WEBVTT

NOTE Shakespeare's Theater

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.000
Welcome back to our second session.

2
00:00:03.000 --> 00:00:08.000
I'm going to talk about Shakespeare and Elizabethan theater.

3
00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:14.000
I want to begin with a quotation from a woman named Janet McTeer.

4
00:00:14.000 --> 00:00:20.000
This is from a Chicago magazine that used to exist called City Talk.

5
00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:26.000
It's from May 25, 2001, an article by Jane Wolman-Russoff.

6
00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:36.000
Janet McTeer is an actress appearing in a Shakespeare play in the Chicago area, and in this interview we learn

7
00:00:36.000 --> 00:00:42.000
the actress has never been keen on doing big Hollywood movies, which she says, quote,

8
00:00:42.000 --> 00:00:47.000
all seem to be about making money, and I don't find that terribly interesting.

9
00:00:47.000 --> 00:00:53.000
Today in our world, art has to be commercial. That's a really sad point of view.

10
00:00:53.000 --> 00:00:59.000
If Shakespeare had had to be commercial, he wouldn't have written the things he did.

11
00:00:59.000 --> 00:01:01.000
That's just amazing.

12
00:01:01.000 --> 00:01:08.000
It just shows you how deep ingrained this cultural myth of the isolated artist in our culture is.

13
00:01:08.000 --> 00:01:15.000
Shakespeare was a fully commercial artist working in a fully commercial theater.

14
00:01:15.000 --> 00:01:21.000
And indeed, he's exhibit A for my whole case.

15
00:01:21.000 --> 00:01:30.000
If you want to say that great commercial art is possible, you just have to point to Shakespeare.

16
00:01:30.000 --> 00:01:34.000
Case closed. No way we could all go home right now.

17
00:01:34.000 --> 00:01:42.000
Shakespeare's the greatest writer who ever lived. He's probably the greatest artist who ever lived.

18
00:01:42.000 --> 00:01:45.000
And he worked in a commercial environment.

19
00:01:45.000 --> 00:01:54.000
If that was possible, there can't be anything fundamentally wrong with a commercial basis for art.

20
00:01:54.000 --> 00:01:59.000
So in a way, we could stop here, but let's try to explicate that.

21
00:01:59.000 --> 00:02:07.000
And my aim this afternoon is to show that, yes, Shakespeare operated in a commercial environment,

22
00:02:07.000 --> 00:02:15.520
And I want to show that much of his achievement was because of that and not in spite of that.

23
00:02:15.520 --> 00:02:22.120
That is, you could say, yes, Shakespeare worked in a commercial environment, but he overcame

24
00:02:22.120 --> 00:02:23.120
it.

25
00:02:23.120 --> 00:02:26.280
And in a certain sense, that is true.

26
00:02:26.280 --> 00:02:32.280
And I'm certainly not going to say that a commercial environment produced Shakespeare

27
00:02:32.280 --> 00:02:35.740
because there was only one Shakespeare.

28
00:02:35.740 --> 00:02:39.420
And if you could credit his achievement to commerce, then there should have been a whole

29
00:02:39.420 --> 00:02:41.980
bunch of Shakespeare's running around in his day.

30
00:02:41.980 --> 00:02:46.220
And there were certainly people who were trying to be Shakespeare, who were trying to be great

31
00:02:46.220 --> 00:02:49.780
playwrights at the time, and they didn't quite succeed, or at least didn't succeed the way

32
00:02:49.780 --> 00:02:50.780
Shakespeare did.

33
00:02:50.780 --> 00:02:55.840
So I'm not claiming that the commercial environment was responsible for Shakespeare.

34
00:02:55.840 --> 00:03:00.900
But nevertheless, I want to point to aspects of the theater of his day that were genuinely

35
00:03:00.900 --> 00:03:05.580
commercial and that contributed to his achievement.

36
00:03:05.580 --> 00:03:11.580
And above all, competition. That's one of the principles I want to talk about this whole week.

37
00:03:11.580 --> 00:03:21.580
You could say the dream of artists themselves and much of the left-wing program for art is to shield the artists from competition.

38
00:03:21.580 --> 00:03:29.580
Oh, how horrible the competitive marketplace is. You see, it's the same argument they make in basic economics.

39
00:03:29.580 --> 00:03:40.580
and Economics. Competition is bad. And if we could only eliminate the competitive aspect of culture, we would have so much better a culture.

40
00:03:40.580 --> 00:03:50.580
Well, it is true that nobody likes competition. Even Shakespeare probably got antsy about Marlowe and Ben Johnson at times.

41
00:03:50.580 --> 00:03:58.580
And everyone sort of dreams about eliminating the competition. But the answer is that's not healthy. It's not healthy in basic economics.

42
00:03:58.580 --> 00:04:05.580
Economics. It's not healthy, I'm going to argue, in culture as well. Just as in basic

43
00:04:05.580 --> 00:04:13.820
economics, competition is healthy for culture. It keeps people on their toes. It gets their

44
00:04:13.820 --> 00:04:22.420
best work out of them. And I think the Elizabethan Theater is an excellent example of that.

45
00:04:22.420 --> 00:04:30.820
So let's talk about the cultural environment that Shakespeare worked in.

46
00:04:30.820 --> 00:04:34.220
Renaissance theatre in England, Elizabethan theatre, Jacobean theatre, that's the two

47
00:04:34.220 --> 00:04:39.860
periods under Queen Elizabeth and then under James I.

48
00:04:39.860 --> 00:04:45.060
This is one of the peaks of world drama.

49
00:04:45.060 --> 00:04:51.740
Probably the greatest body of dramatic work ever produced, chiefly because Shakespeare

50
00:04:51.740 --> 00:04:55.020
is working at that time.

51
00:04:55.020 --> 00:04:58.580
And it was a largely commercial operation.

52
00:04:58.580 --> 00:05:03.260
In fact, it's a good example of the fundamental thing

53
00:05:03.260 --> 00:05:08.420
I was talking about this morning, that a certain economic stage

54
00:05:08.420 --> 00:05:12.700
had to be reached as the precondition for the Elizabethan

55
00:05:12.700 --> 00:05:14.420
Theater.

56
00:05:14.420 --> 00:05:17.460
Shakespeare, growing up in Stratford,

57
00:05:17.460 --> 00:05:19.940
seeing strolling players coming through the town,

58
00:05:19.940 --> 00:05:49.940
He might have dreamed of being the world's greatest playwright, but without a theater and an acting company, he wasn't going anywhere, and he was not in a position to fund that himself, to pay for building a theater or hiring an acting company, and thank goodness there was no government-granting agency that was going to assign the money for this, because they probably would not have given it to Shakespeare.

59
00:05:49.940 --> 00:06:12.940
So what he had to approach was an already established commercial theater world in London, which was predicated on the fact that London, by that time, 1580s, was one of the largest cities in Europe, was a great commercial center already,

60
00:06:12.940 --> 00:06:24.940
therefore had generated surplus wealth so that people could spend money on something as frivolous as entertainment.

61
00:06:24.940 --> 00:06:33.940
And again, in Stratford where Shakespeare grew up, people weren't going to spend their hard-earned money on a play,

62
00:06:33.940 --> 00:06:39.940
at least maybe once a year, but in London you had a situation where there was enough economic wealth

63
00:06:39.940 --> 00:06:47.860
So, people could go to the theater regularly. Now, it took entrepreneurs to figure that out.

64
00:06:51.140 --> 00:06:58.260
The government didn't build the theaters, even the aristocrats didn't build the theater theaters.

65
00:06:58.260 --> 00:07:07.060
There had been already a kind of tradition of acting troops appearing at aristocratic houses,

66
00:07:07.060 --> 00:07:27.060
The theater that Shakespeare knew was a commercial theater in London, theaters started to be built, I believe, in the 1560s, maybe a little later, but it was quite an investment, you had to first of all build a theater,

67
00:07:27.060 --> 00:07:35.980
a little later but it was quite an investment you had to first of all build

68
00:07:35.980 --> 00:07:40.980
a theater and some of you may have seen the replica of the globe that we now have

69
00:07:40.980 --> 00:07:49.140
in London these were large theaters they sat not sure between 2,000 maybe 3,000

70
00:07:49.140 --> 00:07:56.500
people including seating and standing the first theater was built by a man

71
00:07:56.500 --> 00:08:01.500
by a man named Burbage, whose son went on to become Shakespeare's leading actor, Richard Burbage.

72
00:08:01.500 --> 00:08:16.500
So it took typically a four-sided entrepreneur to see that there was an economic opportunity here.

73
00:08:16.500 --> 00:08:22.500
That if you invested the money, rather large sums of money in those days,

74
00:08:22.500 --> 00:08:30.500
to build one of these theaters, you could get enough people to come to it to justify your investment.

75
00:08:30.500 --> 00:08:39.500
The greatest expense was in building the theater. The Elizabethan theaters initially were outdoors.

76
00:08:39.500 --> 00:08:50.500
They didn't have scenery in our modern sense. They did have rather elaborate costuming and that cost money,

77
00:08:50.500 --> 00:08:55.300
money, although in many cases, and here an element of aristocratic patronage enters the

78
00:08:55.300 --> 00:09:02.180
picture, the theaters were often connected with a major aristocrat or even eventually

79
00:09:02.180 --> 00:09:07.540
with the royal court, and often as part of that connection, they got kind of cast off

80
00:09:07.540 --> 00:09:15.020
aristocratic outfits so they could dress up in robes and look like kings and queens without

81
00:09:15.020 --> 00:09:23.020
were not really buying the stuff, but they were kind of using hand-me-downs from their aristocratic patrons.

82
00:09:23.020 --> 00:09:34.020
But anyway, it was by Elizabethan standards, by Renaissance standards, the theater business was rather heavily capitalized,

83
00:09:34.020 --> 00:09:44.020
of Major Investments, and in fact, the theater companies were among the first joint stock companies.

84
00:09:44.020 --> 00:09:54.020
They actually had shareholders. Shakespeare eventually became a shareholder in the theater company he was involved in.

85
00:09:54.020 --> 00:10:01.020
So he got a percentage of the gross. He got the really good Hollywood deal on his plays.

86
00:10:01.020 --> 00:10:17.020
So there really was quite an economic underpinning to these theaters. Again, if London hadn't had reached a certain stage of economic prosperity at this point, nothing would have been possible.

87
00:10:17.020 --> 00:10:47.020
and so basically the theaters were commercial operations they were open to the general public and that means basically the middle class and the lower classes we don't have totally accurate records on the people that attended these plays but it does we get indications that professionals like lawyers seem to have gone to the theater a lot then and often provided legal advice

88
00:10:47.020 --> 00:11:11.020
for the theater companies that are often getting in trouble, but a daily working man would go to the theater and I believe the price was about a penny, which was an hour's wage then, and it's kind of curious how the basic entertainment has stayed at about minimum wage.

89
00:11:11.020 --> 00:11:25.020
Think of what a movie ticket costs now. It's roughly one hour's wage and the admission to Shakespeare's theatre was roughly one hour's wage for the average person.

90
00:11:25.020 --> 00:11:35.520
and the theaters, in other words, appeal to a broad spectrum of the populace of London.

91
00:11:35.520 --> 00:11:42.520
They were all built initially outside the city limits of London.

92
00:11:42.520 --> 00:11:54.520
London is this vast sprawling metropolis and now it was then a rather small walled, still medieval city.

93
00:11:54.520 --> 00:11:59.200
It actually corresponds to what's called the city in London now.

94
00:11:59.200 --> 00:12:03.760
If you know London geography, it's the financial district,

95
00:12:03.760 --> 00:12:07.240
and what's called the city roughly corresponds.

96
00:12:07.240 --> 00:12:10.120
You can still see the old walls at some points.

97
00:12:10.120 --> 00:12:13.240
And the theaters were built outside the city limits

98
00:12:13.240 --> 00:12:18.840
because the civic authorities were not too thrilled with theater.

99
00:12:18.840 --> 00:12:28.840
Some of the London authorities were relatively middle class, some with puritan sympathies,

100
00:12:28.840 --> 00:12:38.840
and so many of them subscribed to the puritan objections to the theater that involved too much sex,

101
00:12:38.840 --> 00:12:44.840
and it was corrupt and men dressed up as women, and so on.

