WEBVTT

NOTE Conservation and Property Rights

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.500
Okay, tonight we're going to talk about conservation.

2
00:00:03.500 --> 00:00:06.100
We've heard a lot about capitalist greed, in quotes,

3
00:00:06.100 --> 00:00:09.200
ravaging our natural resources and destroying it,

4
00:00:09.200 --> 00:00:11.900
sort of like a mighty blight coming over the land.

5
00:00:11.900 --> 00:00:15.400
There are many areas where capitalist greed is supposed to ravage our resources.

6
00:00:15.400 --> 00:00:18.900
The main one for many years used to be the forests, and we'll get to that in a minute.

7
00:00:18.900 --> 00:00:22.700
First question to ask about this point, about capitalist greed ravaging our resources,

8
00:00:22.700 --> 00:00:24.700
is how come it hasn't ravaged a lot of other stuff?

9
00:00:24.700 --> 00:00:28.200
I mean, how come it's ravaged, say, the forest and various other specific items,

10
00:00:28.200 --> 00:00:52.600
How come the capitalist greed has done its evil work in those areas and not in the second areas?

11
00:00:52.600 --> 00:00:57.600
There must be something about the areas themselves that are the problem and not alleged capitalist greed.

12
00:00:57.600 --> 00:01:02.000
First of all, about the forests, which I may as well just mention passing.

13
00:01:02.000 --> 00:01:06.900
True, there's a lot less forest now than there was in 1492 when Columbus landed.

14
00:01:06.900 --> 00:01:10.300
In those days, the whole country, the whole land was covered with forests.

15
00:01:10.300 --> 00:01:15.500
The problem then is, if you really want to preserve the forest's primeval state,

16
00:01:15.500 --> 00:01:18.400
in which it was in 1490, we'd be in pretty bad shape.

17
00:01:18.400 --> 00:01:22.300
As a matter of fact, we wouldn't be here at all, because the only way in which we could land

18
00:01:22.300 --> 00:01:26.500
and clear the established houses and factories and roads and all that sort of stuff

19
00:01:26.500 --> 00:01:36.500
The basic problem here that the forests are occupying this land, which turned out to be more valuable for other things, for other uses, and so we had to chop down the forest.

20
00:01:36.500 --> 00:01:41.500
If the Sierra Club had been around in 1492, we never would have gotten off the boat.

21
00:01:41.500 --> 00:01:49.500
So you have the basic problem with the conservationists that if they want to preserve everything, it's a darn good thing that didn't start a long time ago.

22
00:01:49.500 --> 00:01:58.500
Okay, but obviously if you want to preserve the entire forest of the continent, it's either that or us, it's either the trees or mankind that has to survive.

23
00:01:58.500 --> 00:02:09.500
Okay, so what is there, before we get back to the forest and the ally problems, what is there on the market that prevents ravaging, total destruction of copper and iron and all these other natural resources?

24
00:02:09.500 --> 00:02:17.500
What happens is that the free market has a built-in mechanism, if I can use the word mechanism, there's a built-in mechanism which provides what we can call optimal conservation,

25
00:02:17.500 --> 00:02:26.500
Which provides a situation where business firms in the market produce a certain optimal amount per year and leave the rest of it, also an optimal amount, on the ground.

26
00:02:26.500 --> 00:02:35.000
Put it this way, supposing we have a mine, it could be a copper mine or whatever, and the mine has, say, a hundred million dollars' worth in the ground.

27
00:02:35.000 --> 00:02:40.000
The mine owner, say the copper mine owner, is faced with a choice. How much should he dig out this year and how much should he leave?

28
00:02:40.000 --> 00:02:46.000
Well, if he digs out $10 million this year, okay, let's say he gets a certain profit on that,

29
00:02:46.000 --> 00:02:49.000
but then he's got $90 million worth of copper left.

30
00:02:49.000 --> 00:02:54.000
If, on the other hand, he digs out $20 million, then he's got $80 million left.

31
00:02:54.000 --> 00:02:58.000
Now, this illustrates the point that if he increases his annual production,

32
00:02:58.000 --> 00:03:02.000
or if he steps up his current rate of production, he will get higher profits, let's say, this year.

33
00:03:02.000 --> 00:03:08.000
However, he is then left with a problem and he has $20 million less capital value than he had before.

34
00:03:08.000 --> 00:03:11.960
So in other words, he always has to choose, on the market, he's faced with a constant

35
00:03:11.960 --> 00:03:15.880
series of choices, and one of these series of choices is between annual production, revving

36
00:03:15.880 --> 00:03:19.280
up your current income, but then having a lower capital value.

37
00:03:19.280 --> 00:03:24.600
A lower capital value means that if he wants to sell either the mine itself or the shares

38
00:03:24.600 --> 00:03:28.760
of stock in the mine, he's going to have to accept a lower price because then the capital

39
00:03:28.760 --> 00:03:29.760
value declines.

40
00:03:29.760 --> 00:03:32.560
So these are the two things he always has to guard against.

41
00:03:32.560 --> 00:03:36.200
So in other words, he's not going to just shoot the whole 100 million this year because

42
00:03:36.200 --> 00:03:40.200
and if he does that, his capital value of what he has remaining goes down to zero.

43
00:03:40.200 --> 00:03:44.200
So the corrective mechanism, or part of the corrective mechanism, we can see right away on the market,

44
00:03:44.200 --> 00:03:50.200
even though he wants current profits, he doesn't want to lose the present capital value of his future profits.

45
00:03:50.200 --> 00:03:55.200
In other words, the mine as a whole, he owns the copper mine as a whole, he owns shares in the copper mine as a whole.

46
00:03:55.200 --> 00:03:58.200
The value of that copper mine as a whole is the discount of future returns.

47
00:03:58.200 --> 00:04:02.200
These future returns are brought back by the market into the current capital value.

48
00:04:02.200 --> 00:04:05.200
Basically, choice depends on several things.

49
00:04:05.200 --> 00:04:10.200
Suppose he expects the price to rise in copper in the fairly near future.

50
00:04:10.200 --> 00:04:14.200
Say he expects there's going to be a big copper shortage next year or two years from now.

51
00:04:14.200 --> 00:04:17.200
Well, as he's concerned, the expected capital value has increased.

52
00:04:17.200 --> 00:04:20.200
He expects the price of copper to go up in the near future.

53
00:04:20.200 --> 00:04:25.200
And then, because the capital value is now greater in relation to the current price,

54
00:04:25.200 --> 00:04:27.200
he will then hold back copper.

55
00:04:27.200 --> 00:04:32.200
It's very similar to the wheat speculator who expects the price of wheat, say, to go up in six months.

56
00:05:02.200 --> 00:05:07.760
This capital value mechanism leads him to hold back copper and albinism at prices cheaper

57
00:05:07.760 --> 00:05:11.880
and therefore not as valued by the consumer, and then sell it two years from now, three

58
00:05:11.880 --> 00:05:15.520
years from now, and the copper shortage emerges, and therefore it's more valued by the consumer

59
00:05:15.520 --> 00:05:18.000
and the price is higher, and he sells it.

60
00:05:18.000 --> 00:05:22.200
This is part of the way the free market mechanism shifts resources from where they're less valued

61
00:05:22.200 --> 00:05:26.640
to where they're more valued by the consumer, in this case, from the present to the future,

62
00:05:26.640 --> 00:05:30.280
thereby benefiting the consumers as a whole by shifting the production of copper from

63
00:05:30.280 --> 00:05:31.960
now to three years from now.

64
00:05:31.960 --> 00:05:36.380
On the other hand, closing, he expects that in two or three years there'll be a new substitute

65
00:05:36.380 --> 00:05:41.080
for copper, some big new alloy will come up, or something like that, or some new technological

66
00:05:41.080 --> 00:05:44.600
development to make copper more or less obsolete, which will outcompete copper.

67
00:05:44.600 --> 00:05:49.040
In that case, he expects the price of copper to fall, his estimate of the capital value

68
00:05:49.040 --> 00:05:54.800
will decline, and he will therefore step up his current production and deplete his capital

69
00:05:54.800 --> 00:05:59.280
value, because his effort will be going down anyway, and thereby shift from future production

70
00:05:59.280 --> 00:06:03.320
and the present production, again benefiting the consumers because what's the point of

71
00:06:03.320 --> 00:06:08.360
producing copper in 20 years when there's a new substitute that will be almost worthless?

72
00:06:08.360 --> 00:06:09.360
Better produce it now.

73
00:06:09.360 --> 00:06:12.080
And this market mechanism provides the incentive to do that.

74
00:06:12.080 --> 00:06:15.560
It gets the signal from the market, so to speak, uh-uh, capital value is going down,

75
00:06:15.560 --> 00:06:19.560
the effect is going to be a future obsolescence of copper, therefore let's produce it now

76
00:06:19.560 --> 00:06:21.640
when the profits are greater.

77
00:06:21.640 --> 00:06:25.200
So expected changes in the price are a key thing.

78
00:06:25.200 --> 00:06:30.360
to reflect on the capital value and give the signal to the producer or the mine owner or

79
00:06:30.360 --> 00:06:36.240
the natural resource owner to produce either more or less now or less or more in the future.

80
00:06:36.240 --> 00:06:41.800
Another point, time preference, the higher the rate of interest, the rate of returns

81
00:06:41.800 --> 00:06:42.800
are discounted.

82
00:06:42.800 --> 00:06:47.200
In other words, the lower the capital value of the mine, the lower the rate of interest,

83
00:06:47.200 --> 00:06:48.560
the higher the capital value of the mine.

84
00:06:48.560 --> 00:06:52.600
This means that the higher the rate of interest, the more the mine owner will be induced to

85
00:06:52.600 --> 00:06:54.480
produce now rather than later.

86
00:06:54.480 --> 00:06:58.560
And the lower the rate of interest, the more you'll be induced to save up now and produce

87
00:06:58.560 --> 00:07:00.980
and mine the copper later.

