WEBVTT

NOTE Modern Monetary Theory: The Austrian Contribution

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.000
Okay, this morning's lecture is on the topic of modern monetary theory, the Austrian contribution.

2
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:13.000
And it's in monetary theory that the Austrians diverge most from the mainstream.

3
00:00:13.000 --> 00:00:24.000
At least in micro theory they tend to use the same terminology, supply and demand, marginal utility, entrepreneur and so on.

4
00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:32.000
But in monetary theory, the Austrians approach it on a micro level.

5
00:00:32.000 --> 00:00:40.000
They don't use the same conceptual apparatus as mainstream neoclassical economists do.

6
00:00:40.000 --> 00:00:46.000
They don't use, for example, the quantity theory. They have serious objections to the quantity theory.

7
00:00:46.000 --> 00:00:53.000
What the Austrians have tried to do, and when I talk about Austrian monetary theory, by the way,

8
00:00:53.000 --> 00:00:57.000
I'm really talking about the contributions of Mises and Rothbard.

9
00:00:57.000 --> 00:01:05.000
They are, aside from contributions in business cycle and international monetary economics by Hayek,

10
00:01:05.000 --> 00:01:13.000
they are the really only Austrian monetary economists of the 20th century.

11
00:01:13.000 --> 00:01:21.000
It was their work that resulted in the development of Austrian monetary theory.

12
00:01:21.000 --> 00:01:29.160
And remember, both Mises and Rothbard, to some extent, started their careers as monetary theorists.

13
00:01:29.160 --> 00:01:38.160
Mises' first book in economics was The Theory of Money and Credit, which was mistranslated, as Guido Hülsmann has informed us,

14
00:01:38.160 --> 00:01:49.120
and should have been translated as the theory of fiduciary media, that is the theory of bank deposits and bank notes,

15
00:01:49.120 --> 00:01:57.120
unbacked by reserves and Rothbard one of his earliest books or in this case a

16
00:01:57.120 --> 00:02:00.280
booklet was on what has government done to our money which I mentioned as a

17
00:02:00.280 --> 00:02:04.680
very very not just a primer on money but a very important contribution to the

18
00:02:04.680 --> 00:02:10.480
theory of fiat money also his America's Great Depression which came out in the

19
00:02:10.480 --> 00:02:17.960
same year is really applied monetary theory and there's a long and important

20
00:02:17.960 --> 00:02:46.960
and prior to that chapter there are two other chapters which lay the foundations for monetary theory so both were monetary theorists par excellence so as I said Mises' book, The Theory of Money and Credit, is really what we call the locus classicus, the classical source of monetary theory and monetary theory.

21
00:02:46.960 --> 00:02:52.960
The classical source for Austrian monetary theory, for the praxeological analysis of money and prices.

22
00:02:52.960 --> 00:03:08.960
Austrians from Menger to Wickstede all developed, as we saw, the microeconomic aspects, that is, value theory, price theory, and distribution theory, or factor pricing theory.

23
00:03:08.960 --> 00:03:19.960
But they did so in a border context, and they realized that the main point or objective of economics was to explain money prices.

24
00:03:19.960 --> 00:03:26.960
But they never were able to integrate satisfactorily money, monetary theory with value theory.

25
00:03:26.960 --> 00:03:29.960
And Mises, in fact, did this.

26
00:03:29.960 --> 00:03:45.960
Now, after the Marginalist Revolution, the development was called the neoclassical dichotomy later on, but it was really the neoclassical dichotomy, which means a split by the non-Austrian economists.

27
00:03:45.960 --> 00:03:53.480
So if you look at non-Austrian textbooks of the late 19th century, early 20th century,

28
00:03:53.480 --> 00:04:00.480
you'll see that money is pushed to the end of the textbook in separate chapters and the

29
00:04:00.480 --> 00:04:03.080
analysis uses different concepts.

30
00:04:03.080 --> 00:04:09.620
It doesn't use good old supply and demand, it uses macro, what might later come to be

31
00:04:09.620 --> 00:04:15.620
which would be called macro-concepts, such as the quantity theory.

32
00:04:16.620 --> 00:04:22.620
In this treatment of the non-Austrians, money was really treated like a veil.

33
00:04:22.620 --> 00:04:26.620
It's a veil that obscured the real processes of the economy.

34
00:04:26.620 --> 00:04:31.620
Production was done with real factors of production.

35
00:04:31.620 --> 00:04:37.620
Exchange was really ultimately, even though we exchanged our labor services and our goods against money,

36
00:04:37.620 --> 00:04:42.620
Production was the exchange, ultimately, of goods for goods or goods for services.

37
00:04:42.620 --> 00:04:49.620
Money was only an intermediary and didn't affect the real processes, unless it got out of order.

38
00:04:49.620 --> 00:04:58.620
If there was a rapid inflation or a hyperinflation, as it was in Germany, yes, then that could affect and distort the real processes of the economy.

39
00:04:58.620 --> 00:05:06.620
Or if there was a sudden and unexpected deflation, as there was in the early 1930s, there could be problems with the real economy as a result.

40
00:05:06.620 --> 00:05:17.620
as a result. That much was admitted. But it was an ad hoc explanation because all along money was kept separately in the regular analysis.

41
00:05:17.620 --> 00:05:30.620
As I said, the typical approach was the quantity theory of Irving Fisher, which was written out as a very simple equation.

42
00:05:30.620 --> 00:05:44.420
the quantity equation, money times the velocity of circulation of money, the

43
00:05:44.420 --> 00:05:48.700
number of times that money turns over, the average unit of money turns over in

44
00:05:48.700 --> 00:05:59.780
a given year will equal price. So very simplistic way, if the money supply is

45
00:05:59.780 --> 00:06:11.780
is $100 and if on average those dollars are spent in transactions, let's say, five times during the year,

46
00:06:11.780 --> 00:06:22.780
the velocity of circulation money is therefore five, and let's say that the good that's produced is pizzas,

47
00:06:22.780 --> 00:06:34.780
And so, price of pizza is 10, well then there would be 50 pizzas produced and sold on the market, okay?

48
00:06:34.780 --> 00:06:46.780
So the side in which we have spending is $500 spent in the economy, that is a money supply of $100 that turns over on the average five times a year.

49
00:06:46.780 --> 00:07:00.780
$500 spent per year, and the income received by the producers of, let's say, pizzas is the $10 per pizza times the 50 pizzas that are sold in this case.

50
00:07:00.780 --> 00:07:06.780
So it was a macro concept, or a macro approach, this quantity theory.

51
00:07:06.780 --> 00:07:15.780
Now, this led to the implication that, given that velocity was pretty much fixed by various institutional factors,

52
00:07:15.780 --> 00:07:25.780
the number of times per year workers were paid, the amount of money that people liked to hold, and so on, certain business practices.

53
00:07:25.780 --> 00:07:32.780
We assume that to be fixed, and we also assume that the number of pizzas produced were fixed by the amount of labor,

54
00:07:32.780 --> 00:07:40.780
to measure the amount of capital goods and the type of technology in the economy.

55
00:07:41.780 --> 00:07:45.780
Well then, the only thing that could change, if there was an increase in the money supply,

56
00:07:46.780 --> 00:07:50.780
let's say the money supply doubled to 200, well then prices would double to 20.

57
00:07:51.780 --> 00:07:55.780
Which would mean that both sides would now be 1,000.

58
00:07:56.780 --> 00:08:00.780
Doubling of the money supply would bring about an exact doubling of the price level.

59
00:08:00.780 --> 00:08:10.780
or to put it more generally, a given percentage increase in the money supply would result in the same percentage increase in the price level.

60
00:08:10.780 --> 00:08:18.780
And that was how the value of money was explained, and again I'm simplifying tremendously here, by the non-Austrians.

61
00:08:18.780 --> 00:08:27.780
Now Mises succeeded in repairing the split between monetary theory and value theory.

62
00:08:27.780 --> 00:08:33.780
And let's first start with what Mises sought to accomplish.

63
00:08:33.780 --> 00:08:39.780
He wanted to integrate the theory of money into the overall framework of supply and demand,

64
00:08:39.780 --> 00:08:46.780
which for the Austrian meant that you had to explain demand and supply ultimately by marginal utility.

65
00:08:46.780 --> 00:08:55.780
You had to apply the theory of marginal utility to the explanation of why people held money, why people demanded money.

66
00:08:55.780 --> 00:09:09.780
Now, Menger and Boehm-Bawerk both made a start towards this, but neither developed any sort of complete theory.

67
00:09:09.780 --> 00:09:18.780
So let's start with what Mises saw as the definition of money. First of all, you have to have a definition of what the supply of money is.

68
00:09:18.780 --> 00:09:28.780
Mises defined it theoretically, he took his definition from Menger, as the general medium of exchange. That was the primary function of money.

69
00:09:28.780 --> 00:09:44.780
The other functions that we hear about in our textbooks, store value, the standard of deferred payments, or we might say also the unit of account or store value,

70
00:09:44.780 --> 00:09:49.780
And all of those functions are derivative from the main function of the medium of exchange.

71
00:09:49.780 --> 00:09:55.180
So when we say it's a general medium of exchange, we mean that people routinely and universally

72
00:09:55.180 --> 00:10:02.020
accept money for the most precious items that they have, including their labor.

73
00:10:02.020 --> 00:10:11.020
So no one thinks twice about working for, let's say, $500, even if they're paper dollars.

74
00:10:11.020 --> 00:10:21.020
We readily accept that because we have confidence that we can turn around and use those dollars to purchase the things that we have placed the highest values on.

75
00:10:23.020 --> 00:10:31.020
Now generally, when Mises wrote, before he wrote, economists generally distinguish between banknotes and token coins on one hand,

76
00:10:31.020 --> 00:10:34.020
and demand deposits and checking account balances on the other hand.

77
00:10:34.020 --> 00:10:43.020
They believe that banknotes and token coins were part of the money supply, but that demand deposits or checking account balances were not.

78
00:10:43.020 --> 00:10:52.020
So the money supply, before Mises wrote, was generally defined as consisting of the standard money, which was either gold or silver,

79
00:10:52.020 --> 00:11:00.020
plus banknotes that were denominated in fixed amounts of gold and silver, and any token coins that were issued.

80
00:11:00.020 --> 00:11:05.020
They did not consider checking accounts as part of the money supply, for the most part.

81
00:11:05.020 --> 00:11:11.020
Certainly Irving Fisher, who Milton Friedman referred to as the greatest economist that America has produced,

82
00:11:11.020 --> 00:11:16.020
did not consider checking accounts as part of the money supply.

83
00:11:16.020 --> 00:11:20.020
Something that we do today, as every economist would include today.

84
00:11:20.020 --> 00:11:24.020
So, Mises came up with a taxonomy of money.

85
00:11:24.020 --> 00:11:28.020
He based himself on Menger's essentialist approach.

86
00:11:28.020 --> 00:11:58.020
And he summed that approach up in the following way, he said the greatest mistake that can be made in economic investigation is to fix the tension on mere appearances and to fail to perceive the fundamental difference between things whose externals alone are similar or to discriminate between fundamentally similar things whose externals alone are different. So Mises came up with a new taxonomy of money and let me show you what that taxonomy looked like, diagrammatically.

87
00:11:58.020 --> 00:12:18.740
Mises started with what he called money in the narrow sense, which we might think about

88
00:12:18.740 --> 00:12:20.660
as cash.

89
00:12:20.660 --> 00:12:25.420
Money could either be commodity money like gold and silver, or it could be credit money.

