WEBVTT

NOTE II. The Nature of Economic Calculation

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.800
Section 2. The Nature of Economic Calculation

2
00:00:04.800 --> 00:00:11.760
Every man who in the course of economic life takes a choice between the satisfaction of one need as against another,

3
00:00:11.760 --> 00:00:15.120
eo ipso makes a judgment of value.

4
00:00:15.120 --> 00:00:21.600
Such judgments of value at once include only the very satisfaction of the need itself,

5
00:00:21.600 --> 00:00:28.640
and from this they reflect back upon the goods of a lower and then further upon goods of a higher order.

6
00:00:28.640 --> 00:00:34.200
As a rule, the man who knows his own mind is in a position to value goods of a lower order.

7
00:00:34.200 --> 00:00:42.800
Under simple conditions, it is also possible for him without much ado to form some judgment of the significance to him of goods of a higher order.

8
00:00:42.800 --> 00:00:49.080
But, where the state of affairs is more involved and their interconnections not so easily discernible,

9
00:00:49.080 --> 00:00:55.440
subtler means must be employed to accomplish a correct valuation of the means of production.

10
00:00:55.440 --> 00:01:01.120
It would not be difficult for a farmer in economic isolation to come by a distinction

11
00:01:01.120 --> 00:01:05.920
between the expansion of pasture farming and the development of activity in the hunting

12
00:01:05.920 --> 00:01:07.040
field.

13
00:01:07.040 --> 00:01:13.040
In such a case the processes of production involved are relatively short and the expense

14
00:01:13.040 --> 00:01:16.600
and income entailed can be easily gauged.

15
00:01:16.600 --> 00:01:22.160
But it is quite a different matter when the choice lies between the utilization of a water

16
00:01:22.160 --> 00:01:28.560
Water course for the manufacture of electricity or the extension of a coal mine or the drawing

17
00:01:28.560 --> 00:01:34.320
up of plans for the better employment of the energies latent in raw coal.

18
00:01:34.320 --> 00:01:39.680
Here the roundabout processes of production are many and each is very lengthy.

19
00:01:39.680 --> 00:01:44.680
Here the conditions necessary for the success of the enterprises which are to be initiated

20
00:01:44.680 --> 00:01:51.440
are diverse so that one cannot apply merely vague valuations but requires rather more

21
00:01:51.440 --> 00:01:58.040
more exact estimates and some judgment of the economic issues actually involved.

22
00:01:58.040 --> 00:02:02.920
Valuation can only take place in terms of units, yet it is impossible that there should

23
00:02:02.920 --> 00:02:06.580
ever be a unit of subjective use-value for goods.

24
00:02:06.580 --> 00:02:11.020
Marginal utility does not posit any unit of value, since it is obvious that the value

25
00:02:11.020 --> 00:02:16.320
of two units of a given stock is necessarily greater than, but less than double, the value

26
00:02:16.320 --> 00:02:18.320
of a single unit.

27
00:02:18.320 --> 00:02:23.320
Estimates of value do not measure, they merely establish grades and scales. Even Robinson

28
00:02:23.320 --> 00:02:29.220
Crusoe, when he has to make a decision where no ready judgment of value appears, and where

29
00:02:29.220 --> 00:02:34.820
he has to construct one upon the basis of a more or less exact estimate, cannot operate

30
00:02:34.820 --> 00:02:40.740
solely with subjective use value, but must take into consideration the intersubstitutability

31
00:02:40.740 --> 00:02:46.020
of goods on the basis of which he can then form his estimates.

32
00:02:46.020 --> 00:02:52.540
In such circumstances it will be impossible for him to refer all things back to one unit.

33
00:02:52.540 --> 00:02:58.420
Rather will he so far as he can refer all the elements which have to be taken into account

34
00:02:58.420 --> 00:03:03.140
in forming his estimate to those economic goods which can be apprehended by an obvious

35
00:03:03.140 --> 00:03:09.660
judgment of value, that is to say, to goods of a lower order and to pain cost.

36
00:03:09.660 --> 00:03:13.980
That this is only possible in very simple conditions is obvious.

