WEBVTT

NOTE Bank Failures: Then and Now

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:07.040
Every Friday night we have a few more banks closed, but nobody really seems to know or care about it.

2
00:00:07.040 --> 00:00:10.480
In fact, there were three closed last night.

3
00:00:10.480 --> 00:00:16.400
I don't know how many of you knew that, but there was one in Michigan, one in Minnesota.

4
00:00:16.400 --> 00:00:22.120
And for those of you from Colorado, and I think there's a couple of people here from Colorado,

5
00:00:22.120 --> 00:00:30.560
The Southern Colorado National Bank actually was seized by the FDIC last night.

6
00:00:30.560 --> 00:00:33.720
And this all happens very quietly.

7
00:00:33.720 --> 00:00:38.160
The FDIC comes in, they wrap them in yellow tape.

8
00:00:38.160 --> 00:00:47.800
The senior management is interrogated and generally the FDIC has found another bank

9
00:00:47.800 --> 00:00:55.320
to assume the deposits of the bank that has failed so the new bankers come in and take

10
00:00:55.320 --> 00:01:01.600
over over the weekend so that the bank opens up as usual either on Saturday or the following

11
00:01:01.600 --> 00:01:05.120
Monday morning like nothing happened.

12
00:01:05.120 --> 00:01:11.420
And that way most people's deposits are still there, they don't care, they're not worried

13
00:01:11.420 --> 00:01:15.040
about the banking system and life goes on.

14
00:01:15.040 --> 00:01:23.400
But what's happened because we've had so many of these bank failures is that the FDIC is

15
00:01:23.400 --> 00:01:28.960
number one having trouble getting banks to assume the deposits, but they're really having

16
00:01:28.960 --> 00:01:34.320
difficulty finding banks to take over any of the loans.

17
00:01:34.320 --> 00:01:41.240
And in fact, the only way that the FDIC can get a new bank to take over the loans of a

18
00:01:41.240 --> 00:01:45.640
of a failed bank is to enter into a loss sharing agreement.

19
00:01:46.680 --> 00:01:51.680
Now loss sharing agreement means that the acquiring bank

20
00:01:51.800 --> 00:01:54.120
will take over the loans, they'll try to work them out,

21
00:01:54.120 --> 00:01:57.280
they'll try to collect them, but if they're not able

22
00:01:57.280 --> 00:02:01.720
to collect them, then the FDIC will cover

23
00:02:01.720 --> 00:02:04.380
what's not collected.

24
00:02:04.380 --> 00:02:08.520
And right now the FDIC has 300 million so far

25
00:02:08.520 --> 00:02:13.040
under Law-Sharing Deals, $300 million.

26
00:02:13.040 --> 00:02:17.040
And that's mainly because they're stretched,

27
00:02:17.040 --> 00:02:19.380
both logistically and financially.

28
00:02:20.960 --> 00:02:25.960
The FDIC, when things were good, no banks were failing.

29
00:02:26.560 --> 00:02:30.240
They trim their staff, but now the banks are failing.

30
00:02:30.240 --> 00:02:31.200
They need more people.

31
00:02:31.200 --> 00:02:33.800
They don't have enough people to shut down these banks.

32
00:02:33.800 --> 00:02:37.560
So they enter into these Law-Sharing Agreements.

33
00:02:37.560 --> 00:02:39.680
There've been 98 failures so far.

34
00:02:39.680 --> 00:02:44.680
Three that we had overnight have made a total of 98

35
00:02:45.220 --> 00:02:47.940
this year, 25 last year.

36
00:02:47.940 --> 00:02:52.480
But there are 416 banks on the FDIC's problem list.

37
00:02:54.460 --> 00:02:56.060
And that was as of the second quarter.

38
00:02:56.060 --> 00:02:58.120
I'm sure it'll be higher at the end of the third quarter

39
00:02:58.120 --> 00:03:00.380
when those numbers are announced.

40
00:03:00.380 --> 00:03:04.040
So I just wanted to talk a little bit about the valuation

41
00:03:04.040 --> 00:03:09.040
and one of these loans in United States banking system

42
00:03:09.040 --> 00:03:14.040
because we've had some very instructive bids and markdowns

43
00:03:14.040 --> 00:03:19.040
on what these loans are worth.

44
00:03:19.040 --> 00:03:22.040
In the case of Colonial Bank, which you may be familiar with,

45
00:03:22.040 --> 00:03:27.040
big bank out of our backyard in Alabama down the road in Montgomery,

46
00:03:27.040 --> 00:03:33.040
Colonial Bank failed and BB&T took over that bank

47
00:03:33.040 --> 00:03:38.940
Bank, and they bought $15 billion worth of Colonial's loans.

