WEBVTT

NOTE 4. The Decline of the Ricardian System, 1820-48

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:08.000
Chapter 4. The Decline of the Ricardian System, 1820-1848

2
00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:13.000
1. The Conundrum of Ricardo's Popularity

3
00:00:13.000 --> 00:00:22.000
What accounts for the popularity of Ricardo's principles and for the enduring dominance of the Ricardian system?

4
00:00:22.000 --> 00:00:34.000
The marginal utility revolutionary W. Stanley Jevons, writing the preface to the second edition of his great Theory of Political Economy in 1879,

5
00:00:34.000 --> 00:00:45.500
was forced to complain of the continuing dominance of the Ricardian doctrine, and to lament that when, at length, a true system of economics comes to be established,

6
00:00:45.500 --> 00:00:50.700
It will be seen that that able but wrong-headed man, David Ricardo,

7
00:00:50.700 --> 00:00:54.900
shutted the car of economic science onto a wrong line.

8
00:00:54.900 --> 00:01:02.200
Indeed. And Ricardo won the day with a theory that was not only far from self-evident,

9
00:01:02.200 --> 00:01:06.600
but in many ways bizarre, such as the labor theory of value,

10
00:01:06.600 --> 00:01:10.900
and he wrote his work in a crabbed and obscurantist style

11
00:01:10.900 --> 00:01:14.000
that would hardly be expected to sweep the field,

12
00:01:14.000 --> 00:01:19.000
either among laymen or in those more particularly interested in economics.

13
00:01:19.000 --> 00:01:28.000
Part of the explanation, as Schumpeter pointed out, is that Ricardo was politically in tune with the zeitgeist.

14
00:01:28.000 --> 00:01:35.000
Even though his methodology was so abstract as to be divorced from and to falsify reality,

15
00:01:35.000 --> 00:01:43.000
Ricardo's motivation was not abstract theory but its use in advancing politico-economic conclusions.

16
00:01:43.000 --> 00:01:50.740
Ricardo, like Mill, was devoted to free trade and laissez-faire, and as we shall see, to

17
00:01:50.740 --> 00:01:57.240
hard money, and he applied his abstract system like a hammer in their service.

18
00:01:57.240 --> 00:02:03.160
This ideology was fast becoming the wave of the future in England in the circles of businessmen

19
00:02:03.160 --> 00:02:05.320
and intellectuals.

20
00:02:05.320 --> 00:02:11.920
But what of Ricardo's abysmal writing in style and in organization?

21
00:02:11.920 --> 00:02:16.200
Dr. Gray's heartfelt critique is on the mark.

22
00:02:16.200 --> 00:02:21.560
As to the form rather than the substance of Ricardo's writings, it is perhaps sufficient

23
00:02:21.560 --> 00:02:24.080
to say that he was no writer.

24
00:02:24.080 --> 00:02:29.600
He himself dimly realized that he was a bad writer, but it is doubtful whether he can

25
00:02:29.600 --> 00:02:32.200
have known the whole truth.

26
00:02:32.200 --> 00:02:37.900
It is undiscerning flattery to regard his chief work, The Principles of Political Economy

27
00:02:37.900 --> 00:02:41.360
and Taxation, as a book at all.

28
00:02:41.360 --> 00:02:47.120
Another does it suggest the sweepings of a busy man's study, chapters of very varying

29
00:02:47.120 --> 00:02:52.860
length which he clearly found it difficult to arrange in the right order, brusque notes

30
00:02:52.860 --> 00:02:57.120
and memoranda on points which interested the author.

31
00:02:57.120 --> 00:03:02.360
In defense, it may be admitted that Ricardo did not mean to write a book.

32
00:03:02.360 --> 00:03:08.280
These were indeed memoranda written for himself and his friends, published on his friend's

33
00:03:08.280 --> 00:03:24.240
It is very possible, however, that it was precisely Ricardo's obscurantism that accounted

34
00:03:24.240 --> 00:03:26.320
for his success.

35
00:03:26.320 --> 00:03:34.560
For all too many people, laymen and professionals alike, obscurity and bad writing equal profundity.

36
00:03:34.560 --> 00:03:39.880
If they can't understand it and they hear at every hand that so-and-so is a great man

37
00:03:39.880 --> 00:03:46.360
and his theory is the current light, their belief in his profundity will be redoubled.

38
00:03:46.360 --> 00:03:48.880
There are great charms to obscurity.

39
00:03:48.880 --> 00:03:55.060
Moreover, there are particular charms for the adepts who cluster around the great man,

40
00:03:55.060 --> 00:04:01.780
the circle of initiates who claim, probably correctly, that only they can truly understand

41
00:04:01.780 --> 00:04:03.640
his work.

42
00:04:03.640 --> 00:04:09.800
Only they can penetrate the fog caused by the depth of the great man's wisdom.

43
00:04:09.800 --> 00:04:16.720
Schumpeter notes that quickly his circle developed the attitude, so amusing but also, alas, so

44
00:04:16.720 --> 00:04:22.760
melancholy to behold, of children who have been presented with a new toy.

45
00:04:22.760 --> 00:04:24.640
They thought the world of it.

46
00:04:24.640 --> 00:04:30.680
To them it was of incalculable value that only he could fail to appreciate who was too

47
00:04:30.680 --> 00:04:34.420
are too stupid to rise to Ricardian heights.

48
00:04:34.420 --> 00:04:39.860
Its murkiness and difficulty only heightened the enjoyment and pride of the adepts over

49
00:04:39.860 --> 00:04:41.700
their new toy.

