WEBVTT

NOTE Credit Diverts Production

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:18.000
This is Jeffrey Tucker. I'm at the Mises Institute, and it's my great pleasure to introduce Tom

2
00:00:18.000 --> 00:00:22.120
Ludz. We're talking about his book, Economics in One Lesson. Oh, wait a minute, that's not

3
00:00:22.120 --> 00:00:28.640
yours. It's one of the books you didn't write. A rare case. So this was written long before

4
00:00:28.640 --> 00:00:31.120
Before You and I Were Born, 1946.

5
00:00:31.120 --> 00:00:32.120
I wish I'd written it, though.

6
00:00:32.120 --> 00:00:33.120
What is it?

7
00:00:33.120 --> 00:00:34.120
Sold two million copies?

8
00:00:34.120 --> 00:00:35.120
That'd be it.

9
00:00:35.120 --> 00:00:40.320
That's a serious wrong thing if you don't negotiate a contract.

10
00:00:40.320 --> 00:00:44.400
And so we're talking about just one chapter, and it occurs fairly early in the book, and

11
00:00:44.400 --> 00:00:47.640
it concerns government loans.

12
00:00:47.640 --> 00:00:57.480
So the idea is that if the private markets will not, will not suffice to fund a particular

13
00:00:57.480 --> 00:01:03.160
program or project or service, so we have to get the government involved in it, and

14
00:01:03.160 --> 00:01:09.160
this is 1946, and my goodness, these government loan markets have vastly expanded in that

15
00:01:09.160 --> 00:01:10.160
time, haven't they?

16
00:01:10.160 --> 00:01:12.840
Sure, with the same rationale and everything, to boot, that's right.

17
00:01:12.840 --> 00:01:17.680
Well, it's useful to bear in mind the theme of the whole book here for this chapter, which

18
00:01:17.680 --> 00:01:22.660
is emphasis on what is seen versus what is not seen, that if you're going to think like

19
00:01:22.660 --> 00:01:27.580
Like an economist you have to think of the consequences for everybody over the long term

20
00:01:27.580 --> 00:01:29.240
of whatever it is the government is doing.

21
00:01:29.240 --> 00:01:34.520
So he gives the example of a farmer who's applying for some loan so that he can buy

22
00:01:34.520 --> 00:01:41.240
a tractor or some such thing and he contrasts the situations of farmers A and B. A has a

23
00:01:41.240 --> 00:01:46.760
track record for honesty and paying his debts and being credit worthy and he's also got

24
00:01:46.760 --> 00:01:51.340
some assets that can be used as collateral but then you've got B who has no assets, he's

25
00:01:51.340 --> 00:01:54.740
He's got no track record. He might even be on government relief.

26
00:01:54.740 --> 00:01:58.100
And so the argument is, well, why shouldn't B get a chance, you know?

27
00:01:58.100 --> 00:02:01.500
And the only chance he could possibly have is if the government lends him the money,

28
00:02:01.500 --> 00:02:04.460
intervenes in the credit market to lend him the money.

29
00:02:04.460 --> 00:02:07.460
And Haslett's argument is to note that

30
00:02:07.460 --> 00:02:11.980
we should remember that what's really being lent here isn't so much the money as it is the tractor.

31
00:02:11.980 --> 00:02:15.940
And then he's going to pay back once he can.

32
00:02:15.940 --> 00:02:20.740
But there's a fixed number of tractors at any given time. So if I lend a tractor to one person,

33
00:02:20.740 --> 00:02:22.420
There's somebody else who can't get the tractor.

34
00:02:22.420 --> 00:02:29.420
And so what he suggests is that when you lend this additional money, this government provided

35
00:02:29.420 --> 00:02:33.580
credit to this one guy, you are depriving somebody else of this same property.

36
00:02:33.580 --> 00:02:38.180
You're depriving somebody who has worked to build up a reputation for honesty and a credit

37
00:02:38.180 --> 00:02:39.360
rating and so on.

38
00:02:39.360 --> 00:02:45.900
And so he keeps it in that light, that why is it morally preferable that this person

39
00:02:45.900 --> 00:02:49.780
should get this and crowd out this person out of the market?