37
00:03:13.980 --> 00:03:19.740
In the case of more complicated and more lengthy processes of production, it will plainly not

38
00:03:19.740 --> 00:03:21.360
answer.

39
00:03:21.360 --> 00:03:27.160
In an exchange economy, the objective exchange value of commodities enters as the unit of

40
00:03:27.160 --> 00:03:29.220
economic calculation.

41
00:03:29.220 --> 00:03:31.800
This entails a threefold advantage.

42
00:03:31.800 --> 00:03:37.920
In the first place, it renders it possible to base the calculation upon the valuations

43
00:03:37.920 --> 00:03:40.400
of all participants in trade.

44
00:03:40.400 --> 00:03:45.840
The subjective use-value of each is not immediately comparable as a purely individual phenomenon,

45
00:03:45.840 --> 00:03:48.960
with the subjective use-value of other men.

46
00:03:48.960 --> 00:03:54.680
It only becomes so in exchange-value, which arises out of the interplay of the subjective

47
00:03:54.680 --> 00:03:58.120
valuations of all who take part in exchange.

48
00:03:58.120 --> 00:04:04.320
But in that case, calculation by exchange-value furnishes a control over the appropriate employment

49
00:04:04.320 --> 00:04:05.520
of goods.

50
00:04:05.520 --> 00:04:10.480
Anyone who wishes to make calculations in regard to a complicated process of production will

51
00:04:10.480 --> 00:04:15.140
immediately notice whether he has worked more economically than others or not.

52
00:04:15.140 --> 00:04:19.640
If he finds, from reference to the exchange relations obtaining in the market, that he

53
00:04:19.640 --> 00:04:24.360
will not be able to produce profitably, this shows that others understand how to make a

54
00:04:24.360 --> 00:04:27.840
better use of the goods of higher order in question.

55
00:04:27.840 --> 00:04:34.000
Lastly, calculation by exchange value makes it possible to refer values back to a unit.

56
00:04:34.000 --> 00:04:38.600
For this purpose, since goods are mutually substitutable in accordance with the exchange

57
00:04:38.600 --> 00:04:43.180
relations obtaining in the market, any possible good can be chosen.

58
00:04:43.180 --> 00:04:47.480
In a monetary economy it is money that is so chosen.

59
00:04:47.480 --> 00:04:49.900
Monetary calculation has its limits.

60
00:04:49.900 --> 00:04:53.320
Money is no yardstick of value, nor yet of price.

61
00:04:53.320 --> 00:04:56.280
Value is not indeed measured in money, nor is price.

62
00:04:56.280 --> 00:04:59.040
They merely consist in money.

63
00:04:59.040 --> 00:05:05.880
Money as an economic good is not of stable value as has been naively but wrongly assumed

64
00:05:05.880 --> 00:05:09.840
in using it as a standard of deferred payments.

65
00:05:09.840 --> 00:05:15.640
The exchange relationship which obtains between money and goods is subjected to constant,

66
00:05:15.640 --> 00:05:21.700
if as a rule not too violent, fluctuations originating not only from the side of other

67
00:05:21.700 --> 00:05:25.440
economic goods but also from the side of money.

68
00:05:25.440 --> 00:05:36.440
However, these fluctuations disturb value calculations only in the slightest degree, since usually, in view of the ceaseless alternations in other economic data,

69
00:05:36.440 --> 00:05:49.440
these calculations will refer only to comparatively short periods of time, periods in which good money, at least normally, undergoes comparatively trivial fluctuations in regard to its exchange relations.

70
00:05:49.440 --> 00:06:08.440
The inadequacy of the monetary calculation of value does not have its mainspring in the fact that value is then calculated in terms of a universal medium of exchange, namely money, but rather in the fact that in this system it is exchange value and not subjective use value on which the calculation is based.

71
00:06:08.440 --> 00:06:17.440
It can never obtain as a measure for the calculation of those value determining elements which stand outside the domain of exchange transactions.

