WEBVTT

NOTE 17. The Parson's Cause

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.760
Volume 3, Chapter 17, The Parsons' Cause

2
00:00:05.760 --> 00:00:11.760
A particular area of trouble with England over the Anglican establishment appeared during

3
00:00:11.760 --> 00:00:18.800
this period in the colony of Virginia. Of the seventy or so Anglican clergy in Virginia,

4
00:00:18.800 --> 00:00:25.860
the bulk were moderate, liberal, and easygoing, in keeping with the low church moderation

5
00:00:25.860 --> 00:00:35.220
In the western valley of Virginia, the local vestry, the important local political organ

6
00:00:35.220 --> 00:00:41.680
in that province, included Presbyterians and other dissenters for many years since the

7
00:00:41.680 --> 00:00:49.340
valley was almost exclusively dissenter. Local vestries furthermore selected their ministers

8
00:00:49.340 --> 00:00:55.660
who rapidly fell into the tolerant and liberal spirit of religion in Virginia.

9
00:00:55.660 --> 00:01:03.660
A little knot of high church Anglicans bitterly opposed to this condition and strove to bring

10
00:01:03.660 --> 00:01:11.240
church and British control over ecclesiastical and other affairs of the colony.

11
00:01:11.240 --> 00:01:18.540
These men, largely English-born, clustered in and around the faculty of the College of

12
00:01:18.540 --> 00:01:28.200
of William & Mary. In the fall of 1755, Virginia passed the first of its two-penny acts. Since

13
00:01:28.200 --> 00:01:34.460
Virginia's major currency was tobacco, its dues, contracts and obligations were generally

14
00:01:34.460 --> 00:01:42.660
payable in that commodity or in more convenient warehouse receipts for quantities of tobacco.

15
00:01:42.660 --> 00:01:49.500
In such a system, a poor tobacco crop and a consequent rise in tobacco prices injured

16
00:01:49.500 --> 00:01:54.580
debtors and advantaged creditors.

17
00:01:54.580 --> 00:02:02.660
In 1755, a year of high tobacco prices, there was inaugurated a Virginia practice of fixing

18
00:02:02.660 --> 00:02:07.020
tobacco at an arbitrary price of two pence a pound.

19
00:02:07.020 --> 00:02:14.420
This at a time when the market price of tobacco was far higher than that. Virginians generally

20
00:02:14.420 --> 00:02:22.740
approved the measure because the main creditors or receivers of fixed obligations in tobacco

21
00:02:22.740 --> 00:02:29.620
were the tax collectors and the receivers of government fees. The Two Penny Act caused

22
00:02:29.620 --> 00:02:36.060
a welcome reduction in the real economic burden of taxation and government spending on the

23
00:02:36.060 --> 00:02:42.420
of Virginians, and did this precisely during a time of economic crises when such relief

24
00:02:42.420 --> 00:02:44.820
was most needed.

25
00:02:44.820 --> 00:02:51.980
Government bureaucrats receiving fixed fees in tobacco lost a heavy windfall as a result

26
00:02:51.980 --> 00:02:57.940
of the Two Penny Act, particularly affected with the Anglican Parsons who each received

27
00:02:57.940 --> 00:03:04.660
a fixed sum of a little over 17,000 pounds of tobacco per year.

28
00:03:04.660 --> 00:03:11.500
The knot of high church ministers zealously protested the two-penny law. A small clique

29
00:03:11.500 --> 00:03:17.620
of Parsons, including four professors at William & Mary, sent several bitter protests

30
00:03:17.620 --> 00:03:24.460
to the Bishop of London. They were led by the Reverend John Cam of York County, a professor

31
00:03:24.460 --> 00:03:32.580
of divinity at William & Mary. The 1755 law was meant to be enforced for ten months only,

32
00:03:32.580 --> 00:03:37.860
After which the crop crisis would be over. The most important of the Virginia two-penny

33
00:03:37.860 --> 00:03:45.300
laws was passed in the fall of 1758, amid a catastrophic drought that lowered Virginia's

34
00:03:45.300 --> 00:03:53.040
tobacco production by nearly 90 percent. A fixed maximum price of two pence a pound was