102
00:12:44.840 --> 00:12:50.520
and so the theaters couldn't get licenses within the city limits of London

103
00:12:50.520 --> 00:12:58.600
and moreover they wanted to build the theaters outside the jurisdiction of the city fathers of London

104
00:12:58.600 --> 00:13:04.120
and they also tended to have some aristocratic protection

105
00:13:04.120 --> 00:13:08.040
and here's where the situation gets a little complicated

106
00:13:08.040 --> 00:13:14.280
you can't call the Elizabethan theater purely commercial because there was an element of patronage

107
00:13:14.280 --> 00:13:22.080
All the theater companies were attached to some prominent aristocrat at court.

108
00:13:22.080 --> 00:13:26.880
For example, Shakespeare's company was originally the Lord Chamberlain's men.

109
00:13:26.880 --> 00:13:31.600
Their representative court was the Lord Chamberlain.

110
00:13:31.600 --> 00:13:36.800
Later, they became the King's men when James I came to the throne in 1604.

111
00:13:36.800 --> 00:13:44.240
So they were the most successful company and they got the highest patronage possible, the royal patronage.

112
00:13:44.240 --> 00:14:04.240
and that I don't want to minimize that, a patronage was still important to them when the civic authorities would threaten to close down the theaters or interfere with them, it was very important to have a patron at court who could defend you,

113
00:14:04.240 --> 00:14:13.240
Appearances at court were very important to Shakespeare's company and the other companies.

114
00:14:13.240 --> 00:14:23.240
That is, yes, they performed in these public theaters and got a substantial portion of the income from that.

115
00:14:23.240 --> 00:14:30.240
But a command performance at the court was still a big deal. It was financially rewarding.

116
00:15:00.240 --> 00:15:23.240
that we can't always separate the world of patronage from the world of the market they often blur together but still fundamentally the plays were oriented towards a commercial theater and we can see that in what Shakespeare appealed to in the plays.

117
00:15:23.240 --> 00:15:41.240
Now, it's interesting just to try to think of the status of the plays and the status of playwriting in general then and of Shakespeare's own status because there's a lot of retrospective, retroactive thinking going on.

118
00:15:41.240 --> 00:15:49.240
We saw that in this quote from this woman saying that Shakespeare wouldn't have written what he did if he was commercial.

119
00:15:49.240 --> 00:15:53.240
Well, now we no longer think of Shakespeare as commercial.

120
00:15:53.240 --> 00:15:58.240
As a matter of fact, he's still quite successful commercially, as a number of movies have shown.

121
00:15:58.240 --> 00:16:01.240
But now, we think of Shakespeare as high art.

122
00:16:01.240 --> 00:16:09.240
And this is a kind of optical illusion, a trick of perspective, and it's something I'll be coming back to again and again.

123
00:16:09.240 --> 00:16:14.240
Now, Shakespeare is one of our quintessential images of high culture.

124
00:16:14.240 --> 00:16:18.240
But he was absolutely the pop culture of his day.

125
00:16:18.240 --> 00:16:26.680
the most popular playwright of his day and no one was standing around the

126
00:16:26.680 --> 00:16:34.400
Elizabethan period saying oh we need to go see Shakespeare that's high culture

127
00:16:34.400 --> 00:16:39.840
that was as low as it got then and what's interesting is if you look at the

128
00:16:39.840 --> 00:16:45.080
contemporary reactions to the plays to the theater in general even to

129
00:16:45.080 --> 00:16:53.080
in Shakespeare, it's that this was vulgar pop culture stuff.

130
00:16:53.080 --> 00:17:00.080
There were tremendous attacks on the theater during Shakespeare's lifetime,

131
00:17:00.080 --> 00:17:09.080
largely coming from the Puritan wing in English Protestantism at the time.

132
00:17:09.080 --> 00:17:14.080
This culminated some 50 years later, the Puritan Revolution, 1640s,

133
00:17:14.080 --> 00:17:23.080
In the 1940s, when the Puritans came to power, one of the first things they did was to shut down the theaters and they were shut for a period of about, I think, 18 years.

134
00:17:23.080 --> 00:17:25.080
They were reopened in 1660.

135
00:17:25.080 --> 00:17:31.080
Essentially one of the first things Charles II did when he came to the throne was reopen the theaters.

136
00:17:31.080 --> 00:17:41.080
So the theater was very contentious and basically you got the complaints about Shakespeare's theater,

137
00:17:41.080 --> 00:17:47.080
In his day that you get about first movies, then television, and now video games.

138
00:17:47.080 --> 00:17:53.080
That is what people said, what they say about any good art form at its beginnings,

139
00:17:53.080 --> 00:17:59.080
that there was too much sex and violence in it, and people mistook illusion for reality.

140
00:17:59.080 --> 00:18:05.080
And they took these plays too seriously. They couldn't distinguish between what they saw on the stage and what was real.

141
00:18:05.080 --> 00:18:11.720
is real. And again, you see this in Plato's Republic in his attack on Athenian drama.

142
00:18:11.720 --> 00:18:17.280
You see it today in attacks on video games. It's one consistent point throughout the history

143
00:18:17.280 --> 00:18:23.960
of culture, that whatever culture is the most popular and has the most impact, there are

144
00:18:23.960 --> 00:18:27.980
people who are going to complain about it. Intellectuals are going to complain about

145
00:18:27.980 --> 00:18:33.560
it and moralists are going to complain about it. And Shakespeare's theater is no example.

146
00:18:33.560 --> 00:18:36.920
Now, I don't want to go too far on this.

147
00:18:36.920 --> 00:18:43.400
There were people that recognized Shakespeare's genius in his day, as Shakespeare began writing

148
00:18:43.400 --> 00:18:47.960
probably in the late 1580s, certainly established by the 1590s.

149
00:18:47.960 --> 00:18:54.680
By 1598, a man named Francis Mears was saying in print that this guy Shakespeare is as good

150
00:18:54.680 --> 00:19:01.920
as the ancients, that his tragedies are as good as the ancient Greek and Roman tragedies,

151
00:19:01.920 --> 00:19:05.620
His comedies are as good as Plowdus and Terence and so on.

152
00:19:05.620 --> 00:19:12.680
So people who were in his day recognized this man's genius.

153
00:19:12.680 --> 00:19:16.880
That doesn't mean, though, that he wasn't severely criticized.

154
00:19:16.880 --> 00:19:21.300
In general, the theory was criticized, and Shakespeare was criticized, sometimes by his

155
00:19:21.300 --> 00:19:26.580
fellow playwrights who complained he wasn't educated.

156
00:19:26.580 --> 00:19:35.580
He was famously called an upstart crow in one contemporary critique because the other

157
00:19:35.580 --> 00:19:38.720
playwrights were jealous of him.

158
00:19:38.720 --> 00:19:47.540
So it's a good example of what happens when we compare the past with the present.

159
00:19:47.540 --> 00:19:52.820
Today, Shakespeare in a way has been tamed for us.

160
00:19:52.820 --> 00:19:54.460
He's become a classic.

161
00:19:54.460 --> 00:19:56.340
He's taught in schools.

162
00:19:56.340 --> 00:20:00.220
There's something almost museum-like in our attitude towards him.

163
00:20:00.220 --> 00:20:02.660
We know he's a great playwright.

164
00:20:02.660 --> 00:20:04.500
We know he's the greatest playwright ever.

165
00:20:04.500 --> 00:20:07.820
So we cut him some slack.

166
00:20:07.820 --> 00:20:13.020
There are many people who, if they saw a Shakespeare play and didn't know Shakespeare written,

167
00:20:13.020 --> 00:20:21.020
it would complain bitterly, again, about the unending dirty jokes in his comedies and sometimes

168
00:20:21.020 --> 00:20:23.920
even in his tragedies as in Hamlet.

169
00:20:23.920 --> 00:20:35.920
and more again, the incredible violence, I mean, what video game has more people shot up at the end than Hamlet, percentage-wise?

170
00:20:35.920 --> 00:20:45.920
And so, you know, basically, we've come to terms with Shakespeare and we accept and we forget that in his own day,

171
00:20:45.920 --> 00:20:56.920
He had a real powerful charge to him that frightened many people and the theater even more generally.

172
00:20:56.920 --> 00:21:08.920
And it's fairly typical if you oversee the whole period of one lesson about the transformation of pop culture into high culture.

173
00:21:08.920 --> 00:21:19.920
The number of plays that have survived from Shakespeare's time is in the hundreds, I believe.

174
00:21:19.920 --> 00:21:29.920
We have 37 or 38 plays by Shakespeare. During his lifetime, about 200 plays total,

175
00:21:29.920 --> 00:21:34.920
including 19 of his that were printed in his lifetime were printed.

176
00:21:34.920 --> 00:21:45.160
Other plays have been found since, I don't know the exact figure, but probably about

177
00:21:45.160 --> 00:21:56.560
200, 250 to 300 plays survived from the whole period, let's say roughly from 1580 to 1630.

178
00:21:56.560 --> 00:22:04.640
That's a lot of plays and very few of them are read today and they unquestionably represent

179
00:22:04.640 --> 00:22:12.720
the tip of an iceberg that most of the plays from the time are as lost as early episodes

180
00:22:12.720 --> 00:22:17.960
of My Three Sons.

181
00:22:17.960 --> 00:22:23.520
When you look at the history of television, it's just staggering how much has been produced

182
00:22:23.520 --> 00:22:29.280
and unfortunately much of it has been preserved and we have to live with it on Nick at Night

183
00:22:29.280 --> 00:22:38.280
and TV land. You know, mercifully most of the plays, probably a majority of the plays have been lost.

184
00:22:38.280 --> 00:22:46.280
They were maybe produced once and then disappeared. This is true of Greek tragedy as well.

185
00:22:46.280 --> 00:22:57.280
I really don't have time to talk much about Greek tragedy, but it's estimated that about a thousand tragedies were produced in Athens

186
00:22:57.280 --> 00:23:07.280
in Athens during roughly that century when Athens was producing drama, of those 1,033 plays have survived,

187
00:23:07.280 --> 00:23:14.280
7 by Aeschylus, 7 by Sophocles and 19 by Euripides.

188
00:23:14.280 --> 00:23:23.280
And, you know, when we look back at Greek drama, we justifiably look at it as one of the peaks of dramatic creation,

189
00:23:23.280 --> 00:23:33.280
I would say the two greatest periods of dramatic creation are 5th century Athens and 16th, 17th century London.

190
00:23:33.280 --> 00:23:48.280
And yet if we had all those, that entire 1000 tragedies from ancient Athens, our view of the theme tragedy would probably be somewhat different.

191
00:23:48.280 --> 00:23:56.280
You know, we have every reason to believe that the best of the Greek dramas are the ones that have survived.

192
00:23:56.280 --> 00:24:02.280
They were survived because they were judged to be the best and people went out of the way to praise them.

193
00:24:02.280 --> 00:24:09.280
But, you know, there was undoubtedly a Quentin Tarantino of Athenian drama.

194
00:24:09.280 --> 00:24:17.280
There was undoubtedly an Oliver Stone of Athenian drama and mercifully we've been spared those works.

195
00:24:17.280 --> 00:24:25.280
But they were there and if we saw them we would probably think less of Greek tragedy or at least have a more balanced view.

196
00:24:25.280 --> 00:24:35.280
With Elizabethan and Jacobean drama we have the advantage that almost all of Shakespeare's plays have been preserved, thank heavens.

197
00:24:35.280 --> 00:24:42.280
There's indications that maybe one or two, especially a play called Cardenio, were lost.

198
00:24:42.280 --> 00:24:45.280
But the world was smart enough to preserve those.

199
00:24:45.280 --> 00:25:12.280
We have wonderful dramas by Christopher Marlowe, by Ben Johnson. You can keep going down the ranks and you get some excellent plays by Thomas Middleton, by Cyril Turner, by John Ford, the Jacobean John Ford, not the filmmaker, though the Jacobean John Ford is much more violent than the guy who made The Searchers.

