WEBVTT

NOTE Stalinism, National Socialism and Fascism

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:12.540
I suppose represents the second stage in a discussion of 20th century ideologies, is

2
00:00:12.540 --> 00:00:23.180
on fascism, what is it, Bolshevism, National Socialism and fascism, all of which are conventionally

3
00:00:23.180 --> 00:00:35.600
are seen as forces which the United States in some fashion overcame usually militarily

4
00:00:35.600 --> 00:00:40.580
in the course of the 20th century.

5
00:00:40.580 --> 00:00:44.860
There was a book on multiculturalism which I was looking at, a book that was intended

6
00:00:44.860 --> 00:00:52.060
to be an antidote to multiculturalism by a man named Alvin Schmidt who suggested Americans

7
00:01:52.060 --> 00:01:59.580
The upshot of the war in the end was that we had destroyed the bourgeois civilization of

8
00:01:59.580 --> 00:02:04.340
the Western world, which is a good thing from a neoconservative point of view, because the

9
00:02:04.340 --> 00:02:10.900
world would have been less egalitarian, less feminist, less open to the sort of yuppie

10
00:02:10.900 --> 00:02:17.700
lifestyle that I suppose Mr. Fukuyama leads, or would like to imagine that he leads.

11
00:02:17.700 --> 00:02:22.420
And we would all be living, and he said, some liberalized version of South Africa.

12
00:02:22.420 --> 00:02:26.220
This I assume was before Nelson Mandela took over.

13
00:02:26.220 --> 00:02:31.820
And there would not be a welfare state and all the other good aspects of liberal democracy

14
00:02:31.820 --> 00:02:33.900
as he understands it.

15
00:02:33.900 --> 00:02:38.180
And you know, up until then, I'd never been aware that the Kaiser was fighting for all

16
00:02:38.180 --> 00:02:41.260
these good ideals.

17
00:02:41.260 --> 00:02:46.420
But apparently he was, you know, at least according to Fukuyama.

18
00:02:46.420 --> 00:02:53.340
But there is no question that the First World War is in many ways a kind of turning point

19
00:02:53.340 --> 00:03:02.580
because the disruptions of the war, the wartime economy and the mobilization that the war

20
00:03:02.580 --> 00:03:10.220
brings and finally the frustrations caused by the subsequent peace treaty will feed into

21
00:03:10.220 --> 00:03:19.980
The mass movements of the interwar years, of which there are three major ones, fascism,

22
00:03:19.980 --> 00:03:25.740
communism and national socialism.

23
00:03:25.740 --> 00:03:30.620
If one were looking at the world perhaps in the 1920s, it would seem that the most successful

24
00:03:30.620 --> 00:03:34.100
of the three was fascism.

25
00:03:34.100 --> 00:03:40.100
My friend Jean-Luc Hatch always tells me that, you know, Mussolini was serious, Lenin was

26
00:03:40.100 --> 00:04:06.100
I think by which he means that Mussolini appealed to something real, nationalism, you know, people feel this in their gut, whereas Marxist Leninism is sort of based on an abstract universalist ideal that outside of intellectuals most people don't believe in, and if some people will fight because they're hungry and want food or want redistribution of land.

27
00:04:06.100 --> 00:04:15.060
Whatever the case, I think in the 1920s, fascism was looked upon as the wave of the future,

28
00:04:15.060 --> 00:04:19.380
the paradigm for a managerial society.

29
00:04:19.380 --> 00:04:23.900
And another thing that sort of comes out of the early 20th century and the growth of mass

30
00:04:23.900 --> 00:04:29.380
industrial societies is the notion of government planning.

31
00:04:29.380 --> 00:04:34.740
And the Italian model is seen as one that was working in the 1920s, largely because

32
00:04:34.740 --> 00:05:03.500
The State was a totalitarian state, but actually the state was not all that total.

33
00:05:03.500 --> 00:05:14.500
There was a very, very large, you know, free economy that continues to exist in Italy throughout the 1920s into the 1930s,

34
00:05:14.500 --> 00:05:21.500
which, by the way, was generally not criticized by progressive social democrats and others

35
00:05:21.500 --> 00:05:32.500
who did look upon Mussolini's reform, his Rivoluzione Nazionale, as a serious, you know, attempt to create within nations,

36
00:05:32.500 --> 00:05:37.980
with the nations, particular nations, a kind of model of social planning, government social

37
00:05:37.980 --> 00:05:44.980
planning that could be exported under the proper conditions to the United States and

38
00:05:44.980 --> 00:05:47.340
to England and to other countries.

39
00:05:47.340 --> 00:05:53.180
It is really not, I would say, until the rise of Nazism and the alliance of Mussolini with

40
00:05:53.180 --> 00:05:59.020
Hitler that fascism is perceived as a wicked right-wing ideology.

41
00:05:59.020 --> 00:06:07.600
There's a very good book by John Patrick Diggins on fascism as seen from the United States,

42
00:06:07.600 --> 00:06:13.000
in which he goes through issues of the New Republic, and just about everybody there, including

43
00:06:13.000 --> 00:06:19.220
John Dewey, was very impressed by Mussolini, and saw in him an architect of the kind of

44
00:06:19.220 --> 00:06:21.720
social planning they were trying to introduce.

45
00:06:21.720 --> 00:06:28.700
In fact, Dewey wished to use the word corporatism to describe what he was doing until Mussolini

46
00:06:28.700 --> 00:06:35.500
And he sort of fell from grace, at which point he very successfully chose the term liberalism

47
00:06:35.500 --> 00:06:41.540
to describe what clearly was anti-liberal, but that term has been able to stick.

48
00:06:41.540 --> 00:06:47.080
But in any case, I think fascism to the 20s is seen as a much more successful model than

49
00:06:47.080 --> 00:06:48.080
Bolshevism.

50
00:06:48.080 --> 00:06:51.020
The Bolsheviks are sort of fumbling around.

51
00:06:51.020 --> 00:06:56.020
There are various attempts to take governments over by force in England, France and other

52
00:07:26.020 --> 00:07:33.160
The Communist Party in the United States is pretty much of a joke. It splits, it means

53
00:07:33.160 --> 00:07:39.080
constantly fragments, particularly after the rise of Stalin. And then, of course, there

54
00:07:39.080 --> 00:07:46.920
is an attempted communist takeover of China in the 1920s, which fails miserably. Other

55
00:07:46.920 --> 00:07:54.680
attempts fail miserably in Hungary, in Germany and elsewhere. So the Soviets do not seem

56
00:07:54.680 --> 00:08:00.360
to be in a particularly strong position, whereas Mussolini is a man of honor. Fascists are

57
00:08:00.360 --> 00:08:07.040
sent to Chicago, an aviator, Belbo, comes here, and they put up a... In fact, it still

58
00:08:07.040 --> 00:08:12.220
stands in Buckingham Park in Chicago, and this is put in the second year of the Italian

59
00:08:12.220 --> 00:08:18.280
National Revolution, you know, and he was greatly honored. I mean, this Italian aviator

60
00:08:18.280 --> 00:08:33.280
The 1920s were very much, I think, a period in which the fascists seemed to be the successful managerial model.

