WEBVTT

NOTE Colonial America and the American Revolution

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:30.000
and over the next hour and since I remember I've taken undergraduate and graduate courses in both the colonial period and the American Revolution this will have to be a bit abbreviated but I hope to raise at least a few themes that I think are useful and even indispensable in understanding this period and I begin by noting I don't think professor Livingston is is here that's a shame okay that's alright well because I don't know if the point that I'm going to attribute to him

2
00:00:30.000 --> 00:00:47.000
Professor Livingston's point is that we sometimes use the term founders, the founders of the United States, to refer to the founding generation and the great men who founded the country.

3
00:00:47.000 --> 00:00:53.000
But there's something misleading about this word because obviously the United States wasn't just in an instant founded out of nothing, out of whole cloth.

4
00:00:53.000 --> 00:00:57.000
It obviously owes something to the colonial inheritance.

5
00:00:57.000 --> 00:01:27.000
And I just came across a book and I'm going to mention it to you even though you'll never find it because it's from 1897 but it's a book that's extremely interesting on the topic of where the Constitution came from and it's a book that explores the colonial inheritance and the book is by Sydney George Fisher and it's called, this is the title, I love these 19th century titles, The Evolution of the Constitution of the United States, showing that it is a development

6
00:01:27.000 --> 00:01:32.000
of Progressive History and Not an Isolated Document Struck Off at a Given Time.

7
00:01:32.000 --> 00:01:38.000
So in a sense you don't even need to read the book after you hear that.

8
00:01:38.000 --> 00:01:44.000
But the author goes through 29 colonial charters and constitutions, 17 revolutionary constitutions,

9
00:01:44.000 --> 00:01:51.000
23 plans of union in order to derive the constitution that we have now.

10
00:01:51.000 --> 00:02:01.000
So, in fact, if we discuss where American liberty comes from, you have to start not just with the 1780s, but look back into the colonial period.

11
00:02:01.000 --> 00:02:12.000
Now, some of you may be familiar with a book by David Hackett Fisher. It's enormous, 800 or 900 pages, called Albion Seed, Four British Folkways in America.

12
00:02:12.000 --> 00:02:19.000
We're almost tired of hearing about it, even though it's a great book, and just have a few sentences on that and then jump right in.

13
00:02:19.000 --> 00:02:34.000
In Fisher's book, he argues that in a sense you can see four discrete waves of migration to the United States, and we're talking 17th and 18th centuries here.

14
00:02:34.000 --> 00:02:42.000
And he's talking about roughly the period from 1629 through 1775 is the period that he looks at most closely.

15
00:02:42.000 --> 00:02:54.500
Closely. Beginning with the emigration of English Puritans from the east of England to Massachusetts Bay and concluding with the stirrings of revolution, four distinct geographical regions of England we can see.

16
00:02:54.500 --> 00:03:06.500
So after the Puritans, Fisher identifies as a second group a small putative aristocracy and a sizable number of indentured servants originating in the south of England who made their way to Virginia.

17
00:03:06.500 --> 00:03:11.500
The third migration originated in the North Midlands of England and Wales and terminated in the Delaware Valley

18
00:03:11.500 --> 00:03:18.500
later in the 17th century going into the 18th, and finally from approximately 1718 through 1775

19
00:03:18.500 --> 00:03:23.500
a fourth group consisting of immigrants from the borders of North Britain and Northern Ireland

20
00:03:23.500 --> 00:03:25.500
made their way to the Appalachian back country.

21
00:03:25.500 --> 00:03:31.500
Now obviously all these groups share a number of obvious and important traits in common.

22
00:03:31.500 --> 00:03:34.500
They hailed from the same part of Europe, obviously.

23
00:03:34.500 --> 00:03:40.500
They spoke a common language, and at least in a broad sense, they all shared the same religion.

24
00:03:40.500 --> 00:03:47.500
Interestingly, in the Federalist Papers, Federalist No. 2, one of the few that John Jay wrote,

25
00:03:47.500 --> 00:03:50.500
John Jay, of course, became the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court,

26
00:03:50.500 --> 00:03:58.500
John Jay cited these shared common characteristics as one of the factors that made the American Union possible.

27
00:03:58.500 --> 00:04:26.500
Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people, a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs.

28
00:04:26.500 --> 00:04:29.500
So you notice he's saying the exact opposite of diversity is our strength.

29
00:04:29.500 --> 00:04:32.300
He's saying, just the opposite, sameness is our strength.

30
00:04:32.300 --> 00:04:37.600
This would have been, this Aurelian statement would have been completely incomprehensible to him, of course.

31
00:04:37.600 --> 00:04:42.100
But the notable thing about Fisher's book is that he notes, yes, there are these basic similarities,

32
00:04:42.100 --> 00:04:47.700
but that a lot of times what the colonies noticed about themselves was how different they were from each other.

33
00:04:47.700 --> 00:04:53.000
For instance, in the mid-17th century, one Puritan, speaking of Virginians, declared them, quote,

34
00:04:53.000 --> 00:04:59.800
The farthest from conscience and moral honesty of any such number together in the world.

35
00:04:59.800 --> 00:05:05.200
Likewise, the Virginian William Byrd, referring to the Puritans, warned a correspondent,

36
00:05:05.200 --> 00:05:11.200
A watchful eye must be kept upon these foul traitors.

37
00:05:11.200 --> 00:05:15.500
And the two groups in turn shared a dislike of the Quakers.

38
00:05:15.500 --> 00:05:20.900
And it reminds me, I had a, my college roommate was a Mormon who went on his mission in the,

39
00:05:20.900 --> 00:05:28.900
In the former Yugoslavia, people over there don't like each other, but I'm sure they can all agree they don't like the Mormons.

40
00:05:28.900 --> 00:05:31.900
Good luck, have fun over there.

41
00:05:31.900 --> 00:05:37.900
But it was frequently said that the Society of Friends, as the Quakers were known,

42
00:05:37.900 --> 00:05:43.900
would, quote, pray for their fellow men one day a week and on them the other six.

43
00:05:43.900 --> 00:06:13.900
Likewise, the Quakers returned the favor, and here's what I like, the Quakers, I don't know how many of you know much about them, they're sort of a left-wing, in a sense a left-wing Puritan sect, the Puritans are people who think the Anglicans, I don't know how many of you know anything about Protestant or Christian denominations, I mean I know about them but that's because I'm a strange person, but the Anglicans have not de-Catholicized fast enough for the Puritans, the Puritans want, you know, at least, and there are other theological

44
00:06:13.900 --> 00:06:16.900
The Quakers think the Puritans have not purified enough.

45
00:06:16.900 --> 00:06:20.900
The Quakers will have their services not even in a church, in a meeting house,

46
00:06:20.900 --> 00:06:23.900
and sometimes the whole meeting, no one will speak.

47
00:06:23.900 --> 00:06:25.900
And they would consider that satisfactory.

48
00:06:25.900 --> 00:06:27.900
You speak when you're moved to speak.

49
00:06:27.900 --> 00:06:29.900
It's very egalitarian.

50
00:06:29.900 --> 00:06:34.900
So for them, the Puritans are just an outrage, just barbaric that they would have

51
00:06:34.900 --> 00:06:37.900
these backward customs of a structured,

52
00:06:37.900 --> 00:06:45.400
and just an outrage, just barbaric that they would have these backward customs of a structured sort of liturgy.

53
00:06:45.400 --> 00:06:50.400
And even though the Quakers believed in religious toleration, the principle of religious toleration,

54
00:06:50.400 --> 00:06:53.900
that doesn't mean they were wimps. They believed you should be a Quaker.

55
00:06:53.900 --> 00:07:00.900
So before Pennsylvania was founded, which is where, of course, a lot of the Quakers eventually moved beginning in the 1680s,

56
00:07:00.900 --> 00:07:04.900
some of the Quakers had started to come to the colonies, in particular Rhode Island,

57
00:07:34.900 --> 00:07:40.500
up and down the church aisles to rile these people up about their dogmatic religion and

58
00:07:40.500 --> 00:07:41.500
the need to...

59
00:07:41.500 --> 00:07:44.900
And you can just imagine these sort of staid Puritans wondering, who the hell are these

60
00:07:44.900 --> 00:07:47.140
damn people, right?

61
00:07:47.140 --> 00:07:51.860
So in Massachusetts, they didn't know what to do with these people.

62
00:07:51.860 --> 00:07:57.380
And by the late 1650s, very reluctantly, the Puritans in Massachusetts actually by one

63
00:07:57.380 --> 00:08:03.060
vote passed the death penalty for Quakers who came up and were disruptive.

