WEBVTT

NOTE 10. Mercantilism and Freedom in England from the Tudors to the Civil War

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:08.000
10. Mercantilism and Freedom in England from the Tudors to the Civil War

2
00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:13.000
1. Tudor and Stuart Absolutism

3
00:00:13.000 --> 00:00:29.000
Dominant in English political thought from the early 16th to the early 17th century was a form of simplistic and militant absolutist thought that has been called the Correspondence Theory or the Political Theory of Order.

4
00:00:29.000 --> 00:00:36.040
This royalist doctrine was fashioned for the Tudor-Stewart age, in which the king struggled

5
00:00:36.040 --> 00:00:42.840
to establish his absolute power as against the international influence of the old religion,

6
00:00:42.840 --> 00:00:50.840
Catholicism, and over the Calvinist Puritans, who had definite republican and populist tendencies.

7
00:00:50.840 --> 00:00:56.880
In contrast, God was now supposed to be speaking through the English king, and therefore through

8
00:00:56.880 --> 00:01:00.080
through the head of the Anglican Church.

9
00:01:00.080 --> 00:01:06.800
The basic philosophic groundwork was the natural order, the great chain of being, which since

10
00:01:06.800 --> 00:01:13.400
the Middle Ages had been seen as strictly hierarchical, with God at the head and man

11
00:01:13.400 --> 00:01:16.920
as the highest of his material creatures.

12
00:01:16.920 --> 00:01:24.520
But then came the fundamental methodology, flimsy analogy or argument by correspondence.

13
00:01:24.520 --> 00:01:47.520
Just as God was sovereign and superior to various ranks of angels and, finally, to man and then other inferior earthly creatures in the macrocosm, so in the individual microcosm, within each person, the head must be sovereign over the body, and reason and will dominant over the appetites.

14
00:01:47.520 --> 00:01:53.960
Similarly, the father is sovereign over his family. More specifically and pointedly in

15
00:01:53.960 --> 00:01:59.560
the political realm, the king, the father of his people, must be sovereign over the

16
00:01:59.560 --> 00:02:02.280
body politic.

17
00:02:02.280 --> 00:02:08.640
This flimsy organicist analogy was pushed to great lengths. The head in the human body

18
00:02:08.640 --> 00:02:16.120
was the king in the body politic. Health in the former constituted social well-being in

19
00:02:16.120 --> 00:02:28.120
and the latter. The circulation of the blood was the same as circulation of money. Rule of the rational soul was royal sovereignty and so on.

20
00:02:28.120 --> 00:02:42.120
The only argument was correspondence, that the governmental and social ranking alleged to exist in the heavenly sphere must be duplicated in earthly government and in social life.

21
00:02:42.120 --> 00:02:47.940
One problem with the argument from correspondence is that freedom of the human will enters into

22
00:02:47.940 --> 00:02:55.540
politics and social life but does not do so elsewhere. It is rare for the liver to rebel

23
00:02:55.540 --> 00:03:02.240
against the head, and yet an important conclusion of this royalist political philosophy was

24
00:03:02.240 --> 00:03:10.800
that political rebellion is as evil and anti-natural as such rebellion by the liver. Similarly,

25
00:03:10.800 --> 00:03:17.920
Individual subjects must obey the divinely appointed monarch, else the divine order collapses

26
00:03:17.920 --> 00:03:25.680
into anarchy and disorder, and corruption and decay then rule in human life.

27
00:03:25.680 --> 00:03:32.260
While the liver has not often rebelled against the head, the royal absolutists did, of course,

28
00:03:32.260 --> 00:03:36.760
have an analogy to fall back on in heavenly government.

29
00:03:36.760 --> 00:03:40.760
Satan's Wicked Rebellion Against the Sovereignty of God.

30
00:03:40.760 --> 00:03:47.560
Similarly, the great fact of human history was Adam's fall, brought on by rebelliousness

31
00:03:47.560 --> 00:03:53.920
against divine authority and by overweening self-pride.

32
00:03:53.920 --> 00:04:02.180
God and the King, Satan, Adam and rebellious subjects, these were the analogies and correspondences

33
00:04:02.180 --> 00:04:09.660
The Royal Absolutists tried to drive home. Thus Anglican Church homilies on obedience

34
00:04:09.660 --> 00:04:19.020
in 1547 and 1570 called obedience to the sovereign the very root of all virtues, while a wicked

35
00:04:19.020 --> 00:04:26.420
boldness is the source of all sin and misery. As the homilies stated, all sins possible

36
00:04:26.420 --> 00:04:48.420
It is the absolute duty of all inferiors always and only to obey, just as the body obeys the soul and as the universe obeys God.

37
00:04:48.420 --> 00:04:55.900
In stark contrast to the scholastics, as well as to Calvinist or Lieger Monarcho-Mach thinkers,

38
00:04:55.900 --> 00:05:01.780
the Anglican preachers of order stressed time and again that the subjects must obey the

39
00:05:01.780 --> 00:05:09.020
king in any and all circumstances, whether or not the king or his actions were good or

40
00:05:09.020 --> 00:05:10.580
evil.

41
00:05:10.580 --> 00:05:15.700
There must be no resistance whatever, even to evil princes.

42
00:05:15.700 --> 00:05:24.100
The King is the divinely mandated representative of God on earth by hereditary right. To question,

43
00:05:24.100 --> 00:05:31.140
much less to disobey the King, therefore, was not only treason, but blasphemy. Disobeying

44
00:05:31.140 --> 00:05:38.340
the King is disobeying God. As the influential Mirror for Magistrates, which went through

45
00:05:38.340 --> 00:05:48.020
Through many editions from 1559 to 1587 maintained, God ordains all magistrates. Therefore, God

46
00:05:48.020 --> 00:05:55.040
ordains good when he favoreth the people, and evil when he will punish them. In short,

47
00:05:55.040 --> 00:06:01.260
good kings are a blessing sent to the people by God. Wicked kings are a punishment equally

48
00:06:01.260 --> 00:06:03.860
sent by the Divinity.

49
00:06:03.860 --> 00:06:10.500
In either case, the duty of the subject is absolute obedience to God's and the King's

50
00:06:10.500 --> 00:06:12.100
commands.

51
00:06:12.100 --> 00:06:19.040
And therefore, whosoever rebelleth against any ruler, either good or bad, rebelleth against

52
00:06:19.040 --> 00:06:24.200
God, and shall be sure of a wretched end.

53
00:06:24.200 --> 00:06:29.660
To the royalist thinkers, the rising claims of individual freedom and the natural rights

54
00:06:29.660 --> 00:06:36.500
of each individual only led to mischief and destruction of God's rational order. Thus

55
00:06:36.500 --> 00:06:45.020
Richard Hooker, circa 1554-1600, the leading Anglican theologian of the 16th century in

56
00:06:45.020 --> 00:06:55.900
his famous Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, 1594-1597, lashed out at any notion of individualism.

57
00:06:55.900 --> 00:07:02.900
Although himself a moderate on royal absolutism, Hooker wrote that the idea of every man his

58
00:07:02.900 --> 00:07:09.660
own commander, shaketh universally the fabric of government, tendeth to anarchy and mere

59
00:07:09.660 --> 00:07:16.860
confusion, dissolveth families, dissipateth colleges, corporations, armies, overthroweth

60
00:07:16.860 --> 00:07:23.380
kingdoms, churches, and whatsoever is now, through the providence of God, by authority

61
00:07:23.380 --> 00:07:26.940
and Power Upheld

62
00:07:26.940 --> 00:07:33.340
One of the most extreme royal absolutists in the Tudor-Stewart era was Edward Fawcett,

63
00:07:33.340 --> 00:07:41.580
circa 1553 to 1630, a playwright, owner of the Manor of Tyburn, a Justice of the Peace

64
00:07:41.580 --> 00:07:48.540
and Member of Parliament. Fawcett's magnum opus was a comparative discourse of the body's

65
00:07:48.540 --> 00:07:56.280
His Natural and Political, 1606, whose very title reeks of the argument by correspondence

66
00:07:56.280 --> 00:07:59.820
and the political philosophy of order.

