WEBVTT

NOTE The Euro Currency in the Light of the Progression Theorem

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:07.800
Mainstream economists have been fervently advertising the economic advantages of Europe's single currency, the euro,

2
00:00:07.800 --> 00:00:19.800
which was introduced on 1st January 1999, meant to mark the final and crowning step in Europe's political and economic integration.

3
00:00:19.800 --> 00:00:27.800
The purpose of this article is to revisit and reinterpret the logic of the emergence of the euro

4
00:00:27.800 --> 00:00:34.800
Along the lines of the progression theorem, which denotes, to use a quote from Hoppe,

5
00:00:35.400 --> 00:00:41.680
a theory of the destruction or devolution of money by government. It will be argued in

6
00:00:41.680 --> 00:00:48.680
my paper that the euro is an illustration par excellence of what the progression theorem

7
00:00:49.440 --> 00:00:56.440
holds, namely that states will first replace commodity money with fiat money, second cooperate

8
00:00:56.440 --> 00:00:59.840
Second, cooperate for eliminating competition

9
00:00:59.840 --> 00:01:04.240
between national fiat monies, thereby three,

10
00:01:04.240 --> 00:01:07.240
working towards establishing a world fiat currency,

11
00:01:07.240 --> 00:01:10.800
a process fueled by the propagation

12
00:01:10.800 --> 00:01:13.100
of social democratic socialism.

13
00:01:15.200 --> 00:01:20.200
So, on this chart you would see the content of my paper,

14
00:01:20.400 --> 00:01:24.880
and let us go to part two, on the progression theory.

15
00:01:24.880 --> 00:01:29.000
In What Has Government Done to Our Money from 1963,

16
00:01:29.000 --> 00:01:30.560
Murray Rothbard took recourse

17
00:01:30.560 --> 00:01:32.560
to what can be called the progression theorem,

18
00:01:32.560 --> 00:01:37.080
and I took from an article written by Professor Hülsmann

19
00:01:37.080 --> 00:01:40.080
that it was Joseph Salerno, Professor Joseph Salerno

20
00:01:40.080 --> 00:01:44.480
who coined the term progression theorem.

21
00:01:44.480 --> 00:01:46.440
This progression theorem is actually derived

22
00:01:46.440 --> 00:01:49.680
from praxeology applied to human history.

23
00:01:49.680 --> 00:01:53.720
In that sense, it represents the aphoristic part

24
00:01:53.720 --> 00:01:57.680
of the Austrian historical method, which, as you may know,

25
00:01:57.680 --> 00:02:01.400
rests on the method of understanding.

26
00:02:01.400 --> 00:02:05.120
The progression theorem outlines a praxeologically necessary

27
00:02:05.120 --> 00:02:11.040
sequence of action, as implied by the axiom of human action,

28
00:02:11.040 --> 00:02:15.160
from which a number of irrefutably true propositions

29
00:02:15.160 --> 00:02:17.160
can be logically deduced.

30
00:02:17.160 --> 00:02:21.640
For instance, only individuals act, not collectives as such.

31
00:02:21.640 --> 00:02:24.320
for the Acting Individual, Means for Achieving,

32
00:02:24.320 --> 00:02:27.240
ends are scarce, which requires economizing,

33
00:02:27.240 --> 00:02:30.480
scarcity is a category of human action,

34
00:02:30.480 --> 00:02:33.360
and earlier satisfaction of ones is preferred

35
00:02:33.360 --> 00:02:35.800
over later satisfaction of ones,

36
00:02:35.800 --> 00:02:40.800
a finding which is reflected by positive time preference.

37
00:02:41.880 --> 00:02:45.120
Rothbard's progression theorem based explanation

38
00:02:45.120 --> 00:02:49.680
of why the state replaces commodity money with fiat money

39
00:02:49.680 --> 00:02:53.320
starts with his new theory of the state.

40
00:02:53.320 --> 00:02:55.720
And according to Rothbard, the state is, quote,

41
00:02:56.640 --> 00:02:59.880
that organization which possesses either or both

42
00:02:59.880 --> 00:03:02.860
in actual fact almost always both

43
00:03:02.860 --> 00:03:05.440
of the following characteristics.

44
00:03:05.440 --> 00:03:10.440
A, it acquires its revenue by physical coercion, taxation,

45
00:03:10.900 --> 00:03:14.840
and B, it achieves a compulsory monopoly of force

46
00:03:14.840 --> 00:03:18.080
and of ultimate decision-making power

47
00:03:18.080 --> 00:03:20.920
over a Given Territorial Area, quote, ends.

