WEBVTT

NOTE War, Peace, and the Industrial Revolution

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:27.000
This morning what I'll be doing is finishing up some important and contemporary points about the question of war and peace among classical liberals and libertarians and then discuss a major issue in the whole history of classical liberalism that is the effects of the industrial revolution.

2
00:00:27.000 --> 00:00:38.000
The point of contemporary interest is an issue that is often referred to as a question of the democratic piece.

3
00:00:38.000 --> 00:00:46.000
There are a number of theoreticians that have proposed this and it has drawn some criticism as well.

4
00:00:46.000 --> 00:00:54.000
This is a kind of neo-Wilsonian position and it maintains basically that the antidote,

5
00:00:54.000 --> 00:01:00.000
The ultimate antidote to war is universal democracy.

6
00:01:00.000 --> 00:01:06.000
The major propositions in regard to international relations that it sets forth

7
00:01:06.000 --> 00:01:15.000
can be put in the words of a writer whom perhaps you're familiar with, R.J. Rummel.

8
00:01:15.000 --> 00:01:23.000
R.J. Rommel is most famous for his book, Death by Government.

9
00:01:26.000 --> 00:01:29.000
He's a professor at the University of Honolulu,

10
00:01:29.000 --> 00:01:33.000
which strikes me as a peculiar thing to begin with,

11
00:01:33.000 --> 00:01:39.000
and is often cited by people on our side because his book, Death by Government,

12
00:01:39.000 --> 00:01:52.000
The Federal Government is a compendium of the number of people killed by various governments in recent decades in the 20th century, so that it seems to be useful.

13
00:01:52.000 --> 00:02:04.000
I don't know if you've come across the book or come across references to it, but I would urge you to be very careful in using his statistics.

14
00:02:04.000 --> 00:02:16.000
He comes up with a figure of deaths resulting from the policies of the Soviet regime of, I think, 61 million people, which is totally preposterous.

15
00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:19.000
Nobody except him believes that.

16
00:02:19.000 --> 00:02:25.000
And people who have been critics for a very long time, people who have said, you know,

17
00:02:25.000 --> 00:02:32.380
61 million people, which is totally preposterous. Nobody except him believes that. And people

18
00:02:32.380 --> 00:02:38.600
who have been critics for a very long time of the Soviet Union, we'll be talking about

19
00:02:38.600 --> 00:02:46.160
Marxism and Soviet Communism tomorrow, have settled on a figure of about 20 million people

20
00:02:46.160 --> 00:02:54.200
under Lenin and Stalin, due to all causes. So I'm saying that Rummel is somebody who's

21
00:02:54.200 --> 00:03:01.240
in his own field of alleged expertise has to be treated with a certain amount of care.

22
00:03:01.240 --> 00:03:06.120
But he's come into the debate on the question of the democratic peace and might as well

23
00:03:06.120 --> 00:03:13.640
quote him as well as anybody else because these are the basic propositions of this school

24
00:03:13.640 --> 00:03:15.240
of thought.

25
00:03:15.240 --> 00:03:19.680
One, democracies don't make war on each other.

26
00:03:19.680 --> 00:03:30.680
Two, democracies limit bilateral violence, and three, democracies are the least warlike of states.

27
00:03:31.680 --> 00:03:40.680
Rommel likens liberal democracy, the phrase that's used, liberal democracy which equates with the free society,

28
00:03:41.680 --> 00:03:46.680
questionable on a number of grounds, to Hayek's notion of spontaneous order.

29
00:03:46.680 --> 00:04:00.680
Liberal democracy, according to Rommel, is a free market writ large of the economy, society and politics within an overarching legal framework of civil liberties and political rights.

30
00:04:00.680 --> 00:04:15.680
Such polities are conducive to compromise and tolerance and are naturally attracted to each other because of their domestic similarities, thus reducing the possibility of violence between them.

31
00:04:15.680 --> 00:04:25.680
It is claimed that a vast body of data from the time of the city-states of ancient Greece to the present confirms these claims.

32
00:04:25.680 --> 00:04:32.680
The policy implications are clear and indeed have been adopted by the U.S. government.

33
00:04:32.680 --> 00:04:38.680
President Bush himself has said something along the lines of democracies don't make war on democracies.

34
00:04:38.680 --> 00:04:46.680
By universalizing democracies, including Rommel and the other people of this school, we can expect an end to war.

35
00:04:46.680 --> 00:04:51.680
The theory of the democratic peace has, of course, been subject to a great deal of criticism,

36
00:04:51.680 --> 00:05:00.680
and you can check out on the internet articles by Christopher Lane

37
00:05:00.680 --> 00:05:10.680
and especially Ted Carpenter of the Cato Institute, criticizing this point of view.

38
00:05:10.680 --> 00:05:15.680
Christopher Lane argues that the realist view of international affairs

39
00:05:15.680 --> 00:05:20.680
much better explains the lack of armed conflict among democratic nations.

40
00:05:20.680 --> 00:05:26.680
That is, the power relations that existed, for instance, through the Cold War.

41
00:05:26.680 --> 00:05:35.980
Because of the fear of the Soviet Union, it's unlikely that other democracies would have entered into any kind of hostile relationship with the United States.

42
00:05:35.980 --> 00:05:38.980
Definitions appear to be particularly troublesome.

43
00:05:38.980 --> 00:05:48.980
In order to extend the range of data over 2,500 years back to democratic, according to Rommel, democratic classical Athens,

44
00:05:48.980 --> 00:05:58.980
He states that the definition of democracy employed in that case was loosened to include the criterion of at least two-thirds of the males having equal rights.

45
00:05:58.980 --> 00:06:07.980
However, this just doesn't work. Even in classical Athens, leaving aside other Greek city-states, and leaving aside women,

46
00:06:07.980 --> 00:06:13.980
the majority of the population consisted of persons without political rights, slaves and foreigners.

47
00:06:13.980 --> 00:06:21.980
The number of actual citizens entitled to vote was quite small compared to the population of Athens.

48
00:06:21.980 --> 00:06:31.980
Cases in which democracies appear to have gone to war against each other are dealt with by denying the name democracy to one of the parties in the conflict.

49
00:06:31.980 --> 00:06:38.980
Thus, the Boer Republics, which I talked about last time in connection with the Boer War,

50
00:06:38.980 --> 00:06:41.480
The Boer Republics were not democracies,

51
00:06:41.480 --> 00:06:42.980
according to this point of view,

52
00:06:42.980 --> 00:06:46.980
despite their being so viewed by Britain and the rest of the world.

53
00:06:46.980 --> 00:06:51.480
Nobody at that time thought that if you denied votes to illiterate tribal blacks,

54
00:06:51.480 --> 00:06:54.980
you were somehow infringing on democracy.

55
00:06:54.980 --> 00:07:00.980
So we have the Boer War, Britain presumably a democracy.

56
00:07:00.980 --> 00:07:04.980
At that time, the Boer Republics democracies and yet they went to war.

57
00:07:04.980 --> 00:07:15.980
The confederacy, the confederate states of America, also does not qualify as a democracy because only white males could vote and the president was not directly elected.

58
00:07:15.980 --> 00:07:25.980
Here Rommel seems to have forgotten that was also the case in the republic founded in 1789 that the president wasn't directly elected.

59
00:07:25.980 --> 00:07:33.980
He was elected by a complicated system involving the electoral college which in those days was not a pure formality.

60
00:07:33.980 --> 00:07:52.980
Imperial Germany, that is the German Reich founded by Bismarck in 1871, was not democratic according to this view, despite the fact that it had universal manhood suffrage, which Britain did not achieve until decades after that.

61
00:07:52.980 --> 00:08:07.980
Because there was no ministerial responsibility to the Reichstag, the army was not under Reichstag control and, as Rommel says, in foreign policy Germany was autocratic without a democratic leash.

62
00:08:07.980 --> 00:08:19.980
It is in particular historical cases such as this that Rommel and the other theorists, who were political scientists and not historians, show an astonishing ignorance.

63
00:08:19.980 --> 00:08:29.480
The crisis of July 1914, which I'll talk about on Friday in connection with the origins of the First World War,

64
00:08:29.480 --> 00:08:36.980
not only was the British public in Parliament in the dark regarding the secret commitments to France that brought England into the war,

65
00:08:36.980 --> 00:08:42.980
but it transpired that even the Cabinet itself was unaware of their true content.

66
00:08:42.980 --> 00:08:59.980
That is, the fact that England had obligations, the French were prepared and insisted on calling in, was not known even to the British parliament or the cabinet itself.

67
00:08:59.980 --> 00:09:07.980
This is when John Morley, the last of the great English liberals, resigned from the Asquith government in protest.

68
00:09:07.980 --> 00:09:17.980
The idea that the foreign policy of any of the great powers at the time, including the United States, labored under a democratic leash, is absurd.

69
00:09:17.980 --> 00:09:28.980
And one example that some of these people use shows an appalling ignorance about how Italy got into the First World War.

70
00:09:28.980 --> 00:09:36.980
What they want to say is that Italy was a liberal government, so it reneged on its obligations to Germany and Austria,

71
00:09:36.980 --> 00:09:42.980
and sided with the liberal countries of England and France.

72
00:09:42.980 --> 00:09:46.980
That's not how Italy got into the war. Italy was not a democracy at the time.

73
00:09:46.980 --> 00:09:54.980
About 10% of the adult males could vote because of literacy and property qualifications.

74
00:09:54.980 --> 00:09:59.980
It was a backdoor, a back-stairs intrigue that got Italy into the war

75
00:09:59.980 --> 00:10:04.980
once the Italian regime was promised colonial spoils after the war.

76
00:10:04.980 --> 00:10:34.980
War. But leaving that aside, I imagine these kind of details seem a bit arcane to most people, somewhat obscure. But the fact is that this is a historical argument. Do democracies ever make war on other democracies? Is democracy historically restraining influence on war making? And the people who take that position, including Rommel,

77
00:10:34.980 --> 00:10:38.060
are simply wrong on the history.

78
00:10:38.060 --> 00:10:42.620
Democratic England declared war on Democratic Finland in 1941,

79
00:10:42.620 --> 00:10:48.260
to take another small example, as part of Churchill's desire to appease Stalin.