90
00:12:25.420 --> 00:12:31.820
That is, it could be bank notes that were previously redeemable in gold and silver,

91
00:12:31.820 --> 00:12:36.180
as was the case, for example, in Great Britain before 1797.

92
00:12:36.180 --> 00:12:44.220
Great Britain went off the gold and silver standard during the Napoleonic Wars and the

93
00:12:44.220 --> 00:12:52.020
paper pound became the money or cash in the system because banks were permitted to suspend

94
00:12:52.020 --> 00:12:56.020
and payment in gold and silver, including the Bank of England.

95
00:12:56.020 --> 00:13:02.020
So the paper pound became money from 1797 until 1821.

96
00:13:02.020 --> 00:13:11.020
But everyone expected that after the war ended, the paper pound would once again be convertible into gold and silver.

97
00:13:11.020 --> 00:13:19.020
So, in the case of credit money, it's not just a supply and demand for the money that determines the value of money.

98
00:13:19.020 --> 00:13:21.020
We'll talk about that in more detail.

99
00:13:21.020 --> 00:13:32.020
It's also the expectation that that money will be redeemable in the commodity money at sooner or later point in the future.

100
00:13:33.020 --> 00:13:41.020
Finally, fiat money. Fiat money is a paper money in which there is no prospect that it will ever again be convertible,

101
00:13:42.020 --> 00:13:48.020
or no immediate or plausible prospect that it will be convertible ever again in commodity money,

102
00:13:48.020 --> 00:13:51.620
Money, and such as the money that we have today, okay?

103
00:13:51.620 --> 00:13:56.180
So Mises distinguished those three types of basic cash in the system.

104
00:13:56.180 --> 00:14:00.960
His next category was money substitutes.

105
00:14:00.960 --> 00:14:04.700
He said, given that we have either commodity money or credit money or fiat money, let's

106
00:14:04.700 --> 00:14:09.380
say we have a commodity money, people deposit that in a banking system, okay?

107
00:14:09.380 --> 00:14:13.300
Once you have a banking system, people will deposit part of their cash in the banking

108
00:14:13.300 --> 00:14:14.740
system.

109
00:14:14.740 --> 00:14:23.060
That part of their cash that is completely backed up, I'm sorry, that part of their deposits,

110
00:14:23.060 --> 00:14:27.420
whether it's in exchange for banknotes or checking account deposits, that is completely

111
00:14:27.420 --> 00:14:34.540
backed up by cash he called money certificates, that are not backed up he called fiduciary

112
00:14:34.540 --> 00:14:37.540
media.

113
00:14:37.540 --> 00:14:46.540
You trust that when you come in to redeem your bank note or your checking account deposit, that it will be there.

114
00:14:49.540 --> 00:14:57.540
He then identified the category of money in the broad sense, or MBS, and in today's world that would be known as M1.

115
00:14:58.540 --> 00:15:02.540
And what he said was this, he said that that would be equal to money in the narrow sense,

116
00:15:02.540 --> 00:15:10.040
In a sense, that is, under a commodity system, all the gold coins in the system, plus money certificates,

117
00:15:10.040 --> 00:15:19.840
that proportion of the banknotes and deposits in circulation that is completely backed by gold,

118
00:15:19.840 --> 00:15:27.740
and let's assume we have a gold standard, plus fiduciary media, that proportion of the banknotes and deposits that are not backed,

119
00:15:27.740 --> 00:15:31.840
minus bank reserves, because the bank reserves would be double counting.

120
00:15:31.840 --> 00:15:34.880
They are backing up the money certificates.

121
00:15:34.880 --> 00:15:39.240
So part of the gold, you have to subtract the gold that's being held by the banks

122
00:15:39.240 --> 00:15:42.280
from the total amount of gold coin in the system.

123
00:15:42.280 --> 00:15:45.360
Because that's being substituted for by the money certificates.

124
00:15:45.360 --> 00:15:46.960
Now let me just give you a simple example.

125
00:15:46.960 --> 00:15:53.800
If there's $10,000 in gold coin and there's $5,000 in bank notes and deposits

126
00:15:53.800 --> 00:16:00.480
and banks hold $2,500 in bank reserves, that means that there's a 50% reserve ratio.

127
00:16:00.480 --> 00:16:02.440
What would be the total money supply?

128
00:16:02.440 --> 00:16:07.160
Well, it would be the, in a broad sense,

129
00:16:07.160 --> 00:16:09.720
and this is what Mises thought of as the total money supply,

130
00:16:09.720 --> 00:16:12.160
it would be the $10,000 in gold,

131
00:16:12.160 --> 00:16:16.400
plus the $2,500 in money certificates,

132
00:16:16.400 --> 00:16:17.760
those backed up by gold,

133
00:16:17.760 --> 00:16:21.000
plus the $2,500 in the money that was simply created

134
00:16:21.000 --> 00:16:23.280
out of thin air by the banks,

135
00:16:23.280 --> 00:16:28.280
minus the $2,500 that was backing the money certificates.

136
00:16:28.280 --> 00:16:52.280
So, in total then, you would have $12,500 in the system, so that the banks would have brought about, through their lending operations, in this case, a 25% increase in the money supply, that would have driven up prices roughly by 25%, maybe more, maybe less, okay?

137
00:16:52.280 --> 00:16:56.280
Mises did not believe in the quantity theory in which there was strict proportionality.

138
00:16:56.280 --> 00:17:08.280
Another way of adding it up was simply to take the $10,000 worth of gold coins and add to that the $2,500 of fiduciary money that you would get the same answer.

139
00:17:08.280 --> 00:17:23.280
So this is Mises' new taxonomy of money. What was innovative about it was that Mises was the first one to say that money, or a definition of money, in this case money in the broad sense,

140
00:17:23.280 --> 00:17:34.280
included not just banknotes, but any checking account deposits, whether they were backed or unbacked by the cash in the system.

141
00:17:38.280 --> 00:17:52.280
There were some other 19th century economists, particularly in the United States, that recognized the fact that checking account deposits, just like banknotes, were part of the money supply.

142
00:17:53.280 --> 00:18:01.280
So, Mises points out that, look, whether you pay in banknotes or with checking account money, the effect is the same.

143
00:18:01.280 --> 00:18:07.280
Both banknotes and a check written on your deposits are final means of payment.

144
00:18:07.280 --> 00:18:12.280
You've completely discharged your debt to the seller or to the creditor.

145
00:18:12.280 --> 00:18:19.280
So, since the two things function the same, since banknotes and checking account deposits function the same,

146
00:18:19.280 --> 00:18:22.280
are essentially the same in the Mangerian terminology.

147
00:18:22.280 --> 00:18:26.280
They, in fact, must both be part of the money supply.

148
00:18:26.280 --> 00:18:31.280
It would be inconsistent to include bank notes and not to include checking account money.

149
00:18:37.280 --> 00:18:47.280
Now, what was interesting was that Mises classified most historical periods of paper money,

150
00:18:47.280 --> 00:18:52.560
Not as fiat money, he didn't consider it to be fiat money, he considered it to be credit money.

151
00:18:52.560 --> 00:19:01.080
Because in his experience, every single period in which paper money developed,

152
00:19:01.080 --> 00:19:04.800
whether it was during a war or during an emergency,

153
00:19:04.800 --> 00:19:13.600
always resulted in the currency being eventually redeemable again in gold or silver.

154
00:19:13.600 --> 00:19:18.600
So people always had this expectation that eventually the government after the war is over,

155
00:19:18.600 --> 00:19:28.600
after the king has bankrupted the country and has caused a hyperinflation as in France by issuing paper money,

156
00:19:28.600 --> 00:19:35.600
eventually the paper money is going to be in some way tied back to gold or silver.

157
00:19:35.600 --> 00:19:40.600
So Mises made the following statements.

158
00:19:40.600 --> 00:19:46.600
This is very interesting. He admitted theoretically that we could have a purely paper money.

159
00:19:46.600 --> 00:19:53.600
But he didn't think that he ever really saw an actual instance of this, in which paper money was a fiat money,

160
00:19:53.600 --> 00:19:57.600
a money that was simply, as Murray Rothbard points out, a pure name.

161
00:19:57.600 --> 00:20:00.600
A fiat money is literally a pure name. The dollar is a pure name.

162
00:20:00.600 --> 00:20:07.600
The government could stamp that on here. It could stamp it on your bottle of water.

163
00:20:07.600 --> 00:20:14.100
If it stamped $100 on that bottle of water, legitimately stamped by the Treasury, that would circulate.

164
00:20:14.100 --> 00:20:18.800
Because it's the name which the government monopolizes under fiat money.

165
00:20:18.800 --> 00:20:23.600
That is the essence of money.

166
00:20:23.600 --> 00:20:27.000
So Mises, again, theoretically admitted this, so did Wieser.

167
00:20:27.000 --> 00:20:27.900
They admitted that could happen.

168
00:20:27.900 --> 00:20:36.640
Mises even said that at some point in the future, it may be the case that the commodity money gold

169
00:20:36.640 --> 00:20:44.840
loses its non-monetary functions, that is, that people no longer like or use gold as jewelry or industrial purposes,

170
00:20:44.840 --> 00:20:49.200
so that gold becomes simply a money commodity.

171
00:20:49.200 --> 00:21:00.800
But even in that case, it's not a fiat money, it's still, its supply is still controlled by the market, it's still controlled by the cost of producing gold.

172
00:21:00.800 --> 00:21:05.840
So let me just read you Mises' statement regarding fiat money.

173
00:21:05.840 --> 00:21:23.840
Mises says it can hardly be contested that fiat money, in the strict sense of the word, is theoretically conceivable, meaning a money that is a pure name, that is monopolized by government, and that people have no expectation of it ever being convertible again into gold.

174
00:21:23.840 --> 00:21:33.840
He goes on to say whether fiat money has ever actually existed is of course another question and one that cannot offhand be answered affirmatively.

175
00:21:33.840 --> 00:21:44.840
It can hardly be doubted that most of those kinds of money that are not commodity money must be classified as credit money, but only detailed historical investigation could clear this matter up.

176
00:21:44.840 --> 00:22:00.840
Even as late as 1966, in the third edition of Human Action, we've had from 20 years of the Bretton Woods system in which Americans could not convert their dollars into gold,

177
00:22:00.840 --> 00:22:04.840
in which foreign governments were permitted to, but Americans were not.

178
00:22:04.840 --> 00:22:08.840
In fact, Americans were not able to convert dollars into gold since 1933.

179
00:22:08.840 --> 00:22:16.840
So, yet Mises still was reluctant to admit that the dollar was a pure fiat currency.

180
00:22:16.840 --> 00:22:19.840
And he says, this is in Human Action,

181
00:22:19.840 --> 00:22:23.840
it is not the task of catallactics, meaning economics in a narrow sense,

182
00:22:23.840 --> 00:22:29.840
but of economic history to investigate whether there appeared in the past specimens of fiat money

183
00:22:29.840 --> 00:22:33.840
or whether all sorts of money which were not commodity money were credit money.

184
00:22:33.840 --> 00:22:44.840
So he, okay, then in fact it probably is a credit money, but to clear this question up we do have to have an historical investigation.

185
00:22:44.840 --> 00:22:55.840
Mises never explained how the transition occurred during history from commodity money to credit money finally to fiat money.

186
00:22:55.840 --> 00:22:59.840
That was left to Rothbard.

187
00:22:59.840 --> 00:23:05.840
Now, one problem with Mises' monetary theory, he did include demand deposits,

188
00:23:05.840 --> 00:23:11.840
we're checking account money, as we said, as a money substitute,

189
00:23:11.840 --> 00:23:15.840
but he had a problem with savings deposits.