40
00:02:49.780 --> 00:02:51.060
So that's the type of argument.

41
00:02:51.060 --> 00:02:58.260
And then he also reminds us that the private banking industry has every reason to be careful,

42
00:02:58.260 --> 00:03:02.400
under normal conditions by the way, let's abstract from the Fed, but to be careful in

43
00:03:02.400 --> 00:03:07.820
how it makes loans because if it makes a bad loan, well, then it's in big trouble.

44
00:03:07.820 --> 00:03:15.400
So it has to become very skilled at determining who is a reliable and a good credit risk and

45
00:03:15.400 --> 00:03:16.740
who isn't.

46
00:03:16.740 --> 00:03:20.740
Whereas, as I say, if they make a mistake, they lose their own funds, whereas a government

47
00:03:20.740 --> 00:03:27.060
bureaucrat typically has no experience here, has taken some civil service exam in which

48
00:03:27.060 --> 00:03:31.700
he's got to write about hypothetical people in hypothetical situations.

49
00:03:31.700 --> 00:03:36.180
And if one of these loans goes sour, well, there are no consequences, nobody's fired.

50
00:03:36.180 --> 00:03:40.220
If anything, it just goes to show just how bad the situation is.

51
00:03:40.220 --> 00:03:43.900
We've got so many unfortunate people, even this amount of government money hasn't helped

52
00:03:43.900 --> 00:03:44.900
them.

53
00:03:44.900 --> 00:03:45.900
We need even more.

54
00:03:45.900 --> 00:03:54.900
You know, you cannot get the government into this business because it winds up making bad loans that for good reason the private sector didn't want to make.

55
00:03:54.900 --> 00:04:03.900
And isn't it really something that in recent days has all this housing calamity that's going on, that people are asking the question, well, what is it with the banks?

56
00:04:03.900 --> 00:04:08.900
You know, they seem to have lent money where they shouldn't have. These people weren't credit worthy.

57
00:04:08.900 --> 00:04:15.140
And yet, the whole of government policy for the last, I don't know, umpteen decades, whatever,

58
00:04:15.140 --> 00:04:19.220
has been designed to badger them into doing exactly this.

59
00:04:19.220 --> 00:04:20.220
Yeah, of course.

60
00:04:20.220 --> 00:04:24.860
Well, I mean, there's the one argument is the Community Reinvestment Act, which requires

61
00:04:24.860 --> 00:04:30.580
banks to make loans against their better judgment to groups that are perceived as having been

62
00:04:30.580 --> 00:04:32.440
discriminated against.

63
00:04:32.440 --> 00:04:36.800
But as the record shows, in fact, just look at the statistics, if you look at various

64
00:04:36.800 --> 00:04:43.800
and other various racial groups who are assumed to be discriminated against, there is no evidence for this, that in fact they have the same default rates as anybody else.

65
00:04:43.800 --> 00:04:48.800
If they were being held to some higher unreasonable standard, they wouldn't be defaulting as much.

66
00:04:48.800 --> 00:04:53.800
And then we also have the fact that Asian Americans get loans at a considerably higher rate than whites,

67
00:04:53.800 --> 00:04:59.800
and one assumes there's no particular reason for there to be a pervasive pro-Asian bias in the banking community.

68
00:04:59.800 --> 00:05:08.800
So in other words, the Community Reinvestment Act is based on a fallacy right off the bat involving discrimination.

69
00:05:08.800 --> 00:05:13.800
But it's intended to make loans to people who don't have very good credit ratings.

70
00:05:13.800 --> 00:05:23.800
And of course, the egalitarian mind hates the credit rating, which is the one great criterion of trustworthiness when it comes to money.

71
00:05:23.800 --> 00:05:26.800
So banks have been required to make these loans.

72
00:05:26.800 --> 00:05:33.800
The Federal Reserve system pumps all this additional money and credit into the system, and as a result, banks pretty much at any one time have made the loans they can make.

