WEBVTT

NOTE 74. The Western Lands and the Ordinance of 1784

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:08.000
Volume 4, Chapter 74. The Western Lands and the Ordinance of 1784.

2
00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:17.000
As the Revolutionary War drew to a close, the settlement of the sovereignty over the lands of the Northwest became even more important.

3
00:00:17.000 --> 00:00:25.000
At the beginning of 1781, Virginia had ceded the lands north of the Ohio River to the Continental Congress,

4
00:00:25.000 --> 00:00:30.920
of Congress, and Maryland was then persuaded to drop her objections to the Articles of

5
00:00:30.920 --> 00:00:32.960
Confederation.

6
00:00:32.960 --> 00:00:38.920
But the problem of the Western lands was far from over, for Virginia had agreed to cession

7
00:00:38.920 --> 00:00:45.400
only if Congress voided the claims of the land speculators, influencing Middle States

8
00:00:45.400 --> 00:00:46.640
opinion.

9
00:00:46.640 --> 00:00:53.940
The speculative Indiana, Illinois and Wabash land companies fought back, urging Congress

10
00:00:53.940 --> 00:01:03.940
The company's powerful lobbyists included James Wilson, Benjamin Franklin, Samuel Wharton, Congressman from Delaware, and Bernard Gratz.

11
00:01:03.940 --> 00:01:10.940
With the Virginians battling the land speculators, a lengthy stalemate developed in Congress.

12
00:01:10.940 --> 00:01:18.940
The Western domain, however, looked attractive to Congress as a means of raising revenue by selling parcels of land.

13
00:01:18.940 --> 00:01:25.340
of Raising Revenue by Selling Parcels of Land. Furthermore, it had promised land bounties

14
00:01:25.340 --> 00:01:31.340
to veteran officers and these could only be extracted from the Western lands. Congressional

15
00:01:31.340 --> 00:01:38.020
favor began to shift towards accession and against the land companies. Finally, a committee

16
00:01:38.020 --> 00:01:44.460
of Congress which included such pro-Virginians as John Rutledge and James Madison reported

17
00:01:44.460 --> 00:01:53.180
in early June 1783, implicitly accepting Virginia demands. Maryland and New Jersey delegates

18
00:01:53.180 --> 00:01:59.560
objected strenuously, but were overruled. Virginia's session was then finally accepted

19
00:01:59.560 --> 00:02:06.480
in mid-September and Virginia reaffirmed the session of Northwest claims on modified terms

20
00:02:06.480 --> 00:02:12.880
at the end of the year, but had to be content with a tacit rather than explicit acceptance

21
00:02:12.880 --> 00:02:27.880
The following March 1, Congress officially ratified the confirmed Virginia session, with only New Jersey, and presumably Maryland, if she had been represented, in the chamber at that time, voting nay.

22
00:02:27.880 --> 00:02:41.880
New Jersey, it may be noted, had come so thoroughly under the spell of the land companies that George Morgan, agent of the Indiana Company, had also been appointed agent of the state by the New Jersey Legislature.

23
00:02:41.880 --> 00:02:50.000
The Terms of Virginia's Session had not only worked to void the claims of the land speculators,

24
00:02:50.000 --> 00:02:55.840
they also pledged Congress eventually to carve several states out of the new territory, each

25
00:02:55.840 --> 00:03:02.000
to have the same rights as other states to sovereignty, freedom and independence.

26
00:03:02.000 --> 00:03:08.960
This provision was embodied in the Ordinance of 1784, adopted in late April, and drafted

27
00:03:08.960 --> 00:03:15.160
and Steered Through Congress by Jefferson. This ordinance laid down the pattern for future

28
00:03:15.160 --> 00:03:22.160
American land policy, especially in the carving out of separate states. While the public domain

29
00:03:22.160 --> 00:03:29.440
was unfortunately nationalized and the settlers subjected to the domination of Congress, Virginia's

30
00:03:29.440 --> 00:03:35.160
proviso made sure that the new territories would eventually govern themselves and not

31
00:03:35.160 --> 00:03:40.200
remain as permanent subjects of the original Eastern states.

32
00:03:40.200 --> 00:03:46.040
But that tutelage period of Congressional domination was long enough to make the Civil

33
00:03:46.040 --> 00:03:48.840
War inevitable.

34
00:03:48.840 --> 00:03:54.200
For it meant that the governing of new areas would have to be decided by a Congress which

35
00:03:54.200 --> 00:04:01.880
might contain within it irreconcilable sectional or ideological conflicts.

36
00:04:01.880 --> 00:04:11.880
Nationalizing the public domain meant also the nationalizing, the maximizing of conflicts over its political and social systems.

37
00:04:11.880 --> 00:04:21.880
The broad impact of the Ordinance of 1784, furthermore, was heightened by the fact that it applied not only to the Northwest lands,

38
00:04:21.880 --> 00:04:27.880
but also to any other lands that might be ceded to Congress by the individual states.

39
00:04:27.880 --> 00:04:35.880
A reflection of Jefferson's anticipating Virginia's seeding of the Kentucky lands into a separate state.

40
00:04:35.880 --> 00:04:48.880
The specific form of government for all new territories under the ordinance was to create temporary territorial self-governments, followed by the formation of permanent states.

41
00:04:48.880 --> 00:04:53.880
Both would be subject to the Articles of Confederation.

42
00:04:53.880 --> 00:05:03.880
They would not be allowed to secede from the United States, they would be responsible for their share of the public debt, and they would be republican in form.

43
00:05:03.880 --> 00:05:17.880
Jefferson tried manfully to include the requirement that the western territories create no hereditary titles, nor allow any slaves or indentured servants after 1800.

44
00:05:17.880 --> 00:05:33.880
Given national control over Western territories, only one proviso would have been consistent with liberty and justice, and would have avoided the Civil War from the very beginning, Jefferson's plan for the early outlawing of slavery.

45
00:05:33.880 --> 00:05:55.880
Only nipping the slave question in the bud might have prevented the vast conflict and bloodshed that was to come, but the slavery proviso, which significantly applied to southwest as well as northwest lands, lost by a single vote. Only six states agreed out of thirteen.

46
00:05:55.880 --> 00:06:08.880
The four New England states, New York and Pennsylvania, voted for the prohibition, but the illness of New Jersey's John Beatty deprived the proviso of the seven affirmative votes required.

47
00:06:08.880 --> 00:06:16.880
The opposition to the slavery proviso was led by Richard Dobb Spate of North Carolina and Jacob Reed of South Carolina.

48
00:06:16.880 --> 00:06:33.880
All of this points up the growing sectional North-South division over slavery in the United States, a division that had begun years before around the controversy over the basis of apportioning tax requisitions under the Articles.

49
00:06:33.880 --> 00:06:48.880
In the 1784 vote, the Northern states were lined up against slavery, and the Southern, with the exception of a few liberals such as Jefferson and his young Virginian disciple James Monroe, in favor.

50
00:06:48.880 --> 00:07:02.880
In the controversy concerning the imposed proposed by Congress in April 1783, the Northern states had won a victory by projecting a change in the basis of requisitioning under the Articles.

51
00:07:02.880 --> 00:07:16.880
Instead of the value of ground, land and improvements, the basis was proposed to be population, but this time a concession was made to the South in that only three-fifths of the slaves would be counted.

52
00:07:16.880 --> 00:07:22.880
This again points up the growing sectional disputes based upon slavery.

53
00:07:22.880 --> 00:07:37.880
Following the work of Max Varned at the beginning of the 20th century, historians have, until very recently, almost completely deprecated the important role of sectional and slavery conflicts during the 1780s.
