WEBVTT

NOTE The Economics of Recycling

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:11.000
Lee Jacobson's enthusiasm about recycling just flies in the face of the task that she's up against.

2
00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:21.000
When the markets crashed last year, Auburn University out here, their waste disposal needs fell on hard times.

3
00:00:21.000 --> 00:00:27.000
The company out of Atlanta that had been taking co-mingled trash,

4
00:00:27.000 --> 00:00:37.360
Okay, that's this plastic and paper and glass all together, without any charge, said, no longer.

5
00:00:38.960 --> 00:00:43.520
No, this was no Georgia-Alabama feud, we've got those, but this wasn't one of them.

6
00:00:43.920 --> 00:00:46.120
Simple economics prevailed.

7
00:00:47.040 --> 00:00:49.320
China's demand had slumped.

8
00:00:50.880 --> 00:00:56.720
The entire market for recycled materials went nearly to zero.

9
00:00:57.000 --> 00:01:04.120
When the market disappears, companies can no longer provide dumpsters.

10
00:01:04.120 --> 00:01:10.680
They can't any longer take waste at no charge, and they can't carry that waste to a transfer

11
00:01:10.680 --> 00:01:17.920
center over here in Opalaca, saving this university $20 a ton for doing so.

12
00:01:17.920 --> 00:01:24.160
So six months ago, Lee Jacobson and others representing the city of Auburn, Opalaca and

13
00:01:24.160 --> 00:01:52.160
in Lee County secured an annual Alabama recycling grant for $120,000 and $120,139. AU got $40,895 of that. The funds have come from an imposed extra $1 per drop-off fee or tipping fee at the landfill dumping sites all around the state.

14
00:01:52.160 --> 00:01:59.320
Sixty buildings have now gotten new bins, labels, signs and posters.

15
00:01:59.320 --> 00:02:07.200
Single collections of cardboard mixed with paper and plastic bottles and metal cans are underway.

16
00:02:07.200 --> 00:02:12.880
Residential areas have been the first to come online with this new project.

17
00:02:12.880 --> 00:02:20.840
But everything collected in these new bins still needs to be separated

18
00:02:20.840 --> 00:02:26.760
If the enterprise ever hopes to get paid for having collected it.

19
00:02:26.760 --> 00:02:32.700
So if you look out these windows with the blinds up right over there across the street

20
00:02:32.700 --> 00:02:38.080
on the east side of Donoghue, you will see Lee's workspace.

21
00:02:38.080 --> 00:02:45.360
Peek into the parking lot, look at the bins, see the people manually separating cardboard

22
00:02:45.360 --> 00:02:48.560
and cans from bottles.

23
00:02:48.560 --> 00:02:52.520
It's a small staff, they've got a big goal.

24
00:02:52.520 --> 00:03:00.320
Bundled cardboard last month fetched $17.50 a ton.

25
00:03:00.320 --> 00:03:05.520
Steel and aluminum cans can generally get 10 cents a pound.

26
00:03:05.520 --> 00:03:09.720
Plastic bottles earn one penny per pound.

27
00:03:09.720 --> 00:03:16.520
A great deal of human labor is going into this recycling project, and it has a price

28
00:03:16.520 --> 00:03:22.520
Lee optimistically thinks that this can work.

29
00:03:22.520 --> 00:03:32.520
Economically, the university should stop these recycling efforts and let the waste be hauled to a landfill.

30
00:03:32.520 --> 00:03:42.520
Those landfills can always be mined in the future when there are actual markets for such materials.

31
00:03:42.520 --> 00:03:50.820
The company that holds the university's contract for hauling waste away is Waste Management.

32
00:03:50.820 --> 00:03:52.840
They do not recycle.

33
00:03:52.840 --> 00:03:56.500
They own their own landfill over here in Salem.

34
00:03:56.500 --> 00:04:03.480
The charge for dumping waste there, or tipping, is $21.75 a ton.

35
00:04:03.480 --> 00:04:07.500
AU does already landfill a great amount of waste.

36
00:04:07.500 --> 00:04:10.080
They should landfill all of it.

37
00:04:10.080 --> 00:04:17.800
Ten years ago, when open dumps were closed in the state, private companies began filling that need.

38
00:04:17.800 --> 00:04:29.000
Waste management is today the largest landfilled operator in the country with 281 landfills.

