WEBVTT

NOTE The Dynamic Structure of Human Action

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.000
Ladies and gentlemen, it's a pleasure and honor being here. I'm sorry about the technical problems

2
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:10.000
that I'm an Austrian economist, so I'm going to talk about philosophy.

3
00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:17.000
I'm going to talk about the dynamic structure of human action and the overview because

4
00:00:17.000 --> 00:00:25.000
I would like to start for a real problem on how to use Mises' theory of human action.

5
00:00:25.000 --> 00:00:34.000
And there are five points. The first, this is action of action, the structure of ends and means, individual action within its sociocultural framework,

6
00:00:34.000 --> 00:00:40.000
five, entrepreneurship as creativity, and the last one, the morality of the market.

7
00:00:40.000 --> 00:00:53.000
The third point is our real economic problem, because the current crisis with its constant corporate and financial scandals is having a very dangerous effect.

8
00:00:53.000 --> 00:00:59.000
It's calling into question the role of the market economy and the importance of the firm as a social institution.

9
00:01:00.000 --> 00:01:07.000
Sramantra Gosal, he wrote a very famous article in 2005, whose title was,

10
00:01:07.000 --> 00:01:10.000
Bad Theories Are Ruining Good Practices.

11
00:01:11.000 --> 00:01:17.000
It's very telling, the title, because he was really addressing the problem with using the neoclassical model.

12
00:01:17.000 --> 00:01:18.000
and Model.

13
00:01:18.000 --> 00:01:23.400
I will lie because he echoes Herbert Simon when he said, and I quote,

14
00:01:23.400 --> 00:01:28.560
Nothing is more fundamental in setting our research agenda and informing our research

15
00:01:28.560 --> 00:01:35.320
methods that our view of the nature of human beings whose behaviors we are studying.

16
00:01:35.320 --> 00:01:40.880
It makes a difference to research, but it also makes a difference for the proper design

17
00:01:40.880 --> 00:01:43.960
of institutions.

18
00:01:43.960 --> 00:01:53.560
And here it's important to use Mises' Theory of Human Action, because he and Hayek, they

19
00:01:53.560 --> 00:01:55.640
were worried about different problems.

20
00:01:55.640 --> 00:02:02.840
He was in the debate of economic calculus in a socialist country, but nowadays, what

21
00:02:02.840 --> 00:02:07.920
is at stake is our institution, the capitalist countries.

22
00:02:07.920 --> 00:02:15.920
So I would like to reinterpret Mises' theory of human action through Aristotle's theory

23
00:02:15.920 --> 00:02:18.180
of human action.

24
00:02:18.180 --> 00:02:20.260
And why?

25
00:02:20.260 --> 00:02:22.120
Because it's a very important reason.

26
00:02:22.120 --> 00:02:30.640
Now there are philosophers, about all, from birth to ethics that are challenging on utilitarian

27
00:02:30.640 --> 00:02:32.840
mainstream economics.

28
00:02:32.840 --> 00:02:35.580
because Aristotelian ethical approach

29
00:02:35.580 --> 00:02:37.540
centers on the acting person.

30
00:02:37.540 --> 00:02:41.420
It's said that this is first person ethical point of view.

31
00:02:41.420 --> 00:02:44.980
So his ethics is structured in a system of goods,

32
00:02:44.980 --> 00:02:46.540
norms and virtues.

33
00:02:46.540 --> 00:02:50.060
I will say not only good, not only norms,

34
00:02:50.060 --> 00:02:53.020
not only virtues, a holistic view

35
00:02:53.020 --> 00:02:56.180
that is configured by means of individual action

36
00:02:56.180 --> 00:02:59.060
in the institutions of a particular culture.

37
00:02:59.060 --> 00:03:05.740
So, the basic idea to develop is that the person is a sound politicon.

38
00:03:05.740 --> 00:03:11.980
It is the co-existence and common participation in determining values and beliefs where the

39
00:03:11.980 --> 00:03:15.980
means and ends which constitute individual actions are configured, but I would like to

40
00:03:15.980 --> 00:03:23.140
use Edmund Hursel's philosophy, because the German background is his, and he said, humanity

41
00:03:23.140 --> 00:03:28.040
in general is, by its signs, being men or women,

42
00:03:28.040 --> 00:03:31.360
in many ways, by society and sociability linked.

43
00:03:31.360 --> 00:03:35.980
So it's entirely suitable to redefine human being

44
00:03:35.980 --> 00:03:40.020
as the Husser's mid-sign, being with.

45
00:03:40.960 --> 00:03:45.700
And the Husser's term, living spell, the world of life,

46
00:03:45.700 --> 00:03:49.120
in which institutions and culture conform the world,

47
00:03:49.120 --> 00:03:50.480
our world.

