WEBVTT

NOTE Great Society and the Republican Welfare State

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:15.000
He'll get me for that. There's one thing I want to say. You know, talking about the great society today, pretty easy in this group. I assume everybody's against it.

2
00:00:15.000 --> 00:00:26.000
But there's one last thing I want to say, a little leftover business from yesterday. And I recommended a book by Thomas Sowell. It really is loud. I feel like I'm sort of whispering.

3
00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:56.000
Actually, that's okay. I recommended this book by Thomas Sowell, and I called it Civil Rights, Rhetoric or Reality, and I said you should get it, it refutes every myth, it's outstanding, extremely well done, and it's a very short book, concise, and packs a punch, and I didn't mention because it just didn't occur to me, I wasn't thinking, but it's interesting to note that for those of you who don't know, Sowell is a black man, and I mention that simply because that means that the civil rights establishment

4
00:00:56.000 --> 00:01:02.000
has made his life just a ceaseless joy, constantly.

5
00:01:02.000 --> 00:01:06.000
He gets invited to all the fancy cocktail parties and all the conferences,

6
00:01:06.000 --> 00:01:09.000
and they treat his work very seriously.

7
00:01:09.000 --> 00:01:15.000
They've never caricatured his work or misrepresented him or tried to make him look ridiculous.

8
00:01:15.000 --> 00:01:21.000
And he notes in his final chapter, he makes reference to the fact that he's a black guy,

9
00:01:21.000 --> 00:01:25.000
but just in passing, because he was mentioning that at Cornell University,

10
00:01:55.000 --> 00:01:57.000
The Theory of Money and Credit

11
00:02:25.000 --> 00:02:32.000
Dr. Gordon, is David Bado's book called From Mutual Aid to Welfare State? Is that the title?

12
00:02:32.000 --> 00:02:36.000
Sounds familiar? Okay, it's something like this, okay?

13
00:02:36.000 --> 00:02:41.000
Now this has nothing to do with the Great Society, but it's still somewhat relevant.

14
00:02:41.000 --> 00:02:48.000
Alright, let's see. It's worth looking at.

15
00:02:55.000 --> 00:03:00.000
Okay, you should look at this.

16
00:03:00.000 --> 00:03:07.000
Now this does not deal with the period that I'm dealing with,

17
00:03:07.000 --> 00:03:14.000
but it looks at the question, it looks at what did ordinary people do

18
00:03:14.000 --> 00:03:17.000
before there really was an advanced welfare state?

19
00:03:17.000 --> 00:03:19.000
What had people done?

20
00:03:19.000 --> 00:03:23.000
I think this is the one case in which I'm recommending a book that I haven't read,

21
00:03:23.000 --> 00:03:31.000
I have read several of Beto's unpublished papers on the subject because he gave them to me, and I like what he's done.

22
00:03:31.000 --> 00:03:40.000
But he shows how ordinary people used fraternal associations and like organizations to provide mutual aid in the absence of a welfare state

23
00:03:40.000 --> 00:03:47.000
and how they were able to get cut rate medical insurance and so on and on through this voluntary means.

24
00:03:47.000 --> 00:03:53.720
and that this particular function began to atrophy in the 1930s or so

25
00:03:53.720 --> 00:03:56.280
because the government sort of supplanted it.

26
00:03:56.280 --> 00:04:00.520
But it's an interesting way of considering this question of what would...

27
00:04:00.520 --> 00:04:02.320
So it was a way to answer people who would say,

28
00:04:02.320 --> 00:04:06.240
well, wouldn't everybody drop dead instantly if we eliminated the welfare state?

29
00:04:06.240 --> 00:04:11.800
I don't really have any record of people in the 1920s just corpses lining the streets.

30
00:04:11.800 --> 00:04:16.120
I mean, I don't think anybody has ever testified to that.

31
00:04:16.120 --> 00:04:28.620
Okay. But that's something from a little earlier. The Great Society is the name given, that we give, and that was given at the time, to the anti-poverty programs of Lyndon Johnson's administration.

32
00:04:28.620 --> 00:04:38.620
Now, Lyndon Johnson, of course, took over from Kennedy when he was assassinated in 63 and then continued through January 69 when Nixon took over.

33
00:04:38.620 --> 00:04:45.220
I won't tell the off-color joke I just heard from David Gordon about Lyndon Johnson.

34
00:04:45.220 --> 00:04:48.220
I'll resist that temptation. You can ask him about that later.

35
00:04:48.220 --> 00:04:52.220
I'm sure he's got 27 of them for you if you're interested.

36
00:04:52.220 --> 00:04:56.620
But what I do have are a couple of quotations from Lyndon Johnson

37
00:04:56.620 --> 00:05:00.820
about what his great society would be like.

38
00:05:00.820 --> 00:05:02.620
His great society would be, quote,

39
00:05:02.620 --> 00:05:08.620
A society of success without squalor, beauty without barrenness,

40
00:05:08.620 --> 00:05:14.620
works of genius without the wretchedness of poverty.

41
00:05:14.620 --> 00:05:22.620
He also described the fight against poverty as an investment in the great tradition of the 1930s,

42
00:05:22.620 --> 00:05:26.620
an investment in the future as in the past.

43
00:05:26.620 --> 00:05:34.620
And he goes on to say that this investment will return its cost many-fold to our entire economy.

44
00:05:35.620 --> 00:05:38.620
Well, it didn't really. It didn't really do that.

45
00:05:38.620 --> 00:05:45.620
At this point, it's between five and a half and six trillion dollars that have been spent on these various programs.

46
00:05:45.620 --> 00:05:52.620
And we're still waiting for the great beauty without barrenness and so on and on.

47
00:05:52.620 --> 00:05:57.260
But nevertheless, and we're waiting for the areas that have most benefited from them,

48
00:05:57.260 --> 00:06:02.380
you know, not to look like bombed out remnants of World War II, but nevertheless,

49
00:06:02.380 --> 00:06:08.860
it's interesting, of course, to note the fact that we do not have a poverty problem in the United States.

50
00:06:08.860 --> 00:06:13.100
That should not be a controversial statement.

51
00:06:13.100 --> 00:06:22.140
It is surely a peculiar kind of poverty in which more poor children suffer from obesity than malnourishment.

52
00:06:22.140 --> 00:06:25.140
This is not a normal situation, I think.

53
00:06:25.140 --> 00:06:34.140
Likewise again, if you compare, obviously, the condition of Americans to those of areas of the world that we consider poor.

54
00:06:34.140 --> 00:06:39.140
You know, I mean, we all know this. I mean, the poor are living like kings in the 18th century, for crying out loud.

55
00:06:39.140 --> 00:06:42.140
I mean, just flush toilets is a great thing to have.

56
00:06:42.140 --> 00:06:49.140
But beyond that, all the amenities that we take absolutely for granted, refrigerators, telephones.

57
00:06:49.140 --> 00:06:53.140
I mean, now there are poor people with cell phones today walking around.

58
00:06:53.140 --> 00:06:56.140
Many of them own their own cars, own their own homes.

59
00:06:56.140 --> 00:07:00.140
You know, you see all the time, you see the Heritage Foundation and other groups like this

60
00:07:00.140 --> 00:07:05.140
doing surveys of all the various things that the so-called poor own,

61
00:07:05.140 --> 00:07:09.140
which would make them the envy of the world in any other society.

62
00:07:09.140 --> 00:07:14.140
But according to the great society philosophy, that's not enough.

63
00:07:14.140 --> 00:07:18.140
It's not enough to say, well, they're not living in absolute destitution,

64
00:07:18.140 --> 00:07:27.140
They don't get to enjoy as much of the American abundance as do their fellows, and this needs to be rectified.

65
00:07:27.140 --> 00:07:32.140
So it's a question of inequality to them, and I remember Murray Rothbard used to say things like,

66
00:07:32.140 --> 00:07:39.140
so in other words, one guy has three yachts and I have only one, it's a terrible injustice going on, it has to be rectified.

67
00:07:39.140 --> 00:07:47.140
Well, look at American society, extremely wealthy, and yet we have this anti-poverty crusade taking place.

68
00:07:47.140 --> 00:07:58.140
Roughly from 1950 to 1968, the poverty rate in the U.S. declines from about 30% to about 13% over those years.

69
00:07:58.140 --> 00:08:06.140
And there is, of course, a little bit of that that does take place during Johnson's years,

70
00:08:06.140 --> 00:08:12.140
but that can hardly be attributed to his Great Society program since they hadn't really had any time to get started.

71
00:08:12.140 --> 00:08:18.140
and they weren't really funded as highly as they would be until the early 70s in any case.

72
00:08:18.140 --> 00:08:26.140
That is, you know, the free market has a way of eliminating and combating poverty.

