WEBVTT

NOTE The Worldview of Murray Rothbard

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:23.960
Let me first introduce you, Jared Casey, and you teach at the University College Dublin.

2
00:00:23.960 --> 00:00:24.960
University College Dublin.

3
00:00:24.960 --> 00:00:28.480
University College Dublin, and your profession is?

4
00:00:28.480 --> 00:00:29.480
Philosophy.

5
00:00:29.480 --> 00:00:32.060
Okay, and you're having a book out on Rothbard.

6
00:00:32.060 --> 00:00:32.900
I do indeed.

7
00:00:32.900 --> 00:00:33.720
Let's just jump right into that.

8
00:00:33.720 --> 00:00:34.560
Murray Rothbard.

9
00:00:34.560 --> 00:00:35.380
That's what everybody cares about.

10
00:00:35.380 --> 00:00:37.240
Right now, we love you, but let's hear about you.

11
00:00:37.240 --> 00:00:38.080
You want to hear the book?

12
00:00:38.080 --> 00:00:38.920
Yeah.

13
00:00:38.920 --> 00:00:40.240
Well, what can I say?

14
00:00:40.240 --> 00:00:42.040
I wish it were called The Worldview of Rothbard

15
00:00:42.040 --> 00:00:46.240
as per the advertisement in the ASC guide,

16
00:00:46.240 --> 00:00:47.560
but actually it's just called Murray Rothbard

17
00:00:47.560 --> 00:00:50.080
because the series it's part of

18
00:00:50.080 --> 00:00:52.840
is called The Major Conservative and Libertarian Thinkers.

19
00:00:52.840 --> 00:00:53.920
So there are 20 volumes,

20
00:00:53.920 --> 00:00:55.320
and so it's had the names of the people,

21
00:00:55.320 --> 00:00:59.280
Locke, Hume, von Mises, Rothbard,

22
00:00:59.280 --> 00:01:01.000
and so it's in there, so it's one of those.

23
00:01:01.000 --> 00:01:03.360
I see, so do they give you a word limit?

24
00:01:03.360 --> 00:01:04.200
Yes.

25
00:01:04.200 --> 00:01:05.560
And did you have an outline?

26
00:01:05.560 --> 00:01:08.160
Yeah, they want a kind of intellectual bio,

27
00:01:08.160 --> 00:01:09.520
then they want a substantive chapter

28
00:01:09.520 --> 00:01:11.800
which deals with thought critically.

29
00:01:11.800 --> 00:01:16.280
They want a contemporary relevance

30
00:01:16.280 --> 00:01:19.160
and then current sort of affairs.

31
00:01:19.160 --> 00:01:23.600
So we've got Strauss, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, whatever,

32
00:01:23.600 --> 00:01:24.560
Rothbard, right?

33
00:01:24.560 --> 00:01:25.400
That's one of the...

34
00:01:25.400 --> 00:01:26.760
Well, it's important to get him in there.

35
00:01:26.760 --> 00:01:27.600
Right.

36
00:01:27.600 --> 00:01:30.360
It wasn't a given that he was going to be in there.

37
00:01:30.360 --> 00:01:31.520
Did you have to lobby for this?

38
00:01:31.520 --> 00:01:36.440
No, but the general editor is a guy called John Metacroft

39
00:01:36.440 --> 00:01:37.520
from University College London.

40
00:01:37.520 --> 00:01:41.880
He's a good guy, and it could have been somebody else.

41
00:01:41.880 --> 00:01:45.520
And so he was in touch with me about something else.

42
00:01:45.520 --> 00:01:46.560
And you told him to look at you.

43
00:01:46.560 --> 00:01:47.160
I'm a fan of this.

44
00:01:47.160 --> 00:01:48.320
Well, I think he was looking for somebody.

45
00:01:48.320 --> 00:01:50.520
He wanted to know if I knew somebody who could do it.

46
00:01:50.520 --> 00:01:53.960
And I said, I'll do it.

47
00:01:53.960 --> 00:01:55.120
Me.

48
00:01:55.120 --> 00:01:57.560
And so I did.

49
00:01:57.560 --> 00:02:03.560
And did you take the approach of introducing the whole Rothbard thought? I mean, how could anybody do that?

50
00:02:03.560 --> 00:02:10.560
Well, you can't, so you have to be really selective. So the first is basically life and time, from an intellectual perspective, so it's reasonably short.

51
00:02:10.560 --> 00:02:17.560
The second one kind of looks, to some extent, at the praxeology side, so it kind of goes light on the economics.

52
00:02:17.560 --> 00:02:23.560
I'm not doing Man Economy and the State, so it's called Rothbard the Libertarian, so I focus on that.

53
00:02:23.560 --> 00:02:38.440
and then the third one is really on Rothbard, the historian, which not even, which even people who know a lot about Rothbard don't know, you know, they won't have read the four volumes on American history or they won't have read the two volume economic history and I find Rothbard very interesting as a historian.