73
00:05:33.800 --> 00:05:40.800
So if they find themselves now with all this new money on their hands, they've got to either lower the requirements, lower the qualifications to get the loan,

74
00:05:40.800 --> 00:05:49.800
or lower the requirements to get the loan, or lower the requirements to get the loan, or lower the requirements to get the loan, or lower the requirements to get the loan,

75
00:05:49.800 --> 00:06:04.800
Money on their hands, they've got to either lower the requirements, lower the qualifications to get the loan, and or lower the interest rate, and so what they wind up doing is again making loans that under normal conditions they wouldn't have made,

76
00:06:04.800 --> 00:06:14.800
and then beyond this we have these weird government sponsored enterprises they're called, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and Fannie Mae was once a full-fledged government agency,

77
00:06:14.800 --> 00:06:19.320
Agency, and then these things really only came into their own as major players in the

78
00:06:19.320 --> 00:06:24.920
mortgage market about 10 or 15 years ago, and they, because they're privatized, even

79
00:06:24.920 --> 00:06:30.920
though they enjoy tax benefits no other comparable institution would enjoy, they have regulatory

80
00:06:30.920 --> 00:06:37.080
benefits, they also enjoy the status of having everyone basically know that if they get in

81
00:06:37.080 --> 00:06:38.760
trouble they'll be bailed out.

82
00:06:38.760 --> 00:06:39.760
Socialized losses.

83
00:06:39.760 --> 00:06:44.060
Exactly, so the risk is socialized, and so therefore that's another incentive for banks

84
00:06:44.060 --> 00:06:47.940
to make risky loans, because they know that Fannie and Freddie will just buy up these

85
00:06:47.940 --> 00:06:51.100
mortgages from them and assume the risk.

86
00:06:51.100 --> 00:06:55.700
And so, you know, as Lew Rockwell points out, if you're inclined to say, well, wait a minute,

87
00:06:55.700 --> 00:06:59.420
you know, the banks shouldn't be making these shaky loans in the first place, regardless

88
00:06:59.420 --> 00:07:04.940
of whether or not they can socialize the risk, Lew points out, well, look, the fact is all

89
00:07:04.940 --> 00:07:06.860
your competitors are going to be doing this.

90
00:07:06.860 --> 00:07:10.060
All your competitors will be making these loans and making money, at least in the short

91
00:07:10.060 --> 00:07:13.420
run on them, and you'll get eaten for breakfast if you don't play the game.

92
00:07:13.420 --> 00:07:20.420
The government has so corrupted the system that even somebody who wants to be an honest banker can't do it.

93
00:07:20.420 --> 00:07:26.420
And of course it's in the government's interest always to distract attention from its own responsibility to think.

94
00:07:26.420 --> 00:07:32.420
So it's not our price controls that are causing the meat shortages, it's the farmers hoarding the meat.

95
00:07:32.420 --> 00:07:40.420
We're not responsible for high oil prices, it's the price gougers at the pump, it's the oil companies, the evil oil companies.

96
00:07:40.420 --> 00:07:55.420
It's, we're not responsible for the mortgage mess, it's these irresponsible lenders, it's never the government, so it's incredible, isn't it, over the years, what an absolutely pristine track record government has, it's never been responsible for anything, amazing, yeah.

97
00:07:55.420 --> 00:07:57.420
And all of its regulations will always fix the problem.

98
00:07:57.420 --> 00:08:08.420
We should just give all our money to the government, in fact, you know, one of my favorite old shows was The Honeymooners, and a lot of times Jackie Gleason would sort of improvise when he would do his lines, and there was one show where at the end, you know,

99
00:08:08.420 --> 00:08:12.980
And at first he was criticizing the government about taxes, and at the end he actually says,

100
00:08:12.980 --> 00:08:16.860
we've got the best government in the world, we should give all our money to the government.

101
00:08:16.860 --> 00:08:22.660
I said, oh no, Jackie Cleason, no, come on.

102
00:08:22.660 --> 00:08:27.740
So Hazlett nailed it in 46, and I suppose that there wasn't this big national priority

103
00:08:27.740 --> 00:08:34.820
yet that every person should own a mansion, a plywood palace.

104
00:08:34.820 --> 00:08:39.700
But it was soon to happen, a few years later, that somebody decided that the very definition

105
00:08:39.700 --> 00:08:43.460
of being American is that you don't own a home.