73
00:08:26.140 --> 00:08:31.140
And it does this. And that seems to have been what happened over these years.

74
00:08:31.140 --> 00:08:36.140
So it was happening gradually at roughly the rate of a percentage point per year.

75
00:08:36.140 --> 00:08:41.140
So this is already taking place. Poverty, there's already a so-called war on poverty going on.

76
00:08:41.140 --> 00:08:58.140
going on. That's going on automatically. But that's not fast enough. And of course, what ends up happening is that after the Great Society programs begin, well, the poverty level more or less solidifies and increases slightly and then levels out.

77
00:08:58.140 --> 00:09:11.100
And that's what we have to show for five or six trillion dollars. Well, I have here a few examples of things. By the way, is it about 5,000 degrees in this room or is it just because I'm up here and I haven't slept

78
00:09:11.100 --> 00:09:17.100
I don't know if there's anybody who can do anything about that, but it's kind of warm.

79
00:09:29.100 --> 00:09:33.100
That guy's sweating. That's a guy perspiring.

80
00:09:33.100 --> 00:09:38.100
First thing I want to note is, just to give you a few examples of these things,

81
00:09:38.100 --> 00:09:45.100
I want to give you a few examples of these things. We all know, we're all familiar with at least some of the anti-poverty programs of the Great Society.

82
00:09:45.100 --> 00:09:49.100
But I want to give you a few examples and let's see how they've turned out.

83
00:09:49.100 --> 00:09:54.100
We'll look at them and the wonderful intentions that were behind them and then we'll see what happened.

84
00:09:54.100 --> 00:09:59.100
The first one is the Job Corps, which just won't go away.

85
00:09:59.100 --> 00:10:06.100
The Job Corps. The idea was that every year you'd recruit a hundred thousand really, really disadvantaged people.

86
00:10:06.100 --> 00:10:11.380
Absolutely pathetic human beings who just can't keep a job to save their lives

87
00:10:11.380 --> 00:10:18.580
and we would relocate them far away from the slums, like in some wilderness or near military barracks

88
00:10:18.580 --> 00:10:24.660
and we'll train them to do productive things in life and this will be wonderful,

89
00:10:24.660 --> 00:10:31.300
will show how committed we are to building up job skills among people.

90
00:10:31.300 --> 00:10:34.600
Okay, so that's the idea. Well, how does this work out?

91
00:10:34.600 --> 00:10:38.800
Well, I have a historian's testimony about the Job Corps,

92
00:10:38.800 --> 00:10:43.300
and let me give you a little taste of how the first year goes.

93
00:10:43.300 --> 00:10:48.400
First year, 1965, of the Job Corps.

94
00:10:48.400 --> 00:10:55.000
Let's see, the first year, several members of the Job Corps were arrested at the Atterbury Center in Indiana

95
00:10:55.000 --> 00:10:58.700
for forcing a fellow trainee to commit sodomy.

96
00:10:58.700 --> 00:11:03.740
In Austin, Texas, a trainee on leave from Camp Gary got stabbed in a fight.

97
00:11:03.740 --> 00:11:09.460
At Camp Breckenridge in western Kentucky, a food riot had to be quelled by Federal Marshals.

98
00:11:09.460 --> 00:11:12.860
Members of the Job Corps were charged with burglaries in Laredo,

99
00:11:12.860 --> 00:11:18.380
promiscuity in St. Petersburg, and window smashing in Kalamazoo.

100
00:11:18.380 --> 00:11:20.980
Okay, so that was the first, so once they start killing each other,

101
00:11:20.980 --> 00:11:25.380
once they stop killing each other and raping people,

102
00:11:25.380 --> 00:11:28.260
the program starts to settle down a little bit.

103
00:11:28.260 --> 00:11:44.260
and what the congressmen began to find is that in 1966 it seems to cost about as much to provide for a member of the Job Corps for a year as it would to send the person to Harvard

104
00:11:44.260 --> 00:11:48.260
and they wonder, you know, isn't that a little disappointing that that's all we have to show

105
00:11:48.260 --> 00:11:56.260
well as I say during its second year it starts to settle down but notice this now the typical Job Corps program lasts six to nine months

106
00:11:56.260 --> 00:11:59.060
This is not that difficult to ask of someone.

107
00:11:59.060 --> 00:12:02.660
Six to nine months, we're going to give you a skill that can get you a job.

108
00:12:02.660 --> 00:12:06.060
See, remember, you can't get a job. That's why you're here.

109
00:12:06.060 --> 00:12:10.160
So we're going to give you a free program to give you skills.

110
00:12:10.160 --> 00:12:13.260
Now, you'd think any normal person with a brain would say,

111
00:12:13.260 --> 00:12:15.460
I am completely unworthy of this.

112
00:12:15.460 --> 00:12:18.060
So yes, I'd be happy to finish this program.

113
00:12:18.060 --> 00:12:19.960
Okay.

114
00:12:19.960 --> 00:12:22.260
So here's the problem.

115
00:12:22.260 --> 00:12:27.780
Two-thirds of the people enrolled in the Job Corps quit before completing the program.

116
00:12:27.780 --> 00:12:30.900
More than half of them had quit before three months had elapsed.

117
00:12:30.900 --> 00:12:33.940
Now, remember, this is a free job training program.

118
00:12:33.940 --> 00:12:36.060
All you have to do is show up.

119
00:12:36.060 --> 00:12:36.700
That's it.

120
00:12:36.700 --> 00:12:38.460
And you get a free job training program.

121
00:12:38.460 --> 00:12:40.780
And they can't complete this.

122
00:12:40.780 --> 00:12:48.940
So it sort of seems like, again, I don't think you have to be Einstein to see that maybe this is why,

123
00:12:48.940 --> 00:12:53.460
One reason these people are having difficulty finding jobs and keeping them.

124
00:12:53.460 --> 00:12:57.860
They can't finish a free job training program.

125
00:12:57.860 --> 00:13:00.180
But nevertheless, OK, so we have this.

126
00:13:00.180 --> 00:13:04.860
Then we find that people who do graduate from the Job Corps,

127
00:13:04.860 --> 00:13:11.540
it turns out that their unemployment rates and wage rates are no better

128
00:13:11.540 --> 00:13:16.300
than for those of so-called no-shows, people who've been accepted to the Job Corps,

129
00:13:16.300 --> 00:13:18.100
but who never showed up.

130
00:13:18.100 --> 00:13:28.800
So, if you never showed up to the Job Corps, you'd be just as well as people who went through the whole program and risked getting stabbed and sodomized.

131
00:13:28.800 --> 00:13:32.300
So, that's the Job Corps.

132
00:13:32.300 --> 00:13:38.300
But even more than that, one can say that what kind of jobs are they being trained for?

133
00:13:38.300 --> 00:13:42.800
I mean, they don't have the skills to do very advanced, particularly advanced work.

134
00:13:42.800 --> 00:13:43.800
and Social Work.

135
00:13:43.800 --> 00:13:49.760
So they're being trained for simple jobs like cook or baker, janitor, things that you could

136
00:13:49.760 --> 00:13:54.760
pretty much get on the job training for, that people aren't necessarily going to hire job

137
00:13:54.760 --> 00:13:57.440
corps graduates for.

138
00:13:57.440 --> 00:14:02.840
But beyond that, other people were going to get these jobs anyway, regardless of whether

139
00:14:02.840 --> 00:14:04.040
there was a job corps or not.

140
00:14:04.040 --> 00:14:08.040
So the net effect of unemployment is zero.

141
00:14:08.040 --> 00:14:09.360
Somebody was going to get these jobs anyway.

142
00:14:09.360 --> 00:14:16.160
The only effect is that it slightly privileges one group of the disadvantaged at the expense of another.

143
00:14:16.160 --> 00:14:23.360
So there's the job corps. There's the great society. Beauty instead of barrenness. That's what we have.

144
00:14:23.360 --> 00:14:29.460
Well, the next example that I have is, and you know, incidentally, I had a student who said,

145
00:14:29.460 --> 00:14:34.660
but you know, if the job corps really were ineffective and it had no good results,

146
00:14:34.660 --> 00:14:37.860
you know, why would they continue the program?

147
00:14:37.860 --> 00:14:41.140
And I thought, you know what, I don't even know where to begin in answering that question.

148
00:14:41.140 --> 00:14:44.580
You know, you're right, I'm sure it would be abolished,

149
00:14:44.580 --> 00:14:48.820
because things are very, very often abolished when they don't work.

150
00:14:48.820 --> 00:14:55.340
Okay, the second thing is, I've got to keep my eye on this,

151
00:14:55.340 --> 00:15:01.780
there is some legislation also that Johnson favors

152
00:15:01.780 --> 00:15:06.500
for federal aid to elementary and secondary education.