67
00:07:59.820 --> 00:08:06.800
At some points, Fawcett came close to saying that a monarch could never harm his people.

68
00:08:06.800 --> 00:08:13.300
In other words, however evil his deeds may seem, they must really be good, virtually

69
00:08:13.300 --> 00:08:14.860
by definition.

70
00:08:14.860 --> 00:08:24.860
Indeed, at one point, Fawcett came close to the justification of a king's acts by mystery and power, as in the book of Job.

71
00:08:24.860 --> 00:08:34.860
Thus, as Professor Greenleaf puts it in his discussion of Fawcett's doctrine, the seemingly evil acts of a ruler were only an appearance,

72
00:08:34.860 --> 00:08:40.860
the real nature of which was misconstrued by the fallible minds of the citizens.

73
00:08:40.860 --> 00:08:50.860
The strong implication, of course, is that the mind of the monarch, in contrast to that of the lowly citizen, is infallible.

74
00:08:50.860 --> 00:09:04.860
Probably the most intelligent and surely the most influential of the absolutist order theorists in 17th century England was Sir Robert Filmer, 1588-1653.

75
00:09:04.860 --> 00:09:16.860
Towards the end of his life, this obscure Kentish nobleman published a series of royal absolutist essays in the late 1640s and early 1650s.

76
00:09:16.860 --> 00:09:25.860
Then, three decades later, a filmer revival took place, his collected essays being published in 1679,

77
00:09:25.860 --> 00:09:32.580
and his most famous work, Patriarcha or The Natural Power of Kings, written in the late

78
00:09:32.580 --> 00:09:40.060
1630s or early 1640s, was printed for the first time the following year.

79
00:09:40.060 --> 00:09:46.180
Filmer immediately and posthumously became the leading defender of royal absolutism from

80
00:09:46.180 --> 00:09:50.260
the older perspective of order theory.

81
00:09:50.260 --> 00:09:59.060
Filmer angrily rejected the idea that by law of nature all men are born free as heathen doctrine.

82
00:09:59.060 --> 00:10:05.340
Linking individualism and self-direction to sinful rebellion against God, Filmer warned

83
00:10:05.340 --> 00:10:11.740
against the very desire for freedom which caused Adam's fall from grace.

84
00:10:11.740 --> 00:10:17.740
Most notable in Filmer was his searching critique of the rising contractarian doctrine, which

85
00:10:17.740 --> 00:10:25.740
which laid the foundation of, and therefore justified, the State in some original social contract.

86
00:10:25.740 --> 00:10:33.940
Thomas Hobbes, 1588 to 1679, had spent all his life in service as a tutor, companion

87
00:10:33.940 --> 00:10:40.740
and intellectual guide to the Cavendishes, who were related to the royal Stuart family.

88
00:10:40.740 --> 00:10:49.140
Hobbes had worked out a contractarian justification for royal absolutism during the 1640s.

89
00:10:49.140 --> 00:10:55.040
Filmer spotted crucial flaws in Hobbes' social contract theory, which were to apply just

90
00:10:55.040 --> 00:11:01.180
as fully to John Locke's libertarian version four decades later.

91
00:11:01.180 --> 00:11:07.820
Filmer asked how likely it was that all men would agree to a contract, as was necessary

92
00:11:07.820 --> 00:11:14.800
before it could become universally binding. He wanted to know how and why a contract should

93
00:11:14.800 --> 00:11:21.740
bind all subsequent generations. He suggested it was unreasonable to invoke the specious

94
00:11:21.740 --> 00:11:25.580
notion of tacit consent.

95
00:11:25.580 --> 00:11:31.660
Filmer also trenchantly criticized the growing classical liberal idea of grounding government

96
00:11:31.660 --> 00:11:33.900
in the Consent of the Governed.

97
00:11:33.900 --> 00:11:39.740
Governments, he pointed out, could not then be stable, for governments could sometimes

98
00:11:39.740 --> 00:11:43.660
find that consent to be withdrawn.

99
00:11:43.660 --> 00:11:49.800
Once concede the power of the people to consent as well as the natural law of equal freedom

100
00:11:49.800 --> 00:11:55.220
from subjection, and the logical consequence must be anarchism.

101
00:11:55.220 --> 00:12:01.540
For then, every petty company hath a right to make a kingdom by itself, and not only

102
00:12:01.540 --> 00:12:08.220
May every city, but every village, and every family, nay, every particular man, a liberty

103
00:12:08.220 --> 00:12:12.740
to choose himself to be his own king, if he please.

104
00:12:12.740 --> 00:12:18.500
And he were a madman that, being by nature free, would choose any man but himself to

105
00:12:18.500 --> 00:12:20.180
be his own governor.

106
00:12:20.180 --> 00:12:26.900
Thus, to avoid the having but of one king of the whole world, we shall run into a liberty

107
00:12:26.900 --> 00:12:33.100
of Having as Many Kings as There Be Men in the World, which upon the matter is to have

108
00:12:33.100 --> 00:12:39.380
no king at all, but to leave all men to their natural liberty.

109
00:12:39.380 --> 00:12:45.100
It should be noted that Filmer and other absolutists of the era found great inspiration in the

110
00:12:45.100 --> 00:12:50.940
French theorist Jean Baudin, who has been called the political writer most favorably

111
00:12:50.940 --> 00:13:11.940
The Honor, if that be the proper term, of being the first English mercantilist writer,

112
00:13:11.940 --> 00:13:19.940
should have gone for four centuries to Sir Thomas Smith the Elder, 1513-1577.

113
00:13:19.940 --> 00:13:45.940
Instead, his remarkable work, a discourse on the commonwealth of this realm of England, written in 1549 and published anonymously in 1581, was at first unidentified, and since its 1893 reprint has been incorrectly attributed to another Tudor official, John Hales, died 1571.

114
00:13:45.940 --> 00:13:51.940
Thomas Smith was born into a poor family of small shepherds in the county of Essex.

115
00:13:51.940 --> 00:13:59.940
Impoverished but brilliant, Smith managed to enter Cambridge, where his scholarly abilities were soon recognized.

116
00:13:59.940 --> 00:14:06.940
There he rose to become Regis Professor of Civil Law and then Vice Chancellor of the University.

117
00:14:06.940 --> 00:14:11.940
Smith was a notable orator and a learned and brilliant polymath,

118
00:14:11.940 --> 00:14:17.380
Smith, who wrote books on Greek pronunciation and English spelling and was deeply interested

119
00:14:17.380 --> 00:14:22.460
in mathematics, chemistry, linguistics and history.

120
00:14:22.460 --> 00:14:28.100
Smith embarked on a career as politician and bureaucrat by becoming a secretary under the

121
00:14:28.100 --> 00:14:34.180
protectorate of Lord Somerset from 1547 to 1549.

122
00:14:34.180 --> 00:14:39.620
Though an Anglican, Smith was a moderate who cared little for religious matters, so he

123
00:14:39.620 --> 00:14:45.180
He was able to serve as privy counselor under Catholic Queen Mary on the recommendation

124
00:14:45.180 --> 00:14:50.740
of his old Cambridge colleague, the Catholic Bishop Stephen Gardner.

125
00:14:50.740 --> 00:14:55.860
Under Queen Elizabeth, his influence continued through the powerful position at court of

126
00:14:55.860 --> 00:15:01.500
his old Cambridge student, Sir William Cecil, later Lord Burghley.

127
00:15:01.500 --> 00:15:08.220
Smith, however, was often out of power, a fate helped by his arrogant, boorish and feisty

128
00:15:08.220 --> 00:15:25.220
Thomas Smith was a bitter critic of debasement, and he therefore became a vocal opponent of his mentor, Lord Somerset's policy of repeated debasement in order to acquire increased revenue for the crown.

129
00:15:25.220 --> 00:15:33.220
Sent into exile from the court in 1549, Smith brooded and then did what was characteristic of him.

130
00:15:33.220 --> 00:15:48.220
This penetrating lively work was written in the form of a dialogue among several characters, with The Doctor being the spokesman for the author's own views.

