WEBVTT

NOTE 6. Absolutist Thought in Italy and France (continued)

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:15.720
5. THE SPREAD OF HUMANISM IN EUROPE

2
00:00:15.720 --> 00:00:22.080
The newly fashionable Italian humanism, marked by its philological and literary devotion to

3
00:00:22.080 --> 00:00:28.560
the classical texts, its absolutist political thought and its contempt for the systematic

4
00:00:28.560 --> 00:00:34.520
Catholic thinking and natural law doctrines of the scholastics spread like wildfire to

5
00:00:34.520 --> 00:00:42.040
the north, to France, England, Germany and the Netherlands during the 15th century.

6
00:00:42.040 --> 00:00:47.360
This conquest of northern scholarship and northern universities by the 16th century

7
00:00:47.360 --> 00:00:53.600
was nearly as influential as the upsurge of the Protestant Reformation in putting an end

8
00:00:53.600 --> 00:01:00.560
in two scholastic thought, and in paving the way for the dominance of the absolute state.

9
00:01:00.560 --> 00:01:05.360
There was one important difference, however, in the political thought taken over by the

10
00:01:05.360 --> 00:01:12.520
northern humanists. In countries such as France, Germany and England, where the king was acquiring

11
00:01:12.520 --> 00:01:18.880
ever more centralized and dominant power, all discussion of the virtues of oligarchic

12
00:01:18.880 --> 00:01:24.360
like republicanism seemed like bizarre and irrelevant blather.

13
00:01:24.360 --> 00:01:30.460
For the northern humanists, in contrast, were solidly committed to the prince, although

14
00:01:30.460 --> 00:01:37.400
of course to the virtuous pre-Machiavellian prince, and to themselves as sage counselors

15
00:01:37.400 --> 00:01:39.040
to power.

16
00:01:39.040 --> 00:01:45.520
The first Italian humanist to teach in France, and to cause a sensation in so doing, was

17
00:01:45.520 --> 00:01:54.680
was the Neapolitan Gregorio da Tiferna circa 1415 to 1466, who arrived at the University

18
00:01:54.680 --> 00:02:03.520
of Paris in 1458 to become its first professor of Greek. Other Italian humanists soon came

19
00:02:03.520 --> 00:02:11.240
to storm successfully that venerable redoubt of medieval and early Renaissance scholasticism.

20
00:02:11.240 --> 00:02:21.180
Filippo Barroaldo, circa 1440-1504, came in 1476 to lecture on poetry, philosophy and

21
00:02:21.180 --> 00:02:24.760
humanist studies.

22
00:02:24.760 --> 00:02:34.360
Particularly influential at the University of Paris was Fausto Andralini, circa 1460-1518,

23
00:02:34.360 --> 00:02:41.240
who taught at the University of Paris for 30 years beginning in 1489, winning great

24
00:02:41.240 --> 00:02:48.120
fame for his classical scholarship on the Latin poets and essayists.

25
00:02:48.120 --> 00:02:57.200
Humanism penetrated England beginning with Pietro del Monte, died 1457, who from 1435

26
00:02:57.200 --> 00:03:04.200
to 1440 was a collector of papal revenues in England and, more importantly, was a literary

27
00:03:04.200 --> 00:03:10.600
The advisor to Duke Humphrey of Gloucester, brother to King Henry V, who became the first

28
00:03:10.600 --> 00:03:14.040
English patron of humanism.

29
00:03:14.040 --> 00:03:19.200
Gloucester brought an Italian rhetorician into his household, and he collected a remarkable

30
00:03:19.200 --> 00:03:25.380
library, including all the major humanist texts, many of which he later presented to

31
00:03:25.380 --> 00:03:28.240
Oxford University.

32
00:03:28.240 --> 00:03:33.560
Oxford and Cambridge also served as the home for Italian humanist scholars in the later

33
00:03:33.560 --> 00:03:44.640
The Milanese scholar Stefano Surigoni flourished 1430-1480, taught grammar and rhetoric at

34
00:03:44.640 --> 00:03:55.640
Oxford between 1454 and 1471, and Cornelio Vitelli, circa 1450-1500, became the first

35
00:03:55.640 --> 00:04:01.680
professor of Greek at an English university, coming to teach at New College Oxford in the

36
00:04:01.680 --> 00:04:10.880
1470s. The Italian humanist Lorenzo da Savona taught at Cambridge in the 1470s and published

37
00:04:10.880 --> 00:04:18.620
a handbook on rhetoric in 1478 which went into two printings by the end of the century.

38
00:04:18.620 --> 00:04:27.140
And Caio Alberino, flourished 1450-1500, became official professor of rhetoric at Cambridge

39
00:04:27.140 --> 00:04:33.000
and taught Latin Literature there in the 1480s.

40
00:04:33.000 --> 00:04:39.200
Humanism also came to Northern Europe because many young scholars, often inspired by Italian

41
00:04:39.200 --> 00:04:45.780
professors in their country, traveled to Italy to learn the new humanism at its source.

42
00:04:45.780 --> 00:04:55.140
Thus, Robert Gagin, 1435-1501, after being converted to humanism by the lectures of Gregorio

43
00:04:55.140 --> 00:05:02.900
D'Artiferna, paid two extended visits to Italy in the late 1460s, and returned to become

44
00:05:02.900 --> 00:05:09.920
a distinguished French humanist at the Sorbonne in 1473, where he lectured on rhetoric and

45
00:05:09.920 --> 00:05:16.700
Latin literature, translated Libby, and published a treatise on Latin verse and the first history

46
00:05:16.700 --> 00:05:21.700
of France to be written in full rhetorical style.

47
00:05:21.700 --> 00:05:30.580
From England came William Grosson circa 1449 to 1519, a student of Vitale at Oxford who

48
00:05:30.580 --> 00:05:37.740
studied Humanism and Florence in the late 1480s. Grosson returned to Oxford to become

49
00:05:37.740 --> 00:05:47.980
its first professor of Greek in 1491. William Latimer circa 1460 to 1545, another young

50
00:05:47.980 --> 00:05:53.780
Oxford student accompanied his friend Grosson on his trip to Italy and then went to the

51
00:05:53.780 --> 00:06:01.780
University of Padua to perfect his Greek studies. Soon after Grosson's initial Oxford post,

52
00:06:01.780 --> 00:06:07.620
Latimer was appointed teacher at Magdalen College, Oxford, inaugurating Magdalen as

53
00:06:07.620 --> 00:06:10.900
a centre of humanist studies.

54
00:06:10.900 --> 00:06:19.580
The most eminent of the Oxford travelers to Italy was John Collet, circa 1467 to 1519,

55
00:06:19.580 --> 00:06:27.820
a student of Grosson at Oxford who spent the years 1493 to 1496 in Italy.

56
00:06:27.820 --> 00:06:33.740
On his return from Italy, Collet, too, was appointed a professor at Oxford, and he delivered

57
00:06:33.740 --> 00:06:40.340
before the entire university a famous series of lectures on the epistles of St. Paul from

58
00:06:40.340 --> 00:06:47.260
1498-1499 6.

59
00:06:47.260 --> 00:06:54.700
Botero and the Spread of Machiavellianism The northern humanists along with the Italians

60
00:06:54.700 --> 00:06:59.860
were staunch believers in the necessity for the prince to practice the Christian virtues

61
00:06:59.860 --> 00:07:02.980
of honesty and justice.

62
00:07:02.980 --> 00:07:08.900
At about the same time that Machiavelli was writing his defense of the new pragmatic morality

63
00:07:08.900 --> 00:07:16.500
in The Prince, the greatest humanist of the age was penning a famous advice book to princes,

64
00:07:16.500 --> 00:07:26.500
sternly reiterating the Christian virtues. Desiderius Erasmus, circa 1466 to 1536, a

65
00:07:26.500 --> 00:07:33.900
Dutch Augustinian canon persuaded to study theology by John Collet, dedicated his account

66
00:07:33.900 --> 00:07:42.540
of the Education of a Christian Prince to the Future Emperor Charles V in 1516.