48
00:03:38.940 --> 00:03:47.940
But to buy the 15 billion in Colonial's loans, the FDIC had to agree to absorb 80% of the

49
00:03:47.940 --> 00:03:52.560
losses that would come from liquidating those loans.

50
00:03:52.560 --> 00:04:00.700
And what that means is that if the Colonial portfolio went to zero, the most BB&T could

51
00:04:00.700 --> 00:04:03.220
If you lose, it's 500 million.

52
00:04:03.220 --> 00:04:05.940
And that means the FDIC would absorb the rest.

53
00:04:08.220 --> 00:04:10.700
Now, Colonial Portfolio isn't worthless,

54
00:04:11.560 --> 00:04:14.060
but the credit gurus over at BB&T

55
00:04:14.060 --> 00:04:18.120
are not terribly excited about Colonial's loan portfolio.

56
00:04:18.120 --> 00:04:21.780
In fact, they think that the construction loans

57
00:04:21.780 --> 00:04:26.780
in Colonial's portfolio are only worth 33 cents on the dollar.

58
00:04:26.780 --> 00:04:32.780
That means they marked them down 67%.

59
00:04:32.780 --> 00:04:38.780
They marked the commercial property portfolio down 31%.

60
00:04:38.780 --> 00:04:43.780
And they marked the CNI portfolio, that's commercial and industrial loans, down 15%.

61
00:04:43.780 --> 00:04:49.780
So all in all, after BB&T analyzed the portfolio colonial,

62
00:04:49.780 --> 00:04:55.780
They only thought that their loan portfolio was worth 63 cents on the dollar.

63
00:04:57.180 --> 00:05:01.080
Now that's very similar to the 68 cent valuation

64
00:05:01.080 --> 00:05:04.280
from when U.S. Bancorp bought PFF

65
00:05:04.280 --> 00:05:07.020
and Downey Savings and Loan in California.

66
00:05:08.960 --> 00:05:13.960
So we have a nice valuation that I think we can look to

67
00:05:13.960 --> 00:05:20.460
we can look to, especially banks with heavy real estate exposure.

68
00:05:21.960 --> 00:05:25.960
Now, this wouldn't be so bad if banks had a lot of capital, but they don't.

69
00:05:25.960 --> 00:05:33.960
Banks only have to have 6% capital ratio to be considered well-capitalized, 6%.

70
00:05:33.960 --> 00:05:39.960
So you don't have to lose much money, and you've gone through all your capital.

71
00:05:39.960 --> 00:05:47.280
So, let's take a case. If we have a bank and we're well capitalized, everything's fine,

72
00:05:47.280 --> 00:05:55.700
and we have a 6% capital and our capital is $10. It's a very small bank.

73
00:05:55.700 --> 00:06:04.700
So that means you have assets of $167 and your assets are mostly loans.

74
00:06:04.700 --> 00:06:12.300
So your bank was a very big real estate lender like Colonial, or PFF, or Downey, or most

75
00:06:12.300 --> 00:06:14.980
all of the banks.

76
00:06:14.980 --> 00:06:19.740
And imagine your loan portfolio is worth 63 cents on the dollar.

77
00:06:19.740 --> 00:06:22.620
Or in other words, you had to write it down by 37 percent.

78
00:06:22.620 --> 00:06:29.020
Well if you take 37 percent of a $167 loan portfolio, that means you have to write down

79
00:06:29.020 --> 00:06:32.800
your loan portfolio, $62.

80
00:06:32.800 --> 00:06:37.400
Now remember, our capital is only $10.

81
00:06:37.400 --> 00:06:43.700
So you don't go broke one time, you go broke six times.

82
00:06:43.700 --> 00:06:51.040
And that's the implications of these loan portfolios being valued as low as they are.

83
00:06:51.040 --> 00:06:54.960
And thus, that's why the FDIC is stepping in.

84
00:06:54.960 --> 00:07:01.640
Now right now, there are 3,000 banks in the United States that have real estate concentration

85
00:07:01.640 --> 00:07:04.840
in Commercial Real Estate of 300% of capital.

86
00:07:06.760 --> 00:07:09.800
So that, going back to our $10 capital bank,

87
00:07:09.800 --> 00:07:13.920
that means they have commercial real estate loans of $30.

88
00:07:13.920 --> 00:07:18.160
And if they're worth 63 cents on a dollar,

89
00:07:18.160 --> 00:07:23.160
that means all those banks under that valuation would be broke.