61
00:08:33.280 --> 00:08:41.280
In the 1930s, you have the rise of Nazism in Germany.

62
00:08:41.280 --> 00:08:48.760
I really do not want to get into a discussion of, you know, is Nazism fascist, is Nazism

63
00:08:48.760 --> 00:08:49.760
Stalinist?

64
00:08:49.760 --> 00:08:52.400
It is in fact a combination.

65
00:08:52.400 --> 00:08:59.040
The Germans pick from various managerial models, but the result is infinitely more demonic

66
00:08:59.040 --> 00:09:05.460
and sinister than what happens in Italy, although not more sinister or demonic than what happens

67
00:09:05.460 --> 00:09:11.120
in Russia under Stalin, it just gets a worse press because it lands up on the losing side

68
00:09:11.120 --> 00:09:22.120
The German Nazis are also going to enjoy a certain success for a while, despite the bad

69
00:09:22.120 --> 00:09:29.080
public relations caused by their anti-Semitism, which is not well received in the United States.

70
00:09:29.080 --> 00:09:34.880
Nazi Germany is hated, contrary to what Jewish groups say, that everybody loved Hitler, and

71
00:09:34.880 --> 00:09:35.880
this is not true.

72
00:09:35.880 --> 00:09:41.600
The Nazis were hated in England and other countries, particularly because of their anti-Semitism,

73
00:09:41.600 --> 00:09:42.600
which was very blatant.

74
00:09:42.600 --> 00:09:49.840
You could see the humiliation of Jews in these films and so forth, which were circulated.

75
00:09:49.840 --> 00:09:56.080
These were not well-received in Western countries, and for a while they even created a reaction

76
00:09:56.080 --> 00:10:04.460
in fascists that lead, from Mussolini, so that this was the dark side of the Nazis.

77
00:10:04.460 --> 00:10:09.260
But they did use the language of peace, you know, and to quote Ralph's expression, they

78
00:10:09.260 --> 00:10:16.760
wish to serve mankind, and it's incredible how many of Hitler's speech, you know, contains

79
00:10:16.760 --> 00:10:21.180
the word Friede, Frieden. We're doing this for peace. Whatever they're doing is always

80
00:10:21.180 --> 00:10:27.220
for peace. We want to put this dispute out of the way, or something, and then we can

81
00:10:27.220 --> 00:10:28.220
The Journal of Peace

82
00:10:28.220 --> 00:10:35.700
So, he does use this language of peace, but the behavior toward Jews and toward other

83
00:10:35.700 --> 00:10:42.020
groups that are sort of singled out for special treatment is so unpleasant and also so widely

84
00:10:42.020 --> 00:10:49.220
known that the Nazis will not receive as good a press, certainly as the Italian fascists

85
00:10:49.220 --> 00:10:51.220
had before.

86
00:10:51.220 --> 00:11:17.220
Nonetheless, I think John Lukacs, who writes about this period, is correct, that in the 1930s it does appear that Hitler has become sort of the leading fascist and many people admire him and see him as a great national socialist leader who has, in a sense, sort of taken over and perfected the Italian fascist paradigm.

87
00:11:17.220 --> 00:11:23.220
There are also, as the historian, I think, Ernst Nolte, the German historian, quite rightly points out,

88
00:11:23.220 --> 00:11:30.220
a kind of competition that goes on between a Nazi fascist and a Bolshevik model in the 1930s,

89
00:11:30.220 --> 00:11:40.220
in which people who are strongly anti-communist in Central Europe feel, in some cases, driven to support the German,

90
00:11:40.220 --> 00:11:45.220
because of the German-Italian side rather than the Soviet side.

91
00:11:45.220 --> 00:11:47.220
They see this sort of the communist side.

92
00:11:47.220 --> 00:11:51.220
And the communists, I think, are quite rightly seen throughout the 30s

93
00:11:51.220 --> 00:11:53.220
as the more dangerous mass murderers.

94
00:11:53.220 --> 00:11:56.220
I mean, they've already carried out the things

95
00:11:56.220 --> 00:12:01.220
that Hitler will be doing in the succeeding decade.

96
00:12:01.220 --> 00:12:05.220
And they're also aiming their destructive energies

97
00:12:05.220 --> 00:12:08.220
against the middle class, their anti-bourgeois.

98
00:12:08.220 --> 00:12:15.300
So that much of the middle class sort of feels a, according to Knowlton, I think this is

99
00:12:15.300 --> 00:12:21.580
partly true, it depends on the area, they feel that somehow the German-Italian connection

100
00:12:21.580 --> 00:12:29.320
or ideological camp is safer than the communist camp, and they sort of, one might say emotionally

101
00:12:29.320 --> 00:12:33.220
or in terms of disposition, drift in that direction.

102
00:12:33.220 --> 00:12:38.980
Nonetheless, the communists are going to start to make a comeback in the Soviets in the 1930s,

103
00:12:38.980 --> 00:12:44.060
despite the fact that they're wildly massacring people in the Ukraine, and then during the

104
00:12:44.060 --> 00:12:50.320
purge trials and so forth, because at this time, Stalin is following, at least in terms

105
00:12:50.320 --> 00:12:58.740
of his relations with the Western countries, the popular front tactic, by which he calls,

106
00:12:58.740 --> 00:13:28.740
Ludwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard, Friedrich Hayek, Eugen von Boehm-Bawerk, Eugen von Boehm-Bawerk, Jean-Baptiste Say, Frederic Bastiat, Israel Kirzner, Jean-Baptiste Say, Frederic Bastiat, Israel Kirzner, Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Joseph Salerno, Walter Block, Lew Rockwell, Roger Garrison, Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Friedrich Hayek, Eugen von Boehm-Bawerk, Jean-Baptiste Say, Frederic Bastiat, Eugen von Boehm-Bawerk,

107
00:13:28.740 --> 00:13:46.740
The communist role is probably as significant, and the communists also play roles in disrupting the French government in the 1930s, together with parties of the nationalist right, and the communist membership in the United States will go up.

108
00:13:46.740 --> 00:13:52.740
I mean, the communists do manage to pull, I think, a million votes at one point in the American election.

109
00:13:52.740 --> 00:14:12.740
The problem is that they break apart because they're fragmented in the United States between the followers of Trotsky, the followers of Stalin, other sort of communist sectarians like the Love-Stoneites, out of which some of the neoconservatives, by the way, come. They're Love-Stoneites. They're not really Trotskiists.

110
00:14:12.740 --> 00:14:39.740
In the 1930s, the communists do become a major force or viewed as a major force of resistance against both the Nazis and, to some extent, the fascists.

111
00:14:39.740 --> 00:14:44.180
They always use the word fascism to refer to all their enemies on the right are all fascists,

112
00:14:44.180 --> 00:14:47.420
including the social democrats, they call them fascists.

113
00:14:47.420 --> 00:14:53.300
But I mean, that's sort of the anti-fascist alliance which they provide, and they also

114
00:14:53.300 --> 00:14:59.360
are able to project themselves successfully in European countries as a workers' party

115
00:14:59.360 --> 00:15:06.860
which will redistribute the fruits of production and overcome what seem to be the inequities

116
00:15:06.860 --> 00:15:12.060
and Irregularities or Disruptions of the Capitalist System.