88
00:07:00.980 --> 00:07:03.860
Rate of interest is a reflection of time preferences of consumers.

89
00:07:03.860 --> 00:07:06.860
If the rate of time preference goes up, in other words, if consumers decide they'd like

90
00:07:06.860 --> 00:07:12.100
to consume now rather than later, they want to shift their allocation, consume more now

91
00:07:12.100 --> 00:07:17.140
and less saving and investment for later, then the rate of interest will go up and this

92
00:07:17.140 --> 00:07:21.780
will be reflected in the lower capital value of the mine and then this will induce the

93
00:07:21.780 --> 00:07:26.500
The copper mine owners have produced more now and let the capital value go down further

94
00:07:26.500 --> 00:07:29.060
and produce less in the future.

95
00:07:29.060 --> 00:07:33.340
If on the other hand the time preference falls, consumers decide they'd like to consume less

96
00:07:33.340 --> 00:07:37.520
now and more proportionately later and save and invest more for the future, then the rate

97
00:07:37.520 --> 00:07:42.180
of interest will fall, capital value of the mine will go up, mine owners will hold back

98
00:07:42.180 --> 00:07:46.180
more production now, will cut down their current production and shift toward future production,

99
00:07:46.180 --> 00:07:50.580
or invest, in other words, more in the copper mine.

100
00:07:50.580 --> 00:08:02.580
The new market has a smooth and rapid reflection, provides rapid reflection of consumer wishes, consumer desires here because changes are expected to be either from the supply side or the demand side.

101
00:08:02.580 --> 00:08:10.580
In other words, if from the supply side there's going to be a big shortage, a couple of years of copper, this will be reflected in the higher capital value now.

102
00:08:10.580 --> 00:08:14.580
The copper mine owner will hold onto more of the copper, produce less of it now.

103
00:08:14.580 --> 00:08:20.580
Or if there's going to be a greater supply later on, copper mine owner will produce more now and less later.

104
00:08:20.580 --> 00:08:25.580
Similarly, consumer time preferences are reflected in the rate of interest.

105
00:08:25.580 --> 00:08:29.580
In other words, the changes in demand side by consumers are reflected in the capital value also.

106
00:08:29.580 --> 00:08:35.580
So the capital value mechanism, the fact that the mine owner owns the mine itself, owns the natural resource itself,

107
00:08:35.580 --> 00:08:41.580
he can then allocate his current production versus his future production.

108
00:08:41.580 --> 00:08:47.580
Okay, let's go to another point about copper miner. Supposing supply of copper does dwindle.

109
00:08:47.580 --> 00:08:52.580
We're forgetting now exactly about the present versus the future. Supply of copper gets short.

110
00:08:52.580 --> 00:08:58.580
The price of copper therefore goes up. Now what happens in this situation when the price of copper goes up?

111
00:08:58.580 --> 00:09:03.580
The rise in copper, the price of copper itself provides another built-in mechanism.

112
00:09:03.580 --> 00:09:08.580
The first place, the fact that the price of copper goes up means the consumers, they'll start buying less copper.

113
00:09:08.580 --> 00:09:35.580
In other words, the individual buyer, on the basis of his value scales and income, etc., will voluntarily ration his own purchases, especially the marginal buyers who really just don't really want that much copper anyway, they could easily shift to aluminum or some other metal. The really gung-ho copper buyers will still buy more or less the same amount.

114
00:09:35.580 --> 00:09:42.580
So we have, then, a rationing system which is smooth and voluntary, and where each individual decides on his own boat tightening.

115
00:09:42.580 --> 00:09:49.580
In contrast, of course, the government rationing system, where a meat-axe approaches you, and everybody's got to suffer equally or suffer together.

116
00:09:49.580 --> 00:09:51.580
Suffer, of course, a lot more.

117
00:09:51.580 --> 00:09:56.580
Secondly, the rise in the copper price will then stimulate a greater search for supply.

118
00:09:56.580 --> 00:09:58.580
So the price of copper is now higher.

119
00:09:58.580 --> 00:10:03.580
People start going around with their whatever copper, whatever the Geiger counter equivalent is in the copper business,

120
00:10:03.580 --> 00:10:09.080
and start looking for more copper, since now it would be well worthwhile to start finding it and using it.

121
00:10:09.080 --> 00:10:14.080
There's a lot of minerals down underneath the ground, an enormous number of minerals which haven't been discovered yet.

122
00:10:14.080 --> 00:10:18.080
For example, a natural gas caper, everybody knows there's an enormous amount of natural gas,

123
00:10:18.080 --> 00:10:23.580
it's just they haven't been found yet, but it hasn't been worthwhile if anybody go out and look for it for about 20 years,

124
00:10:23.580 --> 00:10:31.580
because the price of natural gas has been held down about 25 cents per thousand cubic feet when the free market price is somewhere between 55 cents and a dollar.

125
00:10:31.580 --> 00:10:36.180
So, on the other hand, if the price goes up of copper, the higher the price will be and

126
00:10:36.180 --> 00:10:39.620
the greater the incentive to go out there with your copper Geiger counters or whatever and

127
00:10:39.620 --> 00:10:40.620
try to find more copper.

128
00:10:40.620 --> 00:10:43.540
And more copper will inevitably be found, by the way.

129
00:10:43.540 --> 00:10:45.820
Supply will eventually increase and the price will then fall.

130
00:10:45.820 --> 00:10:50.580
And third of all, the rise in the price of copper will stimulate substitutes, will stimulate

131
00:10:50.580 --> 00:10:55.780
people to start using substitutes or whatever other metal will be used or to try to invest

132
00:10:55.780 --> 00:11:00.740
in technologies which will discover substitutes because technology follows the market in most

133
00:11:00.740 --> 00:11:09.740
Nobody's going to start looking around for copper substitutes very much, a great deal of enthusiasm, and invest resources in it, unless there's a big copper scarcity, and the price of copper is high.

134
00:11:09.740 --> 00:11:15.740
Then you start looking around for all sorts of ways of getting around it, and something which will perform the same function as copper.

135
00:11:15.740 --> 00:11:26.740
It's the same way with this energy caper now. There's lots of energy sources around, solar energy, and nuclear, and shale oil, and tropical oceans, and all sorts of other stuff.

136
00:11:26.740 --> 00:11:27.740
and some other stuff.

137
00:11:27.740 --> 00:11:32.100
It just has been too uneconomic to even look around and try to invest in the technology

138
00:11:32.100 --> 00:11:33.100
for these things.

139
00:11:33.100 --> 00:11:36.700
If the price of energy is ever allowed to go up to its free market level, then these

140
00:11:36.700 --> 00:11:40.540
other sources will start...the economic will start investigating these sources and start

141
00:11:40.540 --> 00:11:44.500
trying to exploit them and use them, and then they will start pouring on the market in a

142
00:11:44.500 --> 00:11:45.500
few years.

143
00:11:45.500 --> 00:11:50.380
If not, of course, then the price of energy remains at their current price control level,

144
00:11:50.380 --> 00:11:55.100
and there's no incentive to go out there and invest in the new technology.

145
00:11:55.100 --> 00:12:00.100
Okay, so where the free market operates, where private property rights and the free market are allowed to operate,

146
00:12:00.100 --> 00:12:06.100
we have these built-in mechanisms in the market, which one, eliminating any problem with ravaging of all, you know,

147
00:12:06.100 --> 00:12:10.100
suddenly you wake up tomorrow morning and all the copper is gone. It doesn't work that way.

148
00:12:10.100 --> 00:12:17.100
And if there is an increased scarcity of copper, there are mechanisms that work to voluntarily ration and to also induce greater supply.

149
00:12:17.100 --> 00:12:24.100
So all of these things are at work. How come, then, the forests were ravaged and how come the fish in the ocean were ravaged,

150
00:12:24.100 --> 00:12:25.100
and so forth.

151
00:12:25.100 --> 00:12:29.100
How come there are these areas where it seems that the market didn't work successfully?

152
00:12:29.100 --> 00:12:32.740
It seems that there's overproduction or overuse or depletion.

153
00:12:32.740 --> 00:12:38.500
Before I get to that, just one more point about technology and market and resources.

154
00:12:38.500 --> 00:12:42.780
We think of the Industrial Revolution and technology as using up a lot of resources,

155
00:12:42.780 --> 00:12:47.300
gas guzzling as the current term is and so forth and all these various areas.

156
00:12:47.300 --> 00:12:50.380
Actually technology often creates a lot of resources which weren't resources before

157
00:12:50.380 --> 00:12:53.060
technology or industry came on the scene.

158
00:12:53.060 --> 00:12:56.820
For example, petroleum, which we're now a lot of belly-aching about is going on.

159
00:12:56.820 --> 00:13:01.340
Petroleum wasn't a resource until the Industrial Revolution, before, in other words, the advent

160
00:13:01.340 --> 00:13:07.140
of automobiles, and also kerosene lamps, but basically before the advent of automobiles,

161
00:13:07.140 --> 00:13:11.020
petroleum was just a pain in the neck, just a black ooze, it's a complete waste, I mean,

162
00:13:11.020 --> 00:13:16.220
it wasn't used for anything, it was just a, ugh, yeah, and it was only the development

163
00:13:16.220 --> 00:13:21.140
of automobiles and petroleum technology that created a resource out of something which

164
00:13:21.140 --> 00:13:23.140
The Theory of Money and Credit

165
00:13:51.140 --> 00:13:53.140
writes the function.

166
00:13:53.140 --> 00:13:55.140
Instead of it being capitalist greed as its fault,

167
00:13:55.140 --> 00:13:58.140
the fault is the capitalist greed hasn't been allowed to operate enough.

168
00:13:58.140 --> 00:14:01.140
In other words, the government has come in to restrict

169
00:14:01.140 --> 00:14:04.140
private property and capitalist greed in quotes

170
00:14:04.140 --> 00:14:08.140
from performing its function, the sort of function we've been talking about.

