WEBVTT

NOTE 38. The Nonimportation Movement Begins

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.840
Volume 3, Chapter 38 The Non-Importation Movement Begins

2
00:00:07.360 --> 00:00:13.360
The arrogant encroachments of the Townsend Acts immediately rekindled American resistance to

3
00:00:13.360 --> 00:00:19.600
British oppression. With the exception of tea, much of which was handled by the British East India

4
00:00:19.600 --> 00:00:27.120
Company, the commodities taxed by the Townsend Act were all manufactured products imported almost

5
00:00:27.120 --> 00:00:41.120
The Americans therefore decided to employ the non-importation weapon, which had proved so effective in pressuring the British merchants to have the stamp tax repealed.

6
00:00:41.120 --> 00:00:48.120
A non-importation boycott promised to be the best means of fighting the towns and duties as well.

7
00:00:48.120 --> 00:00:54.520
Boston, the major port for reception of the newly taxed goods, was a natural point of

8
00:00:54.520 --> 00:01:01.400
origin for the resistance, and this vigilant and libertarian-oriented town did not disappoint

9
00:01:01.400 --> 00:01:04.100
anyone's expectations.

10
00:01:04.100 --> 00:01:12.940
The first public resistance came in the Boston town meeting of October 28, 1767, led by James

11
00:01:12.940 --> 00:01:14.880
Otis.

12
00:01:14.880 --> 00:01:20.080
The meeting drew up a lengthy list of British products that Americans were to pledge themselves

13
00:01:20.080 --> 00:01:27.080
not to purchase after the end of the year. Colonists were to patronize local manufacturing

14
00:01:27.080 --> 00:01:33.640
instead. Copies of the resolutions were sent to all the towns in Massachusetts and to the

15
00:01:33.640 --> 00:01:40.640
principal towns in the other colonies. Twenty-four Massachusetts towns backed Boston's action

16
00:01:40.640 --> 00:01:47.640
This original phase of the non-importation movement was organized by Massachusetts town meetings and pledged to the public not to consume certain British imports. These actions were partially spurred by a commercial depression triggered by the restrictions and the lack of access to the public.

17
00:02:10.640 --> 00:02:17.120
and Burdens of the Townsend Acts. Clearly, they would help those caught by the Depression

18
00:02:17.120 --> 00:02:22.480
to retrench their expenses and hence their purchases of imported goods.

19
00:02:22.480 --> 00:02:28.880
Massachusetts towns were not alone in following Boston's example. Rhode Island, in fact,

20
00:02:28.880 --> 00:02:35.400
not only followed, but went one better. On December 2, a Providence town meeting pledged

21
00:02:35.400 --> 00:02:41.200
Most of the town's merchants not to import a list of imported goods after the first of

22
00:02:41.200 --> 00:02:42.840
the year.

23
00:02:42.840 --> 00:02:49.120
Such a pledge of a non-importation boycott by merchants was far more concrete and finely

24
00:02:49.120 --> 00:02:57.840
edged and far easier to maintain than a vague and unwieldy pledge by the mass of consumers.

25
00:02:57.840 --> 00:03:03.420
Providence's action was really the first effective move for a mercantile boycott to pressure

26
00:03:03.420 --> 00:03:11.580
for England for repeal. Any merchant failing to sign or to conform to the boycott was himself

27
00:03:11.580 --> 00:03:18.660
to be boycotted by the people. Two days later, Newport followed suit and then small Rhode

28
00:03:18.660 --> 00:03:26.080
Island towns. In Connecticut, town meetings led by Norwich adopted non-consumption agreements

29
00:03:26.080 --> 00:03:32.780
after the pattern of Boston's. Historians have made much of the fact that popular resistance

30
00:03:32.780 --> 00:03:39.020
to the Townsend duties early took the form of boycott agreements, whereas resistance

31
00:03:39.020 --> 00:03:46.020
to the Stamp Act had stressed armed rebellion. This has been interpreted as a significantly

32
00:03:46.560 --> 00:03:53.560
conservative shift led by merchants fearful of popular mob actions. But this view ignores

33
00:03:54.300 --> 00:04:01.300
the crucial difference between the two threats. The Stamp Tax, being internal to all colonial

34
00:04:01.300 --> 00:04:09.100
All colonial transactions had to be fought by dismantling the new Stamp Act bureaucracy

35
00:04:09.100 --> 00:04:12.940
and then immobilizing the stamped paper.