106
00:08:43.460 --> 00:08:46.700
And it took all these years for it to become this absurd bubble that's now exploded and

107
00:08:46.700 --> 00:08:50.000
is causing great financial difficulties for us.

108
00:08:50.000 --> 00:08:52.820
So there might be other things out there.

109
00:08:52.820 --> 00:08:57.460
Now we've got the student loan problem, of course, that emerged sometime between the

110
00:08:57.460 --> 00:09:00.700
time I wrote the book and today.

111
00:09:00.700 --> 00:09:02.460
And maybe we can address that.

112
00:09:02.460 --> 00:09:10.460
Well, sure, in the interest of full disclosure, I took out some student loans, but I'm one of the suckers who actually paid them back.

113
00:09:10.460 --> 00:09:16.460
Unlike the deadbeats who are running around all over the country going to Hawaii or something, not paying them back.

114
00:09:16.460 --> 00:09:22.460
But the fact is, though, that these student loans, first of all, the ready availability of all this free credit,

115
00:09:22.460 --> 00:09:28.460
is itself at least largely responsible for inflating the price of a college education.

116
00:09:28.460 --> 00:09:34.860
Because if the institution knows you're bringing all this heavily subsidized loan money with you,

117
00:09:34.860 --> 00:09:36.360
well, the price is going to go up.

118
00:09:36.360 --> 00:09:39.660
I mean, if we funded the purchase of potato chips in the same way,

119
00:09:39.660 --> 00:09:42.360
it would cost, you know, $100,000 for a bag of chips, you know?

120
00:09:42.360 --> 00:09:44.660
So it shouldn't be a surprise.

121
00:09:44.660 --> 00:09:48.460
And, you know, I like what a lot of financial advisors are starting to say,

122
00:09:48.460 --> 00:09:54.360
which is that young kids are putting themselves in an impossible hole at the very beginning of their lives.

123
00:09:54.360 --> 00:09:57.660
You know, they start off in debt $160,000 or something.

124
00:09:57.660 --> 00:10:14.660
That's how they start their lives, and I've heard it said that if you were to take your money and put it in almost anything, and just let it grow, it would have been better for you, even when you count the human capital you're building, it would have been better than if you went to college with it.

125
00:10:14.660 --> 00:10:34.660
So arguably the best thing you should do is either if you can possibly in high school get a year's worth of college in with your AP courses, cut that down somehow, or finish college a year early, or spend five years there but work part-time, and learn something.

126
00:10:34.660 --> 00:10:42.660
Exactly. But I mean, if you can get out a year early, then there's an opportunity cost there that you no longer have to bear. You have an extra year's salary.

127
00:10:42.660 --> 00:10:50.660
I mean, you have to think of, you know, Gary North has a lot to say about this, but you have to think of unorthodox solutions to the price of an education.

128
00:10:50.660 --> 00:10:55.660
But the student loan situation is not helping young kids. It's absolutely burying them.

129
00:10:55.660 --> 00:11:03.660
Right. So it really is a calamity. I mean, you've got this argument that, well, the government has to give these loans because private enterprise will not.

130
00:11:03.660 --> 00:11:09.100
And yet, it seems as if private enterprise will not, then they shouldn't be given at all.

131
00:11:09.100 --> 00:11:15.180
Yeah, that's right. That's an indication that society in some way is making clear through the market

132
00:11:15.180 --> 00:11:20.140
the type of risks it's willing and interested in taking. I mean, it's somewhat analogous to the

133
00:11:20.140 --> 00:11:28.140
fact that suppose in 1974 we had known how to make an iPod, let's say, but of course we just weren't

134
00:11:28.140 --> 00:11:33.840
We weren't at the level, the ability to produce the stuff was just still way, way beyond us.

135
00:11:33.840 --> 00:11:39.460
We could probably have produced an iPod in 1974, but when you think of all the resources

136
00:11:39.460 --> 00:11:44.080
that would have been required to extract from society toward this project, it would have

137
00:11:44.080 --> 00:11:47.260
been totally out of line with consumer desire.