171
00:14:08.140 --> 00:14:11.140
The major problem is coming back in those cases where the government has not allowed

172
00:14:11.140 --> 00:14:14.140
private property to function in the resource itself, but has allowed

173
00:14:14.140 --> 00:14:17.140
private property in the use of the resource.

174
00:14:17.140 --> 00:14:20.140
For example, the government says no private property is permissible

175
00:14:20.140 --> 00:14:25.940
The copper mine itself. Nobody is allowed to... It's evil and immoral for the private individuals to own a copper mine.

176
00:14:25.940 --> 00:14:30.440
However, you can take as much copper out of the ground as you want to, and then you own that.

177
00:14:30.440 --> 00:14:33.640
But you can't own the copper mine itself, and actually the resource itself.

178
00:14:33.640 --> 00:14:36.740
Well, what's going to happen? This can be done in either one of two ways.

179
00:14:36.740 --> 00:14:40.440
Either the government can declare what we can call copper communism.

180
00:14:40.440 --> 00:14:45.240
In other words, the mine itself will be used by the first guy who comes there and starts digging it up.

181
00:14:45.240 --> 00:14:46.240
That's one way of doing it.

182
00:14:46.240 --> 00:14:50.740
or, the other way, the government can own the copper mine and lease it out to whoever

183
00:14:50.740 --> 00:14:52.300
it wants to lease it to.

184
00:14:52.300 --> 00:14:58.060
First function, the copper communism, first the system, so to speak, sets up a situation

185
00:14:58.060 --> 00:15:02.080
where if I don't go in there and mine the copper right now, the other guy is going to

186
00:15:02.080 --> 00:15:03.080
mine it.

187
00:15:03.080 --> 00:15:06.960
There's no way of protecting myself from this other guy coming in and grabbing the copper.

188
00:15:06.960 --> 00:15:12.000
Therefore, this induces a holy rush to produce as much copper as you can as fast as possible.

189
00:15:12.000 --> 00:15:17.000
Also, of course, bolstered by the fact, very much so, that nobody owns the copper mine itself.

190
00:15:17.000 --> 00:15:24.000
If I come in there and start mining as much copper as I can, 24 hours a day, etc., all the equipment I can possibly muster,

191
00:15:24.000 --> 00:15:27.000
I don't lose the capital value as this guy does, because there ain't no capital value.

192
00:15:27.000 --> 00:15:28.000
Nobody owns the capital value.

193
00:15:28.000 --> 00:15:32.000
And since nobody can own the capital value, then the sky's the limit.

194
00:15:32.000 --> 00:15:37.000
This system induces a maximization of current production and of forgetting about future production,

195
00:15:37.000 --> 00:15:41.000
because there's nobody around to reap the benefits of the future production.

196
00:15:41.000 --> 00:15:46.200
The government owns it. It usually works out to the same thing. The government leases it to some copper miner.

197
00:15:46.200 --> 00:15:50.400
Again, the government owns the resource. The copper miner owner doesn't.

198
00:15:50.400 --> 00:15:56.300
And so the copper miner owner will be induced to mine as fast as possible, get as much copper out of the ground as he can.

199
00:15:56.300 --> 00:16:01.000
Also, in addition to that, if nobody owns the capital resource, the mine itself,

200
00:16:01.000 --> 00:16:09.200
there's no incentive to somehow redeplete it if you can, and replete it to improve the technology on a long-term basis in some way.

201
00:16:09.200 --> 00:16:11.600
Because, again, nobody can reap the benefit of this.

202
00:16:11.600 --> 00:16:14.400
If you do that, then the other guy will come in and grab the copper.

203
00:16:14.400 --> 00:16:16.040
Nobody owns the capital value.

204
00:16:16.040 --> 00:16:19.320
The government owners will get back to government ownership a little later, but the point is,

205
00:16:19.320 --> 00:16:23.360
of course, government controls the copper mine and owns it in a sort of philosophical

206
00:16:23.360 --> 00:16:26.160
sense, but it doesn't own the capital value.

207
00:16:26.160 --> 00:16:30.320
The government regulates it or rules it or governs it, but the government official, the

208
00:16:30.320 --> 00:16:34.480
head of the Department of the Interior, can't sell the copper mine, sell one-fifth share.

209
00:16:34.480 --> 00:16:36.040
But there ain't no shares.

210
00:16:36.040 --> 00:16:37.400
There's really no ownership.

211
00:16:37.400 --> 00:17:07.400
and so there's nobody there has the economic incentive to govern the thing in a kind of long-range basis it's always said that I mean it's typical in economic literature political science literature that the government should control natural resources or regulate them or even own them because private individuals are short-sighted they've got time preference for us which means that they prefer present the future at some sort of rate the private people out there undervalue the future whereas we as a government government officials are farsighted they look for 200 years ahead

212
00:17:37.400 --> 00:17:40.960
The government, since government doesn't own the resources, even if it regulates it, the

213
00:17:40.960 --> 00:17:43.240
government has no long-range interests whatsoever.

214
00:17:43.240 --> 00:17:44.240
They don't have to preserve anything.

215
00:17:44.240 --> 00:17:47.800
As a matter of fact, government officials, as we all know, have only one interest, which

216
00:17:47.800 --> 00:17:50.080
is baiting everything along to the next election.

217
00:17:50.080 --> 00:17:51.640
Their time horizon is about six months.

218
00:17:51.640 --> 00:17:55.560
In other words, say, if it's now March, the election is November, that's about their

219
00:17:55.560 --> 00:17:56.560
time horizon.

220
00:17:56.560 --> 00:17:59.160
They don't care if the world collapses in December, as long as they get re-elected in

221
00:17:59.160 --> 00:18:00.160
November.

222
00:18:00.160 --> 00:18:05.800
So far from the government being far-sighted, looking for the social future, the custodian

223
00:18:05.800 --> 00:18:08.800
of Humanity and Future Generations, it's just the opposite.

224
00:18:08.800 --> 00:18:12.800
The government's the last person to go to because they're really just interested in the next election.

225
00:18:12.800 --> 00:18:15.800
So let's get the specifics now of the various areas.

226
00:18:15.800 --> 00:18:19.800
Private capitalism is also ravaged and plundered and so forth and so on.

227
00:18:19.800 --> 00:18:20.800
There's the forest.

228
00:18:20.800 --> 00:18:25.800
Okay, I already said my piece about the forest in general, about the, if you expect 300 million square miles

229
00:18:25.800 --> 00:18:30.800
or whatever the acreage of the American continent is, you can't expect that to be preserved.

230
00:18:30.800 --> 00:18:34.800
One other thing though, I think, when it gets to either the forest or anything else,

231
00:18:34.800 --> 00:18:39.800
The environmentalists, the conservationists, want to preserve the forest unpainted and all that stuff.

232
00:18:39.800 --> 00:18:41.680
They want to preserve this and the other thing.

233
00:18:41.680 --> 00:18:44.160
What they should do, of course, is go out in the market and buy it.

234
00:18:44.160 --> 00:18:46.600
If they do that, nobody would have any gripe.

235
00:18:46.600 --> 00:18:48.120
I certainly wouldn't have any gripe.

236
00:18:48.120 --> 00:18:50.480
If they want to preserve the forest primeval, they should buy it.

237
00:18:50.480 --> 00:18:53.520
If they want to preserve the whatever, go out and buy it.

238
00:18:53.520 --> 00:18:56.400
If they want to buy the tundra, then go ahead and buy it.

239
00:18:56.400 --> 00:19:01.240
Now, of course, if they do that, that means they'll have to spend a lot of their own money.

240
00:19:01.240 --> 00:19:05.680
They won't be able to be intellectuals sitting around in the clubs in New York or Washington

241
00:19:05.680 --> 00:19:10.440
telling everybody else and telling the taxpayers to pick up the tab for their aesthetics.

242
00:19:10.440 --> 00:19:12.040
We have a question here of competing aesthetics.

243
00:19:12.040 --> 00:19:15.680
I really don't care about the tundra, but those who do care about the tundra should

244
00:19:15.680 --> 00:19:17.840
buy it and then preserve it forevermore.

245
00:19:17.840 --> 00:19:22.720
As a matter of fact, as Professor Dolman makes the point of a cute point on this whole question,

246
00:19:22.720 --> 00:19:26.160
the error club is always wiping about the government selling them out or the government

247
00:19:26.160 --> 00:19:30.440
allowing the tundra to be used or for us to be chopped down or whatever.

248
00:19:30.440 --> 00:19:33.940
And he says sort of ingenuously, wow, since the government has always been betraying them,

249
00:19:33.940 --> 00:19:34.940
why don't they do it themselves?

250
00:19:34.940 --> 00:19:35.940
Why don't they go out and buy all this stuff?

251
00:19:35.940 --> 00:19:39.960
And then they can certainly trust themselves to preserve it forevermore, so why don't they

252
00:19:39.960 --> 00:19:40.960
do that?

253
00:19:40.960 --> 00:19:45.120
Of course, the preserving of this stuff will lie, or it should lie, and those who want

254
00:19:45.120 --> 00:19:48.480
to do the preserving, and those who are really hopped up about the tundra and the caribou,

255
00:19:48.480 --> 00:19:50.040
they should go out and buy it.

256
00:19:50.040 --> 00:19:54.060
However, if the conservationists use the government, that means the rest of us have to pick up

257
00:19:54.060 --> 00:19:55.060
the tab.

258
00:19:55.060 --> 00:19:58.360
This is like using the taxpayer's money to build a $300 billion monument to something

259
00:19:58.360 --> 00:19:59.360
or other, if you want.

260
00:19:59.360 --> 00:20:03.560
If the people want to kick in the monument, they should go ahead and do it on their own

261
00:20:03.560 --> 00:20:04.560
hook.

262
00:20:04.560 --> 00:20:09.600
Let's get to the specific areas, the forest again.