50
00:04:41.700 --> 00:04:47.620
Nowadays this effect is considerably heightened by the fact that obscurity gives disciples

51
00:04:47.620 --> 00:04:54.180
and critics more to talk and write about, and thus greatly multiplies the career opportunities

52
00:04:54.180 --> 00:04:59.900
for scholars in the current age of publish or perish.

53
00:04:59.900 --> 00:05:06.580
Another reason for the popularity of Ricardianism was the persistent cadre activity of the indefatigable

54
00:05:06.580 --> 00:05:08.800
James Mill.

55
00:05:08.800 --> 00:05:14.420
One of Mill's important actions was to help found the Political Economy Club in London

56
00:05:14.420 --> 00:05:21.680
in 1821, a club that quickly became, for many years, the center of economic discussion and

57
00:05:21.680 --> 00:05:24.020
learning in Great Britain.

58
00:05:24.020 --> 00:05:29.880
It is characteristic of the early 19th century shift of the locus of economics from Scotland

59
00:05:29.880 --> 00:05:50.880
In Scotland, economic thought had centered in the two great universities of Edinburgh and Glasgow, with influence spread through academic, literary and business circles, and members of social clubs in the two cities.

60
00:05:50.880 --> 00:05:59.080
In England, on the contrary, there was almost no academic economics in the fossilized university courses of the day.

61
00:05:59.080 --> 00:06:07.480
Of the 30 founding members of the Political Economy Club, only one, Thomas Robert Malthus, was an academic,

62
00:06:07.480 --> 00:06:12.880
teaching political economy at the East India Company's College at Haleybury.

63
00:06:12.880 --> 00:06:18.680
The other leading English economists in the club included David Ricardo,

64
00:06:18.680 --> 00:06:30.180
Businessman and financier Thomas Took, 1774-1858, with Colonel Robert Torrens of the Royal Marines chairing the first meeting.

65
00:06:30.180 --> 00:06:35.180
Others were businessmen, publicists and government officials.

66
00:06:35.180 --> 00:06:40.180
A few years later, academic opportunities began to open up.

67
00:06:40.180 --> 00:06:46.660
Mill's Scottish friend and fellow leading Ricardian, John Ramsay McCullough, who had been lecturing

68
00:06:46.660 --> 00:06:53.420
for several years, became Professor of Political Economy in 1828 at the University College

69
00:06:53.420 --> 00:06:58.840
London and joined the Political Economy Club shortly thereafter.

70
00:06:58.840 --> 00:07:03.740
But after four years of teaching, he had to spend the rest of his life as a financial

71
00:07:03.740 --> 00:07:05.240
controller.

72
00:07:05.240 --> 00:07:10.780
The first economics post at Oxford was a chair founded by the banker and evangelist Henry

73
00:07:10.780 --> 00:07:17.520
Drummond in 1825, but the term of the chair was only five years.

74
00:07:17.520 --> 00:07:24.160
The first chair holder was the attorney and important young economist Nassau William Sr.,

75
00:07:24.160 --> 00:07:32.420
1790-1864, son of an Anglican vicar in Berkshire who had studied at Oxford and had joined the

76
00:07:32.420 --> 00:07:43.320
The New King's College London established in the same year as University College, 1828,

77
00:07:43.320 --> 00:07:49.880
as a Tory and Anglican haven to offset its non-denominational neighbor, appointed senior

78
00:07:49.880 --> 00:07:54.560
to its own political economy post in 1831.

79
00:07:54.560 --> 00:08:00.040
But senior was kicked out unceremoniously for publishing a pamphlet urging a reduction

80
00:08:00.040 --> 00:08:06.160
in the budget of the Anglican establishment in Ireland, and he spent the rest of his career

81
00:08:06.160 --> 00:08:12.040
as a real property attorney and government lawyer, with the exception of another drummond

82
00:08:12.040 --> 00:08:18.280
professorship at Oxford in 1847 to 1852.

83
00:08:18.280 --> 00:08:24.040
Cambridge treated economics with such disdain that its only contribution was to have a young

84
00:08:24.040 --> 00:08:33.040
A young lawyer of no distinction in the field, George Prime, teach economics without pay and at unpopular hours.

85
00:08:33.040 --> 00:08:45.040
Prime taught under those conditions for over 40 years from 1816 on, remarkably becoming professor of political economy in 1828.

86
00:08:45.040 --> 00:08:53.040
Apparently, he wrote nothing in economics and contributed to no important discussions.

87
00:08:53.040 --> 00:08:59.560
2. THE RAPID DECLINE OF RICARDIAN ECONOMICS

88
00:08:59.560 --> 00:09:05.040
Before setting out to explain a problem, one must be quite sure that the problem really

89
00:09:05.040 --> 00:09:12.120
exists. Surely a partial answer to the conundrum of Ricardo's popularity and dominance over

90
00:09:12.120 --> 00:09:19.340
English economics is that that dominance was largely a myth. Until recently, the orthodox

91
00:09:19.340 --> 00:09:24.740
Richard's view in the history of economic thought was that Ricardianism dominated British

92
00:09:24.740 --> 00:09:32.460
thought from the date of Ricardo's principles through Jevin's abortive revolution in 1871

93
00:09:32.460 --> 00:09:39.500
and until the 1890s when Alfred Marshall's neo-Ricardianism supposedly integrated marginal

94
00:09:39.500 --> 00:09:44.560
utility into a basically Ricardian framework.