80
00:10:48.260 --> 00:10:53.140
Now, a striking example is Rommel's treatment of the Israeli attack on the

81
00:10:53.140 --> 00:10:54.780
American spy ship

82
00:10:54.780 --> 00:10:58.060
USS Liberty during the Arab-Israeli

83
00:10:58.060 --> 00:11:01.540
war of 1967.

84
00:11:01.540 --> 00:11:13.540
I don't know, if you know about that, there are websites devoted to this problem by, I think, sustained by some of the remaining survivors of that attack.

85
00:11:13.540 --> 00:11:24.540
The attack by the Israelis, which resulted in the death of 34 American sailors and the wounding of 171 others, appears to have been deliberate by all the evidence.

86
00:11:24.540 --> 00:11:29.540
Ordinarily, such an attack would result in a state of war.

87
00:11:29.540 --> 00:11:35.540
In this case it did not, because among other reasons, President Lyndon Johnson's position was,

88
00:11:35.540 --> 00:11:40.540
according to a U.S. Navy Admiral, quote, that he didn't care if the ship sunk,

89
00:11:40.540 --> 00:11:44.540
he would not embarrass his allies, end quote.

90
00:11:44.540 --> 00:11:49.540
In any case, Rummel takes the assault to have been intended by the Israelis.

91
00:11:49.540 --> 00:11:54.540
He doesn't think that it was an accident or a matter of misidentifying the ship.

92
00:11:54.540 --> 00:11:59.040
and Rommel's strange grounds for leaving such an act of warfare out of consideration

93
00:11:59.040 --> 00:12:05.540
are that Israel was only partially free owing to its heavily socialized economy.

94
00:12:06.540 --> 00:12:13.540
You see how definitions here are being massaged as Carpenter says.

95
00:12:13.540 --> 00:12:18.540
He seems not to realize what bringing socialized economic elements does

96
00:12:18.540 --> 00:12:23.040
to his rosy-eyed view of the liberal democracies in the present world

97
00:12:23.040 --> 00:12:28.040
and his equation of democracy and freedom.

98
00:12:28.040 --> 00:12:36.040
We go back to Herbert Spencer, a century, more than a century ago now,

99
00:12:36.040 --> 00:12:47.040
who at the end of his life lived to see people talking so blithely about democracy and how that legitimates anything the government does.

100
00:12:47.040 --> 00:12:50.040
This is what Spencer said, free thinks the Englishman.

101
00:12:50.040 --> 00:13:00.040
How can I be other than free if by my vote I share in electing a representative who helps to determine the national transactions home and abroad?

102
00:13:00.040 --> 00:13:04.040
But this is what Spencer replies to that position.

103
00:13:04.040 --> 00:13:12.040
Delivering a paper ballot he identifies with the possession of those unrestrained activities which liberty implies.

104
00:13:12.040 --> 00:13:15.040
This is the case nowadays very often, isn't it?

105
00:13:15.040 --> 00:13:21.040
and one reason why the government and whoever controls public service announcements and so on

106
00:13:21.040 --> 00:13:24.040
insists that everybody has an obligation to vote

107
00:13:24.040 --> 00:13:30.040
because this equates with the most basic freedom of the world.

108
00:13:30.040 --> 00:13:41.040
But Spencer says, despite the fact that an individual can deliver this paper ballot once every two years or four years or whatever

109
00:13:41.040 --> 00:13:55.040
To take one instance, much more important is the threatened penalty that every day reminds him that his children must be stamped with the state pattern, not as he wills it, but as others will.

110
00:13:55.040 --> 00:14:07.040
What Spencer is saying is much more important than this 100 millionth of a vote, for instance, that Americans have in a presidential election every four years.

111
00:14:07.040 --> 00:14:12.040
More important than that is the fact that they're under the thumb of the system of public education.

112
00:14:12.040 --> 00:14:25.040
Enforced compulsory attendance, state subsidies, state dictation of content, the content of your kids' minds,

113
00:14:25.040 --> 00:14:32.040
that's a lot more important than this mystified, reified, idealized paper ballot.

114
00:14:32.040 --> 00:14:35.040
Spencer wrote that the essential question for the citizen is

115
00:14:35.040 --> 00:14:43.040
is what part of his work goes to the power which rules over him and what part remains available for satisfying his own wants.

116
00:14:43.040 --> 00:14:47.040
What I'm getting at is what is this thing liberal democracy?

117
00:14:47.040 --> 00:14:51.040
Spencer gives a good rule of thumb.

118
00:14:51.040 --> 00:14:58.040
The individual is free to the degree that he can control the product of his own labor,

119
00:14:58.040 --> 00:15:02.040
the product of his own efforts on the free market.

120
00:15:02.040 --> 00:15:06.040
What do we see among these so-called liberal democracies in the world today?

121
00:15:06.040 --> 00:15:12.040
And the pattern of liberal democracy that the United States intends to impose wherever it goes,

122
00:15:12.040 --> 00:15:16.040
if it even gets that far and is successful at it.

123
00:15:16.040 --> 00:15:21.040
In all likelihood, Spencer would have scoffed at the notion that welfare democracies

124
00:15:21.040 --> 00:15:29.040
that regularly tax away 50 or 60 percent of the citizens' income can rationally be termed free societies.

125
00:15:32.040 --> 00:15:59.040
They have, sure, I mean the people have the right to produce and distribute pornography to their hearts content, and I'm not saying they should be interfered with, it's a personal matter, but I don't think that that freedom is as important as the freedom to keep what you yourself have earned, and to use it for your own purposes and the purposes of your family.

126
00:15:59.040 --> 00:16:14.040
Now, Rommel concedes that even within democracies there are agencies such as the CIA that are virtually totalitarian subsystems, that is under no popular control whatsoever.

127
00:16:14.040 --> 00:16:20.040
This he does to forestall the criticism that the United States in recent decades has plotted assassinations,

128
00:16:20.040 --> 00:16:24.280
brought into being armed insurrections with states with which we are not at war

129
00:16:24.280 --> 00:16:29.160
and actually overthrown or helped overthrow democratically elected regimes

130
00:16:29.160 --> 00:16:31.560
in Guatemala, Iran and Chile for instance.

131
00:16:32.840 --> 00:16:38.040
Actions which are hardly compatible with the tolerance, respect for others, etc.

132
00:16:38.040 --> 00:16:41.880
that democracy in that account is supposed to foster.

133
00:16:42.760 --> 00:16:47.640
Rommel replies that the solution to this problem, the existence of these

134
00:16:47.640 --> 00:16:55.640
The solution to this problem is more sunshine and greater democratic control, as if these were at all likely to occur.

135
00:16:55.640 --> 00:17:03.640
Bringing the CIA and all the NSA, other intelligence agencies under democratic control,

136
00:17:03.640 --> 00:17:27.640
As if these were at all likely to occur, bringing the CIA and the NSA and other intelligence agencies under democratic control, particularly as the United States undertakes to involve itself in the internal affairs of countries all over the world in an attempt to transform them into democracies.

137
00:17:27.640 --> 00:17:35.640
How many people in America even know that the CIA plotted a number of times to assassinate Fidel Castro?

138
00:17:35.640 --> 00:17:48.640
The only question is whether they bothered to inform John Kennedy about it or kept him in the dark so that he could invoke deniability if it ever was made public.

139
00:17:48.640 --> 00:18:16.640
They tried a number of times, and with their usual brilliance and invariable success, they tried to poison his cigars, they tried to have some kind of depilatory agent introduced so he would lose his beard and the status symbol or whatever patriarchal macho thing it meant to his people.

140
00:18:16.640 --> 00:18:29.640
and a number of other times. It's not surprising that he invited Soviet missiles, especially after the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba.

141
00:18:29.640 --> 00:18:39.640
So this is how the CIA operates and the idea that somehow sunshine is going to be brought into the activities of the CIA is absurd.

142
00:18:39.640 --> 00:18:50.440
One aspect of the question that seems to have been overlooked by the democratic peace advocates

143
00:18:50.440 --> 00:18:56.840
is this. Let us suppose that all countries could be turned overnight or in a short amount

144
00:18:56.840 --> 00:19:03.060
of time into well-established democracies, because that's a criterion that are used

145
00:19:03.060 --> 00:19:09.700
by these theorists, enjoying civil liberties, the rule of law, property rights, etc.

146
00:19:09.700 --> 00:19:16.100
Then, leaving other considerations aside, the notion of universal, perpetual democratic

147
00:19:16.100 --> 00:19:25.540
peace might have a certain superficial plausibility, unless what a world of well-established democracies

148
00:19:25.540 --> 00:19:32.260
eventuates into would-be world government and short of a nuclear holocaust that's the

149
00:19:32.260 --> 00:19:40.180
it's the worst thing that could happen to our race. The idea that of a universal government,

150
00:19:41.140 --> 00:19:50.180
right, tax harmonization throughout the world, redistribution from America, Europe, and Canada

151
00:19:50.180 --> 00:20:20.180
to the majority of the world's population, in India, China, Bangladesh, Indonesia and so on, a World Bank, they don't have to worry about inflating to their heart's content, so aside from world government, even supposing that we still have independent democratic states, even if that should happen, well maybe there could be universities,

152
00:20:20.180 --> 00:20:23.180
and universal democratic peace.

153
00:20:23.180 --> 00:20:31.180
However, the process of turning universalizing democracy throughout the world into a reality,

154
00:20:31.180 --> 00:20:39.180
the crusade to do so would be a long drawn-out affair entailing a multitude of unintended consequences.

155
00:20:39.180 --> 00:20:45.180
The power and authority of the U.S. government would be enhanced, inevitably,

156
00:20:45.180 --> 00:20:55.180
I see it's being advanced even in this current war on terrorism and its cost to American taxpayers increased.

157
00:20:55.180 --> 00:21:00.180
How much of the free society would remain is problematical.

158
00:21:00.180 --> 00:21:09.180
Now I think what I'll end with here are some general considerations drawn from the history of classical liberal thinkers

159
00:21:09.180 --> 00:21:14.180
back to Cobden and even before through Cobden, William Graham Sumner,

160
00:21:14.180 --> 00:21:20.580
Rothbard, who wrote a lot on this question, and others.

161
00:21:20.580 --> 00:21:28.480
These I propose as general objections to interventionism in foreign affairs.