90
00:07:26.160 --> 00:07:31.160
Now in June, Wilshire State Bank took over Millbury Bank,

91
00:07:31.160 --> 00:07:37.360
Bank, also in Los Angeles, and the FDIC agreed to assume most of the future losses of that

92
00:07:37.360 --> 00:07:48.360
loan portfolio that took over. And in fact, Joanna Kim, who's chief executive at Wilshire

93
00:07:48.360 --> 00:07:58.320
said, quote, after we understood how the law sharing works, we were literally overjoyed.

94
00:07:58.320 --> 00:08:02.120
A veteran banker, Joseph Evans, told the Wall Street Journal, quote,

95
00:08:02.120 --> 00:08:07.920
From a turnaround guy's perspective, I've never had this kind of downside protection.

96
00:08:07.920 --> 00:08:12.720
I don't believe we would have ever been interested in or found interested investors

97
00:08:12.720 --> 00:08:21.320
to enter the banking industry at this moment absent FDIC assistance, end quote.

98
00:08:21.320 --> 00:08:28.560
So thus you have the FDIC, which at the end of the second quarter was nearly broke,

99
00:08:28.560 --> 00:08:35.360
entering into law sharing agreements of which they have $300 billion worth now.

100
00:08:35.360 --> 00:08:40.600
At the end of the second quarter, the FDIC had $10.4 billion.

101
00:08:40.600 --> 00:08:53.600
It sounds like a lot of money, except they're insuring $4.8 trillion worth of deposits.

102
00:08:53.600 --> 00:08:55.600
And things have gotten even worse.

103
00:08:55.600 --> 00:09:05.320
The other day, Sheila Baer, who's the chairwoman of the FDIC, admitted finally that the FDIC is running a deficit.

104
00:09:05.320 --> 00:09:09.760
So the 10.4 that they had at the end of the second quarter is now gone.

105
00:09:09.760 --> 00:09:13.860
And of course, she had a great idea to fix this.

106
00:09:13.860 --> 00:09:19.160
She thought, you know what, we're going to go borrow money from the banks we insure

107
00:09:19.160 --> 00:09:23.660
to shore up our reserves.

108
00:09:23.660 --> 00:09:30.560
Now imagine if you got a letter from your car insurer that said,

109
00:09:30.560 --> 00:09:34.560
the little green lizard, he sends you a letter and says,

110
00:09:34.560 --> 00:09:41.480
You know, we really need a loan to cover your car insurance.

111
00:09:41.480 --> 00:09:44.160
I mean, what would you think?

112
00:09:44.160 --> 00:09:47.880
That seemed to kind of drop off the radar pretty quick.

113
00:09:47.880 --> 00:09:51.880
And now they're talking about their next plan

114
00:09:51.880 --> 00:09:58.040
is to have the banks pay three years of insurance assessments

115
00:09:58.040 --> 00:09:59.880
in advance.

116
00:09:59.880 --> 00:10:02.200
And this is going to raise $45 billion

117
00:10:02.200 --> 00:10:12.200
to shore up their reserves, but all the banks only made $1.8 billion in the first six months of the year.

118
00:10:12.200 --> 00:10:19.200
So how could they charge them, even if they charge three years, there's no way the banking industry can come up with $45 billion.

119
00:10:19.200 --> 00:10:22.200
It would put just that many more banks out of business.

120
00:10:22.200 --> 00:10:28.200
So I'm not sure that plan is going to hold any water either.

121
00:10:28.200 --> 00:10:35.280
either. Now the positive thing about having these loans worked out by existing

122
00:10:35.280 --> 00:10:38.880
banks in the private sector is that private sector will tend to do a better

123
00:10:38.880 --> 00:10:44.320
job than the FDIC would have, but the bad news of course is that the FDIC is

124
00:10:44.320 --> 00:10:51.260
covering any losses and the FDIC obviously doesn't have the staff to

125
00:10:51.260 --> 00:11:02.100
dispose of these assets and the banks inquiring, failed banks don't want any of these real estate loans.

126
00:11:02.100 --> 00:11:15.700
So thus we have the valuations made by BB&T and U.S. Bancorp and it gives you an idea that really most of the United States banking system is really upside down.

127
00:11:15.700 --> 00:11:17.980
But how are they operating?

128
00:11:17.980 --> 00:11:21.780
Well, they're operating with deposit insurance.

129
00:11:21.780 --> 00:11:22.680
So what did they do?

130
00:11:22.680 --> 00:11:25.180
They increased the amount of deposit insurance.