200
00:25:12.280 --> 00:25:42.280
but you know we it's an impressive body of material but we begin to see the way any real culture is tiered in terms of quality that you know in this case we have the supreme figure of Shakespeare standing above it all then we have some still giant figures like Marlon Johnson and some lesser figures and then it starts it spreads

201
00:25:42.280 --> 00:26:12.280
and there's some pretty bad Elizabethan and Jacobean dramas, comedies that aren't funny, tragedies that are completely wacky, and again we don't have that kind of material for Greek tragedy, but when we look at the drama of Shakespeare it starts to look more like the culture of our time, like the history of cinema for example, where again you have some titanic geniuses in the course of the 20th century,

202
00:26:12.280 --> 00:26:22.280
And then, you know, you get down the ranks and, you know, what I'm getting at is any true culture, a real living culture, is based on a pyramid of garbage.

203
00:26:22.280 --> 00:26:32.280
I mean, basically, a lot of lousy stuff has turned out. The vast proportion, as we can tell in any culture, is lousy.

204
00:26:32.280 --> 00:26:48.280
Lousy stuff is turned out, the vast proportion, as we can tell in any culture, is lousy, and you need that range of work in order to produce the great achievements of any period.

205
00:26:48.280 --> 00:26:56.280
When people complain about commercial culture today, they have plenty of trash to point to.

206
00:26:56.280 --> 00:27:01.280
Thousands of bad movies have been made.

207
00:27:01.280 --> 00:27:07.280
Thousands of bad television shows are being shown at any given moment as you speak.

208
00:27:07.280 --> 00:27:09.280
But there are peaks of quality.

209
00:27:09.280 --> 00:27:16.280
And the problem we have is when people compare the average work of commercial culture today

210
00:27:16.280 --> 00:27:21.280
with the peaks of the past, which are now thought of as non-commercial,

211
00:27:21.280 --> 00:27:25.280
but in fact were part of a vibrant commercial culture in their day.

212
00:27:25.280 --> 00:27:44.960
And I mean, you realize in fact that the same environment that produced Shakespeare in his day, you know, is producing the great movies, the great television shows of our day, that is, you need a very competitive marketplace.

213
00:27:44.960 --> 00:27:55.960
Again, I don't have time to talk about Greek drama, but it is interesting that even though you can't call Athenian theater commercial, but it was competitive.

214
00:27:55.960 --> 00:28:01.960
It was a civic institution and specifically designed as competition.

215
00:28:01.960 --> 00:28:25.960
These great dramas we read today, Aeschylus Aurestaia, Sophocles of Antigone and the Oedipus Tyrannus and so on, these were all part of quite literally a competitive system and so even though that theater wasn't commercial, it had a very strong competitive element built into it and the dramas were written for civic dramatic competitions.

216
00:28:25.960 --> 00:28:34.960
Elizabethan England didn't have quite that system, but it was a very competitive environment.

217
00:28:34.960 --> 00:28:39.960
And what I'm saying is the plays were better for that reason.

218
00:28:39.960 --> 00:28:50.960
That competition spurred innovation, it spurred creativity, it kept people from settling into comfortable ruts.

219
00:28:50.960 --> 00:28:58.960
Now, the reason the Elizabethan theater was so competitive is it was so entrepreneurial.

220
00:28:58.960 --> 00:29:12.960
There was some barrier to entry in that you needed enough money to create, build a theater and outfit it and hire actors and hire playwrights and so on.

221
00:29:12.960 --> 00:29:21.960
But, you know, if you could raise the money, you could enter the business, especially since it was a kind of fringe business.

222
00:29:21.960 --> 00:29:32.960
Again, it was a very unregulated marketplace. They built the theatre specifically outside the city limits so that they were in unregulated zones.

223
00:29:32.960 --> 00:29:48.960
So how commercial the Elizabethan theater was, particularly in the South Bank area where the Globe was eventually built and where Shakespeare spent much of his career.

224
00:29:48.960 --> 00:29:56.960
I mean, that was the center for theaters, bare baiting pits and houses of prostitution in Shakespeare's day.

225
00:29:56.960 --> 00:30:02.960
All the fun activities were concentrated in this one area outside the city.

226
00:30:02.960 --> 00:30:08.960
Ironically, the land was under the control of the Bishop of Winchester, I believe,

227
00:30:08.960 --> 00:30:12.960
and therefore the city couldn't intervene because it was church territory.

228
00:30:12.960 --> 00:30:22.960
But the bear baiting was this wonderful sport, sort of the Elizabethan equivalent of bullfighting.

229
00:30:22.960 --> 00:30:29.960
I think they would tie a bear to a stake and stick dogs on it, and people would bet on who won, the dog or the bears.

230
00:30:29.960 --> 00:30:32.960
I believe Bear Henshaw did a movie of it.

231
00:30:32.960 --> 00:30:36.960
And how's the prostitution, I don't need to explain.

232
00:30:36.960 --> 00:30:39.960
But it is interesting, a number of the theater entrepreneurs doubled.

233
00:30:39.960 --> 00:30:42.960
They ran bordellos and they ran theaters.

234
00:30:42.960 --> 00:30:45.960
Burbage was one example of that.

235
00:30:45.960 --> 00:30:48.960
And I think Philip Henslow also was in the dual business.

236
00:30:48.960 --> 00:30:55.960
Again, this gives some idea of the world and the commercial character of the world Shakespeare operated.

237
00:30:55.960 --> 00:30:58.960
We'll talk about this in a minute, but we're going to show a film tonight.

238
00:30:58.960 --> 00:31:10.960
We're going to show Tom Stoppard's Shakespeare in Love, which I think is a wonderful attempt to capture the very commercial nature of the world Shakespeare dealt in.

239
00:31:10.960 --> 00:31:22.960
So, it was very competitive. There were usually about three major theater companies in England during Shakespeare's lifetime.

240
00:31:22.960 --> 00:31:28.960
And again, they were very competitive. They were always looking for new talent.

241
00:31:28.960 --> 00:31:36.960
And that's one of the keys to Shakespeare's life story and to the story of this whole world.

242
00:31:36.960 --> 00:31:49.120
The theater attracted talent because it was a world that rewarded talent at a time where talent wasn't all that rewarded throughout society.

243
00:31:49.120 --> 00:32:03.560
I mean, Shakespeare's world was emerging from what we call feudalism, an era when most people were born into the station of life that they were going to stay in.

244
00:32:03.560 --> 00:32:12.560
Most people in Shakespeare's lifetime stayed in the social rank, the economic rank they were born in.

245
00:32:12.560 --> 00:32:16.560
If your father was a blacksmith, you became a blacksmith.

246
00:32:16.560 --> 00:32:20.560
That's why we have the name Smith, so confident in our language.

247
00:32:20.560 --> 00:32:32.560
Many of our names are referred to the occupations, the name Cooper, for example, the guy who put wheels together, the name Taylor.

248
00:32:32.560 --> 00:32:44.560
Shakespeare's world was not a world of great economic and social mobility. It was more so than England had been.

249
00:32:44.560 --> 00:32:59.560
But one of the chief routes to upward mobility in his day was the theater. And you can see that because it attracted a lot of people from the universities.

250
00:32:59.560 --> 00:33:07.080
that is now people would go to university and end up unemployable as a result.

251
00:33:07.080 --> 00:33:15.240
Now, in some cases, yeah, you see the Elizabethan age was a great age of doctors, of lawyers.

252
00:33:15.240 --> 00:33:20.120
Shakespeare's plays reflect that. He knows the lingo of doctors. He knows the lingo of lawyers.

253
00:33:20.120 --> 00:33:26.440
Probably met them at the theater, picked up the vocabulary. And yeah, it was already the beginnings

254
00:33:26.440 --> 00:33:32.300
of the modern world of professionalism. People would go get educations and then

255
00:33:32.300 --> 00:33:36.580
maybe work their way up through court and so on. But that was pretty hard work, you

256
00:33:36.580 --> 00:33:42.740
know. That's not like striking it rich in Hollywood. And so indeed what the

257
00:33:42.740 --> 00:33:47.860
Elizabethan theater meant in Shakespeare's day is much what Hollywood

258
00:33:47.860 --> 00:33:53.340
meant through a lot of the 20th century and what television has come to mean. I

259
00:33:53.340 --> 00:33:58.840
I remember I went to Harvard as an undergraduate. I was class of 66.

260
00:33:58.840 --> 00:34:04.340
I remember there was one kid in our class who wanted to go to Hollywood.

261
00:34:04.340 --> 00:34:08.340
And we thought this was the craziest idea we'd heard of.

262
00:34:08.340 --> 00:34:14.840
This is the Kennedy era. You know, you went to Harvard because you wanted to become president or become the advisor president.

263
00:34:14.840 --> 00:34:18.340
But there was this one kid that wanted to become a movie maker.

264
00:34:18.340 --> 00:34:26.340
His name was Tim Hunter, actually, and he went on to make some movies, including a movie called Text and a movie called River's Edge.

265
00:34:26.340 --> 00:34:33.340
But I remember we thought it was the strangest thing. And then I remember I stayed at Harvard. I was a professor there for a while.

266
00:34:33.340 --> 00:34:39.340
And people were, by the 1970s, people were interested in going to television.

267
00:34:39.340 --> 00:34:43.340
And we thought that was the absolutely stupidest idea we'd ever heard of.

268
00:34:43.340 --> 00:34:55.340
What we didn't know was Conan O'Brien was a couple of slots down in the classes that the entire Simpsons group was about to go over and take over television, comedy and so on.

269
00:34:55.340 --> 00:35:05.340
And I remember one of the late 70s, there was a student named Phil Zednik who was writing musical comedy. He went on to write Mulan and some other things for Disney.

270
00:35:05.340 --> 00:35:12.260
And, you know, at any given point, ambitious young people, wanting to rise more, make money,

271
00:35:12.260 --> 00:35:18.260
they look at where's the money coming from and where's it coming from in culture.

272
00:35:18.260 --> 00:35:22.980
You know, today would seem to be to be video games, we'll talk about that at the end of

273
00:35:22.980 --> 00:35:23.980
the week.

274
00:35:23.980 --> 00:35:29.060
But in Shakespeare's day, one of the things you could do to rise in the world was the theater.

275
00:35:29.060 --> 00:35:32.460
And you can see the pattern again and again.

276
00:35:32.460 --> 00:35:35.460
I think Ben Johnson was a Cambridge graduate.

277
00:35:35.460 --> 00:35:43.460
It is interesting that most of the other playwrights in Shakespeare's day were university graduates.

278
00:35:43.460 --> 00:35:52.460
And as I said, they actually seemed to have held it against him that he didn't have a university education.

279
00:35:52.460 --> 00:35:54.460
But, you know, he proved them wrong.

280
00:35:54.460 --> 00:36:01.460
And there's even some indications in his early plays, he was trying to show that he was a university graduate.

281
00:36:01.460 --> 00:36:07.180
He was trying to show off that he actually was well-educated, particularly in Latin.

282
00:36:07.180 --> 00:36:14.540
Among his earlier plays, you've got Comedy of Errors, that's an imitation of Plautus' Latin play, the Manekmai.

283
00:36:14.540 --> 00:36:20.540
You've got Titus Andronicus, which is very much in the mode of a Seneca tragedy.

284
00:36:20.540 --> 00:36:26.740
He's showing that he knows the Latin models and that sort of thing.

285
00:36:26.740 --> 00:36:31.020
I think he was sensitive to the fact that he hadn't gone to university.

286
00:36:31.020 --> 00:36:39.020
But he was pursuing the course that an intelligent young man, in his day, would.

287
00:36:39.020 --> 00:36:51.020
Theater in London then was life in the fast lane, as Hollywood has been for so many people in the 20th century.

288
00:36:51.020 --> 00:36:57.020
And the financial rewards were pretty substantial,

289
00:36:57.020 --> 00:37:07.020
Especially for someone who didn't have connections at court and really didn't have many other opportunities.

290
00:37:07.020 --> 00:37:12.020
The nice thing about the theater was, then as now, it recognized talent.

291
00:37:12.020 --> 00:37:16.020
If you could act well and bring in the audiences, you were in great shape.

292
00:37:16.020 --> 00:37:20.020
If you could write a play that people liked, you were in great shape.

