WEBVTT

NOTE Disbanding Troops and Bureaucrats

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:17.920
This is Jeffrey Tucker with another installment in our continuing series of interviews with

2
00:00:17.920 --> 00:00:23.840
economists about this book, Economics in One Lesson, and it's my privilege to introduce

3
00:00:23.840 --> 00:00:28.080
Walter Block, who is the editor of the book, actually not editor, he just wrote the introduction,

4
00:00:28.080 --> 00:00:34.680
Certainly one of the top enthusiasts for Hazlitt's work. So the first chapter we're going to cover is

5
00:00:34.680 --> 00:00:40.560
disbanding troops and bureaucrats, a particular problem in 1946, right? And the second one concerns

6
00:00:40.560 --> 00:00:45.440
this issue of full employment, which is a phrase we still hear today. So let's first talk about

7
00:00:45.440 --> 00:00:51.040
troops and bureaucrats. Maybe you can give some of the background behind Hazlitt's discussion.

8
00:00:51.040 --> 00:00:58.000
Well, in 1946, I think the book came out in 1946, so he might have written it in 45, I'm

9
00:00:58.000 --> 00:01:05.000
guessing, but maybe 44, late 44. Say it was 45 and he knew the war was just about over

10
00:01:05.000 --> 00:01:12.000
or it was over, and now there were many, many foreign soldiers located in Europe, located

11
00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:18.720
in Asia, many, many of them in World War II, and they wanted more than anything else to

12
00:01:18.720 --> 00:01:24.040
to come home, I'm sure, to establish families or to see their wives and kids who they hadn't

13
00:01:24.040 --> 00:01:30.480
seen for a while, and they were going to sort of inundate the U.S. with themselves, so there'd

14
00:01:30.480 --> 00:01:36.760
be many of them coming, and people were afraid. Would there be jobs enough for them? And I

15
00:01:36.760 --> 00:01:43.120
think that was the context under which Hazlitt was writing. And the fear would be that there

16
00:01:43.120 --> 00:01:47.600
wouldn't be jobs for them, because, you know, right now we have one percent unemployment

17
00:01:47.600 --> 00:02:06.600
and now you have several hundreds of thousands or even millions of people descending upon the US all within a matter of weeks or months at the most and maybe there wouldn't be enough jobs for them but Haslund quite rightly set this aside or gave it the back of his hand as it deserves.

18
00:02:06.600 --> 00:02:11.600
The idea we have to address is what creates jobs in the first place.

19
00:02:11.600 --> 00:02:15.600
We have to get down into the nitty-gritty.

20
00:02:15.600 --> 00:02:19.600
And the reason we have jobs in the first place is because of scarcity.

21
00:02:19.600 --> 00:02:23.600
And what is scarcity? Scarcity means we have less than what we want.

22
00:02:23.600 --> 00:02:26.600
We have this much, we want that much.

23
00:02:26.600 --> 00:02:29.600
And that's where the jobs come from.

24
00:02:29.600 --> 00:02:33.600
And as long as there's unmet needs, as long as people want more stuff than they have,

25
00:02:33.600 --> 00:02:39.520
have, they'd be jobs not only for all the U.S. soldiers but for a zillion Martians or Chinese

26
00:02:39.520 --> 00:02:48.520
or just anyone could come down to the U.S. or to the world or whatever and have jobs.

27
00:02:48.520 --> 00:02:54.760
Perhaps it would be easier to understand if people understood that Hazlitt was writing

28
00:02:54.760 --> 00:03:00.120
and also not just in light of the Second World War but also from the New Deal experience

29
00:03:00.120 --> 00:03:05.080
where we had all these years where the government was trying to reduce the unemployment rate

30
00:03:05.080 --> 00:03:10.620
but couldn't and the widespread perception that it was the war that solved the employment

31
00:03:10.620 --> 00:03:11.620
problem, right?

32
00:03:11.620 --> 00:03:12.620
Right.

33
00:03:12.620 --> 00:03:15.120
Well, Higgs has done a lot of good work on that.

34
00:03:15.120 --> 00:03:17.400
I mean, that was just silly.

35
00:03:17.400 --> 00:03:20.840
We certainly had unemployment problems.

36
00:03:20.840 --> 00:03:24.920
I mean, if you take millions of people and take them out of the labor force, of course

37
00:03:24.920 --> 00:03:28.400
the unemployment rates are going to look better.