39
00:04:29.000 --> 00:04:38.560
Now, if they're the largest with 281 landfills, does that sound like enough landfills in the whole country to you?

40
00:04:38.560 --> 00:04:47.800
And is it? Isn't that one of the three things absolutely everybody knows about recycling?

41
00:04:47.800 --> 00:04:54.920
And everybody knows when we talk trash? Number one, we know we're running out of landfill

42
00:04:54.920 --> 00:05:05.480
space. Number two, we know we're saving resources and protecting the environment by recycling.

43
00:05:05.480 --> 00:05:11.640
Number Three, we know that no one would recycle if they weren't forced to.

44
00:05:13.040 --> 00:05:16.640
Well, let's look at these things that we think we know.

45
00:05:17.360 --> 00:05:20.040
Are they real or are they rubbish?

46
00:05:21.200 --> 00:05:25.160
One, are we running out of landfill space?

47
00:05:26.640 --> 00:05:31.880
Two events created the perfect garbage storm back in the late 1980s.

48
00:05:31.880 --> 00:05:39.880
One barge and one bureaucrat created this one overhyped myth.

49
00:05:39.880 --> 00:05:43.880
The garbage barge was the Mobro 4000.

50
00:05:43.880 --> 00:05:47.880
The bureaucrat was J. Winston Porter.

51
00:05:47.880 --> 00:05:59.880
Mobro 4000 gained infamous celebrity status by spending two months and 6,000 miles scouring the Atlantic coast and the Gulf of Mexico,

52
00:05:59.880 --> 00:06:06.880
Looking, presumably, for landfill space as if nonexistent.

53
00:06:06.880 --> 00:06:11.880
The physical availability of landfill space was not the issue.

54
00:06:11.880 --> 00:06:17.880
But you would not have guessed that from the hysteria that the media whipped up about this.

55
00:06:17.880 --> 00:06:25.880
J. Winston Porter became a star that season at the Environmental Protection Agency, the EPA,

56
00:06:25.880 --> 00:06:35.000
by writing Agenda for Action, which Porter proclaimed recycling is absolutely vital because

57
00:06:35.000 --> 00:06:42.760
America is running out of landfill space. What Porter thought he knew simply was not.

58
00:06:42.760 --> 00:06:53.080
So the EPA had noticed that the number of landfills was dropping. The EPA had failed to notice that the

59
00:06:53.080 --> 00:06:58.200
The capacity of each landfill had grown larger and larger.

60
00:06:58.200 --> 00:07:00.920
The sizes were larger.

61
00:07:00.920 --> 00:07:07.360
Total landfill capacity was not disappearing, it was rising.

62
00:07:07.360 --> 00:07:13.560
The EPA also underestimated the prospects for condition, for newer capacity.

63
00:07:13.560 --> 00:07:22.400
Obviously, and as usual, the real landfill problem is not a landfill problem at all.

64
00:07:22.400 --> 00:07:24.960
is a political problem.

65
00:07:24.960 --> 00:07:29.640
Fears about the effects of landfills on the local environment have led to the rise of

66
00:07:29.640 --> 00:07:37.480
the Not in My Backyard or NIMBY syndrome, which has made permitting facilities difficult.

67
00:07:37.480 --> 00:07:41.520
Actual landfill capacity is not running out.

68
00:07:41.520 --> 00:07:50.520
Today 1,654 landfills take care of 54% of all the solid waste in the country.

69
00:07:50.520 --> 00:07:56.840
One third of them are privately owned. The largest landfill is in Doug French's old

70
00:07:56.840 --> 00:08:05.840
hometown, Las Vegas, and it received 3.8 million tons during 2007 at fees that ranged between

71
00:08:05.840 --> 00:08:12.240
the national average of $24 a ton to $70 a ton.

72
00:08:12.240 --> 00:08:18.760
Landfills are no longer any threat to our environment or public health. State-of-the-art

73
00:08:18.760 --> 00:08:25.440
Part landfills with redundant clay and plastic liners and leachate collection systems have

74
00:08:25.440 --> 00:08:30.620
now replaced all of our previously unsafe dumps.

75
00:08:30.620 --> 00:08:35.780
More and more landfills are producing pipeline quality natural gas.

