WEBVTT

NOTE The Curse of Machinery

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:19.680
My name is Jeffrey Tucker, I'm at the Mises Institute, and today I'm interviewing Robert

2
00:00:19.680 --> 00:00:26.560
Murphy, who's an economist, and we're going to be talking about one chapter from this

3
00:00:26.560 --> 00:00:43.560
This new edition of Economics and One Lesson, a book that was published in 1946 and republished now, and just as relevant as ever, and Dr. Murphy, the subject of the chapter we're discussing is, has to do with jobs and technology, right?

4
00:00:43.560 --> 00:00:44.560
Right.

5
00:00:44.560 --> 00:00:46.560
And the title of the chapter is?

6
00:00:46.560 --> 00:00:47.560
The Curse of Machinery.

7
00:00:47.560 --> 00:00:48.560
The Curse of Machinery.

8
00:00:48.560 --> 00:00:51.560
Okay, so what does that mean by the Curse of Machinery?

9
00:00:51.560 --> 00:00:57.040
Well, he's referring to the fact, and he shows that it's gone back, far back in history,

10
00:00:57.040 --> 00:01:02.680
that anytime a new technique is developed that is a labor-saving device, that people

11
00:01:02.680 --> 00:01:06.520
fear it because they think, oh, you're throwing people out of work. And so machinery is a

12
00:01:06.520 --> 00:01:12.100
curse because it's just causing unemployment. And so therefore, we ought to resist the introduction

13
00:01:12.100 --> 00:01:17.720
of new machines, sometimes with the caveat, unless the machine doesn't save labor. So

14
00:01:17.720 --> 00:01:20.960
as long as it's not putting people out of work, then sometimes people say, okay, a new

15
00:01:20.960 --> 00:01:26.560
New Machines is a good thing, but if it causes the firm to lay off some people because now

16
00:01:26.560 --> 00:01:30.480
we have the machine doing the job of ten men, then that's obviously bad.

17
00:01:30.480 --> 00:01:31.480
That's the idea.

18
00:01:31.480 --> 00:01:34.620
And he talks about the Industrial Revolution and how this is a controversy back.

19
00:01:34.620 --> 00:01:37.040
But even now, it's a controversy.

20
00:01:37.040 --> 00:01:39.720
Even about the Industrial Revolution, you still read people say, well, you know, it

21
00:01:39.720 --> 00:01:40.720
was really regrettable.

22
00:01:40.720 --> 00:01:48.040
You know, it took people off their wonderful, their happy lives on their landed plots there

23
00:01:48.040 --> 00:01:50.040
and drove them to the city.

24
00:01:50.040 --> 00:01:54.700
Right, so he goes through, I like what he does in the chapter, so first he just quotes

25
00:01:54.700 --> 00:01:59.060
people to make sure you believe he's not setting up a strawman, he just quotes people after

26
00:01:59.060 --> 00:02:03.840
people saying just what you've said, and people follow him up to Eleanor Roosevelt saying

27
00:02:03.840 --> 00:02:07.460
well yeah in the past it was okay but now this is really serious, during the Depression

28
00:02:07.460 --> 00:02:11.380
this is serious, and yeah people just have these false views about what happened in the

29
00:02:11.380 --> 00:02:15.160
past and he goes through his statistics to show, actually in a lot of these industries

30
00:02:15.160 --> 00:02:19.620
with the new machines, for example the automobile industry, obviously there were more people

31
00:02:49.620 --> 00:02:58.100
The effects are somewhat unpredictable, aren't they, from new machinery? It can cause an

32
00:02:58.100 --> 00:03:05.460
expansion of an industry, but it can also cause its complete elimination and displacement

33
00:03:05.460 --> 00:03:06.460
of an industry.

34
00:03:06.460 --> 00:03:10.740
Right, so you have in mind that the horse and buggies go out of business because of

35
00:03:10.740 --> 00:03:17.940
the car. That's certainly one effect, but what he's really trying to focus in on is

36
00:03:17.940 --> 00:03:23.660
and even a sillier fallacy in an industry that benefits from the machinery so that they

37
00:03:23.660 --> 00:03:27.900
still make the same product but now they use machines to do it. But you're right, he makes

38
00:03:27.900 --> 00:03:33.820
the point that sometimes advocates on our side of this issue go too far and they just

39
00:03:33.820 --> 00:03:39.140
stress the long-term net effects in general on how everyone must be richer per capita,

40
00:03:39.140 --> 00:03:44.140
which is obviously true. With machines, more stuff is getting produced so obviously per

41
00:03:44.140 --> 00:03:49.300
Per person, there's more stuff to be consumed, but it is possible that individual labors have

42
00:03:49.300 --> 00:03:53.300
you spent your whole life learning a trade and then a machine comes along that does your

43
00:03:53.300 --> 00:03:56.380
job, you might be worse off for a few years.