48
00:03:50.480 --> 00:03:52.400
So that is the general framework.

49
00:03:53.140 --> 00:04:01.140
I am trying, it's a suggestion, how to go forward in the theory of human action.

50
00:04:01.140 --> 00:04:08.140
Central part is individual action, the acting person with the prerequisites of action, that is, individual action.

51
00:04:08.140 --> 00:04:13.140
We are using methodological individualism or subjectivism.

52
00:04:13.140 --> 00:04:18.140
But it's action within society, within culture.

53
00:04:18.140 --> 00:04:23.100
What is the most important institution, the freedom? What is the norms, things, culture?

54
00:04:23.100 --> 00:04:28.620
And how is the dynamism in which our individual action is taking place?

55
00:04:28.620 --> 00:04:35.020
So I will start with the middle part of figure one, because it represents the mission action

56
00:04:35.020 --> 00:04:41.260
of action from the three prerequisites that inform an act. And I'm following Mises' story.

57
00:04:41.820 --> 00:04:47.740
There are three points. The first one, an act is initiated as something wanted,

58
00:04:47.740 --> 00:05:06.380
And third, there must be a free will. So here we are encountering the material object of ethics,

59
00:05:06.380 --> 00:05:14.140
voluntary and free acts. And from Aristotle, he defined voluntary and free acts with the same

60
00:05:14.140 --> 00:05:22.860
In three points, the first one, in the first place, he must have knowledge, second, he

61
00:05:22.860 --> 00:05:29.180
must choose the ads and choose them for their own sake, because they are good, and third,

62
00:05:29.180 --> 00:05:34.420
his action must proceed from a film and an interchangeable character.

63
00:05:34.420 --> 00:05:40.820
So for Aristotle, we are not talking about theoretical problems, we are talking about

64
00:05:40.820 --> 00:05:47.820
for Practical Knowledge or Practical Reasons, and he said that the end aim is not knowledge, but action.

65
00:05:47.820 --> 00:05:53.820
So that is the reason that the common ground for all social science is the theory of human action.

66
00:05:53.820 --> 00:06:01.820
And that is important because the neoclassical economies that lift the choice of ends of the analysis

67
00:06:01.820 --> 00:06:09.820
and focus on deliberation of means will soon be clear that the choice of ends is a key element of human action and economics.

68
00:06:09.820 --> 00:06:19.820
For Mises, it was not necessary to talk about ends, because I was talking the necessity of the price of the system of prices, wherever the end was.

69
00:06:19.820 --> 00:06:30.820
We were talking about price system or not, cost plan or market, but we are now talking about institutions and in Human Action we must talk about ends,

70
00:06:30.820 --> 00:06:47.820
Because the most important thing is that each individual adjusts his or her present reality to his or her future reality, an adjustment made through ideas, purposes, internationality, pursuing projects and always with a view to an end.

71
00:06:47.820 --> 00:06:57.820
The philosopher, Nancy Sherman, who is working on Henry Richardson and Martha Nussbaum, he says, and I really like this quote,

72
00:06:57.820 --> 00:07:11.820
For Aristotle, rationality, practical rationality, requires that agents think of themselves as connected with the future, as perceiving over time, and as making decisions with motivation.

73
00:07:11.820 --> 00:07:29.820
The fact that future plans constrain the present, is the future with acting in the present, is not the past with acting and repeating in the present, and force it to come into line with long-term projects, best indicates the force of temporal sense of coherence.

74
00:07:29.820 --> 00:07:39.100
So, normally, Austrian School of Economics is accused that this methodological individualism

75
00:07:39.100 --> 00:07:44.540
is very egoistic and utilitarian approach to humans, and it cannot account for society,

76
00:07:44.540 --> 00:07:51.660
culture, and ethics, that capitalism is essentially greed, it's greedy, so we must remove all

77
00:07:51.660 --> 00:07:58.820
our friends. But I think that this accusation is absolutely false, because if we're talking

78
00:07:58.820 --> 00:08:02.980
about Individual, obviously, society does not exist.

79
00:08:02.980 --> 00:08:04.740
There are only people.

80
00:08:04.740 --> 00:08:08.660
But, action with other individuals is social action,

81
00:08:08.660 --> 00:08:11.820
and action with meaning is cultural action.

82
00:08:11.820 --> 00:08:14.780
So, following Mises, he has the following paragraph

83
00:08:14.780 --> 00:08:16.940
in Theory and History.

84
00:08:16.940 --> 00:08:19.180
The fundamental thing about culture

85
00:08:19.180 --> 00:08:21.220
is the assimilation of ideas that

86
00:08:21.220 --> 00:08:23.460
roads the making from the inner routine

87
00:08:23.460 --> 00:08:27.460
of a merely animal existence to a life of reasoning

88
00:08:27.460 --> 00:08:29.260
and Speculating.