153
00:15:06.500 --> 00:15:13.140
And this isn't meant as an education measure per se, as much as it is an anti-poverty measure, once again.

154
00:15:13.140 --> 00:15:22.540
Because these funds under this program will be targeted to the poorer school districts.

155
00:15:22.540 --> 00:15:29.700
Okay, so that's the idea, and we'll help them, because the idea is that poverty is a trap, and education is the cure-all.

156
00:15:29.700 --> 00:15:36.380
So if we can lift these people out with education, we can stop this cycle of poverty.

157
00:15:36.380 --> 00:15:40.220
and federal money is the way to go.

158
00:15:40.220 --> 00:15:41.180
And what did they find?

159
00:15:41.180 --> 00:15:45.620
Well, they found when you actually study the question,

160
00:15:45.620 --> 00:15:47.620
even when government agencies studied the question,

161
00:15:47.620 --> 00:15:51.740
they found that either they found absolutely no difference,

162
00:15:51.740 --> 00:15:56.500
none, in academic performance between students

163
00:15:56.500 --> 00:15:58.740
in poor areas that had received this money

164
00:15:58.740 --> 00:16:01.420
and students who had not, absolutely no difference

165
00:16:01.420 --> 00:16:03.580
in achievement, in those few cases

166
00:16:03.580 --> 00:16:10.580
is where they could pinpoint some initial improvement in the academic performance of low-income students.

167
00:16:10.580 --> 00:16:18.580
This advantage, however slight, this advantage had disappeared after the following summer going into the next academic year.

168
00:16:18.580 --> 00:16:23.580
So that was it. And billions and billions and billions of dollars over the years were poured into this.

169
00:16:23.580 --> 00:16:30.580
And interestingly, a study was conducted as part of the 1964 Civil Rights Act,

170
00:16:30.580 --> 00:16:37.780
carried out by several researchers under Professor Coleman of Johns Hopkins in 1966.

171
00:16:37.780 --> 00:16:45.100
And the study concluded this. Taking all these results together, one implication stands out

172
00:16:45.100 --> 00:16:50.180
above all that schools bring little influence to bear on a child's achievement that is independent

173
00:16:50.180 --> 00:16:55.020
of his background and general social context, and that this very lack of an independent effect

174
00:16:55.020 --> 00:17:00.140
means that the inequalities imposed on children by their home, neighborhood, and peer environment

175
00:17:00.140 --> 00:17:05.140
are carried along to become the inequalities with which they confront adult life at the end of school.

176
00:17:05.140 --> 00:17:14.140
That is to say, education does not seem to have, and marginal changes in the level of spending on education

177
00:17:14.140 --> 00:17:21.140
don't really seem to have much of an effect on children's performance and are destined not to have such an effect

178
00:17:21.140 --> 00:17:26.140
because of the impact on their home environment, for one thing.

179
00:17:26.140 --> 00:17:36.140
If you're living around degenerates all day and then you go to school and you get a fancier set of blocks than the other kid, it's really not going to be able to erase your difficulties.

180
00:17:36.140 --> 00:17:45.140
So once again, nothing to show for it, but again, nobody resigns, nobody is disgraced by this, no one feels sorry about it.

181
00:17:45.140 --> 00:17:50.140
Again, reminding us of Murray Rothbard's one of his laws that nobody ever resigns, nobody ever resigns.

182
00:17:50.140 --> 00:17:53.140
No matter how wrong you are, nobody ever resigns.

183
00:17:53.140 --> 00:18:01.140
So nobody resigned over that, my friends. In fact, though, the radical left at least did learn something from this.

184
00:18:01.140 --> 00:18:12.140
A number of people on the radical left noticed that precisely that education had so little effect on children and on erasing inequality in society,

185
00:18:12.140 --> 00:18:18.140
that Christopher Jencks, who was a leftist who wrote a book in 1972 called Inequality,

186
00:18:18.140 --> 00:18:24.740
One of the things he argued in that book is that since education is not going to work in order to equalize society better, as we've seen,

187
00:18:24.740 --> 00:18:30.340
radicals need to just focus simply on just crude redistribution of wealth now.

188
00:18:30.340 --> 00:18:35.540
Just take from the rich and give to the poor, because this intermediate thing of fixing up education isn't working.

189
00:18:35.540 --> 00:18:40.140
So let's just cut right to the chase and just start robbing people and giving them money.

190
00:18:40.140 --> 00:18:46.740
So, okay, a couple people picked up something. That wouldn't be quite the lesson that I would draw from this, but that's the lesson they drew.

191
00:18:46.740 --> 00:19:16.740
and the same thing can be said for Head Start by the way, Head Start is the sort of the counterpart to this for preschool children that again it's supposed to help them give them a boost give them an advantage and again the same results seem to to to obtain that after I think something like 44 billion dollars have been spent on Head Start and it's again it's one of these things where whatever marginal gains are observed are flushed out within about a year or so so you know thank you so much. Then there is something

192
00:19:16.740 --> 00:19:24.480
something called Medicare and Medicaid, somewhat less obscure program than these others.

193
00:19:24.480 --> 00:19:30.820
Now this is, along with social security, here's a classic way you take a segment of society

194
00:19:30.820 --> 00:19:36.400
that is, by temperament, the most conservative, the elderly, and you enlist them in the ranks

195
00:19:36.400 --> 00:19:40.880
of the welfare state, and you make them the greatest cheerleaders of all.

196
00:19:40.880 --> 00:19:50.880
the wealthiest, the wisest, and generally they are, but this, they've been compromised, my friend, some of them,

197
00:19:50.880 --> 00:20:01.880
and it actually brings to mind the Simpsons episode, I was talking about this, you should all be watching this program by the way,

198
00:20:01.880 --> 00:20:08.880
not because I'm going to argue it's free market or anything, sometimes it is, but it's just funny, and Paul Cantor of the University of Virginia

199
00:20:08.880 --> 00:20:14.880
Mises is going to be one of the great programs of all time, and he's a Mises adjunct scholar.

200
00:20:14.880 --> 00:20:18.880
He's got his PhD from Harvard, so obviously that means you have to listen to everything he says.

201
00:20:18.880 --> 00:20:25.880
But there's a Simpsons episode where the kids, Lisa and Bart, have been writing cartoon scripts

202
00:20:25.880 --> 00:20:30.880
and submitting them to a network, but they've been submitting them under an adult's name

203
00:20:30.880 --> 00:20:34.880
because they want to be taken seriously. So they've been submitting them under their grandfather's name.

204
00:20:34.880 --> 00:20:39.440
and he's been getting royalty checks, and so finally they said to him,

205
00:20:39.440 --> 00:20:44.480
there are two jokes,

206
00:20:44.480 --> 00:20:48.160
finally they said to him, well, grandpa, didn't you wonder why you were getting

207
00:20:48.160 --> 00:20:52.360
money for doing absolutely nothing? And he said, well, I just figured it was because the

208
00:20:52.360 --> 00:20:54.000
Democrats were in power again.

209
00:20:54.000 --> 00:21:00.280
Now, I had intended that for later because that sort of,

210
00:21:00.280 --> 00:21:04.600
you know, would that that were so, it doesn't really matter which party is in power, of course,

211
00:21:04.600 --> 00:21:06.320
That's a point that I'll return to.

212
00:21:06.320 --> 00:21:10.960
But a better example is, the grandfather is complaining one day

213
00:21:10.960 --> 00:21:14.240
that the young generation always wants to get something for nothing.

214
00:21:14.240 --> 00:21:15.480
They always want to get something for nothing.

215
00:21:15.480 --> 00:21:17.560
And as soon as he's finished making this complaint,

216
00:21:17.560 --> 00:21:19.680
he marches into the Social Security office and says,

217
00:21:19.680 --> 00:21:23.400
I'm old, gimme, gimme, gimme.

218
00:21:23.400 --> 00:21:25.520
Oh, gee.

219
00:21:25.520 --> 00:21:27.200
Well, here we have Medicare and Medicaid.

220
00:21:27.200 --> 00:21:32.480
The idea being that for Medicare, obviously we're talking about medical care

221
00:21:32.480 --> 00:21:35.760
for the Elderly and Medicaid for the Poor.

222
00:21:35.760 --> 00:21:37.800
Okay, here's a great program.

223
00:21:37.800 --> 00:21:39.840
Well, a couple of things to note about this.

224
00:21:39.840 --> 00:21:45.760
Obviously, if you're going to provide these kinds of services,

225
00:21:45.760 --> 00:21:48.720
as has been noted up here at least one other time,

226
00:21:48.720 --> 00:21:51.080
you're going to stimulate demand like crazy.