48
00:03:21.760 --> 00:03:23.960
A central insight in this contact is

49
00:03:23.960 --> 00:03:25.800
that the state has a necessary,

50
00:03:25.800 --> 00:03:29.520
so an inherent tendency for expansion.

51
00:03:29.520 --> 00:03:33.160
As Hoppe said, quote, every minimal government

52
00:03:33.160 --> 00:03:37.000
has the inherent tendency to become maximal government.

53
00:03:37.920 --> 00:03:40.960
Government expansion, of course, has to be financed

54
00:03:40.960 --> 00:03:43.760
and the ultimate pillar of its aggrandizement

55
00:03:43.760 --> 00:03:46.740
is the monopolization of money production.

56
00:03:46.740 --> 00:03:54.140
Once a fiat money regime has been established, government can increase its income at the

57
00:03:54.140 --> 00:04:01.900
expense of those outside government at practically no cost and without having to fear bankruptcy.

58
00:04:01.900 --> 00:04:06.580
And to be in a position to make use of fiat money inflation in particular combined with

59
00:04:06.580 --> 00:04:13.600
the issuance of public debt as an instrument of raising its revenue, government must obtain

60
00:04:13.600 --> 00:04:17.400
in full control, that is, the monopoly over money production.

61
00:04:17.400 --> 00:04:20.440
For as long as there is unhampered currency competition

62
00:04:20.440 --> 00:04:23.220
at the national or international level,

63
00:04:23.220 --> 00:04:25.600
government's ability to make use of inflation

64
00:04:25.600 --> 00:04:29.520
and debt issuance as a source of financing remains limited.

65
00:04:30.440 --> 00:04:32.920
This is because a policy of open and high inflation

66
00:04:32.920 --> 00:04:35.220
would sooner or later make domestic money users

67
00:04:35.220 --> 00:04:39.000
replace the inflated domestic currency

68
00:04:39.000 --> 00:04:42.280
with less inflated foreign currencies.

69
00:04:42.280 --> 00:04:45.600
and so taking recourse to the progression theory,

70
00:04:45.600 --> 00:04:49.280
Rothbard identified a number of steps taken by government

71
00:04:49.280 --> 00:04:52.600
to replace commodity money by fiat money.

72
00:04:52.600 --> 00:04:55.640
In short, government monopolizes the minting

73
00:04:55.640 --> 00:04:59.620
of commodity money, then monopolizes the issuance

74
00:04:59.620 --> 00:05:04.080
of money substitutes, so claims to money proper,

75
00:05:04.080 --> 00:05:07.640
allows for fractional reserve banking and central banking

76
00:05:07.640 --> 00:05:10.980
and then to avoid the collapse of banks issuing

77
00:05:10.980 --> 00:05:14.980
Money Substitute in Excess of Money Proper,

78
00:05:14.980 --> 00:05:17.380
it suspends the redeemability of notes,

79
00:05:17.380 --> 00:05:20.380
thereby severing the link between paper, tickets

80
00:05:20.380 --> 00:05:23.700
and book entries and money proper.

81
00:05:23.700 --> 00:05:27.100
So the letter will be placed by central bank money

82
00:05:27.100 --> 00:05:29.980
resulting in a pure fiat money system.

83
00:05:30.860 --> 00:05:34.180
Now let me go to part three of my paper

84
00:05:34.180 --> 00:05:36.780
titled Monetary Imperialism,

85
00:05:36.780 --> 00:05:39.200
The Path of the Military Means.

86
00:05:39.200 --> 00:06:00.200
Hans-Hermann Hoppe in his article Banking Nation States and International Politics argued that the economically and militarily dominant state will set out to eliminate competition between national fiat monies and establish its own fiat currency as the world's reserve money.

87
00:06:00.200 --> 00:06:06.200
The reserve currency issuing government reaps seigniorage and enjoys a lowering of the cost of debt financing.

88
00:06:06.200 --> 00:06:11.560
financing. According to Hoppe, the economically and military dominant government will pursue

89
00:06:11.560 --> 00:06:18.560
monetary imperialism by military means, that is by aggressive territorial conquest, in

90
00:06:19.260 --> 00:06:26.260
other words, war. And this leads me directly to part four of my presentation. It's titled

91
00:06:26.480 --> 00:06:32.800
From National Fiat Currencies Towards the World Fiat Currency, The Path of Social Democratic

92
00:06:32.800 --> 00:06:38.000
Socialism, the conclusion derived from the progression theory, namely that a group of

93
00:06:38.000 --> 00:06:43.720
nation states will move towards a world fiat currency can be reached without having to

94
00:06:43.720 --> 00:06:49.400
take recourse to the idea that the economically and militarily dominant government employs

95
00:06:49.400 --> 00:06:52.800
military means as argued by Hoppe.

