WEBVTT

NOTE Ben Bernanke: Loose Talk and Loose Money

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.680
as you can see by your program, if you have a program, and hopefully you do, that I am

2
00:00:04.680 --> 00:00:06.480
first up and

3
00:00:06.480 --> 00:00:10.200
you'll see that I have this sort of clever

4
00:00:10.200 --> 00:00:12.240
title to my talk

5
00:00:12.240 --> 00:00:14.960
which involves Ben Bernanke's

6
00:00:14.960 --> 00:00:16.920
Ben Bernanke's Lips

7
00:00:16.920 --> 00:00:19.320
and Ben Bernanke's Money

8
00:00:19.320 --> 00:00:23.680
but before we get into all that

9
00:00:23.680 --> 00:00:28.360
I wanted to talk about money period because it's a very important subject

10
00:00:28.360 --> 00:00:36.840
that for those of you who are going on to college, and I think most of you probably will,

11
00:00:36.840 --> 00:00:46.760
or maybe some of you are in college already, that we ought to talk about money and talk about the way it's taught and talk about the way it's mistaught.

12
00:00:46.760 --> 00:00:54.920
Now, the way it should be taught is through Ludwig von Mises' regression theorem.

13
00:00:54.920 --> 00:01:05.920
And he was continuing the work of Carl Menger, and Carl Menger was the founder, really, of Austrian economics.

14
00:01:05.920 --> 00:01:16.920
And through his money regression theorem, he found that according to which the price or purchasing power of money is determined by its supply and its demand.

15
00:01:16.920 --> 00:01:18.920
Simple enough, right?

16
00:01:18.920 --> 00:01:30.920
which in turn determine not by its purchasing price today, but by the knowledge the actor formed on purchasing price, its purchasing price yesterday.

17
00:01:30.920 --> 00:01:42.920
At the same time, the purchasing price yesterday was determined by the demand for money which developed based on the knowledge of its purchasing price the day before.

18
00:01:42.920 --> 00:02:09.920
Well, we can trace this pattern back over and over and over again when for the first time in history people began to demand a certain good as a medium of exchange and we've all kind of heard the stories about how seashells and ox and tobacco leaves and all those kind of things served as money and we won't trudge through that today, but that's how it happened that the market created the money.

19
00:02:09.920 --> 00:02:16.920
So therefore this theorem reflects Menger's theory of spontaneous emergence in the evolution of money.

20
00:02:16.920 --> 00:02:23.920
Spontaneous urgence in the evolution of money founded around individual action.

21
00:02:23.920 --> 00:02:33.920
Now the cumulative development of a medium exchange on the free market is the only way that money can be established.

22
00:02:33.920 --> 00:02:45.200
Money cannot originate in any other way, neither by someone suddenly deciding money can be

23
00:02:45.200 --> 00:02:54.160
created out of some useless material, nor by government calling bits of paper money.

24
00:02:54.160 --> 00:02:58.800
The reason I emphasize that is you're going to go to college and some professor is going

25
00:02:58.800 --> 00:03:15.800
I'm going to tell you that money is whatever the government says it is, and sure they have legal tender laws and that kind of thing that use force to force us to take paper money, but that's not how money developed.

26
00:03:15.800 --> 00:03:38.800
Money is a commodity, and Murray Rothbard, who I studied under at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas, said that learning the simple lesson is one of the world's most important tasks, just learning the idea that money is a commodity.

27
00:03:38.800 --> 00:03:45.160
because so often people talk about money being so many other things, much more

28
00:03:45.160 --> 00:03:50.000
than what it is and much less than what it is. It's not an abstract unit of

29
00:03:50.000 --> 00:03:58.240
account, divorceable from some concrete good, it's not a useless token for good

30
00:03:58.240 --> 00:04:05.280
for exchanging, it's not a claim on society, it is not a guarantee of a fixed

31
00:04:05.280 --> 00:04:35.280
price level. It is simply a commodity. Now it differs from other commodities in that it is demanded mainly as a medium exchange. You trade money for other things, for other goods and services. But aside from this, it is a commodity. And like all commodities, it has an existing stock. It faces demands by people to buy and hold it. Like all commodities, its price in terms of other goods is determined by the interaction

32
00:04:35.280 --> 00:04:42.800
and its total supply or stock and the total demand by people to buy and hold it.

33
00:04:42.800 --> 00:04:47.780
People buy money by selling their goods and services for it, just as they sell money when

34
00:04:47.780 --> 00:04:49.980
they buy goods and services.

35
00:04:49.980 --> 00:04:56.380
So if I ask you to, well, I've got a wonderful shoe shine from Paul out in the lobby, by

36
00:04:56.380 --> 00:04:58.220
the way.

37
00:04:58.220 --> 00:04:59.220
Highly recommend him.

38
00:04:59.220 --> 00:05:10.220
If you need your shoes shined, Paul traded his services for, as it turned out, eight bucks.