131
00:11:25.180 --> 00:11:31.080
They increased while the FDIC is going broke,

132
00:11:31.080 --> 00:11:34.680
they decided they would increase the amount of insurance they need to provide,

133
00:11:34.680 --> 00:11:38.180
up to 250,000 for interest-bearing deposits

134
00:11:38.180 --> 00:11:43.580
and up to unlimited for non-interest-bearing accounts.

135
00:11:43.580 --> 00:11:49.020
So while their finances decrease, their obligations increase.

136
00:11:49.020 --> 00:11:54.860
And the loan portfolio and the loan valuations are not going to get any better.

137
00:11:54.860 --> 00:12:01.460
Charge-offs and delinquencies are exceeding 9% and they're still rising.

138
00:12:01.460 --> 00:12:11.460
And if you look at that measure during the S&L crisis, it topped out at 8% in the first quarter of 1991.

139
00:12:11.460 --> 00:12:16.620
Charge-offs alone are now approaching 3% and getting worse.

140
00:12:16.620 --> 00:12:23.140
During the S&L crisis, charge-offs never reached 2%.

141
00:12:23.140 --> 00:12:32.500
So for those who say things, this banking crisis isn't as bad as the S&L crisis, just plain not true.

142
00:12:32.500 --> 00:12:37.900
And by the way, a portion of the equity capital for some banks is debt.

143
00:12:37.900 --> 00:12:41.380
This isn't something that has gotten a lot of news.

144
00:12:41.380 --> 00:12:45.880
But many banks, while they were growing during the boom years,

145
00:12:45.880 --> 00:12:52.380
if they had trouble raising capital, would issue securities called trust preferred securities.

146
00:12:52.380 --> 00:12:56.880
Now trust preferred securities are essentially debt,

147
00:12:56.880 --> 00:13:00.280
but they have some of the attributes of equity.

148
00:13:00.280 --> 00:13:04.780
And any corporation could have issued them,

149
00:13:04.780 --> 00:13:08.680
but it was mainly bank holding companies that took advantage of this,

150
00:13:08.680 --> 00:13:13.480
and that's because the Federal Reserve Board issued an opinion in 1996

151
00:13:13.480 --> 00:13:20.520
that allowed the proceeds of trust preferred to be counted as tier one capital.

152
00:13:20.520 --> 00:13:28.600
So under the Fed guidelines, a bank could have 25% of their equity in debt

153
00:13:28.600 --> 00:13:33.040
and have it be counted as equity.

154
00:13:33.040 --> 00:14:00.640
And so Wall Street, which issued the Trust Preferred, did a booming business and at the end of 2008, over 1,400 banks had Trust Preferred as part of their capital structure, $148 billion worth and for these banks, a good chunk, 25% of their capital structure is essentially debt,

155
00:14:00.640 --> 00:14:05.440
Something that's unprecedented in any of the past banking meltdowns,

156
00:14:05.440 --> 00:14:09.640
whether it be the Depression or the S&L crisis.

157
00:14:09.640 --> 00:14:16.640
Something else that's very prominent in the banking meltdown is the Federal Home Loan Bank.

158
00:14:16.640 --> 00:14:22.240
Banks during the property boom, when they had trouble attracting deposits,

159
00:14:22.240 --> 00:14:29.340
would go to the Federal Home Loan Bank, we used to call it FLUB, and we'd go borrow from FLUB.

160
00:14:29.340 --> 00:14:31.780
Now, you may wonder what federal home loan banks are.

161
00:14:31.780 --> 00:14:37.940
They were, like most bad things, they were established in the Great Depression,

162
00:14:37.940 --> 00:14:42.500
and they were to provide funding for savings and loans and thrifts.

163
00:14:42.500 --> 00:14:47.620
And the mission of FLUB is cost-effective funding to its members for the use in housing,

164
00:14:47.620 --> 00:14:52.540
community, and economic development, to provide regional affordable housing programs,

165
00:14:52.540 --> 00:14:56.660
which create housing opportunities for low and moderate income families,

166
00:14:56.660 --> 00:15:01.700
to support housing finance through advances in mortgage programs.

167
00:15:01.700 --> 00:15:07.020
Well, during the boom, Federal Home Loan Bank really provided liquidity.

168
00:15:07.020 --> 00:15:13.900
They provided, they had extended just over $100 billion in 1993,

169
00:15:13.900 --> 00:15:24.740
and by the end of 2007, they had extended $822 billion in loans to the banking system.

170
00:15:24.740 --> 00:15:33.540
Now, how this affects what the FDIC will collect is this.