96
00:06:52.800 --> 00:06:59.080
The logical tendency towards a world fiat currency can also be explained by the propagation

97
00:06:59.080 --> 00:07:06.920
of Social-Democratic Socialism, meaning a societal order characterized by private ownership,

98
00:07:06.920 --> 00:07:13.560
but with no owner of the means of production enjoying full control over his property.

99
00:07:13.560 --> 00:07:20.960
Under Social-Democratic Socialism, redistribution policies unfold within each nation state,

100
00:07:20.960 --> 00:07:26.520
even though to a varying degree, and this leads to a growing harmonization of economic

101
00:07:26.520 --> 00:07:30.580
and Social Policies Among Nation States.

102
00:07:30.580 --> 00:07:33.320
This in turn will make it increasingly convenient

103
00:07:33.320 --> 00:07:35.640
for a national government to increasingly engage

104
00:07:35.640 --> 00:07:39.320
in coordinated policy efforts with other nation states.

105
00:07:40.260 --> 00:07:42.560
As noted earlier, any government has an interest

106
00:07:42.560 --> 00:07:46.820
in aggrandizement which can most conveniently be achieved

107
00:07:46.820 --> 00:07:48.480
by its monopolistically issuing

108
00:07:48.480 --> 00:07:51.080
an inflationary fiat currency.

109
00:07:51.080 --> 00:07:54.320
An internationally prevailing social democratic socialism

110
00:07:54.320 --> 00:07:57.840
will therefore work in particular towards eliminating

111
00:07:57.840 --> 00:08:01.680
interstate fiat currency competition.

112
00:08:01.680 --> 00:08:03.800
And the latter can be brought about

113
00:08:03.800 --> 00:08:06.940
through international cooperation in monetary affairs

114
00:08:06.940 --> 00:08:09.920
by way of, say, pursuing a policy

115
00:08:09.920 --> 00:08:13.240
of fixing bilateral exchange rates.

116
00:08:13.240 --> 00:08:17.800
Such a strategy, however, has a couple of shortcomings, though.

117
00:08:17.800 --> 00:08:22.400
For as long as these policies rest on voluntary cooperation

118
00:08:22.400 --> 00:08:29.840
among nation states, those states deviating from the agreement cannot be sanctioned effectively.

119
00:08:29.840 --> 00:08:35.480
What is more, it might not be attractive for those nation states that pursue a relatively

120
00:08:35.480 --> 00:08:40.660
low inflation policy to team up with governments that are already pursuing a relatively high

121
00:08:40.660 --> 00:08:48.100
inflation policy. A political solution to this problem can be found though, namely merging

122
00:08:48.100 --> 00:08:54.100
and investing national fiat currencies into a single currency under the political promise

123
00:08:54.100 --> 00:08:59.100
that the new single fiat currency will be non-inflationary and that would be the first step.

124
00:08:59.100 --> 00:09:05.100
And then once this has been accomplished, embark on a policy of actually high inflation.

125
00:09:05.100 --> 00:09:08.100
That would be the second step.

126
00:09:08.100 --> 00:09:15.100
I should say at this juncture that of course fiat currencies are not only inflationary

127
00:09:15.100 --> 00:09:28.100
As you know, and we heard interesting lectures about what Mises found in his book The Theory of Money and Credit in 1912,

128
00:09:28.100 --> 00:09:39.100
naming that fiat money leads, and necessarily so, to boom and bust cycles, to malinvestment, to social and economic crises.

129
00:09:39.100 --> 00:09:49.100
And once national fiat currencies are established the world over and markets are allowed to work freely and unrestricted in terms of international capital flows,

130
00:09:49.100 --> 00:09:56.100
the still fragmented fiat money world order will increasingly bring about a crisis on an international scale.

131
00:09:56.100 --> 00:10:05.100
And these kind of crises caused by fiat currencies, national fiat currencies, actually work as a catalyst for bringing about a world fiat monetary system

132
00:10:05.100 --> 00:10:10.900
in the monetary system because it sets into motion an economic incentive for governments

133
00:10:10.900 --> 00:10:17.980
to increasingly cooperate in monetary affairs and at this point I would like to show you

134
00:10:17.980 --> 00:10:27.060
one graph just to bring some actual data into the debate.