293
00:37:20.020 --> 00:37:28.500
It's hard to translate finances into modern terms,

294
00:37:28.500 --> 00:37:32.580
but I think the figures are roughly like this,

295
00:37:32.580 --> 00:37:38.100
that a playwright could be paid five pounds for writing a play

296
00:37:38.100 --> 00:37:41.180
when you could live for a year on 10 pounds.

297
00:37:41.180 --> 00:37:46.620
In other words, you could get a lot of money in real terms

298
00:37:46.620 --> 00:37:47.820
for writing a play.

299
00:37:47.820 --> 00:37:49.860
Don't quote me exactly on those figures,

300
00:37:49.860 --> 00:37:54.860
But, you know, it would be like getting $50,000 for a script now.

301
00:37:54.860 --> 00:38:01.860
I know it sounds ridiculous because the monetary, the nominal amounts are so low, but we can thank inflation for that.

302
00:38:01.860 --> 00:38:13.860
But the playwrights were well rewarded and, of course, in Shakespeare's case, he became a shareholder in a theater company.

303
00:38:13.860 --> 00:38:23.140
And he was so important to its success that they let him buy into the company itself.

304
00:38:23.140 --> 00:38:29.180
I believe he was the only playwright who was a shareholder in one of the companies.

305
00:38:29.180 --> 00:38:35.420
So he had a real financial stake and he became a very wealthy man.

306
00:38:35.420 --> 00:38:40.420
I mean, basically, he was from a lower middle class family.

307
00:38:40.420 --> 00:38:45.420
The fortunes of his family went up and down.

308
00:38:45.420 --> 00:38:50.420
His father was, in effect, the mayor of Stratford at one point, but then suffered business reverses.

309
00:38:50.420 --> 00:38:56.420
But he made enough money to buy, eventually, the second bickest house in Stratford.

310
00:38:56.420 --> 00:39:00.420
And he owned a lot of land in Stratford.

311
00:39:00.420 --> 00:39:30.420
and he invested in some London property as well so again it's hard to translate this into modern terms but he became he was quite successful financially and every indication is that he wanted wanted to be now to say again it's hard for us to recapture the status of writers in that day because we again we projected back this idea that

312
00:39:30.420 --> 00:39:37.300
Here's this great writer, Shakespeare, and everybody must have been aware of him as a

313
00:39:37.300 --> 00:39:46.300
great writer. But a better way to think about it is that playwrights in Shakespeare's day

314
00:39:46.300 --> 00:39:56.360
had more or less the status of screenwriters today. Most people are unaware of who the

315
00:39:56.360 --> 00:40:11.360
What are the screenwriters of movies are? I mean, most people wouldn't know who the screenwriter of Gone with the Wind was, or the Wizard of Oz, or, you know, Citizen Kane we know was Orson Welles, because he was also the director and so on.

316
00:40:11.360 --> 00:40:22.360
But in most cases, most people are not aware of who the screenwriter is, and you almost never can sell a film on the basis of who the screenwriter is.

317
00:40:22.360 --> 00:40:33.360
The films are very star-oriented. People want to go see the latest Brad Pitt movie or the latest Angelina Jolie movie.

318
00:40:33.360 --> 00:40:40.360
They don't want to see the latest Jo Esther Haas movie, especially after Showgirls.

319
00:40:40.360 --> 00:40:45.360
There was a brief period, for example, when Esther Haas was hot.

320
00:40:45.360 --> 00:40:56.360
and, you know, you'll occasionally see, you know, films are sold on Starz, you'll occasionally see from the producers who brought you American Pie 2,

321
00:40:56.360 --> 00:41:11.360
and I wonder if that ever brings anybody in, you know, maybe Jerry Bruckheimer, they'll try a Jerry Bruckheimer production, but, you know, basically you sell films on the Starz and that probably was true in Shakespeare's day,

322
00:41:11.360 --> 00:41:27.360
That the actors were the most famous. The two most famous serious actors were a man named Edwin Allen, who worked for Marlowe, the company Marlowe was associated with, and Richard Burbridge, who worked for the company Shakespeare was associated with.

323
00:41:27.360 --> 00:41:38.360
There were also some famous comedians, I'll talk about them in a minute. And I think the feeling, we don't know, we really don't know how the plays were advertised, with a few exceptions.

324
00:41:38.360 --> 00:41:56.360
but I have a feeling that people went to see the latest Richard Burbridge production, oh I hear he's in something called Hamlet this year, you know, he was so great as Julius Caesar or Brutus or whatever role he played,

325
00:41:56.360 --> 00:42:04.360
But it is, so people were not aware of even who were writing these plays.

326
00:42:04.360 --> 00:42:13.360
What's interesting is Shakespeare was so good that he seems to have been the first name playwright of the time.

327
00:42:13.360 --> 00:42:16.360
There's an excellent book on the subject, it's the one I recommended.

328
00:42:16.360 --> 00:42:22.360
Lucas Ernst, Shakespeare's Literary Dramatist, really is a breakthrough book in re-understanding what Shakespeare's role was.

329
00:42:22.360 --> 00:42:35.360
And he makes the point and shows you that when Shakespeare's plays were first published, his name didn't even appear on the title page in the early 1590s.

330
00:42:35.360 --> 00:42:39.360
They were just, you know, saying the tragedy of Richard III or whatever.

331
00:42:39.360 --> 00:42:50.360
At a certain point in the 1590s, they start putting his name on the title page as if they realized he's marketable, Shakespeare's marketable.

332
00:42:50.360 --> 00:42:59.360
And it does seem, this book is revolutionary because he argues that Shakespeare's plays were intended to be printed.

333
00:42:59.360 --> 00:43:07.360
You know, the common view is that Shakespeare had no interest in publishing his plays and that, you know,

334
00:43:07.360 --> 00:43:18.360
it's just lucky that we happen to have some texts that were illegally printed and then were published in the first folio in 1623 by his friends.

335
00:43:18.360 --> 00:43:24.240
Ernst says this is just a mistaken assumption. He comes up with a very

336
00:43:24.240 --> 00:43:29.520
elaborate argument that Shakespeare's theater company had a project,

337
00:43:29.520 --> 00:43:36.960
essentially a branding Shakespeare. You know, you could like, Stephen King, you can

338
00:43:36.960 --> 00:43:43.160
sell a movie on the Stephen King name. So it's always Stephen King's whatever,

339
00:43:43.160 --> 00:43:59.160
He argues that you start to see Shakespeare's name appearing as if his company realizes this can help sell the plays.

340
00:43:59.160 --> 00:44:07.160
It's very interesting that the whole notion of the commercial advantage of his name,

341
00:44:07.160 --> 00:44:22.160
It is probably true that by 1600 people were thinking, oh I hear Shakespeare has a new play at the Globe, it's called King Lear, let's go to see it, Othello was so good.

342
00:44:22.160 --> 00:44:36.160
Now again we can't prove this, we don't have contemporary reactions that show that, but a lot of the evidence shows that people were beginning to notice Shakespeare's name in a way that they weren't noticing other names.

343
00:44:36.160 --> 00:44:41.760
with the possible exception of Christopher Marlowe and then Ben Johnson comes along.

344
00:44:41.760 --> 00:44:48.160
He's the first guy who starts definitely printing his own plays and his name is bigger than the title of the play.

345
00:44:48.160 --> 00:44:59.160
And so it's an interesting moment, very important moment in literary history when the author of the play starts to emerge as important.

346
00:44:59.160 --> 00:45:11.160
Because you have to understand that, again, we're very much obsessed with the notion of, again, this single solitary genius, remember, sitting up at the attic, writing the play.

347
00:45:11.160 --> 00:45:20.160
Again, most English Renaissance plays were much more like screenplays in that they had multiple authors.

348
00:45:20.160 --> 00:45:50.160
Shakespeare's unusual in that he seems to have written most of his plays himself, by himself, but they're actually signed, many of them may be, not many, some of them may be collaborations, increasingly people find the hand of Thomas Middleton and Macbeth, and maybe time of Athens, it's always been clear that Shakespeare collaborated with John Fletcher towards the end of his career,

349
00:45:50.160 --> 00:45:55.720
in Korea on a play called Two Noble Kinsmen, which for a long time was not assigned to

350
00:45:55.720 --> 00:46:00.800
Shakespeare's canon because it was clear it wasn't totally by him, but now increasingly

351
00:46:00.800 --> 00:46:05.640
is admitted to complete Shakespeare editions. Fletcher and Shakespeare may have combined

352
00:46:05.640 --> 00:46:12.240
on Henry VIII. This was a more common pattern, just the way there's no movie with a single

353
00:46:12.240 --> 00:46:17.960
screenplay author. And in fact, the names you see up there on the screen are a fraction

354
00:46:17.960 --> 00:46:26.040
and the people who actually wrote the film. In fact, there's a huge deal of negotiations.

355
00:46:26.040 --> 00:46:33.560
Who gets screen credit for a film? And, you know, Casablanca, which maybe we'll talk about

356
00:46:33.560 --> 00:46:40.160
when we get it, you know, roughly nine writers have been identified with that, the creation

357
00:46:40.160 --> 00:46:45.400
of that script, and more people keep coming out of the woodwork, claiming they wrote This

358
00:46:45.400 --> 00:46:48.720
Which is the beginning of a beautiful friendship.

359
00:46:48.720 --> 00:46:50.960
Well that's the way Shakespeare's theater was.

360
00:46:50.960 --> 00:46:59.360
There's every indication, for example, that Shakespeare's theater had script doctors.

361
00:46:59.360 --> 00:47:05.720
You know, there are people, any Hollywood movie at the minute, they bring in somebody

362
00:47:05.720 --> 00:47:12.360
who's good at endings or good at continuity.

363
00:47:12.360 --> 00:47:19.200
Here's another interesting point about division of labor that enters into culture in ways

364
00:47:19.200 --> 00:47:20.520
you know it's not supposed to.

365
00:47:20.520 --> 00:47:27.360
Again, the image of, I said this morning that the whole of culture would only be possible

366
00:47:27.360 --> 00:47:29.880
because of division of labor.

367
00:47:29.880 --> 00:47:35.880
But even within art, we are so entranced by this theory of the single creator that we

368
00:47:35.880 --> 00:48:05.880
I don't realize that division of labor is a principle in Hollywood there are certain, they know there are certain joke writers and you got a film and you show it in a screening and it's just dying in front of you and the studio decides this needs some jokes and they bring in so-and-so because he's known as a joke writer you wouldn't run him writing the whole film he can't do it but what he's a specialist at is getting just the

369
00:48:05.880 --> 00:48:10.880
You can't write jokes at a certain point, or someone else is perfect at writing endings.

370
00:48:10.880 --> 00:48:14.880
Can't write beginnings or middles, but knows how to end a film.

371
00:48:14.880 --> 00:48:18.880
Writing is a very specialized art in Hollywood.

372
00:48:18.880 --> 00:48:23.880
And again, we don't have the kind of records that would tell us this in detail,

373
00:48:23.880 --> 00:48:29.880
but there seems to be indications that, you know, like with Marlowe's Dr. Faustus,

374
00:48:29.880 --> 00:48:40.880
It's almost certain that that play we have is not completely by Marlowe, and I think some guy was brought in to add jokes to it. Probably a guy named Samuel Rowley.

375
00:48:40.880 --> 00:48:55.880
Every indication we have is that the way these plays were written was more the way films are written than the way we think of plays being written.

376
00:48:55.880 --> 00:49:00.880
You know, when Eugene O'Neill wrote a play, we like to think Eugene O'Neill wrote the

377
00:49:00.880 --> 00:49:01.880
whole play.

378
00:49:01.880 --> 00:49:05.360
I'm not even sure if that's true in many cases.

379
00:49:05.360 --> 00:49:14.080
But in Shakespeare's day, we're seeing a collaborative effort dictated by commercial

380
00:49:14.080 --> 00:49:16.200
needs in the play.

381
00:49:16.200 --> 00:49:23.460
And again, now one view of this would be that this ruined the plays.

382
00:49:23.460 --> 00:49:29.620
that the authentic genius of one author's vision got corrupted.