38
00:03:28.400 --> 00:03:33.840
But I think the point needs to be made that I think we've said this before about Hazlitt

39
00:03:33.840 --> 00:03:38.340
is that it could have been written yesterday because right now we have soldiers in Iraq

40
00:03:38.340 --> 00:03:46.240
and Iran and we have 800 military bases in 140 different countries and suppose Ron Paul

41
00:03:46.240 --> 00:03:51.720
ran one for president and his first policy would bring the troops home, I don't know

42
00:03:51.720 --> 00:03:56.760
that there are as many troops nowadays in 2008 as there were in 45, 46, but there's

43
00:03:56.760 --> 00:04:03.760
There's quite a hunk of them in Germany and Korea. You name a country, there's probably a U.S. troop there.

44
00:04:03.760 --> 00:04:08.760
And if we were to bring them all now, it's the same situation as it was in 1946.

45
00:04:08.760 --> 00:04:14.760
But part of the fear, though, is that these people will have to be, I don't know if the word is retrained,

46
00:04:14.760 --> 00:04:18.760
but they would accept different kinds of jobs. Government jobs require different kinds of skills,

47
00:04:18.760 --> 00:04:22.760
especially in the military, than is required in the private sector. So that's part of the fear.

48
00:04:22.760 --> 00:04:30.760
Well, you see, I think the main fear was not so much that they would have to switch from killing people to making cars or something like that.

49
00:04:30.760 --> 00:04:34.760
The fear was that there just weren't any jobs, even if they were to switch.

50
00:04:34.760 --> 00:04:38.760
Now, you're quite right that the switching would take some time.

51
00:04:38.760 --> 00:04:40.760
People have to get allotted to the new slots.

52
00:04:40.760 --> 00:04:41.760
I can see that.

53
00:04:41.760 --> 00:04:49.760
But the fear that he was addressing in this chapter was that there wouldn't be enough jobs even if they were retrained because, you know, there are millions of them coming.

54
00:04:49.760 --> 00:04:54.120
These are them coming. Well, one way to look at it is that they come not only with arms

55
00:04:54.120 --> 00:05:00.120
but with mouths, and they'll be producing stuff that they'll be eating, or the additional

56
00:05:00.120 --> 00:05:04.280
amount that they produce they'll be eating. But, see, to look at that way is sort of a

57
00:05:04.280 --> 00:05:10.040
Keynesian-ish way to look at it, that what's really causing it is their mouths, the man.

58
00:05:10.040 --> 00:05:17.320
That's sort of backwards. First we have to produce, then we can eat. It's sort of a basic

59
00:05:17.320 --> 00:05:25.320
There's a premise that you can't eat first, eating can't be the cause of things, it's rather the producing.

60
00:05:25.320 --> 00:05:32.320
And as long as we want more things than we have, there's jobs for them to do to create those things that we don't have.

61
00:05:32.320 --> 00:05:38.320
Now there is one way out of that, and that is if we end scarcity.

62
00:05:38.320 --> 00:05:43.320
Lots of rock, as they say, but there are ways, I mean one way to end scarcity is produce more.

63
00:05:43.320 --> 00:05:45.600
very problematic because

64
00:05:45.600 --> 00:05:47.460
our eyes are bigger than our stomachs

65
00:05:47.460 --> 00:05:50.400
no matter how much we produce there's always something else we want

66
00:05:50.400 --> 00:05:55.000
on the other hand we could go the other route, the ascetic route like Gandhi

67
00:05:55.000 --> 00:05:58.580
where all you want is a diaper and some goat's milk and that's it although he did want the

68
00:05:58.580 --> 00:06:01.680
British out of India which is, you know, not nothing

69
00:06:01.680 --> 00:06:06.400
but apart from that, so if you had a group of ascetics who didn't really want much of

70
00:06:06.400 --> 00:06:07.480
anything

71
00:06:07.480 --> 00:06:10.960
well then there wouldn't be jobs for them but then there'd be no need for those jobs

72
00:06:10.960 --> 00:06:13.080
because we don't want the stuff

73
00:06:13.080 --> 00:06:17.240
so there's really no problem with the laissez-faire capitalism. You know it

74
00:06:17.240 --> 00:06:21.480
occurs to me too that this is also does have an impact on the immigration

75
00:06:21.480 --> 00:06:29.600
question. Oh, absolutely. The fear that the immigrants will come in and there

76
00:06:29.600 --> 00:06:33.320
won't be anywhere for them to work or another related fear is that there will

77
00:06:33.320 --> 00:06:39.080
drive down wage rates for everybody else. Well this is a very complex subject and

78
00:06:39.080 --> 00:06:46.080
And as you know, there is division among libertarians. Hans Hoppe and Murray Rothbard take one view on immigration.

79
00:06:46.080 --> 00:06:47.080
Not so much on the economic issues.