162
00:21:28.480 --> 00:21:32.380
In the case of the United States, today by far the most significant, since this country

163
00:21:32.380 --> 00:21:39.140
is the only existing superpower and a would-be world hegemone, a number of theoretical considerations

164
00:21:39.140 --> 00:21:46.140
would seem to weigh heavily against the policy of interventionism from a libertarian standpoint.

165
00:21:46.140 --> 00:21:55.140
First, there is no reason to suppose that our political leaders are any more competent in international affairs than they are in domestic affairs.

166
00:21:55.140 --> 00:22:03.140
If we think they've made a mess of the economy, if we think that they've made a mess of American society,

167
00:22:03.140 --> 00:22:16.140
The process by which our leaders are selected is practically guaranteed to assure a general incompetence and ignorance.

168
00:22:16.140 --> 00:22:23.140
Foreign interventions will often be triggered by purely partisan political considerations,

169
00:22:23.140 --> 00:22:29.140
that is immediate advantage to the politician or his party,

170
00:22:29.140 --> 00:22:40.140
Since the public opinion polls, as is well known, almost invariably register a shot in the arm, as they say, to the president's popularity when an overseas embrogio comes about.

171
00:22:40.140 --> 00:22:50.140
Second, the central insight popularized by the School of Public Choice is highly relevant in the field of foreign affairs.

172
00:22:50.140 --> 00:22:56.140
The decision to intervene is subject, like all political decisions, to the influence of pressure groups

173
00:22:56.140 --> 00:23:00.140
representing constituencies with their own axis to grind.

174
00:23:00.140 --> 00:23:07.140
Meanwhile, the interests of the public at large are lost in the process of determining policy.

175
00:23:07.140 --> 00:23:15.140
It cannot be emphasized strongly enough that the American people are rationally ignorant,

176
00:23:15.140 --> 00:23:21.140
as the phrase goes among public choice theorists, they are rationally ignorant in foreign affairs.

177
00:23:21.140 --> 00:23:50.140
The knowledge of foreign countries, of their histories, of their problems, even their approximate locations on the map, even the continent in which they are located, is limited, shall we say, and it's been the subject of well-earned ridicule.

178
00:23:50.140 --> 00:24:03.140
An interventionist foreign policy will tend therefore to be determined by relatively small groups and cliques, with a private interest, financial and sentimental, in foreign entanglements.

179
00:24:03.140 --> 00:24:16.140
Such groups that have in fact influenced U.S. policy abroad include particular capitalist circles, eager to socialize the costs of doing business in foreign countries,

180
00:24:16.140 --> 00:24:27.140
are nowadays the oil companies, obviously, and various American ethnic groups with strong emotional attachments to foreign states and political movements.

181
00:24:27.140 --> 00:24:39.140
And I don't just mean the Zionists, they're also the Cuban-American constituency in the crucial state of Florida that keeps pressure on the Republican Party

182
00:24:39.140 --> 00:24:46.300
Party to continue this economic blockade of Cuba that's been going on for over 40 years

183
00:24:46.300 --> 00:24:53.900
now and has not toppled Castro, but has just given Castro and the communists an excuse

184
00:24:53.900 --> 00:25:00.140
for the failure of the communist economy in Cuba, can blame it on the Americans and the

185
00:25:00.140 --> 00:25:27.140
and the American Embargo, and now across the board, liberal, conservative and centrist political voices say it's time to end this stupid embargo, hasn't done what it was supposed to do, and why is the embargo not ended, to a large extent because of the political influence of this constituency in Florida that feels immensely strongly about it.

186
00:25:30.140 --> 00:25:44.140
Now, third, even supposing that an activist foreign policy were formulated by competent leaders who never exploited it for personal political advantage and who were invulnerable to pressures from special interests,

187
00:25:44.140 --> 00:25:56.140
right, fat chance, still, the world is such a complicated place that there will likely be unintended consequences, negative unintended consequences from American interventions.

188
00:25:56.140 --> 00:26:19.140
The classic example I'll talk about on Friday is World War I, where U.S. involvement led to total Entente victory, the total victory of England and France, the Paris Peace Conference, which produced the vindictive Treaty of Versailles, setting the stage for World War II.

189
00:26:19.140 --> 00:26:45.140
A further point. Following the reasoning of William Graham Sumner, a globalist policy perverts the American constitutional system, concentrating power in the presidency and the executive branch, some of them like the CIA, totally impervious to public scrutiny, rather than in Congress, and in Washington instead of the states and localities.

190
00:26:45.140 --> 00:26:50.140
Inevitably, if you have an activist foreign policy, that's where the power is going to be channeled.

191
00:26:50.140 --> 00:26:53.140
The executive branch, because they're the ones who carry out foreign policy,

192
00:26:53.140 --> 00:26:56.140
to Washington, rather than the states and the communities,

193
00:26:56.140 --> 00:27:01.140
those powers situated in the places furthest from public oversight

194
00:27:01.140 --> 00:27:08.140
and activities centered in the area of policy most distant from the interests and concerns of the people at large.

195
00:27:08.140 --> 00:27:12.140
I mean, if you want to talk about democracy, right,

196
00:27:12.140 --> 00:27:24.140
I think that you find it a common phenomenon that people get most excited, you see it on your local TV news, don't you?

197
00:27:24.140 --> 00:27:30.140
People get most excited about whether a traffic light is going to be put up at this corner or not.

198
00:27:30.140 --> 00:27:36.140
They turn out to discuss this, they debate about it, they pressure their councilmen about it.

199
00:27:36.140 --> 00:27:43.140
Whereas, and they know something about it, and they have some deep personal interest in it,

200
00:27:43.140 --> 00:27:50.140
when it comes to bombing this country or that country, or threatening to bomb this country or that country,

201
00:27:50.140 --> 00:27:56.140
or engaging in acts that are actually acts of war, of undeclared war against one country or another,

202
00:27:56.140 --> 00:27:59.140
the American people simply go along with their leaders.

203
00:27:59.140 --> 00:28:10.140
after all, leaders know much more than they do and they're certainly impartial and not self-interested in what they're doing

204
00:28:10.140 --> 00:28:21.140
and the whole democratic voting and we voted for him, we voted for these leaders, they are our leaders, the whole democratic myth.

205
00:28:21.140 --> 00:28:29.140
Finally, focusing on foreign affairs diverts attention from the need to reform at home.

206
00:28:29.140 --> 00:28:36.140
Right-centrists, center-right people like Rommel, may be satisfied that the United States is a free country.

207
00:28:36.140 --> 00:28:42.140
The works of James Bovard, you don't know Jim Bovard, he has a web page.

208
00:28:42.140 --> 00:28:49.140
And he spoke at, I believe, the last scholars conference here in Auburn at the Mises Institute.

209
00:28:49.140 --> 00:28:55.140
He gets published everywhere because he does real good investigative work.

210
00:28:55.140 --> 00:29:02.140
He gets published in the Wall Street Journal, the New Republic, but especially in libertarian publications.

211
00:29:02.140 --> 00:29:06.140
The works of James Bovard and others tell a different story.

212
00:29:06.140 --> 00:29:16.140
Libertarian and also what you might follow in this regard are the columns of Paul Craig Roberts,

213
00:29:16.140 --> 00:29:27.140
In case you don't know who he is, Paul Craig Roberts is a very distinguished economist and also historian, as I'll talk about tomorrow, historian of the Soviet Union.

214
00:29:27.140 --> 00:29:41.140
He's also a syndicated columnist and he keeps talking about how our American system is little by little being eroded, particularly in rights having to do with the judiciary.

215
00:29:41.140 --> 00:29:53.380
So, Paul Craig Roberts or another author I will suggest to you is a man who has

216
00:29:53.380 --> 00:30:06.380
often spoken at the Mises Institute and that's Paul Gottfried. Now Paul has

217
00:30:06.380 --> 00:30:13.180
He's written a number of books, very interesting books, two books in particular, two short

218
00:30:13.180 --> 00:30:15.540
books in particular in recent years.

219
00:30:15.540 --> 00:30:21.580
One book called After Liberalism and the second book, a follow-up to that, something, I forget

220
00:30:21.580 --> 00:30:25.420
the name exactly, but it's about multiculturalism.

221
00:30:25.420 --> 00:30:32.580
And what he talks about is the systematic international campaign on the part of elites

222
00:30:32.580 --> 00:30:39.700
in America and in European countries, Canada also, the systematic campaign to destroy the traditional

223
00:30:39.700 --> 00:30:46.500
culture of those societies and replace it by what left intellectuals would much prefer.

224
00:30:47.700 --> 00:30:54.260
So this includes feminism, this includes attacks on everything they consider racism.

225
00:30:54.980 --> 00:31:01.300
The most recent example, where was it, some high school kids decided to have a white,

226
00:31:01.300 --> 00:31:08.300
White, besides a regular high school prom, a high school prom for whites, and they were

227
00:31:08.300 --> 00:31:13.580
not only attacked by their own school officials, not only attacked by the politicians in the

228
00:31:13.580 --> 00:31:18.300
area, this became a national issue.

229
00:31:18.300 --> 00:31:23.140
Columnists from the Washington Post and the New York Times and so on attacked these kids.

230
00:31:23.140 --> 00:31:27.540
I don't think any of them mentioned that everywhere in America there are black only high school

231
00:31:27.540 --> 00:31:39.540
And everywhere in America there are black dormitories, there are areas in which blacks prefer to associate with their own kind.

232
00:31:39.540 --> 00:31:46.540
But the fact that whites did this becomes an issue. And this is the kind of thing that Gottfried is talking about.

233
00:31:46.540 --> 00:31:52.540
He's not defending slavery or racism in any real, rational sense.

234
00:31:52.540 --> 00:32:03.540
What he's attacking is a campaign against pseudo-racism, that is, as Paul Craig Roberts says, any kind of equal treatment for whites.

235
00:32:03.540 --> 00:32:14.540
So that there's an international and also speech codes, which have gone a lot further in Europe than in America, but through international agreements.