64
00:08:03.060 --> 00:08:07.860
And they reluctantly did this, because the problem is they kept making the penalty worse and worse,

65
00:08:07.860 --> 00:08:12.260
but that made the Quakers come in greater and greater numbers. They were seeking martyrdom.

66
00:08:12.260 --> 00:08:15.660
So they, you know, they cut off people's ears and they would still come back.

67
00:08:15.660 --> 00:08:21.860
So finally they went with the death penalty, and my favorite story is of Mary Dyer from an island who went up there.

68
00:08:21.860 --> 00:08:25.460
She went up to the mass grave several times. They kept throwing her out, get out of here, get out of here.

69
00:08:25.460 --> 00:08:29.060
Well, one of the times she was up there, she was with two male companions.

70
00:08:29.060 --> 00:08:34.860
I don't know what the circumstances were, but she's with her two male companions, and she's causing problems.

71
00:08:34.860 --> 00:08:39.740
So the Massachusetts authorities sentenced her and the companions to death.

72
00:08:39.740 --> 00:08:46.020
So they're led to the scaffold. Her two male companions are executed in front of her, and now it is her turn.

73
00:08:46.020 --> 00:08:51.340
And again, they beg her, you know, please, just leave, and we won't kill you.

74
00:08:51.340 --> 00:08:54.540
They were very uncomfortable executing a woman. Just get out of here.

75
00:08:54.540 --> 00:08:58.340
She said, no, no, no, I must stay here and protest this unjust law against the Quakers.

76
00:08:58.340 --> 00:09:00.500
Well, they finally said, all right, look, we just get out of here.

77
00:09:00.500 --> 00:09:01.260
They just pushed her out.

78
00:09:01.260 --> 00:09:02.380
They literally threw her out.

79
00:09:02.380 --> 00:09:03.140
Get out.

80
00:09:03.140 --> 00:09:04.420
And then she came back again.

81
00:09:04.420 --> 00:09:07.340
And finally, they said, all right, this time, we have to execute her.

82
00:09:07.340 --> 00:09:08.340
Unbelievable.

83
00:09:08.340 --> 00:09:11.820
So this is the situation that they're faced with.

84
00:09:11.820 --> 00:09:15.780
The fact is, they just don't care for each other a lot of times

85
00:09:15.780 --> 00:09:17.900
in the colonies.

86
00:09:17.900 --> 00:09:21.740
As late as 1795, one Quaker referred to New England in general

87
00:09:21.740 --> 00:09:23.660
as the flock of cane.

88
00:09:23.660 --> 00:09:26.340
So what I'm getting at with all this is that the fact that they

89
00:09:26.340 --> 00:09:33.340
The fact that we don't like each other is actually very fortuitous, because it means, as one of the points that Fisher later makes in his book,

90
00:09:33.340 --> 00:09:40.340
he didn't make all of these peculiar points, but one of the points that he makes in his book is that when it comes time to make a constitution,

91
00:09:40.340 --> 00:09:45.340
nobody wants the Quakers to have any authority over them or New England or anything else.

92
00:09:45.340 --> 00:09:51.340
So in fact, you get a fairly laissez-faire approach in various areas of life.

93
00:09:51.340 --> 00:09:59.340
For example, very often we hear about, at the Constitutional Convention, there's a struggle between the small states and the large states.

94
00:09:59.340 --> 00:10:06.340
Fisher says, yeah, that's moderately interesting, but what's also interesting is the competing regional cultures that are at work,

95
00:10:06.340 --> 00:10:10.340
all these different cultures that are sometimes mutually antagonistic. How are they dealt with?

96
00:10:10.340 --> 00:10:17.340
So when we look, for instance, at the First Amendment, and I promise I won't be treading upon Professor Livingston's Constitution talk,

97
00:10:17.340 --> 00:10:29.340
The First Amendment is written in deceptively simple language, and yet, says Fisher, it entails a regional compromise of the highest complexity.

98
00:10:29.340 --> 00:10:36.340
Because on the one hand, you want to preserve the religious liberty of Virginia and of Pennsylvania,

99
00:10:36.340 --> 00:10:40.340
but at the same time, New England is not going to let you encroach upon their established churches.

100
00:10:40.340 --> 00:10:44.340
So what position does the Constitution take? None whatsoever.

101
00:10:44.340 --> 00:10:48.460
make up your own decisions, we're not going to impose uniformity on you.

102
00:10:48.460 --> 00:10:52.380
So in a sense, precisely because of the mutual antagonism, the differences,

103
00:10:52.380 --> 00:10:55.260
the response of the Constitution is silence.

104
00:10:55.260 --> 00:10:59.500
And so that's why I say that their mutual dislike

105
00:10:59.500 --> 00:11:04.140
to know them is to hate them, to quote an eminent Austrian economist,

106
00:11:04.140 --> 00:11:08.020
was in fact fortuitous. Now obviously there's much more than mutual

107
00:11:08.020 --> 00:11:09.140
antagonism

108
00:11:09.140 --> 00:11:13.260
going on here that accounts for American liberty.

109
00:11:13.260 --> 00:11:30.860
There is the fact that the American colonists did not see themselves as having some kind of a utopian task of remaking the whole world, and they were immensely practical men.

110
00:11:30.860 --> 00:11:37.660
Now it's true, you can cite a few people to the contrary, that's true.

111
00:11:37.660 --> 00:11:41.780
But when you compare the Americans to the French, the French Revolutionaries, for instance,

112
00:11:41.780 --> 00:11:45.900
the Americans are not going to establish a new calendar, a brand new calendar.

113
00:11:45.900 --> 00:11:50.940
Well, let's date everything from the year one when we first started, I don't know, executing Quakers or something.

114
00:11:50.940 --> 00:11:54.460
We'll start the calendar then, and it just wouldn't have occurred to them to do that.

115
00:11:54.460 --> 00:12:01.100
And Professor Reiko mentioned that I've got this collection of writings of Rufus Choate coming out.

116
00:12:01.100 --> 00:12:06.700
Nobody knows who he is. He was a Daniel Webster clone in Massachusetts.

117
00:12:06.700 --> 00:12:11.820
and but Rufus Choate, it was a mid 19th century observer who wrote about the colonial period

118
00:12:11.820 --> 00:12:15.820
and he looked back at it and he said here's something very noteworthy about the colonial period

119
00:12:16.460 --> 00:12:20.620
so I have this passage from Choate. There was another great work which they, meaning the

120
00:12:20.620 --> 00:12:26.060
colonists, had to do and that was to establish their system of colonial government, to frame

121
00:12:26.060 --> 00:12:30.860
their code of internal law and to administer the vast and perplexing political business of the

122
00:12:30.860 --> 00:12:35.500
colonies in their novel and trying relations to England through the whole colonial age.

123
00:12:35.500 --> 00:12:41.500
Of all their labors, this was the grandest, the most intellectual, the best calculated to fit them for independence.

124
00:12:41.500 --> 00:12:50.500
Consider how much patient thought, how much observation of man and life, how much sagacity, how much communication of mind with mind,

125
00:12:50.500 --> 00:12:59.500
how many general councils, plots, and marshalling of affairs, how much slow accumulation, how much careful transmission of wisdom that labor demanded.

126
00:12:59.500 --> 00:13:04.500
And what a school of civil capacity this must have proved to them who partook in it.

127
00:13:04.500 --> 00:13:13.000
Hence, I think, the sober, rational and practical views and conduct which distinguished even the first fervent years of the Revolutionary Age.

128
00:13:13.000 --> 00:13:16.500
How little giddiness, rant and foolery do you see there.

129
00:13:16.500 --> 00:13:21.500
No riotous and shouting processions, no grand festivals of the goddess of reason.

130
00:13:21.500 --> 00:13:23.500
I wonder what he's talking about there.

131
00:13:23.500 --> 00:13:32.500
No impious dream of human perfectibility, no unloosing of the hoarded up passions of ages from the restraints of law, order, morality and religion.

132
00:13:32.500 --> 00:13:38.500
and then he becomes frank, such as shamed and frightened away the newborn liberty of revolutionary France.

133
00:13:38.500 --> 00:13:43.500
Hence, our victories of peace were more brilliant, more beneficial than our victories of war.

134
00:13:43.500 --> 00:13:47.500
So they were practical people. Now it's true, you read the Puritans,

135
00:13:47.500 --> 00:13:51.500
and John Winthrop uses the biblical city on a hill analogy.

136
00:13:51.500 --> 00:13:53.500
I always love listening to neoconservatives who say,

137
00:13:53.500 --> 00:13:57.500
as Ronald Reagan said, we are a city on a hill.