227
00:21:51.080 --> 00:21:54.240
People are going to continually use this over time.

228
00:21:54.240 --> 00:21:56.080
More and more and more, they're going to demand everything.

229
00:21:56.080 --> 00:22:00.560
Doctor, I'm 107 years old

230
00:22:00.560 --> 00:22:07.560
I feel fatigued and tired a lot. I have some aches.

231
00:22:07.560 --> 00:22:11.560
I'd like to run 17 tests to figure out what's wrong with me.

232
00:22:11.560 --> 00:22:14.560
Look, the answer is you're 107, I think.

233
00:22:14.560 --> 00:22:21.560
But there's no market test that's going to stop you from doing this, or not quite as much.

234
00:22:21.560 --> 00:22:27.560
And when you spend all this money on something, obviously you're going to get prices going up and up and up,

235
00:22:27.560 --> 00:22:46.560
Hospital prices had increased 7% the year before Medicare, and the year following it, they increased 14% and continued to increase at an accelerating and runaway rate.

236
00:22:46.560 --> 00:22:53.560
What's notable, though interestingly about Medicare, and here I'm citing another historian, is as follows.

237
00:22:53.560 --> 00:22:57.560
The average aged person was little better off.

238
00:22:57.560 --> 00:23:05.560
True, he paid only 29% of his medical bills directly out of pocket in 1975, compared to 53% before Medicare,

239
00:23:05.560 --> 00:23:08.560
but his total bill was also much higher.

240
00:23:08.560 --> 00:23:13.560
In a way, the price inflation created by Medicare erodes some of its benefits.

241
00:23:13.560 --> 00:23:24.560
The average beneficiary spent $237 out of pocket in the year before Medicare and $390 10 years later in constant dollars almost exactly the same.

242
00:23:24.560 --> 00:23:33.560
Likewise, then also the question of Medicaid, medical treatment for poor people.

243
00:23:33.560 --> 00:23:38.560
Well, it might be worth asking, what did poor people do before Medicaid?

244
00:23:38.560 --> 00:23:43.800
Medicaid, just everybody died or something. What did they do? What happened? They jumped

245
00:23:43.800 --> 00:23:50.120
off a cliff when they were sick. What happened? Well, generally what happened is doctors used

246
00:23:50.120 --> 00:23:56.320
to, in the days before medicine was bureaucratized, as much as it is now, would provide reduced

247
00:23:56.320 --> 00:24:02.480
cost or pro-bono services regularly for poor people, and the poor would try to pay what

248
00:24:02.480 --> 00:24:08.240
they could whenever that became possible. I would recommend, by the way, another book.

249
00:24:08.240 --> 00:24:13.320
I'm sorry, but you've got to be a lifelong reader. You should be reading.

250
00:24:13.320 --> 00:24:19.240
Okay. This one I won't check up on you on, but you really should do this.

251
00:24:19.240 --> 00:24:23.680
I'll erase my sweaty man. There we go.

252
00:24:23.680 --> 00:24:28.320
Still warm in here. Man, for some reason, the other rooms, it's...

253
00:24:28.320 --> 00:24:31.280
I feel like I'm living in a... Well, anyway, never mind.

254
00:24:31.280 --> 00:24:35.880
I feel like a piece on a meat hook or something. Okay.

255
00:24:35.880 --> 00:24:53.880
This is a really good book, and it's not written by a free marketeer, to my knowledge, but it's written by an honest scholar, and those pop up every now and then.

256
00:24:53.880 --> 00:25:02.880
And this is a scholar who's willing to say, look, if something is a big, stinking disaster, I'm going to admit it, and I'm going to document it.

257
00:25:02.880 --> 00:25:12.380
This book, The Unraveling of America, where I'm drawing the bit on Medicare and Medicaid, is useful, at least for the chapters on the Great Society.

258
00:25:12.380 --> 00:25:18.880
So if you're interested in any of these themes or you want to know how you can smash this stuff, I would recommend this book, my friends.

259
00:25:18.880 --> 00:25:23.880
Okay. Again, let me cite a bit of this.

260
00:25:23.880 --> 00:25:33.380
In the last year before Medicaid, the hospital admission rate for families with incomes below $3,000 was $107 per 1,000 families.

261
00:25:33.380 --> 00:25:39.480
For families with incomes $10,000 and above, it was only $89 per 1,000 families.

262
00:25:39.480 --> 00:25:50.280
Before Medicaid, the average low-income person visited a doctor 4.3 times a year, not dramatically less than the 5.1 visits made by high-income persons.

263
00:25:50.280 --> 00:25:56.280
Granted that the poor are more frequently ill, these figures do not sustain a thesis of gross inequality.

264
00:25:56.280 --> 00:26:06.280
And then he goes on, most of the government's medical payments on behalf of the poor compensated doctors and hospitals for services once rendered free of charge or at reduced prices.

265
00:26:06.280 --> 00:26:14.280
And he concludes that really this is a transfer program from essentially middle class taxpayers to middle class physicians.

266
00:26:14.280 --> 00:26:17.280
And that's your great society program.

267
00:26:17.280 --> 00:26:21.280
There's Medicare and Medicaid, mentioned that, mentioned all these other things.

268
00:26:21.280 --> 00:26:26.280
Okay, now there are a million points one could make,

269
00:26:26.280 --> 00:26:29.280
because there are so many great society programs.

270
00:26:29.280 --> 00:26:36.280
When Lyndon Johnson, when he actually announced that Medicare,

271
00:26:36.280 --> 00:26:40.280
he said, in part of his speech, he said,

272
00:26:40.280 --> 00:26:48.280
He said, thou shalt open thine hand wide unto thy brother, to thy poor, to thy needy, in thy land,

273
00:26:48.280 --> 00:26:53.280
citing a biblical passage that does not exist, to my knowledge.

274
00:26:53.280 --> 00:26:58.280
Just invented that.

275
00:26:58.280 --> 00:27:00.280
I don't know.

276
00:27:00.280 --> 00:27:05.280
I don't know. If you're desperate, you just start making up things.

277
00:27:05.280 --> 00:27:09.280
Okay. Well, this is not the brightest guy in the world anyway, Lyndon Johnson.

278
00:27:09.280 --> 00:27:39.280
Well, okay, well then we see also that there is, and I don't want to belabor this because we've all heard a million times about the rise of the underclass, but this is a group of people, and it's hard to, you know, different researchers, you know, they differ on how many people there are in this group called the underclass, but we're talking about a group of people who are poor, but not simply poor, who have really pathological difficulties, that they don't understand the connection between work and money, or they don't understand...

279
00:27:39.280 --> 00:28:09.280
This is Michael Levin wrote a great article in the free market some years ago when he said that a lot of the times when Korean businesses will be attacked in cities that's because the local residents have been whipped up into a frenzy that somehow the Koreans have stolen things from them because there's only a fixed amount of wealth out there so how could they have all this stuff? They must have taken it from us in some way. That's a typical underclass pathology, an utter lack of understanding of how wealth is created

280
00:28:09.280 --> 00:28:12.280
How to live like a civilized human being.

281
00:28:12.280 --> 00:28:20.280
These are people for whom whether or not to commit a crime very often is simply a matter of cost-benefit economic analysis.

282
00:28:20.280 --> 00:28:24.280
So, what do you do with these people and where did they come from?

283
00:28:24.280 --> 00:28:35.280
Well, you may be familiar with this, but I'm going to erase these.

284
00:28:35.280 --> 00:28:48.280
This is such a familiar book that you're almost going to be disappointed that I mention it, but maybe some of you don't know about it, and it's a little neocony, but it's pretty good, actually. It still stands up, in my opinion.

285
00:28:50.280 --> 00:28:52.280
Okay, let's see. Here we go.

286
00:28:53.280 --> 00:28:56.280
Oh, it's Charles Murray, the big racist.

287
00:28:58.280 --> 00:29:00.280
I was being sarcastic.

288
00:29:00.280 --> 00:29:07.280
Okay. Yes, it's losing ground. You should get this. It's not bad.

289
00:29:07.280 --> 00:29:11.280
Yeah, it's got all the information you need to smash everybody.

290
00:29:11.280 --> 00:29:14.280
Yeah, that's the spirit.

291
00:29:14.280 --> 00:29:20.280
Because basically, as you all know, or some of you know, his basic thesis is that

292
00:29:20.280 --> 00:29:28.280
this rise of the underclass, this phenomenon by which the poor have become,

293
00:29:28.280 --> 00:29:40.280
have become, or at least a particular identifiable group of the poor, have become, in a sense, hooked on, you know, getting free handouts and all the rest of it.

294
00:29:40.280 --> 00:29:46.280
He says you can't hold the Great Society programs themselves altogether blameless in this case.