72
00:06:17.440 --> 00:06:47.440
If, for example, a man were to calculate the profitability of erecting a water works, he would not be able to include in his calculation the beauty of the waterfall which the scheme might impair, except that he may pay attention to the diminution of tourist traffic or similar changes which may be valued in terms of money, yet these considerations might well prove one of the factors in deciding whether or not the building is to go up at all. It is customary to term such elements extra-economic. This perhaps is appropriate.

73
00:06:47.440 --> 00:06:52.240
We are not concerned with disputes over terminology, yet the considerations themselves can scarcely

74
00:06:52.240 --> 00:06:56.840
be termed irrational. In any place where men regard a significant the beauty of a neighborhood

75
00:06:56.840 --> 00:07:01.760
or of a building, the health, happiness, and contentment of mankind, the honor of individuals

76
00:07:01.760 --> 00:07:08.080
or nations, they are just as much motive forces of rational conduct as are economic factors

77
00:07:08.080 --> 00:07:12.600
in the proper sense of the word, even where they are not substitutable against each other

78
00:07:12.600 --> 00:07:42.600
that monetary calculation cannot embrace these factors lies in its very nature, but for the purposes of our everyday economic life this does not detract from the significance of monetary calculation, for all those ideal goods are goods of a lower order and can hence be embraced straightway within the ambit of our judgment of values, there is therefore no difficulty in taking them into account even though they must remain outside the

79
00:07:42.600 --> 00:07:44.600
and the sphere of monetary value.

80
00:07:44.600 --> 00:07:47.600
That they do not admit of such computation

81
00:07:47.600 --> 00:07:51.600
renders their consideration in the affairs of life easier and not harder.

82
00:07:51.600 --> 00:07:55.600
Once we see clearly how highly we value beauty, health, honor and pride,

83
00:07:55.600 --> 00:07:59.600
surely nothing can prevent us from paying a corresponding regard to them.

84
00:07:59.600 --> 00:08:02.600
It may seem painful to any sensitive spirit

85
00:08:02.600 --> 00:08:05.600
to have to balance spiritual goods against material,

86
00:08:05.600 --> 00:08:08.600
but that is not the fault of monetary calculation.

87
00:08:08.600 --> 00:08:11.600
It lies in the very nature of things themselves.

88
00:08:11.600 --> 00:08:17.600
If our judgments of value can be established directly without computation in value or in money,

89
00:08:17.600 --> 00:08:22.600
the necessity of choosing between material and spiritual satisfaction cannot be evaded.

90
00:08:22.600 --> 00:08:28.600
Robinson Crusoe and the socialist state have an equal obligation to make the choice.

91
00:08:28.600 --> 00:08:36.600
Anyone with a genuine sense of moral values experiences no hardship in deciding between honor and livelihood.

92
00:08:36.600 --> 00:08:58.360
He knows his plain duty. If a man cannot make honor his bread, yet can he renounce his bread for honor's sake, only they who prefer to be relieved of the agony of this decision, because they cannot bring themselves to renounce material comfort for the sake of spiritual advantage, seeing the choice a profanation of true values.

93
00:08:58.360 --> 00:09:03.360
Monetary calculation only has meaning within the sphere of economic organization.

94
00:09:03.360 --> 00:09:09.360
It is a system whereby the rules of economics may be applied in the disposition of economic goods.

95
00:09:09.360 --> 00:09:16.360
Economic goods only have part in this system in proportion to the extent to which they may be exchanged for money.

96
00:09:16.360 --> 00:09:21.360
Any extension of the sphere of monetary calculation causes misunderstanding.

97
00:09:21.360 --> 00:09:26.360
It cannot be regarded as constituting a kind of yardstick for the valuation of goods

98
00:09:26.360 --> 00:09:32.360
and cannot be so treated in historical investigations into the development of social relationships.

99
00:09:32.360 --> 00:09:37.440
It cannot be used as a criterion of national wealth and income, nor as a means of gauging

100
00:09:37.440 --> 00:09:42.440
the value of goods which stand outside the sphere of exchange, as who should seek to

101
00:09:42.440 --> 00:09:48.400
estimate the extent of human losses through emigrations or wars in terms of money.

