WEBVTT

NOTE 27. The Litterer

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.000
Chapter 27 The Litterer

2
00:00:04.000 --> 00:00:08.000
The Litterer today will find few defenders.

3
00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:14.000
He is beset on all sides, bearing the brunt of the barbs of do-gooder groups.

4
00:00:14.000 --> 00:00:20.000
Radio and television stations beam anti-litter messages as a public service.

5
00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:26.000
Neighborhood and parent-teacher associations, church groups and civic organizations

6
00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:29.000
are in agreement on the issue of littering.

7
00:00:29.000 --> 00:00:41.000
The film industry, which must pass over many topics as too controversial, is united in its hatred for litter. Litter is a great unifier.

8
00:00:41.000 --> 00:00:50.000
There is, however, one small, seemingly insignificant detail which destroys the case against litter and the litterer.

9
00:00:50.000 --> 00:00:58.000
Litter can only take place in the public domain, never in the private domain.

10
00:00:58.000 --> 00:01:04.560
The ads showing the supposed evils of litter take place on highways, beaches, streets,

11
00:01:04.560 --> 00:01:08.120
parks, subways or public bathrooms.

12
00:01:08.120 --> 00:01:10.920
All public areas.

13
00:01:10.920 --> 00:01:15.440
This is not because most littering occurs in public places.

14
00:01:15.440 --> 00:01:17.160
It is definitional.

15
00:01:17.160 --> 00:01:23.620
If something resembling littering in all other aspects were to occur in a private place,

16
00:01:23.620 --> 00:01:26.760
it would not be considered littering.

17
00:01:26.760 --> 00:01:32.600
When large crowds leave a ballpark, movie theater, concert, or circus, what remains

18
00:01:32.600 --> 00:01:38.000
among the seats and aisles is not and cannot be litter.

19
00:01:38.000 --> 00:01:42.960
It is garbage, dirt, or waste, but not litter.

20
00:01:42.960 --> 00:01:48.820
After normal working hours in the downtown area of our cities, a horde of cleaners descend

21
00:01:48.820 --> 00:01:56.040
upon the privately owned banks, stores, restaurants, office buildings, factories, etc.

22
00:01:56.040 --> 00:02:02.760
What they do is clean, and under no circumstances do they pick up litter.

23
00:02:02.760 --> 00:02:09.080
Concurrent with this, the Department of Sanitation cleans the public streets and sidewalks, picking

24
00:02:09.080 --> 00:02:11.360
up litter.

25
00:02:11.360 --> 00:02:17.480
Now there is no real distinction to be drawn between leaving garbage in public places and

26
00:02:17.480 --> 00:02:20.460
leaving garbage in private places.

27
00:02:20.460 --> 00:02:26.020
There is no reason to call the former and not the latter littering, since what is being

28
00:02:26.020 --> 00:02:29.300
done in both cases is the same.

29
00:02:29.300 --> 00:02:35.340
In both cases, the creation of garbage is a concomitant of the process of producing

30
00:02:35.340 --> 00:02:38.340
or of consuming.

31
00:02:38.340 --> 00:02:44.060
In some instances, leaving garbage to be picked up later is the optimal solution.

32
00:02:44.060 --> 00:02:49.260
For example, it is too time consuming for a carpenter to clean up the wood shavings

33
00:02:49.260 --> 00:02:56.020
is as he works. It is easier and cheaper to allow the litter, wood shavings, to accumulate

34
00:02:56.020 --> 00:03:02.820
and be swept away at the end of the day or at periodic intervals. The factory manager

35
00:03:02.820 --> 00:03:09.220
could institute an anti-litter campaign and force the carpenters to keep their work area

36
00:03:09.220 --> 00:03:14.940
free of any accumulation of wood shavings. He might even enforce this edict with the

37
00:03:14.940 --> 00:03:21.780
The Threat of a $50 Fine. However, with these rules, his workforce might quit, or if they

38
00:03:21.780 --> 00:03:27.860
did not quit, the costs of production would rise inordinately, and he would lose business

39
00:03:27.860 --> 00:03:33.480
to competitive factories. In the medical practice, on the other hand,

40
00:03:33.480 --> 00:03:40.800
littering cannot be tolerated. Operating, consulting or treatment rooms must be sanitary, well

41
00:03:40.800 --> 00:03:47.320
All Scrubbed and Free of Debris Failure to adopt a strong anti-litter campaign

42
00:03:47.320 --> 00:03:53.120
here would involve the administrator of the hospital in financial failure, as it became

43
00:03:53.120 --> 00:03:57.480
known that his institution was unsanitary.