131
00:15:48.220 --> 00:15:57.220
Later, Smith was to repeat the dialogue form in his book Dialogue on the Queen's Marriage, 1561.

132
00:15:57.220 --> 00:16:09.220
The former work was not meant for publication, Smith noting in the tract that it is dangerous to meddle in the king's matters, as indeed it was.

133
00:16:09.220 --> 00:16:20.220
The basic thrust of the discourse on the Commonwealth was an attack on debasement and its consequences in high prices, inflation and social unrest.

134
00:16:20.220 --> 00:16:28.220
Debasement, and not the arbitrary decision of farmers or merchants, is responsible for higher prices.

135
00:16:28.220 --> 00:16:33.220
The principal losers from this policy are people on fixed incomes.

136
00:16:33.220 --> 00:16:38.220
The discourse was published after Sir Thomas' death by his nephew William.

137
00:16:38.220 --> 00:16:44.220
Included are later passages, interpolated by Thomas during the 1570s,

138
00:16:44.220 --> 00:16:51.120
Studies, attributing the Elizabethan inflation of the later 16th century to another factor,

139
00:16:51.120 --> 00:16:56.260
the influx of newly mined species from the Western Hemisphere.

140
00:16:56.260 --> 00:17:03.220
It is not known whether Smith was familiar with the similar Navaras analysis of 1556,

141
00:17:03.220 --> 00:17:09.420
or the Baudin analysis of French inflation 12 years later, or whether this was Smith's

142
00:17:09.420 --> 00:17:17.180
Independent Discovery as Price Inflation Moved from Spain Northwards into Europe.

143
00:17:17.180 --> 00:17:24.880
In 1562, Smith returned to the debasement theme, in a lengthy work, still unpublished,

144
00:17:24.880 --> 00:17:31.240
The Wages of a Roman Foot Soldier, or A Treatise on the Money of the Romans.

145
00:17:31.240 --> 00:17:36.280
This treatise on Roman money and cleanage was written in answer to a question posed

146
00:17:36.280 --> 00:17:43.280
by his friend and colleague Cecil, at this point, Queen Elizabeth's principal secretary.

147
00:17:43.280 --> 00:17:53.280
Again, Smith returns to his attack on debasement as evidence of the decay of the state and as a cause of excessive prices.

148
00:17:53.280 --> 00:18:00.280
In both the Discourse and the Treatise, Smith took the convenient, if fallacious, position

149
00:18:00.280 --> 00:18:07.080
that the king himself is the greatest loser from the high prices caused by debasement.

150
00:18:07.080 --> 00:18:12.980
Since debasement adds to the king's revenue immediately and before prices have had a chance

151
00:18:12.980 --> 00:18:19.440
to rise, the king, on the contrary, is the prime beneficiary of debasement and other

152
00:18:19.440 --> 00:18:23.320
measures of monetary inflation.

153
00:18:23.320 --> 00:18:29.160
Smith's discourse is strikingly modern in frankly grounding its social analysis in the

154
00:18:29.160 --> 00:18:44.160
Self-interest, Smith declared, is a natural fact of human life, to be channeled by constructive policy rather than thwarted by repressive legislation.

155
00:18:44.160 --> 00:18:51.160
Not that Smith abandons nascent mercantilism for any sort of liberal or laissez-faire outlook.

156
00:18:51.160 --> 00:18:56.160
Self-interest is not to be left alone within a property rights framework.

157
00:18:56.160 --> 00:19:02.160
It is to be channeled and directed by government to a common goal set by the state.

158
00:19:02.160 --> 00:19:11.160
But at least Smith was wise enough to point out that it is better for men to be provoked with lucre towards proper goals

159
00:19:11.160 --> 00:19:15.160
than to have governments take this reward from them.

160
00:19:15.160 --> 00:19:23.160
In short, government should work in tandem with the powerful incentive provided by individual self-interest.

161
00:19:23.160 --> 00:19:31.840
Smith sees that economic incentives are always at work in the market to move economic resources

162
00:19:31.840 --> 00:19:39.440
out of less profitable and into more profitable uses, and governments should work with such

163
00:19:39.440 --> 00:19:43.360
incentives rather than against them.

164
00:19:43.360 --> 00:19:49.720
Smith however was assuredly a mercantilist, as seen by his desire to foster the manufacture

165
00:19:49.720 --> 00:20:05.700
John Hales came from a prominent Kentish family and was a friend and fellow tutor official

166
00:20:05.700 --> 00:20:14.380
of Smith. Yet his economic and social philosophy was very different. In 1549, for example,

167
00:20:14.380 --> 00:20:19.940
The year that Smith's discourse was written, and which included an attack on new taxes

168
00:20:19.940 --> 00:20:28.060
on manufactured cloth, Hales was the very person responsible for instituting the tax.

169
00:20:28.060 --> 00:20:34.380
Hales also disliked two favorite themes of the discourse, love for the civil law and

170
00:20:34.380 --> 00:20:36.860
admiration for sheep farming.

171
00:20:36.860 --> 00:20:42.980
Hales, furthermore, far from being indifferent to religion, was a deacon and a dedicated

172
00:20:42.980 --> 00:20:46.500
and organizer of Bible readings.

173
00:20:46.500 --> 00:20:52.700
Most important in any contrast between Hales and the author of the Discourse, Hales attributed

174
00:20:52.700 --> 00:21:00.360
the high prices not to debasement but to three very different supply-side factors, scarcity

175
00:21:00.360 --> 00:21:06.700
of cattle and poultry, speculation and excessively high taxes.

176
00:21:06.700 --> 00:21:12.740
None of these factors, in truth, can account for any general price increase.

177
00:21:12.740 --> 00:21:19.380
Finally, Hayles took the old-fashioned moral position of attributing all ills, including

178
00:21:19.380 --> 00:21:24.160
high prices, to man's all-pervasive greed.

179
00:21:24.160 --> 00:21:30.620
Why greed should have increased rapidly in recent years to account for high prices was,

180
00:21:30.620 --> 00:21:34.740
of course, a problem that was not even addressed.

181
00:21:34.740 --> 00:21:38.940
and the desire for profit were the great social evils.

182
00:21:38.940 --> 00:21:46.340
The only cure for all this, opined Hales, was to purge man of self-love, to remove the

183
00:21:46.340 --> 00:21:53.060
self-love that is in many men, to take away the inordinate desire of riches wherewith

184
00:21:53.060 --> 00:22:00.460
many be cumbered, to expel and quench the insatiable thirst of ungodly greediness wherewith

185
00:22:00.460 --> 00:22:26.980
Again, in his defense, written the same year as the discourse, John Hales expressly denies

186
00:22:26.980 --> 00:22:33.060
It is that self-love can be in any sense the foundation of the public good.

187
00:22:33.060 --> 00:22:39.100
It may not be lawful for every man to use his own as he listeth, but every man must

188
00:22:39.100 --> 00:22:43.580
use that he hath to the most benefit of his country.

189
00:22:43.580 --> 00:22:49.980
There must be something devised to quench the insatiable thirst of greediness of men.

190
00:22:49.980 --> 00:22:58.220
Pevatus-ness must be weeded out by the roots, for it is the destruction of all good things.

191
00:22:58.220 --> 00:23:07.180
Sir Thomas Smith was responsible, rather than his associates Sir Thomas Gresham, circa 1519-1579,

192
00:23:07.180 --> 00:23:13.580
for the first expression of Gresham's Law in England. Until recently it had been thought

193
00:23:13.580 --> 00:23:18.980
that the well-known and anonymous Memorandum for the Understanding of the Exchange had

194
00:23:18.980 --> 00:23:26.100
had been submitted by Gresham to Queen Elizabeth early in her reign in 1559.

195
00:23:26.100 --> 00:23:31.900
It now turns out, however, that the memorandum was written by Smith early in Queen Mary's

196
00:23:31.900 --> 00:23:35.100
reign in 1554.