80
00:06:47.080 --> 00:06:52.080
Oh, no. Not on the economics. You're quite right. I stand corrected on that. Not on the economics.

81
00:06:52.080 --> 00:07:05.080
We all agree that there's no problem of creating jobs for immigrants, for soldiers, for Martians, for new babies who are immigrating from Storkovia.

82
00:07:05.080 --> 00:07:19.080
They come with Storks. I don't know if you knew this, Jeff, but they come from this country called Stork OVM. Storks bring them, and 20 years later, you've heard about this, and 20 years later or 15 years later they need jobs too.

83
00:07:19.080 --> 00:07:29.080
And where do all these jobs come from? And the answer is they come from scarcity. As long as we want more than we have, there'll be jobs for immigrants, there'll be jobs for anyone.

84
00:07:29.080 --> 00:07:31.080
What about the fear of wage rates declining?

85
00:07:31.080 --> 00:07:51.080
Well, there it's a very, this is not, we're now out of praxeology, we're into climology, and there will be, look, if say, the immigration consists solely of physicists, well, there might be a case where physicists' wages would fall.

86
00:07:51.080 --> 00:08:00.580
And if the wage consists of solely low skilled people, well then the wages of low skilled people might fall, but even there it's an empirical issue.

87
00:08:00.580 --> 00:08:07.580
It might be that economies of scale, even with physicists or low-wage people might increase it, it depends upon how much capital there is.

88
00:08:07.580 --> 00:08:12.580
These are very, very empirically dirty questions.

89
00:08:12.580 --> 00:08:19.420
Everybody is aware that the rarer your skills are, the higher your pay tends to be, provided

90
00:08:19.420 --> 00:08:24.980
that your skills are more demanded in the market. So if people who do your thing are

91
00:08:24.980 --> 00:08:29.420
more prevalent, then you need to move on. And we do that in life anyway, don't we?

92
00:08:29.420 --> 00:08:32.580
That's right. Look, what are we going to do? I mean, your daughter is now taking piano

93
00:08:32.580 --> 00:08:38.460
lessons. So she's ruining the piano industry because she's lowering the wages of all pianists

94
00:08:38.460 --> 00:08:44.780
And by the way, you know, why do we consider this to be such a terrible thing for a person

95
00:08:44.780 --> 00:08:49.780
to change? You know, how many of us, well, I guess all of us have a variety of things

96
00:08:49.780 --> 00:08:54.820
we're interested in doing. And if we find somebody who does what we're doing now just

97
00:08:54.820 --> 00:08:58.700
as well as us and does it at the same wage rate and does it even better, then it gives

98
00:08:58.700 --> 00:09:03.020
us an opportunity to move on and do something else. Why is that such a terrible thing?

99
00:09:03.020 --> 00:09:06.860
No, no, I agree with you. Hans Hoppe and I have an article co-authored where we say you

100
00:09:06.860 --> 00:09:12.760
You have the right to own things but you don't have the right to own the price of them because

101
00:09:12.760 --> 00:09:16.340
the price of them is determined by all buyers and sellers and the marginal buyer and the

102
00:09:16.340 --> 00:09:17.540
marginal seller.

103
00:09:17.540 --> 00:09:22.140
So if you get an extra physicist or pianist and the wages of physicists and pianists go

104
00:09:22.140 --> 00:09:24.620
down, tough.

105
00:09:24.620 --> 00:09:29.580
You shouldn't enter the market if you're afraid of things because you don't own the price.

106
00:09:29.580 --> 00:09:31.700
The price is determined by the market.

107
00:09:31.700 --> 00:09:35.660
And also wonderful because it gives you a chance to do something else, to seek out your

108
00:09:35.660 --> 00:09:36.660
highest value.

109
00:09:36.660 --> 00:09:40.420
You don't necessarily have to do something else. You could stay as a pianist or a physicist

110
00:09:40.420 --> 00:09:45.180
just at a lower wage or if you don't like the wage you go do something else.

111
00:09:45.180 --> 00:09:51.840
It's really not a problem. A lot of the issues that Hazel is dealing with here are refuting

112
00:09:51.840 --> 00:09:56.900
fallacies that are generated from a mechanistic view of economics that doesn't look at economics

113
00:09:56.900 --> 00:10:01.180
from the point of view of human actors but looks at these big aggregates working. One

114
00:10:01.180 --> 00:10:06.460
of these aggregates is the unemployment rate. There's this longing for so-called full employment

115
00:10:06.460 --> 00:10:14.460
And that doesn't really mean, in the economics literature, that doesn't mean that everybody's working, does it?