76
00:08:35.780 --> 00:08:43.600
Waste management plans to turn 60 of their waste sites into energy facilities by 2012.

77
00:08:43.600 --> 00:08:49.480
The new plants will capture methane gas from decomposing landfill waste, generating more

78
00:08:49.480 --> 00:08:56.880
than 700 megawatts of electricity, enough to power 700,000 homes.

79
00:08:56.880 --> 00:09:02.080
The end use of most landfills is parkland.

80
00:09:02.080 --> 00:09:11.800
Holding all of America's garbage for the next 100 years requires a space 255 feet deep

81
00:09:11.800 --> 00:09:19.280
or high and ten miles on the side, all of them.

82
00:09:19.280 --> 00:09:26.960
Two, are we saving resources and protecting the environment by recycling?

83
00:09:26.960 --> 00:09:29.240
We want to be.

84
00:09:29.240 --> 00:09:37.400
What are the cost in energy and material resources to recycling as opposed to landfill disposal?

85
00:09:37.400 --> 00:09:42.560
Which method of handling solid waste uses the least amount of resources as valued by

86
00:09:42.560 --> 00:09:44.660
the market?

87
00:09:44.660 --> 00:09:50.920
As government budgets tighten and the cost of being green rubs against the reality of

88
00:09:50.920 --> 00:09:58.560
rising taxes, recycling coordinators like Lee Jacobson increasingly will be under fire

89
00:09:58.560 --> 00:10:05.020
to justify their programs as cost-effective alternatives to waste disposal methods like

90
00:10:05.020 --> 00:10:06.020
landfilling.

91
00:10:06.020 --> 00:10:23.020
I don't think she'll be able to do it, but it should be easier for Lee at the university than it will be for her counterpart in the city of Auburn or any city that funds curbside recycling like Seattle or San Francisco.

92
00:10:23.020 --> 00:10:39.020
Curbside recycling is substantially more costly, and it uses far more resources than a program in which disposal is combined with a voluntary drop-off buyback option.

93
00:10:39.020 --> 00:10:48.020
Overall, curbside recycling cost runs between 35% and 55% higher than other recycling costs.

94
00:10:48.020 --> 00:10:58.980
First, recycling itself costs more than three times more resources than does land filling.

95
00:10:58.980 --> 00:11:05.620
The largest U.S. organization dedicated to recycling just found out how difficult this

96
00:11:05.620 --> 00:11:08.340
chosen path can be.

97
00:11:08.340 --> 00:11:15.860
The final death knell for the National Recycling Coalition, NRC, appeared to ring earlier this

98
00:11:15.860 --> 00:11:25.860
The NRC ceased operations and terminated all staff members at the close of business on September 4.

99
00:11:25.860 --> 00:11:33.860
They had tried to merge with Keep America Beautiful, but that had failed.

100
00:11:33.860 --> 00:11:37.860
NRC is now trying to avoid bankruptcy by reorganization.

101
00:11:37.860 --> 00:11:40.860
Even though there are half a million dollars in debt, they think,

102
00:11:40.860 --> 00:11:41.860
Association.

103
00:11:41.860 --> 00:11:45.820
Even though there are half a million dollars in debt, they think, well, if we can cobble

104
00:11:45.820 --> 00:11:49.860
together a business plan, maybe we can make this work.

105
00:11:49.860 --> 00:11:52.420
But what is their business plan?

106
00:11:52.420 --> 00:11:59.220
They're looking to the Kerry Boxer bill on clean energy to include some nice subsidies

107
00:11:59.220 --> 00:12:01.460
for recycling.

108
00:12:01.460 --> 00:12:06.780
So the market knows this is a losing proposition, but these players are trying to get taxpayers

109
00:12:06.780 --> 00:12:09.460
to fund their enterprises.

110
00:12:09.460 --> 00:12:14.720
The Solid Waste Association of North America found in the six communities involved in one

111
00:12:14.720 --> 00:12:22.720
particular study that all but one of the curbside recycling programs, and absolutely all of

112
00:12:22.720 --> 00:12:29.780
the composting programs and waste to energy incinerators, increased the cost of waste

113
00:12:29.780 --> 00:12:30.780
disposal.

114
00:12:30.780 --> 00:12:45.780
Indeed, the price for recycling often tends to soar far higher than the combined cost of manufacturing from raw materials and virgin sources and dumping rubbish into landfills.