295
00:29:46.280 --> 00:29:54.280
In fact, he actually correlates the two. He says that the incentives that are being used here

296
00:29:54.280 --> 00:30:01.280
are going to tend to make people act like parasites and act in antisocial ways

297
00:30:01.280 --> 00:30:03.280
when you reward them for this behavior.

298
00:30:03.280 --> 00:30:06.280
And he has in this book actually a very interesting example

299
00:30:06.280 --> 00:30:10.280
which he was roundly criticized for but which I think works.

300
00:30:10.280 --> 00:30:13.280
I won't go into any detail because you should get it.

301
00:30:13.280 --> 00:30:18.520
There's a 10th anniversary edition that came out recently where he has a new introduction

302
00:30:18.520 --> 00:30:22.600
where he looks at the research in intervening years and he says, I don't change, I basically

303
00:30:22.600 --> 00:30:25.060
don't change the thing I said.

304
00:30:25.060 --> 00:30:29.480
But he gives an example of, he says that suppose we had a government anti-smoking program whereby

305
00:30:29.480 --> 00:30:31.800
we paid you a bounty to quit smoking.

306
00:30:31.800 --> 00:30:36.300
He said, I can demonstrate to you logically that the net result would be more people would

307
00:30:36.300 --> 00:30:37.720
be smoking at the end of the program.

308
00:30:37.720 --> 00:30:39.700
And you think, well how could that be?

309
00:30:39.700 --> 00:30:42.720
But yet he explains it and you read it and you say, you know he's right.

310
00:30:42.720 --> 00:30:45.840
it would work out that way and he said likewise that's the same thing for any

311
00:30:45.840 --> 00:30:49.360
social welfare policy because you for one thing there is something that

312
00:30:49.360 --> 00:30:54.280
economists refer to as the disutility of labor people would rather not work if

313
00:30:54.280 --> 00:30:59.360
they could get away with it so there's always this difficulty of how do you

314
00:30:59.360 --> 00:31:04.080
provide for people who are desperate without at the same time making the

315
00:31:04.080 --> 00:31:08.520
package so attractive that you make being desperate seem attractive you know

316
00:31:08.520 --> 00:31:12.400
I'd like to get free this and free that and especially when you consider that

317
00:31:12.400 --> 00:31:42.400
In many cases, the programs of the Great Society, the housing programs, the medical programs, the educational programs, the AFDC, which is originally a Franklin Roosevelt program, but greatly expanded in the Great Society, where you have additional children, you get more cash and everything else, well the result is, first of all, remember all these benefits are tax free, so you bear that in mind, it might not seem like that much money, but it's tax free.

318
00:31:42.400 --> 00:31:50.400
This package of benefits gave you an income that was well above what you'd get with a minimum wage job,

319
00:31:50.400 --> 00:31:54.400
and in some cases well above what you'd get at one and a half times the minimum wage.

320
00:31:54.400 --> 00:31:59.400
So a lot of people said, well, to heck with this, I guess I'll just get some free stuff,

321
00:31:59.400 --> 00:32:02.400
because that's what I'm entitled to and everything else.

322
00:32:02.400 --> 00:32:05.400
In fact, again, just the last Simpsons example I will give is Ned Flanders,

323
00:32:05.400 --> 00:32:08.400
the man you'd most like to punch in the face.

324
00:32:08.400 --> 00:32:37.400
Murray makes additional arguments that, at the same time that government is making it more and more attractive to be in and to remain in,

325
00:32:37.400 --> 00:32:41.240
in a completely pathetic position and not to lift oneself out of it

326
00:32:41.240 --> 00:32:44.280
and to give a bureaucratic solution to this whole thing.

327
00:32:44.280 --> 00:32:49.320
There are other signals that are being sent. Discipline in the schools is being destroyed.

328
00:32:49.320 --> 00:32:54.920
Crime, because of various developments, is not being punished

329
00:32:54.920 --> 00:32:58.920
as readily and as effectively, so that becomes more of a legitimate

330
00:32:58.920 --> 00:33:03.000
option, just simply from a rational economic calculation point of view.

331
00:33:03.000 --> 00:33:06.120
And he goes into this in some great detail.

332
00:33:06.120 --> 00:33:14.120
The usual argument against Murray is to say that, well, the reason you had this growth of the underclass was that there just weren't that many jobs for them.

333
00:33:14.120 --> 00:33:21.120
Okay, well, in some cases, there could be a little something to that. I don't really know.

334
00:33:21.120 --> 00:33:34.120
But, interestingly, Harvard economist Richard Freeman, in 1980, did a survey in which he asked out-of-work inner-city black youths about their job prospects.

335
00:33:34.120 --> 00:33:40.120
and over 70% of them said they could easily find a job, but they didn't.

336
00:33:40.120 --> 00:33:43.620
They completely dropped out of the labor force altogether.

337
00:33:43.620 --> 00:33:49.120
In 1989, it had risen to around 75% and said they could easily find a job,

338
00:33:49.120 --> 00:33:55.120
but minimum wage jobs now seem silly and ridiculous and like chump jobs.

339
00:33:55.120 --> 00:34:00.120
What's the point? Even though those are generally the first step for other things.

340
00:34:00.120 --> 00:34:22.120
The Catastrophic Rate at which young black men began to drop out of the labor force altogether took place at a time when the economy was booming.

341
00:34:22.120 --> 00:34:26.120
So it's a little difficult to argue that that was the explanation.

342
00:34:26.120 --> 00:34:36.120
There's also a controversy about Murray's claim that these programs encouraged more out of wedlock births.

343
00:34:36.120 --> 00:34:39.120
His argument is it's a simple economic calculation.

344
00:34:39.120 --> 00:34:44.120
He's not necessarily saying that a woman is sitting there saying,

345
00:34:44.120 --> 00:34:50.120
I get an extra $100, so I think I'll do something with this guy.

346
00:34:50.120 --> 00:34:54.120
They're not thinking that way, but they don't have to think in that way.

347
00:34:54.120 --> 00:35:08.120
And people just very often respond to incentives, but the preponderance of studies seems to demonstrate a correlation, at least, between the rise in these programs, and AFDC in particular, these payments and out-of-wedlock births.

348
00:35:08.120 --> 00:35:14.120
And there's certainly at least a logical correlation, and certainly these payments are not doing anything to discourage out-of-wedlock births.

349
00:35:14.120 --> 00:35:17.120
And indeed, why should these women get married in these cases?

350
00:35:17.120 --> 00:35:24.120
Because, as Charles Murray said, a welfare mother's child provides her with the economic insurance that a husband used to represent.

351
00:35:24.120 --> 00:35:26.120
You get children, you get more money.

352
00:35:26.120 --> 00:35:29.120
So you have all these difficulties going on.

353
00:35:29.120 --> 00:35:38.120
Well, and the pathology is so deep among the underclass that even if you argue that,

354
00:35:38.120 --> 00:35:46.120
Well, how can these unskilled people possibly get the skilled jobs that are becoming increasingly numerous in our sophisticated economy?

355
00:35:46.120 --> 00:35:49.120
How can you expect them to be employed in these areas?

356
00:35:49.120 --> 00:35:55.120
Well, I want to cite a little passage from another historian who says this.

357
00:35:55.120 --> 00:36:05.120
The so-called higher skills that one steel mill not far from Chicago needed recently to fill jobs that were going begging for lack of qualified applicants

358
00:36:05.120 --> 00:36:09.120
amounted to a little more than being able to divide 100 by 4

359
00:36:09.120 --> 00:36:15.120
and going one step further to understand the concept of 75%.

360
00:36:15.120 --> 00:36:21.120
It generally takes only basic math for a worker to handle the statistical process control

361
00:36:21.120 --> 00:36:25.120
that is one of the key recent technological advances in manufacturing.

362
00:36:25.120 --> 00:36:30.120
One didn't think of secretarial skills as being particularly elevated until recently

363
00:36:30.120 --> 00:36:34.120
when corporations in big cities found that increasing numbers of applicants lacked them.

364
00:36:34.120 --> 00:36:41.120
Now, anxious companies pay their employees bounties for bringing in qualified applicants for secretarial jobs.

365
00:36:41.120 --> 00:37:00.120
Anyone who wants her children to escape poverty needs only to make sure they learn basic literacy, computer typing, and polite business-like demeanor.

366
00:37:00.120 --> 00:37:06.120
How can a scarcity of unskilled jobs in steel mills explain why ghetto mothers don't do this?

367
00:37:06.120 --> 00:37:12.120
Okay, but there again, well, we need more job training programs, I guess. I don't know what the explanation is.

368
00:37:12.120 --> 00:37:15.120
But anyway, so we've got this and this and that.