171
00:15:33.540 --> 00:15:37.740
When banks would get an advance from FLUB,

172
00:15:37.740 --> 00:15:46.840
FLUB collateralizes its advance by filing a claim on a portion of the bank's loans.

173
00:15:46.840 --> 00:15:50.340
They'd file a UCC filing on a certain number of their loans,

174
00:15:50.340 --> 00:15:53.740
and they wouldn't take all their loans as collateral.

175
00:15:53.740 --> 00:15:56.780
They wouldn't take land loans, they wouldn't take construction loans,

176
00:15:56.780 --> 00:15:59.460
they wouldn't take loans involving petroleum,

177
00:15:59.460 --> 00:16:06.260
they wouldn't take any special purpose loans like bowling alleys or anything like that.

178
00:16:06.260 --> 00:16:13.460
Just bread and butter, plain vanilla, office buildings, generally owner-occupied loans.

179
00:16:13.460 --> 00:16:21.140
So when you see these bank failures and you notice that the projected hit to the FDIC Reserve

180
00:16:21.140 --> 00:16:23.660
is so much higher than it used to be.

181
00:16:23.660 --> 00:16:26.260
The reason is most of these banks,

182
00:16:26.260 --> 00:16:29.860
depending on FLUB for their advances.

183
00:16:29.860 --> 00:16:33.180
And FLUB would take those loans

184
00:16:33.180 --> 00:16:37.180
because they had them as collateral when the bank failed.

185
00:16:38.280 --> 00:16:42.220
Therefore, the FDIC didn't have those loans to collect,

186
00:16:42.220 --> 00:16:46.840
to offset what they had to pay to make the depositors whole.

187
00:16:46.840 --> 00:16:50.400
So it used to be that during the SNL crisis,

188
00:16:51.140 --> 00:17:00.140
The billion-dollar bank failed. Generally, the loss to the FDIC fund would be about 25%.

189
00:17:00.140 --> 00:17:04.140
Well, now it's over 30%, 33%.

190
00:17:04.140 --> 00:17:06.140
And it's probably going to go higher.

191
00:17:06.140 --> 00:17:12.140
Again, this is because of these advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

192
00:17:12.140 --> 00:17:16.140
Well, now it's likely that the Federal Home Loan Bank's in trouble.

193
00:17:16.140 --> 00:17:20.140
6.30.09, it had a trillion won in assets.

194
00:17:20.140 --> 00:17:31.380
Assets. It only had 45 billion in total capital. That means FLUB is leveraged at 25 to 1. So

195
00:17:31.380 --> 00:17:37.500
if they take a hit of 5% to their assets, it will wipe out their capital base. So if

196
00:17:37.500 --> 00:17:45.180
you wake up one morning and say, the government is bailing out the Federal Home Loan Bank,

197
00:17:45.180 --> 00:17:47.620
and you'll know what happened.

198
00:17:47.620 --> 00:17:50.060
It may be the next Federal Veil app

199
00:17:50.060 --> 00:17:51.940
that no one's ever heard of before.

200
00:17:53.600 --> 00:17:56.700
Now we constantly hear that today's bank crisis

201
00:17:56.700 --> 00:17:59.280
isn't near as bad as the Great Depression.

202
00:17:59.280 --> 00:18:01.420
It's not near as bad as the SNL crisis.

203
00:18:01.420 --> 00:18:03.160
We hear that all the time.

204
00:18:03.160 --> 00:18:04.860
A little over a year ago,

205
00:18:04.860 --> 00:18:08.460
financial columnist David Widener wrote

206
00:18:08.460 --> 00:18:11.860
an article called Chicken Littles and the US Banks.

207
00:18:11.860 --> 00:18:20.700
and Widener went to Lawrence White to be his expert witness on this and Lawrence

208
00:18:20.700 --> 00:18:25.700
White actually served on the, you guessed it, Federal Home Loan Bank Board from

209
00:18:25.700 --> 00:18:32.660
1986 to 1989 and it was the view of Mr. White that the current crisis just

210
00:18:32.660 --> 00:18:39.380
doesn't strike me as anything close to the period between 1982 and 1993 when

211
00:18:39.380 --> 00:18:42.020
Thousands of SNLs and banks had to be closed.

212
00:18:45.020 --> 00:18:47.620
And Widener said, he said,

213
00:18:47.620 --> 00:18:50.820
I don't think this crisis would even make the top 10.

214
00:18:50.820 --> 00:18:52.820
And certainly nothing like the depression

215
00:18:52.820 --> 00:18:54.540
when thousands of banks fail.

216
00:18:55.940 --> 00:19:00.940
So in the view of those gentlemen in a year ago,

217
00:19:01.300 --> 00:19:04.220
there was no problem.