44
00:03:56.380 --> 00:04:00.460
And so it's good that he, he, he, he, he dots all the I's and crosses all the T's and

45
00:04:00.460 --> 00:04:01.460
get, and make sure he catches all his threats.

46
00:04:01.460 --> 00:04:02.460
It's quite systematic, yeah.

47
00:04:02.460 --> 00:04:05.420
Now, a lot of this we can understand from our own work lives.

48
00:04:05.420 --> 00:04:10.740
In fact, probably everybody can understand it at some level because we've all benefited

49
00:04:10.740 --> 00:04:13.860
enormously from, in the last 15, 20 years.

50
00:04:13.860 --> 00:04:18.860
Almost daily, there are new things that help us.

51
00:04:18.860 --> 00:04:23.860
Right, I mean it's gotten to the point now where the anti-capitalist criticism is, you know,

52
00:04:23.860 --> 00:04:27.860
Oh, give me a break, you know, I want to just be able to go on vacation and not have my boss be able to get in touch with me,

53
00:04:27.860 --> 00:04:31.860
and I just could turn off all my pagers, or I was a consumer, I have too many choices,

54
00:04:31.860 --> 00:04:36.860
and you go into McDonald's and there's 16 different value menus, and so yeah, now it's almost like they,

55
00:04:36.860 --> 00:04:41.860
even the people who hate capitalism can't with a straight face say it's impoverished us,

56
00:04:41.860 --> 00:04:46.860
______ does not have to say we're overwhelmed with all these choices and all these gadgets that don't really help us.

57
00:04:46.860 --> 00:04:52.860
And yet, I'm sure you've had this experience of talking to people and the subject of computers and software,

58
00:04:52.860 --> 00:04:57.860
and it's always an interesting dinner time conversation, and there will always be somebody that says something like,

59
00:04:57.860 --> 00:05:03.860
you know, I really regret a lot of this in many ways because, you know, we've just become this nation in which,

60
00:05:03.860 --> 00:05:07.860
unless you know how to use a computer, there's nothing for you to do.

61
00:05:07.860 --> 00:05:13.360
And there's lots of people who just cannot and will not do this. And what's going to become of them?

62
00:05:13.360 --> 00:05:20.860
Right. And yeah, at some point, there's always ways you can try to show, no, even anybody, even someone...

63
00:05:20.860 --> 00:05:26.860
Like if you've seen it in the fast food restaurants now, like some of the terminals, they just have pictures of the value meals.

64
00:05:26.860 --> 00:05:32.860
And so, I mean, they just do everything business needs to do to cater to any type of, you know, human being of any sort.

65
00:05:32.860 --> 00:05:39.580
How can we adapt to use this person, to integrate them into the social nexus of cooperation?

66
00:05:39.580 --> 00:05:43.500
But you're right, ultimately if there is somebody that just refuses to learn, what if someone

67
00:05:43.500 --> 00:05:47.620
just said, I don't want to use language, what are you going to do about that?

68
00:05:47.620 --> 00:05:49.060
Is that a vexing social problem?

69
00:05:49.060 --> 00:05:54.180
Well, I don't know, but this is all voluntary decisions happening and if the great majority

70
00:05:54.180 --> 00:05:58.060
are benefiting, we're not forcing you to not use computers, we're saying we're going to

71
00:05:58.060 --> 00:06:01.100
use computers and you're free to use them if you want to.

72
00:06:01.100 --> 00:06:11.100
Doesn't it seem like you meet more and more people, though, that are very successful at what they do, but are doing something that they weren't trained to do at all in college? Doesn't it seem more and more common now?

73
00:06:11.100 --> 00:06:19.100
I think so. I mean, I don't know historically what the difference would be, but certainly, yeah. I mean, I'm not doing exactly right now what I thought I was going to be doing.

74
00:06:19.100 --> 00:06:28.100
I thought I was going to be at a college teaching classes, and I'm not doing that right now, but I love what I'm doing. And yeah, you're right. Plenty of people I talk to. It's almost a joke.

75
00:06:28.100 --> 00:06:35.100
It's almost a joke. I don't even ask people anymore what your major is, because I know that's more like just saying, what are your hobbies at this point, that has nothing to do.

76
00:06:35.100 --> 00:06:44.100
Now I ask people, do you know what you're going to do with your career? Even that's not the right phrase anymore, because that just makes it sound like, oh, I'm going to go work for IBM for my life, and nobody thinks like that anymore.

77
00:06:44.100 --> 00:06:52.100
Nobody thinks like that. But don't you have some sense, of course we weren't around, but don't you have some sense that sometime after World War II, there was this perception that, well, your life is really laid out for you.