39
00:05:10.220 --> 00:05:17.220
On the other hand, then I sold my money for his shoes shined for that eight bucks.

40
00:05:17.220 --> 00:05:23.220
And that's how this exchange takes place.

41
00:05:23.220 --> 00:05:28.220
Now, the reason I bring this up and start kind of at the beginning here

42
00:05:28.220 --> 00:05:38.620
is that there's a guy named Paul Samuelson wrote a book in its 11th edition of economics.

43
00:05:38.620 --> 00:05:55.220
I think there was a total of 19 editions of the book economics and if you're not studying in this book now more than likely in your college years you are going to get stuck reading Samuelson about economics.

44
00:05:55.220 --> 00:06:11.220
Most kinds of money tended once to be of some value or use for their own sake.

45
00:06:11.220 --> 00:06:21.220
Thus, even wampum had decorative uses, and paper money began as a warehouse or mint receipts for such metal.

46
00:06:21.220 --> 00:06:24.220
So far so good.

47
00:06:24.220 --> 00:06:26.220
Samuelson's doing great.

48
00:06:26.220 --> 00:06:29.220
But the intrinsic usefulness of the money medium

49
00:06:29.220 --> 00:06:32.220
is now the least important thing about it.

50
00:06:32.220 --> 00:06:36.220
Samuelson writes that money as money is wanted

51
00:06:36.220 --> 00:06:41.220
not for its own sake, but for what it will buy.

52
00:06:41.220 --> 00:06:44.220
We wish to use money by getting rid of it.

53
00:06:44.220 --> 00:06:48.220
Money is an artificial social convention,

54
00:06:48.220 --> 00:06:50.220
is what Samuelson says.

55
00:06:50.220 --> 00:07:05.220
Now remember, we just, I just talked about Menger and Mises and Rothbard saying that money evolved from the marketplace, and here Samuelson says that it's an artificial social convention.

56
00:07:05.220 --> 00:07:12.220
Samuelson writes paradox, money is accepted because it is accepted.

57
00:07:12.220 --> 00:07:21.220
Well that's not terribly enlightening there, but that's the kind of analysis that you're liable to get.

58
00:07:21.220 --> 00:07:28.220
He says by the printing of more or fewer zeros on the face value of the bill,

59
00:07:28.220 --> 00:07:35.620
A greater or smaller amount of value can be embodied in a light, transportable medium

60
00:07:35.620 --> 00:07:38.980
of little bulk.

61
00:07:38.980 --> 00:07:47.700
So he must have been talking about this bill, which you guys can't see, but I can describe

62
00:07:47.700 --> 00:07:49.780
it to you.

63
00:07:49.780 --> 00:07:56.460
It's for a hundred trillion dollars from the Bank of Zimbabwe.

64
00:07:56.460 --> 00:08:03.780
So this must have been what Samuelson was talking about, printing as many zeros on a

65
00:08:03.780 --> 00:08:10.980
bill to create as much value as you could have in this very lightweight piece of paper.

66
00:08:10.980 --> 00:08:14.060
It's very well done, it's nice, it's crisp.

67
00:08:14.060 --> 00:08:21.580
You've got three stones here that are balancing and on the back you have an ox and a waterfall

68
00:08:21.580 --> 00:08:26.380
and it's signed by my favorite central banker, Gideon Gono.

69
00:08:26.380 --> 00:08:32.420
So a hundred trillion dollar banknote is what he is talking about.

70
00:08:32.420 --> 00:08:40.860
And so presumably he was saying that a hundred trillion dollars sounds like a lot of money,

71
00:08:40.860 --> 00:08:41.860
doesn't it?

72
00:08:41.860 --> 00:08:45.380
I mean, if you had a hundred trillion dollars, I mean, you probably wouldn't be sitting here

73
00:08:45.380 --> 00:08:46.380
right now.

74
00:08:46.380 --> 00:08:50.440
You'd have had it already figured out.

75
00:08:50.440 --> 00:08:55.380
But the question is whether a hundred trillion dollars was worth anything.

76
00:08:55.380 --> 00:09:04.380
Well, this is a camera phone picture about the time that the $100 trillion note was created.

77
00:09:04.380 --> 00:09:08.380
And this was outside a restroom in Zimbabwe.

78
00:09:08.380 --> 00:09:13.380
And it says, toilet paper only to be used in this toilet.

79
00:09:13.380 --> 00:09:21.380
No cardboard, no cloth, no Zimbabwe dollars, no newspaper.

80
00:09:21.380 --> 00:09:32.860
So, as much as Professor Samuelson may say that adding zeros to a piece of paper adds value to it,

81
00:09:32.860 --> 00:09:38.500
doesn't mean the marketplace is going to accept that value.

82
00:09:38.500 --> 00:09:48.100
Now, Samuelson goes on to write that he envisions a day when anything so crude as a poker chip, a coin,

83
00:09:48.100 --> 00:09:56.180
or bill will be dispensed with in favor of records that automatically balance each other out,

84
00:09:56.180 --> 00:10:02.260
a person's in-payments and out-payments over the whole of their lifetime.