67
00:07:42.540 --> 00:07:49.060
While old Nick was proclaiming that no consideration must stand in the way of maintaining the ruler

68
00:07:49.060 --> 00:07:56.140
in state power, Erasmus warned the prince that he must never do anything, regardless

69
00:07:56.140 --> 00:08:01.940
of his motives, which may harm the cause of justice.

70
00:08:01.940 --> 00:08:08.580
Machiavelli's Prince was not printed until 1532 and after that, as we have noted, a storm

71
00:08:08.580 --> 00:08:13.620
of attack on Machiavelli proceeded throughout Europe.

72
00:08:13.620 --> 00:08:18.780
In England, the favorite term for Machiavelli was the politic atheist.

73
00:08:18.780 --> 00:08:27.500
Thus, one James Hull wrote a book on Machiavelli in 1602 entitled The Unmasking of the Politic

74
00:08:27.500 --> 00:08:29.460
Atheist.

75
00:08:29.460 --> 00:08:34.900
The northern humanists generally took the same position, defending the focus of traditional

76
00:08:34.900 --> 00:08:41.220
political philosophy on justice and honesty, and attacking the overriding concern of the

77
00:08:41.220 --> 00:08:47.820
new theorists with what one Machiavellian aptly termed the reason of state.

78
00:08:47.820 --> 00:08:55.940
Thus Cardinal Reginald Pole, 1500-1558, one of the champions of English Catholicism as

79
00:08:55.940 --> 00:09:02.260
as Against the Henryshian Reformation, and A Distinguished Humanist, attacked Machiavelli's

80
00:09:02.260 --> 00:09:12.060
Political Theory in 1539 in his Apology to Charles V as Destroying All the Virtues. Roger

81
00:09:12.060 --> 00:09:20.140
Asham, 1515-1568, another leading humanist and a long-time tutor to Queen Elizabeth in

82
00:09:20.140 --> 00:09:26.740
in Greek and Latin, commented in horror in his Report and Discourse of the Affairs and

83
00:09:26.740 --> 00:09:33.300
State of Germany, that Machiavelli taught that one may think, say and do whatever may

84
00:09:33.300 --> 00:09:38.340
serve best for profit and pleasure.

85
00:09:38.340 --> 00:09:43.040
Machiavelli also proved to be grist for the Huguenots' mill during the French religious

86
00:09:43.040 --> 00:09:45.860
war of the 1570s.

87
00:09:45.860 --> 00:09:52.900
The Huguenots attributed the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre of 1572 to the wicked designs

88
00:09:52.900 --> 00:09:59.860
of the Queen Mother, Catherine de' Medici, daughter of the self-same Lorenzo the Magnificent

89
00:09:59.860 --> 00:10:06.180
to whom Machiavelli had dedicated the prince. The Huguenots attributed the massacre to the

90
00:10:06.180 --> 00:10:13.260
philosophical outlook of Machiavelli. Thus the Awakener continually denounced the pernicious

91
00:10:13.260 --> 00:10:19.500
This Heresy of Machiavelli and asserted that the king was actually persuaded by the doctrines

92
00:10:19.500 --> 00:10:29.300
of Machiavelli to try to eradicate the Huguenots. Another tract, the Alarm Bell, 1577, maintained

93
00:10:29.300 --> 00:10:36.140
that Catherine had deliberately trained her son in the doctrines of the atheist Machiavelli,

94
00:10:36.140 --> 00:10:42.420
thereby instructing the young king in the precepts most suitable for a tyrant.

95
00:10:42.420 --> 00:10:49.180
To other Huguenots, Machiavelli was a preceptor in the science of cheating, a science imported

96
00:10:49.180 --> 00:10:54.340
by Italians, such as Catherine, into France.

97
00:10:54.340 --> 00:11:01.900
The outstanding example of the genre of anti-Machiavellian tracts was the Anti-Machiavelle of Innocent

98
00:11:01.900 --> 00:11:12.980
and Jean-Thier, circa 1535 to 1595, published in 1576. Jean-Thier was a French Huguenot

99
00:11:12.980 --> 00:11:19.660
who fled to Geneva after the massacre of St Bartholomew. Machiavelli, he pointed out,

100
00:11:19.660 --> 00:11:27.380
was essentially a satanic writer of handbooks on how to become a complete tyrant. But still

101
00:11:27.380 --> 00:11:34.060
All the seductive nature of the new morality of the justifying of evil means by the allegedly

102
00:11:34.060 --> 00:11:41.580
overriding end of maintaining and advancing state power, began to take hold among various

103
00:11:41.580 --> 00:11:42.700
writers.

104
00:11:42.700 --> 00:11:48.660
In Italy, a group of Machiavellians appeared during the 16th century, headed by Giovanni

105
00:11:48.660 --> 00:11:58.900
by Danny Botero, 1540-1617, and his treatise of 1589, The Reason of State.

106
00:11:58.900 --> 00:12:04.500
Botero was a leading humanist from Piedmont who joined the Jesuit order.

107
00:12:04.500 --> 00:12:10.420
It is indicative of the decay of scholasticism in Italy in this period that this proponent

108
00:12:10.420 --> 00:12:17.460
of reason of state, and hence opponent of natural law ethics in political life, should

109
00:12:17.460 --> 00:12:21.220
would have been a member of the great Jesuit order.

110
00:12:21.220 --> 00:12:27.660
Since Machiavelli was scarcely popular in Europe, especially in Catholic circles, Botero took

111
00:12:27.660 --> 00:12:35.100
care to attack Machiavelli explicitly and pro forma, but that was merely a ritualistic

112
00:12:35.100 --> 00:12:41.340
cover for Botero's adoption of the essence of Machiavellian thought.

113
00:12:41.340 --> 00:12:47.220
While beginning by paying lip service to the importance of the prince's cleaving to justice,

114
00:12:47.220 --> 00:12:54.460
Botero quickly goes on to justify political prudence as crucial to all government, then

115
00:12:54.460 --> 00:13:01.520
defines the essence of prudence that, in the decisions made by princes, interest will always

116
00:13:01.520 --> 00:13:04.860
override every other argument.

117
00:13:04.860 --> 00:13:10.340
All other considerations, such as friendship, treaties or other commitments, must go by

118
00:13:10.340 --> 00:13:12.120
the board.

119
00:13:12.120 --> 00:13:19.480
The overall view of Botero is that a prince must be guided primarily by reason of state,

120
00:13:19.480 --> 00:13:25.880
and that actions so guided cannot be considered in the light of ordinary reason.

121
00:13:25.880 --> 00:13:31.840
The morality and justification for actions of the prince is diametrically opposed to

122
00:13:31.840 --> 00:13:35.560
the principles that must guide the ordinary citizen.

123
00:13:35.560 --> 00:13:42.160
Botero's work touched off a raft of similar works in Italy over the next 40 years, all

124
00:13:42.160 --> 00:13:47.200
of which had the same title, The Reason of State.

125
00:13:47.200 --> 00:13:53.120
In addition to being a leading theorist of political pragmatism and reason of state,

126
00:13:53.120 --> 00:14:00.080
Giovanni Botero has the notable but dubious distinction of being the first Malthusian,

127
00:14:00.080 --> 00:14:06.200
The First Bitter Complainer About the Alleged Evils of Population Growth

128
00:14:06.200 --> 00:14:15.000
In his On the Cause of the Greatness of Cities, 1588, translated into English in 1606, Botero

129
00:14:15.000 --> 00:14:23.800
laid out almost the entire thesis of Malthus' famous essay on population two centuries later.

130
00:14:23.800 --> 00:14:30.840
The analysis was, therefore, highly mechanistic. Human population tends to increase without

131
00:14:30.840 --> 00:14:38.600
limit or, rather, the only limit is the maximum possible degree of human fertility. The means

132
00:14:38.600 --> 00:14:45.220
of subsistence, on the contrary, can only be increased slowly. Therefore, the growth

133
00:14:45.220 --> 00:14:53.320
of population always, to use Malthus' famous words, tends to press on the means of subsistence,

134
00:14:53.320 --> 00:14:58.880
with the result being ever-present poverty and starvation.