369
00:37:15.120 --> 00:37:20.120
Well, in addition to Murray, there's been an additional argument that's been made that,

370
00:37:20.120 --> 00:37:26.120
that although these programs were probably a necessary component of the rise of this degeneracy,

371
00:37:26.120 --> 00:37:30.320
at the same time they may not have been completely sufficient they may have

372
00:37:30.320 --> 00:37:34.400
helped it but was going on simultaneously was a cultural battle in

373
00:37:34.400 --> 00:37:40.200
which the left was making a deliberate attempt to remove the stigma that had

374
00:37:40.200 --> 00:37:43.840
been traditionally attached to receiving government handouts you just wouldn't do

375
00:37:43.840 --> 00:37:48.200
it you had pride about it but now in the 60s people were being actively told that

376
00:37:48.200 --> 00:37:52.000
you had a right to this that that society owed this to you

377
00:37:52.000 --> 00:38:02.000
Sgt. Shriver said something like that he intended to institute a new grievance procedure between the poor and the rest of society

378
00:38:02.000 --> 00:38:07.000
because it probably is my fault that some bum doesn't have a job after all.

379
00:38:07.000 --> 00:38:11.000
I feel like I can say anything at this conference.

380
00:38:11.000 --> 00:38:19.000
But imagine, for instance, even as late as the early 1960s, imagine an America in which, for instance, in Philadelphia,

381
00:38:19.000 --> 00:38:22.360
Half of the applicants for welfare were rejected.

382
00:38:22.360 --> 00:38:29.320
In New York City, welfare workers are still being told that withholding assistance is just

383
00:38:29.320 --> 00:38:32.280
as if not more important than granting it.

384
00:38:32.280 --> 00:38:33.280
Things like this.

385
00:38:33.280 --> 00:38:37.560
Or there are still attempts made to try to contact relatives and to tell families, maybe

386
00:38:37.560 --> 00:38:41.240
you want to play a role in supporting this person.

387
00:38:41.240 --> 00:38:43.120
All these types of things.

388
00:38:43.120 --> 00:38:47.080
Applicants still had to verify their eligibility with marriage and birth certificates and so

389
00:38:47.080 --> 00:38:48.840
on.

390
00:38:48.840 --> 00:38:54.120
Unwed mothers very often had to promise not to have any male collars coming to my home

391
00:38:54.120 --> 00:38:59.640
or meeting me elsewhere under improper conditions and likewise that they would not knowingly

392
00:38:59.640 --> 00:39:05.600
contribute or be a contributing factor to shaming their children by their conduct.

393
00:39:05.600 --> 00:39:10.680
But these attitudes change because remember the left, they despise bourgeois morality,

394
00:39:10.680 --> 00:39:14.480
they despise the work ethic, they despise the connection between work and reward, they

395
00:39:14.480 --> 00:39:17.880
They despise the capitalist system, and boy, this is just great.

396
00:39:17.880 --> 00:39:23.280
For some reason, the left always seems to identify with the most degenerate aspects of society,

397
00:39:23.280 --> 00:39:25.380
and there are many, many examples of this.

398
00:39:25.380 --> 00:39:31.880
But for instance, at Columbia University, which I mentioned just at random,

399
00:39:31.880 --> 00:39:36.780
at their School of Social Work, in the, around the mid-60s,

400
00:39:36.780 --> 00:39:41.480
they published a famous monograph at the School of Social Work,

401
00:39:41.480 --> 00:39:44.760
Citing Old and New Testament passages in favor of this.

402
00:39:44.760 --> 00:39:47.520
I think these were real ones in this case.

403
00:39:47.520 --> 00:39:50.480
And they were saying there should be no penalty or stigma

404
00:39:50.480 --> 00:39:54.380
for any competent and able-bodied individuals who,

405
00:39:54.380 --> 00:39:58.840
just for whatever reason, don't seem capable of holding a job.

406
00:39:58.840 --> 00:40:01.080
And that, in fact, social justice,

407
00:40:01.080 --> 00:40:04.400
said these social workers at Columbia University,

408
00:40:04.400 --> 00:40:06.280
meant that we couldn't really scrutinize

409
00:40:06.280 --> 00:40:09.840
the behavior of the poor, because really, quote,

410
00:40:09.840 --> 00:40:15.200
The origin of economic or social need is far less important than the fact of its existence.

411
00:40:15.200 --> 00:40:19.480
And this just goes on and on and on.

412
00:40:19.480 --> 00:40:27.800
The National Welfare Rights Organization is founded and again and again emphasized an emphasis on rights.

413
00:40:27.800 --> 00:40:35.640
A key instrument in advancing this new approach were a thousand governmental neighborhood service centers

414
00:40:35.640 --> 00:40:38.840
funded by the Office of Economic Opportunity

415
00:40:38.840 --> 00:40:43.640
and were basically aimed at agitating among the poor and getting them to recognize that

416
00:40:43.640 --> 00:40:47.000
that welfare payments were a right that they had.

417
00:40:47.000 --> 00:40:52.520
The New York Times spoke of a new philosophy of social welfare that seeks to establish

418
00:40:52.520 --> 00:40:57.400
the status of welfare benefits as rights based on the notion that everyone is entitled to

419
00:40:57.400 --> 00:40:59.720
a share of the commonwealth.

420
00:40:59.720 --> 00:41:03.160
You know, incidentally libertarians are accused all the time of, you know, they don't care

421
00:41:03.160 --> 00:41:04.160
about community.

422
00:41:04.160 --> 00:41:05.160
They break down community.

423
00:41:05.160 --> 00:41:07.760
All they care about is individuals, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

424
00:41:07.760 --> 00:41:13.520
Well, but then look at this, look at what I talked about yesterday, look at this today.

425
00:41:13.520 --> 00:41:19.200
The left thinks absolutely nothing of destroying community standards about handouts, about

426
00:41:19.200 --> 00:41:25.980
hard work, busing people's kids around all the time, destroying the little local patriotisms

427
00:41:25.980 --> 00:41:28.680
that used to exist in cities and towns.

428
00:41:28.680 --> 00:41:31.820
They think nothing of this, but we're the ones who destroy communities by just leaving

429
00:41:31.820 --> 00:41:33.320
everybody the hell alone.

430
00:41:33.320 --> 00:41:37.320
Anyway, I felt like mentioning that.

431
00:41:37.320 --> 00:41:40.320
I had already mentioned this guy.

432
00:41:40.320 --> 00:41:44.320
The National Welfare Rights Organization is always an interesting thing to note.

433
00:41:44.320 --> 00:41:53.320
It's interesting that observers at their meetings were always struck by welfare mothers coming to their meetings,

434
00:41:53.320 --> 00:41:57.320
and they still had this old-fashioned idea that they really shouldn't be receiving state aid,

435
00:41:57.320 --> 00:42:02.320
but they kept hearing the word rights, rights, rights over and over again, and it got through to them.

436
00:42:02.320 --> 00:42:13.320
One of the members of the NWRO conceded regretfully that the initial attempt, anyway, to pull in the black churches was actually unsuccessful.

437
00:42:13.320 --> 00:42:15.320
So thus this passage.

438
00:42:15.320 --> 00:42:27.320
We met with Whitney Young, director of the Urban League, and he gave us a long speech about how it was more important to get one black woman into a job as an airline stewardess than it was to get 50 poor families onto welfare.

439
00:42:27.320 --> 00:42:31.320
By the way, there are two... sorry, I have to just give these to you. I can't resist.

440
00:42:31.320 --> 00:42:38.320
And you might find them useful. I don't know if you're interested in these topics, but I'll give them to you anyway.

441
00:42:38.320 --> 00:42:43.320
There are two books that are pretty good, pretty good.

442
00:42:43.320 --> 00:42:48.320
This one's sort of pretty good because it's irritatingly neo-Khani here and there,

443
00:42:48.320 --> 00:42:56.320
but it's got enough incriminating quotations that that alone makes it worth something.

444
00:42:56.320 --> 00:43:01.320
I mean, it's fine, but, you know, there are parts of it where you're just groaning.

445
00:43:01.320 --> 00:43:08.320
The subtitle of this book is something like the 60s legacy to the underclass.

446
00:43:08.320 --> 00:43:14.320
Okay. It's pretty good, because he goes into some depth about this deliberate attempt to undermine

447
00:43:14.320 --> 00:43:21.320
the standard view of government handouts as a prerequisite to this explosion in handouts.

448
00:43:21.320 --> 00:43:25.320
Second book I would mention, there's just one chapter that's pertinent to this,

449
00:43:25.320 --> 00:43:41.320
And that's this guy. Again, I'm not saying this is a perfect individual who's never made any mistakes in his life, faith-based charities, but he's still worth looking at in this case.