117
00:15:12.060 --> 00:15:18.620
So the 1930s, the communists do make a comeback, and there is no question that if you look

118
00:15:18.620 --> 00:15:24.900
at the end of the Second World War, the communists are big, big, big winners.

119
00:15:24.900 --> 00:15:30.220
They are big winners despite the fact that they had been treacherous, they had supported

120
00:15:30.220 --> 00:15:32.020
the Nazis.

121
00:15:32.020 --> 00:15:33.020
Something that is hardly ever mentioned.

122
00:15:33.020 --> 00:15:35.020
I mean, I never hear this mentioned.

123
00:15:35.020 --> 00:15:38.700
It's not even mentioned, one never dares mention this, even in France.

124
00:15:38.700 --> 00:15:43.420
I mean, if you say this, you know, this is considered to be a fascist statement.

125
00:15:43.420 --> 00:15:49.820
But in France, they went so far in observing the Nazi-Soviet pact, when Hitler and Stalin

126
00:15:49.820 --> 00:15:57.020
were allies, that they A, undermined the war effort of the French, B, beat up, killed members

127
00:15:57.020 --> 00:15:59.740
of the Communist Party who fought against Hitler.

128
00:15:59.740 --> 00:16:04.300
And it was only when the Soviet Union is invaded that the Communist Party in France, Italy

129
00:16:04.300 --> 00:16:11.140
in Italy and other countries will turn around, but by the end of the war, they not only bear

130
00:16:11.140 --> 00:16:18.180
the mantle of anti-fascism and the resistance, but they carry out savage reprisals against

131
00:16:18.180 --> 00:16:23.820
people who are far less guilty of collaboration than they were, and they do this in Italy

132
00:16:23.820 --> 00:16:32.160
and in France and other countries, and the communists also are able, like in a country

133
00:17:02.160 --> 00:17:18.160
Paul Serrant, Les Vanquishes et les Liberations, The Vanquish and the Liberation

134
00:17:32.160 --> 00:18:02.160
and a lot of it was just a matter of taking revenge on somebody you didn't like but you know the communist party somehow comes out of the war smelling good they had won and of course they had been the worst collaborators they turned around and they're exterminating other people at the end of the war and they weren't even the best resistance force in these countries during the war they were not this is a lie but they are but what they do is they take control of the left and of the so-called anti-fascist side and come out on top at the end

135
00:18:02.160 --> 00:18:06.360
End of the War.

136
00:18:06.360 --> 00:18:13.440
The communists will continue to ride high for a while, though by the 1950s, I think

137
00:18:13.440 --> 00:18:19.480
there's a very definite reaction in the other direction in most European countries.

138
00:18:19.480 --> 00:18:26.320
I think there's a kind of movement back toward the right, which starts to take place.

139
00:18:26.320 --> 00:18:31.040
And you have, you know, sort of conservative Christian Democrat governments, you even have

140
00:18:31.040 --> 00:18:39.040
The theory of neo-fascist parties winning local elections, but being able to reorganize themselves in some countries.

141
00:18:39.040 --> 00:18:44.040
And the communists are generally in very bad odor throughout the Western world.

142
00:18:44.040 --> 00:18:49.040
They're seen as repressive, they're associated with Stalinism and so forth.

143
00:18:49.040 --> 00:18:58.040
And at this point, there develops a theory which I think might be re-examined, examined and re-examined today,

144
00:18:58.040 --> 00:19:05.600
because it's one that I know that I grew up with and I believed until relatively recently.

145
00:19:05.600 --> 00:19:13.740
And this is the view that communism, Nazism, all these things are totalitarian movements

146
00:19:13.740 --> 00:19:18.920
and that they're all pretty much the same.

147
00:19:18.920 --> 00:19:25.520
And the struggle against Nazism leads into the struggle against the second kind of Nazism,

148
00:19:25.520 --> 00:19:31.720
which is Soviet Bolshevism, and that we're somehow the good guys because we end up destroying

149
00:19:31.720 --> 00:19:37.760
all these monsters in the end, or at least opposing all these monsters in the end.

150
00:19:37.760 --> 00:19:43.280
And the theory of totalitarianism, which is originally, well, a number of people put it

151
00:19:43.280 --> 00:19:44.280
together.

152
00:19:44.280 --> 00:19:49.680
There's actually a deviationist Marxist named Franz Borkenau in the 1930s who comes

153
00:19:49.680 --> 00:20:19.680
Carl Wittfoglum, I knew, you know, had created such a theory by the 1940s, but it's a famous book by Brzezinski and Carl Friedrich, Zbigniew Brzezinski and Carl Friedrich on totalitarianism, that comes out soon after the Second World War, in which this argument is put forth that totalitarian governments are qualitatively different from both democratic and authoritarian.

154
00:20:19.680 --> 00:20:29.160
Authoritarian governments control everything in the societies that they take over and use

155
00:20:29.160 --> 00:20:37.520
terror as a way of enforcing control, distort reality by creating some sort of ideology that

156
00:20:37.520 --> 00:20:46.200
is empirical nonsense, but which they force upon people as an instrument of control.

157
00:20:46.200 --> 00:20:53.120
Authoritarian governments are seen simply as undeveloped regimes that exist or primitive

158
00:20:53.120 --> 00:20:57.080
regimes that exist in economically primitive parts of the world.

159
00:20:57.080 --> 00:21:01.260
Parts of the world that have not yet modernized, because once they modernize, you'll get middle

160
00:21:01.260 --> 00:21:08.200
classes forming together with a strong drive toward the creation of parliamentary democratic

161
00:21:08.200 --> 00:21:09.200
institutions.

162
00:21:09.200 --> 00:21:15.680
Therefore, Spain has an authoritarian government because it's sort of economically primitive

163
00:21:15.680 --> 00:21:25.080
and the good democratic camp.

164
00:21:25.080 --> 00:21:28.600
Whereas totalitarian governments are sort of dead end, they can't go anywhere, they have

165
00:21:28.600 --> 00:21:34.440
to be removed, usually by force, because their control is total and they are incapable of

166
00:21:34.440 --> 00:21:41.140
evolving since they totally destroy anything that stands in their way.

167
00:21:41.140 --> 00:21:49.160
This argument is presented in a kind of turgid, Germanic fashion by Hannah Arendt in what

168
00:21:49.160 --> 00:21:55.740
I think is one of the worst written books of all times, Origins of Totalitarianism.

169
00:21:55.740 --> 00:22:00.580
It's also a kind of book that's sort of like a garbage can, which you throw every idea

170
00:22:00.580 --> 00:22:07.780
that ever occurred to this dotty German refugee.

171
00:22:07.780 --> 00:22:19.780
Part of her argument is to show that Hitler and Stalin really have sort of similar roots and that Stalinism and Nazism are pretty much the same, the ones in continuation of the other.

172
00:22:19.780 --> 00:22:30.780
Now, I think if we hear these sorts of arguments, there's nothing intrinsically offensive or would seem unreasonable about them, right?