95
00:09:44.560 --> 00:09:52.320
One of the last expressions of this orthodoxy came in 1949, when Professor Sidney G. Checkland,

96
00:09:52.320 --> 00:09:58.520
from an anti-Ricardian perspective, bewailed the manner in which the two Scotsmen, James

97
00:09:58.520 --> 00:10:06.760
Mill and McCullough, like Ricardo, the Spanish-Portuguese Jew, expatriates from their native culture,

98
00:10:06.760 --> 00:10:13.500
and therefore presumably alienated from mainstream English life, used brilliant cadre tactics

99
00:10:13.500 --> 00:10:18.140
is to acquire their hegemony over English thought.

100
00:10:18.140 --> 00:10:24.280
Checkland saw that Mill was the cadre leader of the Ricardians, cleverly advising Ricardo

101
00:10:24.280 --> 00:10:31.620
not to give publicity to his critics by deigning to reply to them in the third, 1821 edition

102
00:10:31.620 --> 00:10:34.020
of his Principles.

103
00:10:34.020 --> 00:10:41.000
Mill wrote his Elements of Political Economy as a Ricardian textbook in 1821, but since

104
00:10:41.000 --> 00:10:47.440
Since it lacked popular appeal, the younger McCullough, a charismatic, enormously strong,

105
00:10:47.440 --> 00:10:53.520
booming, burly, Scotch whiskey-drinking figure of a man, took over as the popularizer and

106
00:10:53.520 --> 00:10:56.520
propagator of Ricardianism.

107
00:10:56.520 --> 00:11:02.240
The first important revision of the myth of Ricardian triumph came with the Marxist Ronald

108
00:11:02.240 --> 00:11:06.120
Meek's rebuttal of Checkland the following year.

109
00:11:06.120 --> 00:11:17.120
Checkland, he points out, made the crucial mistake, following J.M. Keynes, of treating Say's law as equivalent to the Ricardian system.

110
00:11:17.120 --> 00:11:27.120
While Ricardo and McCullough followed Mill in considering Say's law to be very important, they did not regard it as crucial to the Ricardian system,

111
00:11:27.120 --> 00:11:33.120
which actually comprised the Ricardian theories of value and distribution.

112
00:11:33.120 --> 00:11:39.760
While Say's law indeed triumphed early, with only Malthus temporarily opposing it, the

113
00:11:39.760 --> 00:11:44.320
Ricardian system proper met a very different fate.

114
00:11:44.320 --> 00:11:50.480
In fact, as he managed to do in other areas of the history of economic thought, John Maynard

115
00:11:50.480 --> 00:11:56.780
Keynes, in his general theory, skewed and distorted Ricardian development.

116
00:11:56.780 --> 00:12:03.260
It was only Keynes, in his preoccupation with promoting government deficits and inflationism

117
00:12:03.260 --> 00:12:10.180
and attacking Say's law, who made that law the central feature of the Ricardian system.

118
00:12:10.180 --> 00:12:16.380
It was also Keynes who distorted the facts by holding up Malthus as the proto-Keynesian

119
00:12:16.380 --> 00:12:24.420
hero, stubbornly calling for an anti-Say and anti-Ricardian alternative to the Ricardian

120
00:12:24.420 --> 00:12:25.700
system.

121
00:12:25.700 --> 00:12:32.740
On the contrary, Malthus, despite various differences, considered himself a Smithian and was generally

122
00:12:32.740 --> 00:12:39.740
friendly to Ricardianism as well as to Ricardo personally. Malthus' interest in the alleged

123
00:12:39.740 --> 00:12:46.700
general glut and in denouncing Say's law was an ephemeral product of the post-Napoleonic

124
00:12:46.700 --> 00:12:54.640
war depression in England. When England's prosperity returned after 1823, Malthus totally

125
00:12:54.640 --> 00:13:01.120
Murray lost interest in the general glut question and wrote no more about it. Say's law had

126
00:13:01.120 --> 00:13:07.800
triumphed except among a few radical fringe people in the economic underworld, and Malthus

127
00:13:07.800 --> 00:13:15.120
steadfastly refused to be drawn into alliance with them. These fringe persons who continued

128
00:13:15.120 --> 00:13:22.200
their worn-out cries of a general glut into the 1830s included the prolific left Tory

129
00:13:22.200 --> 00:13:31.340
Murray's statist poet and essayist, Robert Southey, 1774-1843, who had attacked deflation

130
00:13:31.340 --> 00:13:38.820
after the Napoleonic War, and member of parliament, geologist and authority on volcanoes, George

131
00:13:38.820 --> 00:13:44.820
Paulette Scroop, 1797-1876.

132
00:13:44.820 --> 00:13:52.300
Raising the fallacious cry of underconsumption, Scrope, in his Principles of Political Economy,

133
00:13:52.300 --> 00:13:59.940
1833, charged that any decline in consumption in favor of a general increase in the propensity

134
00:13:59.940 --> 00:14:08.060
to save would necessarily and proportionately diminish the demand as compared with the supply,

135
00:14:08.060 --> 00:14:10.660
and occasion a general glut.

136
00:14:10.660 --> 00:14:18.380
In this old proto-Keynesian fallacy, savings apparently leak out of the economy and result

137
00:14:18.380 --> 00:14:21.300
in permanent depression.

138
00:14:21.300 --> 00:14:26.840
Apparently investment, since it is transitional and not final, is not considered spending

139
00:14:26.840 --> 00:14:28.260
at all.