102
00:09:48.400 --> 00:09:52.000
This is mere stylistic tomfoolery.

103
00:09:52.000 --> 00:09:57.400
However much it may be indulged in by otherwise perspicacious economists.

104
00:09:57.400 --> 00:10:04.940
Nonetheless, within these limits, which in economic life it never overlaps, monetary calculation

105
00:10:04.940 --> 00:10:08.760
fulfills all the requirements of economic calculation.

106
00:10:08.760 --> 00:10:13.600
It affords us a guide through the oppressive plentitude of economic potentialities.

107
00:10:13.600 --> 00:10:19.240
It enables us to extend, to all goods of a higher order, the judgment of value, which

108
00:10:19.240 --> 00:10:28.240
which is bound up with and clearly evident in the case of goods ready for consumption or, at best, of production goods of the lowest order.

109
00:10:28.240 --> 00:10:38.240
It renders their value capable of computation and thereby gives us the primary basis for all economic operations with goods of a higher order.

110
00:10:38.240 --> 00:10:49.240
Without it, all production involving processes stretching well back in time, and all the longer roundabout processes of capitalistic production, would be gropings in the dark.

111
00:10:49.240 --> 00:10:53.240
There are two conditions governing the possibility of calculating value in terms of money.

112
00:10:53.240 --> 00:11:01.240
Firstly, not only must goods of a lower but also those of a higher order come within the ambit of exchange, if they are to be included.

113
00:11:01.240 --> 00:11:05.240
If they do not do so, exchange relationships would not arise.

114
00:11:05.240 --> 00:11:35.240
True enough, the considerations which must obtain in the case of Robinson Crusoe prepared within the range of his own hearth to exchange, by production, labor and flour for bread, are indistinguishable from those which obtain when he is prepared to exchange bread for clothes in the open market, and therefore it is to some extent true to say that every economic action, including Robinson Crusoe's own production, can be termed exchange. Moreover, the mind of one man alone, be it

115
00:11:35.240 --> 00:11:42.200
Ever so cunning is too weak to grasp the importance of any single one among the countlessly

116
00:11:42.200 --> 00:11:44.480
many goods of higher order.

117
00:11:44.480 --> 00:11:50.000
No single man can ever master all the possibilities of production innumerable as they are as to

118
00:11:50.000 --> 00:11:55.520
be in a position to make straightway evident judgments of value without the aid of some

119
00:11:55.520 --> 00:11:57.800
system of computation.

120
00:11:57.800 --> 00:12:03.240
The distribution among a number of individuals of administrative control over economic goods

121
00:12:03.240 --> 00:12:08.560
in a community of men who take part in the labor of producing them and who are economically

122
00:12:08.560 --> 00:12:15.020
interested in them, entails a kind of intellectual division of labor, which would not be possible

123
00:12:15.020 --> 00:12:19.720
without some system of calculating production and without economy.

124
00:12:19.720 --> 00:12:25.720
The second condition is that there exists in fact a universally employed medium of exchange,

125
00:12:25.720 --> 00:12:30.120
namely money, which plays the same part as a medium in the exchange of production goods

126
00:12:30.120 --> 00:12:31.200
also.

127
00:12:31.200 --> 00:12:36.200
If this were not the case, it would not be possible to reduce all exchange relationships

128
00:12:36.200 --> 00:12:38.660
to a common denominator.

129
00:12:38.660 --> 00:12:43.600
Only under simple conditions can economics dispense with monetary calculations.

130
00:12:43.600 --> 00:12:47.740
Within the narrow confines of household economy, for instance, where the father can supervise

131
00:12:47.740 --> 00:12:52.480
the entire economic management, it is possible to determine the significance of changes in

132
00:12:52.480 --> 00:12:57.280
the processes of production without such aids to the mind, and yet with more or less of

133
00:12:57.280 --> 00:12:58.700
accuracy.

134
00:12:58.700 --> 00:13:04.060
In such a case, the process develops under a relatively limited use of capital.