197
00:23:35.100 --> 00:23:41.320
The memorandum was certainly not a free market tract, advocating, as it did, various state

198
00:23:41.320 --> 00:23:44.880
controls over the foreign exchange market.

199
00:23:44.880 --> 00:23:51.240
It did, however, not only denounce debasement and call for a high-valued currency, but it

200
00:23:51.240 --> 00:23:57.800
also enunciated Gresham's Law that the cause of a shortage of gold coin in England was

201
00:23:57.800 --> 00:24:01.720
the legal undervaluation of gold.

202
00:24:01.720 --> 00:24:08.940
Gresham, fiscal agent of the Crown in Antwerp, himself adhered to Gresham's Law, which was

203
00:24:08.940 --> 00:24:15.300
was set forth by the Royal Commission of 1560 that he heavily influenced.

204
00:24:15.300 --> 00:24:21.380
Gresham was also a full-fledged statist and architect of Tudor monopoly privilege.

205
00:24:21.380 --> 00:24:27.460
A member of the monopoly wool cloth export company, the Merchant Adventurers, Gresham

206
00:24:27.460 --> 00:24:35.300
was the chief architect of England's tightening of that monopoly during the 1550s and 1560s,

207
00:24:35.300 --> 00:24:41.700
preventing Hanseatic merchants from exporting English cloth, increasing tariffs on foreign

208
00:24:41.700 --> 00:24:48.260
cloth, and, finally, making the adventurers far more oligarchic and tightly controlled

209
00:24:48.260 --> 00:24:51.220
from the top.

210
00:24:51.220 --> 00:24:56.380
Influenced greatly by the memorandum, and echoing its Gresham's Law position, was the

211
00:24:56.380 --> 00:25:08.380
and the younger Sir Richard Martin, 1534-1617, goldsmith, warden and master of the mint during all of Queen Elizabeth's reign.

212
00:25:08.380 --> 00:25:16.380
Trained as a goldsmith from youth, Martin also served as prime warden of the worshipful company of goldsmiths,

213
00:25:16.380 --> 00:25:21.380
alderman of London for many years, and was twice Lord Mayor.

214
00:25:21.380 --> 00:25:30.380
In the Royal Commission of 1576 on Currency and the Exchanges, whose members were hand-picked by Sir Thomas Smith,

215
00:25:30.380 --> 00:25:38.380
then Principal Secretary to the Queen, Gresham and Martin as well as Cecil were all included.

216
00:25:38.380 --> 00:25:43.380
The Commission did not include Smith himself, who had fallen ill.

217
00:25:43.380 --> 00:25:50.380
Their backing of Gresham's law was echoed a generation later by the Royal Commission of 1600,

218
00:25:50.380 --> 00:25:57.380
in which Martin served and prepared the principal memoranda.

219
00:25:57.380 --> 00:26:03.220
3. The Economic Liberalism of Sir Edward Cook

220
00:26:03.220 --> 00:26:09.420
It used to be held that the famous anti-monopoly common law decisions of Chief Justice Sir

221
00:26:09.420 --> 00:26:18.420
Edward Cook, 1552-1634, the eminent early 17th century jurist, were an expression of

222
00:26:18.420 --> 00:26:24.660
and the alleged commitment of a rising class of Puritan merchants to economic liberalism

223
00:26:24.660 --> 00:26:31.320
and laissez-faire. A particularly prominent advocate of this thesis is the prolific English

224
00:26:31.320 --> 00:26:38.020
Marxist historian Christopher Hill, who needs this view to fit into the Marxian schema of

225
00:26:38.020 --> 00:26:40.700
the English Civil War.

226
00:26:40.700 --> 00:26:46.580
It turns out, however, that there are many grave flaws in this thesis. Cook himself was

227
00:26:46.580 --> 00:26:52.620
is a moderate Anglican and not particularly concerned with religious issues. He was also

228
00:26:52.620 --> 00:26:58.260
not in any sense a merchant or a spokesman for merchants. He was a country gentleman

229
00:26:58.260 --> 00:27:04.300
from Norfolk, who successively married two heiresses and spent most of his career as

230
00:27:04.300 --> 00:27:11.140
a government lawyer, successively attorney general and chief justice. Also, Cook showed

231
00:27:11.140 --> 00:27:17.140
had no interest whatever in the new juristic concerns of merchants, such new branches of

232
00:27:17.140 --> 00:27:23.940
the law as joint stock ownership, insurance bankruptcy, negotiable instruments and commercial

233
00:27:23.940 --> 00:27:25.700
contracts.

234
00:27:25.700 --> 00:27:31.500
More important, Cook never displayed any sympathy for laissez-faire.

235
00:27:31.500 --> 00:27:36.140
As a member of parliament, Cook supported many mercantilist measures.

236
00:27:36.140 --> 00:27:42.140
Furthermore, he had imbibed from his close associate, William Cecil, Lord Burghley, an

237
00:27:42.140 --> 00:27:47.620
admiration for the elaborate tutor structure of state controls.

238
00:27:47.620 --> 00:27:51.420
His approach to foreign trade was profoundly mercantilist.

239
00:27:51.420 --> 00:27:58.580
Thus, in the 1621 session of Parliament, after he had broken with the Crown, Cook deplored

240
00:27:58.580 --> 00:28:03.340
the economic effects of the alleged scarcity of coin.

241
00:28:03.340 --> 00:28:09.340
He attacked the unfavorable balance of trade, deplored the fact that the East India Company

242
00:28:09.340 --> 00:28:15.320
was allowed to export bullion, and attacked the import trade with France as introducing

243
00:28:15.320 --> 00:28:23.320
into England immoral luxury items such as wines and lace and such like trifles.

244
00:28:23.320 --> 00:28:29.520
Cook also called for outlawing the importation of tobacco from Spain.

245
00:28:29.520 --> 00:28:34.800
Sir Edward Cooke also tried his best to cripple the new practice of exporting unfinished cloth

246
00:28:34.800 --> 00:28:41.180
to the continent and then re-importing the finished cloth. He consistently advocated

247
00:28:41.180 --> 00:28:47.720
prohibiting the importation of foreign cloths as well as the export of unfinished cloth

248
00:28:47.720 --> 00:28:55.280
and also tried to outlaw the export of raw wool to be used by foreign manufacturers.

249
00:28:55.280 --> 00:29:00.880
In general, Sir Edward Cook had no quarrel with government regulation and control of

250
00:29:00.880 --> 00:29:05.000
trade, or with the creation of monopolies.

251
00:29:05.000 --> 00:29:13.100
What he objected to was the King doing the regulating or monopolizing rather than Parliament.

252
00:29:13.100 --> 00:29:19.460
Cook favored the detailed regulation and cartelization of industry, the wage controls

253
00:29:19.460 --> 00:29:27.740
and Compulsory Employment imposed by the Statute of Artificers of 1563. He supported the laws

254
00:29:27.740 --> 00:29:33.620
against forestalling and engrossing, which, under the guise of attacks on monopoly and

255
00:29:33.620 --> 00:29:40.940
high prices, were actually price-raising and cartellizing devices prohibiting speculation

256
00:29:40.940 --> 00:29:48.860
in food products and prohibiting sales outside officially designated local markets. Laws

257
00:29:48.860 --> 00:29:54.700
Those against forestalling were lobbied for by privileged owners of local markets trying

258
00:29:54.700 --> 00:30:00.460
to exclude competitors and to raise their own prices.

259
00:30:00.460 --> 00:30:06.300
Most important, Cook's well-known opposition to government-granted monopolies was merely

260
00:30:06.300 --> 00:30:11.820
an opposition to grants by the king rather than to grants by parliament.

261
00:30:11.820 --> 00:30:32.820
Thus, in the famous Statute of Monopolies, passed in 1623, and drafted largely by Cook, Parliament abolished royal grants of monopoly privilege, but explicitly reserved to itself the right to grant such privileges, which it soon proceeded to do.

262
00:30:32.820 --> 00:30:57.220
The statute also specifically exempted from abolition large categories of royal monopoly, including such industries as printing, gunpowder and saltpeter, the rights of corporations such as London to prevent non-Londoners from engaging in trade within the city limits, or monopoly corporations engaged in foreign trade.

