WEBVTT

NOTE Crisis and Liberty: Lecture 6

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:19.000
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the beginning of the end. This is session 6 of 10, so we're on the downhill slope from this time forward.

2
00:00:19.000 --> 00:00:39.000
We economists are often accused, correctly, of being Philistines and so to take a little bit of the edge off of that ever so valid accusation,

3
00:00:39.000 --> 00:00:55.000
I want to begin this session with a poetry reading that is, oddly enough, relevant to this session's topic, the New Deal.

4
00:00:55.000 --> 00:01:05.000
This is actually a portion of a poem describing, as it were, the New Deal.

5
00:01:05.000 --> 00:01:15.000
A dollar for the services a true producer renders, and a dollar for experiments of governmental spenders.

6
00:01:15.000 --> 00:01:22.000
A dollar for the earners and the savers and the thrifty, and a dollar for the wasters.

7
00:01:22.000 --> 00:01:28.000
It's a case of 50-50.

8
00:01:28.000 --> 00:01:41.400
And we owe that to one, Burton Braley, who has a whole book full of such poems, and that

9
00:01:41.400 --> 00:01:46.640
one struck me especially once upon a time.

10
00:01:46.640 --> 00:01:54.400
It's one of many indications we have that the New Deal was not as wildly popular as

11
00:01:54.400 --> 00:02:02.800
as some historians seem to suggest when they tell the story of the Roosevelt administration.

12
00:02:02.800 --> 00:02:15.120
And Roosevelt became during the 30s and 40s and remains to the present time, I'd say,

13
00:02:15.120 --> 00:02:22.920
the most popular of all American presidents. It may be a little neck and neck with Abraham

14
00:02:22.920 --> 00:02:37.920
I'm Lincoln, but I suspect that if we were to take some kind of a poll, we'd find that Franklin Roosevelt is the most popular American president.

15
00:02:37.920 --> 00:02:51.920
And a lot of observations could be made about that curious fact, but the one I want to make right now is that in reality, a lot of people hated him at the time.

16
00:02:51.920 --> 00:03:00.920
and it wasn't just rich and callous reactionaries.

17
00:03:00.920 --> 00:03:09.920
Sometimes when the historians do recognize that people opposed Roosevelt and the New Deal,

18
00:03:09.920 --> 00:03:23.880
to Deal. They are quick to represent the opponents as Republican vested interests of throwbacks

19
00:03:23.880 --> 00:03:33.040
to the age of laissez-faire, which were hard enough to find by 1933 indeed, Republican

20
00:03:33.040 --> 00:03:41.400
or otherwise. But a great many ordinary people hated Roosevelt or at least disliked him enough

21
00:03:41.400 --> 00:03:49.200
to vote against him in elections. So even though he won reelection three times, some

22
00:03:49.200 --> 00:03:58.920
of those elections were not wildly lopsided. And even in the ones he won most easily, tens

23
00:03:58.920 --> 00:04:05.320
Millions and millions of people voted against him, so it wasn't just a few rich capitalists

24
00:04:05.320 --> 00:04:12.980
who disliked him and his policies, a lot of people did, but nonetheless he certainly perfected

25
00:04:12.980 --> 00:04:21.620
an apparatus for vote buying that succeeded better than any other such apparatus ever

26
00:04:21.620 --> 00:04:28.000
employed in American national politics, and in the circumstances it worked like a charm

27
00:04:28.000 --> 00:04:40.240
to keep him in office until the grim reaper relieved us of the great man.

28
00:04:40.240 --> 00:04:48.960
Let's take a look at the conditions that allowed Roosevelt to gain office and the New Deal policies

29
00:04:48.960 --> 00:05:00.000
to be implemented.

30
00:05:00.000 --> 00:05:09.840
The depression began probably about midway through 1929 if we look at the real economy

31
00:05:09.840 --> 00:05:14.780
as opposed to the financial markets which didn't really crash until the stock market

32
00:05:14.780 --> 00:05:22.700
crash in October. But many of the time series measuring the level of real economic activity

33
00:05:22.700 --> 00:05:29.100
reached their peaks about the middle of 1929. So the economy was already beginning to decline

34
00:05:29.100 --> 00:05:36.460
and then the stock market crash brought everybody's attention to the decline and contributed to

35
00:05:36.460 --> 00:05:44.700
further decline along with many other contributors. But the real gross national product ultimate

36
00:05:44.700 --> 00:05:57.700
failed by approximately 30% between 1929 and 1933 when it hit bottom and then began to bounce back some.

37
00:05:57.700 --> 00:06:09.700
During that slide, real investment spending declined by almost 90% and in fact there was so little investment spending

38
00:06:09.700 --> 00:06:33.700
I'm understanding that it was far from enough to make up for the depreciation of existing capital, so in fact, during those years, the capital stock of the country was wasting away because wear and tear was not being compensated.

39
00:06:33.700 --> 00:06:42.700
The prices fell a great deal for four years straight, and the Gross National Product deflator,

40
00:06:42.700 --> 00:06:47.700
which is a very broad-gauge price index, went down by 22%.

41
00:06:47.700 --> 00:06:51.700
Wholesale prices went down by about 30%.

42
00:06:51.700 --> 00:06:56.700
Consumer prices a little less.

43
00:06:56.700 --> 00:07:01.700
So there was deflation at the same time there was depression.

44
00:07:01.700 --> 00:07:14.700
Unfortunately, many people have attributed causal significance to that association ever since and have come to fear deflation as such,

45
00:07:14.700 --> 00:07:22.700
although it wasn't the deflation as such that was the problem at the time, it was the depression.

46
00:07:22.700 --> 00:07:35.700
The most important index of the depression for most people was the level of unemployment that was reached.

47
00:07:35.700 --> 00:07:47.700
I have here a graph of the unemployment rate measured as a proportion of a civilian labor force.

48
00:07:47.700 --> 00:08:08.700
You can see that prior to 1930, the only time that unemployment rate had moved above 10 percent, starting from 1890 onward, was during the depression of the mid 1890s.

49
00:08:08.700 --> 00:08:38.700
and then it got up into the range of 12 to 14 percent for three or four years in the mid 1890s, but normally the economy had an unemployment rate that bounced around in the neighborhood of five percent and we always expect a dynamic economy to have some unemployment because there are always adjustments being made in economic life, some businesses

50
00:08:38.700 --> 00:08:49.700
The businesses are closing or going broke and their workers have to find new places of employment which they don't do immediately for perfectly good economic reasons.

51
00:08:49.700 --> 00:08:57.700
They sometimes like to spend more time searching for the best opportunity before they accept employment.

52
00:08:57.700 --> 00:09:06.700
So there's always a certain amount of so-called frictional unemployment and it's because some industries may be declining relative to others,

53
00:09:06.700 --> 00:09:15.340
and declining in absolute terms, there's a shedding of labor that then has to relocate

54
00:09:15.340 --> 00:09:21.860
to other employment opportunities. So structural changes that were going on in a growing economy

55
00:09:21.860 --> 00:09:27.380
also contributed to some unemployment. So 5 percent is approximately what we would view

56
00:09:27.380 --> 00:09:48.380
It was about a normal level of unemployment in this economy, but we see now that very quickly in the early 1930s the unemployment rose to heights never reached before, not even approached before.

57
00:09:48.380 --> 00:10:06.380
And even though after 1933 the unemployment rate did fall a great deal for several years till 1937, even in 1937 it's barely dipped below 10% in what seemed to be a prosperous year.

58
00:10:06.380 --> 00:10:13.380
In fact, many people in 1937 were talking as if, well, the depression is about over.

59
00:10:13.380 --> 00:10:23.380
You know, we've been growing rapidly for four years now, and unemployment has fallen, and real production has risen, and we're just about out of this.

60
00:10:23.380 --> 00:10:42.380
But still, unemployment was almost 10 percent, and then it popped back up again, and the so-called depression within a depression began in 1937, and on an annual basis was worst in 1938.

61
00:10:42.380 --> 00:10:51.140
and that wiped out much of the progress that people thought had occurred and was

62
00:10:51.140 --> 00:10:56.900
a very deep depression by most standard measures the investment spending almost

63
00:10:56.900 --> 00:11:04.820
collapsed completely for a year or a year and a half and the stock market

64
00:11:04.820 --> 00:11:10.460
fell drastically and it was it was a very big depression if it weren't

65
00:11:10.460 --> 00:11:21.460
If we weren't embedded in this gigantic, long Great Depression, it would be viewed as the third worst business slump in our history.

66
00:11:21.460 --> 00:11:32.460
But most people don't even know it happened because I guess it's a little like getting pneumonia when you're fighting leukemia or something.

67
00:11:32.460 --> 00:11:39.460
You've got bigger troubles going on, and who's going to pay a lot of attention to this other one?

68
00:11:39.460 --> 00:11:50.460
But finally, in the early 1940s, we see the unemployment rate drop and fall to almost disappear during the war.

69
00:11:50.460 --> 00:12:01.460
And that, of course, people misinterpreted, too, by presuming that the government's spending for war purposes

70
00:12:01.460 --> 00:12:24.460
had in a Keynesian type fashion been responsible for economic recovery and this was a bona fide recovery like the ones that take place in civilian circumstances but it was very different because of the war conditions and I'll talk about them in a later talk.

71
00:12:24.460 --> 00:12:35.460
The point of this graph that's, I hope, clear enough is that this was an extraordinary time, and it lasted a long time.

72
00:12:35.460 --> 00:12:42.460
I mean, we look at this, and there's a whole century of experience displayed there, so it doesn't look very long,

73
00:12:42.460 --> 00:12:50.460
but if, say, you were a young person that grew up and started looking for work in the early 1930s,

74
00:12:50.460 --> 00:12:56.960
It must have seemed like forever that it was hard to find a decent job.

75
00:12:56.960 --> 00:13:03.960
In fact, a lot of young people never had a proper job for the whole decade

76
00:13:03.960 --> 00:13:09.960
because there were so many workers looking for jobs that employers had their pick.

77
00:13:09.960 --> 00:13:11.960
They could be very choosy.