115
00:12:45.780 --> 00:12:55.780
To recycle waste is to use twice the energy and create twice the pollution from factories, trucks and by-products.

116
00:12:55.780 --> 00:13:00.280
Recycled newspapers have to be de-inked first.

117
00:13:00.280 --> 00:13:04.280
That creates a sludge that has to be disposed of.

118
00:13:04.280 --> 00:13:08.780
Recycling more newspapers will not save trees.

119
00:13:08.780 --> 00:13:13.780
Trees are grown especially to be a crop to become paper.

120
00:13:13.780 --> 00:13:21.780
The amount of new growth every year that occurs in forest in the world exceeds by a factor of 20.

121
00:13:21.780 --> 00:13:28.180
The amount of wood and paper that is consumed by the world every year.

122
00:13:28.180 --> 00:13:35.940
Wherever private property rights to forest are well defined and enforced, forests are stable and growing.

123
00:13:35.940 --> 00:13:44.880
Glass is made from silica dioxide. What's that? That's beach sand.

124
00:13:44.880 --> 00:13:48.620
That's the most abundant mineral in the crust of the earth.

125
00:13:48.620 --> 00:13:55.420
Plastic is derived from petroleum byproducts after fuel is harvested from the raw material.

126
00:13:55.420 --> 00:14:06.420
Recycling paper, glass and plastic is usually not justified compared to the virgin prices of these materials.

127
00:14:06.420 --> 00:14:16.920
The best way to measure the scarcity of a natural resource, such as tree or sand or oil, is to use the market prices of those resources.

128
00:14:16.920 --> 00:14:26.620
If the price of a resource is going up over time, and it's not just because it's being pushed up there by inflation,

129
00:14:26.620 --> 00:14:30.120
then the resource is getting scarcer.

130
00:14:30.120 --> 00:14:37.180
But if the price of those resources is dropping, then it's becoming more plentiful.

131
00:14:37.180 --> 00:14:47.740
Indeed, since 1845, the average price of raw materials has fallen roughly 80% after adjusting for inflation.

132
00:14:47.740 --> 00:15:01.940
This is a paradox. This paradox of we will have more by using more is explained by the use of the most important resource out there, the human mind.

133
00:15:01.940 --> 00:15:12.300
Human Ingenuity makes natural resources increasingly available through prices, innovation and substitution.

134
00:15:12.300 --> 00:15:20.380
Bureaucrats, however, appear to occupy a place at the far and opposite end from human ingenuity.

135
00:15:20.380 --> 00:15:25.380
Their interfaces and interferences in markets do damage.

136
00:15:25.380 --> 00:15:28.940
Just two examples will illustrate what I mean by that.

137
00:15:28.940 --> 00:15:34.820
One is about a light with a dark side, and the other example requires that you either

138
00:15:34.820 --> 00:15:38.300
clean your plate or become a composter.

139
00:15:38.300 --> 00:15:47.060
Our Congress in 2007 banned incandescent bulbs, not exactly a market action.

140
00:15:47.060 --> 00:15:52.660
The phase out of incandescent light is to begin with the 100 watt bulb in 2012 and end

141
00:15:52.660 --> 00:15:56.900
in 2014 with the 40 watt bulb.

142
00:15:56.900 --> 00:16:03.260
By 2020, bulbs must be 70% more efficient than they are today.

143
00:16:03.260 --> 00:16:13.380
While a standard 100 watt bulb cost $1.24, the spiral compact fluorescent light CFL bulb

144
00:16:13.380 --> 00:16:18.500
100 watt was $4.97.

145
00:16:18.500 --> 00:16:23.740
Advocates argue that the CFL will last longer and use less energy.

146
00:16:23.740 --> 00:16:30.460
The packaging claims here say that after six years of using that, I will have saved $74

147
00:16:30.460 --> 00:16:31.460
in energy.

148
00:16:31.460 --> 00:16:40.020
Thereby, in the year 2007 alone, under this edict, some 397 million compact fluorescent

149
00:16:40.020 --> 00:16:44.020
light bulbs were placed onto the market.

150
00:16:44.020 --> 00:16:46.700
Their debut is counted as a success.