263
00:30:57.220 --> 00:31:04.720
Furthermore, Cooke personally favored the monopoly Russia, Virginia and East India companies.

264
00:31:04.720 --> 00:31:12.720
Cooke's legal economic philosophy might be summed up in a phrase he used in Parliament in 1621,

265
00:31:12.720 --> 00:31:18.720
that no commodity can be banished but by act of Parliament.

266
00:31:18.720 --> 00:31:28.960
4. THE BULLYONIST ATTACK ON FOREIGN EXCHANGE AND ON THE EAST INDIA TRADE

267
00:31:28.960 --> 00:31:34.760
Having survived the assaults of ignorant moralists before the Reformation, the foreign exchange

268
00:31:34.760 --> 00:31:41.160
market was subjected, during the far more secular age of the late 16th century onwards,

269
00:31:41.160 --> 00:31:48.120
to the assaults of regulators on behalf of the nation-state. Writers who have been misnamed

270
00:31:48.120 --> 00:31:54.860
Bullionists adopted the ignorant view that an outflow of gold or silver bullion abroad

271
00:31:54.860 --> 00:32:00.560
was iniquitous, and that this calamity was brought about by the machinations of evil

272
00:32:00.560 --> 00:32:07.000
foreign exchange dealers who deliberately sought gain by depreciating the value of the

273
00:32:07.000 --> 00:32:09.280
nation's currency.

274
00:32:09.280 --> 00:32:15.380
Nowhere was there any insight that the outflow of bullion might have been performing an economic

275
00:32:15.380 --> 00:32:22.060
function, or was the result of underlying supply and demand forces.

276
00:32:22.060 --> 00:32:27.700
Despite their insights into Gresham's law and debasement, Thomas Smith and Gresham would

277
00:32:27.700 --> 00:32:31.300
have to be placed in the bullionist category.

278
00:32:31.300 --> 00:32:35.340
The policy conclusion of the bullionists was all too simple.

279
00:32:35.340 --> 00:32:42.020
The state should outlaw the export of bullion and should severely regulate or even nationalize

280
00:32:42.020 --> 00:32:45.180
the foreign exchange market.

281
00:32:45.180 --> 00:32:52.920
The exchange dealers battled back with sensible and powerful arguments. Thus, in 1576, they

282
00:32:52.920 --> 00:32:59.520
argued in a protest against the state control of exchange business that state intervention

283
00:32:59.520 --> 00:33:06.140
would cause a drying up of commerce. On the low value of the English pound, they replied

284
00:33:06.140 --> 00:33:12.520
that we can say nothing but that our exchanges are made with a mutual consent between merchant

285
00:33:12.520 --> 00:33:19.200
and Merchant, and that abundance of the deliveries or of the takers make the exchange rise and

286
00:33:19.200 --> 00:33:21.520
fall.

287
00:33:21.520 --> 00:33:29.040
One prominent bullionist of the early 17th century was Thomas Mills, circa 1550 to circa

288
00:33:29.040 --> 00:33:31.320
1627.

289
00:33:31.320 --> 00:33:39.880
In a series of tracts from 1601 to 1611, Mills advances the old bullionist position.

290
00:33:39.880 --> 00:33:44.200
In exchange transactions, Mills opined, were evil.

291
00:33:44.200 --> 00:33:49.640
They were institutions with which private merchants and bankers, covetous persons whose

292
00:33:49.640 --> 00:33:55.000
end is private gain, rule in the place of kings.

293
00:33:55.000 --> 00:33:57.760
Something new, however, had been added.

294
00:33:57.760 --> 00:34:04.280
For the powerful East India Company had been chartered in 1600 to monopolize all trade

295
00:34:04.280 --> 00:34:07.400
with the Far East and the Indies.

296
00:34:07.400 --> 00:34:13.540
The East India trade was unique in that Europeans purchased a great deal of valuable muslins

297
00:34:13.540 --> 00:34:21.820
and spices, but the Indies in turn bought very little from Europe except gold and silver.

298
00:34:21.820 --> 00:34:27.740
European nations, therefore, had an unfavorable balance of trade with the Far East, and the

299
00:34:27.740 --> 00:34:34.300
India trade therefore quickly became a favorite target for mercantilist writers.

300
00:34:34.300 --> 00:34:41.940
Not only were goods being imported from the East as against few exports, but specie, bullion,

301
00:34:41.940 --> 00:34:48.360
seemed to flow eternally eastwards. Mills therefore took up the bullionist cudgels by

302
00:34:48.360 --> 00:34:54.740
calling for restriction or prohibition of the Indies trade and attacking the activities

303
00:34:54.740 --> 00:35:01.580
of the East India Company. Mills was also eager to intensify regulations against the

304
00:35:01.580 --> 00:35:07.300
The Merchant Adventurers, The Governmentally Privileged Monopoly for the Export of Woolen

305
00:35:07.300 --> 00:35:14.820
Cloth to the Netherlands. Instead, he craved a return to the old privileged raw wool export

306
00:35:14.820 --> 00:35:21.780
monopoly of the merchant staple. In fact, Mills went so far as to call the old regulated

307
00:35:21.780 --> 00:35:28.700
staple trade the first step towards heaven. It is certainly likely that Mills' eagerness

308
00:35:28.700 --> 00:35:34.100
His choice to regulate and prohibit foreign trade and bullion flows was connected with

309
00:35:34.100 --> 00:35:37.580
his own occupation as customs official.

310
00:35:37.580 --> 00:35:43.220
The more regulation, the more work and power for Thomas Mills.

311
00:35:43.220 --> 00:35:52.260
Stung to the quick, the Secretary of the Merchant-Adventurers, John Wheeler, circa 1553 to 1611, replied

312
00:35:52.260 --> 00:35:58.380
to Mills' charges in his Treatise of Commerce in 1601.

313
00:35:58.380 --> 00:36:04.260
Miller upheld the orderly competition of the 3,500 merchant members joined together in

314
00:36:04.260 --> 00:36:11.980
the privileged monopoly as against the unorganized, dispersed, straggling and promiscuous trade

315
00:36:11.980 --> 00:36:14.380
of free competition.

316
00:36:14.380 --> 00:36:23.700
He also engaged in semantic trickery by asserting that monopoly by definition means only single-seller.

317
00:36:23.700 --> 00:36:29.820
Merchants linked together into a privileged export company were able, after all, to act

318
00:36:29.820 --> 00:36:33.500
virtually as one privileged firm.

319
00:36:33.500 --> 00:36:40.060
In Wheeler's own words, these merchants were united and held together by their good government,

320
00:36:40.060 --> 00:36:46.260
and by their politic and merchant-like orders, backed up, we must not forget, by the armed

321
00:36:46.260 --> 00:36:48.700
might of the State.

322
00:36:48.700 --> 00:36:54.900
Peering at the idea of free competition, Wheeler smugly opined that any merchant who loses

323
00:36:54.900 --> 00:37:00.460
a little liberty will be better off being restrained in that estate than if he were

324
00:37:00.460 --> 00:37:04.300
left to his own greedy appetite.

325
00:37:04.300 --> 00:37:11.700
When John Cale, over a decade later in The Trade's Increase, 1615, protested that the

326
00:37:11.700 --> 00:37:18.080
monopoly of the merchant adventurers would unjustly keep others out forever, his pamphlet

327
00:37:18.080 --> 00:37:24.920
was suppressed by the Archbishop of Canterbury and he earned a stint in jail for his pains.

328
00:37:24.920 --> 00:37:33.320
Later, in the 1650s, Thomas Violet had a Mills-type motive for special pleading in his call for

329
00:37:33.320 --> 00:37:39.740
prohibition of the export of bullion. Violet had been a professional searcher and government

330
00:37:39.740 --> 00:37:46.940
informer seeking out violations of the law prohibiting the export of bullion. Now, in

331
00:37:46.940 --> 00:37:54.100
A True Discovery to the Commons of England, 1651, he sought to reinstate that good old

332
00:37:54.100 --> 00:38:00.420
law, and he accompanied his call for reinstatement of bullion prohibition with a request that

333
00:38:00.420 --> 00:38:07.340
he himself be employed once again to seek out violators. To the embarrassing fact that

334
00:38:07.340 --> 00:38:14.740
he, Violet, had himself been convicted and punished for violating these very provisions,

335
00:38:14.740 --> 00:38:22.000
He countered with a ready quip. An old deersteler is the best keeper of a park.