78
00:13:11.960 --> 00:13:15.460
And there were all kinds of anecdotes that went around about, say,

79
00:13:15.460 --> 00:13:29.860
A gas station needs somebody to pump gas, so it puts up a sign, help wanted, and a hundred guys show up standing in line to interview for the job, and the gas station owner comes out and says,

80
00:13:29.860 --> 00:13:33.500
All right, everybody's not a college graduate, drop out of the line.

81
00:13:33.500 --> 00:13:47.140
As if that were necessary to do the job, but you could set all kinds of extraordinary conditions and still hire somebody.

82
00:13:47.140 --> 00:13:49.660
Amazing things happened.

83
00:13:49.660 --> 00:13:59.620
Thousands of American engineers, unable to find employment in engineering, went to the Soviet Union

84
00:13:59.620 --> 00:14:08.020
to work in Stalin's industrialization program, building factories in Russia.

85
00:14:08.020 --> 00:14:10.620
Amazing.

86
00:14:10.620 --> 00:14:20.260
And some lines of work in some industries, some places, it wasn't 15% or 20% or 25% unemployment.

87
00:14:20.260 --> 00:14:28.580
It was 50% or 75% unemployment, depending on the specialty.

88
00:14:28.580 --> 00:14:36.300
While real production fell by 30%, construction fell by almost 80%.

89
00:14:36.300 --> 00:14:45.300
So if you were a worker with a construction skill, whether it's architect, engineer, or carpenter, plumber, whatever,

90
00:14:45.300 --> 00:14:53.500
unemployment rates were extraordinary. There just was hardly any construction going on in the early 1930s.

91
00:14:53.500 --> 00:15:06.860
So you had to look for some other kind of work or move to some unusual place and people resorted to all of these measures to try to cope.

92
00:15:06.860 --> 00:15:12.140
They did various inventive and desperate things.

93
00:15:12.140 --> 00:15:19.140
My family had a whole collection of family lore about how my father managed to survive during the 1930s.

94
00:15:19.140 --> 00:15:49.140
And for a while, he chopped wood, and he would chop a quart of wood, and if you know how much that is, it's quite a large stack of chopped wood, for a dollar, he'd get paid for chopping a quart of wood, on one occasion, he and my mother and my older brother, I wasn't born then, but they moved to Arizona and lived in a tent

95
00:15:49.140 --> 00:15:56.420
And picked cotton somewhere in the outskirts of Phoenix because they wanted cotton pickers

96
00:15:56.420 --> 00:16:03.060
out there and that was something they knew about and went out to find work.

97
00:16:03.060 --> 00:16:12.220
So people did extraordinary things and of course many people who weren't as willing

98
00:16:12.220 --> 00:16:19.500
or as able to do extraordinary things, were happy to go on the government dole when government

99
00:16:19.500 --> 00:16:31.580
doles came along and were made available to them. Those were still times when many Americans

100
00:16:31.580 --> 00:16:40.220
thought that was wrong. To go on the dole, period. My family was like that. That was

101
00:16:40.220 --> 00:16:53.420
was just a shameful thing, so they didn't, but even people who had felt that way before,

102
00:16:53.420 --> 00:17:01.500
after years and years and years of hardship, began to say, well, okay, I'll go on the government

103
00:17:01.500 --> 00:17:10.700
Joel. I don't see very many good alternatives. So these conditions were calculated, as it

104
00:17:10.700 --> 00:17:17.900
were, to grind down people's moral sensibilities, to make them more desperate and more willing

105
00:17:17.900 --> 00:17:26.920
to turn to government measures that they otherwise would have objected to, if not on practical

106
00:17:26.920 --> 00:17:48.920
This decade had a profound effect on the character of the American people, for the worse, much for the worse.

107
00:17:48.920 --> 00:17:58.460
Well, after this initial slide went on for four years running and things reached such abysmal depths,

108
00:17:58.460 --> 00:18:06.680
a great many people had grown quite desperate for some way to stop it and improve the situation.

109
00:18:06.680 --> 00:18:13.960
And to understand the New Deal, we really have to understand that sense of desperation

110
00:18:13.960 --> 00:18:23.320
that existed by the time Franklin Roosevelt took office because it was that atmosphere

111
00:18:23.320 --> 00:18:31.000
in which all of these New Deal proposals were put forward and enacted into law and put into

112
00:18:31.000 --> 00:18:40.200
practice. These things were not thrust upon people. In fact, one of the remarkable attributes

113
00:18:40.200 --> 00:18:49.960
of those conditions in 1933 was that the scope of the interest groups and types of people

114
00:18:49.960 --> 00:18:56.640
clamoring for government aid was very, very wide. It wasn't, for example, like the depression

115
00:18:56.640 --> 00:19:05.240
of the 90s when unemployed people and farmers tried to press for government assistance especially.

116
00:19:05.240 --> 00:19:12.720
Now we've got everybody from rich capitalists down through middle class homeowners and farmers

117
00:19:12.720 --> 00:19:17.800
who own land down to unemployed people at the other end of the scale.

118
00:19:17.800 --> 00:19:23.280
Everybody is now clamoring for some kind of aid from the only place they see as capable

119
00:19:23.280 --> 00:19:26.640
of providing it, government.

120
00:19:26.640 --> 00:19:32.920
Many of them had become convinced by 1933 that the market system just had broken down.

121
00:19:32.920 --> 00:19:39.920
Now you look around and say, it doesn't work anymore. Don't tell me old Adam Smith stuff. Look around you.

122
00:19:39.920 --> 00:19:46.920
The machine is busted. The only way out is through government assistance.

123
00:19:46.920 --> 00:19:56.920
Yes, yes, I know, that's not the American way, but this is a different situation.

124
00:19:56.920 --> 00:20:02.920
So they said, okay, what can government do for us? What kind of help can it provide?

125
00:20:02.920 --> 00:20:16.920
Now, when we think about the New Deal, it's hard to hold it in our hand without it slipping away because it's not a coherent thing.

126
00:20:16.920 --> 00:20:22.920
It's not a program or a plan that all hangs together logically.

127
00:20:22.920 --> 00:20:42.920
In fact, very often it seems to be a whole collection of programs that war with one another because one kind of New Deal program has an effect on variable X to move it upward at the same time that another New Deal program has an effect on variable X to move it downward.

128
00:20:42.920 --> 00:20:55.920
So it looks as if this is just a hodgepodge of things that don't make any sense, and I think we need to recognize that ideologically it doesn't make any sense.

129
00:20:55.920 --> 00:21:05.920
That it's a mass of expedience. The only common denominator here is it's all something being done by government.

130
00:21:05.920 --> 00:21:11.200
and in many cases, not all, but many, federal government,

131
00:21:11.200 --> 00:21:14.720
many of the things that had never been done before,

132
00:21:14.720 --> 00:21:20.000
at least at the federal level of government, if at any level.

133
00:21:20.000 --> 00:21:26.960
So we get every kind of political view coming into play here,

134
00:21:26.960 --> 00:21:31.760
with the possible exception of classical liberalism, I suppose.

135
00:21:31.760 --> 00:21:39.520
they didn't have a lot of input into the New Deal but classical liberals were hard to find in 1933

136
00:21:40.160 --> 00:21:48.400
and even people that you might think is not just classical liberal but paragons of classical

137
00:21:48.400 --> 00:21:55.040
liberalism people like some of the professors at the University of Chicago you know Frank Knight

138
00:21:55.040 --> 00:22:06.040
Simons, Viner, you go back and you look at some of the measures that were being proposed

139
00:22:06.040 --> 00:22:16.200
and tried in 1933 and you'll find these guys signing their names to support them. So classical

140
00:22:16.200 --> 00:22:24.860
Social liberalism really didn't have many people manning the barricades at the time.

141
00:22:24.860 --> 00:22:30.000
Some of them came back to life later on and regretted, I think, their having lost the

142
00:22:30.000 --> 00:22:34.820
faith in the pit of the depression.

143
00:22:34.820 --> 00:22:40.760
But we have people of all sorts of views and schemes.

144
00:22:40.760 --> 00:22:56.260
If you just look at Roosevelt's brain-trusters, for example, you've got on the one hand Rexford Tugwell, who's a near-communist, I guess you could say.

145
00:22:56.260 --> 00:23:09.760
He certainly believed in socialism. He was one of the many naive Americans who had taken the ritual journey to the Soviet Union and had come back quite enthusiastic about what he had seen.

146
00:23:09.760 --> 00:23:27.760
We all know how they were toured around and kept out of sight of the reality, but at all events, he believed in planning and nationalization of industry, of central direction by the government.

147
00:23:27.760 --> 00:23:38.760
He wanted the government to even take over land ownership, so that they would have central planning of agriculture.

148
00:23:38.760 --> 00:23:56.760
That's enough to give a Misesian a real headache, but there's Tugwell on the one hand, and then there's Hugh Johnson, who's a cartellizer, a big business flack.

149
00:23:56.760 --> 00:24:05.760
On the other, he certainly doesn't want to eliminate private property in the formal sense, at least.

150
00:24:05.760 --> 00:24:14.760
Although he certainly wants a little fascistic organization for the assistance of his government keepers.

151
00:24:14.760 --> 00:24:23.760
There's Molle, Raymond Molle. Molle doesn't know anything. He's specialized in criminology,

152
00:24:23.760 --> 00:24:31.760
But he's kind of a middle-of-the-road new dealer who's willing to try anything, but not anything real radical.

153
00:24:31.760 --> 00:24:33.760
So these guys are all over the place.

154
00:24:33.760 --> 00:24:42.760
And if you look beyond the brain trust to all the people who are involved in making proposals or implementing proposals,

155
00:24:42.760 --> 00:24:49.760
they range from people who have monetary crank schemes like George Warren,

156
00:24:49.760 --> 00:24:54.760
The Cornell professor who thought if we raised the price of gold, we'd raise the price of everything.

157
00:24:54.760 --> 00:25:02.760
If so facto, just like that. His statistical work had proven it.

158
00:25:02.760 --> 00:25:11.760
To leftover populace who wanted the government to print paper money and give it to farmers.