54
00:02:38.440 --> 00:02:41.000
Right, historian and historian of thought.

55
00:02:41.000 --> 00:02:53.320
Historian of thought, yeah, exactly. So the third chapter, I think, even for people who are aficionados and so on might find something of interest in there, especially because I reviewed the review literature, in other words, the reviews that came out

56
00:02:53.320 --> 00:02:56.160
in the journals, as far as I can find them.

57
00:02:56.160 --> 00:02:57.720
I see, like Panic of 1819 and...

58
00:02:57.720 --> 00:03:00.600
Yeah, from the very earliest work to the latest stuff.

59
00:03:00.600 --> 00:03:01.680
Right, Conceived in Liberty and everything.

60
00:03:01.680 --> 00:03:02.520
So I put all that in.

61
00:03:02.520 --> 00:03:04.080
And the last one then really just takes all of that

62
00:03:04.080 --> 00:03:05.640
and applies it to current circumstances.

63
00:03:05.640 --> 00:03:08.520
And that's where I kind of let myself go a little bit

64
00:03:08.520 --> 00:03:09.360
and had a bit of fun.

65
00:03:09.360 --> 00:03:11.560
If Rothbard had not been an economist,

66
00:03:11.560 --> 00:03:13.800
had not been a philosopher,

67
00:03:13.800 --> 00:03:15.600
he could have been a historian, right?

68
00:03:15.600 --> 00:03:17.280
Oh yeah, clearly, clearly.

69
00:03:17.280 --> 00:03:19.480
And in the course of the chapter I say

70
00:03:19.480 --> 00:03:22.000
that one of the reasons why he didn't go down

71
00:03:22.000 --> 00:03:32.000
I think what he did particularly well with the historian establishment was because his approach is so different and so on, he does really call a lot of things into question that they take for granted.

72
00:03:32.000 --> 00:03:38.000
So he adopts the same radical perspective and of course he brings his libertarianism to bear.

73
00:03:38.000 --> 00:03:46.000
I mean what he's focusing on, what he's looking for evidence of is stress on liberty and on freedom.

74
00:03:46.000 --> 00:04:03.680
Well, sure, it's the same way as you and I, when we pick up the newspaper, we go, oh, well, look, you know, Gaddafi's killing his own people, that's what states do, or whatever, you know, you have this libertarian, so Murray looked back at history and did the same thing, right? There's an intimacy he had with history, I find.

75
00:04:03.840 --> 00:04:15.960
But he also has, I think he has a narrative style that many historians would or should die for. It's just like, I don't think the man was capable of writing a dull word, you might disagree with him.

76
00:04:16.000 --> 00:04:20.960
You might think he goes over the top, but the one cardinal saying he never commits is being

77
00:04:20.960 --> 00:04:21.960
tolerant, boring.

78
00:04:21.960 --> 00:04:25.720
Well, he's excited to tell you about what he knows.

79
00:04:25.720 --> 00:04:26.720
He's evangelical.

80
00:04:26.720 --> 00:04:29.640
He's got news to tell and he's a person to tell you.

81
00:04:29.640 --> 00:04:30.640
Yeah, he can't wait.

82
00:04:30.640 --> 00:04:31.640
And he never runs out of it.

83
00:04:31.640 --> 00:04:34.240
He's the kind of guy, you know if you met him in the corridor, you wouldn't escape.

84
00:04:34.240 --> 00:04:37.800
It would be 45 minutes and you'd be saying, I've got to go to an appointment and so on

85
00:04:37.800 --> 00:04:39.680
and he'd be still telling you and you'd still be interested.

86
00:04:39.680 --> 00:04:43.000
Yeah, until about 4 a.m. as I recall.

87
00:04:43.000 --> 00:04:46.600
I never knew him personally and it's my one regret. I'd love to have known him.

88
00:04:46.600 --> 00:04:54.280
Now you had finished all your academic studies and got your present teaching position and everything

89
00:04:54.280 --> 00:04:58.520
and then you bumped into Rothbard and the Austrian tradition.

90
00:04:58.520 --> 00:05:05.640
Yeah, yeah. I'm a very late convert and so on. So I was well, I came as a real shock to me. I was

91
00:05:05.640 --> 00:05:10.520
always interested in the phenomenon of money and what it was. It seemed a very mysterious sort of

92
00:05:10.520 --> 00:05:19.520
Obviously you could show pieces of paper or coins and so on, but it seemed a very odd sort of thing that people were willing to exchange goods and services for crumpled, dirty pieces of paper.

93
00:05:19.520 --> 00:05:29.520
So a friend of mine who was interested in German philosophy was on a sabbatical and he brought me home a copy of Mises' Theory of Money and Credit.

94
00:05:29.520 --> 00:05:30.520
I see.

95
00:05:30.520 --> 00:05:32.520
Which is like, wow.

96
00:05:32.520 --> 00:05:34.520
Yeah, it explains everything.