78
00:06:52.100 --> 00:07:22.100
I grew up in Rochester, New York and I think its title was the imaging capital of the world because I had IBM and Xerox and Kodak were headquartered there and yeah there people would be growing in the 80s is when I started really becoming politically aware and then the letters to the editor because Kodak was downsizing so was IBM and all the letters were talking about how it used to be that you know there was loyalty and you put in your hours in the company

79
00:07:52.100 --> 00:08:00.100
I do, too, and it's probably my person. I don't mean to say this too glibly, but I think I have Attention Deficit Disorder.

80
00:08:00.100 --> 00:08:06.100
The idea of just doing one thing for 30 years just seems inconceivable to me, so you're right.

81
00:08:06.100 --> 00:08:10.100
And this technological progress, it is accelerating.

82
00:08:10.100 --> 00:08:17.100
And we just take for granted that every time we buy a new computer that's supposed to do things, then something little happens.

83
00:08:17.100 --> 00:08:46.620
What about the next chapter that is titled spread the work? What is a spread the work

84
00:08:46.620 --> 00:08:51.540
Scheme. Is this an anachronism these days, or no? No, I don't think it's an anachronism,

85
00:08:51.540 --> 00:08:54.900
because most examples, so the Spread the Work Scheme is just the idea that there's a fixed

86
00:08:54.900 --> 00:09:00.300
amount of work to be done, and so it would be unfair, you know, left to their own devices,

87
00:09:00.300 --> 00:09:03.860
these greedy businessmen would have just picked the most efficient laborers, the ones that

88
00:09:03.860 --> 00:09:06.780
they could give the lowest wages to, and they would do all the work and everyone else would

89
00:09:06.780 --> 00:09:11.740
be out of a job, and so we need to have the government or unions come in and put rules

90
00:09:11.740 --> 00:09:16.580
in place to spread this fixed amount of work around to make sure everyone gets some pay

91
00:09:16.580 --> 00:09:20.700
Pay and get some work in there that would allow there to be more consumer spending and

92
00:09:20.700 --> 00:09:24.660
things like that. So that's the idea. And no, most of the examples Hazlitt gives are

93
00:09:24.660 --> 00:09:30.180
things like federal rules on overtime pay. He said part of the motivation, the explicit

94
00:09:30.180 --> 00:09:34.820
motivation for that when they put those rules into place was we want to give businessmen

95
00:09:34.820 --> 00:09:39.020
an incentive not, you know, if they have 80 hours of work to be done, don't give it all

96
00:09:39.020 --> 00:09:44.140
to the most productive guy. Give 40 hours to one person and 40 hours to somebody else.

97
00:09:44.140 --> 00:09:48.140
So it wasn't about human rights, it was just a sort of silly economic thing.

98
00:09:48.140 --> 00:09:53.100
Right, yeah, Hazlitt clarified, he said some of those things were an issue like prohibitions

99
00:09:53.100 --> 00:09:54.620
on child labor and things like that.

100
00:09:54.620 --> 00:09:58.940
He said he thinks a lot of the motivation was a sort of, this is unseemly, but he said

101
00:09:58.940 --> 00:10:03.100
nobody thought working 50 hours a week was going to physically break someone's back,

102
00:10:03.100 --> 00:10:07.420
and that the precise quantitative amounts for some of these things were clearly and

103
00:10:07.420 --> 00:10:12.620
explicitly ideas of during the Depression and what have you, we've got to really spread

104
00:10:12.620 --> 00:10:13.620
the work around.

105
00:10:13.620 --> 00:10:43.620
and then he just goes through and quotes all these ridiculous union regulations, things that I know are still in force today, maybe not the specifics, but the idea that there needs to be the electrician on site to screw in a light bulb and really ridiculous things where someone can't do the work of someone else or else you have to pay him an extra day's wages and you have to pay the guy who should have done it and just all these crazy things. You encounter that in large cities even now.

106
00:10:43.620 --> 00:11:13.620
The Theory of Money and Credit The Theory of Money and Credit The Theory of Money and Credit

107
00:11:13.620 --> 00:11:16.620
You know, if there weren't these official regulations, obviously.

108
00:11:16.620 --> 00:11:23.620
So we live with the remnants of this fallacy, but is the fallacy itself still around? Do you hear it?

109
00:11:23.620 --> 00:11:30.620
I guess, I don't think I hear as much now as Hazlitt seems to make it sound it being prevalent then.

110
00:11:30.620 --> 00:11:35.620
I mean, some of the other stuff in his book about, you know, the benefits of a tornado,

111
00:11:35.620 --> 00:11:39.620
boosting GDP because now we have to rebuild, I mean, those sorts of things,

112
00:11:39.620 --> 00:11:50.620
The Broken Window Fallacy, I see a lot more now. The Spread the Work idea, it's still embedded in union propaganda, but I haven't seen that being trumpeted too much.