89
00:08:29.260 --> 00:08:32.300
It's the individual effort, it's always individual effort,

90
00:08:32.300 --> 00:08:35.300
it's not social effort, it's always individual effort

91
00:08:35.300 --> 00:08:38.460
to humanize himself by taking in the tradition

92
00:08:38.460 --> 00:08:41.820
of all the best things earlier generation have created.

93
00:08:42.700 --> 00:08:46.960
So, I would like to introduce a very famous

94
00:08:46.960 --> 00:08:48.420
United States philosopher,

95
00:08:48.420 --> 00:08:51.140
she's working in business ethics at Freedman's,

96
00:08:51.140 --> 00:08:54.500
the creator of stakeholder theories

97
00:08:54.500 --> 00:08:57.840
that started into the Sir Holder approach,

98
00:08:57.840 --> 00:09:02.280
was he introduced his principle of a continuous creation.

99
00:09:02.280 --> 00:09:04.980
Business as an institution

100
00:09:04.980 --> 00:09:07.360
is a source of the creation of failure.

101
00:09:07.360 --> 00:09:09.040
To compare it with the Sympathian

102
00:09:09.040 --> 00:09:10.220
creative destruction idea,

103
00:09:10.220 --> 00:09:13.540
I know that it's very famous, Joseph Aloisian Petter,

104
00:09:13.540 --> 00:09:15.740
and he spoke of creative destruction,

105
00:09:15.740 --> 00:09:18.420
implying with this concept that every economic innovation

106
00:09:18.420 --> 00:09:23.360
was an abandonment, sorry, abandonment of economic equilibrium.

107
00:09:23.360 --> 00:09:28.360
But in my opinion, creative innovation cannot be a reduction,

108
00:09:28.680 --> 00:09:32.400
but rather an enlargement of the satisfaction of needs

109
00:09:32.400 --> 00:09:34.940
and an enlargement in the possibilities of action.

110
00:09:37.440 --> 00:09:39.760
I'm following Edward Freeman.

111
00:09:39.760 --> 00:09:43.860
He says, the beauty of modern corporate form

112
00:09:43.860 --> 00:09:46.320
is that it can be made to be continuous

113
00:09:46.320 --> 00:09:47.740
rather than destructive.

114
00:09:47.740 --> 00:09:50.040
One creation does not have to destroy another.

115
00:09:50.040 --> 00:09:52.920
Rather, there is a continuous cycle of value creation

116
00:09:52.920 --> 00:09:55.320
that rises the well-being of everyone.

117
00:09:55.320 --> 00:09:59.240
So that means that, sorry, that action,

118
00:09:59.240 --> 00:10:02.000
individual action is something active and creative.

119
00:10:02.000 --> 00:10:05.280
And here I want to use pure entrepreneurship.

120
00:10:05.280 --> 00:10:07.440
But pure entrepreneurship is not a role,

121
00:10:07.440 --> 00:10:11.440
a person that's a human faculty or capacity.

122
00:10:11.440 --> 00:10:13.680
In my view, pure entrepreneurship is the deployment

123
00:10:13.680 --> 00:10:15.040
of the person's creativity capacity

124
00:10:15.040 --> 00:10:16.400
in the reality around him.

125
00:10:17.280 --> 00:10:20.280
I had the opportunity to discuss this with Professor Kirzner.

126
00:10:21.320 --> 00:10:22.320
He didn't agree.

127
00:10:22.920 --> 00:10:37.920
But at least he accepted that I have a point, and it's possible to use his own readings, and for instance, to try to back my view on entrepreneurship, I'm going to quote Kirzner,

128
00:10:37.920 --> 00:10:42.880
Listeners, our world is a closely inefficient world, but what is inefficient about the world

129
00:10:42.880 --> 00:10:50.120
is surely that, at its instant, enormous scope exists for improvements that are in one way

130
00:10:50.120 --> 00:10:55.440
or another ready to hand and yet are simply not noticed.

131
00:10:55.440 --> 00:11:03.600
So entrepreneurship as a human faculty is not objective and scientific knowledge that

132
00:11:03.600 --> 00:11:11.920
It is defining economic behavior in a world without perfect knowledge. It is the perception

133
00:11:11.920 --> 00:11:17.600
of a possibility that is not a comparison of alternatives, that is not given ends because

134
00:11:17.600 --> 00:11:24.200
they do not exist. They are in the future imagined by the entrepreneur. As Kirzner says,

135
00:11:24.200 --> 00:11:31.400
the incentive is to try to get something for nothing. If only one can see what can be done.

