WEBVTT

NOTE Interest Rates and Employment

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:15.000
I'm going to talk about interest rates and jobs, because we hear in the news every day that as long as the Federal Reserve can lower interest rates, we're going to have more employment, right?

2
00:00:15.000 --> 00:00:26.000
You hear that each and every day. So I want to talk a little bit about interest rates and how it relates to jobs.

3
00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:33.080
Now, consumers and entrepreneurs often speak about the cost of money when referring to

4
00:00:33.080 --> 00:00:34.080
interest rates.

5
00:00:34.080 --> 00:00:41.760
In fact, modern lenders, of which I used to be, we would call loan, the interest that

6
00:00:41.760 --> 00:00:45.080
we would charge would be loan pricing, in fact.

7
00:00:45.080 --> 00:00:51.080
So viewed in this way, you can think that interest rates are like any other good.

8
00:00:51.080 --> 00:01:10.080
The cheaper the good, the more affordable it is. And if the central bank can lower interest rates as much as possible, then they can essentially turn scarcity into prosperity, right?

9
00:01:10.080 --> 00:01:14.080
They'd be modern-day alchemists, if you will.

10
00:01:14.080 --> 00:01:20.600
But the problem is right now is the low interest rates that engendered the boom that we had,

11
00:01:20.600 --> 00:01:27.600
the boom in housing, the boom in stocks, the boom in commercial real estate, commodities.

12
00:01:29.120 --> 00:01:35.940
There's still a deleveraging going on. There's still bad loans out there to be liquidated.

13
00:01:35.940 --> 00:01:42.040
And so that's working against this lowering of interest rates. But central bankers are

14
00:01:42.040 --> 00:01:47.720
to Deter. They continue in their faith, in their ancient tradition, that if they can

15
00:01:47.720 --> 00:01:56.720
just lower interest rates low enough, then they can re-stimulate the economy. And if

16
00:01:56.720 --> 00:02:02.200
the patient, being the economy, doesn't respond, that just means they haven't given them enough

17
00:02:02.200 --> 00:02:07.320
medicine. They haven't lowered interest rates low enough. And that's what we constantly

18
00:02:07.320 --> 00:02:11.780
hear. In fact, a year ago when the Fed announced that it was going to do quantitative easing

19
00:02:11.780 --> 00:02:18.220
In 2002, otherwise known as QE2, they were going to buy 600 billion dollars worth of

20
00:02:18.220 --> 00:02:26.460
government debt with money created out of nowhere off the Federal Reserve balance sheet.

21
00:02:26.460 --> 00:02:33.880
The Associated Press wrote the idea of QE2 was for cheaper loans to get people to spend

22
00:02:33.880 --> 00:02:38.300
more and then stimulate hiring.

23
00:02:38.300 --> 00:02:43.220
And that's what the thought was, if you could just get interest rates low enough.

24
00:02:43.220 --> 00:02:47.940
So let's look at what interest rates have been in the last three years.

25
00:02:47.940 --> 00:02:53.220
Since December of 08, the Fed funds rate, which is the interest rate that the Fed controls,

26
00:02:53.220 --> 00:02:57.300
has been zero, zero to 25 basis points.

27
00:02:57.300 --> 00:03:01.300
Basis point being a hundredth of a percentage.

28
00:03:01.300 --> 00:03:08.300
So zero to a quarter interest has been, or quarter percent interest, has been the interest

29
00:03:08.900 --> 00:03:15.300
rate that the Fed has dictated. They can't go any lower than that, by the way. They'd

30
00:03:15.300 --> 00:03:21.120
like to go negative. They'd like to have negative interest rates, but we'll get into that. Now

31
00:03:21.120 --> 00:03:26.500
at the end of 2008, let's see what the interest rate's been on the 10-year bond. At the end

32
00:03:26.500 --> 00:03:56.500
In 2008, the interest on 10-year bond was 3.92%. Today, it's 2.94%. So 10-year money has come down 100 basis points. Now, how about 1-year money? Back in 2008, 1-year money was 1.44%. That's pretty low. Today, 17 basis points. That's 0.17%. Now, the prime lending rate is really what most people

33
00:03:56.500 --> 00:04:03.500
If you're an entrepreneur, if you're a consumer, a lot of times you're lending off prime.