36
00:04:12.940 --> 00:04:18.440
This could be done only by the armed action of the aroused people.

37
00:04:18.440 --> 00:04:25.400
But the towns and levees reverted to the more orthodox import duties, and early mob action

38
00:04:25.400 --> 00:04:27.560
would have been pointless.

39
00:04:27.560 --> 00:04:34.560
What was needed now was mercantile action, smuggling in defiance of the duties and boycott

40
00:04:34.560 --> 00:04:37.520
pressure on English merchants.

41
00:04:37.520 --> 00:04:42.880
Mob violence at that point would have been ineffectual and even absurd, and hence was

42
00:04:42.880 --> 00:04:45.440
not embarked upon.

43
00:04:45.440 --> 00:04:50.920
As would soon be seen, neither the American liberal leaders nor the public had become

44
00:04:50.920 --> 00:04:56.320
more timid or conservative since the Stamp Crisis.

45
00:04:56.320 --> 00:05:02.320
Different methods of oppression simply called for different means of resistance.

46
00:05:02.320 --> 00:05:07.920
The change was one of tactics, not of spirit.

47
00:05:07.920 --> 00:05:14.480
As in the case of the Stamp Act, popular local action was supplemented by petitions and resolutions

48
00:05:14.480 --> 00:05:15.480
of the assemblies.

49
00:05:15.480 --> 00:05:21.640
A clarion call was sounded in the form of a letter drawn up by the indefatigable Samuel

50
00:05:21.640 --> 00:05:25.960
Adams and presented to the Massachusetts General Court.

51
00:05:25.960 --> 00:05:33.580
Adopted on February 11, 1768, the missive was sent out as a circular letter to the assemblies

52
00:05:33.580 --> 00:05:36.740
of all the other colonies.

53
00:05:36.740 --> 00:05:41.680
The letter acknowledged the power of parliament to regulate the colonies, but categorically

54
00:05:41.680 --> 00:05:46.760
denied any power of taxation, internal or external.

55
00:05:46.760 --> 00:05:53.600
Furthermore, not only the constitutional, but the natural rights of Americans were charged

56
00:05:53.600 --> 00:06:01.160
to have been violated by such a tax, because the doctrine of consent to taxation was an

57
00:06:01.160 --> 00:06:08.760
unalterable right in nature, ingathered into the British Constitution.

58
00:06:08.760 --> 00:06:14.760
Hence the Townsend duties were spurned, along with any move to make executive, including

59
00:06:14.760 --> 00:06:21.840
judicial, offices independent of assembly appropriations, and United Action was called

60
00:06:21.840 --> 00:06:23.280
for.

61
00:06:23.280 --> 00:06:30.140
The Massachusetts circular letter was approved by the assemblies of New Hampshire, New Jersey,

62
00:06:30.140 --> 00:06:39.280
Connecticut, Maryland, Virginia, Georgia and South Carolina during the spring and summer,

63
00:06:39.280 --> 00:06:46.040
and Virginia reinforced it by a circular letter of its own against British taxation.

64
00:06:46.040 --> 00:06:52.280
Another powerful and widely influential statement of the American case against the towns and

65
00:06:52.280 --> 00:06:57.600
Townsend Duties was delivered by the eminent leader of the Pennsylvania liberals, the young

66
00:06:57.600 --> 00:06:59.960
lawyer John Dickinson.

67
00:06:59.960 --> 00:07:06.560
Dickinson's Letters from a Farmer appeared in the Pennsylvania Chronicle around the turn

68
00:07:06.560 --> 00:07:11.000
of the year 1767-68.

69
00:07:11.000 --> 00:07:17.360
It denied the right of any parliamentary taxation and hence of the Townsend Duties, although

70
00:07:17.360 --> 00:07:35.120
Dickinson also called for a determined non-importation campaign to effect repeal of the Townsend taxes.

71
00:07:35.120 --> 00:07:41.520
It soon became clear that official petitions and individual protest and even uncoordinated

72
00:08:11.520 --> 00:08:40.520
After several meetings, almost every merchant and trader of New York agreed to import no British goods after October 1, 1768, and on tail repeal of the Townsend duties, provided that Boston continued its boycott and Philadelphia concurred.