336
00:38:22.000 --> 00:38:28.580
The most distinguished bullionist of the early seventeenth century was Gerard de Malin, died

337
00:38:28.580 --> 00:38:36.740
1641. Malin was a Fleming born in Antwerp to the prominent Van Mechelen family, probably

338
00:38:36.740 --> 00:38:43.660
changing his name to Malin when he emigrated to London in the 1580s, perhaps in response

339
00:38:43.660 --> 00:38:49.500
to the Spanish persecution of Protestants in the Netherlands in that era.

340
00:38:49.500 --> 00:38:54.760
Malin was listed as an alien in the records of that period and as a member of the Dutch

341
00:38:54.760 --> 00:38:56.840
Protestant Church.

342
00:38:56.840 --> 00:39:04.820
He is also depicted in the records as a merchant stranger, that is, as a merchant from abroad.

343
00:39:04.820 --> 00:39:11.100
Malin turned out to be a speculator and an unscrupulous, even crooked businessman, embezzling

344
00:39:11.100 --> 00:39:16.900
and Money from his Dutch business associates. He was often on the verge of bankruptcy, and

345
00:39:16.900 --> 00:39:23.820
his partner and father-in-law, the Antwerp-born Willem Vermeiden, died in debtor's prison.

346
00:39:23.820 --> 00:39:30.700
Malin, nonetheless, was a linguist and highly educated scholar, deeply interested in literature,

347
00:39:30.700 --> 00:39:37.120
the Latin language, mathematics and classical Greek philosophy. He was also well versed

348
00:39:37.120 --> 00:39:39.680
in Scholastic Doctrine.

349
00:39:39.680 --> 00:39:46.000
A member of a royal commission of 1600 to study economic problems, Moline began his

350
00:39:46.000 --> 00:39:53.960
bullionist writings in 1601, in particular, a treatise on the canker of England's Commonwealth,

351
00:39:53.960 --> 00:39:58.580
and published many tracts on into the 1620s.

352
00:39:58.580 --> 00:40:04.500
Like Gresham and the 16th century bullionists, Moline fulminated against the foreign exchange

353
00:40:04.500 --> 00:40:10.180
Exchange Dealers, asserting superficially and incorrectly that exchange rates were set

354
00:40:10.180 --> 00:40:14.860
by willful conspiracies of exchange dealers.

355
00:40:14.860 --> 00:40:18.500
Malin was more rigorous than previous bullionists.

356
00:40:18.500 --> 00:40:24.820
Instead of institutions to control exchange dealings, he advocated a government bank,

357
00:40:24.820 --> 00:40:30.820
which would enjoy a monopoly on all foreign exchange transactions.

358
00:40:30.820 --> 00:40:36.780
Intertwined with his star-crossed business career was Moline's service in government,

359
00:40:36.780 --> 00:40:42.060
becoming at various times a top bureaucrat at the royal mint and a financial adviser

360
00:40:42.060 --> 00:40:49.940
to the crown. Moline also had a personal stake in the revival of rigorous exchange control,

361
00:40:49.940 --> 00:40:56.700
for he himself eagerly anticipated filling the resurrected post of royal exchanger.

362
00:40:56.700 --> 00:41:03.620
To Malin, there was a just exchange rate at the legal par, and the government's task was

363
00:41:03.620 --> 00:41:06.060
to enforce it.

364
00:41:06.060 --> 00:41:14.100
In an earlier tract in 1601, St. George for England allegorically described, Malin, harking

365
00:41:14.100 --> 00:41:21.340
back to an old theme, denounced foreign exchange dealings as usury, and expressed the hope

366
00:41:21.340 --> 00:41:27.820
that by tight control this usury could die a gradual death.

367
00:41:27.820 --> 00:41:34.140
To advocate rigorous exchange control, Moline, of course, had to deny that the foreign exchange

368
00:41:34.140 --> 00:41:41.580
market could in any way equilibrate or regulate itself, or that exchange rates were set by

369
00:41:41.580 --> 00:41:44.740
supply and demand forces.

370
00:41:44.740 --> 00:41:50.660
To Moline goes the dubious credit for the emergence of the spurious and pernicious terms

371
00:41:50.660 --> 00:41:53.260
Terms of Trade Fallacy

372
00:41:53.260 --> 00:41:59.900
This doctrine argues that a balance of trade deficit and export of bullion will not regulate

373
00:41:59.900 --> 00:42:06.580
itself, for higher foreign exchange rates and cheaper domestic currency will not, as

374
00:42:06.580 --> 00:42:11.540
one might believe, spur exports and retard imports.

375
00:42:11.540 --> 00:42:18.980
Instead, the unfavorable terms of trade of, say, the pound in terms of foreign currency

376
00:42:18.980 --> 00:42:27.460
will lead to even more imports and fewer exports, thus driving more bullion out of the country.

377
00:42:27.460 --> 00:42:33.580
Even if a cheaper pound will bring in less foreign exchange revenue, a highly unlikely

378
00:42:33.580 --> 00:42:40.900
event seen more often in armchair speculation than in practice, one wonders where the English

379
00:42:40.900 --> 00:42:47.460
would continue to find either foreign currency or specie to pay for the higher-priced foreign

380
00:42:47.460 --> 00:42:55.020
and Products. Surely the specie would eventually run out, and for that reason alone, some market

381
00:42:55.020 --> 00:43:01.500
mechanism would have to come into play to restrict foreign imports or the export of

382
00:43:01.500 --> 00:43:08.740
specie. Thus, Moline managed to take the absurd position that whatever happens in the foreign

383
00:43:08.740 --> 00:43:15.680
exchange market, specie will keep flowing out of England. Flowing out if the pound should

384
00:43:15.680 --> 00:43:22.920
should be expensive since this will restrict exports and encourage imports, a correct insight,

385
00:43:22.920 --> 00:43:30.120
but also flowing out if the reverse happens because of the terms of trade argument.

386
00:43:30.120 --> 00:43:35.560
The specie outflow was therefore blamed on the metaphysical malevolence of the exchange

387
00:43:35.560 --> 00:43:42.280
dealers and it could only be cured by severe government control, including prohibition

388
00:43:42.280 --> 00:43:45.360
of the export of bullion.

389
00:43:45.360 --> 00:43:51.840
and also advocated control of the exchange rate at the legal mint par, which would mean

390
00:43:51.840 --> 00:44:00.120
in the context of the time a substantial appreciation or higher value of the pound sterling.

391
00:44:00.120 --> 00:44:06.880
Yet continuing in the faulty terms of trade mode, Moline saw no problem of specie outflow

392
00:44:06.880 --> 00:44:10.840
from such a marked appreciation of the currency.

393
00:44:10.840 --> 00:44:17.560
In fact, he hailed the higher domestic prices that would supposedly draw more specie into

394
00:44:17.560 --> 00:44:19.560
the country.

395
00:44:19.560 --> 00:44:25.920
In a similar bizarre twist, Malin, correctly noting that the inflationary influx of specie

396
00:44:25.920 --> 00:44:32.560
from the New World had hit the other countries of Western Europe before coming into England,

397
00:44:32.560 --> 00:44:37.040
yet concluded this was a terrible event for England.

398
00:44:37.040 --> 00:44:43.880
For instead of realizing that lower prices made English goods more competitive abroad,

399
00:44:43.880 --> 00:44:50.400
Moline concluded that these unfavorable terms of trade put England into a poor competitive

400
00:44:50.400 --> 00:44:56.060
position and led to a permanent outflow of specie.