263
00:20:09.600 --> 00:20:14.880
The problem with the forest, aside from the fact, the inevitable fact of the forest, hundreds

264
00:20:14.880 --> 00:20:18.440
of millions of square miles of forest, they're not going to make it on the market for a good

265
00:20:18.440 --> 00:20:19.440
reason.

266
00:20:19.440 --> 00:20:23.440
Aside from that fact, the problem with the forest, especially in the West, is the Federal

267
00:20:23.440 --> 00:20:26.380
Government owns most of the land west of the Great Plains.

268
00:20:26.380 --> 00:20:27.380
They still own it.

269
00:20:27.380 --> 00:20:31.380
Federal government has never really allowed private ownership of the forest in the United States.

270
00:20:31.380 --> 00:20:35.380
There are some, of course, but looking at it sort of on a large scale,

271
00:20:35.380 --> 00:20:40.380
we have placed all sorts of restrictions on being able to own forest, homestead forest, etc.

272
00:20:40.380 --> 00:20:43.380
We have, in other words, government ownership of most of the forests.

273
00:20:43.380 --> 00:20:45.380
As a result, if you want to cut down lumber,

274
00:20:45.380 --> 00:20:50.380
what you have to do usually is to lease parts of the forest from the government on an annual basis.

275
00:20:50.380 --> 00:20:53.380
Now when that happens, this sets up the same mechanism I've been talking about.

276
00:20:53.380 --> 00:20:55.380
In other words, the government doesn't own anything anyway.

277
00:20:55.380 --> 00:21:25.380
the Federal Reserve, fiat money, fractional reserve banking, Human Action, man economy,

278
00:21:25.380 --> 00:21:30.460
and the way the copper owner balances expected future prices, interest rates, expected shortages

279
00:21:30.460 --> 00:21:35.060
and so forth and so on, and also another very important thing which comes in more obviously

280
00:21:35.060 --> 00:21:39.140
in the, because of technological reasons in the forest than it does in the copper mine,

281
00:21:39.140 --> 00:21:43.180
the five owners of the forest will have the incentive to maintain the forest, chop down

282
00:21:43.180 --> 00:21:46.860
the right spacing of trees and rebuild it and all that sort of stuff.

283
00:21:46.860 --> 00:21:49.700
Forest technology is very complicated, I'm obviously not an expert in it, but the point

284
00:21:49.700 --> 00:21:53.700
is there's all sorts of ways, if you own the forest, to chop down trees and preserve it

285
00:21:53.700 --> 00:21:57.160
at the same time, so you can keep the capital value more or less constant and still chop

286
00:21:57.160 --> 00:21:58.160
down a lot of trees.

287
00:21:58.160 --> 00:22:02.340
And in Western Europe, for example, most forests are privately owned.

288
00:22:02.340 --> 00:22:07.080
In Western Europe, nobody belly aches about ravaging of forests, there are no complaints

289
00:22:07.080 --> 00:22:11.980
about total destruction of forests, because since you have largely private ownership of

290
00:22:11.980 --> 00:22:15.040
the forests in Europe, they are maintained in this way, that's just to conserve them

291
00:22:15.040 --> 00:22:18.620
and replant the trees and all that sort of stuff.

292
00:22:18.620 --> 00:22:22.460
In addition to keeping forests off the market, trees off the market, the government has kept

293
00:22:22.460 --> 00:22:52.460
Shale oil off the market has prevented any leases from taking place in shale oil and various other, and coal mining, a lot of possible strip mining of coal that could be taking place in the western states, but again the land is almost all owned by the federal government, they haven't allowed any leasing for the, they just haven't leased anything, they just haven't used the land. Now this is an interesting point about the federal government because before that from approximately 1861 when the Homestead Act came in, but unfortunately it wasn't applied to large-scale ranches, the tragedy was

294
00:22:52.460 --> 00:23:05.460
The Homestead Act came in just at the point where it became obsolete in the sense of the homesteading was 160 acres, which was allowed to the settler in his own fee simple, if he could clear the land, et cetera, and use it.

295
00:23:05.460 --> 00:23:08.460
He was granted the land by the government, which officially forced-owned it.

296
00:23:08.460 --> 00:23:15.460
But shortly after that, the settlement crossed the Mississippi and got into the Western Great Prairies.

297
00:23:15.460 --> 00:23:19.300
And at that point, where agriculture is much, where the climate is much drier,

298
00:23:19.300 --> 00:23:24.020
the 160 acres doesn't mean a darn thing, but you really have to have a much larger number, acreage,

299
00:23:24.020 --> 00:23:26.660
to raise cattle, for example, 160 acres doesn't give you a thing.

300
00:23:27.380 --> 00:23:31.460
And the homestead law was never changed to accommodate this. It kept on with the old original

301
00:23:32.100 --> 00:23:37.140
sort of wet agriculture of the eastern and middle western states, instead of the further west.

302
00:23:37.140 --> 00:23:41.140
So as a result, we never really got the homesteading applied very much west of, say, Iowa.

303
00:23:41.140 --> 00:23:51.140
as a result of that, finally, by 1900 or so, the government finally clamps down, it just reserves all the land that it has now and prevents anybody from homesteading it.

304
00:23:51.140 --> 00:23:56.140
So we have this conservation movement since about 1900, which has closed off all this land in the west.

305
00:23:56.140 --> 00:24:02.140
The government just holds on to it, doesn't do anything with it, or leases it out in some way, but doesn't really use it properly.

306
00:24:02.140 --> 00:24:05.140
Why did conservation come in in a big way with Teddy Roosevelt?

307
00:24:05.140 --> 00:24:09.820
The usual story is that it came in because of left-wing intellectuals sitting in New

308
00:24:09.820 --> 00:24:12.020
York and belly-aching about the trees.

309
00:24:12.020 --> 00:24:17.300
Well, there's no question about the fact that was a, that was an important factor.

310
00:24:17.300 --> 00:24:20.500
It's usually true, by the way, that the people actually living out west, living with the

311
00:24:20.500 --> 00:24:21.500
trees, don't belly-ache about it.

312
00:24:21.500 --> 00:24:23.060
They don't really care much about the trees.

313
00:24:23.060 --> 00:24:26.920
New York intellectuals who never see a tree will constantly want to preserve it out there

314
00:24:26.920 --> 00:24:29.420
when it's 3,000 miles away.

315
00:24:29.420 --> 00:24:34.700
New York intellectuals and Washington intellectuals did, yes, indeed, spark the conservation movement.

316
00:24:34.700 --> 00:25:04.700
The First World War, they didn't really finance it, financing of the conservation movement came from very interesting sources, they came from two sources, the railroads, Western railroads, and the Western real estate owners, Western land owners, because the railroad, which had a land grant of a huge amount of land, which was granted to the railroads, the seller they saw fit. The settlers, either sitting on this land, and also you have private real estate owners, private land owners also sitting on land, you could induce the Federal Government some way to keep all of its land,

317
00:25:04.700 --> 00:25:07.180
I hear you, off the market, completely, forever and ever,

318
00:25:07.180 --> 00:25:09.780
because the name of conservation is forevermore.

319
00:25:09.780 --> 00:25:12.260
If you can do that, then the value of your land goes way up,

320
00:25:12.260 --> 00:25:13.860
because if anybody wants to settle on land in the West,

321
00:25:13.860 --> 00:25:15.820
they have to settle on your land.

322
00:25:15.820 --> 00:25:18.300
So what you have is a beautiful example of an unholy alliance

323
00:25:18.300 --> 00:25:19.820
between liberal intellectuals,

324
00:25:19.820 --> 00:25:21.900
or liberal conservationists, kooks,

325
00:25:21.900 --> 00:25:25.300
and sinister forces who knew exactly what they were doing,

326
00:25:25.300 --> 00:25:29.060
or didn't really care about the Western caribou, whatever.

327
00:25:29.060 --> 00:25:31.980
They were keeping all the government's land off the market,

328
00:25:31.980 --> 00:25:32.820
preventing hope-studdings,

329
00:25:32.820 --> 00:25:38.180
This is supposed to raise the value of their real estate, and so the Western Railroads financed

330
00:25:38.180 --> 00:25:41.580
the National Conservation Association and their paper, their magazine in Washington.

331
00:25:41.580 --> 00:25:42.580
Cute story.

332
00:25:42.580 --> 00:25:45.620
It's probably still going on if anybody bothered investigating this.

333
00:25:45.620 --> 00:25:48.140
If you're looking at waste, then you're looking at ravaging, etc.

334
00:25:48.140 --> 00:25:50.540
It seems to me the real waste of a resource is not to use it.

335
00:25:50.540 --> 00:25:55.300
I mean, after all, what's the resource around for except to use?

336
00:25:55.300 --> 00:25:58.580
If your conservationists get their way and one way or another keeps all of this land

337
00:25:58.580 --> 00:26:02.620
or keeps the copper or whatever off the market forever and doesn't allow it to be used,

338
00:26:02.620 --> 00:26:12.620
That's the real waste, because then you're just compulsorily, coercively deleting all these resources for possible use for mankind, for production and consumption.

339
00:26:12.620 --> 00:26:18.620
So the real waste is not using it too fast, the real waste is not using it at all, which is a conservationist's holy dream.

340
00:26:18.620 --> 00:26:22.620
There's another argument which should be mentioned at this point, a philosophic argument.

341
00:26:22.620 --> 00:26:27.620
We should cut down our own production, our own consumption, in order to benefit future generations.

342
00:26:27.620 --> 00:26:32.820
In our belts, it was to preserve the copper and the land and the forest for the future.

343
00:26:32.820 --> 00:26:33.940
There are several problems with this.

344
00:26:33.940 --> 00:26:38.180
One big problem is that, see, if you use this argument, the future generations will eventually

345
00:26:38.180 --> 00:26:39.180
become present.

346
00:26:39.180 --> 00:26:43.220
In other words, 30 years from now, our children will emerge, and they'll be told the same

347
00:26:43.220 --> 00:26:44.220
crappy argument.