383
00:49:29.620 --> 00:49:35.300
Now in the case of Marlowe's, Dr. Faust, that seems to be the case.

384
00:49:35.300 --> 00:49:41.060
The comedy scenes do not seem to be written on the level of inspiration as the great tragic

385
00:49:41.060 --> 00:49:42.060
scenes.

386
00:49:42.060 --> 00:49:45.500
But that, on the other hand, may be just the point, that they create a very interesting

387
00:49:45.500 --> 00:49:48.220
counterpoint between comedy and tragedy in a play.

388
00:49:48.220 --> 00:49:56.220
and you can get a great debate about Dr. Faustus, do the comedy scenes ruin it or improve it.

389
00:49:56.220 --> 00:50:00.220
But I want to suggest that you see the two options are there.

390
00:50:00.220 --> 00:50:06.220
Sometimes the collaborative nature of the plays may have messed them up.

391
00:50:06.220 --> 00:50:10.220
Sometimes it may have improved them.

392
00:50:10.220 --> 00:50:15.220
So again, Shakespeare was so talented that it seems that he could get away

393
00:50:15.220 --> 00:50:23.780
with writing pretty much the whole plays themselves. But that was fairly unusual. And many of the

394
00:50:23.780 --> 00:50:30.820
plays we know to be collaborations by two, sometimes three authors. And again, they were

395
00:50:30.820 --> 00:50:38.500
not necessarily the worst for that. Again, Shakespeare's case, you know, King Lear is

396
00:50:38.500 --> 00:50:42.580
pretty somber. We need a few comedy scenes in it. They didn't have to bring in Sammy

397
00:50:42.580 --> 00:51:10.580
I used the analogies to Hollywood so that you can see that this was a more complicated system, this renaissance playwriting and theater in general, and one that could, in many ways, lead to what makes the plays great.

398
00:51:10.580 --> 00:51:19.080
Here's another example of how Shakespeare was working in a kind of active commercial theater environment.

399
00:51:19.080 --> 00:51:28.080
Shakespeare was himself an actor. We know that. He was not the star of the company.

400
00:51:28.080 --> 00:51:35.580
There's no hard evidence, but there are legends that say he played Hamlet's father's ghost,

401
00:51:35.580 --> 00:51:40.080
that he may have played the character, the old servant Adam in As You Like It.

402
00:51:40.080 --> 00:51:48.320
He was a bit player, maybe a character actor, not a star the way Burbage was, but we know

403
00:51:48.320 --> 00:51:56.360
something about his theater company and he worked with it.

404
00:51:56.360 --> 00:52:01.640
A good indication is the matter of comedy.

405
00:52:01.640 --> 00:52:07.560
We know the two principal comedians that Shakespeare worked with.

406
00:52:07.560 --> 00:52:14.680
The first was a man named Wil Kemp and the second was a man named Robert Armand.

407
00:52:14.680 --> 00:52:24.080
Wil Kemp was the comic lead in the first half of Shakespeare's career in the 1590s and probably

408
00:52:24.080 --> 00:52:34.080
created roles like Dogberry in Much Ado About Nothing, Lancelot, Gobo in Merchant of Venice

409
00:52:34.080 --> 00:52:40.940
and so on. And we can infer from this and from independent evidence that Kemp was good

410
00:52:40.940 --> 00:52:47.200
at dancing. There's something called Kemp's jig became famous. He once danced across half

411
00:52:47.200 --> 00:52:53.520
of England on a publicity stunt. We know he's a good dancer and he evidently did great little

412
00:52:53.520 --> 00:53:01.020
comic dialogues with himself. He could talk to himself. And Shakespeare wrote parts for

413
00:53:01.020 --> 00:53:10.020
for this guy and you can see that the comic parts in his early comedies are written with

414
00:53:10.020 --> 00:53:11.020
Kemp in mind.

415
00:53:11.020 --> 00:53:15.980
Now again, in typical Hollywood fashion, Kemp decided he was too big for Shakespeare's company

416
00:53:15.980 --> 00:53:20.700
and he could go off on his own and start his own company, he was such a big star, he was

417
00:53:20.700 --> 00:53:27.460
the David Caruso on this day, and he actually did okay.

418
00:53:27.460 --> 00:53:32.860
He was then replaced by a man named Robert Armand, who was evidently very funny, but

419
00:53:32.860 --> 00:53:41.980
a different kind of humor. He had a good voice. He could sing. And Shakespeare, middle of

420
00:53:41.980 --> 00:53:51.940
his career shifts from writing parts for clowns to writing parts for fools. Touchstone in

421
00:53:51.940 --> 00:53:58.900
in 12th Night, excuse me, Touchstone as you like it, Feste in 12th Night, and Above All

422
00:53:58.900 --> 00:54:07.900
the Fool in King Lear. And, you know, this is actually a major change in what Shakespeare

423
00:54:07.900 --> 00:54:14.500
is doing dramatically, culminating in one of the most brilliant ideas in all world drama

424
00:54:14.500 --> 00:54:22.400
of Adding the Part of This Comic Fool to the Most Tragic Play Ever Written, King Lear,

425
00:54:22.400 --> 00:54:27.320
and you know, if you were just, if we knew nothing about theater history, we could say,

426
00:54:27.320 --> 00:54:32.400
you know, Shakespeare just did this because he was a genius. But looking at the facts,

427
00:54:32.400 --> 00:54:38.360
you can't help saying that this was an artifact of a change in his theater company, that Robert

428
00:54:38.360 --> 00:54:41.840
Dr. Armin had replaced Will Kemp.

429
00:54:41.840 --> 00:54:45.560
Now it doesn't make Shakespeare less of a genius because, you know, there were other

430
00:54:45.560 --> 00:54:49.960
people in the theater company and they weren't writing King Lear and they weren't coming

431
00:54:49.960 --> 00:54:52.440
up with this brilliant idea of the fool of King Lear.

432
00:54:52.440 --> 00:54:54.120
It still took Shakespeare to do it.

433
00:54:54.120 --> 00:55:00.280
Nevertheless, you can see that he was working as a man in a theater world with certain constraints

434
00:55:00.280 --> 00:55:06.760
just as, you know, John Ford, the 20th century one.

435
00:55:06.760 --> 00:55:16.760
He knew the actors. He had this acting company that John Wayne was going to be in the film, that Ward Bond was going to be in the film.

436
00:55:16.760 --> 00:55:24.760
He had these character actors and he always was creating parts for them. And it's one of the reasons his films are so great,

437
00:55:24.760 --> 00:55:34.760
is that Ford had a great working relationship with his actors and knew he could write parts for them and they'd play them perfectly.

438
00:55:34.760 --> 00:55:40.120
that, you know, when he wanted the sidekick, Andy Devine was waiting there to fill the role.

439
00:55:40.120 --> 00:55:43.920
What I'm saying is Shakespeare was similar in that respect.

440
00:55:43.920 --> 00:55:51.080
And again, the fact that he worked in a commercial theater environment meant that he made certain decisions

441
00:55:51.080 --> 00:55:55.280
not on what we would call purely aesthetic grounds.

442
00:55:55.280 --> 00:56:03.040
He didn't say, I have to have a fool in King Lear, let's go out and hire someone that can do it.

443
00:56:03.040 --> 00:56:10.760
I got Robert Armand here. He was so great in As You Like It. He was so great in Twelfth

444
00:56:10.760 --> 00:56:16.680
Night. What can I do for him? I'm going to write him a part like you've never seen before.

445
00:56:16.680 --> 00:56:22.640
It'll have incredible pathos. And that's a sort of accident of theater history, but

446
00:56:22.640 --> 00:56:27.080
the result is one of the greatest, probably the greatest drama I've ever written and one

447
00:56:27.080 --> 00:56:31.260
One of the greatest strokes of genius in that drama.

448
00:56:31.260 --> 00:56:36.000
So this would be the case where, you know, in the abstract and people who have contempt

449
00:56:36.000 --> 00:56:43.320
for commercial theater would say, what's worse than having the actors you're working with

450
00:56:43.320 --> 00:56:47.400
dictate the kind of parts you write in your plays?

451
00:56:47.400 --> 00:56:53.040
And Shakespeare would say, I know what I'm doing, leave me alone, I can live with this.

452
00:56:53.040 --> 00:56:58.460
And you know, it's interesting, all of this that I'm saying has bearing on the famous question

453
00:56:58.460 --> 00:57:03.680
of Shakespeare's authorship. I hesitate to bring this up, but I'm sure someone will, and

454
00:57:03.680 --> 00:57:09.380
I'll forestall this. You know, there are all these crazy theories that Shakespeare didn't

455
00:57:09.380 --> 00:57:19.380
write his plays, and one of the prominent candidates is that the Earl of Oxford wrote

456
00:57:19.380 --> 00:57:23.620
the Plays, and Joe Sobrant, who's a great friend of the Mises Institute and whom I've

457
00:57:23.620 --> 00:57:30.460
met here. He and I had a very vicious exchange in The Weekly Standard when I did a negative

458
00:57:30.460 --> 00:57:37.340
review of his book in which he, alias Shakespeare, which he claimed that the Earl of Oxford wrote

459
00:57:37.340 --> 00:57:47.140
The Plays. I bring it up because the issue actually reflects this anti-commercial prejudice.

460
00:57:47.140 --> 00:57:57.140
The argument against Shakespeare having written these plays is how could this lower middle

461
00:57:57.140 --> 00:58:07.900
class kid from rural Stratford who never went to a university write these great plays.

462
00:58:07.900 --> 00:58:12.620
It must have been an aristocrat.

463
00:58:12.620 --> 00:58:17.520
I had a great fun with Sovereign accusing me of being a Marxist because this argument was

464
00:58:17.520 --> 00:58:23.180
so class-based that a middle-class figure couldn't have written these plays, only an

465
00:58:23.180 --> 00:58:26.580
aristocrat could have written this well about aristocrats.

466
00:58:26.580 --> 00:58:33.180
And it was interesting, we had actually a pretty civil exchange of letters and then

467
00:58:33.180 --> 00:58:41.820
the miracle of all miracles happened, Charlton Heston came to my defense, wrote a letter

468
00:58:41.820 --> 00:58:48.980
to the Weekly Standard, saying, I don't know much about the real Shakespeare, but I know

469
00:58:48.980 --> 00:58:56.020
one thing, he was an actor. That the man who wrote these plays was an actor. And he really

470
00:58:56.020 --> 00:59:01.820
is a brilliant letter, very learned, scholarly, and really insightful. You know, the whole

471
00:59:01.820 --> 00:59:08.100
charge is how could some ignorant actor have written these plays instead of this well-educated

472
00:59:08.100 --> 00:59:13.820
Errol of Oxford, this aristocrat, and Heston said, you know, the one thing you can tell

473
00:59:13.820 --> 00:59:20.700
from these plays, and he said, having acted in them, is that the guy who wrote these plays

474
00:59:20.700 --> 00:59:27.140
knew something about acting, that if you wanted to choose one profession for the guy who wrote

475
00:59:27.140 --> 00:59:30.180
these plays, and there have been all these theories, he must have been a lawyer, he must

476
00:59:30.180 --> 00:59:33.260
have been a doctor, he must have been this, this and that, you know, Heston really cut

477
00:59:33.260 --> 00:59:40.260
You know what? He must have been an actor. He knows so well how to write parts for actors.

478
00:59:40.260 --> 00:59:48.260
And so Heston had this idea that Shakespeare grew out of a world of the theater, a commercial world.

479
00:59:48.260 --> 00:59:56.260
And it's so interesting to me to see that this prejudice against commercial art even extends to the notion of Shakespeare's origins.

480
00:59:56.260 --> 01:00:06.260
that how can he have been this lower middle class figure, he must have been an aristocrat, only an aristocrat could produce these plays.

481
01:00:06.260 --> 01:00:16.260
Now, you know, my reaction to that is, you know, if we saw that every other Elizabethan and Jacobean dramatist was an aristocrat,

482
01:00:16.260 --> 01:00:21.260
and Shakespeare was the one anomaly, we could say maybe we got an argument here.

483
01:00:21.260 --> 01:00:28.260
But every one of these other play, almost every one, let me say that, is from lower middle class origins.