85
00:10:02.260 --> 00:10:07.660
So really what Samuelson is looking for is not money in its physical form at all,

86
00:10:07.660 --> 00:10:15.620
he just thinks that this should be a kind of like your credit card statement and that's what money should be.

87
00:10:15.620 --> 00:10:30.620
But Samuelson goes on to say, he says, by careful engraving, the value of money can be protected from counterfeiting and alteration, adulteration.

88
00:10:30.620 --> 00:10:43.620
The fact that private individuals cannot create it at will in unlimited amounts keeps it scarce, i.e. an economic and not a free good.

89
00:10:43.620 --> 00:11:01.620
So what Samuelson is trying to say is that as long as you can, the government is in charge of creating money and not individuals like you and I, that they are going to keep money scarce.

90
00:11:01.620 --> 00:11:10.620
It didn't work out that way in Zimbabwe and it's not exactly working out that way in the United States as well.

91
00:11:10.620 --> 00:11:18.620
Money scarce? Well, Paul Samuelson was born in 1915, and he died at the end of 2009.

92
00:11:18.620 --> 00:11:26.620
And when Professor Samuelson was born, the money supply in the United States was 17.6 billion dollars.

93
00:11:26.620 --> 00:11:30.620
17.6 billion with a B.

94
00:11:30.620 --> 00:11:37.620
When his first economics textbook was first published, 1948,

95
00:11:37.620 --> 00:11:45.620
M2 money supply, the money supply was $148 billion with AB.

96
00:11:45.620 --> 00:11:55.620
When Samuelson died at the end of 2009, the money supply was $8.5 trillion with a T.

97
00:11:55.620 --> 00:12:02.620
Now remember, please, that a trillion is a thousand billion.

98
00:12:02.620 --> 00:12:12.580
So the money supply in the government's hands has grown exponentially, despite the fact

99
00:12:12.580 --> 00:12:16.600
that Samuelson makes the case.

100
00:12:16.600 --> 00:12:22.380
And Samuelson, by the way, was the Nobel Prize winner and he was the first American Nobel

101
00:12:22.380 --> 00:12:25.060
Prize winner in economics.

102
00:12:25.060 --> 00:12:35.860
So he's claiming that government keeps money scarce and the facts would prove exactly otherwise.

103
00:12:35.860 --> 00:12:42.100
Now there is no way that gold and silver money could have been produced at or pulled out

104
00:12:42.100 --> 00:12:49.180
of the ground at nearly this rate for that long and of course to create this money it

105
00:12:49.180 --> 00:12:57.940
takes a central bank and in the United States the central bank is known as the Federal Reserve

106
00:12:57.940 --> 00:13:03.440
and the guy in charge of the central bank is a guy named Ben Bernanke and hopefully

107
00:13:03.440 --> 00:13:09.740
most of you, if not all of you, know who Ben Bernanke is and hopefully all of you follow

108
00:13:09.740 --> 00:13:12.940
every word that he says.

109
00:13:12.940 --> 00:13:19.020
That's probably not right but you know humor me a little bit.

110
00:13:19.020 --> 00:13:27.180
So anyway, our guy running the, our money, keeping money as an economic good, keeping

111
00:13:27.180 --> 00:13:31.100
it scarce, is Ben Bernanke.

112
00:13:31.100 --> 00:13:40.140
And Ben Bernanke was first interviewed on CBS's 60 Minutes back in 2009.

113
00:13:40.140 --> 00:13:46.700
And nobody really, the press really hadn't been invited into the Federal Reserve offices

114
00:13:46.700 --> 00:14:16.700
This is in Washington D.C., the Eccles Building. It's very secretive. They don't let people in there. They don't want people to know what they're up to, but they had this little dog and pony show where Scott and Pelley from 60 Minutes, which is a very highly watched program on Sundays, was brought in to interview the chairman of the Federal Reserve back in 2009, and Scott Pelley did an interview.

115
00:14:16.700 --> 00:14:23.420
And he started the interview with saying, you know Mr. Chairman, I think the Federal Reserve for most people is a mystery.

116
00:14:23.420 --> 00:14:32.900
And the Federal Reserve may be a mystery to many of you here, most people on the street, the Federal Reserve is a mystery.

117
00:14:32.900 --> 00:14:41.420
And Bernanke replied, well, it's an institution that people don't hear so much about, but it is a very important one, Bernanke said.

118
00:14:41.420 --> 00:14:44.620
It manages monetary policy for the country.