348
00:26:44.220 --> 00:26:47.900
They'll also be told you have to preserve a future generation, which means, of course,

349
00:26:47.900 --> 00:26:52.300
the resource will never be used because the future will stretch on infinitely.

350
00:26:52.300 --> 00:26:56.420
And if at one point, let's say 100 years from now, they will allow the future generation,

351
00:27:26.420 --> 00:27:39.420
In other words, you catch the fish, you go out there on a boat or whatever, you catch the fish, then it's yours, you can use it. However, nobody can own the fish resource itself, nobody can own parts of the ocean.

352
00:27:39.420 --> 00:27:48.420
Nobody can fence it off, nobody can do anything with it. As a result, we have ocean communism, also known as freedom of the seas, that's a euphemistic term.

353
00:27:48.420 --> 00:27:55.420
The point is that, as a result of that, we're now in the ocean the same way that we were before agriculture.

354
00:27:55.420 --> 00:28:01.420
In other words, the same way we were on the land in the hunting and gathering stage, before farming and agriculture came in.

355
00:28:01.420 --> 00:28:10.420
Hunting and gathering meant you went out there, you got seeds, you got berries off the bush, you got turnips and whatever other stuff you got down there, and walnuts.

356
00:28:10.420 --> 00:28:15.420
You picked them off and you shot wild animals with your bow and arrow, and so forth.

357
00:28:15.420 --> 00:28:18.620
In other words, you could use the fruits of the land, but you couldn't do anything with the land itself.

358
00:28:18.620 --> 00:28:22.020
You couldn't preserve it, you couldn't transform it, you couldn't do anything with it.

359
00:28:22.020 --> 00:28:24.420
As a result, the productivity of the land was very low.

360
00:28:24.420 --> 00:28:28.420
The thing is, originally, in the hunting and gathering stage, land was really super-abundant.

361
00:28:28.420 --> 00:28:33.020
There was no point even talking about property and land, or private property, because it was so abundant.

362
00:28:33.020 --> 00:28:36.220
So many forests out there and so forth, that nobody even thought in those terms.

363
00:28:36.220 --> 00:28:44.020
However, in order for agriculture to take place, in order for somebody to lop off a certain portion of the earth

364
00:28:44.020 --> 00:28:49.140
and do something with it and grow wheat and barley, etc. You had to have private property

365
00:28:49.140 --> 00:28:53.060
or some sort of property rights because otherwise somebody across the mountain is going to come in

366
00:28:53.060 --> 00:28:59.060
and the next guy across the field come in and take your wheat away. It was because private property

367
00:28:59.060 --> 00:29:03.700
comes in, the land gets a little scarcer, the population increases, private property is then

368
00:29:03.700 --> 00:29:08.020
allowed in the land itself and not just things you pick off the land, the things you, the berries

369
00:29:08.020 --> 00:29:12.740
you pick off the bush, the private property in the land itself, the productivity of the land

370
00:29:12.740 --> 00:29:18.740
increases enormously, just no comparison. In other words, as soon as you allow agriculture, which means, you know, cultivation of the land,

371
00:29:18.740 --> 00:29:25.740
then the farmer can come in, he can use fertilizer, and he can use all sorts of techniques, and et cetera, et cetera. Productivity increases enormously.

372
00:29:25.740 --> 00:29:30.740
We're still in the ocean, we're still in the hunting and gathering state, because we don't allow private property in parts of the ocean.

373
00:29:30.740 --> 00:29:39.740
And so everybody rushes out and fishes as much as they can, and then nobody has any incentive to preserve the fish, to maintain it, to increase the productivity of fish.

374
00:29:39.740 --> 00:29:47.240
And there's also no incentive for anybody to engage in fish technology, and aquaculture would be the comparable term.

375
00:29:47.240 --> 00:29:53.240
There's no incentive for anybody to engage in aquacultural technological research, because there's no possibility of applying it.

376
00:29:53.240 --> 00:30:02.240
Because there's no point in having all sorts of fancy technological ways of improving ocean technology, if the government doesn't allow property in it, nobody would be allowed to do it.

377
00:30:02.240 --> 00:30:05.240
Now we have a situation, more and more of course, where the ocean...

378
00:30:05.240 --> 00:30:12.240
The reason why the freedom of seas came in is because in the 18th century, the 17th century and the freedom of seas doctrine comes in,

379
00:30:12.240 --> 00:30:17.240
the ocean was super abundant with so many fish nobody even thought in terms of property resource in them.

380
00:30:17.240 --> 00:30:22.240
However, we're getting to the point obviously more and more where the fish are getting scarcer and scarcer.

381
00:30:22.240 --> 00:30:28.240
The government tries to meet this by having all sorts of crazy regulations like limiting the number of months you can catch the fish,

382
00:30:28.240 --> 00:30:34.240
or limiting the size, and having anti-technological regulation where you can't use super nets, you can only use small hand nets.

383
00:30:34.240 --> 00:30:44.240
cut down the size of the catch, or having seasons, or any way you do it. First of all, it doesn't help. It's like rationing. It doesn't help increase the resource of aquaculture wood and private property.

384
00:30:44.240 --> 00:30:52.240
And second of all, it messes things up. It distorts things. For example, if you say you can only fish starting on March the 1st, then you have a certain limit, say, on the catch.

385
00:30:52.240 --> 00:31:03.240
And what happens is, this is what happens with salmon in the Northwest, everybody comes in with these huge boats and they fish like mad to try to beat out the other guy until the total number of salmon reaches its maximum limit.

386
00:31:03.240 --> 00:31:09.240
As a result, the amount of salmon gets cut in the season for catching salmon. It gets compressed from six months to three weeks to six weeks, whatever it is.

387
00:31:09.240 --> 00:31:13.240
And this distorts everything. It distorts the technology. The salmon aren't as tasty.

388
00:31:13.240 --> 00:31:17.240
Too many big boats get built as an overinvestment in huge boats.

389
00:31:17.240 --> 00:31:23.240
And all the rest is a complete distortion of the salmon market as a result of these regulations.

390
00:31:23.240 --> 00:31:29.240
Aside from the craziness of not allowing super nets or whatever other super technology to increase fish productivity,

391
00:31:29.240 --> 00:31:36.240
Now, if private property were allowed in parts of the ocean, you have things like that, you're fencing off of parts of the ocean.

392
00:31:36.240 --> 00:31:40.240
It could have been done even before the electronic period. You could have anchors in the ocean.

393
00:31:40.240 --> 00:31:44.240
But now with electronics, it's duck soup. You can easily have electronic fencing.

394
00:31:44.240 --> 00:31:48.240
There's no problem with that. You know, if they allow you to do it, in other words, if you're assured of the fact,

395
00:31:48.240 --> 00:31:52.240
some other fisherman is not going to come along and grab all your fish inside the fence.

396
00:31:52.240 --> 00:31:58.240
Okay, if you have private property rights then in parts of the ocean, you have this sort of electronic fencing.

397
00:31:58.240 --> 00:32:00.240
You can use the equivalent of fertilizer.

398
00:32:00.240 --> 00:32:04.240
The first thing you can do right now, even before any improvement in fish technology,

399
00:32:04.240 --> 00:32:08.240
is you can segregate the big fish from the little fish, segregate by size.

400
00:32:08.240 --> 00:32:13.240
Unfortunately, fish have not found out about natural rights and the non-aggression axiom.

401
00:32:13.240 --> 00:32:16.240
The big fish have to eat little fish, even incestuously.

402
00:32:16.240 --> 00:32:21.240
If you separate the little fish from the big fish, you'll enormously increase fish production just right there.

403
00:32:21.240 --> 00:32:24.240
You give them something else to eat, give them plankton or whatever.

404
00:32:24.240 --> 00:32:33.240
Just that, and doing nothing else but electronic fencing and segregating fish by size, enormously increase fish productivity, and lots of other things, obviously, that could be done.

405
00:32:33.240 --> 00:32:37.240
If aquaculture were allowed, if private property and parts of the ocean were allowed.

406
00:32:37.240 --> 00:32:44.240
Now, this is getting to be a very dicey question, because we're getting now, not all the ocean, by the way, is really important in this connection.

407
00:32:44.240 --> 00:32:50.240
We're really talking about the continental shelves and the North Atlantic and parts of the North Pacific.

408
00:32:50.240 --> 00:32:53.200
When we have a situation with the ocean in these areas, we're getting very scarce.

409
00:32:53.200 --> 00:32:57.500
We're getting to a point where we have many areas where, say, Russian trawlers are trying

410
00:32:57.500 --> 00:33:02.280
to fish, fishermen are trying to fish from their boats, nets are coming out in some other

411
00:33:02.280 --> 00:33:07.440
way land-based, somebody's trying to drill for offshore oil, and something else is happening.

412
00:33:07.440 --> 00:33:10.880
Five or six people competing for one lousy piece of ocean.

413
00:33:10.880 --> 00:33:14.680
They cannot resolve that unless private property rights are allowed in parts of the ocean.

414
00:33:14.680 --> 00:33:17.280
I think that probably something like this will happen.

415
00:33:17.280 --> 00:33:19.880
If it won't be private property, at least it will be national property.

416
00:33:19.880 --> 00:33:32.880
In some way, to be able to keep out, to allocate, of course obviously private property is the only correct solution here, but at least there must be some way of ending ocean communism, because otherwise there would be no way of exploiting these resources at all.

417
00:33:32.880 --> 00:33:42.880
Of course there's some offshore drilling, the Japanese have their beds which are underneath the water, where they have private property. That's not really separate from the land, it's really just out from the coast.

418
00:33:42.880 --> 00:33:50.880
So there's been a little bit of that, but obviously this is the next great frontier for production, and it can only be used if we allow private property in it.

419
00:33:50.880 --> 00:33:52.880
So that's the fish caper.

420
00:33:52.880 --> 00:33:57.880
This one I recommend here is a very good book by Christie and Scott called The Commonwealth and Ocean Fisheries,

421
00:33:57.880 --> 00:34:04.880
which deals with legal, economic, political, all the problems connected with international fish, the whole ocean question.