190
00:23:15.840 --> 00:23:23.840
Now, as early as the 1920s and even earlier, banks, even though in the small print,

191
00:23:23.840 --> 00:23:33.840
If you had a passbook savings deposit, it would say they could require you to give 30 days notice before you could withdraw money from your savings account.

192
00:23:33.840 --> 00:23:38.840
So technically it was an investment deposit, meaning that they would make short-term loans with that money.

193
00:23:38.840 --> 00:23:50.840
But after a while, because of central bank policy, and certainly in the 1920s and 1930s, savings accounts could be withdrawn on demand at par.

194
00:23:50.840 --> 00:23:59.840
So if you had $10,000 in a savings account and you wanted to go purchase something for $10,000, you could immediately go to the bank and withdraw that money on demand.

195
00:23:59.840 --> 00:24:13.840
The bank would not invoke that 30-day clause, that 30-day warning that you would have to give them, that you wanted the money back.

196
00:24:13.840 --> 00:24:22.840
So, Mises had an ambivalent attitude towards the inclusion of savings deposits in his broader definition of money.

197
00:24:22.840 --> 00:24:28.840
As early as 1924, he recognized that institutional developments had led banks to, quote,

198
00:24:28.840 --> 00:24:34.840
undertake the obligation to pay out small sums of savings deposits at any time without notice.

199
00:24:34.840 --> 00:24:40.840
So, he was saying that in fact banks were not invoking that clause that you had to give them notice.

200
00:24:40.840 --> 00:24:48.340
And this circumstance, he went on to say, induced small business people in lower-income households to use these deposits as current accounts.

201
00:24:48.340 --> 00:24:57.340
He's admitting that people are using them almost as checking accounts, except they simply have to walk to the bank to withdraw the money, despite the fact that they were technically investment deposits.

202
00:24:57.340 --> 00:25:06.840
Thus, Mises implied that at least some portion of savings deposits functioned economically as money substitutes and should be included in the broad concept of money.

203
00:25:06.840 --> 00:25:34.840
Mises did place much of the blame for the financial and exchange rate instability that occurred in the early 1930s on the widespread treatment of savings deposits as current money, or as he would say, money substitutes.

204
00:25:34.840 --> 00:25:39.840
And he pointed out that this development was actively sought and encouraged by the banks.

205
00:25:39.840 --> 00:25:46.840
The banks wanted people to have confidence that they could take the money out of savings accounts at any time.

206
00:25:46.840 --> 00:25:54.840
Because that would increase the amount of deposits they got, which could be loaned out and it would increase their interest income.

207
00:25:54.840 --> 00:26:01.840
And the central banks made sure that if any of these banks were unable to pay,

208
00:26:01.840 --> 00:26:31.840
they were there to bail these banks out, in other words, they attempted though there wasn't any sort of deposit insurance at this point they attempted to ensure that the instantaneous convertibility of savings deposits which the commercial banks promised to their customers would actually be something that people believed in, that people had trust in so Mises points out that it wasn't

209
00:26:31.840 --> 00:26:37.740
not money flowing from one country to the other or capital flight in the 1930s that

210
00:26:37.740 --> 00:26:39.840
added to the problem of the Great Depression.

211
00:26:39.840 --> 00:26:44.640
What he said was it was this attempt by both central banks and commercial banks to get

212
00:26:44.640 --> 00:26:49.840
people to use savings accounts as if they were checking accounts that caused a lot of

213
00:26:49.840 --> 00:26:50.840
the problems.

214
00:26:50.840 --> 00:26:58.840
So that when people began to fear that, for example, you know, the Austrian bank, the

215
00:26:58.840 --> 00:27:08.840
When that collapsed, many foreign firms and governments had deposits, savings deposits they were getting interest on, that they immediately pulled out.

216
00:27:08.840 --> 00:27:14.840
And this made the financial situation more unstable than it already was.

217
00:27:14.840 --> 00:27:25.840
Despite this brilliant analysis of savings deposits and how they had come to operate as part of the money supply, Mises pulled back from including them in the money supply.

218
00:27:25.840 --> 00:27:37.840
So, in 1966, in the third edition, at one point, he referred to them as demand deposits, not subject to check, but then inconsistently denied that they were money substitutes.

219
00:27:37.840 --> 00:27:47.840
Rather, he identified savings deposits as the foremost among what he called secondary media of exchange, which included highly marketable financial assets.

220
00:27:47.840 --> 00:27:58.840
He included savings deposits, he included blue chip stocks, he included government bonds, not as money, but as secondary media of exchange that people could easily liquidate.

221
00:27:58.840 --> 00:28:10.840
So if you needed cash for a current purpose, you could sell your IBM stock or you could sell your government treasury bill pretty quickly for actual cash.

222
00:28:10.840 --> 00:28:21.840
But the problem is, by then, 1966, we have a Federal Reserve system, we have federal deposit insurance of savings and checking accounts,

223
00:28:21.840 --> 00:28:28.840
whereas you're never completely certain of what price you're going to get for your IBM stock or your treasury bill,

224
00:28:28.840 --> 00:28:36.840
you are certain that you're going to get the full face value or par value of your savings account.

225
00:28:36.840 --> 00:28:46.840
So, you're not selling something. When you go cash in your savings account, you're not selling some sort of financial asset for a price on a market. It isn't a market.

226
00:28:46.840 --> 00:28:58.840
All it is is converting a claim to ready cash. So, it should have been counted as part of the money supply. Mises did not do that. That's another improvement that we'll see that Rothbard made.

227
00:28:58.840 --> 00:29:01.840
Now, what about the demand for money?

228
00:29:01.840 --> 00:29:10.840
Early Austrians had problems in applying marginal utility theory to money because of what was called by a German who was an anti-Austrian.

229
00:29:10.840 --> 00:29:25.840
His name was Carl Helfrich, who became the chairman of the German Central Bank, which was the cause of the hyperinflation in Germany.

230
00:29:25.840 --> 00:29:34.840
Helfrich wrote a big book on money and he criticized the Austrians. He said, look, you can never apply marginal utility to money because of the Austrian Circle.

231
00:29:34.840 --> 00:29:44.840
So he used this term which has stuck in the literature and which was supposed to be referring to a major failing of the Austrian value theory.

232
00:29:44.840 --> 00:29:52.840
And the Austrian Circle looks like this. This is what Helfrich said.

233
00:29:52.840 --> 00:29:58.840
He said, in order to figure out the value of money, let's look at the top, the marginal utility of money.

234
00:29:58.840 --> 00:30:06.840
That is, how an individual values money against other goods and services, which would determine how much that individual would hold in his or her cash balance.

235
00:30:06.840 --> 00:30:10.840
In order to figure that out, that person has to know the purchasing power of money.

236
00:30:10.840 --> 00:30:12.840
That is, what is the value of money on the market?

237
00:30:12.840 --> 00:30:20.840
To know how many dollars to hold, you have to know how much lunch is going to be every day during your pay period.

238
00:30:20.840 --> 00:30:24.840
How much, I live in New York, how much a subway is going to cost?

239
00:30:24.840 --> 00:30:29.840
How much a glass of beer will cost? How much a restaurant meal will cost? How much a shirt will cost?

240
00:30:29.840 --> 00:30:36.840
You already have to know the value of money before you can figure out, let's call it the objective value of money.

241
00:30:36.840 --> 00:30:40.840
You have to know the objective value of money, which is the exchange value of money on the market,

242
00:30:40.840 --> 00:30:48.840
before you can know the subjective value of money, before you can judge subjectively how much money to hold for the future.

243
00:30:48.840 --> 00:30:54.840
And you make that judgment by comparing goods with money.

244
00:30:54.840 --> 00:30:57.840
But the money has to have a previous purchasing power.

245
00:30:57.840 --> 00:31:03.840
So he went on to say, the marginal utility of money then does determine the demand for money,

246
00:31:03.840 --> 00:31:07.840
how much money people want to hold, which, given the supply of money,

247
00:31:07.840 --> 00:31:10.840
the demand and supply determines the purchasing power of money,

248
00:31:10.840 --> 00:31:12.840
which in turn determines the marginal utility of money.

249
00:31:12.840 --> 00:31:15.840
So what he was saying was that, all the Austrians were saying was that

250
00:31:15.840 --> 00:31:23.840
The purchasing power of money determines the purchasing power of money, indirectly, so it was a circle, which could not be broken.

251
00:31:23.840 --> 00:31:37.840
Once again, you have to know what prices are before you know how many of these pieces of paper, which we call a dollar, that you want to hold in your wallet, in your checking account, in your savings account.

252
00:31:37.840 --> 00:31:43.840
Because if prices were lower, you would want to hold fewer of these dollars, because you could purchase more with each one.

253
00:31:43.840 --> 00:31:53.840
If prices were higher, you would want to hold more of these dollars. Each single dollar would have a lower value to you, and you would want to hold more purchasing power.

254
00:31:53.840 --> 00:31:58.840
In any case, that was the Austrian Circle. Now, how did Mises get out of the Austrian Circle?

255
00:31:58.840 --> 00:32:02.840
He got out of it through something that we call the regression theorem.

256
00:32:02.840 --> 00:32:10.840
Can we write that here?

257
00:32:10.840 --> 00:32:18.840
Which was a great theoretical breakthrough.

258
00:32:18.840 --> 00:32:24.840
Let me point something out. As J.V. Say said in 1803,

259
00:32:24.840 --> 00:32:29.840
In response, the previous economists would claim that human beings could create goods.

260
00:32:29.840 --> 00:32:34.840
Say, basically, you said human beings cannot create matter at all.

261
00:32:34.840 --> 00:32:42.840
Only God can create matter. Human beings can transform resources and various elements of their environment

262
00:32:42.840 --> 00:32:46.840
into other forms that have greater use to them or greater utility to them.

263
00:32:46.840 --> 00:32:53.840
But they can't create anything. Well, one thing that human beings can create is new ideas,

264
00:32:53.840 --> 00:32:59.840
New systems of thought, new concepts, and Mises created this new theory.

265
00:32:59.840 --> 00:33:05.840
He was a creative genius. Now, what he said was the following.

266
00:33:05.840 --> 00:33:11.840
In fact, Helferich has made an elementary error.

267
00:33:11.840 --> 00:33:21.840
Because it's not the purchasing power of tomorrow that determines the marginal utility of money today.

268
00:33:21.840 --> 00:33:35.840
We have to date these things. What Mises pointed out was that when we make our judgment about how much money to hold for tomorrow, we do so based on what the value of money is today.

269
00:33:35.840 --> 00:33:38.840
So let me show you what I mean by that.

270
00:33:38.840 --> 00:33:53.840
What Mises did, the purchasing power of money in time t0, which is today,

271
00:33:53.840 --> 00:34:06.840
I have the arrows going in the opposite direction, meaning that the amount of money that you demand, that you'll demand today.

272
00:34:06.840 --> 00:34:32.840
Today. So the monetary demand depends on what the purchasing power of money was today. So you see the prices around you, you determine the value of money, the marginal utility of money and so on, or actually let me, because I have these hours going backwards, let's start here. Let's start to the right.

273
00:34:32.840 --> 00:34:41.840
The supply and demand for money yesterday, T minus one, determines what the purchasing power of money was yesterday.

274
00:34:41.840 --> 00:34:44.840
So the supply and demand for money was yesterday.

275
00:34:44.840 --> 00:34:52.840
Now, today what you do then is you look at prices yesterday, before you go into the market,

276
00:34:52.840 --> 00:35:01.840
and you determine, based on how much a dollar can purchase, how many dollars you want to hold and how many dollars you want to spend.

