WEBVTT

NOTE The Subsistence Fund and ABCT

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.000
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you very much for having me here.

2
00:00:05.000 --> 00:00:15.000
I am very happy to be able to develop one argument of my PhD thesis here.

3
00:00:15.000 --> 00:00:27.000
The first thing I would like to do is to remind you that this session is not dedicated to the celebration of Ludwig von Mises.

4
00:00:27.000 --> 00:00:33.760
Instead, it is the symposium on the centennial of the theory of money and credit.

5
00:00:33.760 --> 00:00:36.240
It is important to keep this in mind.

6
00:00:36.240 --> 00:00:39.840
We have to distinguish between the two.

7
00:00:39.840 --> 00:00:43.160
The one is a person, the other is a book.

8
00:00:43.160 --> 00:00:46.520
In a sense, of course, the two are connected.

9
00:00:46.520 --> 00:00:52.400
Mises is the author of the book in question of the theory of money and credit.

10
00:00:52.400 --> 00:00:55.600
but from a different point of view, it is essential

11
00:00:55.600 --> 00:00:58.980
to keep the book and its author apart.

12
00:01:00.240 --> 00:01:03.920
We've just heard that Nikolai Gatchev has written

13
00:01:03.920 --> 00:01:06.680
about the difference between human action

14
00:01:06.680 --> 00:01:08.880
and the theory of money and credit

15
00:01:08.880 --> 00:01:11.760
concerning Mises' monetary thought.

16
00:01:12.640 --> 00:01:16.480
Mises changed some of his arguments over time,

17
00:01:16.480 --> 00:01:18.740
which of course cannot be said of a book,

18
00:01:18.740 --> 00:01:20.900
which can't be said about the theory of money and credit,

19
00:01:20.900 --> 00:01:22.760
which was published 100 years ago.

20
00:01:23.620 --> 00:01:26.540
At least it cannot be said about the first edition.

21
00:01:26.540 --> 00:01:30.740
As we are celebrating today the book and not its author,

22
00:01:31.820 --> 00:01:33.620
this might be a good opportunity

23
00:01:33.620 --> 00:01:36.060
to do a rather unusual thing,

24
00:01:36.060 --> 00:01:38.380
to defend the book against its own author.

25
00:01:38.380 --> 00:01:41.580
To be precise, I'm going to argue

26
00:01:41.580 --> 00:01:43.540
that at least on one point,

27
00:01:44.640 --> 00:01:47.820
the theory of money and credit has to be preferred

28
00:01:47.820 --> 00:01:50.480
to all later writings by Mises himself,

29
00:01:50.480 --> 00:01:54.040
even and especially to human action.

30
00:01:54.040 --> 00:01:56.560
This one point is an important one, however.

31
00:01:56.560 --> 00:01:59.200
I'm talking about the business cycle theory,

32
00:01:59.200 --> 00:02:02.880
best known as the Austrian theory of the business cycle.

33
00:02:02.880 --> 00:02:04.960
Concerning this theory, I maintain

34
00:02:04.960 --> 00:02:09.000
the theory of money and credit is much more consistent

35
00:02:09.000 --> 00:02:13.560
than the later writings of Ludwig von Mises.

36
00:02:13.560 --> 00:02:18.040
To defend this claim, it is necessary to outline,

37
00:02:18.040 --> 00:02:20.160
at least in a few words, the central idea

38
00:02:20.160 --> 00:02:22.480
of the Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle.

39
00:02:22.480 --> 00:02:25.760
In a nutshell, the theory is mainly concerned

40
00:02:25.760 --> 00:02:29.160
with the effect that the financial sector

41
00:02:29.160 --> 00:02:31.620
of an economy has on the real sector.

42
00:02:32.620 --> 00:02:34.580
Its principal examination object

43
00:02:34.580 --> 00:02:37.920
is the artificial expansion of credit

44
00:02:37.920 --> 00:02:41.980
and the influence this expansion has on the economic system.

45
00:02:43.620 --> 00:02:46.140
As you're all familiar with the theory,

46
00:02:46.140 --> 00:02:49.460
I think that it suffices to highlight those elements

47
00:02:49.460 --> 00:02:51.980
of the theory that are necessary for my point.

48
00:02:53.100 --> 00:02:55.240
As you all know, Mises distinguishes

49
00:02:55.240 --> 00:02:56.960
two different kinds of credit.

50
00:02:58.220 --> 00:03:02.260
Commodity credit and circulation credit or fiduciary credit.

51
00:03:03.220 --> 00:03:06.720
Commodity credit for him is the healthy kind of credit.