422
00:34:04.880 --> 00:34:09.880
Another area which partakes of both water and land is oil pools, petroleum.

423
00:34:09.880 --> 00:34:16.880
One of the problems with petroleum, which led to an original overdrilling, ravaging of our petroleum food oil resources,

424
00:34:16.880 --> 00:34:19.880
which then led to a monstrous cartelization by the government,

425
00:34:19.880 --> 00:34:23.880
was that because of the way the law of capture worked with oil,

426
00:34:23.880 --> 00:34:28.880
well, the way the common law was applied when oil was first discovered,

427
00:34:28.880 --> 00:34:33.880
you dig a drill down to the part of the pool, you find this pool,

428
00:34:33.880 --> 00:34:38.880
and then you can use as much as you want of that oil, drill as much as you want of it.

429
00:34:38.880 --> 00:34:40.880
Nobody owns the pool itself.

430
00:34:40.880 --> 00:34:43.880
Well, obviously the pool, the oil pool, is a technological unit.

431
00:34:43.880 --> 00:34:48.880
And yet, since no private property is allowed in the oil pool, but only in the use of the oil,

432
00:34:48.880 --> 00:34:51.880
we have the same situation developed as in the case of the fisheries.

433
00:34:51.880 --> 00:34:55.880
Every man and his brother rushes in and take advantage of this and put a drill down there.

434
00:34:55.880 --> 00:34:57.880
You have hundreds of drills going now.

435
00:34:57.880 --> 00:35:00.880
First of all, you have over-drilling, a lot of investment in drilling, etc.

436
00:35:00.880 --> 00:35:06.880
If I don't drill oil as fast as possible, the other guys will pump it up and pretty soon be in an oil pool.

437
00:35:06.880 --> 00:35:13.880
The way to solve this is to allow private property and the resource itself, and not just in the annual use of it.

438
00:35:13.880 --> 00:35:21.880
Plenty of guys now drilling in the same oil pool, they should be allowed to unitize, to have to merge in one corporation or company, which would then own the whole oil pool.

439
00:35:21.880 --> 00:35:26.880
It's now, I believe, illegal to do that, some sort of antitrust violation or something.

440
00:35:26.880 --> 00:35:32.880
To unitize your oil holdings that you can then, one corporation, one firm, and own the whole pool.

441
00:35:32.880 --> 00:35:37.880
So, until we do that, there'll be then a tendency toward overuse and over-depletion of this oil pool.

442
00:35:37.880 --> 00:35:41.880
And then, of course, the government comes in and has this proration plan,

443
00:35:41.880 --> 00:35:44.880
formalizes and restricts production on top of all of this.

444
00:35:44.880 --> 00:35:48.880
Not, of course, solving this problem, just adding another one on top of it.

445
00:35:48.880 --> 00:35:52.880
But again, you have the same problem not allowing, because of the legal structure,

446
00:35:52.880 --> 00:35:57.880
the government's legal structure, not allowing private property in the technological unit.

447
00:35:57.880 --> 00:36:05.880
Then we have the oil pool. Now we have another area where the government doesn't allow private property ownership in a sense of overuse, I guess.

448
00:36:05.880 --> 00:36:13.880
Here the problems are a little bit different. But again, you have an area where the government allows the use of something but doesn't allow property and resource itself.

449
00:36:13.880 --> 00:36:18.880
These are radio and TV channels. Again, you have a situation where radio was first invented.

450
00:36:18.880 --> 00:36:22.880
The question is, how do the courts deal with this whole question? Who owns what?

451
00:36:22.880 --> 00:36:31.380
And during the early 20s, when radio was first coming in, people were operating radio stations in Detroit at certain kilo-cycles, etc., etc.

452
00:36:31.380 --> 00:36:36.380
And somebody else would then beam something at the same kilo-cycle nearby, and it would be interference.

453
00:36:36.380 --> 00:36:42.380
And they went to the courts, and the courts would then decide, could only decide on the basis of common law, which is basically libertarian.

454
00:36:42.380 --> 00:36:47.880
And as they began to make decisions, the Illinois courts, for example, made decisions, okay, here's what you do.

455
00:36:47.880 --> 00:36:58.380
The guy who homesteads, in a sense, the guy who first sets up his channel, a 1600 kilocycle, blah, blah, blah, owns that kilocycle, or owns the right to beam out on that frequency.

456
00:36:58.380 --> 00:37:04.880
Then you have to find a technological unit. This is, you find it for 160 acres of wet land or for an oil pool.

457
00:37:04.880 --> 00:37:16.880
A technological unit is fairly easy to find out. It's a certain width, whatever the width of the band is, so you don't have interference, and the radius of the frequency of the beam is sent out.

458
00:37:16.880 --> 00:37:21.880
So you decide, okay, you have a 200-mile radius, let's say, and you own the 1,600-kilocycles

459
00:37:21.880 --> 00:37:27.880
within a band of plus or minus a certain number of kilocycles for this 200-mile period.

460
00:37:27.880 --> 00:37:31.880
And anybody who interferes with this is a transgressor and, you know, is an aggressive

461
00:37:31.880 --> 00:37:34.880
issue of property, you can take an injunction and smash them.

462
00:37:34.880 --> 00:37:37.880
Now, this is beginning to be developed in the early 20s.

463
00:37:37.880 --> 00:37:41.880
Now, what happens is that Herbert Hoover, now, why he did this, I don't really know.

464
00:37:41.880 --> 00:37:46.880
I know, nobody as far as I know has investigated the infamous Radio Act of 1926, I think it was.

465
00:37:46.880 --> 00:37:51.880
Hoover decided, there's a terrible thing going on, people interfering with each other's radio channels.

466
00:37:51.880 --> 00:37:54.880
We can't allow this, and private enterprise hasn't worked in this area, and private property,

467
00:37:54.880 --> 00:37:57.880
therefore we have to nationalize the radio frequencies.

468
00:37:57.880 --> 00:38:04.880
He did, because he did not tell the rest of the country about the court decisions, which were quietly going on at the same time.

469
00:38:04.880 --> 00:38:08.880
So Hoover, who was the secretary of commerce at the time, pushes through the Radio Act,

470
00:38:08.880 --> 00:38:12.700
which nationalized radio channels and later on TV channels.

471
00:38:12.700 --> 00:38:15.580
This means the channels are all owned by the government,

472
00:38:15.580 --> 00:38:17.840
not by private people.

473
00:38:17.840 --> 00:38:22.200
In order to be allowed graciously to use channel 1600 kilocycles,

474
00:38:22.200 --> 00:38:25.700
you have to get a license from the Federal Communications Commission.

475
00:38:25.700 --> 00:38:31.280
And this means, of course, total totalitarian control over the media, radio and TV media.

476
00:38:31.280 --> 00:38:34.600
And it's a total suppression of free speech, free press,

477
00:38:34.600 --> 00:38:36.680
and I don't know why nobody seems to realize this,

478
00:38:36.680 --> 00:38:45.680
The FCC requires so-called balanced news. For a long time, they didn't allow any editorials, because an editorial means somehow you're loading the dice.

479
00:38:45.680 --> 00:38:49.680
They demand equal time by every cluck that comes on with a certain point of view.

480
00:38:49.680 --> 00:38:58.680
There's got to be balance, it can't be this, it can't be that, which really means if you take any kind of position at all, which is certainly any position which differs from the majority, you get a clobber by the FCC.

481
00:38:58.680 --> 00:39:00.680
The FCC doesn't renew your license.

482
00:39:00.680 --> 00:39:01.680
New Year License

483
00:39:01.680 --> 00:39:05.000
And this is complete totalitarianism. Supposing, for example, it's applied to the press, and

484
00:39:05.000 --> 00:39:09.280
the magazines and books and newspapers. Supposing the government said, okay, from now on there's

485
00:39:09.280 --> 00:39:13.680
blah, blah, blah, we have interference, there's scarcity of newsprint. That's another argument

486
00:39:13.680 --> 00:39:17.800
for nationalization, the fact that the radio and TV channels are scarce. Of course, everything

487
00:39:17.800 --> 00:39:22.360
is scarce, as we should know by this time. Every darn thing that's not free is scarce.

488
00:39:22.360 --> 00:39:26.060
So newsprint is scarce, we nationalize everything. The government then nationalizes everything

489
00:39:26.060 --> 00:39:29.180
and then licenses people to be allowed to print stuff.

490
00:39:29.180 --> 00:39:31.860
Well, in that case, we would have a similar situation.

491
00:39:31.860 --> 00:39:33.740
Any newspaper steps out of line a little bit,

492
00:39:33.740 --> 00:39:37.460
a little too radical, a little too rambunctious.

493
00:39:37.460 --> 00:39:38.860
Your license is not gonna be a renew-buster.

494
00:39:38.860 --> 00:39:40.140
Of course, you have complete freedom of speech,

495
00:39:40.140 --> 00:39:41.940
but you can't operate without a license.

496
00:39:41.940 --> 00:39:44.320
You can't produce anything, you can't sell anything

497
00:39:44.320 --> 00:39:45.160
without a license.

498
00:39:45.160 --> 00:39:46.880
Now, this would be considered total totalitarianism,

499
00:39:46.880 --> 00:39:48.580
fascism of the worst sort.

500
00:39:48.580 --> 00:39:51.220
And yet, we allow the same thing to happen on radio and TV

501
00:39:51.220 --> 00:39:52.620
and nobody protests about it.

502
00:39:52.620 --> 00:39:55.180
This is the exact same situation.

503
00:39:55.180 --> 00:40:25.180
There was, for example, a heroic libertarian radio station, Hawaii, not too long ago, an FM station, I think, which was quite popular, which was beaming libertarian broadcasts several hours a night, which then got clobbered by the FCC because of unbalanced reporting or whatever, and they threatened to take their license away, and they didn't have the money even to fight the legal fee to fight the license, so they just folded up. So this is just a small indication. The thing is, it obviously permeates. It has what the courts call a chilling effect on any kind of real freedom of speech.