35
00:03:53.040 --> 00:04:00.580
placed on tobacco for the following year. The Tory faction of the Virginia establishment

36
00:04:00.580 --> 00:04:06.880
was embittered at the loss of its windfall gains. The market tobacco price had risen

37
00:04:06.880 --> 00:04:13.540
to six pence a pound. Half of the Anglican clergy of the colony convened and with dispatch

38
00:04:13.540 --> 00:04:22.900
sent John Cam to England to plead their parson's cause for royal disallowance of the law. Cam

39
00:04:22.900 --> 00:04:29.500
took with him the minister's representation of the clergy of the Church of England. The

40
00:04:29.500 --> 00:04:48.500
The representation bitterly and incorrectly denounced the Two-Penny Act as deliberately designed to injure the Anglican clergy and angered the Virginians by warning that the royal prerogative was being violated by the colony.

41
00:04:48.500 --> 00:04:56.180
The Anglican clergy were thus urging a royal veto over the self-governing acts of the Virginians,

42
00:04:57.140 --> 00:05:02.980
and went from there to urge the nullifying, rather than the mere setting aside of the law,

43
00:05:03.620 --> 00:05:08.180
so that the two-penny act would be null and void from the beginning.

44
00:05:08.180 --> 00:05:13.060
The importance of this stemmed from the short-term nature of the crisis

45
00:05:13.060 --> 00:05:19.940
and of the law. If it could be voided from the beginning, Virginia would be liable for

46
00:05:19.940 --> 00:05:27.220
a large retroactive salary to its established clergy. The Virginia assembly countered the

47
00:05:27.220 --> 00:05:34.860
appointment of Cam in early 1759 by appointing its own agent in London and selecting a committee

48
00:05:34.860 --> 00:05:41.140
of correspondents to carry on the struggle. The argument was now carried to England, where

49
00:05:41.140 --> 00:05:47.040
Where Virginians were further embittered by a vicious attack upon them by Bishop Thomas

50
00:05:47.040 --> 00:05:52.940
Sherlock of London, who had long been one of the prime movers in the scheme for an American

51
00:05:52.940 --> 00:06:01.820
episcopate. Sherlock leveled false accusations of a deliberate attack on the Virginia clergy,

52
00:06:01.820 --> 00:06:07.580
and then went on in a crescendo of calumny to charge the Virginia Assembly in its passing

53
00:06:07.580 --> 00:06:22.040
Sherlock went on to denounce the increasing number of dissenters, largely Presbyterians,

54
00:06:22.040 --> 00:06:28.680
in the colony. The CAM Petition, aided by Archbishop Secker, traveled favorably through

55
00:06:28.680 --> 00:06:36.560
the ranks of the British bureaucracy. Finally, in August 1759, the Privy Council disallowed

56
00:06:36.560 --> 00:06:42.000
The Two Two-Penny Acts It also went beyond this to order the Virginia

57
00:06:42.000 --> 00:06:50.520
Governor not to sign in the future any such law that did not have a suspension clause delaying

58
00:06:50.520 --> 00:06:57.400
execution of the law until the King should approve, a serious threat to the self-rule

59
00:06:57.400 --> 00:07:04.900
of the colony. The Crown had merely disallowed the Two-Penny Act rather than nullified it

60
00:07:04.900 --> 00:07:11.900
from the start. The outcome of the dispute was therefore still unclear, a fact that would

61
00:07:11.900 --> 00:07:19.220
rankle Virginia-British relations for eight more years. The Reverend Mr. Kam and a few

62
00:07:19.220 --> 00:07:25.460
other Tory Parsons immediately decided to sue in the courts for the missing back pay,

63
00:07:25.460 --> 00:07:32.220
and if these cases were won, total nullification would be a fact. The Virginia taxpayers would

64
00:07:32.220 --> 00:07:57.220
The assembly and its committee of correspondents decided to back the vestries in the court cases, and its committee of correspondents warned that the royal decision called into question the powers of the Virginia legislature to make temporary laws for the public wheel.