401
00:44:56.060 --> 00:45:01.880
In view of his record in propounding tissues of egregious fallacies, it is curious that

402
00:45:01.880 --> 00:45:07.920
But Malin has had a good press among historians of economic thought, even among those who

403
00:45:07.920 --> 00:45:10.960
disagree with his basic outlook.

404
00:45:10.960 --> 00:45:16.680
They seem to laud him for recognizing that prices vary directly with the quantity of

405
00:45:16.680 --> 00:45:23.440
money, so that a country losing gold will find its prices falling, whereas a country

406
00:45:23.440 --> 00:45:27.980
accumulating gold will see its prices rise.

407
00:45:27.980 --> 00:45:34.260
But Malin, eager to indict the workings of international prices and exchanges, rather

408
00:45:34.260 --> 00:45:41.140
than explain how they work, was scarcely willing to develop the full implication of his occasional

409
00:45:41.140 --> 00:45:42.140
insights.

410
00:45:42.140 --> 00:45:48.260
Furthermore, considering that this quantity theory had long been known, and developed

411
00:45:48.260 --> 00:45:55.480
and integrated for centuries, by the Spanish scholastics, Baudin and others, Malin's achievements

412
00:45:55.480 --> 00:45:58.760
seem dubious at best.

413
00:45:58.760 --> 00:46:06.720
5. The East India Apologists Strike Back

414
00:46:06.720 --> 00:46:12.880
England suffered a severe recession in the early 1620s and Gerard Moline returned to

415
00:46:12.880 --> 00:46:18.920
the attack, publishing a series of tracts repeating his well-known views and calling

416
00:46:18.920 --> 00:46:25.680
for Stringent Measures to Curb the Merchant-Adventurers and especially the East India Company, as

417
00:46:25.680 --> 00:46:32.120
well as any other traders who dared to export bullion from the Kingdom. His influence was

418
00:46:32.120 --> 00:46:39.840
bolstered by having been a member of the Royal Commission on the Exchanges in 1621.

419
00:46:39.840 --> 00:46:46.160
Taking up the torch in defense of the Merchant-Adventurers was one of its members. Edward Misseldon

420
00:46:46.160 --> 00:46:56.320
died 1654. In a tract entitled Free Trade or the Means to Make Trade Flourish, 1622,

421
00:46:56.320 --> 00:47:02.320
following service on a Privy Council Committee of Inquiry on the Depression of Trade, Misseldon

422
00:47:02.320 --> 00:47:09.040
advanced somewhat beyond Moline's analysis. He acknowledged that bullion was exported

423
00:47:09.040 --> 00:47:15.400
from England, not due to the machinations of wicked exchange dealers, but from imports

424
00:47:15.400 --> 00:47:22.800
Exceeding Exports, from what would later be called an unfavorable balance of trade.

425
00:47:22.800 --> 00:47:29.240
Miseldon then was not concerned with regulating the exchanges, but he did want the state to

426
00:47:29.240 --> 00:47:37.120
force a favorable balance into being by subsidizing exports, restricting or prohibiting imports

427
00:47:37.120 --> 00:47:40.920
and cracking down on the export of bullion.

428
00:47:40.920 --> 00:47:46.280
In short, he called for the usual set of mercantilist measures.

429
00:47:46.280 --> 00:47:51.020
Misseldon was largely concerned to defend his merchant adventurers.

430
00:47:51.020 --> 00:47:57.480
Like Wheeler, a generation earlier, he maintained that his company was not at all a monopolist,

431
00:47:57.480 --> 00:48:02.040
but simply the organization of orderly and structured competition.

432
00:48:02.040 --> 00:48:09.120
Besides, wrote Misseldon, his merchant adventurers exported cloth to Europe and therefore fitted

433
00:48:09.120 --> 00:48:11.880
in with the interests of England.

434
00:48:11.880 --> 00:48:18.440
The truly evil firm was the privileged East India Company, which had a decidedly unfavorable

435
00:48:18.440 --> 00:48:26.800
balance of trade of its own with the Indies, and which continually exported bullion abroad.

436
00:48:26.800 --> 00:48:32.300
Misseldon now entered into a series of angry pamphlet debates with Moline, who replied

437
00:48:32.300 --> 00:48:36.680
in the same year with the maintenance of free trade.

438
00:48:36.680 --> 00:48:41.520
Neither party, of course, had the slightest interest in what would now be called free

439
00:48:41.520 --> 00:48:43.340
trade.

440
00:48:43.340 --> 00:48:50.520
In 1623, Misselden accepted a post as Deputy Governor of the Merchant Adventurers in Holland,

441
00:48:50.520 --> 00:48:56.280
perhaps as a reward for his stirring defense of the company and the public prince.

442
00:48:56.280 --> 00:49:02.640
But in addition, the East India Company, seeing in Misselden an effective champion and a troublesome

443
00:49:02.640 --> 00:49:09.560
and Faux, made him a member, and one of their commissioners in Holland during the same year.

444
00:49:09.560 --> 00:49:16.520
As a result, when his second pamphlet, The Circle of Commerce, was published in 1623,

445
00:49:16.520 --> 00:49:21.680
Misseldon displayed a miraculous change of heart, for the East India Company had been

446
00:49:21.680 --> 00:49:25.640
suddenly transformed from villain to hero.

447
00:49:25.640 --> 00:49:31.800
Misseldon, quite sensibly, now pointed out that while the East India Company did export

448
00:49:31.800 --> 00:49:47.980
The outstanding defender of the East India Company in the early 17th century was one

449
00:49:47.980 --> 00:49:55.140
of its prominent directors, Sir Thomas Munn, 1571-1641.

450
00:49:55.140 --> 00:50:00.480
Munn was early engaged as a merchant in the Mediterranean trade, especially with Italy

451
00:50:00.480 --> 00:50:07.880
and the Middle East. In 1615, Munn was elected a director of the East India Company, and

452
00:50:07.880 --> 00:50:14.620
after that he spent his life in actively promoting its interests. He entered the lists on behalf

453
00:50:14.620 --> 00:50:23.480
of the Company in 1621 with his tract, A Discourse of Trade from England unto the East Indies.

454
00:50:23.480 --> 00:50:28.360
The following year he and Misseldon were both members of the Privy Council Committee of

455
00:50:28.360 --> 00:50:30.120
of Inquiry.

456
00:50:30.120 --> 00:50:36.520
Munn's second and major work, England's Treasure by Foreign Trade or The Balance of Foreign

457
00:50:36.520 --> 00:50:42.620
Trade is the Rule of Our Treasure, taking a broader view of the economy, was written

458
00:50:42.620 --> 00:50:50.640
about 1630 and published posthumously by Munn's son John in 1664.

459
00:50:50.640 --> 00:50:55.920
When published it carried the stamp of approval of Henry Bennet, Secretary of State in the

460
00:50:55.920 --> 00:51:01.840
The Restoration Government, and also an architect of England's mercantilist policy against The

461
00:51:01.840 --> 00:51:03.360
Dutch.

462
00:51:03.360 --> 00:51:09.080
The pamphlet was highly influential and was reprinted in several editions, the last being

463
00:51:09.080 --> 00:51:12.520
published in 1986.

464
00:51:12.520 --> 00:51:17.680
Thomas Munn set forth what would become the standard mercantilist line.

465
00:51:17.680 --> 00:51:23.520
He pointed out that there was nothing particularly evil about the East India Company trade.

466
00:51:23.520 --> 00:51:31.320
The company imported valuable drugs, spices, dyes and cloth from the Indies, and it re-exported

467
00:51:31.320 --> 00:51:37.560
most of these products to other countries. Overall, in fact, the company had actually

468
00:51:37.560 --> 00:51:44.800
imported more specie than it had exported. In any case, the focus of English policy should

469
00:51:44.800 --> 00:51:51.680
not be on the specific trade of one company or with one country, but on the overall or

470
00:51:51.680 --> 00:51:58.260
for General Balance of Trade. There it must make sure that the country exports more than

471
00:51:58.260 --> 00:52:05.920
it purchases from abroad, thereby also increasing the wealth of the nation. As Munn succinctly

472
00:52:05.920 --> 00:52:11.800
put it at the beginning of England's treasure, the ordinary means to increase our wealth

473
00:52:11.800 --> 00:52:19.160
and treasure is by foreign trade, wherein we must ever observe this rule, to sell more

474
00:52:19.160 --> 00:52:24.520
were to strangers yearly than we consume of theirs in value.