504
00:40:25.180 --> 00:40:26.180
and the media.

505
00:40:26.180 --> 00:40:30.700
And this direct result of nationalization, what happens is that the networks, for example,

506
00:40:30.700 --> 00:40:34.820
have this big bonus in the fact that they're allowed to use these channels for nothing.

507
00:40:34.820 --> 00:40:39.180
They don't have to pay any money for it, either to anybody else or the government or whatever.

508
00:40:39.180 --> 00:40:42.340
You have this peculiar situation where the networks are locked into a subsidy because

509
00:40:42.340 --> 00:40:46.180
they're getting the use of the channel free, and yet they have no real power over it.

510
00:40:46.180 --> 00:40:48.700
They have no power over what they say, et cetera.

511
00:40:48.700 --> 00:40:53.300
Of course, one argument technologically is that now with UHF and with FM, et cetera,

512
00:40:53.300 --> 00:41:02.060
The idea that you should nationalize something because it's scarce, you know, completely

513
00:41:02.060 --> 00:41:05.780
just by any kind of collective, except the air, which also isn't going to collectivize

514
00:41:05.780 --> 00:41:06.780
anyway.

515
00:41:06.780 --> 00:41:10.340
So the government owns the air, we'll get to that in a minute.

516
00:41:10.340 --> 00:41:15.320
Okay, I think I've already talked about traffic ingestion as part of the reflux of price control,

517
00:41:15.320 --> 00:41:18.940
but here again we have a situation looking at it from another angle, the streets and

518
00:41:18.940 --> 00:41:22.300
the roads are all owned by the government, there's no private property allowed on the

519
00:41:22.300 --> 00:41:32.300
in the United States, except for few isolated communities, and again the government has no incentive for any kind of rational pricing system or any kind of preservation of resource or whatever,

520
00:41:32.300 --> 00:41:45.300
and as a result you have a situation where the government keeps the price at zero, the price of using the streets, as a result of course of congestion, shortages, in other words traffic congestion, especially in downtown areas, especially in rush hours, etc.

521
00:41:45.300 --> 00:41:47.300
And the parking pricing is...

522
00:41:47.300 --> 00:41:52.300
We've discussed now the various areas of so-called overuse and capitalist depletion.

523
00:41:52.300 --> 00:41:58.300
We also have other areas where part of the conservation argument is so-called pollution.

524
00:41:58.300 --> 00:42:02.300
Two really very different wings for the conservationist argument.

525
00:42:02.300 --> 00:42:06.300
One is the idea of overuse and ravaging of resource and destruction and depletion.

526
00:42:06.300 --> 00:42:08.300
The other is the idea of pollution, which is really two different things.

527
00:42:08.300 --> 00:42:10.300
However, the problem is still the same.

528
00:42:10.300 --> 00:42:15.620
and Money. Pollution comes about, or rather, pollution beyond the optimum comes about because

529
00:42:15.620 --> 00:42:20.060
the government does not allow private property to function in these areas. Somehow this has

530
00:42:20.060 --> 00:42:24.740
not been stressed of the cause of the pollution problem in the media. But this is what it

531
00:42:24.740 --> 00:42:29.020
boils down to. Private property has not been either used or been allowed to exert itself

532
00:42:29.020 --> 00:42:35.700
to the full. We can't be against all pollution, period. There's obviously a certain optimal

533
00:43:05.700 --> 00:43:18.700
the value he's got in his mind. He also wants to maximize his revenue and of course people on the one hand don't want to go to a dirty beach and on the other hand they don't want to be oppressed by some guard hanging, breathing out of their neck all the time as they drop a popsicle wrapper.

534
00:43:18.700 --> 00:43:24.700
Now probably in a free market there would be different degrees of beaches. There would be really tough beaches where you can't hardly do anything.

535
00:43:24.700 --> 00:43:34.700
And other beaches would be sort of permissive and you can litter around and stuff around etc. And people would then gravitate at what they're interested in. There would be different qualities of beach and different prices of beach also.

536
00:43:34.700 --> 00:44:04.700
And of course, when the government comes in, you immediately have this uniform sort of thing, and either you have complete littering or else you have the hot hand of fascism down your neck, arresting you for six months or something for litter, either complete non-use of the resource or also the Medax approach, which incidentally, again, going back to the traffic congestion, is typical of a government. They set the price of riding the streets at zero, and then when the traffic appears and develops, etc., then they turn for the Medax as a solution and threaten to prohibit private cars altogether.

537
00:44:04.700 --> 00:44:10.300
which is the mayor of New York is always trying to do, is always threatening to prohibit all private cars from entering Manhattan.

538
00:44:10.300 --> 00:44:15.700
It's a typical government solution, a problem which the government itself creates by setting the price at zero,

539
00:44:15.700 --> 00:44:20.900
either a zero price or a total outworry, the only way the government can look at things.

540
00:44:20.900 --> 00:44:25.300
Okay, two areas of pollution which are particularly, of course, talked about,

541
00:44:25.300 --> 00:44:30.100
and again where the non-use of private property provides us with a key explanation,

542
00:44:30.100 --> 00:44:35.100
One is water pollution. Waters are being deadened, the waters are being destroyed, and so forth.

543
00:44:35.100 --> 00:44:39.100
Again, of course, in the case of the oceans, we've already seen the fact nobody can own parts of the ocean,

544
00:44:39.100 --> 00:44:43.100
so we dump sewage out of the ocean without any compunction.

545
00:44:43.100 --> 00:44:47.100
The oil companies, you all allow oil slicks to develop, et cetera, because nobody owns it.

546
00:44:47.100 --> 00:44:51.100
And second of all, the same way with the rivers. The rivers are non-owned. In other words, they're owned by the government.

547
00:44:51.100 --> 00:44:54.100
You have an effect, river communism. Nobody really owns the rivers.

548
00:44:54.100 --> 00:44:59.100
And so everybody dumps sewage into the rivers, and you have polluted rivers, et cetera.

549
00:44:59.100 --> 00:45:03.500
And incidentally, the main culprit in the dumping sewage is none other than the municipal sewer system.

550
00:45:03.500 --> 00:45:06.700
The government itself is the major river dumper.

551
00:45:06.700 --> 00:45:12.300
So what you have is a system where essentially municipal governments are providing sewage service for free.

552
00:45:12.300 --> 00:45:15.900
Of course, they're doing it out of taxpayer, but the user doesn't really pay for it.

553
00:45:15.900 --> 00:45:17.900
And then, of course, everybody uses it.

554
00:45:17.900 --> 00:45:22.700
If this didn't occur, if you had a proper pricing system, you had private ownership of the rivers,

555
00:45:22.700 --> 00:45:27.500
in a proper pricing system, then you would turn more and more to things, for example, like chemical toilets.

556
00:45:27.500 --> 00:45:32.820
There are, even right now, a technology that has been developed, a super chemical toilet,

557
00:45:32.820 --> 00:45:35.060
which completely eliminates all pollutants.

558
00:45:35.060 --> 00:45:37.660
No pollution gets out, no water pollution, no air pollution, no nothing.

559
00:45:37.660 --> 00:45:39.180
But of course, who's going to pay for it?

560
00:45:39.180 --> 00:45:40.180
Who's going to buy it?

561
00:45:40.180 --> 00:45:43.900
Who's going to invest in a chemical toilet so they can turn the good old free municipal

562
00:45:43.900 --> 00:45:45.260
government for the sewage system?

563
00:45:45.260 --> 00:45:50.140
Then the sewage system is going to turn, dump it in the good old free government-owned communist

564
00:45:50.140 --> 00:45:51.140
quotes river.

565
00:45:51.140 --> 00:45:55.260
So again, we have a situation developed where private ownership is not allowed in a river

566
00:45:55.260 --> 00:46:03.260
The Hudson River resource, which is an important resource, as a result of that, not only is it not used properly, but there's no incentive to develop technology to preserve the river.

567
00:46:03.260 --> 00:46:17.260
I mean, who knows? If the Hudson River were owned by a corporation, they probably would have found a way by this time to allow stuff to be dumped down the river and then quickly clean it up and recycle it, whatever, and preserve the river for all these different uses, for beaches and for...

568
00:46:17.260 --> 00:46:22.260
which of course, I mean, nobody swum without taking their life in their hands on the Hudson River for about 60 years.

569
00:46:22.260 --> 00:46:27.260
If the river were owned by somebody, they would want to maximize either the highest value of their revenue,

570
00:46:27.260 --> 00:46:31.260
first of all, to use the river for the highest economic resource,

571
00:46:31.260 --> 00:46:35.260
and secondly, if they can possibly do it technologically, to allow all these things to take place.

572
00:46:35.260 --> 00:46:38.260
Industrial use and then recycle it and somehow clean it up,

573
00:46:38.260 --> 00:46:42.260
and then allow the beach use and residential use and pleasure craft and whatever.

574
00:46:42.260 --> 00:46:47.260
The law does exist right now in the western states which permit private ownership of the rivers.

575
00:46:47.260 --> 00:46:52.260
There are two kinds of water law. There's the old common law, the Parian common law, which is pretty unfortunate,

576
00:46:52.260 --> 00:46:59.260
because what it said was, again, the common law was evolved, of course, in the days when the river was not considered a scarce resource.

577
00:46:59.260 --> 00:47:05.260
So you have something like freedom of the seas in the sense that if you happen to own a piece of land abutting a river,

578
00:47:05.260 --> 00:47:10.260
then you own that part of the river, which doesn't make too much sense. This is the Parian ownership.

579
00:47:10.260 --> 00:47:20.260
As a result, you might have 300,000 owners of this river, each one only because he happens to be sitting near it and looking out at it, which doesn't seem to be a very useful kind of definition of ownership.

580
00:47:20.260 --> 00:47:23.260
And of course, you can't really do much of anything in that situation.