138
00:13:57.500 --> 00:14:08.500
Yeah, he said that. Anyway, when he says that, he doesn't mean we're a city on a hill, then we're going to run around the world and, you know, hillify the rest of the world.

139
00:14:08.500 --> 00:14:15.500
The purpose of the city on a hill analogy, imagery, was to say that we will be visible to the rest of the world.

140
00:14:15.500 --> 00:14:25.500
They can see our example of what a peaceful social order we have and prosperity we have when we follow the Bible in the way that we think right.

141
00:14:25.500 --> 00:14:40.500
It was not meant to be something that would be an image, an imperialistic image, but of course later, when the later generations of Puritans had lost their faith, and all they had were the slogans, like John Dewey.

142
00:14:40.500 --> 00:14:48.500
John Dewey is raised in a typical Protestant church, and he loves the bake sales and the dances, the picnics, but he doesn't believe in God.

143
00:14:48.500 --> 00:14:52.500
So he wants to keep having the picnics and the bake sales and everything else.

144
00:14:52.500 --> 00:14:58.500
So those people use this kind of Puritan language in a way that it was not intended to be used.

145
00:14:58.500 --> 00:15:02.500
I have to say some nice things about Massachusetts. I come from there.

146
00:15:02.500 --> 00:15:08.500
Now it's true. I'm not saying you would want to have lived in Massachusetts in the 17th century.

147
00:15:08.500 --> 00:15:13.500
You might get thrown out. They would throw you out if you didn't conform to...

148
00:15:13.500 --> 00:15:23.500
If you lived in New England town, and they weren't going to go into your home and ask about the inner workings of your conscience. That was private.

149
00:15:23.500 --> 00:15:31.500
But in Massachusetts, of course, I'm not sure how much you know about this, but obviously it was somewhat theocratic.

150
00:15:31.500 --> 00:15:36.500
In order to be able to vote, not that voting is everything, but you had to be a church member.

151
00:15:36.500 --> 00:16:06.500
in order to be a church member you had to be in effect interviewed by about seven what were called pillars of the church and they would sit you down and ask you questions and they would want to know about your conversion experience and they would want to know you know and if this seemed persuasive to them and it seemed to them as if you were one of the elect God had chosen to go to heaven then you would become a church member even if you didn't get chosen to be a church member you still had to go to church because that might be just the thing for you would be sort of their

152
00:16:06.500 --> 00:16:13.500
So that's true. But on the other hand, and there was something sort of utopian about their little communities.

153
00:16:13.500 --> 00:16:18.500
For instance, the dead of Massachusetts, still in existence, their covenant.

154
00:16:18.500 --> 00:16:27.500
Part of what their covenant said was that we shall by all means labor to keep off from us all such as are contrary minded

155
00:16:27.500 --> 00:16:31.500
and receive only such unto us as may probably be of one heart with us.

156
00:16:31.500 --> 00:16:52.500
The idea is that we would have a community that would be of one mind, and I happen to think that much as I'm not sympathetic to this form of Protestantism, I think a lot of what John Winthrop wrote about his vision of the community is rather beautiful, so, you know, throw me in jail or something.

157
00:16:52.500 --> 00:17:03.500
Anyway, but on the other hand, there is, so we all know about this community aspect of New England life, and that sometimes it could be stifling, and that yes, they would throw Roger Williams out or whatever.

158
00:17:03.500 --> 00:17:19.500
But on the other hand, we should take, for instance, the Massachusetts Body of Liberties, 1641, is a significant document that shows that on the other hand, there was a concern for individual rights and for limitation of state power.

159
00:17:19.500 --> 00:17:26.500
What's notable about this is that the long-time governor of Massachusetts Bay was John Winthrop.

160
00:17:26.500 --> 00:17:34.500
And Winthrop's view was that there should be as little written law as possible,

161
00:17:34.500 --> 00:17:43.500
because he thought the less written law there is, the more discretion he and his judges will have in applying the Bible into particular cases.

162
00:17:43.500 --> 00:17:52.500
So that meant, now John Winthrop was, you know, a reasonable person, but that meant you had to trust John Winthrop quite a lot and his judges.

163
00:17:52.500 --> 00:18:03.500
And much as people of Massachusetts obviously respected him, they kept voting him back in, they voted him out temporarily because they realized this discretion is simply too great.

164
00:18:03.500 --> 00:18:10.500
We would like to have some kind of a written description of what our rights are. And so you get the Massachusetts body of liberties.

165
00:18:10.500 --> 00:18:19.500
Now, there are over a hundred provisions of the Massachusetts Body of Liberties, and they include items that are familiar to the student of British law and politics.

166
00:18:19.500 --> 00:18:32.500
So, in the Massachusetts Body of Liberties, there are things like no taxation without representation, the right to a jury trial, the guarantee that no person would be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.

167
00:18:32.500 --> 00:18:38.700
Law. It also contains a sort of peculiar provision prohibiting wife beating excepting when the

168
00:18:38.700 --> 00:18:48.620
husband is acting in self-defense, interestingly. Kind of an odd thing to mention. Now, in Jack

169
00:18:48.620 --> 00:18:54.700
Green, who is one of the great colonial historians, has a book called Pursuits of Happiness in

170
00:18:54.700 --> 00:19:00.740
which he argues that if you look at the colonies, there's a sort of a continuum with some of

171
00:19:00.740 --> 00:19:08.740
I saw them on one side beginning as very community-oriented and other ones being much more individualistic.

172
00:19:08.740 --> 00:19:14.740
So for instance, New England in its first several generations would fall on the first category

173
00:19:14.740 --> 00:19:18.740
because that was a self-consciously family-oriented migration.

174
00:19:18.740 --> 00:19:21.740
It wasn't just a bunch of single guys moving to Massachusetts.

175
00:19:21.740 --> 00:19:28.740
These were families who moved there and they had strong community identity and so on and so forth.

176
00:19:28.740 --> 00:19:33.820
Whereas, on the other hand, you had colonies like Virginia, which I'll say a few things

177
00:19:33.820 --> 00:19:36.600
about in a second, that start off just the opposite.

178
00:19:36.600 --> 00:19:41.900
That did start off mainly as single men, just a bunch of single men going to Virginia.

179
00:19:41.900 --> 00:19:46.080
And as you can probably expect, that worked out just great, the first generation or so.

180
00:19:46.080 --> 00:19:47.080
No problems there.

181
00:19:47.080 --> 00:19:51.120
Only half of them died.

182
00:19:51.120 --> 00:19:54.900
And the thing is that because Virginia, the first generation or so, there was disease

183
00:19:54.900 --> 00:20:04.900
The Death Trap and the Chesapeake

184
00:20:24.900 --> 00:20:34.900
The Pressure of a Growing Population

185
00:20:54.900 --> 00:21:24.900
The cohesive community type colony is going to begin to dissipate in a certain way, whereas on the other hand, Virginia that had started off sort of like this, as it becomes prosperous and they realize that tobacco seems like a great source of prosperity, people begin to move there, it becomes more cohesive, more settled, and you get a kind of an aristocracy there that is very, very committed to self-government and local liberties.

186
00:21:24.900 --> 00:21:34.900
In fact, in Virginia, they are so dedicated to their local, every time they speak about my country, of course, they mean Virginia.

187
00:21:34.900 --> 00:21:44.900
They're so committed to this that, for instance, the House of Burgesses, the Legislative Assembly, which was the first representative assembly, which was established in 1619,

188
00:21:44.900 --> 00:21:54.900
In the House of Burgesses in Virginia, it was actually a law that if you were a member of the House of Burgesses, every member had to be present, especially for the opening session.

189
00:21:54.900 --> 00:22:03.900
So it was kind of a sense that we have a special responsibility toward the people and toward our local area.

190
00:22:03.900 --> 00:22:07.900
And I always mention poor James Bray in 1691.

191
00:22:07.900 --> 00:22:20.900
The House of Burgesses was so offended by his explanation for his absence that a warrant for his arrest was actually issued and he was held in custody until he made an apology because he was not there the first time.

192
00:22:20.900 --> 00:22:29.900
So this, you know, is kind of an anecdotal way of illustrating the attachment that the Virginians had to their locality.

193
00:22:29.900 --> 00:22:37.900
And that's worth noting. Even Daniel Boorstin, who's sort of a neoconish type historian, has this to say about them.

194
00:22:37.900 --> 00:22:42.900
And this is very important. When he says they, he's talking about the Virginians.

195
00:22:42.900 --> 00:22:46.900
Their localism has been given far too little attention and too little credit.