277
00:35:01.840 --> 00:35:06.340
Okay, so you determine the marginal utility of money, the value of a dollar in relation to other goods and services.

278
00:35:07.740 --> 00:35:13.240
That in turn determines today's demand for money, okay?

279
00:35:13.640 --> 00:35:20.840
And given the supply of money, either, let's say under the gold standard, supply and demand determines today's purchasing power of money.

280
00:35:21.140 --> 00:35:25.140
So we're not saying that the purchasing power of money determines the purchasing power of money.

281
00:35:25.540 --> 00:35:29.340
We're saying that there is a human judgment and choice being made.

282
00:35:29.340 --> 00:35:34.340
Human beings are looking back at yesterday's purchasing power.

283
00:35:34.340 --> 00:35:38.340
There's always a pre-existing set of prices, of money prices.

284
00:35:38.340 --> 00:35:41.340
You look at those prices, you determine the purchasing power of money,

285
00:35:41.340 --> 00:35:45.340
you know what money can exchange for on the market yesterday,

286
00:35:45.340 --> 00:35:47.340
and you might make a judgment about what it will be tomorrow,

287
00:35:47.340 --> 00:35:50.340
but it's always based on what it was yesterday.

288
00:35:50.340 --> 00:35:54.340
And then you determine subjectively how many units of money to hold,

289
00:35:54.340 --> 00:35:58.340
which determines your demand for money, and we'll talk more about holding money and so on.

290
00:35:58.340 --> 00:36:03.840
And that, in conjunction with the supply of money, will determine today's purchasing power of money.

291
00:36:03.840 --> 00:36:09.040
At the end of the market day, there will be certain prices that have emerged that will be different from yesterday's.

292
00:36:09.040 --> 00:36:12.840
So the following day, you will do the same thing.

293
00:36:12.840 --> 00:36:20.040
You look at, tomorrow you look at what today's prices were, determine the marginal utility of money, which will determine your demand for money,

294
00:36:20.040 --> 00:36:22.940
and given the supply, that will determine a new purchasing power of money.

295
00:36:22.940 --> 00:36:44.700
Now, the second objection that came up was, well, all Mises has done is come up with a regressus ad infinitum in Latin,

296
00:36:44.700 --> 00:36:59.700
Meaning, we explain the value of money by continually going back in time and never ever ultimately explaining where the purchasing power of money came from initially.

297
00:36:59.700 --> 00:37:03.700
So, it regresses infinitely back in time.

298
00:37:03.700 --> 00:37:19.700
Well, Mises points out, well, that's not true, because, in fact, the regression theorem tells us that the value of money emerged the day after barter ended.

299
00:37:19.700 --> 00:37:35.700
That if you go back again to the last day of barter, when people were only using gold, let's say, for ornamental purposes, for jewelry, for rituals, and so on.

300
00:37:35.700 --> 00:37:45.500
Then it was simply the marginal utility of gold on the last day of barter, and you can't really see it there, but I have that as T minus N minus 1.

301
00:37:45.500 --> 00:37:49.180
In other words, let's say we've had N days of a monetary economy.

302
00:37:49.180 --> 00:37:54.140
Well, the day before T minus N minus 1, the day before the monetary economy started,

303
00:37:54.140 --> 00:38:06.340
on that day, the value of gold, the marginal utility of gold, was determined at that moment by the uses of gold, just like any other good.

304
00:38:06.340 --> 00:38:12.620
So when we go out and today you purchase a Wendy's hamburger, your demand for that hamburger,

305
00:38:12.620 --> 00:38:18.140
Your decision to purchase that hamburger depends on your value scale at that moment.

306
00:38:18.140 --> 00:38:25.340
There is no temporal component in determining the marginal utility of any other good except money.

307
00:38:25.340 --> 00:38:29.660
So gold was determined, the value of gold was determined on the last day of border,

308
00:38:29.660 --> 00:38:33.500
but the subjective value, which gave rise to demand for gold,

309
00:38:33.500 --> 00:38:39.660
and given the supply of gold in the system, you had a price of gold.

310
00:38:39.660 --> 00:38:45.660
The price of gold on the border was in terms of every other good that it exchanged for.

311
00:38:45.660 --> 00:38:53.460
So, on the first day in which someone said, you know what, everybody in the society accepts gold or uses gold directly,

312
00:38:53.460 --> 00:39:00.260
and therefore I'm going to exchange my goods for gold not because I want to use gold directly,

313
00:39:00.260 --> 00:39:05.260
but because I want to go and buy wheat or I want to go and buy a plow.

314
00:39:05.260 --> 00:39:15.560
At that point, then, people can take gold and demand it as money because there is a pre-existing purchasing power under barter.

315
00:39:15.560 --> 00:39:20.940
So it does come to a close. It is not regressus ad infinitum.

316
00:39:20.940 --> 00:39:29.700
The value of money can be traced back, the temporal element in determining the value of money can be traced back to the last day of barter.

317
00:39:29.700 --> 00:39:56.700
Now, a general equilibrium economist who we talked about yesterday, John Hicks satirized Mises' explanation, his regression theorem, and said that well then, money becomes the ghost of gold, according to von Mises, okay?

318
00:39:56.700 --> 00:39:58.700
And he meant to be sarcastic.

319
00:39:58.700 --> 00:40:08.700
Well, money is not the ghost of gold, but it certainly, the fiat money that we have today has a connection to gold.

320
00:40:08.700 --> 00:40:18.700
The paper dollar, despite what Hicks said, would never have come onto the market or arisen spontaneously on the market.

321
00:40:18.700 --> 00:40:26.700
Or even, it couldn't be forced into existence by governments either, because people would not know what the value of the paper dollar was.

322
00:40:26.700 --> 00:40:34.700
The paper dollar had to have some connection to a commodity that had a pre-existing purchasing power.

323
00:40:34.700 --> 00:40:36.700
In this case, it was the gold dollar.

324
00:40:36.700 --> 00:40:43.700
So if you want to use these terms, which was an attempt to belittle Mises' explanation,

325
00:40:43.700 --> 00:40:49.700
it's certainly true. It is the ghost or the shadow of gold, in some sense.

326
00:40:49.700 --> 00:40:58.700
That's not to say that the dollar itself isn't a real money today, even though it is a pure fiat currency. It certainly is.

327
00:40:58.700 --> 00:41:07.700
So those are some of Mises' most important concepts in monetary theory. I want to mention a few others.

328
00:41:07.700 --> 00:41:21.700
and a few others. One, he did criticize the idea that you could average up the value of money into one single unitary figure.

329
00:41:21.700 --> 00:41:33.700
That is, that you could figure out a single price level. As Mises points out, the purchasing power of money consists of an array of different specific quantities of individual goods

330
00:41:33.700 --> 00:41:37.300
that the monetary unit will exchange for at any point in time.

331
00:41:37.300 --> 00:41:41.700
For example, right now, the purchasing power of money is, let's say, one Coke,

332
00:41:41.700 --> 00:41:45.380
because, let's say, a Coke is a dollar,

333
00:41:45.380 --> 00:41:50.140
or one-third of a Wendy's hamburger, okay, that's three dollars,

334
00:41:50.140 --> 00:41:57.220
or, as I found out yesterday, when my wife called me and told me that a Rolling Stones concert ticket was $175,

335
00:41:57.220 --> 00:42:02.100
one one-hundred and seventy-fifth of a Rolling Stones concert ticket,

336
00:42:02.100 --> 00:42:07.580
or one-sixty-thousandth of a Cadillac escalate, and so on.

337
00:42:07.580 --> 00:42:16.860
So there's almost an infinite array that constitutes the purchasing power of money.

338
00:42:16.860 --> 00:42:25.900
And since those are all heterogeneous goods, you cannot add up and average out that array into a single price index,

339
00:42:25.900 --> 00:42:34.300
as all modern economists attempt to do, which really was a method of approach that began with Fisher.

340
00:42:34.300 --> 00:42:45.100
And I won't go into details, but Mises has some very interesting critiques or very, very interesting criticisms of Fisher's concept, okay?

341
00:42:45.100 --> 00:42:52.900
What I do want to point out is that Mises makes a very interesting comment in Human Action.

342
00:42:52.900 --> 00:42:55.820
Mises pointed out that there are many different ways, they're all arbitrary,

343
00:42:55.820 --> 00:43:03.420
and we see how the Fed is continually changing the consumer price index to make inflation look less bad.

344
00:43:05.420 --> 00:43:07.220
And Mises pointed out the following.

345
00:43:08.020 --> 00:43:13.100
A judicious housewife knows much more about price changes as far as that she has little use for computations

346
00:43:13.100 --> 00:43:18.140
disregarding changes both in quality and in the amount of goods which she is able or permitted to buy

347
00:43:18.140 --> 00:43:20.820
at the prices entering into the computation.

348
00:43:20.820 --> 00:43:35.820
If she measures the changes for personal appreciation by taking prices of only two or three commodities as a yardstick, she is no less scientific and no more arbitrary than the sophisticated mathematicians in choosing their methods for manipulating the data of the market.

349
00:43:35.820 --> 00:43:41.820
And we saw back in the mid-90s, they took out the price of houses and they put in rents because of the housing bubble.

350
00:43:41.820 --> 00:43:48.820
Price of housing was rising at a much higher level because of low interest rates or a much higher rate than rents were.

351
00:43:48.820 --> 00:43:57.820
So it made the consumer price index look better from the point of view of inflation and also the problem of quality changes.

352
00:43:57.820 --> 00:44:07.820
I mean, in order for these statistics, these price indices to have meaning, they have to have the same goods.

353
00:44:07.820 --> 00:44:12.820
But we know goods are always changing in quality and new goods are always coming into the basket.

354
00:44:12.820 --> 00:44:17.820
So, before they changed the basket to include cell phones, I don't know if they did or not,

355
00:44:17.820 --> 00:44:20.820
you didn't have cell phones in the basket.

356
00:44:20.820 --> 00:44:29.820
You had a huge part of the money, or a large amount of money that was spent on so-called average consumer basket of goods,

357
00:44:29.820 --> 00:44:32.820
was spent on cell phones, but that had a zero weight in the basket.

358
00:44:32.820 --> 00:44:38.820
So, what Mises is saying is that there's no scientific way of measuring inflation.

359
00:44:38.820 --> 00:45:01.820
of Inflation. Historically, statistics are interesting, they can show us the magnitude of inflation, but a housewife or someone who goes shopping regularly and habitually buys certain goods, on her own can figure out, more relevantly to herself certainly, what inflation is, how bad inflation is.

360
00:45:01.820 --> 00:45:31.820
Murray Rothbard was always saying that he hated the CPI because it didn't give a good big weight to books and he was always buying books, the price of books were going up at a very rapid rate, they still are, well you can tell if you're a student, you can see the way textbooks have increased, and being a parent of a student, tuition is weighted, to me it has a huge weight in my budget right now, and that's going up more rapidly. Finally about Mises,

361
00:45:31.820 --> 00:45:46.820
pointed out that the quantity theory was wrong because it implied that a given change, a percentage change in the quantity of money resulted in all other things equal a given percentage change in prices.

362
00:45:46.820 --> 00:45:50.820
So if the money supply went up by 10%, prices would go up by 10%.

363
00:45:50.820 --> 00:46:04.820
Mises pointed out that this was not correct, that in fact, you had to analyze changes in the purchasing power of money through what he called a step-by-step process, which was later called period analysis.

364
00:46:04.820 --> 00:46:11.820
And basically what that was, was the following. You focus on where the new money comes into the system, where it's injected into the system.