135
00:14:58.880 --> 00:15:03.260
Population growth, then, can only be checked in two ways.

136
00:15:03.260 --> 00:15:09.680
One is the dying of large numbers of people through starvation, plague or wars over scarce

137
00:15:09.680 --> 00:15:13.840
resources, Malthus' positive check.

138
00:15:13.840 --> 00:15:20.320
Second is the only element of free will or active human response permitted by Botero's

139
00:15:20.320 --> 00:15:27.000
Botero's theory that starvation and poverty may induce some people to abstain from marriage

140
00:15:27.000 --> 00:15:33.320
and procreation, Malthus' preventive or negative check.

141
00:15:33.320 --> 00:15:41.680
In an epoch marked by rising population and rising living standards and economic growth,

142
00:15:41.680 --> 00:15:48.640
Botero's gloom and doom about population growth was hardly likely to fall on friendly ears.

143
00:15:48.640 --> 00:15:55.640
Indeed, as we shall see further below, those 17th and 18th century theorists who foresaw

144
00:15:55.640 --> 00:16:04.860
unlimited population growth favored the idea as a spur to prosperity and economic growth.

145
00:16:04.860 --> 00:16:10.800
In any case, whether one draws pessimistic, neutral or optimistic conclusions from the

146
00:16:10.800 --> 00:16:17.840
thesis of unlimited population growth, its basic flaw is assuming that people will not

147
00:16:17.840 --> 00:16:24.440
react if they see their living standards declining from bearing large families.

148
00:16:24.440 --> 00:16:32.860
Botero and Malthus after him indeed gave the case away by even mentioning preventive checks.

149
00:16:32.860 --> 00:16:38.880
For if people will lower the number of children when faced with absolute destitution, why

150
00:16:38.880 --> 00:16:42.300
may they not lower it long before that?

151
00:16:42.300 --> 00:16:47.820
And if so, no such mechanistic tendency can be postulated.

152
00:16:47.820 --> 00:16:55.820
Historically, indeed, the facts totally contradict the gloomy Malthusian forecasts.

153
00:16:55.820 --> 00:17:03.100
Population only tends to rise in response to greater economic growth and prosperity, and

154
00:17:03.100 --> 00:17:09.320
the consequent rise in living standards, so that population and standards of living tend

155
00:17:09.320 --> 00:17:14.640
to move together rather than in diametric opposition.

156
00:17:14.640 --> 00:17:20.440
This rise in population generally comes in response to falling death rates caused by

157
00:17:20.440 --> 00:17:27.620
the better nutrition, sanitation and medical care attendant on higher living standards.

158
00:17:27.620 --> 00:17:33.980
The dramatic declines in death rates lead to accelerated population growth, roughly

159
00:17:33.980 --> 00:17:38.060
measured by birth rate minus death rate.

160
00:17:38.060 --> 00:17:44.060
After a few generations, the birth rate usually falls as people act to preserve their higher

161
00:17:44.060 --> 00:17:49.940
living standards so that population growth then levels off.

162
00:17:49.940 --> 00:17:56.540
The main defect of the Botero-Malthus doctrine of population is that it assumes that two

163
00:17:56.540 --> 00:18:04.220
entities, population and the means of subsistence, or production or living standards, operate

164
00:18:04.220 --> 00:18:11.460
under laws that are totally independent of each other. And yet, as we have seen, population

165
00:18:11.460 --> 00:18:17.980
growth may be highly responsive to changes in production. Similarly, the reverse can

166
00:18:17.980 --> 00:18:25.100
be true. Increases in population may well encourage the growth of investment and production

167
00:18:25.100 --> 00:18:33.060
by providing a greater market for more products, as well as more labor to work on these processes.

168
00:18:33.060 --> 00:18:38.380
Schumpeter puts the overall point well in his critique of Malthus.

169
00:18:38.380 --> 00:18:44.420
There is, of course, no point whatever in trying to formulate independent laws for the

170
00:18:44.420 --> 00:18:49.660
behavior of two interdependent quantities.

171
00:18:49.660 --> 00:18:55.100
In England, a leading humanist and colleague of Cardinal Pole in defending the Catholic

172
00:18:55.100 --> 00:19:04.260
Church, as against the Anglican Reform, was Stephen Gardner, circa 1483 to 1555, Bishop

173
00:19:04.260 --> 00:19:05.780
of Winchester.

174
00:19:05.780 --> 00:19:13.260
Gardner, in contrast to Pohl, was the first northern humanist to take a pro-Machiavellian

175
00:19:13.260 --> 00:19:14.620
line.

176
00:19:14.620 --> 00:19:19.900
Written appropriately enough when he was Lord Chancellor under the despotic Queen Mary

177
00:19:19.900 --> 00:19:26.860
and Tutor in the early 1550s, Gardner's discourse on the coming of the English and Normans to

178
00:19:26.860 --> 00:19:34.280
Britain was dedicated to King Philip II of Spain. Written as an advice book to King Philip

179
00:19:34.280 --> 00:19:40.000
on the eve of his marriage to Queen Mary, the book counseled the King on how to govern

180
00:19:40.000 --> 00:19:46.900
England. Gardner openly endorsed Machiavelli's view that it was far more important for a

181
00:19:46.900 --> 00:20:15.900
An ardent, if implicit, disciple of Machiavellianism was the prominent late 16th century Belgian

182
00:20:15.900 --> 00:20:23.900
and Classical Scholar and Humanist, Justice Lipsius, 1547-1606.

183
00:20:23.900 --> 00:20:31.900
Lipsius had moved from Antwerp to Leiden in Holland to avoid the rigors of the war against Spanish rule.

184
00:20:31.900 --> 00:20:38.900
In 1589, in Leiden, Lipsius published his Six Books of Politics.

185
00:20:38.900 --> 00:20:55.900
The prince, wrote Lipsius, must learn how to engage in profitable deceit, and judiciously be able to intermingle that which is profitable with that which is honest. Reason of state was again triumphant.

186
00:20:57.900 --> 00:21:02.900
7. Humanism and Absolutism in France

187
00:21:02.900 --> 00:21:11.400
Before humanism made its mark in France, political thought was medieval rather than absolutist.

188
00:21:11.400 --> 00:21:22.900
Thus, near the end of his life, the prominent royal bureaucrat, jurist and churchman, Claude de Cecil, circa 1450 to 1520,

189
00:21:22.900 --> 00:21:29.400
published a treatise on monarchy summing up the post-medievalist perspective in politics.

190
00:21:29.400 --> 00:21:40.400
He wrote The Monarchy of France on the death of King Louis XII in 1515 and presented it to the new king, Francis I.

191
00:21:40.400 --> 00:21:50.400
The book was published four years later under the more presumptuous title The Grand Monarchy of France and was reissued often thereafter.

192
00:21:50.400 --> 00:22:05.400
Dissaisel was born in Savoy, trained as a jurist, and served King Charles VIII and King Louis XII, the latter as member of the Grand Council and, on numerous occasions, as ambassador.

193
00:22:05.400 --> 00:22:17.400
But despite his long service in the bureaucracy and his great admiration for Louis XII, Dissaisel was a constitutionalist rather than an absolutist.

194
00:22:17.400 --> 00:22:33.400
The king, he averred, is indeed absolute within his own sphere, but that sphere is severely delimited by a network of rights held by others in accordance with customary, natural and divine law.

195
00:22:33.400 --> 00:22:46.400
In contrast, the lengthy reign of Francis I, 1515-1547, saw the beginning of the triumph of absolutism in French political thought.

196
00:22:46.400 --> 00:22:55.680
This new trend was launched by the leading humanist in France, Guillaume Boudet, 1467-1540.

197
00:22:55.680 --> 00:23:03.100
A highly erudite classical and legal scholar, Boudet traveled in Italy in the early 1500s,

198
00:23:03.100 --> 00:23:09.520
imbibed humanism there and returned to write a bitter attack on scholastic jurisprudence

199
00:23:09.520 --> 00:23:15.160
in his Annotations on the Pandex in 1508.