196
00:22:46.900 --> 00:22:56.900
In these days, when states' rights are out of fashion, we are too often told that a man's preoccupation with the habits of the place where he lives can only drag the national progress.

197
00:22:56.900 --> 00:23:00.900
We are fortunate that 18th century Virginians thought differently.

198
00:23:00.900 --> 00:23:04.900
Their concern with the special requirements of their own particular place on earth

199
00:23:04.900 --> 00:23:07.900
not only flavored their political life and expectations,

200
00:23:07.900 --> 00:23:11.900
it also gave all their thinking the aroma of the specific

201
00:23:11.900 --> 00:23:15.900
and kept all their social ideals within finite bounds.

202
00:23:15.900 --> 00:23:21.900
So again, the utopian sentiment is nowhere to be found that tends to be so mischievous.

203
00:23:21.900 --> 00:23:24.900
So therefore, what I'm getting at is that the colonies succeeded on the one hand

204
00:23:24.900 --> 00:23:29.860
on the one hand in providing the individual liberty that makes a rational and civilized

205
00:23:29.860 --> 00:23:35.820
life possible, while at the same time cultivating a corporate sentiment that provided a source

206
00:23:35.820 --> 00:23:40.780
of resistance to centralizing and consolidationist schemes.

207
00:23:40.780 --> 00:23:45.700
Remember Professor Livingston's point about the tendency of the modern state to want to

208
00:23:45.700 --> 00:23:49.980
flatten out all of these things, well it was not easy to flatten these things out.

209
00:23:49.980 --> 00:23:55.300
I would just mention very quickly the classical liberal Benjamin Constant, a great figure,

210
00:23:55.300 --> 00:24:00.380
had this to say about the importance of the kind of local institutions that were being

211
00:24:00.380 --> 00:24:02.580
built up in the colonies.

212
00:24:02.580 --> 00:24:07.220
The interests and memories which are born of local customs contain a germ of resistance

213
00:24:07.220 --> 00:24:12.720
which authority suffers only with regret and which it hastens to eradicate.

214
00:24:12.720 --> 00:24:15.360
With individuals it has its way more easily.

215
00:24:15.360 --> 00:24:32.360
The French revolutionaries, of course, despised the local customs and particularities that dotted their country's landscape and reorganized France into arbitrary departments that bore no relation to its historic regions.

216
00:24:32.360 --> 00:24:39.360
In our own century, the deliberate and coordinated destruction of local institutions and intermediary associations

217
00:24:39.360 --> 00:24:42.860
has been a principal weapon of various totalitarian systems

218
00:24:42.860 --> 00:24:45.860
in eliminating potential sources of resistance.

219
00:24:45.860 --> 00:24:48.360
Hitler, of course, despised German federalism,

220
00:24:48.360 --> 00:24:52.360
which he correctly perceived as an obstacle to his consolidation of power.

221
00:24:52.360 --> 00:24:55.860
Stalin, for his part, attempted to starve Ukraine into submission

222
00:24:55.860 --> 00:24:58.860
when standard Soviet propaganda proved insufficient

223
00:24:58.860 --> 00:25:01.860
to divest it of its traditional national feeling.

224
00:25:01.860 --> 00:25:04.860
In the soft totalitarianism of social democracy,

225
00:25:04.860 --> 00:25:08.360
we have seen how our own government has abetted social upheavals

226
00:25:08.360 --> 00:25:11.360
at the local level in order to strengthen its control everywhere.

227
00:25:11.360 --> 00:25:15.360
I'll have more to say about that later in the week.

228
00:25:15.360 --> 00:25:17.360
Okay, there are a million other things.

229
00:25:17.360 --> 00:25:18.360
We're going to move on. Let's see.

230
00:25:18.360 --> 00:25:20.360
I think I'm doing okay on time. I'm doing all right.

231
00:25:20.360 --> 00:25:22.360
Okay, good. Okay.

232
00:25:22.360 --> 00:25:26.360
In fact, now is a good time for some water.

233
00:25:26.360 --> 00:25:28.360
Talk amongst yourselves.

234
00:25:28.360 --> 00:25:31.360
Okay, I'm ready.

235
00:25:31.360 --> 00:25:36.360
Another theme to note about all this that relates to the building up of local institutions is that

236
00:25:36.360 --> 00:25:44.360
is that from the beginning we see the colonies being extremely suspicious of any kind of confederation, right from the beginning.

237
00:25:44.360 --> 00:25:51.360
I can think of three examples off the top of my head, because I've sort of given a similar talk before, sort of why it's on the top of my head,

238
00:25:51.360 --> 00:26:01.360
but I can give three examples of confederations that were or were not entered into, and that reveal something about the Americans at this time,

239
00:26:01.360 --> 00:26:10.360
at this time, how suspicious they were about, you know, would their rights be taken away from them if they entered into a confederation for some good purpose?

240
00:26:10.360 --> 00:26:20.360
So, for instance, it was only belatedly that the Puritans entered into an inter-colonial alliance, the so-called Confederation of New England.

241
00:26:20.360 --> 00:26:29.360
Persistent rumors of Indian hostilities and ongoing suspicions of the Narragansett tribe in particular led the colonies to consider this move.

242
00:26:29.360 --> 00:26:34.360
And yet, in the classic American tradition, the colonists kept a close watch on this confederation.

243
00:26:35.360 --> 00:26:43.360
So, for instance, New England had lived without incident for some years in increasing proximity to New Netherland.

244
00:26:43.360 --> 00:26:48.360
But when in 1652 Cromwell attacked the Netherlands and the two mother countries were thus at war,

245
00:26:48.360 --> 00:26:53.360
the possibility of a colonial clash with each side arming its Indian allies worried New Englanders.

246
00:26:53.360 --> 00:26:57.360
And Connecticut and New Haven began to beat the drums for war and said,

247
00:26:57.360 --> 00:27:02.840
This is what the Confederation of New England was made for, to go and prevent these things

248
00:27:02.840 --> 00:27:03.840
from happening.

249
00:27:03.840 --> 00:27:07.860
And yet it was at this moment that Massachusetts, who was a member of the Confederation, stood

250
00:27:07.860 --> 00:27:12.520
up and questioned the right of the Confederation to declare offensive war.

251
00:27:12.520 --> 00:27:14.540
This was not the understanding that we had.

252
00:27:14.540 --> 00:27:18.360
And they absolutely, in a sense, used an early form of nullification, said, we're not going

253
00:27:18.360 --> 00:27:25.440
to obey this plan of the Confederation to launch a preventive war.

254
00:27:25.440 --> 00:27:31.240
So right away, you see a colony keeping watch over a confederation, rising up against it,

255
00:27:31.240 --> 00:27:37.040
refusing to go along, and containing that great American spirit that is still so present

256
00:27:37.040 --> 00:27:42.120
in our population today.

257
00:27:42.120 --> 00:27:43.120
I was being sarcastic.

258
00:27:43.120 --> 00:27:51.280
I'm sorry, that's from the Simpsons, actually, but I'll give you that story later.

259
00:27:51.280 --> 00:27:56.320
Likewise, also, there is another example, the Dominion of New England, now this was

260
00:27:56.320 --> 00:28:02.720
a confederation that was imposed on the colonies, partly in an effort to make sure that British

261
00:28:02.720 --> 00:28:10.680
trade regulations would be enforced more effectively, and partly out of a concern, supposedly, for

262
00:28:10.680 --> 00:28:16.560
the colony's defense against New France, King James II in the 1680s established the Dominion

263
00:28:16.560 --> 00:28:21.580
of New England. So he took Massachusetts, and Maine, and New Hampshire, and then later

264
00:28:21.580 --> 00:28:27.960
other colonies, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, and others, and formed them into

265
00:28:27.960 --> 00:28:33.120
one government with one royally appointed governor. Now this was obviously people didn't

266
00:28:33.120 --> 00:28:37.160
take kindly to this. What are you doing? You're just going to take our local institutions

267
00:28:37.160 --> 00:28:42.760
and throw them in the garbage so that we can all, and plus making New York and New Jersey

268
00:28:42.760 --> 00:28:47.760
in the same organization, this is just not going to fly with anybody.

269
00:28:47.760 --> 00:28:52.260
Nobody wants to be in an organization with Rhode Island, either, because they're a bunch of...

270
00:28:52.260 --> 00:28:56.260
The colonial view of Rhode Island the whole time was they were a bunch of freaks to stay away from them.

271
00:28:56.260 --> 00:29:01.260
They were called Rogue Island. When they didn't send any representatives to the Constitutional Convention,

272
00:29:01.260 --> 00:29:06.260
people were happy. Well, good. We were just being polite.