173
00:22:30.780 --> 00:22:40.780
When we talk about right and left, we really don't mean Hitler on one side and Stalin on the other side.

174
00:22:40.780 --> 00:22:45.780
Or if there is a political spectrum in which these people stand on one side or the other,

175
00:22:45.780 --> 00:22:49.780
it is different from any political spectrum we'd want to be a part of.

176
00:22:49.780 --> 00:22:54.780
And we can generally agree on this.

177
00:22:54.780 --> 00:23:02.780
The question in my mind is that why was this model of totalitarianism never really widely accepted,

178
00:23:02.780 --> 00:23:08.780
except as a military propagandistic tool in pursuing the Cold War?

179
00:23:08.780 --> 00:23:11.780
I mean, most intellectuals do not seem to buy into this.

180
00:23:11.780 --> 00:23:14.780
That is because most intellectuals like the communist

181
00:23:14.780 --> 00:23:20.780
and do not want to compare them in any way to Hitler or even to Mussolini.

182
00:23:20.780 --> 00:23:31.780
And I remember even as a young assistant professor at Case Western Reserve many decades ago, people would never refer to communism, it would be Stalinism.

183
00:23:31.780 --> 00:23:34.780
And Stalinism was never as bad as fascism.

184
00:23:34.780 --> 00:23:40.780
Although Mussolini only killed about 10 people and Stalin killed about 50 million, you don't want to compare these two.

185
00:23:40.780 --> 00:23:51.340
So there was always this favorable comparison of Stalinism to Italian fascism, or certainly

186
00:23:51.340 --> 00:23:54.500
to Franco, who was even worse than Hitler.

187
00:23:54.500 --> 00:24:00.780
But the fact is most intellectuals did not buy this because they thought that communism

188
00:24:00.780 --> 00:24:05.300
and the kind of manipulative socialism they believed in were really the same.

189
00:24:05.300 --> 00:24:13.100
There was like no reason to make these distinctions, you know, and on the other hand I think they

190
00:24:13.100 --> 00:24:19.340
probably believed that Richard Nixon was at least as bad as Hitler or something like this,

191
00:24:19.340 --> 00:24:25.580
McCarthy, I mean you see this in CNN, McCarthy was worse than Stalin, you know, he had the

192
00:24:25.580 --> 00:24:30.060
whole country gripped with fear and so forth, so I mean the intellectuals were actually

193
00:24:30.060 --> 00:24:34.220
very soft on the communists, they thought Stalin, maybe a little bit too far, but they

194
00:24:34.220 --> 00:24:38.860
would vote for one of his henchmen anyhow, but I mean the totalitarian argument was never

195
00:24:38.860 --> 00:24:41.660
really bought.

196
00:24:41.660 --> 00:24:47.060
I would make this because I was strongly anti-communist and thought that the communists were in fact

197
00:24:47.060 --> 00:24:53.100
the worst mass murderers of all times and were being defended by everybody, you know,

198
00:24:53.100 --> 00:24:59.620
in the name of fighting some long-dead fascist enemy and so forth, and this of course goes

199
00:24:59.620 --> 00:25:02.700
on even now.

200
00:25:02.700 --> 00:25:07.020
But the totalitarian model, I think, is flawed from the very outset.

201
00:25:07.020 --> 00:25:11.160
And I'll try to explain why.

202
00:25:11.160 --> 00:25:17.040
Not every totalitarian government has acted in the way that totalitarian governments are

203
00:25:17.040 --> 00:25:19.600
supposed to act.

204
00:25:19.600 --> 00:25:24.820
For instance, the Soviet Union did not fall apart because it got invaded.

205
00:25:24.820 --> 00:25:29.100
I mean, you're told by Hannah Arendt, by Britain, that it's going to fall apart because

206
00:25:29.100 --> 00:25:30.620
these countries are going to be torn down.

207
00:25:30.620 --> 00:25:52.620
The Soviet Union did not go away that way. What you had was it became better by stages from what it had been under Stalin, and finally just sort of imploded from within, when it sort of overextended itself.

208
00:25:52.620 --> 00:26:03.620
The Chinese government, which was quite totalitarian, has in fact become a lot better than it was under Mao.

209
00:26:03.620 --> 00:26:08.620
I mean, it may not be an ideal state into which we'd want to live and so forth, but is it totalitarian?

210
00:26:08.620 --> 00:26:17.620
It's also questionable in my mind whether Mao's China really had control over, or the government really had control over everybody.

211
00:26:17.620 --> 00:26:23.620
You're dealing with a country of over a billion people who are dispersed over a very, very large landmass.

212
00:26:23.620 --> 00:26:31.620
I have a young colleague who's Chinese, who's doing a book on Chinese politics, and she's certainly not a Marxist,

213
00:26:31.620 --> 00:26:35.620
and she's arguing that there's very little control over the central government.

214
00:26:35.620 --> 00:26:37.620
The central government has very little control over the people.

215
00:26:37.620 --> 00:26:39.620
They collect very few taxes. They can't.

216
00:26:39.620 --> 00:26:44.620
The economic system is so inefficient in the country, and you go on and on like this.

217
00:26:44.620 --> 00:26:54.620
So I mean countries that we consider totalitarian may be brutal, unpleasant, you wouldn't want to live there but do they necessarily follow the totalitarian model?

218
00:26:54.620 --> 00:27:03.620
And my answer is no. They all have to be overthrown from within in order to be gotten rid of.

219
00:27:03.620 --> 00:27:12.620
What I would argue in the end is that the whole model of totalitarianism, and I think Ralph Reiko and I were discussing this

220
00:27:12.620 --> 00:27:24.460
I think that one problem with the totalitarian model is it basically is an attempt created

221
00:27:24.460 --> 00:27:35.220
by the social democratic left to project onto communism what is a kind of fascist Nazi bugaboo.

222
00:27:35.220 --> 00:27:40.940
And again John Lukacs made the argument that Hannah Arendt was essentially a Trotskyist

223
00:27:40.940 --> 00:27:48.740
and that the origins of totalitarianism is a Trotskyist view of both, you know, Germany and the Soviet Union.

224
00:27:48.740 --> 00:27:58.140
You know, that it is somehow a derailed form of socialism that has, you know, resulted in this monstrous kind of regime.

225
00:27:58.140 --> 00:28:03.460
But what makes the Soviet Union bad is it resembles a fascist state.

226
00:28:03.460 --> 00:28:10.460
So that one might say the paradigm of ultimate evil in the totalitarian conception is always

227
00:28:10.460 --> 00:28:12.460
something like Nazism.

228
00:28:12.460 --> 00:28:14.140
It is not the Soviets.

229
00:28:14.140 --> 00:28:19.600
The Soviets are bad because they're red fascists, they use, you know, Harry Truman's term.

230
00:28:19.600 --> 00:28:24.460
It is not that the Nazis are imitating the communists, which may be historically true.

231
00:28:24.460 --> 00:28:26.260
I think Nolte is correct.

232
00:28:26.260 --> 00:28:29.300
You know, I mean, the model that's that, that Hitler, it was Stalin's model, it was

233
00:28:29.300 --> 00:28:30.300
there.