159
00:25:11.760 --> 00:25:24.760
To big businessmen like Gerard Swope, the head of General Electric Corporation, who wanted to cartelize all of industry and let businessmen run the cartels.

160
00:25:24.760 --> 00:25:36.760
To do-gooders who wanted the government to come on board and set minimally decent conditions for women and children working in industry.

161
00:25:36.760 --> 00:26:00.760
and it just goes on and on, labor unionists, they're all part of the new deal and they obviously are very strange bedfellows ideologically or practically, but they're all in there and so we need to bear that in mind, otherwise we'll never understand how this thing came into being or how it worked.

162
00:26:00.760 --> 00:26:20.760
The second thing I think that is helpful is to recognize the extent to which New Deal programs just brought back to life the programs that had been used during World War I by the Wilson administration.

163
00:26:20.760 --> 00:26:38.260
Now, in some ways, you can see immediately that that's what you would expect because, look, after Wilson left office, the Republicans have had control of the bureaucracy and sometimes the Congress, too, until the New Deal starts.

164
00:26:38.260 --> 00:26:48.260
So now, all of these Democrats who've been living in the wilderness for 12 years are suddenly back, you know, they've left their haunts nowadays, you know, when this happens.

165
00:26:48.260 --> 00:26:53.260
These guys bail out of the Brookings Institution and go back into the Federal bureaucracy.

166
00:26:53.260 --> 00:27:00.260
Well, Brookings had just got started back in those days, so it couldn't warehouse as many Democrats out of office.

167
00:27:00.260 --> 00:27:05.260
But they found places out there and waited their turn, and now their turn has come again.

168
00:27:05.260 --> 00:27:09.260
And they come back wanting to do the same kinds of things they used to do.

169
00:27:09.260 --> 00:27:17.260
So it's natural that they would want to reinvent the war finance corporation and reinvent the food administration

170
00:27:17.260 --> 00:27:22.260
and Re-Invent the War Industries Board and all the rest of it.

171
00:27:22.260 --> 00:27:29.260
But the other thing that is important and affected far more people

172
00:27:29.260 --> 00:27:36.260
is that many people had come away from World War I with the idea,

173
00:27:36.260 --> 00:27:41.260
which I suggested this morning was planted there by Bernard Baruch and his friends,

174
00:27:41.260 --> 00:27:48.260
that World War I had been an example of very successful government economic management.

175
00:27:48.260 --> 00:27:58.260
So they readily swallowed a kind of analogy which was that World War I was a great national emergency

176
00:27:58.260 --> 00:28:02.260
and we dealt with it with programs of this sort.

177
00:28:02.260 --> 00:28:09.260
We're now in a terrible economic depression which is a national emergency.

178
00:28:09.260 --> 00:28:16.260
So we know how to deal with national emergencies. We've dealt with them before. Let's do it the same way we did last time.

179
00:28:16.260 --> 00:28:32.260
Of course, the analogy was totally far-fetched. The sense in which World War I had constituted a national emergency was totally different from the sense in which the Great Depression constituted a national emergency.

180
00:28:32.260 --> 00:28:41.260
So it was a very faulty logic, but nonetheless it was one that had a kind of gut-level appeal.

181
00:28:41.260 --> 00:28:52.260
And when people thought about proposals they were sometimes easily led to accept those proposals on grounds no stronger than that.

182
00:28:52.260 --> 00:29:01.260
The third element that many of these proposals and programs shared was that they sought to raise prices.

183
00:29:01.260 --> 00:29:15.260
As I said, there had been a lot of deflation somewhere, depending on the price you looked at, between 20 and 30 percent or even more. Farm prices fell by more than 50 percent on average.

184
00:29:15.260 --> 00:29:30.260
So people looked around and of course if you were selling good or service X and its price had fallen, you thought to yourself, I'd be a lot better off if I could get a higher price for what I sell.

185
00:29:30.260 --> 00:29:33.860
The problem is prices are too low.

186
00:29:33.860 --> 00:29:38.100
Well, yeah, for every individual that could be viewed as a problem.

187
00:29:38.100 --> 00:29:43.380
But, of course, it's completely different if all prices have fallen.

188
00:29:43.380 --> 00:29:48.900
And your problem won't necessarily be solved, of course, if all prices are raised.

189
00:29:48.900 --> 00:29:53.220
But people viewed this matter piecemeal.

190
00:29:53.220 --> 00:29:56.820
Farmers said, we need to get farm prices up.

191
00:29:56.820 --> 00:30:04.820
Of course, if prices they paid for labor and materials and equipment and everything else went up accordingly, they wouldn't be any better off.

192
00:30:04.820 --> 00:30:09.820
But they didn't think of it that way. What we're doing is trying to raise farm prices.

193
00:30:09.820 --> 00:30:16.820
Manufacturers are trying to raise the price of cars or refrigerators or whatever they had to sell.

194
00:30:16.820 --> 00:30:22.820
And so people looked at this as a question of price raising. The term was reflation at the time.

195
00:30:22.820 --> 00:30:39.820
They were seeking reflation, and many of the New Deal programs aimed to achieve reflation, in many cases, bizarrely, by supply restrictions.

196
00:30:39.820 --> 00:30:59.820
And again, if you think in terms of partial analysis, if you think in terms of one industry at a time or one commodity at a time, well yes, restricting supply, other things being equal, will cause a higher price to prevail in the market.

197
00:30:59.820 --> 00:31:07.820
But if we have an anti-depression policy that consists of restricting supply across the board,

198
00:31:07.820 --> 00:31:14.820
that's simply ensuring that the whole economy's real output falls even farther.

199
00:31:14.820 --> 00:31:20.820
That's what the depression really consists of, is low levels of producing real goods and services.

200
00:31:20.820 --> 00:31:30.160
Services. So this was a kind of policy guaranteed to fail when implemented on a wide scale.

201
00:31:30.160 --> 00:31:37.220
But that's how it was implemented. And particularly when it worked through the War Industries Board,

202
00:31:37.220 --> 00:31:46.100
which affected most of the manufacturing sector of the economy, it was responsible for drastically

203
00:31:46.100 --> 00:31:56.080
slowing the economy's recovery after 1933. We've seen it did recover some, but without

204
00:31:56.080 --> 00:32:02.480
the National Recovery Administration, it would have recovered much quicker. But people were

205
00:32:02.480 --> 00:32:10.100
trying to raise prices. One other attribute that we see of the events of that period is

206
00:32:10.100 --> 00:32:32.100
is that they gave rise to a great deal of centralization of government activity, functions that had been performed before at some level of government such as relief of the unemployed and the destitute that had been overwhelmingly done by local governments in this country for centuries.

207
00:32:32.100 --> 00:32:39.700
Towns, Counties made efforts to relieve people who were impoverished.

208
00:32:39.700 --> 00:32:44.460
Every county had what used to be known as the poor house where you could house people

209
00:32:44.460 --> 00:32:46.460
who were destitute.

210
00:32:46.460 --> 00:32:51.580
Cities during business slumps would set up soup lines where at least you could go get

211
00:32:51.580 --> 00:32:59.700
something to eat at the expense of the city if you were out of work and didn't have any

212
00:32:59.700 --> 00:33:01.580
food.

213
00:33:01.580 --> 00:33:11.580
During the New Deal, welfare and relief came to be much more centralized at the federal level.

214
00:33:11.580 --> 00:33:18.580
The federal government had never undertaken to provide those kinds of benefits to people before, at all.

215
00:33:18.580 --> 00:33:24.580
It hadn't even been willing to subsidize states and local governments doing so.

216
00:33:24.580 --> 00:33:33.580
But beginning in 1932, when Hoover was still in office, the federal government did begin to make loans.

217
00:33:33.580 --> 00:33:39.580
It turned out they were actually gifts because subsequently the loans were forgiven.

218
00:33:39.580 --> 00:33:53.580
Loans to states so that the states would have the funds to pay for more provision of relief to unemployed and destitute people.

219
00:33:53.580 --> 00:34:05.580
So, in many, many ways, the government became more centralized as a result of the way the New Deal policies were constructed.

220
00:34:05.580 --> 00:34:15.580
I'll come back in a minute to this final aspect having to do with the distinction between the early and the later New Deal.

221
00:34:15.580 --> 00:34:35.580
Now, there's so many things that happened, I can barely even list them, much less say anything intelligent about them in a few minutes here, but I just want to touch on some of the high points and make a few comments that I hope are worthwhile.

222
00:34:35.580 --> 00:34:43.380
Well, as I said, the farmers were suffering disproportionately, and in fact, in some places,

223
00:34:43.380 --> 00:34:50.380
so much so that they were becoming violent. Farmers were having their farms repossessed

224
00:34:50.380 --> 00:34:56.860
when they were unable to make payments on their mortgages, so the mortgage holders,

225
00:34:56.860 --> 00:35:05.100
as the lending agreements provided for, were taking the security when they weren't receiving

226
00:35:05.100 --> 00:35:13.460
In the interest that was due, well, okay, you might say the farmers had agreed to this.

227
00:35:13.460 --> 00:35:18.100
This was a term of the contract they'd entered into.

228
00:35:18.100 --> 00:35:25.340
But that's a hard thing to stomach, particularly if this is a farm that you've lived on your

229
00:35:25.340 --> 00:35:28.000
whole life.

230
00:35:28.000 --> 00:35:30.940
Maybe your parents lived there.

231
00:35:30.940 --> 00:35:32.080
Maybe you were born there.

232
00:35:32.080 --> 00:35:33.660
This is not just a farm.

233
00:35:33.660 --> 00:35:48.660
It's not just a piece of security for a loan. It's, on the one hand, your livelihood, and on the other, maybe, it's a lot more than that.

234
00:35:48.660 --> 00:35:58.660
So a lot of these farmers took offense to having insurance companies or bankers come around with the sheriff and tell them, you've got to get out of here.