97
00:05:34.520 --> 00:05:43.520
Okay, and it does. And it does in such a way, I mean, again, Mises doesn't have the same kind of touch as Rothbard does in terms of being sort of popular and appealing on the surface and so on.

98
00:05:43.520 --> 00:05:58.520
But because I was turned on to this particular question, for me, it was like the answers and then not only persuasive in the sense that, yes, it may well be true, but there are others, but persuasive in the sense that it kind of wrestled me to the ground, cut me in half, Nelson, and I couldn't move.

99
00:05:58.520 --> 00:05:59.520
But it's so systematic.

100
00:05:59.520 --> 00:06:00.520
It's brilliant.

101
00:06:00.520 --> 00:06:01.520
Yeah.

102
00:06:01.520 --> 00:06:18.520
But as I said before, it's not where you'd normally start, but you need to start where your interests are, and those were mine, and I'm sure people have told you the same story, once you start, you're on a slippery slope, is that where you go, whew, and you know, human action.

103
00:06:18.520 --> 00:06:29.520
And yet it's a credit to you, I mean it's a credit to you that you had a teachable spirit, even as a mature academic, that's a little unusual.

104
00:06:29.520 --> 00:06:59.520
I don't know, but yeah, my kids often wonder what I'm going to do when I grow up and I feel the same way, you know, it's, I just, I'm not like the Athenians always on the lookout for something new necessarily, but I do have questions and those are the kind of things which were motivating me and it just happened that at the right time when these questions were live, to use a kind of Jamesian sense for me, the book came and the result was, you know, putting a detonator in something.

105
00:06:59.520 --> 00:07:09.520
Now do you feel that Rothbard has been, you read a lot of reviews of his book and you see that he's variously criticized from the left, from the right, from all.

106
00:07:09.520 --> 00:07:14.520
Do you feel the need to come to his defense? I think you have in several papers.

107
00:07:14.520 --> 00:07:21.520
Yes, I have. Look, nobody's perfect, right? And that includes Rothbard. So nobody gets everything right all the time.

108
00:07:21.520 --> 00:07:28.360
but the one thing and you could you could make accusations of various kinds you

109
00:07:28.360 --> 00:07:31.420
know people have accused him of perhaps not being a scholarly at times as he

110
00:07:31.420 --> 00:07:36.120
needed to be and that may well be right okay but in the sense he was producing so

111
00:07:36.120 --> 00:07:40.240
much material and and I'm very happy to forgive him because of the liveliness of

112
00:07:40.240 --> 00:07:43.360
what he's got and somebody else can fill in the details and cross the T's and

113
00:07:43.360 --> 00:07:48.940
dot the I's and so on but the one thing you can't criticize him for is raw

114
00:07:48.940 --> 00:07:50.940
All Intellectual Integrity

115
00:07:50.940 --> 00:07:52.940
And that comes to me shining through the page

116
00:07:52.940 --> 00:07:56.940
I mean, he's the guy who could be completely wrong

117
00:07:56.940 --> 00:07:58.940
I'm not saying he is, but he could be completely wrong on something

118
00:07:58.940 --> 00:08:02.940
but he clearly believes and is passionately interested in what he's talking about

119
00:08:02.940 --> 00:08:06.940
and is not afraid to change his mind if he needs to do it and so on

120
00:08:06.940 --> 00:08:13.940
But he always comes across, he has the sort of passion of a very good teacher

121
00:08:13.940 --> 00:08:15.940
This is what you always look for in a teacher

122
00:08:15.940 --> 00:08:19.860
is somebody who not only knows the stuff, but is really passionately interested in it and

123
00:08:19.860 --> 00:08:23.320
manages to communicate that. It's like lighting a torch, it's like lighting a fire and passing

124
00:08:23.320 --> 00:08:29.220
it on to the students. And he does that. And in his writings all the time, however, I mean

125
00:08:29.220 --> 00:08:35.540
people have remarked that it was contrary and he was hard to get along with and so on.

126
00:08:35.540 --> 00:08:39.140
That may be so. I didn't know him, but I can tell you, if I'd known him, we wouldn't

127
00:08:39.140 --> 00:08:43.780
have had any problem getting along. He's just my kind of guy. If only because of that absolutely

128
00:08:43.780 --> 00:08:46.820
and the outrageous cackle that he had, which I've heard on the recordings.

129
00:08:46.820 --> 00:08:49.740
I mean, anybody who laughs like that is my kind of guy.

130
00:08:50.060 --> 00:08:54.380
So, so, you know, so I would I would have killed to be the kind of guy

131
00:08:54.380 --> 00:08:57.380
who was stuck in his apartment in New York until four o'clock in the morning.

132
00:08:57.380 --> 00:08:58.380
I would have been there until six.

133
00:08:58.380 --> 00:09:00.460
He would have he would have had to throw me out.

134
00:09:00.460 --> 00:09:03.620
That's how part of the part of the revolutionary band of five people.

135
00:09:03.620 --> 00:09:07.220
Yeah, I would have been there to sign up.