119
00:14:44.620 --> 00:14:50.340
it is one of the main tools we have for stabilizing our economy

120
00:14:50.340 --> 00:14:53.520
and keeping prices stable

121
00:14:53.520 --> 00:14:56.460
stabilizing our economy

122
00:14:56.460 --> 00:15:01.380
we've had a tech bubble, we've had a housing bubble, we've had a commodity

123
00:15:01.380 --> 00:15:06.020
bubble, we've had price inflation, we've had stagflation, we've had boom, we've had

124
00:15:06.020 --> 00:15:09.300
bust, we've had recession, we've had depression

125
00:15:09.300 --> 00:15:12.720
and this is what Mr. Bernanke calls

126
00:15:12.720 --> 00:15:37.720
Stabilizing. And as far as prices being stable, since 1913, when the Fed was founded, the value of a dollar has fallen over 95%. It's not exactly price stability. And besides, there's no man or group of men or group of women who have the tools to do what he's talking about.

127
00:15:37.720 --> 00:15:43.000
F. A. Hayek, who won the Nobel Prize in 1974, an Austrian economist, said,

128
00:15:43.000 --> 00:15:50.640
man will have to learn that in this, as in all other fields where essentially complexity

129
00:15:50.640 --> 00:15:56.280
of an organized kind prevails, he cannot acquire the full knowledge

130
00:15:56.280 --> 00:16:00.760
which would make mastery of these events possible.

131
00:16:00.760 --> 00:16:07.920
So it's just not possible to do what Bernanke said that the Fed is doing.

132
00:16:07.920 --> 00:16:13.300
Now during this interview, Pelley asked about the Fed bailing out AIG.

133
00:16:13.300 --> 00:16:17.800
Hopefully some of you at least have heard about AIG.

134
00:16:17.800 --> 00:16:25.020
They're a big insurance company that was bailed out during the financial meltdown of 2008.

135
00:16:25.020 --> 00:16:27.900
And Bernanke says, it makes me angry.

136
00:16:27.900 --> 00:16:31.740
I slammed the phone more than a few times on discussing AIG.

137
00:16:31.740 --> 00:16:34.820
I understand why the people, American people are angry.

138
00:16:34.820 --> 00:16:38.340
It's absolutely unfair that taxpayer dollars

139
00:16:38.340 --> 00:16:43.540
are going to prop up a company that made these terrible bets

140
00:16:43.540 --> 00:16:47.620
that was operating out of the sight of regulators,

141
00:16:47.620 --> 00:16:51.980
but which we had no choice but to stabilize

142
00:16:51.980 --> 00:16:57.300
or else risk enormous impact, not just in the financial system,

143
00:16:57.300 --> 00:17:00.620
but on the whole of the US economy.

144
00:17:00.620 --> 00:17:04.860
Now notice that he said AIG was operating out

145
00:17:04.860 --> 00:17:07.940
of the sight of regulators.

146
00:17:07.940 --> 00:17:09.300
It's not true.

147
00:17:09.300 --> 00:17:12.020
AIG was regulated.

148
00:17:12.020 --> 00:17:15.180
Scott Polikoff, acting director of the Office of Thrift

149
00:17:15.180 --> 00:17:19.180
Supervision, which was AIG's primary regulator,

150
00:17:19.180 --> 00:17:23.260
told lawmakers in March 2009 that his office did

151
00:17:23.260 --> 00:17:27.140
have oversight of AIG's operation.

152
00:17:27.140 --> 00:17:29.580
AIG's main business insurance

153
00:17:29.580 --> 00:17:33.300
was regulated in every state they did business with. So they probably had fifty

154
00:17:33.300 --> 00:17:36.860
regulators in the United States. They had probably had dozens of regulators

155
00:17:36.860 --> 00:17:38.580
overseas.

156
00:17:38.580 --> 00:17:42.580
They were regulated every which way but loose.

157
00:17:42.580 --> 00:17:46.540
And of course the Office of Thrift Regulation

158
00:17:46.540 --> 00:17:48.740
or Thrift Supervision

159
00:17:48.740 --> 00:17:53.340
monitored all the other businesses that AIG was involved in,

160
00:17:53.340 --> 00:17:57.020
including financial products such as credit default swaps

161
00:17:57.020 --> 00:18:03.300
which is ultimately the problem that AIG had.

162
00:18:03.300 --> 00:18:08.900
Now Pelley tells the audience, in the midst of the crisis,

163
00:18:08.900 --> 00:18:12.020
Bernanke had freedom to act independently.

164
00:18:12.020 --> 00:18:15.940
He didn't need permission from Congress or the president.

165
00:18:15.940 --> 00:18:18.020
While they debated on Capitol Hill,

166
00:18:18.020 --> 00:18:21.220
Bernanke cut interest rates nearly to zero.

167
00:18:21.220 --> 00:18:25.020
Then he used Depression Area's emergency powers

168
00:18:25.020 --> 00:18:30.740
to launch a dozen rescue programs of his own.

169
00:18:30.740 --> 00:18:35.380
And he was asked if it's tax money the Fed is spending.

170
00:18:35.380 --> 00:18:38.820
Bernanke said it's not tax money.

171
00:18:38.820 --> 00:18:43.500
The banks have accounts with the Fed, much the same way that you have an account at a

172
00:18:43.500 --> 00:18:45.580
commercial bank.

173
00:18:45.580 --> 00:18:50.680
Probably most of you guys already have accounts at commercial banks.