365
00:46:11.820 --> 00:46:25.820
The government spends new money on weapons guidance systems, they buy more defense computers from Silicon Valley, they therefore create new money to make these purchases.

366
00:46:25.820 --> 00:46:38.820
Now what happens? Well initially the people who get the new money, the first people to receive that money are the stockholders and workers in high tech firms, in a specific point, in California.

367
00:46:38.820 --> 00:46:43.820
Now, let's say the workers increase their demand for beer because they have higher cash balances now.

368
00:46:43.820 --> 00:46:45.820
They have more money than they want to hold.

369
00:46:45.820 --> 00:46:47.820
Prices haven't gone up yet.

370
00:46:47.820 --> 00:46:49.820
They don't go up instantaneously and proportionally.

371
00:46:49.820 --> 00:46:52.820
Now, the price of beer goes up.

372
00:46:52.820 --> 00:46:58.820
The stockholders in these companies increase their demand for fine wines from Napa Valley.

373
00:46:58.820 --> 00:47:00.820
So, the price of wine goes up.

374
00:47:00.820 --> 00:47:06.820
You and I, or the people who are on the East Coast, we're paying higher prices for beer and wine,

375
00:47:06.820 --> 00:47:08.820
Yet, our incomes haven't changed.

376
00:47:08.820 --> 00:47:16.820
So, there is a step-by-step redistribution of wealth away from people who receive the new money late or not at all,

377
00:47:16.820 --> 00:47:22.820
to the people, including the government, who create and receive the new money initially.

378
00:47:22.820 --> 00:47:24.820
Now, let's take a few steps further.

379
00:47:24.820 --> 00:47:32.820
The people in the Napa Valley where wine is produced, the people in Milwaukee who are producing beer,

380
00:47:32.820 --> 00:47:36.820
They're much more prosperous. They have higher cash balances.

381
00:47:36.820 --> 00:47:40.820
Their marginal utility of money drops because now money has a lower value to them

382
00:47:40.820 --> 00:47:44.820
because they have more of it, vis-à-vis other goods.

383
00:47:44.820 --> 00:47:49.820
So they spend, let's say, more money on going out for steak dinners.

384
00:47:49.820 --> 00:47:53.820
So now the demand for beef goes up.

385
00:47:53.820 --> 00:47:59.820
Now I'm paying higher prices not only for beer and wine, but for steak.

386
00:47:59.820 --> 00:48:07.820
And let's assume also that they begin buying more automobiles from Detroit.

387
00:48:07.820 --> 00:48:10.820
So now the prices of American cars are going up.

388
00:48:10.820 --> 00:48:12.820
So now what has happened?

389
00:48:12.820 --> 00:48:21.820
There are four prices that have risen and people who are not yet part of this chain of spending of the new money have their real incomes shrinking.

390
00:48:21.820 --> 00:48:32.820
And eventually, maybe 12 months down the line, 18 months down the line, that new money will be spent in New York, where I work.

391
00:48:32.820 --> 00:48:39.820
So maybe eventually people will start taking, because they have more money, more vacations in New York.

392
00:48:39.820 --> 00:48:44.820
The prices of, let's say, hotels in New York haven't risen, the prices of Broadway shows haven't risen yet.

393
00:48:44.820 --> 00:48:49.820
They'll also start taking more advantage of financial services, which are produced in New York.

394
00:48:49.820 --> 00:48:55.740
are produced in New York. Now, finally, 18 months later, the demand for a PACE MBA, PACE

395
00:48:55.740 --> 00:49:01.140
University MBA goes up, I teach the MBA program. So the price of, so finally PACE's tuition

396
00:49:01.140 --> 00:49:11.260
goes up and I get a raise. So for 18 months, what has happened to my real income? It shrunk.

397
00:49:11.260 --> 00:49:16.500
Not only that, the second point that Mises made is that there is a permanent redistribution

398
00:49:16.500 --> 00:49:32.500
In other words, the people that gain, the people that are the early receivers of the new money, demand different things than the people that are the late receivers of the money or people of fixed income.

399
00:49:32.500 --> 00:49:39.500
So because income has been redistributed and wealth has been redistributed to them, the structure of demand in the economy changes.

400
00:49:39.500 --> 00:49:49.500
So let's say retired people on fixed incomes in Florida find that their wealth is permanently reduced and their incomes are permanently reduced.

401
00:49:49.500 --> 00:49:55.500
They never get any of that new money. So what you'll see then is, is possibly condominiums in Florida actually falling in price.

402
00:49:55.500 --> 00:50:05.500
Even though there's a general inflation in the economy. Because people are demanding, the people that demand those things have suffered a loss in real income.

403
00:50:05.500 --> 00:50:10.500
And as Mises points out, money therefore is non-neutral.

404
00:50:10.500 --> 00:50:18.500
That is, increasing the money supply will not increase all prices proportionately and instantaneously.

405
00:50:18.500 --> 00:50:25.500
It takes time for the purchasing power of money to adjust to a change in the money supply, number one.

406
00:50:25.500 --> 00:50:30.500
And number two, when it does adjust, it adjusts unevenly.

407
00:50:30.500 --> 00:50:43.500
So at the end of the whole process, certain prices will have risen by, let's say, 15%, other prices may have risen only by 3% and some prices may have actually fallen.

408
00:50:43.500 --> 00:50:59.500
With the implication that resources then will move into those areas that have higher prices and higher profits and away from areas in which profits did not increase or actually fell or where there were losses.

409
00:50:59.500 --> 00:51:05.500
So there will be a readjustment of real resources as a result of the change in the money supply.

410
00:51:05.500 --> 00:51:09.500
And if this wasn't the case, Mises points out, then why would anybody inflate?

411
00:51:09.500 --> 00:51:16.500
Why would a government ever inflate if as soon as you created new money, all prices went up proportionally?

412
00:51:16.500 --> 00:51:20.500
There will be no reason for inflation.

413
00:51:20.500 --> 00:51:32.400
It's precisely because money is non-neutral that governments are lured to inflate the money supply, or their central banks.

414
00:51:32.400 --> 00:51:44.200
Now, by the way, in current monetary theory, there's a difference made between what happens in the short run and what happens in the long run.

415
00:51:44.200 --> 00:51:57.200
In the short run, they admit that money is non-neutral, not in the Austrian sense of percolating or rippling through the economy at a different speed and affecting prices at different times,

416
00:51:57.200 --> 00:52:10.200
but in some sort of Keynesian sense. That is, if you increase the money supply, you're going to cause for a while an increase in output and then later on prices will adjust and the output will go back to its natural level.

417
00:52:10.200 --> 00:52:25.200
But in the long run, they still believe, as in the naive quantity theory, that if you increase the money supply by 10%, eventually, in the long run, all other things equal, all prices will eventually rise by 10%, which is crazy.

418
00:52:25.200 --> 00:52:36.200
And it was Mises who developed, and Mises alone was responsible for this step-by-step analysis, or sometimes called process analysis or period analysis.

419
00:52:36.200 --> 00:52:46.200
And, by the way, no matter how quickly people spend their money, there's still a sequence in which people receive the money.

420
00:52:46.200 --> 00:52:55.200
So even if the whole thing happened in a day, it doesn't matter how quickly it happens, whether it happens over 18 months or one day, it still happens in a sequence.

421
00:52:55.200 --> 00:52:59.200
That is, some people get the money first, spend it before prices have risen, they gain.

422
00:52:59.200 --> 00:53:07.200
The people who get the money at the end of the day, after most prices have risen, and most of the money has been spent, are the ones that suffer.

423
00:53:07.200 --> 00:53:20.200
Because there's been some criticisms of Austrian economic, of Mises' analysis to the effect that, well, in today's world where, you know, money can be spent instantaneously, you know, you can spend on the internet and so on,

424
00:53:20.200 --> 00:53:27.200
Well, all prices go up very rapidly, even if they do all go up very rapidly.

425
00:53:27.200 --> 00:53:31.200
They still go up one after the other. It's still a step-by-step process and that's important.

426
00:53:31.200 --> 00:53:41.200
Okay, let's talk a little bit about Rothbard now and his contributions to Austrian monetary theory.

427
00:53:41.200 --> 00:53:47.200
He developed the theory of how fiat money comes about.

428
00:53:47.200 --> 00:54:00.840
What is government done to our money?

429
00:54:00.840 --> 00:54:09.120
What he did was to develop what I might call a historical logical theory of how fiat money

430
00:54:09.120 --> 00:54:10.120
developed.

431
00:54:10.120 --> 00:54:13.600
He bases himself basically on Mises regression theorem.

432
00:54:13.600 --> 00:54:26.600
He points out that, yes, fiat money cannot develop by some king simply putting his picture on a piece of paper and calls it one-knit,

433
00:54:26.600 --> 00:54:40.600
and then disperses it among the public and says, okay, you have a monetary economy now, go forth and spend and make everybody prosperous.

434
00:54:40.600 --> 00:54:46.440
People wouldn't know how much to charge for the goods they're selling because it has no pre-existing purchasing power.

435
00:54:46.440 --> 00:54:49.400
Nor could it be a social compact.

436
00:54:49.400 --> 00:54:56.280
In other words, for a while, the general media of exchange in colonial Virginia were tobacco leaves.

437
00:54:56.280 --> 00:54:58.520
Well, the people get together and say,

438
00:54:58.520 --> 00:55:02.360
let's have a town meeting. We have these problems with barter,

439
00:55:02.360 --> 00:55:05.400
including the lack of

440
00:55:05.400 --> 00:55:06.840
coincidence of wants.

441
00:55:06.840 --> 00:55:08.400
So let's all agree

442
00:55:08.400 --> 00:55:12.960
to accept tobacco leaves. It didn't happen that way either. It happened over the course

443
00:55:12.960 --> 00:55:19.800
of centuries that gold and silver emerged as the general media of exchange. And eventually

444
00:55:19.800 --> 00:55:24.920
towards the end of the 18th century, gold became, the 19th century, gold became the

445
00:55:24.920 --> 00:55:29.460
general medium of exchange. The government may have had something to do with driving

446
00:55:29.460 --> 00:55:36.060
Noticing silver out, that still has to be explored.

447
00:55:36.060 --> 00:55:42.300
Now what Rothbard did was to look back in history, it was more sociology than specific

448
00:55:42.300 --> 00:55:43.300
history.

449
00:55:43.300 --> 00:55:45.540
What he said was generally what happened was this.

450
00:55:45.540 --> 00:55:48.520
Initially you had a gold standard.

451
00:55:48.520 --> 00:55:54.780
The king saw that one way of increasing his revenues was to monopolize the mint so he

452
00:55:54.780 --> 00:55:57.060
took over the function of minting money.

453
00:55:57.060 --> 00:56:06.060
He took that function over and he charged a monopoly price, but that's called seigneurage.

454
00:56:06.060 --> 00:56:16.060
That's a monopoly price for the minting of money.

455
00:56:16.060 --> 00:56:25.060
It comes from the French, it comes from seigneur, it's the prerogative of the Lord to print money.

456
00:56:25.060 --> 00:56:43.060
The story is that Signorage initially, during the feudal era, referred to the fact that the Lord of the Manor had the right to spend the first evening with the new bride of his serf or vassal.

457
00:56:43.060 --> 00:56:50.060
He didn't actually do that. He would allow the vassal to buy his way out with a certain sum of money.

458
00:56:50.060 --> 00:56:55.560
So, in some sense, when government inflates, we get the same thing being done to us.

459
00:56:56.560 --> 00:56:58.060
I won't get any more explicit than that.

