Chapter 8. Municipalized Trash. It's Uncivilized. September 14, 2009.
Driving into work today, I saw garbage bins overflowing and city dumpsters spilling out with trash.
It stinks. It's disgusting. It's uncivilized. It's probably dangerous to some extent.
It's a holiday, so of course the government workers charged with picking up this nasty
refuse can't work, even though construction workers and private firms are busy bees taking
advantage of the extra time.
It's true with house trash, too.
Pickup is once per week, on schedule, and there is nothing you can do to make it more
frequent.
It's part of the master plan, don't you know, and if you make more trash than the
and the once-per-week pick-up can contain, that's your problem, not the city's.
The very fear that people have about private trash collection, that trash will pile up
and no one will do anything about it, turns out to be a regular feature of government
trash collection. But we look the other way. Why?
Before getting to this, let us first establish that garbage is a serious issue.
W.M.F. Buckley, his head full of schemes for threatening populations with nuclear annihilation,
once chided libertarians for bothering with such petty concerns as trash collection.
It is only because of the conservatives' disposition to sacrifice in order to withstand
the enemy, wrote Buckley in 1961, that libertarians are able to enjoy their monasticism and pursue
to their busy little seminars on whether or not to demunicipalize the garbage collectors.
Ah yes, little seminars. Seminars about such things as avoiding the plague. Humanity has
some experience with the results of failing to dispose of trash properly, and that experience
was deadly. Plague swept the ancient world every fifty years or so, spread mainly through
through the lack of good sanitation.
The Black Death in Europe might have been avoided with better sanitation and a decent
system for disposing of trash rather than letting it pile up in the streets.
History's fight with the plague in the developed world came to an end at the time of the rise
of capitalism in the late Middle Ages, and no surprise there.
With the accumulation of capital came innovation and trash disposal, since living in sanitary
conditions and staying alive turns out to be something of a priority for people.
This is why the largest advances in garbage collection came about during the Industrial
Revolution.
And yet, here we are in 2009, with trash piled up on the streets and stinking the high heaven,
Bags full of raw animal parts, chickens, pigs, cows, fish, baby diapers stuffed with waste,
rotting eggs mixed with sour cream dip from game-day parties, piles that are right now
being scavenged by roaches and rats. This in a town that prides itself on its tidiness.
And we put up with this for the same reason that we put up with lost mail, potholes in
and the road, dilapidated schools, depreciated money, and a clogged court system, because
these services are monopolized by the government.
Now you can make all the public goods arguments you want about roads and courts, but trash
disposal is not rocket science and could easily be handled by the market.
Everyone wants trash removed and the sooner the better.
That means there is a market demand for the service.
There is money to be made. The only way to keep something like this at bay is to make
it illegal.
If markets were in charge, trash pickup would surely be more than once per week. We wouldn't
have to drag our trash bins out to the curb. In fact, we would be faced with several or
many options for trash pickup. If we made more trash than we should, we wouldn't get
Angri Notes from the City Government The private pickup companies would be thrilled.
We might be paying by frequency or pickup or perhaps by the pound.
That would be for the market to decide.
In fact, trash pickup services might actually be characterized by, perish the thought, innovation.
Just as they were in the early part of the 20th century when trash pickup was mostly
private.
Our houses might be directly connected to underground trash transmission services that
would whisk it all away in an instant.
Our kitchens might have highly effective trash chutes that would zap away trash as we made
it.
But because of this ghastly tradition of municipalizing trash pickup, or we might call it Sovietizing,
the entire industry is stuck in the past, utterly impervious to improvement and modernization.
We get our news through fiber optics, walk around with tiny wireless phones that can
instantly connect with anyone, anywhere, and shop digitally with any vendor in the world.
But when it comes to trash, we are still relying on once per week, strictly scheduled pickups
by tax-funded workers driving monstrous old model trucks.
In my town, even the trash cans are paid for and owned by the government, as if the private
Sector has yet to figure out on its own initiative how to make a tub for holding things.
So why does this system persist?
I asked a few people about this, and the answer usually came down to some system of graft.
Powerful people make the trucks, manage the landfills, and dole out the contracts.
Perhaps so, but why do we put up with it?
It seems like a preposterously unobjectionable plan.
Between the system to private ownership and competition, and thereby innovation.
I don't mean just contracting out, I mean abolishing city trash pick-up and letting
private enterprise completely take over.
There is just no way that the existing muck would persist, for it offends every aesthetic
sensibility and it may pose a ghastly health risk.
As for the old conservative claim that libertarians are insufficiently worried about the Soviet
threat and too worried about garbage collection, note that the Soviet Union is gone and the
garbage problem is still with us.