52
00:03:07.640 --> 00:03:10.580
Somebody saves out of his income and transfers

53
00:03:10.580 --> 00:03:13.180
these savings to somebody else.

54
00:03:15.780 --> 00:03:17.860
This kind of credit, commodity credit,

55
00:03:17.860 --> 00:03:22.100
is characterized by the fact that they impose a sacrifice

56
00:03:22.100 --> 00:03:25.820
on that party who performs his part of the bargain

57
00:03:25.820 --> 00:03:27.680
before the other does.

58
00:03:27.680 --> 00:03:30.220
The foregoing of immediate power of disposal

59
00:03:30.220 --> 00:03:31.380
over the exchange good.

60
00:03:32.820 --> 00:03:35.900
Circulation credit or fiduciary credit on the other hand

61
00:03:35.900 --> 00:03:39.600
is for Mises the unhealthy kind of credit

62
00:03:39.600 --> 00:03:42.020
or the artificial kind of credit.

63
00:03:42.020 --> 00:03:43.980
The central bank or the banking system

64
00:03:43.980 --> 00:03:51.980
for whoever creates money without any prior savings and grants credit to others, out of thin air, so to speak.

65
00:03:53.980 --> 00:04:03.980
Circulation credits are characterized by the fact that in them the gain of the party who receives before he pays is balanced by no sacrifice on the part of the other party.

66
00:04:04.980 --> 00:04:07.980
So this is the artificial kind of credit for Mises.

67
00:04:07.980 --> 00:04:26.980
Now in all of his versions of the Austrian business cycle theory, Mises maintains that an expansion of this kind of credit, of artificial credit, of circulation credit, causes a boom that must ultimately result in a bust.

68
00:04:26.980 --> 00:04:40.980
So far the earlier and the later versions are homogeneous. They differ in the way that Mises explains the effect that an expansion of circulation credit has on the economy.

69
00:04:40.980 --> 00:04:48.980
And it is here that I consider the theory of money and credit to be superior to human action. Let us see why I think so.

70
00:04:48.980 --> 00:04:59.980
In The Theory of Money and Credit, Mises explains the influence of circulation credit on the economy in terms of the so-called subsistence fund.

71
00:04:59.980 --> 00:05:10.980
This fund consists of consumption goods. These consumption goods are a necessary precondition for every production process.

72
00:05:10.980 --> 00:05:17.980
Without something to eat, something to drink, clothes and so forth, nobody will participate in production.

73
00:05:17.980 --> 00:05:22.980
Workers need consumption goods, otherwise they cannot produce.

74
00:05:23.180 --> 00:05:26.100
This is the main idea of the subsistence fund theory.

75
00:05:27.100 --> 00:05:31.260
And it can be seen in the following quote

76
00:05:31.260 --> 00:05:33.700
from the theory of money and credit.

77
00:05:36.700 --> 00:05:40.140
There, in 1912 and later on, he says,

78
00:05:40.140 --> 00:05:42.980
"'The period of production must be of such a length

79
00:05:42.980 --> 00:05:45.380
"'that exactly the whole available subsistence fund

80
00:05:45.380 --> 00:05:47.060
"'is necessary on the one hand

81
00:05:47.060 --> 00:05:50.180
and sufficient on the other for paying the wages

82
00:05:50.180 --> 00:05:52.020
of the laborers throughout the duration

83
00:05:52.020 --> 00:05:54.540
of the productive process.

84
00:05:54.540 --> 00:05:57.520
So here he highlights the subsistence fund.

85
00:06:00.060 --> 00:06:05.060
In the normal course of things, Mises maintains in 1912,

86
00:06:06.340 --> 00:06:10.060
production adapts itself to the size of the subsistence fund

87
00:06:10.060 --> 00:06:13.100
and you can see this from the following quote,

88
00:06:13.100 --> 00:06:16.300
again from 1912, a lengthening of the period

89
00:06:16.300 --> 00:06:23.020
of production is only practicable when either the means of subsistence have increased or

90
00:06:23.020 --> 00:06:29.060
when the wants of producers have decreased. The businessmen or the producers, of course,

91
00:06:29.060 --> 00:06:33.860
do not orientate themselves by something called the subsistence fund. Mises knew this, of

92
00:06:33.860 --> 00:06:40.620
course. Businessmen orientate themselves by the interest rate. So in the 1912 version

93
00:06:40.620 --> 00:06:47.420
of Mises' Theory of the Business Cycle, a lowering of the interest rate indicates to the businessmen

94
00:06:47.420 --> 00:06:54.300
that the amount of the subsistence fund has increased and that therefore longer production processes

95
00:06:54.300 --> 00:06:58.700
have become feasible and profitable.