460
00:57:01.060 --> 00:57:11.560
Then, what the king did, since he was vain, he substituted a name for the standard weight of gold.

461
00:57:11.560 --> 00:57:16.560
Gold and silver would initially money circulated simply by weight and not by tail.

462
00:57:16.560 --> 00:57:18.560
Tail being the name.

463
00:57:20.060 --> 00:57:46.060
So you substituted a brand name, then as banks emerged, people began to accept banknotes, as we talked about, and checking account deposits, denominated in the name, so now you had dollars, or francs, or pounds, even though they still referred to and were defined at a specific weight of gold,

464
00:57:46.060 --> 00:57:53.060
The dollar was defined from 1834 to 1933 as about one-twentieth of an ounce of gold.

465
00:57:53.060 --> 00:58:00.060
The pound was defined as about one-fourth of an ounce of gold from 1821 to 1931.

466
00:58:00.060 --> 00:58:06.060
But now people see this paper money that's circulating and that has its name on it.

467
00:58:06.060 --> 00:58:13.060
Now, since these banks or fractional reserve banks, as fractional reserve banks grow up,

468
00:58:13.060 --> 00:58:18.060
They get into trouble at various times in history. They ask the government to bail them out.

469
00:58:18.060 --> 00:58:27.060
The government then legally permits them to suspend payment of gold in exchange for the paper money.

470
00:58:27.060 --> 00:58:32.060
And so people continue to use the paper money. It now becomes what?

471
00:58:32.060 --> 00:58:41.060
We have a progression, or I would call it not a progression, but a devolution away from gold or commodity money towards credit money.

472
00:58:41.060 --> 00:58:45.060
But now people become used to the fact that it's the paper that's the money.

473
00:58:45.060 --> 00:58:51.060
Now eventually they go back onto the gold standard after the war or after the bank crisis is over.

474
00:58:51.060 --> 00:59:00.060
But now people have in their minds that the dollar is the actual piece of paper that they're holding and the gold somehow is backing it up.

475
00:59:00.060 --> 00:59:08.060
Governments encourage this by setting up a central bank which issues its own paper money.

476
00:59:08.060 --> 00:59:14.060
The Bank of England issued its own paper money, which is backed up by gold, and it's defined as a weight of gold,

477
00:59:14.060 --> 00:59:21.060
but now they even have more confidence in banks, because look, we have the full faith and credit of the British government behind these notes.

478
00:59:21.060 --> 00:59:32.060
So that causes people to further, it furthers their belief that it's the paper that's the actual money.

479
00:59:32.060 --> 00:59:42.060
And the commercial banks begin holding the central bank notes, which themselves are convertible into gold, but they begin holding those notes as reserves.

480
00:59:42.060 --> 01:00:00.060
So, when you cash a check, you don't get the gold, you get the paper pound notes issued by the Bank of England, which does promise to convert that into a fourth of an ounce of gold, approximately, for every one pound note.

481
01:00:00.060 --> 01:00:15.060
Going further, Rothbard points out that then governments begin implementing a gold bullion standard, meaning that, well, before that, they begin to centralize the gold reserves.

482
01:00:15.060 --> 01:00:20.060
They tell the banks, look, give us all the gold, we'll keep them in our vaults, you just keep our paper notes.

483
01:00:20.060 --> 01:00:30.060
So they centralize the gold reserves. Then they begin to convert their notes into only gold bullion, big bars of gold.

484
01:00:30.060 --> 01:00:38.060
And they encourage people to use their notes or checking accounts at the commercial banks for everyday transactions.

485
01:00:38.060 --> 01:00:47.060
So the circulation of gold coins diminishes. And you just see paper money.

486
01:00:47.060 --> 01:01:11.060
So now the gold coin is all locked up in the vaults and for the most part it's people, big businesses involved in international trade that will convert the notes into big bars of gold bullion that are not convenient for everyday transactions but they are convenient for shipping back and forth for purposes of settling international trade balances.

487
01:01:11.060 --> 01:01:19.060
Then the government, after bank failures, come up with a deposit insurance.

488
01:01:19.060 --> 01:01:28.060
So now people know that, look, that dollar is as good as an ounce of gold.

489
01:01:28.060 --> 01:01:34.060
Finally, governments during the war go off the gold standard.

490
01:01:34.060 --> 01:01:37.060
So during the Civil War, the U.S. goes off the gold standard.

491
01:01:37.060 --> 01:01:43.060
During the Napoleonic Wars, as I said, the British Bank of England goes off the gold standard.

492
01:01:43.060 --> 01:01:53.060
Again, people don't like this, but they believe that they're going to go back to the gold standard after the emergency passes, after the war is over.

493
01:01:53.060 --> 01:02:03.060
So finally, World War II comes along, World War I, all belligerents went off the gold standard, including the U.S. when it entered the war.

494
01:02:03.060 --> 01:02:11.060
So people are now very, very used to, in the 1920s, 1930s, they're used to money as paper money.

495
01:02:11.060 --> 01:02:19.060
They still have faith in it because it's backed by gold, because they believe that this gold is all in a vault,

496
01:02:19.060 --> 01:02:27.060
somewhere in the central bank and the government's guarding it rigorously.

497
01:02:27.060 --> 01:02:33.060
Okay, so what finally happens then? What happens in World War II?

498
01:02:33.060 --> 01:02:39.060
We go off the gold standard, Britain goes off the gold standard in 1931, we go off in 1933, France goes off in 1936,

499
01:02:39.060 --> 01:02:45.060
and the war ends, people still have expectations, even Mises had expectations, right?

500
01:02:45.060 --> 01:02:48.060
That we would go back onto the gold standard.

501
01:02:48.060 --> 01:02:52.060
What they do is they set up a phony gold standard, okay?

502
01:02:52.060 --> 01:03:03.060
A gold standard in which, as it was hammered out at Bretton Woods by the various allied powers, Great Britain, the U.S., France, and so on.

503
01:03:03.060 --> 01:03:12.060
Under this Bretton Woods system, only the U.S. dollar was convertible into gold at the rate of $35 per ounce.

504
01:03:12.060 --> 01:03:28.060
So that's the other point. They also devalue, so even though gold was defined for about a hundred years or the dollar was defined for about a hundred years as one-twentieth of an ounce of gold, in 1933 it's devalued and made less than one-thirtieth of an ounce of gold.

505
01:03:28.060 --> 01:03:39.060
In other words, the price of gold has changed. So you act as if it's the paper that's the money and that you're changing the price of the gold, which is sort of just what backs up the money. It's not the true money itself.

506
01:03:39.060 --> 01:03:48.060
So, as you devalue, people begin looking, the paper dollar contains less and less gold, let's say, or the paper pound contains less and less gold, okay?

507
01:03:48.060 --> 01:03:59.060
So, that's something else that acclimates people to thinking of paper money as the actual money and not just as simply the receipt for gold, okay?

508
01:03:59.060 --> 01:04:03.060
Which, in fact, is what it was under a commodity standard.

509
01:04:03.060 --> 01:04:06.020
So the phony gold standard is set up, as Rothbard points out,

510
01:04:07.380 --> 01:04:10.260
dollars convertible into gold, but not to U.S. citizens.

511
01:04:10.260 --> 01:04:14.900
U.S. citizens aren't even allowed to own gold from 1933 to 1976,

512
01:04:15.940 --> 01:04:18.260
let alone convert their dollars into gold.

513
01:04:18.260 --> 01:04:22.900
Only foreign governmental institutions, foreign treasuries,

514
01:04:22.900 --> 01:04:26.900
or foreign central banks can convert dollars into gold.

515
01:04:27.620 --> 01:04:31.300
So by the mid-60s, the U.S. is inflating like mad

516
01:04:31.300 --> 01:04:37.420
because foreign governments have backed their currencies by the dollar

517
01:04:37.420 --> 01:04:39.980
because the dollar is as good as gold.

518
01:04:39.980 --> 01:04:43.380
The U.S. government has solemnly promised in 1946

519
01:04:43.380 --> 01:04:49.100
to convert all dollars held by foreign governments into gold.

520
01:04:49.100 --> 01:04:53.460
Now, that was back when the U.S. government had most of the gold in the world.

521
01:04:53.460 --> 01:04:59.980
We had a stockpile of gold of over $25 billion worth at the rate of $35 per ounce.

522
01:04:59.980 --> 01:05:04.740
There was something like maybe $12 billion held by foreign governments.

523
01:05:04.740 --> 01:05:08.820
So the foreign dollars were more than 100% backed up by gold,

524
01:05:08.820 --> 01:05:11.820
so everyone trusted that the U.S. government could pay off.

525
01:05:11.820 --> 01:05:17.620
But in the 1960s, as President Johnson promises us guns and butter,

526
01:05:17.620 --> 01:05:22.140
that is that we're going to fight the Vietnam War and increase spending on the Vietnam War.

527
01:05:22.140 --> 01:05:24.500
We're also going to fight the war on poverty.

528
01:05:24.500 --> 01:05:26.460
We're going to increase the welfare state.

529
01:05:26.460 --> 01:05:29.180
And we're not going to raise taxes.

530
01:05:29.180 --> 01:05:32.740
We're not going to prevent people from purchasing consumer goods.

531
01:05:32.740 --> 01:05:34.860
Well, how does he pay for all this? He prints new money.

532
01:05:34.860 --> 01:05:36.740
And he prints tremendous amounts of money.

533
01:05:36.740 --> 01:05:39.780
So tremendous amounts of money are printed during the 1960s.

534
01:05:39.780 --> 01:05:43.820
Eventually, our gold stock falls to $12 billion.

535
01:05:43.820 --> 01:05:47.260
Foreign dollar holdings go up to $80 billion.

536
01:05:47.260 --> 01:05:50.340
The French start to get nervous. Germans get nervous.

537
01:05:50.340 --> 01:05:51.940
Germany is basically an occupied country.

538
01:05:51.940 --> 01:05:55.420
There are still American troops there, so they can't make too much noise.

539
01:05:55.420 --> 01:06:03.920
The French pull out of NATO. They form their own nuclear force, independent of NATO, so that the U.S. can't blackmail them,

540
01:06:03.920 --> 01:06:12.920
because the U.S. was saying, well, we'll pay your dollar liabilities in gold, but we're going to have to remove our nuclear umbrella.

541
01:06:12.920 --> 01:06:24.920
And it was Mises' follower and friend Jacques Rouef who pushed the goal to force the U.S. to convert dollars into gold, which was a great thing.

542
01:06:24.920 --> 01:06:26.400
The U.S. really couldn't do it.

543
01:06:26.400 --> 01:06:30.920
1968, there's still free gold markets in London and Zurich.

544
01:06:30.920 --> 01:06:34.360
Price of gold is shooting up above $35.

545
01:06:34.360 --> 01:06:38.080
So how do you keep the price of gold back down to $35?

546
01:06:38.080 --> 01:06:41.960
The U.S. has to continually pour gold into these foreign markets.

547
01:06:41.960 --> 01:06:48.160
So in these foreign markets, you have a run on gold.

548
01:06:48.160 --> 01:06:53.000
So now our stock falls to $9 billion.

549
01:06:53.000 --> 01:07:01.000
And there's a run on gold in 1968. They stopped the run by saying gold will only be traded between central banks.

550
01:07:01.000 --> 01:07:10.000
From now on, we're not going to worry about the free gold market, which means that then the price of gold, there's two prices of gold, the price of gold goes up because of the inflation of the dollar.

551
01:07:10.000 --> 01:07:14.000
1971, foreign governments want their gold back.