235
00:35:58.660 --> 00:36:05.660
This is not your land anymore, it's not your farmhouse, and particularly out in the Midwest,

236
00:36:05.660 --> 00:36:10.860
some of them became violent, and when the sheriff came around or when the bankers came

237
00:36:10.860 --> 00:36:17.420
around to tell them they were going to be put off of their property, they threatened

238
00:36:17.420 --> 00:36:23.580
to shoot these people, and in some cases, they resorted to going after them, beating

239
00:36:23.580 --> 00:36:52.580
In 1932-34, 25 states passed stay laws on mortgage obligations, and that allowed people

240
00:36:52.580 --> 00:37:00.940
People who were in a position to be foreclosed on, to have more time to repay, and in some

241
00:37:00.940 --> 00:37:06.780
cases actually change the terms of what they owed.

242
00:37:06.780 --> 00:37:12.400
This was a classic case of what you might call interference with the obligation of contract,

243
00:37:12.400 --> 00:37:18.860
to use the words of the United States Constitution, and in fact it was precisely this sort of

244
00:37:18.860 --> 00:37:26.580
The thing, actually, this event applicable to farm mortgages that had caused the trouble

245
00:37:26.580 --> 00:37:32.460
that led the framers of the Constitution to put that language in there to begin with,

246
00:37:32.460 --> 00:37:39.700
because it was not the first time that this situation had arisen and the debtors had prevailed

247
00:37:39.700 --> 00:37:44.480
on state governments to help them out, to give them more time or to scale down what

248
00:37:44.480 --> 00:37:49.640
and what they owed and had brought forth some plausible argument.

249
00:37:49.640 --> 00:37:55.080
They came forward and they said, look, I borrowed this money, sure enough.

250
00:37:55.080 --> 00:38:00.160
But when I borrowed it, you know, the money was worth a lot less than it is now.

251
00:38:00.160 --> 00:38:04.360
So these banks are asking me to repay $100.

252
00:38:04.360 --> 00:38:10.820
That's a lot more real purchasing power than I borrowed from them or that I promised to

253
00:38:10.820 --> 00:38:18.260
Repay, so that's not right. And it's often in these changes, in these situations where

254
00:38:18.260 --> 00:38:24.360
the price level is fluctuated violently, that we see these kinds of conflicts between borrowers

255
00:38:24.360 --> 00:38:31.340
and lenders, because that's precisely what gets deranged. These contracts have an inter-temporal

256
00:38:31.340 --> 00:38:37.580
dimension. They're all premised on somebody's forecast of what the price level will be in

257
00:38:37.580 --> 00:38:44.300
in the future when certain money obligations are due and if people misforecast and make

258
00:38:44.300 --> 00:38:49.820
mistakes they get themselves in deep economic trouble and that's what the farmers had done

259
00:38:49.820 --> 00:38:56.560
who tended to be debtors and found themselves with real repayment obligations much greater

260
00:38:56.560 --> 00:39:01.220
than they had expected they would have even without that they would have been having enough

261
00:39:01.220 --> 00:39:08.780
have trouble. Things were difficult as it was, but that made their situation much worse.

262
00:39:08.780 --> 00:39:15.580
So these states did pass the mortgage moratoria, and they were challenged on constitutional

263
00:39:15.580 --> 00:39:24.280
grounds and taken to the U.S. Supreme Court, which actually ruled that the states could

264
00:39:24.280 --> 00:39:34.820
do that. It was one of those less than crystal clear decisions, but the upshot of it was

265
00:39:34.820 --> 00:39:41.400
that the U.S. Supreme Court did not strike down the Minnesota Moratorium Law, which was

266
00:39:41.400 --> 00:39:49.080
the one under challenge and therefore all the others that were like it at the time.

267
00:39:49.080 --> 00:39:59.240
Businessmen were losing money hand over fist in most cases. In 1931, 32, 33, net corporate

268
00:39:59.240 --> 00:40:06.320
profits were negative every year. It didn't mean every single business in America lost

269
00:40:06.320 --> 00:40:12.000
money of course, but it meant that if you take all the losses, they're bigger than all

270
00:40:12.000 --> 00:40:22.000
and all the gains. So, there had never been anything like that before. There had never been a time when net earnings of business were negative three years running.

271
00:40:22.000 --> 00:40:35.000
So, businessmen, everybody from General Electric and General Motors down to Mom and Pop, were very apprehensive about their ability to remain in business.

272
00:40:35.000 --> 00:40:45.000
and of course the failure rate of businesses skyrocketed in those years and many people did in fact go broke and lose their investments.

273
00:40:45.000 --> 00:41:00.000
So businessmen were in all sorts of ways clamoring for some kind of bailout and eventually that pressure coalesced in large part

274
00:41:00.000 --> 00:41:09.440
in support of the National Industrial Recovery Act, passed in the spring of 1933, administered

275
00:41:09.440 --> 00:41:18.500
by the National Recovery Administration, NRA, which authorized businessmen to get together

276
00:41:18.500 --> 00:41:24.600
and form so-called codes of fair competition.

277
00:41:24.600 --> 00:41:31.560
If you apply Higgs' Rule of Political Rhetoric to this term by simply reversing it in order

278
00:41:31.560 --> 00:41:36.680
to find its actual meaning, what you find, of course, is that these were all intended

279
00:41:36.680 --> 00:41:45.680
to suppress competition, and they did that in endless variety of ways. Each industry

280
00:41:45.680 --> 00:41:54.320
Industry had a different kind of regulations, it concocted, and even though supposedly workers

281
00:41:54.320 --> 00:41:59.060
and the public were involved along with businessmen in writing these codes, they were written

282
00:41:59.060 --> 00:42:07.020
almost exclusively by the bigger business owners in each industry, eventually some 750

283
00:42:07.020 --> 00:42:13.780
of them were written and approved by the government, and it didn't do any good to have principles

284
00:42:13.780 --> 00:42:20.780
Because if you didn't get together in your industry and write one, the government would impose one on you.

285
00:42:20.780 --> 00:42:30.500
So the New Deal lawyers would sit down and if you and the nuts and bolts industry hadn't produced a code of fair competition,

286
00:42:30.500 --> 00:42:34.460
they would write one and impose it on you that was legally binding.

287
00:42:34.460 --> 00:42:41.380
So, of course, all businessmen decided it was better to try to design this thing ourselves

288
00:42:41.380 --> 00:42:50.220
than to have these young Harvard grads in Washington, D.C. do it and force it on us.

289
00:42:50.220 --> 00:42:56.740
So that's what people did and they, in some cases, suppressed competition by imposing

290
00:42:56.740 --> 00:43:03.100
standardization on products because, of course, one of the ways that people compete is by

291
00:43:03.100 --> 00:43:06.100
by differentiating their products.

292
00:43:06.100 --> 00:43:09.620
My product's designed differently or performs differently from yours.

293
00:43:09.620 --> 00:43:10.620
It's better.

294
00:43:10.620 --> 00:43:15.820
Well, I mean, I'll compete your product.

295
00:43:15.820 --> 00:43:21.380
If we're going to cut competition, we've got to get rid of that kind of behavior.

296
00:43:21.380 --> 00:43:31.500
A lot of reporting requirements went in so that the making of better deals that is, again,

297
00:43:31.500 --> 00:43:36.260
One of the standard ways that businessmen compete, you know, I give you better financing terms

298
00:43:36.260 --> 00:43:41.760
or I give you quicker delivery or I give you more additional services or maintenance or

299
00:43:41.760 --> 00:43:48.700
whatever it is that I have as part of our agreement, if my competitors don't know how

300
00:43:48.700 --> 00:43:55.620
I'm sweetening the deal, then they can't so readily meet my terms and get those customers

301
00:43:55.620 --> 00:44:00.260
back from me or prevent them from ever switching to begin with.

302
00:44:00.260 --> 00:44:23.260
So many of these codes required businessmen to report all kinds of details about the business they were doing and thereby reveal, make public to everybody in the industry what the transactions were and prevent sweet deals from being made without the knowledge of other members of the industry.

303
00:44:23.260 --> 00:44:33.260
and it just went on and on and on. In some cases they put restrictions on how much time plants could be operated

304
00:44:33.260 --> 00:44:40.260
so that, you know, if my business happens to be so good that I'm just running two shifts a day,

305
00:44:40.260 --> 00:44:48.260
well, maybe if I were restricted and could only run one shift a day, then I wouldn't be able to serve as many customers

306
00:44:48.260 --> 00:45:14.260
There's no end to the number of ways that have kind of a plausible rationale about them and yet if you approach them by asking what is the effect of this provision on competition, you find in every instance the effect is to diminish the vitality of competition.

307
00:45:14.260 --> 00:45:32.260
And so we got all of these codes that you can think of as cartel agreements, not necessarily classic type cartel agreements of dividing a market by area or fixing a price, but serving the same purpose.

308
00:45:32.260 --> 00:45:41.260
That was similar to what the fascists had done in Italy under Mussolini.

309
00:45:41.260 --> 00:45:51.260
And at the time, Mussolini's economic policies had many adherents in the United States.

310
00:45:51.260 --> 00:45:57.260
And if you go back and read the periodicals of the early 30s,

311
00:45:57.260 --> 00:46:13.260
May be astonished to find businessmen and journalists and politicians all writing so favorably about Mussolini and the great job he was doing with the Italian economy and suggesting that that's what we need in more ways than one.

312
00:46:13.260 --> 00:46:24.260
We not only need to organize industry the way Mussolini has done in Italy by getting labor and government and business together and that kind of cooperation.

313
00:46:24.260 --> 00:46:26.940
Cooperation sounds like a good idea, right?

314
00:46:26.940 --> 00:46:30.820
Of course, if they had looked into how the Italian system worked, they would have found

315
00:46:30.820 --> 00:46:37.940
that the cooperation was all people doing what the government told them to do, that

316
00:46:37.940 --> 00:46:44.540
these fascist organizations were all frauds, and in fact, the government dictated the rules

317
00:46:44.540 --> 00:46:52.080
from top to bottom, but nonetheless, many people at the time thought not only that business

318
00:46:52.080 --> 00:47:04.080
and Business Government, cooperation sounded like a good idea, I mean, diminished conflict, right, have a more harmonious world, but they also like the idea of having a dictator.

319
00:47:04.080 --> 00:47:12.080
It may be the only time in American history where people openly espoused dictatorship.