484
01:00:28.260 --> 01:00:36.260
Ben Johnson's father was a bricklayer. Forget what the business, Shakespeare's father was a glove maker.

485
01:00:36.260 --> 01:00:50.260
Marlowe's father was also a tradesman. And what you see generally, the pattern you see is that these playwrights of this time were on the make.

486
01:00:50.260 --> 01:01:02.260
In fact, when you go through the history of art, whether it's painting, music, literature, there are very few aristocrats who've achieved anything in the arts.

487
01:01:02.260 --> 01:01:10.260
Aristocrats don't have to achieve anything. They're born to their wealth and their status. They typically rest on their laurels.

488
01:01:10.260 --> 01:01:14.260
It's precisely people from the middle class who have something to prove.

489
01:01:14.260 --> 01:01:24.260
and almost all the figures you see in the arts are people who have very middle class motivations and therefore you can say commercial motivations.

490
01:01:24.260 --> 01:01:33.260
They want to make money and be successful and make something out of themselves in the classic capitalist rags to riches stories.

491
01:01:33.260 --> 01:01:42.260
And so, again, even I think this great conundrum of Shakespeare's origins and whether he really wrote the plays,

492
01:01:42.260 --> 01:02:02.260
I can actually reinterpret it in light of what I'm saying here, that the logic of the situation indeed dictates that a young kid from Stratford would be likely to produce this phenomenon, someone very ambitious trying to make something of himself in the world.

493
01:02:02.260 --> 01:02:14.260
Now, I don't want to overstress this too much, the positive aspect of the commercial character of Shakespeare's theatre.

494
01:02:14.260 --> 01:02:28.260
So let me qualify it, and again, one of the things I'm doing over today and tomorrow is suggesting how the patronage and commercial systems blend, overlap, sometimes their intentions, sometimes reinforce each other.

495
01:02:28.260 --> 01:02:36.260
There are significant signs that Shakespeare was not entirely comfortable with commercial theater.

496
01:02:36.260 --> 01:02:44.260
You know, in the words of the Godfather, you know, this is the life we chose.

497
01:02:44.260 --> 01:02:50.260
I think he understood that this is what he pursued and he pursued it very successfully.

498
01:02:50.260 --> 01:02:55.260
But I think he had doubts and we see this in many ways.

499
01:02:55.260 --> 01:03:03.540
is for one thing, he did seek out patronage at a number of points in his career, as if

500
01:03:03.540 --> 01:03:11.660
he was just testing the waters for the other course in life. That is, it does appear that

501
01:03:11.660 --> 01:03:18.340
he began in the theater, but plague was a problem in those days, and when plague broke

502
01:03:18.340 --> 01:03:23.860
out in London, they often shut down the theaters, sometimes I believe for as long as a year

503
01:03:23.860 --> 01:03:36.860
And it does seem that in the 1590s, when Shakespeare was not able to write plays because the theaters were shut down, he wrote poetry.

504
01:03:36.860 --> 01:03:51.860
Super elegant, mellifluous Elizabethan poetry. The Rape of Lucrece and Venus and Adonis, two extremely learned, high culture poems

505
01:03:51.860 --> 01:03:58.360
with references to Ovid and obviously to Roman antiquity.

506
01:03:58.360 --> 01:04:03.360
They were exactly what people thought of as literature in those days.

507
01:04:03.360 --> 01:04:07.360
Plays were not thought of as literature.

508
01:04:07.360 --> 01:04:11.860
Again, they were thought of roughly the way people think of TV scripts now.

509
01:04:11.860 --> 01:04:15.860
They weren't sure who the authors were. They didn't think they'd last.

510
01:04:15.860 --> 01:04:19.360
There's reason to think that Shakespeare worried

511
01:04:19.360 --> 01:04:25.360
that his name would not become immortal if he simply wrote plays.

512
01:04:25.360 --> 01:04:31.360
As I said, when he started writing plays, they didn't even put his name on the play bill.

513
01:04:31.360 --> 01:04:34.360
And they didn't put it on published versions of the play.

514
01:04:34.360 --> 01:04:39.360
So there are signs that he was considering the alternate route.

515
01:04:39.360 --> 01:04:46.360
He was a great poet of writing poetry, and he dedicated it to the Earl of Southampton.

516
01:04:46.360 --> 01:05:06.360
The dedication is fulsome in the way that only renaissance efforts to get patronage can be.

517
01:05:06.360 --> 01:05:13.360
You do not know what sucking up can be until you've read dedication to a renaissance noble.

518
01:05:13.360 --> 01:05:20.960
and, you know, it's obvious Shakespeare was trying to get a position in Southampton's

519
01:05:20.960 --> 01:05:21.960
court.

520
01:05:21.960 --> 01:05:28.280
There's some indication that Southampton did help him out at various points and there

521
01:05:28.280 --> 01:05:33.200
were strange interactions between Shakespeare's company and the career of Southampton and

522
01:05:33.200 --> 01:05:36.120
the career of Essex and so on.

523
01:05:36.120 --> 01:05:45.560
So it does seem that he was keeping his options open or trying to open up new options of getting

524
01:05:45.560 --> 01:05:51.560
patronage from a prominent noble.

525
01:05:51.560 --> 01:05:58.720
And as I said, the career of Shakespeare's company was not entirely divorced from aristocratic

526
01:05:58.720 --> 01:06:10.440
or eventually Royal Patronage and in fact the Globe Theatre was built in 1598-99.

527
01:06:10.440 --> 01:06:18.640
In the early 1600s the company opened up an indoor theatre, the Blackfriars, which had

528
01:06:18.640 --> 01:06:23.400
a more upscale clientele.

529
01:06:23.400 --> 01:06:29.880
They could charge more and generally attracted a more aristocratic audience.

530
01:06:29.880 --> 01:06:38.200
We see this pattern in general in the period that there was not a simple divorce between

531
01:06:38.200 --> 01:06:43.120
the commercial theaters and the kind of aristocrat court.

532
01:06:43.120 --> 01:06:52.840
This is even clearer in Ben Johnson's career, Johnson who worked for time in Shakespeare's

533
01:06:52.840 --> 01:07:22.840
Company, Shakespeare, we do know acted in one of Johnson's plays, their careers intersected at many points, but Johnson eventually made the bulk of his money writing court pageants for James I, and again there was, if you could be successful at court, there was, you got these nice lump sum payments and eventually Johnson got a pension from the king, so again,

534
01:07:22.840 --> 01:07:37.840
Johnson is typical of what was going on that people pursued all their options just as now people will work in the commercial world of art and also seek out government grants if they can get them and sometimes patronage as well.

535
01:07:37.840 --> 01:07:42.840
It's kind of interesting when you look at the careers of some 20th century artists, they'll take money wherever they can get it.

536
01:07:42.840 --> 01:07:53.840
So in Shakespeare's case as well, there seemed to be signs that he was looking to get patronage when he could.

537
01:07:53.840 --> 01:08:00.840
There are signs to me that he was uncomfortable with the world of the theater.

538
01:08:00.840 --> 01:08:03.840
You see it particularly in some late plays.

539
01:08:03.840 --> 01:08:33.840
In Antony and Cleopatra, maybe the last tragedy, Shakespeare wrote, when Cleopatra is horrified at the prospect of being caught by Octavian, she commits suicide saying she doesn't want to be led in triumph to Rome by Octavius and see pageants put on about her career and she says she doesn't want to see someone boy my greatness in the posture of a whore, because again boys played women

540
01:08:33.840 --> 01:08:40.240
in Elizabethan Theater, and so she imagines what's exactly happening for us before our

541
01:08:40.240 --> 01:08:46.160
eyes. Boy actors playing Cleopatra, saying, I don't want to be up on a stage. And of course,

542
01:08:46.160 --> 01:08:55.160
Coriolanus, Shakespeare wrote roughly the same time, 1607, 08, 09, that period. There,

543
01:08:55.160 --> 01:09:02.280
the whole thing is about this hero who's too proud to run an election campaign in Rome

544
01:09:02.280 --> 01:09:08.600
and keeps saying things like, a dull actor, I forgot my part, he just hates the idea of

545
01:09:08.600 --> 01:09:16.120
appearing before a crowd and regards the whole world of the theatre as somehow corrupting

546
01:09:16.120 --> 01:09:17.120
to his soul.

547
01:09:17.120 --> 01:09:24.680
You know, my guess is that Shakespeare was a sensitive guy and, you know, that the world

548
01:09:24.680 --> 01:09:28.920
of commercial theatre was rough on him and that, you know, having to be an actor was

549
01:09:28.920 --> 01:09:35.120
was tough on him and dealing with this whole commercial world was a strain for him. All

550
01:09:35.120 --> 01:09:41.880
the compromises involved, all having to work with other playwrights and with the owners

551
01:09:41.880 --> 01:09:46.600
of the company, well he was a co-owner but the manager of the company and working with

552
01:09:46.600 --> 01:09:50.280
the actors, that this was difficult. And you know the oddest thing about Shakespeare is

553
01:09:50.280 --> 01:10:19.280
In the years he retires, probably 1610, 1611, goes back to Stratford, you know, at the peak of his powers, he's still writing things like The Tempest, there's no sign of any feebleness of his powers, it does seem as if he's salted away enough money and owned enough land, he said, I don't need this anymore.

554
01:10:19.280 --> 01:10:28.520
One personal theory is that he went home to prepare an edition of his plays. This is a

555
01:10:28.520 --> 01:10:34.320
very controversial idea. Again, the most common view is that Shakespeare was utterly indifferent

556
01:10:34.320 --> 01:10:39.240
to the publication of his plays. I cannot believe that. I cannot believe that if I'd

557
01:10:39.240 --> 01:10:44.680
written King Lear, I wouldn't want it to be preserved and in as good a copy as it could

558
01:10:44.680 --> 01:10:48.680
And I'm glad to say finally some scholars are coming around to the same view.

559
01:10:48.680 --> 01:11:00.680
Earn makes the point, Sammy Wells in his book Shakespeare All Time points to some interesting facts that in Shakespeare's will there are three legacies.

560
01:11:00.680 --> 01:11:08.680
One to Richard Burbage, one to John Hemings and one to Henry Condal.

561
01:11:08.680 --> 01:11:16.680
Hebbings and Condell went on to publish Shakespeare's plays in the famous First Folio of 1623.

562
01:11:16.680 --> 01:11:24.680
And we have Shakespeare's plays in rather bad text, but better than we might have hoped.

563
01:11:24.680 --> 01:11:32.680
And my guess is, and other scholars now support this, is that Shakespeare was talking to these friends

564
01:11:32.680 --> 01:11:39.160
about publishing his works and maybe even you know preparing the idea that if he

565
01:11:39.160 --> 01:11:44.280
died they would finish the project. Burbridge died before the first folio

566
01:11:44.280 --> 01:11:53.320
came out, but there are little indications like that. The texts for some

567
01:11:53.320 --> 01:11:58.440
of Shakespeare's plays are extraordinarily good, some are extraordinarily bad, but

568
01:11:58.440 --> 01:12:28.440
Decisions like the Tempest, Coriolanus, Anthony Cleopatra have very good text and my guess is Shakespeare had sat down and started to prepare good text and unfortunately died, he was only 54 when he died, 52, 52, so he could have expected to live long, that was pretty old for his day, but again this suggests that he was not indifferent

569
01:12:28.440 --> 01:12:43.440
So, going back to the point I started to make, if you look at certain signs in Shakespeare's career, he was not entirely comfortable with the world of the commercial theater.

570
01:12:43.440 --> 01:12:53.440
I'm not claiming that. Again, the people that see problems with the commercial character of theater are right.

571
01:12:53.440 --> 01:12:59.000
Undoubtedly, Shakespeare had to do things that he didn't want to.

572
01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:04.800
It's interesting, for example, a couple of his plays have tantalizing titles.

573
01:13:04.800 --> 01:13:10.960
As You Like It, Twelfth Night is subtitled What You Will.

574
01:13:10.960 --> 01:13:16.280
As if Shakespeare is saying to his audience, OK, this is what you want.

575
01:13:16.280 --> 01:13:18.240
Here it is.