174
00:18:50.680 --> 00:18:57.520
So, to lend to a bank, Bernanke says, we simply use the computer to mark up the size of the

175
00:18:57.520 --> 00:19:00.680
account that they have with the Fed.

176
00:19:00.680 --> 00:19:06.120
That's much more akin to printing money than it is to borrowing.

177
00:19:06.120 --> 00:19:09.040
Pelley asked, you've been printing money?

178
00:19:09.040 --> 00:19:12.240
Well, effectively, Bernanke said.

179
00:19:12.240 --> 00:19:17.560
And we need to do that because our economy is very weak and inflation is very low, he

180
00:19:17.560 --> 00:19:18.560
said.

181
00:19:18.560 --> 00:19:32.560
When the economy begins to recover, that will be the time that we need to unwind these programs, raise interest rates, reduce the money supply, and make sure that we have a recovery that does not involve inflation.

182
00:19:32.560 --> 00:19:42.560
So again, in 2009, Bernanke said, yeah, we're printing money. So what? We need to do it.

183
00:19:42.560 --> 00:19:48.180
First, James Grant, who writes a publication that happens to be probably my favorite, Grant's

184
00:19:48.180 --> 00:19:55.420
Interest Rate Observer, he writes that he doubts the Fed will be able to say when to

185
00:19:55.420 --> 00:19:58.160
say when, so to speak.

186
00:19:58.160 --> 00:20:03.600
He says, the trouble with living authorities in money and banking is the ideas they absorbed

187
00:20:03.600 --> 00:20:08.000
in school, like, say, Samuelson.

188
00:20:08.000 --> 00:20:13.280
For instance, that a central bank can calibrate the rate of debasement of its currency at

189
00:20:13.280 --> 00:20:20.500
prints by adjusting the speed of the printing press, or that the Federal Open Market Committee

190
00:20:20.500 --> 00:20:26.540
can pick the interest rate that will cause GDP to grow and payrolls to swell, prices

191
00:20:26.540 --> 00:20:32.360
to levitate by 2% per annum, give or take a basis point.

192
00:20:32.360 --> 00:20:36.080
Such things are impossible, Grant writes.

193
00:20:36.080 --> 00:20:43.040
Bernanke got a Ph.D. in economics from MIT. He chaired the economics department at Princeton,

194
00:20:43.040 --> 00:20:48.120
where his specialty was of course the Great Depression. He believes it was the Federal

195
00:20:48.120 --> 00:20:55.640
Reserve itself that turned a recession in 1929 into a global calamity that is of course

196
00:20:55.640 --> 00:21:03.520
is known as the Great Depression. Bernanke told 60 Minutes, they, meaning the Fed then,

197
00:21:03.520 --> 00:21:19.520
They made two mistakes, basically one, that they had let the money supply contract very sharply, prices fell, deflation, so monetary policy was in fact very contractionary, very tight during that period.

198
00:21:19.520 --> 00:21:30.520
And then the second mistake they made is that they let banks fail. They didn't make any strong effort to prevent the failure of thousands of banks.

199
00:21:30.520 --> 00:21:38.320
And that failure had terrible effects on credit and on the ability of the economy to ride itself, according to Bernanke.

200
00:21:38.320 --> 00:21:49.960
Now Murray Rothbard in America's Great Depression, and if you want to read one book about the Great Depression, read Murray's America's Great Depression.

201
00:21:49.960 --> 00:21:59.960
He wrote that the federal government had tried hard to inflate, raising controlled reserves by $195 million.

202
00:21:59.960 --> 00:22:08.360
largely in bills bought and bills discounted, but uncontrolled reserves declined by 302 million,

203
00:22:08.360 --> 00:22:18.640
largely due to a huge $356 million increase in money and circulation.

204
00:22:18.640 --> 00:22:20.560
So what was happening?

205
00:22:20.560 --> 00:22:25.720
The inflationary attempts of the government were thus offset by the people's attempts

206
00:22:25.720 --> 00:22:29.840
to convert their bank deposits into legal tender.

207
00:22:29.840 --> 00:22:33.960
If you take your money out of a bank, the bank can't lend it.

208
00:22:33.960 --> 00:22:39.720
And if the bank can't lend it, it can't, through fractional reserve banking, create money out

209
00:22:39.720 --> 00:22:41.440
of nowhere.

210
00:22:41.440 --> 00:22:44.640
And that's what happened during the Great Depression.

211
00:22:44.640 --> 00:22:48.320
But it didn't mean that the Federal Reserve was tight.

212
00:22:48.320 --> 00:22:51.860
Federal Reserve was as loose as it could be.

213
00:22:51.860 --> 00:23:02.020
And it was the people acting very rationally that stopped what the Fed was doing.

214
00:23:02.020 --> 00:23:06.980
Now banks were failing, people were rightly scared and they were pulling their money out.