320
00:47:12.080 --> 00:47:17.080
They looked around and said, look, our politicians just do nothing.

321
00:47:17.080 --> 00:47:23.080
Here we are, we're floundering in this terrible situation. They can't seem to act.

322
00:47:23.080 --> 00:47:34.080
We've got too much gridlock. We need a dictator, somebody who can really take charge and get something done, like Mussolini.

323
00:47:34.080 --> 00:47:43.080
So this was the climate of the early 30s that gave rise to the NIRA.

324
00:47:43.080 --> 00:47:55.080
Now, of course, no sooner had they created these monstrosities than many people discovered that they didn't deliver what they had expected them to deliver.

325
00:47:55.080 --> 00:47:57.080
The benefits were not forthcoming.

326
00:47:57.080 --> 00:48:08.080
Labor unions had signed up for the NIRA because it had provisions that required every code to provide for collective bargaining.

327
00:48:08.080 --> 00:48:38.080
and that's what they've been trying to get the government to support for a long long time so great this is wonderful we'll be able to organize like gangbusters now because people will have to recognize our unions and bargain collectively with us but it didn't work out very well and in a lot of cases businessmen still wouldn't recognize and bargained with unionists when they came forward and in addition

328
00:48:38.080 --> 00:48:51.080
It was clear that the whole set up was being created and administered by business people and the unionists were just tokens in this apparatus and no one was paying much real attention to them.

329
00:48:51.080 --> 00:49:05.080
Even the businessmen, once they got their code authorities in operation, began to resent them because the government, which they thought was just going to endow them with this wonderful authority

330
00:49:05.080 --> 00:49:10.640
and then step aside and let them wield it as they thought best, didn't step aside.

331
00:49:10.640 --> 00:49:15.200
Bureaucrats kept showing up over and over, wanting to see reports, wanting to talk to

332
00:49:15.200 --> 00:49:21.000
them about this and that, wanting to see what they were doing, and this kind of chronic

333
00:49:21.000 --> 00:49:26.160
meddling by government officials was new to them. They never had to tolerate that before

334
00:49:26.160 --> 00:49:32.360
except briefly during World War I. So they began to think, well, that isn't what we

335
00:49:32.360 --> 00:49:38.200
This isn't working out.

336
00:49:38.200 --> 00:49:44.640
And furthermore, many of them discovered that the very purpose of these schemes, the reflation,

337
00:49:44.640 --> 00:49:46.840
wasn't working out either.

338
00:49:46.840 --> 00:49:51.200
If you go back and look at what happened to prices after 1933, there's a little bounce

339
00:49:51.200 --> 00:49:58.260
up in 1934, maybe 6 or 7 percent increase in prices, and that's it.

340
00:49:58.260 --> 00:50:02.120
Price index is hardly budged for the rest of the decade.

341
00:50:02.120 --> 00:50:07.240
So these people who had just had their prices fall by 20, 30, 40 percent depending on the

342
00:50:07.240 --> 00:50:12.240
industry, wanting to go back to where they were and they're not even getting close to

343
00:50:12.240 --> 00:50:18.460
prices they used to charge for their goods. So they're saying, this isn't delivering

344
00:50:18.460 --> 00:50:23.900
the goods, this is not what we thought we had accomplished and yet we have to put up

345
00:50:23.900 --> 00:50:28.800
with all this meddling by government officials and lawyers and people asking us to send in

346
00:50:28.800 --> 00:50:31.840
and reports every week or every month.

347
00:50:31.840 --> 00:50:39.560
So a lot of people became badly disillusioned by the National Recovery Scheme.

348
00:50:39.560 --> 00:50:46.620
It had provisions in there besides authorizing labor unionization, provisions for minimum

349
00:50:46.620 --> 00:50:58.640
wages and for setting working conditions at decent levels, and that turned out to have

350
00:50:58.640 --> 00:51:03.840
have considerable effect, particularly in some industries and places.

351
00:51:03.840 --> 00:51:26.840
If you were to look, for example, at wages, let's take the wage level out here and look

352
00:51:26.840 --> 00:51:30.840
The frequency with which that wage rate is paid up here.

353
00:51:30.840 --> 00:51:42.840
You'd find a distribution of wages in any industry, and let's say we look at people who work in the lumber industry in the south.

354
00:51:42.840 --> 00:51:49.840
That was a big southern industry in those days, and we'd find a distribution that looks like that.

355
00:51:49.840 --> 00:51:58.840
Most of the workers have relatively low wages, and then as we go out, we find a few have higher wage levels.

356
00:51:58.840 --> 00:52:05.840
In fact, that is the general shape of the wage distribution for almost any kind of work we can think of.

357
00:52:05.840 --> 00:52:17.840
Well, what happened was that when they put these NRA minimum wages into effect, they were set at levels like 25 cents an hour.

358
00:52:17.840 --> 00:52:27.840
Well, if we take southern lumber workers, we'd find that 25 cents is right here.

359
00:52:27.840 --> 00:52:39.840
So any wage lower than that can no longer be legally paid under this scheme.

360
00:52:39.840 --> 00:52:46.840
Well, here are all these workers who used to work at some wage less than 25 cents an hour.

361
00:52:46.840 --> 00:52:55.920
and employers now simply discover that they're not worth hiring anymore so they

362
00:52:55.920 --> 00:53:03.040
lay them off they fire them and a great many southern workers and workers in

363
00:53:03.040 --> 00:53:07.560
other low-wage regions and low-wage industries and occupations found

364
00:53:07.560 --> 00:53:16.760
themselves suddenly out of work because of the NRA minimum wage and for that

365
00:53:16.760 --> 00:53:44.760
For that reason, the NRA came to be known among many blacks as the Negro Removal Administration and correctly known for that because blacks tended to work in relatively low-wage occupations and low-wage industries

366
00:53:44.760 --> 00:53:51.160
and so they were disproportionately affected by that provision.

367
00:53:51.160 --> 00:53:57.620
At the same time, in agriculture, provisions for administering agricultural benefits were

368
00:53:57.620 --> 00:54:04.680
structured in such a way that landowners received payments, even when landowners operated their

369
00:54:04.680 --> 00:54:08.740
farms with tenant labor.

370
00:54:08.740 --> 00:54:20.580
So the landowners got rid of anybody who might have a competing claim to receive farm benefits

371
00:54:20.580 --> 00:54:26.780
from the federal government and the result was that a lot of tenants were dismissed and

372
00:54:26.780 --> 00:54:34.180
replaced by wage workers and then the farm owner raked in the benefits that were coming

373
00:54:34.180 --> 00:54:36.860
from the federal government.

374
00:54:36.860 --> 00:54:43.100
So once again the effect of that in the south was that a lot of black farm tenants found

375
00:54:43.100 --> 00:54:50.780
themselves dismissed or asked to change their status and become wage workers and many of

376
00:54:50.780 --> 00:54:53.580
them were just let go.

377
00:54:53.580 --> 00:55:00.880
In addition, many of the farmers were able to use their agricultural benefits to buy

378
00:55:00.880 --> 00:55:07.080
machinery and then replace labor with machinery so that they didn't need as much labor as

379
00:55:07.080 --> 00:55:13.280
before. They operated with more capital and less labor and that again set blacks on the

380
00:55:13.280 --> 00:55:24.120
road. Blacks had always been avid supporters of the Republican Party all the way from emancipation

381
00:55:24.120 --> 00:55:32.420
to 1932, but they began to switch strangely enough, and there's an irony here, because

382
00:55:32.420 --> 00:55:37.280
from what I've been telling you, you'd think they'd see that the government was the cause

383
00:55:37.280 --> 00:55:45.040
of their immediate woes, at least in part. But in fact, what was happening at the same

384
00:55:45.040 --> 00:55:52.800
time is that the federal government was establishing work relief and dole programs for which blacks

385
00:55:52.800 --> 00:55:58.880
were eligible and so being put in this dire circumstance by the federal government and

386
00:55:58.880 --> 00:56:05.460
then turning around and getting some pittance of relief from the WPA or from some other

387
00:56:05.460 --> 00:56:14.140
federal dole agency, they concluded that the federal government had saved them.

388
00:56:14.140 --> 00:56:18.640
From that time forward, blacks in this country became strong supporters of the Democratic

389
00:56:18.640 --> 00:56:27.680
Party, and until in the last 50 years it's more like a 90% level of support for Democrats

390
00:56:27.680 --> 00:56:39.320
among the black population. And that all happened by virtue of the New Deal programs. A great

391
00:56:39.320 --> 00:56:47.800
many programs had something to do with finance. The laws were changed, first of all, to go

392
00:56:47.800 --> 00:56:53.480
go off the gold standard. Roosevelt did that by executive order. The second day he was

393
00:56:53.480 --> 00:57:02.480
in office, he declared a bank holiday, nationwide bank holiday. By that time, the states themselves

394
00:57:02.480 --> 00:57:07.640
had closed most of the banks in the country, which meant banks just weren't allowed to

395
00:57:07.640 --> 00:57:14.440
do any business. You couldn't go withdraw money or get a check cleared or anything.

396
00:57:14.440 --> 00:57:21.880
They were shut down and they were shut down totally for a week after which the banks began

397
00:57:21.880 --> 00:57:27.120
to reopen with federal approval after federal banking inspectors had gone around and looked

398
00:57:27.120 --> 00:57:31.080
at their books and declared some of them safe enough to reopen.

399
00:57:31.080 --> 00:57:38.940
But it took many, many months for all of them to, well, most of them to come back into operation.

400
00:57:38.940 --> 00:57:40.640
Some of them were never reopened.

401
00:57:40.640 --> 00:57:49.640
They were simply closed permanently because the inspectors declared them unfit to be operated again at all.

402
00:57:49.640 --> 00:57:58.640
And when Roosevelt declared the bank holiday, he also put restrictions on international dealings in gold.

403
00:57:58.640 --> 00:58:07.640
And quickly thereafter, he nationalized the gold and required everybody to surrender their gold,

404
00:58:07.640 --> 00:58:14.640
except those people who used gold for industrial purposes or jewelry or for collector's items.