234
00:28:30.300 --> 00:28:37.180
The Soviets evolved into something like what the Germans or other evil fascist countries

235
00:28:37.180 --> 00:28:44.740
were in the 1930s, and therefore can only be dealt with the way Nazi Germany was by decimating,

236
00:28:44.740 --> 00:28:49.340
going in there, taking over the country, and so forth.

237
00:28:49.340 --> 00:28:51.260
Not all of them, of course, go quite that far.

238
00:28:51.260 --> 00:28:56.260
They usually are never as angry at the Soviets as they are at the Germans, but they don't

239
00:28:56.260 --> 00:29:01.100
I don't want to invade them, bomb them, you know, carry out saturation bombing of Russians.

240
00:29:01.100 --> 00:29:02.100
You don't get this sort of...

241
00:29:02.100 --> 00:29:06.540
Well, you know, it's not possible anymore, but actually the dislike of the Soviets, usually

242
00:29:06.540 --> 00:29:11.220
among the advocates of totalitarian theory, was never as strong as the dislike of the

243
00:29:11.220 --> 00:29:14.220
Nazis.

244
00:29:14.220 --> 00:29:22.660
And I think what you typically get is an attempt to sort of push on to the Soviets or the Chinese

245
00:29:22.660 --> 00:29:27.140
What are the features of the Nazi German government?

246
00:29:27.140 --> 00:29:34.140
One of the interesting cases of this is 1984 by George Orwell, who is seen in many ways

247
00:29:34.140 --> 00:29:39.220
as the person who takes the managerial models of James Burnham, who was introduced by Burnham

248
00:29:39.220 --> 00:29:45.460
as the manager of evolution, and takes this model and then uses it to create this hellish,

249
00:29:45.460 --> 00:29:51.380
dystopic society, you know, in which various regions are killing each other and so forth.

250
00:29:51.380 --> 00:30:13.380
And supposedly this is an anti-Stalinist book. Well, I've read it, and it looks like an anti-Nazi book to me. I mean, they're militaristic. I mean, you do have some Stalinist stuff there, like the war against Trotsky, who becomes Goldstein in 1984, but it's a perpetually belligerent society, always engaged in war against other regions and mobilizing for war.

251
00:30:13.380 --> 00:30:16.740
and you know you can't help feeling and looking at this is that what he's

252
00:30:16.740 --> 00:30:21.000
describing is you know the fascist glorification of war which he then

253
00:30:21.000 --> 00:30:24.660
transfers on to the communists. If you read Orwell, he always says this, that the

254
00:30:24.660 --> 00:30:28.200
communists look like Nazis. I mean this is something he says in his

255
00:30:28.200 --> 00:30:36.180
correspondence. I would finally say that all of this sort of leads to a kind of

256
00:30:36.180 --> 00:30:42.320
misunderstanding and this is some a problem which my friend Hans-Hermann

257
00:30:42.320 --> 00:30:49.380
Mr. Hoppe had a few years ago when he suggested in some article that Nazi Germany was not

258
00:30:49.380 --> 00:30:54.000
as totalitarian as the Soviet Union under Stalin.

259
00:30:54.000 --> 00:30:59.520
And this was considered to be the worst sort of laissez-magecité or just crime against

260
00:30:59.520 --> 00:31:04.600
humanity or against the nobility of the human soul and so forth.

261
00:31:04.600 --> 00:31:08.700
And he was actually, his article I think was banned from some libertarian journal and they

262
00:31:08.700 --> 00:31:11.160
hanged him in effigy and so forth.

263
00:31:11.160 --> 00:31:18.520
Now, what he said is perfectly true. I mean, it's like, you know, self-evident. I mean,

264
00:31:18.520 --> 00:31:24.120
the Nazis may have been very unpleasant. They incarcerated members of my family. They

265
00:31:24.120 --> 00:31:28.200
probably killed others. I mean, I have no, you know, brief for them, but they did not

266
00:31:28.200 --> 00:31:33.600
have the kind of intellectual, the kind of control of opinion that the media and the

267
00:31:33.600 --> 00:31:39.640
state have in the United States today. I mean, or in Germany today. I mean, Germany is a

268
00:31:39.640 --> 00:31:49.640
I mean, Hitler killed a lot more people. He put them in concentration camps. They got brutalized, everything else. He was a gangster. He was a mass murderer.

269
00:31:49.640 --> 00:31:57.640
But if you're talking about totalitarianism, you have to also talk about control of thought. This is basic to totalitarianism.

270
00:31:57.640 --> 00:32:03.640
And the Nazis did not control thought in the same manner that the communists did, you know.

271
00:32:03.640 --> 00:32:23.640
The Left is always more totalitarian in this regard, in the sense that they try to control people's thought, reconstruct their consciousness much more intensively and much more relentlessly than any right-wing government.

272
00:32:23.640 --> 00:32:29.240
that they try to control people's thought, reconstruct their consciousness much more intensively

273
00:32:30.360 --> 00:32:36.120
and much more relentlessly than any right-wing government or even a brutal, you know,

274
00:32:36.680 --> 00:32:42.040
ultra-nationalist gangster like Hitler. There's just no comparison. This is the way the left operates.

275
00:32:42.920 --> 00:32:46.760
And I don't think the totalitarian model really takes that into account,

276
00:32:46.760 --> 00:33:07.760
And I found that these are different types of control, you know, that the Nazis committed mass murder, brutalized people, invaded countries all over the place, carried out an insane foreign policy, everything else, but they did not engage in the same degree of thought control as the communists in most countries did.

277
00:33:07.760 --> 00:33:10.160
However, even the communist will change.

278
00:33:10.160 --> 00:33:16.760
I mean, if you look at communist Hungary 20 years ago, there was less thought control there

279
00:33:16.760 --> 00:33:20.760
than you get in your Western European countries of today,

280
00:33:20.760 --> 00:33:26.760
which nonetheless have relatively freer market economies, okay?

281
00:33:26.760 --> 00:33:28.760
I'm not going to, you know, there's nothing to write home about.

282
00:33:28.760 --> 00:33:34.760
There are heavily socialized economies, but there's more of a free market in Germany today

283
00:33:34.760 --> 00:33:36.760
than there was in Hungary 20 years ago.

284
00:33:36.760 --> 00:34:04.200
And the fact that not all totalitarian governments

285
00:34:04.200 --> 00:34:12.200
The Nazis behaved the same way, supposedly, to other governments, and some are able to change from within.

286
00:34:12.200 --> 00:34:15.200
I mean, it's quite possible that the Soviets could change from within.

287
00:34:15.200 --> 00:34:20.200
The Nazis might not have been able to do this. They might have become worse and worse.

288
00:34:20.200 --> 00:34:25.200
But, you know, did the Nazi model necessarily apply to the Soviet Union?

289
00:34:25.200 --> 00:34:31.200
Were the Nazis as intellectually totalitarian as the Soviets? No, they were not.

290
00:34:31.200 --> 00:34:37.800
But on the other hand, there may have been other aspects of their government that were more dangerous.

291
00:34:37.800 --> 00:34:43.640
But, you know, I think one has to look at individual political models,

292
00:34:43.640 --> 00:34:47.480
even of the most disagreeable governments, without making these judgments.