140
00:14:28.260 --> 00:14:35.220
And then, as in all varieties of crank economic analysis, the price system and the relationship

141
00:14:35.220 --> 00:14:42.500
of Selling Prices to Costs is somehow not considered worthy of mention at all.

142
00:14:42.500 --> 00:14:49.860
George Poulet Scroop was originally named George Thompson, son of John Poulet Thompson,

143
00:14:49.860 --> 00:14:52.580
head of a firm of Russian merchants.

144
00:14:52.580 --> 00:14:57.940
He took the name Scroop after marrying an heiress of the Scroop family.

145
00:14:57.940 --> 00:15:03.100
Born in London, Scroop studied at Oxford and Cambridge and was a member of the House of

146
00:15:03.100 --> 00:15:10.860
Commons for 35 years. A champion of free trade, he wrote so many pamphlets on economic issues,

147
00:15:10.860 --> 00:15:16.140
about 70, that he was commonly dubbed Pamphlet Scroop.

148
00:15:16.140 --> 00:15:22.820
In contrast to the triumph of Say's law, the Ricardian system proper was rapidly repudiated

149
00:15:22.820 --> 00:15:30.840
in the world of English economics. In January 1831, eight years after Ricardo's death, Colonel

150
00:15:30.840 --> 00:15:37.200
Professor Robert Torrens addressed the political economy club that Ricardo had helped to found.

151
00:15:37.200 --> 00:15:43.120
Torrens raised the crucial question, how many of the Ricardian principles were still held

152
00:15:43.120 --> 00:15:45.000
to be correct?

153
00:15:45.000 --> 00:15:46.000
His answer?

154
00:15:46.000 --> 00:15:51.880
All the great principles of Ricardian system had been abandoned, especially the critical

155
00:15:51.880 --> 00:15:55.840
ones of value, rent and profits.

156
00:15:55.840 --> 00:16:03.200
Samuel Bailey, in his Great Espousal of the Utility Theory of Value in 1825, had smashed

157
00:16:03.200 --> 00:16:04.960
the labor theory.

158
00:16:04.960 --> 00:16:10.780
Thomas Perenette Thompson had disposed of the Ricardian theory of rent.

159
00:16:10.780 --> 00:16:17.060
The theory of profit is unsound because Ricardo ignored the replacement of capital, and the

160
00:16:17.060 --> 00:16:22.900
Malthusian subsistence theory of wages had been generally abandoned.

161
00:16:22.900 --> 00:16:29.820
To the Marxian Ronald Meek, this wholesale desertion of Ricardianism comprised a capitalist

162
00:16:29.820 --> 00:16:36.020
plot against the labor theory of value, whose socialistic implications had been drawn out

163
00:16:36.020 --> 00:16:40.800
during the 1820s by the Ricardian socialists.

164
00:16:40.800 --> 00:16:48.860
At any rate, by 1829 to 1831, there were no adherents of the labor theory of value left

165
00:16:48.860 --> 00:16:51.840
in mainstream British economics.

166
00:16:51.840 --> 00:16:57.720
To Meek, the only exception was McCullough, who in turn had abandoned Ricardo on many

167
00:16:57.720 --> 00:17:04.980
other issues, including the idea of productive versus unproductive labor, the theory of profit

168
00:17:04.980 --> 00:17:12.600
and the theory of class conflict on the market implicit in the Ricardian theory of distribution.

169
00:17:12.600 --> 00:17:19.180
Only Say's law, with its strong laissez-faire implications, had survived what Meek laments

170
00:17:19.180 --> 00:17:21.940
as the purge.

171
00:17:21.940 --> 00:17:29.180
But the purge, or abandonment, came even earlier, antedating the Ricardian socialists.

172
00:17:29.180 --> 00:17:34.780
Professor Frank W. Fetter, in his classic article, points out that upon Ricardo's death

173
00:17:34.780 --> 00:17:42.260
in 1823, James Mill wrote despairingly to McCullough and noted that they were the two

174
00:17:42.260 --> 00:17:50.260
and only genuine disciples of Ricardo in existence, and McCullough did not stay one for long.

175
00:17:50.260 --> 00:17:56.580
Fetter notes that economic opinion in the 1820s was diverse and unsettled, except for

176
00:17:56.580 --> 00:18:00.060
a general adherence to free trade.

177
00:18:00.060 --> 00:18:06.380
Everyone dismissed the portentous Ricardian conclusion that profits varied inversely to

178
00:18:06.380 --> 00:18:10.660
wages, except as a banal arithmetic truism.

179
00:18:10.660 --> 00:18:27.260
Furthermore, even Ricardo himself had pointed the way to abandoning his own crucial permanent subsistence theory of wages, which the German socialist Ferdinand LaSalle was later to call the iron law of wages.

180
00:18:27.260 --> 00:18:38.660
Ricardo had adopted the subsistence wage theory taken from the hardcore Malthusian first edition of Malthus' Essay on Population, 1798.

181
00:18:38.660 --> 00:18:51.660
But many of his statements, apart from this rigid formal model, were really adopted from the much weaker, indeed contradictory second edition of the essay, 1803.

182
00:18:51.660 --> 00:18:59.660
These were qualifications which Marx would correctly note amounted to a desertion of the iron law.

183
00:18:59.660 --> 00:19:05.660
Criticism of Malthusian doctrine prevailed in the journals by the late 1820s.

