WEBVTT

NOTE 30. Another Central Plan Fails

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.000
CHAPTER 30 ANOTHER CENTRAL PLAN FAILS

2
00:00:04.000 --> 00:00:07.000
DECEMBER 31, 2002

3
00:00:07.000 --> 00:00:17.000
For the last two decades, the conservative wing of education experts has touted one magic bullet apart from vouchers, high-stakes testing.

4
00:00:17.000 --> 00:00:26.000
The idea is to subject students and teachers, too, to a standardized test that would create incentives to learn the basics,

5
00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:37.000
and statistics compel curriculum committees to toss out the fluff, yield reliable data for assessing performance, and inspire students and teachers to keep their noses to the grindstone.

6
00:00:37.000 --> 00:00:44.000
In state after state for the last ten years, these tests have become the leading avenue for education reform.

7
00:00:44.000 --> 00:00:47.000
The trend began in Texas and spread.

8
00:00:47.000 --> 00:00:54.000
Now millions of students begin their first day of class with the profound awareness of the impending make-or-break tests

9
00:00:54.000 --> 00:00:58.000
This was taken at regular intervals from the first to the twelfth grade.

10
00:00:58.000 --> 00:01:01.000
On the face of it, it seemed to work.

11
00:01:01.000 --> 00:01:04.000
Curriculum committees threw up their arms in despair.

12
00:01:04.000 --> 00:01:08.000
Teachers started teaching math and stopped teaching so much fluff.

13
00:01:08.000 --> 00:01:11.000
And everyone had a sudden sense of accountability.

14
00:01:11.000 --> 00:01:13.000
A conservative victory?

15
00:01:13.000 --> 00:01:16.000
The Bush administration thinks so.

16
00:01:16.000 --> 00:01:21.000
Which is why it is working toward the supposed dream of a national testing system.

17
00:01:21.000 --> 00:01:26.560
Data, officials say, can be generated that allow for a comparison between states, build

18
00:01:26.560 --> 00:01:32.880
proof of success, and otherwise allow for a better national system of education.

19
00:01:32.880 --> 00:01:39.880
The No Child Left Behind legislation uses carrot and sticks to impose high-stakes testing

20
00:01:39.880 --> 00:01:44.320
on states that do not currently use the system.

21
00:01:44.320 --> 00:01:49.600
While the plan seems sound on the face of it, the reformers forgot one thing.

22
00:01:49.600 --> 00:01:55.720
We are dealing with public school, which lacks any real means of operating in a sound economic,

23
00:01:55.720 --> 00:02:02.520
which is to say resourceful and rational, manner. Think of it this way. Let's say that Soviet

24
00:02:02.520 --> 00:02:07.540
grain production had been down for three years straight and some clique came up with the

25
00:02:07.540 --> 00:02:13.560
idea that the workers and managers needed clearer rules for daily operations. The plan

26
00:02:13.560 --> 00:02:19.120
might look good on paper, but in the end it doesn't address the underlying problem. The

27
00:02:19.120 --> 00:02:22.840
The Fact of Central Planning itself.

28
00:02:22.840 --> 00:02:26.160
Central Planning has several universal features.

29
00:02:26.160 --> 00:02:27.760
It is coercive.

30
00:02:27.760 --> 00:02:32.560
It bypasses the needs of the consumers for the sake of politics.

31
00:02:32.560 --> 00:02:37.040
It relies on edicts which may or may not reflect reality.

32
00:02:37.040 --> 00:02:42.040
It does not take advantage of the price system, profit or loss.

33
00:02:42.040 --> 00:02:44.260
It is impervious to change.

34
00:02:44.260 --> 00:02:46.560
It ignores local conditions.

35
00:02:46.560 --> 00:02:51.220
It does not permit flexibility according to circumstance.

36
00:02:51.220 --> 00:02:55.700
It robs those who know the most of the ability to make decisions and innovate.

37
00:02:55.700 --> 00:03:01.100
It creates incentives to obey the plan, but diverts attention from the real goal, whatever

38
00:03:01.100 --> 00:03:04.580
it may be, and it may be the wrong goal.

39
00:03:04.580 --> 00:03:10.860
It ends up over-utilizing material resources, under-utilizing human ones, and not generating

40
00:03:10.860 --> 00:03:13.680
the intended results.