405
00:58:14.640 --> 00:58:21.640
But if you had either gold coins, which were still circulating quite widely in those days,

406
00:58:21.640 --> 00:58:30.640
or gold certificates, paper money which was directly redeemable for a fixed amount of gold,

407
00:58:30.640 --> 00:58:35.640
you had to surrender all of those forms of money to the Federal Reserve System.

408
00:58:35.640 --> 00:58:44.180
System, and you would be given what? Federal Reserve notes. What else? So what did the

409
00:58:44.180 --> 00:58:50.800
Federal Reserve note promise to pay you? Lawful money. Still does. What's that? More Federal

410
00:58:50.800 --> 00:58:59.400
Reserve notes. So that's where we made that switch in 1933. And having gone off gold,

411
00:58:59.400 --> 00:59:06.300
The New Dealers then undertook to pursue George Warren's cockamamie scheme, which is to try

412
00:59:06.300 --> 00:59:17.520
to get reflation by raising the price of gold.

413
00:59:17.520 --> 00:59:24.960
Government began to use the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to bid up the price, the

414
00:59:24.960 --> 00:59:30.600
The dollar price of gold, starting in the spring of 1933, and it edged it up a little

415
00:59:30.600 --> 00:59:39.600
bit every week, every week. The Reconstruction Finance guys would come in and talk to Roosevelt.

416
00:59:39.600 --> 00:59:44.960
Well, what do you want the price of gold to be this week? You can't imagine anything

417
00:59:44.960 --> 00:59:48.280
more arbitrary than that. The President of the United States is saying now what the price

418
00:59:48.280 --> 00:59:53.960
of gold should be this week, and gradually he set it higher and higher and higher. And

419
00:59:53.960 --> 00:59:59.840
Under the law that Congress had passed in the spring of 1933, he was allowed to raise

420
00:59:59.840 --> 01:00:09.040
the price by 60 percent. So when he finally got the price up to $35, that was a 59 percent

421
01:00:09.040 --> 01:00:15.680
increase in the dollar price of gold, which in the old days had been $20.67. He said,

422
01:00:15.680 --> 01:00:21.720
okay, that's it. That's where we stop. And the government did, in fact, hold the price

423
01:00:21.720 --> 01:00:32.720
The price of gold at $35 an ounce from 1934 until the early 1970s, when it finally gave up, fixing the dollar price of gold. Yes, sir?

424
01:00:32.720 --> 01:00:38.720
I think this understood something. I thought it was illegal to own gold if it rose above the industry.

425
01:00:38.720 --> 01:00:41.720
Only monetary gold.

426
01:00:41.720 --> 01:00:43.720
Do you purchase gold bullion?

427
01:00:43.720 --> 01:00:56.720
No, you could purchase gold for use in industry, or you could maintain gold jewelry, or you could have collector's pieces.

428
01:00:56.720 --> 01:01:02.720
So you can buy gold for 35 cents, 35 dollars an ounce to make into jewelry.

429
01:01:02.720 --> 01:01:11.720
Yes, that's right, yeah. So it wasn't a forbidden substance, but monetary gold was forbidden, not only the use of monetary gold,

430
01:01:11.720 --> 01:01:18.600
Gold, but even the possession of monetary gold. So if you had a big collection of, you

431
01:01:18.600 --> 01:01:25.560
know, gold eagles that you'd put in your piggy bank over the years, that was unlawful

432
01:01:25.560 --> 01:01:33.080
to hold on to, you know, 50 of those, say. They'd probably let you keep a few in a collection.

433
01:01:33.080 --> 01:01:38.360
I don't know what the exact limit would have been. I do know they allowed some collector's

434
01:01:38.360 --> 01:01:45.360
Mr. Redleaf, you have gold again in 73, monetary gold.

435
01:02:08.360 --> 01:02:38.360
I had a friend who tried to get me involved in speculating on gold in the early 70s, and I said nah, I don't know anything, I'd lose my shirt, and of course if I'd done it I would have got rich within a few years, but well there's just another one of those times I didn't get rich, okay, but in addition to going off gold, again this is part of the reflation program, right, well we already

436
01:02:38.360 --> 01:02:48.360
No, it didn't work. They raised the price of gold 59 percent, but prices in general came up about 6 or 7 percent for the rest of the decade.

437
01:02:48.360 --> 01:03:02.360
So George Warren was decisively refuted and had to go back to Cornell and wallow in his price data some more, but they didn't give up on reflation.

438
01:03:02.360 --> 01:03:15.360
and in 1935 the banking laws were amended significantly so that authority was centralized in Washington, D.C. in the Federal Reserve Board

439
01:03:15.360 --> 01:03:27.360
whereas before the individual banks had had much more autonomy in setting their policies and the New York City Fed had been the leader and most important

440
01:03:27.360 --> 01:03:57.360
is important but still only one of twelve. There really was no formally centralized monetary policy making prior to 1935 except to the extent that Benjamin Strong at the New York Fed or somebody else could persuade the other banks to act in a coordinated way and sometimes they did or sometimes the New York Bank was so decisive that it could really affect the course of events

441
01:03:57.360 --> 01:04:09.360
and its own actions, but only after 1935 did we have something that qualifies as a central bank equivalent to those of say the Western European countries.

442
01:04:09.360 --> 01:04:22.360
That didn't do any good either. Obviously nothing the Fed did in the whole decade of the Great Depression can be said to have helped in any way.

443
01:04:22.360 --> 01:04:43.360
The monetarists, of course, blame the entire debacle on the Federal Reserve system because they say it simply stood by and did not act decisively enough to prevent that 30% reduction in money stock between 1929 and 1933.

444
01:04:43.360 --> 01:04:58.360
It did not intervene actively enough to prevent that series of banking panics, which gave rise to ultimately more than 9,000 bankruptcies of commercial banks, and therefore it's to blame.

445
01:04:58.360 --> 01:05:04.360
It created such a terrible situation that it took the rest of the decade to get out of it.

446
01:05:04.360 --> 01:05:21.360
Well, that's an argument, but I think that's far from a complete story of why the depression was as deep as it was and how it might have been prevented or how recovery might have been brought about more quickly.

447
01:05:21.360 --> 01:05:32.360
Neoclassical economists have come, even the people who are semi-Keynesian, have come to be very naive monitors about the whole experience of the Great Depression.

448
01:05:32.360 --> 01:05:39.360
The Federal Reserve, fiat money, fractional reserve banking, Human Action, Man Economy and State, The Theory of Money and Credit

449
01:06:02.360 --> 01:06:22.360
I would claim that they could not have if other things had happened in the same way, if, for example, the New Deal had adopted the same policies, no amount of money creation would have led businessmen and investors to resume the investment at old levels, when they were afraid that they were going to be wiped out in the next few years.

450
01:06:22.360 --> 01:06:37.360
The amount of money creation would have led businessmen and investors to resume the investment at old levels when they were afraid that they were going to be wiped out or even have their property confiscated by the federal government.

451
01:06:37.360 --> 01:06:43.360
We've seen any number of countries in the world have rapid rates of money growth and they don't have prosperity.

452
01:06:43.360 --> 01:06:45.360
All they have is inflation.

453
01:06:45.360 --> 01:06:54.360
and I think the neoclassical economists have simply overlooked the context of the 1930s

454
01:06:54.360 --> 01:07:00.360
and put way too much emphasis on both the initial collapse of money.

455
01:07:00.360 --> 01:07:05.360
I think it did contribute to the financial debacle of those years

456
01:07:05.360 --> 01:07:11.360
and much too much emphasis on the ability of monetary acceleration

457
01:07:11.360 --> 01:07:19.080
to have brought the economy out of the conditions prevailing in 1933. But needless to say, that's

458
01:07:19.080 --> 01:07:29.040
an endlessly debated topic in macroeconomics, even now, after all this time.

459
01:07:29.040 --> 01:07:36.720
Let me say just a little bit about the labor reforms. The NIRA was declared unconstitutional

460
01:07:36.720 --> 01:07:46.600
in 1935 on the grounds that Congress had delegated unconstitutional authority to the President

461
01:07:46.600 --> 01:07:58.600
by just letting him approve or even create these codes of fair competition. And so that

462
01:07:58.600 --> 01:08:08.360
That came to an end. I don't think too many people were sorry to see it go, although I've

463
01:08:08.360 --> 01:08:12.660
run into a few other historians who think they have a lot of evidence that some businessmen

464
01:08:12.660 --> 01:08:18.000
continued. Butler Schaefer, for example, in his book argues that in fact a lot of business

465
01:08:18.000 --> 01:08:26.080
people would like to have had NRA continue or be recreated in some constitutionally acceptable

466
01:08:26.080 --> 01:08:56.080
in a political way, but my reading is the same as I think most historians, which is that people had had enough of N.I.R.A. by 1935, even the people who had liked it to begin with had stopped liking it in most cases, but what happened is as soon as it was declared unconstitutional is that some of the parts that had a lot of political support were reenacted in other ways, the most important of those reenactments

467
01:08:56.080 --> 01:09:02.220
was the labor provisions, the old Section 7A that authorized collective bargaining was

468
01:09:02.220 --> 01:09:11.220
blown up hugely into the National Labor Relations Act of 1935, often called the Wagner Act,

469
01:09:11.220 --> 01:09:21.320
and from that time on, that law is still in effect as amended, 1935, the right to bargain

470
01:09:21.320 --> 01:09:43.320
and a whole list of so-called unfair labor practices identified, which meant that it was unlawful for employers to take various actions they had routinely taken in the past to discourage the formation or operation of unions in their workplaces.

471
01:09:43.320 --> 01:09:53.240
So, after 1935, for example, an employer could not even circulate information to workers.

472
01:09:53.240 --> 01:09:57.480
Let's say a union came in and tried to organize his workforce.

473
01:09:57.480 --> 01:10:04.440
He might have in the past circulated a flyer saying, look, if you adopt a union here, the

474
01:10:04.440 --> 01:10:07.920
consequences are going to be the following.