184
00:19:05.660 --> 00:19:13.100
Thus, in early 1826, a writer noted in the monthly review that the law of relentless

185
00:19:13.100 --> 00:19:18.580
increase in population operates only in poor societies.

186
00:19:18.580 --> 00:19:23.300
It moves in an inverse proportion to the acquisition of wealth.

187
00:19:23.300 --> 00:19:29.280
It is only when people become more luxuriant, when those engagements which form the principal

188
00:19:29.280 --> 00:19:48.800
Finally, in 1829, Nassau W. Senior's letters to Malthus effectively put the boots to the

189
00:19:48.800 --> 00:19:50.640
iron law.

190
00:19:50.640 --> 00:19:55.880
In this published exchange of correspondence, following the delivery of his lectures on

191
00:19:55.880 --> 00:20:02.040
and Population, Two Lectures on Population, to which is added a correspondence between

192
00:20:02.040 --> 00:20:09.840
the author and the reverend T. R. Malthus, London, 1829, Senior dealt a devastating blow

193
00:20:09.840 --> 00:20:16.740
to the Malthusian doctrine. In the first place, while agreeing that excessive population growth

194
00:20:16.740 --> 00:20:23.880
could conceivably one day constitute a problem, Senior in effect stood Malthus on his head

195
00:20:23.880 --> 00:20:29.760
by pointing out that while population indeed pressed on the food supply in undeveloped

196
00:20:29.760 --> 00:20:35.940
countries, the history of the prosperous countries of the West had been marked by an increase

197
00:20:35.940 --> 00:20:40.340
in the food supply outstripping the rise in population.

198
00:20:40.340 --> 00:20:46.000
Indeed, this fact is simply demonstrated by the rising living standards of the Western

199
00:20:46.000 --> 00:20:53.080
countries over the centuries, and this economic growth must be due to a general tendency of

200
00:20:53.080 --> 00:20:59.480
of Agricultural and Other Productivity to Rise, as well as people devoting themselves

201
00:20:59.480 --> 00:21:03.080
to safeguarding their higher living standards.

202
00:21:03.080 --> 00:21:09.400
As a result, population does not grow enough to reduce the living standards of the public

203
00:21:09.400 --> 00:21:11.960
to the subsistence level.

204
00:21:11.960 --> 00:21:18.160
And while Malthus would not verbally go so far as senior in speaking of a general tendency

205
00:21:18.160 --> 00:21:25.040
for Food to Increase Faster Than Population, it was clear from Malthus' reply that the

206
00:21:25.040 --> 00:21:29.560
mellower Malthus of the second edition had triumphed.

207
00:21:29.560 --> 00:21:35.760
That senior saw the full implications of the changes of the second edition is also demonstrated

208
00:21:35.760 --> 00:21:40.160
by his own formulation of the population principle.

209
00:21:40.160 --> 00:21:46.960
That the population of the world is limited only by moral or physical evil, or by fear

210
00:21:46.960 --> 00:21:53.020
of the deficiency of those articles of wealth which the habits of individuals of each class

211
00:21:53.020 --> 00:21:57.720
of its inhabitants lead them to acquire.

212
00:21:57.720 --> 00:22:05.040
But while the iron law of wages was in fact finished de facto, it still continued to reign

213
00:22:05.040 --> 00:22:08.000
as it were de jure.

214
00:22:08.000 --> 00:22:14.160
For Nassau Sr., suffering from excessive piety toward Malthus, lacked the instinct for the

215
00:22:14.160 --> 00:22:21.160
The juggler that would have stripped the veil of evasions from the grave fallacies of the Malthusian doctrine.

216
00:22:21.160 --> 00:22:35.160
Instead, Senior collaborated in the sham, insisting, though he knew better, on continuing to hail the Malthusian principle of population as a cornerstone of economic science.

217
00:22:35.160 --> 00:22:40.160
As Joseph Schumpeter, ever alive to the follies of economists, lamented,

218
00:22:40.160 --> 00:22:56.160
Senior always treated Malthus with infinite respect. He even called him a benefactor of humanity, and did all in his power to minimize his deviation from what he evidently considered to be established doctrine.

219
00:22:56.160 --> 00:23:02.880
All the less justification is there for the practice of some later writers, who, with

220
00:23:02.880 --> 00:23:09.480
nauseating pontificality, treated Senior as a none-too-intelligent pupil who needed to

221
00:23:09.480 --> 00:23:12.320
be set right by Malthus.

222
00:23:12.320 --> 00:23:18.360
As a matter of fact, it is perfectly clear that Senior realized the extent to which Malthus'

223
00:23:18.360 --> 00:23:25.080
qualifications ought to have spelled recantation, and to what degree his adherence to some of

224
00:23:25.080 --> 00:23:35.600
3. THE THEORY OF RENT

225
00:23:35.600 --> 00:23:45.040
The Ricardian Theory of Rent was effectively demolished by Thomas Perenette Thompson, 1783-1869,

226
00:23:45.040 --> 00:23:53.000
in his pamphlet, The True Theory of Rent, 1826. Thompson weighed in against this fallacious

227
00:23:53.000 --> 00:23:56.280
This capstone to the Ricardian system.

228
00:23:56.280 --> 00:24:03.080
The celebrated theory of rent, Thompson charged, is founded on a fallacy, for demand is the

229
00:24:03.080 --> 00:24:07.440
key to the price of corn and to rent.

230
00:24:07.440 --> 00:24:14.580
The fallacy lies in assuming to be the cause what in reality is only a consequence.

