WEBVTT

NOTE Turning the World Upside Down: Cantillon and the Meaning of Entrepreneurship

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.420
Good morning, everyone. My name is Chris Brown. I appreciate you coming here, and I'm glad

2
00:00:04.420 --> 00:00:08.960
that I'm able to wear a suit today. My luggage got here just a couple of days ago. I flew

3
00:00:08.960 --> 00:00:12.880
Air New Zealand, and it was a wonderful flight. They had great movies, great entertainment.

4
00:00:12.880 --> 00:00:17.560
I'd always flown here from Australia on United, because it's always the cheapest, and that's

5
00:00:17.560 --> 00:00:23.080
because they only have the one movie screen. So it was great to have my own personal screen.

6
00:00:23.080 --> 00:00:28.420
The only thing missing from the flight was my luggage. So that's the excuse for my casual

7
00:00:28.420 --> 00:00:37.420
I'm from the Australian Graduate School of Entrepreneurship at Swinburne University, which is near Melbourne, Australia.

8
00:00:37.420 --> 00:00:43.420
I teach and lecture in entrepreneurship and just sometimes in economics.

9
00:00:43.420 --> 00:00:54.420
I incorporate actually a lot of Cantillon into my entrepreneurship classes, and I think he's a good foundation for economics and especially for entrepreneurship.

10
00:00:54.420 --> 00:01:03.420
and Entrepreneurship. And it's a very fruitful area, not only in economics, I think, but especially in entrepreneurship, because people usually know what you're talking about when you talk about Kant-John.

11
00:01:03.420 --> 00:01:15.420
So, an overview of our presentation, and I should just let you know that Mark will be presenting as well. I sort of feel like a bad warm-up act to the main event, because Mark's the expert.

12
00:01:15.420 --> 00:01:23.020
He mentioned here that he oversaw the translation of the new essay on economic theory by Cantillon.

13
00:01:23.020 --> 00:01:28.820
So, overview of the presentation. I'm going to go over the French term entrepreneur,

14
00:01:28.820 --> 00:01:36.020
and I won't try and butcher the language, but I'll go over the term and how it was used starting in the 12th century,

15
00:01:36.020 --> 00:01:42.820
and then how Cantillon used the term and changed its meaning, or as we say, turned it upside down, he flipped its meaning.

16
00:01:42.820 --> 00:02:06.820
And then Mark's going to go over some reasons why this might be the case in terms of looking at Cantillon's three career phases in his life and how his career, how the change in meaning of the term entrepreneur can be reflected by his career and the way he used the term significantly impacted those of the school of the physiocrats and then how we sort of understand the term today.

17
00:02:06.820 --> 00:02:12.100
all right so looking at the term there we've got the 12th century where it's

18
00:02:12.100 --> 00:02:16.660
very general which is to do something which it's okay being general because

19
00:02:16.660 --> 00:02:21.740
Mises also uses the term very generally in a way that we're all entrepreneurs

20
00:02:21.740 --> 00:02:26.500
acting under conditions of uncertainty and this is what it meant in the 12th

21
00:02:26.500 --> 00:02:31.660
century later on sort of the same thing and the 14th person who assumed some

22
00:02:31.660 --> 00:02:34.980
task and what this really means during the Middle Ages was someone who built

23
00:02:34.980 --> 00:02:40.880
Religious buildings such as cathedrals or abbeys, which I found pretty interesting.

24
00:02:40.880 --> 00:02:44.580
We don't usually think of the entrepreneur in that sense, but even more interesting might

25
00:02:44.580 --> 00:02:48.660
be on the 16th, we've got violent war-like action.

26
00:02:48.660 --> 00:02:54.140
So some of the Trojan warriors, for example, in the French literature were referred to

27
00:02:54.140 --> 00:02:58.800
as entrepreneurs, and others during the 16th century would say that these entrepreneurs

28
00:02:58.800 --> 00:03:05.260
Entrepreneurs are hardy, usurping, and intent to risk their lives and fortunes.

29
00:03:05.260 --> 00:03:10.760
And then we've got also, now in the 17th century, we've got the French terms there, which I

30
00:03:10.760 --> 00:03:17.040
won't pronounce, but we've got that first one, which also means one who undertakes something,

31
00:03:17.040 --> 00:03:20.520
but then the next one is someone who works as a contractor, and we get into this notion

32
00:03:20.520 --> 00:03:22.600
of the entrepreneur as a contractor.