34
00:04:04.000 --> 00:04:11.000
And the bank prime rate was slashed to 4% in October of 2008. That was right around

35
00:04:11.240 --> 00:04:18.240
the financial crash. It was slashed to 4%. Less than a year before that, the prime rate

36
00:04:18.240 --> 00:04:24.040
A year before that, the prime rate had been eight and a quarter percent.

37
00:04:24.040 --> 00:04:28.960
So you saw those interest rates come way down and prime rate has actually come down from

38
00:04:28.960 --> 00:04:33.640
there to three and a quarter percent and has been there ever since.

39
00:04:33.640 --> 00:04:39.880
So you have an extraordinarily low prime rate that we've had for the last three years of

40
00:04:39.880 --> 00:04:42.440
three and a quarter percent.

41
00:04:42.440 --> 00:04:47.520
Thirty-year mortgages, another rate that a lot of people follow and are very interested

42
00:04:47.520 --> 00:04:55.760
in, end of October of 08, 6.87 for a 30-year mortgage if you're going to get a home loan.

43
00:04:55.760 --> 00:05:02.720
Last week, 4.49, 200 basis points less.

44
00:05:02.720 --> 00:05:07.720
So rates have been extraordinarily low for three years.

45
00:05:07.720 --> 00:05:09.120
But what are the banks doing?

46
00:05:09.120 --> 00:05:17.440
So the idea, remember, was you lower rates, people borrow money, they start hiring, right?

47
00:05:17.440 --> 00:05:23.080
Well, the banks aren't lending the money and the borrowers aren't borrowing it.

48
00:05:23.080 --> 00:05:27.960
The first quarter of this year, loans were down $126 billion in the banking system.

49
00:05:27.960 --> 00:05:34.960
That was a drop of about 2% and that was the largest drop in bank lending in the 28 years

50
00:05:34.960 --> 00:05:38.000
that those figures have been kept.

51
00:05:38.000 --> 00:05:43.800
So despite these low rates that have been pushed down by the central bank, banks aren't

52
00:05:43.800 --> 00:05:46.680
lending the money.

53
00:05:46.680 --> 00:05:52.540
And while the interest rates have fallen, unemployment has actually risen. In October

54
00:05:52.540 --> 00:05:58.560
of 2008, the unemployment rate was 6.1 percent. What is it today? It's over 9 percent. It's

55
00:05:58.560 --> 00:06:05.560
been as high as 10, but it lingers at about 9 percent. And if you count discouraged workers,

56
00:06:06.280 --> 00:06:12.840
if you count workers that have to work part-time because they can't find a full-time job, that

57
00:06:12.840 --> 00:06:20.560
number is actually 15% and if you follow John Williams at shadowstats.com who actually

58
00:06:20.560 --> 00:06:26.320
tracks unemployment the way it used to be calculated, the unemployment rate is actually

59
00:06:26.320 --> 00:06:32.940
over 20%. So we have a lot of people unemployed still. The other thing we have a lot of people

60
00:06:32.940 --> 00:06:38.340
on is something called SNAP. I don't know if you guys have heard of SNAP, but you may

61
00:06:38.340 --> 00:06:45.340
What used to be food stamps is now SNAP, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

62
00:06:48.380 --> 00:06:53.860
The government likes acronyms, don't it? You guys probably run into a few acronyms

63
00:06:53.860 --> 00:07:00.860
in your business. So we have 44 million people in the United States on SNAP. That is an all

64
00:07:00.860 --> 00:07:04.980
That is an all-time record. It grows by double digits

65
00:07:04.980 --> 00:07:09.580
each and every month. So if you go back to the original premise

66
00:07:09.580 --> 00:07:14.220
that if you cut rates, bankers will lend,

67
00:07:14.220 --> 00:07:17.700
people will be hired, it's all falling apart.