231
00:24:14.580 --> 00:24:21.300
It is the rise in the price of produce that enables and causes inferior land to be brought

232
00:24:21.300 --> 00:24:29.620
into Cultivation, and not the cultivation of inferior land that causes the rise of rent.

233
00:24:29.620 --> 00:24:35.700
Thompson goes on to note in wonder that Ricardo perceived the fallacy in the view that corn

234
00:24:35.700 --> 00:24:43.420
sells for a high price because rent is paid and not vice versa, and yet pressed on to

235
00:24:43.420 --> 00:24:47.820
adopt a similar cost theory of price.

236
00:24:47.820 --> 00:24:53.500
Here Ricardo reversed cause and effect by maintaining that the cultivation of inferior

237
00:24:53.500 --> 00:25:00.780
land causes the price of corn to rise instead of the other way around.

238
00:25:00.780 --> 00:25:06.020
During the same year, Colonel Robert Torrens himself destroyed the Ricardian theory of

239
00:25:06.020 --> 00:25:13.820
rent even more effectively, zeroing in on the crucial fallacy of rent as a differential.

240
00:25:13.820 --> 00:25:19.140
Characteristically, Torrens, who was involved in all the economic controversies of the

241
00:25:19.140 --> 00:25:25.100
day and changed his mind significantly on nearly all of them, delivered his coup de

242
00:25:25.100 --> 00:25:31.700
grâce in the third edition of a work in which he had originally predated Ricardo in the

243
00:25:31.700 --> 00:25:37.580
discovery and championing of the theory of differential rent.

244
00:25:37.580 --> 00:25:44.660
This work was the Essay on the External Trade, originally published in 1815.

245
00:25:44.660 --> 00:25:52.100
But now, Torrens honed in on the critical point that the rent of land, A, does not depend

246
00:25:52.100 --> 00:26:00.020
on its being more fertile or productive than some other piece of land, B, that on the contrary,

247
00:26:00.020 --> 00:26:06.080
the rent on each land stems from its own productivity, period.

248
00:26:06.080 --> 00:26:12.080
In turn, partially determined by the scarcity of that particular land and by the demand

249
00:26:12.080 --> 00:26:18.880
for its product, the existence of a return on a piece of land is by no means dependent

250
00:26:18.880 --> 00:26:22.320
on the existence of inferior lands.

251
00:26:22.320 --> 00:26:28.820
As Torrance puts it, neither the gradations of soil nor the successive applications of

252
00:26:28.820 --> 00:26:35.680
capital to land with decreasing returns are in any way essential to the appearance or

253
00:26:35.680 --> 00:26:38.120
for the Rise of Rents.

254
00:26:38.120 --> 00:26:44.720
If all soils were of one uniform quality, and if land, after having been adequately

255
00:26:44.720 --> 00:26:51.660
stocked, could yield no additional produce, still the rise in the value of raw produce

256
00:26:51.660 --> 00:26:58.880
would cause a portion of the surplus produce of the soil to assume the form of rent.

257
00:26:58.880 --> 00:27:05.080
In the very same year, 1831, that Colonel Torrens was thus pronouncing the death of

258
00:27:05.080 --> 00:27:13.600
of the Ricardian System, the Rev. Richard Jones, 1790-1855, a Cambridge graduate, put

259
00:27:13.600 --> 00:27:20.120
the final boots to the Ricardian theory in his discourse on rent, in his essay on the

260
00:27:20.120 --> 00:27:28.120
distribution of wealth, a Baconian inductivist, historicist and anti-theorist who paradoxically

261
00:27:28.120 --> 00:27:35.060
first succeeded senior as professor of political economy at King's College London and then

262
00:27:35.060 --> 00:27:41.240
When followed Malthus as professor at the East India College of Halleberry, Jones stressed

263
00:27:41.240 --> 00:27:47.580
the error of Ricardo's historical dictum that the most fertile lands are always cultivated

264
00:27:47.580 --> 00:27:55.700
first in every country, which then moved successively to less and less fertile lands.

265
00:27:55.700 --> 00:28:02.020
For Schumpeter and others to dismiss Jones' case as confusing historical fact with an

266
00:28:02.020 --> 00:28:06.860
An Abstract Theoretical Model Misses The Real Point

267
00:28:06.860 --> 00:28:11.900
Fallacious anti-theorist Richard Jones undoubtedly was.

268
00:28:11.900 --> 00:28:18.580
But from his own point of view, David Ricardo was not simply setting up an abstract and

269
00:28:18.580 --> 00:28:22.640
totally unrealistic theoretical model.

270
00:28:22.640 --> 00:28:28.340
Ricardo was interested above all in political applications, and he was deluded enough to

271
00:28:28.340 --> 00:28:34.780
to believe that his model was spewing forth accurate laws of past and future historical

272
00:28:34.780 --> 00:28:36.580
trends.

273
00:28:36.580 --> 00:28:44.040
For Ricardo, inexorable rises in rent, crippling future economic development, were a predictable

274
00:28:44.040 --> 00:28:48.260
empirical consequence of his own theory.

275
00:28:48.260 --> 00:28:55.500
Specific empirical facts cannot give rise to or test theory, but a theoretical law that

276
00:28:55.500 --> 00:29:04.500
Attempts to predict past and future can be validly countered by examining the course of actual history.

277
00:29:04.500 --> 00:29:11.500
Empirical facts can properly be used to refute empirical generalizations.