200
00:23:15.160 --> 00:23:24.160
The advent of Francis I in 1515 had characteristically contrasting effects on the veteran de Cécelles

201
00:23:24.160 --> 00:23:26.280
and on the younger Boudet.

202
00:23:26.280 --> 00:23:32.560
de Cécelles wrote his magnum opus to instruct the young king on the greatness of what he

203
00:23:32.560 --> 00:23:37.240
believed to be the old king's constitutionalist regime.

204
00:23:37.240 --> 00:23:44.120
Boudet was inspired by the advent of the new prince to write The Institution of a Prince

205
00:23:44.120 --> 00:23:52.440
in 1519, celebrating the king's potentially absolute greatness and power.

206
00:23:52.440 --> 00:23:58.060
In this French form of advice book to the king, Boudet developed the idea, then new

207
00:23:58.060 --> 00:24:05.900
in France, of the prince as totally and absolutely sovereign, whose power and every whim must

208
00:24:05.900 --> 00:24:09.080
never be limited or questioned.

209
00:24:09.080 --> 00:24:16.840
The prince, in toned boudet, was a quasi-divine person, a man necessarily superior to all

210
00:24:16.840 --> 00:24:24.720
others. Laws that bind the prince's subjects do not bind or apply to him, for laws apply

211
00:24:24.720 --> 00:24:31.000
only to the average and the equal, not to the prince, who closely approaches the perfect

212
00:24:31.000 --> 00:24:33.720
ideal of mankind.

213
00:24:33.720 --> 00:24:39.860
The prince, in short, was a god among men, and a law unto himself.

214
00:24:39.860 --> 00:24:47.680
The monarch, therefore, was superhuman, himself the source and the criterion of all justice.

215
00:24:47.680 --> 00:24:53.560
For Boudet, the king's actions are always right, because the heart of the king moves

216
00:24:53.560 --> 00:25:01.380
by instinct and by impulsion of God, who controls and attracts it according to his pleasure,

217
00:25:01.380 --> 00:25:09.380
to undertake enterprises that are praiseworthy and honest and useful to his people and himself.

218
00:25:09.380 --> 00:25:15.780
Ruling by divine right and inspired directly by God, the King needs only the advice of

219
00:25:15.780 --> 00:25:22.980
philosophers, and it did not take much imagination to see who the great Boudet had in mind as

220
00:25:22.980 --> 00:25:26.380
philosophic counselor to Francis I.

221
00:25:26.380 --> 00:25:34.380
Boudet's work was carried on and developed by succeeding decades of humanists and particularly legists.

222
00:25:34.380 --> 00:25:42.380
The French kings were delighted at these dominant theories of their age and proceeded happily to put them into practice.

223
00:25:42.380 --> 00:25:51.380
In this they were greatly aided by the absolutist jurists being themselves top bureaucrats in the service of the king.

224
00:25:51.380 --> 00:26:13.900
Two of the leading jurists wrote in the reign of Francis I, Barthélemy de Chasseneu, 1480-1541, whose Catalogue of the Glory of the World was published in 1529, and Charles de Grasselle, whose Regale of France was written in 1538.

225
00:26:13.900 --> 00:26:26.400
Grasseil declared that the King of France was God in the flesh, that all his actions were inspired and brought about by God operating through the person of the King.

226
00:26:26.400 --> 00:26:31.900
The King was therefore God's vicar on earth and a living law.

227
00:26:31.900 --> 00:26:38.900
In a sense then, Charles de Grasseil said it all, the King is God on earth.

228
00:26:38.900 --> 00:26:53.900
The 16th century French legalists also systematically tore down the legal rights of all corporations or organizations, which, in the Middle Ages, had stood between the individual and the state.

229
00:26:53.900 --> 00:27:05.900
There were no longer any intermediary or feudal authorities. The king is absolute over these intermediaries, and makes or breaks them at will.

230
00:27:05.900 --> 00:27:10.380
Thus, as one historian sums up Chasseneu's view,

231
00:27:10.380 --> 00:27:17.660
All jurisdiction, said Chasseneu, pertains to the supreme authority of the prince.

232
00:27:17.660 --> 00:27:24.100
No man may have jurisdiction except through the ruler's concession and permission.

233
00:27:24.100 --> 00:27:29.860
The authority to create magistrates thus belongs to the prince alone.

234
00:27:29.860 --> 00:27:37.700
All offices and dignities flow and are derived from him as from a fountain.

235
00:27:37.700 --> 00:27:43.220
The most important contribution to the tearing down of the intermediary structures hampering

236
00:27:43.220 --> 00:27:50.220
the monarch's absolute rule over his subjects was that of the greatest jurist of his age,

237
00:27:50.220 --> 00:27:52.300
Charles Dumoulin.

238
00:27:52.300 --> 00:27:58.900
We have already seen Dumoulin's, Molinaeus, critique of the prohibition of usury in his

239
00:27:58.900 --> 00:28:07.780
and Treatise on Contracts and Usury, 1546. Far more important was his magnum opus, Commentaries

240
00:28:07.780 --> 00:28:17.380
on the Customs of Paris, 1539, a compilation and commentary on customary law in France.

241
00:28:17.380 --> 00:28:23.900
This book dealt a lethal blow to the medieval rights and privileges of intermediary orders

242
00:28:23.900 --> 00:28:31.420
and placed virtually all authority into the hands of the Monarch and his State.

243
00:28:31.420 --> 00:28:33.700
8.

244
00:28:33.700 --> 00:28:39.580
The Skeptic as Absolutist, Michel de Montaigne

245
00:28:39.580 --> 00:28:46.260
It is a favorite conceit of modern 20th century liberals that skepticism, the attitude that

246
00:28:46.260 --> 00:28:53.260
nothing can really be known as the truth, is the best groundwork for individual liberty.

247
00:28:53.260 --> 00:28:59.580
The fanatic, convinced of the certainty of his views, will trample on the rights of others.

248
00:28:59.580 --> 00:29:03.420
The skeptic, convinced of nothing, will not.

249
00:29:03.420 --> 00:29:06.620
But the truth is precisely the opposite.

250
00:29:06.620 --> 00:29:14.500
The skeptic has no ground on which to stand to defend his or others' liberty against assault.

251
00:29:14.500 --> 00:29:19.380
Since there will always be men willing to aggress against others for the sake of power

252
00:29:19.380 --> 00:29:25.740
or PELF, the triumph of skepticism means that the victims of aggression will be rendered

253
00:29:25.740 --> 00:29:32.700
defenseless against assault. Furthermore, the skeptic, being unable to find any principle

254
00:29:32.700 --> 00:29:40.020
for rights or for any social organization, will probably cave in, albeit with a resigned

255
00:29:40.020 --> 00:29:55.500
An excellent case in point is one of the great skeptics of the modern world, the widely read

256
00:29:55.500 --> 00:30:05.580
and celebrated 16th century French essayist Michel de Montaigne, 1533-1592.

257
00:30:05.580 --> 00:30:11.540
Men was born to a noble family in the Périgord region of southwestern France near the city

258
00:30:11.540 --> 00:30:13.380
of Bordeaux.

259
00:30:13.380 --> 00:30:20.300
He became a judge in the Bordeaux Parliament in 1557 at the age of 24 as his father had

260
00:30:20.300 --> 00:30:22.100
been before him.

261
00:30:22.100 --> 00:30:27.820
He also joined at the Parliament an uncle, his father's brother, a first cousin of his

262
00:30:27.820 --> 00:30:31.100
mother and a brother-in-law.

263
00:30:31.100 --> 00:30:36.140
Staying in the parliament for thirteen years and then denied promotion to the upper chamber

264
00:30:36.140 --> 00:30:44.980
of that body, Montaigne retired to his rural chateau in 1570 to write his famous essays.

265
00:30:44.980 --> 00:30:51.940
There he remained, except for a four-year stint as mayor of Bordeaux in the early 1580s.