136
00:09:07.660 --> 00:09:09.100
So that that really comes across.

137
00:09:09.100 --> 00:09:12.700
And I'm not saying other people don't have intellectual integrity,

138
00:09:12.700 --> 00:09:17.500
but he has it and he has it in a way in which and he lives it out he lives it out in his writings he

139
00:09:17.500 --> 00:09:23.980
lives it out in his polemical work he lives it out in in the engagements that he had practical engagements

140
00:09:23.980 --> 00:09:28.540
what he did and what he didn't do and yeah okay so he might be a little bit prickly and all of the

141
00:09:28.540 --> 00:09:32.940
rest but hey so am i i mean human beings are like that i must prefer them like that right with a

142
00:09:32.940 --> 00:09:37.340
few rough edges and right and so on rather than be all smooth and polished and how did you uh how

143
00:09:37.340 --> 00:09:42.060
did in your book how do you assess his well let me ask it this way i was going to ask about his

144
00:09:42.060 --> 00:09:48.760
is anarchism. But let me just ask it more broadly. What do you think Rothbard's major

145
00:09:48.760 --> 00:09:54.300
contributions to the world of ideas really are? I mean, if you're going to name two,

146
00:09:54.300 --> 00:09:55.940
three, or four, what would they be?

147
00:09:55.940 --> 00:10:00.260
Okay, I'm not going to comment on the economic stuff because I'm not really that confident.

148
00:10:00.260 --> 00:10:04.200
So my not mentioning doesn't mean that those aren't important. I think they are probably.

149
00:10:04.200 --> 00:10:12.960
economists had better comment on that. I think his major contribution is his, well

150
00:10:12.960 --> 00:10:19.020
probably twofold. One is taking the idea of liberty really seriously and he has

151
00:10:19.020 --> 00:10:22.060
the virtues of a logician. I'm a logician myself by training and I

152
00:10:22.060 --> 00:10:27.520
recognize it. So that he takes the idea and he's prepared to follow it wherever

153
00:10:27.520 --> 00:10:32.920
it takes him. He's not saying oh this would be unpopular or this would might

154
00:10:32.920 --> 00:10:35.360
I think that might be inexpedient or this might upset somebody.

155
00:10:35.360 --> 00:10:36.360
I might not get promoted.

156
00:10:36.360 --> 00:10:37.360
Yeah.

157
00:10:37.360 --> 00:10:38.360
Well, he didn't, right?

158
00:10:38.360 --> 00:10:40.520
But he didn't seem to worry, right?

159
00:10:40.520 --> 00:10:43.840
So he has that, and I love that.

160
00:10:43.840 --> 00:10:48.320
I mean, okay, even if the guy is completely wrong, at least you can sit and you're working

161
00:10:48.320 --> 00:10:51.120
all night, but I don't think he is, but he takes that, okay?

162
00:10:51.120 --> 00:10:53.960
And the other really interesting thing for me from the point of view, because this appeals

163
00:10:53.960 --> 00:10:59.720
to me as a Catholic to some extent, Catholics often tend to think that sort of the natural

164
00:10:59.720 --> 00:11:02.160
law is something which is sort of Catholic doctrine or something.

165
00:11:02.160 --> 00:11:06.240
And it isn't, of course, right? But nonetheless, it has received probably its greatest development

166
00:11:06.240 --> 00:11:10.760
and most of its adherents would be in the Catholic tradition. Rothbard's not in that

167
00:11:10.760 --> 00:11:16.680
tradition and yet he discovers that himself and it has an immediate appeal to him. So

168
00:11:16.680 --> 00:11:24.480
he manages to combine his libertarian views and he gives it a grounding in natural law,

169
00:11:24.480 --> 00:11:28.720
which I think is probably the only way it can be grounded. In other words, okay, I know

170
00:11:28.720 --> 00:11:32.280
I know there are people who do it through a utilitarian perspective, people like David

171
00:11:32.280 --> 00:11:35.040
Rieben and others.

172
00:11:35.040 --> 00:11:38.880
But apart from the fact that if you ever do that, you're always giving hostages fortune

173
00:11:38.880 --> 00:11:42.000
because it's always open to somebody to come up and say, well, if we go down the liberty

174
00:11:42.000 --> 00:11:45.280
route, it's not actually going to be productive of the greatest good for the greatest number

175
00:11:45.280 --> 00:11:47.440
or whatever it might be.

176
00:11:47.440 --> 00:11:48.760
And that's something you'd have to take into account.

177
00:11:48.760 --> 00:11:52.160
But I think in the end, it's not principled.

178
00:11:52.160 --> 00:11:53.560
And Rothbard's account is principled.

179
00:11:53.560 --> 00:12:02.560
So he tries, especially in the Ethics of Liberty, which I use as the textbook for a course I'm doing, and students find it incredibly exciting.

180
00:12:02.560 --> 00:12:05.060
But it's just one chapter or two on natural law.