236
00:32:14.540 --> 00:32:44.540
In the future, they may come to the United States also, as people say, you have to somehow control the Internet, because there's so much garbage and filth there, well, and I would probably tend to agree with something like that, but what I would suggest is that the first attempt to control the Internet, for whatever reason, will inevitably

237
00:32:44.540 --> 00:32:55.540
to political censorship of the internet, of anybody considered a right-winger, extreme right-winger, any group considered a hate group,

238
00:32:55.540 --> 00:33:08.540
and the usual communist salami tactics, first they'll start with the most extreme, you know, you can redo this famous thing about the Nazis,

239
00:33:08.540 --> 00:33:22.540
First they'll come for the fascists, then they'll come for the extreme conservatives, and anybody who denies their left-liberal egalitarian worldview.

240
00:33:22.540 --> 00:33:37.540
So we have to be worried about any attempt to censor the internet, which is at this point really just about all we have in the way of freedom of expression.

241
00:33:37.540 --> 00:33:47.540
These are the kind of problems that Jim Boehmard and Paul Craig Roberts deal with.

242
00:33:47.540 --> 00:33:52.540
Is the United States a free country that has the right now to simply...

243
00:33:52.540 --> 00:33:57.540
We're so far ahead, we're so great, we're so much the city on the hill,

244
00:33:57.540 --> 00:34:03.540
that we can now impose our version of democracy on the rest of the world.

245
00:34:03.540 --> 00:34:10.540
It will be interesting to see, by the way, and there are just at this point, just certain Catholic publications that are looking out for this point,

246
00:34:10.540 --> 00:34:18.540
how in Afghanistan and Iraq, the United States begins to introduce the methods of planned parenthood.

247
00:34:18.540 --> 00:34:32.540
That is, into these traditional Muslim societies, now part of what they mean by democracy are reproduction rights for women, including birth control and abortion.

248
00:34:32.540 --> 00:34:39.740
There are some Catholic groups that are looking at this to see what democracy will actually entail.

249
00:34:39.740 --> 00:34:44.940
What will entail democracy in the American and West European sense, which includes these so-called

250
00:34:46.700 --> 00:34:55.260
reproduction health rights for women. I don't want to deny that there's a case to be made for

251
00:34:55.260 --> 00:35:11.260
or a woman's right in general, let's say. However, the point is, democracy is not going to mean what Thomas Jefferson thought it meant, this democracy that's going to be imposed on other countries.

252
00:35:11.260 --> 00:35:19.260
And is America really so perfect that we don't have to worry about what's going on here, we can start worrying about the rest of the world?

253
00:35:19.260 --> 00:35:33.260
Libertarians will wonder to what degree a country can be said to be free if close to 40% of the citizen's income is confiscated by different levels of political authority year in, year out.

254
00:35:33.260 --> 00:35:48.800
And I will finally end with a relevant quotation from Richard Cobden, along these lines.

255
00:35:48.800 --> 00:35:55.740
Cobden said, there is a true secret of despots, it is to employ one nation in cutting the

256
00:35:55.740 --> 00:36:01.260
throats of another, so that neither nation may have time to reform the abuses in their

257
00:36:01.260 --> 00:36:16.260
and their own domestic government, in other words, directing the attention of the people to foreign enemies, ramshackle regimes as we see that Saddam Hussein's was,

258
00:36:16.260 --> 00:36:24.260
that according to Tony Blair were in a position to launch attacks on Britain within 45 minutes notice.

259
00:36:24.260 --> 00:36:37.260
You know, George Orwell talked about the memory hole. You've heard that phrase, the memory hole.

260
00:36:37.260 --> 00:36:44.260
You know, in 1984, you should read this, there's so much wisdom in that book.

261
00:36:44.260 --> 00:36:53.260
In his book, 1984, the hero, Winston Smith, that's his job in the Ministry of Truth.

262
00:36:53.260 --> 00:37:01.000
Whenever the party line changes, what he has to do is go back and search out the newspapers

263
00:37:01.000 --> 00:37:04.400
where the party had taken a different position.

264
00:37:04.400 --> 00:37:11.440
You know, where the party had said, well, we have to attack East Asia, you know, the whole world is divided into three huge powers.

265
00:37:11.440 --> 00:37:18.200
We're at war with East Asia, East Asians are cannibals and savages and so on, and we're friends with Eurasia.

266
00:37:18.200 --> 00:37:23.640
Well, the alliance is shift. Party can't be wrong. Big Brother can't be wrong.

267
00:37:23.640 --> 00:37:29.880
So Winston Smith has to go and get the old newspapers and destroy the articles where the

268
00:37:29.880 --> 00:37:36.040
party was wrong in the past or seems to have been wrong in the past. And on his desk he has a memory

269
00:37:36.040 --> 00:37:42.200
hole, actually a hole, and he tosses it down and goes down into the furnaces at the bottom of the

270
00:37:42.200 --> 00:37:44.720
of the Ministry of Truth.

271
00:37:44.720 --> 00:37:49.400
Nowadays, the government doesn't need memory holes.

272
00:37:49.400 --> 00:37:52.360
What actually was the case, you can find anywhere

273
00:37:52.360 --> 00:37:55.200
on the internet, you can find in major newspapers.

274
00:37:55.200 --> 00:37:57.460
I mean, they'll be in the newspapers in your library,

275
00:37:57.460 --> 00:37:59.800
but right on your computer, you can

276
00:37:59.800 --> 00:38:02.440
find that the government lied about this,

277
00:38:02.440 --> 00:38:06.400
that the government leaders lied about this.

278
00:38:06.400 --> 00:38:09.360
And the difference is that George Orwell thought

279
00:38:09.360 --> 00:38:17.360
that somehow people would care if it turned out that they could read in the newspaper that the government had lied.

280
00:38:17.360 --> 00:38:25.360
So that all has to be blocked out. It doesn't have to be blocked out now. It's there, but people don't care, for the most part.

281
00:38:25.360 --> 00:38:38.360
So Cobden's view is that instead of diverting attention to non-existent enemies, to puffed-up enemies,

282
00:38:38.360 --> 00:38:43.360
What we should do is pay attention to reforming our own domestic society.

283
00:38:43.360 --> 00:38:45.360
He meant the England of his time.

284
00:38:45.360 --> 00:38:47.360
I would suggest the America of our time.

285
00:38:47.360 --> 00:38:51.360
Well, that's what I want to say about international affairs.

286
00:38:51.360 --> 00:38:57.360
And I want to start now to discuss another quite important issue.

287
00:38:57.360 --> 00:39:04.360
And that is, in general, the issue of the Industrial Revolution.

288
00:39:08.360 --> 00:39:37.360
Now, there's a book I suggest to you that has been in print since it was published, I think in 1954, from the University of Chicago Press, edited by Hayek, with contributions by a number of different authors.

289
00:39:37.360 --> 00:39:45.360
and the book is Capitalism and the Historians, Capitalism and the Historians.

290
00:39:45.360 --> 00:39:52.360
Now, it comes from 1954, so the research is somewhat dated, but I'll deal with that in a moment.

291
00:39:52.360 --> 00:40:00.360
Actually, the most important thing in the book is the introductory essay by Hayek on history and politics.

292
00:40:00.360 --> 00:40:18.360
And here Hayek has one of his best essays. It really shows Hayek at his best, his wisdom, his careful statement of issues and careful presentation of his own answers.

293
00:40:18.360 --> 00:40:30.960
And he says that if we think about it, there's a very close connection between people's view of history and their political views.

294
00:40:30.960 --> 00:40:38.020
Now, if you're an economist or a philosopher, if that's your field, you might feel that this is rather unfair.

295
00:40:38.020 --> 00:40:45.720
You might feel that really those are the disciplines which people should study in order to come to conclusions about

296
00:40:45.720 --> 00:40:50.520
what's best for us and what's individually and what's best for society.

297
00:40:50.520 --> 00:40:55.280
However, you know, for better or worse, that's not the way it's done.

298
00:40:55.280 --> 00:41:01.040
And if you think about it, I think that you'll see maybe even in your own case for the most part,

299
00:41:01.040 --> 00:41:07.440
that your political views have been very strongly influenced and in many ways determined

300
00:41:07.440 --> 00:41:13.480
by what you think history has shown, okay?

301
00:41:13.480 --> 00:41:15.480
The Impact of History

302
00:41:17.480 --> 00:41:20.480
See if this sounds familiar to you.

303
00:41:20.480 --> 00:41:26.480
There was a time in America, starting in the last decades of the 19th century,

304
00:41:26.480 --> 00:41:33.480
that America was under a regime of laissez-faire.

305
00:41:33.480 --> 00:41:40.480
And under this regime of laissez-faire, there grew up a class of robber barons

306
00:41:40.480 --> 00:41:49.480
who got together and eventually cartelized and monopolized the American economy.

307
00:41:49.480 --> 00:41:57.480
Then, thank God, who does look over the United States of America, we had the progressive movement.

308
00:41:57.480 --> 00:42:06.480
And the progressive movement and the Sherman anti-trust law and progressive leaders like Teddy Roosevelt,

309
00:42:06.480 --> 00:42:11.280
I can't imagine what that man is doing on Mount Rushmore with the others.

310
00:42:11.280 --> 00:42:13.800
Maybe Lincoln would have been a soulmate of his.

311
00:42:13.800 --> 00:42:18.920
But I think he's staring at Thomas Jefferson.

312
00:42:18.920 --> 00:42:22.680
And Jefferson looks cowed.

313
00:42:22.680 --> 00:42:27.660
But this view, this interpretation goes on.

314
00:42:27.660 --> 00:42:32.640
And put an end to this terrible regime of laissez-faire in that way salvaged by government

315
00:42:32.640 --> 00:42:40.000
Intervention salvaged the American economy. Does that sound right at all? I mean, that

316
00:42:40.000 --> 00:42:46.040
such a view exists. Have you ever heard such an interpretation as that? Well, okay, that's

317
00:42:46.040 --> 00:42:54.140
one interpretation. How about this? In the 1920s, somehow we got laissez-faire back,

318
00:42:54.140 --> 00:42:58.840
And laissez-faire went haywire.

319
00:42:58.840 --> 00:43:04.500
People started speculating like crazy on the stock market.