475
00:52:24.520 --> 00:52:31.440
To that end, Munn advocated sumptuary laws banning consumption of imported goods, protective

476
00:52:31.440 --> 00:52:37.000
tariffs and subsidies and directives to consume domestic manufacturers.

477
00:52:37.000 --> 00:52:43.560
Munn, on the other hand, opposed any direct restrictions on the export of bullion, such

478
00:52:43.560 --> 00:52:47.720
as conducted by the East India Company.

479
00:52:47.720 --> 00:52:53.400
Men was wise enough in combating the fallacies of Moline and Misseldon.

480
00:52:53.400 --> 00:52:59.320
Against Moline he pointed out that the movements of the exchange rate reflect not the manipulations

481
00:52:59.320 --> 00:53:04.920
of bankers and dealers, but the supply and demand of currencies.

482
00:53:04.920 --> 00:53:12.080
That which causes an under or overvaluing of monies by exchange is the plenty or scarcity

483
00:53:12.080 --> 00:53:14.280
thereof.

484
00:53:14.280 --> 00:53:19.080
Misselden had advocated debasement of the currency as a means of increasing the price

485
00:53:19.080 --> 00:53:20.480
level.

486
00:53:20.480 --> 00:53:27.000
Such increase, Misselden had argued in pre-Keynesian fashion, will be abundantly recompensed unto

487
00:53:27.000 --> 00:53:33.520
all in the plenty of money and quickening of trade in every man's hand.

488
00:53:33.520 --> 00:53:38.880
As a leader of the merchant adventurers, Misselden was undoubtedly highly interested in the spur

489
00:53:38.880 --> 00:53:42.480
that debasement would give to exports.

490
00:53:42.480 --> 00:53:49.440
But Munn denounced debasement, first as bringing confusion by changing the measure of value,

491
00:53:49.440 --> 00:53:53.440
and second by increasing prices all around.

492
00:53:53.440 --> 00:54:00.440
If the common measure be changed, our lands, leases, wares both foreign and domestic must

493
00:54:00.440 --> 00:54:03.240
alter in proportion.

494
00:54:03.240 --> 00:54:08.760
Neither did Munn bend his energies towards an export surplus because he was enamored

495
00:54:08.760 --> 00:54:13.620
Part of the idea of accumulating specie in England.

496
00:54:13.620 --> 00:54:18.560
Adhering to the quantity theory of money, Munn realized that such accumulation would

497
00:54:18.560 --> 00:54:26.120
simply drive prices up, which would not only be to no avail, but would discourage exports.

498
00:54:26.120 --> 00:54:33.160
Munn wanted to accumulate specie not for its own sake, not to drive up prices at home,

499
00:54:33.160 --> 00:54:38.760
to drive trade, to increase foreign trade still further.

500
00:54:38.760 --> 00:54:45.600
An expansion of foreign trade per se seems to be Thomas Munn's main objective, and this

501
00:54:45.600 --> 00:54:51.960
overriding goal is not very puzzling from a leader of the great East India Company.

502
00:54:51.960 --> 00:54:58.960
Furthermore, foreign trade, for Thomas Munn fully as much as for Montaigne, increased

503
00:54:58.960 --> 00:55:06.600
the National Power as well as the power of English traders at the expense of other nations.

504
00:55:06.600 --> 00:55:12.500
England and her inhabitants only wax great at the expense of foreigners.

505
00:55:12.500 --> 00:55:19.980
As Munn put it succinctly, in trade, one man's necessity becomes another man's opportunity,

506
00:55:19.980 --> 00:55:23.680
and one man's loss is another man's gain.

507
00:55:23.680 --> 00:55:30.040
In an odd prefigurement of the Keynesian view that national debt held at home is immaterial

508
00:55:30.040 --> 00:55:36.760
because we only owe it to ourselves, Munn and his fellow mercantilists considered internal

509
00:55:36.760 --> 00:55:43.840
trade unimportant because there we only transfer wealth among ourselves.

510
00:55:43.840 --> 00:55:50.320
The export balance in foreign trade then becomes of crucial importance, so that the export

511
00:55:50.320 --> 00:55:56.960
Merchant becomes by far the most productive occupation in the economy.

512
00:55:56.960 --> 00:56:04.400
That Mun was far from being a primitive inflationist is seen by the scorn he properly and contemptuously

513
00:56:04.400 --> 00:56:11.280
heaped upon the common plea and favorite mercantilist complaint that business and the economy were

514
00:56:11.280 --> 00:56:15.000
suffering from a scarcity of money.

515
00:56:15.000 --> 00:56:21.080
The conclusion invariably drawn from such analysis is that the government was duty bound to do

516
00:56:21.080 --> 00:56:24.760
something quickly to augment the money stock.

517
00:56:24.760 --> 00:56:32.080
Munn wittily reposted in his Discourse of Trade, Concerning the evil or want of silver,

518
00:56:32.080 --> 00:56:38.400
I think it hath been and is a general disease of all nations, and so will continue until

519
00:56:38.400 --> 00:56:40.320
the end of the world.

520
00:56:40.320 --> 00:56:44.400
For poor and rich complain they never have enough.

521
00:56:44.400 --> 00:56:50.720
But it seems that the malady is grown mortal here with us, and therefore it cries out for

522
00:56:50.720 --> 00:56:51.720
remedy.

523
00:56:51.720 --> 00:57:00.160
Well, I hope it is but imagination maketh us sick when all our parts be sound and strong.

524
00:57:00.160 --> 00:57:05.560
Thomas Munn may have been the most prominent and sophisticated of the early seventeenth-century

525
00:57:05.560 --> 00:57:07.520
mercantilists in England.

526
00:57:07.520 --> 00:57:14.100
Yet, as Schumpeter points out, these were all pamphleteers, not particularly interested

527
00:57:14.100 --> 00:57:21.620
and Analysis of the Economy, Special Pleaders rather than Aspiring Scientists.

528
00:57:21.620 --> 00:57:27.740
Perhaps the best economic analyst of all in this period was Rice Vaughan, whose A Discourse

529
00:57:27.740 --> 00:57:34.620
of Coin and Coinage, though published in 1675, was written in the mid-1620s.

530
00:57:34.620 --> 00:57:40.780
Vaughan, in the first place, held that the disappearance of silver during this period

531
00:57:40.780 --> 00:57:47.620
Gold was the effect of what we now call Gresham's Law, the bimetallic undervaluation by the

532
00:57:47.620 --> 00:57:54.560
English government of silver as against gold. Since silver, rather than gold, was the money

533
00:57:54.560 --> 00:58:01.740
for most transactions, this undervaluation had a certain deflationary effect. In the

534
00:58:01.740 --> 00:58:07.660
course of his tract, von pointed out that an export surplus will not have the desired

535
00:58:07.660 --> 00:58:34.060
Von was also astute enough to recognize that prices do not all move together when the value

536
00:58:34.060 --> 00:58:44.060
The value of money changes. For example, that domestic prices usually lag behind the debasement or devaluation of money standards.

537
00:58:44.060 --> 00:58:58.060
Most importantly, Rice Vaughan remarkably harked back to the scholastic, continental, subjective utility and scarcity tradition in the determination of the values and prices of goods.

538
00:58:58.060 --> 00:59:08.060
Von concisely pointed out that the value of a good is dependent on its subjective utility, and hence demand by consumers.

539
00:59:08.060 --> 00:59:18.060
Use and delight, or the opinion of them, are the true causes why all things have a value and price set upon them.

540
00:59:18.060 --> 00:59:27.060
While the actual price is determined by the interaction of this subjective utility with the relative scarcity of the good,

541
00:59:27.060 --> 00:59:34.060
The proportion of that value and price is wholly governed by rarity and abundance.