44
00:03:57.480 --> 00:04:04.560
In the case of consumption, most restaurants, for example, do not pursue anti-litter campaigns.

45
00:04:04.560 --> 00:04:10.760
There are no signs on restaurant walls forbidding the dropping of forks, napkins or breadcrumbs.

46
00:04:10.760 --> 00:04:17.760
A restaurant could prohibit litter, but it would lose its customers to other establishments.

47
00:04:17.760 --> 00:04:23.960
What these seemingly disparate examples have in common is to illustrate that in the market,

48
00:04:23.960 --> 00:04:29.680
the decision of whether and how much litter to allow is based ultimately on the wishes

49
00:04:29.680 --> 00:04:32.880
and desires of the consumers.

50
00:04:32.880 --> 00:04:38.520
The question is not treated simplistically, and there is no general outcry to get rid

51
00:04:38.520 --> 00:04:40.380
of litter bugs.

52
00:04:40.380 --> 00:04:46.520
There is, rather, a careful weighing of the costs and benefits of allowing waste materials

53
00:04:46.520 --> 00:04:48.400
to accumulate.

54
00:04:48.400 --> 00:04:54.820
To the extent that the costs of garbage collection are low and the harm caused by garbage accumulating

55
00:04:54.820 --> 00:05:02.060
is high, there tend to be frequent collections and severe penalties for leaving garbage around,

56
00:05:02.060 --> 00:05:06.640
as in the example given of littering in a medical facility.

57
00:05:06.640 --> 00:05:12.640
If the costs of garbage collections are high and the harm caused by the accumulation is

58
00:05:12.640 --> 00:05:19.160
low, there tend to be less frequent collections and no penalties for littering.

59
00:05:19.160 --> 00:05:24.800
These differences in policy are not the result of any governmental law, but are a result

60
00:05:24.800 --> 00:05:28.160
of the market process.

61
00:05:28.160 --> 00:05:33.840
Entrepreneurs who do not act in accordance with an accurate cost-benefit analysis lose

62
00:05:33.840 --> 00:05:52.720
A system which is based on the needs and desires of the people involved is very flexible.

63
00:05:52.720 --> 00:05:58.240
In each example, a policy on littering was tailored to the requirements of the specific

64
00:05:58.240 --> 00:05:59.520
situation.

65
00:05:59.520 --> 00:06:11.520
Moreover, such a system is capable of responding quickly to changes, whether they be in the costs of litter collection or in the harm caused by uncollected litter.

66
00:06:11.520 --> 00:06:24.520
If, for instance, a system were installed in hospitals enabling litter to be taken out at very little cost, or if consumer desires regarding litter underwent a marked change,

67
00:06:24.520 --> 00:06:30.020
Hospital administrators would have to relax their stringent anti-litter stance.

68
00:06:30.020 --> 00:06:39.020
The hospitals which failed to adjust to the new technology and tastes would tend to lose patience to competing institutions.

69
00:06:39.020 --> 00:06:43.020
These are private, profit-making hospitals.

70
00:06:43.020 --> 00:06:51.520
Public hospitals, which obtain their funds through compulsory taxation, have no such incentives to please customers.

71
00:06:51.520 --> 00:07:13.520
On the other hand, if it were discovered that soda cans and popcorn boxes left under the seats at baseball stadiums were disease carriers or interfered with the viewing of the game, the stadium rules concerning litter would be changed automatically by stadium owners, without any government edict.

72
00:07:13.520 --> 00:07:23.520
In considering litter in the public domain, there is no finely attuned system responding to the needs and desires of the people.