576
01:13:18.240 --> 01:13:22.680
He'd written The Merchant of Venice, which is an unusually dark comedy,

577
01:13:22.680 --> 01:13:31.680
An unusually complex one, one which borders on tragedy and some feel has a strong tragic element.

578
01:13:31.680 --> 01:13:36.680
Maybe it didn't do so well, and Shakespeare says the next thing he's writing is,

579
01:13:36.680 --> 01:13:40.680
as you like it, what you will, much ado about nothing, as if he's saying,

580
01:13:40.680 --> 01:13:47.680
you know, my comedy's too serious for you, I can write this trivial stuff for you.

581
01:13:47.680 --> 01:13:57.960
or, you know, Troilus and Cressida, my guess is it bombed. It was some kind of weird experiment

582
01:13:57.960 --> 01:14:06.040
that never succeeded. You know, you look at the conversation between Hamlet and the players,

583
01:14:06.040 --> 01:14:12.640
you see that they're Shakespeare's very into the whole business of theater companies and

584
01:14:12.640 --> 01:14:19.000
and their rivalry, and he must have felt rivalry with first Christopher Marlowe, then with

585
01:14:19.000 --> 01:14:26.080
Ben Johnson. Ben Johnson was always taking pot shots at Shakespeare, claiming his Roman

586
01:14:26.080 --> 01:14:32.640
plays weren't Roman enough, and claiming that he made mistakes in his plays and so on.

587
01:14:32.640 --> 01:14:40.000
And so it was a very competitive environment that Shakespeare operated in, and my guess

588
01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:48.400
says, yes, it was a strain on him, and yes, at times, he felt pressured into doing things

589
01:14:48.400 --> 01:14:54.800
that he might not have wanted to do. You know, there's this famous legend that Queen Elizabeth

590
01:14:54.800 --> 01:15:00.320
liked the character Falstaff so much that she wanted to see him in love, and Shakespeare

591
01:15:00.320 --> 01:15:06.880
Shakespeare had to write the comedy, Mary Wise of Windsor. You know, it's almost like

592
01:15:06.880 --> 01:15:14.600
when poor, Sherlock Holmes was, when Arthur Condor had a kill-off, thought he had a kill-off

593
01:15:14.600 --> 01:15:20.880
Sherlock Holmes so he could go on to write other things and he couldn't, the public forced

594
01:15:20.880 --> 01:15:27.640
him to resurrect Sherlock Holmes. You know, Shakespeare killed off Falstaff in Henry the

595
01:15:27.640 --> 01:15:32.100
and the fifth, maybe felt, thank God I'm done with that guy, don't want to write any more

596
01:15:32.100 --> 01:15:39.500
false set plays and then he gets forced into writing Mary Weiser Windsor. I have no doubt

597
01:15:39.500 --> 01:15:45.680
that he felt the pressures of working in the intensely competitive world of commercial

598
01:15:45.680 --> 01:15:55.880
theatre. But I also think he was a better playwright for it. That he knew the theatre

599
01:15:55.880 --> 01:16:17.880
the company he was writing for and he knew his audience. My guess, he was there every night in the theater, maybe acting in the plays or standing backstage and it meant his play, it's one of the things that gave them life.

600
01:16:17.880 --> 01:16:28.880
Now again, there were probably a hundred other playwrights at the time, and all in the same commercial environment, and all under the same pressures that Shakespeare operated under.

601
01:16:28.880 --> 01:16:41.880
So that doesn't explain his genius. You know, if this explained the genius, then the plays of Thomas Decker ought to be a lot better than they are.

602
01:16:41.880 --> 01:16:51.280
Not that the shoemaker's holiday is all that bad, but again, I'm talking about a necessary,

603
01:16:51.280 --> 01:16:58.560
not a sufficient condition. I do think, however, that the whole world Shakespeare operated

604
01:16:58.560 --> 01:17:09.160
was uplifted by these competitive pressures. You really see what it is to have this city

605
01:17:09.160 --> 01:17:16.660
of London with, you know, at any given moment, probably three major theater companies where

606
01:17:16.660 --> 01:17:24.920
everyone's competing for the public's attention, for the public's money. It energized two or

607
01:17:24.920 --> 01:17:31.820
three generations of writers, and they all lifted each other up, and Shakespeare really

608
01:17:31.820 --> 01:17:38.180
lifted them up. You know, there's a tendency among most lyric professors to study the influence

609
01:17:38.180 --> 01:17:41.180
and the influence of other dramatists on Shakespeare.

610
01:17:41.180 --> 01:17:44.180
Well, it's an even more fascinating question

611
01:17:44.180 --> 01:17:48.180
to raise the question of Shakespeare's influence on his contemporaries,

612
01:17:48.180 --> 01:17:54.180
because, you know, it was like a great Hollywood director.

613
01:17:54.180 --> 01:17:59.180
People see a John Ford western,

614
01:17:59.180 --> 01:18:06.180
and then someone else can do a western much better than he could have

615
01:18:06.180 --> 01:18:14.340
in the example of John Ford, or Hitchcock's influence on thrillers.

616
01:18:14.340 --> 01:18:19.300
One thing that happens in this kind of intense competitive environment is people do imitate

617
01:18:19.300 --> 01:18:25.700
each other, and Shakespeare undoubtedly learned something from Marlowe, for example.

618
01:18:25.700 --> 01:18:32.300
The very sound of his blank verse is inherited from Marlowe, but he went beyond Marlowe.

619
01:18:32.300 --> 01:18:41.700
But in general, when we look at this period, which may be the absolute peak of drama in

620
01:18:41.700 --> 01:18:50.140
the Western tradition, surely one of the highest peaks, it's not because it was non-commercial.

621
01:18:50.140 --> 01:18:57.180
It's not because these playwrights were shielded from competition.

622
01:18:57.180 --> 01:19:02.500
If you look, and again you can't, Shakespeare is such a genius he might have succeeded in

623
01:19:02.500 --> 01:19:07.460
any environment. We'll talk about this when we get to someone like Shostakovich operating

624
01:19:07.460 --> 01:19:12.100
under Stalin in the Soviet regime, that even he is able to achieve great things under the

625
01:19:12.100 --> 01:19:18.300
worst possible conditions. You will see it hinges on a Shakespeare-based opera, he wrote

626
01:19:18.300 --> 01:19:25.300
Lady Macbeth, but in some ways what's interesting is how a commercial environment can lead to

627
01:19:27.180 --> 01:19:34.180
and Lift All Boats, that the richness of this period has to do precisely with the fact that

628
01:19:34.900 --> 01:19:41.900
the exact patterns you get in a commercial theater of people imitating, following leads,

629
01:19:42.220 --> 01:19:47.400
I mean, one of the things that makes Shakespeare's theater look like the modern world of commercial

630
01:19:47.400 --> 01:19:54.400
movies is, for example, sequels. Shakespeare writes Henry IV, part one, and then he writes

631
01:19:54.400 --> 01:19:56.400
And then he writes Henry IV Part II.

632
01:19:56.400 --> 01:20:02.400
Now it's very possible that the two plays, I think they were in fact planned to begin with,

633
01:20:02.400 --> 01:20:08.400
you know, like the three parts of Lord of the Rings or the Pirates of the Caribbean sequence now.

634
01:20:08.400 --> 01:20:19.400
But it is interesting that you find the same phenomenon that one thing succeeds and then everyone starts imitating it.

635
01:20:19.400 --> 01:20:29.400
Hamlet helped kick off a sequence of revenge tragedies in the Jacobian period, which it sort of inaugurates.

636
01:20:29.400 --> 01:20:36.400
These are commercial principles. Something succeeds, other people start imitating it.

637
01:20:36.400 --> 01:20:40.400
Now the imitations of Hamlet are not as good as Hamlet.

638
01:20:40.400 --> 01:20:44.400
There's a play called The Revenger's Tragedy.

639
01:20:44.400 --> 01:20:51.400
The Revenge of Tragedy

640
01:21:14.400 --> 01:21:20.800
about a Rockham Sockham revenge tragedy with everybody dead at the end. That's what whoever

641
01:21:20.800 --> 01:21:26.840
wrote that play saw on Hamlet. And it's a pretty good play. It's actually, if you see

642
01:21:26.840 --> 01:21:33.840
it staged, it's a really exciting play with some great moments, some great dramatic turns.

643
01:21:33.840 --> 01:21:44.320
So this is what I'm talking about when I say that commercial theater is quite viable. Shakespeare

644
01:21:44.320 --> 01:21:50.720
didn't succeed in spite of the commercial world he operated in and he didn't succeed

645
01:21:50.720 --> 01:21:54.800
because of it either because again we're talking about a level of genius here which is actually

646
01:21:54.800 --> 01:22:01.040
unique in the history of the human race but still there are ways in which the very commercial

647
01:22:01.040 --> 01:22:06.200
character of the theater world he operated in fed his creativity.

648
01:22:06.200 --> 01:22:13.180
We will never know you know if he had been on government grants or had taught at a university

649
01:22:13.180 --> 01:22:21.680
where a salary was paid no matter what plays he wrote, whether he would have gone through the effort to churn out two plays a year.

650
01:22:21.680 --> 01:22:30.180
You know, it's very suspicious. People think he had a contract with Lord Chamberlain's men and the King's men, two plays a year,

651
01:22:30.180 --> 01:22:36.180
because that's what you see in a pattern. He's basically producing two plays a year.

652
01:22:36.180 --> 01:22:42.680
Try to think of writing Othello and King Lear in one year. That's quite the way it works out.

653
01:22:42.680 --> 01:22:49.880
I mean that's a staggering achievement and you know if you didn't have a

654
01:22:49.880 --> 01:22:56.840
contract to do it, would you have done it? We'd like to think yes, but you'll see

655
01:22:56.840 --> 01:23:01.160
this in Shakespeare in Love tonight that you know the pressure of the deadline,

656
01:23:01.160 --> 01:23:07.680
the fact that his money depended upon meeting the demands of the company, the

657
01:23:07.680 --> 01:23:14.680
and Demands of the Public. Sometimes you need that. If he'd been a souring professor of

658
01:23:14.720 --> 01:23:21.720
creative writing at Oxford, who knows? He might have said, well, you know, we can wait

659
01:23:21.840 --> 01:23:28.840
a year to produce these works. So I'm not in any way trying to demean Shakespeare by

660
01:23:28.840 --> 01:23:34.480
I'm not in any way trying to demean Shakespeare by suggesting that there was this commercial

661
01:23:34.480 --> 01:23:40.940
aspect to his career. What I'm trying to do is actually uplift the notion of commerce in

662
01:23:40.940 --> 01:23:51.320
our minds that doing something to make money to please the public is not an ignoble activity.

663
01:23:51.320 --> 01:23:57.860
And again, every indication we have is that Shakespeare was a fully commercial artist

664
01:23:57.860 --> 01:24:04.340
And if that's so, it doesn't take Shakespeare down a peg.

665
01:24:04.340 --> 01:24:07.380
It lifts commercial art up in our minds.

666
01:24:07.380 --> 01:24:09.780
And we should understand that if he could grow out

667
01:24:09.780 --> 01:24:13.060
of a commercial atmosphere, then there's

668
01:24:13.060 --> 01:24:17.340
nothing inherently evil or demeaning about commerce

669
01:24:17.340 --> 01:24:19.140
as a motive for art.

670
01:24:19.140 --> 01:24:20.300
So I'll stop here.

671
01:24:20.300 --> 01:24:21.900
And now we've got a couple of minutes.

672
01:24:21.900 --> 01:24:23.180
We can take some questions.

673
01:24:27.860 --> 01:24:44.540
Yes, I mean, it's very operatic, as a matter of fact, and it is interesting that Revenge

674
01:24:44.540 --> 01:24:47.540
is such a motive in Italian opera, and it is...

675
01:24:47.540 --> 01:25:05.540
I've got a question about Karl Marx. I read a letter of review of Karl Marx's reading of what he did in the 60s, and I think it was E. Willow Jones, professor of classical architecture, said Shakespeare was one of his favorite authors.

676
01:25:17.540 --> 01:25:32.540
Shakespeare was extremely famous in Germany in the 19th century and the German translations of Shakespeare by Schlegel and Teague are among the finest translations of anything ever done.