135
00:10:27.060 --> 00:10:38.180
What you would see is from January 2007 up to March 2012, the so-called Euro Cross Currency

136
00:10:38.180 --> 00:10:43.540
Basis Swap Spread, this red line.

137
00:10:43.540 --> 00:10:44.540
What does it mean?

138
00:10:44.540 --> 00:10:50.780
It shows you the cost of funding, the cost of funding for Euro area banks which try to

139
00:10:50.780 --> 00:10:53.460
get hold of US dollars.

140
00:10:53.460 --> 00:11:00.620
So a bank, for instance in Europe, has not only refinancing needs in dollars or in Japanese

141
00:11:00.620 --> 00:11:03.600
yen, but also in US dollars.

142
00:11:03.600 --> 00:11:05.900
And how can a bank obtain US dollars?

143
00:11:05.900 --> 00:11:12.700
It could either issue a dollar denominated bond, and if that doesn't work, it could do

144
00:11:12.700 --> 00:11:13.820
the following trick.

145
00:11:13.820 --> 00:11:22.380
It could issue a euro denominated bond, take the proceeds, convert these proceeds into

146
00:11:22.380 --> 00:11:29.660
U.S. dollars and at the same time do enter a forward contract, namely getting the dollars

147
00:11:29.660 --> 00:11:36.340
back into euro. And what you would see here is the cost of these transactions. As you

148
00:11:36.340 --> 00:11:45.340
can see in 2008 when Lehman Brothers went bankrupt, the market so to speak dried out.

149
00:11:45.340 --> 00:11:52.340
So it was very difficult for your area banks to obtain dollar funding. And as you can see

150
00:11:52.340 --> 00:11:55.780
The same problem reappeared quite recently.

151
00:11:55.780 --> 00:12:01.820
And at the end of November, the 30th of November, 2011,

152
00:12:01.820 --> 00:12:03.620
the major central banks in the world

153
00:12:03.620 --> 00:12:06.660
announced so-called liquidity swaps,

154
00:12:06.660 --> 00:12:11.820
meaning that they would be prepared to finance any kind

155
00:12:11.820 --> 00:12:13.780
of money needed by banks.

156
00:12:13.780 --> 00:12:16.460
So the US Federal Reserve basically

157
00:12:16.460 --> 00:12:21.460
announced to provide any unlimited amount

158
00:12:21.460 --> 00:12:26.800
of West dollars to all banks in the world and at the same time the European

159
00:12:26.800 --> 00:12:31.540
Center Bank would do the same and so would the Bank of Canada, the Bank of

160
00:12:31.540 --> 00:12:36.780
Japan, the Bank of England and the Swiss National Bank and this is I would say an

161
00:12:36.780 --> 00:12:43.540
unprecedented action taken by Center Bank and it should give you an insight

162
00:12:43.540 --> 00:12:48.700
how far advanced this kind of international coordination of monetary

163
00:12:48.700 --> 00:12:51.800
Policy has already become.

164
00:12:51.800 --> 00:13:00.300
So let me move to the fourth part of my presentation, what the progression theorem tells us about

165
00:13:00.300 --> 00:13:02.740
the euro currency.

166
00:13:02.740 --> 00:13:09.300
Against these theoretical considerations above, we are now in a position to revisit and reinterpret

167
00:13:09.300 --> 00:13:13.660
Europe's process towards setting up a single currency.

168
00:13:13.660 --> 00:13:18.040
And it has been long in the making, the push towards introducing a single currency stems

169
00:13:18.040 --> 00:13:25.320
comes from the early 1970s under the so-called Werner Plan, former Prime Minister of Luxembourg

170
00:13:25.320 --> 00:13:30.600
who suggested that the then six countries participating in the European Economic Community

171
00:13:30.600 --> 00:13:37.640
should converge their economies and currencies. In 1979, the European Monetary System was

172
00:13:37.640 --> 00:13:43.120
set up for reducing the degree of fluctuations of exchange rates between these countries

173
00:13:43.120 --> 00:13:53.720
And in June 1989, the President of the European Commission put forward his so-called three-stage plan for achieving economic and monetary integration,

174
00:13:53.720 --> 00:14:01.520
a plan that resulted in the so-called Maastricht Treaty, which was signed on 7 February 1992,

175
00:14:01.520 --> 00:14:12.120
establishing the European Union and laying down the foundations for a single currency and the European Monetary Union in three successive stages.