138
00:11:47.260 --> 00:11:53.040
The market has a way of balancing the fact that yes, we'd all like iPods in 1974, or

139
00:11:53.040 --> 00:11:57.840
Or we'd all like every single human being to have a four-year education, you know, heavily

140
00:11:57.840 --> 00:12:03.080
subsidized, but the fact is we can't have all these things, there's a trade-off involved,

141
00:12:03.080 --> 00:12:06.600
and the market helps us to balance these things out rationally.

142
00:12:06.600 --> 00:12:11.640
You've written a lot about economics and morality, and your comment earlier about credit ratings

143
00:12:11.640 --> 00:12:18.080
being an indication of trustworthiness, and I wonder if you could elaborate on that, the

144
00:12:18.080 --> 00:12:24.080
The extent to which credit and credit ratings actually help shape our characters.

145
00:12:24.080 --> 00:12:27.080
Well, the way you put it, I'd love to hear you elaborate on this, as a matter of fact.

146
00:12:27.080 --> 00:12:32.080
Well, no, just encourage me when you say that. I mean, this is one way that the market helps train us.

147
00:12:32.080 --> 00:12:37.080
Yes, no, absolutely. In fact, if you follow your credit rating, if you subscribe to any kind of service,

148
00:12:37.080 --> 00:12:41.080
it'll actually tell you this is why your score is what it is.

149
00:12:41.080 --> 00:12:44.080
You've got these positive elements, but you've got these negative elements.

150
00:12:44.080 --> 00:12:48.280
Developments, you keep opening up new credit accounts, you keep doing this or that, or

151
00:12:48.280 --> 00:12:53.440
you won't pay this bill, you're being a bum or something, and it tells you this.

152
00:12:53.440 --> 00:12:59.820
If you want people to interact with you on the best possible terms, then you know exactly

153
00:12:59.820 --> 00:13:05.080
what you need to do, basically to improve your own character, not to take on purchases

154
00:13:05.080 --> 00:13:08.440
that you can't possibly really meet the cost of.

155
00:13:08.440 --> 00:13:13.200
You do learn these things, and these are good qualities that you should have as a human

156
00:13:13.200 --> 00:13:19.200
And also, we should bear in mind, we're not saying that, you know, therefore, you know, very, very few people should have houses.

157
00:13:19.200 --> 00:13:26.200
There's no way to know, there's no non-arbitrary way to determine how many people should live in homes they own, how many should rent.

158
00:13:26.200 --> 00:13:32.200
You know, the market has to determine that, but I do think that maybe a lot of people should just have smaller homes.

159
00:13:32.200 --> 00:13:36.200
You can still own your own home, but not everybody has to have a gigantic mansion.

160
00:13:36.200 --> 00:13:43.200
And I do kind of like Karen DeCoster's term that she invented that's now in the Urban Dictionary.

161
00:13:43.200 --> 00:13:49.200
It's the 2000 Air. It's the guy, he's got the brand new home, the two beautiful cars.

162
00:13:49.200 --> 00:13:53.200
He goes on great vacations with his wife and they've got $2,000 in the bank.

163
00:13:53.200 --> 00:13:58.200
One even the slightest calamity and they are wiped out.

164
00:13:58.200 --> 00:14:05.200
And the credit rating is there in effect to force you to, best it can, to try to prevent this thing from happening.

165
00:14:05.200 --> 00:14:08.880
to plan your life more sensibly and responsibly.

166
00:14:08.880 --> 00:14:12.800
And it isn't interesting, too, that the more irresponsible you are,

167
00:14:12.800 --> 00:14:16.520
the more short-term you're thinking, the higher an interest rate you're going to pay.

168
00:14:16.520 --> 00:14:18.920
So at least there's a little bit of a punishment.

169
00:14:18.920 --> 00:14:22.920
Yes, that's right, that's right. The market is good all around, in a sense.

170
00:14:22.920 --> 00:14:24.440
We've made a good case, Dr. Woods.

171
00:14:24.440 --> 00:14:25.840
Okay, pleasure being with you, Jack.

172
00:14:35.200 --> 00:14:45.200
www.fieggen.com