273
00:29:06.260 --> 00:29:10.760
But anyway, so James II established this dominion of New England,

274
00:29:10.760 --> 00:29:15.800
And the colonists were just waiting for an opportunity to smash this thing.

275
00:29:15.800 --> 00:29:24.440
And in particular, it would have been difficult to keep them merged into this one royal government for very long, even in the best of circumstances.

276
00:29:24.440 --> 00:29:29.160
But it was Sir Edmund Andros who was sent over to be the royal governor of this new dominion.

277
00:29:29.160 --> 00:29:36.320
And of course, as you can hear from what I said, it included much more than what is today known as New England.

278
00:29:36.320 --> 00:29:40.880
Andros, for instance, would just levy taxes just by his own fiat,

279
00:29:40.880 --> 00:29:45.800
and if you protested this, he'd throw you in jail, and that grates on people after a while.

280
00:29:45.800 --> 00:29:48.000
You can't really keep doing that.

281
00:29:48.000 --> 00:29:52.360
And after the Glorious Revolution, and of course, there are no fax machines,

282
00:29:52.360 --> 00:29:54.960
so it takes a while for the colonies to find out what's happened.

283
00:29:54.960 --> 00:29:58.640
There's a completely new regime in England.

284
00:29:58.640 --> 00:30:03.320
They get word in Boston that the new King and Queen, William and Mary,

285
00:30:03.320 --> 00:30:09.320
They wanted all magistrates who have been unjustly turned out to resume their former employment.

286
00:30:09.320 --> 00:30:15.320
That is to say, allow the colonies to reestablish their governments.

287
00:30:15.320 --> 00:30:21.320
As Borsten puts it, the machine-like precision with which this parallel revolution unrolled

288
00:30:21.320 --> 00:30:25.320
points to careful plans and leadership which no one has yet unearthed.

289
00:30:25.320 --> 00:30:28.320
The townspeople rose, the countryside rose,

290
00:30:28.320 --> 00:30:32.320
Andros and some of his principal counselors were thrown into jail.

291
00:30:32.320 --> 00:30:36.020
A meeting presided over by the last governor under the Bay Colony Charter

292
00:30:36.020 --> 00:30:39.820
adopted the Declaration of the Gentlemen, Merchants and Inhabitants

293
00:30:39.820 --> 00:30:42.320
that had been drawn up by Cotton Mather.

294
00:30:42.320 --> 00:30:46.320
And the dominion was at an end and self-rule was again in effect.

295
00:30:46.320 --> 00:30:48.920
It was this same spirit that led the colonists to reject

296
00:30:48.920 --> 00:30:53.120
Benjamin Franklin's proposed Albany Plan of Union in 1754.

297
00:30:53.120 --> 00:30:55.720
By the way, obviously all of you should own

298
00:30:55.720 --> 00:30:59.020
Murray Rothbard's Conceived in Liberty collection, four volumes.

299
00:30:59.020 --> 00:31:01.320
I've been nagging Jeff Tucker for years.

300
00:31:01.320 --> 00:31:03.920
I'd love to see this thing get put back into print.

301
00:31:03.920 --> 00:31:07.280
You know, I'm marking up the library copy,

302
00:31:07.280 --> 00:31:12.360
and I didn't really feel that guilty about that because I had to use it,

303
00:31:12.360 --> 00:31:15.160
and it's so useful.

304
00:31:15.160 --> 00:31:18.520
I mean, just imagine reading Murray Rothbard on colonial merit.

305
00:31:18.520 --> 00:31:21.640
He finds all the evil people and exposes them.

306
00:31:21.640 --> 00:31:25.000
He's the only historian who understands monetary history

307
00:31:25.000 --> 00:31:26.060
in the colonial period.

308
00:31:26.060 --> 00:31:28.740
All the other historians say, well, according to everyone,

309
00:31:28.740 --> 00:31:31.000
there was a shortage of species.

310
00:31:31.000 --> 00:31:33.000
So therefore they needed paper money.

311
00:31:33.000 --> 00:31:36.200
You just think, well, I'm pleading with you people.

312
00:31:36.200 --> 00:31:38.500
And also one of the great things is his portrayal

313
00:31:38.500 --> 00:31:40.000
of Benjamin Franklin.

314
00:31:40.000 --> 00:31:42.800
He's withering, Murray's withering on Benjamin Franklin.

315
00:31:42.800 --> 00:31:43.760
He's a big jerk.

316
00:31:43.760 --> 00:31:47.320
He goes along with all these, all these British, you know,

317
00:31:47.320 --> 00:31:49.040
he recommends to one of his friends,

318
00:31:49.040 --> 00:31:51.500
oh, you should become a stamp tax agent.

319
00:31:51.500 --> 00:31:53.400
What is wrong with you?

320
00:31:53.400 --> 00:31:55.640
Or he's in favor of paper money inflation

321
00:31:55.640 --> 00:31:57.700
because it turns out, well, his print shop

322
00:31:57.700 --> 00:32:00.000
is gonna get the contract for the money.

323
00:32:00.000 --> 00:32:05.680
What a classic Rothbardian find that fact is, you know, man, we knew it was a conspiracy all along.

324
00:32:05.680 --> 00:32:17.280
Well, anyway, Benjamin Franklin, under the pressure of Indian War, helped to drop a scheme according to which the colonies would yield a considerable amount of their authority to a new inter-colonial governing structure.

325
00:32:17.280 --> 00:32:22.640
How many colonial assemblies ratified this plan? Zero. So there is that spirit again.

326
00:32:22.640 --> 00:32:27.440
To heck with your confederations, we're concerned about them, we think they're a threat to our liberty.

327
00:32:27.440 --> 00:32:34.440
So this is why I would argue that it's sort of misleading to say the traditional, the tradition of American liberty, you just start with the Constitution, you move forward.

328
00:32:34.440 --> 00:32:44.440
In fact, you know, of course, we all know the Constitution probably step back, step away, you know, I have seven different hats on the Constitution, depending on where I am.

329
00:32:44.440 --> 00:32:52.440
If I'm talking to Hillary Clinton, I'm very pro-Constitution, but when I'm with this crowd, you know, ah, throw it out, who needs?

330
00:32:52.440 --> 00:33:01.440
Anyway, at the time of the framing of the Constitution, which sort of brings up, that's about the boundary of my talk,

331
00:33:01.440 --> 00:33:08.440
and the formation of an allegedly more perfect union, the colonists had precedents for challenging the powers of a confederation,

332
00:33:08.440 --> 00:33:15.440
as in the case of the Confederation of New England, for rejecting a confederation, as in the case of the Albany Plan of Union,

333
00:33:15.440 --> 00:33:20.440
and for bringing down a confederation by force, as in the case of the Dominion of New England.

334
00:33:20.440 --> 00:33:37.440
So it can hardly be surprising, therefore, that at the time, to learn that at the time of the ratification of the Constitution, three states, Virginia, New York, and Rhode Island, in exceeding to the new confederation, explicitly reserved the right to withdraw from the new union.

335
00:33:37.440 --> 00:33:43.440
And as Virginia said, when so ever the same shall be perverted to her injury or oppression.

336
00:33:43.440 --> 00:33:47.440
Apparently that hasn't happened yet in New York. They love it, I guess, or something, I don't know.

337
00:33:47.440 --> 00:33:55.440
In so doing, they were only exercising the vigilance and libertarian principle that had animated the American experience during the colonial period.

338
00:33:55.440 --> 00:34:07.440
So what we see from the colonial period, and the basic lesson it has to teach us, is that really the classic American sentiment is not Andrew Jackson's famous toast.

339
00:34:07.440 --> 00:34:13.900
Post, Our Federal Union, it must be preserved, but John C. Calhoun's beautiful reply, The

340
00:34:13.900 --> 00:34:18.000
Union Next to Our Liberties, Most Dear.

341
00:34:18.000 --> 00:34:21.200
Now that might sound like a nice way to end, boy, that's really dramatic, but I've got

342
00:34:21.200 --> 00:34:23.880
78 other things to say, so I'm going to move on.

343
00:34:23.880 --> 00:34:28.120
It would have been a great ending, but now I had to talk about, it was the ending, I

344
00:34:28.120 --> 00:34:31.000
think, for something else that I did, but now we've talked about things having to do

345
00:34:31.000 --> 00:34:32.000
with the revolution.