176
00:14:12.120 --> 00:14:19.080
The political challenge for establishing a single currency in Europe had been to win over Germany,

177
00:14:19.080 --> 00:14:25.720
the continent's largest and most populous economy with a tradition of hard money.

178
00:14:25.720 --> 00:14:30.920
The latter resulted obviously from the dismal experience made in the early 1920s

179
00:14:30.920 --> 00:14:36.920
when there was hyperinflation through which the former currency, the Reichsmark, was completely destroyed.

180
00:14:36.920 --> 00:14:41.920
In fact, it was the German population's preference for relatively low inflation

181
00:14:41.920 --> 00:14:48.920
that had made the Deutsche Bundesbank, so Germany's central bank,

182
00:14:48.920 --> 00:14:51.920
the least inflating central bank and, accordingly, the DMACC,

183
00:14:51.920 --> 00:14:54.920
being the least inflated currency in Western Europe.

184
00:14:54.920 --> 00:15:00.920
With fully convertible currencies and free flow of capital across Europe,

185
00:15:00.920 --> 00:15:09.920
The monetary policy of the Bundesbank had put an effective limit to high inflation policies in European countries.

186
00:15:09.920 --> 00:15:23.920
The German population's resistance against giving up monetary sovereignty and joining a European single currency was finally overcome with the fall of the Berlin Wall on 9th November 1989.

187
00:15:23.920 --> 00:15:26.440
This event, according to some observers,

188
00:15:26.440 --> 00:15:28.680
resulted in a political deal.

189
00:15:28.680 --> 00:15:31.240
Namely, France demanded replacing the DMACC

190
00:15:31.240 --> 00:15:33.920
by the single currency as the political price

191
00:15:33.920 --> 00:15:36.980
Germany had to pay for the West's approval

192
00:15:36.980 --> 00:15:39.300
to German reunification.

193
00:15:39.300 --> 00:15:42.400
And be that as it may, the German euphoria

194
00:15:42.400 --> 00:15:45.820
of the world's demolition effectively gave the then

195
00:15:45.820 --> 00:15:50.120
so-called ruling a conservative liberal coalition,

196
00:15:50.120 --> 00:15:52.680
which was more inclined to pursue a kind of

197
00:15:52.680 --> 00:15:57.680
Social Democratic Socialism, I may add, government carte blanche.

198
00:15:59.380 --> 00:16:01.200
The government enthusiastically embracing

199
00:16:01.200 --> 00:16:04.120
political integration in Europe agreed to hand over

200
00:16:04.120 --> 00:16:08.560
monetary sovereignty to a supranational body.

201
00:16:08.560 --> 00:16:12.720
This decision could be made by German parliamentarians

202
00:16:12.720 --> 00:16:16.040
without holding a referendum.

203
00:16:16.040 --> 00:16:18.880
The German government's approval to replacing the DMACC

204
00:16:18.880 --> 00:16:21.960
by a single currency came with some conditions though

205
00:16:21.960 --> 00:16:24.640
for Becoming Lingering Stability Concerns

206
00:16:24.640 --> 00:16:26.280
Among the German Electorate.

207
00:16:26.280 --> 00:16:28.800
The institutional framework governing

208
00:16:28.800 --> 00:16:31.400
the European single currency had to comply

209
00:16:31.400 --> 00:16:33.640
with German stability standards,

210
00:16:33.640 --> 00:16:35.540
so-called stability standards.

211
00:16:35.540 --> 00:16:37.160
Most important, the German government

212
00:16:37.160 --> 00:16:39.440
demanded a European central bank constructed

213
00:16:39.440 --> 00:16:41.840
along the lines of the Deutsche Bundesbank.

214
00:16:41.840 --> 00:16:44.120
This included, for instance, that the European

215
00:16:44.120 --> 00:16:46.200
central bank would be politically independent,

216
00:16:46.200 --> 00:16:49.320
dedicated to a monetary policy of low inflation,

217
00:16:49.320 --> 00:16:53.920
and prohibited from financing public sector deficits.

218
00:16:53.920 --> 00:16:57.060
What had long been desired by adherence

219
00:16:57.060 --> 00:17:00.280
to social democratic socialism became reality

220
00:17:00.280 --> 00:17:03.040
as from the 1st January 1999.