320
00:43:04.500 --> 00:43:14.460
There's a tremendous irrational boom, and it ended in the Great Depression, which was

321
00:43:14.460 --> 00:43:23.540
thankfully dealt with by the super savior of American history, Franklin Roosevelt, who

322
00:43:23.540 --> 00:43:31.940
came in with his New Deal and through government intervention in many different respects saved

323
00:43:31.940 --> 00:43:38.380
the American economy. Does that sound familiar? That is this interpretation. Have you ever

324
00:43:38.380 --> 00:43:48.460
heard this? Here's another one, more in connection with international affairs. In World War I,

325
00:43:48.460 --> 00:43:59.600
We had a man as president who was virtually a saint, agonized with spiritual issues, finally

326
00:43:59.600 --> 00:44:08.060
against his will and every inclination was forced to bring about a declaration of war

327
00:44:08.060 --> 00:44:14.200
against Germany, get us into the First World War, and this saint, Woodrow Wilson, harbored

328
00:44:14.200 --> 00:44:21.720
A dream and a vision called the League of Nations.

329
00:44:21.720 --> 00:44:27.400
God smiled on the United States again, we were on the winning side in that war and President

330
00:44:27.400 --> 00:44:34.920
Wilson went to Paris to the peace conference in order to bring about his dream and his

331
00:44:34.920 --> 00:44:35.920
vision.

332
00:44:35.920 --> 00:44:41.640
It was finally agreed to by his other allies, it was part of the Treaty of Versailles with

333
00:44:41.640 --> 00:44:46.200
Germany that there should be set up this League of Nations to put an end to war.

334
00:44:47.320 --> 00:44:56.600
This sainted, spiritually tormented man returns to America and tries to get the Senate of the

335
00:44:56.600 --> 00:45:06.280
United States to agree to this treaty. The Senate of the United States at that time was controlled by

336
00:45:06.280 --> 00:45:16.280
A group of men that history knows, or that you at least know, or that I at least know, is isolationists, right?

337
00:45:16.280 --> 00:45:23.280
Isn't that the term that's used? Not non-interventionists or people who believed in US neutrality, but isolationists.

338
00:45:23.280 --> 00:45:30.280
So they turned down the Treaty of Versailles and in this way broke the heart of this sainted American president

339
00:45:30.280 --> 00:45:43.280
and kept America out of the League of Nations so that the inevitable result was Hitler or Hitler the Second World War and everything that came about from that.

340
00:45:43.280 --> 00:45:49.280
Doesn't that teach us something? Isn't this one of the lessons of history, right?

341
00:45:49.280 --> 00:46:08.280
We should follow our sainted and inspired leaders, and especially to engage in cooperative efforts of collective security through international organizations, now the United Nations.

342
00:46:08.280 --> 00:46:13.280
Does that sound like a very familiar interpretation of history?

343
00:46:13.280 --> 00:46:20.520
Okay, now, and others could be cited. In all of these cases, the case of the so-called

344
00:46:20.520 --> 00:46:26.560
Robert Barons, the case of the Great Depression, the case of the League of Nations, I would

345
00:46:26.560 --> 00:46:33.800
suggest that most people who have any views or impressions or ideas at all about the pertinent

346
00:46:33.800 --> 00:46:41.400
political issues take their views from these interpretations. This is what determines their

347
00:46:41.400 --> 00:46:47.400
We tried laissez-faire in the past. It led to monopolies and trusts. It led to the Great Depression.

348
00:46:47.400 --> 00:46:53.400
We tried a system of minding our own business and arm neutrality for the United States.

349
00:46:53.400 --> 00:46:59.400
It led to the rejection of the League of Nations. It led to Hitler and everything else.

350
00:46:59.400 --> 00:47:07.400
So that Hayek doesn't give these examples, but these would be examples confirming his view, I think,

351
00:47:07.400 --> 00:47:14.400
that history is a major determinant of the views that people have about politics.

352
00:47:14.400 --> 00:47:25.400
Now, why Hayek goes into this is that he's introducing this book Capitalism and the Historians

353
00:47:25.400 --> 00:47:33.400
and he talks about the supreme myth that has been used against capitalism

354
00:47:33.400 --> 00:47:38.400
and that is the myth of what happened during the Industrial Revolution.

355
00:47:42.400 --> 00:47:45.400
That's what I want to talk about in the time that remains.

356
00:47:46.400 --> 00:47:56.400
The Industrial Revolution, by the way, we now know that it occurred even in England at a much slower pace than originally supposed.

357
00:47:56.400 --> 00:48:15.400
It was over a question, over a span of time of probably close to a century, let's say from 1750 to 1850, that industrialization got underway in Britain.

358
00:48:15.400 --> 00:48:22.400
But nonetheless, the main outlines remain the same. It was a question of the introduction of the factory system,

359
00:48:22.400 --> 00:48:52.400
System with the production of a particular good now took place in different stages but all under one roof and with the application now of the steam engine and more specialized machinery to every step of the process of production, the division of labor was intensified in this way, the world market expanded, urbanization took place,

360
00:48:52.400 --> 00:49:00.400
And these various aspects constitute what's known as the Industrial Revolution.

361
00:49:00.400 --> 00:49:07.400
Now for a long time this myth prevailed, the myth that Hayek refers to.

362
00:49:07.400 --> 00:49:13.400
It was thought that the Industrial Revolution represented a catastrophe for the working classes of Britain.

363
00:49:13.400 --> 00:49:20.400
And Britain was a test case of the results of the Industrial Revolution.

364
00:49:20.400 --> 00:49:24.400
Everybody agreed to that. This revolution eventually spreads to other countries and so on.

365
00:49:24.400 --> 00:49:29.400
But we want to focus, people said, we want to, historians, scholars, we want to focus on Britain,

366
00:49:29.400 --> 00:49:33.400
see what happened there, whether it was a bad or a good thing.

367
00:49:33.400 --> 00:49:36.400
The first idea was that it was a catastrophe.

368
00:49:36.400 --> 00:49:42.400
The new factories, it was claimed, ushered in a nightmare world of slave-like conditions for working men

369
00:49:42.400 --> 00:49:46.400
that were even worse for women and worst of all for children.

370
00:49:46.400 --> 00:49:56.400
Cruel poverty, filthy slums, rampant pollution, and a host of other social evils were the end result of giving free reign to the heartless regime of laissez-faire.

371
00:49:56.400 --> 00:50:12.400
Only in the last years of the 19th century, with the introduction of effective factory laws and other government measures, and above all with the rise of labor unions, did the condition of working people start gradually to improve.

372
00:50:12.400 --> 00:50:26.400
The lesson taught by this presumed historical example, repeated endlessly in popular literature from clerical and political pulpits, in school rooms, university lectures, was clear and decisive.

373
00:50:26.400 --> 00:50:34.240
But university lecture halls are of particular interest because what happens in the first

374
00:50:34.240 --> 00:50:41.480
decades of the 20th century is that in Britain especially, France especially, other Western

375
00:50:41.480 --> 00:50:49.200
European countries that have colonial empires, the elites, the native elites are often brought

376
00:50:49.200 --> 00:50:54.480
to the home country in order to undergo advanced education there.

377
00:50:54.480 --> 00:51:01.480
In this way, they hoped to meld the native population more to the home country.

378
00:51:01.480 --> 00:51:15.480
So what we have are people who became famous after the Second World War as leaders of Ghana, Indonesia, the Vietnam Communist Revolution and many other places in the world.

379
00:51:15.480 --> 00:51:19.480
They had studied at British and French universities.

380
00:51:19.480 --> 00:51:47.480
They had learned these alleged lessons of the Industrial Revolution and they were determined that, yes, they would industrialize their countries but they wouldn't industrialize their countries through awful laissez-faire because look at what laissez-faire had done to Britain and other countries that had had to endure it during their industrial revolutions.

381
00:51:47.480 --> 00:52:03.480
And in the political arena, this is the intellectual and academic arena, in the political arena this myth created a standing presumption in favor of state intervention to protect the present day victims of capitalist exploitation.

382
00:52:03.480 --> 00:52:16.480
However, things began to change in the 1920s when what has been called an optimist school made gradual and then more rapid progress

383
00:52:16.480 --> 00:52:24.480
against what are called the pessimists on the higher levels of scholarship.

384
00:52:24.480 --> 00:52:34.480
This change was based on the steady accumulation of more objective, less politically contaminated data

385
00:52:34.480 --> 00:52:41.480
and the refinement of statistical techniques, the application of better economic theory.

386
00:52:41.480 --> 00:52:56.480
The earlier view had largely been based on the blue books collected by parliamentary House of Commons commissions into the condition of working people in the mid-19th century and after that.

387
00:52:56.480 --> 00:53:09.480
These are called blue books and what was behind these commissions is of interest and importance.

388
00:53:09.480 --> 00:53:19.000
If we take England in the, let's say, following the Napoleonic Wars of 1815. Parliament is unreformed.

389
00:53:20.120 --> 00:53:28.440
There are heavy tariffs to the advantage of the landowning nobility. They control all public

390
00:53:28.440 --> 00:53:39.400
offices. The Church of England bases its income largely on tithes extorted from non-believers.

391
00:53:39.480 --> 00:53:50.480
from Presbyterians and Baptists and Quakers and others. In other words you have a parasitic established church.

392
00:53:50.480 --> 00:53:58.480
Many other elements of the conservative control and domination of English society.

393
00:53:58.480 --> 00:54:03.480
Well, there has been a liberal movement. I've talked about liberalism in different countries.

394
00:54:03.480 --> 00:54:08.480
There's a powerful liberal movement in England that threatens this domination.

395
00:54:08.480 --> 00:54:37.180
They threaten also, for instance, the slaves owned by the absentee plantation owners, mainly English noblemen,

396
00:54:38.480 --> 00:54:47.480
And the defenders of the establishment and the status quo come back with a counter attack.

397
00:54:47.480 --> 00:54:57.480
They say, you liberals, you great lovers of the oppressed, don't you have your own oppressed?

398
00:54:57.480 --> 00:55:04.480
Aren't you yourself slave owners in a sense? What about the workers in your factories?

399
00:55:04.480 --> 00:55:08.480
Why don't we go and investigate what's happening there?

400
00:55:08.480 --> 00:55:13.480
Parliamentary commissions are set up with the political aim

401
00:55:13.480 --> 00:55:18.480
of exposing the factory system at the base of the economic power

402
00:55:18.480 --> 00:55:22.480
of these liberals and these reformers.

403
00:55:22.480 --> 00:55:29.480
And just as when U.S. Congress sets up some committee or subcommittee

404
00:55:29.480 --> 00:55:38.160
to investigate sweatshop conditions in Chinatown, in San Francisco, or elsewhere and so on.