215
00:23:06.980 --> 00:23:14.220
Now as far as bank failures go, Rothbard explains in probably one of my favorite books of Murray's

216
00:23:14.220 --> 00:23:16.780
is the mystery of banking.

217
00:23:16.780 --> 00:23:27.780
If you ever want to know how banking works, fractionalized banking works, The Mystery of Banking is the book to purchase.

218
00:23:27.780 --> 00:23:39.780
Of course, it's free online, and Bob Murphy is teaching a class out of The Mystery of Banking, a class on the Fed, actually, in the Mises Academy.

219
00:23:39.780 --> 00:23:46.340
He explains in the mystery of banking, bank failures are a healthy weapon by which the

220
00:23:46.340 --> 00:23:49.460
market keeps bank credit inflation in check.

221
00:23:49.460 --> 00:23:55.740
An absence of failure might mean that the check is doing poorly and that inflation of

222
00:23:55.740 --> 00:23:58.900
money and credit is all the more rampant.

223
00:23:58.900 --> 00:24:04.500
So Bernanke thinks saving banks and creating money allows the economy to right itself,

224
00:24:04.500 --> 00:24:07.420
but it's exactly the opposite.

225
00:24:07.420 --> 00:24:13.260
The malinvestments created by the easy money policy in the 20s had to be corrected and

226
00:24:13.260 --> 00:24:18.300
the malinvestment of the 1990s and the 2000s must be cleansed.

227
00:24:18.300 --> 00:24:25.780
The extra houses, the extra shopping centers, the extra whatever that have been built, these

228
00:24:25.780 --> 00:24:36.220
These uneconomic malinvestments, as we call them in Austrian economics, must be cleansed

229
00:24:36.220 --> 00:24:39.660
through a recession, depression.

230
00:24:39.660 --> 00:24:44.100
Standing in the way of that depression only prolongs the agony.

231
00:24:44.100 --> 00:24:50.020
The Fed stood in the way of that correction, and that's what made a recession back in

232
00:24:50.020 --> 00:24:52.480
the 20s, the Great Depression.

233
00:24:52.480 --> 00:24:57.600
And it is, in fact, exactly what Bernanke is doing today.

234
00:24:57.600 --> 00:25:02.000
Now Bernanke appeared again on 60 Minutes this past December.

235
00:25:02.000 --> 00:25:04.720
I'm sure you all saw it.

236
00:25:04.720 --> 00:25:09.600
After all, unemployment's still high, even all the things that he's done, nothing's really

237
00:25:09.600 --> 00:25:11.140
gotten much better.

238
00:25:11.140 --> 00:25:17.320
So he rolled out the red carpet again, Scott Pelly was called in and they had another interview.

239
00:25:17.320 --> 00:25:24.000
And he had just announced that the Fed was going to buy $600 trillion in treasury debt,

240
00:25:24.000 --> 00:25:29.360
otherwise known as QE2 or Quantitative Easing 2.

241
00:25:29.360 --> 00:25:34.180
Quantitative Easing means the Fed creates money out of nowhere and buys government bonds

242
00:25:34.180 --> 00:25:35.180
with it.

243
00:25:35.180 --> 00:25:37.200
That's what QE means.

244
00:25:37.200 --> 00:25:43.040
It sounds a little more clever when it's called QE, but that's what it is.

245
00:25:43.040 --> 00:25:49.040
So Bernanke told Scott Pelley, the unemployment rate is just not going down.

246
00:25:49.040 --> 00:25:59.320
Unemployment is just about the same as it was in mid-2009 when the economy started growing,

247
00:25:59.320 --> 00:26:01.440
so that's a major concern.

248
00:26:01.440 --> 00:26:06.960
And it looks that at current rates, that it may take some years before the unemployment

249
00:26:06.960 --> 00:26:10.560
rate gets back down to more normal levels.

250
00:26:10.560 --> 00:26:17.560
Bernanke thinks that by lowering the 10-year treasury bond rate from say three to say two,

251
00:26:17.560 --> 00:26:21.000
the Fed will provide this enormous boost for business.

252
00:26:21.000 --> 00:26:29.280
Suddenly government bond rates are going to go down, so immediately the businessman running

253
00:26:29.280 --> 00:26:35.920
the yogurt shop on the corner is going to run out and see the light and hire people

254
00:26:35.920 --> 00:26:39.000
and borrow money and so on.

255
00:26:39.000 --> 00:26:49.000
But the fact is that the Fed funds rate, controlled by the Federal Reserve, has been at 0 to a quarter percent since December 2008.

256
00:26:49.000 --> 00:26:55.000
And what have been the results? Well, the prime lending rate, and most people don't borrow at Treasury rates.

257
00:26:55.000 --> 00:27:01.000
The average business person borrows at the prime rate, prime plus something.

258
00:27:01.000 --> 00:27:08.000
Prime rate has gone down from 8.25 down to 3.25, so there's been a huge drop in that.

259
00:27:08.000 --> 00:27:14.000
And what's happened? Well, banks aren't lending and borrowers aren't borrowing.