218
00:19:04.220 --> 00:19:07.260
Now I attended the Hard Asset Conference in Las Vegas

219
00:19:07.260 --> 00:19:15.460
last fall and listened to a gentleman, many of you in the room know, I think, Dennis Gartman.

220
00:19:15.460 --> 00:19:23.960
And he said at the time, at worst, there will be 117 bank failures and it's no big deal.

221
00:19:23.960 --> 00:19:29.960
So quit worrying about it, he said. He repeated over and over and over that 96% of the homeowners

222
00:19:29.960 --> 00:19:32.960
were paying their mortgages on time and everything was just going to be fine.

223
00:19:32.960 --> 00:19:40.360
Don't know if he's changed his point of view, but he's coming up a little short on that bank failure number.

224
00:19:40.360 --> 00:19:49.760
Sheila Baer, chairwoman of the FDIC, she said after the IndyMac failure, there will be more bank failures,

225
00:19:49.760 --> 00:19:54.960
but nothing compared with previous cycles, such as the savings and loan days, that's what she said.

226
00:19:54.960 --> 00:20:01.360
And even today, Michael Menzies, he's the chairman of the Independent Community Bankers of America.

227
00:20:01.360 --> 00:20:19.360
He says, quote, community banks lend locally, they know their customers and continue to stick to traditional lending practices, all of which constitute the continued stability and strength of the community banking sector, unquote.

228
00:20:19.360 --> 00:20:28.360
So the experts say, gee, this isn't a big deal, it doesn't compare at all to the Great Depression, doesn't compare at all to the savings and loan crisis.

229
00:20:28.360 --> 00:20:44.360
So let's have a look. From 1929 to 1941, there were over 10,000 banks that failed, totaling $7.6 billion in deposits, which is roughly $100 billion in 2009 dollars.

230
00:20:44.360 --> 00:20:52.360
Now 10,000 sounds like a bunch of banks and it is, but branch banking in the Depression was virtually unheard of.

231
00:20:52.360 --> 00:21:01.940
have. Every single branch was its own bank. And so, it's hard to make the comparison

232
00:21:01.940 --> 00:21:09.540
between them and NAB. I mean, we've only had 98 failures this year, 25 a year ago,

233
00:21:09.540 --> 00:21:16.880
but consider Washington Mutual. Washington Mutual had over 2,200 branches. Colonial Bank

234
00:21:16.880 --> 00:21:22.480
Bank had 346 branches, Downey Savings and Loan and PFF had over 200 branches,

235
00:21:22.480 --> 00:21:26.080
Guaranteed Bank had 162 branches and so on.

236
00:21:26.080 --> 00:21:34.080
We've had over 3,700 bank branches that have failed in this current meltdown

237
00:21:34.080 --> 00:21:40.080
and that doesn't include Wachovia, which had 3,300 branches.

238
00:21:40.080 --> 00:21:43.480
Of course, Wachovia isn't counted as a failure

239
00:21:43.480 --> 00:21:50.960
because they were deemed systemically important and they were married to Wells Fargo

240
00:21:50.960 --> 00:21:57.320
and somewhat of a shotgun wedding there at the end of last year to keep them off the failure list.

241
00:21:57.320 --> 00:22:05.920
So we've really had about 7,000 branches fail during this meltdown.

242
00:22:05.920 --> 00:22:11.520
But the number of branches or banks doesn't reflect the complete impact.

243
00:22:11.520 --> 00:22:15.160
John Lounsbury of the street.com lays out the numbers.

244
00:22:15.160 --> 00:22:20.160
And this is as of the end of August, but adjusted to $2009,

245
00:22:22.380 --> 00:22:24.900
the depression banking crisis was 100 billion,

246
00:22:24.900 --> 00:22:29.900
as I mentioned before, the SNL crisis was 923 billion

247
00:22:31.000 --> 00:22:34.660
and the current crisis is 7.1 trillion.

248
00:22:36.700 --> 00:22:38.460
So on a per capita basis,

249
00:22:38.460 --> 00:22:41.220
we've had some population growth since then,

250
00:22:41.220 --> 00:22:47.060
The failed deposits in the depression were 821 per person, $821 per person.

251
00:22:47.060 --> 00:22:51.300
They were over $3,800 per person in the S&L crisis,

252
00:22:51.300 --> 00:22:56.540
and they're over $23,000 per person in the current crisis.

253
00:22:56.540 --> 00:22:59.300
And this was calculated before Corus Bank failed.