33
00:03:22.600 --> 00:03:35.600
And of course we get from that term, redemptor, however you pronounce it, redeemer, and that has a Christian meaning of someone who enters into a contract, for example, or a covenant.

34
00:03:35.600 --> 00:03:45.600
So, later on in the 17th century, we've got undertaker of a construction project which is this idea of contracting with the government, right?

35
00:03:45.600 --> 00:04:00.600
So an entrepreneur was someone who engaged in a construction project, contracted with the government, which is significant because the price of the contract was fixed, so the costs are what was uncertain.

36
00:04:00.600 --> 00:04:13.600
So costs were uncertain, price was fixed, therefore the entrepreneur had to minimize those costs as much as possible to obtain a profit, and if not they would make a loss.

37
00:04:13.600 --> 00:04:18.600
Whereas we'll see later that Cantillon flipped this or reversed this.

38
00:04:18.600 --> 00:04:26.600
Okay, this was also in the French legal and economic literature, you can read this, that it was mainly a government contractor.

39
00:04:26.600 --> 00:04:34.600
But then later on in the 18th century, keeping in mind that Cantillon's essay was published in 1755,

40
00:04:34.600 --> 00:04:38.600
we've got not only a contractor but someone who undertakes substantial projects.

41
00:04:38.600 --> 00:04:46.200
Projects. By that I mean public works mainly, so buildings, roads, canals, bridges, these

42
00:04:46.200 --> 00:04:54.320
sorts of things. It's really interesting because at this time as well, the division of labor

43
00:04:54.320 --> 00:05:01.700
becomes more obvious, or greater, or more recognized in France. And there's the creation

44
00:05:01.700 --> 00:05:10.380
of the Academy of Architecture, which you might think of as sort of the modern day Academy

45
00:05:10.380 --> 00:05:15.460
of, what is it, the AMA, Medical Association, right?

46
00:05:15.460 --> 00:05:18.360
So let me read you this from Hosselitz.

47
00:05:18.360 --> 00:05:23.640
This is his classic 1951 article, which is very difficult to find, but may I point out

48
00:05:23.640 --> 00:05:27.240
that it's on Peter Klein's website, and that's the only place I could find it.

49
00:05:27.240 --> 00:05:35.160
So, he says, the architects, let me point out before I read you the quote, at the time

50
00:05:35.160 --> 00:05:38.560
the entrepreneurs did everything, they were pretty much the architects, they were those

51
00:05:38.560 --> 00:05:43.120
who oversaw the labor and the construction of the projects and what not, Toselit says,

52
00:05:43.120 --> 00:05:47.640
the architects especially felt that their services were of a higher quality than those

53
00:05:47.640 --> 00:05:51.080
of ordinary master masons or contractors.

54
00:05:51.080 --> 00:05:55.840
This sentiment was enhanced in France by the formation of an academy of architecture and

55
00:05:55.840 --> 00:06:03.240
And in 1676, entrepreneurs, master masons in the building trade were prohibited from

56
00:06:03.240 --> 00:06:09.080
adopting the designation architect of the king, or king's architects, an appellation

57
00:06:09.080 --> 00:06:13.760
which was reserved to those men whom the king had chosen to compose this academy of architecture

58
00:06:13.760 --> 00:06:17.560
to which only outstanding artists were admitted.

59
00:06:17.560 --> 00:06:35.560
Okay, so then later it becomes more of this, again, sort of this mythology of the entrepreneur becoming, you know, bold and daring and dashing and sort of Richard Branson or Bill Gates-ish.

60
00:06:35.560 --> 00:06:39.560
Okay, or maybe the Schumpeter notion of the entrepreneur.

61
00:06:39.560 --> 00:06:48.560
And then we also have now Undertaker of a Business Project, so it's starting to become different, and obviously now we're after Cantillon's essay.

62
00:06:48.560 --> 00:06:56.560
In this 1872 version of the French Dictionary, it references Condiac and Jean-Baptiste Say.