96
00:06:58.700 --> 00:07:06.780
In other words, when the interest rate decreases entrepreneurs think that workers can be supplied

97
00:07:06.780 --> 00:07:12.860
with Consumption Goods for a Longer Time and that More Long-Term Projects Can Be Started.

98
00:07:12.860 --> 00:07:23.820
Also from 1912, a reduction of the rate of interest must necessarily lead to a lengthening

99
00:07:23.820 --> 00:07:32.540
of the average period of production. So you see, I don't lie. Now, in the Austrian business cycle

100
00:07:32.540 --> 00:07:38.540
In the Austrian Business Cycle Theory, an expansion of circulation credit disturbs this process.

101
00:07:38.540 --> 00:07:52.540
In the 1912 version of the Austrian Business Cycle Theory, additional circulation credit creates the illusion of an increased subsistence fund, of an increased amount of available consumption goods.

102
00:07:52.540 --> 00:08:02.980
The entrepreneurs start long-term projects, although their workers cannot be supplied with consumption goods for the whole duration of the projects.

103
00:08:02.980 --> 00:08:10.380
Sooner or later, the consumption goods will become scarce, which ultimately will cause a bust.

104
00:08:10.380 --> 00:08:17.020
So here again, from 1912, he explains the busts are following the way, the following way.

105
00:08:17.020 --> 00:08:21.740
A time must necessarily come when the means of subsistence available for consumption are

106
00:08:21.740 --> 00:08:27.700
all used up, although the capital goods employed in production have not yet been transformed

107
00:08:27.700 --> 00:08:29.180
into consumption goods.

108
00:08:29.180 --> 00:08:36.140
The market prices of consumption goods rise and those of production goods fall.

109
00:08:36.140 --> 00:08:43.380
You see, in the theory of money and credit, it is the scarcity of the subsistence fund,

110
00:08:43.380 --> 00:08:49.780
The scarcity of means of subsistence of consumption goods that triggers a crisis in the economy

111
00:08:49.780 --> 00:08:53.060
at the turning point of the business cycle.

112
00:08:53.060 --> 00:08:59.660
This is what I consider to be the consistent version of the Austrian business cycle theory.

113
00:08:59.660 --> 00:09:06.420
In Human Action, however, Mises explains his theory in a different way.

114
00:09:06.420 --> 00:09:11.900
There, it is not the subsistence fund that limits the length of the different production

115
00:09:11.900 --> 00:09:17.240
Expansion Processes, an expansion of circulation credit does not cause the entrepreneurs to

116
00:09:17.240 --> 00:09:23.220
think that the subsistence fund has grown and it is also not the subsistence fund that

117
00:09:23.220 --> 00:09:25.580
becomes scarce at the end of a boom.

118
00:09:25.580 --> 00:09:33.660
Instead, Mises explains his theory in terms of capital goods, that is, in terms of produced

119
00:09:33.660 --> 00:09:36.020
means of production.

120
00:09:36.020 --> 00:09:46.860
A further expansion of production is possible only if the amount of capital goods is increased

121
00:09:46.860 --> 00:09:53.100
by additional saving, that means by surpluses produced and not consumed.

122
00:09:53.100 --> 00:09:58.940
The characteristic mark of the credit expansion boom is that such additional capital goods

123
00:09:58.940 --> 00:10:03.440
have not been made available.

124
00:10:03.440 --> 00:10:10.780
In this version, an artificial credit expansion makes entrepreneurs behave as if the supply

125
00:10:10.780 --> 00:10:18.320
of capital goods had increased, which allegedly is not the case, according to Mises.

126
00:10:18.320 --> 00:10:24.840
This can be again seen from another quote, the entrepreneurs embark upon an expansion

127
00:10:24.840 --> 00:10:30.640
of investment on a scale for which the capital goods available do not suffice.

128
00:10:30.640 --> 00:10:37.240
The projects are unrealizable on account of the insufficient supply of capital goods.

129
00:10:37.240 --> 00:10:41.960
They must fail sooner or later.

130
00:10:41.960 --> 00:10:47.840
Now I believe that this version cannot be upheld.

131
00:10:47.840 --> 00:10:51.520
Additional circulation credit does not create the illusion of an increased stock of capital

132
00:10:51.520 --> 00:10:58.720
goods, and at the turning point of the business cycle, it is not capital goods that become

133
00:10:58.720 --> 00:10:59.720
scarce.