266
00:30:51.940 --> 00:30:58.020
A leading humanist, Montaigne virtually created the essay form in France.

267
00:30:58.020 --> 00:31:04.420
He started writing these brief essays in the early 1570s and published the first two volumes

268
00:31:04.420 --> 00:31:12.700
in 1580. The third book of essays was published in 1588, and all three volumes were posthumously

269
00:31:12.700 --> 00:31:16.220
published seven years later.

270
00:31:16.220 --> 00:31:22.940
Though a practicing Catholic, Montaigne was a thoroughgoing skeptic. Man can know nothing,

271
00:31:22.940 --> 00:31:30.220
His reason being insufficient to arrive either at a natural law ethics or a firm theology.

272
00:31:30.220 --> 00:31:36.320
As Montaigne put it, reason does nothing but go astray in everything, and especially when

273
00:31:36.320 --> 00:31:39.120
it meddles with divine things.

274
00:31:39.120 --> 00:31:46.560
And for a while, Montaigne adopted as his official motto the query, what do I know?

275
00:31:46.560 --> 00:31:51.600
If Montaigne knew nothing, he could scarcely know enough to advocate setting one's face

276
00:31:51.600 --> 00:31:56.080
against the burgeoning absolutist tyranny of his day.

277
00:31:56.080 --> 00:32:02.720
On the contrary, stoic resignation, a submission to the prevailing winds, became the required

278
00:32:02.720 --> 00:32:06.320
way of confronting the public world.

279
00:32:06.320 --> 00:32:12.200
Skinner sums up Montaigne's political counsel as holding that everyone has a duty to submit

280
00:32:12.200 --> 00:32:18.840
himself to the existing order of things, never resisting the prevailing government, and,

281
00:32:18.840 --> 00:32:23.040
are necessary enduring it with fortitude.

282
00:32:23.040 --> 00:32:28.760
In particular, Montaigne, though skeptical about religion itself, cynically stressed

283
00:32:28.760 --> 00:32:34.960
the social importance of everyone outwardly observing the same religious forms.

284
00:32:34.960 --> 00:32:41.280
Above all, France must submit completely to the authority of our Catholic ecclesiastical

285
00:32:41.280 --> 00:32:44.020
government.

286
00:32:44.020 --> 00:32:50.800
Everyone to constituted authority was indeed the key to Montaigne's political thought.

287
00:32:50.800 --> 00:32:56.800
Everyone must remain obedient to the King at all times, no matter how he discharges his

288
00:32:56.800 --> 00:32:59.600
obligation to rule.

289
00:32:59.600 --> 00:33:06.160
Unable to use reason as a guide, Montaigne had to fall back on the status quo, on custom

290
00:33:06.160 --> 00:33:08.140
and on tradition.

291
00:33:08.140 --> 00:33:14.260
He warned gravely and repeatedly that every one must wholly follow the accepted fashion

292
00:33:14.260 --> 00:33:21.660
and forms, for it is the rule of rules and the universal law of laws that each man should

293
00:33:21.660 --> 00:33:26.020
observe those of the place he is in.

294
00:33:26.020 --> 00:33:31.740
Montaigne hailed Plato for wanting to prohibit any citizen from looking even into the reason

295
00:33:31.740 --> 00:33:38.500
of the Civil Laws, for those laws must be respected as divine ordinances.

296
00:33:38.500 --> 00:33:45.100
Although we may wish for different rulers, we must nevertheless obey those that are here.

297
00:33:45.100 --> 00:33:50.520
The finest achievement of the Christian religion, according to Montaigne, was its insistence

298
00:33:50.520 --> 00:33:56.260
on obedience to the magistrates and maintenance of the government.

299
00:33:56.260 --> 00:34:01.320
Considering Montaigne's fundamental outlook, it is no wonder that he warmly embraced the

300
00:34:01.320 --> 00:34:05.400
The Machiavellian concept of reason of state.

301
00:34:05.400 --> 00:34:11.200
May we say that he held the reason of man to be worthless, but the reason of state to

302
00:34:11.200 --> 00:34:13.240
be overriding?

303
00:34:13.240 --> 00:34:19.140
Characteristically, while Montaigne writes that he personally likes to keep out of politics

304
00:34:19.140 --> 00:34:26.080
and diplomacy because he prefers to avoid lying and deceit, he also asserts the necessity

305
00:34:26.080 --> 00:34:31.040
of lawful vice in the operations of government.

306
00:34:31.040 --> 00:34:37.200
in a ruler may be necessary, and furthermore such vices are positively needed for sowing

307
00:34:37.200 --> 00:34:44.080
our society together, as are poisons for the preservation of our health.

308
00:34:44.080 --> 00:34:50.240
Montaigne then goes on to integrate his defense of deceit in a prince with his seemingly paradoxical

309
00:34:50.240 --> 00:34:56.840
defense of reason of state, while having no use for human reason at all.

310
00:34:56.840 --> 00:35:02.680
For in following reason of state, the prince has simply abandoned his own reason for a

311
00:35:02.680 --> 00:35:09.400
more universal and powerful reason, and this mystical super reason has shown him that an

312
00:35:09.400 --> 00:35:14.440
ordinarily evil action needed to be done.

313
00:35:14.440 --> 00:35:20.840
Michel de Montaigne made a notable and highly influential contribution to mercantilism,

314
00:35:20.840 --> 00:35:26.120
the strictly economic aspect of state absolutism as well.

315
00:35:26.120 --> 00:35:32.040
Although he claimed that he knew nothing, on one thing he certainly asserted truth.

316
00:35:32.040 --> 00:35:35.720
His much-vaunted skepticism suddenly vanishing.

317
00:35:35.720 --> 00:35:42.120
In what Ludwig von Mises was later to call the Montaigne Fallacy, he insisted, as in

318
00:35:42.120 --> 00:35:50.360
the title of his famous essay number 22, that the plight of one man is the benefit of another.

319
00:35:50.360 --> 00:35:57.360
Where is the essence of mercantilist theory insofar as mercantilism has a theory at all?

320
00:35:57.360 --> 00:36:03.080
In contrast to the fundamental truth well known to the scholastics that both parties

321
00:36:03.080 --> 00:36:10.440
benefit from an exchange, Montaigne opined that in a trade one man can only benefit at

322
00:36:10.440 --> 00:36:12.900
the expense of another.

323
00:36:12.900 --> 00:36:20.120
By analogy, in international trade, one nation must benefit at the expense of another.

324
00:36:20.120 --> 00:36:26.360
The implication is that the market is a ravening jungle, so why should not a Frenchman urge

325
00:36:26.360 --> 00:36:31.880
the French state to grab as much from others as it can?

326
00:36:31.880 --> 00:36:37.560
Montaigne developed his theme in Essay 22 in a characteristically worldly, wise and

327
00:36:37.560 --> 00:36:39.520
cynical manner.

328
00:36:39.520 --> 00:36:45.100
He notes that an Athenian once condemned a funeral director on the charge that he demanded

329
00:36:45.100 --> 00:36:50.760
Unreasonable Profit, and this profit could not accrue to him but by the death of a great

330
00:36:50.760 --> 00:36:52.900
number of people.

331
00:36:52.900 --> 00:36:59.100
This judgment appears to be ill-grounded inasmuch as no profit can possibly be made but at the

332
00:36:59.100 --> 00:37:07.740
expense of another, and because by the same rule every kind of gain would have to be condemned.

333
00:37:07.740 --> 00:37:13.980
All work is done at the expense of others, and Montaigne correctly notes that the physician

334
00:37:13.980 --> 00:37:20.060
could be condemned in the same way. The same charge could be levied at the farmer or retailer

335
00:37:20.060 --> 00:37:25.380
for gaining because of people's hunger, the tailor for profiting because of someone's

336
00:37:25.380 --> 00:37:32.540
need for clothing, and so forth. He concluded broadly that the benefit of any one entity

337
00:37:32.540 --> 00:37:39.700
is necessarily the dissolution and corruption of some other thing. Unfortunately, of course,

338
00:37:39.700 --> 00:37:46.440
He could not see also that these producers did not create such needs, but instead were

339
00:37:46.440 --> 00:37:52.880
fulfilling them, and thereby removing the want and pain of their customers, and adding

340
00:37:52.880 --> 00:37:56.400
to their happiness and standard of living.