677
01:25:32.540 --> 01:25:35.540
They're simply magnificent. They're accurate and they're beautiful.

678
01:25:35.540 --> 01:25:47.540
and so Shakespeare plays almost as well in German as he does in English. I just saw Macbeth in German in Frankfurt and I can testify to this.

679
01:25:47.540 --> 01:25:54.540
And so there was more Shakespeare scholarship in 19th century Germany than there was in 19th century England.

680
01:25:54.540 --> 01:26:04.540
It was a big deal. Goethe loved Shakespeare. Schiller loved Shakespeare. And so Marx, who very much, Marx to me is a German romantic.

681
01:26:04.540 --> 01:26:13.560
He grew up in the world of German Romanticism, and his vision is utopian in the way that

682
01:26:13.560 --> 01:26:19.460
German Romanticism was. He claimed it was anti-utopian and scientific, but that makes

683
01:26:19.460 --> 01:26:28.340
it all the more utopian. So Marx, you know, he really is the disaffected literary intellectual.

684
01:26:28.340 --> 01:26:33.860
So I mean, you know, one of the good points about him is that he liked Shakespeare, though

685
01:26:33.860 --> 01:26:45.940
often for the wrong reasons, but there's quite a significant body of Marxist scholarship on

686
01:26:45.940 --> 01:26:51.780
Shakespeare, which takes off from the fact that the great man liked Shakespeare and therefore,

687
01:26:51.780 --> 01:26:59.100
even in the Soviet Union, there was actually some very good Marxist criticism of Shakespeare in the

688
01:26:59.100 --> 01:27:02.100
1930s. Yes.

689
01:27:29.100 --> 01:27:34.940
Yeah, it's a complicated point because Ben Johnson, for example, for all his quibbling

690
01:27:34.940 --> 01:27:39.700
about Shakespeare, knew he was a much greater artist, and that's one reason he quibbles

691
01:27:39.700 --> 01:27:40.700
about it.

692
01:27:40.700 --> 01:27:46.180
And then, of course, in the poem that's preparatory to the first folio, he says he was not of

693
01:27:46.180 --> 01:27:49.820
an age but for all time.

694
01:27:49.820 --> 01:27:55.940
I know exactly what you're talking about, and it is important to realize that Shakespeare

695
01:27:55.940 --> 01:28:25.940
Francis Mears was regarded as essentially a pop culture figure, but what's also true is that already in this time people were beginning to realize he was a genius, again this fact that Francis Mears already in 1598 is comparing him to the ancient dramatist, so it's not simple, I mean, you know, his reputation is complex to begin with, but you're right that Beaumont and Fletcher,

696
01:28:25.940 --> 01:28:50.940
the 17th century stage than Shakespeare, Johnson less so than Shakespeare, but rather respected and it is interesting that these playwrights, except for the Puritan interregnum, there's something of a continuity in dramatic production throughout the 17th, 18th century.

697
01:28:50.940 --> 01:28:58.100
in the 18th century. But yes, when Shakespeare, by the end of the 18th century, he's starting

698
01:28:58.100 --> 01:29:06.540
to be held up as this genius who can be totally divorced from his origins above all in a commercial

699
01:29:06.540 --> 01:29:12.260
theater world. People are beginning to forget that that was a commercial theater. He's starting

700
01:29:12.260 --> 01:29:19.900
to be thought of as an elite figure, high culture, and then the romantics, he becomes

701
01:29:19.900 --> 01:29:27.680
a great image of the perfect creator and you know he is I mean he's the greatest

702
01:29:27.680 --> 01:29:36.260
genius I think that ever lived and and again you can see his differences from

703
01:29:36.260 --> 01:29:41.060
the other playwrights that he he really didn't need help in most cases and could

704
01:29:41.060 --> 01:29:46.520
write the plays all aspects of him on his own but he does increasingly get

705
01:29:46.520 --> 01:29:51.580
Package, so that ultimately we can get to that kind of quote I began with that

706
01:29:51.580 --> 01:29:55.240
Shakespeare wouldn't have written the plays he did if he wrote for the

707
01:29:55.240 --> 01:30:01.120
commercial theater and people just completely forget his origins. Yes.

708
01:30:01.120 --> 01:30:21.120
I was going to ask about your opening comments about the typical public response to any really popular art or literature that the elite condemned as lowbrow and the moral condemned as corrupting. The first thing that came to mind was Harry Potter, although I'm sure you could come up with a hundred examples.

709
01:30:31.120 --> 01:30:43.880
I've heard some people say good things about those books, I've heard some people say some

710
01:30:43.880 --> 01:30:52.640
pretty nasty things about them, but I'll say this, from a total external view, it's a phenomenon.

711
01:30:52.640 --> 01:30:59.320
It has some kind of power, what we call legs in the business, and so I assume there must

712
01:30:59.320 --> 01:31:07.160
must be something to it, and my guess is that people condemning it are like me viewing it

713
01:31:07.160 --> 01:31:14.160
from the outside, and that people who actually have contact with it, who read these books

714
01:31:14.160 --> 01:31:19.440
to their children or whatever, talk to their children about them, that there's probably

715
01:31:19.440 --> 01:31:20.840
something there.

716
01:31:20.840 --> 01:31:26.560
Now, it hasn't, well, I guess some people, they must condemn them because of the witchcraft

717
01:31:26.560 --> 01:31:51.560
My very, very distant reaction to it is, this is just the world of an English public school, which is, say, a private school, and that's what looks so weird and exotic to Americans, but as far as I can tell, it's just like any public school environment I've ever seen in England.

718
01:31:51.560 --> 01:31:58.560
I'm talking about something I know nothing about. One more question? Yes.

719
01:31:58.560 --> 01:32:05.560
I was very intrigued about your very brief connection between Shakespeare's sense of nature

720
01:32:05.560 --> 01:32:13.560
and Coriolanus's refusal to toe the line as a traditional politician running for election. Could you elaborate on that?

721
01:32:13.560 --> 01:32:33.560
Well, I mean, you know, I hesitate because this is so speculative. But I will say this. What's so strong in Coriolanus is his contempt for the mob, and the mob is portrayed very much as a theater audience.

722
01:32:33.560 --> 01:32:40.560
And I suspect that Shakespeare has a profound identification with that moment.

723
01:32:40.560 --> 01:32:51.560
Coriolanus' reluctance to expose himself naked to the crowd probably gives us insight into the way Shakespeare felt when he got up on the stage.

724
01:32:51.560 --> 01:32:59.560
I mean, many actors will tell you this, that they are in private, very private people.

725
01:32:59.560 --> 01:33:07.560
Johnny Carson was a classic example of this. He was very shy and retired, but when he was on the screen, he lit up.

726
01:33:07.560 --> 01:33:12.560
And, you know, he was Mr. Congeniality, but it was an act.

727
01:33:12.560 --> 01:33:19.560
This is a great line. Sincerity is the most important thing in show business. If you can fake that, you can fake anything.

728
01:33:19.560 --> 01:33:27.560
Show business involves, you know, acting. And it's a, you know, some people are hams, and they just love getting up in front of audiences.

729
01:33:27.560 --> 01:33:31.560
Other people, you know, have stage fright.

730
01:33:31.560 --> 01:33:38.560
My guess is that Shakespeare was one of these people who wasn't comfortable on stage, but forced himself to do it.

731
01:33:38.560 --> 01:33:43.560
And we see some signs of that in Coriolanus.

732
01:33:43.560 --> 01:33:52.560
And again, you know, what I'm thinking is, you know, here is the greatest human genius who's ever lived.

733
01:33:52.560 --> 01:33:58.640
and he's got to get up in front of this crowd of groundlings and perform for them

734
01:33:58.640 --> 01:34:03.520
knowing that they don't have a clue what his great stuff is about

735
01:34:03.520 --> 01:34:09.200
and yet, you know, this is the life we chose, you know, this is how he earns his money

736
01:34:09.200 --> 01:34:15.200
and he did it, he did it for 20 years and turned out play after play for these people

737
01:34:15.200 --> 01:34:24.720
And by and large they were mostly successful. Walter Kaufman has this great line about Shakespeare.

738
01:34:24.720 --> 01:34:34.440
He knew how to give his pearls the air of the sty before casting them before the swine.

739
01:34:34.440 --> 01:34:38.680
Only a German could say something like that about Shakespeare. And I think it's a real

740
01:34:38.680 --> 01:34:44.400
insight that he knew how to succeed in the commercial theater and yet I suspect there

741
01:34:44.400 --> 01:34:46.400
The Theory of Money and Credit

742
01:35:14.400 --> 01:35:18.680
If you look at the records, there are a lot of things that play Shakespeare in Stratford

743
01:35:18.680 --> 01:35:24.280
during those years, lawsuits, you know, buying a new house, getting it rebuilt and so on.

744
01:35:24.280 --> 01:35:29.080
And his theory is that for Shakespeare, he calls Shakespeare the first commuter artist,

745
01:35:29.080 --> 01:35:34.040
that he needed the sanctuary of Stratford to get away from the London theatre world.

746
01:35:34.040 --> 01:35:38.320
And he even proposes the amazing theory that Shakespeare wrote his plays in Stratford.

747
01:35:38.320 --> 01:35:43.040
He says, how the hell could he have written these plays in the hustle and bustle of London?

748
01:35:43.040 --> 01:35:58.040
He has this theory that says, you know, it's about a four or five day journey from London to Stratford, but he has this idea that Shakespeare needed that retreat, he needed to be able to put distance himself between London and the London theatre world and somehow this private world.

749
01:35:58.040 --> 01:36:10.040
Now, we have no proof for that, but it's a fascinating theory, and again, if you try to get into the mind of this human being, and none of us can, because it's a mind that's so far beyond any of us, it's not even funny.

750
01:36:10.040 --> 01:36:31.040
A man with such sensitivity to human emotion who could feel his way into any human being, it must have been bizarre for him to be among people because he was becoming them all the time, must have been incredible pressure, he needed his space.

751
01:36:31.040 --> 01:36:45.040
I think why he finally said, enough already, I've made enough money, I've written enough great plays, I'm going home to Stratford, I'm going to turn them into books and leave that theater world behind me.

752
01:36:45.040 --> 01:36:51.600
so and again that you know that's just my gut reaction but I think you know if

753
01:36:51.600 --> 01:36:57.520
you look at certain moments you can see it in the sonnets where he's in some ways

754
01:36:57.520 --> 01:37:03.120
so embarrassed to be played before crowds and so on I think you see in

755
01:37:03.120 --> 01:37:07.760
Coriolanus but that is the rank of speculation please I don't I'm not

756
01:37:07.760 --> 01:37:14.120
channeling Shakespeare I'm just just suggesting something so tomorrow we do

757
01:37:14.120 --> 01:37:22.360
painting and music. Now, we're going to show Shakespeare in Love tonight here at 7 o'clock.

758
01:37:22.360 --> 01:37:27.160
It won't be on the final. You don't have to be obliged to come, but if you'd like to,

759
01:37:27.160 --> 01:37:30.720
if you've never seen it, it's a great movie. If, like me, you've seen it but want to see

760
01:37:30.720 --> 01:37:35.160
it again, it's a great opportunity. And we'll talk about it a bit afterwards. We can be

761
01:37:35.160 --> 01:37:40.440
a little more informal. The great Internet audience won't be out there watching us as

762
01:37:40.440 --> 01:37:44.440
as we do it, but I thought we would try to have a movie every night at 7.

763
01:37:44.440 --> 01:37:50.440
Tomorrow night it will be Amadeus, which will fit in with what we're doing on classical music.

764
01:37:50.440 --> 01:37:56.440
And then Wednesday I'm going to show a Shostakovich film that will prepare us for what we're doing on Thursday.

765
01:37:56.440 --> 01:38:00.440
And then Thursday night, the high point, to prepare us for Friday morning's lecture,

766
01:38:00.440 --> 01:38:04.440
we'll watch an episode of The Simpsons and an episode of The X-Files.

767
01:38:04.440 --> 01:38:08.440
And we'll see what truly great commercial art can be.

768
01:38:08.440 --> 01:38:10.440
Thank you very much.