151
00:16:46.700 --> 00:16:53.820
However, the recycling of these spent CFLs has been an abject failure.

152
00:16:53.820 --> 00:17:00.220
Well, already, Gracious introduced in 2007 and they've already failed by 2009.

153
00:17:00.220 --> 00:17:02.740
They're in the landfills.

154
00:17:02.740 --> 00:17:07.620
That doesn't sound like they got six years worth of use out of those.

155
00:17:07.620 --> 00:17:15.140
But despite CFL disposal bans in states like Maine and despite continuing statewide education efforts

156
00:17:15.140 --> 00:17:24.700
and a free CFL recycling program there, households throw the used bulbs into the trash that does end up in the landfills.

157
00:17:24.700 --> 00:17:32.740
Well, what's the problem with that? Landfills, as we've learned, have the space and they have the appetite for our waste.

158
00:17:32.740 --> 00:17:44.540
Well, the problem is the potential public and environmental health effect of the collective release of the small amount of mercury in each discarded CFL.

159
00:17:44.540 --> 00:18:01.540
For example, using the mean amount of 5 milligrams per CFL, the total amount of mercury contained in that 2007 shipment of CFLs alone was 4,376 pounds.

160
00:18:01.540 --> 00:18:13.540
There's no mention on GE's packaging that this bulb contains mercury, and there isn't any special precaution that you have to take when the bulb breaks.

161
00:18:13.540 --> 00:18:24.700
Notice, however, that Mercury Free is already a selling point to the producers of the new LED technology accent bulbs.

162
00:18:24.700 --> 00:18:31.900
Now, they're called accent because they don't give off enough light to read by.

163
00:18:31.900 --> 00:18:35.180
But they're cute and comforting.

164
00:18:35.180 --> 00:18:41.860
And these makers and producers of this packaging, at least, have experienced a CFL bulb before

165
00:18:41.860 --> 00:18:49.660
because they say, you will get a warm, nice light, which is something you will not get

166
00:18:49.660 --> 00:18:53.020
from a CFL.

167
00:18:53.020 --> 00:18:57.820
In June of this year, Maine did adopt the nation's first law that required the CFL

168
00:18:57.820 --> 00:19:11.700
bulb manufacturers to share the cost, cost is going to go up, but how can savings result?

169
00:19:11.700 --> 00:19:17.140
How can I save over six years seventy-four dollars? The costs are going to go up, and

170
00:19:17.140 --> 00:19:21.540
what a boondoggle it is to think that I've got this health hazard instead.

171
00:19:21.540 --> 00:19:30.180
Well, bringing new depth and meaning to the word boondoggle, San Francisco had a new mandatory

172
00:19:30.180 --> 00:19:37.820
recycling ordinance last month. All residences, all restaurants, and all businesses must not

173
00:19:37.820 --> 00:19:45.500
Not only just recycle, but must compost too.

174
00:19:45.500 --> 00:19:51.360
It's a green bin and you'll like the color of it.

175
00:19:51.360 --> 00:19:57.060
They found out that 36% of their landfills waste was compostable, but that happens to

176
00:19:57.060 --> 00:20:03.600
be the very ingredient that made the landfill valuable in future years as an energy source

177
00:20:03.600 --> 00:20:06.140
because it would compost.

178
00:20:06.140 --> 00:20:12.700
Collecting your food scraps, your plant trimmings, your soiled paper, and I do mean toilet paper.

179
00:20:12.700 --> 00:20:18.540
Your soiled paper and other compostables is considered necessary by San Franciscans to

180
00:20:18.540 --> 00:20:24.700
fight global warming.

181
00:20:24.700 --> 00:20:28.580
That was an issue I talked about last year.

182
00:20:28.580 --> 00:20:37.020
Let's get both a green cart and a green pamphlet called Stop Trashing the Planet.

183
00:20:37.020 --> 00:20:45.900
And you will face a $100 fine if you're caught having your paper with food scraps on it.

184
00:20:45.900 --> 00:20:51.160
I don't know about pizza plates.

185
00:20:51.160 --> 00:20:55.300
Businesses will face a fine of $500 because, of course, they can afford to, and really

186
00:20:55.300 --> 00:20:57.780
bad actors will be fined $1,000.

187
00:20:57.780 --> 00:21:04.620
The stated goal is to get to zero waste.