65
00:07:57.220 --> 00:08:05.660
The Assembly in late 1760 petitioned the Crown for power to pass such temporary measures,

66
00:08:05.660 --> 00:08:13.700
but in vain. News of Bishop Sherlock's bitter blast particularly infuriated Virginians and

67
00:08:13.700 --> 00:08:20.980
set off a pamphlet war in the colony. Two of Virginia's leading planter oligarchs,

68
00:08:20.980 --> 00:08:29.380
Richard Bland, Jr. and Colonel Landon Carter, both Burgesses and both Anglicans, attacked

69
00:08:29.380 --> 00:08:36.700
Sherlock and became involved in a series of exchanges with John Cam. The Bland family

70
00:08:36.700 --> 00:08:43.500
was intermarried with such eminent planter families as the Randolphs and the Carters with

71
00:08:43.500 --> 00:08:52.040
the Randolphs, Byrds and Harrison's. Bland's pamphlet, A Letter to the Clergy, 1760, was

72
00:08:52.040 --> 00:08:59.840
notable for a sardonic statement on the royal prerogative. Like the King of Babylon's decree,

73
00:08:59.840 --> 00:09:06.460
it may, for aught I know, almost force the people of the plantations to fall down and

74
00:09:06.460 --> 00:09:17.180
Worship any image it shall please to set up. Moreover, as salis populi est suprema lex,

75
00:09:17.180 --> 00:09:24.020
every consideration must give place to it, and even these royal instructions may be deviated

76
00:09:24.020 --> 00:09:30.180
from with impunity. But the major threat lay in the court-suits

77
00:09:30.180 --> 00:09:36.420
of the Reverend Mr. Cam and four of his fellow ministers, for their victory would mean that

78
00:09:36.420 --> 00:09:51.960
The slow processes of the courts kept the whole issue alive and festering. The first

79
00:09:51.960 --> 00:09:58.580
case to be decided was that of Reverend Alexander White of King William County. White's case

80
00:09:58.580 --> 00:10:06.380
This case was turned over in Toto in the fall of 1762 to the jury, which naturally found

81
00:10:06.380 --> 00:10:13.060
for Virginia. In the case of the Reverend Thomas Warrington, decided soon afterward,

82
00:10:13.060 --> 00:10:18.980
the Elizabeth City County Court, headed by George Wythe, sustained the original validity

83
00:10:18.980 --> 00:10:25.140
of the Two Penny Act. Furthermore, it also found for the defendant.

84
00:10:25.140 --> 00:10:32.260
The third case to emerge was that of the Reverend James Murray of Louisa County and was decided

85
00:10:32.260 --> 00:10:35.180
in Hanover County Court.

86
00:10:35.180 --> 00:10:43.700
On November 5, 1763, Judge John Henry decreed that the two-penny act had been null and void

87
00:10:43.700 --> 00:10:45.660
from the start.

88
00:10:45.660 --> 00:10:52.900
The only problem remaining was a jury trial fixing the amount of damages due to Murray.

89
00:10:52.900 --> 00:11:01.100
The trial was held in December. To Murray's disgust, the jury included the vulgar herd,

90
00:11:01.100 --> 00:11:07.700
two of which were ardent New Light Presbyterians. Dissenters had obvious reason to be hostile

91
00:11:07.700 --> 00:11:14.940
to levering taxes upon themselves for the benefit of an Anglican establishment.

92
00:11:14.940 --> 00:11:21.340
The great significance of the Murray trial was the emergence upon the scene of the brilliant

93
00:11:21.340 --> 00:11:28.100
Young Lawyer Patrick Henry Henry, son of Judge John Henry, a leading

94
00:11:28.100 --> 00:11:35.500
planter of Hanover County, was a nephew of a venerable Anglican minister, the Reverend

95
00:11:35.500 --> 00:11:41.060
Patrick Henry, who was one of the ministers filing suit against the colony.

96
00:11:41.060 --> 00:11:48.980
Young Patrick had every family incentive to be on the Tory-Anglican side of the dispute.