221
00:17:03.040 --> 00:17:05.100
National fiat currency were replaced

222
00:17:05.100 --> 00:17:06.980
by the single fiat currency, the euro,

223
00:17:06.980 --> 00:17:09.440
managed by the European Central Bank.

224
00:17:09.440 --> 00:17:12.080
With the euro in place, the economic and political

225
00:17:12.080 --> 00:17:14.800
incentives for individual nation states

226
00:17:14.800 --> 00:17:19.020
to play by the rules declined sharply, to say the least.

227
00:17:19.020 --> 00:17:21.860
As soon as 2003, the ECB had abandoned

228
00:17:21.860 --> 00:17:25.300
its so-called monetary pillar, making it even easier

229
00:17:25.300 --> 00:17:28.140
to pursue an inflationary policy

230
00:17:28.140 --> 00:17:31.700
in terms of increasing bank circulation credit.

231
00:17:31.700 --> 00:17:33.480
With the financial and economic crisis

232
00:17:33.480 --> 00:17:36.060
becoming ever more severe, the ECB has been

233
00:17:36.060 --> 00:17:40.180
increasingly buying bonds since May 2010

234
00:17:40.180 --> 00:17:42.620
and providing the Euro-era banking sector

235
00:17:42.620 --> 00:17:46.820
with unlimited amounts of base money to prevent bankruptcies.

236
00:17:46.820 --> 00:17:51.820
In fact, the ECB policy has already embarked upon a policy

237
00:17:52.060 --> 00:17:54.300
of running the printing press.

238
00:17:54.300 --> 00:17:58.540
This observation corresponds to what was suggested earlier.

239
00:17:58.540 --> 00:18:01.580
It is the logical second step following from the first step,

240
00:18:01.580 --> 00:18:04.540
inflating the single currency above the level

241
00:18:04.540 --> 00:18:08.980
seen in the least inflationary national fiat currencies.

242
00:18:09.860 --> 00:18:13.140
If the chairman allows me two more minutes,

243
00:18:13.140 --> 00:18:18.140
I briefly touch upon the last paragraph,

244
00:18:18.140 --> 00:18:21.220
the way towards world fiat currency.

245
00:18:21.220 --> 00:18:23.980
Under social democratic socialism,

246
00:18:23.980 --> 00:18:26.340
this story, of course, does not end here.

247
00:18:27.220 --> 00:18:29.740
The progression theorem holds that the existence

248
00:18:29.740 --> 00:18:32.380
of national governments brings with it the tendency

249
00:18:32.380 --> 00:18:36.360
for setting up world fiat currencies by non-military means.

250
00:18:37.700 --> 00:18:41.540
It is, of course, beyond the scope and available time

251
00:18:41.540 --> 00:18:47.740
to go into detail about, for instance, various reform proposals which have been put forward

252
00:18:47.740 --> 00:18:54.300
for reforming the international monetary architecture. I would also, I would just like to conclude

253
00:18:54.300 --> 00:19:00.180
with the following. The progression theorem reveals the inherent tendency of pushing towards

254
00:19:00.180 --> 00:19:06.180
a world fiat currency and the introduction of the euro is a step along this path. Such

255
00:19:06.180 --> 00:19:11.380
Such a development bodes badly, I should say, given the economic problems of national fiat

256
00:19:11.380 --> 00:19:18.020
money, namely inflation, malinvestment, indebtedness, you name it.

257
00:19:18.020 --> 00:19:24.060
It goes without saying that a world fiat currency would increase all these bad developments

258
00:19:24.060 --> 00:19:25.860
greatly.

259
00:19:25.860 --> 00:19:32.340
Most important, a world fiat currency is not compatible with a free market society.

260
00:19:32.340 --> 00:19:34.380
It would actually destroy it.

261
00:19:34.380 --> 00:19:37.740
And it was Mises who put it succinctly, quote,

262
00:19:37.740 --> 00:19:40.620
it would be a mistake to assume that the modern organization

263
00:19:40.620 --> 00:19:43.740
of exchange is bound to continue to exist.

264
00:19:43.740 --> 00:19:47.900
It carries within itself the germ of its own destruction.

265
00:19:47.900 --> 00:19:50.840
The development of fiduciary medium

266
00:19:50.840 --> 00:19:53.860
must necessarily lead to its breakdown.

267
00:19:53.860 --> 00:19:56.900
Ladies and gentlemen, by following

268
00:19:56.900 --> 00:20:01.980
the pure progression theorem, we actually

269
00:20:01.980 --> 00:20:08.980
find that the progression theory makes another praxeological case against the state. Thank you very much.