116
00:10:14.460 --> 00:10:16.460
Well, certainly not.

117
00:10:16.460 --> 00:10:17.460
What is full employment?

118
00:10:17.460 --> 00:10:21.460
Well, in this chapter, what I think Hazlitt is doing, the essence of this chapter is saying,

119
00:10:21.460 --> 00:10:24.460
look, we don't want full employment, what we want is full production.

120
00:10:24.460 --> 00:10:32.460
We want as much as production as we can get, because look, I think he has this, I forget where he has this story in which chapter,

121
00:10:32.460 --> 00:11:02.460
But I think it's in this chapter where he says, look, if you really wanted full employment, get rid of all the trains and then put the stuff that goes on a train, say from Auburn or say from Atlanta to Chicago, a big long train of 500 cars, each car has got tons of stuff in it, put that on people's backs, 50 pounds to a person, let them walk from Atlanta to Chicago, and then we'll have jobs not only for everyone in the United States,

122
00:11:02.460 --> 00:11:09.460
We don't have jobs for anyone who's ever lived and for trillions of people because, you know, and that way you'd have full employment.

123
00:11:09.460 --> 00:11:17.460
But everyone would be working on carrying stuff from Atlanta to Chicago. We'd have no food, we'd have no clothing, we'd have no medical care, we'd have nothing.

124
00:11:17.460 --> 00:11:25.460
So I think he's focusing us in the right direction, that full employment, employment is bad.

125
00:11:25.460 --> 00:11:30.460
We don't want employment. We're against employment. Employment is a bad thing. Play is good.

126
00:11:30.460 --> 00:11:37.460
Employment is a bad thing. It's a necessary evil, because we live in a world of scarcity, so we have to work in order to produce.

127
00:11:37.460 --> 00:11:41.460
But if I could press a button and say, look, no employment.

128
00:11:41.460 --> 00:11:42.460
You just want to play forever.

129
00:11:42.460 --> 00:11:52.460
And we just play, and stuff comes down from heaven like manna, and you want a bicycle, you sort of think a bicycle, you got one, you want lunch, you think about lunch and you have it.

130
00:11:52.460 --> 00:11:58.460
We don't want employment. We accept unemployment unhappily, because we're on the wrong side of the Garden of Eden.

131
00:11:58.460 --> 00:12:03.900
for in the Garden of Eden there'd be no employment, there'd be play. Now, Mises

132
00:12:03.900 --> 00:12:10.780
makes the very good point that the ideal thing is to be paid to play like

133
00:12:10.780 --> 00:12:17.060
a basketball player or a singer who I assume enjoys it and they get paid or you

134
00:12:17.060 --> 00:12:21.680
and I have a job, Jeff don't tell Lou otherwise he won't pass, but we're not

135
00:12:21.680 --> 00:12:27.060
working if I can include you in here. We've never worked an inch of our

136
00:12:27.060 --> 00:12:33.060
We have our lives here at the Mises Institute. We are playing. We enjoy this. If we could afford to, we would do it for no pay.

137
00:12:33.060 --> 00:12:46.060
We're having fun now. We're playing. It's true with being paid to play, which is the ideal, but not everyone can be paid to play because you've got to take out the garbage and not everyone likes dealing with garbage.

138
00:12:46.060 --> 00:12:47.060
Right.

139
00:12:47.060 --> 00:12:51.460
So, we don't want employment, and we don't want full employment.

140
00:12:51.460 --> 00:12:55.980
We don't want unemployment, namely people who want a job and can't get it, but that's

141
00:12:55.980 --> 00:12:56.980
due to government.

142
00:12:56.980 --> 00:12:57.980
Right.

143
00:12:57.980 --> 00:12:58.980
And that's very different.

144
00:12:58.980 --> 00:13:03.980
What about this idea that all unemployment in a free market is voluntary?

145
00:13:03.980 --> 00:13:04.980
Absolutely.

146
00:13:04.980 --> 00:13:05.980
Stick by that.

147
00:13:05.980 --> 00:13:11.780
All unemployment in a free market situation is voluntary in the sense that you're demanding

148
00:13:41.780 --> 00:13:50.860
This is one of the additional problems with minimum wage, it puts a floor on people's

149
00:13:50.860 --> 00:13:56.460
ability to evaluate their contribution.

150
00:13:56.460 --> 00:14:00.420
The analogy that I like to use sometimes with the minimum wage is that the skunk is a very

151
00:14:00.420 --> 00:14:05.900
weak animal, but it has a compensating differential, the smell, and if it didn't have that it'd

152
00:14:05.900 --> 00:14:07.680
probably go extinct.