68
00:07:17.700 --> 00:07:23.060
In fact, this rate cutting hasn't stabilized anything

69
00:07:23.060 --> 00:07:28.500
other than dependence on the government. And at the same time,

70
00:07:28.500 --> 00:07:34.800
While the folks at the Bureau of Labor Statistics, those are the people that keep inflation stats,

71
00:07:34.800 --> 00:07:41.980
they say that price inflation is running about 3.57%. Now, that's high enough in itself.

72
00:07:41.980 --> 00:07:46.740
But again, John Williams, who calculates CPI the way it used to be before all these hedonic

73
00:07:46.740 --> 00:07:54.900
adjustments during the Boskin Commission back in the mid and late 90s, he says that consumer

74
00:07:54.900 --> 00:08:09.900
The government prices are actually rising at 11% and I think anybody that has to go shop for groceries, gas, insurance, anything like that will agree that prices continue to go up even though the government says it's not going up.

75
00:08:09.900 --> 00:08:17.900
So what we have is we have all this money, all this government stimulus but no growth and no jobs to show for it.

76
00:08:17.900 --> 00:08:22.900
We only have high prices even though the government says we don't have any high prices.

77
00:08:22.900 --> 00:08:33.660
So, why is this? I mean the Keynesians, when I say, Mark is going to talk about Keynesian

78
00:08:33.660 --> 00:08:43.220
economics I assume in the next section here, but the Keynesians view is that you can manage

79
00:08:43.220 --> 00:08:50.980
the economy through central bank engineering and they are undeterred in their belief that

80
00:08:50.980 --> 00:08:57.140
that these low rates will put people back to work, it will solve all of America's economic

81
00:08:57.140 --> 00:09:02.900
woes or whatever country you may be in.

82
00:09:02.900 --> 00:09:07.720
And the reason is Keynes believed that the rate of interest is, quote, the reward for

83
00:09:07.720 --> 00:09:11.980
parting with liquidity for a specific period.

84
00:09:11.980 --> 00:09:17.500
He believed it was a measure of the unwillingness of those who possess money to part with their

85
00:09:17.500 --> 00:09:33.740
And he actually believed that those who hold cash for speculative money to be wicked, and

86
00:09:33.740 --> 00:09:42.340
it was up to central bankers to stop this evil.

87
00:09:42.340 --> 00:09:47.060
Keynes thought that money would be barren as a store of wealth while investments yielded

88
00:09:47.060 --> 00:09:53.700
Returns. In fact, he wrote, quote, why should anyone outside a lunatic asylum use, wish

89
00:09:53.700 --> 00:10:00.060
to use money as a store of wealth? Now imagine that. I mean, that's what Keynes is saying

90
00:10:00.060 --> 00:10:06.380
is when you put your money in a savings account, you don't buy stocks, you don't buy bonds,

91
00:10:06.380 --> 00:10:11.860
you're just holding it, he thinks that you should be in an insane asylum if you're doing

92
00:10:11.860 --> 00:10:20.540
Net and Keynesians are the ones who are controlling monetary policy in Washington.

93
00:10:20.540 --> 00:10:26.520
Now liquidity preference by the way determine the rate of interest rates.

94
00:10:26.520 --> 00:10:31.020
Rates by the way would be lowest during the recovery and at the peak of booms, that's

95
00:10:31.020 --> 00:10:35.060
when confidence would be high and everyone would be seeking to trade their liquidity

96
00:10:35.060 --> 00:10:38.540
for investments and things.

97
00:10:38.540 --> 00:10:44.700
Actually, as Harry Hazlitt writes, it's precisely in the recovery and at the peak of the boom

98
00:10:44.700 --> 00:10:48.700
that short-term interest rates are highest.

99
00:10:48.700 --> 00:10:52.700
Now what do the Keynesians leave out?

100
00:10:52.700 --> 00:10:55.740
What the Keynesians leave out is time.

101
00:10:55.740 --> 00:10:58.260
They leave that out of their calculus.

102
00:10:58.260 --> 00:11:03.340
While lenders may think they're lending money, they're actually lending time.

103
00:11:03.340 --> 00:11:08.500
Present goods are more valuable than future goods.