293
00:34:47.480 --> 00:34:50.840
Was Mussolini's Italy a totalitarian state?

294
00:34:50.840 --> 00:34:55.240
Well, as much as Mussolini liked the term totalitarian, the answer is no.

295
00:34:55.240 --> 00:34:57.080
It was a rather weak state.

296
00:34:57.080 --> 00:35:00.880
Everybody marched around with a uniform or something or sang a song,

297
00:35:00.880 --> 00:35:06.440
But it had a relatively free economy in comparison to the United States today.

298
00:35:06.440 --> 00:35:10.320
It did not engage in a particularly adventurous foreign policy.

299
00:35:10.320 --> 00:35:22.040
They bombed Corfu, they tried to grab Albania, handed it to them, just take it, no complaints.

300
00:35:22.040 --> 00:35:25.480
But I mean, they did not try to serve mankind the way we do it today.

301
00:35:25.480 --> 00:35:27.520
So they didn't have the means to do it.

302
00:35:27.520 --> 00:35:30.360
I mean, they were too weak a state.

303
00:35:30.360 --> 00:35:36.360
I think I generally agreed at a certain point that Italy was not totalitarian, just bad or something like that.

304
00:35:36.360 --> 00:35:41.360
Was Franco-Spain totalitarian? Because very often the term did get used.

305
00:35:41.360 --> 00:35:45.360
The answer is no. It was a kind of traditional military dictatorship.

306
00:35:45.360 --> 00:35:49.360
So then it fell into the authoritarian camp.

307
00:35:49.360 --> 00:35:56.360
The argument about authoritarian governments I find much more convincing than totalitarian ones.

308
00:35:56.360 --> 00:36:26.360
The Theory of Money and Credit

309
00:36:26.360 --> 00:36:35.120
I think one can agree about the authoritarian government without necessarily assuming the

310
00:36:35.120 --> 00:36:42.080
judgments that are associated with the totalitarian model, which I think becomes more and more

311
00:36:42.080 --> 00:36:44.040
open to question.

312
00:36:44.040 --> 00:36:51.360
And I think, as I said, more and more associated with a certain kind of Cold War liberal politics.

313
00:36:51.360 --> 00:36:57.800
And I hope I've given you enough food for thought, since I've said much that will

314
00:36:57.800 --> 00:37:04.160
cause controversy or at least cause you to think about the problems that I've raised.

315
00:37:04.160 --> 00:37:07.160
Perhaps I can now open this to questions.

316
00:37:07.160 --> 00:37:08.160
Yes, sir.

317
00:37:08.160 --> 00:37:13.160
You mentioned that there is a lot of imprisonment, or there is imprisonment for PC and drugs.

318
00:37:13.160 --> 00:37:16.160
Can you give me a few examples, please?

319
00:37:16.160 --> 00:37:20.760
Well, there's actually a piece in the New York Times about a year and a half ago.

320
00:37:20.760 --> 00:37:27.600
I try to document this in the book of mine that's now coming out, but people are in

321
00:37:27.600 --> 00:37:31.480
jail or are facing criminal charges.

322
00:37:31.480 --> 00:37:33.680
Sometimes these things get appealed and they're put in jail.

323
00:37:33.680 --> 00:37:40.840
You're able to appeal the case, but they have been accused and found guilty of saying things

324
00:37:40.840 --> 00:37:50.440
which threaten the German constitution or threaten German democracy.

325
00:37:50.440 --> 00:37:55.760
And you have agencies that are attached both to the federal and provincial governments

326
00:37:55.760 --> 00:37:57.440
which look into these things.

327
00:37:57.440 --> 00:38:03.600
There is one case that I looked at which was particularly ominous, it was a German newspaper

328
00:38:03.600 --> 00:38:08.400
which I find very boring actually, Junger Freiheit, which is supposed to be a sort of

329
00:38:08.400 --> 00:38:10.920
right center.

330
00:38:10.920 --> 00:38:15.200
It is, you know, it's probably where the National Review was about five, ten years

331
00:38:15.200 --> 00:38:16.200
ago.

332
00:38:16.200 --> 00:38:41.200
Stoibel, Christian Social Party in Bavaria, Nordrhein-Westfalen, The Land of Nordrhein-Westfalen,

333
00:38:41.200 --> 00:39:09.200
In the meantime, they've had to pay to leave for legal costs because they've tried to close down their magazine, they've lost their subscribers, they've lost their advertisers, and a Berlin bank closed their account because they don't want to be associated with these politically incorrect people.

334
00:39:09.200 --> 00:39:13.900
Now this kind of thing goes on all the time in Germany and they're lucky they haven't been thrown in jail

335
00:39:15.320 --> 00:39:19.800
Because their magazine represents it must be a national conservative direction

336
00:39:19.800 --> 00:39:25.200
They've published people critical of third-world immigration and in France. This is this is a very common occurrence

337
00:39:25.800 --> 00:39:31.960
There was somebody given I think six months in jail. I don't know if he spent the whole time whether it was just parole or what I

338
00:39:32.520 --> 00:39:37.160
For writing an article against immigration which I looked at which was I mean this you know also

339
00:39:37.160 --> 00:39:43.980
Also Holocaust denial in the case of France means denying anything the Nuremberg tribunal

340
00:39:43.980 --> 00:39:49.880
said at the end of the war so that people have actually been prosecuted for saying that

341
00:39:49.880 --> 00:39:55.000
the 10,000 Polish soldiers who were killed in the Katyn woods were killed by the Soviets

342
00:39:55.000 --> 00:39:56.560
and not by the Germans.

343
00:39:56.560 --> 00:40:00.400
That is a criminal offense today in France.

344
00:40:00.400 --> 00:40:04.120
And usually of the communist party pushing all this stuff, but the socialists go along

345
00:40:04.120 --> 00:40:05.120
with it.

346
00:40:05.120 --> 00:40:06.120
They're quite happy to do this.

347
00:40:06.120 --> 00:40:10.120
I didn't see any of this in Germany when I was living there.

348
00:40:12.120 --> 00:40:14.120
Ten years ago.

349
00:40:36.120 --> 00:40:49.120
Anti-fascist riots, businesses are destroyed, the darkest days of the Nazi takeover, the police just stand there, they don't even want to get involved.

350
00:40:49.120 --> 00:40:59.120
There are a lot of books that have come out on this, but there was a speech by a man named Martin Walzow about it, I think Ralph R. sent this to me about a year ago,

351
00:40:59.120 --> 00:41:10.120
I mentioned this to me and he was given an award for a literary prize and he said you know it's high time we talk about the totalitarian aspect of our government.

352
00:41:10.120 --> 00:41:26.120
We seem to be proud of this and this compulsory guilt about things that most of us never did and the way this is used to destroy intellectual freedom and freedom of speech and criminalizing improper opinions and so forth.

353
00:41:26.120 --> 00:41:34.120
How can a discussion nowadays in the current state of the Chinese government, would you call it authoritarian, totalitarian, or neither?

354
00:41:56.120 --> 00:42:00.120
The Chinese government is a problem since it's a weak government.