341
00:37:56.400 --> 00:38:02.680
If he had gone that far, he would have realized the nonsense of his dog-eat-dog, or what would

342
00:38:02.680 --> 00:38:18.480
9. Jean Baudin, Apex of Absolutist Thought in France

343
00:38:18.480 --> 00:38:24.460
While Montaigne paved the way for the dominance of absolutist thought in France, surely the

344
00:38:24.460 --> 00:38:31.420
The founder, or at least the locus classicus of 16th century French absolutism, was Jean

345
00:38:31.420 --> 00:38:36.140
Baudin, 1530-1596.

346
00:38:36.140 --> 00:38:41.700
Born in Angers, Baudin studied law at the University of Toulouse, where he taught for

347
00:38:41.700 --> 00:38:43.700
12 years.

348
00:38:43.700 --> 00:38:49.380
Baudin later went to Paris to become a jurist, and soon became one of the leading servitors

349
00:38:49.380 --> 00:38:55.860
of King Henry III and one of the leaders of the statist Politik Party, which upheld the

350
00:38:55.860 --> 00:39:01.940
power of the king as against the principled militants among the Huguenots on one side

351
00:39:01.940 --> 00:39:04.940
and the Catholic League on the other.

352
00:39:04.940 --> 00:39:13.300
Baudet's most important work was The Six Books of a Commonwealth, 1576.

353
00:39:13.300 --> 00:39:18.340
Perhaps the most massive work on political philosophy ever written, The Six Books was

354
00:39:18.340 --> 00:39:24.420
is certainly the most influential book on political philosophy in the 16th century.

355
00:39:24.420 --> 00:39:30.500
In addition to this work, Baudin published books on money, law, the historical method,

356
00:39:30.500 --> 00:39:34.940
natural science, religion and the occult.

357
00:39:34.940 --> 00:39:40.300
Central to Baudin's theory of absolutism, written in the face of the challenge of Huguenot

358
00:39:40.300 --> 00:39:46.740
rebellion, was the notion of sovereignty, the unchallengeable power of command in the

359
00:39:46.740 --> 00:40:01.500
A Monarch Ruling Over the Rest of Society. Characteristically, Baudin defined sovereignty as the most high, absolute and perpetual power over the citizens and subjects in a commonwealth.

360
00:40:01.500 --> 00:40:16.300
Central to sovereignty in Baudin was the sovereign's function as law-giver to society, and the essence of law-making was command, in exercise of will with binding force.

361
00:40:16.740 --> 00:40:28.740
Since the sovereign is the maker or creator of the law, he must therefore be above that law, which applies only to his subjects and not to himself.

362
00:40:28.740 --> 00:40:35.740
The sovereign, then, is a person whose will creates order out of formlessness and chaos.

363
00:40:35.740 --> 00:40:43.740
The sovereign, furthermore, must be unitary and indivisible, the locus of command in society.

364
00:40:43.740 --> 00:40:51.340
Bodin explains that we see the principal point of sovereign majesty and absolute power to

365
00:40:51.340 --> 00:40:57.700
consist in giving laws to subjects in general without their consent.

366
00:40:57.700 --> 00:41:05.780
The sovereign must be above the law that he creates as well as any customary law or institutions.

367
00:41:05.780 --> 00:41:12.580
Bodin urged the sovereign prince to follow God's law in framing his edicts, but the important

368
00:41:12.580 --> 00:41:24.580
The point was that no human action or institution could be employed to see that the prince follows the divine path, or to call him to account.

369
00:41:24.580 --> 00:41:32.580
Baudin, however, called upon the prince to rely for advice or counsel on a small number of wise advisors,

370
00:41:32.580 --> 00:41:42.580
Men who, allegedly lacking motives of self-interest, would be able to aid the king in legislating for the public good of the entire nation.

371
00:41:42.580 --> 00:41:50.580
In short, a small elite of wise men would share in the sovereign power behind the scenes,

372
00:41:50.580 --> 00:41:58.580
while publicly the sovereign would hand down decrees as if solely the product of his own will.

373
00:41:58.580 --> 00:42:16.580
As Kyoan writes, in Baudin's system, the monarch's dependence on his counselors is hidden by the impressive and satisfying fiction that the law is handed down by one benevolent, absolute, superhuman will.

374
00:42:16.580 --> 00:42:27.580
It is hardly far-fetched to conclude that Baudin, court politician and jurist, saw himself as one of the sages running government from behind the scenes.

375
00:42:27.580 --> 00:42:36.140
Plato's ideal of combined philosopher-king had now been transformed into the more realistic,

376
00:42:36.140 --> 00:42:42.660
and for Baudet, more self-serving, goal of philosopher-guiding the king.

377
00:42:42.660 --> 00:42:49.300
And all this cloaked in the illusory assumption that such a court philosopher has no self-interest

378
00:42:49.300 --> 00:42:53.820
in money or power in his own right.

379
00:42:53.820 --> 00:42:59.740
Baudet also envisaged a broad role for various groups to participate in the government of

380
00:42:59.740 --> 00:43:05.940
the Commonwealth, as well as a wide scope for bureaucrats and administrators.

381
00:43:05.940 --> 00:43:12.460
The crucial point is that all be subordinated to the power of the king.

382
00:43:12.460 --> 00:43:18.220
It is often true that political analysts are at their most acute in revealing the flaws

383
00:43:18.220 --> 00:43:21.260
in systems with which they disagree.

384
00:43:21.260 --> 00:43:27.860
Accordingly, one of Baudin's keenest insights was his examination of the popular democracies

385
00:43:27.860 --> 00:43:29.700
of the past.

386
00:43:29.700 --> 00:43:35.880
Baudin points out that if we rip up all the popular states that ever were and closely

387
00:43:35.880 --> 00:43:41.780
examine their real condition, then we shall find that the alleged rule of the people was

388
00:43:41.780 --> 00:43:45.620
always ruled by a small oligarchy.

389
00:43:45.620 --> 00:43:52.600
Anticipating such perceptive late 19th century theorists of the power elite or ruling class

390
00:43:52.600 --> 00:44:00.540
as Robert Michel, Gaetano Mosca and Vilfredo Pareto, Baudin pointed out that in reality

391
00:44:00.540 --> 00:44:09.500
rule is always exercised by an oligarchy for whom the people serves but for a mask.

392
00:44:09.500 --> 00:44:16.180
There is a curious lacuna, however, in the agenda of absolutist power, proclaimed by

393
00:44:16.180 --> 00:44:18.460
Jean Baudin.

394
00:44:18.460 --> 00:44:27.100
That lacuna lies in an area always crucial to the practical exercise of state power—taxation.

395
00:44:27.100 --> 00:44:32.620
We have seen that before the 14th century, French monarchs were expected to live off

396
00:44:32.620 --> 00:44:57.620
and while a regular and oppressive system of taxation was in place in France by the early 16th century, even the royal and absolutist theorists hesitated to grant the monarch the unlimited right to tax.

397
00:44:57.620 --> 00:45:09.620
In the late 16th century, both the Huguenots and the Catholic Leaguers bitterly condemned the arbitrary power of the king to tax as a crime against society.

398
00:45:09.620 --> 00:45:18.620
As a result, Baudin and his fellow establishment politiques were reluctant to play into the hands of the king's enemies.

399
00:45:18.620 --> 00:45:26.620
Like the French writers before him then, Baudin inconsistently upheld the rights of private property

400
00:45:26.620 --> 00:45:32.620
as well as the invalidity of the kings taxing his subjects without their consent.

401
00:45:32.620 --> 00:45:40.620
It is not in the power of any prince in the world at his pleasure to raise taxes upon the people,

402
00:45:40.620 --> 00:45:44.620
no more than to take another man's goods upon him.