97
00:11:48.980 --> 00:11:57.580
Instead, hired despairingly at the last minute, Henry, presumably in a helpless situation,

98
00:11:57.580 --> 00:12:05.900
radicalized the atmosphere and captured the imagination of the colony in a dramatic speech

99
00:12:05.900 --> 00:12:13.980
to the jury. In short, Henry escalated the dispute straight up to the Crown. By annulling

100
00:12:13.980 --> 00:12:21.260
Between the good and necessary two-penny act, the king had violated the original compact

101
00:12:21.260 --> 00:12:30.220
between king and people, by which the latter had promised obedience in return for royal

102
00:12:30.220 --> 00:12:40.180
protection of their rights. Therefore, concluded Henry inexorably, a king by disallowing acts

103
00:12:40.180 --> 00:12:48.980
of Socialitarian Nature from being the father of his people degenerated into a tyrant and

104
00:12:48.980 --> 00:12:54.040
forfeits all rights to his subjects' obedience.

105
00:12:54.040 --> 00:12:59.600
At that point, the Reverend Mr. Murray recounted that the more sober part of the audience was

106
00:12:59.600 --> 00:13:02.160
struck with horror.

107
00:13:02.160 --> 00:13:08.440
Peter Lyons, the leading lawyer of the area and Murray's counsel, cried out at this that

108
00:13:08.440 --> 00:13:17.880
Henry had spoken treason, and murmurs of treason arose from the audience. But Henry, unruffled,

109
00:13:17.880 --> 00:13:24.040
continued to denounce bitterly the Anglican clergy. The clergy of Virginia, on refusing

110
00:13:24.040 --> 00:13:31.280
to acquiesce in the law, ought to be considered as enemies of the community, and Murray and

111
00:13:31.280 --> 00:13:37.200
and his colleagues should be not rewarded but stripped of their appointments.

112
00:13:37.200 --> 00:13:42.880
In a stirring proration, Henry warned that unless the jury were disposed to rivet the

113
00:13:42.880 --> 00:13:49.420
chains of bondage on their own necks, he hoped they would not let slip the opportunity which

114
00:13:49.420 --> 00:13:57.400
now offered of making such an example of him, Murray, as might hereafter be a warning to

115
00:13:57.400 --> 00:14:04.000
to himself and his brethren not to have the temerity for the future, to dispute the validity

116
00:14:04.000 --> 00:14:06.880
of such laws.

117
00:14:06.880 --> 00:14:16.840
The jury swayed and moved, brought in a verdict for token minimum damages, one penny.

118
00:14:16.840 --> 00:14:22.680
Judge Henry moved to tears by his son's great speech, upheld the verdict, and the happy

119
00:14:22.680 --> 00:14:39.500
John Cam's own case came to trial in April 1764. This critical case was decided by the

120
00:14:39.500 --> 00:14:47.360
Council of Virginia, sitting as the Supreme General Court of the colony. The Council decided

121
00:14:47.360 --> 00:14:56.840
against CAM by a vote of five to four. Voting against CAM were John Blair of Williamsburg,

122
00:14:56.840 --> 00:15:04.040
sometime President of the Council, John Taylor, William Byrd III, Robert Burwell, and Presley

123
00:15:04.040 --> 00:15:12.440
Thornton. Voting for CAM were Richard Corbin, Robert Carter, Peter Randolph, Surveyor General

124
00:15:12.440 --> 00:15:20.320
of the Customs, and Philip Ludwell Lee. William and Thomas Nelson of York County excused themselves

125
00:15:20.320 --> 00:15:26.440
from voting as parishioners of the Reverend Mr. Kamm. White, Warrington, and Morrie each

126
00:15:26.440 --> 00:15:32.200
had appealed their cases to the Council, sitting as the Supreme General Court, and the Reverend

127
00:15:32.200 --> 00:15:38.400
Mr. Henry's suit was dismissed when the Kamm case was decided. All the other cases were

128
00:15:38.400 --> 00:15:44.900
were now ended, and the Parsons' cause rested on Cam's further appeal to the Privy Council

129
00:15:44.900 --> 00:15:51.960
in England. Meanwhile, the pamphlet war between Cam, on the one hand, and Bland and Carter

130
00:15:51.960 --> 00:16:00.420
on the other, had renewed in 1763 and 1764. Finally, Richard Bland published in August

131
00:16:00.420 --> 00:16:08.540
August 1764, his famous The Colonel Dismounted, which the historian Lyon G. Tyler has called