63
00:06:56.560 --> 00:07:03.560
And we know that at least Condiac was heavily influenced by Cantillon, and in his work he wrote,

64
00:07:03.560 --> 00:07:10.060
I have drawn the basis of this chapter from Cantillon's essay and several observations of which I have made in other chapters.

65
00:07:10.060 --> 00:07:13.060
It is one of the best works I know on this subject.

66
00:07:13.060 --> 00:07:20.560
Schumpeter later wrote that nobody before Cantillon had formulated it so fully, referring to the theory of entrepreneurship.

67
00:07:20.560 --> 00:07:26.560
Okay, so let's now take a look at the way Cantillon formulated his theory.

68
00:07:26.560 --> 00:07:31.560
So let me just give an example. He mentions the entrepreneur over a hundred times in his essay.

69
00:07:31.560 --> 00:07:34.760
And there's three main economic actors in the essay.

70
00:07:34.760 --> 00:07:46.260
You've got landowners, where demand comes from, so all entrepreneurs are trying to meet the wishes and tastes and needs of the landowners,

71
00:07:46.260 --> 00:07:49.260
and then you've got the entrepreneurs, and then you've got wage laborers.

72
00:07:49.260 --> 00:07:57.260
And the difference between the entrepreneurs and the laborers are that the laborer is on a fixed wage and the entrepreneurs are on an unfixed wage.

73
00:07:57.260 --> 00:08:09.260
And to me, this seemingly simple or small detail is quite significant in terms of entrepreneurship education, which I'll get to in a minute in the conclusions.

74
00:08:09.260 --> 00:08:13.260
Okay, so Cantillon gives the example of the farmer-entrepreneur.

75
00:08:13.260 --> 00:08:25.260
This farmer-entrepreneur coordinates with the manufacturer-entrepreneur, and there's uncertainty between the present and future.

76
00:08:25.260 --> 00:08:42.260
And for the farmer entrepreneur, Cantillon lists not only is there uncertainty and risk in terms of if a sale will even take place, but obviously in the future the prices are uncertain and this is now flipping the government contractor where the prices were fixed.

77
00:08:42.260 --> 00:08:53.260
So there's no guarantee of profit or loss because of this uncertain future between the two and we see entrepreneurs all along the supply chain.

78
00:08:53.260 --> 00:09:07.260
The same thing occurs with the manufacturer-entrepreneur, the middleman-entrepreneur, profit and loss, uncertainty between present and future, and Cantillon really mentions two main types of risks, right, barring any government bailouts, you would have bankruptcy or starvation.

79
00:09:07.260 --> 00:09:20.260
Okay, later economists of the physiocrat school were influenced by Cantillon, especially Canet, who uses this term three times in his work.

80
00:09:20.260 --> 00:09:29.260
He talks about the operator of a large farm or a businessman or one who supervises labor but does not participate in the labor process.

81
00:09:29.260 --> 00:09:35.260
So with that, let me turn the time over to Mark to talk about Cantillon's three career phases.

82
00:09:39.260 --> 00:09:41.260
Thank you, Chris. Hi, everyone.

83
00:09:41.260 --> 00:10:05.260
What we're basically arguing is that the term entrepreneur changes dramatically from one of a government contractor to the modern term of entrepreneurship, which is someone who is working at risk, who's buying inputs, putting them together in some way, and selling them at an uncertain price in the near future.

84
00:10:05.260 --> 00:10:15.760
And one of the things that we suggest is that his career was influential in this changing of the term.

85
00:10:15.760 --> 00:10:22.260
Cantillon was a banker. He was born an Irish Catholic in Ireland.

86
00:10:22.260 --> 00:10:28.760
His family estates, the ownership of his family's estates were taken by Cromwell.

87
00:10:28.760 --> 00:10:39.760
And so when he reached the age of majority, young adult, there was not much to do in Ireland because they had lost their land.

88
00:10:39.760 --> 00:10:47.760
And so he moved with his brother Bernard to Paris and he started working in his older cousin's bank.

89
00:10:47.760 --> 00:10:54.760
And he was given the account of the British Paymaster General for the War Department.

90
00:10:54.760 --> 00:11:04.760
So, why do you think the British Paymaster General would have their account in an Irish Catholic bank?