73
00:08:40.520 --> 00:09:07.520
The city of Philadelphia, scarcely hit by the trade depression, was more heavily ridden with Tories than any other city in the American colonies. Here the Tory machine of Joseph Galloway was in control and was able to overrule John Dickinson.

74
00:09:07.520 --> 00:09:15.480
During meetings in Philadelphia in March and April 1768, Dickinson eloquently reminded

75
00:09:15.480 --> 00:09:20.920
the merchants of the numerous attempts by Great Britain to cripple the trade and the

76
00:09:20.920 --> 00:09:27.200
nascent manufacturing of the colonies. The towns and acts were an invasion of liberty,

77
00:09:27.200 --> 00:09:34.540
and liberty, property and industry went hand in hand. Therefore, Dickinson urged the merchants

78
00:09:34.540 --> 00:09:42.700
is to forgo present advantage for principle and for long run self-interest, but the Philadelphia

79
00:09:42.700 --> 00:09:50.140
merchants taking their cue from Galloway remained unmoved and the great and imaginative project

80
00:09:50.140 --> 00:09:58.460
for a non-importation league of merchants from the leading American cities collapsed.

81
00:09:58.460 --> 00:10:03.140
Boston's betrayal was a severe blow to the colonial cause.

82
00:10:03.140 --> 00:10:08.820
Notwithstanding, nearly all the merchants of Boston fearlessly agreed on August 1 to

83
00:10:08.820 --> 00:10:14.700
go it alone and to discontinue imports of all goods from Great Britain for the entire

84
00:10:14.700 --> 00:10:22.140
year of 1769, as well as imports of all goods on the Townsend duty list until those duties

85
00:10:22.140 --> 00:10:23.140
were repealed.

86
00:10:23.140 --> 00:10:28.260
The heroic example of Boston's merchants inspired others.

87
00:10:28.260 --> 00:10:34.620
Soon, the merchants of Salem, Plymouth and other towns followed suit.

88
00:10:34.620 --> 00:10:42.300
On August 27, the New York merchants decided to go far beyond their Boston confrères.

89
00:10:42.300 --> 00:10:50.540
Almost unanimously, they agreed to cease all importation after November 1, 1768, and until

90
00:10:50.540 --> 00:10:56.840
All the Townsend duties were repealed. Any subscribing merchants violating the agreement

91
00:10:56.840 --> 00:11:04.200
would be publicly designated enemies to their country. Furthermore, the retail tradesmen

92
00:11:04.200 --> 00:11:10.380
in New York signed an agreement to refuse to buy from any merchants who themselves refused

93
00:11:10.380 --> 00:11:16.780
to sign or follow the merchants' agreement. The merchants of Albany and other towns of

94
00:11:16.780 --> 00:11:24.820
The following April, New York's assembly on motion of Philip Livingston, merchant and

95
00:11:24.820 --> 00:11:31.060
leader of the liberal wing of the landed oligarchy, voted its thanks to the New York merchants

96
00:11:31.060 --> 00:11:34.900
for their patriotic decision for a boycott.

97
00:11:34.900 --> 00:11:42.180
Once again in the fall of 1768, the merchants of Philadelphia were on the spot.

98
00:11:42.180 --> 00:11:47.940
and once again they coolly ignored the pressure for a boycott and confined themselves to their

99
00:11:47.940 --> 00:11:53.980
own petitions, supporting a request to England by the Pennsylvania Assembly for repeal of

100
00:11:53.980 --> 00:12:02.420
the Townsend Act. Finally, however, the Philadelphia merchants pledged themselves to non-importation

101
00:12:02.420 --> 00:12:10.140
effective next spring if the Townsend Act had not then been repealed. With no sign of

102
00:12:10.140 --> 00:12:28.140
In mid-March of 1769, the great bulk of the Philadelphia merchants at last agreed to import virtually no goods from Great Britain after April 1, 1769, until the towns and duties should be repealed.

103
00:12:28.140 --> 00:12:35.140
Any violator would be publicly stigmatized as an enemy of the liberties of America.

104
00:12:35.140 --> 00:12:45.860
Thus, by the spring of 1769, the three great ports had joined in a boycott until repeal.

105
00:12:45.860 --> 00:12:52.160
After a year of shilly-shallying, Philadelphia was at last permitting concerted American

106
00:12:52.160 --> 00:12:55.080
and Pressure upon Great Britain.

107
00:12:55.080 --> 00:12:57.840
The boycott movement was over the top.