346
00:34:32.000 --> 00:34:35.000
Now obviously the revolution, good, I think I got, I don't know, 17 minutes and I got

347
00:34:35.000 --> 00:34:39.960
Leave some time for questions. So a few themes that might be useful when looking

348
00:34:39.960 --> 00:34:44.520
at the revolution. And then the question is, is it a revolution? Is it just a war

349
00:34:44.520 --> 00:34:48.400
for independence? Was it radical? Was it conservative? I'll give a few thoughts on

350
00:34:48.400 --> 00:34:54.200
this. I think for me the most impressive thing when you study the years leading

351
00:34:54.200 --> 00:34:58.480
up to the colonists decision to make the break with Britain is the level of

352
00:34:58.480 --> 00:35:01.960
sophistication of some of some of their arguments. I mean you know sometimes

353
00:35:01.960 --> 00:35:07.400
Sometimes they're right, sometimes they're wrong, but they're dealing with very profound

354
00:35:07.400 --> 00:35:09.560
issues in many cases.

355
00:35:09.560 --> 00:35:14.120
So for instance, 1761, and this is long before people had thought about making a break with

356
00:35:14.120 --> 00:35:19.280
England, but we all remember about James Otis talking about the general writs of assistance,

357
00:35:19.280 --> 00:35:24.640
which were in a sense search warrants that you could get with practically no evidence

358
00:35:24.640 --> 00:35:28.520
and just barge into people's homes to check to see if they're smuggling.

359
00:35:28.520 --> 00:35:35.880
James Otis stood up and spoke out against this, the renewal of the writs of assistance.

360
00:35:35.880 --> 00:35:43.080
And this is sort of significant. The colonists were totally against the writs of assistance,

361
00:35:43.080 --> 00:35:47.000
partly because they were completely guilty. I mean, they're all smuggling. They're smuggling

362
00:35:47.000 --> 00:35:50.440
like there's no tomorrow. So, of course, they don't want somebody to come into my home.

363
00:35:50.440 --> 00:35:55.720
I got all the, you know, whatever I'm not supposed to have. There's that. But also,

364
00:35:55.720 --> 00:36:07.720
Also, the fairly sophisticated argument that Otis is making has to do with what does it mean for something to be constitutional when you don't have a written document, as, of course, the British have an unwritten constitution.

365
00:36:07.720 --> 00:36:20.720
Is something constitutional simply because Parliament says it is, hence legal positivism, or does it have to conform to some accumulated set of traditions and common practices and customs?

366
00:36:20.720 --> 00:36:25.560
And the latter position, of course, was the American one.

367
00:36:25.560 --> 00:36:28.640
But of course, Parliament would often say, well, we approved it.

368
00:36:28.640 --> 00:36:30.560
Where's the room for argument?

369
00:36:30.560 --> 00:36:32.360
Where's the further need for argument?

370
00:36:32.360 --> 00:36:34.200
This is a very interesting issue.

371
00:36:34.200 --> 00:36:37.400
And Otis is not successful.

372
00:36:37.400 --> 00:36:39.520
But this is the type of thing that Sam Adams, who's

373
00:36:39.520 --> 00:36:43.760
sort of the poor man's James Otis, can popularize issues

374
00:36:43.760 --> 00:36:46.240
like this and explain them to ordinary people.

375
00:36:46.240 --> 00:36:49.600
Now today, I think it would take about three hours

376
00:36:49.600 --> 00:36:52.240
to explain this idea to people.

377
00:36:52.240 --> 00:36:54.760
But at the time, people read, they're interested in things,

378
00:36:54.760 --> 00:36:58.080
they discuss things in taverns, and so on.

379
00:36:58.080 --> 00:37:02.760
Another thing is, for instance, 1764, the American Revenue Act,

380
00:37:02.760 --> 00:37:04.760
sometimes known as the Sugar Act.

381
00:37:04.760 --> 00:37:08.160
Now, there are many reasons that Americans

382
00:37:08.160 --> 00:37:10.120
might have been against this act.

383
00:37:10.120 --> 00:37:12.000
And I don't have time to go into all of them,

384
00:37:12.000 --> 00:37:14.880
but in Murray Rothbard's book, there's

385
00:37:14.880 --> 00:37:18.640
fantastic treatment of this particular act.

386
00:37:18.640 --> 00:37:35.640
But I would just note one thing. We all know, and I think it was Dr. Higgs who pointed this out in the first talk, that the British had imposed a series of trade regulations that would pertain to colonial trade for the purpose of enriching the mother country, frankly.

387
00:37:35.640 --> 00:37:45.640
And what's notable is that in principle, you don't really see the colonists in principle opposing that. In practice they oppose it, they just smuggle and they just ignore it.

388
00:37:45.640 --> 00:37:53.640
In principle, they say, the British government has the authority to regulate the trade on behalf of the good of the mother country.

389
00:37:53.640 --> 00:37:56.640
In principle, that's basically their position.

390
00:37:56.640 --> 00:38:05.640
Now, in this American Revenue Act, another thing you also know is that for a long time, a lot of these regulations had just not been enforced very well.

391
00:38:05.640 --> 00:38:08.640
They just looked the other way, and so on.

392
00:38:08.640 --> 00:38:18.640
Well, one of the things we see in this American Revenue Act is that up till now, there had been an absolutely prohibitive tariff on molasses from the French and Dutch West Indies.

393
00:38:18.640 --> 00:38:24.640
You get your molasses from the British West Indies, and you obviously see why they would do that.

394
00:38:24.640 --> 00:38:36.640
Well, as a result, in 1764, the American Revenue Act actually lowered the tariff on foreign molasses considerably, and yet the colonists were furious at this.

395
00:38:36.640 --> 00:38:42.640
Now, this is something, you know, you would just think, most people would just wonder why would you be upset about lowering a tariff.

396
00:38:42.640 --> 00:38:45.640
But notice the principle that's involved here.

397
00:38:45.640 --> 00:38:48.640
Nobody paid the tariff when it was a million percent.

398
00:38:48.640 --> 00:38:51.640
I mean, nobody paid a hundred percent tariff. Nobody was paying that.

399
00:38:51.640 --> 00:38:54.640
And it was not really bringing in revenue.

400
00:38:54.640 --> 00:38:59.640
In fact, the British trade regulations, it cost them, up to about 1764,

401
00:38:59.640 --> 00:39:05.640
it was costing the British government on the order of four times as much to enforce the trade regulations

402
00:39:05.640 --> 00:39:08.000
as they got in revenues from the tariffs collected.

403
00:39:08.000 --> 00:39:11.320
So it wasn't meant to be a source of revenue for the British government.

404
00:39:11.320 --> 00:39:16.040
But if you lower the tariff, it might make it possible or reasonable for some people to

405
00:39:16.040 --> 00:39:22.040
pay that tariff, to purchase the formal assets and pay the tariff, and therefore become a

406
00:39:22.040 --> 00:39:23.740
source of revenue for the British government.

407
00:39:23.740 --> 00:39:26.600
So suddenly now, it seems like it's a nice thing.

408
00:39:26.600 --> 00:39:27.600
They're playing nice.

409
00:39:27.600 --> 00:39:28.600
They're lowering the tariff.

410
00:39:28.600 --> 00:39:32.280
But in fact, it's a sneaky way of engaging in taxation without representation.

411
00:39:32.280 --> 00:39:33.280
Now that's great.

412
00:39:33.280 --> 00:39:38.680
You know, that's great! What a sophisticated argument that is, in my opinion.

413
00:39:38.680 --> 00:39:42.880
And again, it's something that you think would just, whoosh, over most people's heads.

414
00:39:42.880 --> 00:39:46.280
As far as I can see, the tariff is lower.

415
00:39:46.280 --> 00:39:51.080
And that's what, you know, Tom Brokaw says is lower, so I guess, uh...

416
00:39:51.080 --> 00:39:55.280
I always tell my students to rile them up that, you know, this, and I don't single them out,

417
00:39:55.280 --> 00:40:01.880
but I say, the American population today is exactly the type of people King George III would love to have dealt with.

418
00:40:01.880 --> 00:40:04.920
They do as little as possible, they don't learn anything,

419
00:40:04.920 --> 00:40:08.840
they speak in slogans that, you know, on bumper stickers or in the newspaper.

420
00:40:08.840 --> 00:40:10.800
Beautiful, beautiful.

421
00:40:10.800 --> 00:40:14.200
You know, I mean, I could just imagine King George III coming up with a slogan,

422
00:40:14.200 --> 00:40:17.800
the king is your friend, and then going up to people and saying,

423
00:40:17.800 --> 00:40:19.600
oh my gosh, look at what they're doing.

424
00:40:19.600 --> 00:40:22.600
Yeah, but the king is our friend.