134
00:10:59.720 --> 00:11:01.480
Why do I think so?

135
00:11:01.480 --> 00:11:07.120
Now, in Mises' own definition, capital goods are produced means of production.

136
00:11:07.120 --> 00:11:13.820
So if these produced means of production should happen to become scarce, as Mises maintains

137
00:11:13.820 --> 00:11:19.840
in Human Action, there should arise no problem for the economy.

138
00:11:19.840 --> 00:11:24.880
These capital goods, the produced means of production, will become more expensive, of

139
00:11:24.880 --> 00:11:30.880
of course, as they are scarce, and it will be more profitable to produce them, that is it.

140
00:11:30.880 --> 00:11:38.480
This should be the solution. There is no reason why this solution should not work and why a crisis should occur.

141
00:11:38.480 --> 00:11:44.680
There is no bottleneck. The capital goods are produced means of production that can be produced.

142
00:11:44.680 --> 00:11:54.680
Mises does not explain where indeed there is a bottleneck that would stop producers or entrepreneurs to produce these capital goods.

143
00:11:54.680 --> 00:12:02.680
So, I think that one cannot explain the business cycle this way. The scarcity of capital goods cannot cause a bust.

144
00:12:02.680 --> 00:12:09.680
That is why I believe that the Austrian business cycle theory in human action is not consistent.

145
00:12:09.680 --> 00:12:18.680
It does not explain how a bust occurs. It is different with the version that can be found in the theory of money and credit.

146
00:12:18.680 --> 00:12:23.680
As you will remember, there it is, the scarcity of the subsistence fund that triggers the bust.

147
00:12:23.680 --> 00:12:29.680
Concerning the subsistence fund, it cannot be said what I've just said about the capital goods.

148
00:12:29.680 --> 00:12:35.680
When the means of subsistence become scarce, it cannot be argued that this is no problem

149
00:12:35.680 --> 00:12:39.680
because they can easily be produced, like I said about the capital goods.

150
00:12:39.680 --> 00:12:46.680
No, the subsistence fund, a fund of consumption goods, of available consumption goods,

151
00:12:46.680 --> 00:12:53.080
comes into being by people who save, who save parts of their income.

152
00:12:53.200 --> 00:12:59.120
It is necessary that some people abstain from consumption without this,

153
00:12:59.240 --> 00:13:04.920
without savings, no subsistence fund comes into being, is spilled up.

154
00:13:05.040 --> 00:13:11.280
This, I think, this is the problem that causes the crisis.

155
00:13:11.400 --> 00:13:13.840
This indeed is a bottleneck.

156
00:13:13.840 --> 00:13:19.840
People do not save enough, or if people do not save enough, the subsistence fund shrinks

157
00:13:19.840 --> 00:13:27.840
and consequently many investment projects cannot be finished and turn out to be malinvestments.

158
00:13:27.840 --> 00:13:32.840
This problem cannot be healed by production but only by saving.

159
00:13:32.840 --> 00:13:42.840
If people do not save, decreases or if people do not save more the crisis cannot be avoided.

160
00:13:42.840 --> 00:13:50.440
To repeat my point, in human action, it is the capital goods that become scarce, which causes the crisis.

161
00:13:50.440 --> 00:13:54.040
In the theory of money and credit, it is the subsistence fund.

162
00:13:54.040 --> 00:14:03.640
The scarcity of capital goods, however, should be no problem, as they can be produced profitably if needed.

163
00:14:03.640 --> 00:14:07.040
The subsistence fund, on the other hand, comes into being by saving,

164
00:14:07.040 --> 00:14:14.040
and we have no reason to suppose that savings do rise sufficiently to fill up the subsistence fund.

165
00:14:14.040 --> 00:14:24.040
So what I've done here is to celebrate the theory of money and credit.

166
00:14:24.040 --> 00:14:33.040
Concerning the theory of the business cycle, it is in my view, this book, is in my view the best of Mises' writings.

167
00:14:33.040 --> 00:14:42.640
If you have not yet done so, you should study the business cycle theory in The Theory of Money and Credit in detail.

168
00:14:42.640 --> 00:14:54.640
And furthermore, if you are interested in an elaborated version of the Austrian business cycle theory that runs in terms of the subsistence fund,

169
00:14:54.640 --> 00:15:02.040
you should consult the book Capital and Production by Richard von Striegel.

170
00:15:02.040 --> 00:15:13.040
I think Striegel's version of the theory is one that is most congenial to the theory of money and credit.

171
00:15:13.040 --> 00:15:16.040
Thank you very much for your attention.