153
00:14:07.680 --> 00:14:13.240
The porcupine is a very weak animal except for its quills, and if it didn't have that

154
00:14:13.240 --> 00:14:14.240
it would go extinct.

155
00:14:14.240 --> 00:14:19.200
The deer, too, except for its speed, these are very weak animals, but they have one little

156
00:14:19.200 --> 00:14:26.000
thing that keeps them alive, well, very unskilled people, too, have a compensating differential,

157
00:14:26.000 --> 00:14:29.320
the ability to work for low wages, and then they can get a job.

158
00:14:29.320 --> 00:14:34.640
But the minimum wage is like taking away from a poor person the quills of the porcupine

159
00:14:34.640 --> 00:14:50.440
But here we are entering into another period where the unemployment data is on the rise,

160
00:14:50.440 --> 00:14:51.440
a little bit.

161
00:14:51.440 --> 00:14:52.440
Right?

162
00:14:52.440 --> 00:14:53.440
We're seeing more evidence of this.

163
00:14:53.440 --> 00:14:59.800
And the policy tendency is to do exactly what you're suggesting is the worst thing to do.

164
00:14:59.800 --> 00:15:02.040
We just had a rise in the minimum wage.

165
00:15:02.040 --> 00:15:05.740
And we have another one scheduled, I think, up to 720 or something?

166
00:15:05.740 --> 00:15:06.740
Something like that.

167
00:15:06.740 --> 00:15:10.800
And there'll be other moves to try to pressure employers from firing workers, from laying

168
00:15:10.800 --> 00:15:13.320
people off, and so on and so on.

169
00:15:13.320 --> 00:15:14.440
Welcome back to the Depression.

170
00:15:14.440 --> 00:15:18.560
That's what FDR tried to do, keep wages up, artificially.

171
00:15:18.560 --> 00:15:19.880
And that's what caused the unemployment.

172
00:15:19.880 --> 00:15:25.480
If the wages would have been allowed to settle to their market levels, we still had a depression

173
00:15:25.480 --> 00:15:28.640
and there were misallocations of resources in the 20s.

174
00:15:28.640 --> 00:15:30.640
There would have been a lot of problems.

175
00:15:30.640 --> 00:15:37.560
But the depression could have lasted 10 months instead of 15 years, or 18 years, or however

176
00:15:37.560 --> 00:15:38.720
you count it.

177
00:15:38.720 --> 00:15:44.000
Well, and maybe we can say that Hazlitt hadn't written his book yet in the Great Depression,

178
00:15:44.000 --> 00:15:51.360
so maybe that's one factor, but he has written a book now, and so we have access to all this

179
00:15:51.360 --> 00:15:52.360
information.

180
00:15:52.360 --> 00:15:54.640
There's no excuse for repeating the same mistakes.

181
00:15:54.640 --> 00:16:00.280
Well, Hazlitt hadn't written his book by 29, but Mises had written a book or two, so there

182
00:16:00.280 --> 00:16:08.280
There was really no excuse, but the mainstream economists don't read Mises. That's the explanation, I think.

183
00:16:08.280 --> 00:16:16.280
Well, do you think it would assist in avoiding some of these terrible errors of the past for this book to be more widely circulated?

184
00:16:16.280 --> 00:16:24.280
You know, I used to be an anarchist, but I now believe in government, and government should have one function.

185
00:16:24.280 --> 00:16:27.280
They don't call me Walter Moderate Block for nothing.

186
00:16:27.280 --> 00:16:30.280
and the one function of the government should be to make everyone read that

187
00:16:30.280 --> 00:16:37.040
book. And that's it. See, I'm very moderate, I believe in government, but, you know, limited government, I'm not an

188
00:16:37.040 --> 00:16:39.240
extremist here, I'm a moderate and

189
00:16:39.240 --> 00:16:42.520
they ought to make everyone read that bloody book

190
00:16:42.520 --> 00:16:46.280
and have a quiz on it, and if they don't pass the quiz, they read it again.

191
00:16:46.280 --> 00:16:51.800
Would your law expire, or be it applied to every new generation? Everyone.

192
00:16:51.800 --> 00:16:53.680
Thank you very much, Dr. Block. My pleasure.

193
00:16:57.280 --> 00:17:00.880
In the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

194
00:17:00.880 --> 00:17:03.120
I am the King of the World.

195
00:17:03.120 --> 00:17:05.920
I am the King of the World.

196
00:17:05.920 --> 00:17:09.680
I am the King of the World.

197
00:17:09.680 --> 00:17:13.280
I am the King of the World.