581
00:47:23.260 --> 00:47:27.260
Now, on the other hand, this riparian water level has been adopted by the eastern states.

582
00:47:27.260 --> 00:47:36.260
On the other hand, the western states adopted the so-called appropriation form of water ownership, which is almost geared toward this kind of private property and river that we've been talking about.

583
00:47:36.260 --> 00:47:43.260
Appropriation theory is that, of course, in the western space it's very dry, so there's a lot of use of irrigation and so forth.

584
00:47:43.260 --> 00:47:50.260
If you start using, say, 10% of the flow of the river at a certain point, then you own 10%, you have the rights to 10%.

585
00:47:50.260 --> 00:47:53.260
The next guy has the rights to the second 30% or whatever.

586
00:47:53.260 --> 00:47:56.260
And the allocation then is sort of a private property basis.

587
00:47:56.260 --> 00:48:02.260
The problem with appropriation theory is that, first of all, the government regulates it very severely.

588
00:48:02.260 --> 00:48:04.260
You can't use it for this, you can't use that for that, etc.

589
00:48:04.260 --> 00:48:14.260
And second of all, you can't transfer the ownership. In other words, if I happen to have the rights to the first 10% of a river flow, I can't sell it. I have to give it back. If I want to stop using it, I have to give it back to the government.

590
00:48:14.260 --> 00:48:20.260
As a result, there's no real market or full private property has been allowed, even in the Western situation.

591
00:48:20.260 --> 00:48:27.260
But it's pretty clear that you can start with a Western appropriation system and move pretty quickly to a full private property in either the whole river or part of the river.

592
00:48:27.260 --> 00:48:41.260
It would be interesting to discuss that, what the technological unit of the river is. I'm not really sure. I'm sure that could be worked out if we all have the end in mind, the object in mind of establishing private property and water resources.

593
00:48:41.260 --> 00:48:52.260
If somebody owned Lake Erie, everybody's wiping about Lake Erie, but if somebody really owned it, then you wouldn't be able to pollute it because the Lake Erie owner would take you to court and sue you, etc., take out an injunction.

594
00:48:52.260 --> 00:49:00.260
In order to be able to pollute Lake Erie, you have to make an agreement with the Lake Erie owner and pay him for allowing you to pollute, which means that you then have the optimal amount of pollution, in quotes.

595
00:49:00.260 --> 00:49:05.260
In other words, the polluter is then paying for his pollution. He's paying the cost of it.

596
00:49:05.260 --> 00:49:13.260
If it becomes too expensive, and it obviously will become much more expensive than now because now the pollution is free, now you can dump this stuff in Lake Erie because nobody owns Lake Erie.

597
00:49:13.260 --> 00:49:25.260
So if somebody owned it and then charged you for this pollution, the amount of pollution obviously decreased enormously, and certainly the amount of invasive pollution, in other words, aggressive pollution, would decrease to zero, whereas now it's whatever.

598
00:49:25.260 --> 00:49:28.260
It's hard to know how much it is now, because nobody owns the river.

599
00:49:28.260 --> 00:49:33.260
That leads us to the final, probably the gutsiest, in a way, form of pollution, which is air pollution.

600
00:49:33.260 --> 00:49:36.260
What about air pollution? Doesn't capitalist greed bring about air pollution?

601
00:49:36.260 --> 00:49:42.260
First place, of course, we can say that one of the worst pollution problems is in Soviet Russia.

602
00:49:42.260 --> 00:49:53.260
Capitalist greed is very responsible, and second of all, perhaps the biggest single air polluter is Con Ed, the monopoly utilities and so forth, which are government regulated and whatever, it's hardly an example of free market activity.

603
00:49:53.260 --> 00:50:07.260
However, once again what you have is a situation where instead of capitalist greed being in full, the problem is the government has not allowed full use of private property, namely in your lungs and the air space around your head, or around your orchards and around your property.

604
00:50:07.260 --> 00:50:11.420
This problem first came up in the middle and late 19th century when factories first came in.

605
00:50:11.420 --> 00:50:14.460
First factories come in, say, around the mid-19th century.

606
00:50:14.460 --> 00:50:17.660
Somebody would set up a factory and they'd bulge smoke. In those days we weren't sophisticated,

607
00:50:17.660 --> 00:50:21.580
we didn't know too much about nitrous oxide and all the rest of it, but they knew about smoke, boy.

608
00:50:21.580 --> 00:50:25.260
They could see the smoke pour out, they could see the smoke, they could breathe in the smoke,

609
00:50:25.260 --> 00:50:29.020
they didn't like it, and they could see the smoke injure the orchards and the grass and the trees

610
00:50:29.020 --> 00:50:33.500
of the farmers. So the farmers began to take the factories to court, say, look, we've got to either

611
00:50:33.500 --> 00:51:03.500
The Court began systematically to say, well, we realize, former Jones, that you're really right, that this industry is invading your private property, however, and it's too bad, however, there's something more, we know, this is 1868, or whatever the year was, this is now progressive, no longer back in the old 18th century hydropower, hydropower companies, hydropower companies,

612
00:51:03.500 --> 00:51:10.500
and the private-bound kind of framework, we now realize there's something more important than private property, and that's public policy.

613
00:51:10.500 --> 00:51:16.500
Public policy and the common good and the general welfare and all that sort of jazz, and these things decree the factories are a good thing.

614
00:51:16.500 --> 00:51:21.500
We can't allow the development of factories to be limited or restricted by some kind of many farmers' private property.

615
00:51:21.500 --> 00:51:24.500
Therefore, we will permit this to continue.

616
00:51:24.500 --> 00:51:54.500
As systematically the law was changed by the judges, the whole common law system of tort law and nuisance law and all the things which would have corroborated the polluting factories immediately, before they hardly got started, all these laws were changed by the judges because before that, before, let's say, the Civil War period, any factory, the poor smoker, farmer, etc., could be, you know, it's an invasion of property and you get smashed and the farmer can come in, get an injunction, stop it and pay damages. But then they changed it systematically to say, well, because public policy

617
00:51:54.500 --> 00:52:04.500
The industry is important, etc. They changed the law to say the factory can only be paid damages, etc., if the factory is pouring more smoke than most of its fellow factory owners.

618
00:52:04.500 --> 00:52:11.500
Sort of an unusual smoke pourer, sort of maliciously doing it and so forth, then you can zap them, otherwise you can't.

619
00:52:11.500 --> 00:52:17.500
The thing is, it's only been discovered within the last couple of years that this has been done, this systematic change by the courts.

620
00:52:17.500 --> 00:52:22.500
It wasn't really done by statute so much as by judicial reinterpretation and burglarizing of the common law.

621
00:52:22.500 --> 00:52:28.500
The question is, why do they do it? And that hasn't been investigated at all yet. This has been a great open area for historical research.

622
00:52:28.500 --> 00:52:37.500
Why do the courts systematically do this? Of course, I have my own hunches about it, which is they were in league with the manufacturers, but that has not yet been proven.

623
00:52:37.500 --> 00:52:42.500
I can only say this is the first place I would look if I were doing the study of it.

624
00:52:42.500 --> 00:52:49.500
So we have the government changing the guidelines, saying, okay, we permit invasion of property in this area because the industry and factories are important.

625
00:52:49.500 --> 00:52:57.500
What's happened is over the last hundred years or so, the whole technology is of course geared toward a polluting technology, toward air pollution technology.

626
00:52:57.500 --> 00:53:04.500
My favorite analogy on this is, supposing the court decided when trucks were first coming in, you know, early 20th century, there was a traffic jam,

627
00:53:04.500 --> 00:53:07.500
the trucks started cutting across people's lawns in order to get to the other street.

628
00:53:07.500 --> 00:53:12.500
People would take their trucks to court, and the court would say, well, it's too bad about your lawn.

629
00:53:12.500 --> 00:53:17.500
We really weep about it and so forth, but it's really more important for the society to get the truck through.

630
00:53:17.500 --> 00:53:24.500
and so therefore if the truck isn't really doing significantly more damage to your lawn than other trucks will allow them to keep doing it.

631
00:53:24.500 --> 00:53:31.500
If that were true by this time you'd have a big lawn crushing technology and nobody would have any lawns at all and the trucks would be zipping over everybody's property.

632
00:53:31.500 --> 00:53:33.500
The whole system would be geared to it.

633
00:53:33.500 --> 00:53:42.500
And the same thing has happened in the industry now because the legal structure has been changed, because invasive pollution has been claimed to be free and permitted by the courts,

634
00:53:42.500 --> 00:53:44.500
industrial technology has been geared in that direction.

635
00:53:44.500 --> 00:53:49.140
Direction. What we have to do is to change this and establish private property once again

636
00:53:49.140 --> 00:53:54.820
in people's air and lungs and orchards etc. So that invasives non-polluting

637
00:53:54.820 --> 00:53:58.460
technology, but that was the government that set this whole thing up by changing

638
00:53:58.460 --> 00:54:04.860
the common-law structure. We see in every area that something peculiar has happened

639
00:54:04.860 --> 00:54:10.020
on the market, either a ravaging of a resource, undue depletion, pollution. In

640
00:54:10.020 --> 00:54:12.700
some way the market hasn't really functioned. It hasn't been because of the

641
00:54:12.700 --> 00:54:19.700
The market hasn't been because of capitalist greed. It's been precisely because the market of private property has not been allowed to function by the government itself.

642
00:54:19.700 --> 00:54:27.700
Call upon the government itself to do the remedying is like, in one of my favorite analogies, call upon the fox to guard the chicken coop against predation.

643
00:54:27.700 --> 00:54:38.700
It's obviously the government that's the main problem in this whole business, and we should then call upon the government to allow private property to function in these areas as it has allowed in other areas, or at least even more so.

644
00:54:38.700 --> 00:54:43.400
to catch up with the other areas of the market so that we don't have these extra problems

645
00:54:43.400 --> 00:54:45.160
messing up the system. Thank you.