181
00:12:05.060 --> 00:12:11.060
Oh, he throws it away. It's almost like he's saying, well, I'm doing this because it's kind of obvious and so on, so I take a bit longer to do it.

182
00:12:11.060 --> 00:12:17.060
But he does. He just kind of throws it away. But he exhibits it. He instantiates it in the rest of the book.

183
00:12:17.060 --> 00:12:25.540
So you get this grounding in natural law in a fully Thomist tradition and then a quick

184
00:12:25.540 --> 00:12:33.580
movement into a kind of an enlightenment style embrace of human rights and then a little

185
00:12:33.580 --> 00:12:38.100
further down the trajectory you end in anarchism.

186
00:12:38.100 --> 00:12:41.780
So I mean this is a gigantic apparatus.

187
00:12:41.780 --> 00:12:44.980
It's a little book with an almighty charge.

188
00:12:44.980 --> 00:12:49.220
Okay, I mean, it's the kind of book that probably should probably take about a thousand pages.

189
00:12:49.220 --> 00:12:52.580
Sure, but Murray slotted it out quickly so he can get it.

190
00:12:52.580 --> 00:12:53.060
That's what I'm saying.

191
00:12:53.060 --> 00:12:53.940
And then you fill it in.

192
00:12:53.940 --> 00:12:57.700
But the great thing from a pedagogical point of view is because it's relatively short,

193
00:12:57.700 --> 00:13:02.180
because the chapters are brief, because he writes so well and engagingly,

194
00:13:02.180 --> 00:13:06.820
even if there are questions that are not answered and roughnesses and so on,

195
00:13:06.820 --> 00:13:11.540
it's precisely the right kind of text to give to an undergraduate with an inquiring mind,

196
00:13:11.540 --> 00:13:14.340
because there are lots of things you can latch onto.

197
00:13:14.340 --> 00:13:22.340
And not only does he, it's not a stuffy piece of philosophical work, all polished, so nobody can engage with it, and you have the application chapters.

198
00:13:22.340 --> 00:13:31.340
And there are things in there that I just find slightly outrageous myself, but that's fine. It's great. It's challenging. It's engaging. It's annoying. It's wonderful. It's all of these things.

199
00:13:31.340 --> 00:13:43.340
Well, I think you make a good point about his applications, and I'm not sure I've entirely thought about it this way, but sometimes people say, well, Rothbard had his conclusion in mind, and then sort of patched up his argument to arrive at it.

200
00:13:43.340 --> 00:13:50.940
But you're saying really the opposite. He had an argument in mind and wanted to see where it would go.

201
00:13:50.940 --> 00:14:03.100
Yeah. Look, I mean, let's be frank. If I were to take a minimal government position, I would have many more converts.

202
00:14:03.100 --> 00:14:05.500
I would have many more people who'd be prepared to buy it.

203
00:14:05.500 --> 00:14:10.100
If I said, look, let's take off all this stuff about communications and we don't need the government.

204
00:14:10.100 --> 00:14:40.100
Let's take off health, education and welfare might be more difficult, but let's get rid of all that and let's just say we need the government for provision of loan order, legal services and so on. And so we're stuck with that. And they'd probably go, yeah, it's that last one. That's the real sticking point. Okay, so when I'm doing my class, I tell the students how it works and I go, and I'm going all the way. I'm not stopping here. I'm going all the way. I mean, this is the this is the this is the pons as a neuron. This is the one, you know, that really tests whether you want to take it all the way.

205
00:14:40.100 --> 00:14:41.460
That's the hard core.

206
00:14:41.460 --> 00:14:45.940
You recall how power and market opens, right?

207
00:14:45.940 --> 00:14:48.900
First chapter, boom, national defense.

208
00:14:48.900 --> 00:14:51.020
So you get that one, at least in Rothbard's mind,

209
00:14:51.020 --> 00:14:51.860
that's the first one.

210
00:14:51.860 --> 00:14:54.700
And of course, I mean, even to the publishers,

211
00:14:54.700 --> 00:14:56.460
this was something like a scandal.

212
00:14:56.460 --> 00:14:58.180
It was a nervous breakdown.

213
00:14:58.180 --> 00:14:59.700
So they subverted it, basically.

214
00:14:59.700 --> 00:15:01.460
And yet you look around the world today.

215
00:15:01.460 --> 00:15:04.380
I mean, what is the power that the state has that's

216
00:15:04.380 --> 00:15:06.540
the most potentially deadly?

217
00:15:06.540 --> 00:15:08.420
Yes, absolutely.

218
00:15:08.420 --> 00:15:12.420
I mean, if you do the numbers, I mean, how many people have been killed in the 20th century?

219
00:15:12.420 --> 00:15:16.420
And I say to my first-year class, I was saying the other day, this is not in the libertarian class,

220
00:15:16.420 --> 00:15:21.420
but saying, count up the number of people who have been killed by the state or those who aspire to control the state.