135
00:13:04.060 --> 00:13:08.660
Few of the capitalistic roundabout processes of production are here introduced.

136
00:13:08.660 --> 00:13:13.620
What is manufactured is, as a rule, consumption goods, or at least such goods of a higher

137
00:13:13.620 --> 00:13:16.980
order as stand very near to consumption goods.

138
00:13:16.980 --> 00:13:22.740
The division of labor is, in its rudimentary stages, one and the same laborer controls

139
00:13:22.740 --> 00:13:27.820
the labor of what is in effect a complete process of production of goods ready for consumption

140
00:13:27.820 --> 00:13:33.020
from beginning to end. All this is different, however, in developed communal production.

141
00:13:33.020 --> 00:13:37.840
The experiences of a remote and bygone period of simple production do not provide any sort

142
00:13:37.840 --> 00:13:43.660
of argument for establishing the possibility of an economic system without monetary calculation.

143
00:13:43.660 --> 00:13:48.260
In the narrow confines of a closed household economy, it is possible throughout to review

144
00:13:48.260 --> 00:13:53.200
the process of production from beginning to end and to judge all the time whether one

145
00:13:53.200 --> 00:13:58.600
One or another mode of procedure yields more consumable goods. This, however, is no longer

146
00:13:58.600 --> 00:14:04.040
possible in the incomparably more involved circumstances of our own social economy. It

147
00:14:04.040 --> 00:14:10.320
will be evident, even in the socialist society, that 1,000 hectoliters of wine are better

148
00:14:10.320 --> 00:14:16.660
than 800, and it is not difficult to decide whether it desires 1,000 hectoliters of wine

149
00:14:16.660 --> 00:14:22.560
rather than 500 of oil. There is no need for any system of calculation to establish this

150
00:14:22.560 --> 00:14:37.560
In this fact, the deciding element is the will of the economic subjects involved, but once this decision has been taken, the real task of rational economic direction only commences, i.e. economically, to place the means at the service of the end.

151
00:14:37.560 --> 00:14:42.560
That can only be done with some kind of economic calculation.

152
00:14:42.560 --> 00:14:59.560
If the human mind cannot orientate itself properly among the bewildering mass of intermediate products and potentialities of production without such aid, it would simply stand perplexed before the problems of management and location.

153
00:14:59.560 --> 00:15:08.560
It is an illusion to imagine that in a socialist state calculation in natura can take the place of monetary calculation.

154
00:15:08.560 --> 00:15:15.280
Calculation in natura, in an economy without exchange, can embrace consumption goods only.

155
00:15:15.280 --> 00:15:20.240
It completely fails when it comes to dealing with goods of a higher order.

156
00:15:20.240 --> 00:15:27.160
And as soon as one gives up the conception of a freely established monetary price for goods of a higher order,

157
00:15:27.160 --> 00:15:30.320
rational production becomes completely impossible.

158
00:15:30.320 --> 00:15:36.880
Every step that takes us away from private ownership of the means of production and from the use of money

159
00:15:36.880 --> 00:15:40.880
also takes us away from rational economics.

160
00:15:40.880 --> 00:15:46.880
It is easy to overlook this fact, considering that the extent to which socialism is in evidence among us

161
00:15:46.880 --> 00:15:51.880
constitutes only a socialistic oasis in a society with monetary exchange,

162
00:15:51.880 --> 00:15:54.880
which is still a free society to a certain degree.

163
00:15:54.880 --> 00:15:57.880
In one sense we may agree with the socialist assertion,

164
00:15:57.880 --> 00:16:02.880
which is otherwise entirely untenable and advanced only as a demagogic point,

165
00:16:02.880 --> 00:16:22.880
To the effect that the nationalization and municipalization of enterprise is not really socialism, since these concerns in their business organizations are so much dependent upon the environing economic system with its free commerce, that they cannot be said to partake today of the really essential nature of a socialist economy.

166
00:16:22.880 --> 00:16:31.880
In state and municipal undertakings, technical improvements are introduced because their effect in similar private enterprises, domestic or foreign, can be noticed.