91
00:11:08.760 --> 00:11:16.760
Well, apparently he was very successful at what he did, and he was soon approached by the British Paymaster General

92
00:11:16.760 --> 00:11:22.760
and given a job as a clerk in the British Paymaster General's office in Madrid, Spain.

93
00:11:22.760 --> 00:11:26.600
And what had been going on is the War of Spanish Succession.

94
00:11:26.600 --> 00:11:29.680
So Britain, France, Spain, Austria, the Netherlands

95
00:11:29.680 --> 00:11:31.120
were all at war.

96
00:11:31.120 --> 00:11:33.760
British troops were in Spain.

97
00:11:33.760 --> 00:11:35.520
British prisoners were in Spain.

98
00:11:35.520 --> 00:11:39.480
And they had to be paid for by the British War Department.

99
00:11:39.480 --> 00:11:44.560
Money had to be sent to Madrid.

100
00:11:44.560 --> 00:11:49.360
Goods and services had to be bought for the troops

101
00:11:49.360 --> 00:11:52.440
to provision those troops.

102
00:11:52.440 --> 00:12:14.440
So what essentially is going on is that the British Paymaster General is getting money for the British government, sending it to a bank in Madrid, who is then giving the money to the Assistant Paymaster General in Spain, and then food, clothing and so forth, the pay of the soldiers is then doled out.

103
00:12:14.440 --> 00:12:19.840
He's working, the British Paymaster General at the time was James Bridges, who was known

104
00:12:19.840 --> 00:12:26.840
in history as the most successful war privateer of the age, and essentially what was going

105
00:12:26.840 --> 00:12:34.400
on is all of these guys were on the take, the regiments, the officers, the whole process

106
00:12:34.400 --> 00:12:42.200
was one of graft and corruption, and Cantillon was a very successful employee of this operation.

107
00:12:42.200 --> 00:12:47.780
He came up with the idea of two sets of books, where the money would come into the Paymaster

108
00:12:47.780 --> 00:12:53.820
General's office, into the Paymaster General's account.

109
00:12:53.820 --> 00:13:00.780
Then they would be used to buy goods and services for the troops by a shadow company who would

110
00:13:00.780 --> 00:13:08.400
then sell those provisions to the army at marked up prices.

111
00:13:08.400 --> 00:13:16.080
So it's very similar to today where Halliburton buys a gallon of gasoline in the United States,

112
00:13:16.080 --> 00:13:25.200
ships it over to Afghanistan, and it goes from $3 a gallon to $500 a gallon.

113
00:13:25.200 --> 00:13:29.960
So it's very much a very corrupt affair.

114
00:13:29.960 --> 00:13:38.240
After the war, he's greatly rewarded by Bridges for his services, the two sets of books idea,

115
00:13:38.240 --> 00:13:45.440
and his silence, because the British government was after bridges for graft and corruption,

116
00:13:45.440 --> 00:13:50.960
but Cantillon was able to cover the whole thing up.

117
00:13:50.960 --> 00:13:55.640
So he takes that money and goes into banking in Paris.

118
00:13:55.640 --> 00:14:02.640
He's very successful working, lending money, cashing bills of exchange for people.

119
00:14:02.640 --> 00:14:08.600
As was the main business of, you get a bill of exchange from a London bank, take it with

120
00:14:08.600 --> 00:14:14.120
you to a Paris bank and then cash it in for silver coins whenever you needed it.

121
00:14:14.120 --> 00:14:20.760
And so that was the main role of banking, but the banks also lent money to businesses

122
00:14:20.760 --> 00:14:26.760
and Cantino talks about that process and the various types of businesses that he was familiar

123
00:14:26.760 --> 00:14:33.240
with Making Loans II.

124
00:14:33.240 --> 00:14:38.720
And this is where he sort of understood the idea that, you know, you were always at risk.

125
00:14:38.720 --> 00:14:40.480
You were at risk lending money.

126
00:14:40.480 --> 00:14:44.720
You were at risk changing bills of exchange.

127
00:14:44.720 --> 00:14:48.000
The businesses themselves were at risk.

128
00:14:48.000 --> 00:14:54.320
All of this is used, all of this analysis is used in his analysis of usury laws, which

129
00:14:54.320 --> 00:15:00.320
which he sees as only harmful to the economy.