221
00:15:21.420 --> 00:15:28.420
Okay, put that in one column. And I said, on the other column, put the number of people who have been killed by ordinary, decent murders.

222
00:15:28.420 --> 00:15:31.420
In revenge or in crime.

223
00:15:31.420 --> 00:15:32.420
Duel.

224
00:15:32.420 --> 00:15:38.420
Well, start from the ground and you come up to here with this one and you're barely half an inch off the ground on the other one.

225
00:15:38.420 --> 00:15:43.420
And what was the function of the state again? To preserve the peace and order and to protect us and so on?

226
00:15:43.420 --> 00:15:47.420
Hmm, I wonder, we might have a slight problem here, don't you think?

227
00:15:47.420 --> 00:15:58.420
Now, did you find that you had reflected on the nature of the state before you had read Rothbard?

228
00:15:58.420 --> 00:16:06.420
Not really. I would have probably accepted it as a sort of an unpleasant necessity.

229
00:16:06.420 --> 00:16:10.420
I was doing a job that somebody had to do, not that I particularly wanted to do it.

230
00:16:10.420 --> 00:16:14.420
But yeah, I wouldn't really have thought about it. Political philosophy wasn't something I was particularly interested in.

231
00:16:14.420 --> 00:16:19.420
But Murray identifies the state, right? I mean, he says this is the state, and he puts a circle around it,

232
00:16:19.420 --> 00:16:25.420
he investigates it closely and helps the reader understand it as something special, unique,

233
00:16:25.420 --> 00:16:29.420
pervasive, more so than you thought, and unclouds the mind.

234
00:16:29.420 --> 00:16:37.420
It does, yeah. Well, the other thing, since I've started down this road, I've been investigating the historical antecedents, I've been reading a lot of stuff.

235
00:16:37.420 --> 00:16:45.420
There's a huge amount of material on there. And the one very interesting thing is, it wouldn't be true to say that the state is a 17th century invention,

236
00:16:45.420 --> 00:16:49.420
but the state as we know it is a 17th century invention.

237
00:16:49.420 --> 00:16:56.660
In other words, more or less, the essential components of the state have been present in all coercive governments, in empires and so on.

238
00:16:56.660 --> 00:17:02.420
But the particular kind of state that we now have, which most people simply take for granted,

239
00:17:02.420 --> 00:17:11.380
the first thing I have to do in my class is to impress upon the students the contingency, the sheer raw contingency of the state.

240
00:17:11.380 --> 00:17:12.700
The nation state as we know it.

241
00:17:12.700 --> 00:17:17.180
Yeah, I just say, look, there was a time when it did not exist.

242
00:17:17.180 --> 00:17:21.980
There will be a time, please God, soon, when it will not exist.

243
00:17:21.980 --> 00:17:26.500
And people will look back and talk about the age of the state.

244
00:17:26.500 --> 00:17:33.060
But for us, the nature of human beings is that when we look around the world,

245
00:17:33.060 --> 00:17:37.740
we tend to see not only that things are so, but without reflecting on it too much,

246
00:17:37.740 --> 00:17:41.740
we conclude from this that they must be so, it must be this way.

247
00:17:41.740 --> 00:17:45.820
So, and I give a hackneyed example to say when I was growing up in Ireland,

248
00:17:45.820 --> 00:17:49.260
Telephones were provided by the Department of Posts and Telegraphs.

249
00:17:49.260 --> 00:17:50.740
You know, you had to apply for one.

250
00:17:50.740 --> 00:17:53.460
It took two years in order to get one.

251
00:17:53.460 --> 00:17:55.980
You had no control over the color of the apparatus.

252
00:17:55.980 --> 00:17:58.820
They put it wherever they wanted to, usually in a drafty hall.

253
00:17:58.820 --> 00:18:00.820
And they charged you whatever you like.

254
00:18:00.820 --> 00:18:05.500
OK, but but this was the natural order.

255
00:18:05.500 --> 00:18:12.700
This was the way it was and the way it had to be to move forward 50 or 60 years.

256
00:18:12.700 --> 00:18:18.460
and now there are rival phone companies and you can have a telephone on the top of your roof if you want

257
00:18:18.460 --> 00:18:22.700
and you can have a Mickey Mouse one dangling from your ceiling and you can you know you can have

258
00:18:22.700 --> 00:18:28.300
different services or none at all and just use one of these so it's quite yeah i mean so you see again

259
00:18:28.300 --> 00:18:34.860
and so i try to use examples like these to to shift to to unsettle the idea that things must be so

260
00:18:34.860 --> 00:18:39.020
and once and and so for example in terms of the anarchy thing instead of coming straight at the

261
00:18:39.020 --> 00:18:45.020
I use examples that I've got from the BBC recordings of programs where they talk about the removal of traffic lights.

262
00:18:45.020 --> 00:18:46.020
Oh, of course.

263
00:18:46.020 --> 00:18:55.020
And so that's not contentious, okay? That doesn't raise any questions about force or crime and so on, where people are involved.