167
00:16:31.880 --> 00:16:37.360
are noticed, and because those private industries which produce the materials for these improvements

168
00:16:37.360 --> 00:16:40.920
give the impulse for their introduction.

169
00:16:40.920 --> 00:16:46.900
In these concerns the advantages of reorganization can be established because they operate within

170
00:16:46.900 --> 00:16:52.580
the sphere of a society based upon private ownership of the means of production and upon

171
00:16:52.580 --> 00:16:59.080
the system of monetary exchange, being thus capable of computation and account.

172
00:16:59.080 --> 00:17:04.400
This state of affairs, however, could not obtain in the case of socialist concerns operating

173
00:17:04.400 --> 00:17:07.320
in a purely socialistic environment.

174
00:17:07.320 --> 00:17:13.240
Without economic calculation there can be no economy, hence in a socialist state wherein

175
00:17:13.240 --> 00:17:18.680
the pursuit of economic calculation is impossible, there can be in our sense of the term no economy

176
00:17:18.680 --> 00:17:19.980
whatsoever.

177
00:17:19.980 --> 00:17:26.000
In trivial and secondary matters, rational conduct might still be possible, but in general

178
00:17:26.000 --> 00:17:30.160
it would be impossible to speak of rational production anymore.

179
00:17:30.160 --> 00:17:33.800
There would be no means of determining what was rational,

180
00:17:33.800 --> 00:17:39.200
and hence it is obvious that production could never be directed by economic considerations.

181
00:17:39.200 --> 00:17:40.800
What this means is clear enough.

182
00:17:40.800 --> 00:17:44.960
Apart from its effects on the supply of commodities,

183
00:17:44.960 --> 00:17:50.200
rational conduct would be divorced from the very ground which is its proper domain.

184
00:17:50.200 --> 00:17:53.560
Would there in fact be any such thing as rational conduct at all,

185
00:17:53.560 --> 00:17:57.400
or indeed such a thing as rationality and logic and thought itself,

186
00:17:57.400 --> 00:18:01.360
historically human rationality is a development of economic life.

187
00:18:01.360 --> 00:18:04.480
Could it then obtain, when divorced therefrom,

188
00:18:04.480 --> 00:18:08.920
for a time the remembrance of the experiences gained in a competitive economy,

189
00:18:08.920 --> 00:18:13.320
which has obtained for some thousands of years, may provide a check

190
00:18:13.320 --> 00:18:16.920
to the complete collapse of the art of economy.

191
00:18:16.920 --> 00:18:20.400
The older methods of procedure might be retained

192
00:18:20.400 --> 00:18:24.600
not because of their rationality, but because they appear to be hallowed by tradition.

193
00:18:24.600 --> 00:18:30.600
Actually, they would meanwhile have become irrational, as no longer comporting with the new conditions.

194
00:18:30.600 --> 00:18:39.600
Eventually, through the general reconstruction of economic thought, they will experience alterations, which will render them in fact uneconomic.

195
00:18:39.600 --> 00:18:44.200
The supply of goods will no longer proceed anarchically of its own accord, that is true.

196
00:18:44.200 --> 00:18:49.600
All transactions which serve the purpose of meeting requirements will be subject to the control of a supreme authority.

197
00:18:49.600 --> 00:18:57.600
Yet in place of the economy of the anarchic method of production, recourse will be had to the senseless output of an absurd apparatus.

198
00:18:57.600 --> 00:19:04.600
The wheels will turn but will run to no effect. One may anticipate the nature of the future socialist society.

199
00:19:04.600 --> 00:19:12.600
There will be hundreds and thousands of factories in operation. Very few of these will be producing wares ready for use.

200
00:19:12.600 --> 00:19:18.600
In the majority of cases, what will be manufactured will be unfinished goods and production goods.

201
00:19:18.600 --> 00:19:25.100
All these concerns will be interrelated. Every good will go through a whole series of stages before it is ready for use.

202
00:19:25.100 --> 00:19:31.600
In the ceaseless toil and moil of this process, however, the administration will be without any means of testing their bearings.