403
00:45:44.620 --> 00:45:52.620
Baudet's notion of consent, however, was scarcely a thoroughgoing or radical one.

404
00:45:52.620 --> 00:45:59.220
Instead, he was content with the existing formal agreement to taxation by the State's General.

405
00:45:59.220 --> 00:46:05.780
Baudet's own actions as a deputy from the Vermondois at the State's General meeting

406
00:46:05.780 --> 00:46:15.220
at Blois, 1576 and 1577, emphatically stress the limited taxes aspect of his consistent

407
00:46:15.220 --> 00:46:18.120
attitude toward sovereignty.

408
00:46:18.120 --> 00:46:26.060
The King had proposed to substitute a graduated income tax on all commoners with no exemptions,

409
00:46:26.060 --> 00:46:32.380
what might now be called a flat tax with bumps, for the myriad of different taxes they then

410
00:46:32.380 --> 00:46:38.780
were forced to pay. Curiously enough, this scheme was almost precisely the one which

411
00:46:38.780 --> 00:46:45.980
Baudin himself had publicly advocated a short while before. But Baudin's opposition to

412
00:46:45.980 --> 00:46:52.340
The King's proposal displayed his shrewdly realistic attitude toward government.

413
00:46:52.340 --> 00:46:58.340
He noted that the King could not be trusted when he said this tax would be substituted

414
00:46:58.340 --> 00:47:01.540
for the tails, aides and gabels.

415
00:47:01.540 --> 00:47:08.980
Rather, it was much more likely that the King was plotting to make this an additional tax.

416
00:47:08.980 --> 00:47:15.500
Baudet also engaged in a perceptive interest analysis of the reason that the Parisian deputies

417
00:47:15.500 --> 00:47:20.100
had taken the lead in support of the new higher tax.

418
00:47:20.100 --> 00:47:25.620
For he showed that the Parisians had not been paid any interest on their government bonds

419
00:47:25.620 --> 00:47:31.180
for a long while and were hoping that the higher taxes would allow the king to resume

420
00:47:31.180 --> 00:47:32.860
his payments.

421
00:47:32.860 --> 00:47:40.660
Jean-Baudin, anxious to prevent the king from launching an all-out war against the Huguenots,

422
00:47:40.660 --> 00:47:48.420
led the estates in blocking not only the single tax plan, but also other emergency grants to the king.

423
00:47:48.420 --> 00:47:53.820
Baudet pointed out that temporary grants often became permanent.

424
00:47:53.820 --> 00:48:03.460
He also warned the king and his countrymen that one cannot find more frequent upsets, seditions and ruins of commonwealths

425
00:48:03.460 --> 00:48:07.260
than because of excessive tax burdens and imposts.

426
00:48:07.260 --> 00:48:29.260
Among the absolutist writers following Baudin, the seventeenth century servitors of the absolute state, all hesitance or piety to the medieval legacy of strictly limited taxation was destined to disappear. State power, unlimited, was to be glorified.

427
00:48:29.260 --> 00:48:33.500
In the more narrowly economic sphere of the theory of money,

428
00:48:33.500 --> 00:48:41.900
Baudin, as we have seen above, has long been credited by historians with pioneering the quantity theory of money,

429
00:48:41.900 --> 00:48:47.500
more strictly, the direct influence of the supply of money on prices,

430
00:48:47.500 --> 00:48:53.900
in his response to the paradoxes of Monsieur de Malastrois, 1568.

431
00:48:53.900 --> 00:49:02.580
Malastroie had attributed the unusual and chronic price increases in France to debasement,

432
00:49:02.580 --> 00:49:09.880
but Baudin pinpointed the cause as the increased supply of specie from the New World.

433
00:49:09.880 --> 00:49:15.900
We have seen, however, that the quantity theory had been known since the time of the 14th

434
00:49:15.900 --> 00:49:23.020
century scholastic Jean Bourdain and of Nicolaus Copernicus in the early 16th century.

435
00:49:23.020 --> 00:49:28.900
The increased specie from the New World was spotted as the cause of price rises a dozen

436
00:49:28.900 --> 00:49:36.940
years earlier than Baudin by the eminent Spanish scholastic Martin de Azpilcueta Navarres.

437
00:49:36.940 --> 00:49:43.280
As a highly learned scholar, Baudin would certainly have read Navarres' treatise, especially

438
00:49:43.280 --> 00:49:48.860
since Navarres had taught at the University of Toulouse a generation before Baudin came

439
00:49:48.860 --> 00:49:50.340
there to study.

440
00:49:50.340 --> 00:49:56.240
Baudin's claim of originality in this analysis should therefore be taken with many grains

441
00:49:56.240 --> 00:49:58.580
of salt.

442
00:49:58.580 --> 00:50:04.540
Jean Baudin was also one of the first theorists to point out the influence of social leaders

443
00:50:04.540 --> 00:50:09.060
on demand for goods, and therefore on their price.

444
00:50:09.060 --> 00:50:16.340
People, he points out, esteem and raise in price everything that the great lords like,

445
00:50:16.340 --> 00:50:21.380
Although the things in themselves are not worth that valuation.

446
00:50:21.380 --> 00:50:27.620
Then a snob effect takes over, after the great lords see that their subjects have an abundance

447
00:50:27.620 --> 00:50:30.780
of things that they themselves like.

448
00:50:30.780 --> 00:50:37.940
The lords then begin to despise these products, and their prices then fall.

449
00:50:37.940 --> 00:50:44.720
Despite his numerous keen economic and political insights, however, Baudin was ultra-orthodox

450
00:50:44.720 --> 00:50:51.680
in his view of usury, ignoring the work of his near-contemporary Dumoulin as well as

451
00:50:51.680 --> 00:50:54.480
the Spanish scholastics.

452
00:50:54.480 --> 00:51:01.560
Interest-taking was prohibited by God, according to Baudin, and that was that.

453
00:51:01.560 --> 00:51:03.760
10.

454
00:51:03.760 --> 00:51:04.760
After Baudin

455
00:51:04.760 --> 00:51:14.200
Jean Baudin's exaltation of sovereignty struck French political thought like a thunderclap.

456
00:51:14.200 --> 00:51:21.320
Here at last was a way to justify and expand the ever-increasing powers of the Crown.

457
00:51:21.320 --> 00:51:26.760
In particular, the new view was adopted and subtly transformed by writers who were far

458
00:51:26.760 --> 00:51:32.640
more absolutist in practice than was Baudin himself.

459
00:51:32.640 --> 00:51:38.080
The one element that Baudin's veneration of sovereignty lacked was the Protestant notion

460
00:51:38.080 --> 00:51:45.880
of Divine Sanction, for to Baudin, absolute sovereignty was simply a fact of nature.

461
00:51:45.880 --> 00:51:50.920
Other politiques, however, soon added the missing ingredient, since they had long been

462
00:51:50.920 --> 00:51:55.120
accustomed to think of rule as by divine right.

463
00:51:55.120 --> 00:52:02.200
The idea of the king's rule being commanded by God was a familiar one in the 16th century.

464
00:52:02.200 --> 00:52:08.540
None, however, had extended kingly rule to the notion of absolute sovereignty created

465
00:52:08.540 --> 00:52:11.060
by Baudin.

466
00:52:11.060 --> 00:52:20.820
The most important immediate follower of Baudin was Pierre Gregoire in his De Republica, 1578.

467
00:52:20.820 --> 00:52:27.280
The king for Gregoire was God's appointed vicar in the temporal sphere, and his rule

468
00:52:27.280 --> 00:52:31.320
was under the constant influence of God's will.

469
00:52:31.320 --> 00:52:38.040
The king's command was therefore equivalent to God's, and was equally owed absolute obedience

470
00:52:38.040 --> 00:52:40.080
by his subjects.

471
00:52:40.080 --> 00:52:47.600
The prince is the image of God, in power and in authority, wrote Gregoire.