130
00:15:00.320 --> 00:15:05.960
And then finally, Cantillon was involved

131
00:15:05.960 --> 00:15:08.800
in John Law's Mississippi Company and the Mississippi

132
00:15:08.800 --> 00:15:10.920
Bubble.

133
00:15:10.920 --> 00:15:12.920
He was an integral part.

134
00:15:12.920 --> 00:15:15.160
He was hired by John Law.

135
00:15:15.160 --> 00:15:18.800
He set up with Bernard an expedition to Louisiana

136
00:15:18.800 --> 00:15:23.440
to actually try to exploit the Mississippi Company.

137
00:15:23.440 --> 00:15:29.860
He made tons of money on the way up, selling short on the way down, and making another

138
00:15:29.860 --> 00:15:33.420
fortune in foreign exchange.

139
00:15:33.420 --> 00:15:40.260
So he understood the whole thing, and he understood it basically as a government racket, as something

140
00:15:40.260 --> 00:15:42.440
that was completely contrived.

141
00:15:42.440 --> 00:15:48.640
The Mississippi Company actually was the tax collector, the central bank, and the owner

142
00:15:48.640 --> 00:15:52.540
of all the colonial overseas properties of France.

143
00:15:52.540 --> 00:15:58.660
So he has these three career moves, one as a government contractor, then as a banker,

144
00:15:58.660 --> 00:16:04.860
and then finally as sort of a government contractor working within this combination of central

145
00:16:04.860 --> 00:16:08.860
bank, IRS, and overseas empire.

146
00:16:08.860 --> 00:16:17.060
And I think what we find is that as the government contractor in Spain, the government contractor

147
00:16:17.060 --> 00:16:23.900
in the Mississippi bubble were very corrupt practices, they didn't necessarily have to

148
00:16:23.900 --> 00:16:32.360
exist and they weren't a part of the normal, well-regulated function in the economy, whereas

149
00:16:32.360 --> 00:16:41.020
a typical bank was different. It was an entrepreneurial venture, everything was truly at risk, just

150
00:16:41.020 --> 00:16:49.100
This is the general entrepreneurial category of people buying fixed prices for their cost

151
00:16:49.100 --> 00:16:56.940
of production and selling at risk uncertain prices in the marketplace.

152
00:16:56.940 --> 00:17:03.940
So that's basically our conclusions is that we think that Cantillon's career experiences

153
00:17:03.940 --> 00:17:08.940
influenced his understanding of what the entrepreneur was and what it wasn't.

154
00:17:08.940 --> 00:17:17.940
Chris, do you have any things to finish up with?

155
00:17:17.940 --> 00:17:27.940
Sure, I guess I would just say coming from the entrepreneurship perspective in terms of teaching entrepreneurship,

156
00:17:27.940 --> 00:17:38.940
I would say that this has quite an impact on entrepreneurship education in terms of how we think about the entrepreneur and what we teach.

157
00:17:38.940 --> 00:17:54.940
So for me, my PhD work looks at entrepreneurship education and I argue that to understand what should be taught, we have to understand what the entrepreneur actually does or what the function or role of the entrepreneur is.

158
00:17:54.940 --> 00:18:01.900
And if it's sort of as ubiquitous as Cantillon points out that it's anyone on an unfixed wage,

159
00:18:01.900 --> 00:18:09.100
then that's not just someone who engages in bold business behavior or makes decisions,

160
00:18:09.100 --> 00:18:15.420
but a whole host of activities from finance to marketing to creativity to innovation to ideas,

161
00:18:15.420 --> 00:18:17.980
whether ideas or opportunities and whatnot.

162
00:18:17.980 --> 00:18:24.340
I also think we talk about in the paper the danger of public-private partnerships

163
00:18:24.340 --> 00:18:28.660
where these contracts are entered into when the price is fixed

164
00:18:28.660 --> 00:18:31.460
in the future or if it's cost plus pricing even worse

165
00:18:31.460 --> 00:18:36.460
where there's a guaranteed profit margin and how this causes

166
00:18:36.460 --> 00:18:39.260
inefficiencies and things like that.

167
00:18:39.260 --> 00:18:42.260
Thank you very much.

168
00:18:42.260 --> 00:18:44.260
Thank you very much.