405
00:55:38.160 --> 00:55:44.600
What they bring in are people who are ready to tell them the worst horror stories.

406
00:55:44.600 --> 00:55:52.000
They don't generally consider why these people are working in sweatshops in San Francisco

407
00:55:52.000 --> 00:55:59.460
when they could be enjoying life in Shandong province or something, and living like millionaires

408
00:55:59.460 --> 00:56:07.460
And then the Congressional Committee issues its findings.

409
00:56:07.460 --> 00:56:12.460
Well, these parliamentary commissions in England issued their findings.

410
00:56:12.460 --> 00:56:17.460
And they are compendiums of horror stories, one after another,

411
00:56:17.460 --> 00:56:26.460
about terrible people working at whatever, 16, 18 hours, women working, children working as well.

412
00:56:26.460 --> 00:56:41.460
And it was on the basis, and this is data, right? It was on the basis of these collections, of the supposed data, that the first interpretations and histories of the Industrial Revolution were composed.

413
00:56:41.460 --> 00:56:57.460
Friedrich Engels, who of course was Marx's collaborator, wrote a book, The Condition of the British Working Class, the English Working Class in 1844.

414
00:56:57.460 --> 00:57:08.460
And the book is based on these parliamentary commissions. Other people who began lecturing and writing about the Industrial Revolution took the same tack.

415
00:57:08.460 --> 00:57:31.460
So that when in the early 20th century, better, more detailed, more comprehensive data begins to be collected, on wages, on availability of foodstuffs, on longevity, length of life and so on, things begin to change.

416
00:57:31.460 --> 00:57:38.820
People don't have to depend on the contaminated data, they can go to the sort of data that

417
00:57:38.820 --> 00:57:46.860
historians can debate, more objective facts.

418
00:57:46.860 --> 00:57:52.140
And moreover, new probing questions were asked, the sort of things that didn't occur to earlier

419
00:57:52.140 --> 00:57:58.180
writers opening novel perspectives.

420
00:57:58.180 --> 00:58:04.480
So you had a different and contrasting interpretation of the Industrial Revolution, beginning with

421
00:58:04.480 --> 00:58:10.780
J. H. Clapham, an older historian of the 20s and 30s, but especially in the 40s and

422
00:58:10.780 --> 00:58:19.620
50s, T. S. Ashton, who was represented in Hayek's collection, Capitalism and the Historians,

423
00:58:19.620 --> 00:58:30.260
And more recently, Max, as he's known, or R.M. Hartwell, well, he's retired now, but

424
00:58:30.260 --> 00:58:33.620
at the University of Chicago and Oxford.

425
00:58:33.620 --> 00:58:39.820
Fundamentally, what came out of this newer research is this.

426
00:58:39.820 --> 00:58:46.660
In fact, for most of the working people of Britain, the standard of living did not deteriorate,

427
00:58:46.660 --> 00:58:57.300
Let alone collapse, but improved slowly from around 1780 to 1850 and more rapidly thereafter.

428
00:58:57.300 --> 00:59:21.300
In other words, what we would have is a graph, let's say 1780, a graph that would go something like this, okay?

429
00:59:21.300 --> 00:59:28.300
This occurred despite powerful factors working in the opposite direction,

430
00:59:28.300 --> 00:59:35.300
or countervailing factors that tended to depress the standard of living,

431
00:59:35.300 --> 00:59:42.300
so that even if it were discovered that actual living standards had fallen,

432
00:59:42.300 --> 00:59:46.300
this would not necessarily count against industrialization,

433
00:59:46.300 --> 00:59:55.800
Because it could have been that industrialization permitted people to have a higher standard of living than they would have otherwise.

434
00:59:55.800 --> 01:00:04.300
Even though, let's say, in actuality, living standards fell because of other factors that I'll talk about.

435
01:00:04.300 --> 01:00:10.800
There was first, and that's shown around here, that's very rough.

436
01:00:10.800 --> 01:00:15.800
There was first the destructionist effects of a whole generation of war.

437
01:00:15.800 --> 01:00:44.800
with the French Revolution and Napoleon, the most expensive war in history to that time from 1793 when England declared war on revolutionary France after the execution of the king to Waterloo in 1815 with the exception of one year, just one year around 1804 of truce.

438
01:00:44.800 --> 01:00:53.800
So a whole generation of war and all of the wealth and assets that England poured into this war.

439
01:00:53.800 --> 01:01:00.800
All of the ships and the furnishing of men, the artillery, the other munitions,

440
01:01:00.800 --> 01:01:05.800
the subsidies given to its allies on the continent to fight against the French.

441
01:01:05.800 --> 01:01:11.800
This immense amount of wealth was, well you could say, used for a good purpose,

442
01:01:11.800 --> 01:01:23.800
and the Defeat of Napoleon, but nonetheless was not available for productive uses for the general British public.

443
01:01:23.800 --> 01:01:34.800
The kind of wealth that could have gone into increasing the capital stock of England and therefore tending to raise wages,

444
01:01:34.800 --> 01:01:38.800
producing more for the British consumers, including working people.

445
01:01:38.800 --> 01:02:00.800
Secondly, a sharply regressive system of taxation was used to finance the war and an array of counterproductive government measures and policies for the depressed living standards.

446
01:02:00.800 --> 01:02:06.800
Now finally, and I'm going to elaborate on some of these points.

447
01:02:06.800 --> 01:02:12.800
Finally, I want to point out this chart over here.

448
01:02:12.800 --> 01:02:25.800
What this chart shows is the population of various European countries at various points in modern history.

449
01:02:25.800 --> 01:02:32.800
So in the middle of the 18th century, the population of England was six million. It had never been higher than that.

450
01:02:32.800 --> 01:02:39.800
And the population of none of these European countries had ever been at all substantially higher.

451
01:02:39.800 --> 01:02:48.800
I mean, there had been maybe peaks at one time or another, slightly higher peaks, but basically this was the limit of population.

452
01:02:48.800 --> 01:02:56.800
And you see now the population 50 years later and then in the middle of the century and then finally in 1900.

453
01:02:56.800 --> 01:03:08.800
Population of Europe as a whole from 1800 to 1900 increased from around 180 million to over 500 million.

454
01:03:08.800 --> 01:03:15.800
This was an unprecedented population explosion in the history of mankind.

455
01:03:15.800 --> 01:03:21.880
It was not limited to Europe, by the way. You found this in other areas, of course, Eurasia.

456
01:03:21.880 --> 01:03:27.160
The reasons for it are not totally clear, but nonetheless, this is the fact of the matter.

457
01:03:27.160 --> 01:03:34.840
So, the question is, what were different societies going to do about this population explosion?

458
01:03:34.840 --> 01:03:43.080
How could these new tens of millions of people be fitted into the older mercantilist,

459
01:03:43.080 --> 01:03:52.120
Guild-controlled economy with the older methods of production and I started off from a series of

460
01:03:52.120 --> 01:04:00.120
lectures by quoting Mises on the European miracle and here Mises again puts his finger on the

461
01:04:00.120 --> 01:04:07.960
essential point that Europe was faced on the eve of industrialization Europe was faced with this

462
01:04:07.960 --> 01:04:13.960
of Unprecedented Population Explosion and the Industrial Revolution was Europe and America's

463
01:04:13.960 --> 01:04:22.120
answer to this problem. And ultimately the way that these tens of millions of people

464
01:04:23.400 --> 01:04:33.000
were able to survive. So when our friend Ayn Rand says that people should get down on their knees

465
01:04:33.000 --> 01:04:45.000
She says something really along these lines, get down on their knees and celebrate the smokestacks of the factories of the Industrial Revolution.

466
01:04:45.000 --> 01:04:50.000
That's a novelist way of saying it, maybe, but she is perfectly right.

467
01:04:50.000 --> 01:05:01.000
Ultimately, you understand, I hope, that it's not that you actually work a lot harder than your grandfather, than your grandparents or your great-grandparents

468
01:05:01.000 --> 01:05:11.000
You might think that you're just totally, you know, you're used by some draft animal and work so hard, but it's not really the case.

469
01:05:11.000 --> 01:05:20.000
And the reason that you enjoy a higher standard of living has to do with the accumulation of capital and the workings of the capitalist system.

470
01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:35.000
and the workings of the capitalist system. That's what people began to acknowledge to a small degree and then a little bit more, but in any case began to experience during industrialization.

471
01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:45.000
These figures are about the best we can get, the best I've been able to find, and they're interesting in their own right.

472
01:05:45.000 --> 01:05:50.000
Notice, and the population of France in 1750 must have been about 20 million.

473
01:05:50.000 --> 01:06:01.000
Notice that France was always, throughout the history, up until the 19th century, always had a much higher population than England did.

474
01:06:01.000 --> 01:06:14.000
And in fact, up until around the time of the French Revolution and also the Russian participation in the partition of Poland,

475
01:06:14.000 --> 01:06:38.000
of Poland. France had the largest population of any country in Europe, which is one reason why it was the standard military power of Europe for so long, but the English population begins to explode, then overtake the population of France.

476
01:06:38.000 --> 01:06:44.000
France, of all the great countries, is the only one whose population remains quite steady,

477
01:06:44.800 --> 01:06:51.760
and for what social reasons are behind that, having to do with the inheritance of land,

478
01:06:51.760 --> 01:06:58.240
or early introduction of birth control procedures, I don't think is clear.

479
01:06:59.280 --> 01:07:06.080
Here, the population of Italy is increasing enormously, despite the fact that millions upon

480
01:07:06.080 --> 01:07:17.080
and millions of Italians emigrated so that they form, for instance, the largest ethnic group, biological, not linguistic, but the largest ethnic group in Argentina.

481
01:07:17.080 --> 01:07:26.080
As we know, many of them have come to America and enriched our American culture almost infinitely.

482
01:07:26.080 --> 01:07:37.080
As Senator Geary says in Godfather 2, if you haven't seen Godfather 2, I don't even know what I'm doing here talking to you.

483
01:07:37.080 --> 01:07:42.080
Godfather 1, of course, also. Have you seen it? Good, very good.

484
01:07:42.080 --> 01:07:50.080
Senator Geary, the total sleazeball politician, a really great characterization.