203
00:19:31.600 --> 00:19:39.100
It will never be able to determine whether a given good has not been kept for a superfluous length of time in the necessary processes of production,

204
00:19:39.100 --> 00:19:43.600
or whether work and material have not been wasted in its completion.

205
00:19:43.600 --> 00:19:49.600
How will it be able to decide whether this or that method of production is the more profitable?

206
00:19:49.600 --> 00:19:56.600
At best, it will only be able to compare the quality and quantity of the consumable end product produced,

207
00:19:56.600 --> 00:20:02.600
but will in the rarest cases be in a position to compare the expenses entailed in production.

208
00:20:02.600 --> 00:20:07.600
It will know, or think it knows, the ends to be achieved by economic organization,

209
00:20:07.600 --> 00:20:14.200
and will have to regulate its activities accordingly, i.e. it will have to attain those ends with the least expense.

210
00:20:14.200 --> 00:20:19.000
It will have to make its computations with a view to finding the cheapest way.

211
00:20:19.000 --> 00:20:22.600
This computation will naturally have to be a value computation.

212
00:20:22.600 --> 00:20:27.600
It is eminently clear and requires no further proof that it cannot be of a technical character

213
00:20:27.600 --> 00:20:33.200
and that it cannot be based upon the objective use value of goods and services.

214
00:20:33.200 --> 00:20:38.560
Now, in the economic system of private ownership of the means of production, the system of

215
00:20:38.560 --> 00:20:45.200
computation by value is necessarily employed by each independent member of society. Everybody

216
00:20:45.200 --> 00:20:50.480
participates in its emergence in a double way, on the one hand as a consumer and on

217
00:20:50.480 --> 00:20:55.720
the other as a producer. As a consumer, he establishes a scale of valuation for goods

218
00:20:55.720 --> 00:21:00.840
ready for use and consumption. As a producer, he puts goods of a higher order into such

219
00:21:00.840 --> 00:21:14.840
In this way, all goods of a higher order receive a position in the scale of valuations in accordance with the immediate state of social conditions of production and of social needs.

220
00:21:14.840 --> 00:21:25.840
Through the interplay of these two processes of valuation, means will be afforded for governing both consumption and production by the economic principle throughout.

221
00:21:25.840 --> 00:21:35.840
Every graded system of pricing proceeds from the fact that men always and ever harmonize their own requirements with their estimation of economic facts.

222
00:21:35.840 --> 00:21:42.840
All this is necessarily absent from a socialist state. The administration may know exactly what goods are most urgently needed,

223
00:21:42.840 --> 00:21:50.840
but in so doing it has only found what is in fact but one of the two necessary prerequisites for economic calculation.

224
00:21:50.840 --> 00:21:56.840
In the nature of the case, it must, however, dispense with the other, the valuation of the means of production.

225
00:21:56.840 --> 00:22:00.840
It may establish the value attained by the totality of the means of production,

226
00:22:00.840 --> 00:22:04.840
this is obviously identical with that of all the needs thereby satisfied.

227
00:22:04.840 --> 00:22:09.840
It may also be able to calculate the value of any means of production

228
00:22:09.840 --> 00:22:14.840
by calculating the consequence of its withdrawal in relation to the satisfaction of needs.

229
00:22:14.840 --> 00:22:21.240
of Needs. Yet, it cannot reduce this value to the uniform expression of a money price,

230
00:22:21.240 --> 00:22:26.520
as can a competitive economy, wherein all prices can be referred back to a common expression

231
00:22:26.520 --> 00:22:32.600
in terms of money. In a socialist commonwealth, which, whilst it need not of necessity dispense

232
00:22:32.600 --> 00:22:37.640
with money altogether, yet finds it impossible to use money as an expression of the price

233
00:22:37.640 --> 00:22:44.760
of the factors of production including labor, money can play no role in economic calculation.

234
00:22:44.760 --> 00:22:47.760
Picture the building of a new railroad.

235
00:22:47.760 --> 00:22:52.240
Should it be built at all, and if so, which out of a number of conceivable roads should

236
00:22:52.240 --> 00:22:53.240
be built?