41
00:03:13.680 --> 00:03:18.900
All of these features have doomed the testing movement, at least if you take seriously the

42
00:03:18.900 --> 00:03:22.900
The Results of a New Study from Arizona State University

43
00:03:22.900 --> 00:03:42.900
http://www.asu.edu, slash educ, slash epsl, slash capital E, capital P, capital R, capital U, slash epru, underscore 2002, underscore research, underscore writing, dot htm.

44
00:03:42.900 --> 00:03:46.900
The first to examine the issue nationally.

45
00:03:46.900 --> 00:03:57.900
The researchers have found an inverse relationship between the ability to pass the tests and the scores on independent assessment tools like the SAT and ACT.

46
00:03:57.900 --> 00:04:03.900
The latter come up with a measure of the student's mastery of the ability to think and solve problems.

47
00:04:03.900 --> 00:04:13.900
The school exams, on the other hand, only measure whether students have mastered material on the tests, which are not thought-based but curriculum-based.

48
00:04:13.900 --> 00:04:19.420
It turns out that even as students have shown consistent improvement on state tests, the

49
00:04:19.420 --> 00:04:24.100
opposite is true with regard to performance on outside tests.

50
00:04:24.100 --> 00:04:29.020
After adopting these exams, twice as many states slipped against the national average

51
00:04:29.020 --> 00:04:33.040
on the SAT and ACT as gained on it.

52
00:04:33.040 --> 00:04:37.940
This turns out to be true across the board, even on math scores, with the exception of

53
00:04:37.940 --> 00:04:40.060
middle school math.

54
00:04:40.060 --> 00:04:45.260
And the trend on advanced placement tests was also worse in states that had adopted

55
00:04:45.260 --> 00:04:46.260
tests.

56
00:04:46.260 --> 00:04:48.340
What's the story?

57
00:04:48.340 --> 00:04:52.380
Well, the tests themselves have become the curriculum.

58
00:04:52.380 --> 00:04:57.900
That's all that teachers focus on, and they do so at the expense of teaching valuable

59
00:04:57.900 --> 00:05:00.140
learning and thinking skills.

60
00:05:00.140 --> 00:05:06.500
The one goal of passing the tests has replaced the goal of producing good thinkers, students,

61
00:05:06.500 --> 00:05:07.760
learners.

62
00:05:07.760 --> 00:05:10.640
The students are being trained narrowly.

63
00:05:10.640 --> 00:05:18.220
The school tests measure that, but not broadly, as shown by SAT-ACT data, and hence the whole

64
00:05:18.220 --> 00:05:22.440
point of education is being lost.

65
00:05:22.440 --> 00:05:27.140
Just as striking, the study also found an increase in dropout rates.

66
00:05:27.140 --> 00:05:33.340
In fact, it is likely that the study underestimates dropout rates because it relies exclusively

67
00:05:33.340 --> 00:05:39.140
on Reported Data, while most everyone agrees that there are more dropouts than are typically

68
00:05:39.140 --> 00:05:40.140
reported.

69
00:05:40.140 --> 00:05:45.260
Now, the conservative response to this bit of news might be, good, if a student isn't

70
00:05:45.260 --> 00:05:51.260
there to learn, better he leave the classroom and cease to hold back those who want to learn.

71
00:05:51.260 --> 00:05:54.420
And in some ways, that's a valid point here.

72
00:05:54.420 --> 00:06:01.780
Yet, I think back to the story once told to me by former Soviet economist Yuri Maltsev.

73
00:06:01.780 --> 00:06:06.960
When the Soviet government became alarmed at the high death rate in hospitals, an edict

74
00:06:06.960 --> 00:06:11.960
was issued from Moscow that gave a quota on the number of people who could die under official

75
00:06:11.960 --> 00:06:18.340
care. The result was hospitals hurling people on their deathbeds out the front door and

76
00:06:18.340 --> 00:06:25.560
down the steps to die. They complied with the plan, but missed the larger point. Something

77
00:06:25.560 --> 00:06:31.620
similar may be happening with the high dropout rates. Teachers and administrators are probably

78
00:06:31.620 --> 00:06:43.620
One public school teacher revealed to me her tactic for dealing with the mandatory 90% pass rate.

79
00:06:43.620 --> 00:06:51.620
When she enters a class of 30, she identifies the three students she can ignore and otherwise write off as obvious failures.

80
00:06:51.620 --> 00:06:58.620
Now, this is not a cruel woman, just a person who knows what's necessary to survive in the new environment.