278
00:29:11.500 --> 00:29:21.500
The various demolitions of Ricardo's theory of rent, especially that of Perenette Thompson, quickly triumphed in the economic literature.

279
00:29:21.500 --> 00:29:35.500
The Thompson critique had been anticipated in the influential journals in the British Critic as early as 1821, and by Nassau W. Senior in the quarterly review in the same year.

280
00:29:35.500 --> 00:29:49.500
By the early 1830s, Thompson's view had triumphed in the journals, including an article by Samuel Mountafort Longfield, the first Irish professor of political economy at Trinity College, Dublin.

281
00:29:49.500 --> 00:29:57.500
By the 1840s, the Ricardian theory of rent was dead in the water and almost beneath discussion.

282
00:29:57.500 --> 00:30:10.500
Apart from McCullough, the only one willing to defend it was the ardent and emotional Ricardian, the poet and writer Thomas de Quincy, 1785-1859.

283
00:30:10.500 --> 00:30:17.500
David Ricardo, as he himself acknowledged, did not originate his differential theory of rent.

284
00:30:17.500 --> 00:30:31.500
It began in 1777 on the publication of an inquiry into the nature of the Corn Laws by the Scottish farmer James Anderson, 1739-1808.

285
00:30:31.500 --> 00:30:43.500
An Aberdeenshire farmer, Anderson founded and edited the weekly Bee and later moved to London, where he edited publications in Agricultural Science and the Arts.

286
00:30:43.500 --> 00:30:50.940
Anderson's theory, however, remained forgotten until independently replicated by three writers

287
00:30:50.940 --> 00:30:59.460
in 1815, Thomas Robert Malthus in his Inquiry into the Nature and Progress of Rent, Sir

288
00:30:59.460 --> 00:31:08.880
Edward West's 1782-1828 Essay on the Application of Capital to Land, and the first edition

289
00:31:08.880 --> 00:31:15.760
and of Torren's Essay on the External Corn Trade. Malthus did not integrate his theory

290
00:31:15.760 --> 00:31:22.000
into anything like the Ricardian system, and furthermore, he was scarcely an opponent of

291
00:31:22.000 --> 00:31:29.480
the landlords or of land rent. To the contrary, Malthus defended the corn laws. On the other

292
00:31:29.480 --> 00:31:36.320
hand, West, an attorney and fellow of University College, Oxford, who later served as Supreme

293
00:31:36.320 --> 00:31:59.240
The interesting question is, what gave rise in a very short period of time, 1815 to 1817,

294
00:31:59.240 --> 00:32:07.280
with such intense concern, or at least attention to, the alleged problems of rising rents.

295
00:32:07.280 --> 00:32:13.280
For apart from the relatively unknown James Anderson, attention to rising rents occurs

296
00:32:13.280 --> 00:32:18.960
within a very few years shortly after the end of the Napoleonic Wars.

297
00:32:18.960 --> 00:32:25.720
The answer was brilliantly supplied by the early 20th century American-Austrian economist

298
00:32:25.720 --> 00:32:27.860
Frank Albert Fetter.

299
00:32:27.860 --> 00:32:35.140
The Napoleonic wars of the first 15 years of the 19th century were marked by high taxation,

300
00:32:35.140 --> 00:32:42.780
blockages of food imports, currency inflation and, consequently, unprecedentedly high prices

301
00:32:42.780 --> 00:32:49.460
for corn in England and, hence, highly inflated agricultural rents.

302
00:32:49.460 --> 00:32:55.900
It is surely no accident, as Fetter notes, that the so-called Ricardian doctrine of rent

303
00:32:55.900 --> 00:33:03.100
was independently formulated by several other writers, West, Malthus, Torrens and others,

304
00:33:03.100 --> 00:33:10.820
between 1813 and 1815, when wheat prices were at their peak.

305
00:33:10.820 --> 00:33:13.660
4.

306
00:33:13.660 --> 00:33:19.200
Colonel Perenette Thompson, Anti-Ricardian Benthamite

307
00:33:19.200 --> 00:33:25.180
We must pause a moment to consider the fascinating character of Colonel Perenette Thompson, an

308
00:33:25.180 --> 00:33:31.860
An ardent Benthamite radical and a champion of free trade and opponent of the Corn Laws.

309
00:33:31.860 --> 00:33:38.100
Thompson, the son of a prosperous merchant and banker from Sussex and member of parliament

310
00:33:38.100 --> 00:33:43.940
for a decade, spent the first part of his adult life in the military, retiring from

311
00:33:43.940 --> 00:33:51.060
active service in 1922 at the age of 39 with the rank of lieutenant.

312
00:33:51.060 --> 00:33:56.420
Despite this relatively low rank, Thompson had been made the first royal governor of

313
00:33:56.420 --> 00:34:03.740
the colony of Sierra Leone in 1808, but got himself recalled quickly by clamoring for

314
00:34:03.740 --> 00:34:06.900
the abolition of the slave trade.

315
00:34:06.900 --> 00:34:12.560
His removal by the Tory-British government over the issue of slavery radicalized young

316
00:34:12.560 --> 00:34:18.980
Thompson, whose education in classical liberalism was further advanced by reading Adam Smith

317
00:34:18.980 --> 00:34:26.820
and Turgeau. After retiring from active service, Thompson was compensated for his low rank in

318
00:34:26.820 --> 00:34:33.700
important work over a long military career by being repeatedly promoted while inactive.

319
00:34:34.340 --> 00:34:38.820
By the time of his death, Thompson had risen to the rank of full general.