237
00:22:53.240 --> 00:22:58.460
In a competitive and monetary economy, this question would be answered by monetary calculation.

238
00:22:58.460 --> 00:23:03.280
The new road will render less expense of the transport of some goods, and it may be possible

239
00:23:03.280 --> 00:23:08.120
to calculate whether this reduction of expense transcends that involved in the building and

240
00:23:08.120 --> 00:23:10.920
upkeep of the next line.

241
00:23:10.920 --> 00:23:13.920
That can only be calculated in money.

242
00:23:13.920 --> 00:23:18.860
It is not possible to attain the desired end merely by counterbalancing the various physical

243
00:23:18.860 --> 00:23:21.360
expenses and physical savings.

244
00:23:21.360 --> 00:23:27.420
Where one cannot express hours of labor, iron, coal, all kinds of building material, machines

245
00:23:27.420 --> 00:23:32.880
and other things necessary for the construction and upkeep of the railroad in a common unit,

246
00:23:32.880 --> 00:23:35.260
it is not possible to make calculations at all.

247
00:23:35.260 --> 00:23:40.080
The drawing up of bills on an economic basis is only possible where all the goods concerned

248
00:23:40.080 --> 00:23:42.080
can be referred back to money.

249
00:23:42.080 --> 00:23:47.760
Admittedly, monetary calculation has its inconveniences and serious defects, but we have certainly

250
00:23:47.760 --> 00:23:53.200
nothing better to put in its place, and for the practical purposes of life, monetary calculation

251
00:23:53.200 --> 00:23:59.120
as it exists under a sound monetary system always suffices. Were we to dispense with

252
00:23:59.120 --> 00:24:04.720
it, any economic system of calculation would become absolutely impossible. The socialist

253
00:24:04.720 --> 00:24:10.200
society would know how to look after itself. It would issue an edict and decide for or

254
00:24:10.200 --> 00:24:15.700
or against the projected building, yet this decision would depend at best upon vague estimates.

255
00:24:15.700 --> 00:24:21.040
It would never be based upon the foundation of an exact calculation of value.

256
00:24:21.040 --> 00:24:26.320
The static state can dispense with economic calculation, for here the same events in economic

257
00:24:26.320 --> 00:24:31.400
life are ever recurring, and if we assume that the first disposition of the static socialist

258
00:24:31.400 --> 00:24:37.360
economy follows on the basis of the final state of the competitive economy, we might,

259
00:24:37.360 --> 00:24:42.480
Let all events conceive of a socialist production system which is rationally controlled from

260
00:24:42.480 --> 00:24:47.160
an economic point of view, but this is only conceptually possible.

261
00:24:47.160 --> 00:24:51.720
For the moment we leave aside the fact that a static state is impossible in real life,

262
00:24:51.720 --> 00:24:57.280
as our economic data are forever changing, so that the static nature of economic activity

263
00:24:57.280 --> 00:25:02.900
is only a theoretical assumption, corresponding to no real state of affairs, however necessary

264
00:25:02.900 --> 00:25:06.900
may be for our thinking and for the perfection of our knowledge of economics.

265
00:25:06.900 --> 00:25:13.900
Even so, we must assume that the transition to socialism must, as a consequence of the leveling out of the differences in income

266
00:25:13.900 --> 00:25:20.900
and the resultant readjustments in consumption and therefore production, change all economic data in such a way

267
00:25:20.900 --> 00:25:27.900
that a connecting link with the final state of affairs in the previously existing competitive economy becomes impossible.

268
00:25:27.900 --> 00:25:39.400
But then we have the spectacle of a socialist economic order floundering in the ocean of possible and conceivable economic combinations without the compass of economic calculation.

269
00:25:39.400 --> 00:25:50.900
Thus, in the socialist commonwealth, every economic change becomes an undertaking whose success can be neither appraised in advance nor later retrospectively determined.

270
00:25:50.900 --> 00:25:56.900
There is only groping in the dark. Socialism is the abolition of rational economy.