264
00:18:55.020 --> 00:19:00.020
But you can actually see graphically what happens when you actually remove the traffic lights.

265
00:19:00.020 --> 00:19:02.020
It's better.

266
00:19:02.020 --> 00:19:07.020
And then you realize, and the guy tells you, there are 48,000 sets of traffic lights in the UK.

267
00:19:07.020 --> 00:19:10.940
and then they show it and then you see the photographs and there's a whole

268
00:19:10.940 --> 00:19:15.100
bunch of people sitting at traffic lights spew fumes spewing out and on the other

269
00:19:15.100 --> 00:19:18.260
side and nobody's moving they're all just sitting there and nobody's moving

270
00:19:18.260 --> 00:19:21.220
and then you see a village where they took deliberately took out the traffic

271
00:19:21.220 --> 00:19:25.180
lights and one woman predicted chaos she said this place is mad enough you take

272
00:19:25.180 --> 00:19:27.900
out the traffic lights it's gonna be ten times worse came back to her three days

273
00:19:27.900 --> 00:19:30.740
later and she said I can't believe it looked around the camera there's nobody

274
00:19:30.740 --> 00:19:36.020
there the car an occasional car whizzing by it's just you know and so that those

275
00:19:36.020 --> 00:19:39.820
Those are the kinds of things, and of course Rothbard would have approved of these, because

276
00:19:39.820 --> 00:19:43.300
these are the kinds of things that again show, because when you come into the big ones, you've

277
00:19:43.300 --> 00:19:48.120
already, as it were, softened the students' mind up so that they're now receptive to thinking

278
00:19:48.120 --> 00:19:49.120
about it.

279
00:19:49.120 --> 00:19:56.740
Now, Murray, I wonder if Rothbard's writing is clear enough on the distinction between

280
00:19:56.740 --> 00:20:04.000
the nation-state as we know it and something like a medieval personal state.

281
00:20:04.000 --> 00:20:05.000
Probably not.

282
00:20:05.000 --> 00:20:11.720
What is essentially the Weberian definition of the state, which is probably correct, it's

283
00:20:11.720 --> 00:20:20.680
that organization which claims, bracket rightfully, the monopoly of force within a given territory.

284
00:20:20.680 --> 00:20:23.840
That's why I say that the state as we know it originated in the 17th century, because

285
00:20:23.840 --> 00:20:28.600
it's a product of the breakdown of the medieval synthesis, the product of the reformation,

286
00:20:28.600 --> 00:20:30.520
it comes from that period.

287
00:20:30.520 --> 00:20:34.760
So when the church breaks up and you've already had the empire broken up, then that's when

288
00:20:34.760 --> 00:20:36.960
And you get the nation-state.

289
00:20:36.960 --> 00:20:44.040
But elements of the state, at least in empire, they claim the monopoly of force, but strictly

290
00:20:44.040 --> 00:20:45.360
speaking, they weren't able to enforce it.

291
00:20:45.360 --> 00:20:46.780
They hadn't got the means.

292
00:20:46.780 --> 00:20:48.880
The populations were too diverse.

293
00:20:48.880 --> 00:20:55.720
And sorry, just to finish, even in the Middle Ages, of course, you had overlapping authorities.

294
00:20:55.720 --> 00:20:59.960
You had vertical and horizontal and you had merchants and so on.

295
00:20:59.960 --> 00:21:02.720
So it was a complicated legal and political structure.

296
00:21:02.720 --> 00:21:10.720
The fun of that, if you like, for somebody was that there were cracks, there were crevices, there were gaps you could slip in and out of, you could move around.

297
00:21:10.720 --> 00:21:21.720
It wasn't ideal, I don't want to make it sound idyllic, but at least you didn't have what I suppose in the 20th century became the totalitarian claims of the state to be all in all,

298
00:21:21.720 --> 00:21:30.720
to determine ultimately every feature to be the final legal port of call. That didn't work in the Middle Ages, so there is a transition.

299
00:21:30.720 --> 00:21:39.720
That is very interesting. I guess I didn't entirely understand that that was your view, that the Rothbardian view of the state really comes into being as a modern thing.

300
00:21:39.720 --> 00:21:43.720
And the state of the 12th century, the state of the 19th century.

301
00:21:43.720 --> 00:21:52.720
Well, you can hardly call, in fact, in that book by what I can't think of his name, the legal scholar, Lowen Revolution, Harald Berman.

302
00:21:52.720 --> 00:21:59.720
Berman argues, in fact, that the state, the first state, was the church. It's an interesting thesis.

303
00:21:59.720 --> 00:22:04.280
He says they were the first ones to develop a central organized authority, a bureaucracy.

304
00:22:04.280 --> 00:22:06.840
You need a bureaucracy in order to organize a state.

305
00:22:06.840 --> 00:22:12.320
That's why a personal rule, that's why in others, in the move, for example, in Rome from the Republic to the Empire,

306
00:22:12.320 --> 00:22:19.680
really only begins to take shape about 200 AD when the emperors begin to develop a bureaucracy, right?