450
00:43:45.320 --> 00:43:53.320
He's got one chapter in this book that's really good. Well, I don't know, I just mean that it's very good on this topic.

451
00:43:55.320 --> 00:44:05.320
I would recommend these. And as I say, this one, if you're interested in the Great Society, there's just one chapter that you'll like.

452
00:44:05.320 --> 00:44:07.320
Okay.

453
00:44:07.320 --> 00:44:23.320
I don't want to talk about that. And also, the Federal Office of Economic Opportunity, also, many of the lawyers that worked for it helped the NWRO,

454
00:44:23.320 --> 00:44:30.760
National Welfare Rights Organization in its class action suits and legal cases and so for instance,

455
00:44:30.760 --> 00:44:38.020
and this is from Magnet, rules that welfare officials without extensive hearings could declare a person employable

456
00:44:38.020 --> 00:44:44.320
and require him to take a job, struck down thanks to left-wing government lawyers.

457
00:44:44.320 --> 00:44:49.920
Rules that women receiving AFDC could not have a man in the house, struck down.

458
00:44:49.920 --> 00:44:59.920
Rules that recipients suspected of fraud had to answer questions or else face possible loss of subsidy, struck down, et cetera, et cetera, and it just goes on and on and on.

459
00:44:59.920 --> 00:45:07.920
So in other words, radicals are going around in various communities organizing the poor to go into the courts and demand their rights.

460
00:45:07.920 --> 00:45:16.920
And also what they would do is that these OEO attorneys would encourage the poor to just keep requesting more hearings all the time from local welfare officials

461
00:45:16.920 --> 00:45:22.120
so as to increase their caseload impossibly and just force them to give in, which is what they would do.

462
00:45:22.120 --> 00:45:25.120
Or have sit-ins in these people's offices and they don't know what to do.

463
00:45:25.120 --> 00:45:27.720
I'm just a local state bureaucrat. I don't know what to do about this.

464
00:45:27.720 --> 00:45:31.620
I'll just approve your damn application. I'll just do whatever you want me to do.

465
00:45:31.620 --> 00:45:37.120
Again and again and again, sleep-ins, sit-ins and so on.

466
00:45:37.120 --> 00:45:44.520
So about, now just one little statistic and then I will more or less wrap up after one more example.

467
00:45:44.520 --> 00:45:51.020
During the 1950s, the AFDC rolls rose by 100,000 families, or 17%.

468
00:45:51.020 --> 00:45:56.620
During the 1960s, the increase was 107%, or 800,000 families,

469
00:45:56.620 --> 00:46:02.220
with about three quarters of that increase occurring from 1965 to 1968 alone,

470
00:46:02.220 --> 00:46:07.720
which was not a time of terrible economic conditions by any means.

471
00:46:07.720 --> 00:46:12.920
The overall AFDC population increased from 4.3 million in 1965

472
00:46:12.920 --> 00:46:16.120
to $10.8 million in 1974.

473
00:46:16.120 --> 00:46:20.040
Well, the last thing I would mention is the evil Michael Harrington

474
00:46:20.040 --> 00:46:23.040
wrote a book in 1962, I think.

475
00:46:23.040 --> 00:46:25.280
It was called The Other America.

476
00:46:25.280 --> 00:46:27.840
And you probably have to read it in school.

477
00:46:27.840 --> 00:46:30.440
And he's arguing, Michael Harrington, I mentioned him

478
00:46:30.440 --> 00:46:35.040
because this is one more example of a leftist attempting

479
00:46:35.040 --> 00:46:38.960
to give some other explanation for the existence of the poor.

480
00:46:38.960 --> 00:46:41.560
And he's saying that it's just structural things in the economy,

481
00:46:41.560 --> 00:46:43.800
that it can't be helped.

482
00:46:43.800 --> 00:46:46.640
So for instance, Harrington, by the way, when he died,

483
00:46:46.640 --> 00:46:49.680
I think he died in 1989, was president of the Democratic

484
00:46:49.680 --> 00:46:53.400
Socialists of America, and he helped to oversee the Great

485
00:46:53.400 --> 00:46:54.480
Society programs.

486
00:46:54.480 --> 00:46:58.720
He was the one who stirred the consciences of America.

487
00:46:58.720 --> 00:47:01.640
He says, the other Americans are the victims of the very

488
00:47:01.640 --> 00:47:04.240
inventions and machines that have produced a higher living

489
00:47:04.240 --> 00:47:06.520
standard for the rest of the society.

490
00:47:06.520 --> 00:47:10.000
As the society becomes more technological, more skilled,

491
00:47:10.000 --> 00:47:14.120
Those who learn to work the machines, who get the expanding education, move up.

492
00:47:14.120 --> 00:47:17.760
Those who miss out at the very start find themselves at a new disadvantage,

493
00:47:17.760 --> 00:47:20.640
condemned to an economic underworld.

494
00:47:20.640 --> 00:47:25.840
Now obviously, if you're going to say that poverty is being caused by the economic system,

495
00:47:25.840 --> 00:47:30.240
there's no longer any distinction between the deserving and the undeserving poor.

496
00:47:30.240 --> 00:47:32.760
You know, some guy who just doesn't feel like going to work,

497
00:47:32.760 --> 00:47:37.920
well, you know, one of the reasons he may not feel like it is because he's overcome by despair

498
00:47:37.920 --> 00:47:43.920
at his situation. It's not because he's lazy, in some cases, because none of them are lazy.

499
00:47:43.920 --> 00:47:50.920
It's that they just overcome by despair. So he even says that even if a person is unfit for work

500
00:47:50.920 --> 00:47:56.920
because he's drunk or a drug addict, you know, don't be so quick to condemn this person

501
00:47:56.920 --> 00:48:03.920
because this is not because of vice. It's at despair, at his powerlessness to advance in this economy

502
00:48:03.920 --> 00:48:08.920
The Causality is reversed or something.

503
00:48:08.920 --> 00:48:18.920
Poverty is something that gets inside people, transforms them, stamps them with a distinctive personality, he goes on to say.

504
00:48:18.920 --> 00:48:27.920
So therefore, we have to have big programs, because there's no way to expect these people to advance.

505
00:48:27.920 --> 00:48:33.920
and but beyond this there's no there's no way and it's not even desirable to

506
00:48:33.920 --> 00:48:38.520
attempt to distinguish among different classes of the poor all of them are

507
00:48:38.520 --> 00:48:44.200
equally worthy of these payments and of course over time the the result has been

508
00:48:44.200 --> 00:48:48.120
what we have now now if you're interested in anything having to do with

509
00:48:48.120 --> 00:48:51.360
welfare and you want all the statistics on it you know but how much has been

510
00:48:51.360 --> 00:48:55.680
spent and what has happened what are the outcomes the book it's not that well

511
00:48:55.680 --> 00:48:58.680
It's all written, but it doesn't matter. It gives you the data.

512
00:48:58.680 --> 00:49:00.680
There's this Michael Tanner book, The End of Welfare.

513
00:49:00.680 --> 00:49:02.680
At least it's got all the data in there.

514
00:49:02.680 --> 00:49:04.680
It's written from a free market point of view.

515
00:49:04.680 --> 00:49:07.680
And the other, so that would be one thing.

516
00:49:07.680 --> 00:49:10.680
The other thing you might have some interest in,

517
00:49:10.680 --> 00:49:14.680
it's not his best book by any means, but it makes a reasonable,

518
00:49:14.680 --> 00:49:17.680
it's sort of useful, another Charles Murray book,

519
00:49:17.680 --> 00:49:24.680
and that is his book In Pursuit of Happiness and Good Government.

520
00:49:24.680 --> 00:49:28.680
And I mention this because in here, he's got an interesting graph.

521
00:49:28.680 --> 00:49:36.680
He plots, he looks at the growth or decline in private charitable giving.

522
00:49:36.680 --> 00:49:38.680
And then he plots it against time.

523
00:49:38.680 --> 00:49:44.680
And he's showing that during periods where the government is increasing its social welfare expenditures,

524
00:49:44.680 --> 00:49:47.680
private charity declines.

525
00:49:47.680 --> 00:49:52.680
Whereas during periods in which at least the impression is that the government is cutting back,

526
00:49:52.680 --> 00:50:19.280
5.5 trillion dollars spent, nothing to show for it other than devastation and destruction,

527
00:50:19.280 --> 00:50:24.880
This is what the left refers to as a great society.

528
00:50:24.880 --> 00:50:26.480
Thank you very much, my friends.

529
00:50:26.480 --> 00:50:33.880
All right, let's see.

530
00:50:33.880 --> 00:50:35.480
I've got about six minutes.

531
00:50:35.480 --> 00:50:37.680
If anybody has a question or a comment

532
00:50:37.680 --> 00:50:40.180
or would like to add something to what I said.