136
00:11:31.400 --> 00:11:37.000
But, I really prefer Peter Drucker says, the best way to predict the future is to create

137
00:11:37.000 --> 00:11:38.000
it.

138
00:11:38.000 --> 00:11:46.320
So, in this approach, I am expanding Robin's, the famous canonical definition of economics.

139
00:11:46.320 --> 00:11:52.000
The science with the studies human behavior, socialization between ends and scarce means,

140
00:11:52.000 --> 00:11:53.480
which have iterative uses.

141
00:11:53.480 --> 00:11:59.680
Now, let's go towards Mises' definition, economics is not about things and tangible

142
00:11:59.680 --> 00:12:04.520
Material Objects, it's about men, their meanings and axioms.

143
00:12:04.520 --> 00:12:08.800
Goods, commodities, and wealth, and other notions of conduct

144
00:12:08.800 --> 00:12:12.320
are not elements of nature, they are elements of human meaning,

145
00:12:12.320 --> 00:12:15.440
they are cultural and candid.

146
00:12:15.440 --> 00:12:18.280
He who wants to deal with them must not look at external world,

147
00:12:18.280 --> 00:12:20.880
he must search for them in the meaning of active men.

148
00:12:22.480 --> 00:12:26.920
So I'm coming here for a more ethical point of view.

149
00:12:26.920 --> 00:12:30.360
Because any axiom had two points.

150
00:12:30.360 --> 00:12:33.320
One is the sternal efface, in Greek, poiesis,

151
00:12:33.320 --> 00:12:36.880
Latin facere, in English making.

152
00:12:36.880 --> 00:12:40.120
And there, another point of view, the internal one,

153
00:12:40.120 --> 00:12:42.960
how we are building our character,

154
00:12:42.960 --> 00:12:46.000
our praxis, agere, or doing.

155
00:12:46.000 --> 00:12:48.640
And the first approach, the telek and virtum,

156
00:12:48.640 --> 00:12:50.840
that following Saint Thomas Aquinas,

157
00:12:50.840 --> 00:12:53.080
the habitus operatibus bonus,

158
00:12:53.080 --> 00:12:54.640
is the fulfillment of excellence

159
00:12:54.640 --> 00:12:56.840
in intelligence respect to poiesis.

160
00:12:56.840 --> 00:13:03.840
doing or making story through individual action that we are supporting social institutions

161
00:13:03.840 --> 00:13:07.520
producing shoes, houses, whatever, goods in general.

162
00:13:07.520 --> 00:13:13.120
But in the second place, economics does not reduce only the productive ad.

163
00:13:13.120 --> 00:13:18.320
It comprises also the election of ends and means of production in order to economic action

164
00:13:18.320 --> 00:13:19.320
dynamism.

165
00:13:19.320 --> 00:13:23.080
So, we are entering the rite of judgment.

166
00:13:23.080 --> 00:13:28.640
Professor Peter Klem, Professor Nicola Foss, who are talking about action and judgment.

167
00:13:28.640 --> 00:13:33.520
But in the Aristotelian terms, we are talking about prudence, fronesis, which is a fulfillment

168
00:13:33.520 --> 00:13:40.960
or excellence with respect to praxis, adjere, doing, so the choice of action.

169
00:13:40.960 --> 00:13:47.040
So we are not just doing truth or houses, we are doing good truth or houses.

170
00:13:47.040 --> 00:13:54.720
Just to finish, this approach has consequences. As the philosopher Robert Solomon points out,

171
00:13:54.720 --> 00:14:01.480
it views business as a human institution in service of human and not as a marvelous machine

172
00:14:01.480 --> 00:14:07.760
or the black box. Entrepreneur, what is that? Or in terms of the materialistic magic of

173
00:14:07.760 --> 00:14:14.400
the market, because people render social life more human, both in the family and the civic

174
00:14:14.400 --> 00:14:18.320
Community, Throat Improvement of Houston and Institutions.

175
00:14:18.320 --> 00:14:21.640
And, assuming that, in praxeology,

176
00:14:21.640 --> 00:14:24.200
things occupy a central position

177
00:14:24.200 --> 00:14:26.740
as basic institution in society.

178
00:14:26.740 --> 00:14:30.400
And what is the market economy based in this

179
00:14:30.400 --> 00:14:33.360
has a very positive moral content.

180
00:14:34.360 --> 00:14:38.600
The possibility of excellence in human action.

181
00:14:38.600 --> 00:14:43.440
Arrete, virtu, so things based in people acting together,

182
00:14:43.440 --> 00:14:50.600
sharing the culture of the organization, create and distribute most of the economic wealth,

183
00:14:50.600 --> 00:14:53.240
innovate, trade and raise living standards.

184
00:14:53.240 --> 00:14:54.240
Thank you for your attention.