475
01:10:07.920 --> 01:10:24.920
I'm going to lay off 10% of you, or I'm going to change the way I forgive you for coming in late, or any number of things could have been told to the workers, but that kind of information was outlawed.

476
01:10:24.920 --> 01:10:35.920
Company unions were outlawed. Of course, the unionists had always hated company unions because they sometimes preempted them.

477
01:10:35.920 --> 01:10:40.800
In fact, many workers liked company unions. That's why they joined them and stayed with

478
01:10:40.800 --> 01:10:47.120
them. They were more cooperative. They weren't organizations with built-in hostility to the

479
01:10:47.120 --> 01:10:56.120
employer. And these new unions, particularly the CIO unions that flourished after 1935

480
01:10:56.120 --> 01:11:02.840
under this legislation, were more than hostile to employers. They sometimes looked as if

481
01:11:02.840 --> 01:11:32.840
they were trying to wreck the industries they organized and they were full of communists and that's not just a turn of phrase they were full of actual card-carrying communists and indeed the CIO even the leaders who were not communists liked having these communists along with them because they worked harder they were more ideologically inspired to get out there and really take risks and put in a lot of hours

482
01:11:32.840 --> 01:11:40.840
and Organized Workers and so the CIO unions, whether it's rubber workers or

483
01:11:40.840 --> 01:11:47.000
automobile workers or steel workers, all these big industrial unions that

484
01:11:47.000 --> 01:11:54.400
organized not along occupational lines but everybody in a given plant or even a

485
01:11:54.400 --> 01:12:01.240
given company or a given industry would belong to the same union. They were

486
01:12:01.240 --> 01:12:06.540
We're full of communists who hated the capitalist system and we're viewing this unionization

487
01:12:06.540 --> 01:12:13.740
as just a means to the destruction of that system and its replacement with socialism.

488
01:12:13.740 --> 01:12:21.960
So that was not something calculated to bring about industrial peace and in fact in 1937

489
01:12:21.960 --> 01:12:25.280
all hell broke loose in labor relations in this country.

490
01:12:25.280 --> 01:12:31.140
There were not only big strikes in many of these industries, like the rubber industry

491
01:12:31.140 --> 01:12:37.600
and the automobile industry, where CIO unions were attempting to organize, but for the first

492
01:12:37.600 --> 01:12:42.760
time the unions began to stage so-called sit-down strikes.

493
01:12:42.760 --> 01:12:46.880
This was really quite an extraordinary thing because a sit-down strike is not at all what

494
01:12:46.880 --> 01:12:50.680
it seems to be from the language.

495
01:12:50.680 --> 01:12:54.720
It's not a strike.

496
01:12:54.720 --> 01:13:01.960
It's a takeover of somebody else's property. These men would come into a plant, not work,

497
01:13:01.960 --> 01:13:07.420
but not leave, and not let anybody else come in or work there. So they just literally took

498
01:13:07.420 --> 01:13:13.080
control of the property, and you might think, well, why didn't the owner call the police

499
01:13:13.080 --> 01:13:22.840
and have them eject these people? Well, you're the police in Detroit, and Ford calls up and

500
01:13:22.840 --> 01:13:30.840
I've got 12,000 guys sitting here in the plant and they won't leave. What are you going to do?

501
01:13:30.840 --> 01:13:39.840
There are too goddamn many of them. You can't send the police and eject 12,000 guys who are determined to stay there

502
01:13:39.840 --> 01:13:44.840
and willing to use violence against you if you try to throw them out.

503
01:13:44.840 --> 01:14:07.840
So these unions and their sit-down strikes and the refusal of state governors and city mayors to do what would have been required to bring this action to an end meant that employers just had no choice but in some cases to capitulate, to recognize these unions and to enter into collective bargaining agreements with them.

504
01:14:07.840 --> 01:14:14.440
and again think back this is now part and parcel of what's called the second New

505
01:14:14.440 --> 01:14:21.600
Deal period 1935 on the Crown Jewels being the National Labor Relations Act

506
01:14:21.600 --> 01:14:26.800
and the Social Security Act this is the New Deal's turn to the left it's then now

507
01:14:26.800 --> 01:14:31.320
starting to repudiate the cartelizers and the big businessmen that it had had

508
01:14:31.320 --> 01:14:43.320
had embraced in 1933, if reluctantly. It's not only repudiating them, but it's making them the fall guys.

509
01:14:43.320 --> 01:14:54.320
And Roosevelt and his lieutenants are starting to attack them on every occasion, publicly, as economic royalists,

510
01:14:54.320 --> 01:15:04.320
People who are wrecking the economy by their selfishness and their refusal to do the right thing like recognize CIO unions

511
01:15:04.320 --> 01:15:11.320
and accusing them of industrial sabotage, saying, why aren't they making investments?

512
01:15:11.320 --> 01:15:17.320
They're trying to sabotage my administration. That's what they're trying to do.

513
01:15:17.320 --> 01:15:29.320
Well, you know, this is like the saboteur accusing the victim of sabotaging him because these businessmen were scared to death.

514
01:15:29.320 --> 01:15:35.320
You know, this isn't some nut on a street corner. It's the President of the United States talking this way.

515
01:15:35.320 --> 01:15:41.320
They'd never encountered anything like that before. Nothing like that had ever happened before.

516
01:15:41.320 --> 01:15:44.320
They hadn't imagined anything like that happening.

517
01:15:44.320 --> 01:15:48.820
Big businessmen, wealthy people had always been movers and shakers.

518
01:15:48.820 --> 01:15:53.320
Now there's some guy in the position of highest power in the government

519
01:15:53.320 --> 01:15:59.320
who's threatening to take away their property and who's tolerating occupation of their factories.

520
01:15:59.320 --> 01:16:02.320
What's going to happen next?

521
01:16:02.320 --> 01:16:04.320
Well, put yourself in their position.

522
01:16:04.320 --> 01:16:08.320
They not only are looking at this, but they're looking around the world.

523
01:16:08.320 --> 01:16:13.320
Mussolini has taken over Italian economy, a dictator.

524
01:16:13.320 --> 01:16:22.320
Hitler's running the economy. Germany. A bunch of the smaller countries in Europe are gone fascist.

525
01:16:22.320 --> 01:16:28.320
It looks as if the whole civilized, or what used to be the civilized world, is going to hell in dictatorship.

526
01:16:28.320 --> 01:16:37.320
Why should we be different? Especially when our own president is acting as if he wants to be dictator.

527
01:16:37.320 --> 01:16:45.320
So they were frightened, and long-term investment was almost non-existent.

528
01:16:45.320 --> 01:16:52.320
The investment that took place between 1935 and 1940 was almost all investment in inventories

529
01:16:52.320 --> 01:16:56.320
and investment in equipment with short life.

530
01:16:56.320 --> 01:17:03.320
Because it made no economic sense in view of the risks associated with appropriating future returns

531
01:17:03.320 --> 01:17:09.640
Returns from Long-Term Investment to put good money now into projects that wouldn't pay

532
01:17:09.640 --> 01:17:21.600
off fully for 20 or 25 years. So, new construction, new plants, new infrastructure, no. None of

533
01:17:21.600 --> 01:17:29.920
those long-term projects, effectively none, were revived in the late 30s. And that's one

534
01:17:29.920 --> 01:17:50.920
The principle reasons why the whole economy never revived, because if we look at the economy's normal operation, it has never before or since been the case that it went 10 years without adding to the capital stock, and that's exactly what it did in the 1930s.

535
01:17:50.920 --> 01:18:01.920
Net investment for the entire decade was negative, so we didn't even make up for depreciation over a 10-year period.

536
01:18:01.920 --> 01:18:14.920
Normally, the capital stock would have been growing by 2%, 3%, 4% a year, and we would have ended up after a decade with a capital stock that was 20% or 30% greater than it had been at the beginning.

537
01:18:14.920 --> 01:18:21.520
It's part and parcel of the growth process, adding to our capital equipment to accommodate

538
01:18:21.520 --> 01:18:28.120
our roundabout production, but it didn't happen in the 1930s because the New Deal scared

539
01:18:28.120 --> 01:18:37.620
the devil out of the investor class in the service of FDR selling himself and his policies

540
01:18:37.620 --> 01:18:46.060
to the voters in the face of a situation which is desperate enough for a lot of people, even

541
01:18:46.060 --> 01:18:53.980
as late as 1936, still a lot of people hurting, and by that time a number of complete nut

542
01:18:53.980 --> 01:18:58.080
cases were challenging the president from the left.

543
01:18:58.080 --> 01:19:07.280
Huey Long, Father Coughlin, Dr. Townsend, people who had crazy schemes for having the

544
01:19:07.280 --> 01:19:14.920
government give big sums of money to the unemployed or poor or old people, and those schemes had

545
01:19:14.920 --> 01:19:21.240
great appeal to the masses. And so Roosevelt looked around and said, you know, I've got

546
01:19:21.240 --> 01:19:28.680
to start sucking those voters away from these guys or I might lose the election.

547
01:19:28.680 --> 01:19:37.200
And this demagoguery he resorted to so strongly from 1935 on until 1940 when he had to start

548
01:19:37.200 --> 01:19:44.240
sweet-talking businessmen to get them to cooperate with the war mobilization, this demagoguery

549
01:19:44.240 --> 01:19:48.720
was responsible for prolonging, I believe, the depression and would have prolonged it

550
01:19:48.720 --> 01:19:54.360
even if the Fed had jacked up the money supply much quicker than it did.

551
01:19:54.360 --> 01:20:01.440
I wrote an article making this argument and presenting some evidence that I've never seen

552
01:20:01.440 --> 01:20:06.960
anybody else present on the question called Regime Uncertainty.

553
01:20:06.960 --> 01:20:13.080
It's in the Independent Review in 1997, if you'd like to look at it, and you may find

554
01:20:13.080 --> 01:20:18.080
it useful as just kind of a synopsis of the second New Deal.

555
01:20:18.080 --> 01:20:47.080
I have a question actually about the unemployment data on the slide there. I wanted to ask whether you thought that there might be certain kinds of unemployment which are actually potentially quite significant that are not listed there.