260
00:27:14.000 --> 00:27:20.000
Total bank loans are down. Commercial and industrial loans are down by 25%.

261
00:27:20.000 --> 00:27:29.000
And no matter how low rates are, business people aren't borrowing.

262
00:27:29.000 --> 00:27:34.000
And consumers aren't borrowing either. Households have slashed a trillion dollars

263
00:27:34.000 --> 00:27:42.000
from their balances, their debt balances since the peak of the third quarter in 2008.

264
00:27:42.000 --> 00:27:54.000
Now, Bernanke responded to this with, he says, a lot of small businesses are not seeking credit because you know, because their businesses are not doing well,

265
00:27:54.000 --> 00:28:01.000
because the economy is slow. Others are not qualified for credit, maybe because the value of their property has gone down,

266
00:28:01.000 --> 00:28:26.000
And so then the next question that Scott Pelley should have asked would have been, since you can't really make rates go any lower than they are now, and it hasn't worked for spurring job creation in the last two years, then how do you think it's going to work now?

267
00:28:26.000 --> 00:28:29.000
But Pelley didn't ask that question.

268
00:28:29.000 --> 00:28:37.000
Bernanke talked about the banks, and he said we want them to take risk, but not excessive risk.

269
00:28:37.000 --> 00:28:40.000
We want them to have a happy medium.

270
00:28:40.000 --> 00:28:43.000
And I think banks are back in the business, he said.

271
00:28:43.000 --> 00:28:49.000
But they have not yet come back to a level of confidence or overconfidence that they had previous to the crisis.

272
00:28:49.000 --> 00:28:53.000
We want to have an appropriate balance, he said.

273
00:28:53.000 --> 00:29:10.000
Well, Happy Medium, Happy Medium, I'm wondering what he means by Happy Medium because in 2005, when Ben Bernanke was questioned about the housing market and maybe whether the housing market had gotten ahead of itself,

274
00:29:10.000 --> 00:29:21.000
Bernanke said, well, I guess I don't buy your premise. It's a pretty unlikely possibility. We've never had a decline in house prices on a nationwide basis.

275
00:29:21.000 --> 00:29:29.000
So what I think is more likely is that house prices will be slow, maybe stabilize, might slow consumption spending a bit.

276
00:29:29.000 --> 00:29:34.000
I don't think it's going to drive the economy too far from its full employment path, though.

277
00:29:34.000 --> 00:29:41.000
Concerning inflation, Bernanke told Pelley, well, this fear of inflation, I think, is way overstated.

278
00:29:41.000 --> 00:29:45.000
We look at it very, very carefully. We've analyzed it every which way.

279
00:29:45.000 --> 00:29:51.820
Okay, so the trick is to find the appropriate moment when to begin to unwind this policy

280
00:29:51.820 --> 00:29:54.440
and that's what we're going to do.

281
00:29:54.440 --> 00:29:59.960
So the folks at the Fed think that they will know the exact right moment when to tighten

282
00:29:59.960 --> 00:30:02.240
monetary policy.

283
00:30:02.240 --> 00:30:09.000
Now this not might work in the physical sciences, but as Hayek explains, such complex phenomenon

284
00:30:09.000 --> 00:30:16.680
as the market, which depends on the actions of many individuals, all the circumstances

285
00:30:16.680 --> 00:30:24.400
which will determine the outcome of a process, will hardly ever be fully known or measurable.

286
00:30:24.400 --> 00:30:28.520
Pelly asked, can you act quickly enough to prevent inflation from getting out of control?

287
00:30:28.520 --> 00:30:35.240
Bernanke says, we could raise interest rates in 15 minutes if we had to, so there really

288
00:30:35.240 --> 00:30:38.360
is no problem with raising rates.

289
00:30:38.360 --> 00:30:45.800
Tightening monetary policies, slowing the economy, reducing inflation at the appropriate time.

290
00:30:45.800 --> 00:30:49.740
Now that time is not now, he said.

291
00:30:49.740 --> 00:30:54.280
And Pelley said, well what degree of confidence do you have in your ability to control this?

292
00:30:54.280 --> 00:30:57.320
Bernanke said 100%.

293
00:30:57.320 --> 00:31:05.280
Bernanke is 100% sure that he can control this process, that he can control inflation,

294
00:31:05.280 --> 00:31:11.360
He can goose the economy and make it go where he wants to and then shut off the tap at the

295
00:31:11.360 --> 00:31:15.060
precise exact moment.

296
00:31:15.060 --> 00:31:23.820
After seeing 60 Minutes Society Generals, Albert Edwards wrote this, very little surprises

297
00:31:23.820 --> 00:31:26.340
me anymore in this business.

298
00:31:26.340 --> 00:31:32.600
But even I was surprised by Ben Bernanke's comment on CBS's 60 Minutes that he has a

299
00:31:32.600 --> 00:31:39.600
There is a 100% confidence that he can act quickly to stop inflation getting out of control.