73
00:07:23.520 --> 00:07:33.520
Rather, the public domain is the ward of the government, and the government treats consumer demands in a rather cavalier manner, virtually ignoring them.

74
00:07:33.520 --> 00:07:40.400
Government enterprise is the only enterprise that will deal with an increased desire to

75
00:07:40.400 --> 00:07:48.320
litter with a steadfast determination to eliminate it, thereby refusing to adapt to either consumer

76
00:07:48.320 --> 00:07:52.400
desires or changing technology.

77
00:07:52.400 --> 00:07:58.640
Only a non-profit government agency could react to increased consumer desires for road

78
00:07:58.640 --> 00:08:04.140
use, traffic tie-ups, with the threat to ban cars.

79
00:08:04.140 --> 00:08:10.400
Only a government agency free from the necessity of earning profits could react to increased

80
00:08:10.400 --> 00:08:17.360
consumer desires for park use by forbidding people to enter parks after dark.

81
00:08:17.360 --> 00:08:19.560
The law is the law.

82
00:08:19.560 --> 00:08:24.680
The government can function this way because it is outside the market.

83
00:08:24.680 --> 00:08:30.080
It does not obtain its revenues from the market process of voluntary trade.

84
00:08:30.080 --> 00:08:36.540
It obtains its revenues through taxation, a process completely unrelated to its ability

85
00:08:36.540 --> 00:08:39.400
to satisfy customers.

86
00:08:39.400 --> 00:08:45.400
The governmental argument against litter is that it is done out of disrespect for others'

87
00:08:45.400 --> 00:08:46.440
rights.

88
00:08:46.440 --> 00:08:48.960
But this argument is without merit.

89
00:08:48.960 --> 00:08:53.540
The whole concept of private litter is a case in point.

90
00:08:53.540 --> 00:08:59.100
If litter were a violation of rights and a refusal to consider the comfort of others,

91
00:08:59.100 --> 00:09:04.400
what of the litter in restaurants, ballparks, factories, etc.?

92
00:09:04.400 --> 00:09:11.420
Litter comes about in the private market precisely as a means of satisfying the desires of consumers

93
00:09:11.420 --> 00:09:13.220
for comfort.

94
00:09:13.220 --> 00:09:18.860
One no more violates the restaurant owner's rights by littering than by eating, since

95
00:09:18.860 --> 00:09:21.780
both are paid for.

96
00:09:21.780 --> 00:09:27.120
How is the government's failure to maintain a flexible litterbug policy in the public

97
00:09:27.120 --> 00:09:29.820
sector to be interpreted?

98
00:09:29.820 --> 00:09:36.400
It is not entirely due to indifference, although it is far simpler to totally prohibit something

99
00:09:36.400 --> 00:09:39.660
than to deal with it in a reasonable manner.

100
00:09:39.660 --> 00:09:45.940
The explanation is that no government, no matter how interested or beneficent, could

101
00:09:45.940 --> 00:09:49.940
maintain a flexible litterbug policy.

102
00:09:49.940 --> 00:09:57.060
Such a policy must be supported by a price system, a profit and loss system, to measure

103
00:09:57.060 --> 00:10:03.340
the cost and benefits of littering and to automatically penalize managers who failed

104
00:10:03.340 --> 00:10:05.940
to adjust accordingly.

105
00:10:05.940 --> 00:10:11.020
If the government enacted a system of this type, it would no longer be a governmental

106
00:10:11.020 --> 00:10:19.060
system, for it could not rely on the bet noir of government, a tax system completely unrelated

107
00:10:19.060 --> 00:10:24.140
to Success in Satisfying the Wants of Consumers.

108
00:10:24.140 --> 00:10:30.580
The inability of the government to be flexible can occasionally take strange turns.

109
00:10:30.580 --> 00:10:36.620
For many years there was no effective restriction in New York City of dog owners who allowed

110
00:10:36.620 --> 00:10:40.820
their dogs to defecate on the streets and sidewalks.

111
00:10:40.820 --> 00:10:47.580
Presently there is a movement afoot to prohibit dog defecation on any street or sidewalk

112
00:10:47.580 --> 00:10:54.500
launched by citizens groups organized under the banner of children before dogs.