254
00:22:59.300 --> 00:23:01.640
Corus Bank failed a couple of weeks ago.

255
00:23:01.640 --> 00:23:05.220
Big Chicago bank, big high-rise condo lender,

256
00:23:05.220 --> 00:23:07.500
and they were a multi-billion dollar bank.

257
00:23:07.500 --> 00:23:10.980
So the numbers would even be worse at this point.

258
00:23:10.980 --> 00:23:13.220
So the SNL crisis was five times bigger

259
00:23:13.220 --> 00:23:16.540
than the banking crisis in the Great Depression.

260
00:23:16.540 --> 00:23:21.540
And the current crisis is 25 times bigger

261
00:23:22.060 --> 00:23:25.680
than the crisis of the Great Depression,

262
00:23:25.680 --> 00:23:29.780
both on a per capita basis and so on.

263
00:23:29.780 --> 00:23:32.220
Now, you may wonder how it could get that big,

264
00:23:32.220 --> 00:23:37.140
but the financial sector just grew huge

265
00:23:37.140 --> 00:23:41.740
in the last few years and making mortgages

266
00:23:41.740 --> 00:23:46.020
so everybody had a place to live with no money down

267
00:23:46.020 --> 00:23:48.500
and a very low payment, et cetera, et cetera.

268
00:23:48.500 --> 00:23:53.500
And so the financial part of the S&P had grown 45%

269
00:23:54.820 --> 00:23:59.140
and thus the meltdown has to be just that much higher.

270
00:23:59.140 --> 00:24:00.260
Now there are those that believe

271
00:24:00.260 --> 00:24:01.760
that banks should be making loans

272
00:24:01.760 --> 00:24:03.940
to get the economy going again.

273
00:24:03.940 --> 00:24:05.260
You hear that all the time.

274
00:24:05.260 --> 00:24:12.260
But banks can't lend because these credit losses are chewing away their capital.

275
00:24:12.260 --> 00:24:15.260
So there's no way they're going to be able to crank up the lending.

276
00:24:15.260 --> 00:24:17.260
That's why lending is down.

277
00:24:17.260 --> 00:24:27.260
I mean, what's clearly far from normal is the fact that the Federal Reserve has invented deposits out of thin air to buy toxic assets

278
00:24:27.260 --> 00:24:34.260
so that banks can keep a lot of cash on deposit at the Federal Reserve.

279
00:24:34.260 --> 00:24:52.260
And in most cases, these banks wouldn't keep it on deposit at the Federal Reserve, they'd go out and lend that money and then the money would multiply through the banking system and grow by ten times the amount that would be on deposit at the Federal Reserve.

280
00:24:52.260 --> 00:25:00.300
Federal Reserve, but that's not the case because they don't have anybody to lend the money to

281
00:25:00.300 --> 00:25:09.660
and they are losing money on real estate deals and other types of deals, which is eroding their capital.

282
00:25:09.660 --> 00:25:13.220
Well, the very same thing happened in the Depression.

283
00:25:13.220 --> 00:25:20.540
Despite what you may have read in Friedman and Schwartz, the Federal Reserve did all it could to inflate the money supply.

284
00:25:20.540 --> 00:25:26.540
Fed Governor Eugene Meyer persuaded Hoover and Carter Glass to push through Glass-Steagall Act,

285
00:25:26.540 --> 00:25:34.140
which allowed the Fed to use U.S. government securities, in addition to gold,

286
00:25:34.140 --> 00:25:42.240
to inflate as collateral for Federal Reserve notes.

287
00:25:42.240 --> 00:25:45.940
And this allowed the Fed to greatly expand credit, and it did.

288
00:25:45.940 --> 00:25:50.500
It did by buying $1.1 billion in government securities in 1931.

289
00:25:52.220 --> 00:25:55.340
Now, despite this attempt to inflate, the money supply fell.

290
00:25:55.340 --> 00:25:57.380
The banks wouldn't lend.

291
00:25:57.380 --> 00:26:00.220
Other banks were failing, just like they are now.

292
00:26:00.220 --> 00:26:02.780
The ones left standing were shy to take the risk.

293
00:26:03.780 --> 00:26:07.340
Also, the expansionary Fed policy lowered interest rates

294
00:26:07.340 --> 00:26:10.780
just at a time when loans became risky to make.

295
00:26:10.780 --> 00:26:14.580
Thus, the weakened bank's incentive to bear risk was very low.

296
00:26:14.580 --> 00:26:21.220
So if you make loans during the Depression, you had no incentive to because the rates were low and the risk was high.