113
00:11:50.620 --> 00:11:52.620
I haven't asked you what's wrong with it. What's wrong with actually Spread the Work?

114
00:11:52.620 --> 00:11:55.620
With the Spread the Work scheme? We're just assuming that this is stupid.

115
00:11:55.620 --> 00:12:06.620
Yeah, we know it's wrong, but again, just to plug Haslitt's book, you know the stuff's got to be wrong, but he just goes through and says, let's make sure we understand why it's wrong.

116
00:12:06.620 --> 00:12:12.740
And with this he said, okay, so let's say the government or the union or what have you

117
00:12:12.740 --> 00:12:16.340
just sets up a rule where, okay, now there's a certain amount of people working and why

118
00:12:16.340 --> 00:12:21.940
don't we say you have to work 75% of the hours you used to and that's the rule.

119
00:12:21.940 --> 00:12:24.780
He said there's two ways, two things that can happen.

120
00:12:24.780 --> 00:12:30.520
So if we allow the business to cut wages and so that the workers who used to be employed

121
00:12:30.520 --> 00:12:36.220
working so much now earn 75% in their paycheck, he said, well then, you know, all you've done

122
00:12:36.220 --> 00:12:41.220
The problem is they're giving some of their money to the people who now fill the gap in it.

123
00:12:41.220 --> 00:12:46.220
So it's not that society is richer and you're just benefiting one group at the expense of the other.

124
00:12:46.220 --> 00:12:51.220
You're not helping labor because obviously the workers who now get their hours cut back are worse off.

125
00:12:51.220 --> 00:12:57.220
And then he said on the other hand, if you insist that, no, no, let's cut back their hours,

126
00:12:57.220 --> 00:13:02.220
but you still have to give them the same gross paycheck every week and then also then decide what you want to do.

127
00:13:02.220 --> 00:13:04.220
The Theory of Money and Credit

128
00:13:32.220 --> 00:13:37.900
Yeah, you just say in the original equilibrium before this intervention, things were the

129
00:13:37.900 --> 00:13:43.420
way they were for a certain reason, and even there Hazlitt clarified that this is under

130
00:13:43.420 --> 00:13:46.780
the most generous assumptions that really what happens is the people who are working

131
00:13:46.780 --> 00:13:50.380
the most are the most productive. And so if you arbitrarily say you can't work as much

132
00:13:50.380 --> 00:13:55.780
and give that job to somebody else, then the total amount of output drops because now you're

133
00:13:55.780 --> 00:13:58.220
giving the work to people who aren't as efficient.

134
00:13:58.220 --> 00:14:05.220
It's an example of government regulations creating people as some sort of... acting as if all workers are homogenous.

135
00:14:05.220 --> 00:14:17.220
In this and in the previous chapter 2, the curse of machinery, he stresses over and over that one of the main things that's wrong with this is this idea that there's a set amount of work that needs to be done and who's going to do it.

136
00:14:17.220 --> 00:14:23.020
when no in general if wages can adjust you can hire as many people as want to

137
00:14:23.020 --> 00:14:26.820
work and so then the issue is not there's a these are the tasks to be done

138
00:14:26.820 --> 00:14:30.820
who's going to do it but no different tasks can be done I mean labor's scarce

139
00:14:30.820 --> 00:14:34.180
and you put workers into where they're most highly needed and then if more

140
00:14:34.180 --> 00:14:37.440
machinery comes in oh great now we can do more stuff we can accomplish more

141
00:14:37.440 --> 00:14:41.180
things and so you always channel workers to where they're needed most on the

142
00:14:41.180 --> 00:14:45.300
margins observation that there's always work to do isn't just an empirical

143
00:14:45.300 --> 00:14:48.260
You've got an observation of a certain time and a place, but it's always true, always

144
00:14:48.260 --> 00:14:49.260
everywhere, isn't it?

145
00:14:49.260 --> 00:14:50.260
Right, yeah.

146
00:14:50.260 --> 00:14:52.300
I mean, you've got to, I suppose, come up with crazy scenarios.

147
00:14:52.300 --> 00:14:56.820
If there were 10 trillion people and someone would be, you know, labor would no longer

148
00:14:56.820 --> 00:14:57.820
be scarce.

149
00:14:57.820 --> 00:15:03.540
But yeah, this is clearly, in any practical sense, there's always more work to be done.

150
00:15:03.540 --> 00:15:06.500
The reason people stop working is because on the margin they say, you know what, my

151
00:15:06.500 --> 00:15:07.820
leisure is more important.

152
00:15:07.820 --> 00:15:12.460
It's not because there's absolutely nothing that human creativity in a pair of hands couldn't

153
00:15:12.460 --> 00:15:19.460
Thank you very much, Dr. Murphy, for your wonderful talk.