104
00:11:08.500 --> 00:11:14.940
by Time. Hazlitt reminds us, Henry Hazlitt reminds us that the old word for interest used

105
00:11:14.940 --> 00:11:21.700
to be usury. You probably are all familiar with the term usury and it has a very negative

106
00:11:21.700 --> 00:11:27.300
connotation of very high interest rates, usury laws that are put in place in some states

107
00:11:27.300 --> 00:11:34.300
where you can't charge interest over a certain amount, but actually that word is very descriptive

108
00:11:34.300 --> 00:12:01.300
Ludwig von Mises explains that people do not save and accumulate because there is interest.

109
00:12:01.300 --> 00:12:07.500
is neither the impetus to saving nor the reward or compensation granted for abstaining from

110
00:12:07.500 --> 00:12:14.280
immediate consumption. It is the ratio in mutual valuation of present goods as against

111
00:12:14.280 --> 00:12:23.280
future goods. So, if I ask everybody in this room, I said, would you rather have, bless

112
00:12:23.280 --> 00:12:29.180
you, would you rather have fifty dollars today or fifty dollars in a year? What would you

113
00:12:29.180 --> 00:12:59.180
Today. Right? It's easy. Now, if I said you could have $50 today or $70 in a year, what would you say? It depends. In fact, there's about 50 of you in here. I might get 50 different answers, right? I might get 5 different answers. I might get 10 different answers, but who knows? And everybody's discounting of the present rate,

114
00:12:59.180 --> 00:13:03.180
The rate of this money is going to be different depending on their circumstances.

115
00:13:03.180 --> 00:13:13.180
And yours may change from one day to the next if you got a bill due or stumbled onto a girl at the bar or whatever the case may be.

116
00:13:13.180 --> 00:13:27.180
So it's important to realize that the collective time preference is not something that the monetary authorities know when they're setting interest rates.

117
00:13:27.180 --> 00:13:38.180
They can't know what the collective 50 opinions are for present valuing, even in this room, let alone the entire country, let alone an economy.

118
00:13:40.180 --> 00:13:46.180
It's determined subjectively by the actions of millions of market participants.

119
00:13:46.180 --> 00:13:49.180
And this is out of the reach of the monetary authorities.

120
00:13:49.180 --> 00:13:54.180
And that's why whenever they set interest rates, they always get it wrong.

121
00:13:54.180 --> 00:14:03.180
Whatever they do will not fix the economy. It's impossible for them to know what the proper interest rate should be.

122
00:14:03.180 --> 00:14:22.180
When they dictate interest rates by command and control, they bear no relation to the time preference that you guys, or anybody in the economy, any economic actors, display.

123
00:14:22.180 --> 00:14:27.860
So, what they can do is only cause distortions and chaos.

124
00:14:27.860 --> 00:14:32.540
Now, F. A. Hayek, you may have heard that name, you may not, but he won the Nobel Prize

125
00:14:32.540 --> 00:14:33.540
in 1974.

126
00:14:33.540 --> 00:14:43.220
He was an Austrian and he said that monetary and fiscal policies by central bankers are

127
00:14:43.220 --> 00:14:50.580
the product of what he called the scientistic attitude which is in fact unscientific in

128
00:14:50.580 --> 00:14:56.260
and that it involves a mechanical and uncritical application of habits of thought to fields

129
00:14:56.260 --> 00:15:00.620
different than those in which they are being formed.

130
00:15:00.620 --> 00:15:06.980
In other words, this works great, dictating interest rates, dictating policy, if you're

131
00:15:06.980 --> 00:15:09.580
in a laboratory.

132
00:15:09.580 --> 00:15:17.540
But when you have actors, millions and millions, billions of actors who are engaged in subjective

133
00:15:17.540 --> 00:15:24.540
Transactions, subjective valuations, different time preferences for each individual, different

134
00:15:25.120 --> 00:15:32.120
time preferences each and every day. There is no way that these interest rates can dictate

135
00:15:32.860 --> 00:15:39.860
what will happen with an economy. Now James Grant, who writes a wonderful publication

136
00:15:39.860 --> 00:15:45.580
A wonderful publication called Grant's Interest Rate Observer.