552
01:07:14.000 --> 01:07:19.560
So there is such a run on gold that U.S. gold stock would have completely run out within two weeks.

553
01:07:19.560 --> 01:07:28.040
President Nixon then reneges on the solemn pledge to continue to convert dollars into gold in 1971.

554
01:07:28.040 --> 01:07:30.840
He closes the gold window, as it is said.

555
01:07:30.840 --> 01:07:34.960
At that point, as Rothbard points out, the last link to gold is broken.

556
01:07:34.960 --> 01:07:41.520
The last tiny link to gold is broken, and you have fiat money.

557
01:07:41.520 --> 01:07:52.480
So, because Rothbard was such a good historian, he was able to come up with an historical, logical explanation of fiat money.

558
01:07:52.480 --> 01:07:57.680
So, fiat money has to develop from commodity money.

559
01:07:57.680 --> 01:08:11.320
So, if you want to use Hicks' sarcastic reference to Mises regression theorem, that the dollar or the pound is the ghost of gold, well, in some sense it is.

560
01:08:11.320 --> 01:08:17.520
and Rothbard rigorously has shown how you can get to fiat money from commodity money.

561
01:08:17.520 --> 01:08:21.360
This is a great accomplishment of his.

562
01:08:21.360 --> 01:08:26.160
Another great accomplishment of his was that his definition of the money supply.

563
01:08:26.160 --> 01:08:35.160
He found an article by a Chinese economist written in the early 1930s and neglected.

564
01:08:35.160 --> 01:08:40.080
The name of the author was Lin Lin, and I can't remember the exact title of the article.

565
01:08:40.080 --> 01:09:07.580
But that sparked in Rothbard the thought that the medium of exchange can be defined as anything that people will routinely and universally accept as a final means of payment or anything that is immediately interchangeable into the medium of exchange, that is dollars, at par, on demand.

566
01:09:07.580 --> 01:09:10.940
Well, I've been redundant there.

567
01:09:10.940 --> 01:09:20.260
Anything that's redeemable in cash, instantaneously, and at par.

568
01:09:20.260 --> 01:09:23.300
Now, that's certainly true of checking accounts.

569
01:09:23.300 --> 01:09:26.900
You can instantaneously redeem your checking account deposits

570
01:09:26.900 --> 01:09:29.740
by writing a check to a third party, or by going down yourself

571
01:09:29.740 --> 01:09:33.020
and cashing a check and withdrawing the money from your checking account.

572
01:09:33.020 --> 01:09:36.140
But Rothbard pointed out, and this is Lin's point,

573
01:09:36.140 --> 01:09:38.420
The same was true of savings accounts.

574
01:09:38.420 --> 01:09:41.860
You could immediately transfer them into, especially with ATM machines today,

575
01:09:41.860 --> 01:09:45.580
savings accounts can be transferred into checking accounts.

576
01:09:45.580 --> 01:09:48.580
Or you can immediately withdraw the money, especially with ATM machines,

577
01:09:48.580 --> 01:09:52.900
you don't even have to walk to the bank from your savings account.

578
01:09:52.900 --> 01:10:00.860
So Rothbard said, since savings accounts are functionally identical with checking accounts

579
01:10:00.860 --> 01:10:03.820
and are in fact immediately interchangeable with the checking accounts,

580
01:10:03.820 --> 01:10:13.820
is ordered to cash on demand at par, at par meaning that for every dollar that you have on the books in your checking account, you can get a full dollar out.

581
01:10:13.820 --> 01:10:24.820
So Rothbard, in his book, first develops this definition of the money supply in America's Great Depression,

582
01:10:24.820 --> 01:10:38.820
and then writes an article in 1976 defending it on the Austrian definition of the money supply in 1976.

583
01:10:38.820 --> 01:10:51.820
So Rothbard then actually goes further and he points out not only are savings accounts immediately and instantaneously redeemable in readily spendable dollars,

584
01:10:51.820 --> 01:10:57.820
But so are savings bonds. You know those bonds you were given when you were younger that were issued by the Treasury?

585
01:10:57.820 --> 01:11:03.820
They're government savings bonds. Well, basically they're claims, immediately redeemable claims against the Treasury.

586
01:11:03.820 --> 01:11:14.820
After six months, even though they have a nine-year maturity, after six months you can redeem them without losing any interest, with interest, at any bank or at the Treasury.

587
01:11:14.820 --> 01:11:22.820
So even though their formal maturity was nine years or seven years, I don't remember what it was, you paid $50 and you got a $25 bond.

588
01:11:22.820 --> 01:11:29.820
You got the accrued interest, we're giving them before maturity, so the stock of savings bonds was included.

589
01:11:29.820 --> 01:11:38.820
He also included two items that used to be in the money supply but were dropped out after World War II for some reason.

590
01:11:38.820 --> 01:11:44.820
Government deposits, in other words government deposits that governments held at commercial banks

591
01:11:44.820 --> 01:11:48.820
and that the US government held at commercial banks and at the Fed.

592
01:11:48.820 --> 01:11:50.820
Now they're not included in the money supply.

593
01:11:50.820 --> 01:11:54.820
But Rothbard pointed out that they're no different than any other demand deposit.

594
01:11:54.820 --> 01:11:58.820
They can be spent at any time by the government, so that was included.

595
01:11:58.820 --> 01:12:06.820
Any included, which again was dropped out, foreign government deposits held at US banks.

596
01:12:06.820 --> 01:12:10.420
All deposits held by foreign governments and foreign central banks and US banks.

597
01:12:10.420 --> 01:12:17.540
So he took Mises' definition of money to its logical conclusion.

598
01:12:17.540 --> 01:12:22.780
The money supply consists of the general medium of exchange.

599
01:12:22.780 --> 01:12:29.380
And the general medium of exchange is any asset that can be readily spent

600
01:12:29.380 --> 01:12:36.780
or that is immediately redeemable at par into an asset that can be readily spent.

601
01:12:36.780 --> 01:12:41.780
So this was a great advance in theory of the money supply.

602
01:12:46.780 --> 01:12:51.780
There's a few other things that he added to monetary theory.

603
01:12:52.780 --> 01:12:55.780
His theory of the demand for money, I just might mention that last.

604
01:12:55.780 --> 01:13:00.780
In it, what Rothbard did was to show that there was really two components to the demand for money.

605
01:13:00.780 --> 01:13:15.780
And he took the following. He said, look, the overall demand for money is equal to what he called the exchange demand for money plus the reservation demand for money.

606
01:13:15.780 --> 01:13:21.780
Okay. So there's two ways of demanding money according to Rothbard.

607
01:13:21.780 --> 01:13:25.780
The first is the exchange demand for money.

608
01:13:25.780 --> 01:13:30.780
Anytime you sell anything, you are demanding money.

609
01:13:30.780 --> 01:13:34.780
So when you go to work, you are selling your labor services in exchange for money.

610
01:13:34.780 --> 01:13:40.780
That's a representation or that's an instance of the exchange demand for money.

611
01:13:40.780 --> 01:13:48.780
So we're always looking, when you talk about the market for money, we're looking at it from reversing things.

612
01:13:48.780 --> 01:13:53.780
You are buying money. When you buy apples, you demand apples.

613
01:13:53.780 --> 01:14:00.780
Going out and purchasing apples or steak or something is a reflection of your demand for that thing.

614
01:14:00.780 --> 01:14:05.780
The same thing is true with buying money. When you work or if you sell your used car to someone,

615
01:14:05.780 --> 01:14:10.780
you are selling something in exchange for money. You are demanding money. That's the exchange demand.

616
01:14:10.780 --> 01:14:16.780
The main part of the exchange demand for money comes from the supply of goods and services every year in the U.S. economy.

617
01:14:16.780 --> 01:14:23.780
So, as the economy becomes more productive, as we have so-called economic growth,

618
01:14:23.780 --> 01:14:27.780
you want to use that biological metaphor, which is really not a good metaphor,

619
01:14:27.780 --> 01:14:31.780
you have an increase in the exchange demand for money.

620
01:14:31.780 --> 01:14:37.780
As population increases and more people go to work, the demand for money is increasing.

621
01:14:37.780 --> 01:14:39.780
People demand more money.

622
01:14:39.780 --> 01:14:45.780
Now, this is also called the pre-income demand for money.

623
01:14:45.780 --> 01:14:57.780
So, what happens is that when your demand is exercised through going to work, now you've gotten your paycheck, do you hold all that money?

624
01:14:57.780 --> 01:15:10.780
Do you keep it and just keep piling it up? No. You take some of it and you spend it on goods and services, depending on the marginal utility of money versus other goods and services.

625
01:15:10.780 --> 01:15:21.780
But you do hold some in your checking accounts. You don't spend all the money that you get when you exchange other goods and services for it. You don't immediately spend all your money. You hold some.

626
01:15:21.780 --> 01:15:39.780
Right now, all of us are exercising a reservation demand for money. Right now, by not rushing out and purchasing various items, we are holding in our wallets and our checking accounts a certain sum of money, each one of us.

627
01:15:39.780 --> 01:15:42.780
That constitutes a reservation demand for money.

628
01:15:42.780 --> 01:15:48.780
So, during any period of time, the demand for money consists of,

629
01:15:48.780 --> 01:15:54.780
and for the fellows here, I'm going to give a presentation presenting a paper I'm working on,

630
01:15:54.780 --> 01:15:56.780
going further into detail about this.

631
01:15:56.780 --> 01:16:05.780
But the demand for money during any, let's say, week, refers to the following.

632
01:16:05.780 --> 01:16:14.780
The amount of money that people receive for selling things, which is simply the amount of money that's spent on goods and services,

633
01:16:14.780 --> 01:16:22.780
but we're looking at it from the other side, plus the amount of money that is held off the market by people in their pockets.

634
01:16:22.780 --> 01:16:32.780
So, for example, if there's $1,000, if we're a small community and in total, let's say we have in total $10,000,

635
01:16:32.780 --> 01:16:44.580
And we purchase, at market clearing prices, $7,000 worth of goods and services, including labor services, okay?

636
01:16:44.580 --> 01:16:53.380
So people sell $7,000 worth of goods, they have exercised an exchange amount for money and receive $7,000.

637
01:16:53.380 --> 01:16:58.980
But if $7,000 was spent, the other $3,000 was held in people's cash balances.

638
01:16:58.980 --> 01:17:00.080
Why do people do that?

639
01:17:00.080 --> 01:17:09.600
Well, for spending in the future, for medical emergencies, for opportunities for good sales, or investments that they may find.

640
01:17:10.200 --> 01:17:16.280
So, there's both an exchange demand and a reservation demand for money. That's an important Rothbardian innovation.

641
01:17:17.680 --> 01:17:27.360
And one thing that it leads to, by the way, is to realize that the natural tendency of prices in the free market economy is to fall.

642
01:17:27.360 --> 01:17:36.360
Because, in a free market economy where you have a commodity money, which tends to be naturally scarce and therefore to increase at a very slow rate over time,

643
01:17:36.360 --> 01:17:43.360
where you have capital accumulation, the exchange demand for money increases tremendously.

644
01:17:43.360 --> 01:17:54.360
So, if the supply of gold is fixed or increasing very slowly, and the demand for money is increasing because of the increase in supplies of goods and services,

645
01:17:54.360 --> 01:17:58.360
You're going to get a naturally falling price level, which is what we had during World War II.

646
01:17:58.360 --> 01:18:02.360
I'm sorry, it was what we had during the 19th century.

647
01:18:02.360 --> 01:18:09.360
Prices in 1896 were as low as they were in 1812, or maybe even a little bit lower.