355
00:42:00.120 --> 00:42:06.120
It does things that are not nice, but then so did governments five, six hundred years ago in Europe,

356
00:42:06.120 --> 00:42:09.120
but they were not particularly strong governments.

357
00:42:09.120 --> 00:42:15.120
They might have grabbed some peasant and hanged him, but they reached an extent very much beyond that peasant.

358
00:42:15.120 --> 00:42:20.120
So it is not a powerful government like the American government.

359
00:42:20.120 --> 00:42:25.120
The American government in terms of technology, in terms of money,

360
00:42:25.120 --> 00:42:33.120
So a distinction for you between authoritarian and totalitarian would be the strength of the state?

361
00:42:55.120 --> 00:43:11.120
I was thinking that I had two comments. One was that I think that sometimes thought control has contributed to Germany more than it was really proactive as an excuse for the complacency of the German people and as a way to somehow explain it.

362
00:43:11.120 --> 00:43:17.120
So people think, well, there was all kinds of PR and all kinds of, you know, mass thought control.

363
00:43:17.120 --> 00:43:24.120
And my other comment was that one thing that seems contrary to your statement about Hitler not being very popular,

364
00:43:24.120 --> 00:43:30.120
or maybe Hitler was popular but the Nazis weren't, what about the thing about him being times man of the year, twice I think.

365
00:43:30.120 --> 00:43:36.120
Okay, by the way, being times man of the year, it was explained at the time that this was not a popular, they didn't think he was a nice man.

366
00:43:36.120 --> 00:43:39.120
They just thought he had influenced world events.

367
00:43:39.120 --> 00:43:40.120
I see.

368
00:43:40.120 --> 00:43:44.000
I mean, and they made that distinction, Ralph can probably speak on that more because he's

369
00:43:44.000 --> 00:43:50.720
done work on this period, but you know, I think that's very clear.

370
00:43:50.720 --> 00:43:56.120
I think obviously there was attempt to control, I mean, they pushed anti-Semitism 24 hours

371
00:43:56.120 --> 00:44:03.480
a day in Nazi Germany, and obviously people were influenced by this, you know, I mean,

372
00:44:03.480 --> 00:44:07.440
it was perhaps the most liberal country in terms of treating Jews anywhere in Europe,

373
00:44:07.440 --> 00:44:12.320
And some, you know, they become, you know, handing in Jews, I mean, so obviously this

374
00:44:12.320 --> 00:44:14.440
does influence countries.

375
00:44:14.440 --> 00:44:18.320
I don't accept for a moment the Goldhagen thesis about every German wanting to kill

376
00:44:18.320 --> 00:44:24.520
Jews by 1900, I think this is highly improbable, and the book is a piece of junk, which makes

377
00:44:24.520 --> 00:44:30.040
up its quotations and its phony statistics and so forth.

378
00:44:30.040 --> 00:44:35.520
But obviously this is effective propaganda.

379
00:44:35.520 --> 00:44:39.400
On the other hand, I think that, you know, a lot of the Germans weren't complacent.

380
00:44:39.400 --> 00:44:41.160
I mean, many of them were afraid of the government.

381
00:44:41.160 --> 00:44:45.840
If you disagree, you'd be in a concentration camp, you'd be beaten up, something like that.

382
00:44:45.840 --> 00:44:49.120
I mean, it's not that you just would not be invited to a cocktail party.

383
00:44:49.120 --> 00:44:51.600
You know, you'd land up in Dachau.

384
00:44:51.600 --> 00:44:54.760
So you know, there were reasons to go along with the system.

385
00:44:54.760 --> 00:44:55.760
Ralph, you?

386
00:44:55.760 --> 00:44:58.160
Ralph here.

387
00:44:58.160 --> 00:45:09.160
I found your talk interesting and provocative, and what I was interested in thinking about was your allusion to the terminological question.

388
00:45:09.160 --> 00:45:16.160
I don't think we could emphasize enough how much terminology determines thought, and politics.

389
00:45:16.160 --> 00:45:24.160
For instance, whenever there's excessive belief, force used against demonstrators is quote, logistic.

390
00:45:24.160 --> 00:45:48.160
Right. Of course, it was the checkup in 1918 on that introduced mass terror by the secret police, killing already tens of thousands in Lenin's time, but we never say fascistic, we never say communist, and you alluded to the fact that they like to talk about some kind of generic fascism.

391
00:46:18.160 --> 00:46:33.920
Well, there's nothing I disagree with. Is there anybody else who? Any other questions?

392
00:46:33.920 --> 00:46:43.920
I was reading in your book, the conservative movement last night, I think the first chapter

393
00:46:43.920 --> 00:46:49.920
about the conservative movement in 1950, and it seems like there were several on the post-war

394
00:46:49.920 --> 00:46:53.920
right, guys like William Huckley, who actually thought that Joseph McCarty had him up far

395
00:46:53.920 --> 00:46:57.920
enough, and they basically seemed to be saying that if you were a critic of democracy and

396
00:46:57.920 --> 00:47:03.920
How would you put democracy in the form of giving aid and comfort to the Soviet Union that he'd be put in jail and silenced?

397
00:47:03.920 --> 00:47:09.920
I was just wondering how you would put that into the context of your speech?

398
00:47:27.920 --> 00:47:35.440
The Left does not believe in saying what you want at all.

399
00:47:35.440 --> 00:47:43.000
Now that they've taken over, it's like you have the intellectual freedom of Auschwitz.

400
00:47:43.000 --> 00:47:45.760
This is all nonsense.

401
00:47:45.760 --> 00:47:51.160
The fact is that a lot of that stuff was being turned not only against the Left, but I think

402
00:47:51.160 --> 00:47:54.660
as Ralph and Lew and others have pointed out, it was basically being turned against the

403
00:47:54.660 --> 00:47:55.840
Right as well.

404
00:47:55.840 --> 00:48:01.960
Buckley did not agree with them, you know, got extra-sized, excommunicated and so forth.

405
00:48:01.960 --> 00:48:10.520
So I think that was a very bad tendency to achieve what the Germans called Gleitschaltung,

406
00:48:10.520 --> 00:48:16.000
just sort of force everybody into the same model of thought which Buckley began in the

407
00:48:16.000 --> 00:48:17.000
fifties.

408
00:48:17.000 --> 00:48:18.000
Lou?

409
00:48:18.000 --> 00:48:22.000
I was going to mention, too, that Buckley's an evil book, God and Man, in the end.

410
00:48:22.000 --> 00:48:30.000
The first thing I'm aware of on the right is to argue for an end to academic freedom and to purge people who differ in what they believe.

411
00:48:30.000 --> 00:48:36.000
And so it's really the Godfather, all of the things today, of purging people who are insensitive to know what diversity or whatever.

412
00:48:36.000 --> 00:48:42.000
Buckley is responsible for many evils, but this is one of his babies.

413
00:49:18.000 --> 00:49:25.880
Yes, Betreason No, and I said, this is really good. You know, in the early 70s, I said,

414
00:49:25.880 --> 00:49:31.280
you know, this man is, you know, is really on to something. He's a tough fellow, you

415
00:49:31.280 --> 00:49:35.520
know, and the little that I know is he'd be turned against the right, you know, but

416
00:49:35.520 --> 00:49:41.680
the same thing takes place in Germany, which I discovered from doing this work, that you

417
00:49:41.680 --> 00:49:56.980
The Schutzverfassungsgericht.