132
00:16:08.540 --> 00:16:15.500
the great critical paper of the revolution. Colonel Bland began by asserting that the

133
00:16:15.500 --> 00:16:25.060
Virginians properly retain the rights of all Englishmen. He added, under an English government,

134
00:16:25.060 --> 00:16:32.300
All men are born free, are only subject to laws made with their own consent. If then

135
00:16:32.300 --> 00:16:38.820
Virginians are free-born and have the rights of Englishmen, then laws over them can be

136
00:16:38.820 --> 00:16:47.980
made only by their own representatives. This, Bland declared, applied to internal laws,

137
00:16:47.980 --> 00:16:55.020
whereas external laws are to be determined by Parliament. As for the royal prerogative,

138
00:16:55.020 --> 00:17:04.060
and warned that submission, even to the supreme magistrate, is not the whole duty of a citizen.

139
00:17:04.060 --> 00:17:10.340
Something is likewise due to the rights of our country and to the liberties of mankind.

140
00:17:10.340 --> 00:17:17.140
To say that a royal instruction to a governor is to have the validity of a law and must

141
00:17:17.140 --> 00:17:24.000
be obeyed without reserve is, at once, to strip us of all the rights and privileges

142
00:17:24.000 --> 00:17:39.640
Thus, the strictures of Bland and Henry emphasized the importance of the Parsons' cause in expanding

143
00:17:39.640 --> 00:17:49.080
the colonial conflict with Britain, from taxation by colonists themselves to legislation by

144
00:17:49.080 --> 00:17:51.120
the colonists.

145
00:17:51.120 --> 00:17:59.520
As historian Richard Morton puts it, from the principle of no taxation without representation,

146
00:17:59.520 --> 00:18:08.040
Virginians had moved on to no legislation without representation.

147
00:18:08.040 --> 00:18:13.260
During this debate, Virginians developed the great constitutional arguments, which they

148
00:18:13.260 --> 00:18:19.880
were to use effectively a few years later to justify rebellion, and it started Patrick

149
00:18:19.880 --> 00:18:28.680
Henry on his eloquent and outspoken defiance of British authority in America.

150
00:18:28.680 --> 00:18:35.920
Nullifying the two-penny acts by the Crown irritated the Virginians in many ways. It

151
00:18:35.920 --> 00:18:43.560
involved using royal power to annul a law popular in the colony. It attempted to impose

152
00:18:43.560 --> 00:18:50.480
suspension clauses to restrict further Virginian legislation. It gave rise to the Parsons'

153
00:18:50.480 --> 00:18:59.240
call for rendering such laws initially null and void. It rendered obnoxious to moderate

154
00:18:59.240 --> 00:19:06.320
low church Virginia an influential portion of the Anglican clergy devoted to high church

155
00:19:06.320 --> 00:19:13.320
and it recalled the Episcopal schemes of the leaders of the Church of England. Furthermore,

156
00:19:16.240 --> 00:19:23.240
the Parsons' Cause polarized Virginian opinion, aligning the Anglican and dissenting laity

157
00:19:23.400 --> 00:19:30.400
of Virginia against the reactionary wing of the local Anglican clergy, the English Church

158
00:19:31.600 --> 00:19:33.520
and the Crown itself.

159
00:19:33.520 --> 00:19:38.920
The Parsons' cause now rested on Kam's appeal to the Privy Council.

160
00:19:38.920 --> 00:19:46.680
To combat Kam's case, the Virginia Assembly's Committee of Correspondence in July 1764 prepared

161
00:19:46.680 --> 00:19:52.680
argumentation against Kam. The main brief was drawn up by Committee member Robert Carter

162
00:19:52.680 --> 00:19:58.720
Nicholas of Williamsburg, who had been chief defense lawyer against Kam before the General

163
00:19:58.720 --> 00:20:14.720
and by George Wythe of Williamsburg. The case dragged on unresolved until the end of 1766 when the Privy Council dismissed Cam's appeal on a legal technicality.

164
00:20:14.720 --> 00:20:24.880
The Parsons' cause was ended, but even then, unclearly and inconclusively, it left a significant

165
00:20:24.880 --> 00:20:30.880
Legacy of Opposition and Hostility by Virginians to the Crown.