472
00:52:47.600 --> 00:52:53.560
Baudin and others had still retained the idea that true justice was a concept separate and

473
00:52:53.560 --> 00:53:00.380
apart from the king's edicts, so that the king's actions could well be unjust.

474
00:53:00.380 --> 00:53:06.200
No one, however, was allowed to obstruct or disobey such actions.

475
00:53:06.200 --> 00:53:12.580
But in the Doctrine of the Gallicized Scott, Adam Blackwood, the two concepts became almost

476
00:53:12.580 --> 00:53:15.060
totally conflated.

477
00:53:15.060 --> 00:53:20.540
Adversus Georgii Buchananii, 1581.

478
00:53:20.540 --> 00:53:26.260
The will of the prince, for Blackwood, becomes just virtually by definition.

479
00:53:26.260 --> 00:53:33.380
The King was necessarily just and virtually superhuman, a living law unto himself.

480
00:53:33.380 --> 00:53:40.660
Indeed, Blackwood carried the glorification of divinely constituted monarchy to its apogee,

481
00:53:40.660 --> 00:53:46.540
asserting that the very person of the King and not simply the authority of his office

482
00:53:46.540 --> 00:53:53.100
was divine and that he was, in a literal sense, a god on earth.

483
00:53:53.100 --> 00:53:58.580
As its title indicates, Blackwood's work was written as an attack on his fellow-galicized

484
00:53:58.580 --> 00:54:06.580
Scott, the radical Calvinist, George Buchanan. Buchanan's libertarian and pro-tyrannicide

485
00:54:06.580 --> 00:54:14.260
doctrine had rested, unsurprisingly, on the concept of natural law. And so Blackwood denounced

486
00:54:14.260 --> 00:54:20.540
natural law as a source of anarchistic liberty, prompting in its believers an aversion to

487
00:54:20.540 --> 00:54:24.180
to Law and to Political Authority.

488
00:54:24.180 --> 00:54:31.140
Against natural law, Blackwood upheld the eus gentium, the positive law of nations,

489
00:54:31.140 --> 00:54:36.420
as the explanation and justification of political authority.

490
00:54:36.420 --> 00:54:43.220
It is not surprising that the consensual limit on taxation, still active in Baudin's thought,

491
00:54:43.220 --> 00:54:50.260
should drop out immediately upon the fusion of absolute sovereignty and divine right.

492
00:54:50.260 --> 00:54:57.700
The leader of that fusion, Pierre Gregoire, introduced erasing the tax limit as well.

493
00:54:57.700 --> 00:55:04.460
Whereas even Baudin had conceded that natural law established a right to private property,

494
00:55:04.460 --> 00:55:11.340
with Gregoire, natural law only ratifies the unchecked power of the king.

495
00:55:11.340 --> 00:55:18.100
For Gregoire, the king had the unlimited prerogative to levy taxes, since the good of the state

496
00:55:18.100 --> 00:55:31.100
is higher than the property rights of the individual. Indeed, the king possessed by divine grant an absolute authority over all the persons and properties of his subjects.

497
00:55:31.100 --> 00:55:41.100
To avoid confusion, therefore, or any implication of consent to taxation, the States General should be abolished altogether.

498
00:55:41.100 --> 00:55:50.100
It was indeed Adam Blackwood who uniquely and radically reached the clarity of consistency on the ruler's right to tax.

499
00:55:50.100 --> 00:55:59.100
For if property rights are important and the king has the absolute right to tax or otherwise sees private property at will,

500
00:55:59.100 --> 00:56:07.100
then this must mean that all lands were originally held by the king and were granted by him to others.

501
00:56:07.100 --> 00:56:18.100
and the granting of fiefs by the king was but a partial transfer. All lands owed tribute to him and remained subject to his authority.

502
00:56:18.100 --> 00:56:27.100
In short, in an odd version of the state of nature, only the king had original or continuing property rights.

503
00:56:27.100 --> 00:56:33.820
Rights, all other seeming property rights are simply allowances by the king, temporary

504
00:56:33.820 --> 00:56:41.260
possessions that are regulatable by the king and revocable by him at any time.

505
00:56:41.260 --> 00:56:48.960
Whereas Adam Blackwood had been a lone extremist in absolutism in the early 1580s, a host of

506
00:56:48.960 --> 00:56:54.060
royalist pamphleteers were soon adopting his views.

507
00:56:54.060 --> 00:57:01.260
From approximately 1585 to Henry IV's conversion to Catholicism eight years later, the royal

508
00:57:01.260 --> 00:57:07.740
power was beleaguered and subordinate to the strength of the militant Catholic League.

509
00:57:07.740 --> 00:57:13.580
The royalist writers therefore felt obliged to push the divine sanction of the sovereign

510
00:57:13.580 --> 00:57:20.820
to the maximum in order to eliminate any power of the pope in France, and to counsel absolute

511
00:57:20.820 --> 00:57:26.660
Obedience to Any Legitimate Sovereign, Regardless of His Religion.

512
00:57:26.660 --> 00:57:33.380
The king had absolute authority over the Catholic Church in France as well as all other institutions.

513
00:57:33.380 --> 00:57:42.100
Thus, François Lejaye, On the Dignity of Kings, 1589, asserted that kings were established

514
00:57:42.100 --> 00:57:47.840
for the honor and service of God, and that subjects should obey their rulers as they

515
00:57:47.840 --> 00:58:06.840
Louis Servin, in his Vindicii, 1590, trumpeted of Henry IV, then still a Huguenot, that God is our king. By him he lives and flourishes, and by his spirit is he animated.

516
00:58:06.840 --> 00:58:23.840
Probably the most extreme version of this doctrine was expressed in a speech of Jacques de la Guelle, Procurator General of France, asking the Parliament to condemn a priest who had upheld the supreme temporal authority of the Pope.

517
00:58:23.840 --> 00:58:31.980
Sirs, the authority of the king is sacrosanct, ordained by God, the principal work of his

518
00:58:31.980 --> 00:58:38.840
providence, the masterpiece of his hands, the image of his sublime majesty, and proportionate

519
00:58:38.840 --> 00:58:45.680
to his immense grandeur, so as to bear comparison of the creature with the Creator.

520
00:58:45.680 --> 00:58:53.160
For just as God is by nature the first king and prince, so is the king by creation and

521
00:58:53.160 --> 00:58:58.560
and Imitation, God of All on Earth.

522
00:58:58.560 --> 00:59:05.240
The subjects, according to these Henryshian absolutists, owed this quasi-divine figure

523
00:59:05.240 --> 00:59:07.760
absolute obedience.

524
00:59:07.760 --> 00:59:13.480
These writers developed the Black Woodian theme that the king's decrees were ipso facto

525
00:59:13.480 --> 00:59:16.240
and necessarily just.

526
00:59:16.240 --> 00:59:25.240
Jacques Hurot, in his On the Offices of State, 1588, developed this doctrine most clearly.

527
00:59:25.240 --> 00:59:30.420
Hurot explained that the prince was guided by the hand of God and therefore could do

528
00:59:30.420 --> 00:59:37.700
no wrong. The ruler was not simply a man, but justice itself, which he dispensed according

529
00:59:37.700 --> 00:59:45.080
to the will of God. The constitution of the state was subordinated in Hurot to two simple

530
00:59:45.080 --> 00:59:53.020
points, the princes necessarily just commands and the obedience of his subjects, the ruler

531
00:59:53.020 --> 00:59:57.640
commands and the subjects obey, period.

532
00:59:57.640 --> 01:00:03.400
Furthermore, in reaction to the leaguer emphasis on the people, the royalists counseled the

533
01:00:03.400 --> 01:00:10.200
king not to allow naturally restless subjects much liberty.

534
01:00:10.200 --> 01:00:16.160
Since the Politiques and Henry 4th triumphed shortly thereafter, these ultra-absolutist

535
01:00:16.160 --> 01:00:23.000
views of the embattled Henryshian pamphleteers inspired and were followed fairly completely

536
01:00:23.000 --> 01:00:29.760
by the dominant theoreticians of the great age of absolutism, seventeenth century France.