300
00:31:39.600 --> 00:31:48.600
Surely, if there is one thing Ben Benenke should be 100% confident about, it is his own fallibility.

301
00:31:48.600 --> 00:31:54.600
Remember, this is the man who was not only adamant that U.S. house prices would not decline,

302
00:31:54.600 --> 00:32:01.600
but refuted the very notion that there was even a house price bubble in the first place.

303
00:32:01.600 --> 00:32:23.600
I realize these guys have to pretend that they know what they're doing, but you would have thought that having been at the epicenter of the greatest economic and financial crash since the 1930s, he would show a little humility and uncertainty, apparently not.

304
00:32:23.600 --> 00:32:37.600
Mr. Bernanke is very sure, he is very confident, but then again Mr. Bernanke was equally sure, not only in 2005, as Mr. Edwards points out, but also in May of 2007.

305
00:32:37.600 --> 00:32:52.600
Bernanke testified, given the fundamental factors in place that should support the demand for housing, we believe the effect of the troubles of the subprime sector on the broader housing market will likely be limited.

306
00:32:52.600 --> 00:33:02.600
and we do not expect significant spillovers from the sub-prime market to the rest of the economy or the financial system.

307
00:33:02.600 --> 00:33:09.600
The vast majority of mortgages, including even sub-prime mortgages, continue to perform well.

308
00:33:09.600 --> 00:33:16.600
Past gains in house prices have left most homeowners with significant amounts of equity

309
00:33:16.600 --> 00:33:24.600
and Growth in Jobs and Income should help keep the financial obligations of most households manageable.

310
00:33:24.600 --> 00:33:27.600
That was back in 2007.

311
00:33:27.600 --> 00:33:37.600
Now you remember I quoted earlier Mr. Bernanke from 2009 and 60 Minutes where he admitted to Scott Pelley that the Fed was creating money.

312
00:33:37.600 --> 00:33:47.600
A year later, Bernanke says, one myth that's out there is that what we're doing is printing money.

313
00:33:47.600 --> 00:33:54.600
We're not printing money. The amount of currency in circulation is not changing.

314
00:33:54.600 --> 00:33:58.600
The money supply is not changing in any significant way.

315
00:33:58.600 --> 00:34:03.600
What we're doing is lowering interest rates and buying treasury securities.

316
00:34:03.600 --> 00:34:12.600
Well, of course, technically, Fed isn't printing money. I mean, how could we be so naive? I mean, we're not making that case.

317
00:34:12.600 --> 00:34:23.600
The days of printing money are long gone. Now the Fed, all they have to do is push a button and, as he said in 2009, credit the bank's accounts at the Fed.

318
00:34:23.600 --> 00:34:29.600
I mean, it merely buys U.S. government debt from the banks, not printing money.

319
00:34:29.600 --> 00:34:37.760
When they buy these bonds, they don't print money and drop a pallet load over at Citibank.

320
00:34:37.760 --> 00:34:43.920
But how does he pay for the bills and notes and the bonds he buys?

321
00:34:43.920 --> 00:34:46.640
They do it electronically.

322
00:34:46.640 --> 00:34:51.640
And the banks are then supposed to lend it out once they do it.

323
00:34:51.640 --> 00:34:57.120
Once they buy these bonds, the banks are supposed to lend it out. And for every dollar they get from the Fed,

324
00:34:57.120 --> 00:35:06.120
Collectively, they can lend 10. Not the individual banks, but collectively, they can lend 10, and that's how it works.

325
00:35:06.120 --> 00:35:17.120
So, if anyone wanted to borrow money, and if the Fed had bought, say, a trillion dollars worth of US government debt, the banks could lend out 10 times that amount.

326
00:35:17.120 --> 00:35:24.120
And the supply of money in circulation could increase to 10 trillion dollars.

327
00:35:24.120 --> 00:35:27.120
Does that sound like money printing to you?

328
00:35:27.120 --> 00:35:30.120
And if you said yes, well, you'd be right.

329
00:35:30.120 --> 00:35:39.120
In fact, the Fed has created $1.5 trillion in money supply since the summer of 2007,

330
00:35:39.120 --> 00:35:43.120
when the financial breakdown started.

331
00:35:43.120 --> 00:35:47.120
And that's a 20% increase in the money supply.

332
00:35:47.120 --> 00:35:51.120
So indeed, the Fed is printing money,

333
00:35:51.120 --> 00:35:59.880
and Money, no matter what, Ben Bernanke wants to tell the folks on 60 Minutes, but I just,

334
00:35:59.880 --> 00:36:04.840
I want you to remember what the Austrians say about how money is created, I want you

335
00:36:04.840 --> 00:36:11.760
to remember and compare that to what Samuelson says and what Bernanke is telling you on 60

336
00:36:11.760 --> 00:36:12.760
Minutes.

337
00:36:12.760 --> 00:36:17.880
I hope you carry this with you a long time, it will serve you well, and thank you for

338
00:36:17.880 --> 00:36:19.880
Thank you for your attention.