297
00:26:21.220 --> 00:26:29.500
Same situation as now, rates are very low, risk is very high, so banks aren't lending.

298
00:26:29.500 --> 00:26:34.140
And they piled up excess reserves.

299
00:26:34.140 --> 00:26:39.940
So the government tried to browbeat the banks into making loans.

300
00:26:39.940 --> 00:26:43.600
Huber blamed the banks for not lending, and he was, quote,

301
00:26:43.600 --> 00:26:46.380
disturbed at the apparent lack of cooperation

302
00:26:46.380 --> 00:26:48.580
of the commercial banks of the country

303
00:26:48.580 --> 00:26:51.960
in the credit expansion drive, end quote.

304
00:26:53.220 --> 00:26:57.380
Ohio Democratic Senator Altie Palmerine

305
00:26:57.380 --> 00:27:00.020
denounced the laggard banks bitterly.

306
00:27:00.020 --> 00:27:02.660
He said, quote, I measure my words,

307
00:27:02.660 --> 00:27:05.500
the bank that is 75% liquid or more

308
00:27:05.500 --> 00:27:09.700
and refuses to make loans when proper security is offered

309
00:27:09.700 --> 00:27:16.500
under present circumstances is a parasite on the community."

310
00:27:16.500 --> 00:27:17.860
Hoover even got into the act.

311
00:27:17.860 --> 00:27:23.940
He railed against the public for what he called traitorous hoarding.

312
00:27:23.940 --> 00:27:25.340
We have a little of that now.

313
00:27:25.340 --> 00:27:30.820
You're supposed to go out and spend cash for clunkers.

314
00:27:30.820 --> 00:27:32.580
You're not supposed to be saving money.

315
00:27:32.580 --> 00:27:38.940
Everybody's worried about the savings rate going up

316
00:27:38.940 --> 00:27:41.800
and People Not Stimulating the Economy.

317
00:27:41.800 --> 00:27:46.800
Earlier this year, Barney Frank said that President Obama

318
00:27:46.800 --> 00:27:50.300
would require the banks to start lending

319
00:27:50.300 --> 00:27:52.340
to businesses and customers.

320
00:27:52.340 --> 00:27:55.240
Obama himself said, soon my Treasury Secretary,

321
00:27:55.240 --> 00:27:58.060
Tim Geithner, will announce a new strategy

322
00:27:58.060 --> 00:28:00.540
for reviving our financial system

323
00:28:00.540 --> 00:28:04.400
that gets credit flowing to businesses and families.

324
00:28:06.200 --> 00:28:08.560
So of course this inflating by the central bank

325
00:28:08.560 --> 00:28:10.600
and the bank brow beating by the government

326
00:28:10.600 --> 00:28:14.040
only serves to delay what is really needed.

327
00:28:14.040 --> 00:28:16.640
And that's the process of liquidation

328
00:28:16.640 --> 00:28:18.840
and reduction of costs needed to clear the way

329
00:28:18.840 --> 00:28:22.320
of the malinvestments made over the last few years,

330
00:28:22.320 --> 00:28:25.700
which were created by fractionalized banking during the boom.

331
00:28:26.840 --> 00:28:30.100
So just as the depression was extended and aggravated

332
00:28:30.100 --> 00:28:32.640
by the Fed and other government intervention,

333
00:28:32.640 --> 00:28:35.040
so it is again today with the current depression.

334
00:28:35.920 --> 00:28:37.880
As Murray Rothbard explained, quote,

335
00:28:37.880 --> 00:28:44.180
A dearth of bank failure should rather be treated with suspicion, as they witnessed the drop

336
00:28:44.180 --> 00:28:50.860
of bank failures in the United States since the advent of the FDIC. It might indeed mean

337
00:28:50.860 --> 00:28:59.040
that banks are doing better, but at the expense of society and the economy faring worse. Bank

338
00:28:59.040 --> 00:29:05.240
failures are a healthy weapon by which the market keeps credit inflation in check and

339
00:29:05.240 --> 00:29:12.240
And absence of failure might well mean that that check is doing poorly and that inflation

340
00:29:12.240 --> 00:29:16.640
of money and credit is all the more rampant.

341
00:29:16.640 --> 00:29:23.220
Now we've had the last 20 years be a boom for bankers and for banks.

342
00:29:23.220 --> 00:29:30.640
And they've morphed in size to a gargantuan proportion of the economy on what hopefully

343
00:29:30.640 --> 00:29:37.840
I've shown is the rickettiest capital structure that the world's ever seen. So the need for

344
00:29:37.840 --> 00:29:44.040
correction is equally huge and we are just getting started. Thank you.