307
00:22:19.680 --> 00:22:25.240
And that's when you begin to exercise something like this, the permanent aspect of the state and the control.

308
00:22:25.240 --> 00:22:34.640
And of course, Frederick, Frederick the Great, again, so this period of time, the 11th, 12th century, is really the beginnings of Western civilization as we know it.

309
00:22:34.640 --> 00:22:39.640
It's from that that we get the universities, it's from that that we get the beginnings of the modern state.

310
00:22:39.640 --> 00:22:43.960
Frederick attempted to, but wasn't in a position to control the empire in the way that he wanted.

311
00:22:43.960 --> 00:22:51.400
But he did, he did, he set up the University of Naples as a training institution for his civil servants.

312
00:22:51.400 --> 00:22:56.520
He wanted these people and of course the University of Bologna was started by and run by students

313
00:22:56.520 --> 00:22:59.560
again with an idea that they would go into the public service.

314
00:22:59.560 --> 00:23:03.560
I mean there were guys on the make just like they are now lawyers, lawyers then lawyers

315
00:23:03.560 --> 00:23:05.280
now we know what they're like.

316
00:23:05.280 --> 00:23:11.540
So you have the beginnings of that but the nature of society at that period was such

317
00:23:11.540 --> 00:23:16.680
that it simply wasn't possible even for somebody as strong will say as the emperors to impose

318
00:23:16.680 --> 00:23:18.980
their rule in the way that they wanted to.

319
00:23:18.980 --> 00:23:23.180
It took the breakup of the religious unity of Europe before that became available.

320
00:23:23.180 --> 00:23:26.300
I have to ask you a last question.

321
00:23:26.300 --> 00:23:29.220
I think I could sit here all afternoon with you.

322
00:23:29.220 --> 00:23:31.020
This is so fascinating.

323
00:23:31.020 --> 00:23:35.140
But just one last question on this issue of the state.

324
00:23:35.140 --> 00:23:40.380
I think my impression is that today when people think of the state, they think of politicians.

325
00:23:40.380 --> 00:23:41.380
Yes.

326
00:23:41.380 --> 00:23:44.460
Who are we going to elect?

327
00:23:44.460 --> 00:23:46.860
Who's the face?

328
00:23:46.860 --> 00:23:48.420
And you're saying that's just completely wrong.

329
00:23:48.420 --> 00:23:55.420
Yeah, the state you see is an institution and institutions always have to be served by particular individuals.

330
00:23:55.420 --> 00:23:58.420
In other words, you can't have an institution that doesn't have people if you like pulling the levers.

331
00:23:58.420 --> 00:24:03.420
But the whole point about an institution is that any individual can come or go.

332
00:24:03.420 --> 00:24:05.420
No individual is indispensable.

333
00:24:05.420 --> 00:24:11.420
So, in other words, say in Britain you've got a prime minister, you're always going to have a prime minister.

334
00:24:11.420 --> 00:24:13.420
It'll be this guy, it'll be that guy.

335
00:24:13.420 --> 00:24:15.420
But it doesn't really make too much difference as we see.

336
00:24:15.420 --> 00:24:27.420
So once you have set up the state, you've set up what is, if you like, a complicated apparatus of levers and so on, and then you can more or less slot anybody in to pulling those particular levers.

337
00:24:27.420 --> 00:24:37.420
The politics games we played here in the United States and in the UK and in Ireland simply involve shuffling the lever pullers around. You can have this group of lever pullers or that group of lever pullers.

338
00:24:37.420 --> 00:24:47.420
Even more profoundly, you could even put all of the political figures on a boat to China and the state, but still.

339
00:24:47.420 --> 00:24:55.420
Well, we have a spectacular case. Belgium. Belgium, at the moment, hasn't had a government for almost a year.

340
00:24:55.420 --> 00:25:02.420
They had an election about a year ago, as we speak, and they have not been able to form a government.

341
00:25:02.420 --> 00:25:08.420
And by and large, the Belgian bureaucracy and so on has been continuing to do the kinds of things.

342
00:25:08.420 --> 00:25:12.420
Now some decisions are going to come up that are going to cause problems because they will need executive action.

343
00:25:12.420 --> 00:25:15.420
There's no way to change the system.

344
00:25:15.420 --> 00:25:23.420
But isn't it astonishing that the government can disappear for nine, ten months and nobody seems to notice that.

345
00:25:23.420 --> 00:25:26.420
But it's not anarchy, it's a state.

346
00:25:26.420 --> 00:25:31.420
It's exactly the same thing. The bureaucratic structures are all in place and they all get administered and everything gets turned over

347
00:25:31.420 --> 00:25:54.420
Professor Casey, we have so much to learn from you. I'm glad that you used this interview to teach us a little bit. I hope we're going to hear much more from you in the future. Thank you for all your wonderful work and for coming to Auburn and for sitting down here with me. It's my pleasure.