188
00:21:04.620 --> 00:21:09.300
Now when the goal is zero waste, I think people in San Francisco will say, well what the heck

189
00:21:09.300 --> 00:21:15.060
am I paying for garbage pickup for?

190
00:21:15.060 --> 00:21:19.100
Obviously San Francisco believes we've run out of landfill space and obviously they don't

191
00:21:19.100 --> 00:21:29.420
Don't have any vision to see the energy plants that landfills can become and are becoming.

192
00:21:29.420 --> 00:21:32.660
Recycling is a manufacturing process.

193
00:21:32.660 --> 00:21:36.580
Don't think that it will save resources or save pollution.

194
00:21:36.580 --> 00:21:43.220
The US Office of Technology Assessment has said that it is usually not clear whether

195
00:21:43.220 --> 00:21:48.900
Another secondary manufacturing such as recycling produces less pollution per ton of material

196
00:21:48.900 --> 00:21:52.860
process than primary manufacturing does.

197
00:21:52.860 --> 00:22:01.300
Well, if it's not clear to the people who are pushing it on us, I'd say it's not clear.

198
00:22:01.300 --> 00:22:09.500
Manufacturing paper, glass and plastic from recycled materials uses appreciably more energy

199
00:22:09.500 --> 00:22:15.020
and Water and Produces as Much or More Air Pollution.

200
00:22:15.020 --> 00:22:24.180
Takes twice as many trucks. Just imagine, instead of 400 trucks in L.A., I've got 800 trucks now cruising the curbs.

201
00:22:24.180 --> 00:22:27.940
That's a little bit of pollution, air pollution.

202
00:22:27.940 --> 00:22:35.060
Will only the people who are forced to recycle, is that true?

203
00:22:35.060 --> 00:22:43.060
Lord, recycling is at least the world's second oldest profession.

204
00:22:43.060 --> 00:22:46.380
They were called scavengers or rag pickers.

205
00:22:46.380 --> 00:22:52.220
Anything that is of value is recycled now.

206
00:22:52.220 --> 00:22:55.420
Anything of value is recycled now.

207
00:22:55.420 --> 00:22:58.940
You just wonder what needs to be recycled.

208
00:22:58.940 --> 00:23:02.540
You recycle the thing that somebody is knocking on your door

209
00:23:02.540 --> 00:23:18.540
are begging to buy from you. Silver, metal, that's why aluminum cans, you'll find not even 1% of that in any landfill, everybody's been collecting cans and making money off of that.

210
00:23:18.540 --> 00:23:24.540
If it is worthy of being recycled, you are already being paid for it.

211
00:23:24.540 --> 00:23:29.540
Henry Haslett and Ludwig von Mises do speak to recycling.

212
00:23:29.540 --> 00:23:41.540
In Economics in One Lesson, Haslett teaches us that mandatory recycling considers only short-term benefits for a few people,

213
00:23:41.540 --> 00:23:49.540
politicians, public relations consultants, environmental organizations, and waste handling corporations.

214
00:23:49.540 --> 00:24:16.540
Instead of looking at the longer-term effects for whole groups of people, the negative consequences of this short-sighted, short-term special interest group look is going to be a huge squandering of human resources, your brain power, your innovation.

215
00:24:16.540 --> 00:24:20.540
And in conclusion, Mises also teaches us what to expect.

216
00:24:20.540 --> 00:24:29.540
In his great work, Human Action, he does not say to us that recycling is a bad belief.

217
00:24:29.540 --> 00:24:31.540
Never would say that.

218
00:24:31.540 --> 00:24:43.540
He shows by example that mandatory coerced recycling is an inappropriate means of caring about the environment.

219
00:24:43.540 --> 00:24:55.540
It's an inappropriate means. Waste is inescapable. That's the second law of thermodynamics. Waste is inescapable.

220
00:24:55.540 --> 00:25:07.540
Austrian economics leaves it to every person to decide whether your belief, what you think you know, whether it's so or not, what you think you know,

221
00:25:07.540 --> 00:25:20.540
that your belief is more important than the avoidance of the inevitable economic consequences of forest recycling policies,

222
00:25:20.540 --> 00:25:33.540
wasted natural resources when we don't have any to waste, and wasted human resources, which is the most valuable of all the resources.