113
00:10:54.500 --> 00:11:00.580
The flexibility of the market is completely ignored by both of these factions.

114
00:11:00.580 --> 00:11:07.180
Nowhere is it realized that dog litter can be restricted to certain places.

115
00:11:07.180 --> 00:11:14.740
The issue is seen as a choice between prohibiting it altogether or allowing it everywhere.

116
00:11:14.740 --> 00:11:20.740
Imagine the beneficent results that would ensue if the streets and sidewalks were privately owned.

117
00:11:20.740 --> 00:11:31.740
A greater flexibility would result because of the rewards entrepreneurs would gain for devising methods of satisfying both groups.

118
00:11:31.740 --> 00:11:40.740
Some might object to the private ownership of the sidewalks on the grounds that dog owners would have to pay for the use of a dog lot,

119
00:11:40.740 --> 00:11:47.300
which they now use free, assuming there is no prohibition of dog defecation.

120
00:11:47.300 --> 00:11:53.260
But this is incorrect, because no individual, including the dog owner, has the free use

121
00:11:53.260 --> 00:11:55.180
of the sidewalks.

122
00:11:55.180 --> 00:12:00.920
The sidewalks, as all other goods and services provided by the government, are paid for by

123
00:12:00.920 --> 00:12:04.180
the citizens through taxes.

124
00:12:04.180 --> 00:12:10.420
Citizens pay not only for the original cost of the sidewalks, but also for upkeep, maintenance,

125
00:12:10.420 --> 00:12:13.620
Policing and Cleaning Services.

126
00:12:13.620 --> 00:12:19.820
It is difficult to anticipate the exact way a free market would function in this area,

127
00:12:19.820 --> 00:12:22.420
but some guesses may be hazarded.

128
00:12:22.420 --> 00:12:28.380
Perhaps several enterprising entrepreneurs could set up fenced-in, sandy areas which

129
00:12:28.380 --> 00:12:30.500
dogs could use.

130
00:12:30.500 --> 00:12:36.180
These entrepreneurs could have two separate contracts, one with the dog owners, which

131
00:12:36.180 --> 00:12:42.340
Each would specify the fee for use of the area, the other with garbage truck owners,

132
00:12:42.340 --> 00:12:45.740
specifying the cost of maintaining the areas.

133
00:12:45.740 --> 00:12:51.780
The exact location and number of these areas would, as with any service, be determined

134
00:12:51.780 --> 00:12:55.460
by the needs of the people involved.

135
00:12:55.460 --> 00:13:01.020
In the light of the inflexibility of the government and its apparent lack of interest in accommodating

136
00:13:01.020 --> 00:13:05.640
public tastes, how is the litter bug to be viewed?

137
00:13:05.640 --> 00:13:11.160
The litterbug treats public property in much the same way he would treat private property

138
00:13:11.160 --> 00:13:13.400
if he were but free to.

139
00:13:13.400 --> 00:13:16.760
Namely, he leaves garbage around on it.

140
00:13:16.760 --> 00:13:22.680
It has been demonstrated that there is nothing intrinsically evil about this activity, and

141
00:13:22.680 --> 00:13:28.320
that but for government calcification it would be as widely accepted in the public arena

142
00:13:28.320 --> 00:13:30.800
as it is in the private.

143
00:13:30.800 --> 00:13:38.600
It is an activity which should be regulated by people's needs, not by government fiat.

144
00:13:38.600 --> 00:13:44.220
We must conclude, therefore, that far from being a public enemy, the litterer is actually

145
00:13:44.220 --> 00:13:45.760
a hero.

146
00:13:45.760 --> 00:13:51.720
The courage exhibited by the litterer, given the intense campaign of vilification directed

147
00:13:51.720 --> 00:13:54.760
against him, is considerable.

148
00:13:54.760 --> 00:14:00.640
Even more important, the behavior of the litterer, who purposefully takes the law into his own

149
00:14:00.640 --> 00:14:05.520
in Hands can serve as a protest against an unjust system.