81
00:06:58.620 --> 00:07:05.060
environment. She said all her colleagues do the same. So while the results seem at first

82
00:07:05.060 --> 00:07:11.060
counterintuitive, how can testing lead to lower scores and more failures? When you think

83
00:07:11.060 --> 00:07:16.980
about it, the results make perfect sense. Students are being run through the cruelest

84
00:07:16.980 --> 00:07:22.500
gauntlet of narrow examinations produced by the politicians while teachers are robbed

85
00:07:22.500 --> 00:07:28.380
of the ability to deal with the students as individual learners. This system might appear

86
00:07:28.380 --> 00:07:45.020
How do conservatives respond?

87
00:07:45.020 --> 00:07:49.980
They first point out that a lead researcher in the study, David Berliner, is a critic

88
00:07:49.980 --> 00:07:54.940
of school vouchers, and that the study was underwritten by an affiliate of the National

89
00:07:54.940 --> 00:07:58.940
and the Federal Education Association, which opposes do-or-die tests.

90
00:07:58.940 --> 00:08:05.940
In other words, they are saying the people opposing this central plan are partisans of another central plan.

91
00:08:05.940 --> 00:08:10.940
Granted, but what about the substance of the results?

92
00:08:10.940 --> 00:08:16.940
Chester Finn, an education official under Reagan, had this to say to the New York Times.

93
00:08:16.940 --> 00:08:38.940
You almost never have a pure cause and effect relationship. Yes, you're introducing high-stakes tests, but maybe you're also changing the way you license teachers, or extending the school day, or changing textbooks. There's always a lot of things going on concurrently, so you really cannot peg everything on the high-stakes tests.

94
00:08:38.940 --> 00:08:52.940
Aside from observing that his critique applies to all social science research, which always and everywhere involves human volition and infinite variables, Finn's argument misses the point.

95
00:08:52.940 --> 00:09:01.940
The case for the tests was in part driven by the desire to be able to measure results in precisely the way the Arizona study is done.

96
00:09:01.940 --> 00:09:13.940
If you live by the data sword, you have to be willing to die by it, too, and it is hard to argue against the reality that the new data has produced some very deep cuts.

97
00:09:13.940 --> 00:09:18.940
Most compelling about this study is how it comports with anecdotal evidence.

98
00:09:18.940 --> 00:09:26.940
Teachers and students these days are obsessed with the tests, way beyond anything that anyone over the age of 30 knows anything about.

99
00:09:26.940 --> 00:09:33.940
The basics, reading, writing, math, science, are hammered home like never before.

100
00:09:33.940 --> 00:09:38.940
Preparation for tests has become the sum total of all public school education.

101
00:09:38.940 --> 00:09:44.940
Advanced students are bored out of their minds, while weak students are relentlessly frustrated.

102
00:09:44.940 --> 00:09:52.940
Teachers wonder why they spent so much time learning how to teach when all they end up doing is drilling for exams.

103
00:09:52.940 --> 00:10:02.940
This new system is unsustainable, especially now that it turns out that the results produce the opposite of what it intended.

104
00:10:02.940 --> 00:10:13.940
Now, this is not to say that the alternative of left liberal education policies with no tests and no focus on basics or accountability is the answer.

105
00:10:13.940 --> 00:10:31.940
The problem with education is more fundamental. It is run according to a central plan, so it has all the classic failures of central planning, including vast expense, vast waste of material and human resources, and results that are always disappointing.

106
00:10:31.940 --> 00:10:47.940
The whole subject of education and the institutions that support it needs to be rethought, away from the still surviving Deweyite progressivist model and toward the ancient tradition of private tutoring now being revived in homeschools across America.

107
00:10:47.940 --> 00:11:00.940
All schools can learn from the experience of homeschools, with their attention to individual needs, the flexibility that allows students to develop in unique ways, their privately run and funded character,

108
00:11:00.940 --> 00:11:15.940
These are the elements that make for good institutions of all sorts, whether it is commercial businesses, charities, civic institutions or schools.

109
00:11:15.940 --> 00:11:20.940
In short, the answer is not to adopt yet another central plan.

110
00:11:20.940 --> 00:11:27.060
and Plan, it is to disempower the planners altogether and restore decision-making power

111
00:11:27.060 --> 00:11:33.020
back to the parents, the teachers they employ, and the students.

112
00:11:33.020 --> 00:11:36.780
Testing and better data will not save education in America.

113
00:11:36.780 --> 00:11:41.260
A wholesale repudiation of all educational centralized planning will.