556
01:20:47.080 --> 01:20:55.080
For example, I mean, an argument can be made that conscription shouldn't really be considered a kind of employment because it's actually the government taking resources.

557
01:20:55.080 --> 01:21:01.080
In which case, that drastic recovery there in World War II wouldn't look so drastic if you were told of that.

558
01:21:01.080 --> 01:21:03.080
Wouldn't show up at all.

559
01:21:03.080 --> 01:21:12.080
Much later on, in the 60s, 70s, 80s, a lot of drug laws, for example, are putting non-violent offenders in jail.

560
01:21:12.080 --> 01:21:21.080
And if I remember my macroeconomics from way back when correctly, the government typically doesn't include people who are not looking for work.

561
01:21:21.080 --> 01:21:28.080
And if people are being put in jail for nonviolent crimes, that's artificially suppressing the unemployment rate.

562
01:21:28.080 --> 01:21:31.080
Think of it as an unemployment program.

563
01:21:31.080 --> 01:21:41.240
You know, your points are very well taken. These are standard unemployment data. They

564
01:21:41.240 --> 01:21:47.200
are adjusted in one way at least, which is that the data for the 1930s have been adjusted

565
01:21:47.200 --> 01:21:55.480
so that the persons on government work relief programs are no longer counted as unemployed.

566
01:21:55.480 --> 01:22:03.040
In the standard Labor Department data series, which is still used by many people, those

567
01:22:03.040 --> 01:22:11.000
persons were regarded as unemployed and there were anywhere from 3 to 5 million of them

568
01:22:11.000 --> 01:22:16.760
during the New Deal. So they make a substantial difference in the rate of unemployment. You'll

569
01:22:16.760 --> 01:22:23.040
see here it never gets above 22 percent. If you were to throw in those people on the work

570
01:22:23.040 --> 01:22:29.840
Work Relief Programs, it would be 25% unemployment, and the argument was at the time and since

571
01:22:29.840 --> 01:22:34.400
that they weren't in regular employment, this was emergency employment, shouldn't be counted

572
01:22:34.400 --> 01:22:41.440
as equivalent to real jobs, but I think it's a bad argument and they should be counted

573
01:22:41.440 --> 01:22:46.640
as employed even though they're employed differently, they're not unemployed clearly.

574
01:22:46.640 --> 01:22:55.640
Just quickly, what was the logic, again, why the tenants were being complained about wage workers, and what happened again with that?

575
01:23:16.640 --> 01:23:44.640
How did sharecroppers fare during the Great Depression?

576
01:23:46.640 --> 01:23:53.640
We talked about the National Labor Relations Act, the Wagner Act, and I think when you're talking about the growth in government,

577
01:23:53.640 --> 01:24:19.580
We talked about the National Labor Relations Act, the Wagner Act, and I think when you're talking about the growth in government, you should also consider a look at the growth of government-sanctioned

578
01:24:19.580 --> 01:24:32.580
When you look at the growth of government sanctioned unions for government workers, when did that all come into effect and how did that all work? Are you familiar with the history?

579
01:24:49.580 --> 01:25:11.580
And of course, they didn't like that, or the people who wanted to organize unions among government workers didn't like that, and eventually they got the law changed, and it's had a big effect because virtually the only growth in unionized labor in recent decades has been government workers.

580
01:25:11.580 --> 01:25:41.580
And now, the unions have declined so much in the past 50 years that of the private labor force, less than 10% is unionized, but of the government workers, I believe it's something in the neighborhood of 40%, that includes school teachers and of course they're the ones that cause the most trouble because they like to wait until school's about to start in the fall and then go on strike

581
01:25:41.580 --> 01:26:09.580
Is there any book or article that treats that subject that you're aware of?

582
01:26:11.580 --> 01:26:17.380
and some very good books that deal with public sector unionism as well as the unionism elsewhere

583
01:26:17.380 --> 01:26:18.380
in the economy.

584
01:26:18.380 --> 01:26:24.300
A couple of books written in the 1980s and they're easy to find, in fact many of the

585
01:26:24.300 --> 01:26:31.100
Mises Institute reading lists list them, so if you don't find them there just look up

586
01:26:31.100 --> 01:26:34.660
Morgan Reynolds on Google and they'll pop right up.

587
01:26:34.660 --> 01:26:35.660
Yes sir.

588
01:26:35.660 --> 01:26:45.660
When did the minimum wage legislation go into effect and are there many estimates of what the impact was on the unemployment rate?

589
01:27:05.660 --> 01:27:12.660
The New Minimum Wage Law was passed in 1938, the so-called Fair Labor Standards Act, and it had more coverage, and more uniform coverage, and then that law has been amended a number of times over the years to increase the scope of coverage, and just about everybody was covered by a code of fair competition.

590
01:27:35.660 --> 01:28:05.660
is covered nowadays and of course states have their own minimum wages and sometimes they set higher rates than the federal rate requires so so there's been change over time and there's some variation across space there have been many studies of the effect of the minimum wage it's a it's a cottage industry in the economics profession they they almost all find some kind of effect we would expect that is that they make unemployment

591
01:28:05.660 --> 01:28:07.660
The Theory of Money and Credit

592
01:28:35.660 --> 01:28:43.660
We can always argue about the magnitude of the effect because economic theory doesn't tell us what the magnitude will be.

593
01:28:43.660 --> 01:28:50.660
Most of the time, it turns out, the magnitude that's estimated in these studies is not very big.

594
01:28:50.660 --> 01:29:04.660
That is, when the minimum wage is raised, let's say, from $5 to $6, it's often just compensating for some price level changes that have taken place since the last change.

595
01:29:04.660 --> 01:29:18.660
So it's not a real change at all, but you know for the moment it's a change and it has a relatively small effect, a few percentage points change in what the situation would otherwise be for the unemployment rate.

596
01:29:18.660 --> 01:29:26.460
so it's it's not a big deal because in our economy relatively few people are

597
01:29:26.460 --> 01:29:31.900
directly subject to that effect there aren't that many people in the free

598
01:29:31.900 --> 01:29:39.180
market who would earn below the minimum wage that's set so so its effect is is

599
01:29:39.180 --> 01:29:44.620
on relatively few people directly it affects more people indirectly because

600
01:29:44.620 --> 01:30:05.620
Indeed, the reason the labor unions support it so actively is not because their members are going to be immediately affected by it, but because many unions have members producing goods which compete with goods produced by people who do earn around the minimum wage rate.

601
01:30:05.620 --> 01:30:18.620
So this is a way of placing competitors at a disadvantage, competitors for the goods that their members help to produce.

602
01:30:18.620 --> 01:30:24.620
So it's a kind of indirect protectionist scheme for higher wage workers more than anything else,

603
01:30:24.620 --> 01:30:32.620
but it's one of those schemes that's easily sold to people as what it purports to be, a way to help the poor.

604
01:30:32.620 --> 01:30:39.620
No matter how many times you explain it to people, they just refuse to accept the argument.

605
01:30:39.620 --> 01:30:43.620
I've gone through this any number of times with people myself.

606
01:30:43.620 --> 01:30:52.620
We've got a guy now in Louisiana in the legislature who's set out to raise the state minimum wage level.

607
01:30:52.620 --> 01:31:00.620
And that's all we need in Louisiana, you know, is to reduce the number, you know, the handful of us who are still working and not on welfare down there.

608
01:31:00.620 --> 01:31:29.620
and yet they're trying to do it and a friend of mine in Baton Rouge, a libertarian over there, he's made it a project to persuade this legislator of the error of his ways and so he's been prevailing upon me for articles to give to this legislator and I'm sure this is quite a futile endeavor but I've done what I could to help him out.

609
01:31:30.620 --> 01:31:45.620
I just wanted to mention that having been a federal employee, a lot of that number is increased or is there because they have what's called a dental plan.

610
01:31:45.620 --> 01:31:55.620
And if you join the union, you get this dental plan and most people, the only reason they even join the union is so they can get that so-called free dental plan.

611
01:31:55.620 --> 01:32:11.620
I think if we looked at the overall level of pay, factoring in the benefit value as part of the pay packages, we'd find that government employees, especially at the federal level, are earning substantially above market rates.

612
01:32:11.620 --> 01:32:22.620
The ones at the state and local level are not so far out of line in general, although some of them, depending on the work they're doing, are.

613
01:32:22.620 --> 01:32:30.620
But there's always been a lot of variation in how much effect unions have in actually changing their wages.

614
01:32:30.620 --> 01:32:36.620
Tons of studies have been done in neoclassical labor economics to try to make estimates of this.

615
01:32:36.620 --> 01:32:52.620
They range all the way from nothing, you know, unions that are totally ineffective, to some unions, say, airline pilots unions, that have maybe even doubled the pay that these workers would be getting without the union.

616
01:32:52.620 --> 01:33:13.620
What you want is to work in, if you want to make a union really count, then unionize a group of workers in an industry where there's a small amount of labor cost relative to the cost of other inputs, but that labor is very critical.

617
01:33:13.620 --> 01:33:23.620
So if you're talking about airlines, there's all this huge capital cost associated with the airplanes and the equipment and the repair facilities and so forth.

618
01:33:23.620 --> 01:33:27.620
And then the pilots that come on board, now they're critical.

619
01:33:27.620 --> 01:33:31.620
You can't operate your business without pilots to fly the airplanes.

620
01:33:31.620 --> 01:33:37.620
But how much of your total cost of operation is pilot expense?

621
01:33:37.620 --> 01:33:39.620
Fairly small amounts.

622
01:33:39.620 --> 01:33:47.420
So, that puts them in a position to really squeeze and still not be displaced. You can't

623
01:33:47.420 --> 01:33:55.340
really displace them in the end. So, those people have been very successful and if you

624
01:33:55.340 --> 01:34:04.420
try to unionize somebody like janitors, it has really no effect because they just get

625
01:34:04.420 --> 01:34:12.100
fire instead of using a janitor the clean-up people use a mechanical mop or

626
01:34:12.100 --> 01:34:31.060
something to clean up the building okay we'll call a halt for today

627
01:34:34.420 --> 01:34:36.420
Thank you very much.