137
00:15:45.580 --> 00:15:50.140
He wrote recently, the trouble with living authorities and money and banking is the ideas

138
00:15:50.140 --> 00:15:53.060
they absorbed in school.

139
00:15:53.060 --> 00:15:58.180
For instance, that a central bank can calibrate the rate of displacement of currency at print

140
00:15:58.180 --> 00:16:03.180
by adjusting the speed of the digital press.

141
00:16:03.180 --> 00:16:07.220
Or that the federal open market committee can pick the interest rate that will cause

142
00:16:07.220 --> 00:16:14.220
allows the GDP to grow and payrolls to swell and prices to levitate at 2% per annum, give

143
00:16:14.700 --> 00:16:21.700
or take a basis point. Such things are simply impossible.

144
00:16:21.700 --> 00:16:28.300
So while the Fed thinks it can print money, and that means more employment, they can print

145
00:16:28.300 --> 00:16:34.540
money but they don't know what's going to, essentially going to happen. Right now we

146
00:16:34.540 --> 00:16:41.300
We have a clearing of malinvestments that were created by the Fed's low interest rates

147
00:16:41.300 --> 00:16:47.380
during the boom, the stock market boom, the dot-com boom, the real estate boom.

148
00:16:47.380 --> 00:16:56.700
And while those malinvestments are being cleared, it makes no sense to lower rates so that people

149
00:16:56.700 --> 00:17:01.900
want to buy the very things that need to be cleared from the market.

150
00:17:01.900 --> 00:17:04.940
There's no sense propping up home prices.

151
00:17:04.940 --> 00:17:10.440
There's no sense propping up the price of cars with cash for clunkers and those kind

152
00:17:10.440 --> 00:17:12.820
of things.

153
00:17:12.820 --> 00:17:16.140
Those malinvestments need to be cleared.

154
00:17:16.140 --> 00:17:21.640
The fact is that those pushing the monetary buttons for the Federal Reserve are just naive

155
00:17:21.640 --> 00:17:26.020
in believing they can steer the economy by setting interest rates.

156
00:17:26.020 --> 00:17:31.540
So that's why when you read in the paper that they've lowered interest rates, they're

157
00:17:31.540 --> 00:17:37.260
We're going to keep them low indefinitely to spur employment and it's not working

158
00:17:37.260 --> 00:17:45.660
is the reason is that that money, instead of rushing into productive activities, gets

159
00:17:45.660 --> 00:17:51.020
misdirected into speculation, into malinvestments.

160
00:17:51.020 --> 00:17:52.880
So what do we have?

161
00:17:52.880 --> 00:17:59.000
We have unemployment at 9%, 15%, 20%, depends on the number you choose.

162
00:17:59.000 --> 00:18:03.880
We have 44 million people on food stamps and growing.

163
00:18:03.880 --> 00:18:07.920
You have businesses going out of business everywhere.

164
00:18:07.920 --> 00:18:12.000
But then Washington seems to be doing okay, right?

165
00:18:12.000 --> 00:18:14.520
Real estate in fact even is good in Washington.

166
00:18:14.520 --> 00:18:17.920
Wall Street seems to be doing okay.

167
00:18:17.920 --> 00:18:24.400
And that's who gets the money first and that's who is benefiting by these low rates.

168
00:18:24.400 --> 00:18:30.200
It's not the guy on Main Street that's borrowing from his local bank to create jobs.

169
00:18:30.200 --> 00:18:39.760
It's the guys on Wall Street borrowing at 0% and speculating in derivatives or stocks

170
00:18:39.760 --> 00:18:44.540
or whatever instrument they choose.

171
00:18:44.540 --> 00:18:49.800
So what we have is low interest rates are not going to increase employment.

172
00:18:49.800 --> 00:18:56.800
They're just going to increase chaos, distortions, and speculation.

173
00:18:56.800 --> 00:19:05.800
And if you like the current economy, it's my view that you're going to like it for a long, long time.

174
00:19:05.800 --> 00:19:08.800
Because we are stuck with this for quite some time.