648
01:18:09.360 --> 01:18:15.360
Then there was new discoveries of gold, and prices rose from 1896 to 1913.

649
01:18:15.360 --> 01:18:17.360
And people call that the great inflation.

650
01:18:17.360 --> 01:18:22.360
Prices rose by 13% from 1896 to 1913.

651
01:18:22.360 --> 01:18:28.360
That's not 13% per year, but less than 1% per year, and people thought, oh, this is a great inflation.

652
01:18:28.360 --> 01:18:36.360
Imagine that. But by 1913, prices were then maybe just as high as they were in 1812 or something.

653
01:18:36.360 --> 01:18:44.360
So, the natural tendency is, as we see in those high tech industries in which we've had tremendous technological improvement,

654
01:18:44.360 --> 01:18:46.360
for prices to fall.

655
01:18:46.360 --> 01:18:52.360
Despite the fact that the Fed has been inflating like mad during the late 1980s and 1990s

656
01:18:52.360 --> 01:18:54.360
in terms of increasing the money supply,

657
01:18:54.360 --> 01:18:57.360
the prices of computers have come down tremendously

658
01:18:57.360 --> 01:19:02.360
because technological progress and capital investment in the computer industry

659
01:19:02.360 --> 01:19:08.360
has been so great that the exchange demand for money on the part of people in that industry

660
01:19:08.360 --> 01:19:12.360
has increased more than the supply of money.

661
01:19:12.360 --> 01:19:36.060
And if you think about it, if you go back to 19, you know, right before World War II, a model T Ford cost you about $350, a men's suit was something like $20, an ounce of gold was $20.

662
01:19:36.060 --> 01:19:46.060
Well, if you look at things today, in terms of paper money, a middle class automobile is $20,000, let's say.

663
01:19:46.060 --> 01:19:52.060
A good man's suit or a decent man's suit is between $300 and $400.

664
01:19:52.060 --> 01:19:59.060
Basically, what's happened? A man's suit is still one ounce of gold, at the current price of gold.

665
01:19:59.060 --> 01:20:02.060
So, paper money has depreciated.

666
01:20:02.060 --> 01:20:07.060
So, what would have happened is that we would have had to fall on all prices.

667
01:20:07.060 --> 01:20:18.060
If the government hadn't, the money supply stood at something like 25 billion dollars in 19, right before the Fed came into existence in 1914.

668
01:20:18.060 --> 01:20:25.060
I think it was 25 billion. In any case, what does it say? M1, which is a narrow definition, Austrians would have a broad, but let's just take M1.

669
01:20:25.060 --> 01:20:28.060
M1 is one trillion dollars.

670
01:20:28.060 --> 01:20:36.560
So the government has increased the money supply many, many times over, and that's what has prevented a fall in prices.

671
01:20:36.560 --> 01:20:44.560
We would have had extremely low prices in dollars if the government, if the Fed hadn't come into existence and inflated the money supply.

672
01:20:44.560 --> 01:20:50.560
Alright, I will stop here and take about six minutes of questions or so. Yes?

673
01:20:50.560 --> 01:21:01.560
At the end of World War II, we were using cigarettes, and I remember it cost me three cigarettes to have my laundry done.

674
01:21:01.560 --> 01:21:07.560
Was this, I know in POW camps, in German POW camps, American soldiers used cigarettes.

675
01:21:07.560 --> 01:21:11.560
Are you speaking about that, or are you speaking about actually in the Army?

676
01:21:11.560 --> 01:21:13.560
In the Army.

677
01:21:13.560 --> 01:21:14.560
In the Army, yeah.

678
01:21:14.560 --> 01:21:17.560
When the war ended, I lost my laundry.

679
01:21:17.560 --> 01:21:47.560
Cigarettes were something that everyone routinely accepted, most people used, and therefore they became, there's a famous article by an economist who was a German POW who came out in 1946 in which he showed how cigarettes grew up as the commodity money in these camps because care packages were sent every month and cigarettes were part of these care packages and most soldiers, in every World War II movie everybody's smoking of course,

680
01:21:47.560 --> 01:21:56.560
So what people did then was, since the care packages were standard, yet people's preferences differ,

681
01:21:56.560 --> 01:21:58.560
because people have different subjective values,

682
01:21:58.560 --> 01:22:03.560
what people did was, in exchanging for goods that they preferred more and giving away goods that they preferred less,

683
01:22:03.560 --> 01:22:07.560
they would exchange the goods that they didn't want for the cigarettes and they'd go and find the goods that they did want.

684
01:22:07.560 --> 01:22:12.560
And they'd suppose prices at the end of each barracks.

685
01:22:12.560 --> 01:22:19.560
Not only that, as people smoke the cigarettes, towards the end of the month, there was deflation.

686
01:22:19.560 --> 01:22:25.560
And when a new care package came in, the prices all jumped up.

687
01:22:25.560 --> 01:22:32.560
I was given a carton of cigarettes every month. I didn't smoke them.

688
01:22:32.560 --> 01:22:35.560
So you traded them. Right, right. Yes.

689
01:22:35.560 --> 01:22:53.560
I noticed the media always refer to rising prices as increasing inflation, and I'm confused by that because I always thought there was a distinction between rising prices and rising inflation.

690
01:22:53.560 --> 01:22:58.560
As the term inflation is used today, that's true.

691
01:22:58.560 --> 01:23:01.560
Inflation is a rise in the price level.

692
01:23:01.560 --> 01:23:06.560
If the inflation rate goes up, then they should say it's an increase in the inflation rate.

693
01:23:06.560 --> 01:23:13.560
In other words, if prices start rising at 5% per year instead of 3% per year this month, that is, it's calculated.

694
01:23:13.560 --> 01:23:20.560
Let's say every quarter they tell us what the consumer price index is, or maybe it's every month.

695
01:23:20.560 --> 01:23:28.560
In any case, an increase in inflation means that prices are rising at a more rapid rate, or it should mean that.

696
01:23:28.560 --> 01:23:34.560
Well, if not, doesn't that mean that the money supply is increasing? It has nothing to do with prices.

697
01:23:34.560 --> 01:23:38.560
I think it's kind of on the ten-hole side of things that we've done.

698
01:23:38.560 --> 01:23:43.560
But rising prices cause inflation, like white streets or the ranch.

699
01:23:58.560 --> 01:24:11.560
So, I guess your question then is different. What you want to do is you want to go back to the earlier definition of inflation as a change in the money supply.

700
01:24:11.560 --> 01:24:18.560
But remember, definitions are arbitrary in science and we define things in a way so that they are expedient.

701
01:24:18.560 --> 01:24:26.560
And so they allow us to clearly get our concepts across to one another as economists and to the public.

702
01:24:26.560 --> 01:24:33.560
and you are absolutely right. Defining inflation as rising prices hides a lot of things.

703
01:24:33.560 --> 01:24:39.560
So in the 1990s it looked like we had very little inflation because prices weren't rising much.

704
01:24:39.560 --> 01:24:48.560
So no one expected the bubble and the recession that we got in 2000-2001

705
01:24:48.560 --> 01:24:51.560
because there wasn't much consumer price inflation.

706
01:24:51.560 --> 01:25:01.560
But in fact, if you look at the money supply figures, as Austrians did, you saw that, in fact, there was no money being injected into the economy, and it was affecting certain sectors of the economy.

707
01:25:01.560 --> 01:25:13.560
Not the CPI, which everyone looks at, but it was affecting the housing market, it was affecting the financial markets, the financial market bubble burst, bringing in its train a recession.

708
01:25:13.560 --> 01:25:19.560
So the Austrians were predicting some sort of a recession in the 1990s, because they were looking at the money supply.

709
01:25:19.560 --> 01:25:23.560
And it would be better, and George Reisman argues this and I agree with him,

710
01:25:23.560 --> 01:25:29.560
it would be better if we went back to defining inflation as changes in the money supply

711
01:25:29.560 --> 01:25:35.560
because changes in the money supply have many different effects beyond just a rise in consumer prices.

712
01:25:35.560 --> 01:25:43.560
It pushes down interest rates, it pushes up asset prices, it pushes up housing prices, it redistributes income and so on.

713
01:25:43.560 --> 01:25:48.560
But all of that is hidden when you just focus on one effect of an increase in the money supply and call that inflation.

714
01:25:48.560 --> 01:26:01.560
If you go and find an old Webster's Dictionary that is 40 years old, the definition of inflation in it is an increase in the amount of money.

715
01:26:18.560 --> 01:26:35.560
can move up or down. The money supply is a volume that increases, so in some etymological sense, it's more intuitive to think of inflation as a change in the money supply.

716
01:26:35.560 --> 01:27:03.560
Can you talk about the relationship between the commodity value of money necessarily that stems from gold, futures, and demand itself, and then the desire for people to have a low transaction cost, especially with internet commerce right now, and international commerce and the ease and velocity of money.

717
01:27:03.560 --> 01:27:32.560
would use predominantly digital credit rather than necessarily cash, or for security purposes, given a gold standard system and an accumulation of gold being used in reserves necessarily, but if you rarely see the redemption taking place, how does that affect necessarily with the relationship of a separate market for people who use gold?

718
01:27:33.560 --> 01:27:39.560
There will still be a need for cash transactions, for physical cash transactions.

719
01:27:39.560 --> 01:27:45.560
And Mises always stressed that we should have gold coins in circulation.

720
01:27:45.560 --> 01:27:51.560
But one of the problems is, and we'll talk about this on Friday, gold is so valuable now

721
01:27:51.560 --> 01:28:00.560
that it would be extremely hard to have gold coins for small transactions.

722
01:28:00.560 --> 01:28:10.060
And so, Guido Hussmann has argued that a silver standard also would be reinstated and may be the primary cash in the system.

723
01:28:10.060 --> 01:28:29.560
Certainly, though, any transaction over the internet and so on using claims against gold dollars, let's say, would still be based on a commodity.

724
01:28:29.560 --> 01:28:34.560
No one's going to accept something that has no pre-existing purchasing power.

725
01:28:34.560 --> 01:28:39.560
And that's why it's difficult to simply, for example, some people say,

726
01:28:39.560 --> 01:28:43.560
well, let's just allow people to make contracts in gold,

727
01:28:43.560 --> 01:28:48.560
and then when the government inflates the money supply, people will shift to gold

728
01:28:48.560 --> 01:28:51.560
because its purchasing power is more stable and use that as a money.

729
01:28:51.560 --> 01:28:57.560
But all of us think in terms of dollars, and all of us do our calculations in terms of dollars.

730
01:28:57.560 --> 01:29:09.560
So the inflation would have to almost be a hyperinflation and destroy the dollar itself, which we don't want, before I think Americans would go back spontaneously to a gold standard.

731
01:29:09.560 --> 01:29:19.560
That's why Rothbard has always, and we'll talk about this on Friday too, has always emphasized that it's important that we at least initially relink the dollar to gold.

732
01:29:19.560 --> 01:29:25.560
Give the American people the gold that was stolen from them in 1933 and put in Fort Knox.

733
01:29:25.560 --> 01:29:28.560
Most of it is in the New York Federal Reserve Bank now.

734
01:29:28.560 --> 01:29:30.560
But anyway, get gold back in circulation.

735
01:29:30.560 --> 01:29:36.560
Then if we need silver to supplement it, it will be monetized by the market.

736
01:29:36.560 --> 01:29:40.560
I have to stop here, but that's a very interesting point.

737
01:29:40.560 --> 01:29:42.560
We're going to talk more about it on Friday.

738
01:29:42.560 --> 01:29:43.560
Okay, thanks.