320
00:34:40.260 --> 00:34:46.180
Before going into military service, Thompson had graduated from Queens College, Cambridge,

321
00:34:46.180 --> 00:34:49.700
and Ben Made, a fellow of that college.

322
00:34:49.700 --> 00:34:55.720
On retiring from the military life, he joined Bentham's circle of admirers and plunged into

323
00:34:55.720 --> 00:35:00.260
Benthamite utilitarianism and radicalism.

324
00:35:00.260 --> 00:35:06.060
Thompson's first published work appeared in the very first issue of Bentham's own periodical,

325
00:35:06.060 --> 00:35:14.860
The Westminster Review, 1824, his true theory of rent designed to uphold Adam Smith's views

326
00:35:14.860 --> 00:35:21.200
on Rent as Against Ricardo, followed, and the next year, Peronette Thompson published

327
00:35:21.200 --> 00:35:28.660
his well-known Catechism on the Corn Laws, 1827, generally considered the most important

328
00:35:28.660 --> 00:35:36.100
work in the entire anti-corn law literature. Later, Thompson became one of the most effective

329
00:35:36.100 --> 00:35:44.740
members of the Anti-Corn Law League. In 1829, only half a decade since his plunge into politics,

330
00:35:44.740 --> 00:35:51.100
The now Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Perenette Thompson became the sole owner of the Benthamite

331
00:35:51.100 --> 00:35:57.860
Westminster Review and contributed articles to every issue until relinquishing ownership

332
00:35:57.860 --> 00:36:00.300
seven years later.

333
00:36:00.300 --> 00:36:06.980
After being defeated for parliament in 1834, Thompson won election a year later, taking

334
00:36:06.980 --> 00:36:12.420
his stand with George Grote and the philosophic radicals in parliament.

335
00:36:12.420 --> 00:36:18.860
Losing his seat two years later, he ran several times unsuccessfully, serving in Parliament

336
00:36:18.860 --> 00:36:28.220
from 1847 to 1852 and, again, from 1857 to 1859.

337
00:36:28.220 --> 00:36:32.180
Thompson's writings were prolific and in many areas.

338
00:36:32.180 --> 00:36:39.240
At the age of 59, a six-volume collection of his writings to date was published, Exercises

339
00:36:39.240 --> 00:36:46.400
as Political and Others, 1842, and he kept writing pamphlets and newspaper articles on

340
00:36:46.400 --> 00:36:52.480
democratic reform until the day before his death at the age of 86.

341
00:36:52.480 --> 00:36:58.120
In addition to his widespread political and economic concerns, Thompson wrote and published

342
00:36:58.120 --> 00:37:04.320
works on mathematics, the science of acoustics and the theory of musical harmony.

343
00:37:04.320 --> 00:37:09.900
An organ, built on the lines of Thompson's harmonic theory, received honorable mention

344
00:37:09.900 --> 00:37:14.240
at the Great Exhibition of 1851.

345
00:37:14.240 --> 00:37:18.800
Thompson contributed more to economics than his attack on rent.

346
00:37:18.800 --> 00:37:24.600
His first article in the Westminster Review on the instrument of exchange followed Bentham's

347
00:37:24.600 --> 00:37:30.520
own inflationist views by advocating an inconvertible paper currency.

348
00:37:30.520 --> 00:37:39.520
Another equally dubious contribution of Thompson's in the same essay followed up a hint made 10 years before by Malthus.

349
00:37:39.520 --> 00:37:54.520
Malthus, who had been trained in mathematics at Cambridge, had observed in a pamphlet in 1814 that differential calculus might prove useful in the theory of morals, economics, and politics,

350
00:37:54.520 --> 00:38:01.280
since many questions in these disciplines center around the pursuit of maxima and minima.

351
00:38:01.280 --> 00:38:07.760
By the time of the publication of his Principles of Political Economy in 1820, however, Malthus

352
00:38:07.760 --> 00:38:14.880
had wisely grown skeptical of the possibilities of maths in economics as well as in ethics

353
00:38:14.880 --> 00:38:16.360
and politics.

354
00:38:16.360 --> 00:38:23.040
Thompson, however, also trained in mathematics at Cambridge, had no such scruples, and his

355
00:38:23.040 --> 00:38:32.040
The 1824 article opened a fateful door by using the differential calculus in defining a maximum gain.

356
00:38:32.040 --> 00:38:41.040
The perfect benthamite, steeped in looking at maxima of pleasure and minima of pain, had struck a fateful chord.

357
00:38:41.040 --> 00:38:45.040
Pandora's box had been opened.

358
00:38:45.040 --> 00:38:59.040
Thompson's sympathy for mathematical economics, however, did not keep him from denouncing the Smith-Ricardo search for a fixed and invariable measure of value, which he wisely dismissed as a chimera.

359
00:38:59.040 --> 00:39:13.040
Furthermore, in the Westminster Review in 1832, Thompson trenchantly criticized all cost theories of value, pointing out that cost and price almost always differ.

360
00:39:13.040 --> 00:39:25.040
And these differences, he added, are not accidental and ephemeral, as Smith and especially Ricardo assumed, in their focus on the long-run natural price.

361
00:39:25.040 --> 00:39:32.040
On the contrary, these short-run differences are the essence of the dynamic real world.

362
00:39:32.040 --> 00:39:47.040
This perpetual oscillation on both sides of the cost-price, instead of being an inconsiderable accident, is in reality the great agent by which the commercial world is kept in motion.