425
00:40:22.600 --> 00:40:27.280
Oh, gosh. Anyway, 1767, one more example.

426
00:40:27.280 --> 00:40:30.560
The, what do you call it, the Townshend Acts had to do,

427
00:40:30.560 --> 00:40:39.560
Well, there are several things involved with them, but in this case you've got tariffs imposed on lead, paper, paint, glass and tea.

428
00:40:39.560 --> 00:40:44.560
Now obviously the items themselves are not that significant, but what is significant is,

429
00:40:44.560 --> 00:40:54.560
all right, you've got another taxation issue and there are issues related to that, but what were the British going to do with the revenue they got from these particular taxes?

430
00:40:54.560 --> 00:41:00.880
was of even greater significance because up till now, many of the colonies had royal governors,

431
00:41:00.880 --> 00:41:05.360
royally appointed governors. That was the way that England could keep a kind of a hand

432
00:41:05.360 --> 00:41:14.200
in these governments. But the colonial legislatures retained the right to pay the governor's salary.

433
00:41:14.200 --> 00:41:18.240
So if the governor got out of line, you would just threaten not to pay his salary. And you'd

434
00:41:18.240 --> 00:41:23.680
be amazed at how quickly they would turn around on issues like this. Well, one of the things

435
00:41:23.680 --> 00:41:29.680
The reason why this is going to be done with these tariffs is that the British would take the revenue and pay the governor's salaries with it.

436
00:41:29.680 --> 00:41:37.680
So that the one restraint that remained to the colonists would be violently destroyed.

437
00:41:37.680 --> 00:41:40.680
And now they would have really no control over these governors.

438
00:41:40.680 --> 00:41:45.680
Now these are, you know, this isn't just, well they raised some taxes and the colonies didn't like it.

439
00:41:45.680 --> 00:41:47.680
Okay, that's true, that's true.

440
00:41:47.680 --> 00:41:57.680
but all these issues are, you know, they show really good functioning minds and these are issues that were being popularized for ordinary people

441
00:41:57.680 --> 00:42:03.680
and yet in each case, and this is where I think maybe I differ a little bit from Murray Rothbard and I hate to do this

442
00:42:03.680 --> 00:42:10.680
but in this case there's always this question of is the American Revolution a radical event or a conservative event

443
00:42:10.680 --> 00:42:16.680
because you get the Russell Kirk's of the world and you know I'm sure he has his fine qualities, Russell Kirk

444
00:42:16.680 --> 00:42:20.880
It seems like every book... I don't know if this is being recorded or not, but who cares?

445
00:42:20.880 --> 00:42:26.480
Every book is the same thing. You know, like, you can't have liberty without order. Okay, I got you.

446
00:42:26.480 --> 00:42:31.880
And they would say that it was conservative because...

447
00:42:31.880 --> 00:42:36.280
Well, actually, let's hold that up. There was another argument that the American Revolution was actually rather radical.

448
00:42:36.280 --> 00:42:41.480
And some of the things you might cite in this regard were the fact that by percentage of the population,

449
00:42:41.480 --> 00:42:46.380
there were actually, in a sense, more emigres in the American Revolution than in the French one.

450
00:42:46.380 --> 00:42:50.380
People who just had to flee to get out, people who were British loyalists and so on,

451
00:42:50.380 --> 00:42:53.380
and that indicates a certain spirit of radicalism.

452
00:42:53.380 --> 00:42:56.380
But notice in each of the cases that I've mentioned here,

453
00:42:56.380 --> 00:42:58.380
and I didn't just pick these because they work,

454
00:42:58.380 --> 00:43:01.380
all the cases basically follow this model,

455
00:43:01.380 --> 00:43:03.380
what are the colonists really upset about?

456
00:43:03.380 --> 00:43:08.380
They're upset that in each case the British are guilty of an innovation.

457
00:43:08.380 --> 00:43:12.380
The colonists are the ones who want to continue along the traditional path

458
00:43:12.380 --> 00:43:15.380
of self-government, the traditional rights of Englishmen,

459
00:43:15.380 --> 00:43:23.380
The British are guilty of doing something new, of engaging in innovation.

460
00:43:23.380 --> 00:43:29.380
That's very different. That's why I tend to think that it is a conservative event in the best sense of the word conservative.

461
00:43:29.380 --> 00:43:33.380
Conserve good things. These rights that they had were good things.

462
00:43:33.380 --> 00:43:41.380
That's why I come down on this side of things, because on the other hand, if you look at the French Revolution,

463
00:43:41.380 --> 00:43:45.660
that's just innovation after innovation after innovation and there's no logical

464
00:43:45.660 --> 00:43:48.760
stopping point you can always keep innovating whereas the the American

465
00:43:48.760 --> 00:43:53.220
Revolution when it's over it's over you know and that's that's anyway that's

466
00:43:53.220 --> 00:43:57.500
that's my my take on all this the final thing I would I would note and and the

467
00:43:57.500 --> 00:44:00.140
thing and the more I read Murray Rothbard's take on this the more I think

468
00:44:00.140 --> 00:44:04.180
this may just be a semantic some of this is just a semantic difference but I want

469
00:44:04.180 --> 00:44:07.180
to say I think I've got a little just a few more minutes we start a few minutes

470
00:44:07.180 --> 00:44:13.180
I know we want to stay on schedule, but it's very kind of you, sir. I appreciate that.

471
00:44:13.180 --> 00:44:19.180
I want to just put a couple things on. I haven't used this whiteboard once, and let's use that.

472
00:44:19.180 --> 00:44:23.180
It's a crying shame, but there's one more point I want to make,

473
00:44:23.180 --> 00:44:28.180
and plus this will be a beautiful segue into Professor Livingston's talk, I assume.

474
00:44:28.180 --> 00:44:35.180
And that is this. I want to just show very, very ridiculously briefly one more point

475
00:44:35.180 --> 00:44:40.940
And how the colonial period and the revolutionary years can be brought to bear to settle a very,

476
00:44:40.940 --> 00:44:45.900
very important historical dispute that has gone on since probably the 1830s.

477
00:44:45.900 --> 00:44:48.880
Now I don't know, again, what the relative level of knowledge is here.

478
00:44:48.880 --> 00:44:50.560
Some of you may be experts on this.

479
00:44:50.560 --> 00:44:52.860
Some of you may never have heard about this before.

480
00:44:52.860 --> 00:44:59.420
But really beginning about the 1830s, in a systematic way, you start to see two different

481
00:44:59.420 --> 00:45:04.340
schools of thought trying to explain what is the nature of the American Union.

482
00:45:04.340 --> 00:45:08.240
You have what might be referred to as a nationalist school and you have what might be referred

483
00:45:08.240 --> 00:45:10.240
to as a compact school.

484
00:45:10.240 --> 00:45:22.740
So here we go, put them on the board.

485
00:45:22.740 --> 00:45:26.940
And basically the question that comes up here is, when the United States becomes the United

486
00:45:26.940 --> 00:45:32.980
States, when the Constitution is formed beyond, even before the Constitution, what do we have

487
00:45:32.980 --> 00:45:33.980
on our hands here?

488
00:45:33.980 --> 00:45:41.980
Do we have a single people taken in the aggregate, the American people, and they founded the United States, and it's one and indivisible?

489
00:45:41.980 --> 00:45:49.980
Or do we have a series of independent states coming together to form a confederation that's these people?

490
00:45:49.980 --> 00:46:00.980
Now, it's true, if you look in the Constitution, well, it's true that you can see the words,

491
00:46:00.980 --> 00:46:09.980
We, the people, do ordain and establish, and it looks like, well, the people of the United States did it, so I guess these people win.

492
00:46:09.980 --> 00:46:16.980
The nationalist people, by the way, that argument totally doesn't work. It's the only argument they have and it totally doesn't work, but you can ask me about that later.

493
00:46:16.980 --> 00:46:24.980
These people, who are these people? Who are the guilty parties? From Massachusetts, my home.

494
00:46:24.980 --> 00:46:32.980
Everything's named after Daniel Webster. Take the Daniel Webster Highway and then pass the Daniel Webster Liberty Tree and then turn right on it.

495
00:46:32.980 --> 00:46:41.980
Then there's Joseph Story, great jurist. He's telling kind of a story.

496
00:46:41.980 --> 00:46:43.980
And finally...

497
00:46:50.980 --> 00:46:52.980
I don't know how you people feel about Lincoln.

498
00:46:56.980 --> 00:46:58.980
That's supposed to be a skull and crossbones.

499
00:46:59.980 --> 00:47:04.980
Just give me a few minutes, and if you have a question, I'll try to take one question at the end, or you can see me afterwards.