485
01:07:50.080 --> 01:08:16.080
I want to say that a growing number of my constituents are of Italian descent, and from the time of the great Christopher Columbus to the time of Enrico Fermi.

486
01:08:16.080 --> 01:08:29.080
They have contributed as much as any and on and on of all this rubbish, this politician blah blah blah, that we hear all the time from every politician virtually.

487
01:08:29.080 --> 01:08:43.080
So, with the Italians, and with the Italians it remained a steady problem, that is overpopulation.

488
01:08:43.080 --> 01:08:52.080
Unlike England and France and Germany, for instance, because in the South industrialization has never taken place.

489
01:08:52.080 --> 01:08:57.080
That is south of Rome, Naples, Calabria, Sicily and so on.

490
01:08:57.080 --> 01:09:07.080
And they have this endemic unemployment that's been going on for so long and many other social problems.

491
01:09:07.080 --> 01:09:14.080
Here, we see very significant growth in population in Germany.

492
01:09:14.080 --> 01:09:23.080
So by the end of the century, there are 36 million more or less French and 50 million Germans.

493
01:09:23.080 --> 01:09:28.080
And actually there are even more inhabitants of Austria-Hungary in those days.

494
01:09:28.080 --> 01:09:35.080
But among the considerable military powers, this is a very significant gap.

495
01:09:35.080 --> 01:09:44.120
gap, and Ireland, which in the middle of the century, well the population would be more

496
01:09:44.120 --> 01:09:49.860
1840 than 1850, had six and a half million people, more than it's ever had since, many

497
01:09:49.860 --> 01:09:57.720
more than it's ever had since, and then three and a half million afterwards, because of

498
01:09:57.720 --> 01:10:16.720
The Irish famine, the vast emigration of the Irish, the diaspora of the Irish, and the deaths from, and these kind of things, people don't die generally from starvation, they die from the diseases caused by malnutrition and the terrible death rate.

499
01:10:16.720 --> 01:10:28.720
So, and these figures, if you talk about Russia, if you talk about Poland, the rest of Europe can be paralleled.

500
01:10:28.720 --> 01:10:39.720
The question is, what's to be done with all these new people? And as I say, and as you can read in Rosenberg and Birdsell,

501
01:10:39.720 --> 01:10:45.720
A book I believe. Have you been given a copy of this book?

502
01:10:45.720 --> 01:10:47.720
Haven't they given you anything?

503
01:10:47.720 --> 01:10:52.720
So what is it? Basically these sandwiches and chips at lunchtime?

504
01:10:52.720 --> 01:10:55.720
Well, times are bad.

505
01:10:55.720 --> 01:11:01.720
But it's in the library or I think it's also for sale in the bookstore.

506
01:11:01.720 --> 01:11:03.720
Easily available in paperback and so on.

507
01:11:03.720 --> 01:11:05.720
How the West Grew Rich.

508
01:11:05.720 --> 01:11:07.720
Brad, show them your book.

509
01:11:07.720 --> 01:11:12.000
okay okay if you have not seen that before it's a best introduction to what

510
01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:15.760
I've been talking about the best summary although there'd be a lot of other works

511
01:11:15.760 --> 01:11:23.560
to consult and as they say industrial revolution was not the problem it was the

512
01:11:23.560 --> 01:11:28.760
solution well I'm going to continue this I have a few more things to say about

513
01:11:28.760 --> 01:11:36.280
this I'll say continue this afternoon but now we want to talk about any we want

514
01:11:36.280 --> 01:11:43.480
I'll discuss any questions or comments you might have about the first half of my lecture

515
01:11:43.480 --> 01:11:49.940
regarding the idea of the democratic peace and the principled arguments against intervention

516
01:11:49.940 --> 01:11:56.040
in foreign affairs and also about the Industrial Revolution or let's say the role of history

517
01:11:56.040 --> 01:11:58.040
in forming political views.

518
01:11:58.040 --> 01:12:00.040
Yes, Jeremy?

519
01:12:00.040 --> 01:12:03.040
Jeremy? Right.

520
01:12:30.040 --> 01:13:00.040
Let's say these are small individual plots of land in a village, and let's say, it doesn't have to be a feudal lord, let's say the major land owner of the area, or there are other more substantial land owners, and then there's maybe a major land owner, and this territory here would be commons area, and commons area meant that anybody in the village

521
01:13:00.040 --> 01:13:16.040
The time came and there were two waves of enclosures.

522
01:13:16.040 --> 01:13:22.760
Enclosures meant that the commons was now literally enclosed, that is, fences or hedges

523
01:13:22.760 --> 01:13:36.760
was set up and divided up among, or theoretically divided up among the other landowners, small and large, of the village.

524
01:13:36.760 --> 01:13:53.760
Now the argument is that with the absence of enclosures, this meant that the smaller land owners, really small farmers, were not able to survive economically.

525
01:13:53.760 --> 01:14:05.760
And since the enclosures were political acts, acts of parliament or decisions by judges, the bulk of the enclosed land went to the most influential people in the village.

526
01:14:05.760 --> 01:14:12.240
in the Village. That's an argument that's often used. I don't have all my notes here,

527
01:14:12.240 --> 01:14:18.680
but modern research basically has shown that that's very much exaggerated. Yes, there were

528
01:14:18.680 --> 01:14:24.420
some people who now could not survive in the village, had to become laborers or whatever,

529
01:14:24.420 --> 01:14:31.420
but the bulk of the people who went into the towns were not just a few of these people

530
01:14:31.420 --> 01:15:01.420
Queen Anne, Queen Anne, Queen Anne, Queen Anne Queen Anne

531
01:15:01.420 --> 01:15:10.420
The Germans, the Hanoverians. Or to take another example, there's a famous historian Edward Gibbon, who has a nice little autobiography.

532
01:15:10.420 --> 01:15:18.420
If you want to get an idea of 18th century thought, the part of a highly civilized man, the great historian Gibbon, you can read his little autobiography.

533
01:15:18.420 --> 01:15:28.420
And in his autobiography, he says that my father named three of his boys Edward. His own name was Edward.

534
01:15:28.420 --> 01:15:33.420
And, you know, it's not because his father was kind of crazy or something.

535
01:15:33.420 --> 01:15:38.420
It was in order for the name Edward to survive in the family, to make sure that it would survive.

536
01:15:38.420 --> 01:15:44.420
So that terrible infant mortality began to recede.

537
01:15:44.420 --> 01:15:49.420
I'm not really certain what the reasons for it were.

538
01:15:49.420 --> 01:16:00.420
But nonetheless, it was from this, the higher birth rate, a lessened death rate, that the bulk of the population came.

539
01:16:00.420 --> 01:16:05.420
Yeah. Yes, Brad?

540
01:16:05.420 --> 01:16:12.420
Did you write something down?

541
01:16:12.420 --> 01:16:17.420
Wait a minute, did you have a caricature of me? Is that what you did?

542
01:16:17.420 --> 01:16:32.420
As I understood it, when they talked about democracies didn't wade wars on each other,

543
01:16:32.420 --> 01:16:37.420
were they saying that these were universal democracies?

544
01:16:37.420 --> 01:16:44.220
maybe it's the criticism of, well, this wasn't democratic, that wasn't democratic, but that's all.

545
01:16:44.220 --> 01:16:52.540
I would say that universal democracies have a greater chance of going to war, because the greatest tyrannies have been

546
01:16:52.540 --> 01:17:01.860
unlimited democracy, where the elites lead the massive ground by they know it, making men think that they're making decisions,

547
01:17:01.860 --> 01:17:05.780
they set up the situation where they want us to tell them what to do.

548
01:17:05.780 --> 01:17:12.780
Well, that's interesting. What would you consider an example of that?

549
01:17:26.780 --> 01:17:30.740
Okay, you raise an interesting point. Why do they talk about democracy?

550
01:17:30.740 --> 01:17:33.180
Why don't they just talk about a free society?

551
01:17:33.180 --> 01:17:40.380
Take an example in the later 20th century that was very important and that was Hong Kong.

552
01:17:40.380 --> 01:17:46.180
Hong Kong was the opposite of a democracy. It was totally ruled by the high commissioner sent from London.

553
01:17:46.180 --> 01:17:56.380
There was no democracy in Hong Kong. However, there was a scrupulous respect for property rights and the right of contract and so on.

554
01:17:56.380 --> 01:17:58.980
And what happened? You know what happened.

555
01:17:58.980 --> 01:18:05.380
Milton Friedman uses this as a prime example in his television series, Free to Choose.

556
01:18:05.380 --> 01:18:10.020
I don't know if you ever saw any of that. But I think maybe even the first installment of that

557
01:18:10.020 --> 01:18:16.820
shows him in Hong Kong talking about Hong Kong. An area with no natural resources whatsoever,

558
01:18:16.820 --> 01:18:24.260
you can imagine, is basically just a city-state. And it became immensely wealthy. The average

559
01:18:24.260 --> 01:18:28.780
The average person also, the average person had been before, what used to be known as

560
01:18:28.780 --> 01:18:35.220
a Chinese coolie, that is a totally penniless individual who worked enormous amounts of

561
01:18:35.220 --> 01:18:40.900
time for nothing, and now gradually middle class came into existence, an affluent working

562
01:18:40.900 --> 01:18:45.300
class and of course many very wealthy people, how?

563
01:18:45.300 --> 01:18:53.640
By total freedom of trade, absence of government regulations, absence of unionism and so on,

564
01:18:53.640 --> 01:19:21.640
The question was, from the laws that began to put in place in the Indianization, this always happened at the end of the time when things were getting started to improve, because the only reason the laws were effective was that people were able actually to do that.

565
01:19:23.640 --> 01:19:32.640
You know, normal families, most every family, they don't like the idea of their young children going to work.

566
01:19:32.640 --> 01:19:37.640
Why did the young children go to work? That's how the family was able to survive.

567
01:19:37.640 --> 01:19:44.640
Why are young children, well at least young teenagers, working in Nike factories in Indonesia?

568
01:19:44.640 --> 01:19:49.640
Because their family wants to get the extra income?

569
01:19:49.640 --> 01:19:56.480
Well, no, because the family is very, very poor and the alternative to working in the

570
01:19:56.480 --> 01:20:06.320
factories is for the boys to be unemployed or underemployed maybe the rest of their lives

571
01:20:06.320 --> 01:20:09.200
and for the girls to become prostitutes.

