 --> 00:09:49.480
We really start quote professionalizing things and also using the law as a means to select

84
00:09:49.480 --> 00:09:53.240
who is going to go into certain kinds of occupations.

85
00:09:53.240 --> 00:09:57.500
That was really not the case in the United States before the progressive era.

86
00:09:57.500 --> 00:10:02.020
So we're talking about individual workers, but we're also talking about the kinds of

87
00:10:02.020 --> 00:10:07.200
regulation we see from antitrust regulation and I think the economists in this room who

88
00:10:07.200 --> 00:10:31.200
The Interstate Commerce Act and the regulation of the railroads and later trucking and airlines and all these things that came out of progressivism, what were they doing, all right?

89
00:10:31.200 --> 00:10:38.200
To most of the intelligentsia, they were reforming.

90
00:10:38.200 --> 00:10:44.200
To an economist, they're creating economic rents.

91
00:10:44.200 --> 00:10:46.200
Let me go back.

92
00:10:46.200 --> 00:10:54.200
What they're doing is they're dividing, creating economic rents that are now being enforced,

93
00:10:54.200 --> 00:10:57.200
not by entrepreneurship in the market.

94
00:10:57.200 --> 00:11:27.200
In other words, that if somebody has a rent, and entrepreneurs can take advantage, they can see those rents, and they can, you can try to move into that area, but with progressivism, people had economic rents that were protected by the state, whether it's through licensing, through regulation, and the like, and so, and in fact, one of the things

95
00:11:27.200 --> 00:11:57.200
and the things that Roderick had made a point that I don't have this up here that we need to point out that also the businessmen of the progressive era, the Andrew Carnegie's and the Henry Clay Fricks and others, ended up buying into progressivism, alright, the great entrepreneurs ended up getting into this whole we're captains of industry and that there's some sort of special dispensation. And so, you know, the whole country gets taken over by this stuff, unfortunately.

96
00:11:57.200 --> 00:12:04.880
And so what happens is this, that political rents have to be distributed politically.

97
00:12:04.880 --> 00:12:07.840
You don't have economic competition for political rents.

98
00:12:07.840 --> 00:12:08.840
It doesn't work that way.

99
00:12:08.840 --> 00:12:11.320
The political classes never allow that.

100
00:12:11.320 --> 00:12:14.440
You have to go at it in a different way.

101
00:12:14.440 --> 00:12:19.460
And so what happens when you create these rents, what are you doing?

102
00:12:19.460 --> 00:12:23.280
You are shrinking the economy.

103
00:12:23.280 --> 00:12:24.280
You really are.

104
00:12:24.280 --> 00:12:29.640
There's no way that you can put these added burdens upon economic activity and have more

105
00:12:29.640 --> 00:12:30.880
economic activity.

106
00:12:30.880 --> 00:12:37.920
I mean, anybody who thinks that should embrace Obamacare.

107
00:12:37.920 --> 00:12:44.320
So what happens is that now that you're causing things to shrink, you now set up a system

108
00:12:44.320 --> 00:12:46.780
of competition.

109
00:12:46.780 --> 00:12:47.780
What do we mean?

110
00:12:47.780 --> 00:12:53.040
A system of competition with political rents where you have winners and you have losers.

111
00:12:53.040 --> 00:12:56.720
Who's going to be the winner? Who's going to be the loser? How do you do this? How do

112
00:12:56.720 --> 00:13:04.380
you do these things? Jim Crow laws not only kept blacks out of occupations, which it previously

113
00:13:04.380 --> 00:13:08.440
worked. Now what happened, look at the propaganda coming out there. Oh, well, they're feeble-minded.

114
00:13:08.440 --> 00:13:13.540
Well, you know, they weren't so feeble-minded when they were doing this work before. But

115
00:13:13.540 --> 00:13:20.540
also, look at what happened. You have widespread disenfranchisement, okay? Because what happens

116
00:13:20.540 --> 00:13:26.380
in these systems where you have political spoils. What you were talking about before,

117
00:13:26.380 --> 00:13:31.460
that what Stalin was doing was creating political spoils. You've got to have a mechanism for

118
00:13:31.460 --> 00:13:37.300
being able to distribute these. How do you do it? Well, with the blacks, the idea was

119
00:13:37.300 --> 00:13:43.700
this, get them out of the picture. Push them out of the way, make them do menial work.

120
00:13:43.700 --> 00:13:49.860
You'll love this. I can't remember if I have it up here if I do. Let me give you an

121
00:13:49.860 --> 00:14:19.860
Minimum wage. What were the progressives saying about the minimum wage? When told that it's going to knock some people out of the labor market, it's going to price people out of the market, they said, good! These are feeble-minded people, they really shouldn't be in the workplace anyway, they shouldn't be allowed to be around here, and so this is a really good thing. If we can just impose this minimum wage, we can

122
00:14:19.860 --> 00:14:34.860
This is an administrative view of an entire economy. It's the idea that we can have some sort of state control, divide everybody up into different groups and call it progress.

123
00:14:34.860 --> 00:14:47.360
And so, in my, you know, that we do conclude that these Jim Crow laws, these were not blind spots.

124
00:14:47.360 --> 00:14:56.060
What they were, were nothing more than cold-blooded attempts, basically, to make these economic reforms work.

125
00:14:56.060 --> 00:15:03.760
How do you make them work? Well, you shut people out, you make sure that people cannot participate in the workplace,

126
00:15:03.760 --> 00:15:08.680
and you give yourself some sort of grandiose rhetoric about the whole thing

127
00:15:08.680 --> 00:15:11.680
and you call it progressivism. Thank you.