500
00:47:04.980 --> 00:47:08.980
On the other hand, you've got great people. You're totally thrilled to be siding with them.

501
00:47:08.980 --> 00:47:16.980
Thomas Jefferson

502
00:47:16.980 --> 00:47:24.980
Calhoun

503
00:47:24.980 --> 00:47:32.980
Abel Upshur

504
00:47:32.980 --> 00:47:42.980
A Brief Inquiry into the True Nature and Character of Our Federal Government

505
00:48:02.980 --> 00:48:12.980
and why does this matter? What are the practical consequences of what might seem a fairly obscure issue of political theory?

506
00:48:12.980 --> 00:48:22.980
And the answer is this, obviously, if you view the United States as being a compact among states, then you're much more likely,

507
00:48:22.980 --> 00:48:28.980
it makes much more logical sense, to support things like nullification, which is an issue I don't have time to get into,

508
00:48:28.980 --> 00:48:35.980
or secession, because, for instance, Lincoln, who holds this other view that it's just one big unbreakable hole,

509
00:48:35.980 --> 00:48:41.980
for Lincoln, secession is just an arbitrary, states are just sort of arbitrary lines around an arbitrary group of people,

510
00:48:41.980 --> 00:48:48.980
and so if a state secedes, Lincoln sees this as treason of one part of an unbreakable hole breaking away,

511
00:48:48.980 --> 00:48:57.980
whereas these people see this as the supreme act of sovereignty, of a sovereign state withdrawing from a confederation

512
00:48:57.980 --> 00:49:00.260
and Federation that it joined.

513
00:49:00.260 --> 00:49:02.300
Well, throughout the whole colonial period,

514
00:49:02.300 --> 00:49:04.740
now obviously you can go into much more depth about this,

515
00:49:04.740 --> 00:49:07.660
but the whole colonial period totally vindicates

516
00:49:07.660 --> 00:49:10.020
these people, it completely vindicates them.

517
00:49:10.020 --> 00:49:14.260
Story in his book on the subject goes completely overboard

518
00:49:14.260 --> 00:49:16.420
and says that the Americans have been one people

519
00:49:16.420 --> 00:49:17.780
since the colonial period.

520
00:49:17.780 --> 00:49:19.900
They've been one people, just one people.

521
00:49:19.900 --> 00:49:22.700
Well, let me just read very quickly, very, very quickly,

522
00:49:22.700 --> 00:49:24.220
just a little bit from Abel Upshur,

523
00:49:24.220 --> 00:49:37.740
The colonial governments were clothed with the sovereign power of making laws and of enforcing obedience to them from their own people.

524
00:49:37.740 --> 00:49:43.500
The people of one colony owed no allegiance to the government of any other colony and were not bound by its laws.

525
00:49:43.500 --> 00:49:49.180
The colonies had no common legislature, no common treasury, no common military power, no common judiciary.

526
00:49:49.180 --> 00:49:52.620
The people of one colony were not liable to pay taxes to any other,

527
00:49:52.620 --> 00:49:58.220
nor to bear arms in its defense, they had no right to vote in its elections, etc., etc., etc., etc.

528
00:49:58.220 --> 00:50:03.820
And there's just so many more things that... And he goes on and on and on.

529
00:50:03.820 --> 00:50:10.300
For instance, suppose there had been one colony that had not gone along with the Declaration of Independence.

530
00:50:10.300 --> 00:50:14.700
Would the other colonies, does anybody think the other colonies would have had the right

531
00:50:14.700 --> 00:50:18.620
to coerce that colony because, hey, you're one people with us,

532
00:50:18.620 --> 00:50:20.820
You've got to join with us against the British.

533
00:50:20.820 --> 00:50:22.820
You know, no one says that.

534
00:50:22.820 --> 00:50:26.020
Now, the other colonies may well have viewed that one as their enemy,

535
00:50:26.020 --> 00:50:28.820
but they would have had no right to accuse it of treason.

536
00:50:28.820 --> 00:50:32.220
That colony would have been in the same position as Canada

537
00:50:32.220 --> 00:50:34.820
in the midst of this, in the midst of all this.

538
00:50:34.820 --> 00:50:39.020
And there are so many arguments that these folks make, but none of them work.

539
00:50:39.020 --> 00:50:42.020
And the final thing I would just note very quickly is

540
00:50:42.020 --> 00:50:53.320
Even the Continental Congress, which during the Revolutionary War, there was kind of a national government, sort of,

541
00:50:53.320 --> 00:51:00.520
but it was something that was established for practical purposes, had no authority to force the states to do anything,

542
00:51:00.520 --> 00:51:10.020
depended on the subsequent ratification of its acts on the states, and that is sometimes cited as well.

543
00:51:10.020 --> 00:51:12.580
Well, they were one people, they had this government.

544
00:51:12.580 --> 00:51:19.620
Well, the colonies, nevertheless, were engaging in acts of sovereignty all this time.

545
00:51:19.620 --> 00:51:24.140
Ticonderoga was taken by the troops of Connecticut before the Declaration of Independence.

546
00:51:24.140 --> 00:51:28.620
Massachusetts and Connecticut fitted out armed vessels to cruise against those of England

547
00:51:28.620 --> 00:51:29.620
in 1775.

548
00:51:29.620 --> 00:51:31.620
South Carolina followed their example.

549
00:51:31.620 --> 00:51:35.780
And even in treaties and everything, especially in the provisional articles with Great Britain

550
00:51:35.780 --> 00:51:39.780
in 1782, by which our independence was acknowledged, proceeded upon this same idea, and this is

551
00:51:39.780 --> 00:51:51.780
This is my final point. His Britannic Majesty acknowledges the said United States to wit New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island, and lists them all, each to be a free, sovereign and independent state.

552
00:51:51.780 --> 00:51:58.780
So the British acknowledge that they were dealing with the common agent of 13 independent sovereignties.

553
00:51:58.780 --> 00:52:04.780
There is no mystical, because all these people have to rely on is emotion and mysticism.

554
00:52:04.780 --> 00:52:05.780
and Socialism.

555
00:52:05.780 --> 00:52:06.780
Oh, we've always been all one people.

556
00:52:06.780 --> 00:52:12.220
But then you actually bring law to them, and that's just seen as being very pedestrian.

557
00:52:12.220 --> 00:52:14.100
How could you actually give us legal arguments?

558
00:52:14.100 --> 00:52:15.300
We've all been one people.

559
00:52:15.300 --> 00:52:19.700
This is all crazy stuff, and it has a lot to do with, I think, the artificiality that

560
00:52:19.700 --> 00:52:22.660
Professor Livingston talked about when he talked about the modern state.

561
00:52:22.660 --> 00:52:23.940
You have these people to thank for that.

562
00:52:23.940 --> 00:52:27.180
I wish I didn't have to rush through this so much, but I think I've already gone over

563
00:52:27.180 --> 00:52:28.180
a minute.

564
00:52:28.180 --> 00:52:29.180
I'm sorry.

565
00:52:29.180 --> 00:52:30.180
I don't know what happens to me.

566
00:52:30.180 --> 00:52:31.420
I'll take one less minute next time.

567
00:52:31.420 --> 00:52:32.420
But what happens here?

568
00:52:32.420 --> 00:52:33.420
Do I take questions?

569
00:52:33.420 --> 00:52:53.420
Okay, except in passing you didn't mention much about the Declaration of Independence, nor natural law, and how much this helped shape the future nation.

570
00:53:03.420 --> 00:53:06.420
and the Declaration and the various ways that people have interpreted it.

571
00:53:06.420 --> 00:53:09.420
It didn't occur to author Schlesinger either.

572
00:53:09.420 --> 00:53:12.420
Yeah, yeah, well, you know, surprise.

573
00:53:12.420 --> 00:53:18.420
But Professor Higgs was telling me earlier that there are a couple of very interesting books that have just come out.

574
00:53:18.420 --> 00:53:24.420
One of them is a series of essays on kind of an intellectual exploration of the Declaration.

575
00:53:24.420 --> 00:53:27.420
I can't remember the... he can tell us about that later.

576
00:53:27.420 --> 00:53:31.420
But I mean, off the top of my head, it's hard to give a quick answer

577
00:53:31.420 --> 00:53:59.420
You're talking about the radical versus conservative argument, perhaps one of the reasons that the revolution might appear radical is because it's so radical in the mainstream of the state that it's not making progress today.

578
00:53:59.420 --> 00:54:02.420
Even what's concerning them right now.

579
00:54:29.420 --> 00:54:31.420
but you know we started a little late. Thank you.