418
00:50:26.980 --> 00:50:55.980
The right must have been very cocky to believe that they'd get away with this stuff, you know, if you just look at the political forces that were present, you know, it would not be long before you'd be on the receiving end, and I think this happens in a number of western countries.

419
00:50:55.980 --> 00:50:59.980
Were these agencies in fact set up by the U.S. government?

420
00:50:59.980 --> 00:51:02.980
These German agencies were set up by the U.S. government?

421
00:51:02.980 --> 00:51:03.980
Absolutely.

422
00:51:03.980 --> 00:51:09.980
I can't think that they were intended to ever do good in a Christian sense or whatever.

423
00:51:25.980 --> 00:51:55.220
The American government in 1947 was supporting a socialist-neutralist Schumacher against

424
00:51:55.220 --> 00:52:01.660
Adenauer, who was pro-Western, anti-communist Catholic, and even under Truman you have this,

425
00:52:01.660 --> 00:52:05.740
but then we sort of change course, you know, under Eisenhower and this, and the Germans

426
00:52:05.740 --> 00:52:11.220
become the bulwark of Western civilization, and the right pretty much gets to run things,

427
00:52:11.220 --> 00:52:16.100
you know, and they are concerned with Christian morality and so forth, and then in the late

428
00:52:16.100 --> 00:52:20.660
60s, as things are turning around in the United States, they turn around in Germany even more

429
00:52:20.660 --> 00:52:39.660
Do you find in our totalitarian features and values of income, bills and FDR to say that the values were totalitarian, you know, petitions?

430
00:52:50.660 --> 00:53:03.660
Can we find totalitarian features in the regimes of income, or do we also have an FDR to say, according to your definition, that these regimes are totalitarian?

431
00:53:20.660 --> 00:53:23.660
and they're all post-liberal.

432
00:53:23.660 --> 00:53:27.660
They're becoming increasingly post-bourgeois societies.

433
00:53:27.660 --> 00:53:33.660
And the fascists, I think, are Italian fascists, may be the most conservative

434
00:53:33.660 --> 00:53:36.660
because there's a very large middle-class component.

435
00:53:36.660 --> 00:53:41.660
They make an alliance with the Catholic Church in 1929 and so forth.

436
00:53:41.660 --> 00:53:46.660
The American New Deal is the most successful model,

437
00:53:46.660 --> 00:53:49.660
which is a variation on the Scandinavian socialist model,

438
00:53:49.660 --> 00:54:05.660
The Managero Model, which had already been developed in the 1920s in Sweden, and which, of course, was being planned by English socialists, and that is the one that sort of takes off, the Nazis go nowhere, and the communists fall apart.

439
00:54:05.660 --> 00:54:30.660
The point is, does the managerial model, which is created in the United States by the progressives, Wilson, the New Deal, and then, you know, grows in a kind of intermittent fashion, but with ever more vigor in the last third of the 20th century, does that model necessarily lead to total control?

440
00:54:30.660 --> 00:54:34.500
And my argument is, yes, it does.

441
00:54:34.500 --> 00:54:40.060
Or should we say that there are forces within that model which do this?

442
00:54:40.060 --> 00:54:50.260
One thing, it leaves the state in such control that it can do all sorts of things to society.

443
00:54:50.260 --> 00:54:58.220
It's not that the state is simply serving us or is doing a few little things for us or helping us with our retirement plans or something.

444
00:54:58.220 --> 00:55:07.220
I mean, it tells you what you can say to other people, what's politically correct, women's rights in relation to men, it has recolonized the family.

445
00:55:07.220 --> 00:55:18.220
And I think all of these things are, should we say, ever-present dangers, which become more and more likely realities once you've created that managerial state.

446
00:55:18.220 --> 00:55:20.220
Without the managerial state, you couldn't do these things.

447
00:55:20.220 --> 00:55:25.220
You know, someone would say, well, wouldn't you have a feminist movement without the managerial state?

448
00:55:25.220 --> 00:55:26.220
and the Financial State.

449
00:55:26.220 --> 00:55:29.160
Yes, you would, but it wouldn't amount to a hill of beans.

450
00:55:29.160 --> 00:55:30.160
Right?

451
00:55:30.160 --> 00:55:31.540
I mean, you need the state to do these things.

452
00:55:31.540 --> 00:55:36.920
It just like you could have had anti-Semitism in Germany in 1931 when you had all these

453
00:55:36.920 --> 00:55:39.340
millions of Jews killed without the Nazi state.

454
00:55:39.340 --> 00:55:40.340
And the answer is no.

455
00:55:40.340 --> 00:55:45.660
You know, you obviously need a political instrument to bring these things about.

456
00:55:45.660 --> 00:55:50.700
And the political instrument is so powerful in the case of the United States and the people

457
00:55:50.700 --> 00:55:57.180
are so passive and the media is so effective in organizing support of the government, so

458
00:55:57.180 --> 00:56:02.660
are the churches, unfortunately, that it seems to me that once you've created this managerial

459
00:56:02.660 --> 00:56:05.900
model, the rest is very likely to follow.

460
00:56:05.900 --> 00:56:09.100
And you could say, well, why doesn't the managerial model wander off to the right?

461
00:56:09.100 --> 00:56:14.540
So it becomes like a kind of traditional Catholic social state that provides, you know, family

462
00:56:14.540 --> 00:56:15.540
relief.

463
00:56:15.540 --> 00:56:18.060
Well, things don't work this way.

464
00:56:18.060 --> 00:56:24.060
The managerial model that was created in the 1930s was created on the left, and it was a result of social planning.

465
00:56:24.060 --> 00:56:33.060
And it always had a certain component of social engineers, and it continues to move, and the people who go into government service believe all these things.

466
00:56:33.060 --> 00:56:39.060
You know, they don't believe in medieval corporatism, they believe in modern social democracy.

467
00:56:39.060 --> 00:56:50.060
So I think that once you have created this kind of state, it will inevitably move toward this very despotic, leftist social control, as seems to be the case in every Western country.

468
00:57:09.060 --> 00:57:24.060
What used to be a state company, state resources, and all this other stuff. Is this fitting into what you're talking about, that Russia is not really disintegrating, it's just molding into...

469
00:57:24.060 --> 00:57:28.060
No, no, it's disintegrating. It's just the communist leaders have all the money.

470
00:57:28.060 --> 00:57:29.060
That's what I mean.

471
00:57:29.060 --> 00:57:30.060
Yeah, I mean they basically...

472
00:57:30.060 --> 00:57:33.060
Is the model going to change from what it used to be?

473
00:57:33.060 --> 00:57:40.060
It's something that's still totalitarian, but, you know, they take great wealth from it themselves first.

474
00:58:03.060 --> 00:58:12.060
It hasn't happened in Germany. Why has not it had the catastrophic effect on the social life in Europe?

475
00:58:33.060 --> 00:59:02.540
Germany, and I also think that as the family breaks down and as all the social problems