533
00:50:40.180 --> 00:50:43.880
To get back to your civil rights and connect with this,

534
00:50:43.880 --> 00:50:48.080
the black people are vastly overrepresented on this.

535
00:50:48.080 --> 00:50:52.080
Is there any particular reason for that?

536
00:51:10.080 --> 00:51:16.080
Do you know anything about the tax rate right before the advent of your society?

537
00:51:18.080 --> 00:51:24.080
Where do we get the money to fund all these things?

538
00:51:48.080 --> 00:52:18.080
When the title of the thing is The Republican Warfare, what did they do to solidify the later Nixon War?

539
00:52:18.080 --> 00:52:25.740
programs, but every time, like when Newt Gingrich was around, he was constantly being accused

540
00:52:25.740 --> 00:52:31.160
of wanting to abolish Medicare. He's going to abolish Medicare, he's going to cut it significantly,

541
00:52:31.160 --> 00:52:39.160
and he constantly said the opposite. He constantly said, I'm not going to do that. So my argument

542
00:52:39.160 --> 00:52:43.240
always was, well look, no matter what you say, the press is going to say you're abolishing

543
00:52:43.240 --> 00:52:47.120
Medicare, so you may as well do it. You may as well cut it back, because they're always

544
00:52:47.120 --> 00:52:52.120
I think he's going to accuse you of cutting it back because they're dishonest in the way they talk about cuts and things.

545
00:52:52.120 --> 00:52:57.120
Well, the Republican position basically has been to consolidate things.

546
00:52:57.120 --> 00:53:06.120
So, for instance, we'll go back even further. Eisenhower came in and he was not a terribly ideological person.

547
00:53:06.120 --> 00:53:15.120
And he, for instance, he added more people to the Social Security roles, I think self-employed people and some farmers and some other things

548
00:53:15.120 --> 00:53:18.120
and some other things, because Truman had expanded the Social Security rules.

549
00:53:18.120 --> 00:53:21.120
He increased the minimum wage.

550
00:53:21.120 --> 00:53:29.120
He made some beginnings of efforts for some other welfare state programs.

551
00:53:29.120 --> 00:53:38.120
And then, of course, Nixon, you know, Nixon really is in large part responsible for the beginnings of goals and timetables in affirmative action.

552
00:53:38.120 --> 00:53:43.120
We shouldn't fail to give him the credit for that.

553
00:53:43.120 --> 00:53:47.560
But in large part, they continued to fund these things at ever higher levels.

554
00:53:47.560 --> 00:53:55.640
And also Nixon, to his everlasting shame, nearly established a guaranteed income program in

555
00:53:55.640 --> 00:54:00.360
the United States, the Family Assistance Plan, that would guarantee everybody a minimum income,

556
00:54:00.360 --> 00:54:05.160
which probably would have had some effects on people's labor patterns if that had passed.

557
00:54:05.160 --> 00:54:09.000
And in his defense, the best he can say is, well, you know, I mean, I'm more interested

558
00:54:09.000 --> 00:54:15.400
in Foreign Policy, and I sort of think that the domestic front can run itself.

559
00:54:15.400 --> 00:54:19.040
But then, you know, and especially as you just look down, I mean, the budget doubled

560
00:54:19.040 --> 00:54:26.520
under Reagan, and I mean, Reagan actually added a cabinet position of Veterans Affairs,

561
00:54:26.520 --> 00:54:27.680
and you know, and so it goes.

562
00:54:27.680 --> 00:54:33.380
And I remember in 1994, Dick Armey saying, you know, we're going to think about privatizing

563
00:54:33.380 --> 00:54:36.160
the post office, and that'll be just the beginning.

564
00:54:36.160 --> 00:54:41.000
okay and it was just the end too because it never happened they thought about it

565
00:54:41.000 --> 00:54:45.160
or a couple of them and then nothing so it it sort of makes me think that people

566
00:54:45.160 --> 00:54:49.720
say well our position is completely unrealistic we'll never get to it but you

567
00:54:49.720 --> 00:54:52.800
know like for instance that like like Hans's position or Murray Rothbard's

568
00:54:52.800 --> 00:54:56.880
position of a stateless society well it's completely unreasonable it'll never

569
00:54:56.880 --> 00:55:00.880
happen but well I mean do you think the abolition of these programs is ever

570
00:55:00.880 --> 00:55:05.080
going to happen I mean so I mean in a way the only way any of this is ever

571
00:55:05.080 --> 00:55:07.580
is ever going to be cut back.

572
00:55:07.580 --> 00:55:10.120
It's not going to be because some politician wins office.

573
00:55:10.120 --> 00:55:11.680
That should be obvious by now.

574
00:55:11.680 --> 00:55:13.400
It's not going to happen.

575
00:55:13.400 --> 00:55:16.680
There's going to have to be some crisis that shakes the system

576
00:55:16.680 --> 00:55:18.000
to its foundations.

577
00:55:18.000 --> 00:55:20.440
And I would rather, the thing that

578
00:55:20.440 --> 00:55:22.560
attracts me about the stateless position

579
00:55:22.560 --> 00:55:24.560
is that when that crisis comes, it

580
00:55:24.560 --> 00:55:27.320
would be nice to have a well-articulated alternative

581
00:55:27.320 --> 00:55:30.640
view to begin to pick up the pieces with.

582
00:55:30.640 --> 00:56:00.640
because I don't see with a world filled with CNN and you know where we see every day they'll pick out the one really hard case and everybody assumes that's the common example of what happens with welfare and it's just and there's just no way to go around explaining it but jeez you know I sometimes think by the way sometimes libertarians say technology is such a great thing it's going to be a wonderful avenue for liberty maybe it is in some some extremely restricted cases

583
00:56:00.640 --> 00:56:06.140
But for crying out loud without television, I actually think we'd have a much easier time of it.

584
00:56:06.140 --> 00:56:12.640
A constant propaganda device in everybody's home, training them to think the same way, and this is a device for liberty?

585
00:56:12.640 --> 00:56:17.640
I mean, it could be used for liberty if, you know, if any of our people could get into the thing.

586
00:56:17.640 --> 00:56:20.640
You know, other than John Stossel. How about somebody else?

587
00:56:20.640 --> 00:56:22.640
Okay, I'm sorry, go ahead.

588
00:56:22.640 --> 00:56:29.280
Do you often hear these statistics that although inner-cities, Blacks, Mexicans are overrepresented population-wise,

589
00:56:29.280 --> 00:56:35.920
still 60% or something of social welfare goes to poor, rural whites, and first of all, is that true?

590
00:56:35.920 --> 00:56:40.080
And second of all, if so, do we have the same morally hazardous effect that you see in the inner-city?

591
00:56:40.080 --> 00:56:48.720
Yeah, good question. Yeah, it is true that most of the recipients are white, but again, you know, there are percentages and proportions here that are relevant.

592
00:56:48.720 --> 00:57:09.720
Well, I mean, I don't know. In some environments, I think everywhere it has a certain deleterious effect, because the mere fact that it's an outside state agency means that it can't really have any kind of real personal oversight of individual cases.

593
00:57:09.720 --> 00:57:20.720
And secondly, precisely because the word entitlement is used in all cases, I think that undermines an older, better view of these things.

594
00:57:20.720 --> 00:57:35.720
But on the other hand, I do think that in some environments it just adds fuel to an already blazing fire because it increases a sense of victimization.

595
00:57:35.720 --> 00:57:40.720
You know, I remember one time, I'll be honest with you, I'm going to make a confession I shouldn't make,

596
00:57:40.720 --> 00:57:46.720
but I applied for some fellowship many years ago, some sort of Christian thing, and I didn't get it.

597
00:57:46.720 --> 00:57:50.720
And I concluded from this, the reason was because I'm a Catholic, and these Protestants, you know,

598
00:57:50.720 --> 00:57:53.720
they think I worship statues and all this nonsense, and I thought,

599
00:57:53.720 --> 00:57:56.720
boy, those bastards, I can't believe they robbed me of this fellowship.

600
00:57:56.720 --> 00:58:01.720
And I suddenly realized, you know, boy, if I do this even once, it must be so easy to go through life,

601
00:58:01.720 --> 00:58:07.220
to go through life, thinking that every slight, everything is due to race or something like that.

602
00:58:07.220 --> 00:58:16.120
And anything that encourages that, anything that encourages the idea that the society is inherently unjust,

603
00:58:16.120 --> 00:58:24.120
and you therefore are entitled to a kind of an ongoing reparation payment, is going to be culturally very destructive.

604
00:58:24.120 --> 00:58:27.120
Okay, I've already gone over my time. Thank you very much.

605
00:58:27.120 --> 00:58:29.120
Thank you very much.