572
01:20:09.200 --> 01:20:12.720
That's a reality of those kind of situations.

573
01:20:12.720 --> 01:20:19.560
So this campaign to do away with sweatshops in Indonesia, I mean it's a ridiculous thing

574
01:20:19.560 --> 01:20:27.560
That's how societies develop economically. That's economic development. Society is very poor to begin with.

575
01:20:27.560 --> 01:20:36.560
Leftists think that the answer to that is to simply expropriate all the wealth of anybody who has a little bit more, give it out to the poor.

576
01:20:36.560 --> 01:20:45.560
Well, as Camille Paglia said in another context, if we'd done that from the beginning, we'd all still be living in grass huts.

577
01:20:45.560 --> 01:20:50.120
You only have economic development if you have capital accumulation.

578
01:20:50.120 --> 01:20:53.120
Capital accumulation is in the hands of wealthy people.

579
01:20:53.120 --> 01:20:57.960
Their wealth is very good for them. Their wealth is also very good for everybody else

580
01:20:57.960 --> 01:21:01.200
if it's put into productive use.

581
01:21:01.200 --> 01:21:04.800
So in underdeveloped countries

582
01:21:04.800 --> 01:21:08.120
you start with what you want to call sweat shops.

583
01:21:08.120 --> 01:21:13.080
But one of the things that happens with economic development, people get

584
01:21:13.080 --> 01:21:22.080
Gradually more affluent, and one of the things that they trade off is maybe a little bit higher wages for better working conditions.

585
01:21:22.080 --> 01:21:27.080
They're not going to go into those areas anymore because they don't have to, that they can afford not to.

586
01:21:27.080 --> 01:21:31.080
They can afford maybe to go to this other job. There are now more job opportunities.

587
01:21:31.080 --> 01:21:41.080
So that, and also pardon me, also with education, you don't have to have government compulsory education.

588
01:21:41.080 --> 01:21:57.080
If the society starts at a low economic level, gradually improves, one of the things that a family buys after they take care of their most basic necessities is education for their children in one form or another.

589
01:21:57.080 --> 01:22:06.080
And that's what was happening also in England, as Edward West, the late Canadian economist specialized in improving.

590
01:22:06.080 --> 01:22:18.080
Levels of literacy were improving gradually over time before any government education was put into place in England.

591
01:22:18.080 --> 01:22:29.080
So what people see then is a gradual improvement in working conditions and living conditions and education for their kids,

592
01:22:29.080 --> 01:22:35.080
a gradual fading out of child labor, at the same time the government is putting in these regulations,

593
01:22:35.080 --> 01:22:41.680
Unionism is coming about. So, I figure that it's the latter that accounted for the first.

594
01:22:41.680 --> 01:22:45.880
But, if you did not have the gradual economic improvement,

595
01:22:45.880 --> 01:22:50.480
government laws and union regulations wouldn't have made any difference.

596
01:22:50.480 --> 01:22:58.680
People would have gotten around them in one way or another in order to have the family survive.

597
01:22:58.680 --> 01:23:03.680
The repeal of the Corn Laws, is that one of the things that gave a boost after 1850?

598
01:23:06.680 --> 01:23:12.680
So by doing that, some of the countries didn't necessarily industrialize, they still had the benefit of industrialization?

599
01:23:28.680 --> 01:23:43.680
The story of classical liberalism and the struggle for freedom is a rather dramatic and at times exciting story and one part of it, Brad has brought up, and that is the repeal of the Corn Laws in England.

600
01:23:43.680 --> 01:23:48.680
The last and greatest bastion of protectionism in England.

601
01:23:48.680 --> 01:23:59.680
Corn laws, corn is used in this British sense of grain, not maize as with us, but grain in general, especially wheat.

602
01:23:59.680 --> 01:24:16.680
Okay, after the fall of Napoleon, since international trade had been very heavily interfered with and imports into England restricted, the price of wheat went down.

603
01:24:16.680 --> 01:24:24.280
This meant that the rents of the large landowners who controlled parliament also went down.

604
01:24:24.280 --> 01:24:30.680
In order to preserve their privileged position, they imposed Corn Laws, and that is a system

605
01:24:30.680 --> 01:24:38.040
of tariffs on the importation of grain, especially wheat, into Britain.

606
01:24:38.040 --> 01:24:44.760
Now the situation in England is not as bad as in other places, but still bread is a very

607
01:24:44.760 --> 01:24:50.040
A very large portion of the expenditure of any working family.

608
01:24:50.040 --> 01:24:59.880
So that this was a tax on, an extremely regressive tax on working people especially.

609
01:24:59.880 --> 01:25:08.040
And as the liberal movement expanded and progressed, the demand came up to get rid of this tax.

610
01:25:08.040 --> 01:25:13.480
The only people that really benefited were the large landowners.

611
01:25:13.480 --> 01:25:22.680
didn't even benefit other farmers who leased and rented land from the large landowners

612
01:25:22.680 --> 01:25:29.920
because their rents went up with the increase in price of the grain, so that they didn't

613
01:25:29.920 --> 01:25:33.880
have any net benefit from it, it was the large landowners who benefited.

614
01:25:33.880 --> 01:25:41.640
Everybody else was harmed, consumers, working people, also, as Brad points out, providers

615
01:25:41.640 --> 01:25:48.120
of Grain in Foreign Countries. In those days, especially Poland, Lithuania, Russia, Prussia

616
01:25:48.120 --> 01:25:55.040
even, who would be perfectly happy to sell their foodstuffs, their wheat and so on to

617
01:25:55.040 --> 01:26:03.800
the British, and in return by British manufactured goods. So this was the class situation, I

618
01:26:03.800 --> 01:26:10.360
mean this is class conflict of the sort that I talked about yesterday, pitting a privileged

619
01:26:10.360 --> 01:26:16.360
and land-owning aristocratic class against every other class in society.

620
01:26:16.360 --> 01:26:23.360
Well, gradually the system of protectionism was done away with in England step by step

621
01:26:23.360 --> 01:26:28.360
until the major thing that remained were the Corn Laws.

622
01:26:28.360 --> 01:26:36.360
And in the 1840s, around 1840, an organization came into existence called the Anti-Corn Law League.

623
01:26:36.360 --> 01:26:49.360
And it was led by the two men that I mentioned yesterday, John Bright and especially Richard Cobden, and they had other leaders as well, but they were the main men, the Manchester School.

624
01:26:49.360 --> 01:27:04.360
It was the first mass political movement in British history. What they did was, as has to happen, you have to get money from somewhere, and they got money from northern manufacturers,

625
01:27:04.360 --> 01:27:34.360
Show that they had an economic advantage in free trade and with this money, this anti-corner law league, they put out newspapers, they put out pamphlets, they had campaigns to elect people to the House of Commons, they sent speakers out all around the country, they hired holes in London week after week, a massive educational campaign to repeal the Corn Laws. Cobden and Bright were elected to the House of Commons.

626
01:27:34.360 --> 01:27:45.480
and there were the two main parties, the Whigs and the Tories of conservatives were controlled by the

627
01:27:45.480 --> 01:27:55.800
landed interests so that they resisted the demand for free trade in grain until the time came when

628
01:27:57.560 --> 01:28:01.240
the arguments just seemed insuperable and the Irish famine

629
01:28:01.240 --> 01:28:12.040
and it seemed savagely criminal to continue the Corn Laws in the face of this famine.

630
01:28:12.040 --> 01:28:20.080
And Richard Cobden, maybe you've got the idea, is one of my favorite guys, gave a speech

631
01:28:20.080 --> 01:28:24.680
in the House of Commons, marshaling all the arguments, summarizing everything.

632
01:28:24.680 --> 01:28:29.200
And the Tory Prime Minister, Robert Peel, turned to William Gladstone, who in those

633
01:28:29.200 --> 01:28:43.200
In those days was a Tory, he became a great liberal Prime Minister afterwards, and Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Sir Robert Peel said to Gladstone, you have to answer Cobden because I can't.

634
01:28:43.200 --> 01:28:51.200
In other words, the leader of the Conservatives had conceded, had surrendered, had given in on the question of repeal.

635
01:28:51.200 --> 01:29:21.200
1846 the Corn Laws are repealed and England goes over to free trade and becomes the bastion of free trade and the beacon of free trade until the Great Depression and they finally, there's too much pressure and they give into a certain amount of protectionism but really it's a great story and as I mentioned last time then after this victory Cobden and Bright go on and tackle the issue of war and peace. They oppose the

636
01:29:21.200 --> 01:29:22.200
The Crimean War

637
01:29:22.200 --> 01:29:27.200
In London, you can see a statue, a female figure, and it says Crimea.

638
01:29:27.200 --> 01:29:31.200
This was the war of Florence Nightingale.

639
01:29:31.200 --> 01:29:38.200
Through war and combat, but mainly through disease, the English lost over 100,000 men.

640
01:29:38.200 --> 01:29:43.200
The French more, the Russians and many, many more, the Turks.

641
01:29:43.200 --> 01:29:45.200
It was a terrible war, senseless war.

642
01:29:45.200 --> 01:29:49.200
To this day, nobody understands why it took place.

643
01:29:49.200 --> 01:30:05.200
And there's this statue of Crimea, and John Bright had a big family, one time he was with his grandson, strolling through the streets of London, and the little boy asked, what is that? What does that say?

644
01:30:05.200 --> 01:30:12.200
and Bright says, a crime. Crimea, a crime.

645
01:30:15.200 --> 01:30:26.200
Because they opposed the Crimean War, these two great heroes of the productive English middle class lost their seats in the next election.

646
01:30:27.200 --> 01:30:33.200
They had been feted and celebrated and praised throughout the country because of their great work

647
01:30:33.200 --> 01:30:37.200
in regard to free trade, but the jingoism, the chauvinism,

648
01:30:37.200 --> 01:30:43.200
I don't know if they had flapping Union Jacks from their coaches in those days or what,

649
01:30:43.200 --> 01:30:49.200
but that kind of attitude did them in. They went back into politics afterwards,

650
01:30:49.200 --> 01:30:58.200
but it taught them a lesson about the public and misunderstood conception of patriotism.

651
01:30:58.200 --> 01:31:03.200
Well, I think it's about enough for right now. We'll continue this afternoon.